Military Review

The price of the English "democracy"

27
The price of the English "democracy"The “stronghold of democracy”, which is actively used by the UK in mentoring with the outside world, once again collapses and allows everyone to see the true face of the leaders of this country and their aggressive policies.


More recently, we all witnessed the “struggle for democracy in Syria” proclaimed by London, which, as a result of the “help” provided to the Syrian armed opposition, turned into rampant banditry and terrorism in this country, leading to the unjustified death of thousands of civilians.

Through his actions in the international arena, official London repeatedly tried to emphasize that “in the name of democracy” he is ready to do much only to help people living outside the UK to gain access to common values ​​and improve the living conditions of citizens of other countries and the future of their children. It is for these reasons that London, with the banner of "democracy" unfolded by it and with bayonets in addition, took an active part in the armed invasion of Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and was ready to continue this "cause" in Syria and in any other part of the world. The consequences of these "democratic" interventions on the face: a destroyed economy and infrastructure, poverty and the constant threats of banditry and terrorism in Iraq, Libya.

We note here that the official London did not take any such steps disinterestedly, but to gain access to the national wealth of the countries, in the intervention of which he is always ready to take part. After all, this was the case in Iraq, Libya, where the main price of the armed invasion was access to the energy resources of these countries. Although why be surprised? “After all, this is just a continuation of the imperial colonial policy that London has led on many continents for centuries, pumping out other countries of wealth, condemning the local population to poverty and slave lawlessness.

But over the years, nothing has changed, neither in the English perception of the world, nor in the policies pursued. Yes, there are new faces in the national establishment, new slogans, with the help of which British politicians lure trustful people into the beautiful words. It happened just now, when London began trying to portray itself as a "defender of democracy." And what happened in reality?

Between 2001 and 2011, when Labor was in power, the British government argued that labor migrants are needed for economic development. Then in the UK began to observe an immigration boom: nearly four million immigrants arrived in the country. However, the Labor leader recently admitted that in terms of immigration policy, his party had missed and the doors of "democratic England should be closed to foreigners." It was not the “democratic” campaigns launched in the national media against immigrants of all stripes. Even not only people from Asia or Africa, but also members of the European Union, whom London began to divide according to racial and national principles.

For many months, the Cameron government has supported and artificially promoted information campaigns against immigrants in the national press, making them guilty of the financial and social failures of the current government, instead of limiting military spending, especially on military actions in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria. In particular, it is increasingly possible to see in the British press information that almost three-quarters of young mothers in London and other major cities of the country are foreign migrants. Migrants are accused of unjustly receiving social benefits, various benefits, the national media state that they should not move freely, not only in the country, but throughout Europe. There are calls to legally restrict the rights of migrants, to start a campaign in the media on the anti-advertising benefits of the UK in order to reduce the interest of migrants in this European country.

Very indicative in this regard, organized at the end of November of this year. British Prime Minister D. Cameron campaign against migrants, poisoned the political climate not only in the UK, but also in Europe and beyond. Having published his vision of migration policy in the Financial Times under the heading “Free movement in Europe should be less free”, D. Cameron proposed a whole program of actions against immigrants, including legislative restrictions on their movement in Europe, rights in England, and termination of social benefits. . He suggested starting such “democratic processes” with the citizens of the European Union - Bulgarians and Romanians, as representatives of the “second-class” countries.

The statements and actions of the British Prime Minister were criticized not only by public organizations, but even by European Commission President José Manuel Barroso, who reminded Cameron “Democrat” that free movement in Europe is a fundamental principle of the EU and must be implemented by all members of this union. Moreover, it is noteworthy that at the end of 2011, the European Union rather sharply criticized English “democracy” for its policy on foreign migrants and demanded that the UK change the rules for issuing social benefits so that not only those who have the right to reside in the country could receive them. The EU even threatened London at the time that it would sue the government of the country if the authorities did not present a plan to lift the restrictions on receiving social benefits for migrants within two months.

Under these conditions, official London found, as it seemed to him, a very “solution” for himself and other representatives of Western Europe. In particular, on his initiative, which was picked up by other European “pillars of democracy”, the EU made a proposal to Latvia: in exchange for reducing public debt, significantly increase the quota for accommodating migrants from Arab and African countries, actually becoming a haven for uncomfortable for Old Europe immigrants. Indeed, according to the current rules of the European distribution of quotas, it is the European Union that determines how many countries each member of the EU is obliged to accept migrants, regardless of the will of the indigenous population. It is not surprising that such a proposal was made precisely to Latvia - one of the post-Soviet states that have joined the EU, and many Europeans do not hide their attitude to it as a stepdaughter and an obvious burden in private conversations.

Here you have the price of European integration, to which the population of this Baltic country so aggressively sought.

I wonder if they know about it in Ukraine? After all, Ukraine on the territory significantly exceeds Latvia and here you can accommodate much more foreign European migrants! And what else do Ukraine need for European politicians and, above all, for the British, who so vehemently rushed the Ukrainian authorities for not wanting the EU to become an associate member of this “democratic” union on the conditions clearly unfavorable for this country.
Author:
Originator:
http://ru.journal-neo.org/2013/12/10/rus-tsena-anglijskoj-demokratii/
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. AVV
    AVV 11 December 2013 14: 41 New
    13
    Yes, and Ukraine needs to be placed, here all the wastes of the Old World, starting with migrants, ending with the real wastes of the chemical industry, the nuclear industry in the west, are considered such an option with the Chernobyl zone, since in the EU countries themselves there simply are no places for waste disposal. development of this program, investments, creation of new jobs in this zone will be promised, that’s what Europe needs in the first place !!! So, rejoice at the citizens of Ukraine that you will be allowed to produce shale gas with the help of the same British who such mining is prohibited and delivering it to the countries of the European Union !!! Forward to a bright and rich future !!!
  2. ele1285
    ele1285 11 December 2013 15: 35 New
    10
    After some time, there will be: a native Latvian, est, Lithuanian - this is a black representative of the sexual minority with disabilities sitting on unemployment benefits
    1. complete zero
      complete zero 11 December 2013 15: 41 New
      +1
      moreover, others are injecting this allowance!
    2. yurii p
      yurii p 11 December 2013 16: 55 New
      +3
      even if there will be more of these minorities, then they will really be less, but this is their headache or rear-wheel drive, this road to nowhere, remember SODOM and GOMOR, a happy journey !!! just do not drag others into the abyss.
      1. Cynic
        Cynic 12 December 2013 18: 57 New
        0
        Quote: yurii p
        even if there will be more of these minorities, then they will really be fewer

        Do you really think so?
        Problem procreation the minority has always decided at the expense of the majority! No wonder there is such a frenzied propaganda of LGBT values ​​under the guise of tolerance.
        Unfortunately, there, at the state level. request
    3. Cynic
      Cynic 12 December 2013 18: 51 New
      0
      Quote: ele1285
      it's ... a member of the sexual minority

      It is believed that by then no longer minorities ! hi
  3. complete zero
    complete zero 11 December 2013 15: 40 New
    +1
    They still have blue ones (Hyde Park of the great winter is warm where to place) ... although they are already there by the rampart
  4. svp67
    svp67 11 December 2013 15: 42 New
    +7
    England, there is England and it has ONLY its INTERESTS, it’s time for us to act the same way ...
    1. S-200
      S-200 11 December 2013 15: 51 New
      +2
      Quote: svp67
      England, there is England and it has ONLY its INTERESTS, it’s time for us to act the same way ...

      Sergey, SO DO NOT act ...
      at the beginning of the 20th century, Great Britain is the largest empire in the world!
      50 years later, after WWII only - "Commonwealth ..."
      We look at the USA ... wait, sir, the loss of influence in the regions. wink
    2. adm656
      adm656 11 December 2013 18: 52 New
      0
      bull's-eye...
    3. alone
      alone 11 December 2013 23: 04 New
      0
      The price of English democracy is 1 Pence.
  5. horoh
    horoh 11 December 2013 15: 43 New
    +5
    Interestingly, and that part of the population of Ukraine that screams for European integration, is it not at all sane ???? If everything is visible and understandable, you have to be some kind of idiot to stick your head in the jaws of a crocodile, or rather, the European Union ????
    1. Setrac
      Setrac 11 December 2013 17: 55 New
      +1
      Quote: horoh
      Interestingly, and that part of the population of Ukraine that screams for European integration, is it not at all sane ????

      They were given money, they scream, there is no ideological.
  6. makarov
    makarov 11 December 2013 15: 54 New
    +7
    ".. It is not surprising that such a proposal was made specifically to Latvia - one of the countries of the post-Soviet space that joined the EU, and many Europeans do not hide their attitude as a stepdaughter and an obvious burden in private conversations ..."

    Chatlanin: - they will crawl in front of us on all fours, and we will spit in them!
    Uncle Vova: - why is this?
    Chatlanin: - to have fun!
    Kin Dza Dza movie
    1. Rusich51
      Rusich51 11 December 2013 19: 42 New
      0
      Quote: makarov

      Chatlanin: - they will crawl in front of us on all fours, and we will spit in them!
      Uncle Vova: - why is this?
      Chatlanin: - to have fun!
      Kin Dza Dza movie


      Ku ... sat down twice. wassat

      The main thing is that Little Russians did not fall for this geyropsky temptation.
  7. gladysheff2010
    gladysheff2010 11 December 2013 16: 20 New
    +1
    Thirty pieces of silver ...?! ..., and how much is it in pounds? ... or in euros? A question for the ruling (read-opposition) circles of Ukraine.
  8. Keeper
    Keeper 11 December 2013 16: 31 New
    0
    After interventions in other countries - Democracy does not smell ...
    It becomes more creepy and doomed ..
  9. Alekseir162
    Alekseir162 11 December 2013 17: 00 New
    +1
    Indeed, according to today's rules for the European allocation of quotas, it is the European Union that determines how much each country of the EU is obliged to accept migrants, regardless of the desire of the indigenous population.

    It seems that in Ukraine, opposition leaders prefer not to talk about this to the people. And most likely it is this fate (and many other nasty things) that awaits the Ukrainians if they join the European Union.
  10. Arkan
    Arkan 11 December 2013 17: 00 New
    +2
    "The EU made an offer to Latvia: in exchange for reducing the state debt, significantly increase the quota for accommodating migrants from Arab and African countries, in fact becoming a haven for immigrants inconvenient for Old Europe."

    A "normal" business proposal, you cannot refuse, they will cut off the oxygen, after which the Latvian "establishment" will happily inhale the smell of any excrement of their masters.
  11. andrei332809
    andrei332809 11 December 2013 17: 18 New
    +1
    I did not learn anything new about the Britons. always rich at the expense of the colonies.
    And yet, I constantly have a question-the Germans were condemned for the Holocaust, and in such a way that they are still paying the price. And when the Britons are condemned for the "assiento" and they will rip them off to the fullest?
    1. ale-x
      ale-x 12 December 2013 10: 33 New
      0
      Who are the judges?
  12. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 11 December 2013 17: 30 New
    +1
    If the Baltic countries are in a rogue position in the European Union, what role do European democratizers assign to Ukraine? It's hard to say, but it will be an unenviable role. For all that, they will constantly bombard the Ukrainians for the poor fulfillment of their conditions of stay in the European Union. It will be necessary to forget about sovereignty ...
  13. Stinger
    Stinger 11 December 2013 17: 41 New
    0
    For some reason, the more democracies are planted on the ground, the more the one-man who escapes from there.
  14. dengy12
    dengy12 11 December 2013 17: 56 New
    0
    Quote: yurii p
    even if there will be more of these minorities, then they will really be less, but this is their headache or rear-wheel drive, this road to nowhere, remember SODOM and GOMOR, a happy journey !!! just do not drag others into the abyss.

    gloating is a sin ...
  15. morpogr
    morpogr 11 December 2013 18: 03 New
    +1
    It’s just that the type of colonization has changed. Now we ourselves decide which slaves to go to us, and which we will send, and the new colonies are now joined under the guise of democratization and association with the EU and establish rules. How to behave these colonies and write laws for them.
  16. mountain
    mountain 11 December 2013 18: 12 New
    0
    It seems Pavetkin got it, Klitschko, he shook his head strongly, although he himself lost. It was better to train, which would be for sure, and now turmoil and a mess can not be avoided. And the British still have everything in front, a nightmare and hell their best friend.
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 11 December 2013 18: 33 New
      +1
      Povetkin fought with Vladimir, and Vitaliy runs the UDAR. And he probably would have hurt his head without Povetkin, otherwise he wouldn’t have fallen for Russia, which brought him up and brought him to life.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  17. voliador
    voliador 11 December 2013 19: 35 New
    0
    I don’t know how the British have it, but we just need to drastically reduce the number of immigrants, and illegal immigrants in general - a kick in the ass, but with working out the fare!
  18. Sterlya
    Sterlya 11 December 2013 23: 50 New
    0
    But I envy Ukrainians. what a smart people. Yes, the president is not well chosen. and Russia, as always, harms Ukrainians. And how would they integrate. and would live happily ever after laughing
  19. Horn
    Horn 12 December 2013 06: 27 New
    +1
    Migrants from Africa and Asia with Latin America should be hosted by countries that had colonies there.
  20. Lelek
    Lelek 12 December 2013 08: 15 New
    +2
    The rule of Anglo-Saxon: destroy, loot, and then sell these glass beads to these savages, let them become accustomed to civilization. There, American officials are already walking with cookies on Khreshchatyk, accustom barbarians to Western civilization. And these are not even flowers. fool