Military Review

Kyrgyzstan has handed a note to the American ambassador

28
At the end of last week from the Kyrgyz Ministry of Defense came the news that the head of the Kyrgyz Defense Ministry informed his Russian counterpart Sergei Shoigu about the presentation of the note to the American side. The note concerns the withdrawal of US military personnel from the Manas base, and, according to Taalaibek Omuraliev, was handed to the American side by the Foreign Ministry of Kyrgyzstan.


Kyrgyzstan has handed a note to the American ambassador


Last Thursday, a personal meeting of Erlan Abdyldaev (Kyrgyz Foreign Minister) with US Ambassador Pamela Spratlen took place in Bishkek. Mrs. Spratlen has been serving as US Ambassador to the Kyrgyz Republic since 15 on April 2011 of the year (she started work even before the current presidency of Kyrgyzstan, Almazbek Atambayev, took office).

At the meeting, Abdyldaev and Spratlen were sent to the US ambassador by the very same note in which the United States was officially notified that the 11 of July 2014 of the year ended with the validity of two agreements at once. The first: “Cooperation Agreement between the Government of Kyrgyzstan and the US Government”, the second: “Agreement between the Government of Kyrgyzstan and the US Government regarding the Transit Center at Manas International Airport”. At the same time, Kyrgyz diplomats say that the American side is obliged to begin a full-scale curtailment of its stay in Manas in January next year, and within six months it must completely release, let's say, “living space”.

Madam Spratlen, of course, accepted the note, but ... How ready are the United States to take and leave Kyrgyzstan like that? - big question. Recently, such a tendency has emerged that if the American military comes somewhere, they remain there seriously and for a long time, and if they leave, then not everything and often close ...

The above-mentioned Taalaibek Omuraliev, despite all the subtleties of American policy, states that the process of leaving the Americans from Manas has allegedly begun, and that the process of transferring objects in the American-rented airport segment has begun. Indeed, Kyrgyz media publish photographs of how American servicemen pack crates and backpacks and are actively going somewhere. But does this mean that the star-striped "partners" are going to leave home exactly?

It is worth recalling that Kyrgyz President Atambayev last summer signed a law on the withdrawal of the American contingent from the Manas base after the almost 12-year-old American presence in Kyrgyzstan. It would seem that all the necessary legal framework was prepared for the Americans to leave the republic: the law, and the presentation of the note. However, it is alarming that something similar has already happened under the previous president. Everyone was also actively talking about the fact that the Americans have no place in Kyrgyzstan, that the presence of a US military base does not meet the interests of the Kyrgyz people. President Bakiyev loudly stated that "another day or two" and the base will be finished (in the legal sense of the word, of course). And in fact, the base was, indeed, “finished” - it was taken and renamed by its light movement of the hand that put the corresponding signatures ... To the Transit Center. And the Americans remained safely in their places.

Is the same trick possible now by the Kyrgyz authorities? There is a probability, and this probability obviously depends not only on the Kyrgyz authorities themselves, but also on how much the Americans want to stay in Kyrgyzstan “not for long”, and what gingerbread is ready to promise official Bishkek for this. After all, if the gingerbread cookies are big and sweet, then the temptation of the new renaming, for example, to some kind of joint “US-Kyrgyz regional security club”, will show itself.

For Russia, by and large, the withdrawal of US troops from Kyrgyzstan is not a matter of principle. Fundamentally different - how much can you trust the Kyrgyz authorities. Simply put, will they throw it? .. After all, it is clear that Kyrgyzstan, for pointing out the door to the Americans, has been promised certain “bonuses” on the part of Russia, and some of these bonuses are already being realized for Kyrgyzstan. This can explain the original report of the Minister of Defense of Kyrgyzstan Omuraliev before the Russian head of the military department, Sergei Shoigu, that "everything is going according to plan." The “report” was heard during the meeting of defense ministers of the CIS states held in Moscow.
By the way, it is not necessary to exclude the fact that the American side can go not according to the “gingerbread” system. The possibility of using a whip in relation to Kyrgyzstan is also not that illusive, especially in light of the world events of recent years. If Washington decides that Bishkek has too actively reoriented itself to Russia, then new provocations in this long-suffering post-Soviet republic cannot be ruled out. The same president, Atambayev, without the support of Russia and other CIS countries, may repeat the fate of his predecessors, who had to leave the presidency not at their own will. In this regard, close contacts of the defense ministries of Kyrgyzstan and Russia are explained. Bishkek unequivocally makes it clear that “in case of something you are already there ... - provide all possible assistance”.

So, if the US military actually leaves Kyrgyzstan before 11 July 2014, then a wave of chaos may well rise in the republic, sponsored by those of the United States, for example. If Bishkek is left alone with provocative groups, as it was more than once recently, then Atambayev’s term will obviously be short. The most amazing thing is that the term of the Kyrgyz president may not be long even if he decides at the last moment to leave the Americans in Manas. The reason is that he has already launched a flywheel, and this pressure is not exactly appealing to Washington.

In general, 2014 is a special year for Kyrgyzstan. One thing is clear that the game has gone too far, and it's time to complete it. Attempts by the Kyrgyz authorities to sit down again on two chairs will not lead to anything good for them. And then, if the choice is made, then you need to finish the job and finally decide on the main allies, and not expect gingerbread from two directions ...
Author:
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Same lech
    Same lech 25 November 2013 07: 36
    +8
    Well, the power of the Bai clans in Kyrgyzstan is an unstable phenomenon.
    Although the president is there, he is a fragile figure.
    1. Kiliny
      Kiliny 25 November 2013 08: 23
      +7
      There is no stability not only with Kyrgyzstan but also with, for example, Tajikistan, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, where the situation can radically change. Therefore, hoping for the best, one must always prepare for the worst
      1. self-propelled
        self-propelled 25 November 2013 10: 43
        +2
        Recently, a tendency has emerged that if the US military arrives somewhere, then they remain there seriously and for a long time, and if they leave, then not everyone is often nearby ...

        The possibility of using a whip in relation to Kyrgyzstan is also not so illusory, especially in the light of world events of recent years

        just like that, the Stars and Stripes will not give up their positions. either they found something nearby, or we should expect "flower-fruit" riots and revolutions in Kyrgyzstan ... recourse
      2. Heccrbq.3
        Heccrbq.3 26 November 2013 22: 00
        -1
        As there is no stability, the youngest and, accordingly, the poorest and most active part of these republics in Rasei is earning money, the top of these republics is calm, the remaining opposition is more their than the Ministry of Internal Affairs if the European Championship crushes, and Rassia, well, then PRESIDENT said that it’s not enough for us migrants, we need them even more. So stability is complete, everywhere!
  2. makarov
    makarov 25 November 2013 08: 08
    +2
    He handed the notes in public, and then they went to dine at the teahouse, and took those notes back
    1. avt
      avt 25 November 2013 11: 37
      +1
      Quote: makarov
      He handed the notes in public, and then they went to dine at the teahouse, and took those notes back

      He took it and after receiving the bakshisha he sang on the notes, twice an encore.
  3. SIBIR38RUS
    SIBIR38RUS 25 November 2013 08: 20
    +7
    And the Americans hoped that it would be different ?! The USSR collapsed but I personally think that this phenomenon is temporary, all republics gained independence, won in some respects, but also weakened in part, washed up with the problems and teachings of the Americans ... They walked independent and realized that it was time to return home ... that we watching. Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, further Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine rush about in doubt already .. Who is next? I realized the people of the Union republics that it’s bad without Mother Russia .. Together we are strong, but they will bite one by one ..
    1. TARAZKZ
      TARAZKZ 25 November 2013 10: 27
      +4
      You say it right
      we are power
    2. Turkestan
      Turkestan 25 November 2013 11: 11
      +7
      The people understood. Yes, the buys and the mafia clans NO. How hot it smells, it will immediately TURN to alternate Airfields. And they will not need the MOTHERLAND AND PEOPLE. Because of their duplicity and venality, we still sorrow human and blood.
    3. bazilio
      bazilio 25 November 2013 13: 49
      0
      Quote: SIBIR38RUS
      USSR collapsed but personally I think that this is a temporary phenomenon

      Do you think that the revival of the USSR is good? Yes, good, but for whom? For the "center". And for the union republics then something is science, technology, defense. And what about the union republics - to give raw materials at prices set by the "center", the centralized budget of all republics, the inability to pursue their own policy. I do not argue that it is possible to create an integration model minus certain points, but ultimately how beneficial is the revival of the USSR to all participants in this process.
      Ask ordinary Kazakhs what "benefits" did the TS bring them? I mostly heard only negative reviews about the CU, since Kazakhstan had to raise its duties to the level of those of the Russian Federation, which led to a rise in prices.
    4. valerei
      valerei 25 November 2013 14: 02
      +1
      Yes, strength, while we feed. See the example of Ukraine: they frightened the Russian leadership and immediately got a discount on gas! And who will give me a discount on "our national treasure", personally? Those who stole our "property" are fattening, holding us for idiots, advertising this "national treasure" (?!), and gas prices are rising twice a year. Or alone, what's the difference? However, nobody reads our comments.
    5. alone
      alone 25 November 2013 20: 06
      +3
      I don’t remember what Kazakhstan said about the reanimation of the USSR. Ukraine too. As for the rest, how can they strengthen Russia? your international debts that you have to pay for? Or will their crushed economies boost your economy?
      Rather, they will be on a par with subsidized Russian regions yes
  4. Kiliny
    Kiliny 25 November 2013 08: 28
    +4
    Something like this...
    1. alone
      alone 25 November 2013 20: 02
      0
      Dreams Dreams!
  5. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 25 November 2013 08: 33
    +9
    I read somewhere (it was a long time ago) that Russia "gives" the Kirghiz weapons and weapons worth 1,2 billion evergreens (China for 20 million), for such a "gift" the leadership of the enty state in "hands" should endure everyone amerikosov.
    And as for trust ... hmmm, well, which of the former republics can be trusted ... only "by the throat", but not too much to "breathe", but there was no strength to pull, yeah. hi
    1. sapran
      sapran 25 November 2013 15: 30
      +2
      said beautifully ... Honestly and to the point.
  6. Ddhal
    Ddhal 25 November 2013 08: 57
    +2
    This is a game as old as the world ... It is called "I want-I want".
    Also with Egypt.
    New sponsor - new arrivals in your pocket on the best conditions. And so in a circle ...
  7. aszzz888
    aszzz888 25 November 2013 09: 19
    +1
    I can’t believe that the mericatos will leave. Undercover fuss all this.
  8. major071
    major071 25 November 2013 09: 19
    +7
    Kyrgyzstan has handed a note to the American ambassador

    Why only one? Could all seven on the komuz play.
    1. Valery Neonov
      Valery Neonov 25 November 2013 11: 51
      +1
      Komuz is a three-stringed pinch (!), It seems the same with BALALAYKA, but the principle is completely different; OUR SOME THREE-STRINGS ARE MORE AND IMPACT! Yes, and vary in size (we won’t talk about melodies)! wink
  9. parazit
    parazit 25 November 2013 09: 49
    +3
    The prostitute country, who pays the most, dances her. In this case, it will dance with us for how long ... time will tell.
  10. FormerMariman
    FormerMariman 25 November 2013 10: 24
    +4
    Quote: KilinY
    Something like this...

    God forbid! And then again you will scream that everyone owes you. Here and so on the site there is an aggressive pseudo-patriotic oligophrenic community, spewing slogans without a hint of the thought process, but with pleasure complementing each other. Something reminiscent of LGBT people in the West.
  11. ZU-23
    ZU-23 25 November 2013 10: 32
    0
    Drive oh broom and go to hell so quickly. Well, there, of course, the Kirghiz got hold of them, he guys say that their prostitutes take out a lot of dough from this base. So the next revolution smells in Kyrgyzstan.
  12. FormerMariman
    FormerMariman 25 November 2013 10: 36
    +1
    Quote: SIBIR38RUS
    And the Americans hoped that it would be different ?! The USSR collapsed but I personally think that this phenomenon is temporary, all republics gained independence, won in some respects, but also weakened in part, washed up with the problems and teachings of the Americans ... They walked independent and realized that it was time to return home ... that we watching. Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, further Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine rush about in doubt already .. Who is next? I realized the people of the Union republics that it’s bad without Mother Russia .. Together we are strong, but they will bite one by one ..

    Bullshit on a summer night! At a time when the economy (and most industries such as Ukraine and Belarus at the moment) was oriented towards old ties, this was still possible! More than 20 years have passed, the economic integration of the former Soviet republics is taking leaps and bounds. If all sales markets of production (especially heavy machines) of Ukraine are oriented to Russia, then it can be blackmailed! Now Russia should at least keep its territory under control (there are so many national districts with their own cockroaches in their heads) And no one needs all these CSTO and TS except Russia!
    1. Turkestan
      Turkestan 25 November 2013 11: 27
      +3
      In the Central Asian Republics Great unemployment. According to unconfirmed reports, about 7 million citizens of these republics are earning money in Russia. Billions of $ -s come to these republics from RUSSIA. Please, this is one of the examples and directions of the possibility of Russia - to influence the economic and political situation in the REGION.
  13. smersh70
    smersh70 25 November 2013 10: 46
    +2
    .. well do not go away and what to do .... winked wage a guerrilla war against the invaders ... wassat
  14. Kovrovsky
    Kovrovsky 25 November 2013 11: 09
    +1
    And then, if the choice is made, then you need to finish the job and finally decide on the main allies, and not expect gingerbread from two directions ...

    Yes, the piston usually arrives from two directions! wassat
  15. DimychDV
    DimychDV 25 November 2013 15: 34
    +2
    Dissatisfaction with the Union among the peoples is warmed up by local princes, who are good at sitting on their loaf and not sharing with anyone. Japan and more. At our place, the local elite complains that all the reins of government have pulled Muskva under themselves. So they manage the efficiency of our ports and border guards, factories and ship repair from there. EVERYTHING, except two, the berths in Nakhodka were given for coal. But would it not be reasonable for Masquva to prepare from local - sensible managers and return them to their place? Or is there enough of your experts on the economy, a rod - you can’t hold it? So they drive raw materials from here. Local would like to preserve traditional resources. Who in Russia was hindered by our fishing fleet, once the grandest? To whom fur farms prevented? And not one left! Where are our state farms? Where is the transport fleet? Bulk and survived only thanks to offshore ...
    So in terms of the struggle of the elites and we have enough childhood diseases. And not so soon that inter-republican mosaic will fit into the COUNTRY, if there are problems here and at the regional level ..
  16. Humpty
    Humpty 25 November 2013 18: 37
    0
    You can trust the Kyrgyz only after the fact. This "people" with their bays completely discredited themselves. The credit of trust is in the red.
  17. Sterlya
    Sterlya 25 November 2013 20: 58
    0
    the author writes as if he himself was afraid of amers. horror. pi ... they scared everyone
  18. operator35
    operator35 25 November 2013 22: 51
    0
    a lot of local people work at this base, plus many sell equipment on the Osh market, due to this they live-the salary at the American base is 4 times higher than at our in Kant .... the people themselves will be against ....
  19. Asan Ata
    Asan Ata 25 November 2013 23: 56
    0
    Kyrgyzstan has a chance to become a prosperous country, but the Kyrgyz themselves do not want, highlanders, your division.
    1. Humpty
      Humpty 26 November 2013 06: 45
      +2
      Quote: Asan Ata
      Kyrgyzstan has a chance to become a prosperous country, but the Kyrgyz themselves do not want, highlanders, your division.


      The chances, that is, only not-so-good dancers in Kyrgyzstan became a bit too much.
      1. O_RUS
        O_RUS 1 December 2013 17: 47
        +1
        Quote: Humpty
        The chances, that is, only not-so-good dancers in Kyrgyzstan became a bit too much.


        hi

        And who is thin. hands. have these dancers?