Speech by Marat Mussin at the 18th World Russian People's Council.
Your Eminence, dear Valery Nikolayevich, friends.
At the end of the 2007-2009 crisis, the leaders of leading European countries publicly acknowledged that the existing socio-economic system has outlived itself and is to be destroyed. Politicians then modestly kept silent about which specific elements of the system are planned to be destroyed, whose peoples and who exactly will have to pay for it with their lives.
As you know, if the process cannot be stopped, it must be headed. At least for a short time. Without drawing conclusions from their own mistakes, once in a hundred years, the Anglo-Saxons spawn a monster, with whom they soon have to start fighting. This century is no exception to this rule.
The 2011 year officially opened the era of bloody religious (more precisely, pseudo-religious) wars of the 21st century, and in fact, forceful reformatting of the rich resource countries with their hands.
The last time the United States fought a war with its own hands ten years ago, when, under the false pretext of their troops occupied Iraq. As they left, the Yankees, with the hands of Al Qaeda, launched a self-replicating machine for the self-destruction of the people of the defeated country. As a result, a strong and rich state in the past has plunged into the darkness of the Middle Ages for decades. There are still bloody feuds in the country. Sunni and Shiite civil strife claimed the lives of three percent of Iraq’s population. The unguarded act of aggression and the execution of the legitimate ruler of the richest oil country caused a deaf murmur, a sense of fear and outrage in many states. The growth of protest sentiments forced the Americans to urgently summarize the Iraqi experience and reconsider their military doctrine so that in the eyes of world public opinion they don’t look like an outright aggressor.
Since Iraq’s bet on terror and ritual killings has fully justified itself, the commander of the CIA general General David Petraeus proposed to use the Wahhabi guns and militants as the gunman’s meat the future parachute division’s “famous” for killing children and grandson Saddam Hussein. Qaida. From his presentation, the art of waging war with someone else’s hands (Islamist hands), reliance on terror, special operations and sabotage formed the basis of the new US military doctrine.
The new military concept was successfully tested in Libya when aviation NATO destroyed military infrastructure and the only combat-capable Libyan brigade, and outside-controlled Al Qaeda and Qatari mercenaries quickly drove the country rich in hydrocarbons and fresh water to its original pristine state. Here for the first time completely different forces were brought together and competently coordinated: missile and bombing assaults of the NATO Air Force and Navy; NATO intelligence, which ensured the development of political special operations and major international provocations; direct executors of these cannibalistic plans related to the category of war crimes and crimes against humanity - criminal elements, terrorists, professional mercenaries, Al Qaeda, Wahhabis; Western media; influential politicians and lobbyists at the UN ... The fusion of respectable state and political structures of the leading countries of the world with criminal and terrorist international organizations gave rise to the creation of international state organized criminal communities.
The next victim of an undeclared war was Syria. The firm position of Russia and China did not allow the Americans to bomb the Syrian Arab army, destroy the Syrian air force and navy, which would equalize the forces of militants and government forces. Here, the Anglo-Saxons were forced to limit themselves to sending and providing combat support to thousands of Al Qaeda troops mobilized by Wahhabi recruitment networks in 83 countries. Equip them with NATO intelligence, modern types of closed army communications, armored vehicles, modern types of heavy weapons, ATGMs and missiles to combat tanks and aircraft, artisanal production technologies of IEDs and weapons of mass destruction, providing them with training camps and military instructors. The Anglo-Saxons brought Al Qaeda to the level of the regular army of a large country. Allowing the Wahhabis to gain a unique experience in fighting in urban conditions, deploy a recruiting network around the world and get production technologies from improvised materials from IEDs and weapons of mass destruction (in particular, chemical weapons), the authors of the project thereby created their own gravedigger.
The specificity of the world repartition and the 21 wars themselves lies in the art of waging war with others. Today, global transformation strategists simultaneously use two forms of forceful influence on resource-rich countries: external and internal. At the same time, the “internal” unrest is intended to destroy the fundamental foundations of society, creating a nutritive protest environment for the supply of “cannon fodder” to Islamist radical networks for the implementation of an “external” aggression.
Today, external force is carried out in the traditional form of direct military aggression, but without the use of its own armies, with the exception of their intelligence, communications, transportation, logistics and management resources, including military instructors. In some cases, such as, for example, it was in Libya, using bomber and cruise missiles from the Air Force and Navy from a safe distance.
At the same time, the main focus of the external attack is on the use of cannon fodder from the ideologically motivated army of international Wahhabi terrorists (Salafis), formed from the totalitarian sects in Islam historically controlled by the Anglo-Saxons and their network combat structures.
The external form of military aggression determines the need for the constant replenishment of terrorist units with cannon fodder. War requires young fighters. Therefore, ideologists of totalitarian sects seek to attract young people to their ranks. Desirable obstinate, dark and uneducated young men and even adolescents, in work with whom it will be easy to reduce everything to primary human instincts and base passions.
Note that the principle of creating totalitarian extremist sects in different religious denominations is the same and is based on the pride of an immature mind. A trap for young minds is the use by radicals of the same deceptive Protestant proposal to directly cognize the truth through the Koran or the Bible, excluding the influence of all intermediaries (spiritual and moral authorities, the institution of church or monasticism, icons, monuments of material culture, etc. historical traditions, parents and loved ones ...). In the same way today, in different countries of the world, the Anglo-Saxons and Israelis are trying to distort and destroy the meaning of basic social norms and regulators, focusing on the destruction of the institution of the family, motherhood and childhood, morality and spirituality. Then the young man easily becomes the object of ideologically motivated manipulation with direct appeal to his most base instincts.
It is easy to seduce an impatient and intolerant young arrogant person by instilling in him the illusion of instantly resolving the most complicated contradictions with the help of ... the physical elimination of dissidents. No need to learn and work, especially to think. Kill the wrong, and all the problems accumulated in society will be resolved by themselves. Here, an alternative bet is placed on the instinct of domination - on the right of force for a person with a low educational qualification. The machine gun in his hands gives him the full right to dispose of the life and death of people with higher social status, all infidels or their loved ones. And killing, violence and impunity quickly turns a person into a wild beast. The eternal human laziness, unwillingness to learn and work, a lot to master the profession of labor, contributes a lot to self-deception of neophytes.
Thus, another fatal mistake of the Anglo-Saxons is the very model of mobilization of cannon fodder, when the bet is placed on not very smart, but strong and stubborn young people. God is replaced by the devil, love by hate. An inexperienced person is told that there is only one injustice around, that everyone has sold out, and only by force of arms can you restore desecrated justice and faith. There is no religious authority, no spiritual leaders, no family and loved ones, no positive ancestral experience. There is nothing but the Koran. You yourself can understand everything, and if you are lazy to read, they will be prompted to you by “brothers” ... And the “brothers” tell the neophyte that you need to live according to primitive rules and everyone who does not follow them should be destroyed. A young man throws up two false installations. The first illusion is that to resolve all the problems that have accumulated in society, it is allegedly enough to physically destroy one of the parties to the conflict. But this problem does not disappear. The second thing that is necessary and possible is to physically destroy tens and hundreds of millions of “infidels”, which is technically impossible. And this is the second deception of the ideologues and puppeteers of the Salafi project. Thus, terror is the ideology of losers who are not capable of solving social problems in an evolutionary way. And the very principle of selection of stupid, hard-nosed youth in Wahhabi military units and totalitarian sects is a bet on the same losers. As a result, tens of thousands of deceived young people are doomed to perish in foreign countries for false ideals and illusions, before that they have richly stained their hands with the blood of compatriots or innocent civilians of distant countries.
A special role in attracting young people to Islamist radical networks is given to the free satisfaction of their sexual needs. The cynical use of the primary instinct of procreation in all its traditional and non-traditional forms and manifestations is carried out under the guise of "religious" fatwas (free sex, pedophilia, sodomy, violence against women and men ...). And here the weakness of Islam plays into the hands of his and our enemies.
The rate of the Anglo-Saxons precisely on the radical currents of Islam is due to the varying degree of stability of traditional denominations - Orthodoxy, Catholicism and Islam - to the penetration of a particular kind of extremist heresy among believers.
It is known that in Orthodoxy totalitarian sects practically do not take root. History has convincingly shown that this is the most faith-tolerant religious faith. Unlike Orthodoxy in Catholicism in previous centuries, it was possible to do this. In medieval Europe, Protestants and Catholics with arms took to the streets of cities and began to massively slaughter each other. But today, even the sophisticated provocation with Breivik, in whose project an obvious Israeli trace is traced, did not allow to model and launch the Christian version of jihad in a series.
And only in Islam - in the youngest world religion - totalitarian sects of Islamic radicals are now experiencing their rebirth. Perhaps this is the effect of the historical influence that British intelligence agencies have always had on the process of the formation and development of these radical movements. Let me remind you that as early as the end of 18, the close friend of the founder of Wahhabism, Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab, was the British emissary, Mr. Humpher, whose advice he always listened to. Many researchers point out that the Muslim Brotherhood organization, founded in 1928, with its institute of fidais (Islamic militants), as well as a number of its modern branches, was also always in the zone of strategic interests of Britain.
Not wanting to provoke the righteous anger of convinced atheists, Trotskyists and Marxists, I still dare to raise one uncomfortable, but vital for all of us question - the question of the role and place of theologians in the struggle against radical Islamist sects and Wahhabism. Above, I have listed the main methods of involving immature youth in totalitarian sects and militant terrorist groups of Islamists, which makes it possible to correctly prioritize when developing a system to counter this threat. In the struggle against this evil, naturally, the issues of education, raising the level of education of the population, protecting traditional values and the institution of the family, solving the problem of youth employment come to the fore ...
Unfortunately, the answer to one fundamental question has remained beyond the scope of consideration. What is the main difference between the religious faith of traditional denominations and the views of members of totalitarian extremist sects who are antagonists of traditionalists? The answer is extremely simple: God is always love and life, sects are always hate and death. In fact, the confrontation of extremist totalitarian sects with traditional denominations is reduced to the eternal dispute between Evil and Good, the devil's fight with God ...
Indeed, in totalitarian destructive sects, God is always secretly replaced by his antagonist — the devil as the highest evil spirit. As a result, instead of voluntary self-restraint of believers, violent restrictions of sect members, instead of love, hatred is preached, and the struggle for the souls of people and the desire for a righteous life degenerate into a bloody jihad, bringing death and danger to all the "unfaithful." I note that such substitutions are dangerous not only for members of totalitarian sects.
No less tempting to simplify a difficult situation often overwhelms those who are called upon to fight this evil, but do not know how. As a result, both sides begin to work for destruction, transferring fundamentally eliminated peaceful conflicts at the beginning and ideological theological disputes into an insoluble antagonistic phase of military confrontation. Thus, the question of the methodology and methods of countering the ideology of totalitarian destructive sects is of paramount importance.
Who is able to effectively deal with this evil: scientists, security officials or theologians?
Scientists can be heard only by enlightened and educated young people. Neophytes will not hear them.
Siloviki. Today, anti-terror groups and special forces units practically do not crawl out of the mountains of the North Caucasus, physically clearing gangs of Wahhabis there. Losing their people, they wage a real war of extermination with these so-called takfirists, the “Trotskyists of Islam”. But the bullet is always the last point in an unresolved ideological dispute. A soldier in a war is clearly not up to the Koran, and certainly not up to intimate conversations with a deadly adversary about the reasons for his delusions. Counterintelligence also operate in the old manner, relying on the commonplace recruitment techniques and the creation of an agent network. Without the necessary ideological and theological training, they, with rare exceptions, are also unable to achieve the ideological disarmament of lost souls. Moreover, sometimes for the sake of accountability and premiums on the ground, they begin to engage in overt postscripts, writing down unidentified Muslims with all the consequences to the Islamic radicals. But any injustice, mistakes or illiterate actions of security officials give the ideologists of "jihad" strong trumps in the struggle for the souls of offended neophytes, allowing them to direct their anger against the government and traditional Islam.
Thus, only a thin layer of theologians remains, who today are the first target of the Islamic radicals.
Today, the basis of both internal and external forms of power pressure on sovereign states is the same method. The enemy purposefully tries to discredit and destroy the three main social regulators of the traditional civilized state: religion, morality and culture (including language, folklore, literature, education, science, family institute, etc.). Replace the true values of artificial, frankly cannibalistic surrogates, putting the ideology of individualism, permissiveness, sexual freedom and licentiousness at the forefront.
Today, under the pretext of the primacy of universal values, the absolutization of individual rights and the priority of international law, both Western and Russian countries have been hit by a shaft of destructive legislative initiatives: juvenile justice, legalization of same-sex marriages, marriages with inanimate objects, with themselves or animals, legalization of pedophilia, Bologna the process of destruction of national education systems and its “ill-conceived” reforms, the destruction of science, the law on culture, etc., etc.
The internal destructive effect is based on the launch from the outside of the mechanism of guaranteed self-destruction through the purposeful use of the power of state coercion and the institution of law based on the American version of the Constitution of the Russian Federation 1993. What is enough to reorient the national legal system and the state’s repressive mechanism ensuring it to the destruction of traditional spiritual-moral and national-cultural values, including the institution of the family. Instead of the primacy of collectivist principles, the principles of individualism must be built at the forefront. Old truth: it is difficult to break a bundle of brushwood, but breaking the twig behind the twig is easy to achieve.
The substitution of domestic law by falsely understood international law is, in fact, the process of replacing it with a special type of domestic colonial law imposed on the victor by the defeated party. The legalized priority of “international law” and the thoughtless borrowing from it of norms and customs that are alien to our people while the state refuses to defend its own traditional values (national culture and ideology) allows the power of the repressive apparatus of the state to be used to destroy the very foundations of society. After that, the final destruction of the basic traditional values, the institution of the family, motherhood and childhood will, in fact, be carried out by our own hands - by the hands of the duped and disunited compatriots.
But, after all, it was our country that, with all its tragic history after 1917, helped discover and formulate the law of the irreducibility of social norms, paying for it with a lot of blood. The law is formulated as follows: A social norm of a higher order cannot be replaced by a norm of a lower order. However, only the entire set of social regulators (1. Religious 2. Moral 3. Culture as the positive experience of ancestors and the institution of the family - language, folklore, education, science, the institution of the family, etc. 4. The right of 5. Politics) together with the economic regulator of the lowest, the sixth level, in their inseparable unity, they allow to harmonize and harmonize relations in society.
It is completely obvious that the purposefully destroyed ideals, the values of the intangible order and the national traditions proven by centuries will not replace anything new and cannot come. Breaking is not building. How can you never make a Russian German or an Englishman replace the Orthodox ethics with the Protestant, and replace the unknowable Russian soul, divine love and Christian morality with a bare rational calculation. After all, what is good for the Russian is death for the German. And no one has proven that the opposite is not true.
Our geopolitical opponents understand and use all this perfectly. The inevitable mass protest against the destruction of the very foundations of our existence, caused by the Anglo-Saxon "mine" laid down in the system of Russian domestic law - the American edition of the 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation, will create the necessary breeding ground for filling the Wahhabi-style terrorist organizations with irreconcilable fighters. After all, if the state does not protect our traditional values, then its process will be headed by its irreconcilable opponents.
Today, the Wahhabi International terrorist is unfolding in Russia. To know and understand the weaknesses of the enemy is a necessary condition for our spiritual Victory.