Military Review

Great War of Sovereignty

20
Each country has its own sovereignty. Someone is big, someone is small. As a rule, it depends on the size of the country and its location. And yes, of course, from the presence of minerals. But no country in the world has absolute sovereignty. It limits the entry into various unions (do not care, the Customs Union or European). The sense is in how much the state is independent in making decisions. Limiting the sovereignty of other countries is very beneficial. Think of sovereignty as a constant. For example, we express it by the number - 100. This number cannot increase or decrease - 100 sovereignty at all. And if your sovereignty increases, then for someone it decreases. The world has become global and everything depends on everyone. For example, migrants from country “B” are going to country “A”. There they work, and the money is sent home. And at some point, the share of money of migrants in the budget of the country "B" exceeds 30 percent. It is worth the country "A" to introduce a ban on migrant labor - the country "B" will go bankrupt. But the country "A" can not take and ban migrants from the lantern - they are already built into its infrastructure. But in any case, she will suffer less damage.


There are many levers of influence (from economic and social, to ideological and military). In the Middle Ages, the ruler of a weak principality never made decisions without looking at the ruler of a strong principality. Or even refused sovereignty and became a vassal. So the states appeared. Those who misled "I am the king and no one decreed to me," simply destroyed. Now armed incursions have been replaced by more humane methods of weaning sovereignty — investment, promotion of ideology, economic sanctions, orange revolutions, and so on. Military intervention has become an extreme case. But the United States has proven that this method of limiting sovereignty is too early to be discounted. Now the spin of sovereignty is hidden under the beautiful words "our geopolitical interests." What do countries that do not have military power, but also eager to squeeze a piece of the number of 100? Only methods of terror.

This is the true cause of terrorism. This is a kind of animal grin of a small dog. She pursed her tail and bared her teeth. She has nowhere to retreat before the huge beast hanging over her. But her choice is small - either to bite the teeth, or to whine and try to lick the feet of the one who is approaching her. Today, Russia is such a bear, which stands and looks at how a huge beast bent over a flock of small dogs. He does not kill them, but only waits when their will breaks and they become his vassals. Those who have already sworn allegiance to the monster, bark at the bear and try to jump and bite at least by the finger. Both the bear and the beast understand that they cannot fight each other — both will die. When the beast comes on dogs too, the bear growls. This is the modern world.

Why, you ask, are terrorism carried to us, and not to the beast? Why do dogs, which are crushed by an animal, try to bite a bear? Because 100 is a constant, and the lair of the beast is far away. And, if you do not have strategic bombers to influence the one who takes away your sovereignty, then it remains only to try to squeeze it from those to whom you can reach. Roughly speaking, the strong Petya took the apple from Vasya, and Vasya went to take the apple from the less powerful Gena, and that, in turn, from Alena. And so in a circle. And this situation will not change. If you want a little more freedom, you can only get it by taking someone else away. In this world we live in now. This is the answer to the questions in the comments about who is this unknown customer of terrorism and extremism in Russia, who is trying to destroy the country, is it really insidious State Department, blah blah blah ... Beneficial for many. Some will instill terrorism in our country, others throw mud at everything that is happening in the country and shout that "the whisker is gone!", Others will say, but let's separate the Caucasus, we don't like it. Small dogs in the neighborhood will bark, those who dare - try to slap a finger. And the rats will try to arrange the attacks. So what? We live on. Nearby there is a bison, which, I am absolutely sure, will never betray a bear. And alarmists, cowards and rats have been at all times. Nothing new.

This video, I'm sure, you all saw. But in the light of the above, I think, now evaluate it in a new way:



And we have nonche snow fell. White-white ...
Author:
Originator:
http://hardingush.livejournal.com/127463.html
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 5 December 2013 06: 06
    0
    Everything is too abstruse and the video is left -
    1. Civil
      Civil 5 December 2013 06: 09
      +2
      If Russia is understood as a bear, that is the problem, there is no unity. There is no public consent, including due to the lack of moral standards among the elites.
      1. Denis
        Denis 5 December 2013 06: 24
        +2
        Quote: Civil
        lack of moral standards among the elites
        Why are our military, designers, artists and scientists immoral?
        THEY OF THE ELITE!
        And about whom you thought, Mr. ..., and rare
        1. Kirzhak
          Kirzhak 5 December 2013 06: 34
          +1
          And about whom you thought, Mr. ..., and rare

          I agree with you. They can be called Russians only by their passports and the place of "cutting the dough" And families, real estate and bank accounts have long been all abroad.
        2. Civil
          Civil 5 December 2013 06: 53
          0
          Alas, Denis, who is really an elite, does not have a couple of signs, this is access to the distribution of public goods and state power, then we call the "elite" of outright unprincipled swindlers.
          1. Yuri Y.
            Yuri Y. 5 December 2013 07: 15
            +1
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Everything is too abstruse and the video is left -

            And in general, in my opinion, it contradicts itself. Either the beast forces everyone to jump to its tune, or something like it has nothing to do with it.
            Really insidious State Department, blah blah blah ... Beneficial to many.

            Although it is beneficial to many, but when it comes to actions, they often need to be organized and help with resources.
            1. seller trucks
              seller trucks 5 December 2013 10: 16
              0
              In the Middle Ages, the ruler of a weak principality never made decisions without regard to the ruler of a strong principality.


              this is not all, the ruler also looked back at rich citizens (local oligarchs). Civilizations were lost, cities were dying, the state system was changing, and the power of money, corruption and greed never faded away. In the next branch, Zakhar Prilepin recalls Stalin, more specifically "an old overcoat and worn out boots." After all, there was an IDEA opposed to MONEY, but in the end, base feelings won, sadly.
      2. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 5 December 2013 08: 38
        +2
        Quote: Civil
        including due to the lack of moral standards among the elites.

        And ordinary people, is that really different.
        1. Denis
          Denis 5 December 2013 11: 28
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          And ordinary people, is that really different.
          I want to believe that the other
          A lot of people will steal pensioners, rat children's payments, etc. to change an existing car or apartment for a better one?
      3. Rusich51
        Rusich51 5 December 2013 18: 47
        +1
        Quote: Civil
        If Russia is understood as a bear, that is the problem, there is no unity. There is no public consent, including due to the lack of moral standards among the elites.


        This is not our elite, they keep capital in the west, and they are pumped out of Russia. Ghouls damn it.
    2. makarov
      makarov 5 December 2013 07: 14
      +1
      Perhaps the material was sculpted by some sort of abstractionist ....
      1. alone
        alone 5 December 2013 19: 11
        0
        the strong Petya took the apple from Vasya, and Vasya went to take the apple from the less powerful Gena, and he, in turn, from Alena. And so in a circle. And this situation will not change.


        really the author is Christopher Columbus himself? He is trying to show us what has long been practiced in the world. The strongest survive. Laws of the Jungle.
  2. avant-garde
    avant-garde 5 December 2013 06: 08
    0
    And we have nonche snow fell. White-white ...he melts with us yes, but otherwise it’s clear that all the mess in the world because of resources.
  3. And Us Rat
    And Us Rat 5 December 2013 06: 13
    -3
    Nearby there is a bison, which, I'm absolutely sure, will never betray a bear


    Oh, no matter how the bison turned out to be a crocodile, the ear should always be kept open.
    Trust, but verify - folk wisdom.
    But in general, spit on the article - briefly, clearly and without embellishment.
    1. Denis
      Denis 5 December 2013 06: 20
      +3
      Quote: And Us Rat
      as if a bison was not a crocodile
      Checked that the land by the occupiers, they pretty fertilized
      And the policemen from them, unlike other neighbors, can be counted on the fingers
      So you want to drive a wedge between us?
      1. Civil
        Civil 5 December 2013 06: 55
        +1
        By the way, the author of Kazakhstan saigas forgot!
      2. And Us Rat
        And Us Rat 5 December 2013 07: 28
        +2
        Quote: Denis
        So you want to drive a wedge between us?


        Are you paranoid? I just look at things soberly, there were enough precedents in the past. I sometimes go on vacation in the taiga in the summer, and I want to continue doing this without the need to learn Chinese. No.
        You are looking for enemies where it is convenient for you, and not where it sometimes stands. A world view based on prejudice does not lead to good, because it pushes a person to draw conclusions and act in a way that does not fit into de facto realities. The consequences are sometimes irreparable.
        And the fact that you put a minus on me - you put a minus on your own sanity, I am not your enemy ... but if you continue to persuade me of this ... who will then be to blame? A cat is a well-fed, friendly and phlegmatic animal, but if you constantly kick it, claiming that it is a "witch's offspring" - sooner or later it will grab the kicker with its claws in his ... lo. For neh..th!
        1. Denis
          Denis 5 December 2013 08: 31
          +1
          Quote: And Us Rat
          Do you have paranoia?
          No, I have a certificate of normality laughing
          Quote: And Us Rat
          you put a minus to me
          That is generally kindergarten
          I agree about the cat, and the rest is just words. Where are the facts?
          Although about the Chinese, too, true
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Denis
    Denis 5 December 2013 06: 16
    0
    Too poetic about such disgusting
    In my opinion, terrorism is a movement of fooled idiots. It's about ordinary people. Their spiritual dad will not put on his belt and will not go undermine, but send someone simply.
    And count the money
  6. Sunjar
    Sunjar 5 December 2013 06: 25
    0
    What kind of world we live in primarily depends on the morality of power. If at the head of most states and peoples are scoundrels who think only about their selfish interests, about how to fill their belly, have sex with "elite" prostitutes, acquire as much and better material goods (despite the fact that most of all this they don’t it is necessary), it is not surprising that the author perceives the World precisely from this position. And thoughts imperceptibly penetrated into people's heads, one hundred and this is the goal of all life and true good, much more effective than just coming and taking the "apple", because the effect will be short-lived, but if you change the consciousness of the object on which you have your eyes, then this object itself will gladly bring you everything and will be proud of what a young fellow he is, while leading itself to self-destruction.

    But if moral people are at the helm, then they will have no desire to take anything away from anyone, when everything is in abundance. The problem of modern civilization is that a parasitic worldview is introduced from above into the minds of people, and the thirst for exploitation of some people by others, which leads to crises of various kinds.
    1. Denis
      Denis 5 December 2013 06: 34
      0
      Quote: Sunjar
      depends on the morality of power
      Alas, that sounds like a prostitute's chastity
      Where and when in real, not in the Bible or City of the Sun, history, power was moral?
      There is no time for fat ... At least let not betray, there were sad examples
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Denis
        Denis 5 December 2013 10: 13
        +4
        Quote: Denis
        sad examples
        at least that ...
  7. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 5 December 2013 06: 30
    +2
    from the Don.
    Bison and Bear! Hmm! So simple? Until there is a common state (Belarus, Ukraine, Russia), all this will hang in the air. Dependence on: elites: - mine! Even a year ago, in a conversation with my son, I told him He said that the preservation and development of the country (countries) will be only with the revival of autocracy. He laughed! And now I see more and more stuffing of trial information on this subject.
  8. shpuntik
    shpuntik 5 December 2013 06: 30
    +1
    We live in such a world. This is the answer to questions in the comments about who this unknown customer of terrorism and extremism in Russia is, who is trying to ruin the country, is it really an insidious State Department, blah blah blah ...

    The author of course surprised with allusions. Some kind of adult kindergarten: "... we are bears, bison are nearby, dogs are barking, the caravan is on its way .." lol
    Can bear worms eat from the inside? Do borders mean anything in the modern world? Who raised the Decembrists, who "flunked" the tsar? Four girls and a boy to boot ...
    Yes, really ..., we’ll go far with such an understanding of reality. There are no words, only thoughts.
    Video production, it fits the article. hi
    PS "Hwai came out, Mikhan's style."
  9. svskor80
    svskor80 5 December 2013 06: 37
    0
    "Who is stronger than that and is right" - this rule is carefully veiled by civilization, but it nevertheless often determines the relationship of countries. Well, and "Woe to the Vanquished."
  10. demotivator
    demotivator 5 December 2013 06: 45
    0
    Yes, he piled everything, not immediately and you will understand what this is about. Here is an example of an author with migrants:
    ".... And at some point, the share of migrants' money in the budget of country" B "exceeds 30 percent. As soon as country" A "imposes a ban on migrant labor, country" B "will go bankrupt. But country" A "will not can take and ban migrants from the lantern - they are already built into its infrastructure. "
    And now what, not to resist, but to relax and learn the pleasure of the influx of uninvited guests?
    In order for this sovereignty to really exist, and not on paper or in the minds of individual representatives, a powerful army and navy are needed that are ready to repulse anyone who encroaches on it.
  11. Oskar
    Oskar 5 December 2013 07: 00
    0
    Each country has its own sovereignty. Someone is big, someone is small. This usually depends on the size of the country and its location.
    There are small countries and small nations and at the same time very proud.
  12. Denis
    Denis 5 December 2013 08: 33
    0
    Quote: Denis
    Quote: And Us Rat
    Do you have paranoia?
    No, I have a certificate of normality laughing
    Quote: And Us Rat
    you put a minus to me
    That is generally kindergarten. I do not judge and do not want to be judged
    I agree about the cat, and the rest is just words. Where are the facts?
    Although about the Chinese, too, true