Military Review

Libya went to life according to Sharia

60
Libya went to life according to Sharia

More than two years have passed since the NATO bloc and its Arab allies conducted a military operation to destroy the regime of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. The war was declared by Washington, Paris, London and the League of Arab States as "humanitarian intervention" in the interests of the civilians of the Libyan state. However, the establishment of "democracy" did not lead to the triumph of democratic and humanitarian values, but to the victory of overt banditry, archaic tribal relations and Islamism. So, Libya, despite the protests of the West, decided to go to Sharia norms. As many experts predicted, the victory of the “Arab spring” inevitably leads to the Islamization of the countries of North Africa, the return of archaic relations. Only the dictatorship, the authoritarian regime, can preserve the secularism of the state in the Near and Middle East. In particular, in Egypt, the secularism of the country so far retains only the army. Moreover, it cannot stop the process of de-Christianization of the country.


On Tuesday, the Libyan parliament - the General National Congress - voted to make Sharia the basis of the country's legislation and the "basis of the activities of the institutions of government at all levels."

Sharia is a combination of legal, canonically traditional, moral, ethical and religious norms of Islam (from Arabic. “The right way”). Now all new laws must comply with Sharia law, and the old ones will be tested for compliance with Islamic norms. For this, a special committee will be created. The provisions of criminal and financial law will also be formed on the basis of Sharia. Thus, loans in Libya can become interest-free, as the Sharia forbids usury.

To say that the transition to the Sharia of Libya, which is actually ruined into a number of state formations and autonomous tribal territories, turned out to be a surprise, it is impossible. Thus, almost immediately after the assassination of Gaddafi, at the ceremony of the abolition of the Libyan Jamahiriya, the head of the Transitional National Council, Mustafa Abdel Jalil, said that the Islamic state of Libya would accept Sharia as the main source of legislation. At the same time, the head of the Transitional National Council promised that the new authorities would adhere to “moderate Islam” and defeat the radical Islamists.

However, in a country of "moderate Islam", Islamist movements have flourished to this day. Libya became the center of supply weapons to neighboring countries, to Syria, where the struggle of the legitimate authorities and gangs continues. Libya is also the largest supplier of "cannon fodder" - militants. The rampant unemployment, the presence of a significant mass of young men with combat experience, and the free distribution of radical ideas created an excellent ground for the mercenary market and the “ideological” jihadists. Ethnic and racial cleansing (persecution of blacks), the massacres of Gaddafi’s supporters, the facts of atrocities and torture in prisons have not only remained unpunished, but even not really investigated.

Naturally, in the European Union such news caused concern. The European Parliament's rapporteur on Libya, Anna Gomez, believes that “the introduction of Sharia law is not based on a democratic decision-making process.” Gomez stressed that Libya must adhere to generally accepted norms, respect human rights. Sharia is a matter of concern, as it contains norms that oppress women's rights and are clearly contrary to human rights. EU authorities have warned that they have learned from the “Arab Spring” and will refrain from supporting the government, which violates international obligations, in particular with regard to respect for the rights of prisoners of war and the rights of women.

Some Sharia norms that contributed to the construction of a fair society were also implemented by Gaddafi. So, when it banned usury, introduced zyakat - an additional tax in favor of the poor. At the same time, Gaddafi was against the idea of ​​the caliphate, since the people should not expose the neck to the yoke of the power of the caliph, who concentrated spiritual power in his hands.

In general, the Islamic inclination of the authorities, who are replacing the “Arab spring” with authoritarian, but secular regimes, should not be surprising. The secular regimes in the Middle East, including the regime of Saddam Hussein that fell in 2003, were oriented towards the USSR (before its fall), the countries of Western Europe and the USA. They carried out modernization in society, tribal relations and the most archaic norms, including religious ones, gradually faded into the past. It was necessary for several generations for the population of the region to move to a different stage of development. The same processes were going on in the Libyan Jamahiriya. There was a growth in the literacy of the population, its education, the urban population grew, the secular intelligentsia, tribal relations were destroyed. However, the violent destruction of secular regimes brought the region back to the past, archaization became the main trend in public life.

Secular intellectuals, Westernized youth, liberal-democratic movements that, together with the Islamists (and at first they often represented an insignificant element of the revolutionary movement), overthrew the “bloody regimes” and paved the way for the jihadists. Dictators were kept in the yoke of radical Islamists, they were deep underground. In the future, the Islamists received complete domination or occupied important positions.

Western ideology cannot resist Islam. The bulk of the population, the same poor people, the peasantry in Egypt, are guided by Islam. Islamists are available to answer basic questions: "Who is to blame" and "What to do." In this regard, we can recall the experience of the February 1917 revolution in Russia. Autocracy was destroyed by liberal-Masonic circles, aristocrats, generals, bankers, industrialists and intellectuals focused on Western values. However, they could not hold power in their hands, since their values ​​and concepts did not correspond to the basic values ​​of the traditional, patriarchal Russian population (peasantry). The Russian radicals - the Bolsheviks - seized control in their hands, having received the support of the majority. Although before the February Revolution they were a marginal group that had no chance of success.

We see a similar picture in the Near and Middle East, westernized groups of people became the main driving force of the revolution in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. However, they can not give a holistic program of development of the country, to solve internal problems. As a result, Islamists intercept the power, or get such strong positions that they have to be considered. The Islamic political forces are supported by the population not only because Islam is the traditional religion of the region, but also because of a certain “leftism”. Islamists declare the values ​​of a just society (socialism), a fair distribution, from rich to poor, help for the sick, disadvantaged and orphans, free social benefits and so on. With such a strong foundation, the Islamists are winning up. At least, at first, as long as their cases do not prove otherwise.

In addition, all Islamist movements are representatives of the global "Islamic project". This project is an alternative to Western. With a reasonable approach, which, by the way, Gaddafi applied, the Libyan leader was able to make a successful synthesis of Islam and socialism (Libyan Jamahiriya), the Islamic project could unite a significant part of the Muslim world, at least its Arab part. Creation of the Arab (Islamic) confederation, union could solve a lot of problems. In particular, Gaddafi began to form such a union in Africa, but this was one of the reasons for his death. Both Western countries opposed him, as his project violated their monopoly power in Africa, and the Arab monarchies, which have their own project of consolidating the Arab world, but more archaic, not meeting the interests of ordinary people.

The Islamic Project, which is usually represented as a bearded Mujahid with the Kalashnikov in his hands, has three versions:

- Koranic type, aimed at restoring justice in society. A similar society built Gaddafi. This is a synthesis of Islam and socialism, a society of social justice, where the interests of the majority of the population are respected. When a leader like Stalin appears, the Arab-Muslim world can unite, at least from North Africa to the borders of Afghanistan and Pakistan. This will allow the union: to have nuclear weapons (available from Pakistan and Iran’s developments), solving the security problem; huge reserves of hydrocarbons and other natural resources with reasonable use will create the basis for an industrial breakthrough; the rejection of individual armies in each country and the creation of a unified armed forces will save huge amounts of money; the presence of a large population will provide an opportunity to create a large domestic market; the introduction of a single monetary unit on the basis of gold will give financial independence, etc. Such a union would solve a lot of internal problems, turn now running wild, degrading territories into flowering areas. However, such a union is a threat to the Western project, so all its shoots are ruthlessly destroyed;

- the union of the non-slave type, where the “elite” lives in luxury, killing time for hedonism, and the bulk of the population is “two-legged tools”. This is a project of Saudi Arabia and its allies - the Arab monarchies of the Persian Gulf. The Gulf Cooperation Council is at the core of this project. The GCC has a common currency project, a single armed forces. Perhaps the appearance of its nuclear weapons soon (with the help of Pakistan). Riyadh already has the Royal Saudi Strategic Missile Forces. The Arab "oil elite" has built a very unfair society. Sheikhs bathe in luxury, “indigenous Arabs” mostly sit back, the main work is done by migrant workers from other countries. Saudi Arabia is a model of a consumer, parasitic state, exploiting natural resources, migrant labor, indifferent to the problem of building a society of creation and cognition. Moreover, it is dominated by a branch of radical Islam, which considers all other directions to be “unclean”. Saudi Arabia, with the participation of other monarchies, is one of the main sponsors of jihadist organizations and cells around the world. The Anglo-Saxons and the Saudis spawned the "collective Hitler" - the network movements of the radical Islamists who initiated the transformation of the Middle East into the main front of the global war. This war, according to its creators, should deliver deadly blows to old Europe, Russia, India and China;

- The third scenario is a victory of the past, an involution. Huge areas of Eurasia will be turned into Somalia, Afghanistan or Yemen (where 75-90% of the population are drug addicts who sit on a cat). This is the victory of the “bearded mojahed with a gun”. Rollback to the past, the archaization of a significant part of humanity. The sharp decline in the population due to a sharp drop in the level of education, health care, constant slaughter between clans, tribes, different religious groups for water, land, sources of income, etc.

I must say that the draft Arab monarchies (Arab or World Caliphate) will eventually lead to the implementation of the third scenario. The masters of the Western project count on this. The Saudis will be defeated, and new areas will collapse into inferno.

Currently, Libya is rapidly moving towards the complete victory of the third scenario. If Bashar Assad suffers a defeat, the same fate awaits the secular yet Syrian Arab Republic, and there is no hope for the moderation of the leaders of various gangs. The massacre of non-believers, rollback to medievalism and savage cruelty, permission to rape "unfaithful" women, destruction of the country's infrastructure, famine, lack of essential goods, the flight of hundreds of thousands of people into lands not controlled by official Damascus have now become the norm of life.
Author:
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 6 December 2013 07: 40 New
    18
    Democracy is the direct path to Sharia! It is time to introduce Sharia standards throughout Europe. Sharia is success and prosperity and the most that there is no democracy. Allah is akbarlaughing
    1. nycsson
      nycsson 6 December 2013 08: 14 New
      +4
      A sharp decline in the population due to a sharp drop in the level of education, health care, the constant massacre between clans, tribes, various religious groups for water, land, sources of income, etc.
      Good morning everyone. Do not forget that population reduction is the main goal. And by what methods this will be achieved - this is not important for them. The planet is then swallowed utterly.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 6 December 2013 08: 21 New
        +1
        Quote: nycsson
        Good morning everyone

        And you do not get sick wink
        1. nycsson
          nycsson 6 December 2013 08: 55 New
          +2
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          And you do not get sick

          Romanov! Stop smoking! Change the picture! wink
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 6 December 2013 09: 10 New
            +3
            Quote: nycsson
            Romanov! Stop smoking!

            You forgot to put a minus wink
            1. nycsson
              nycsson 6 December 2013 09: 30 New
              -3
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              You forgot to put a minus

              Right! Less to you for the picture! tongue
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 6 December 2013 09: 43 New
                0
                Quote: nycsson
                Less to you for the picture!

                Well done! But I spit tongue return wink
                1. nycsson
                  nycsson 6 December 2013 11: 14 New
                  -1
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  But I spit

                  Romanov! Change the picture! You have it immoral. Man lights a cigar from the dollar! Probably this has a deep meaning that I don’t understand. We need to promote a healthy lifestyle.
                  1. Alexander Romanov
                    Alexander Romanov 6 December 2013 11: 24 New
                    +5
                    Quote: nycsson
                    She is immoral with you.

                    Burning dollars for you is sacrilege?
                    Quote: nycsson
                    We need to promote a healthy lifestyle.

                    Putin with dumbbells will go?
                    1. Onyx
                      Onyx 6 December 2013 11: 28 New
                      +3
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      Putin with dumbbells will go?

                      laughing decided to troll a little nixon?
                      I did not find pictures with dumbbells, but there is one smile
                      1. nycsson
                        nycsson 6 December 2013 11: 34 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Onyx
                        I did not find pictures with dumbbells, but there is one

                        Nothing too...... smile
                    2. nycsson
                      nycsson 6 December 2013 11: 32 New
                      +1
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      Burning dollars for you is sacrilege?

                      You could say that.
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      Putin with dumbbells will go?

                      Quite! Better in a kimono.
                      1. Alexander Romanov
                        Alexander Romanov 6 December 2013 11: 36 New
                        +1
                        Quote: nycsson
                        Quite! Better in a kimono.

                        Yes, I do not like him request
      2. Mitek
        Mitek 6 December 2013 10: 04 New
        +1
        Quote: nycsson
        A sharp decline in the population due to a sharp drop in the level of education, health care, the constant massacre between clans, tribes, various religious groups for water, land, sources of income, etc.
        Good morning everyone. Do not forget that population reduction is the main goal. And by what methods this will be achieved - this is not important for them. The planet is then swallowed utterly.

        Minus. Take a look at all these Orthodox garbage dumps. They breed there like cockroaches! There is no education, they cannot plan a family, Alaal forbids them to protect themselves ...
    2. Very old
      Very old 6 December 2013 10: 06 New
      +2
      There are two misfortunes in "tanned" Paris: tolerance and ... The capital of all French colonies
    3. Sandov
      Sandov 6 December 2013 11: 24 New
      +3
      Democracy is the direct path to Sharia! It is time to introduce Sharia standards throughout Europe. Sharia is success and prosperity and the most that there is no democracy. Allah is akbar

      On Tuesday, the Libyan parliament - the General National Congress - voted to make Sharia the basis of the country's legislation and the "basis of the activities of the institutions of government at all levels."

      Under Gaddafi, the country developed successfully, after the intervention of the West, the Middle Ages came. Congratulations on this success to all Western and pro-Western liberalists.
      1. Deniska
        Deniska 6 December 2013 14: 28 New
        0
        And to them .... pokershek your congratulations ((They achieved what they wanted.
    4. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 6 December 2013 12: 13 New
      +2
      I don’t know how you guys are, but I believe in a Higher Power that rules the world.

      If politicians and everyone who has a direct or indirect influence on world processes are not wise and make the wrong decision, then there will be a reward for them.

      Dinosaurs once also hosted the planet, but they were gone in an instant, and everyone heard about Atlantis, it seems to me that the world should be looked at from a different perspective, some leaders who imagined themselves masters of the universe, being fleas on one dog called Earth think about things like cause and effect.
      1. iConst
        iConst 6 December 2013 12: 22 New
        +2
        Quote: Max_Bauder
        Dinosaurs once also hosted the planet, but they were gone in an instant, and everyone heard about Atlantis

        Well, dinosaurs did not know what they were doing - they just lived.
        But with Atlantis - a very good example! Only this power will not separate the "bad" from the "good"!

        The hostess does not sort bacteria - there are also useful ones. Herax bleach - and spotlessly clean.

        And then - do not blame others. Irresponsibility - doing nothing - will be even worse. This is passive complicity.

        "I just stood on the line" in court will not give a ride - they will still give you a term. laughing
        1. Deniska
          Deniska 6 December 2013 14: 30 New
          +1
          Well, dinosaurs did not know what they were doing - they just lived.


          By the way, they also lived according to Sharia. And also not protected laughing
        2. Max_Bauder
          Max_Bauder 6 December 2013 15: 23 New
          0
          Agree

          everyone will be pumped, they won’t ask smile

          need to unite, Hitler won collectively drinks

          and about dinosaurs, I mean that everything changes, you’re the boss, tomorrow there will be others, and the Sharia also has its place, somewhere between the future and the past
    5. dark_65
      dark_65 6 December 2013 23: 15 New
      0
      What does democracy have to do with it? animal instincts (hereinafter referred to as simply highly developed animals, eg) will always prevail over conditional habits.
      You can consider me .... at will (nevermind).
      But people living in difficult conditions return to their original conditions much faster. Europeans are a little longer.
      there is no democracy here. there is no Sharia, there is a body free. with unlimited possibility of action (fear is unknown) .. well, you’ll get it.
  2. predator.3
    predator.3 6 December 2013 08: 00 New
    +3
    How the process is warming up! Only in the opposite direction: Socialism under Gaddafi - anarchy and Sharia - feudalism and slavery - primitive communal ... and palm !
    1. nycsson
      nycsson 6 December 2013 08: 15 New
      +1
      Quote: predator.3
      primitive communal -... and on the palm tree!

      Right. On a palm tree, resources are not needed!
    2. hohryakov066
      hohryakov066 6 December 2013 10: 29 New
      +5
      And all together - on a palm tree!
  3. makarov
    makarov 6 December 2013 08: 14 New
    +2
    Let them eat their fill of "freedom", so that there would be something to compare, and then you see, the layers will give out on the mountain their Arabian Chegevara, or Chavez ...
    1. Deniska
      Deniska 6 December 2013 14: 32 New
      0
      The fact is that whoever "thinks" will never live. and those who will finish the meal - they themselves set the table ...
  4. hecn61
    hecn61 6 December 2013 08: 49 New
    +1
    And in front of slavery!
  5. albatross
    albatross 6 December 2013 08: 54 New
    +3
    - The third scenario is a victory of the past, involution. Huge areas of Eurasia will be turned into Somalia, Afghanistan or Yemen (where 75-90% of the population are drug addicts who are sitting on a kat). This is the victory of the "bearded mujahideen with a gun."

    Libyans are probably in shock. Gasoline was 14 cents, now an order of magnitude higher. Someone needs such Islam if they help him come to power.
    We’ll choke and grief with such Islam.
    1. Deniska
      Deniska 6 December 2013 14: 34 New
      0
      Hard video! In my opinion, you don’t have to upload this.
      1. Same lech
        Same lech 6 December 2013 15: 01 New
        +4
        There is still tougher, in my opinion it is necessary to lay out such a thing - so that the people know what the Shariah is for him.
      2. predator.3
        predator.3 6 December 2013 20: 35 New
        0
        Quote: Deniska
        Hard video! In my opinion, do not spread this

        Somewhere there was infa that in Libya, the participants in this mockery are slowly being caught and destroyed!
  6. Keeper
    Keeper 6 December 2013 09: 12 New
    +2
    So I wonder if the "Shariat" regime corresponds to the democratic canons for which the invasion was made ?!
    And, if no matches are found (of course) then who is obliged to answer for the "error" ????
    Anger is not enough ....
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 6 December 2013 09: 21 New
      +5
      Quote: Keeper
      So I wonder if the "Shariat" regime corresponds to the democratic canons,

      Of course, Sharia is the basis of modern democracy. He appeared on TV with a cross-fired hi
      1. iConst
        iConst 6 December 2013 11: 49 New
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Appeared on TV with a cross-fired

        There is fear - the fear of annoying insolent "guests" once again.

        Imagine, a "druzhban" comes to your home - and starts pumping rights - why are socks drying in the bathroom - I hate to wash my hands to go ...

        And what should be the answer? laughing
    2. Jager
      Jager 6 December 2013 19: 05 New
      0
      There was no "mistake". The result of the "Arab Spring" is the destruction of the state and its dropping to the level of specific principalities with elements of a slave system, terror and genocide. This was what the West needed, now it has become much easier and less costly to pump out resources.
  7. vlad0
    vlad0 6 December 2013 09: 18 New
    0
    In general, nothing new and surprising. Such a scenario was supposed 2,5 years ago. Now, if a secular or democratic regime were established there, we would be surprised here!
    The well-fed Libyan people chose their own destiny for their inaction and infantility.
  8. alexxxxx
    alexxxxx 6 December 2013 09: 22 New
    0
    America sees Tyranny in everything and brings "Democracy" to these countries
  9. ZU-23
    ZU-23 6 December 2013 09: 28 New
    +3
    There are no words, there was a country and there is no country, that is what an uneducated and poor people mean, hanging noodles and giving a couple of bucks for a coup is very easy. We are now looking at Ukraine whether the former Soviet education will be able to survive, because today's education is clearly European.
  10. Semurg
    Semurg 6 December 2013 10: 18 New
    +2
    According to Sharia, Iran, Afghanistan, the CA and a number of Gulf countries live, and the situation is different everywhere. Sharia is a set of laws and rules, and how to apply it depends on the people. Western law is based on Roman law, Muslim law is based on Sharia. Muslim judicial legislation is neither bad nor good; it is not other western (based on Roman law). Russians often write that they are not part of the West and Eurasian civilization, the same Muslims (in particular Arabs) believe that they are not part of the West but a separate civilization with its enforceable practice different from Western (this is neither good nor bad, it's different). And all the noise raised against Sharia in the West is simply due to the fact that the Arabs and others do not want to live according to the imposed laws of the West.
  11. BARKAS
    BARKAS 6 December 2013 10: 33 New
    +2
    European Parliamentary Rapporteur on Libya Anna Gomez believes that "the introduction of Sharia is not based on a democratic decision-making process."

    Strange, where are the calls to bomb the country again?
  12. iConst
    iConst 6 December 2013 11: 40 New
    +3
    I’ll say a blasphemous thing: the leaders in Geyrop and even NATO are either bought or intimidated by some pro-Islamic power.

    Otherwise, how can one explain - Yugoslavia-Kosovo, migration, gay bacchanalia, etc. crap. Simultaneous weakening of one side and strengthening of the other.

    Let’s go, take a pill for paranoia ... laughing
    1. iConst
      iConst 6 December 2013 11: 51 New
      0
      Quote: iConst
      Let’s go, take a pill for paranoia ...

      A glass is better, but early ... laughing
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  13. Russ69
    Russ69 6 December 2013 12: 32 New
    +4
    As they say; "whatever they do in Russia, it turns out a Kalash." Now, we can rephrase; "Whichever America crap, it turns out Al-Qaeda."
    1. iConst
      iConst 6 December 2013 12: 43 New
      0
      Quote: Russ69
      "Whichever America crap, it turns out Al-Qaeda."

      And where the hell are you, Bin Laden? (be it wrong!) laughing
    2. The comment was deleted.
  14. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 6 December 2013 15: 23 New
    0
    <<< So, Libya, despite the protests of the West, decided to switch to Sharia norms. As many experts predicted, the victory of the "Arab Spring" will inevitably lead to the Islamization of the countries of North Africa, the return of archaic relations. >>>
    Self-confident Western puppeteers with their crap-democratization have done in front of the whole world: the "Dolls" have used them, and now they felt their power and SEND ....... their puppeteers!
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. Same lech
    Same lech 6 December 2013 15: 48 New
    0
    [media = http: /youtu.be/d7ZtqK5THmU/]

    In Syria, another alla I'm in the bar.
  17. Black
    Black 6 December 2013 15: 56 New
    0
    Quote: Semurg
    According to Sharia, Iran, Afghanistan, the CA and a number of Gulf countries live, and the situation is different everywhere. Sharia is a set of laws and rules, and how to apply it depends on the people.


    This is where the "dog" lies, which is buried.
    Everything depends on the mufti, who has seized the position of "father of the nation".
    Therefore, democracy based on the principles of Roman law is a disgusting thing, but no one has come up with a better idea.
    1. Semurg
      Semurg 6 December 2013 19: 02 New
      +2
      Quote: Chen


      This is where the "dog" lies, which is buried.
      Everything depends on the mufti, who has seized the position of "father of the nation".
      Therefore, democracy based on the principles of Roman law is a disgusting thing, but no one has come up with a better idea.

      in general, the mufti is a Muslim priest, and the judge is a qadi (it may not matter to you, but that's more accurate). Kadi, like a judge in Roman law, makes his decisions on the basis of the investigation and testimony (and both the qadi and the judge in the west can get caught and make unfair judgments) At the expense of a fair system built only on Roman law (as I understand you mean democracy) is far from being the ultimate truth, but a quote from an apologist for "Western democracy", which everyone repeats without realizing that several different systems are developing on earth. And if today "Roman law" dominates, this does not mean that it is the best, it is supported and pushed by the countries of "Western democracies" for their own domination and imposing their own vision of the world order.
      1. Sandov
        Sandov 7 December 2013 21: 25 New
        0
        Quote: Semurg
        actually the mufti is a Muslim pop, and the judge is qadi

        The younger was reading the Koran. Therefore, these concepts are known. By the way, there are a lot of good positive thoughts expressed in the Koran. Why did Muslims stop honoring the Koran? Americans bred like suckers apparently.
  18. Stinger
    Stinger 6 December 2013 16: 02 New
    +2
    Nothing new. All previous "democracies", beginning with the ancients, led to decline and then to dictatorship. As the German general told Stirlitz: the more we get freedom, the sooner we want the Fuhrer and the SS.
  19. cayman gene
    cayman gene 6 December 2013 16: 02 New
    0
    the author has only one remark. Libya does not move towards the victory of the third scenario, but already quite personifies it.
  20. EdwardTich68
    EdwardTich68 6 December 2013 16: 50 New
    +2
    In the situation in which Libya found itself, it has no other choice but sharia. This is a natural world order from ancient times in which there is order.
  21. FormerMariman
    FormerMariman 6 December 2013 18: 59 New
    +2
    Quote: EdwardTich68
    In the situation in which Libya found itself, it has no other choice but sharia. This is a natural world order from ancient times in which there is order.

    100%! In the country, anarchy and sharia is a natural development of events!
  22. Turkestan
    Turkestan 6 December 2013 20: 40 New
    0
    How to stop the chaos that is now in LIVIA? WHAT TO DO? There is a bloody massacre in the country. Not one political, elite, economic structure can not restore order there. If Sharia law can stop this massacre in this country, then these laws MUST be introduced. No matter how the international community applies to these laws. There is NO other way out. The Libyan state for many years knocked out FRIENDS from potassium EVOLUTIONS of world democratic secular development.
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 6 December 2013 23: 03 New
      0
      I do not agree with such an interpretation, this is what happens, it means that your country is plunged into lawlessness, then with a sweet smile they say to you, let's establish Sharia for your order.
      Well, chop off the heads of half the country is okay -BAT WILL BE ORDER heh heh SHARIAT.
      1. EdwardTich68
        EdwardTich68 6 December 2013 23: 25 New
        +1
        You do not understand that besides Islam, there is no longer any other idea; without Sharia, they all face death.
        1. Same lech
          Same lech 7 December 2013 01: 20 New
          0
          without sharia, they all face death


          I don’t believe in these tales about Sharia.
          It is up to the Libyans to put on their own loop (sharia) for themselves.
        2. FormerMariman
          FormerMariman 7 December 2013 16: 45 New
          0
          I agree! Shariah is the norms of morality, law and behavior of the faithful, everything is spelled out in it for all occasions (how to get divorced, bury, borrow, pay off debt, judge property crimes and against the person, etc.) And if the Shariah stops this massacre then god! BUT IN SHARIAS IT IS NOT SPELLED HOW TO KEEP THE INTEGRITY OF THE STATE!
  23. samoletil18
    samoletil18 6 December 2013 21: 44 New
    0
    Slightly, maybe off topic. When they killed Gaddafi, my son and I were in Egypt. The feeling was not pleasant when it was behind the next fence. Arabs walk side by side. They then said that they had a revolution because they needed Putin, only Egyptian. Tunisians started the "Arab Spring" under the slogan "We want it like in Libya." Something their desires lead to troubles.
  24. George
    George 6 December 2013 22: 40 New
    0
    Naturally, such news in the European Union caused concern.

    Strange, everything went wrong according to their scenario?
    It seems they should be satisfied - "democracy" has triumphed.
  25. KG_patriot_last
    KG_patriot_last 6 December 2013 22: 44 New
    -1
    They will live under the Shariah all over the world soon, except for the islets in SE. Asia, South America and V. Europe ...
    A certain percentage of the population at all times had difficulties with intelligence. And now the population is growing ... And this relatively young religion is fueled by oil, the strength of which is also due to the triumph of democracy and the retreat of other religions / philosophies.
  26. Free Island
    Free Island 7 December 2013 11: 24 New
    +1
    Iraq collapsed as a result of democratization
    , Libya fell apart, in the late 90s, Chechnya almost fell apart into teip and tribal formations .. BUT DULL WAS BROWNED, WHICH HARVES AT EUROMAIDAN, WATER AREA AND OTHER RALLATIONS THIS DOES NOT SEE THIS! THE CROWD OF THESE IMBICYCLES CONTINUES WANTED FOR DEMOCRACY, WESTERN CHIPS AND GAYROPEAN VALUES. BLINDS.
    1. Sandov
      Sandov 7 December 2013 21: 29 New
      0
      Quote: Free Island
      Iraq collapsed as a result of democratization
      , Libya fell apart, in the late 90s, Chechnya almost fell apart into teip and tribal formations .. BUT DULL WAS BROWNED, WHICH HARVES AT EUROMAIDAN, WATER AREA AND OTHER RALLATIONS THIS DOES NOT SEE THIS! THE CROWD OF THESE IMBICYCLES CONTINUES WANTED FOR DEMOCRACY, WESTERN CHIPS AND GAYROPEAN VALUES. BLINDS.

      Puppeteers rule however. When the guys from Israel say that there is no conspiracy, I can see it clearly by the results of this mess.
  27. Alex_Popovson
    Alex_Popovson 7 December 2013 19: 52 New
    0
    Libya fell apart in the late 90s

    However, practice has shown that Gaddafi kept a bunch of tribes in check. And those tribes are worse than other bandits.
    Chechnya almost fell apart into teip and tribal formations

    Taki fell apart. The truth is Comrade. Putin proved himself cunningly (though not in relation to us, ordinary Russians). He just bought some Czechs, on condition that others calm down. Here they played 2 cards at once - and the shit of the next campaign was not allowed, and even no peace is supported (although there is no way to wander around the mountains as a tourist, there are still shaitans from the First).
  28. iConst
    iConst 7 December 2013 22: 02 New
    +1
    Yes, God be with her, with Syria. You need to plow your garden ...