Military Review

In the suburbs deployed regimental set of C-400

41

"Until the end of 2013, the regimental anti-aircraft missile system C-400 will be delivered to the aerospace defense forces, which will be deployed in the Moscow region", - quoted the press service of the Russian Defense Ministry Alexander Vadim Golovko.


The first two C-400 anti-aircraft missile regiments are deployed in Elektrostal and Dmitrov.

Today, C-300PM medium-range anti-aircraft missile systems, Triumph’s C-400 long-range and medium-range long-range medium-range systems and Pantsir-S anti-aircraft missile-cannon systems are among the combat personnel of the East Kazakhstan armies.

“In 2014, the delivery of another C-400 air defense missile system to the aerospace defense forces was scheduled,” said Alexander Golovko, speaking today at the Military Academy of the Aerospace Defense Forces. Marshal Zhukov in Tver.

The commander noted that today air defense brigades have modern automated systems capable of controlling fighter aviation. Golovko also emphasized that the East Kazakhstan region has special hopes for promising S-500 anti-aircraft missile systems, which will be operational by 2017.

“First of all, it should be noted that this system belongs to the new generation of ground-to-air anti-aircraft missile systems and is a universal complex of long-range and high-altitude interception with an increased potential for antimissile defense. Perspective air defense systems can hit not only ballistic, but also aerodynamic targets - airplanes, helicopters, as well as cruise missiles, ”said the commander, describing the future weapons of the East Kazakhstan region.

Recall that the C-400 anti-aircraft missile system, also called Triumph, is capable of striking all modern types of strategic aviation and ballistic missiles. Each installation can simultaneously destroy up to 36 targets, pointing 72 missiles at them. The air defense system detects them at a distance of 600 km. According to Western experts, the C-400 surpasses the American Patriot in many combat characteristics.

The first division, equipped with C-400 complexes, took up combat duty in the Moscow region in August 2007.
Originator:
http://russian.rt.com/
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Airman
    Airman 2 December 2013 12: 02
    +5
    And again, Moscow, as if there was nothing more to cover. Already 2 regiment are on the cover, now it will be the third. And in 2017 they also want to put C-500 on duty near Moscow.
    1. lukke
      lukke 2 December 2013 12: 10
      25
      Yes, everything seems logical - first cover your head, then your knees and elbows. And the human reserve in Moscow and the region is 20% of our entire state. I am not saying that it is right - it is a picture of the day
      1. Airman
        Airman 2 December 2013 16: 43
        0
        Quote: lukke
        Yes, everything seems logical - first cover your head, then your knees and elbows. And the human reserve in Moscow and the region is 20% of our entire state. I am not saying that it is right - it is a picture of the day

        And where is your logic? The enemy must be destroyed at distant approaches. If out of 100 aircraft in a raid on distant approaches, 90 will be destroyed, then the remaining ones will be easily handled. But if there is no one to destroy planes at distant approaches, then in the near air defense zone there simply will not be enough working time to shell ALL TARGETS. According to your logic, 50% of the ground forces should be located around Moscow.
        1. lukke
          lukke 2 December 2013 17: 01
          +3
          maybe comrades in the General Staff proceed from the fact that, first of all, the enemy suppresses air defense systems, and it is easier and faster to suppress them near the borders than in depth ?! As for the Sukhoi troops, maybe in your words, as the history of the Second World War showed, there is some logic too)
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Onyx
          Onyx 2 December 2013 17: 02
          +2
          Quote: Povshnik
          And where is your logic? The enemy must be destroyed at distant approaches. If out of 100 aircraft in a raid on distant approaches, 90 will be destroyed, then the remaining ones will be easily handled. But if there is no one to destroy planes at distant approaches, then in the near air defense zone there simply will not be enough working time to shell ALL TARGETS. According to your logic, 50% of the ground forces should be located around Moscow.

          With regard to aircraft, this is true, but if we talk about ballistic missiles (which the United States may be installing in mines under the guise of anti-ballistic missiles at missile defense facilities in Europe), it turns out differently. The S-400, located at the western borders of Russia, will not be able to reach the missiles flying towards Moscow in height, so it is necessary to put the S-400 in close proximity to probable targets for enemy missiles. Is it logical?
          1. Airman
            Airman 2 December 2013 17: 52
            -1
            Quote: Onyx
            [
            With regard to aircraft, this is true, but if we talk about ballistic missiles (which the United States may be installing in mines under the guise of anti-ballistic missiles at missile defense facilities in Europe), it turns out differently. The S-400, located at the western borders of Russia, will not be able to reach the missiles flying towards Moscow in height, so it is necessary to put the S-400 in close proximity to probable targets for enemy missiles. Is it logical?

            Do not forget about the presence of a missile defense zone around Moscow. The Americans are covering their bases, not Washington.
            1. Nikone
              Nikone 2 December 2013 18: 16
              +1
              And Russia covers the central industrial region and command headquarters.
            2. Onyx
              Onyx 2 December 2013 18: 18
              0
              Quote: Povshnik
              Do not forget about the presence of a missile defense zone around Moscow.

              missile defense area is 100 missiles? This is clearly not enough.
              Quote: Povshnik
              The Americans are covering their bases, not Washington.

              What do the Americans have to do with it? Let them cover what they want
            3. Papakiko
              Papakiko 2 December 2013 18: 50
              +1
              Quote: Povshnik
              Do not forget about the presence of a missile defense zone around Moscow. The Americans are covering their bases, not Washington.

              You forget the most important thing, that we are not going to attack and were not going to, and we will not be going to.
              But the "friends" are only doing this, ATTACK!
              From this and the priorities of missile defense defense. Which in gayrope is a modern "persing", those. disarming first strike weapon.
              And the general hype of "specialists" around the S-400 and S-500 reminds me of this collage:
        4. Jager
          Jager 2 December 2013 18: 32
          +1
          Have you ever seen a map? This is how many regiments are needed to cover all the "distant approaches". Moscow is properly defended - the administrative and command center, the capital, a transport hub, the largest communications center ... And they put it because since the beginning of the 90s Moscow's air defense was practically eliminated, now they are reviving.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Heccrbq.3
            Heccrbq.3 2 December 2013 20: 46
            0
            Who will this largest hub contact with if subscribers are destroyed? And the same questions about your other arguments!
      2. Just Vasilich
        Just Vasilich 2 December 2013 18: 13
        0
        Lukke: yes everything seems to be logical - first cover your head, then your knees and elbows.

        They forgot about the ass, there are a lot of them in Moscow ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. evgenii67
      evgenii67 2 December 2013 12: 11
      +1
      Quote: Povshnik
      And again Moscow

      and then the exclamations "came in large numbers", all for Moscow, why not in Smolensk, for example (the western border of Russia), someone will say there allegedly will cover Belarus, and if it does not cover it, we will fight back in Moscow itself?
      1. lukke
        lukke 2 December 2013 12: 31
        +2
        for a start it is necessary to compare which enterprises and how many in the territory of the Smolensk region and the Moscow region (we do not take the government as a "value"). Not everything can fly from the West direction.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Boris55
        Boris55 2 December 2013 12: 42
        +2
        Quote: evgenii67
        why not in Smolensk, for example

        C-400 even from Red Square perfectly covers Smolensk.

        "The S-400 air defense system provides the ability to build an echeloned defense of ground targets against a massive air attack. The system provides destruction of targets flying at speeds up to 4 800 m / s at a distance to 400 km. at altitudes up to 30 km. In this case, the minimum range of the complex is only 2 km., And the minimum height of the target is only 5 m.
        For example, American complexes Patriot unable to destroy targets flying below 60 m. "

        Excerpt from: http://topwar.ru/5071-sovremennye-sistemy-pvo-s-400-chast-1.html
      4. Airman
        Airman 2 December 2013 12: 59
        +2
        Quote: evgenii67
        Quote: Povshnik
        And again Moscow

        and then the exclamations "came in large numbers", all for Moscow, why not in Smolensk, for example (the western border of Russia), someone will say there allegedly will cover Belarus, and if it does not cover it, we will fight back in Moscow itself?

        To locate such a "long-range" complex as the S-400 in Elektrostal and Dmitrov is like placing them in one position. It is normal if the distance between divisions is 1/4 of the far edge of the affected area.
      5. tirazu
        tirazu 2 December 2013 14: 27
        +1
        About 19 million people, or about 13% of the total population of Russia, live in Moscow and its environs, although there is no doubt that all major cities and strategic facilities need cover from Western partners and friends.
        1. Onyx
          Onyx 2 December 2013 14: 46
          +6
          Quote: tirazu
          About 19 million people or about 13% of the total population of Russia live in Moscow and its environs.

          You just need to understand that the cover with new complexes in the first place of the capital is associated not so much with the need to cover a large number of the population, but with the need to defend the military-political control facilities located in the metropolitan area. Indeed, in the event of a large-scale war, one of the first will strike at objects of command and control of the troops and the state as a whole.
        2. Heccrbq.3
          Heccrbq.3 2 December 2013 20: 47
          0
          19 million Russians live? Or how?
    4. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 2 December 2013 13: 18
      +3
      Quote: Povshnik
      And again, Moscow, as if there was nothing more to cover. Already 2 regiments are on the cover, now it will be the third

      And the whole Far East, only one regiment sad
      1. lukke
        lukke 2 December 2013 14: 02
        -5
        Do not stink) there drunk bears and radio-controlled Siberian Cranes will cover us
        1. Onyx
          Onyx 2 December 2013 14: 25
          +5
          Quote: lukke
          Do not stink) there drunk bears and radio-controlled Siberian Cranes will cover us

          Yes, we don’t. In a psychiatric hospital, they’ll not cover you like that
          1. lukke
            lukke 2 December 2013 15: 03
            0
            You have bad humor, I understood that. But because of your minuses, I have already run out of snot thread - the status changes like a swing
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. klimpopov
        klimpopov 2 December 2013 14: 24
        0
        Hi!
        For now, fight back.
        We have a little better tongue
    5. Bronis
      Bronis 2 December 2013 13: 33
      +2
      Quote: Povshnik
      And again, Moscow, as if there was nothing more to cover. Already 2 regiment are on the cover, now it will be the third. And in 2017 they also want to put C-500 on duty near Moscow.

      It seems to be the 2 division in Kaliningrad and Nakhodka (and the 1-2 division in Novorossiysk, it seems). Actually, given the dynamics of the issue, otherwise they can’t be put. And not so much for the military as for political reasons. Places of deployment are selected according to the points of political tension. It will be possible to talk about military significance only after saturation by these complexes of troops (so far - too little).
    6. chunga-changa
      chunga-changa 2 December 2013 15: 22
      0
      You're right. Stop covering Moscow! And if we are going to deploy s-400 regardless of the need to defend the country, I propose to cover s-400 with all cities whose names begin with H, and s-500, respectively, with cities with names in P, but with s-300 it’s clear to losers with the letter T.
      Yes, and the capital should be moved first to Chita, and then with supplies of s-500 to Perm.
    7. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 2 December 2013 19: 45
      +1
      A total of Moscow’s cover is planned to be introduced before 2020. 4 regiments / 8 divisions (64 PU) S-400 Triumph.

      Starting from 2014, the Armed Forces of Russia will receivewa-three regimental sets S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems per year with the growth of pace. Purchase is foreseen 28 regimental sets C-400.

    8. Gennady1973
      Gennady1973 2 December 2013 19: 56
      -1
      Air defense officer. There the elite! And we are with you, so the second grade for them. They have an "umbrella". Staffs, chief commander, etc. They are afraid. You and I have nothing to lose, except children. And as for the industry, why not put ? or in Nizhny? or Komsomolsk?
      1. Lord of the Sith
        Lord of the Sith 2 December 2013 20: 04
        0
        Yes, there are many where.

        That's specifically for the S-400
        6 regiments / 12 divisions / 96 PU
        2 divisions in (Moscow)
        2 divisions in Elektrostal (Moscow)
        2 divisions in Dmitrov (Moscow)
        2 divisions in Find
        2 divisions in Kaliningrad region
        2 divisions in Novorossiysk

        Air defense systems:

        ZSU-23-4 «Shilka» more 500
        Tunguska 256 complexes
        Armor-С1 28 complexes
        Thor 120
        Wasp / AKM 400
        Arrow-10M3-K 400
        "Beech" 350
        S-300PS | S-300PM 1900 PU
        C-300B more than 200 PU
        C-400 80 PU

        S-300 more than 2100 launchers, everything you need is covered, don’t worry!
        1. patsantre
          patsantre 2 December 2013 20: 59
          0
          Quote: Sith Lord
          ZSU-23-4 "Shilka" more than 500
          Tunguska 256 complexes
          Shell-C1 28 complexes
          Thor 120
          Wasp / AKM 400
          Arrow-10M3-K 400
          Beech 350
          S-300PS | S-300PM 1900 PU
          S-300V more than 200 PU


          Have you ever read anything besides Wikipedia, no? Of these 1900, the S-300 is working well if a quarter.
          1. Lord of the Sith
            Lord of the Sith 2 December 2013 22: 56
            +2
            Wiki is how to say the archive.
            There, for each search, in addition to general information about what you are looking for, there are also links to official sources, other sites and so on. There are links to websites of institutions developing this product, to websites of factories where they report on completed orders.
            In order not to burden you, for example, on S-400 58 with links to various resources that are fond of air defense of Russia and other countries, I gave general figures. Naturally, something is in reserve and something needs to be removed from service, but there the numbers do not differ much.
            That’s where you got the idea that out of 2100 S-300 launchers, a quarter is combat-ready; that’s another matter. In Learn from someone else read? wink
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Stiletto
    Stiletto 2 December 2013 12: 10
    +9
    “According to Western experts, the S-400 is superior to the American Patriot in many combat characteristics.
    American experts are clearly flattering themselves: According to the laws of common sense, the American Patriot with our S-400 and was not lying around ...
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 2 December 2013 13: 53
      -4
      Quote: Stiletto
      American experts clearly flatter themselves

      The author flatters himself, I have never met the opinion of American experts about the superiority of the S-400 over the Patriot.
      Quote: Stiletto
      According to the laws of common sense, the American Patriot was not lying around with our S-400

      So he does not roll around, but knocks down targets with a direct hit, and not a controlled detonation. GSKB used to chat about the prospect of creating a missile defense system with the principle of hit-to-kill, but recently they have been silent, which suggests that they cannot afford it.
      1. Onyx
        Onyx 2 December 2013 14: 33
        +5
        Quote: Nayhas
        knocks down targets with a direct hit, not a controlled detonation.

        If at the same time he shot down targets with direct detonation at such ranges, and most importantly - at an altitude of 5 m, then he would not have had a price. And so, his minimum defeat height is already 60 m, and the range is significantly inferior even to the S-400 missile with a range of 250 km, not to mention the 40N6E per 400 km.
  4. S-200
    S-200 2 December 2013 12: 24
    -4
    Quote: Stiletto
    American experts are clearly flattering themselves: According to the laws of common sense, the American Patriot with our S-400 and was not lying around ...

    their Patriot is also good and is constantly being modernized, otherwise they would have bought ours or Chinese air defense systems ... bully
    1. S-200
      S-200 2 December 2013 18: 29
      +1
      already several imbeciles-patriots were marked by minuses!
      I would like to know their total number on the branch .. wassat
  5. alexng
    alexng 2 December 2013 12: 46
    +5
    Slowly but surely, our sky closes from unexpected guests and all evil.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Peaceful military
    Peaceful military 2 December 2013 12: 47
    +5
    In the suburbs deployed regimental set of C-400

    Or maybe still Regiment Expanded, or The regiment got on the database?
    1. The comment was deleted.
  8. Stiletto
    Stiletto 2 December 2013 12: 49
    +2
    Quote: S-200
    their Patriot is also good and is constantly being modernized, otherwise they would have bought ours or Chinese air defense systems ...


    They would never have bought, in any case. It was only ours under Serdyukov who were ready to buy the dubious French and Italian cities, completely ignoring their developments. The best in the world, by the way.
  9. Onyx
    Onyx 2 December 2013 13: 01
    +2
    Interestingly, they have already switched to the new basing of launchers of four hundred with truck tractors with semi-trailers on a four-axle chassis. Option based on the BAZ chassis:

    Or such an option on the MZKT chassis:
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 2 December 2013 14: 01
      +6
      Quote: Onyx
      Interestingly, we have already switched to the new basing of launchers of four hundred with truck tractors with semi-trailers on a four-axle chassis

      This placement has a weak spot. If the tractor fails (and there may be many reasons), the system loses, if necessary, the movement of four missiles. The semitrailer can be attached to another tractor unit.
      1. Onyx
        Onyx 2 December 2013 14: 38
        +1
        Quote: Nayhas
        This placement has a weak spot. If the tractor fails (and there may be many reasons), the system loses, if necessary, the movement of four missiles. The semitrailer can be attached to another tractor unit.

        So it is, but are there spare tow tractors in the air defense columns? The S-300 of the first releases were also based on semi-trailers with tractors, later modifications have already risen on four-axle chassis
  10. sxn278619
    sxn278619 2 December 2013 15: 05
    0
    First you need to cover up the elite on Rublevka, and then all the rest on the residual basis. Everything is logical for our country.
  11. sxn278619
    sxn278619 2 December 2013 15: 05
    +2
    First you need to cover up the elite on Rublevka, and then all the rest on the residual basis. Everything is logical for our country.
    1. Neighbor
      Neighbor 2 December 2013 15: 57
      +4
      Indeed, if they ate the "elite" on the ruble, they would be dunked - their loot in the west will remain. Although .... In Russia, apparently, it will not return anyway.
  12. stayer
    stayer 2 December 2013 17: 15
    +4
    Why are the guys indignant? They will cover Moscow (the capital), cover Peter (the second capital), then the city with millionaires, then just industrial centers, etc. Not all at once. S-400, S-500 for at least half a century will be relevant in their performance characteristics. Yes, and the S-300 is not thrown away, but probably transferred to cover other territories. Not in a hurry, but things are moving ...
  13. Kulneff2009
    Kulneff2009 2 December 2013 19: 05
    +1
    Of course, they are needed in Moscow. But you don’t need to forget about the borders! There would be a couple more divisions to Kaliningrad. Yes, and you should not forget about the Far East.
  14. darksoul
    darksoul 2 December 2013 23: 29
    0
    Moscow Moscow, Moscow ...... deliveries somehow go slowly and everything is in one direction
  15. Air Force
    Air Force 21 December 2013 11: 14
    0
    I have long wanted to know: what does "regimental kit" mean? What does it include?