System A-35 PRO Moscow - photo

Rare photos of the launcher and missiles of the Moscow A-35 ABM system. Launcher - stationary, lifting, turning.

Comments

[morpogr]

Our story. It is a pity that the photo is small.

[karal]

The capital of the motherland must always be protected!

[10kAzAk01]

The capital of the motherland must always be protected!

... it would not hurt to protect other cities besides Moscow ...

[stayer]

Under the ABM limitation agreement, this could not be done. In July 1974, according to the additional protocol to this Treaty, it was allowed to have only one such system: either around the capital, or in the area of ​​launchers of ICBMs (for the USSR - with a center in the capital; for the USA - based on the Grand Forks).

As you know, the United States unilaterally withdrew from the ABM Treaty. Now, in fact, you can protect at least every home.

[not good]

Something seems to me that the Americans have long scored an ABM treaty on this treaty. We should take an example from them. And let them worry then.

[stayer]

The USA withdrew from the treaty on January 13, 2001. Its validity still lasted 6 months until June 12, 2001.
It cannot be said that the Russians are not taking steps in this regard. For example, early warning stations of the Voronezh type (in Armavir) have proven their expediency and combat readiness this year by showing missile launches in the Mediterranean Sea. Isn't it a missile defense element? Now there are 3 of them, but as VVP said, 7 more are needed. And then you see, the S-400, S-500 will arrive in time.

[clidon]

So they could be built within the framework of the contract ...

[stayer]

You confuse missile defense and air defense. These are different things. And the protection is accordingly different.

[clidon]

I am talking about SPRN stations. Exactly like the S-400, which also fit into the framework of missile defense. The only one who (possibly) will marry them will be the S-500.

[stayer]

At the moment, for more than 10 years, the United States withdrew from the ABM limitation treaty. Therefore, the Agreement is not valid and, accordingly, Russia is free from obligations. In fact, now it is possible to build any stations and missiles regardless of this Treaty. After all, the USA is building an umbrella over its territory and Europe. And it will not hurt us to protect our sky.

[clidon]

I wrote that we could build all this infrastructure and weapons even under the conditions of the treaty. It was not he who disturbed us, but rather the lack of money.

[10kAzAk01]

... it would not hurt to protect other cities besides Moscow ...

I don’t understand why the hell they’re minus ... besides Moscow there are no other cities?

[Onyx]

Quote: 10kAzAk01

... it would not hurt to protect other cities besides Moscow ...

I don’t understand why the hell they’re minus ... besides Moscow there are no other cities?

Yes, but the defense of Moscow is primarily associated with the need to protect the command and control system, unlike other cities

[jagdpanzer]

The capital is all of Russia in your opinion?)

[Check]

it’s good that they are in general))

[DimychDV]

Comrade Bdi! Who needs it - foty in safes have. If your own curator did not light up.

[svp67]

Once, for these photos it was possible either to get big MONEY or a big TERMS, but most likely both that and another ... It’s interesting

[Volodya Sibiryak]

This is an experimental version, the A-135 mine-based version was put into service. Not if not right, correct.

[Desert Fox]

The object is sometimes referred to as the A-135, but on sites dedicated to missile defense of Moscow, it is referred to as the A-35M Tobol.

Missile defense system - a multi-channel missile defense system in Moscow with an atmospheric anti-missile system - modernization of the A-35 missile defense system using updated algorithms,
guidance equipment, with a silo-type launcher and a new A-350R missile.

On the territory are:
- 8 missile silos of the A-35 missile defense system. Entrance hatches in 2 of them are not welded, and access to the inside is free. All the stairs are iron, but already in very poor condition due to a slight flooding of the mines.
- 6 radar installations, surprisingly not completely plundered. Particular attention should be paid to the battery compartment and the installation on the roof of the building. A lot of electrolyte and broken containers from under it remained in the battery compartment, so be careful, and you can experience an amazing audio effect inside the sphere above.
- 2 bunkers for staff, unfortunately, in poor condition and completely looted.

The territory is practically not guarded, although in the middle there remained a live and guarded communications center and generators.

And more photos are not a problem, enjoy http://urban3p.ru/object2758/gallery/

[karal]

There is no information at all: range of destruction, deployment time, combat crew, etc.

[Desert Fox]

Here you have more information if googling yourself is lazy, http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CF%D0%CE_%C0-35

See the rest in the comments above, unfortunately there is nothing to deploy there.

[makarov]

from memory either in 87 or in 88 I saw it all with my own eyes.

[Apollo]

Video in the subject.

[killganoff]

Country of fools! They themselves bombed everything, without war they destroyed the army and surrendered their positions!

[chunga-changa]

That they were all fools and that there was no war at all? And the confrontation with the West and the "cold war" must be assumed to be inventions of political instructors, and no one lost this "cold" one. Not me.)

[ReifA]

Scary colossus

[akreworpa]

I still think that the A-35 and A-135 are different. To be honest, when I served in 1988-90, I didn’t even know what the system is called. Our unit took up test duty in 1990.

[Boris55]

One of the destroyed objects in the Moscow region. There were 4 rockets around each "small ball" ...

[tverskoi77]

As far as I know, silo-launchers are located separately from other systems and in the immediate vicinity of the MKAD.

[chunga-changa]

It’s scary to think how secret these photos were, and maybe they are still like that now, so rare.)

[mountain]

I know that around Moscow at one time, there were three rings and they were called green. And all strategic objects at that time had the same system throughout the USSR. As now not in the know.

[tverskoi77]

third ring, are you talking about the S-200?

[Gronsky]

The photographs are of course exorbitant, what a tough techno, star wars in action. A black and white format only enhances the perception.
Well, for those who merged this whole economy and left it to their own devices, I don’t even have the imagination to come up with a punishment.

[clidon]

Honestly a little surprised when I found out the calculated effectiveness of this system. Something at the level of a couple of ICBM units and a dozen and a half RSD ...

[voliador]

Similar systems appeared in the USSR because there was someone to create them, and there were no stool ministers who plundered money for creating such systems!

[voliador]

Similar systems appeared in the USSR because there was someone to create them, and there were no stool ministers who plundered money for creating such systems!

[kartalovkolya]

No panic, only no panic: everything is going according to plan, the ship is going to the bottom. This is what the conclusion suggests itself from the comments read. But I want to remind you that Moscow's air defense / missile defense system has been updated and even strengthened, despite all attempts to destroy it by our "fifth "Columns (of the so-called dermokrats)! The old gives way to the new, but it only upsets the careless attitude to closed objects, because it is not necessary to destroy it could be adapted for any needs. This was built for the people's money!"

[kartalovkolya]

No panic, only no panic: everything is going according to plan, the ship is going to the bottom. This is what the conclusion suggests itself from the comments read. But I want to remind you that Moscow's air defense / missile defense system has been updated and even strengthened, despite all attempts to destroy it by our "fifth "Columns (the so-called dermokrats)! The old gives way to the new, but it only upsets the careless attitude towards closed objects, because it is not necessary to destroy it could be adapted for any needs.