Samara motorized infantry got new armored personnel carriers

13
The vehicles arrived on December 4 and are destined for the 23 Brigade, which is deployed in the village of Kryazh.
This is the last modification - BTR-82AM. They were made in the Nizhny Novgorod region at the Arzamas machine-building plant. The first prototypes appeared in the 2009 year. In essence, the BTR-82AM is a deep modernization of the BTR-80, created by 30 years ago.
The new armored personnel carriers are equipped with a more powerful engine in 300 horsepower, modern weapons, a sight, a dashboard. The driver and passengers are protected by an inner layer of Kevlar armor. The current batch of vehicles from the 31-th machine - not the last. Until the spring, 130 of new armored personnel carriers will be added to the military unit.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    6 December 2013 06: 23
    The main thing is new!
    1. +5
      6 December 2013 06: 31
      These APCs come not only to this brigade, then how many of them are purchased, if only 160 pieces are here belay
    2. +2
      6 December 2013 06: 32
      Why abandoned the BTR-90? What was wrong with him?
      1. Volkhov
        -2
        6 December 2013 06: 36
        It must be done, and these - to repair from the old.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          6 December 2013 06: 50
          And what is there to do? The base is the same, the only difference from the 82nd tower
          1. Volkhov
            +2
            6 December 2013 06: 52
            You are mistaken - it is twice as heavy and everything else is in it.
            1. 0
              6 December 2013 07: 17
              Quote: Volkhov
              You are mistaken - it is twice as heavy and everything else is in it.

              Well, not in two, but 5 tons, the 500 engine is strong, everything else is essentially the same.
          2. 0
            6 December 2013 15: 40
            BTR-90 is equipped with an automatic hydromechanical reverse gearbox, independent suspension of all-wheel drive with all-wheel drive. Armor, compared with the BTR-80, was significantly strengthened. Significantly improved mine protection, in particular, the bottom of the machine has a V-shape - more resistant to shock waves than a traditional flat.
            Armament stationed in the fighting compartment is stabilized in two planes. This allows you to fire in motion over rough terrain. Despite the fact that the BTR-90 is heavier and larger in comparison with the BTR-80, it is much more maneuverable than its predecessors. So, the car can turn on the spot - this is possible due to the rotation of the wheels of different sides in opposite directions (like a tank).
            The machine is equipped with an on-board information management system (CIUS).
            Significantly increased firepower. Basic armament consists of:
            Automatic 30-mm gun 2A42 (500 shots)
            AGS-17 automatic grenade launcher (400 shots)
            7,62-mm PKT machine gun (2000 rounds)
            ATGM Competition-M (four ATGMs)
        3. +3
          6 December 2013 06: 51
          these are new armored personnel carriers.
        4. 0
          6 December 2013 18: 46
          Quote: Volkhov
          It must be done, and these - to repair from the old.


          Correctly say. Do you know how much money you can really cut, repairing old equipment?
      2. +1
        6 December 2013 06: 52
        Rostock had a bunch of childhood illnesses, there is no mine protection and some minor flaws.
        1. 0
          6 December 2013 11: 08
          and 80 have mine protection?
      3. 0
        6 December 2013 07: 46
        Failure to comply with modern requirements - poor mine protection and lack of landing through the ramp.
      4. The comment was deleted.
    3. Onyx
      -1
      6 December 2013 08: 55
      Quote: Civil
      The main thing is new!

      Rather, modernized eighties
      1. +1
        6 December 2013 10: 34
        I meant that they were made at the factory, and not the modernization of the old ones that were already available.
    4. 0
      6 December 2013 10: 53
      we are talking about the latest modification - BTR-82AM


      How I love the writing fraternity - although what difference does it make to them if they add an extra letter winked
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    6 December 2013 06: 40
    BTR-82 video

  5. +3
    6 December 2013 06: 53
    APCs APCs, but what I look forward to is the new BMP and TBMP.
    let's see what they will give us an armata with kurgan and boomerang.
    1. 0
      6 December 2013 10: 56
      let's see what they will give us an armata with kurgan and boomerang.


      Well, well - especially with Boomerang sad not well, they will bring the car to the end (maybe) - they will live on it and this will be the final chord
  6. +2
    6 December 2013 06: 55
    Well, the article says that it’s not from repair, but built at the Arzamas plant. So I don’t see any reason for pessimism, but you look at what kind of equipment (in the sense of armored personnel carriers armed with the USA and NATO, I would like to compare the performance characteristics. So, considering not single deliveries, after all, we are talking about modernization of the RF NE. And this is very good!
  7. 0
    6 December 2013 08: 00
    Quote: kartalovkolya
    Well, the article says that it’s not from repair, but built at the Arzamas plant. So I don’t see any reason for pessimism, but you look at what kind of equipment (in the sense of armored personnel carriers armed with the USA and NATO, I would like to compare the performance characteristics. So, considering not single deliveries, after all, we are talking about modernization of the RF NE. And this is very good!

    hard to compare with NATO. It seems like there requirements for the APC are slightly different
  8. Boot under the carpet
    0
    6 December 2013 08: 16
    Quote: just EXPL
    Rostock had a bunch of childhood illnesses, there is no mine protection and some minor flaws.

    У Sprout! Learn your native language !!!

    Amazed by the number of armored personnel carriers in the party !!! Keep it up!
    1. +2
      6 December 2013 08: 39
      I’m ringing, I didn’t put the stress in the wrong direction, I didn’t read Rostock, but Rostock, why xs, I don’t know.
    2. +2
      6 December 2013 09: 08
      Maybe he is named after the German city. Then everything is correct. )))
  9. +3
    6 December 2013 08: 54
    It's not all about the latest developments. No one argues - it's good when they are. But the Germans did not have new tanks, and they captured all of Europe on the T-II and T-III. And Field Marshal Rommel drove the British across North Africa with the same old stuff. The main ability to fight and competent "fathers" of commanders. Motivation and professionalism. And on such wonderful armored personnel carriers you can rip out the spine of any reptile. Well, the weapons are now all remotely controlled. This is +. good
    1. +1
      6 December 2013 09: 40
      BTR 82AM has an inhabited tower, if I’m not mistaken. On the video there is a piece with a twist.
      Rostock had a new module, remotely controlled. And to be honest, I prefer the interesting platform "Krymsk"
  10. Ahmed Osmanov
    0
    6 December 2013 09: 54
    Fine! Once I saw a new armored personnel carrier - I was driving around the city, I was probably driving from a special operation laughing
  11. 0
    6 December 2013 09: 55
    Btr is good, well, I think it would be better for motorized rifles to have military vehicles based on old decommissioned tanks. Armor is stronger and cheaper + in bulk
    1. 0
      6 December 2013 10: 31
      Well, yes, they especially have a close resource and cost of operation. ) Although I agree on one thing, a certain number of similar TBTR would not hurt. Only new ones.
      1. 0
        6 December 2013 10: 42
        Everyone knows that the resource of wheeled combat equipment is higher than that of a tracked one, and there will be less operating costs. And one should not forget that the armored personnel carrier is a taxi to the battlefield, faster and safer delivery of soldiers to the battlefield, and some of them support.
    2. +1
      6 December 2013 10: 35
      They plan this, there will be TBMP on the platform of Almaty.
  12. soldier's grandson
    0
    6 December 2013 10: 51
    the main thing is not to stand idle
  13. -2
    6 December 2013 13: 53
    I understand that armored personnel carriers are much cheaper than tanks, planes and ships, because they can produce so many, but one suspicion pops up that a lot of military equipment is produced that is mainly intended for infantry fighting. Is it possible that a quantity of armored personnel carriers and right in the center of the Volga region is justified in the fight against the population? Light armored vehicles, not tanks and aircraft, are first of all put forward by popular unrest.
    Or maybe they are preparing for battles with the Islamists, about which Musin speaks so much.
    1. Volkhov
      0
      6 December 2013 18: 58
      Look at the coloring of the party - for the semi-desert (Syria, Iran) - apparently the second echelon, the first in Abkhazia and Ossetia.
  14. kelevra
    0
    12 December 2013 17: 30
    Not bad, not bad!!!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"