Military Review

The end of the lie about the "super-weapon"

183
The end of the lie about the "super-weapon"



So often in recent years there has been a lie about “super-weapons"That the Japanese could not stand and stated - we are just starting to create what your technologically-lagging countries have allegedly been working for a long time.

Who are you, the Japanese are asking. You are technological technicians ...

Oranges will not be born from aspen, and therefore, it is easy to cope with technological lies: if a country does not produce components, computers, does not create new technologies - in communications (communications), aviation, computer science, is not able to use them for research in medicine, the creation of new types of materials - she is not able to create a "super-weapon."

The leader in terms of "technological lies" - Iran.

There was a time when the Persians weekly created new rockets and anti-rockets, drones, planes.

Their characteristics are always the same - they are “no worse than” in the developed countries of the world, often “better”, and always “able to destroy the enemy in any part of the world,” not to mention that they, of course, reach the borders of Israel.

Iranian drones can even shoot down air-to-air missiles - this illiterate nonsense does not even want to comment.

The latest invention of Iranian lies - the drone is not worse than the United States, and they begin to mass production.

How? Not having a tooling?

The Persians do not care - it is enough for them to say something encouraging to their people.

And the December 2011 of the year was an encouragement for them, when the Americans lost their latest drone Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel ("Sentinel") over western Afghanistan.

Ironically, he fell into Iranian territory - fell in a forested mountainous area, “breaking his legs”.

Iran tried to extract maximum benefit from this state of emergency: first, a demonstration of the wounded Sentinel was held, and then it was announced that Iran would create the same plane.

Can Iran produce a copy of the drone? Not able to.

And not only Iran is not capable - no one is capable: a drone is miniature optics, electronic equipment and programs. PRO All this is not copied.

If someone is able to copy a high-tech weapon, that is unbeatable - an advanced aircraft, tank, telephone, computer, you can always buy.

Try, copy ...

Illiterate media said: all - the end of the Americans came to an end, their apparatus will now copy the Russian and Chinese.

It's almost 2, and where are the copies?

But Iran is not alone: ​​in the group of “technological liars”, all those who are not capable of creating modern weapons.

These are Turkey, North Korea, Venezuela, Syria, even China with its “best in the world” a tank».

In their set - rockets and drones that have become fashionable.

Russia stands apart.

Separately - since this country knew weapon success, for many decades it created advanced rocket technology, tanks, airplanes.

The USSR, in particular, was the ancestor of MANPADS - man-portable air defense systems designed for transportation and firing by one person.

The first samples of MANPADS were developed in the 1960-ies for the Egyptian army and were first used in hostilities in the 1969 year during the Arab-Israeli war.

But, as is known, neither MANPADS, nor tanks, nor Soviet-made airplanes, nor the Egyptians, nor the Syrians helped.

It was from that time, according to experts in the field of armaments, that Soviet weapons were no longer the best - both Americans, Europeans, and the Israelis themselves began to develop more effective weapons - based on new weapon technologies.

Today, the world leader in the overwhelming majority of weapons is the United States.

Israel is a leader in the creation and export of unmanned aerial vehicles, one of the leaders in avionics, equipment, small arms, tanks, radars, electronic protection systems, electronic intelligence and EW.

USA and Israel are competing today in the development of Stealth technology for unmanned aircraft.

The corporation Israel Aerospace Industries, which developed the unmanned aerial vehicles Heron and Eitan, intended both for remote reconnaissance operations and for attack of large objects, has created an unmanned aerial vehicle using the Stealth technology - the technology of "reduction of visibility".

This allows a large combat vehicle to be hardly noticeable in the radar, infrared and other areas of the detection spectrum.

When in one of the Russian TV reports, the commander of the newest installation, Triumph C-400, stated that he had shot down all the missiles and even stealth planes, including the pilotless, world gunsmiths at the exercises, smiled.

To shoot down stealth planes, special radars are needed.

Only the USA, Japan, Israel, Great Britain and France are capable of creating them.

There are no other countries on this list - and, given the technological level of countries, there can be no others.

With all due respect to the gunsmiths of Russia - stories Soviet and Russian weapons, the technological level of the country does not allow the creation of opposition systems Stealth technology.

Moreover, Stealth technology itself is moving forward - today it is not at all like the one that was first used by Americans a quarter of a century ago.

By the way, the author of the physical fundamentals of low visibility is the Soviet theoretical theoretical physicist Peter Yakovlevich Ufimtsev, who moved to live in the USA, where he developed the theory of diffraction of electromagnetic waves. The logical end of the lie about the "super-weapons" backward countries put Japan, announcing that she has started to create a radar for detecting subtle aircraft.

After this statement, you will not find a single piece of "technological lies" in the triumphant reports of the Losers countries.

After the world technology leader, Japan, which is not yet capable of detecting and destroying “invisible beings,” it became inconvenient to make boastful statements.

True, gunsmiths much confuses and in the statement of the Japanese.

In particular, they point out that the new radar systems will be aimed primarily at detecting possible Chinese unobtrusive air targets, in particular, J-20 type fighters.

But J-20 does not possess the properties of an invisible aircraft - except in the boastful speeches of the Chinese themselves.

The development of the Japanese led the Japanese air control system radars located on Miyako Island to 13 in December. 2012 failed to detect a Chinese reconnaissance aircraft flying over the Senkaku archipelago claimed by China and Japan.

And in September, 2013, a Chinese unmanned aerial vehicle was not detected that invaded the air defense system recognition zone of Japan.

Detect drones can only while American and Israeli radar.

But they will also be powerless before the new technology of stealth, which has already been developed and is being tested in the USA for aerodynamic aircraft and ballistic missiles.

I deliberately do not comment on the statements of the opponents of the United States that they are creating weapons that, supposedly, are capable of breaking through any defenses of the enemy, and even after 40 years they cannot cope with these missiles.

Those who are a quarter of a century behind the developed countries declare it, and they simply cannot assume what the US anti-missile systems and other leaders will be in 40 years.

And, besides the ignorance of technology, the opponents of the United States make a grave mistake, believing that all these 40 years the United States will sit with their arms bound.

Now, when you hear boastful words that someone’s weapon is "at the level of the best world standards" or even "has no analogues", smile ...
Author:
Originator:
http://stop-news.com/3355-konec-lzhi-o-super-oruzhii-tehnologicheski-otstalyh-stran.html
183 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Tartary
    Tartary 2 December 2013 06: 15
    63
    Wow! "What pё-e-lynchs, what bass and you can see the angelic voice should be" ...
    Yeah, I sang it so sang - I'll go shoot myself for hell ... after all, the polymers have come through again.)))

    As in that song of the Turkish woman in "pure" Russian in the chorus - "seem to be a feather, seem to fart"))) However, I checked it, but not everyone hears - they are dragged by foreign music ... fellow
    1. avant-garde
      avant-garde 2 December 2013 06: 23
      34
      Author Yuval Kraisky- if at the beginning of the article it was written it would not even read yes
      1. Genera
        Genera 2 December 2013 06: 38
        30
        It's just ... nonsense. "Even a fool when he is silent is considered a wise man" - this is advice to Yuval Kreisky.
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 2 December 2013 06: 50
          23
          sometimes it's better to chew than talk ...
          1. Andrey Yuryevich
            Andrey Yuryevich 3 December 2013 05: 21
            +3
            today the newest over-the-horizon "container" radar took over on duty good
        2. evgenii67
          evgenii67 2 December 2013 07: 50
          35
          To shoot down stealth planes, special radars are needed.

          "Only the United States, Japan, Israel, Great Britain and France are capable of creating them.

          There are no other countries on this list - and, given the technological level of countries, there can be no others.

          With all due respect to the gunsmiths of Russia - the history of Soviet and Russian weapons, the technological level of the country does not allow the creation of a system of confrontation with Stealth technology. "Into the furnace S-300, S-400, and in general everything is in the furnace, everything is gone, everything is gone (as you guessed I'm getting lost, the author is burning)
          1. askort154
            askort154 2 December 2013 10: 02
            28
            evgenii67 ... "Only the USA, Japan, Israel, Great Britain and France can create them.

            Why did you forget about Poland ?!
            1. Vasia kruger
              Vasia kruger 2 December 2013 11: 02
              28
              Quote: askort154
              evgenii67 ... "Only the USA, Japan, Israel, Great Britain and France can create them.

              Why did you forget about Poland ?!


              Georgia, Georgia more))))
              1. kush62
                kush62 2 December 2013 14: 12
                +9
                Georgia, Georgia more))))

                And exhausted one republicaaa. No two. These are Estonia and Lithuania.
                1. vlad767
                  vlad767 2 December 2013 17: 47
                  +5
                  And what about Latvia? lol
                  1. Vasek
                    Vasek 2 December 2013 22: 04
                    +2
                    Quote: vlad767
                    And what about Latvia?


                    No, it's just that everyone is aware of the unusual properties of the VEF transistor in the right hands! laughing
                    1. dddym
                      dddym 24 December 2013 18: 13
                      0
                      VEF with vertical take-off which? :)))))
          2. evgenii67
            evgenii67 2 December 2013 11: 49
            12
            Yes, I forgot to add, but it was not an old Soviet rocket that knocked down that super-duper "at that time" stealth technology plane in Yugoslavia (why "" because I don't think that the stealth technology has improved and the dispersion area has decreased dozens of times), if the Americans so cool, why do they buy rocket engines in Russia? Yes, in general, such a .. er from the author's side, he would also write "with spears, we are fighting with spears"
            1. Theophanes
              Theophanes 3 December 2013 01: 57
              +2
              That's x ... what are we selling to the Americans engines and technologies that Chubys have not yet managed to sell (so that his parents hiccuped).
              1. dddym
                dddym 24 December 2013 18: 16
                0
                Rosoboronexport will deliver in the United States a billion rounds
                Friday, April 26, 15: 57
                Private US companies have signed a contract with Rosoboronexport for the supply of nearly a billion rounds. This was reported by the Izvestia newspaper. According to experts, the US domestic market is now experiencing a shortage of ammunition. This is due to the fact that the government, in the framework of military orders, bought a significant part of such products in bulk.

                Che there engines they do not have enough cartridges and you're talking about engines :)
          3. Val_y
            Val_y 2 December 2013 17: 55
            +7
            In addition, the F-117 over Yugoslavia, were shot down by the "telegraph poles" of the C-75, so the author -> author -> author study materiel, cosmopolitan and you are our reader fool
            1. alone
              alone 2 December 2013 19: 25
              +5
              Quote: Val_Y
              In addition, the F-117 over Yugoslavia, were shot down by the "telegraph poles" of the C-75, so the author -> author -> author study materiel, cosmopolitan and you are our reader


              F-117 shot down from the S-125, so that you would not hurt about the materiel. wink
        3. skeptic
          skeptic 2 December 2013 14: 03
          -4
          Quote: Genera
          It's just .... nonsense.


          This is claimed by those who are a quarter of a century behind developed countries,

          This is not nonsense, but the result of "efficiency" from the transition to a capitalist system, with the corresponding consequences for the economy and defense capability of Russia. request
          1. ytqnhfk
            ytqnhfk 2 December 2013 17: 53
            +2
            A skeptic is against the backdrop of production (afar.oronezh t 50 su 34 development of a hangar. Shell. With 400 and many other things that you can’t take into account immediately))
            1. skeptic
              skeptic 4 December 2013 18: 58
              +2
              Quote: ytqnhfk
              A skeptic is against the backdrop of production (afar.oronezh t 50 su 34 development of a hangar. Shell. With 400 and many other things that you can’t take into account immediately))


              This is against the background of collapsed production in the country and a huge reduction in productive forces, a significant reduction in the country's defense potential. And the fact that they haven’t completely collapsed can certainly be rejoiced.
        4. Rink
          Rink 2 December 2013 15: 09
          17
          An ordinary fighter of the information war, this Yuval from the Israeli Stop News ....
          Rather, not an ordinary private, but from the "junior command staff".

          Information Atelier-Agency Stop-News

          CEO: Boris Gelfenbuym

          Deputy General Director Vlad Khmelnitsky

          Editor-in-chief: Boris Stolyarov

          Editors:
          Alexey Berenius
          Igor Dmitrievsky
          Mikhail Malinsky
          Yuval Kraisky

          Analysts:
          Edgar Wereiski (Germany)
          Elijah Pletinsky

          Bureau of Political Expertise: Oleg Orlovsky

          Hydrocarbon Bureau: Alexey Berenius

          Bureau of Modern Arms: Yuval Kraisky

          Bureau of Science, Hi Tech, Internet: Leonid Dunaevsky-Berman

          Health and Diet Bureau: Solomon Key

          Bureau of Economics and Finance: Boris Gelfenbuym

          News Office:
          Vlad Landau
          Ivan Nikolaychuk (Moscow)
          Ilse Pauls-Bronstein
          Alex Varyan (USA)
          Lenik Weiss

          Bureau Arab East: Alim Mantullin

          Sports Bureau: Eduard Pribylovsky

          Bureau Auto World: Vadim Krylovetsky

          Life style:
          Agnia Netochkina
          Lydia Kaledina

          Editorial Processing Bureau: Svetlana Korik

          Legal support: Lawyer Irina Gelfenbuym

          Project development and technical support: Irina Khmelnitskaya

          Source http://stop-news.com/

          Everything falls into place as soon as you find out what kind of "expert" provides such analytics.

          "World arms manufacturers smiled! ..."
          Brad for the demented.
          1. mirag2
            mirag2 2 December 2013 16: 42
            0
            Well, yes, those same love (same) say that we have nothing to do in Venezuela.
            Yeah, give the richest oil reserves to the comrades in the USA from AIPAC.
            Members of the House of Representatives and Senate passed legislation that seeks to dramatically strengthen the strategic partnership between the US and Israel as they work to confront new challenges and threats in the Middle East. The US-Israel Strategic Partnership Act 2013 (HR 938 and S. 462) - Created by Members of the House of Representatives Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FZ) and Ted Deutch (D-FL) in the House and Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Roy Blunt (R-MO) in the Senate - identifies Israel as "the main strategic partner "The United States. The bill expands US-Israeli cooperation in a variety of fields, including defense, intelligence, homeland security, energy, science, and commerce."
            http://www.aipac.org/learn/legislative-agenda/agenda-display?agendaid={D9F4B5E3-

            4883-4800-97FB-7D5655789AAA}
            ... there is a lot of this and about everything, this is just one quote.
            1. Basarev
              Basarev 24 December 2013 18: 05
              0
              But Israel is an ungrateful beast! Stalin tore the veins, climbed out of his skin for the sake of Israel ... But he sold himself to the Americans with giblets.
          2. mirag2
            mirag2 2 December 2013 16: 47
            +4
            An excellent showdown of the mask of the former dissidents, I knew, their deceitful hands.
            They, it is they who are trying to influence our public consciousness, they have a whole industry doing this.
            Starting with trainee journalists and ending with the ministry, I forgot what it is called.
          3. mirag2
            mirag2 2 December 2013 16: 49
            +2
            American Public Relations Committee Israel
            Non-profit organization
            Israel's American Public Relations Committee is a lobbying group that advocates pro-Israeli politics in Congress and the executive branch of the United States. Current AIPAC President Michael Kassen from Westport, Connecticut. Wikipedia
            CEO: Howard Cor
            Founder: Isaiah L. Kenen
            Founded: 1951
            Assets: 105100000 USD (2011)
            Income: 78790000 billion USD (2011)
            This AIPAC is just one of the most influential lobbying Jewish organizations in the US that actually already run foreign policy.
          4. kontrol
            kontrol 2 December 2013 18: 42
            +1
            it seems he wanted a prize from his owners, since such a work is high ... oh, he popped it out. licked it, he licked it! now shsha and other developed countries can save a lot of dough on toilet paper lol
          5. abdrah
            abdrah 3 December 2013 02: 24
            0
            Lönick Weiss and Boria Gelfenbuym, Solomon Key and Izza Pauls-Bronstein ...
            why say something ??
      2. Civil
        Civil 2 December 2013 08: 12
        +4
        Let's just say this in different ways, the question is not only in technology but also in proper application. We cannot create a drone, but here the question is in resources and not in the absence of technology.
      3. DimychDV
        DimychDV 2 December 2013 08: 44
        11
        This is with us - world armourers. And gunsmiths from other countries of the world simply twisted a good face with a bad game. They sell their systems mainly due to PIAR technologies. Well, and not least - thanks to the good R&D costs. World (our) gunsmiths manage to achieve the same results - for those pennies that they have been paid so far. And if the country pays them more? ..
      4. Max_Bauder
        Max_Bauder 2 December 2013 11: 42
        16
        The author is whistling as if he himself was at the factories of Iran, China and Russia, and he personally saw the results of the developments, reasoning at the amateur level without any evidence.

        Europeans also thought about America in the 12-15th century, it is not there! - why? - because it is not on the map! brilliantly simple!

        what did Europeans think about nomads in the 13th century until the Mongols came to them?

        ffii! dirty pastoralists, can such savages create a large army, the best bow in the world, beat from afar to penetrate armor with incredible accuracy, can they create siege vehicles? take cities with a large population?

        as they say to underestimate the enemy - it’s similar to death, it’s also stupid to argue that others who do not create electronics can pile on you.

        let the United States think about Vietnam, the peasant army with Kalash and only defeated the Americans with their powerful fleet of weapons, aircraft. Nobody canceled the fighting spirit.
    2. mirag2
      mirag2 2 December 2013 06: 38
      14
      Strong blow, of course ....
      So far, we have enough brains to create nuclear missiles, with which we can erase everything into atoms, that’s what we are now standing for.
      And in geopolitics they gave odds to everyone, and we earn money against this background, and Venezuela with the largest oil reserves in the world is our client, and consider our oil, but for now there are no alternatives to oil, we will all pay money, and we will need the technology and steal it, and if we have money from oil, we’ll buy it.
      So there are prospects ... And not bad, and China, stealing technology by lawlessness, is our ally.
      1. DimychDV
        DimychDV 2 December 2013 08: 37
        +7
        And we’ll steal the Saudis from the staff! And whoever we want to have in 888, we have lope in the capitals of promising youth! Tomorrow we will whistle - the military registration and enlistment offices of all LGBT people will call - and then hold on, Western liberalists !!!
      2. rolik
        rolik 2 December 2013 14: 54
        +1
        Quote: mirag2
        China, stealing technology for lawlessness, is our ally.

        Let's just say trying to lyamzit them))))) And so, while stealing successfully, only the appearance.
      3. Walker1975
        Walker1975 2 December 2013 20: 01
        +1
        And why are there not enough brains to create a computer processor? RAM? Winchester (which hard drive)? Motherboard? good network routers are also something not Russian ... Yes, I just can’t create a normal car. A TV from its details ... So I think, why do Russians think that they can create something MEGA-MEGA, but they cannot create the simple things listed above?

        PS How many foreign components are there in the Superjet?
        1. Setrac
          Setrac 2 December 2013 22: 16
          +1
          Quote: Walker1975
          And why are there not enough brains to create a computer processor?

          And who do you think created all these pentiums, celerons and other clones of the brainchild of Professor Pentkovsky? And how many Russian materials are there in a Boeing? Russia does not produce consumer goods? So what's wrong with that?
    3. Cherdak
      Cherdak 2 December 2013 12: 17
      13
      Quote: Tartary
      trudge from foreign music


      Poles, they are such Poles ...
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 2 December 2013 12: 19
        +5
        Quote: Cherdak
        Poles, they are such Poles ...

        Yeah, the plane crashed in a symbolic place ... laughing It makes me think. drinks
    4. T-100
      T-100 2 December 2013 17: 43
      +1
      With all due respect to Russia's gunsmiths — the history of Soviet and Russian weapons, the country's technological level does not allow the creation of Stealth technology opposition systems.

      I read it before and realized further it makes no sense to read.
      F-117 (80-ies) shot down a missile from the complex S-125 (60-ies) without even special radars
    5. nnz226
      nnz226 2 December 2013 17: 55
      +1
      From the afftor: "Special radars are needed to shoot down stealth planes!" laugh out loud, let the author of this maxim to the Serbian lieutenant colonel tell you who, with a radar of the 1960s, with an S-75 rocket, filled up "invulnerable, invisible, well protected from detection and so on, and so on, and so on ..." F-117 in 1999 ... And we will all laugh together ...
    6. Angry reader
      Angry reader 2 December 2013 20: 05
      +4
      The next article probably announces the Polish Death Star)) ... PSHIK-1 (KURVA)
      1. Van
        Van 2 December 2013 21: 10
        +1
        As the article says, you need to smile after each such statement about the different super-duper pieces there, well, well, we'll see who will smile last. wassat bully soldier
  2. Kirzhak
    Kirzhak 2 December 2013 06: 28
    17
    Okay, I can still agree about drones and some other weapons. But, our breakthrough missile defense technologies will be ahead of American efforts in this area for a long time.
    1. 77bob1973
      77bob1973 2 December 2013 12: 40
      +2
      As well as jamming technology. Well "author -> author -> avtor" (God forgive me) also put Russia apart and not all "inept" in one pile raked.
      1. vthrehbq
        vthrehbq 2 December 2013 14: 20
        +3
        so take a pole ..
        it is amazing how he did not remember his Poland)))) such as the most advanced country)))))
        1. rolik
          rolik 2 December 2013 14: 56
          +3
          Quote: vthrehbq
          it is amazing how he did not remember his Poland)))) such as the most advanced country)))))

          Do you think the Poles would believe him ???))))
      2. vthrehbq
        vthrehbq 2 December 2013 14: 20
        0
        so take a pole ..
        it is amazing how he did not remember his Poland)))) such as the most advanced country)))))
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. 10kAzAk01
    10kAzAk01 2 December 2013 06: 30
    12
    In addition, Stealth technology itself is moving forward.

    With all due respect to Russia's gunsmiths — the history of Soviet and Russian weapons, the country's technological level does not allow the creation of Stealth technology opposition systems.

    F117 in Yugoslavia shot down with guns ??? ... about 5 years ago there was infa that Stealth is generally a dead end branch of development ...
    1. Andrey57
      Andrey57 2 December 2013 09: 16
      23
      The Russian scientist, on the basis of whose work the mattress makers were puffing over the creation of their stealth technology, returning to Russia from the mattress, wrote a paper with the theory of detecting the vaunted "stealth", so for our radars "stealth" did not exist and does not exist, about this, by the way , said the general designer of the S-300, 400, 500 systems laughing
      1. I do not care
        I do not care 2 December 2013 09: 51
        +9
        the author is sure that mattress covers fly, ride and lay objects with lumpy neutrinos laughing And in Israel there is an invincible Iron bullshit-air defense of all time laughing
      2. andruha70
        andruha70 2 December 2013 10: 02
        +5
        The Russian scientist, on the basis of whose work the mattress makers were puffing on the creation of their stealth technology, having returned to Russia from the mattress, wrote a paper with the theory of detecting the vaunted "stealth"
        here, here ... also, somewhere, I read - that this "technology" was specially snatched to them lol maybe one of those who know will enlighten about this repeat and the second: stealth, stealth ... not noticeable on radars ... but what about the optical range (with super-duper-mega pixels)? and third:
        Oranges won't be born from aspen
        and Japs - it turns out - losers (Fukushima - confirmation of this tongue ) do not know that from a scorpion - potatoes will be born - killing a Colorado potato beetle ... and from a deep-sea flounder - tomatoes that are not afraid of frost minus 10 degrees wassat
      3. Rus2012
        Rus2012 2 December 2013 14: 58
        +3
        Quote: Andrey57
        Russian scientist, on the basis of whose work mattress makers were puffing on the creation of their stealth technology, having returned to Russia from mattress, wrote a paper with the theory of detecting the vaunted "stealth",

        ... so for sure, I confirm!
        By the way, he wrote this work in the states, but he was not accepted ...
        In September 2007, Ufimtsev returned to Russia and now lectures on his theory to students of the Physics Department of Moscow State University.
    2. Vasia kruger
      Vasia kruger 2 December 2013 11: 03
      +3
      Quote: 10kAzAk01
      In addition, Stealth technology itself is moving forward.

      With all due respect to Russia's gunsmiths — the history of Soviet and Russian weapons, the country's technological level does not allow the creation of Stealth technology opposition systems.

      F117 in Yugoslavia shot down with guns ??? ... about 5 years ago there was infa that Stealth is generally a dead end branch of development ...


      Tupikova, they were abandoned because of the fact that the line flies like, missiles of the 60s go astray, and still stands like a tank army ...
    3. rolik
      rolik 2 December 2013 15: 23
      +5
      Quote: 10kAzAk01
      . 5 years ago there was infa that Stealth is generally a dead end branch of development ...

      It is not that it would be a dead end, but it cannot create absolute stealth aircraft. As it turned out, back in the sixties in the USSR, studies were conducted on the effectiveness of the ideas proposed by Ufimtsev. Several aircraft design bureaus built aircraft models. Intensive experiments were conducted with them in the laboratories of leading research institutes, according to the results of which engineers came to the conclusion that the design of such machines using the technologies subsequently called by the Americans "stealth", for a number of reasons, is impractical.
      The "invisible plane", made according to the ideas of Ufimtsev, due to its shape has low speed and maneuverability. In fact, this is a hang glider, poorly adapted to combat maneuver and aerobatics. The car can be detected by special design radars. In addition, when opening bombs and in some flight modes, it is visible with conventional radars. This is about the same as painting your car in an inconspicuous gray color in the hope that no one will see it on the road. But at the same time go along it with the headlights on. "
      Ours went a little different way. Nonequilibrium plasma generators successfully passed state tests more than ten years ago. However, in transitional times, the introduction of the installation in aviation was significantly slowed down. “Perhaps there is some blame for this on the part of the institute’s leadership,” said Anatoly Koroteev. Not very actively promoted Baghp in life. It was a difficult time. Funding was declining, military issues were slowing down. ” A slightly different financing situation has developed now. According to rumors at the T50, nonequilibrium plasma generators will be standing, then it really will be stealth in the full sense of the word.
  5. JIaIIoTb
    JIaIIoTb 2 December 2013 06: 30
    36
    Well, well, for centuries we have been in the eyes of such "experts" as barbarians, incapable of anything.
    And for centuries, their army was pulverized.
    The dog barks, the caravan goes.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Laserson
    Laserson 2 December 2013 06: 37
    +3
    Well, it would be strange that a country with such an arms budget would not be able to create advanced weapons. Although science is where money is and borrow any other country so much money, you can grow a high-tech drone manufacturer from Nicaragua.
    1. dimon-media
      dimon-media 2 December 2013 10: 59
      +5
      The same thoughts visit me. I agree with you. If you inflate the military budget of half a trillion dollars, then you can make a Jedi sword out of your grandmother’s sticks.
  8. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 2 December 2013 06: 38
    31
    I haven’t read such nonsense for a long time! he smiled so smiled! Krai sings the praises of Japan, which is so advanced that it can’t do its own plane! and China cherished ... and they went to the moon, they recently sent a lunar rover! and maybe it will work out! smile kraisky! ay! Do you remember in what year Buran flew on the "machine" ??? fool
    1. DimychDV
      DimychDV 2 December 2013 08: 33
      +5
      That's about Buran. And where did the brains of these brilliant developers implement? In 2003, on the Bitsevsky portal of the metro, I got into a conversation with a "grandfather" of about 58-60 years old, he was selling flower seeds. It turned out to be an engineer from the Buran project team. Have you saved any of them? ..
  9. horoh
    horoh 2 December 2013 06: 39
    +7
    Complete nonsense, but the author himself is a technological excellent student, or a fan of American fiction ?????
    1. alexng
      alexng 2 December 2013 08: 21
      +8
      He (the author of the article, or rather the outpouring of garbage from his head) is probably a relative of the "EURO-MAYDOWNS".
      1. Angry reader
        Angry reader 2 December 2013 22: 42
        0
        no, what are you ... he just got another prodigy wafer in his head ... or something else) he is shell-shocked and pours out on paper ..)
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 2 December 2013 06: 46
      19
      proposal to Kraisky: get on the road, in "stealth", and fly to us! we will meet you with "Triumph" !!! then write off from the other world, what and how! laughing
      1. PSih2097
        PSih2097 2 December 2013 08: 35
        +4
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        proposal to Kraisky: get on the road, in "stealth", and fly to us! we will meet you with "Triumph" !!! then write off from the other world, what and how! laughing

        I think the S-300VM will be enough with the Tungusok battalion especially for the ejected flyer
  11. avant-garde
    avant-garde 2 December 2013 06: 48
    15
    their campaign about Russia and other countries is such an idea
  12. forester
    forester 2 December 2013 06: 50
    +8
    I will not talk about the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of our and non-our types of weapons - something else worries - based on and cultivating myths about the presence of "superweapons" from our neighbors, the Americans are supposedly deploying "defensive" systems near our borders
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. MolGro
    MolGro 2 December 2013 07: 01
    +9
    Let them think so, it will be easier for us to surprise them))
    But seriously, in the USSR, civilian electronics was very little developed, but military electronics for years to the front or level goes with bourgeois fillings.
    1. Astral
      Astral 2 December 2013 07: 32
      +6
      We percent appeared with hemp performance in the 80s, and amers only in the mid 90s. And only then when our developers left after the collapse of the USSR.
      1. DimychDV
        DimychDV 2 December 2013 08: 28
        +2
        Now, if you still knew for sure that WHERE WE NEED, we are able to implement these processors. And it’s neither patented nor implemented - and so is everywhere in Russia. Well, at least in the defense industry is this an order? ..
      2. stroporez
        stroporez 2 December 2013 08: 52
        +6
        in in. In the early 2000s, Novosibirsk craftsmen came up with the old (286-386-486) ​​Amer processes in a cluster to collect .... and sho? Americans immediately banned the sale of these chips. I think if we really were such idiots - there wouldn’t be such a ban ......... otherwise it’s forever money, some technologies are not enough, so there’s folk wisdom - - the need for fiction is tricky ... so sho for tricky x .. we’ll forever think it over .. with a maze laughing
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 2 December 2013 09: 58
      +7
      Quote: MolGro
      Let them think so, it will be easier for us to surprise them))

      Back in the 90s, it was infa that we created an Elbrus-2 chip with a performance 2 times higher than the best US one. Then the Union collapsed and we learned that we had 80 technologies and know-how that no one else in the world had. So, not everything is as bad as the author of the libel would like. And the point is this. the Americans have not done it yet, but are already promoting it as a fait accompli. Ours will do it and are silent, carefully "guarding military secrets." How the striped ones were chatting about the very best fighters. So what? Even the Indians in our SU-30MKI washed them with a devastating score. And about the MiG-29 GDR-ovsky remember? Therefore, to alarmists like Krasivsky I will say: watch the cartoon film "The Bremen Town Musicians" and remember the song, which contains the words "And we keep something in our bosom, do not come up to us, do not come up to us, but THEN WE WILL GET OUT!"
      1. vober
        vober 2 December 2013 16: 20
        +2
        At one time, somewhere in the mid-80s, working in a research institute, I had to write a review about Elbrus, its configuration, command system, etc. He seemed very promising to me, and I unsubscribed. The only drawback of the project was the lack of proven software - there was only a macro assembler for its command system and that was it.
        But Elbrus is not dead - I recently read an article on the creation of military systems based on it.
        1. nikodeus
          nikodeus 3 December 2013 18: 37
          0
          Air defense system S-400. The controls include the Elbrus-90mikro CVC
  15. stayer
    stayer 2 December 2013 07: 05
    21
    They say they can create "invisibility" and avert their eyes to the side. And we say that we do not see them on our radars, and we also avert our eyes to the side.
    1. DimychDV
      DimychDV 2 December 2013 08: 25
      0
      And besides that, we can avert our eyes to someone else. In vain do we have a drain of psychics? Tomorrow we will throw a cry - "Psychics - in PeReO!" - and on the television cursors of foreign tomahawks in the last minutes, a cartoon bullet will appear, then an eye on * ope, and then - a board of its own carrier ...
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. IGS
    IGS 2 December 2013 07: 07
    21
    What kind of nonsense?
    To shoot down stealth planes, special radars are needed.

    Only the USA, Japan, Israel, Great Britain and France are capable of creating them.

    This phrase alone says a lot. The difficulty lies not in detecting an invisible plane, but in defeating it, i.e. in aiming at a target in the final segment of approach with the target. We needed the plane that crashed in Yugoslavia to test its coverage and find out what range of waves it cannot absorb, no coating is capable of absorbing the entire range. And then he became useless. And what about radars is utter nonsense so far we keep at the level. Russia lags behind in the elementary base of computing electronics, but we have good mathematicians and programmers, we cover it. And for some reason the author is silent about our MANPADS in Vietnam. Shy, probably, or the religion "our loot everything" does not allow. MINUS. Morning coffee, B .. SINK IN THE MORNING!
    1. Altona
      Altona 2 December 2013 18: 30
      +6
      Also about Yugoslavia immediately comes to mind ... But how the archaic S-125 was able to bring down the "stealth"? If we "lagged behind" forever, then why even our ancient and archaic weapons successfully click the most "advanced" samples? The same "barbaric" RPG-7 grenade launcher is still loved and in demand by informal armed groups, so to speak ... Let the same Raptor or Lightning version 2 undergo test real battles with planes of probable opponents - Russia, China and India, for example ... With all things dogfighting, early detection and missile combat, aerobatics ... Something the Americans do not strive for real tests, but rush into virtualism, adjusting the initial conditions of the battle to their advantage ... Okay, let's leave the technical side on our conscience the author of the article ... As for Israel, it owes its victories to the greater motivation of the soldiers, their greater professionalism and better organization of hostilities ... As for weapons, the Israeli generals said that they didn’t care what weapon to fight, the main thing is to develop good tactics application, and the T-72 tanks were not at all fiddling, but said that the Arabs stupidly walk head-on without maneuvers, like the Teutons on Lake Peipsi ... The author has a fat minus ... IDF and Heil-Avir plusfor hard work ...
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 2 December 2013 22: 56
      +1
      Quote: IGS
      Russia lags behind elementary base computing electronics, but we have good mathematicians and programmers, we cover it.

      Igor, you have a mistake: not "elementary", but an element base. But this is by the way. On business.
      About our mathematicians and programmers. Young people win practically all Olympiads and contests, and then they are overbought with offers that their parents "cannot refuse". Therefore, to prevent this from happening, we need to create all conceivable conditions for our national geeks. But the enemy is cunning! So that the Russian land does not give birth to more Platons and "fast minds Newtons", Soros and K * decided to destroy first the education system, and then the Academy of Sciences and the entire academic science of the country. So the war is literally on the desks of our children! It is necessary to create incubators of geniuses, like the Novosibirsk mat. physical school. Then we will again have technologies and inventions that are 10 years ahead of their time. IMHO.
      1. IGS
        IGS 4 December 2013 04: 27
        0
        Thanks for the amendment. I said I lost my temper. laughing I disagree about the academy. It has already become a branch of the Soros Foundation. See who owns our scientific journals, and this is the citation index. Young scientists did not get anything from commercial activity at all. Remember what started the whole reform boom? With 5000 apartments for young scientists, for which they allocated money and sawed it off (young scientists received only about 300), including in Novosibirsk, more precisely, it is not at all clear whether they made it there. The young are for reform, but they cannot say anything, they are in the position of slaves. New developments somehow moved if they had a production order and money, and this is far from an academic science. To put it that way, the Academy of Sciences created such conditions that young people were completely dependent on grants from abroad. Whoever I talked to "in the kitchen" all "for", it will not get worse. And all the shouts here are the end of science, etc., have nothing to do with science, this is the dough cut by someone up there. And if after the reform, you do not have to buy at least reagents at your own expense, then the reform was a success. And also the vicious practice of co-authorship, which came from the Brezhnev era, and now just flourished in a stormy color. If you are talented three times now, you will remain on the outskirts, if you do not take a "co-author", and learned people do not like very much when his merits are appropriated, he is ambitious, so they run away. Academics have become "effective managers", having ceased to be interested in science. So we will not blame everything on the worldwide conspiracy, we ourselves will make it worse and faster, the "conspiracy theory" is resting. The country needs a technological breakthrough, the Academy of Sciences, in the form that it is now, cannot provide a base for it. And blame the lack of funding .. money for the mansion, etc. is. So, excuse me, but your mention of young scientists and the reform of the Academy of Sciences in a similar bundle, I consider wrong and harmful. Such statements are beneficial to those who sit at the trough and do not want to give it away, but has an indirect relationship to science, to which, I think, you do not belong. hi
        PS There is a good example, our atomic project, when scientists were engaged in science, and Beria was an effective manager (without quotes).
  18. bomg.77
    bomg.77 2 December 2013 07: 13
    +5
    To shoot down stealth planes, special radars are needed.

    Only the USA, Japan, Israel, Great Britain and France are capable of creating them.
    But what about the "chain mail"
    1. IGS
      IGS 2 December 2013 07: 22
      14
      What did you mean? He does not know what it is. This dweller wrote to ruin my morning! It’s like the neighbors hired my rock drill laughing
      1. bomg.77
        bomg.77 2 December 2013 07: 33
        +4
        Quote: IGS
        . This dweller wrote to ruin my morning!
        I won’t save enough for all the morning guests))
        Quote: IGS
        It’s like the neighbors hired my rock drill
        laughing
  19. lotar
    lotar 2 December 2013 07: 21
    +5
    Yes, everything is simple, the author fulfills his salary. He will not write something bad from those who transfer money to him. He will not mention that the Americans have problems above the roof and often cover up their shortcomings with carefully verified nonsense and lies, well, also by distributing the capabilities of their potential adversaries.
  20. Horn
    Horn 2 December 2013 07: 27
    +6
    Ode to a Jewish genius.
    To the author: somehow it’s not so frankly necessary, or something ... And then everything in r ... not, Israel alone is in white ...
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. Strashila
    Strashila 2 December 2013 07: 43
    +2
    Authors always have fun when the title of the article contradicts its content ... belittling one, praise the other.
  23. kafa
    kafa 2 December 2013 07: 46
    +7
    much paid paid licked right up to the tailbone repeat
    1. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 2 December 2013 14: 54
      +2
      C'mon, the Poles do it out of fierce love! The only thing is that you won’t destroy the shinkars anymore, the time has changed, you have to write Israel not as an enemy of the human race and Jews are no longer purses for a merry robbery. And so the song is old, completely disinterested, it’s just anger at the Russians strangling, so everyone who is against the Russians - well, demigods ...
      1. Vasek
        Vasek 2 December 2013 22: 41
        0
        Yes, he is not a Pole, he is Polish! yes
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. Volodya Sibiryak
    Volodya Sibiryak 2 December 2013 07: 49
    +4
    I can offer the author of this opus soap and a rope to stop the suffering of his sick mind.
  26. Aleksey_K
    Aleksey_K 2 December 2013 07: 50
    10
    "Special radars are needed to shoot down stealth aircraft."
    The author deliberately lies to anger the audience. Well, everyone succumbed. To shoot down invisible planes, you must have several radars (minimum 2). The reflected signal from the 1-th is caught by the 2-th radar. 2 radar induce missile. This was stated by the author of the physical foundations of stealth — the Soviet theoretical physicist Peter Yakovlevich Ufimtsev, who moved to live in the United States, where he developed the theory of diffraction of electromagnetic waves. And the Triumph C-400 and C-300 installations are precisely built on multi-radar warning and target tracking.
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. Stinger
    Stinger 2 December 2013 08: 05
    +2
    Peremptorily and stupid, Schoolboy, did he write something? In the words of O. Bender, Krayevich had not yet reached the physics.
  29. SibRUS
    SibRUS 2 December 2013 08: 05
    +4
    In 1941, the Germans also thought so.
  30. Aleksey_K
    Aleksey_K 2 December 2013 08: 05
    11
    Who are you, the Japanese are asking. You are technological technicians ...

    The author also hints at Russia. This is a pure provocation to further irritate the public. The author obviously forgot about the recently shot down 2 ballistic missiles launched on Syria at one of which the flight path was changed. Obama, Congress and the Pentagon were shocked by Russia's ability to send American missiles to America and instantly stopped official arms transfers and aggression to Syria. And before this incident, there were test launches of tomahawks towards Syria. These tomahawks shunned (were shot down). The Americans were surprised, but did not believe, and launched these 2 notorious ballistic missiles.
  31. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 2 December 2013 08: 12
    10
    The author reminds me of my neighbors - they will come to look at my purchase: "But the Ivanovs are a hundred times cooler!" - Although they did not even dream of such as mine fellow
  32. DimychDV
    DimychDV 2 December 2013 08: 17
    +2
    While the triumphant Iranians carried the corps of the collapsed Sentinel around the cities and villages of the country, periodically stoning him, an intelligent Iranian programmer with a RUDN diploma sat inside him, analyzing, studying, and calling all kinds of schemes.
    And in response to the provocative statements of the Japanese - from the orbit, which had traditionally supposedly been nonexistent from the Soviet era, the old missiles that service their old missiles fell unobtrusively - but each in exactly two cable ships across the bow of all the warships of Japan. And what are we? We are nothing, we just dumped unnecessary trash, in vain with us, perhaps, Progress flew into orbit and in the calculated mode could not dock at all to the station. Somewhere he had been buzzing all this time? ..
    But jokes, jokes, and I want to believe that our space rocket troops do not earn bread alone with launches. That they have an aim from orbit from where and through what ...
  33. Aleksey_K
    Aleksey_K 2 December 2013 08: 18
    +8
    Who are you, the Japanese are asking. You are technological technicians ...

    From my life experience I’ll say: The Soviet military industry produced flat monitors at the end of the 70's when nobody even stuttered about them. I saw them with my own eyes. In these years, microchips were produced for the army that weren’t in PCs or supercomputers. The USSR went in military production for 50 years ahead of the United States. They still haven’t caught up with us on the issue of a missile defense breakthrough. Apparently, the author dreams that the public will begin to boast of modern secrets - it will not wait!
    1. atalef
      atalef 2 December 2013 09: 45
      0
      Quote: Алексей_К
      From my life experience I’ll say: The Soviet military industry produced flat monitors at the end of the 70's when nobody even stuttered about them. I saw them with my own eyes. In these years, microchips were produced for the army that weren’t in PCs or supercomputers. The USSR went in military production for 50 years ahead of the United States. They still haven’t caught up with us on the issue of a missile defense breakthrough. Apparently, the author dreams that the public will begin to boast of modern secrets - it will not wait!

      In the videoconferencing, the main computing equipment was NEC (Japan) while the Soviet computers were on punch cards. Therefore, I don’t quite understand your version, if this wasn’t in the military space (the equipment you are talking about), then where was it? What’s ahead of the USA by 50 le and I dare to notice that 50 years have not passed since your service, So (in your opinion) are we still ahead of the States?
      1. Privat
        Privat 2 December 2013 11: 35
        +3
        You are confusing something.
        The end of the 70s was the time of the beginning of the intensive use of computers of the Unified Series (EC computers). Data input from punch cards on them, of course, was, but basically work was carried out on monitors EC-7066, in which the screen looked flat. Only it was a protective glass, behind which stood an ordinary CRT. smile
      2. The comment was deleted.
  34. pensioner
    pensioner 2 December 2013 08: 29
    +9
    Yuval Kraisky

    It seems to me that the afftor is not a mysterious Yuval with a rare surname Kraiskiy, but quite a trivial Moysha Zingselshuher ...
    1. lotar
      lotar 2 December 2013 09: 40
      +2
      There was a certain "Friend of Russia" on this site, who also extolled the United States and disappeared somewhere, even his comments podter. So I really think that he may well be the author of this article. He just changes his nicknames.
  35. Privat
    Privat 2 December 2013 08: 35
    16
    What a wonderful noodle!
    P. Ya. Ufimtsev developed the mathematical toolbox of stealth technology in 1962, being an employee of the Moscow Central Research Institute of Radio Engineering.
    And in 1990, he was invited to lecture at the University of California to help Americans understand their theory. Now he has returned and gives lectures to students of the physics department of Moscow State University (Moscow).
    In the same 90s, specialists in avionics of an easy-going nationality who graduated from Soviet schools and universities reached out to their "historical homeland". It is they who are now there who make the "most-most" UAVs in the world. laughing

    In general, the article looks like a joke. Suddenly some narrow-minded "patriot" will be offended and will start excitedly telling that no, they say, we have anti-stealth, such and such he has performance characteristics and is installed there and there. But, something suggests that you will have to somehow continue to trample without this information.

    About copy. What prevents the Americans from copying the Shkval missile-torpedo, having at their disposal a sample officially purchased almost 10 years ago? Maybe the highest level of technology, incompatible with the "antediluvian" technical solutions used in it?

    But in general it was fun! The level of education thoroughly dipped not only here. wassat
    1. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 2 December 2013 12: 18
      +5
      What prevents the Americans from copying the Shkval missile-torpedo, having at their disposal a sample officially purchased almost 10 years ago?
      1. rrrd
        rrrd 2 December 2013 12: 48
        +3
        how many years since 300 they can’t copy, and you offer them a flurry! visible article with a stock! the injection is aimed at Russia, on the topic of monirovka, at first I thought that he was a professor, but no. even he won’t write such a fuck!
  36. The comment was deleted.
  37. biglow
    biglow 2 December 2013 08: 42
    +5
    Soon the professor will come and tell us how technologically backward we are, but one small country on the Mediterranean coast has overtaken everyone ... laughing
  38. Armata
    Armata 2 December 2013 08: 44
    +6
    In each tale, there is a share of the tale (relative to the article). Yes, any country in the world is in some ways a leader, but in some ways lagging. The information war also has a place to be, except how to patch holes in reality.
  39. svskor80
    svskor80 2 December 2013 08: 46
    +5
    Hitler believed that the USSR was technologically unable to produce modern military equipment, since it had not mastered even basic toothbrushes. Life has shown how wrong he was. Let the modern "technology leaders" be firmly convinced that Russia does not have modern weapons.
  40. Dimkapvo
    Dimkapvo 2 December 2013 08: 50
    +5
    The usual inexpensive paid article. Rather, even a banal podliz zh.opki for citizenship. By the level of writing and illiteracy, it is simply a masterpiece - the delirium of a fifteen-year-old American schoolboy who has gone crazy on Captain America. Designed for the audience and intelligence of the Papuans. Reading is disgusting and not interesting. It is not even necessary to refute such nonsense, as they say - "Never make excuses - Enemies will still not believe, and friends do not need it."

    Do not underestimate even a weak enemy. Even a weak tribe can set fire to the forest.
  41. Azzi
    Azzi 2 December 2013 08: 51
    +3
    Bullshit. In my opinion, this opus is not even worthy of discussion.
  42. HAM
    HAM 2 December 2013 08: 52
    +2
    With skill and "microwaves" enough to bring down "stealth".
  43. The comment was deleted.
  44. The comment was deleted.
  45. Bort radist
    Bort radist 2 December 2013 09: 07
    +4
    I understand the Information War !!! But this bomb is for whom ?! Ward No. 6 - definitely.
  46. The comment was deleted.
  47. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 2 December 2013 09: 08
    +4
    from the Don.
    The hand was combed to give the author a ride! Some letters are Russian, Jewish thought!
  48. The comment was deleted.
  49. HAM
    HAM 2 December 2013 09: 13
    +2
    Of course, I froze (about microwaves), but the author bought it painfully.
  50. The comment was deleted.