Military Review

Transferred to the second An-140 for the Russian Navy

73
Transferred to the second An-140 for the Russian Navy

The 13A009 aircraft made its first flight in Samara on November 1, 2013. This is the first An-140-100 aircraft built by Aviakor under a contract for the construction of three additional aircraft for the Marine aviation Russian Navy. Earlier, on a separate contract with the Russian Navy concluded by the enterprise in December 2011, one An-17-2013 aircraft was built and finally delivered to the customer on April 140, 100 (serial number 12A008, registration RF-08851).


Taking into account the aircraft being built by Aviakor for the Russian Air Force, the board of the 13А009 serial number became the sixth An-140-100 military built in Samara from 2011 of the year and the third made in 2013 of the year. In a press release of the plant, it is reported that the next An-140-100 aircraft, manufactured under a contract with the Ministry of Defense, Aviacor plans to transfer to the customer in the second quarter 2014 of the year.
Originator:
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/699501.html
73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. PANZER
    PANZER 26 December 2013 11: 45
    +2
    Do you get drunk with joy? Previously, packets were sent to troops ....
    1. Romn
      Romn 26 December 2013 12: 15
      +21
      It is time to stop looking into the past, yes it was, in packs not packs. I personally practically did not find the USSR, but what I saw was the 90 years, when nothing really was done at all and the hope was illusory. And the fact that planes are now beginning to arrive, personally makes me happy. let in small quantities, as they say everything has its time!
      1. PANZER
        PANZER 26 December 2013 12: 35
        +21
        There is no future without the past, dear. I am also glad when new models of weapons and military equipment are supplied to the troops, only the pace with which they are supplied creates the impression that our managers are "nursing a sluggish", forgive me for such a comparison. The 90s ended a decade ago, thank God. It's time to wake up already.
        And about the past: in the so-called 90s, people who had forgotten the past admitted that during the storming of the formidable, motorized rifle brigade and regiment were almost completely burned. For this, by the way, no one answered.
        I beg you do not forget the past ..
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 26 December 2013 12: 51
          +8
          That is, 70 aircraft and more than 100 helicopters per year is not enough?
          1. 2я19
            2я19 26 December 2013 21: 19
            +4
            You won’t believe it, but it’s really not enough.
            1. malikszh
              malikszh 27 December 2013 09: 50
              0
              no, this is normal, but what do you want 500 planes and helicopters in one year? and what in two - three years will the factories fulfill all orders and a hundred further? again, as 90 years will stand and close. ray slowly but surely!
        2. Romn
          Romn 26 December 2013 13: 04
          +3
          I am not saying that the past must be forgotten. it must always be remembered, our history is everything, but now we are talking about deliveries of airplanes, why indulge today's people and constantly speak, but in the past ... Now is not the past, but the present, we have what we have and let the situation gradually improve !
        3. RBLip
          RBLip 26 December 2013 15: 45
          +5
          Quote: PANZER
          I beg you do not forget the past ..

          absolutely agree. and in the first post and in the second. I don’t understand who minus you. the transfer of one (!) aircraft is presented to us as the greatest event. when hundreds are needed. and according to the past ... a popular proverb - who remembers the old - that eye out. and whoever forgets is both. something like that.
          1. Migari
            Migari 26 December 2013 16: 26
            +6
            Demand for these machines (An-140) is now growing, An-24 aircraft are being decommissioned and there is nothing to replace them for state needs.

            The general need of the Ministry of Defense for An-140 for the next ten years is tentatively estimated at 62 aircraft, the FSB of Russia - 23, the Ministry of Internal Affairs - 12 aircraft, the Ministry of Emergencies - 11 aircraft, Roscosmos - approximately ten aircraft. So this is just the beginning.
          2. kodar
            kodar 27 December 2013 01: 01
            +2
            60 BTR-4 are sailing back when they learned that the old ones were repainted - a disgrace. OTK for all types of weapons should be, as under Lavrentiya Pavlovich, otherwise they will only be captured with such weapons.
        4. 31231
          31231 26 December 2013 20: 54
          0
          Can you compare our GDP and the volume of SDOs with the GDP of, say, France or Germany and their spending on the defense ?!
          You know, there was the Roman Empire, but the Italians didn’t wrap their snot on their fists remembering those times.
          Just like you could have fucked Monica Beluchi yesterday, and today only Nastya Zavorotnyuk.
      2. Heccrbq.3
        Heccrbq.3 26 December 2013 13: 41
        +1
        90s is not the USSR at all.
    2. 2я19
      2я19 26 December 2013 21: 17
      0
      Your memory is too good.
  2. Russian sniper
    Russian sniper 26 December 2013 11: 46
    0
    The slow pace of course. yes But you know, cooperation also needs to be established, and then everything should be good or bad, as V. Vysotsky said. drinks
    1. PANZER
      PANZER 26 December 2013 11: 48
      +6
      How much more time does it take for our super-managers to establish cooperation?
      They establish corruption faster.
      1. Apollo
        Apollo 26 December 2013 11: 51
        +5
        Quote-Plane 13А009 made its first flight in Samara on November 1, 2013. This is the first An-140-100 aircraft built by Aviakor under a contract signed in April 2013 for the construction of three additional aircraft for the Naval Aviation of the Russian Navy. Earlier, under a separate contract with the Russian Navy, concluded by the enterprise in December 2011, one An-17-2013 aircraft (serial number 140A100, registration RF-12) was built and finally delivered to the customer on April 008, 08851.


      2. Mace
        Mace 26 December 2013 12: 48
        +1
        PANZER, go get busy, organize efficiently the production of aircraft and rearmament in general.
        Chatterbox....
        1. PANZER
          PANZER 26 December 2013 13: 33
          +4
          Unlike you, I’m busy with a real man’s business, I am in the service in the orderly ranks of the Armed Forces, and I don’t sell clothes with Slavic symbols soldier
          1. Mace
            Mace 26 December 2013 14: 05
            +1
            here, and serve with dignity, and if you climb to judge someone, first think about whether you are able to do better. If not, then go about your business.
            P.S. This is not a thing, but our folk clothes. Do not go too far.
            1. PANZER
              PANZER 26 December 2013 15: 12
              +3
              Quote: Mace
              and our folk clothes

              Especially glamorous white earflaps and "n * dorks" with a pattern, don't tell me. Offended you? Well, sorry, there was no such intent. Just a habit of calling things by their proper names. I have the honor.
              1. Mace
                Mace 26 December 2013 15: 49
                -14%
                Defective people have flawed perceptions. Nothing to add, go serve, maybe you can do it.
                1. PANZER
                  PANZER 26 December 2013 16: 12
                  +2
                  Quote: Mace
                  Nothing to add

                  This was already clear from your first post on this topic.
                  Quote: Mace
                  PANZER, go get busy, organize efficiently the production of aircraft and rearmament in general.
                  Chatterbox....

                  Can you explain this moment?
                  1. Mace
                    Mace 26 December 2013 16: 42
                    +1
                    What is there to explain? Are you having perception difficulties again?
                    The logic is simple, if you criticize something, then you must know how to do it better. If you criticize and do not know what to do, then such criticism is a chatter. But it’s important not only to know how to do one thing or another better, but also to do it yourself CORRECTLY.
                    But in fact it turns out that there are only talkers around, since they themselves do not participate in the criticized processes. And the criticism is often unfounded. They were criticized before, twice they ruined their state, critics are bad.
                    Time to criticize is over, time to demand from the state is over.
                    It is time for the state to demand from citizens, work and dedication.
                    1. komTMG
                      komTMG 26 December 2013 17: 11
                      +3
                      In general, the guy serves. And protects us. And the right to criticize. And here you are from scratch .... Verbiage.
                      1. Mace
                        Mace 26 December 2013 17: 49
                        +1
                        This is called an explanation.
                      2. Botanologist
                        Botanologist 26 December 2013 23: 03
                        0
                        mace, I explain - it’s not very customary on our site, let’s say, to discuss an opponent (although it happens all the way). Discuss the topic, and everyone will be interested.
                    2. 31231
                      31231 26 December 2013 21: 04
                      0
                      Dear, and I served. But I did not criticize anyone, but simply repaid the debt to my homeland. This is called service, not work. The main thing here is to carry out orders, and not to whisper your own inventions.
                  2. gubarev vladimir alexandrovich
                    gubarev vladimir alexandrovich 26 December 2013 19: 41
                    -2
                    A mace, well, what did we chtolite to ruin the state (people) or a bunch of renegades in the 90s with the active participation of the West and who have been feeding the people a sweet life for 20 years 23 years now it’s time to ask the people from them and not them.
                    1. 31231
                      31231 26 December 2013 21: 07
                      +2
                      Dear, there’s Akim in the chat, they don’t seem to want to ruin Ukraine, just to displace the hated power. Only at the same time, the experience of the USSR in '91 is forgotten when, as a result of an extraordinary kipis, ebony came to power.
        2. 31231
          31231 26 December 2013 21: 00
          0
          I served in the 90s, and I didn’t dismiss the nurses.
          And if I now work as a citizen, then I am less valuable to the country than you ?!
          Servant, do not disgrace, do not moan. In the 41st our grandfathers were hundreds of times more difficult. My environment went out near Brest for two months and did not moan.
          And a personal question: if you are Russian, then why is your user name in English?
    2. old rocket man
      old rocket man 27 December 2013 06: 54
      0
      Quote: PANZER
      How much more time does it take for our super-managers to establish cooperation?
      They establish corruption faster.


      Not everything is so simple here, purchases were registered for all departments, it turns out 118. You can, of course, put everyone in cancer, invest in the production of dough and hire people, as a result, solve the problem in two years.
      And then what? People on the street, equipment in a landfill?
  • Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 26 December 2013 11: 50
    +8
    On such an aircraft, the Fleet Commander will fly fishing with Moscow inspectors well. Just a snack can be downloaded and vodka, a lot of alcohol. Not that on a helicopter. Yes, and the rental brisk contract workers will be where to stay. This is of course a joke ... laughing bully wassat It is good news that the aviation of the fleet received a new aircraft. But the basis of our light military-technical cooperation An-24T and An-26 are exhausting their resources, the An-72 is also not eternal, but what will replace them? So far, the Czech L-410 and An-140 are coming into service from the new light military-technical cooperation, but these are "export" aircraft for the leadership, maximum for the evacuation of the wounded and for training transport aviation pilots, since they do not have a cargo ramp. The An-70 project, so it is going to replace the An-12, and at such a pace of joint Russian-Ukrainian "cooperation" it is not clear what will come of this and whether anything will come of it at all. At this rate, we will soon, following the example of the Kazakhs and Lithuanians, begin to buy Airbus A-400 and C-27J "Spartan".

    An-140

    L-410
  • Olegovich
    Olegovich 26 December 2013 11: 53
    +14
    Samara "Aviakor" is being promoted, the products are being produced. Anyway, the aircraft industry, as can be seen from the growing production of aircraft, is not going to bend. Although the media and the Internet formed a completely different opinion. Concern UAC is working, factories are being re-equipped, new machines are being acquired, aircraft are already being built in large batches, on stocks of 6-8 pieces. Giant IL-76MD in Ulyanovsk and then 3 pieces on the conveyor. KNAPO - Superjet this year - 23 units (maybe 2 more will take off), an increase of almost 2 times (as in 2012 - 12 units). Moreover, remember what kind of flood there was, the water approached the buildings of the plant.
    In Tatarstan, a new production of "black" composite wing and carbon fiber parts was launched. Cooperation between aircraft factories is being worked out - and the production rate is growing. Dvigatelists - work ahead of schedule.
    MS-21 - development continues as scheduled. Engine PD-14 - the demonstrator is ready, they will begin to produce experimental engines.
    1. No_more
      No_more 27 December 2013 17: 40
      0
      Of course, I apologize, but as far as I remember with UAC Aviakor, to be exact, Deripaska did not manage to make it up and the plant did not enter the corporation. Yes, the AN-140 was produced, but most of the aircraft was ordered at other plants, because they couldn’t produce it themselves, and then they collected it, drove it, welded it up, so that everything fell into place.
      The production base was not normal and I don’t know where it came from for 3 years of my absence. And most importantly, there were no sensible personnel, especially technologists.
      Of course, everything could change, but I really doubt it. I don’t see factors for such changes. But I really hope that the plant will work in full cycle.
  • jjj
    jjj 26 December 2013 12: 21
    +4
    It seems to be slightly less in terms of passenger capacity than the An-24. The blades are like on "profen". This means that traction and efficiency are provided. On local lines such would
    1. COBOK
      COBOK 26 December 2013 14: 08
      +3
      2 passengers more. Nuzhon, handsome, on local lines, oh, as you need ...
      It remains for the airline owners to explain that it is better than ATRs, just like 24, only more economical, it would have been like a used foreign car at a price
  • kelevra
    kelevra 26 December 2013 12: 25
    +2
    Good plane!
  • Chicot 1
    Chicot 1 26 December 2013 12: 28
    +5
    Very good and the plane is very good. But very, very little ... Based on positive greed, I wanted to, well, at least an order of magnitude more ...
    In general, the Antonovites are great! .. In a short time, they created a rather successful line of aircraft ... I think that the hour is not far off when the An-178, the direct and immediate competitor of the currently designed Russian IL-214 and Tu-330, will fly ...

    An-178 (prospective view)
    1. avt
      avt 26 December 2013 14: 04
      +1
      Quote: Chicot 1
      An-178 is a direct and direct competitor of the currently designed Russian IL-214 and Tu-330 ...

      But is it still working on Tu330 ?? It seems that the project was buried, in the best case there will be Il214.
      1. Chicot 1
        Chicot 1 27 December 2013 01: 14
        +1
        On December 26 this year, the Tupolev company discussed the distribution of the budget for the next year. Among the main areas of work (Tu-204/214, Tu-334, Tu-324) was the Tu-330. So no one buried him completely and irrevocably ...
        Yes, and besides the Air Force, we also have civil aviation, in which the A-24/26 and An-12 families also need to be changed ... But nothing is really heard about PAK YES. But this does not apply to this topic ...

        Transport aircraft Tu-330 (project)
  • marxlight
    marxlight 26 December 2013 12: 54
    +6
    Quote: Olegych
    Samara "Aviakor" is being promoted, the products are being produced.

    I would say Aviakor rises from nothingness. It gives weak signs of life. No more.
    In the war, there they did IL-2, after the war various Tu. In the 80s, every day it was possible to observe the takeoff of new aircraft from the factory. That was mass production. With this in mind, there is certainly not much optimism, looking at today's affairs.
    This is all I am for - for the sake of realism. That there were no illusions.
  • askort154
    askort154 26 December 2013 12: 56
    +5
    In the video ... The joyful captain called him a fifth generation aircraft. Although all the navigation and aerobatic equipment is from the last century. Not a single "display-digit" is visible. It is clear that the guys are missing the new technology. In general, the LTH An-140-100 is better than its predecessors, and I share their joy. Clear skies and soft landings, the number of takeoffs = the number of landings!
  • PANZER
    PANZER 26 December 2013 12: 59
    +2
    Quote: marxlight
    It gives weak signs of life.

    Quote: marxlight
    That there were no illusions.

    To the point good
  • 1c-inform-city
    1c-inform-city 26 December 2013 13: 10
    0
    Stop whining! Establishing large-scale production of aircraft is not easy especially large. These are not teapots. Especially newer models.
  • Vadim12
    Vadim12 26 December 2013 14: 14
    0
    In childhood, often flew on the An-24, it seems very similar ...
  • V. Ushakov
    V. Ushakov 26 December 2013 14: 20
    0
    Well. And without Ukraine-built. This is very good ... We will build more powerful machines ourselves, it will be already - just great ...
    1. standby
      standby 27 December 2013 05: 01
      0
      Without Ukraine, assembled from Ukrainian components! So that's it!
      1. Alekseev
        Alekseev 29 December 2013 10: 29
        0
        Quote: Standby
        Without Ukraine, assembled from Ukrainian components! So that's it!

        And how many of these same Ukrainian components in the An-140?
        Pan director of the Kharkiv plant informs: "The share of Russian enterprises in the production of the An-140 passenger aircraft is about 40-45 percent, the same is the share of the Ukrainian side, and the remaining share is the participation of enterprises from far abroad (USA, France, Great Britain), etc. This was announced by Pavel Naumenko, General Director of the Kharkiv Aviation Production Enterprise (KSAPP). "
        And this is probably normal. Ukraine has never released everything for assembly, but now, as a result of destructive processes and the assembly itself is not able to be mass produced in large quantities. That’s why they assemble An-148 in Voronezh, An-140 in Samara.
        So here it is! wink
  • lazy
    lazy 26 December 2013 14: 29
    +1
    the fact that new equipment is coming to the troops is a plus, and the absence of a ramp is a big minus, it cannot be a full-fledged replacement for an-26, so .... "admiral's podzhopnik"
    1. COBOK
      COBOK 26 December 2013 15: 28
      +1
      This is not a transporter and is needed, first of all, not for the fleet, but for northern freight and passenger traffic.
    2. boom_bah
      boom_bah 26 December 2013 15: 39
      +3
      This is not "podzhopnik". Or do you think that the commander-in-chief of the Navy needs to fly civilian flights? Yes, the Ostafyevo airfield is a "court regiment", but it is also necessary to move the higher command personnel. Moreover, after the Ministry of Defense is in Moscow, and the Main Command of the Navy in St. Petersburg. Happy everyone!
      1. lazy
        lazy 27 December 2013 17: 32
        0
        Well, it's no offense to the plane, it's just that for me it is calculated to carry the general, the admiral on his whistle (car, plane, helicopter, boat), that is, to be under the ass, "podzhopnik", would carry members of the government, would call him a member.
        and by the way, flying high-ranking civilian flights is a very good idea, you need to save money. and then I heard about the courses for which the dads sent the planes, to take them on vacation.
  • So_o_tozh
    So_o_tozh 26 December 2013 14: 30
    +3
    Add me to Anchik)) L-410 Czech, no offense, some kind of freak compared to AN.
    1. RusSever
      RusSever 26 December 2013 16: 25
      +1
      Well, a normal car.
      1. COBOK
        COBOK 26 December 2013 21: 45
        0
        What is normal for? For local lines from village to village - yes, for drop of paratroopers - yes. But the trouble is: they put them on interregional routes (flights for two hours), passengers are wide and have fun - the seats are not folding, their step is small, there is no place to put luggage, there is no kitchen, the conductor is not designed, it’s good at least for convenience not on the street - the dry closet is delivered
        1. RusSever
          RusSever 27 December 2013 17: 38
          0
          This is a normal letak. Yes, for local lines, the flight is no more than an hour if there is enough kerosene. Close, yes, but airbus, for example, does not allow you to sit normally. I’m in the airbus, Boeing, in L-ke. But with L-koy, everything is clear - this company has no show-offs. make an airplane - it flies almost everywhere - without noise and dust.
          1. COBOK
            COBOK 27 December 2013 22: 33
            0
            I bring real facts: gazelki put on flights, with a flight duration of about 2 hours (sorry for passengers), the delights of the flight described above laughing . passengers after elki choose the 24th - they vote in rubles.
            Gazelle is the replacement of the An-2, and the 24th can replace the 140th.
            The question of price arises - even a very economical leasing plane will not beat the plane that has got "for free" at the price, for which one does not have to look through a very hefty sum every month. Now, if the state fusses around and helps the carriers, and the aviation corps ... although I don't believe in fairy tales negative
  • Pollang
    Pollang 26 December 2013 14: 55
    +1
    This is the beginning of the revival of the aviation industry after 20 years of failure, you just need to rejoice. I'll try to assemble it to scale)
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • edeligor
    edeligor 26 December 2013 15: 18
    +2
    There would be no more such news and no Maidan. I personally have several questions, why to the fleet, for what tasks. What engines is equipped. (if I’m not mistaken, at first they wanted to install Pratt & Whitney PW-140A engines on the AN-127)
    Well, the wish that there were more such aircraft (as before, the AN-26) and they were also operated successfully as a famous predecessor smile
    1. COBOK
      COBOK 26 December 2013 15: 26
      +4
      I looked at the Aviakor website - they put TVZ 140 at 117, that is, from 8, and to be more precise: repairable and used by the technical staff up and down (if there are "jambs", then they are known and opportunities have been found to deal with them or to not pay attention). As a result - the replacement of the An-24 in the best sense of the word.
      1. edeligor
        edeligor 26 December 2013 16: 06
        +2
        Thank. Incidentally, TVZ 117 is considered the most reliable engine in the world.
        1. COBOK
          COBOK 26 December 2013 22: 05
          0
          You (seven for familiarity) would hear what those who work with them say about the An-24 ...
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeNj4oYdVro
          so my moaning about 140 is not from scratch laughing
  • admrall
    admrall 26 December 2013 15: 30
    +1
    a batch of 3-6 aircraft is certainly not serious, but I think if they had 100 pieces then they would issue more with money, it seems like no problem
  • air wolf
    air wolf 26 December 2013 15: 41
    +1
    In-navigator is, shame, avionics of the 70s on a new machine ....
    1. boom_bah
      boom_bah 26 December 2013 15: 45
      +1
      Dmitry, when did we have normal avionics?
    2. edeligor
      edeligor 26 December 2013 16: 08
      +1
      Most likely, the cost is reduced at the plant, and the ministry of defense was included, most likely at a normal price!
  • RusSever
    RusSever 26 December 2013 16: 18
    0
    There are nuances for this letak. It sausages on dirt and snow strips, because wheels are made from the fuselage. The AN-24 (26,32) super aircraft has a chassis in engine nacelles, i.e. wide base and roll it off the strip is difficult.
    1. COBOK
      COBOK 26 December 2013 21: 59
      0
      UNIFICATION!!! on the other ANs (148, 158) the same thing (by the way, on the Elks too), and they fly the same. But at 24 it’s easier to break the racks when landing in the crosswind, so that not everything is lost
      And the most beautiful aircraft from the civilian Tu-134 (it was he, not 154), because the most proportional and elegant
      1. RusSever
        RusSever 27 December 2013 17: 46
        0
        I AGREE. But only in the coloring of AEROFLOT or INTERFLUG :) Naked fezelazh is vulgarity. On racks - a little tall, of course, the trunnions can be turned out, but probably it is not entirely in the wind (lateral force from it)?
        1. COBOK
          COBOK 27 December 2013 22: 23
          0
          it’s a matter of restrictions on the strength of the wind, you need to look for and compare the exact data
  • RusSever
    RusSever 26 December 2013 16: 22
    0
    Plus, modern Russian planes are ugly. Therefore, they do not fly. You look at the family of ANs from 10 to 124, or at ILs from 14 to 62 - these are machines. Take a look at Superjet - it's a flying tarantas.
  • Mace
    Mace 26 December 2013 16: 26
    +1
    Quote: RBLip
    the transfer of one (!) aircraft is presented to us as the greatest event. when hundreds are needed. but in the past ...

    The news is neutral. This news is a press release (short informational message), which reports on current events, namely the manufacture of the aircraft.
    This means that the process of aircraft construction has begun. What can be 100 aircraft, if only production is established? Note the message does not indicate the grandeur of this event. This is in your head "the greatest event", but for normal people it is news of the beginning of the process.
    Why are you so crooked-headed.
    1. Edward
      Edward 26 December 2013 21: 57
      +1
      Quote: Mace
      The news is neutral.
      If the news was neutral, then it would not be here :)

      Quote: Mace
      for normal people, this is news about the beginning of the process

      For normal adults, such news has long been habitually questionable. They are tired of "starting processes". They would like to live up to the completion of "beginnings")) ..
      You are offended by the holder.
      But those who oppose you personally saw the Great Power.
      How can you so easily neglect their opinions ?!
      Are their words just senile insanity ?!
      For me, on the contrary, your position is the position of a person humiliated so much that he is unable to endure any sound criticism after the first signs of at least some improvement. It seems to you that people who have doubts about "numerous achievements" are detractors of the Motherland, because they dare to "vilify extraordinary prospects."
      As a result, your Fathers become your Enemies. And you don’t notice it ...
      And most importantly, what follows from this:
      1 - those who suit you, have you.
      2 - and since you reject those who can open your eyes to the situation of those who have you, you are a sentenced individual (geek, etc.)
      3 - give joy to enemies further
      .............
      Edward.
      ..............

      and believe me, more optimistic people than OUR OLD OLDES - you can’t find those who are fond of it. The scavengers dreamed about this, so that the young generations would be excited to argue with their poor parents, dreaming of justice.
  • Leshka
    Leshka 26 December 2013 16: 33
    +2
    flying weather him
  • Russ69
    Russ69 26 December 2013 16: 58
    +3
    The end of the year, the transfer of batches begins at once, and not 2-3 aircraft. Yesterday 14 Ka-52s were handed over to several Mi-8s, two S-400 regiments, and on December 30 they promise to hand over the Severodvinsk nuclear submarine to the fleet.
  • Kulneff2009
    Kulneff2009 26 December 2013 17: 40
    +2
    What comes to the troops is good! What a bad pace!
  • Russ69
    Russ69 26 December 2013 18: 39
    0
    Well ...
    An-12 crashed while landing at the Irkutsk-2 airport, the crew died ...
    An-12 transport plane crashed near Irkutsk while landing at the Irkutsk-2 airport. The winged vehicle fell into military warehouses, blowing off the roofs of two warehouses. As the representative of the Siberian regional center of the Ministry of Emergency Situations specified, a crew of six was on board.
    http://www.dni.ru/incidents/2013/12/26/266583.html

    The military says no one was hurt on the ground, but the roofs of two warehouses were damaged.
  • baku1999
    baku1999 26 December 2013 18: 57
    0
    Your account has been terminated.
  • samoletil18
    samoletil18 26 December 2013 20: 00
    +1
    One, not one plane. People! Factories have earned! Here is the main thing in the event. I would like to wish all the planes received in the troops that the number of takeoffs equal the number of landings.
    Condolences to the families of those killed in the An-12 crash.
  • zheleznyack
    zheleznyack 26 December 2013 20: 20
    +2
    I flew for 12 years as the navigator of the AN-26 (and pieces of aircraft), in 1997 I reduced the entire crew of the Barnaul airport, 10 crews of the AN-26 (6 aircraft), etc. 154-Crews 4, L-40, etc., etc. Now Barnaul is a transit port, rejoice liberals, I can still fly as much and the AN-20 had a resource before
  • alone
    alone 26 December 2013 22: 19
    0
    It is a pity that there is no VAF. I would like to know how many planes and helicopters are withdrawn from the Air Force in a year due to the inability to operate?
  • Bezyana God
    Bezyana God 27 December 2013 00: 41
    +1
    ____ 50 people to move over 2500 km is not enough in my opinion ... Here only the cheapness of manufacturing and delivery can speak "for" ... The good thing is that Russia is now moving towards complete self-sufficiency in the production of equipment necessary for survival. A little paranoid, but worth it ...
  • Flibustiero
    Flibustiero 27 December 2013 06: 34
    0
    Beautiful plane! I like and made with us :)