Iran still hopes for Russia to fulfill the contract for the supply of C-300

26
Iran still hopes for Russia to fulfill the contract for the supply of C-300Iran insists on Russia's fulfillment of its obligations to supply C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems, said Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.

“We still insist on the fulfillment of our previous agreements. Our negotiations continue and will continue between various high-ranking officials of the two countries,” Zarif said at a press conference in Tehran after negotiations with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

"We hope that, on the basis of good and warm relations between the two countries and in view of existing promising cooperation projects, the parties will be able to resolve this issue," he said, answering the Interfax question, whether Iran would agree to supply the Antey-2500 complexes "instead of C-300.

Recall that Moscow and Tehran signed a contract for the supply of Iran S-300 in 2007. However, Russia later refused supplies, since the complexes fell under international sanctions against Iran on restrictions on the supply of conventional weapons, including missiles and missile systems, Tanks, attack helicopters, combat aircraft, ships.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    12 December 2013 10: 11
    Something I don’t understand how defensive weapons fall under the sanctions. And I don’t understand why we are doing this.
    1. +4
      12 December 2013 10: 28
      Politics, for example, at the moment, Iran and America are looking for rapprochement points, which is completely not in our interests. Persians are skilled tricks.
      1. Onyx
        0
        12 December 2013 11: 33
        Quote: tilovaykrisa
        Politics, for example, at the moment, Iran and America are looking for rapprochement points, which is completely not in our interests. Persians are skilled tricks.

        I support. There is no trust in Iran. And in politics there is no need to talk about trust. If you sell S-300 to Iran, then only if we have the opportunity, if something happens, remotely disable it
      2. Tambov we ...
        0
        12 December 2013 15: 53
        That's your right thoughts. Went to a rapprochement with the world, forget about the help that the light forces promised you.
    2. 0
      12 December 2013 12: 39
      Some people wonder why they need a C-300.

      Look at the interview with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. I think any doubts will disappear why Iran needs the S-300.

    3. AVV
      0
      12 December 2013 13: 31
      Yes, this is the same as Gorbachev unilaterally, that would bend in front of Reagan, included in the destruction of the RK system of the Oka !!! The same thing and DAM reinsured !!!
      1. series
        0
        12 December 2013 13: 44
        Quote: AVV
        Yes, this is the same as Gorbachev unilaterally, that would bend in front of Reagan, included in the destruction of the RK system of the Oka !!! The same thing and DAM reinsured !!!

        The supply of high-tech weapons is a serious tool of influence in foreign policy ...
        Two types of paints (black and white) should not describe our relationship with Iran or the United States ...
        We do not know the reasons why Iran chose this particular type of air defense system and rejects Putin proposed in September ...
        Do we have components for the production of this type of air defense system?
        and a number of other reasons ...
        1. 0
          12 December 2013 14: 48
          As I recall, the air defense systems already manufactured for Iran were destroyed. The contract was concluded before the release of the decree of DAM.
          It was especially stipulated that the manufactured components could not be used, since the configuration is sharpened for a specific customer.
          1. 0
            12 December 2013 19: 55
            Quote: ImPerts
            As I recall, the air defense systems already manufactured for Iran were destroyed. The contract was concluded earlier than the DAM decree was issued. It was specifically stipulated that the manufactured components could not be used, since the configuration was sharpened for a specific customer.

            What nonsense are you writing.
            Ours in the place of rocket engines are laying a collection of Ahmadinejad's poems and she flies on "parole" !?
    4. 0
      12 December 2013 20: 37
      The problem is that, with-300 any modifications are not currently available.
      The Iranians want completely new air defense systems. But there are no new ones. That's why they want to offer instead of Antey-2500. Those air defense systems that were prepared to Iran and did not give away have already been sold to one very wealthy buyer. what
    5. 0
      13 December 2013 03: 41
      you ask Dima - when he mowed, thought about problems or not
  2. ramsi
    +3
    12 December 2013 10: 14
    Iran just needs to turn to the Chinese, for our freaks it will be easier to understand
    1. series
      +1
      12 December 2013 10: 19
      Quote: ramsi
      Iran just needs to turn to the Chinese, for our freaks it will be easier to understand

      why spend money on about cheap Chinese termo (Venezuela refused their radar), if you can wait and take thatfrom which the israeli falcons for a hundred miles will shy away... request
      "We will be looking for a look at Turkey ..." (they still coveted the Chinese air defense systems)! boogie ha...
      1. +2
        12 December 2013 10: 30
        Quote: S-200
        why spend money on relatively cheap chinese termo

        But it would be worthwhile to tease with our plans for bulk purchases. hi
        1. +3
          12 December 2013 10: 47
          Hmm, does Iran look like idiots? Why Khetai trash? They will receive their S-300. In vain chtoli Russia frayed with amers.
    2. +1
      12 December 2013 20: 38
      ))) they will first go to court with a lawsuit for 4 billion, and then they will go to the Chinese. I propose that these 4 billion be paid to DAM. I think he will find how to pay this amount
  3. +3
    12 December 2013 10: 16
    It would be necessary to help Iran with the S-300 !!!
  4. +4
    12 December 2013 10: 19
    These are gentlemen, if you remember, a trick on the part of our liberal prime minister. Then he was in the presidents and created various meannesses. I handed over Libya and, on the whole, was ready for anything just to give him a new iPhone. This weapon does not fall under sanctions. Probably Ben Lazar forced him to include this line in the list of prohibited goods. negative
  5. +6
    12 December 2013 10: 27
    We cannot sell them 300 because of the "fucking" decree of the LADY. We cannot sell 400 in principle. But can make a 350-ku (while negotiations are underway) and sell? Iran will have a slightly improved 300. To their delight and to the "joy" of their neighbors in the Middle East?
    1. 0
      12 December 2013 20: 43
      Quote: ImPerts
      We cannot sell them 300 because of the "fucking" decree of the LADY. We cannot sell 400 in principle. But can make a 350-ku (while negotiations are underway) and sell? Iran will have a slightly improved 300. To their delight and to the "joy" of their neighbors in the Middle East?


      You think it’s just that Prince Bandar often went to Moscow on his visits. He’s the intelligence chief of SA. Such people just don’t go anywhere. And 15 billion just do not offer. Syria is just an excuse. As we know Arabs, it’s worth nothing to bribe. 15 All Syrian generals can buy billions. But no, the prince is aimed at Moscow. I’m thinking of the most important direction is Iran.
  6. +4
    12 December 2013 11: 07
    It must be assumed that Lavrov understands this "Persian" pattern. Persians - they are on their own and do not consider the Orthodox as their own, although they do. But you have to be careful.
  7. +2
    12 December 2013 11: 08
    The United States expressed gratitude to Russia for “restraint” in the implementation of the contract for the supply of S-300 air defense systems to Iran. The representative of the State Department, Philip Crowley, noted that "the resolution adopted by the Security Council urges all countries to exercise caution and restraint in the sale of any weapons." However, he agreed that the sale of the S-300 is not prohibited by the decision of the Security Council.
    http://www.iimes.ru/?p=14425
    Well, yes, shitting ourselves in our own pocket and getting appreciation from an official of not the highest level for that - yes, this is a profit.
    There is not even enough liberal power to think that if the enemy praises you, then you are doing something wrong. Oh yes, I forgot. They gave me an iPhone ...
    1. +1
      12 December 2013 12: 55
      He probably cried from happiness - after all, they expressed appreciation to him ...
  8. 0
    12 December 2013 11: 40
    Explain why they should sell the S-300 at all right now? It seems that everything is okay with them, they agreed and even make friends with America, and they frequented us from Saudi Arabia, after what they are doing against Russia. What is going on? And we always have time to deliver, if only then not to regret it.
  9. 0
    12 December 2013 12: 20
    It was impossible to refuse supplies to Iran, as we lose face as a country independent and responsible.
  10. 0
    12 December 2013 12: 50
    It is necessary to be very careful with the Persians, I think it’s not just that they don’t sell S-300s. We have a common border in the Caspian.
    1. +1
      12 December 2013 13: 00
      What does the border have to do with it? The S-300s are terrible for those who are going to bomb Iran. I haven’t heard about such a desire on our part. And if the Americans and the Jews are not going to do the same, then why did they howl?
  11. +1
    12 December 2013 15: 18
    Deliveries of S-300 must be carried out. Otherwise, China will do something similar to Iran, and at the same time, we will lose both face and money.
  12. Leshka
    0
    12 December 2013 15: 19
    let already get these S-300

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"