Military Review

Video recording of the flight of the Russian drone Eleron-3SV appeared on the Internet (video)

18



A video of one of the first flights of the Russian UAV “Eleron-3CB” appeared on the Internet.

Record distributed channel RT.

Earlier it was reported that the Ministry of Defense and the Kazan enterprise “Enix” signed an agreement worth more than 100 million rubles for the supply of 34 reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicles of close range.

The price of “Aileron-3SV” is about five times lower than the analogs of foreign development - Zastava complexes, which are produced in Russia under the contract concluded in 2010 between OPK Oboronprom and Israel Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.

UAV "Eleron-3SV" - a special reconnaissance vehicle of short range.

The development is adapted for the installation of a removable modular payload: a camera, a thermal imager in a hydro-stabilized mechanism, a video camera with a 10-fold increase in a hydro-stabilized mechanism, a thermal imager with a low-level camera and other payload.

The maximum take-off weight of the device is 5,3 kilogram, the payload mass is up to one kilogram, this drone can reach speeds up to 130 kilometers per hour and is capable of rising to heights up to 4 thousand meters.
Originator:
http://www.vz.ru/news/2013/12/4/662800.html
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Alex 241
    Alex 241 5 December 2013 06: 21
    +6
    UAV "Eleron-3SV" is a special short-range reconnaissance vehicle. The UAV is adapted for the installation of a replaceable modular payload: - a television 10-fold camera in a three-coordinate gyro-stabilized gimbal; - thermal imaging camera 640X520 (Pal) in a gyro-stabilized three-coordinate suspension; - cameras. The glider is sealed. The navigation and flight system is assembled on the latest element base, which made it possible to radically expand its capabilities. Fully updated software. The UAV's payload and climb rate have been increased. Acoustically invisible. Technical data
    Range of flight speeds, km / h 70-130
    Range of flight heights, m 50-5000
    Flight Duration, 2.0 hour
    Flight modes
    Target tracking
    Manual
    Radio command
    Pass over point
    Flying around the point
    Autonomous
    Automatic with the ability to switch to manual
    Auto Return
    Automatic landing
    Fire adjustment
    Powerplant electric motor
    Take-off Weight, kg 4.3
    Wing span, m 1470
    The length of the fuselage, m 635
    The diameter of the fuselage, m -
    Start-up time, min. 10
    Launch method T23P rubber-harness catapult type T27P pneumatic catapult
    Parachute landing method
    Application temperature range, degrees from -30 to +40
    Special load
    Video camera with 10x zoom in 3-axis gyrostabilized suspension
    IR emitter
    Weather balloon
    Dumpable container
    Relay and jamming system
    TV + IR cameras combined in a single three-coordinate gyro-stabilized suspension
    Thermal imager 320X240 in a three-axis gyrostabilized suspension
    The thermal imager with pseudo-colors 640X520 (Pal) in a 3-axis gyrostabilized suspension
    Digital camera
    1. fisherman
      fisherman 5 December 2013 06: 41
      +1
      Flight Duration, 2.0 hour


      Fire adjustment


      there will be enough time for at least one "object", with the action of a motorized rifle subunit in an attack (in the battalion zone), most likely, too

      amusing thing
      1. avg
        avg 5 December 2013 08: 59
        +1
        My friend, your post from a tactical point of view is a "hydrostabilized mechanism" from a technical point of view. The fact that you do not know that the battalion is not assigned a "band" and are confused with the "object" is quite excusable, but the "motorized rifle subunit in the attack" is already too much. request
        1. fisherman
          fisherman 5 December 2013 09: 28
          0
          For the battalion, the band is not assigned (as you said) because of the size :)

          those. the number is too small, you correctly noted, and the word "object" was not casually put in quotation marks, implying the task not of a motorized rifle battalion, but rather a special

          I can't say anything about the "hydrostabilized mechanisms", but what surprised you about "actions in attack"?

          my assumptions about the possible effectiveness of this flying thing?
          1. fisherman
            fisherman 5 December 2013 21: 57
            0
            heh, cool I bent, my head was tearing, carefully re-read myself and laughed :)

            "... on the offensive"

            an attack, then it would be more correct:
            "in case of a surprise attack", i.e. completely different conditions

            you need to not only convey the meaning, but also try to make the right words into the correct phrases :)

            it's me to myself, though, here are full of competent specialists who will always correct

            The same concept of "strip", which is so convenient in meaning (and for armies or fronts it is also correct), must be replaced with a more correct one: - "width of the area of ​​operations" or even: "area of ​​the area of ​​intended actions", so it is more correct for a battalion

            "Live and learn, and die a fool :)
    2. Civil
      Civil 5 December 2013 06: 41
      0
      And what's new in it has long been released ...
    3. w.ebdo.g
      w.ebdo.g 5 December 2013 13: 54
      +1
      as an engineer, I don’t understand why the average model (UAV), together with control control, costs about 3,5 million rubles (~ $ 130) ???
      even taking into account the increased security of communications and the use of domestic element base, it is impossible to make a kit more expensive than a cruiser car or a land driver ...
      according to average estimates, given the costs of R&D (copying what has already been developed abroad), the development of a glider, the creation of registration and communication equipment - it turns out no more than $ 40 (000 million rubles). The fact is that no R&D leaves the lion's share in the development of models. And with a small amount of production, the cost of one unit is high. But, with the quantity of 1 pieces, we have a total development cost of 34 million rubles !!!
      On average, copying the performance characteristics of foreign equipment for engineers of the Soviet school at this level requires 3 to 9 months of work, while a team of no more than 30 people is involved (the task is below average complexity)
      Engineer's salary does not exceed 40000 rubles * 30 people = 1200000 rubles. * 9 months (deadline !!!) = 10800000 rubles.
      R&D spent no more than 11 million rubles.
      glider cost + starting equipment = 60 rubles.
      the cost of the control unit (remote control) = 100 000 rubles. (no more)
      the cost of intelligence equipment (computer, camera, infrared, secure transmitter) = 100 rubles.
      total 1 unit of product ready for use costs no more than 260 rubles.
      add here the profit of the enterprise in the amount of 50%: 260 + 130 = 390 thousand rubles. (this is the final cost)
      R&D is simply divided by the number of products 10 million rubles. \ 800 = 000 rubles.
      in total, each product will cost the state (with a 50% profit of the enterprise) at 390 rubles + 000 rubles = 317 rubles.
      the real value of the contract for 34 light UAVs should not exceed 707 rubles. * 000 = 34 rubles.
      that is, only 24 million rubles, not 100, which is 4 times more ...
      the data is more or less accurate. Correct me if something is wrong ...
      equipment for 10 CBs looks more impressive than 3CB
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. alone
        alone 5 December 2013 19: 46
        0
        ordinary tactical blpa for company use
      3. alex86
        alex86 5 December 2013 21: 13
        0
        And if you take into account that the launch of one ENICS target (with 3 cars leaving for the Tula training ground) cost $ 60, and the target is a copy of V-000, then it’s clear that the rollback is 1%. But I am happy for them, because the device is good, and I built their factory. Finally, they gained recognition in this area. Congratulations!
  3. saag
    saag 5 December 2013 06: 34
    +7
    "... in a hydrostabilized mechanism" can it still be in a gyrostabilized one?
  4. makarov
    makarov 5 December 2013 07: 35
    +1
    For its class, the unit is pretty decent. Curious is its cost in mass production, and is it generally provided for ???
    1. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 5 December 2013 09: 09
      0
      agreement worth more than 100 million rubles for the supply of 34 reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicles
  5. VKabanov
    VKabanov 5 December 2013 10: 47
    +1
    Worthy thing! Another thing is that several of these should be in each regiment, and preferably a battalion. The boom is hoping that this is not 34 exclusive samples to all sun. By the way, then the price should be significantly lower.
  6. Dezot
    Dezot 5 December 2013 12: 26
    +1
    A good device for our aircraft. I hope that in the coming years we will close the gap in UAVs.
  7. alex-kon
    alex-kon 5 December 2013 13: 31
    +2
    good It is high time to make up for the lost for 20 years. All the same, we were the first to launch a reusable spacecraft in unmanned mode. And in comparison with it, an airplane is a toy. soldier
  8. Slotxnumx
    Slotxnumx 5 December 2013 17: 45
    0
    To Syria would have him ... for reconnaissance and target designation!
    1. alone
      alone 5 December 2013 19: 47
      0
      Quote: Slot46
      To Syria would have him ... for reconnaissance and target designation!


      In Syria, they are already in bulk. Iranian production. And the militants also have)
  9. Leshka
    Leshka 5 December 2013 19: 14
    0
    cool thing terrorists would be in the Caucasus to catch
  10. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 5 December 2013 20: 57
    +1
    Finally, the case has moved forward. Why buy these devices at the cordon, if our designers can do, at least, not worse. Common sense seems to be returning to the heads of our army customers.
  11. Arkan
    Arkan 7 December 2013 16: 41
    0
    The frames are clear, the optics are not bad.
  12. kelevra
    kelevra 12 December 2013 17: 23
    0
    Still need to create combat drones! This will be a good jerk!