Yemen and American drones: “for” and “against”

24
Yemen and American drones: “for” and “against”The topic of the use of UAVs in Yemen was raised by the world media back in August 2013, but in the light of the November report of human rights activists, it became especially topical. On the one hand, the government of the country asks Washington Drones to fight the al-Qaeda network, on the other hand, it turned out that from 200 to 700 citizens died from UAV strikes (it is impossible to obtain exact data) and that against the attacks "drones”, about which America does not warn Yemen, the entire government, excluding the president, speaks.

In late July and early August, American drones targeting al-Qaeda members hit a number of targets in Yemen. The attacks were associated with the growing terrorist threat in the regions of the Middle East and Africa and the existence of some exposed conspiracy directed against the West by the leader of al-Qaeda A. al-Zawahiri. Due to the terrorist threat, a number of American embassies were also closed for quite a long time, and employees of diplomatic missions were evacuated.

There is no information in the press about whether the missiles from the UAV destroyed the targets. The Americans probably missed. The Pentagon usually cheerfully reports about its "hits".

Two weeks later, the press got information that Yemeni President Abd al-Rahman Mansour al-Hadi asked the United States for the provision of drones to help in the fight against al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula "(AQAP). According to the president, XNUMX Islamist militants have been successfully killed by drone strikes in the country.

The Pentagon responded with a promise to provide Yemen with $ 75 million worth of reconnaissance drones and 48 mobile stations to monitor the vehicles.

Meanwhile, Washington continued its own attacks on the Islamist nests in Yemen.

In November, there were reports of the killing of first three extremists in the east of the country and then 12 al-Qaeda fighters in Abyan province in the south. As before, the Americans did not warn the Yemeni government of the attacks.

Well-known Yemeni human rights activist Baraa Shiban spoke out against the use of drones by the Americans in the country. He arrived in Washington and at a special briefing spoke about the deaths of more than seven hundred people as a result of missile attacks by American UAVs.

Comrade Shiban clarified that his data are approximate. After all, the Pentagon does not provide any detailed reports. According to the Yemeni government, not 700, but only 200 people died. As for the US administration, it considers Baraa Shiban's information "inaccurate."

Human rights defenders regularly complain to the Yemeni authorities, but the latter get off with empty replies and do nothing. According to Shiban, the United States is obliged to warn of strikes.

After Shiban's speech, Yemeni human rights activists and ordinary citizens, whose relatives and friends were killed in the attacks, including those who openly spoke out against Al-Qaeda and Islamist extremism, continued protests in the United States. On November 16, they gathered outside the White House, bringing with them models of drones and gravestones. Barack Obama could not remain silent and promised to make the "drone" attacks more transparent.

And the correspondent "RT" Lucy Kafanov visited the Yemeni village of Howlan, where American drones brought grief.

She said that the father of three children, the teacher of the local school, Ali Nasser, was killed in an American UAV strike. Together with him, his cousin, a 20-year-old student, Salim, was killed: he gave Ali a lift in a borrowed Toyota. History as follows: Ali and Salim picked up two strangers who turned out to be alleged al-Qaeda fighters. According to eyewitnesses, there was a buzz in the sky and rockets hit the car. Relatives identified Salim by a piece of trousers; his body just shattered into pieces. Salim's mother Um Salim Al-Kauli says:

“For XNUMX hours I could not believe that my son was killed by an American drone strike. Why? Tell me! May Allah take their souls, as they took the life of our son. He was the only breadwinner in the family. Now we can only mourn for him. "


The Yemeni Interior Ministry confirmed that the cousins ​​had nothing to do with the terrorists.

However, the White House did not admit that these people were killed by a drone, although relatives are sure that the cause of death of their loved ones is a Hellfire rocket launched by a UAV.

How effective are UAVs in Yemen? Political scientist Abdul-Ghani Al-Iriani explains:

“Drone strikes are not diminishing the numbers of Al Qaeda. On the contrary, it is likely that they helped strengthen the organization. In the future, when the unit develops into a fairly large and powerful grouping, it will be able to inflict serious damage. "


The correspondent of "RT" also quotes the opinion of the president of the organization "Veterans For Peace" Leah Bolger:

“I believe that launching rockets that kill peaceful families from nowhere, from the sky is a kind of terrorism. I don't know how a terrorist can be identified when there is no evidence against him. This is what the Geneva Convention is about ”.


Leah continues:

“These raids are a violation of many of its provisions, a violation of the sovereignty of foreign states that we are striking at. Drone attacks are not only ineffective, they are also dangerous because with each innocent victim we are undeniably making new enemies for ourselves. "


It is unlikely that human rights defenders will achieve anything in the United States, especially if we remember that the President of Yemen does not particularly object to the attacks of "drones" and even asks to provide the country with these very "drones". To the American mistakes made at a distance, the Yemeni mistakes will be added. And every mistake is someone's death, which for the military is nothing more than statistics (and very dark).

The American military-industrial complex will continue to promote the UAV.

The other day on "InoSMI" Ilya Plekhanov's reportage "The Filling Skies" was published, where the author spoke about the first international summit "Unmanned aerial vehicles in the world" held at Georgetown University in the USA. The summit was organized by the University Lawyers' Guild, the Institute for Policy Studies, the women's human rights and antiwar organization Code Pink and The Nation magazine. The meeting was also attended by delegations from Yemen and Pakistan.

As it turned out, strikes from UAVs are inflicted by only three states in the world: the USA, Great Britain, and Israel.

Meanwhile, according to Peter Singer, director of the 87st Century Security and Intelligence Center at the Brookings Institution, 26 countries already have drones. The expert claims that 1 of them have either bought or are close to building "drones" like the MQ-XNUMX "Predator", capable of delivering missile strikes.

In addition to Predator, Israeli IAI Heron is popular in the world market. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, from 2001 to 2011. 41% of all UAVs in international trade were supplied by Israel. Israel sells UAVs to 24 countries, including the United States. "Frost & Sullivan" published a report on Israeli UAVs, from which it became clear that from 2005 to 2012. Israel sold $ 49 billion to 4,6 foreign buyers of drones, while the United States sold only $ 2 billion to $ 3 billion.

The United States is not at all going to wind up drone programs. On the contrary, experts believe that the volume of the UAV market will go up.

Teal Group Corp. recently released the tenth report on the global UAV market. By 2023, the market size may increase from the current $ 5,2 billion to $ 11,6 billion, and investments in R&D will rise from $ 1,9 to $ 4 billion, with the United States taking 65% of the R&D market and 51% of sales.

In 2010, UAVs accounted for 41% of the total number of aircraft in the United States Air Force. In 2011, the Air Force trained 300 drone operators and only 250 F-16 pilots. According to a Brookings Institution report, the Air Force currently has just over 1300 UAV operators (8,5% of the total number of pilots), but there will be 1750 by 2017.

I. Plekhanov quotes the words of John Henry Hoeven, Senator from North Dakota, said by those in December 2012 at a meeting in the Senate on the growing role of UAVs in the world:

“Our military uses UAVs all over the world. We are leading the way in this technology. ... We must continue to be the world leader in aviation technology is important to national security and important to job creation. ... We are obliged to develop technology and systems in order to use UAVs in the airspace of our country simultaneously with commercial aviation and general aviation. This is vital to maintain our leadership. ”


Against the background of recent statements by Obama and John Kerry about American "exceptionalism", we add, Hooven's words take on an ominous connotation.

It should also be remembered that not only in connection with the economic crisis, but also in connection with the inevitable increase in the technological component in the defense strategy of the XNUMXst century, the United States will increase funds that kill at a distance, which, in turn, will be actively promoted by insatiable masters. MIC, successfully lobbying capitalist interests in Congress. One John McCain, the main supporter of the aggression against Syria, whose election campaigns are just sponsored by the American weapons barons, what are they worth! ..

Therefore, as before, Washington will shrug off human rights defenders, making promises, making statements and assuring the international community that the information about civilian casualties in Pakistan or Yemen is inaccurate.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    24 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. makarov
      +2
      30 November 2013 08: 06
      If we consider the situation objectively, we should still “read between the lines”, namely, take into account the fact that all flights of American UAVs over Yemen are made with the consent of the Yemeni authorities. Why the author of the material does not stigmatize her remains a mystery.
    2. makarov
      0
      30 November 2013 08: 06
      If we consider the situation objectively, we should still “read between the lines”, namely, take into account the fact that all flights of American UAVs over Yemen are made with the consent of the Yemeni authorities. Why the author of the material does not stigmatize her remains a mystery.
    3. 0
      30 November 2013 08: 38
      This is where the wide field of activity for all kinds of human rights defenders lies.
      1. 0
        30 November 2013 08: 46
        American drones violate human rights and constitute a war crime. Also relevant to this article, in this case, Yemen.
      2. +2
        30 November 2013 17: 07
        Quote: Jamal
        This is where the wide field of activity for all kinds of human rights defenders lies.
        And the amers do not give a shit, because the main human rights defenders are they, and their mongrels.
      3. AVV
        +2
        1 December 2013 13: 49
        The most interesting thing is that the states are accustomed to sowing death, where they cannot adequately answer, where there is no air defense, where there is no electronic warfare !!! This is a war from the undercover !!! In Iran, for example, the situation is the opposite, they plant and destroy American drones !!! Americans incur real losses in money and prestige !!!
        1. -3
          1 December 2013 15: 10
          The question is, are attacks on al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations not in line with Russian interests? Why stigmatize the United States if they are doing the work of our FSB?
        2. -2
          1 December 2013 15: 10
          The question is, are attacks on al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations not in line with Russian interests? Why stigmatize the United States if they are doing the work of our FSB?
    4. Ddhal
      0
      30 November 2013 08: 54
      I wanted to, but I will not go deeply into the moral aspects of the use of UAVs ..
      The main disadvantage, in my opinion, is that the operator is in the virtual field and does not see death in the eyes of the people he is killing.
      The main plus is that the bandits can be reached on their territory without endangering the lives of soldiers who also have mothers.
      1. +5
        30 November 2013 15: 25
        You do not go into not only moral, but also legal aspects ... A person can be executed only by a court verdict and for crimes proven by justice in an adversarial process ... Murder by a drone, surreptitiously and without a court verdict is twice a crime, it is arbitrariness and lynching ... In comparison, the notorious Stalinist "troikas" and other "horrors of totalitarianism" are sweet and innocent legal pranks ... No one has the right to deprive another person of life on the basis of their own guesses ... either by an action against another person, it does not matter whether it is their own or a patient, and then they "throw it in the eye" ... And here ... An ordinary murder, in fact, genocide, whatever the actions of the drone killers might be explained ...
        1. Shur
          -1
          30 November 2013 20: 23
          Once they have risen "above" the law, then this frees the hands of retaliatory measures. The unleashing of the "eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" principle has already led to the fact that "international norms" have simply disappeared, it is just that no one is supposedly noticing.
        2. -1
          30 November 2013 23: 50
          Quote: Altona
          You do not go into not only moral, but also legal aspects ... A person can be executed only by a court verdict and for crimes proven by justice in an adversarial process ... Murder by a drone, surreptitiously and without a court verdict is twice a crime, it is arbitrariness and lynching ... In comparison, the notorious Stalinist "troikas" and other "horrors of totalitarianism" are sweet and innocent legal pranks ... No one has the right to deprive another person of life on the basis of their own guesses ... either by an action against another person, it does not matter whether it is their own or a patient, and then they "throw it in the eye" ... And here ... An ordinary murder, in fact, genocide, whatever the actions of the drone killers might be explained ...
          - I don’t know why you weren’t given pluses? You managed to do without even traditional anti-Americanism, simply evaluating the actions of the UAV owners from a moral and legal point of view, this was already enough to start a world. a campaign to ban the use of UAVs in such operations. Respect to you
        3. +1
          1 December 2013 02: 54
          Quote: Altona
          Drone murder, surreptitiously, and without a court verdict is twice a crime

          What if the pilot was sitting in the cockpit, and not in the office at the control panel, would it make a difference for you?
          Quote: Altona
          A person can be executed only by a court verdict and for crimes proven by justice in an adversarial process ...

          Those same Dudayev, Basayev, Khattab were also soaked without trial, and they did the right thing. Or do you think that it was necessary to leave them alone until there was an opportunity to arrest and judge?
          Quote: Altona
          In comparison, the notorious Stalinist "troikas"

          Many liberals threw shit at Stalin, you are not the first. But everything does not stick, but bounces back into the shit throwers.
    5. 0
      30 November 2013 09: 13
      I have a suspicion that amerovskie operators perceive this as a computer shooter. and that behind their games real life, they do not even think
      1. 0
        1 December 2013 15: 06
        Well, how, for example, do you think the bombardiers of the British "Lancaster" when they wiped Dresden off the face of the earth? do you think they were crying, well, or at least mentally represented how children die in a firestorm?
    6. 0
      30 November 2013 10: 37
      It looks like drones are operated by "drone" operators.
    7. de bouillon
      +2
      30 November 2013 10: 50
      Mahmoud was driving home peacefully after difficult working days ...

      1. SSR
        +1
        30 November 2013 22: 12
        Worked out clearly, but just as clearly you are substituting concepts. You are related to Jews judging by your answer. Flag you have the Russian Federation but the comment is not the same. I beg your pardon .
    8. de bouillon
      0
      30 November 2013 10: 50
      Mahmoud was driving home peacefully after difficult working days ...

    9. 0
      30 November 2013 12: 04
      Quote: andrei332809
      I have a suspicion that amerovskie operators perceive this as a computer shooter. and that behind their games real life, they do not even think

      Quote: Neighbor
      It looks like drones are operated by "drone" operators.

      Yes, the Americans do not care who their UAVs destroy - terrorists or civilians. They have not only drones, they also have the same drones in the White House. And they don't give a damn about human rights defenders - whether they are from the United States or not.
      Sorry for the inhabitants of the backward countries of the third world ...
    10. porevith
      -3
      30 November 2013 15: 25
      and I support the Americans, why risk the lives of their soldiers, if you can kill them with a UAV. ???? for example, what is better to liquidate militants in Chechnya with a UAV or risk the lives of Russian soldiers ???? And for them their life is dear, And for you ????
      1. Shur
        +2
        30 November 2013 20: 31
        No wonder, soon you will be praying quite officially on the rug in the direction of the White House. By the way, the day is not far off when, after all the associations, "soulless" can also begin to fly over your head. Ukraine is Europe .. yeah yeah ..
      2. 0
        1 December 2013 01: 01
        Quote: porevith
        and I support the Americans, why risk the lives of their soldiers, if you can kill them with a UAV. ???? for example, what is better to liquidate militants in Chechnya with a UAV or risk the lives of Russian soldiers ???? And for them their life is dear, And for you ????

        why kill civilians with a UAV? The article is not about how good drones are, but about the fact that with their help the United States is doing whatever it wants.
    11. porevith
      0
      30 November 2013 15: 25
      and I support the Americans, why risk the lives of their soldiers, if you can kill them with a UAV. ???? for example, what is better to liquidate militants in Chechnya with a UAV or risk the lives of Russian soldiers ???? And for them their life is dear, And for you ????
    12. porevith
      -2
      30 November 2013 21: 52
      Quote: Shur
      No wonder, soon you will be praying quite officially on the rug in the direction of the White House. By the way, the day is not far off when, after all the associations, "soulless" can also begin to fly over your head. Ukraine is Europe .. yeah yeah ..

      I just appreciate that they value the lives of their soldiers, and it’s easier and cheaper for you to risk the lives of your soldiers (and what is ten more, ten less, and if it is your relative ??? or friend ??) than to send a drone. and what does the association with Europe have to do with it, talking about human values.
    13. porevith
      +1
      30 November 2013 21: 52
      Quote: Shur
      No wonder, soon you will be praying quite officially on the rug in the direction of the White House. By the way, the day is not far off when, after all the associations, "soulless" can also begin to fly over your head. Ukraine is Europe .. yeah yeah ..

      I just appreciate that they value the lives of their soldiers, and it’s easier and cheaper for you to risk the lives of your soldiers (and what is ten more, ten less, and if it is your relative ??? or friend ??) than to send a drone. and what does the association with Europe have to do with it, talking about human values.
      1. +1
        2 December 2013 05: 58
        I just appreciate that they value the lives of their soldiers,
        You just do not have enough intelligence to understand that they do not care about their soldiers, otherwise they would not have driven them to Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere. This is a business, just a business in which huge grandmothers are hiding and there are no sons and grandchildren of these "businessmen from the military-industrial complex."
    14. +2
      30 November 2013 22: 02
      if you can destroy the enemy without risking the lives of your soldiers, then the use of BLPA is very effective.
      but in most cases the victims are women and children, and this is already a war crime.
    15. porevith
      -2
      30 November 2013 22: 43
      [quote = lonely] if you can destroy the enemy without risking the lives of your soldiers, then using BLPA is very effective.
      but in most cases the victims are women and children. And this is already a war crime. [/ quot
      Do you know exactly how many times they used the UAV and how many exactly they hit ???? do you have such information ???? and if you miss once or twice, then it immediately becomes known. and that a woman cannot shoot ????? or cannot come with a suicide belt and blow up, for example, a bus with people ????? and that in Afghanistan the children did not shoot at ours ??? they are terrorists, they don’t wear uniforms and can be anyone. and if they can blow up women and children, then why can't they respond in kind ?????
      1. +1
        1 December 2013 23: 41
        Well, then let's throw off a vigorous bomb on Yemen, which is already there. Women can shoot. And buses can blow up too. Actually, it's a pity that you don't live in Yemen, that is the place for you to work as a taxi driver and drive bearded men to the house. I would then see what you think about the American attack UAVs with AGM-114 under the belly above your head, and about the operator who sits at the console, chews a sandwich, and aims a rocket at your car.
    16. porevith
      -1
      30 November 2013 22: 43
      [quote = lonely] if you can destroy the enemy without risking the lives of your soldiers, then using BLPA is very effective.
      but in most cases the victims are women and children. And this is already a war crime. [/ quot
      Do you know exactly how many times they used the UAV and how many exactly they hit ???? do you have such information ???? and if you miss once or twice, then it immediately becomes known. and that a woman cannot shoot ????? or cannot come with a suicide belt and blow up, for example, a bus with people ????? and that in Afghanistan the children did not shoot at ours ??? they are terrorists, they don’t wear uniforms and can be anyone. and if they can blow up women and children, then why can't they respond in kind ?????
    17. porevith
      -1
      1 December 2013 02: 18
      Quote: 0255
      Quote: porevith
      and I support the Americans, why risk the lives of their soldiers, if you can kill them with a UAV. ???? for example, what is better to liquidate militants in Chechnya with a UAV or risk the lives of Russian soldiers ???? And for them their life is dear, And for you ????

      why kill civilians with a UAV? The article is not about how good drones are, but about the fact that with their help the United States is doing whatever it wants.

      so maybe it's just a banal envy ???? they can defend their interests, but you cannot ??? Why is it America can, but we can’t ??? Yes ???? And who is stopping you ??? would take, for example, and with the help of drones, and shoot militants in Syria. America is fighting terrorism, and obviously with the permission of the same Yemen or Pakistan, and in any war there are civilian casualties.
    18. porevith
      -1
      1 December 2013 02: 18
      Quote: 0255
      Quote: porevith
      and I support the Americans, why risk the lives of their soldiers, if you can kill them with a UAV. ???? for example, what is better to liquidate militants in Chechnya with a UAV or risk the lives of Russian soldiers ???? And for them their life is dear, And for you ????

      why kill civilians with a UAV? The article is not about how good drones are, but about the fact that with their help the United States is doing whatever it wants.

      so maybe it's just a banal envy ???? they can defend their interests, but you cannot ??? Why is it America can, but we can’t ??? Yes ???? And who is stopping you ??? would take, for example, and with the help of drones, and shoot militants in Syria. America is fighting terrorism, and obviously with the permission of the same Yemen or Pakistan, and in any war there are civilian casualties.
    19. -4
      1 December 2013 06: 01
      all American UAV flights over Yemen are made with the consent of the Yemeni authorities. Dozens and maybe hundreds of al-Qaeda fighters killed, so the results are obvious. Why so many negative comments remain a mystery to me.
    20. +1
      1 December 2013 11: 58
      yes, damn it, the US only kills terrorists ...
      http://kuraev.ru/smf/index.php?PHPSESSID=8cfd5e8105c7f9ced4a34bc0b554d736&topic=
      615447.0
      http://www.topnews.ru/news_id_41666.html
      http://fakty.ua/130506-voennye-ssha-poziruyut-s-mertvymi-afgancami-foto-video
      do you think this is normal?
    21. porevith
      0
      1 December 2013 12: 45
      Quote: 0255
      yes, damn it, the US only kills terrorists ...
      http://kuraev.ru/smf/index.php?PHPSESSID=8cfd5e8105c7f9ced4a34bc0b554d736&topic=

      615447.0
      http://www.topnews.ru/news_id_41666.html
      http://fakty.ua/130506-voennye-ssha-poziruyut-s-mertvymi-afgancami-foto-video
      do you think this is normal?

      of course this is not normal, and it is necessary to suppress and punish this, but the topic is about drone errors. ours in Afghanistan also killed civilians, by mistake, so what ???? will we now scold all Afghans ??? http://www.diletant.ru/blogs/13778/2152/
      http://afgan-war-soldiers.narod.ru/crime-004.html
      http://afgan-war-soldiers.narod.ru/crime-006.html
    22. porevith
      -3
      1 December 2013 12: 45
      Quote: 0255
      yes, damn it, the US only kills terrorists ...
      http://kuraev.ru/smf/index.php?PHPSESSID=8cfd5e8105c7f9ced4a34bc0b554d736&topic=

      615447.0
      http://www.topnews.ru/news_id_41666.html
      http://fakty.ua/130506-voennye-ssha-poziruyut-s-mertvymi-afgancami-foto-video
      do you think this is normal?

      of course this is not normal, and it is necessary to suppress and punish this, but the topic is about drone errors. ours in Afghanistan also killed civilians, by mistake, so what ???? will we now scold all Afghans ??? http://www.diletant.ru/blogs/13778/2152/
      http://afgan-war-soldiers.narod.ru/crime-004.html
      http://afgan-war-soldiers.narod.ru/crime-006.html
    23. Maxxx
      +1
      9 December 2013 02: 01
      Russia desperately needs attack drones. Then there would have been fewer losses (war in Chechnya, Georgia ...) 1000 drones are not worth 1 pilot.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"