Track to the next
On the new Russian juvenile laws ...
It seems that the world in its madness no longer has a chance to stop: in England, the Essex County social services forcibly subjected a pregnant woman (by the way, an Italian citizen who arrived on a business trip) to a caesarean section and took her child.
All her fault was that at some point she had a feeling of fear that, in principle, happens to pregnant women quite often, and she called the police, who, referring to the condition of “panic attack” diagnosed in her, delivered her in a psychiatric hospital. And there her child was withdrawn (in the most direct sense). And now she, surrounded by lawyers, is suing for custody of her own baby.
Prior to this incident, we had heard only about the practice of taking away a child right in the delivery room of “unworthy mothers” in Germany and Finland, but there it was about babies who were already born naturally. And in order to wrest it from the maternal bosom - such fascism has not yet been practiced.
The West is showing us a picture of global dehumanization, but it would be suicidal to calm down by the fact that we have a different path. Alas, this is not entirely true. The other way is our desire. But in reality, we are only just one step behind. And we have a whole detachment of guides, who are vigilantly watching that we do not stray from the intended course. To go to the next.
Someone does not believe? Evidence around - do not count.
Punish parents to beat drug addiction
Here, for example, 2 December 2013, the State Duma received a bill N 398424-6 "On amending the article 5.35 of the Administrative Offenses Code of the Russian Federation to strengthen the responsibility for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment by minors of content duties by parents or other legal representatives. upbringing, education, protection of the rights and interests of minors ", providing for an increase in fines for non-performance by parents or other legal representatives of minors annostey for their maintenance and education.
He was introduced to the State Duma by a member of the Committee on Family, Women and Children MP LDPR deputy Irina Chirkova, who believes that the increase in fines four times will allow parents to begin "educate children in the spirit of moral and legal norms."
The explanatory note states: “More and more often children are attached to the use of alcohol and drugs, the number of children who do not receive education is increasing, the number of homeless and homeless children is not decreasing. There is a need to improve the effectiveness of the rules on the responsibility of parents and other specified persons. ”
Nobody says that parents should not be responsible for their children, but in the absence of a clear conceptual apparatus in Russian legislation in the sphere of child-parent relations, an unclear causal connection between non-fulfillment of parental duties, which is expressed in (what?) And the ensuing consequences, creates an unlimited room for imagination in the application of such laws and cultivates Ryazan, Vladimir, Kemerovo and other spontaneous laws.
And then, by the will of the young deputy, everything was brilliantly simple: he fined the parent - and, like in a fairy tale, crumbled, turned into dust the drug cartels, drug propaganda in the media, in advertising, in movies and on TV, on the Internet, in pop culture, pseudo-prophylactic anti-drug programs of various NGOs and other large-scale impact. A path has finally been found and the enemy is designated. And this enemy is the parent. Atu it!
For selected child - 30 thousand from parent
And the Federation Council went even further: 4 December 2013 at the Parliamentary hearings on the topic: “The demographic development of the regions: the social aspect. Strengthening parents' responsibility for the maintenance and upbringing of children ”it was announced that senators drafted amendments to the Family Code, according to which it was proposed to deprive parents or guardians of rights to a child for insulting, ridiculing, harassing or intimidating children.
At the same time, Senator Valentina Petrenko, in her speech, noted the high degree of danger of “mental abuse of children”, although she nevertheless suggested thinking over “who and how can assess the degree of mental abuse”.
A member of the Social Policy Committee Valery Aksakov stressed that the draft law “more fully discloses the notion of child abuse and introduces a differentiation of punishment in the Article 156 of the Criminal Code (failure to fulfill the obligations of raising a minor) according to the severity of the offense, as well as depending on the subject of the crime (parents, teachers). ”
Valery Ryazansky, Chairman of the Social Policy Committee of the Social Policy, said that 80% of children in orphanages are orphans with living parents, and in order to create additional guarantees for children to receive money from parents who have been deprived of parental rights, they will be obliged to pay for the maintenance of their child. monthly 20-30 thousand rubles. http://vz.ru/news/2013/12/4/662728.html
And correctly, it should be easy to take away the child: he said that the parent had ridiculed the child - and he is yours. And in the "ill-treatment" of the notorious 156 Art. insert "mental abuse". But to select a child is half the battle, to embed it in the scheme of economic feasibility, when there would be a profit from his stay in an orphanage until the moment of transfer to the hands of a new owner, this is the main task. So he must be profitable. And the key to this is parental alimony to the state. And which parent can pay 20 thousands? That's right, rich. So, now the period of "dispossession", the removal of children from the parents of the wealthy?
Valery Ryazansky is sure: in this case, the “whip method” should be - money spent by the state on providing children from dysfunctional families should automatically become a parent debt, for which poor parents can either go to work and pay most of their salaries or leave housing .
It turns out that under the gun now and the rich and the poor. The target group does not change, but simply expands.
What we assumed.
Fifteen thousand each
Also in the State Duma a member of the State Duma Committee on Public Associations and Religious Organizations, LDPR deputy Vitaly Zolochevsky December 5 2013, introduced Bill N 401490-6 “On Amendments to the Family Code of the Russian Federation”, which stipulates that children of divorced parents will be able to receive 15 thousand rubles monthly.
At the same time, the state will pay them only if mom or dad “maliciously” evade paying alimony, and those parents who are not hiding will pay the entire fixed amount, which will not depend on the parent's real salary, but it can increase by decision of the state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in accordance with the standard of living and other coefficients that are adopted in this constituent entity. This, according to the author, "will testify to the implementation by the state of the function of social protection of this category of citizens." asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/%28SpravkaNew%29?OpenAgent&RN=401490-6&02
Social protection of citizens through their strangulation? Alimony, exceeding the minimum wage three times?
An honest father will have to lay down his bones in any other city except Moscow so that from his average salary in 12-15-20 (and somewhere in the outback 6-10) thousands per month to give 15 thousand to a child and still keep his living and to create a new family.
Again the parent is to blame for the fact that the constitutional social function of the state is not being fulfilled? Is it that the family is not supported in any way? That everyone with her only wants to get something, nothing but a thrill before punitive arbitrariness of guardianship, without giving in exchange? And she is also told that she died long ago?
Or maybe start with parental allowances for a child - at least the same 15 thousand per person per month for a family, and raise them in accordance with "the standard of living and other coefficients" - maybe the family would become stronger, and alimony would not be needed ?
Or is it all quite simple: cynically hiding behind the kids, in this way we lath our budget, drained of anti-crisis measures to support banks and a new kind of “business” - inexhaustible and uncontrollable corruption?
Together with the child and give the house
The Human Rights Council (HRC) has not remained aloof from tearing the family apart. In the framework of the President’s order to improve the Law on Additional Guarantees for Social Support for Orphaned Children, its members suggested that parents deprived of parental rights, whose children are in an orphanage or boarding school, be evicted from their living space in special dormitories, which executive bodies will have to organize or build over the next five years. Like, it will help protect housing from destruction. http://izvestia.ru/news/561417
And the city authorities even worked ahead of the curve: 30 of October 2013 was announced that the Moscow Government decided to prepare and submit to the State Duma a draft of relevant amendments to the current legislation: the head of the Moscow Department of Social Security, Vladimir Petrosyan, believes that with this measure “you can provide children with housing at the expense of their careless parents. " http://komissy.ru/main/?p=3530
It should not be forgotten that in the capital already without 2009, the Regulation on the interaction between the executive authorities of the city of Moscow and the local governments of the inner-city municipalities in the city of Moscow to resolve the issue of using the housing stock of the city of Moscow with the deprivation of parents of parents rights in the application of part 2 of the article 91 of the Housing Code of the Russian Federation ”, which prescribes, in parallel with the package of documents, the deprivation of parental rights in the same three days ulation package of documents on the deprivation of parental social housing. http://www.norm-load.ru/SNiP/Data1/57/57154/index.htm
After a child is taken away from him instead of his legal social housing, a citizen is either not given anything at all or allocated as much as six meters of living space, and his former housing is improved by the living conditions of other families; the child sent to the orphanage, sometime later, probably, will also be given something.
And if a citizen is not an asocial element, but does he have children and a nice large apartment in the center? No abuse will occur? Nobody, on the far-fetched grounds, will deprive a child and will not take shelter? Right? Can you believe?
The housing code of this very 91 article is not just because: according to it, housing can and should be selected. And about the Constitution while no one remembers. And the truth is, to look into it is only to get confused: not a single law corresponds to it, and by definition the state is legal. Complete schizophrenia is obtained ....
So all the same our children - abroad?
According to VTsIOM, 64% of Russians support a ban on the adoption of Russian children by foreign citizens. Regional legislators are trying to restore common sense and morality to lawmaking: 3 December 2013 The Council of People's Deputies of the Kemerovo Region submitted a bill to the State Duma prohibiting the adoption of Russian children by foreigners, except for cases of transferring children for adoption to relatives regardless of their citizenship or place of residence.
In July 2012, the Kemerovo deputies already provoked the anger of Moscow: the chairman of the State Duma Committee on the Family, Elena Mizulina, in response to the regional law “On protecting the rights and interests of orphans and children left without parental care, when adopted by US citizens and stateless permanently residing in the United States "declared the actions of the Kemerovo deputies" unscrupulous, criminal, anti-patriotic, and proclaimed that the regional law could be challenged and repealed, and Kemerovskaya was quick to make prosecutor's office. However, as early as December 2012, the State Duma adopted the “law of Dima Yakovlev” prohibiting, inter alia, the American adoption of our orphans.
And 4 December 2013, the speaker of the Federation Council V.I. Matvienko, talking about the results of the official visit of the delegation to Sweden, announced that the adoption of Russian orphans to Sweden, terminated after the adoption of the law prohibiting the adoption of Russian children in countries where same-sex marriages are legal, can be resumed after the signing of a bilateral agreement regulating the adoption procedure. www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1741083.html
By the way, in Sweden, the procedure of “reshuffling” is allowed, that is, the transfer of an orphan as a thing to an infinite number of “parents”.
How can we understand the ordinary citizen, where is the truth after all: if there is a law, is it necessary to implement it? If necessary, then why, given the current ban on the adoption of Russian orphans, we will still give them to Sweden, a country with perverted cohabitation? So, it is possible under the existing law to simply say: “And we will,” and thus cancel it?
Why? Just "because"?
But at the same time, we definitely do not sell anyone!
According to the recently authorized rhetoric of the Child Rights Ombudsman P. Astakhov, 643 757 are orphans in Russia, and the mechanism of their appearance is as follows: “The guardianship bodies have a stereotype that the state shouldn’t mess up with the parents, the state will raise children. Recently, we have a tendency when the guardianship bodies more and more deprived the parents of their parental rights. At one point, the figure reached a critical threshold in 100 for thousands of disenfranchised parents per year. And these adults usually have two, three or four children. And every year a whole army of children appeared who were seized by a court. ” http://izvestia.ru/news/561677
Back in 2011, the Prosecutor General’s Office revealed more than three thousand violations of the law by the guardianship and custody agencies. http://rg.ru/2011/06/14/opeka-anons.html And where can thousands of children taken away from 643 parents even in such a big country as Russia? Correctly, abroad.
According to P. Astakhov, “about a third of children do not take root in foster families, there are Internet exchanges with 25-30 thousand children”, a quarter of all people in the United States.
You need to understand what a “child appearing on the Internet exchange” is a product that is put up for auction.
And nothing was invented here: 5 December 2013. The Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee for the North-West Federal District issued a statement that a criminal case was opened into trafficking in the United States: illegal exchanges were created on the Yahoo and Facebook Internet resources, which carried out illegal transactions in relation to children, including 26 Russian children, adopted by US citizens, who were also subjected to sexual exploitation. http://sledcom.ru/actual/367706/
Pavel Astakhov is categorical: “I can responsibly declare that in Russia there are no“ child brokers ”selling children, and never will be!”.
May be so. But up to that time they were. The situation, you know, has. And the sale of children can have hidden forms.
In addition, according to Pavel Alekseevich himself, now in Russia, the adoptive parent receives an allowance for each adopted child from the state: “In Moscow 21-22 thousand rubles per month, plus seasonal allowances, plus in-kind, in the Vladimir region - 6 -6,5 thousand rubles, in Krasnodar - 20 thousand rubles.
This, of course, is cheaper than 60-200 thousand rubles per month for the maintenance of one child in an orphanage. But this is incomparably more expensive than state assistance to a specific family with children. Maybe in this scenario, something is mixed up?
So why do we still intend to give up our orphans?
20 Thousands of Russian parents are now queuing for the adoption of a child - will we ignore this fact?
And is it not worthwhile to pay attention also to other countries, with allowed sodomite unions, where we suddenly decided to give our children, despite the 20 thousandth queues of Russian adoptive parents and the prohibitive law?
Road to nowhere
Each of the phenomena described, as links of a chain, eventually closes into an indissoluble link.
So, the legislators create special laws, with non-prescribed key concepts and undisclosed cause-and-effect relationships, allowing, if necessary, to operate with them in the manner of a "gadget": "Watch your hands."
In parallel with this, frontal informational campaigns on the topic of the epidemic of domestic violence and the protection of children from cruel treatment are carried out in the country.
The guardianship and trusteeship bodies create a new dominant of their activities: instead of long-term assistance and support, operational control and radical sanctions against the family.
In social services, plans are made “to work with the family,” the criteria for which each service creates its own.
Representatives of social services use their monopolistic right to take a child from their parents to reduce work with the family: the family is weak / guilty / disliked - they took the child - reported on the measures taken to save the child from abuse - made a new plan.
After the child is selected and a court decision is taken, information about him goes to the federal data bank, to the site, then three refusals of Russian adoptive parents are issued for him according to a certain scheme and the foreign “family” comes to meet him, who often leaves the child immediately.
Is it possible to stop this scheme with only one statement of one person, even if it is a “very big boss”?
After all, the conveyor is not interrupted: both chambers of the Federal Assembly are vying with each other to write laws that reinforce the powerlessness of parents and create new economic strangulation. After that, the stream of orphans will not be interrupted. And as before, new agreements are being prepared on the transfer of Russian orphans to other countries.
Our country is sick. Demographic collapse - this is one of the diagnoses. The country has very few people for its expanses. And even less - children. But the country does not strengthen its tissues, destroys families and gives its neighbors the greatest value - their children. This is the road to nowhere.
Everybody knows it. Only a lazy one has not said this yet. But the path has not changed a millimeter.
We are still following the trail into the darkness of non-existence, encouraging ourselves with cries that now everything will be fine.
Will be. There will certainly be. Someone will definitely be fine. The only question is to whom.
We will cancel the parents, destroy the family and sell the children. And we end up as a people, as a country, as a civilization.
And this point is already close. Only one turn left. If no one stops us.
It seems that the world in its madness no longer has a chance to stop: in England, the Essex County social services forcibly subjected a pregnant woman (by the way, an Italian citizen who arrived on a business trip) to a caesarean section and took her child.
All her fault was that at some point she had a feeling of fear that, in principle, happens to pregnant women quite often, and she called the police, who, referring to the condition of “panic attack” diagnosed in her, delivered her in a psychiatric hospital. And there her child was withdrawn (in the most direct sense). And now she, surrounded by lawyers, is suing for custody of her own baby.
Prior to this incident, we had heard only about the practice of taking away a child right in the delivery room of “unworthy mothers” in Germany and Finland, but there it was about babies who were already born naturally. And in order to wrest it from the maternal bosom - such fascism has not yet been practiced.
The West is showing us a picture of global dehumanization, but it would be suicidal to calm down by the fact that we have a different path. Alas, this is not entirely true. The other way is our desire. But in reality, we are only just one step behind. And we have a whole detachment of guides, who are vigilantly watching that we do not stray from the intended course. To go to the next.
Someone does not believe? Evidence around - do not count.
Punish parents to beat drug addiction
Here, for example, 2 December 2013, the State Duma received a bill N 398424-6 "On amending the article 5.35 of the Administrative Offenses Code of the Russian Federation to strengthen the responsibility for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment by minors of content duties by parents or other legal representatives. upbringing, education, protection of the rights and interests of minors ", providing for an increase in fines for non-performance by parents or other legal representatives of minors annostey for their maintenance and education.
He was introduced to the State Duma by a member of the Committee on Family, Women and Children MP LDPR deputy Irina Chirkova, who believes that the increase in fines four times will allow parents to begin "educate children in the spirit of moral and legal norms."
The explanatory note states: “More and more often children are attached to the use of alcohol and drugs, the number of children who do not receive education is increasing, the number of homeless and homeless children is not decreasing. There is a need to improve the effectiveness of the rules on the responsibility of parents and other specified persons. ”
Nobody says that parents should not be responsible for their children, but in the absence of a clear conceptual apparatus in Russian legislation in the sphere of child-parent relations, an unclear causal connection between non-fulfillment of parental duties, which is expressed in (what?) And the ensuing consequences, creates an unlimited room for imagination in the application of such laws and cultivates Ryazan, Vladimir, Kemerovo and other spontaneous laws.
And then, by the will of the young deputy, everything was brilliantly simple: he fined the parent - and, like in a fairy tale, crumbled, turned into dust the drug cartels, drug propaganda in the media, in advertising, in movies and on TV, on the Internet, in pop culture, pseudo-prophylactic anti-drug programs of various NGOs and other large-scale impact. A path has finally been found and the enemy is designated. And this enemy is the parent. Atu it!
For selected child - 30 thousand from parent
And the Federation Council went even further: 4 December 2013 at the Parliamentary hearings on the topic: “The demographic development of the regions: the social aspect. Strengthening parents' responsibility for the maintenance and upbringing of children ”it was announced that senators drafted amendments to the Family Code, according to which it was proposed to deprive parents or guardians of rights to a child for insulting, ridiculing, harassing or intimidating children.
At the same time, Senator Valentina Petrenko, in her speech, noted the high degree of danger of “mental abuse of children”, although she nevertheless suggested thinking over “who and how can assess the degree of mental abuse”.
A member of the Social Policy Committee Valery Aksakov stressed that the draft law “more fully discloses the notion of child abuse and introduces a differentiation of punishment in the Article 156 of the Criminal Code (failure to fulfill the obligations of raising a minor) according to the severity of the offense, as well as depending on the subject of the crime (parents, teachers). ”
Valery Ryazansky, Chairman of the Social Policy Committee of the Social Policy, said that 80% of children in orphanages are orphans with living parents, and in order to create additional guarantees for children to receive money from parents who have been deprived of parental rights, they will be obliged to pay for the maintenance of their child. monthly 20-30 thousand rubles. http://vz.ru/news/2013/12/4/662728.html
And correctly, it should be easy to take away the child: he said that the parent had ridiculed the child - and he is yours. And in the "ill-treatment" of the notorious 156 Art. insert "mental abuse". But to select a child is half the battle, to embed it in the scheme of economic feasibility, when there would be a profit from his stay in an orphanage until the moment of transfer to the hands of a new owner, this is the main task. So he must be profitable. And the key to this is parental alimony to the state. And which parent can pay 20 thousands? That's right, rich. So, now the period of "dispossession", the removal of children from the parents of the wealthy?
Valery Ryazansky is sure: in this case, the “whip method” should be - money spent by the state on providing children from dysfunctional families should automatically become a parent debt, for which poor parents can either go to work and pay most of their salaries or leave housing .
It turns out that under the gun now and the rich and the poor. The target group does not change, but simply expands.
What we assumed.
Fifteen thousand each
Also in the State Duma a member of the State Duma Committee on Public Associations and Religious Organizations, LDPR deputy Vitaly Zolochevsky December 5 2013, introduced Bill N 401490-6 “On Amendments to the Family Code of the Russian Federation”, which stipulates that children of divorced parents will be able to receive 15 thousand rubles monthly.
At the same time, the state will pay them only if mom or dad “maliciously” evade paying alimony, and those parents who are not hiding will pay the entire fixed amount, which will not depend on the parent's real salary, but it can increase by decision of the state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in accordance with the standard of living and other coefficients that are adopted in this constituent entity. This, according to the author, "will testify to the implementation by the state of the function of social protection of this category of citizens." asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/%28SpravkaNew%29?OpenAgent&RN=401490-6&02
Social protection of citizens through their strangulation? Alimony, exceeding the minimum wage three times?
An honest father will have to lay down his bones in any other city except Moscow so that from his average salary in 12-15-20 (and somewhere in the outback 6-10) thousands per month to give 15 thousand to a child and still keep his living and to create a new family.
Again the parent is to blame for the fact that the constitutional social function of the state is not being fulfilled? Is it that the family is not supported in any way? That everyone with her only wants to get something, nothing but a thrill before punitive arbitrariness of guardianship, without giving in exchange? And she is also told that she died long ago?
Or maybe start with parental allowances for a child - at least the same 15 thousand per person per month for a family, and raise them in accordance with "the standard of living and other coefficients" - maybe the family would become stronger, and alimony would not be needed ?
Or is it all quite simple: cynically hiding behind the kids, in this way we lath our budget, drained of anti-crisis measures to support banks and a new kind of “business” - inexhaustible and uncontrollable corruption?
Together with the child and give the house
The Human Rights Council (HRC) has not remained aloof from tearing the family apart. In the framework of the President’s order to improve the Law on Additional Guarantees for Social Support for Orphaned Children, its members suggested that parents deprived of parental rights, whose children are in an orphanage or boarding school, be evicted from their living space in special dormitories, which executive bodies will have to organize or build over the next five years. Like, it will help protect housing from destruction. http://izvestia.ru/news/561417
And the city authorities even worked ahead of the curve: 30 of October 2013 was announced that the Moscow Government decided to prepare and submit to the State Duma a draft of relevant amendments to the current legislation: the head of the Moscow Department of Social Security, Vladimir Petrosyan, believes that with this measure “you can provide children with housing at the expense of their careless parents. " http://komissy.ru/main/?p=3530
It should not be forgotten that in the capital already without 2009, the Regulation on the interaction between the executive authorities of the city of Moscow and the local governments of the inner-city municipalities in the city of Moscow to resolve the issue of using the housing stock of the city of Moscow with the deprivation of parents of parents rights in the application of part 2 of the article 91 of the Housing Code of the Russian Federation ”, which prescribes, in parallel with the package of documents, the deprivation of parental rights in the same three days ulation package of documents on the deprivation of parental social housing. http://www.norm-load.ru/SNiP/Data1/57/57154/index.htm
After a child is taken away from him instead of his legal social housing, a citizen is either not given anything at all or allocated as much as six meters of living space, and his former housing is improved by the living conditions of other families; the child sent to the orphanage, sometime later, probably, will also be given something.
And if a citizen is not an asocial element, but does he have children and a nice large apartment in the center? No abuse will occur? Nobody, on the far-fetched grounds, will deprive a child and will not take shelter? Right? Can you believe?
The housing code of this very 91 article is not just because: according to it, housing can and should be selected. And about the Constitution while no one remembers. And the truth is, to look into it is only to get confused: not a single law corresponds to it, and by definition the state is legal. Complete schizophrenia is obtained ....
So all the same our children - abroad?
According to VTsIOM, 64% of Russians support a ban on the adoption of Russian children by foreign citizens. Regional legislators are trying to restore common sense and morality to lawmaking: 3 December 2013 The Council of People's Deputies of the Kemerovo Region submitted a bill to the State Duma prohibiting the adoption of Russian children by foreigners, except for cases of transferring children for adoption to relatives regardless of their citizenship or place of residence.
In July 2012, the Kemerovo deputies already provoked the anger of Moscow: the chairman of the State Duma Committee on the Family, Elena Mizulina, in response to the regional law “On protecting the rights and interests of orphans and children left without parental care, when adopted by US citizens and stateless permanently residing in the United States "declared the actions of the Kemerovo deputies" unscrupulous, criminal, anti-patriotic, and proclaimed that the regional law could be challenged and repealed, and Kemerovskaya was quick to make prosecutor's office. However, as early as December 2012, the State Duma adopted the “law of Dima Yakovlev” prohibiting, inter alia, the American adoption of our orphans.
And 4 December 2013, the speaker of the Federation Council V.I. Matvienko, talking about the results of the official visit of the delegation to Sweden, announced that the adoption of Russian orphans to Sweden, terminated after the adoption of the law prohibiting the adoption of Russian children in countries where same-sex marriages are legal, can be resumed after the signing of a bilateral agreement regulating the adoption procedure. www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1741083.html
By the way, in Sweden, the procedure of “reshuffling” is allowed, that is, the transfer of an orphan as a thing to an infinite number of “parents”.
How can we understand the ordinary citizen, where is the truth after all: if there is a law, is it necessary to implement it? If necessary, then why, given the current ban on the adoption of Russian orphans, we will still give them to Sweden, a country with perverted cohabitation? So, it is possible under the existing law to simply say: “And we will,” and thus cancel it?
Why? Just "because"?
But at the same time, we definitely do not sell anyone!
According to the recently authorized rhetoric of the Child Rights Ombudsman P. Astakhov, 643 757 are orphans in Russia, and the mechanism of their appearance is as follows: “The guardianship bodies have a stereotype that the state shouldn’t mess up with the parents, the state will raise children. Recently, we have a tendency when the guardianship bodies more and more deprived the parents of their parental rights. At one point, the figure reached a critical threshold in 100 for thousands of disenfranchised parents per year. And these adults usually have two, three or four children. And every year a whole army of children appeared who were seized by a court. ” http://izvestia.ru/news/561677
Back in 2011, the Prosecutor General’s Office revealed more than three thousand violations of the law by the guardianship and custody agencies. http://rg.ru/2011/06/14/opeka-anons.html And where can thousands of children taken away from 643 parents even in such a big country as Russia? Correctly, abroad.
According to P. Astakhov, “about a third of children do not take root in foster families, there are Internet exchanges with 25-30 thousand children”, a quarter of all people in the United States.
You need to understand what a “child appearing on the Internet exchange” is a product that is put up for auction.
And nothing was invented here: 5 December 2013. The Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee for the North-West Federal District issued a statement that a criminal case was opened into trafficking in the United States: illegal exchanges were created on the Yahoo and Facebook Internet resources, which carried out illegal transactions in relation to children, including 26 Russian children, adopted by US citizens, who were also subjected to sexual exploitation. http://sledcom.ru/actual/367706/
Pavel Astakhov is categorical: “I can responsibly declare that in Russia there are no“ child brokers ”selling children, and never will be!”.
May be so. But up to that time they were. The situation, you know, has. And the sale of children can have hidden forms.
In addition, according to Pavel Alekseevich himself, now in Russia, the adoptive parent receives an allowance for each adopted child from the state: “In Moscow 21-22 thousand rubles per month, plus seasonal allowances, plus in-kind, in the Vladimir region - 6 -6,5 thousand rubles, in Krasnodar - 20 thousand rubles.
This, of course, is cheaper than 60-200 thousand rubles per month for the maintenance of one child in an orphanage. But this is incomparably more expensive than state assistance to a specific family with children. Maybe in this scenario, something is mixed up?
So why do we still intend to give up our orphans?
20 Thousands of Russian parents are now queuing for the adoption of a child - will we ignore this fact?
And is it not worthwhile to pay attention also to other countries, with allowed sodomite unions, where we suddenly decided to give our children, despite the 20 thousandth queues of Russian adoptive parents and the prohibitive law?
Road to nowhere
Each of the phenomena described, as links of a chain, eventually closes into an indissoluble link.
So, the legislators create special laws, with non-prescribed key concepts and undisclosed cause-and-effect relationships, allowing, if necessary, to operate with them in the manner of a "gadget": "Watch your hands."
In parallel with this, frontal informational campaigns on the topic of the epidemic of domestic violence and the protection of children from cruel treatment are carried out in the country.
The guardianship and trusteeship bodies create a new dominant of their activities: instead of long-term assistance and support, operational control and radical sanctions against the family.
In social services, plans are made “to work with the family,” the criteria for which each service creates its own.
Representatives of social services use their monopolistic right to take a child from their parents to reduce work with the family: the family is weak / guilty / disliked - they took the child - reported on the measures taken to save the child from abuse - made a new plan.
After the child is selected and a court decision is taken, information about him goes to the federal data bank, to the site, then three refusals of Russian adoptive parents are issued for him according to a certain scheme and the foreign “family” comes to meet him, who often leaves the child immediately.
Is it possible to stop this scheme with only one statement of one person, even if it is a “very big boss”?
After all, the conveyor is not interrupted: both chambers of the Federal Assembly are vying with each other to write laws that reinforce the powerlessness of parents and create new economic strangulation. After that, the stream of orphans will not be interrupted. And as before, new agreements are being prepared on the transfer of Russian orphans to other countries.
Our country is sick. Demographic collapse - this is one of the diagnoses. The country has very few people for its expanses. And even less - children. But the country does not strengthen its tissues, destroys families and gives its neighbors the greatest value - their children. This is the road to nowhere.
Everybody knows it. Only a lazy one has not said this yet. But the path has not changed a millimeter.
We are still following the trail into the darkness of non-existence, encouraging ourselves with cries that now everything will be fine.
Will be. There will certainly be. Someone will definitely be fine. The only question is to whom.
We will cancel the parents, destroy the family and sell the children. And we end up as a people, as a country, as a civilization.
And this point is already close. Only one turn left. If no one stops us.
Information