Military Review

Are Americans against a cosmopolitan future?

35
Are Americans against a cosmopolitan future?



More than 40 years have passed since the end of the conflict in Vietnam, and it seems that during this time in the United States a generation of “untried” people has grown, those who have never heard of the horrors of war from veterans and, moreover, did not take part in hostilities. The grandmothers and grandfathers of modern 20-year-old Americans had heard enough about the bloodshed in Southeast Asia and at any time could get into the Vietnamese meat grinder. At one time, the Vietnam War became a catalyst for sluggish civil confrontation in the United States. And now: for the first time in nearly half a century, the American youth is opposed to endless military campaigns abroad. What can this mean? Interests of the ruling elite are contrary to the expectations of the people?

New hippies

Information that 52% of Americans are critical of the adventures of the White House was published in the British The Guardian with reference to the Pugh Independent Research Center, whose headquarters is located in Washington itself. According to the statistics of the same center, only 38% of US residents fully support the country's active foreign policy. Another 10% of respondents refrained from responding.

As it turned out, 53% of respondents believe that the foreign policy prestige of the United States in recent years has greatly decreased. Only 17% of respondents disagree with them: in their opinion, the White House gained more than it lost. Another 70% of Americans reported that, in their opinion, the United States no longer enjoys such respect in the world as in past decades. It is worth noting that such a record low evaluation of the foreign policy of the United States was given for the first time in stories “America's Place in the World” survey, which is held annually, starting with 1964.

It turned out that ordinary Americans do not want to take on solving other people's problems. It is becoming increasingly difficult to conceal that Obama’s bonuses are being manipulated by large transnational corporations, ready to use the United States for their own commercial interests. And although the truth that the state is working for global business has not been disclosed, citizens of the United States still do not feel rejoicing over the next triumph of democracy in some overseas country.

The path from permissiveness to greed

However, the opinion of the people in the United States does not interest anyone. The cohort of American political scientists and philosophers who insisted on the global supremacy of the United States and talked about the inevitable development of a golden consumer society is receding into the past. Its most prominent representatives are Zbigniew Brzezinski and Francis Fukuyama - if not the ideologues of the American domination doctrine, then, in any case, people who were able to comprehend and formulate its basic principles. And the main principle was the implementation of the functions of the "world gendarme" by the United States. In his lectures, Fukuyama directly calls for interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states with the aim of “democratization” of entire regions.

But, having shouldered the “white man’s burden”, the United States quickly exhausted. The civilizing mission was quickly replaced by the game of great corporations using American diplomacy in their own interests. Examples are the struggle for control of oil fields in the Middle East, the massive printing of dollars in the hope of artificially increasing the value of the euro, the collapse of the economies of Eastern European countries by removing customs barriers from Western countries, the destruction of national economies of Africa, Southeast Asia and Latin America. Postmodern cosmopolitan magnates use the philosophy of Fukuyama, calling for the unity of humanity under the foot of capitalism. And although his ideas showed their inconsistency, they became a fertile pretext for justifying the actions of financial tycoons acting not in the national interests of America, but, on the contrary, contrary to them.

The merging of state and business was already happening in the USA at the beginning of the 20 century: then Franklin Roosevelt overcame the growing influence of the monopolies and took care of their division into many small firms. In the same period in Europe, the power of corporations led to the emergence of ultra-right regimes that defended big business. Similar processes took place on the eve of the First World War. It seems that nowadays the United States has returned to the state of the 20s, with the difference that Barack Obama does not have enough courage to fight the growing influence of the monopolies. The foreign policy of the United States is entirely dependent on the interests of a narrow circle of people; the needs of the people are not taken into account.

In such circumstances, the United States no longer stands guard over “democratic values,” as was stated back in the early 90s. Now America is just a tool for the destruction of competitors, turned out to be in the capable hands of industrialists. Now the States are experiencing a fateful period, when one part of the ruling elite is in favor of preserving the priority of national interests, and the other part supports further coalescence of business and the state and places corporate interests above national ones. Thus, over the past 20 years, the United States has gone from libertarian permissiveness and imperial neoconservatism to totalitarian control over society and cosmopolitan plutocracy, divorced from the United States itself and rejecting the idea of ​​building an empire. The neocons and plutocrats are the two main forces fighting for power over the United States. The former see the United States as a state that must be saved from the impending social catastrophe and lead to new prosperity by refusing excesses, the latter as a mechanism for controlling global financial flows.

Two roads down

Judging by the US military doctrine and Obama's unwillingness to intervene in the Syrian war, the initiative in foreign policy has so far belonged to the neocons. Those in favor of the national interests of the country refuse adventures abroad, and this finds support from the people, tired of the continuous salvation of all Africans and Asians. Neocons propose to concentrate all efforts on the fight against China, refusing to expand in other directions. The Plutocrats, in their turn, want to return to the policy of dictatorship in order to continue to protect the interests of their transnational corporations in all parts of the world with the mighty military machine of the White House.

But for objective reasons, the United States cannot control everything at once. An attempt to make the world unipolar failed because the US sprayed its forces in an attempt to simultaneously contain the offensive of Islam, prevent the increase in the foreign political power of China and Russia, and even prevent the integration of the European Union. As a result, jihadists became perhaps the main allies of Washington, the Russian world rebelled against the expansion of the United States, China is gradually increasing its presence in Africa and Far East, and the Old World are in a light stupor on how much the euro rises in price against the dollar and it seems , Germany is about to give up the support of the American occupation forces that have been in the country since 1945.

Thus, a failed project of a unipolar world has already been destroyed, regardless of who is in power in the United States - plutocrats or neocons. In the first case, the current situation will remain, that is, America will continue to fight on several fronts at once. This will slow down her humiliation, but will not help Washington save the situation. In the second case, all military and diplomatic power will be thrown at solving the most pressing problems, and so far China’s gain and the revival of Russia are considered. This means that the White House will abandon Latin America and Africa to the mercy of fate, forget about the covert struggle against Western Europe, give the Middle East to the mercy of Sunni fundamentalists and Iran. Consequently, the United States will lose the status of world gendarme and return to the era of the Cold War, limiting itself to confrontation with other world powers. Such a sharp transition will undoubtedly lead to an imbalance in the world, but the United States will only gain from it. First of all, Washington will receive time to rebuild the system of foreign policy relations, and also be able to concentrate on solving urgent problems.

It can be summarized that with the plutocrats America is slowly dying and losing its national sovereignty, turning into a model of the postmodern world without borders, races, nations, where a person is just a consumer. With the neocons, the United States loses the title of superpower and becomes on par with Russia, Brazil, India, China, the European Union, and rolls back to the days after the Vienna Congress 1814-1815, when international problems were solved by searching for a compromise between the powerful.

Thus, the results of a study conducted by the Pugh Center are evidence of a deep systemic crisis that swept the US after the 11 of September of the 2001 of the year. In the States, there is a struggle between a cosmopolitan plutocracy set up to dominate the world and neocons wishing to preserve the sovereignty of the country. And it turns out that Americans do not want to be exemplary consumers. The postmodern world, depicted by Fukuyama in his philosophical utopias, turned out to be a trap not for “totalitarian dictatorships” with a planned economy, but for the USA itself.
Author:
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Siberian
    Siberian 11 December 2013 08: 07
    +5
    "The Russian world rebelled against the US expansion" .... a controversial point
    1. APES
      APES 11 December 2013 14: 19
      0
      Are the interests of the ruling elite contrary to the expectations of the people?


      and where is it not?
      1. alone
        alone 11 December 2013 20: 43
        +2
        Everywhere so. With all those in power, deep down on the drum what the people want.
        1. AVV
          AVV 12 December 2013 00: 00
          +1
          But the people want to live well, work, raise children, which is now problematic in America itself, what can we say about others? But America is the most chosen, only by whom and where, that's the question !!! Judging by the American press, Gays and Lizbians, and another evil !!! The world gendarme number one, let it flow, and where you can’t get far on genetically modified products, and even more so on chicken hams !!!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Nevsky_ZU
      Nevsky_ZU 11 December 2013 14: 41
      +2
      Quote: SIBERIAN
      "The Russian world rebelled against the US expansion" .... a controversial point


      I agree, given the situation in Ukraine. Once upon a time, Eastern Ukraine put things in order there. Today, in the East of Little Russia, young Russian-speaking consumers dream of the EU, and thus give an advantage to Western Ukraine. And the South-East of Ukraine is part of the "Russian World"
    4. Rusich51
      Rusich51 11 December 2013 19: 22
      +2
      It can be summarized that with the plutocrats America is slowly dying and losing its national sovereignty, turning into a model of the postmodern world without borders, races, nations, where a person is just a consumer. With the neocons, the United States loses the title of superpower and becomes on par with Russia, Brazil, India, China, the European Union, and rolls back to the days after the Vienna Congress 1814-1815, when international problems were solved by searching for a compromise between the powerful.

      Personally, I like this alignment. Multipolarity is a good thing.
    5. Hunghuz
      Hunghuz 12 December 2013 05: 33
      0
      hi Look what is happening on the Maidan of Svidomo) demolish Blanca-Ulyanov monuments) and his mother is from Berdychev) he is a JewishGGoma ........)))))) Shalom to romances and chawalam of non-stop Palestine) there is not any politics here but a fact )
  2. kaktus
    kaktus 11 December 2013 08: 18
    +1
    ACE Americans can’t exist without enemies fool
    1. mirag2
      mirag2 11 December 2013 08: 43
      +3
      Americans can, but an array of special services and special units is not.
      And such an array, as in the USA, he definitely needs a huge area for work. And multitasking.
  3. makarov
    makarov 11 December 2013 08: 18
    +3
    And the Americans will soon purr to themselves the forgotten Soviet song: - All life ahead, hope and wait ...
  4. MolGro
    MolGro 11 December 2013 08: 30
    +3
    In Russia, there is progress, but it’s too early to speak about the uprising !!
    We snapped the nose so lightly and that’s it!
  5. ImPerts
    ImPerts 11 December 2013 08: 44
    +6
    The era of the unipolar world ends. It was enough 25 years (approximately). Now the Americans are trying to flirt with the Chinese and return to the familiar bipolar model of the world order. Which is very likely. But no one bothers China to transform the proposed two-centric model again into a monopolar one centered on it? One thing pleases, the mighty China does not exist for a long time, it begins to devour itself. The history of civil strife in China is not yet complete.
    1. Asgard
      Asgard 11 December 2013 09: 57
      +9
      China has never been a global Player.
      It is populated by a population that does not have global aspirations (biorobots))
      If "someone" will lead the Economy and the State, and will be able to direct them to the CAPTURE of neighboring territories, then there WILL BE a war ...
      Although the Chinese are extremely reluctant to crawl out of their territory. They do not have CULTURE that can be offered to the World, Aspirations for the future, a coordinated policy that they as a nation would pursue, at least 10 years))))
      Well, as an example, the 400-year-old Jewish project (Anglo-Saxon)) ... Although, as you can see, it is also rolling)))) Wait, the Jews invested in China, in an attempt to develop and incite the "Huangs" to Russia - there is no one else)) )

      But I think that nothing will turn out ..... The world has changed, INFORMATION ....
      This is where the "unipolar world" lost unequivocally, if there is no Internet, then they will have a chance (small)))
      But there is NO such understanding, on the contrary, they extol the local successes of "revolutions" and pump up "meaningless" volumes of espionage data from Windows, Android, Google)))) It is not clear how THIS can help them in applying the mark of the beast to the forehead of the RUSSIAN MAN) ))))
      We just turn off the electricity)))) All you need is to shoot a transformer at a local substation))))
      1. Andrey57
        Andrey57 11 December 2013 10: 52
        +1
        China will not be a global player - the Chinese and mattresses are connected by one chain and go to the bottom together, after the collapse of mattresses, the Chinese will have no one winked
      2. Black
        Black 11 December 2013 11: 37
        +1
        Quote: Asgard
        China has never been a global Player.

        I agree with you.
        But appetites are known to grow as the body grows. China was not a player, not by virtue of ideology, but by virtue of low living standards, colonial dependencies.
        Now China is strong and feels its strength, Confucianism is buried in Maoism. Therefore, narrow-eyed should not be discounted. God knows what leaders will come to power in 5, 10 years.
        1. ImPerts
          ImPerts 11 December 2013 13: 37
          +1
          To all this, I would add 2 things:
          1) China is a major player in the rare earth metals market;
          2) China has built many factories for the production of components for the electronics industry.
          Given that factories are built and technologies are developed. Given the circumstances that there are reserves of necessary raw materials. Given the huge ability of the Chinese to copy and the influx of Chinese equipment ...
          The Chinese can support the economy with domestic demand, the Chinese can use the technology, the Chinese can shut up the Americans. The main thing is that the Chinese decide that their enemy is the United States (like Japan in WWII) and direct their efforts to this.
      3. Dimy4
        Dimy4 11 December 2013 15: 50
        +1
        It is populated by a population that does not have global aspirations (biorobots))

        I agree here, in the vast VO I saw a photo of their parade, where they are in interesting helmets of this kind, to prevent them from taking cosmonauts (this was such a parody). Yes, but better not to shoot through a trance, but through a bushing, there will be more sense.
      4. Rusich51
        Rusich51 11 December 2013 19: 25
        +1
        Quote: Asgard
        We just turn off the electricity)))) All you need is to shoot a transformer at a local substation))))


        wassat Cool. But by and large it’s right.

        Not bad if Israel is on our side.
        1. Hunghuz
          Hunghuz 12 December 2013 05: 39
          0
          hi What for us your Israel ??? with us Rusty Tolik, Taburetkin and the entire Synagogue)))
  6. darksoul
    darksoul 11 December 2013 08: 45
    +1
    Quote: kaktus
    ACE Americans can’t exist without enemies


    it’s necessary to justify the furious expenditures on the defense industry, they don’t collect such a colossus for protection, and in mine they support their dying economy, but you can understand people, the money that could go to people, social projects go into service, only if it is necessary to ensure the country's defense another when mad with fat, so much dough is poured into the army .....
  7. Normman
    Normman 11 December 2013 08: 58
    +3
    On April 5 of 2013, a Bilzerian Report was released stating that the main reason for discrimination in America is caused by the huge disparity between 2% of Jews and 98% of the rest of the population.
    "If this trend continues, by 2032 the non-goys, accounting for only 2% of the population, will comprise from 54 to 99 percent of members of the Supreme Court, media owners, administrators and students of elite universities, managers and owners of professional sports and the wealthiest Americans." - the report says.
  8. Archikah
    Archikah 11 December 2013 09: 07
    11
    But for disgruntled residents, an analogue of our Ministry of Emergency Situations, buys 4-seater coffins made of especially durable plastic (storage guarantee 100 years). Mobile prisons for 1,5 million people, 5 billion high-capacity cartridges (magnum). Built and provided with security, but not filled with convicts for about 1 million more seats. There is an obvious preparation of the US elite to reformat the population under the "wealthiest Americans" (as in the previous commentary). This is all in the open press. No fantasies. negative
  9. Grbear
    Grbear 11 December 2013 09: 31
    +1
    The path from permissiveness to greed
    - cause and effect are mixed up, and greed is based on strength.

    There is no need to rush to "grab a tambourine and dance on the bones." Sociology today is not a science to be trusted. And those 50% of amers who support state policy may turn out to be a real force, and not a set of housewives with students.

    It is necessary to agree, but to bend your line, and there it will be seen. hi
  10. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 11 December 2013 09: 32
    +2
    For complete victory and in order to turn into a global Empire for a long time, the Americans have neither the strength, nor the means, nor the intelligible idea, to divide the world in half with the USSR and then exploit the "Red Threat" this is yes, but now that the USSR does not exist, what China, with all due respect, no matter how powerful it becomes, it will never replace the USSR on a full scale, it has neither military victories nor influence, and geographically, for the average European or American, God knows where it is, and Chinese tanks they do not stand at the Brandenburg Gate, which means that, in fact, the Chinese will remain somewhere in the backyards, the Americans also suffered, as at one time the United Kingdom and then the USSR, a complete failure in Afghanistan, there is even the presence of a Polish, German, Ukrainian or Georgian cannon meat did not help, Afghanistan now only serves as a feeder for drug money for senior officers of the army and the CIA, which they then launder in Europe, or somewhere in offshore, the swamp is shorter in which it is warm and damp for any carrion and the center of this swamp is the United States itself, which is trying to pull out its tail, so the head gets stuck, trying to pull out the head so the tail gets bogged down, and the lack of an adequate Idea in the end cuts the hegemony of the United States at the root, because their idea of ​​liberalism and unrestrained enrichment cannot unite people , only on the contrary, it separates them and sets them against each other, once the USSR fell for this bait and collapsed, and now the boomerang flew back to the American.
  11. Enot-poloskun
    Enot-poloskun 11 December 2013 10: 20
    +1
    Unfortunately, plutocrats dominate the world now ...

    Can only the global crisis sweep them away?
    1. Nord007hold
      Nord007hold 11 December 2013 21: 19
      0
      Quote: Enot-poloskun
      Can only the global crisis sweep them away?

      The crises are most likely triggered by them (the Masons, the Plutocrats, the globalists, the Zionists - you can call them anything you like)

      We clearly see a situation where a highly organized minority exploits the majority with the help of manipulative methods.
  12. ZU-23
    ZU-23 11 December 2013 10: 26
    +2
    We need to continue to kill their State Department with their minds and then they themselves will collapse like a house of cards.
    1. 11111mail.ru
      11111mail.ru 11 December 2013 20: 02
      -1
      Quote: ZU-23
      you need to continue to kill their minds with the State Department and then they themselves will collapse like a house of cards

      They themselves will not collapse. They have experience of a great crisis. But to "help" them by returning to their homeland foreign exchange reserves (this is the first) and (second) - by closing the shop of the Russian central bank to open the State Bank of the Russian Federation. Then there will be no "Fannie May and Freddie Merck collapse", "Cypriot" bankruptcy of "deceived" Russians, "swamp rallies" ... This is what kind of slavery: sell goods on the foreign market for greens, then you can print yourself (by the Central Bank) Russian rubles at the rate of 1 rubles for 33 green. So they lived to see a sweet life under the Chubais-Medvedy, when 1 kg of baked white bread became more expensive in relation to the average wage more than 10 times than under Brezhnev.
  13. Normman
    Normman 11 December 2013 10: 58
    +3
    We need to "spread straws" or there will be no place for Russians in the global world. Here's what I think about this:

    Patriotic Act (draft)
    "On the right of the indigenous peoples of Russia to self-government"
    Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation

    In order to protect the right of indigenous peoples of Russia to self-government, as well as to avoid conflicts of interest in the performance of duties in the public service.
    Persons who are not representatives of the indigenous peoples of Russia, namely, representatives of nationalities having their own state entities outside the Russian Federation, as well as their direct relatives, parents, children and spouses, are not entitled to occupy any positions (including elected) in government bodies of the Russian Federation at any level, in governing bodies of state enterprises, services and departments, at enterprises with state participation, enterprises registered as mass media howl of information and in the structures of exercising control over such entities. The above persons are not entitled, directly or indirectly by proxy of any type or through proxies, to permanently or temporarily fulfill any duties related to the management and / or disposal of state property.
    The indicated category of persons does not have the right to hold managerial positions in any enterprises where there is access to state secrets, as well as in structures of the Bank of Russia.

    May 23 2013 year.

    Decree of the President of the Russian Federation (draft)

    The Government of Russia, the State Duma and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation shall, within one year, ensure that the personnel of all state enterprises and organizations are brought into conformity with this Patriotic Act. Within the specified time period, bring the legislative and regulatory framework in line, in particular, provide for criminal liability for persons evading the Patriotic Act, as well as for persons denying the right of indigenous peoples of Russia to self-government.

    Moscow. Kremlin.
    1. Hunghuz
      Hunghuz 12 December 2013 06: 04
      0
      hi Benya Lazar will clarify that a Jew can be considered one who can prove up to 4 tribes his evgeystvo on the male or female line .......))) without any offense comrade moderator)))
  14. individual
    individual 11 December 2013 11: 04
    +1
    Quote:
    "It turned out that ordinary Americans do not want to tackle other people's problems."

    Before relying on this quote, we must remember that the United States of America appeared due to cosmopolitans.
    Adventurers of all stripes, people without a homeland, whose idea was only one principle - enrichment.
    They are positioned by world gendarmes, democrats and liberals for completely earthly purposes - totalitarian control over everything and everything.
    And this whole system of values ​​is designed to pump out candy wrappers called the dollar.
    1. 11111mail.ru
      11111mail.ru 11 December 2013 20: 09
      +1
      Quote: individ
      And this whole system of values ​​is designed to pump out candy wrappers called the dollar

      Clarification: pumping out real assets from wrapped states (including us) for candy wrappers and holding debtors by the throat.
  15. abrakadabre
    abrakadabre 11 December 2013 11: 21
    +1
    Civilization mission quickly gave way to the game of great corporations using American diplomacy in their own interests.

    Was there a boy ?!
    The unsubstantiated, deliberately false, beneficial for a narrow circle of people and aggressively imposed statement is taken as an axiom on which the theory of something is built. We all know what.
    There has never been this mission in nature. Already at least in the nature of the capitalist way of thinking.
    But taking over “The burden of a white man”, The USA ran out of steam pretty quickly

    This burden has always consisted only in the bare right of the strong, to take without limit everything that is wanted and required from those who are weaker. All! Point. It is to take, not trade or exchange. Take by force. Everything else is verbal garbage, the essence of sound waves shaking the air and, as we all know, quickly damping nowhere.
    US sprayed its forces in an attempt to simultaneously hold back the onset of Islamism

    How?! How can I put out a fire constantly tossing more and more dry wood into it? fool
  16. Black
    Black 11 December 2013 11: 27
    0
    According to statistics from the same center, only 38% of US residents fully support the country's active foreign policy. Another 10% of respondents refrained from answering.

    I wonder ... Now if the Russian Federation would become strong (well, at least as the USSR winked ), now we would clean up Syria, burn poppy plantations in Afghanistan, save Gaddafi, protect Lenin on the Maidan ..... I wonder what percentage of citizens would approve of the Kremlin’s activity?
  17. uhu189
    uhu189 11 December 2013 11: 33
    +2
    I would look at the problem reflected in the article a little more broadly - the unipolar world and US domination have little to do with the role of both the US itself and its national elites in this process. The process of the United States becoming a "world leader" was initiated by world capital and a group of individuals who instructed the owners of this world capital where and in which direction to invest and how exactly to influence the development of the situation. And the United States was only a tool in achieving goals. A sophisticated, expensive tool, but effective for the time being. Now the need for such an expensive instrument has disappeared, and it is, how to say more precisely - "dismantled". Not instantly, but not stretching for decades. And the local rebellion of a part of the US national elite, accustomed to its exclusivity on the world stage, against this dismantling in a global sense will not be able to change anything - even if they manage to temporarily intercept the conceptual management of the state for a while - they will simply be squeezed out at the supranational level with the help of financial , raw materials, diplomatic and other tools (and even military if required). Riots inside the Euro-Atlantic Conglomerate are suppressed quickly and effectively. Another issue is the general stability of the Conglomerate - here its general degradation is evident. They release control over those global and most dangerous processes that they themselves initiated - and this is precisely the primary threat to which all of us, representatives of Russian culture, should pay primary attention, and take over control, preventing a slide into global chaos ...
    1. Black
      Black 11 December 2013 11: 47
      0
      Quote: uhu189
      They release the management of those global and dangerous processes that they themselves initiated


      Remarkably noticed! Gin, pulled out of a bottle into the light of God, begins to beat the owner's face and walk on its own.
      Radical Islam, Nazism, thoughtless tolerance, homophobia, the power of money, drug trafficking ....
      Russia carries a thousand-year history, a high, great culture. Here they have to rely on.
  18. Letnab
    Letnab 11 December 2013 12: 32
    +2
    Quote: Normman
    We need to "spread straws" or there will be no place for Russians in the global world. Here's what I think about this:

    Patriotic Act (draft)
    "On the right of the indigenous peoples of Russia to self-government"
    Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation

    In order to protect the right of indigenous peoples of Russia to self-government, as well as to avoid conflicts of interest in the performance of duties in the public service.
    Persons who are not representatives of the indigenous peoples of Russia, namely, representatives of nationalities having their own state entities outside the Russian Federation, as well as their direct relatives, parents, children and spouses, are not entitled to occupy any positions (including elected) in government bodies of the Russian Federation at any level, in governing bodies of state enterprises, services and departments, at enterprises with state participation, enterprises registered as mass media howl of information and in the structures of exercising control over such entities. The above persons are not entitled, directly or indirectly by proxy of any type or through proxies, to permanently or temporarily fulfill any duties related to the management and / or disposal of state property.
    The indicated category of persons does not have the right to hold managerial positions in any enterprises where there is access to state secrets, as well as in structures of the Bank of Russia.

    May 23 2013 year.

    Decree of the President of the Russian Federation (draft)

    The Government of Russia, the State Duma and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation shall, within one year, ensure that the personnel of all state enterprises and organizations are brought into conformity with this Patriotic Act. Within the specified time period, bring the legislative and regulatory framework in line, in particular, provide for criminal liability for persons evading the Patriotic Act, as well as for persons denying the right of indigenous peoples of Russia to self-government.

    Moscow. Kremlin.

    Is this a real document?
  19. lukke
    lukke 11 December 2013 12: 53
    +1
    However, in the United States, no one is interested in the opinion of the people.
    key phrase, it should be added that not only in the states
  20. BBM
    BBM 11 December 2013 13: 07
    0
    the growth of state and business already took place in the USA at the beginning of the 20th century: then Franklin Roosevelt defeated the growing influence of the monopolies and took care of their division into many small firms

    the article shows very well the intellectual and educational level of modern growth. and.
    Antitrust legislation was passed under a completely different president, Theodore Roosevelt (and they are not even relatives). But under Franklin, the merger of state and capital took place. In America, a system was created that was essentially similar to the State Planning Committee in the USSR, and if it were abs. honestly, in the USSR, during the times of Kosygin, a model of economic management was created, practically repeating the management model created by the FDR. If anyone is unaware, another option was copied by Hitler's Germany - Hitler's program to get the economy out of kris essentially repeats the "New Deal" without any conceptual differences.
    mass printing of dollars in the hope of artificially raising the value of the euro

    it just do PPC. The author at least reads what he writes. It seems that the article was written using Copy + Past
    1. 11111mail.ru
      11111mail.ru 11 December 2013 20: 19
      0
      Quote: BBM
      and to be abs. honest, then in the USSR, the time of Kosygin created a model of economic management that practically repeats the management model created by the FDR

      The FDR (so you called him) passed away 11 years before my birth. Under Alexei Nikolaevich, he graduated from school and institute. Only I didn’t overlook something in the leadership of the USSR economy.
  21. Normman
    Normman 11 December 2013 20: 32
    0
    Letnab is a real document, I created it as an element of a national idea. You need to become masters in your home. I don’t want to offend anyone, even if representatives of non-indigenous peoples study, work, do business, art, and so on, but let them not manage to manage us, manage our property, and determine our future and lifestyle.
  22. Sergg
    Sergg 11 December 2013 21: 07
    0
    the failed project of a unipolar world has already been destroyed


    It is too early to talk about this, although there are prerequisites. Let's wait for the dollar to fall, civil unrest In the USA - then we will see a real collapse of the unipolar world and American democracy that everyone hates.
  23. Power
    Power 11 December 2013 22: 46
    +1
    The article is weak. Most of the author’s arguments are not consistent. Starting with the first paragraph about 40 years without war, and ending with a systemic crisis. Just rebooting and forming a new world, with other players and rules, but with the same puppeteers.
  24. Keeper
    Keeper 12 December 2013 04: 10
    0
    ... will give up the Middle East to the Sunni fundamentalists and Iran

    Small inaccuracy in the article. America is just artificially supporting Sunni fundamentalists! If it stops pouring in weapons and funding the Sunnis, they will simply cease to Be, since the Shiites are a more "adapted structure to the terrain" ... Sunites will simply officially turn into terrorists, who they are in essence!

    First of all, Washington will get time to rebuild the system of foreign policy relations, and will also be able to concentrate on solving urgent problems


    Again, not entirely true! The fact is that any country is not a "Serpent-Gorynych about three heads, but with one body." In any state there are power structures, analytical, financial, etc., which also have subdivisions! Any system can be rebuilt in jerks or smoothly. And just this process of rebuilding is completely controlled. Take the past wars with their tactical guides (doesn't this remind you of the current games: football, basketball - any team game ?!))) - the "coach" is not among the players ... And therefore, he does not need to remove the main players from the field (foreign policy pressure) to rebuild the system from within (to solve urgent problems). And it's not about funding! Remember how quickly America changed "in face and deeds" after the solution of the Syrian issue - it simply changed the tactics of "presence" and moved from active actions to "observant" ...
  25. Egen
    Egen 12 December 2013 14: 34
    0
    Well, at least someone wrote and realized that there is _national_ in the United States and that he is the same hostage of the upper classes (corporations / Jews / Masons / at least anyone) as in any other country. More "fat", but people :)