Military Review

System A-35 PRO Moscow - photo

37
Rare photos of the launcher and missiles of the Moscow A-35 ABM system. Launcher - stationary, lifting, turning.


System A-35 PRO Moscow - photo



Originator:
http://www.militaryparitet.com/
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. morpogr
    morpogr 29 November 2013 10: 21
    +8
    Our story. It is a pity that the photo is small.
    1. karal
      karal 29 November 2013 10: 32
      0
      The capital of the motherland must always be protected!
      1. 10kAzAk01
        10kAzAk01 29 November 2013 10: 49
        +8
        The capital of the motherland must always be protected!

        ... it would not hurt to protect other cities besides Moscow ...
        1. stayer
          stayer 29 November 2013 10: 59
          +6
          Under the ABM limitation agreement, this could not be done. In July 1974, according to the additional protocol to this Treaty, it was allowed to have only one such system: either around the capital, or in the area of ​​launchers of ICBMs (for the USSR - with a center in the capital; for the USA - based on the Grand Forks).

          As you know, the United States unilaterally withdrew from the ABM Treaty. Now, in fact, you can protect at least every home.
          1. not good
            not good 29 November 2013 11: 08
            +4
            Something seems to me that the Americans have long scored an ABM treaty on this treaty. We should take an example from them. And let them worry then.
            1. stayer
              stayer 29 November 2013 11: 16
              +1
              The USA withdrew from the treaty on January 13, 2001. Its validity still lasted 6 months until June 12, 2001.
              It cannot be said that the Russians are not taking steps in this regard. For example, early warning stations of the Voronezh type (in Armavir) have proven their expediency and combat readiness this year by showing missile launches in the Mediterranean Sea. Isn't it a missile defense element? Now there are 3 of them, but as VVP said, 7 more are needed. And then you see, the S-400, S-500 will arrive in time.
              1. clidon
                clidon 29 November 2013 20: 53
                +1
                So they could be built within the framework of the contract ...
                1. stayer
                  stayer 30 November 2013 12: 29
                  0
                  You confuse missile defense and air defense. These are different things. And the protection is accordingly different.
                  1. clidon
                    clidon 30 November 2013 19: 50
                    +1
                    I am talking about SPRN stations. Exactly like the S-400, which also fit into the framework of missile defense. The only one who (possibly) will marry them will be the S-500.
                    1. stayer
                      stayer 1 December 2013 10: 17
                      0
                      At the moment, for more than 10 years, the United States withdrew from the ABM limitation treaty. Therefore, the Agreement is not valid and, accordingly, Russia is free from obligations. In fact, now it is possible to build any stations and missiles regardless of this Treaty. After all, the USA is building an umbrella over its territory and Europe. And it will not hurt us to protect our sky.
                      1. clidon
                        clidon 1 December 2013 10: 20
                        +1
                        I wrote that we could build all this infrastructure and weapons even under the conditions of the treaty. It was not he who disturbed us, but rather the lack of money.
        2. 10kAzAk01
          10kAzAk01 29 November 2013 20: 11
          0
          ... it would not hurt to protect other cities besides Moscow ...
          I don’t understand why the hell they’re minus ... besides Moscow there are no other cities?
          1. Onyx
            Onyx 30 November 2013 22: 39
            0
            Quote: 10kAzAk01
            ... it would not hurt to protect other cities besides Moscow ...
            I don’t understand why the hell they’re minus ... besides Moscow there are no other cities?

            Yes, but the defense of Moscow is primarily associated with the need to protect the command and control system, unlike other cities
      2. jagdpanzer
        jagdpanzer 30 November 2013 12: 09
        0
        The capital is all of Russia in your opinion?)
    2. Check
      Check 29 November 2013 12: 11
      0
      it’s good that they are in general))
    3. DimychDV
      DimychDV 30 November 2013 09: 19
      0
      Comrade Bdi! Who needs it - foty in safes have. If your own curator did not light up.
  2. svp67
    svp67 29 November 2013 10: 22
    +2
    Once, for these photos it was possible either to get big MONEY or a big TERMS, but most likely both that and another ... It’s interesting
  3. Volodya Sibiryak
    Volodya Sibiryak 29 November 2013 10: 25
    +3
    This is an experimental version, the A-135 mine-based version was put into service. Not if not right, correct.
  4. Desert Fox
    Desert Fox 29 November 2013 10: 27
    +3
    The object is sometimes referred to as the A-135, but on sites dedicated to missile defense of Moscow, it is referred to as the A-35M Tobol.

    Missile defense system - a multi-channel missile defense system in Moscow with an atmospheric anti-missile system - modernization of the A-35 missile defense system using updated algorithms,
    guidance equipment, with a silo-type launcher and a new A-350R missile.

    On the territory are:
    - 8 missile silos of the A-35 missile defense system. Entrance hatches in 2 of them are not welded, and access to the inside is free. All the stairs are iron, but already in very poor condition due to a slight flooding of the mines.
    - 6 radar installations, surprisingly not completely plundered. Particular attention should be paid to the battery compartment and the installation on the roof of the building. A lot of electrolyte and broken containers from under it remained in the battery compartment, so be careful, and you can experience an amazing audio effect inside the sphere above.
    - 2 bunkers for staff, unfortunately, in poor condition and completely looted.

    The territory is practically not guarded, although in the middle there remained a live and guarded communications center and generators.

    And more photos are not a problem, enjoy http://urban3p.ru/object2758/gallery/
  5. karal
    karal 29 November 2013 10: 42
    0
    There is no information at all: range of destruction, deployment time, combat crew, etc. sad
    1. Desert Fox
      Desert Fox 29 November 2013 10: 46
      0
      Here you have more information if googling yourself is lazy, http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CF%D0%CE_%C0-35

      See the rest in the comments above, unfortunately there is nothing to deploy there.
  6. makarov
    makarov 29 November 2013 10: 43
    0
    from memory either in 87 or in 88 I saw it all with my own eyes.
  7. Apollo
    Apollo 29 November 2013 10: 46
    +2
    Video in the subject.
  8. killganoff
    killganoff 29 November 2013 10: 51
    -1
    Country of fools! They themselves bombed everything, without war they destroyed the army and surrendered their positions!
    1. chunga-changa
      chunga-changa 29 November 2013 13: 36
      +4
      That they were all fools and that there was no war at all? And the confrontation with the West and the "cold war" must be assumed to be inventions of political instructors, and no one lost this "cold" one. Not me.)
  9. ReifA
    ReifA 29 November 2013 10: 56
    0
    Scary colossus
  10. akreworpa
    akreworpa 29 November 2013 11: 02
    0
    I still think that the A-35 and A-135 are different. To be honest, when I served in 1988-90, I didn’t even know what the system is called. Our unit took up test duty in 1990.
  11. Boris55
    Boris55 29 November 2013 11: 20
    -1
    One of the destroyed objects in the Moscow region. There were 4 rockets around each "small ball" ...
    1. tverskoi77
      tverskoi77 29 November 2013 15: 53
      0
      As far as I know, silo-launchers are located separately from other systems and in the immediate vicinity of the MKAD.
  12. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 29 November 2013 13: 39
    0
    It’s scary to think how secret these photos were, and maybe they are still like that now, so rare.)
  13. mountain
    mountain 29 November 2013 13: 55
    0
    I know that around Moscow at one time, there were three rings and they were called green. And all strategic objects at that time had the same system throughout the USSR. As now not in the know.
    1. tverskoi77
      tverskoi77 29 November 2013 15: 55
      0
      third ring, are you talking about the S-200?
  14. Gronsky
    Gronsky 29 November 2013 15: 46
    +2
    The photographs are of course exorbitant, what a tough techno, star wars in action. A black and white format only enhances the perception.
    Well, for those who merged this whole economy and left it to their own devices, I don’t even have the imagination to come up with a punishment.
  15. clidon
    clidon 29 November 2013 20: 54
    0
    Honestly a little surprised when I found out the calculated effectiveness of this system. Something at the level of a couple of ICBM units and a dozen and a half RSD ...
  16. voliador
    voliador 30 November 2013 01: 03
    0
    Similar systems appeared in the USSR because there was someone to create them, and there were no stool ministers who plundered money for creating such systems!
  17. voliador
    voliador 30 November 2013 01: 03
    0
    Similar systems appeared in the USSR because there was someone to create them, and there were no stool ministers who plundered money for creating such systems!
  18. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 30 November 2013 08: 37
    +1
    No panic, only no panic: everything is going according to plan, the ship is going to the bottom. This is what the conclusion suggests itself from the comments read. But I want to remind you that Moscow's air defense / missile defense system has been updated and even strengthened, despite all attempts to destroy it by our "fifth "Columns (of the so-called dermokrats)! The old gives way to the new, but it only upsets the careless attitude to closed objects, because it is not necessary to destroy it could be adapted for any needs. This was built for the people's money!"
  19. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 30 November 2013 08: 37
    0
    No panic, only no panic: everything is going according to plan, the ship is going to the bottom. This is what the conclusion suggests itself from the comments read. But I want to remind you that Moscow's air defense / missile defense system has been updated and even strengthened, despite all attempts to destroy it by our "fifth "Columns (the so-called dermokrats)! The old gives way to the new, but it only upsets the careless attitude towards closed objects, because it is not necessary to destroy it could be adapted for any needs.