Military Review

Zashchita Corporation has completed the development of the armored vehicle SBA-60K2 “Bulat”

64
The domestic corporation Zashchita has completed work on the creation of its new armored car under the designation SBA-60К2 “Bulat”, which has the wheel formula 6х6. CJSC "Corporation" Protection ", founded in 1993 year, today occupies one of the leading places in Russia in the market of manufacturers of armored and special vehicles. The activity of the corporation is aimed at the production and development of armored vehicles and special equipment, both civil and military, on the basis of foreign and domestic vehicles of various modifications intended for the transportation of employees of special units, valuable cargo and VIP-persons.


The development of the Bulat armored car was launched in 2011 year, this project was financed from private sources. This armored car uses units and subsystems of the KamAZ plant’s time-tested tactical truck family. A prototype of the Bulat armored car was shown to the general public as part of the RAE 2013 armament exhibition, which was held in Nizhny Tagil.

Special armored car SBA-60-К2 is designed to transport personnel on roads of absolutely all categories and in different climatic conditions and ensure its protection. The car has a high class of body armor - 6 class according to GOST R 50963-96. The machine provides the crew and the assault force with reliable protection against blasting under the bottom of the non-winged improvised explosive devices weighing up to 1 kilograms in TNT equivalent, as well as the explosion of the F-1 fragmentation grenade on the roof of the vehicle. Additionally, inside the cabin can be installed anti-ricochet and anti-shatter protection. In general, the Bulat armored car is significantly higher than the BTR-80 in the existing level of anti-bullet and splinter protection.

Zashchita Corporation has completed the development of the armored vehicle SBA-60K2 “Bulat”

The Bulat armored car was created on the basis of KAMAZ-5350 units and 6x6 wheel assemblies. In front of the body of the armored car are 2-e side hinged doors (commander and driver), in the stern of the hull - another 2-e hinged doors, the roof has 6 hatches. On both sides of the hull special multi-layered bulletproof glass, equipped with built-in loopholes, are placed. The windshield of the car has electric heating. The capacity of the machine is 10 people (2 + 8). The landing chairs are made suspended, they are equipped with built-in shock-absorbing devices, which makes it possible to reduce the load on a person in case of an explosion of an armored car on a mine.

The landing party can conduct firing from individual weapons, using for this purpose both special loopholes (embrasures) of the open type in the side windows and stern doors, and through folding top hatches. In the open position, the opened covers of the upper hatches can additionally play the role of armor casters.

To ensure the crew of armored vehicles comfortable conditions, it is equipped with air conditioning, ventilation and heating systems. If necessary, the “Bulat” can be installed filtering unit. For transportation of firearms of personnel inside the case there are special attachments. The inner surface of the body armored trimmed non-woven material. In order to provide the driver of the armored car with the best view back, you can install a rearview camera with a separate monitor on the car. In the bow of the SBA-60-К2 winch is installed, which has a pulling force in 7 t.


The layout of the armored car "Bulat" is similar to the standard layout of a truck with an armored engine compartment, which is located in front. Behind him are the driver and commander of the car, then the troop compartment. The troop compartment has a slightly elevated roof level in order to provide greater internal volume and to allow mounting a steerable module with weapons, such as an 7,62-mm machine gun with a large frontal firing sector, mounted on the roof.

The armored car has a steel all-welded hull, which provides the crew and the assault force with a reliable level of protection against small-arms fire and fragments of mines and shells. The level of protection is subject to change upon request. The bottom of the body has a V-shape, which improves the level of mine protection. Spare parts boxes are mounted outside the housing on both sides. According to GOST R 50963-96, the level of protection corresponds to the 6 class, which provides protection against fire from a SVD sniper rifle and 7,62-mm armor-piercing bullets.

In the front suspension of an armored car, ordinary springs are applied, and the rear one is installed on 2's semi-elliptical springs. At present, the manufacturer offers 2 turbocharged V8 diesel engines to the role of the main power plant: Euro-3 standard, 165 kW power (240 hp) and Euro-4 power 206 kW (280 hp). Both engines work with a manual gearbox. At the same time, Zashchita Corporation declares that a much more powerful 400 hp diesel engine can be installed on the car, and the manual transmission can be replaced with automatic transmission. At the moment, Bulat is able to develop speed up to 90 km / h on the highway, which, together with the 420 liter fuel reserve (in 2 tanks), provides the car with an impressive power reserve - 800 km.


Both the driver and the vehicle commander have their own side doors that open forward. For an exit of a landing there are used 2-e doors in aft of the body Now these two doors open manually, but if necessary, the manufacturer can provide them with a hydraulic drive controlled from the crew or driver compartment. The survivability of the crew and the landing is increased due to special folding seats with mine protection. There are a total of 4 seats on each side of the troop compartment, which are facing each other. The SBA-60-K2 “Bulat” armored car on display in Nizhny Tagil was equipped with a central tire inflation system and a front electric winch.

6 hatches are located on the roof of the vehicle, but their number can be reduced, for example, to be placed on the roof of the combat module. It is possible to use weapons with remote control or the installation of various options for turrets. Depending on the level of protection installed, the total weight of the machine is at the level of 15,9 or 19,5 tons. Standard equipment of an armored car consists of a fire extinguishing system located in the engine compartment, an air conditioner, special racks for machine guns and other personal weapons of soldiers. At the same time, there is the option of installing on “Bulat” various additional systems: circular view cameras, satellite navigation systems or additional heating.

Currently built copies of the SBA-60K2 are protected vehicles for transporting personnel of combat units, however, the developers have foreseen the option of installing various weapons on the Bulat, for example, PBU-1 turret (similar to the one that is mounted on the BTR-80 ), missile or remote-controlled machine-gun installation. That is, there is a real possibility of transforming a transport armored car into a unified "specialized chassis." The Bulat armored car can become a base for an armored sanitary-evacuation or medical vehicle (the size of the troop compartment and the location of the doors contribute to this), the mobile control point. And although such vehicles are not able to completely replace armored personnel carriers, they are ideally suited for carrying out transport and special tasks as part of various counter-terrorist operations.

Information sources:
http://www.army-guide.com/rus/article/article_2539.html
http://www.zashchita.ru/production/hiddenarmored/Bulat
http://www.dogswar.ru/oryjeinaia-ekzotika/bronetehnika/6680-bronirovannyi-avtomo.html
Author:
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. AlexA
    AlexA 13 November 2013 09: 34
    16
    Colleagues, I would like to ask you to comment on the specialists in armored vehicles. In terms of layout and chassis, the car is no different from the first Soviet armored personnel carrier based on the ZIL-157, developed in the early 50s. And all modern wheeled armored personnel carriers (both German, American, and Finnish) are similar in layout to the BTR-80. What's "new"? What is the delight for?
    1. Login_Off
      Login_Off 14 November 2013 05: 09
      +1
      Look at the first photo. How did the driver get crooked.
      And then figure out what a review on this "Chisel". I will feel sorry for the driver who will drive this car.
  2. Beibit
    Beibit 13 November 2013 09: 40
    +4
    It seems to me that the doors on the back of the crew are uncomfortable ... okay, a healthy fighter will come in and out without any problems. Well, if someone is injured ... it is somehow inconvenient to drag him inside. nothing should be between the two doors (obstacles).
  3. cosmos111
    cosmos111 13 November 2013 09: 42
    10
    Gost..6A class armor protection, and undermining only 1 kg.
    And if the 3rd, then generally 200 gr in .. t er ..
    And why did he suddenly become “Bulat”, although it was designed and released as KamAZ-43269 (BMP-97), ,, SHOT ,, 6/6.
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 13 November 2013 11: 01
      11
      Quote: cosmos111
      Rone defense of Gost. 6A class, and undermining only 1 kg .. in. e. .. how is it?

      This is a protection against anti-personnel mines and grenades under the bottom.

      And we still do not have GOST for mine protection. I don’t know why ... Probably, the military-industrial complex is resisting. It will be difficult to hang noodles on the ears.
  4. pv1005
    pv1005 13 November 2013 09: 55
    +3
    Everything new is well forgotten old.
  5. kirgudu
    kirgudu 13 November 2013 09: 56
    21
    Suspiciously, the BTR-152 based on the ZIS-151 recalls.
    1. Larus
      Larus 13 November 2013 10: 58
      +5
      I wanted to write the same thing. They just attached a roof)
    2. cosmos111
      cosmos111 13 November 2013 10: 58
      +6
      Quote: kirgudu
      Suspiciously BTR-152 based on the ZIS-151 recall

      It does not resemble, but the design and the reservation is an exact copy of the BTR 152, only on the chassis .KaAZ 43269.
      1. samoletil18
        samoletil18 13 November 2013 19: 08
        +4
        It is clear that KAMAZ-ZIL has been killed.
    3. Dimon-chik-79
      Dimon-chik-79 13 November 2013 11: 12
      +3
      And this is quite natural. Both non-floating armored personnel carriers, with a front engine, are based on conventional army serial ATVs. But there are differences and they are significant.
    4. alone
      alone 13 November 2013 22: 13
      +1
      why suspicious? I think they are the same
    5. Eugeniy_369
      Eugeniy_369 13 November 2013 23: 07
      +2
      Quote: kirgudu
      Suspiciously, the BTR-152 based on the ZIS-151 recalls.

      Is everything new a well-forgotten old or a spiral in a spiral?
  6. Prapor Afonya
    Prapor Afonya 13 November 2013 10: 16
    0
    Quote: AlexA
    Colleagues, I would like to ask you to comment on the specialists in armored vehicles. In terms of layout and chassis, the car is no different from the first Soviet armored personnel carrier based on the ZIL-157, developed in the early 50s. And all modern wheeled armored personnel carriers (both German, American, and Finnish) are similar in layout to the BTR-80. What's "new"? What is the delight for?

    As he took off his tongue, he looks more like an armored troop carrier 40! Or an armored troop carrier 3 Reich.
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 13 November 2013 10: 23
      +9
      Good day to all hi !

      citation-Domestic corporation Zashchita completed the creation of its new armored car under the designation SBA-60K2 “Bulat”, which has the wheel formula 6х6.

      video footage in the topic

      1. Akim
        Akim 13 November 2013 11: 27
        +1
        Hmm ... Cramped. And low
      2. Dmitry 2246
        Dmitry 2246 13 November 2013 11: 38
        +3
        The car has the right to life as a leading edge conveyor. A good internal volume under the armor will be in demand by any unit. Given the increasing weight of the "shot" MSB.
  7. moreman78
    moreman78 13 November 2013 10: 29
    +5
    In short, they renamed Vystrel to Bulat, Kamaz really wants to push this creation to the border guards and VVshniks!
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 13 November 2013 11: 05
      +2
      "Corporation Zashchita" is rather a competitor of KamAZ
      1. cosmos111
        cosmos111 13 November 2013 11: 14
        +3
        Quote: Spade
        "Corporation Zashchita" is rather a competitor of KamAZ

        Then why did KamAZ donate ,, its development, Shot 6/6, to its competitor “Protect” ”.

        They do not believe in this unit in its commercial attractiveness for the RA Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Internal Affairs?
        Foreign deliveries of “Shots” were already there, everyone was returned with marriages, different units and armor to Russia.
        1. Xroft
          Xroft 13 November 2013 12: 13
          +1
          Quote: cosmos111
          Quote: Spade
          "Corporation Zashchita" is rather a competitor of KamAZ


          Foreign deliveries of “Shots” were already there, everyone was returned with marriages, different units and armor to Russia.

          Link to the studio (s) to whom they delivered, who returned .... more specifically interesting to read.
          1. TiRex
            TiRex 14 November 2013 00: 42
            +1
            This is a long story. a batch of shots of 30 pieces was ordered, 2 deliveries of 15 each, if the memory does not change Kazakhstan, by the time the second batch was delivered, the first fell apart. moreover, the problems were even with the armor, it cracked, and not at the seam ...
            after that they were somehow shoved by the fsin and everything died out ...
        2. Lopatov
          Lopatov 13 November 2013 12: 35
          +1
          Are you sure you presented?
    2. PSih2097
      PSih2097 13 November 2013 20: 19
      +2
      Quote: moreman78
      Kamaz wants to push this creation BORDERS AND Vshshnikam!

      VVshnikov has Tiger SPM-1 for OMON (reservation for the third protection class) and Tiger SPM-2 for Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (reservation for the fifth class) and this one (GAZ-29651):
  8. Landwarrior
    Landwarrior 13 November 2013 10: 45
    +6
    Hmmm ... Hello, dear 152nd! fellow
    So the "facelifting", which is now fashionable in the automobile industry, has sunk to armored vehicles. laughing
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. svp67
    svp67 13 November 2013 10: 49
    +3
    SBA-60K2 "Damask steel"
    I also don't understand why "Bulat"? That there were no other names, but now Ukraine has a tank, we have an armored personnel carrier ... somehow ... I remember we called it "crocodile" ...
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. the47th
    the47th 13 November 2013 10: 50
    +2
    Where is the weapon module? At least a machine gun was installed on the BTR-152, and "Zashchita" offers to shoot back from the embrasures.
  13. kafa
    kafa 13 November 2013 11: 00
    +1
    well ugly, but ours.
    RPG screens can be hung, but the bottom is flat - it is not clear
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 13 November 2013 11: 04
      +3
      The bottom is just V-shaped
      1. cosmos111
        cosmos111 13 November 2013 11: 35
        +2
        Quote: Spade
        The bottom is just V-shaped

        Where are you this info .. found?

        Quote: kafa
        but the bottom is flat - incomprehensible

        Kafa, here you are right, with a special armored vehicle SBA-60-K2 ,, Damask steel, “- THE BOTTOM IS PLANE AS A TABLE.
        With ,, rational slopes ,, armor plates.

        BTR Th Panz, P107 .304 (F) 1943.
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 13 November 2013 12: 36
          +1
          Quote: cosmos111
          Where are you this info .. found?


          http://www.army-guide.com/rus/article/article_2539.html
          1. kafa
            kafa 13 November 2013 14: 05
            +2
            you would beat more carefully and watch the material there on the video ......................
        2. Dimon-chik-79
          Dimon-chik-79 13 November 2013 14: 49
          +2
          This is reflected in the article and, in general, is noticeable in the pics.
  14. Akim
    Akim 13 November 2013 11: 11
    +5
    I like this. Please note that this is not an army armored personnel carrier, but for the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Front-engine layout protects against undermining. Bevel angle of the armor from the machine gun. The only question is bulletproof glass. It is in appearance, but inside you need to look.
    1. the47th
      the47th 13 November 2013 11: 22
      +4
      The police, probably, only does what it cuts through minefields.
      1. Akim
        Akim 13 November 2013 11: 26
        +4
        Quote: the47th
        he just does what he cuts through the minefields.

        You have a North Caucasus. Or did VV expel from the structures of the Ministry of Internal Affairs?
        1. the47th
          the47th 13 November 2013 11: 37
          0
          Militants mainly use home-made landmines, if "Bulat" can withstand a hit on a 1 kg charge, they will simply lay 2-3 kg or more. "There is a reaction to every action."
          1. Akim
            Akim 13 November 2013 11: 46
            +6
            Quote: the47th
            "There is opposition to every action."

            Then let's use simple wagons. What is the money to spend?
            1. the47th
              the47th 13 November 2013 11: 56
              +1
              Why buy a wagon if there is an armored personnel carrier? If you really buy, then something is really strong.
              1. kafa
                kafa 13 November 2013 12: 43
                +4
                on an armored personnel carrier and ride on top like wagons what difference does it make what thickness is under the ass armor repeat
      2. bask
        bask 13 November 2013 14: 59
        +1
        Quote: the47th
        maybe it’s just doing that in the minefields

        On public roads, along the roadsides of which and the canvas itself, landmines and IEDs are laid, with an average capacity of 10 kg. t / e.
        Therefore, for police armored vehicles and the FSB, mine protection comes to the fore.
        ! 00 kg in t / e is fantastic, but legal 8-10 kg in t / e should be kept under the bottomм.
  15. pv1005
    pv1005 13 November 2013 11: 12
    +4
    Quote: Spade
    Gost..6A class armor protection, and undermining only 1 kg.


    And spirits sometimes lay land mines such that the tank demolishes a tower. Then what armor protection do? 1,5-2 meters? In general, this is an armored car and not an armored personnel carrier (BMP) and it will not go on the attack in battle formations. Its task is to minimize the loss of l / s from any shushera and no more.
  16. Dimon-chik-79
    Dimon-chik-79 13 November 2013 12: 09
    +4
    It would be good if this car went into production and sooner ended up in the army! And it is in the troops and not in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, for them an expensive stuffed Typhoon has already been created


    And Bulat can become a massive army horse that our army needs so much. How many soldiers died in simple, unprotected flatbed trucks. Enough to save on a Russian soldier.
    1. the47th
      the47th 13 November 2013 12: 41
      +2
      Quote: Dimon-chik-79
      It would be nice if this car went into series and soon ended up in the army!

      The troops do not need it in this form. She has no weapons, and a load capacity reserve of 2,5 tons (no module will fit). They will increase engine power, increase tonne carrying capacity by 3, push a turret with a gun (at worst with KPVT), then you can talk about the need for it in the troops.
      1. Akim
        Akim 13 November 2013 13: 04
        +1
        Quote: the47th
        (no module will fit).

        It gets in. With machine guns 12,7 + 7,62.
        1. the47th
          the47th 13 November 2013 16: 07
          +1
          More fighters with equipment (about 120 kg) do not forget. And one more thing: with such a combat module, this machine will be inferior to the BTR-80 in terms of firepower, will not surpass it in spaciousness, inferior in cross-country ability - in any case, also when one of the front wheels is lost (which is easy with a gust on a mine) the machine will become stationary.
          1. Akim
            Akim 13 November 2013 16: 19
            +3
            Quote: the47th
            And one more thing: with such a combat module, this machine will be inferior to the BTR-80 in terms of firepower,

            Again. This is MRAP for internal troops, and not a replacement for an army armored personnel carrier. They have different tasks. Of course, I pay tribute to the KPVT, but that 12,7, that 14,5, that the projectile 20/23-mm manpower equally thrashing. The weight of a similar Polish module is 100 kg. It does not seem that the Russian will be heavier.
            1. the47th
              the47th 13 November 2013 16: 54
              +1
              Dimon-chik-79 really wants to see her in the army. Therefore, I began to compare with the BTR.
      2. Dimon-chik-79
        Dimon-chik-79 13 November 2013 14: 59
        +1
        This is not an infantry fighting vehicle, much less a tank, this machine is for other functions. Keep in mind that this machine is designed to transport personnel and some cargo. But used armored personnel carriers in battles, I think not from a good life.
        And the installation of a 12,7 machine gun is quite enough for self-defense of this type of machine.
        1. the47th
          the47th 14 November 2013 07: 33
          0
          Damask steel has too shitty cross-country ability, too shitty load-bearing capacity to use it as a truck.
      3. Black Colonel
        Black Colonel 14 November 2013 14: 55
        0
        ... and at the same time put shoes on the tracks, put up a tower with a 125 mm cannon and an automatic loader. Then it’s possible for the troops. winked
    2. Larus
      Larus 13 November 2013 13: 18
      +1
      For this, something else was offered for transportation, and this is another armored personnel carrier
    3. IS-80
      IS-80 13 November 2013 14: 07
      +1
      Quote: Dimon-chik-79
      It would be good if this car went into production and sooner ended up in the army! And it is in the troops and not in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, for them an expensive stuffed Typhoon has already been created


      This army car with such resistance to undermining and armor protection is not needed.
      And why did you decide what Typhoon is doing for the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and exclusively?

      Quote: Dimon-chik-79
      And Bulat can become a massive army horse that our army needs so much. How many soldiers died in simple, unprotected flatbed trucks. Enough to save on a Russian soldier.


      Can not. Too cardboard.
      1. Dimon-chik-79
        Dimon-chik-79 13 November 2013 15: 35
        +2
        Not exclusively, just the Ministry of Internal Affairs is showing greater interest in the Typhoons as well as in the Tigers. Yes, and all the same "Typhoon" is expensive for the army, at least mass purchases are unlikely to be expected. They can't shell out for the BMP-3, the BTR-90 is generally abandoned, the BTR-80 is being converted into the BTR-82, the new BMD is not being produced, the old ones are being repaired and modernized, and the T-72 is being modernized in the "budget" option. Byada!

        Regarding the cardboard: these are awning side KAMAZ trucks, Urals, Lawns in the firing columns are "too cardboard". And there is no other in the modern Russian army. And the more attractive this car is that, according to the statement, the security of "Bulat" is higher than that of the BTR-80, and the price is most likely lower (due to the use of the base of a serial truck in a non-floating car, a simple dependent suspension and without other expensive bells and whistles such as variable ground clearance as in " Typhoon "with its independent suspension).
  17. kart
    kart 13 November 2013 12: 30
    +2
    Yes, a specific hans. Only a circular PCT to the top is needed
    1. kafa
      kafa 13 November 2013 12: 46
      +2
      the gentlemen from the Wehrmacht, the Luftwaffe and the Kriegsmarine had so many developments that they were still not embodied so you know winked
  18. ramsi
    ramsi 13 November 2013 13: 02
    0
    in vain they, nevertheless, did not do the side doors at the beginning of the cabin; and the back doors had to be pulled to the roof, someone would probably hook on the forehead, and transferring the condo to the partition between the cabin and the cabin would have been enough for this and that; and, yes, since the car is with a roof, but on the frame, it would be necessary higher ... and the rear partition between the doors is narrower
  19. USNik
    USNik 13 November 2013 13: 15
    +1
    They will increase engine power, increase tonne carrying capacity by 3, push a turret with a gun (at worst with KPVT), then you can talk about the need for it in the troops.
    Yeah, and you get the "old" good BTR-82. The Kamovites are trying to shove the armies of the "OKAMAZenny" BTR-152, where it is not needed nafig. Close, flat-bottomed, unarmed, well, straight Ural-Pokemon, only more expensive ...
  20. Mairos
    Mairos 13 November 2013 13: 32
    +2
    The Typhoon is an order of magnitude better both in habitability and in armor protection. 8 kilos under the bottom versus 1 kilo from "Bulat"
  21. rennim
    rennim 13 November 2013 13: 55
    +3
    Why buy a wagon if there is an armored personnel carrier? If you really buy, then something is really strong.


    I can not agree. For me it is generally incomprehensible this fuss with pseudo armored personnel carriers. Already have a car on a special chassis called BTR. You can call him an armored truck. But he can swim and carry weapons. Those. almost everything you need. The era of armored vehicles is long gone. Previously, armored vehicles were made on their basis in connection with the unification and convenience of production during the war. Or by poverty. For the transportation of personnel you need a normal armored personnel carrier or infantry fighting vehicle. It’s better if with dynamic protection and armor thicker. Often such cars, even wrecked ones, are an excellent shelter. For transporting ammunition and other military cargo, ordinary trucks, but with an armored cabin, are quite suitable. I don’t understand why the garden should be fenced and pull out old forgotten projects and come up with ersatz . Maybe we remember BA-10 during the war. And what ... cheap and cheerful.
    1. IS-80
      IS-80 13 November 2013 14: 47
      0
      Quote: rennim
      The era of armored vehicles is long gone.

      Quote: rennim
      For transportation of ammunition and other military cargo, ordinary trucks, but with an armored cabin, are quite suitable.

      You somehow contradict yourself.
    2. Dimon-chik-79
      Dimon-chik-79 13 November 2013 15: 51
      +1
      Of course, of course, "a normal armored personnel carrier or infantry fighting vehicle is needed to transport personnel," but it will probably not be there for another decade, or maybe more, as before ... "for poverty" and for other reasons. In the meantime, we have only simple, old, good army trucks that have been shooting and burning for more than one war and more than one decade, which do not give soldiers any protection at all.
      So it’s better cheap and cheerful (so for real) than nothing.
  22. kafa
    kafa 13 November 2013 14: 22
    +1
    there is no universal armored car in the world under the moon. there must be an ordered variety, even within the same unit. the chef should not hide in a mobile field self-propelled kitchen protected by dynamic armor and curtain and arena systems. reconnaissance needs mobile secure stealth vehicles coupled with modern communications and target designation damn. more protective
  23. tchoni
    tchoni 13 November 2013 14: 26
    0
    Well, at least I don’t understand how these armored vehicles differ from the BTR 80?

    At a price?
    Quality?
    Simplicity?
    unclear.
    And if you make a light wheeled vehicle with protection, as it was aptly said here, from any riffraff, then making it easier. Given the possibility of transportation by air. (i.e. 13 t is the limit).
    1. kafa
      kafa 13 November 2013 14: 37
      0
      current beauty repeat You are the South African armored cars look guys on the mine threat oh how rummage
  24. saygon66
    saygon66 13 November 2013 14: 29
    +1
    -12 (!) Tons ... 24 (!) Tons ... Are the machines designed for hard surface? In the northwest, 50 percent of the land is swampy, and this thing is not a "Willis" - four of us can't push it out ... Are we going to fight in the summer on good roads? Or are we aiming at the southern theater of operations?
  25. a.hamster55
    a.hamster55 13 November 2013 15: 06
    +3
    Anything is better than a tool box on the Mi-8 for a bortochka-shooter, or a frying pan under the ass. You just hook up the Kevlar panties and wait for the mogul. fellow
  26. voliador
    voliador 13 November 2013 19: 42
    +1
    No weapons of their own, so no fire support; there are loopholes, but how to shoot through them if in the chair the paratrooper is located with his back to the loophole (?); as I understand it - not floating. Who will explain what are the advantages of this kalobakh?
    1. Shur
      Shur 14 November 2013 02: 00
      +2
      The riddle will kneel in the chair. If you want to live, you still don’t get so hot))
  27. Olegmog
    Olegmog 13 November 2013 20: 39
    +3
    Normal armored car for the Caucasus. Width 2m50cm, just
    for public roads. Maneuver
    on it in the village is much easier. The armored personnel carrier is wider, about those meters. KAMAZ engines now
    pulled up. I’ve already run 100 on my own, I haven’t climbed yet.
    For explosives, too, will do. But you can’t catch the landmines. Need to let out
    especially since today there is no such machine in the army.
    1. Shur
      Shur 14 November 2013 01: 58
      +2
      What prevents to modify in the course of action. The basis is the same .. They said that they won’t leave anywhere when the front wheel was torn off, but back, if you saved the units, then it will go back)))
    2. Shur
      Shur 14 November 2013 02: 06
      0
      Yes, you can stir up various modifications. For example, with a high roof, for emergency medical. And there everything is.
  28. a.hamster55
    a.hamster55 13 November 2013 20: 52
    +1
    Well done enough products from three nomenclatures approved by GOST; life is more diverse and complicated. And I am glad that the guys get this variety!
  29. a.hamster55
    a.hamster55 13 November 2013 20: 53
    +1
    Well done enough products from three nomenclatures approved by GOST; life is more diverse and complicated. And I am glad that the guys get this variety!
  30. pawel57
    pawel57 13 November 2013 23: 19
    +5
    Of course this is a remake of btr152. I served on armored personnel carrier 152 in ZAKVO. Pretty simple and reliable and passable armored personnel carrier, of course, everything is in comparison. They were on the exercises and overcame Bichenak pass and marched. Many samples appeared wheeled armored vehicles. It can be seen that this car will be tied to roads and trails or next to them or the steppe not in rainy weather. Application: hide the curfew under armor, so as not to dissect the UAZ and Gaz66; mobile radio stations, electronic warfare; with the installation of weapons of serious security and escort of transport convoys; command staff car; units of combat, technical and rear support. Let the sappers, doctors, techies advance and work near the front line not in the Urals shot through from all sides, but under armor. You can laugh, but a platoon of a battalion would also give a hut to transport kitchens and food can be brought to the front edge under armor. The main thing is to be in the army and not in commercials, but we will always find a place.
  31. bublic82009
    bublic82009 13 November 2013 23: 40
    0
    created new bullshit. only bulletproof armor. now all enemies have RPGs, heavy machine guns. the crew becomes hostage to the armor and dies. nothing new compared to the BTR-80 except that the weight is almost 20 tons. shorter pile of scrap metal
  32. Barmalej
    Barmalej 14 November 2013 00: 13
    +2
    After blowing up the columns and the floor of the body of the corpses, we covered the walls with earth and laid the floor moistly tight with bags of clay, like nothing ZIL 131 had time for our brdm after installing such protection
  33. erix-xnumx
    erix-xnumx 14 November 2013 07: 43
    +1
    What is this armored car designed for? Now a whole bunch of all kinds of armored vehicles for internal troops have been developed - "bears", "typhoons", "tigers", "Ural-VV", just armored trucks. Why is this "Bulat" so special? What outstanding characteristics does it have? Most likely, none .... And on what organ is it needed then?
  34. Dimon-chik-79
    Dimon-chik-79 14 November 2013 11: 00
    0
    Quote: Barmaley
    After blowing up the columns and the floor of the body of the corpses, we covered the walls with earth and laid the floor moistly tight with bags of clay, like nothing ZIL 131 had time for our brdm after installing such protection

    That's just to ensure that the floor of the body of corpses was not and did not have to be wrapped in bags of earth in order to have at least some protection and the army needed this machine, especially since the engine was almost twice as powerful as Zilovsky.
  35. AlexA
    AlexA 14 November 2013 11: 52
    0
    Thank you colleagues for the clarification. But it is clear, after all, not to the end.
    For transporting 10 fighters to the battlefield, and even to shoot back, and even with a machine gun or cannon, ALREADY ARE BTR-80, mastered in SERIAL PRODUCTION.
    For "delivering food to the front line, signalmen, scouts, etc." ALREADY THERE IS A BRDM, mastered in SERIAL PRODUCTION.
    For transport and logistics tasks (such as immediately 30 fighters, 5 tons of cargo at once, etc.), the new armored personnel carrier is not suitable (cannot).
    This begs the question from a stupid engineer: what other fundamentally new or better tasks can this machine carry out with an archaic layout 60 years ago and unprotected bridges?
    Just don't talk about "cheapness". One panoramic bulletproof glass for the entire landing will be more expensive than the entire 80s. And also mastering in production for a small series, and haemorrhoids for a replacement with an additional nomenclature of spare parts, and a weakening of the structure with all these windows. Most likely the car will turn gold.
    Or maybe such a task was set by the developers and their lobbyists in order to provide the owners of the Zashchita private office with a gesheft? Then there are no questions.
    1. tchoni
      tchoni 14 November 2013 12: 05
      0
      All right. This is a banal budget cut. The price of two such BM = one tank :-)
      At one time, I managed to work a little with the Ural "Bear" - and so this device was originally conceived as an ersatz armored personnel carrier with a fully armored cabin and replaceable modules in the body (variations are different from a mobile post block to an armored fuel truck.). as well as variations on MTO protection. - it made sense and from this the federal was born. And this is an attempt to cut down the babal on the loose.
      Start the army to buy this - the situation will be like this: to the battalion of motorized riflemen - 3 BM - for the battalion commander, headquarters, and reconnaissance - and the rest on Kamaz trucks with impromptu log protection (in the sense of logs and sandbags).
  36. And Us Rat
    And Us Rat 16 November 2013 06: 42
    0
    Quote: Akim
    Quote: the47th
    he just does what he cuts through the minefields.

    You have a North Caucasus. Or did VV expel from the structures of the Ministry of Internal Affairs?


    Yeah, and every second in the garden has a "shaitan's pipe" buried, will he withstand an RPG-7 hit?
  37. mithridate
    mithridate 17 November 2013 15: 19
    0
    maybe another cut?
  38. GRIGORY
    GRIGORY 17 November 2013 17: 13
    0
    And what kind of car is it in 1 photo in the background? Thanks in advance.
  39. Starik63
    Starik63 25 November 2013 00: 17
    0
    I think that this unit (both in the 6X6 formula and in the 4X4 formula there is one, yes) should be classified as an armored car, with all the tasks and applications that follow from this. This Tatar chariot does not reach the armored personnel carrier, although it boastfully declares its supposedly better reservation. Although this is complete nonsense. They just want to sell more expensive. Take the same doors of the driver and commander, which are enthusiastically written in the material. ANY aperture in the armor, even if covered by a door, is a weakening of the armor! And what's so good about that? Conclusion - the overwhelming KamAZ, the grand-tortured armored car!