Military Review

Syria can respond to Israeli air strikes

350

The Syrian army has not yet responded to Israeli air strikes on its territory, but reserves the right to respond. Interfax reports this with reference to a military-diplomatic source in Damascus.


“If Israel continues its provocative actions, Syria can respond to them.” She will determine the response time and the means by which it will be given, ”the source of the Russian news agency noted.

October 31 Israeli aircraft, which were located over the neutral waters of the Mediterranean, attacked two Syrian targets near the coastal town of Jeble. “Being at a distance of 70 km from the targets, they fired two missiles on the batteries of the Osa anti-aircraft missile system (SAM). One rocket hit the target, the second missed, ”a Syrian source said.

At the end of January 2013, the Israeli aviation struck an air strike at a military research center in Jemrai, near Damascus. Only a few days later, official Israel in the person of Minister of Defense Ehud Barak recognized his role in this bombing. “We warned that the modern cannot be transported.” weapon to Lebanon, ”he stressed then. As a result of the attack, two people were killed, five were injured.

In early May, this Syrian object was attacked again. Israeli Air Force aircraft fired several missiles at the corps of a research center. According to news agencies, the airstrike was inflicted after approval received at a secret meeting with the participation of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Originator:
http://russian.rt.com/
350 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. mirag2
    mirag2 7 November 2013 13: 56
    16
    How did this article come about?
    From the fact that there were rumors, or reliable info about new Jewish attacks on Syria?
    Or ahead of the joint actions of Saudi Arabia + Israel against the Shiites (Syria + Iran)?
    Now I’ll look at the Jewish press, and I will be ready to argue with the speckled atalef professors ...
    1. smel
      smel 7 November 2013 14: 03
      69
      It was high time to answer the boorish people. Yes, so answer so that the brains fall into place, but it would be better to fly out
      1. Guun
        Guun 7 November 2013 14: 09
        26
        Then the IDF troops invade Syria - does Assad need it? So the Syrian army is exhausted by the civil war, and also the war against Israel. Do not pull this war Syria.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. catapractic
            catapractic 7 November 2013 14: 57
            18
            even before the Civil War, he bombed Syria before, remember the nuclear reactor was heaped, not by any means a jackal — just by the right of a strong one, they understand only the force in the East and until they hit a couple of planes they bombed, they will bomb and the jackals have nothing to do with it, just both countries are at war and everyone is getting out as best he can. Syria is weak now, therefore, it can do nothing except scary statements, just as it’s not a shame for our bastard ovs, this is the reality.
            1. Vovka levka
              Vovka levka 7 November 2013 15: 34
              -22 qualifying.
              Quote: cataphractium
              even before the Civil War, he bombed Syria before, remember the nuclear reactor was heaped, not by any means a jackal — just by the right of a strong one, they understand only the force in the East and until they hit a couple of planes they bombed, they will bomb and the jackals have nothing to do with it, just both countries are at war and everyone is getting out as best he can. Syria is weak now, therefore, it can do nothing except scary statements, just as it’s not a shame for our bastard ovs, this is the reality.

              I agree.
              Syria was weak and will be under such a system of government. And numerous injections will not help because it is water that goes into the sand.
              1. Versed
                Versed 8 November 2013 00: 28
                -8
                Syria can - it's already funny laughing

                As soon as Syria opens the mittens on Israel, it will be immediately erased from planet Earth. In particular, the announcer Bashar will be caught, and Finita La Comedy (Gaddafi / Saddam)
          2. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 15: 01
            +7
            Quote: Russ69
            They use it, purely on a jackal ...

            So they need to answer also, around the world, where they do not wait, and without a signature. Let them think who dared, they have a lot of FRIENDS.
            1. Pimply
              Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 06
              -28 qualifying.
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              So they need to answer also, around the world, where they do not wait, and without a signature. Let them think who dared, they have a lot of FRIENDS.

              Can you be more specific? Well, just like that, otherwise I have a feeling that you are now calling for the fomenting of national danger and terrorism.
              1. Ingvar 72
                Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 15: 32
                26
                Quote: Pimply
                You are now calling for fomenting national isolation and terrorism.

                You are in your repertoire. Which article have I forgotten? It was the Jews who invented world terrorism, inciting and paying for warriors. We all know the nationality of the most famous conspirators and terrorists, and I see no reason for the Arabs not to answer you the same. How is Moses having an eye for an eye?
                1. Pimply
                  Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 38
                  -8
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  You are in your repertoire. Which article have I forgotten? It was the Jews who invented world terrorism, inciting and paying for warriors. We all know the nationality of the most famous conspirators and terrorists, and I see no reason for the Arabs not to answer you the same. How is Moses having an eye for an eye?

                  Continue *)
                  1. Ingvar 72
                    Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 15: 47
                    +2
                    Quote: Pimply
                    Continue *)

                    Are you recording? There will be something for children to read at night. Type of horror stories about Koshchei Immortal. laughing
                    1. Pimply
                      Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 49
                      -4
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      Are you recording? There will be something for children to read at night. Type of horror stories about Koshchei Immortal.

                      I write it down. I love 8 documents)
                      1. Ingvar 72
                        Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 15: 52
                        +3
                        Quote: Pimply
                        I write it down. I love 8 documents)

                        Are you an accountant or lawyer? Dentists do not seem to bother with documents. laughing
                      2. Pimply
                        Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 56
                        -15 qualifying.
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Are you an accountant or lawyer? Dentists do not seem to bother with documents.

                        I have a lawyer;) If you really want to meet with him.
                      3. rolik
                        rolik 7 November 2013 18: 52
                        10
                        Quote: Pimply
                        If you really want to meet him.

                        We ask your lawyer to visit, or maybe you and him will inadvertently take a look)))))) Address, in Biryulyovo, give ???
                      4. Pimply
                        Pimply 7 November 2013 19: 01
                        -7
                        Quote: rolik
                        We ask your lawyer to visit, or maybe you and him will inadvertently take a look)))))) Address, in Biryulyovo, give ???

                        Do I need to shake and be afraid? He died as if I had not seen Natsik. Cowards all as one. Something can only be in the crowd.
                      5. rolik
                        rolik 7 November 2013 21: 52
                        +1
                        Quote: Pimply
                        Something can only be in the crowd.

                        I agree, a crowd can do a lot, and an organized crowd is turning into a mass. Which can very, very much.
                        But you forgot, so to speak, about an individual approach to solving the problem)))) When in the entrance, around the corner, again in the same crowd, you are gently poked so that the surgeon does not help. But it depends on how much the individual managed, sorry, to pump into the soul of all those around him))))))
                      6. Pimply
                        Pimply 7 November 2013 21: 55
                        -3
                        Quote: rolik
                        the entrance, around the corner, again in the same crowd, you are gently poked so that the surgeon does not help. But it depends on how much the individual managed, sorry, to pump into the soul of all those around him)))))

                        Or how much I consider others to be beyond the control of Russian acquaintances.
                      7. rolik
                        rolik 7 November 2013 22: 01
                        +1
                        Quote: Pimply
                        Or how much do others consider myself beyond the control of Russian friends

                        Well, you, everyone walks under the laws)))) Only there are those who are watching them, those who are not watching them, and those who are generally at them - violet, marginals in a word)))))))
                  2. Oberst_71
                    Oberst_71 8 November 2013 06: 13
                    0
                    Well, then you are also bold under the wing of the United States!
        2. rolik
          rolik 7 November 2013 18: 50
          +1
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          Are you recording? There will be something for children to read at night

          No, you simply won’t be given a visa to Israel, because today’s incident will be reported where it should and how it should)))))))
          1. atalef
            atalef 7 November 2013 18: 54
            0
            Quote: rolik
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Are you recording? There will be something for children to read at night

            No, you simply won’t be given a visa to Israel, because today’s incident will be reported where it should and how it should)))))))

            I dare to remind, dear gin, that between us 4 of the year, a visa-free regime fool
          2. rolik
            rolik 7 November 2013 21: 47
            +3
            Quote: atalef
            I dare to remind, dear gin, that between us 4 of the year, a visa-free regime

            I’m afraid to say, but what if I’ll smooth it over))))) that for one individual person .... exceptions can be made)))) It's like writing a report)))))) it’s possible, but it’s possible and that way))))
  2. Dezzed
    Dezzed 7 November 2013 20: 47
    -8
    Quote: Ingvar 72
    It was the Jews who invented world terrorism


    as well as biological weapons that affect the brain.
    while there is only one victim - Ingvar 72
    1. rolik
      rolik 7 November 2013 22: 23
      +1
      Quote: DezzeD
      as well as biological weapons that affect the brain.
      while there is only one victim - Ingvar 72

      Well, here's the transition to the individual .... so ... Apollo Au !!!! Here you need to censor however!
  • rolik
    rolik 7 November 2013 18: 48
    +5
    Quote: Pimply
    that you are now calling for inciting national isolation and terrorism.

    And why immediately cry ???
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 18: 52
      -11 qualifying.
      Quote: rolik
      And why immediately cry ???


      Children are crying. And I believe, and I am firmly convinced that
      a) the laws of the Russian Federation must be respected
      b) there is no place for the Nazis on this site
      1. velikoros-xnumx
        velikoros-xnumx 7 November 2013 19: 01
        19
        Quote: Pimply
        there is no place for the Nazis on this site

        Actually like the Zionists, whom divorced immeasurably.
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 19: 05
          -10 qualifying.
          Quote: velikoros-xnumx
          Actually like the Zionists, whom divorced immeasurably.

          Oh oh Is Zionism calling for ethnic cleansing, for example?
          1. their
            their 7 November 2013 20: 37
            10
            Not only encourages but periodically applies them to the Palestinians
          2. Pimply
            Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 42
            -3
            Quote: sus
            Not only encourages but periodically applies them to the Palestinians


            More specifically.
          3. their
            their 7 November 2013 22: 06
            0
            There is such a thing in the Arab world as the Nakba, when the Zionists arrived in Palestine, you slaughtered Arabs in whole blocks. So there is such a sinner for you.
          4. Pimply
            Pimply 7 November 2013 22: 12
            +2
            Quote: sus
            There is such a thing in the Arab world as the Nakba, when the Zionists arrived in Palestine, you slaughtered Arabs in whole blocks. So there is such a sinner for you.

            Why are there neighborhoods - cities, countries.
            More specifically. Which neighborhoods were cut out.
          5. their
            their 7 November 2013 22: 46
            0
            You yourself know very well that Zionist terror and the terrorist organizations LEKHI, Beitar, Etzel, and Irgun are also written in your Wikipedia.
          6. Pimply
            Pimply 7 November 2013 23: 35
            +1
            Quote: sus
            You yourself know very well that Zionist terror and the terrorist organizations LEKHI, Beitar, Etzel, and Irgun are also written in your Wikipedia.

            I do not know. Tell me in detail about cutting in quarters.
          7. Current 72
            Current 72 8 November 2013 02: 08
            +2
            Listen Pupyrchaty, not the Palestinians came to YOUR territory, but YOU are Israelis. YOU have been allocated 14000 square kilometers. Palestinian territory, and how much you occupy this hour, 28000sq.km .. So who is the invader and terrorist, the answer is one ISRAEL.
          8. Aaron Zawi
            Aaron Zawi 8 November 2013 02: 24
            +2
            Quote: Current 72
            Listen Pupyrchaty, not the Palestinians came to YOUR territory, but YOU are Israelis. YOU have been allocated 14000 square kilometers. Palestinian territory, and how much you occupy this hour, 28000sq.km .. So who is the invader and terrorist, the answer is one ISRAEL.

            War s. Kaliningrad was just Konigsberg only seventy years ago. Winning usually benefits the winner, and not vice versa.
          9. Pimply
            Pimply 8 November 2013 11: 30
            0
            Quote: Current 72
            Listen Pupyrchaty, not the Palestinians came to YOUR territory, but YOU are Israelis. YOU have been allocated 14000 square kilometers. Palestinian territory, and how much you occupy this hour, 28000sq.km .. So who is the invader and terrorist, the answer is one ISRAEL.

            To begin with, I hasten to remind - yes, they came to our territory. The fact that the owner was expelled from the apartment does not mean that the new tenant has become the owner of the apartment.

            Secondly, do you blame Israel for the fact that the Arabs did not want Israel to have these 14000 square kilometers and started the war, abandoning the forum in two states?
  • Dezzed
    Dezzed 7 November 2013 20: 53
    -8
    if so, it turns out that we don’t know how to clean it up.

    but in general they would have brought an example for decency, otherwise some would throw various accusations.
  • velikoros-xnumx
    velikoros-xnumx 7 November 2013 21: 22
    +3
    Pimpled (1)  Today, 20:42 ↑ New

    Quote: sus
    Not only encourages but periodically applies them to the Palestinians


    More specifically.

     Reply
     Quote
     Report a violation of the rules of the site
     0 
     DezzeD (1)  Today, 20:53 ↑ New

    if so, it turns out that we don’t know how to clean it up.

    but in general they would have brought an example for decency, otherwise some would throw various accusations.

    What I said earlier.
  • Victor-M
    Victor-M 7 November 2013 23: 27
    0
    Quote: DezzeD
    if so, it turns out that we don’t know how to clean it up.

    but in general they would have brought an example for decency, otherwise some would throw various accusations.

    A typical Zionist method of dialogue according to the template they set, question to question.
  • Pimply
    Pimply 7 November 2013 23: 36
    -2
    Quote: Victor-M
    A typical Zionist method of dialogue according to the template they set, question to question.

    And what is atypical? 8)
  • The comment was deleted.
  • scrack
    scrack 7 November 2013 22: 20
    -1
    But what about "Kill the best of the goyim"?
  • Pimply
    Pimply 7 November 2013 22: 25
    +1
    Quote: scrack
    Kill the best of the goyim "


    Remember quotation context?
  • Ascetic
    Ascetic 7 November 2013 22: 24
    +8
    Quote: Pimply
    Oh oh Is Zionism calling for ethnic cleansing, for example?


    On November 10, 1975, the United Nations General Assembly, in its resolution No. 3379 (ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION), recognized Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination. After the defeat and collapse of the USSR in 1991. Resolution was repealed
    According to the Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Doctor of Historical Sciences and Professor of the Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Alexander Baryshev, the resolution was canceled without any explanation from the UN General Assembly, due to the changing international conditions and the "fierce" pressure of the United States, which, according to Baryshev, is the center world Zionism and imperialism [12]. Johanan Manor also confirms the opinion on US pressure, referring to the Jerusalem Post that US ambassadors in other countries were instructed to warn that failure to vote to cancel resolution 3379 could affect the relations of these countries with the USA

    Today, any deep criticism of Zionism (as a racial and nationalist ideology of the Jewish bourgeoisie and the financial oligarchy) is rejected as "anti-Semitism", anti-Semitism, or disrespect for Jews as an ethnic group.
  • Pimply
    Pimply 7 November 2013 22: 30
    0
    Quote: Ascetic
    Today, any deep criticism of Zionism (as a racial and nationalist ideology of the Jewish bourgeoisie and the financial oligarchy) is rejected as "anti-Semitism", anti-Semitism, or disrespect for Jews as an ethnic group.

    Exactly
  • rolik
    rolik 8 November 2013 09: 31
    0
    Quote: Ascetic
    Today, any deep criticism of Zionism (as a racial and nationalist ideology of the Jewish bourgeoisie and the financial oligarchy) is rejected as "anti-Semitism", anti-Semitism, or disrespect for Jews as an ethnic group.

    A thousand times right. I, too, suffer, one of the moderators rolls a huge barrel at me))))) I wrote the word w ... s, this gentleman immediately thought up anti-Semitic letters to her))))) And I, perhaps, wanted to write bugs, rednecks, live-throats, but no - it's my fault)))) There is no justice on earth. And most interestingly, when another participant in the discussion writes this bad word, zero attention. It's not fair. So I have to write to the administrators again, I’m stubborn uncle, and Klava will endure everything)))))
  • rolik
    rolik 7 November 2013 22: 04
    +4
    Quote: Pimply
    Can you be more specific? Well, just like that, otherwise I have a feeling that you are now calling for the fomenting of national danger and terrorism.

    And here I would also like to be more specific)))) In what words of the respected Ingvar are calls for ethnic hatred and terrorism pronounced ?????
    What did he write, what should be hung ....... and save Russia ????? I did not see these words, can you give an excerpt in which they are present ???
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 22: 13
      -2
      Quote: rolik
      And here I would also like to be more specific)))) In what words of the respected Ingvar are calls for ethnic hatred and terrorism pronounced ?????
      What did he write, what should be hung ....... and save Russia ????? I did not see these words, can you give an excerpt in which they are present ???


      And let this be shown by a linguistic examination. And she will show.
      1. rolik
        rolik 7 November 2013 22: 21
        +3
        Quote: Pimply
        . And she will show.

        Nifigushenki she will not show)))))) I bet on 100 .... damn what to argue ??))) rupees)))
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 22: 29
          -1
          Quote: rolik
          Nifigushenki she will not show)))))) I bet on 100 .... damn what to argue ??))) rupees)))

          8)
      2. Misantrop
        Misantrop 7 November 2013 22: 25
        +6
        Quote: Pimply
        linguistic examination will show. And she will show.

        It will depend on who exactly will be the expert. And how much he will be paid for the examination (and who exactly) laughing
        1. rolik
          rolik 7 November 2013 22: 31
          +3
          Quote: Misantrop
          It will depend on who exactly will be the expert. And how much he will be paid for the examination (and who exactly)

          Strongly welcome drinks
          Just not Novodvorskaya)))))) I'm afraid, after her expert examination, Ingvar and I are found guilty of the destruction of Sodom and Gomora, the global flood, and another hundred sins including the haemorrhoids of her beloved dog)))))))
          I urge you to be careful too, one moderator is always looking at me, no matter how the shadow of his anger falls on you belay lol
          1. Misantrop
            Misantrop 7 November 2013 22: 36
            +4
            Quote: rolik
            Just not Novodvorskaya)))))) I'm afraid after her expert examination ...
            ... only she and academician Sakharov will remain innocent (and that - only because he died earlier) laughing
            Quote: rolik
            I urge you to caution
            In Crimea, no other way ... request
    2. Russ69
      Russ69 8 November 2013 02: 34
      +1
      Quote: rolik
      And here I would also like to be more specific)))) In what words of the respected Ingvar are calls for ethnic hatred and terrorism pronounced ?????
      What did he write, what should be hung ....... and save Russia ????? I did not see these words, can you give an excerpt in which they are present ???

      It’s enough that I thought maybe. So the court ... smile
  • Victor-M
    Victor-M 7 November 2013 23: 20
    0
    Quote: Pimply
    Can you be more specific? Well, just like that, otherwise I have a feeling that you are now calling for the fomenting of national danger and terrorism.

    And what, are you ready to scribble slogans, purely on the jackal?
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 23: 36
      0
      Quote: Victor-M
      And what, are you ready to scribble slogans, purely on the jackal?

      Well, once you were banned, are you back on the site? It's not for long. 8)
      1. Victor-M
        Victor-M 7 November 2013 23: 47
        +2
        Quote: Pimply
        Well, once you were banned, are you back on the site? It's not for long. 8)

        Who banned "you" or what? For more details please?
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 8 November 2013 01: 40
          0
          Quote: Victor-M
          Who banned "you" or what? For more details please?

          Oh, not banned? Do not worry. Banned.
  • Russ69
    Russ69 8 November 2013 02: 23
    -1
    Quote: Pimply
    Well, just like that, otherwise I have a feeling that you are now calling for the fomenting of national danger and terrorism.

    Israel, this is a constant concern. Or is there a big difference between dead civilians, from the martyr’s belt or a precision bomb ...
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 8 November 2013 11: 33
      +2
      Quote: Russ69
      Or is there a big difference between dead civilians, from the martyr’s belt or a precision bomb ...

      There is. If an innocent person dies from a precision bomb, his death is usually accidental, and is caused by the fact that in the hostilities the death of civilians is an inevitable evil. However, as in the case of Israel, the side that uses precision weapons is trying to minimize the number of civilian casualties. The terrorist, on the other hand, intends to choose among the victims of defenseless civilians. Don't you really see the difference?
  • Ezhaak
    Ezhaak 7 November 2013 18: 45
    +3
    Even assuming that the launches are not tracked in blue and white, the whales will be immediately reported to them. Who, where and when dare. Unfortunately.
  • Scoun
    Scoun 7 November 2013 19: 10
    +4
    Quote: Russ69
    They use it, purely on a jackal ...

    They do everything according to shaklinnoy and then they are surprised for what people do not like their poor ...
    October 31, Israeli aircraft located above neutral waters The Mediterranean Sea attacked two Syrian targets near the seaside village of Jeble.

    On take-off even over the territory of Israel, it is time to shoot down planes as attacking Syria.
    So they will begin to be indignant .. for what? it's not my fault!
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 08
      -5
      Quote: Scoun
      They do everything according to shaklinnoy and then they are surprised for what people do not like their poor ...

      Better to be unloved, but alive than beloved but dead, don’t you?
      Quote: Scoun
      On take-off even over the territory of Israel, it is time to shoot down planes as attacking Syria.
      So they will begin to be indignant .. for what? it's not my fault!

      Tell me, who will do this?
      1. SSR
        SSR 7 November 2013 22: 40
        +2
        Eugene, I’m looking from the outside and I can’t understand, you are at least an intelligent person, but your posts have a tinge of trolling. your post above "better to be unloved, but alive ..... blah blah" where is the logic? The fact that ordinary Jews are persecuted is "cry" and the fact that one should behave like human beings is Zionism. Below you write about Libya, Alya, links to the studio, and so on, some other questions, but specifically from your side, one trolling, when there was a dispute about armored vehicles, it was pleasant to read you, because you wrote reasonably and here you were, IMHO, those trolls.
        Ps
        Here on the forum about s-300 it was repeatedly mentioned about deliveries of s-300 and, if possible, bring down on the territory of Israel .... Do not pretend that other discussions did not touch the axis and the type was not discussed and you did not participate there
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 23: 30
          0
          Quote: SSR
          Eugene, I’m looking from the outside and I can’t understand, you are at least an intelligent person, but your posts have a tinge of trolling. your post above "better to be unloved, but alive ..... blah blah" where is the logic? The fact that ordinary Jews are persecuted is "cry" and the fact that one should behave like human beings is Zionism. Below you write about Libya, Alya, links to the studio, and so on, some other questions, but specifically from your side, one trolling, when there was a dispute about armored vehicles, it was pleasant to read you, because you wrote reasonably and here you were, IMHO, those trolls.

          And what argument can be given in response to an idiotic maxim?
        2. Papakiko
          Papakiko 7 November 2013 23: 39
          +3
          Quote: SSR
          Here on the forum

          And Zhenya at different times is under the influence of different chemistry or his personality disorder.
          As soon as the conversation about Israeli impudent children comes in or catches him in a lie, then Zhenya suffers from radiation sickness (tfu. Star.
          Either he passes exams in Giyur, or without it, he tries to become mine. It does not explain, it only smells fragrant. hi
      2. Russ69
        Russ69 8 November 2013 02: 38
        +1
        Quote: Pimply
        Better to be unloved, but alive than beloved but dead, don’t you?

        Judging by your logic, the shelling of Israel by the Hassans is a good deed? For their part, anyway ...
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 8 November 2013 11: 36
          +1
          Quote: Russ69
          Judging by your logic, the shelling of Israel by the Hassans is a good deed? For their part, anyway ...

          Why? The peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan have perfectly shown that if Israel is not touched, then it will not touch anyone. The guys with the Kasams want something else - they want, in principle, the destruction of Israel. Or do you think they are able to love him somehow differently, except in a dead form?
  • Bashkaus
    Bashkaus 7 November 2013 15: 16
    -2
    Then the IDF troops invade Syria - does Assad need it? Well, well, over the summer units of the airborne peacekeepers were formed. Like nothing like that, only usually peacekeepers come in with a UN mandate, and this is the time for meetings and decision-making. And then from a few puzzles it turns out a whole mosaic.
    A-paratroopers are not motorized infantry and can land on an unprepared base several hours after the order. For ordinary peacekeepers, such a rush is not needed.
    B-pomoyna Putin already announced the possibility of sending our counterparty to the border of Israel and Syria.
    But the overall picture turns out as soon as the Israeli tank wedges move to Damascus, after a few hours our paratroopers with bread and salt, and ATGM will meet them.
    1. Motors1991
      Motors1991 7 November 2013 16: 15
      +7
      How do you like scattering other people's lives, you want to fight? Recruit yourself and eat, kick the Jews of the ass. Only I strongly doubt that you are capable of knocking on the clave, it’s not a dirty trench to sit. And on the topic of nefig climb there. They gave weapons, they want to fight for their homeland, let them fight, they can not and do not want to - these are their problems.
      1. cherkas.oe
        cherkas.oe 7 November 2013 16: 34
        0
        Quote: Motors1991
        They gave weapons, they want to fight for their homeland, let them fight, they can not and they don’t want to - these are their problems

        If you don’t want to give a fuck? Only Russia has its own interests there, if Assad is torn apart, then the sheikhs will immediately pull the string of gas to Europe through Syria, but do we need it?
        1. Motors1991
          Motors1991 7 November 2013 17: 13
          +4
          If you wanted to, they stretched out for a long time and it’s not at all necessary to do this. It’s enough to look at what happened to Libya without Gaddafi, everyone is at war against everyone, oil production has decreased by 90%, it turns out that Russia only won. Syria also has a lot of different things people live, there will be no person who can keep them all in check, the same situation will arise as in Libya and then no one in their right mind will lay any gas pipeline. A gas pipeline is an expensive thing and without political stability it makes no sense to lay it through Syria, otherwise and there is some sort of Habib partisans who will blow it in the name of Allah.
          1. Pimply
            Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 20
            -5
            Quote: Motors1991
            oil production decreased by 90%,

            Details
            1. Motors1991
              Motors1991 7 November 2013 17: 34
              +3
              You have other information, then also in more detail.
              1. Pimply
                Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 41
                +1
                Quote: Motors1991
                You have other information, then also in more detail.


                You give the statement without reference to the source. You keep the answer.
                1. rolik
                  rolik 7 November 2013 18: 56
                  +1
                  Quote: Pimply
                  You give the statement without reference to the source. You keep the answer.

                  hi
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. Scoun
              Scoun 7 November 2013 19: 31
              +2
              Quote: Pimply
              Details

              The militia, having put forward a number of demands to the authorities, seized oil terminals in the summer of 2013. Libyan oil production fell sharply from 1,4 million barrels per day to several hundred thousand barrels per day.
              1. Pimply
                Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 09
                0
                Quote: Scoun
                The militia, having put forward a number of demands to the authorities, seized oil terminals in the summer of 2013. Libyan oil production fell sharply from 1,4 million barrels per day to several hundred thousand barrels per day.

                Yeah. How long did this go on? And where is 90%?
                1. MVS
                  MVS 7 November 2013 23: 53
                  +2
                  Quote: Pimply
                  And where is 90%?

                  http://vz.ru/news/2013/9/13/650292.html
                2. Pimply
                  Pimply 8 November 2013 01: 43
                  -1
                  Quote: MVS
                  http://vz.ru/news/2013/9/13/650292.html

                  Can you understand the information? The strike, as a result of which the volume was reduced in a certain period of time, and not in principle
                3. MVS
                  MVS 8 November 2013 07: 07
                  0
                  Quote: Pimply
                  The strike, as a result of which the volume was reduced in a certain period of time, and not in principle

                  You were interested
                  Quote: Pimply
                  And where is 90%?

                  and I answered you. But about
                  Quote: Pimply
                  How long did it last

                  I did not write a word.
                4. Pimply
                  Pimply 8 November 2013 11: 37
                  0
                  Well, I answer - there is a difference when it comes to a short-term decline in production, and a permanent one. The opponent claimed that the decline is permanent.
  • rolik
    rolik 7 November 2013 18: 55
    +3
    Quote: Motors1991
    kick the jids

    Wow!!!!! The word ".zh.i.d." missed to print ???? And where is our strict Apollo))))) ????
  • Russ69
    Russ69 8 November 2013 02: 43
    0
    Quote: Motors1991
    How do you like to scatter other people's lives, do you want to fight?

    The point is a little different. There were no calls to spread rot on the Israelis. But to cool their ardor, the destruction of the Syrians is necessary. No wonder that Israel was categorically against our peacekeepers.
  • clidon
    clidon 7 November 2013 16: 59
    +8
    I can tell you with confidence. No paratroopers in Damascus (except for the guards of our embassy guards and veon specialists) will not meet Jews. And not only because Lavrov has already clearly said "Russia will not fight for Syria," but primarily because it will be a senseless sacrifice - to act with a small number of light infantry, far from supply bases, without air cover and echeloned defense, only in one case - if you want your people to die heroically.
    However, the chances that the Israelis are now about to get into the Syrian mess are vanishingly small.
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 02
      +1
      Quote: clidon
      I can tell you with confidence. No paratroopers in Damascus (except for the guards of our embassy guards and veon specialists) will not meet Jews. And not only because Lavrov has already clearly said "Russia will not fight for Syria," but primarily because it will be a senseless sacrifice - to act with a small number of light infantry, far from supply bases, without air cover and echeloned defense, only in one case - if you want your people to die heroically.
      However, the chances that the Israelis are now about to get into the Syrian mess are vanishingly small.


      Very pleased with the rare, reasonable comments.
  • catapractic
    catapractic 7 November 2013 18: 39
    +6
    no longer play the Saddan strike and blitzkrieg or other strategies, it seems harmful to you and do not smoke anything. What airborne forces, which ATGMs, what kind of Syria do we need to think about how to defend our border with Wed Asia, an Islamic Islamist will trample from here to you. And you, my dear, are going to fight in Syria, the commander fought there, I fought for 70 years -oh, he told me different things and how the Golan was blown away and how then they presented them to our allegedly bad equipment. Assad needs to put any weapons for grandmothers and help him at the UN, but our guys should go there -volta
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 18: 53
      +1
      Quote: cataphractium
      Assad needs to put any weapons for grandmothers and help him at the UN, but our guys should go there -volta

      What are his grandmothers? Now everything goes on credit
      1. rolik
        rolik 7 November 2013 18: 59
        +3
        Quote: Pimply
        What are his grandmothers? Now everything goes on credit

        Iran helps than it can. Throws some money .... well done.
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 19: 04
          0
          Quote: rolik
          Iran helps than it can. Throws some money .... well done.

          Iran has problems with the currency, you do not know? Syria opened a credit line - but only for the purchase of goods domestically. Russia does not drip from this. And it drips half a billion dollars a month on supplies of oil products alone, which Syria goes on credit. And the arming line of credit is open.
          1. rolik
            rolik 7 November 2013 21: 57
            +1
            Quote: Pimply
            Iran has currency problems

            Officially - yes)))) Just don’t say that he wanted several billion for the C300, to wring out that he has absolutely trouble with money))))
            I look and Abamka looked at him with a gasp, and Israeli politicians nervously fidgeted at the pope. And then, even worse, they ran with the Saudis to whisper. Indeed, the mysterious deeds of the descendants of the Moses))))
        2. alone
          alone 7 November 2013 20: 47
          +1
          Quote: rolik
          Iran helps than it can. Throws some money .... well done.


          The Iranian economy is going through hard times. High inflation and capital outflows + sanctions.
          1. Pimply
            Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 51
            0
            The most important thing is the problem of currency transactions
        3. Dezzed
          Dezzed 7 November 2013 20: 57
          -1
          What Iran and Arabs pay for the light?
  • alone
    alone 7 November 2013 20: 44
    +2
    The IDF will not enter Syria. But the missile-artillery strikes and the Air Force are quite real.
    Assad understands this and therefore will not answer. He is not in this position now to fight on two fronts.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • lelikas
    lelikas 7 November 2013 14: 53
    +4
    One must either answer or not, but you cannot change anything with promises.
    With all due respect to the Syrians - this hour is similar to the promise of a junior high school student to give back if he takes away a trifle from him again.
    In the words of the hero Al Pacino in my favorite movie-Doubt-hit! (although the original sounds even better).
    1. rolik
      rolik 7 November 2013 19: 01
      -1
      Quote: lelikas
      it's like a junior high school promise

      Junior students become high school students. But for some, the older brothers are decrepit, and they cannot protect. Well, you can’t rely on the Saudis, they also go along the blade.
  • Migari
    Migari 7 November 2013 15: 01
    +1
    The elder’s tactics, out of the blue, of course, Syria now wouldn’t have anything to do, but they will beg for it.
  • avg
    avg 7 November 2013 15: 22
    +3
    Quote smel: It was high time to answer the boorish people.
    Yes, they can not now! This is how the Japanese and I suffered during the Second World War. They clenched their teeth and endured, and in August 1945 they answered.
  • Grandson of Veteran
    Grandson of Veteran 7 November 2013 15: 26
    +5
    "It was high time to answer the boorish people."
    So it’s not clear to me, why didn’t they answer?!? Why didn’t the air defense systems work out ??
    This is lawlessness, an airstrike on a military object of a sovereign state on its territory !!! What do you mean, reserve the right to answer? It was necessary to shoot down !!! Jews finally lost fear !!!
    1. atalef
      atalef 7 November 2013 21: 02
      0
      Quote: Veteran's grandson
      What do you mean, reserve the right to answer? It was necessary to shoot down !!

      I agree, it was necessary to shoot down, as the last time, and the year before last. and before and before before before and so 8 times hi
  • Dezzed
    Dezzed 7 November 2013 20: 43
    -4
    if they can then let them answer
  • bif
    bif 7 November 2013 22: 14
    +1
    "... In Yemen there is a saying that says:" In the Arab East, the wind blows in four directions at once. "That is, this signal will be heard by all states. This is a very bad signal for the SA in general, and for the prince in particular. moreover, threats from the West are supplemented by threats from the Russian East.Putin does not like it when someone kills the citizens of his country.Of course, this has not been done without Israel, so it seems that very soon the sun will set for these countries in the East .. . "
    http://www.contrpost.com/en/78-2013-05-10-13-45-19/3384-solntse-zakhodit-na-vost
    okay
  • I am
    I am 7 November 2013 23: 18
    0
    about the flight of brains, yes, the idea is good, but not new. however, there are two more three attacks on Syrian depots with Russian weapons, and there will be nothing to answer them. Therefore, they will probably have to help them informally, as it is a pity the people who have been fighting off jackals for two years, and everyone is standing around and making bets.
  • mirag2
    mirag2 7 November 2013 14: 09
    0
    And here you are - on October 31 the Jewish blow to Latakia ...
  • mirag2
    mirag2 7 November 2013 14: 27
    +7
    This is what a certain Mordikhai Kaydar writes (25 years of service in the intelligence of the Israel Defense Forces, scientist, Arabist-specialization-arabs
    Kie media, domestic and foreign policy of Syria, not Iran (!)):
    "-Saudi Arabia, proud children of the desert, refused a seat on the UN Security Council, because countries with a veto power can influence politics more than countries that do not have such a veto right, and the UN Council will not be able to stop Iran's nuclear program. "
    What: "The Saudis, as true men of honor, do not want half-heartedness."
    We draw conclusions, where were the common ground between Jews and Saudis?
    - That's right, Syria and Iran!
    So that is not necessary:
    "-... we'd rather have a thin peace with Assad than a war with al-Qaeda ..."
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 34
      -7
      Quote: mirag2
      We draw conclusions, where were the common ground between Jews and Saudis?
      - That's right, Syria and Iran!

      You draw strange conclusions from the article of one analyst, where he does not mention Syria or Iran.
    2. atalef
      atalef 7 November 2013 14: 39
      -8
      "-Saudi Arabia, proud children of the desert, refused a seat on the UN Security Council, because countries with a veto power can influence politics more than countries that do not have such a veto right, and the UN Council will not be able to stop Iran's nuclear program. "

      I think the reason is different, I have long said that the receipt of a bomb by Iran will lead to the automatically uncontrolled spread of nuclear weapons in the BW and beyond, and being in the Meringue - Saudi will only hinder
      Saudi Arabia has invested heavily in Pakistan’s nuclear program, which will allow Riyadh to receive nuclear weapons on demand. This was cited by intelligence anchor Mark Urban in the evening program of the BBC Newsnight air company with reference to intelligence.

      This is not the first such statement regarding the emergence of nuclear weapons in Islamabad. At the beginning of 2012, the British The Times, citing a senior Saudi source, reported that the kingdom could acquire nuclear warheads within a few weeks after Tehran’s nuclear weapons.

      “Right now we have no intention of pursuing a unilateral military nuclear program, but the dynamics will immediately change if the Iranians develop their own nuclear capabilities,” said one senior Saudi source. “From a political point of view, it would be completely unacceptable if Iran had nuclear capabilities. but the kingdom does not, "the newspaper quoted the unnamed Saudi as saying.

      The following are of course Turkey, Greece, Egypt, Iraq and the chain
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 15: 05
        +2
        Quote: atalef
        I think the reason is different, I have long said that the receipt of a bomb by Iran will lead to the automatically uncontrolled spread of nuclear weapons in the BW and beyond

        Nonsense, they will not share with anyone. Meaning they do it?
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 25
          -2
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          Nonsense, they will not share with anyone. Meaning they do it?

          Someone says that they will be divided. Just the appearance of a bomb in Iran’s cause for concern would result in a bomb in Saudi Arabia. Just buy from Pakistan.
          1. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 15: 39
            +5
            Quote: Pimply
            Just the appearance of a bomb in Iran’s cause for concern would result in a bomb in Saudi Arabia. Just buy from Pakistan.
            Why don’t they buy now? It seems there is enough money. You are simply afraid that your impunity in the Middle East will come to an end. I understand you, it is always cooler to be with a gun among the natives with bows.
            1. Pimply
              Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 47
              -6
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Why don’t they buy now? It seems there is enough money. You are simply afraid that your impunity in the Middle East will come to an end. I understand you, it is always cooler to be with a gun among the natives with bows.


              And you are just panicky afraid of the Jews. Did they beat you in childhood?
              1. Ingvar 72
                Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 15: 50
                +6
                Quote: Pimply
                And you are just panicky afraid of the Jews.

                If I do not like rats, this does not mean that I am afraid of them. hi
                1. Pimply
                  Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 03
                  -5
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  If I do not like rats, this does not mean that I am afraid of them.

                  But you are afraid of Jews, what a nuisance.
              2. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
          2. igor67
            igor67 7 November 2013 17: 33
            +2
            Quote: Pimply
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Nonsense, they will not share with anyone. Meaning they do it?

            Someone says that they will be divided. Just the appearance of a bomb in Iran’s cause for concern would result in a bomb in Saudi Arabia. Just buy from Pakistan.

            BBC: Saudi Arabia "purchased" nuclear weapons from Pakistan

            publication time: 06: 39
            last update: 06: 53






            The Saudi authorities have invested heavily in the Pakistani nuclear program and expect to be able to receive nuclear weapons from Islamabad at any time, BBC Newsnight reports.

            According to the BBC, Riyadh can get an atomic bomb faster than Tehran.

            BBC Newsnight presenter Mark Urban, citing a senior NATO source, said there is intelligence that nuclear weapons "made in Pakistan for Saudi Arabia" are ready for delivery.

            The author of the program also cites the statement of the former head of the Israeli military intelligence (AMAN) Yamos Yadlin, who said at a conference in Sweden in October that if Iran creates an atomic bomb, "the Saudis will not wait even one month." "They have already paid for the bomb, they will just go to Pakistan and take what they have to take there," Yadlin said.

            Mark Urban recalls that back in 2009, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia warned the US Ambassador-at-Large Dennis Ross that if Tehran "crosses the line," Riyadh "will receive nuclear weapons." In May 2012, Ross announced that Saudi Arabia was ready to begin work on the atomic bomb.

            Speaking about the possible means of delivery to the target of Saudi nuclear warheads, the BBC gives a brief history of the development of the missile program of this kingdom. In particular, they mention the secret purchase back in the late 80s from China of dozens of CSS-2 ballistic missiles (DongFeng 3, an analogue of the Soviet R-14 Chusovaya missile). The range of these missiles is 4.500 km, which allows the Saudis to threaten not only Iran and Israel, but also many other countries, not only in the Middle East region.
            1. Ingvar 72
              Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 18: 04
              0
              Quote: igor67
              According to the BBC, Riyadh can get an atomic bomb faster than Tehran.

              Greetings, namesake. hi I don’t see the great problem of the presence of nuclear weapons. India and Pakistan own it, and nothing, and they have constant tension. But regarding the purchase from Pakistan, I doubt very much whether the United States is unlikely to allow them. First of all, it is the United States that does not want the appearance of nuclear weapons in the region, because this will deprive them of their main lever of influence on oil production - the possibility of a forceful resolution of differences. If Iran has it, most likely they will place theirs somewhere nearby, maybe in the same CA.
              1. igor67
                igor67 7 November 2013 18: 25
                0
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                Quote: igor67
                According to the BBC, Riyadh can get an atomic bomb faster than Tehran.

                Greetings, namesake. hi I don’t see the great problem of the presence of nuclear weapons. India and Pakistan own it, and nothing, and they have constant tension. But regarding the purchase from Pakistan, I doubt very much whether the United States is unlikely to allow them. First of all, it is the United States that does not want the appearance of nuclear weapons in the region, because this will deprive them of their main lever of influence on oil production - the possibility of a forceful resolution of differences. If Iran has it, most likely they will place theirs somewhere nearby, maybe in the same CA.

                Hello namesake, but I see that the problem is not for Israel, although it is not sugar, but for India, which is not in possession of Pakistan and China, it’s a blow, the carriers are Chinese charge Pakistan, or do you think that. If Pakistan doesn’t want guaranteed assistance from Saudi Arabia in the first place, India is firstly Russia's best ally, and this will affect Russia, and so Wahhabism from Saudi Arabia moves across Russia, and even with nuclear weapons it’s a bust
                1. Ingvar 72
                  Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 19: 15
                  0
                  Quote: igor67
                  Pakistan will not want, in which case guaranteed assistance from Saudi

                  CA is nothing more than a dog on a leash. The leash is controlled by the United States, and as the Saudis say, it will. The issue with nuclear weapons is no exception. I did not think about influence through India, probably you are right in something.
                  1. igor67
                    igor67 7 November 2013 19: 32
                    +2
                    Quote: Ingvar 72
                    Quote: igor67
                    Pakistan will not want, in which case guaranteed assistance from Saudi

                    CA is nothing more than a dog on a leash. The leash is controlled by the United States, and as the Saudis say, it will. The issue with nuclear weapons is no exception. I did not think about influence through India, probably you are right in something.

                    So that's why it is geopolitics, you touch on one thing and a chain reaction begins, during the period of economic crisis there is a war for cheap resources, both supplier countries and buyers represented by Europe and the states, what is the essence of the Arab springs (from my point of view) who is more will sell oil and gas to Europe, Libya ended quickly there were no competitors, but many, including Iran, grappled for the Syrian "pipe", they also want to supply gas, oil like Qatar and Saudi Arabia and all through Syria, but here is another player and competitor in the energy carrier Russia, the pipe through Syria is a direct competitor to South Stream, so gas from the BV is cheaper, then everyone remembered about Syria as an ally, let's be honest, have you heard anything about Syrian-Russian relations before the events of 2010? Hardly. For example, the last time I remembered about Syria was in 86-87, repairing it for the Syrians. Turntables mi 24 are old stuff. Release early 70s
                    1. Ingvar 72
                      Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 19: 53
                      +1
                      Quote: igor67
                      Here everything about Syria was remembered like an ally, let's honestly have you heard anything about Syrian-Russian relations before the events of 2010?

                      I heard, but only in passing, here You are right. And in causation, too, there is nothing to add. The appearance of nuclear weapons among players is very much oriented toward political preferences, and the United States is very afraid of this. Imagine Gaddafi's dream - a golden dinar, backed by nuclear weapons.
                    2. Pimply
                      Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 12
                      -2
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      Imagine Gaddafi's dream - a golden dinar, backed by nuclear weapons
                      Talk to one of the economists about the reality of such a dream.
                2. Pimply
                  Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 10
                  0
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  CA is nothing more than a dog on a leash. The leash is controlled by the United States, and as the Saudis say, it will. The issue with nuclear weapons is no exception. I did not think about influence through India, probably you are right in something.

                  It is these words that show your complete misunderstanding of the Middle East realities. Complete and absolute.

                  I recommend that you take a look at, for example, the topic of the 1973 Oil Crisis of the year.
                  1. Ingvar 72
                    Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 20: 23
                    +2
                    Quote: Pimply
                    for example, the theme of the 1973 Oil Crisis.

                    You have a temporary misconception. In 73, the system of guidelines in politics had other directions, and the balance of power in the world was also different. Middle East realities are changing along with the political situation in the WORLD. There is a specificity in the east, I do not argue, but I would not call it realities.
                  2. Pimply
                    Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 27
                    -1
                    Quote: Ingvar 72
                    There is a specificity in the east, I do not argue, but I would not call it realities.

                    With what? Have you read about the latest sayings of Saudi Arabia?
                  3. Ingvar 72
                    Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 20: 45
                    0
                    I read, but this is nothing more than a farce. Again, a CA dog on a leash USA. Now let me take my leave, The Night Cuckoo blows the end, threatening sanctions. laughing
                  4. Pimply
                    Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 53
                    -2
                    Quote: Ingvar 72
                    I read, but this is nothing more than a farce. Again, a CA dog on a leash USA. Now let me take my leave, The night cuckoo blows the end, threatening sanctions

                    Repeat as much as you like. Your misunderstanding of BV from this will not change.
            2. Victor-M
              Victor-M 7 November 2013 23: 40
              +1
              Quote: Pimply
              It is these words that show your complete misunderstanding of the Middle East realities. Complete and absolute.

              As all the same, quickly you began to understand all the Middle Eastern realities, from the moment of flight (emigration) from the collapsed USSR, one word-gifted person ..
            3. Pimply
              Pimply 8 November 2013 01: 44
              0
              Quote: Victor-M
              As all the same, quickly you began to understand all the Middle Eastern realities, from the moment of flight (emigration) from the collapsed USSR, one word-gifted person ..


              Ah, how lovely. Go on.
    3. Dezzed
      Dezzed 7 November 2013 22: 27
      -3
      listen to you my friend so it’s nice to go out Yao to distribute to everyone from Senegal to eastern Ingushetia, let them play
  • Russ69
    Russ69 8 November 2013 02: 56
    +1
    Quote: igor67
    BBC: Saudi Arabia "purchased" nuclear weapons from Pakistan

    I'm wondering. Israel will now insist on bombing the Saudis, as well as the Iranians. Or US allies, you can have an atomic bomb, but not opponents.
    1. igor67
      igor67 8 November 2013 11: 35
      +1
      Quote: Russ69
      Quote: igor67
      BBC: Saudi Arabia "purchased" nuclear weapons from Pakistan

      I'm wondering. Israel will now insist on bombing the Saudis, as well as the Iranians. Or US allies, you can have an atomic bomb, but not opponents.

      Do you feel sorry for the Saudis? There is a hotbed of Wahhabism, they sponsor terrorist activities in Russia, including Saudi one cannot call a democratic state, the execution of torture. They still lacked nuclear weapons. The video contains the execution of a man,
  • Russ69
    Russ69 8 November 2013 02: 49
    +1
    Quote: Pimply
    Someone says that they will be divided. Just the appearance of a bomb in Iran’s cause for concern would result in a bomb in Saudi Arabia. Just buy from Pakistan.

    So why not have a bomb Iran, if Israel has? Moreover, the rhetoric of Israel, regarding Iran, cannot be called friendly, even with a stretch.
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 8 November 2013 11: 40
      +1
      Quote: Russ69
      Moreover, the rhetoric of Israel, regarding Iran, cannot be called friendly, even with a stretch.

      About the friendly rhetoric of Iran, especially Mr. Khamenai - in more detail. But why not Iran? Well, remember the contract they signed. As well as the number of violations. Or a violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Status and hostage-taking? There are a lot of things. Want a nuclear charge in the hands of these unpredictable guys?
  • rolik
    rolik 7 November 2013 22: 41
    +3
    Quote: atalef
    I think the reason is different, I have long said that the receipt of a bomb by Iran will lead to the automatically uncontrolled spread of nuclear weapons in the BW and beyond, and being in the Meringue - Saudi will only hinder

    A. If it’s honest, it’s really scary. It’s scary when a bunch of politicians, bankers and the military begin to decide the fate of the world. I’m not raising for that son that he would run with a gun or lie on the ground with radioactive ashes. Why then all this was necessary, to raise, study, dreams. Of course, here we are reasoning correctly, each in his own truth, how best to do so that it is right. But they don’t listen to us. They think about their dough, career, about how to climb higher so that you can eat another. It’s scary from all this, sometimes it seems that the fishing line on which our ball hangs will burst, and that’s all .... and there will be nothing more. There will be neither today nor tomorrow. There will be no birthdays or New Years .... nothing at all. Only one word remains - after.
    1. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 11 November 2013 11: 42
      0
      "a bunch of politicians, bankers and military men" ... sad. Who should? Are we going to hold referendums? Pindyk then to the whole world in the shortest possible time smile War is part of the world. And this very "handful", in principle, seeks to tear away the best conditions for THEIR. More resources, more territory, better trade. And other small groups do not want to give anything, because in turn they are trying for their own. And you have to run with machine guns ... otherwise you will have to die of hunger or so ... a bullet in the back of the head so that space will be freed up for those who are not broke with a machine gun.
      The main thing is the quality and aspirations of our "handful". So that, first of all, their interests coincide with the interests of the country. So that we can be together, so that it is not so that the "handful" is rowing resources from us and dragging them to someone else's uncle. Well, not in vain. You can die for your Motherland, for your own people, why not? But only so as not in vain! Not because of stupidity, laziness, not because of stupid mistakes! Then break the line or not, and Russia will cope. We always fought back, and now we will wave it off ... just not to be cowardly and not be silly. And traitors to the wall, as the time comes ...
  • Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 7 November 2013 15: 24
    +1
    As soon as Kerry flew to Israel on various resources, several provocative articles appeared, as it were, on the actions of Israel or Syria or Saudi Arabia. If you dig deeper into the sources, then they all go in one direction, first to the Lebanese channel, and he always refers to the militants twitter wink

    Here on the tape.ru article as if Obama is fighting in the White House with Jewish lobbying for the situation with Iran.
    1. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 7 November 2013 15: 48
      +1
      One missile hit the target, the second missed, "- specified a Syrian source.

      action twitter source
  • Army1
    Army1 7 November 2013 17: 29
    0
    And what did not intercept?
  • makarov
    makarov 7 November 2013 13: 56
    +2
    mouse tears come out to the cat. still ahead ..
  • turan_up
    turan_up 7 November 2013 13: 58
    -6
    Well done! Israel will now sit and coward - after all, at any moment a winged answer can come from Syria to their bombing.
    1. Airman
      Airman 7 November 2013 14: 06
      16
      Quote: turan_up
      Well done! Israel will now sit and coward - after all, at any moment a winged answer can come from Syria to their bombing.

      What good fellows? The air defense system would have fulfilled its task if it had hit rockets and carriers, and so .... just watched. If the attacks go unpunished, then the enemy is impudent, and the Jews should not be insolent.
      1. Dezzed
        Dezzed 7 November 2013 22: 33
        -3
        Quote: Povshnik
        and the Jews do not take arrogance.


        you say this as a representative of what modest nationality?
        1. rolik
          rolik 8 November 2013 09: 36
          0
          Quote: DezzeD
          you say this as a representative of what modest nationality?

          Well, we do not position ourselves as God's chosen people, while I am the grandchildren of the Lord. And then, suddenly, God's slaves became God's chosen ?????
          1. Pimply
            Pimply 8 November 2013 11: 41
            0
            Quote: rolik
            Well, we do not position ourselves as God's chosen people, while I am the grandchildren of the Lord. And then, suddenly, God's slaves became God's chosen ?????

            Position yourself.
      2. rolik
        rolik 8 November 2013 09: 33
        0
        Quote: Povshnik
        If the attacks go unpunished, then the enemy is impudent, and the Jews do not take arrogance

        Maybe they are afraid to spot positions and locators ??? This is a rhetorical question.
        1. Airman
          Airman 8 November 2013 11: 30
          0
          Quote: rolik
          Quote: Povshnik
          If the attacks go unpunished, then the enemy is impudent, and the Jews do not take arrogance

          Maybe they are afraid to spot positions and locators ??? This is a rhetorical question.

          The missiles were launched at the position of the Osa air defense system, and therefore either the complex was not turned on or could not be fired.
    2. VAF
      VAF 7 November 2013 14: 43
      10
      Quote: turan_up
      because at any moment a winged answer can come from Syria to their bombing.


      If yes, if you, once again, then we may be ... etc. etc. wassat

      Itself is not funny ????? The Israelis fly as they want and where they want ... let Assad say thank you that even so .. "pointwise" "bother".

      Once again, carefully read the article ... from a range of 70 km (!!!) the size of the OSA is Bam bam and .... no zrk.

      What Assad? ... again "rubbed off" and ... yes we are now and ..... it is disgusting to read your "uryapatriotic" slogans! soldier
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 7 November 2013 14: 57
        13
        Quote: vaf
        Once again, carefully read the article ... from a distance of 70 km (!!!) can you imagine the size of the OSA air defense system ??? Bam-bam and .... no zrk.What Assad? ... again "wiped out" and ... yes we are now and ..... it is disgusting to read your "uryapatriotic" slogans!

        - but how sweet it is to read about your admiration for Israel! good True, it is difficult for me to understand your admiration, tk. you seem to be an employee of the Russian defense industry complex, not the Israeli IAI, and it's hard to understand - what's wrong with that? - shoot with an air-to-ground missile and an Osu anti-radar missile, which does not hit at 70 km. Well, they shot and shot, isn't the Russian "Tactical Missile Armament" releasing the same?
        It is clear, these are the Syrians, gouging. What prevents them from buying rubber copies of the same "Wasp" from the same Russia (with an exact repetition of the signature) and already include in the charter, how to tarry and in what way? And they would exchange expensive Israeli missiles for rubber products - and this is no joke. Someone should think for them for the "asymmetric" answers? The Russians think about asymmetry against NATO and come up with something, so the Syrians against the Jews also think, why rely on the Russians in everything?
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 06
          -12 qualifying.
          Quote: aksakal
          - but how sweet it is to read about your admiration for Israel! True, it is difficult for me to understand your admiration, tk. you seem to be an employee of the Russian defense industry complex, not the Israeli IAI, and it's hard to understand - what's wrong with that? - shoot with an air-to-ground missile and an Osu anti-radar missile, which does not hit at 70 km. Well, they shot and shot, isn't the Russian "Tactical Missile Armament" releasing the same?
          It is clear, these are the Syrians, gouging. What prevents them from buying rubber copies of the same "Wasp" from the same Russia (with an exact repetition of the signature) and already include in the charter, how to tarry and in what way? And they would exchange expensive Israeli missiles for rubber products - and this is no joke. Someone should think for them for the "asymmetric" answers? The Russians think about asymmetry against NATO and come up with something, so the Syrians against the Jews also think, why rely on the Russians in everything?


          It’s only in fairy tales that’s how it works.
        2. atalef
          atalef 7 November 2013 15: 18
          -16 qualifying.
          It is clear, these are the Syrians, gouging. What prevents them from buying rubber copies of the same "Wasp" from the same Russia (

          Better to buy N 2 rubber products in Russia, they may stop reproducing
          And they would exchange expensive Israeli rockets for rubber products - and this is not a joke

          On the gandons or what?

          .
          Someone should think for them for the "asymmetric" answers

          And they’re used to what they think for them, and better still pay
          1. aksakal
            aksakal 7 November 2013 15: 52
            +8
            Quote: atalef
            And they’re used to what they think for them, and better still pay

            - uh, how much hate laughing Meanwhile, it’s not you who have them, but you seized the same Golan.
            Quote: Pimply
            It’s only in fairy tales that’s how it works.

            heh, the Americans bombed and bombed Yugoslavia, yes, they bombed a lot from a purely civilian infrastructure, and from the military Yugoslavia only a few percent were bombed because of the numerous dummies - not from rubber, but from improvised materials. Read and continue your conclusions about fairy tales. You’re trying to tell us tales here - with the help of which such devices with 100% probability at a distance of 70 km it will be possible to distinguish a rubber model with an exact copy of a thermal signature from a real combat product? Unless with the help of Israeli appliances laughing Why, then, India and Brazil did not line up for such miracles of Israeli technology?
            1. atalef
              atalef 7 November 2013 16: 38
              -1
              ш
              aksakal
              - uh, how much hatred. Meanwhile, it’s not you who have them, but you seized the same Golan from them.


              And why should I love them? For the 5 wars? But what about the Golan, as it is with the Kuril Islands, Syria climbed, lost the war and lost territory, why should I cry about this?
            2. Dezzed
              Dezzed 7 November 2013 22: 37
              -1
              Quote: aksakal
              heh, the Americans bombed, bombed


              Amerkintsy are weak on rubber, but Israel was not seen in the destruction of inflatable products.
        3. VAF
          VAF 7 November 2013 16: 21
          +8
          Quote: aksakal
          but how sweet it is to read about your admiration for Israel!


          Now, if ours had not only read, but also studied the tactics of using TSA ... there would have been no price and ... there wasn’t such a disgrace as in August 2008 .. no further need to continue ???

          No admiration ... just waited " fellow -patriots ".. after all, there were so many slogans about the Armor and about the s-300, and what articles about our" mighty or mighty fleet "and the interception of all missiles .. which fly and fly and .... intelligence ???? ? lol

          or is the site already turned into a SHAPITO ????

          Yesterday's example - an article about Putin and ttut the same about all the prosralipolymers, how much expression and pathos ... how many words and emotions, but today bam ... a rag on the snout ... an article about Vasilyev and that ... all the "uryakalki" were blown away ... There is nothing to cover .. or Vova cannot be dirty.

          And by the way, dear, as far as I remember, you preludely promised that if the stools are not dressed (but you yourself understand that never) then you wink , I'm certainly not .... (let's not talk about personalities and 2 moves "I don't write down, but I'm not complaining about memory) wink
    3. smersh70
      smersh70 7 November 2013 14: 59
      0
      Quote: turan_up
      Well done

      You at least look at the picture wassat does this air defense system belong to Syria ... what are you talking about, what means .. everything was destroyed and ruined ..... there were only a couple of airfields on the coast, controlled by Assad .. they say that half of the pilots fled .. right now they brought the North Korean. . they are fighting .....
      1. VAF
        VAF 7 November 2013 16: 24
        +3
        Quote: smersh70
        Is this air defense system owned by Syria.


        It’s not important for the promoter of the photo .. what difference does it make there is Patriot, Hawk or Krotal ... at least to him .. arba wassat

        And you are absolutely right +! drinks
        1. atalef
          atalef 7 November 2013 18: 11
          +1
          Quote: vaf
          Quote: smersh70
          Is this air defense system owned by Syria.


          It’s not important for the promoter of the photo .. what difference does it make there is Patriot, Hawk or Krotal ... at least to him .. arba wassat

          And you are absolutely right +! drinks

          Hi Sash, this Patriots battery (pictured) is located on the city of Carmel (Stela Maris). Near the Carmelite monastery, in Haifa hi
          Downstairs Haifa Bay
          1. atalef
            atalef 7 November 2013 18: 45
            -1
            Sorry, of course Sergey hi
    4. catapractic
      catapractic 7 November 2013 15: 02
      +2
      they’d be beat off ... they’ll hit how, Assad now has his problems for tonsils
    5. alone
      alone 7 November 2013 20: 48
      +1
      ))) however you have a good sense of humor))))
  • mirag2
    mirag2 7 November 2013 13: 59
    +6
    I’ll add, because Syria has no strength to fight 10 fronts, the civil war is worse than any wars, at least 2, at least 8 fronts, and also + external aggression (in the absence of WMD) -Syria cannot cope without Iran.
    And Syria + Iran vs Israel + Saudi Arabia, then certainly Wangi prediction will come true ...
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 08
      -6
      How do you imagine the open interaction between Israel and Saudi Arabia? Do you think that suicides are at the head of the SA?
      Saudi Arabia and Israel are forced to cooperate from time to time. But very secretly and in a very limited way. And do not read Wanga's tales for the night.
      1. Skiff-2
        Skiff-2 7 November 2013 14: 44
        16
        Quote: Pimply
        Saudi Arabia and Israel are forced to cooperate from time to time. But very secretly and in a very limited way. And do not read Wanga's tales for the night.

        I don’t know how much and by whom this cooperation was forced, but the fact is stubborn - Jews bomb, Saudis pay, bandits fight - is it not Jewish happiness (after all, soon there will be no capable enemies around Israel ...).
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 52
          -4
          Quote: Skif-2
          I don’t know how much and by whom this cooperation was forced, but the fact is stubborn - Jews bomb, Saudis pay, bandits fight - is it not Jewish happiness (after all, soon there will be no capable enemies around Israel ...).

          And you, purely conditionally, are not ready to assume that in this game there are several parties with different, for the most part absolutely disagreeing interests and tasks? Or you definitely need a conspiracy.
          1. mirag2
            mirag2 7 November 2013 15: 01
            +5
            "Assuming" is a thankless task.
            1. Pimply
              Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 09
              -7
              Quote: mirag2
              "Assuming" is a thankless task.

              Correctly. Need to know. And for this you need to know at least a little the history of BV, the alignment of forces, to understand the reasons for what is happening - in short, Possess knowledge. But the majority here for some reason prefers to illuminate us, the poor, with the light of their ignorance.
      2. mirag2
        mirag2 7 November 2013 14: 47
        +7
        This is for you, and not for us to imagine your cooperation with them ...
      3. aksakal
        aksakal 7 November 2013 14: 47
        11
        Quote: Pimply
        Saudi Arabia and Israel are forced to cooperate from time to time. But very secretly and in a very limited way. And do not read Wanga's tales for the night.

        - There is nothing more permanent and more obvious than "temporary" and "secret" - do you know this folk wisdom? But a subtle observation. And in your case, it is confirmed.
        Как
        Quote: Pimply
        How do you imagine

        - very simple. An official visit of someone, an exchange of concerns about the "anti-human regime of Assad" and the "dangerous policy of Iran", the conclusion of some kind of Treaty - and forward, and with a song. Nothing here is impossible for an Israeli. For a goy, there is the impossible here - how can you immediately become friends with yesterday's fierce enemy? Here a long evolution of relations is needed for a goy. And for an Israeli, there are no difficulties - if it is profitable, then at least you can cooperate with the devil himself, and you can start right tomorrow, what is the question?
        Don't even convince, dear. And don't prove it. The professor at one time argued on the basis of the conflict in the "Flotilla of Peace" that Turkey and Israel from now on "enemies forever" and will not reconcile. I argued that if Uncle Sam asks, Turkey and Israel will become friends and forget about the "Flotilla". And so it happened! laughing Moreover, Israel also apologized (wow !!!!) for that "Flotilla"!laughing
        Pimpy, the price is your assurances.
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 59
          -11 qualifying.
          Quote: aksakal
          - There is nothing more permanent and more obvious than "temporary" and "secret" - do you know this folk wisdom? But a subtle observation. And in your case, it is confirmed.

          There is nothing more permanent than temporary - do not overdo it. The Saudis and Israel have a common interest. But at the same time to call them full allies means to sign their own illiteracy regarding the situation in the Middle East and ignorance of the realities there. What you actually do. Turn to a normal Arabist - from your theories, he will laugh out loud, poking a finger at you. Well, simply because he perfectly understands what is possible and what is not in the Middle East.


          Quote: aksakal
          Don't even convince, dear. And don't prove it. The professor at one time argued on the basis of the conflict in the "Flotilla of Peace" that Turkey and Israel from now on "enemies forever" and will not reconcile. I argued that if Uncle Sam asks, Turkey and Israel will become friends and forget about the "Flotilla". And so it happened! Moreover, Israel also apologized (wow !!!!) for that "Flotilla"!
          Pimpy, the price is your assurances.


          Do you think that Israel and Turkey have reconciled? Especially taking into account who is in power now and the fact that military cooperation, for example, has been curtailed, and the other day there was a scandal about how the Turks leaked Israeli agents to Iran?

          Do you even know what level of relations between the countries was, and what is it now, you are all-knowing ours? Your ignorance of the situation in BV is simply amazing.
          1. mirag2
            mirag2 7 November 2013 15: 05
            +6
            Well, you already say that they are "in contact"?
            Or say that here we are not a damn thing in the Middle East and its political realities?
            The Turks ceased espionage games around Iran, a fact.
            For which one respected Jewish journalist has already called for the shooting of the Turkish intelligence general.
            -or say that this is actually not a journalist, but a slacker whom no one listens to in the Jewish state?
            1. Pimply
              Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 26
              -5
              Quote: mirag2
              Well, you already say that they are "in contact"?
              Or say that here we are not a damn thing in the Middle East and its political realities?

              Judging by the comments, the vast majority - yes, doesn’t understand anything.
              Quote: mirag2
              For which one respected Jewish journalist has already called for the shooting of the Turkish intelligence general.
              -or say that this is actually not a journalist, but a slacker whom no one listens to in the Jewish state?

              More specifically.
      4. Evgeny_Lev
        Evgeny_Lev 7 November 2013 14: 54
        +8
        Purely so, on the floor bumps, cooperate?
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 12
          -7
          Quote: Evgeny_Lev
          Purely so, on the floor bumps, cooperate?

          Bravo! Bis! Still! You are brilliant! You are aphoristic. Your humor is beautiful! Full house!
      5. gigiperfetto
        gigiperfetto 7 November 2013 14: 59
        +5
        I think Israel is disingenuous. He signs peace treaties after seizing another piece of land in order to consolidate his status quo. For me, well, his behavior is very similar to the behavior of his uncle from "The Lion King". He uses all methods to achieve his goals. Not a falcon (king) Israel, not a falcon. To make it clearer, maybe it's time to translate into Hebrew "I'm going to you"?
        1. mirag2
          mirag2 7 November 2013 15: 06
          +7
          He does not "dissemble" - he is brazenly lying.
          You need to call a spade a spade.
          1. Pimply
            Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 27
            -1
            Quote: mirag2
            He does not "dissemble" - he is brazenly lying.
            You need to call a spade a spade.

            more specifically.
        2. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 09
          0
          Quote: gigiperfetto
          I think Israel is disingenuous. He signs peace treaties after seizing another piece of land in order to consolidate his status quo. For me, well, his behavior is very similar to the behavior of his uncle from "The Lion King". He uses all methods to achieve his goals. Not a falcon (king) Israel, not a falcon. To make it clearer, maybe it's time to translate into Hebrew "I'm going to you"?

          That is, the transfer of Sinai is a capture?
        3. rainufa
          rainufa 7 November 2013 15: 50
          +2
          The Jewish state cannot "go to you", they surreptitiously, like the most vile jackals, swoop in, kill people and take the latter without warning, it is not worth putting our prince Svyatoslav together with those chosen by God.
          1. go
            go 7 November 2013 22: 00
            +2
            I can’t read and comment on this nonsense anymore: what do you think they should go to embrasures to their full potential, or fly to bomb aerodromes on airplanes with an electron intensifier tube like a bus like in the Russian army without electronic warfare? They are not fools; they need to return home to their families. They learned to fight, you can’t argue here. Peshkarus, by the way, they also fight when necessary. And also despite the fact that they certainly capture Palestinian lands, but they do it technically competently and ensure the safety of their citizens in a difficult situation, which cannot be said about Russia, for example, in the Caucasus. So if we speak purely technically, then you can learn this.
          2. Pimply
            Pimply 7 November 2013 22: 15
            +1
            Quote: rainufa
            The Jewish state cannot "go to you", they surreptitiously, like the most vile jackals, swoop in, kill people and take the latter without warning, it is not worth putting our prince Svyatoslav together with those chosen by God.

            It should be ALL GROWTH, and with bare hands.
          3. Dezzed
            Dezzed 7 November 2013 22: 45
            -2
            Quote: rainufa
            they sneak up like sneaky jackals, kill people and take the last


            AND ALSO- "Bite the barrel" of children who went to bed on the edge
      6. olviko
        olviko 7 November 2013 14: 59
        +1
        ". But very secretly and in a very limited way."

        Strange relations between the Semitic brothers!
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 10
          -2
          Quote: olviko
          Strange relations between the Semitic brothers!

          Ukraine supplied Buki to Georgia, which shot down Russian aircraft. Serbia supplied weapons systems that killed Russian soldiers. Strange relations between brothers Slavs.
          1. mirag2
            mirag2 7 November 2013 15: 15
            +5
            Link, pliz about the supply of weapons to our enemies by the Serbs?
            And I ask you to remember that the governments of these countries after the "orange" actions were anti-people, looking into the mouth of the United States + its closest allies fool
            1. Pimply
              Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 32
              -2
              By the beginning of May 2008, Serbia received 50 pump-action shotguns, 370 pistols, 20 million cartridges 7,62x39 mm, 3570 pcs. squibs, 390 pcs. 122-mm smoke shells SMOKE M-60, 1 pcs. 125-mm HEAT-T M8P-1 HEAT-T shells, 1690 pcs. 125 mm AP FSDS-T M-88 APCR shells, 76 pcs. main charges M-560 for 80-mm mortar mines HEM-J60T, 3 thousand M-13P45 main charges for 3-mm mortar mines HEM-82P68T, 1 thousand signal mines "Short Cartridge Illuminating"

              Serbia sold Georgia arms 15 August 2008 | 11: 36 | Source: Danas KRAGUJEVAC - The Russian MoD says that Serbia is one of the countries that helped Georgia militarily prior to the Ossetian conflict.

              Besides Serbia, the list of alleged helpers to Georgia before the South Ossetian crisis broke out were the US, the UK, France, Greece, Turkey, Israel, Lithuania, Estonia, Ukraine and others, reports the BBC.

              As far as Serbia's involvement was concerned, the ministry said that Kalashnikovs produced in Kragujevac's Zastava factory were used in attacks on South Ossetia and Russian troops. In that context, the BBC quotes former Foreign Minister Vuk Drašković, who said that “Russian diplomats warned that the Georgians were shooting down their (Russian) helicopters with bullets manufactured in Serbia.”

              Quote: mirag2
              And I ask you to remember that the governments of these countries after the "orange" actions were anti-people, looking into the mouth of the United States + its closest allies


              Конечно.
              1. The comment was deleted.
          2. olviko
            olviko 7 November 2013 17: 07
            +5
            Well, "Buki" Georgia was supplied not by the Slavic brothers, but by Yushchenko, acting president under the direction of Catherine-Claire Chumachenko-Yushchenko, a US citizen. This Jewish woman was born in 1961 in the USA, in Chicago. She was awarded the American Truman-Reagan Medal of Freedom "for her contribution to spreading the truth about the Holodomor and other crimes of communism." By the way, Georgians were actively arming and training Israel for the war with Russia. So the Semitic sisters and brothers managed to be noted here too!
            1. Pimply
              Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 11
              -1
              Quote: olviko
              Well "Buki" Georgia was supplied not by brothers Slavs, but by Yushchenko

              That is, Yushchenko is not a Slav?
              Wasn’t Yanukovych the prime minister? Also not a Slav. And see the Maidan did not suit the Slavs. Or are the Slavs only those who are for Russia?
              1. olviko
                olviko 7 November 2013 17: 41
                +4
                . "And apparently the Maidan was not arranged by the Slavs"

                Thousands of people took part in the rally on Independence Square all night. The absolutely fantastic picture was in the center of the tent city, where a bus with a field kitchen pulled up from the Brodsky Central Synagogue and the crowd gathered all night to get hot food. The humanitarian aid bus made eleven flights, and the chief rabbi of the Brodsky Central Synagogue Moshe – Reuven Asman and his wife and children arrived to hand out groceries. CNN and Euronews reporters vied to shoot a rabbi with a small child and other synagogue figures in bales and traditional Hasidic hats. A huge line of people lined up near them, who not only supported themselves with hot food, but also tried to take pictures with a rabbi.
                At about two o'clock in the morning, a large consignment of felt boots, fur coats, jackets, blankets and warm warmers arrived. Vadim Rabinovich, President of the United Jewish Community, handed out humanitarian aid. Many members of the Jewish community brought supplies to the synagogue to help the hungry. Community members and Israelis who arrived in Ukraine raised about $ 20. In particular, Vadim Averbukh, an Israeli businessman, was one of the first to respond to the call for help. An amazing picture of peace and cohesion appeared at about three in the morning, when Catholic and Orthodox priests approached the synagogue bus serving food, and together with rabbis and ordinary people. joined hands, began to dance and sing “Shma Israel!” Ukrainian, French, American, Italian, Georgian and Israeli flags have already appeared over Maidan Nezalezhnosti. Toda is a slave for the Maidan, brothers-Semites!
                As for Yushchenko, he’s a Slav. The Slavs, as well as the Jews, also have their own Judas.
                1. Pimply
                  Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 46
                  -2
                  Quote: olviko
                  . "And apparently the Maidan was not arranged by the Slavs"

                  It’s all about the Jews standing 8) How I love it when they tear out one fact from the big picture - and the whole image of 8 is substituted for them)))
                  1. olviko
                    olviko 7 November 2013 18: 10
                    +3
                    "Mostly Jews stood there 8) How I love it when one fact is removed from the overall picture - and they replace the whole image 8)))"
                    This fact is apparently not everyone likes.
                    The question is not the image, the question is - where did the grandmother Zin come from? To paraphrase a well-known proverb: Who pays, he orders the image. And those whose flags dangled over the Maidan, of course, except Ukraine and Georgia, were paid, they themselves are sponsored.
                    1. Pimply
                      Pimply 7 November 2013 18: 16
                      -2
                      Quote: olviko
                      The question is not the image, the question is - where did the grandmother Zin come from? To paraphrase a well-known proverb: Who pays, he orders the image. And those whose flags dangled over the Maidan, of course, except Ukraine and Georgia, were paid, they themselves are sponsored.

                      Definitely. And the poor Slavs again deceived
                      1. olviko
                        olviko 7 November 2013 19: 01
                        +2
                        . "And the poor Slavs were deceived again."

                        Well, about the poor, I wouldn't say that. How many brothers-Semites, passing under the common nickname "oligarchs", feed on the Slavic lands. I wonder why they are still hanging around here, it would be time for the promised land as a gift ... Or, with their habit of constant deceit, well, their mother gave birth to such a thing, living in Israel is a mess? Indeed, according to the Torah, only the goyim can be deceived, and their Jews are a big jamb.
                      2. Pimply
                        Pimply 7 November 2013 19: 06
                        -1
                        Quote: olviko
                        Well, about the poor, I wouldn't say that. How many brothers-Semites, passing under the common nickname "oligarchs", feed on the Slavic lands. I wonder why they are still hanging around here, it would be time for the promised land as a gift ... Or, with their habit of constant deceit, well, their mother gave birth to such a thing, living in Israel is a mess? Indeed, according to the Torah, only the goyim can be deceived, and their Jews are a big jamb.


                        Take away, divide, ZOG rules the world. Bravo.
                      3. atalef
                        atalef 7 November 2013 19: 10
                        -3
                        Quote: olviko
                        . "And the poor Slavs were deceived again."

                        Well, about the poor, I wouldn't say that. How many brothers-Semites, passing under the common nickname "oligarchs", feed on the Slavic lands. I wonder why they are still hanging around here, it would be time for the promised land as a gift ... Or, with their habit of constant deceit, well, their mother gave birth to such a thing, living in Israel is a mess? Indeed, according to the Torah, only the goyim can be deceived, and their Jews are a big jamb.

                        Damn, already cried.
    2. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 15: 10
      +9
      Quote: Pimply
      And do not read Wanga's tales for the night.

      And you would need to cram less Torah, maybe people will reach out to you.
      1. Pimply
        Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 33
        -3
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        And you would need to cram less Torah, maybe people will reach out to you.

        So you compare the tales of Vanga and Torah? Well, well, 8)
        1. aksakal
          aksakal 7 November 2013 16: 22
          +5
          Quote: Pimply
          So you compare the tales of Vanga and Torah? Well, well, 8)

          Well, enlighten, how is one different from the other?
          I haven’t seen any harm from Vanga’s tales, and after the real actions of Israel, something of an impression of the Torah is created quite bad.
          Interestingly, Zalkind and Bela Kun, when with the help of Latvian riflemen the civilians in the Crimean Gulf were drowned by the thousands, were they guided by the Torah? Or what?
          Muslims understand that there is a discrepancy in the Koran, who understands how and what, even one word "jihad" is interpreted differently. The Jews have no discrepancies. Is the Torah really that kind of human ... oh, excuse me, SHE hateful?
          1. Pimply
            Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 33
            -3
            Quote: aksakal
            I haven’t seen any harm from Vanga’s tales, and after the real actions of Israel, something of an impression of the Torah is created quite bad.
            Interestingly, Zalkind and Bela Kun, when with the help of Latvian riflemen the civilians in the Crimean Gulf were drowned by the thousands, were they guided by the Torah? Or what?
            Muslims understand that there is a discrepancy in the Koran, who understands how and what, even one word "jihad" is interpreted differently. The Jews have no discrepancies. Is the Torah really that kind of human ... oh, excuse me, SHE hateful?

            You are a Christian? Muslim?
            1. smersh70
              smersh70 7 November 2013 17: 01
              +1
              Quote: Pimply
              You are a Christian? Muslim?

              he is Topvorovets ..... good
      2. Dezzed
        Dezzed 7 November 2013 22: 50
        +1
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        maybe people will reach for you.


        and YOU Ingvar 72, I would ask you not to "reach out" to us in any boredom.
  • Same lech
    Same lech 7 November 2013 14: 00
    +2
    Perhaps the Jews tried to destroy the very components of the SZOO.
    And the possibility at this stage of a strike by SYRIA IN ISRAEL, I believe it is unlikely, there is too much risk of getting a massive strike from ISRAEL aviation.
    ASAD now has little strength for a full-scale war.
    1. catapractic
      catapractic 7 November 2013 15: 12
      +1
      ASAD now has little strength for a full-scale war.
      Assad now has no strength at all for a war with his neighbors; he cannot control his territory
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. DEfindER
      DEfindER 7 November 2013 14: 12
      +8
      Quote: Nord
      As I understand it, the OSA air defense system poses a threat to Israel !!!

      Yes, it has long been clear that the goal of Israel is to create around itself a zoo of primitive countries inhabited by hobbits, which will not pose any threat to it. the border is really locked. But the threat is posed to him by precisely developed neighbors in every sense, and therefore beats at research centers, which the hobbits could not take on their own ..
      1. Pimply
        Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 14
        -11 qualifying.
        Quote: DEfindER
        Yes, it has long been clear that the goal of Israel is to create around itself a zoo of primitive countries inhabited by hobbits, which will not pose any threat to it. the border is really locked. But the threat is posed to him by precisely developed neighbors in every sense, he is trying to destroy their civilization with the hands of the same hobbits that he constantly helps ..

        In fact, Israel just needs to not be touched. What is shown by the peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan, which have been operating for more than a dozen years.
        1. Норд
          Норд 7 November 2013 14: 46
          11
          Quote Bumpy: "Actually, Israel just needs to be left alone."

          Opensource projects Bravissimo: Typically Jewish logic. Syria, which is bleeding, brutally "touches" Israel with OSA complexes. Itself is not disgusting to write such nonsense? Here on the site you do not need to look for idiots who will swallow something like that.
          1. Pimply
            Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 59
            -7
            Quote: Nord
            Opensource projects Bravissimo: Typically Jewish logic. Syria, which is bleeding, brutally "touches" Israel with OSA complexes. Isn't it disgusting to write such nonsense yourself? Here on the site you do not need to look for idiots who will swallow like

            Passing them to Hezbollah? Yes, it does.
            1. DEfindER
              DEfindER 7 November 2013 15: 27
              +9
              Quote: Pimply
              Passing them to Hezbollah? Yes, it does.

              How is this? Like, the enemy insidiously attacked our planes while they peacefully bombed his cities?

              And why beat science centers? Do they somehow contribute to the supply of weapons to Hezbollah? Those. all new weapons developed there, the Syrian authorities will first put the Hezbollah and not in their own Armed Forces? By this logic, it is possible to bomb the peasants and they feed those who supply weapons to Lebanon.
              1. mirag2
                mirag2 7 November 2013 15: 43
                +2
                To hit the scientific centers, that would drive them into the Stone Age.
                1. atalef
                  atalef 7 November 2013 19: 13
                  -2
                  Quote: mirag2
                  To hit the scientific centers, that would drive them into the Stone Age.

                  Damn, where did Gromova go that her victorious reports became such a rare occurrence in VO, it’s a pity, maybe from many volunteers (from among the site’s participants), someone tore his ass from Claudia and traveled to Syria, saw the hero of an invisible front?
              2. Pimply
                Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 43
                -3
                Quote: DEfindER
                How is this? Like, the enemy insidiously attacked our planes while they peacefully bombed his cities?

                And why beat science centers? Do they somehow contribute to the supply of weapons to Hezbollah? Those. all new weapons developed there, the Syrian authorities will first put the Hezbollah and not in their own Armed Forces? By this logic, it is possible to bomb the peasants and they feed those who supply weapons to Lebanon.


                Scientific MILITARY center with an army column in the yard? Have you ever seen a video record?

                Or do you suggest waiting for this weapon to fall into the hands of guys who like to kill civilians in principle? Let's give a bully instead of a knife a grenade launcher. And we will wait until he takes it. And there he has time to pull the trigger or not - is not so important, is it?
                1. DEfindER
                  DEfindER 7 November 2013 17: 42
                  0
                  Quote: Pimply
                  Scientific MILITARY center with an army column in the yard? Have you ever seen a video record?

                  You still haven’t answered why to beat on this scientific military center? You didn’t destroy the weapons column, but the building itself.
                  1. Pimply
                    Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 48
                    -2
                    Quote: DEfindER
                    You still haven’t answered why to beat on this scientific military center? You didn’t destroy the weapons column, but the building itself.

                    The first is a military building. How do you know what was there? Secondly, if you saw the shooting and not blind, the building is worth it. And next to it is a destroyed column. And, litter, the windows are broken at the building. It was exactly destroyed by him, one hundred pounds.
                2. maxbrov74
                  maxbrov74 7 November 2013 18: 44
                  +6
                  Following your logic, the kind Israeli, objects and warehouses of the promised land should also be smashed to smithereens, in order to suppress the hypothetical possibility of the local junk falling into the hands of the enemies of the same Syria.
                  You say; if Assad dares, he’s a corpse. Drive into the Stone Age and all that. Maybe...
                  But there is one caveat. I remember your government and helped the Georgians. Weapons and instructors. From Jewish warehouses and facilities. Probably from a great friendship to Russia and Russians in particular. What is not the motive? Also will be driven into the Stone Age? What do you think?
                  1. atalef
                    atalef 7 November 2013 18: 51
                    -7
                    maxbrov74 Today, 18: 44 ↑ New
                    Following your logic, the kind Israeli, objects and warehouses of the promised land should also be smashed to smithereens, in order to suppress the hypothetical possibility of the local junk falling into the hands of the enemies of the same Syria.
                    You say; if Assad dares, he’s a corpse. Drive into the Stone Age and all that. Maybe...

                    Well, yes, he has the right to do so, only about junk, you shouldn’t give weapons to bandits
                    You say; if Assad dares, he’s a corpse. Drive into the Stone Age and all that. Maybe...

                    Yes, it will be so and he knows it, otherwise he would have answered long ago
                    But there is one caveat. I remember your government and helped the Georgians. Weapons and instructors. From Jewish warehouses and facilities. Probably from a great friendship to Russia and Russians in particular. What is not the motive? Also will be driven into the Stone Age? What do you think?

                    Georgia then did not fight Russia, and we are the only ones who, after the outbreak of hostilities, stopped the military supplies of Georgia, unlike the same Ukraine and Serbia, can you first introduce them to the Stone Age?
                  2. Pimply
                    Pimply 7 November 2013 18: 54
                    -2
                    Quote: maxbrov74
                    Following your logic, the kind Israeli, objects and warehouses of the promised land should also be smashed to smithereens, in order to suppress the hypothetical possibility of the local junk falling into the hands of the enemies of the same Syria.

                    But before Europe, the USA, Qatar, Turkey and Saudi Arabia - countries that quite officially announced their support for the SSA.
                    I think it's not suicides sitting in Syria to try directly. Why do you think the last war was waged by Hezbollah?
                    1. maxbrov74
                      maxbrov74 7 November 2013 19: 21
                      +2
                      Israel did not announce support for the Georgians either, but it did. And now it supports. Air defense systems in particular. Even after their "noble attempt to reclaim the ancestral territories." In our time, in order to do something, it is not at all necessary to announce it.
                      1. atalef
                        atalef 7 November 2013 19: 27
                        +1
                        Israel did not announce support for the Georgians either, but it did. And now it supports. Air defense systems in particular. Even after their "noble attempt to reclaim the ancestral territories." In our time, in order to do something, it is not at all necessary to announce it.

                        Georgia is a sovereign country and has, in accordance with all international laws, weapons, what is the problem? Ukraine is selling, Serbia is selling, but are we worse? Probably should not be sold in gratitude for the supply of Russian weapons to Syria, which inexplicably appears at Hezbollah and Hamas, and from which not a few Israelis (including Russian citizens) died. By the way, we also deliver weapons to Russia, with that?
                      2. maxbrov74
                        maxbrov74 7 November 2013 20: 06
                        +5
                        Thank God with the departure of furniture business representatives from our Moscow region, the purchase of kosher drones immediately came to naught. Regarding the rest: what then is Israel, so sacredly honoring the sovereign right of Syria bombed? He would bomb Hezbollah beyond its borders if it is a threat. Israel, if the memory does not change the agreement with Syria, is. About the cessation of hostilities. And for what reason, your prime minister, having forgotten about pride, almost throws himself at Putin's feet so that he would not ship air defense systems to Syria. Is it really drunk that a freebie could end? C-300 is not Iskander. Purely defensive systems. Why be afraid of them, if the stigma is not in the gun?
                      3. Pimply
                        Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 30
                        -1
                        Quote: maxbrov74
                        Thank God with the departure of furniture business representatives from our Moscow region, the purchase of kosher drones immediately came to naught.

                        Sure?
                        Quote: maxbrov74
                        Regarding the rest: what then is Israel, so sacredly honoring the sovereign right of Syria bombed?

                        Because Israel and Syria have a war, and when the war is on, they do not wait for the enemy to arm better.
                        Quote: maxbrov74
                        Israel, if the memory does not change the agreement with Syria, is. About the cessation of hostilities.


                        There is an agreement to create a separation zone on a certain section of the border, if you are not aware. With a special caveat, this agreement is by no means a peace agreement.
                        Quote: maxbrov74
                        And for what reason, your prime minister, having forgotten about pride, almost throws himself at Putin's feet so that he would not ship air defense systems to Syria. Is it really drunk that a freebie could end? C-300 is not Iskander. Purely defensive systems. Why be afraid of them, if the stigma is not in the gun?


                        Because Bibi is not, and perfectly understands what the escalation can lead to.
                      4. maxbrov74
                        maxbrov74 7 November 2013 22: 37
                        +1
                        Because Bibi is not, and perfectly understands what the escalation can lead to.

                        With regards to your BB, escalation and I repeat the purely defensive C-300 systems, then this, sorry for the politically incorrect comparison, is the same as if the thief wrote a complaint about the increased security of the savings bank.
                        It is from the same opera as the pamphlets of your striped friends like; "The US military regarded the launching of the anti-missile defense radar in Armavir as destabilizing the balance of strategic forces." Cynical delirium in short.
                      5. Pimply
                        Pimply 7 November 2013 23: 32
                        +2
                        Quote: maxbrov74
                        purely defensive systems C-300,

                        Tell me, here on the radar of a purely defensive system C-300 civilian airliner. And here they launch a rocket. And xnumx corpses in one fell swoop. Cornets also seem to be purely defensive. Wonder how they ended up at Hezbollah?
              3. Pimply
                Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 16
                -2
                You will be surprised - but Russia also sold and transferred, trained officers. 30 countries did this. But always remember for some reason Israel 8)
              4. maxbrov74
                maxbrov74 7 November 2013 20: 19
                +1
                Do not think, why?
              5. Pimply
                Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 32
                0
                Quote: maxbrov74
                Do not think, why?

                I thought about it. Apparently because Israel, like the Jews, is a convenient horror story and an object of hatred. Comfortable and familiar. Most people find it difficult to turn on their heads. And here - like a red rag.
              6. maxbrov74
                maxbrov74 7 November 2013 22: 23
                0
                Here, for example, they say that Chubais is to blame for everything. In the Middle East, the extreme is Israel. However, he, you know, this Chubais, is not guilty of everything. The weather, for example, it spoils itself. Yes, and other freaks here are many long live. But in his case, the measure of guilt is still critical. Even without a court order.
                So Israel is also stupid to blame everything. He already definitely does not affect the weather.
              7. Pimply
                Pimply 7 November 2013 22: 31
                0
                Quote: maxbrov74
                Here, for example, they say that Chubais is to blame for everything. In the Middle East, the extreme is Israel. However, he, you know, this Chubais, is not guilty of everything. The weather, for example, it spoils itself. Yes, and other freaks here are many long live. But in his case, the measure of guilt is still critical. Even without a court order.
                So Israel is also stupid to blame everything. He already definitely does not affect the weather.

                Most listen so - and Israel and the Jews are to blame for the weather.
    2. DEfindER
      DEfindER 8 November 2013 10: 19
      0
      Quote: Pimply
      But before Europe, the USA, Qatar, Turkey and Saudi Arabia - countries that quite officially announced their support for the SSA.

      First of all, I’ll say that if you watch reports from Syria, you would know that Israeli weapons are often found in destroyed militants. Secondly, you are absolutely right that it is necessary to deter not only Israel but all of the countries listed, in this case, Russia took upon itself the task of containing the United States, and given the ongoing war between Syria and Israel, you yourself said that there is no peace treaty, Syria must respond to overt aggression. Yes, Israel has enough strength to destroy Syria, but he must know that in this case he will be destroyed, because the main deterrent is the means of attack and not defense. I think if Syria abandoned its chemical weapons, then there is something else for an adequate response.
      1. Pimply
        Pimply 8 November 2013 11: 42
        0
        Quote: DEfindER
        First of all, I’ll say that if you watch reports from Syria, you would know that Israeli weapons are often found in destroyed militants.

        Incredibly often. At the same time, Israel is so stupid as to transfer marked army weapons to militants.
  • aksakal
    aksakal 7 November 2013 15: 02
    +7
    Quote: Nord
    Here on the site you do not need to look for idiots who swallow like that

    - I don’t know, it’s been hit five times in the forehead that there’s no fools, and Israel’s goals are seen quite clearly here - all on one and the same laughing Local Israelis have a strong belief in miracles. How many times have they stepped on that mop, and their whole heart believes in miracles laughing
    1. atalef
      atalef 7 November 2013 15: 11
      -7
      aksakal, and can you give a specific name to the mop?
  • old rocket man
    old rocket man 7 November 2013 15: 22
    +5
    Quote: Nord
    Here on the site you do not need to look for idiots who swallow it.

    Nah, here he is right somewhere, folk wisdom - do not touch him, he won’t stink laughing
    1. In the reeds
      In the reeds 7 November 2013 18: 46
      -2
      It will be because the people themselves and go to the toilet regularly ... Aksakal, this mop was called in Russia "Rake". But we are no strangers, we are like eggs in one basket, Judas, Christ are all in one place. And you Rocketman, poop calmly nothing will fly ...
  • screw cutter
    screw cutter 7 November 2013 15: 01
    +9
    | Israel just needs to not be touched | |
    Israel just needs it so that it can be built on other people's territories without regard to others.
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 12
      -9
      Quote: screw cutter
      Israel just needs it so that it can be built on other people's territories without regard to others.

      And what are they strangers?
  • fzr1000
    fzr1000 7 November 2013 14: 57
    +5
    In fact, in the end, the hobbits gave someone some robbery. But Jews do not teach anything to Jews.
  • Yura
    Yura 7 November 2013 14: 02
    0
    Only a few days later, official Israel in the person of Minister of Defense Ehud Barak recognized his role in this bombardment. “We warned that it is impossible to transport modern weapons to Lebanon,” he emphasized then. As a result of the attack, two people were killed and five were injured.
    Well, since it is impossible to transport modern weapons to Lebanon (the sending of which there is not at all a fact), it seems that they will be sent under their own power to Israel.
  • KCC
    KCC 7 November 2013 14: 03
    +8
    Western democracy in action, that I want to toss and turn, while others should be silent in a rag. Well, what is the conclusion regarding the state of Israel. The conclusion is a simple adequate answer and so that it is not discouraging. Sometimes you understand Iran, the Jews cannot believe in the Holocaust without the strongest reason for that.
    1. their
      their 7 November 2013 20: 58
      0
      Israel wants to bomb Iran, and yet 30 Iranian Jews live peacefully there. Israel wanted to spit on them, real anti-Semites
      1. Pimply
        Pimply 7 November 2013 21: 08
        -1
        About 70 of thousands of Russians live in Georgia. Did this prevent Russia from attacking it? 2 million Arabs live in Israel? Did this prevent Hezbollah from shelling Israel?
        Life is not fair. In the know about this?
        By the way, about peacefully - it’s you who made a good joke. I served and studied with several Jews from Iran who recently moved to Israel. They would laugh at your words well.
        1. their
          their 7 November 2013 21: 29
          +1
          Nobody would laugh at my words, Iranian Jews who live in Iran today can’t tolerate Israel and the Zionists, I don’t need to tell tales. The last Iranian Jews left for Israel at the beginning of the 50
          1. Pimply
            Pimply 7 November 2013 21: 53
            -1
            Quote: sus
            Nobody would laugh at my words, Iranian Jews who live in Iran today can’t tolerate Israel and the Zionists, I don’t need to tell tales. The last Iranian Jews left for Israel at the beginning of the 50

            True? Honestly what? Well, after all, who is it that I met then, say, in 2004 at Bar Ilan University? Did the girl move to Israel in 2001? Or whom did he meet in 2002 in the army? The guy moved to 1994. Mystic. They are ghosts.
            And 55 of thousands of Jews who left Iran in 1979-1984? They do not exist either. In the 1978 year, the Jewish population of Iran was about 80 thousand people, in the 2002 year, there were already 11200 Jews in Iran.
            1. their
              their 7 November 2013 22: 27
              0
              On the Iranian site, I read the official 30 000 information for today, and the rest there is completely different. I don’t know whom to believe, the fact that Jews and synagogues are there.
              1. Pimply
                Pimply 7 November 2013 22: 33
                0
                Quote: sus
                On the Iranian site, I read the official 30 000 information for today, and the rest there is completely different. I don’t know whom to believe, the fact that Jews and synagogues are there.

                Recall how it was in the USSR?
  • mirag2
    mirag2 7 November 2013 14: 03
    +1
    The first post is gone
    I talked about where such a topic?
    Why did this article appear here?
    Either rumors, or accurate info appeared about the actions of Jews against Syria, or a game to outrun the future actions of Jews + Saudi Arabia against Shiites (Syria + Iran).
    Now I will look through the Jewish press, I will be ready to argue with the pimply professors ...
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 10
      -9
      Are you going to argue about the number of identical posts?
      1. JIaIIoTb
        JIaIIoTb 7 November 2013 14: 21
        +2
        Pimpy I answered your question in the subject on PAK FA, to the account F22. And you somehow do not respond)))
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 23
          -5
          Have questions about F22? 8)
          1. JIaIIoTb
            JIaIIoTb 7 November 2013 14: 24
            +6
            Hmm, chatterbox You are not a serious person)))
            1. Pimply
              Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 32
              -6
              Quote: JIaIIoTb
              Hmm, chatterbox You are not a serious person)))

              To begin with, if you had tracked the comment, you would have understood that it was about the F-35 fighter, and not about the F-22. You have to be more careful. Next - it was about the operation of the machine. This is what I asked to prove - that he is F35, and not F22, dear.
      2. mirag2
        mirag2 7 November 2013 14: 35
        +3
        Take a look above - find my answer ...
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 37
          -2
          Is this about Wang’s prediction? 8)
  • Nayhas
    Nayhas 7 November 2013 14: 09
    +3
    Like another Chinese warning ... If you can punish, punish, you can not, do not stutter ...
  • old rocket man
    old rocket man 7 November 2013 14: 11
    0
    Quote: mirag2
    The first post is gone

    Yes, he’s not lost, he’s the first and is hi
  • old rocket man
    old rocket man 7 November 2013 14: 12
    0
    Quote: mirag2
    The first post is gone

    Yes, he’s not lost, he’s the first and is hi
  • Ihrek
    Ihrek 7 November 2013 14: 17
    +5
    Syria is in a difficult situation, and then I got this srail with my raids. I am sure God's punishment will come upon them, and no one will feel pity for them again, as after the Second World War.
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 25
      -9
      Syria in the 1948 year attacked Israel. Then, for decades, she fought with him, sponsored terrorists, gave them shelter and shelter. In Damascus sat Islamic Jihad, Hamas, PFLP and many others. Hezbollah fed there. Do not you think that in this case, God's punishment just overtook the long-standing sponsors of terrorists?
    2. atalef
      atalef 7 November 2013 18: 14
      -3
      Quote: Jamal
      Syria is in a difficult situation, and then I got this srail with my raids. I am sure God's punishment will come upon them, and no one will feel pity for them again, as after the Second World War.

      Yes . well, not earlier than half an ode ago, Assad said that until the final victory there were 2 months
  • JonnyT
    JonnyT 7 November 2013 14: 17
    +3
    And what will they answer?
    Israel for Syria is now inaccessible ....
    1. their
      their 7 November 2013 21: 06
      0
      Israel is reaching Syria now, it is enough to lower the entire arsenal of missiles to the center of Israel, and place C-300, Shell, Buk. Syria used to be weak enough, but today it is no longer, so they caught up with the terrorists.

      Assad can strike at any time against Israel, and Hezbollah will help him in this. Israel will tryndets.
      1. Pimply
        Pimply 7 November 2013 21: 13
        -1
        Quote: sus
        Israel is reaching Syria now, it is enough to lower the entire arsenal of missiles to the center of Israel, and place C-300, Shell, Buk. Syria used to be weak enough, but today it is no longer, so they caught up with the terrorists.

        Assad can strike at any time against Israel, and Hezbollah will help him in this. Israel will tryndets.

        As I understand it, you think that there are suicides in Syria. Or in Lebanon? Why do you think everything is so quiet after the Second Lebanon on the northern border of Israel?
        1. their
          their 7 November 2013 21: 35
          0
          Given the high morale of the Syrian soldiers and their hatred of Israel, I think they have nothing to lose, the country is bombed in the trash. Israel should be wary, not Syria. They have nothing to lose already, many civilian refugees fled. It’s quiet on the Lebanese border, because Israel has other interests now - Syria. Anyway, they are preparing to strike at Israel, I mean Assad and Nasrallah. They have plans to finally get rid of Israel, what happened in 2006 was a walk. And Assad will regain the Golan Heights as a result of imho.
          1. Pimply
            Pimply 7 November 2013 21: 45
            -1
            Quote: sus
            Given the high morale of the Syrian soldiers and their hatred of Israel, I think they have nothing to lose, the country is bombed in the trash. Israel should be wary, not Syria. They have nothing to lose already, many civilian refugees fled. It’s quiet on the Lebanese border, because Israel has other interests now - Syria. Anyway, they are preparing to strike at Israel, I mean Assad and Nasrallah. They have plans to finally get rid of Israel, what happened in 2006 was a walk. And Assad will regain the Golan Heights as a result of imho.

            And they will defeat everyone! And capture! And get off!
            1. their
              their 7 November 2013 22: 28
              +1
              Wait and see, if I were you, I wouldn’t be too happy
          2. atalef
            atalef 7 November 2013 21: 48
            0
            Quote: sus
            Anyway, they are preparing to strike at Israel, I mean Assad and Nasrallah. They have plans to finally deal with Israel, what happened in 2006 was a walk. And Assad will return the Golan Heights to himself as a result of imho.

            I swear by my cocked hat --- forgot to add laughing
  • old rocket man
    old rocket man 7 November 2013 14: 19
    +6
    I would not condemn Assad so much for excessive "patience", his situation is very difficult and the war with Israel now Israel needs to provoke Syria in retaliation in order to overcome the internal opposition, which is against the war with Syria
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 26
      -8
      Quote: Old Rocketman
      I would not condemn Assad so much for his excessive "patience", his position is very difficult and the war with Israel is not needed at all. Israel needs to provoke Syria into retaliatory actions in order to overcome the internal opposition, which is against the war with Syria

      Not necessary. Israel just needs certain types of weapons not to hit certain guys.
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 7 November 2013 15: 20
        +5
        Quote: Pimply
        Not necessary. Israel just needs certain types of weapons not to hit certain guys.

        Which guys? Who love to eat heart alive? Then not those bomb.
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 37
          -8
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          Which guys? Who love to eat heart alive? Then not those bomb.

          Do you think that the Assad guys do not do similar cute things?

          According to the Times, Dr. David Knott, who worked for five weeks as a volunteer in a hospital in northern Syria, the nature of the injuries indicates that snipers organize deadly games targeted at specific parts of the body of civilians. According to Nott, it is about snipers fighting on the side of Bashar al-Assad - most opinions among local residents agree on this.
          “One day a pregnant woman was brought to us with a gunshot wound to the uterus, and not just one,” said the surgeon. “We took out eight bullets at once. The snipers were aiming specifically at the child. The next day, they were wounded only in the left side of the chest The next day we did not have a single wounded in the chest - only people with gunshot wounds to the neck. The first casualties who arrived could understand what kind of wounds you would face for the whole day. It was a game. We heard snipers won packs of cigarettes for a certain number of accurate hits. "

          Lovely fun. However, the guys who are fighting against Assad are no better. This is a civil war. Read somehow about what both white and red did in Russia in Civil.
          1. Botanologist
            Botanologist 7 November 2013 17: 29
            +7
            Quote: Pimply
            According to the Times, Dr. David Nott, who worked for five weeks as a volunteer in a hospital in northern Syria, the nature of the injuries indicates that snipers are organizing deadly games targeted at specific parts of the body of civilians. According to Nott, it’s about the snipers fighting on the side of Bashar al-Assad


            I remember one respected person, even at the UN, was shaking white powder. I just wanted to bomb Iraq. And then it turned out that these stories (and in your case, with reference to the Times lol ) It is impossible to confirm in any way.
            So let's not copy fantasy. You are being bullshit, because it’s like something bad about Israel - you need a reference to the studio, you want documentation. And then there are such shoals.
            1. Pimply
              Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 40
              +1
              Quote: Botanologist
              I remember one respected person, even at the UN, was shaking white powder. I just wanted to bomb Iraq. And then it turned out that these stories (and in your case, with reference to the Times) cannot be confirmed in any way.

              Then, until Assad himself announced the presence of chemical weapons, everyone shouted that it was slander, and you won’t prove anything. It is strange how it came to be with him, and moreover, in an amount that would require a billion to destroy. The riddle.

              I gave one example. Will we dig further? To be honest, I'm lazy. Because the scheme will be standard - I will post a dozen or two proofs from different sources, and they will puff on me that this is a fabricated fake.
              Well, as in the case of the shot down Syrian moment - "there are no such tails in airplanes, they were made of plywood."

              Let's not replicate fantasies - there is video and evidence where the rebels commit crimes, there are videos and evidence where the Assad guys do it. At the moment, it’s not possible to blame any of the parties for humanism.
              1. Botanologist
                Botanologist 7 November 2013 18: 31
                +2
                Quote: Pimply
                there is video and evidence where the rebels commit crimes, there are videos and evidence where the Assad guys do it.


                First of all, I didn’t protect anyone. And I do not believe in humanism in a civil war.
                I'm talking about something else. During the war, photos and video evidence are massively made, as you wrote, about the atrocities of the enemy. A photograph beloved by all humanists, where hungry, exhausted people look in Yugoslavia at a soldier through barbed wire and then exposed - the soldier was guarding the military camp, and the naked and thin crowded outside the camp. They came to the photo shoot. So with photos and videos from the battle zone you need to be careful. And you are right in the face of us all - some volunteer saw the wounded and knows for sure that these are Assad soldiers. Do not forget to write that Assad personally stood behind them and showed where to shoot.
                1. Pimply
                  Pimply 7 November 2013 18: 59
                  -1
                  Quote: Botanologist
                  First of all, I didn’t protect anyone. And I do not believe in humanism in a civil war.

                  So I do not believe.
                  There are a lot of different evidence. About the shooting of civilians by both sides is more than enough.

                  Quote: Botanologist
                  I'm talking about something else. During the war, photos and video evidence are massively made, as you wrote, about the atrocities of the enemy. A photograph beloved by all humanists, where hungry, exhausted people look in Yugoslavia at a soldier through barbed wire and then expose them - the soldier was guarding the military camp, and naked and thin crowded outside the camp. They came to the photo shoot. So with photos and videos from the battle zone you need to be careful. And you are right in the face of us all - some volunteer saw the wounded and knows for sure that these are Assad soldiers.

                  Without a doubt, photos and videos from the battle zone need to be evaluated extremely carefully. It's just that usually the guys who oppose Assad are immediately written in thugs, and his soldier in angels. And this is stupid, agree.

                  I have no illusions about the bias of witnesses. There is now a normal civil war. And civil war is always a massacre.
                  1. Botanologist
                    Botanologist 7 November 2013 19: 41
                    0
                    Quote: Pimply
                    I have no illusions about the bias of witnesses. There is now a normal civil war. And civil war is always a massacre.


                    So we agreed drinks
                    Let's not dehumanize Assad, but think about what we will do with that gobble of thugs who, after Syria, go to scream allahakbar somewhere in Central Asia and the Caucasus. With the direct patronage of the SA, with which our government still can not play enough in some strange games. .
                    1. Pimply
                      Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 18
                      0
                      Quote: Botanologist
                      Let's not dehumanize Assad, but think about what we will do with that gobble of thugs who, after Syria, go to scream allahakbar somewhere in Central Asia and the Caucasus. With the direct patronage of the SA, with which our government still can not play enough in some strange games. .

                      But this is a serious question. But I think it’s more likely that the Caucasus will not be the main arena. Zone of Conflict of the Future - Iran, Iraq, Syria
  • major071
    major071 7 November 2013 14: 20
    11
    Now I read on Wikipedia that the Israeli army is the most powerful in the world and has not yet lost a single war. It is necessary to fix this, and not by making corrections to Wikipedia.
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 27
      -4
      Quote: major071
      Now I read on Wikipedia that the Israeli army is the most powerful in the world and has not yet lost a single war. It is necessary to fix this, and not by making corrections to Wikipedia.

      So what's stopping you? Cap in hand - and go 8)
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 7 November 2013 14: 39
        +2
        Here is a link for you. Are you their lover?
        http://www.nautilus.co.il/Pages/pgsPress/pgMindPress.aspx?artID=3225&menuID=5&sr
        cPPack = ru, 0,0
        Read, there is an answer to you for everything from your scout Mordyhay Keidar, a specialist in Syria, which brings you and the "proud children of the desert" Saudis together.
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 14: 48
          -3
          Quote: mirag2
          Read, there is an answer to you for everything from your scout Mordyhay Keidar, a specialist in Syria, which brings you and the "proud children of the desert" Saudis together.

          Have you read the article at all? Well, for fun. It's not about rapprochement, if that. It clearly says: Although the Saudis did not mention Iran by name, it was clear that they did not mean Israel, from which they did not feel threatened, however, the Iranian nuclear problem, which caused them their greatest concern, should have pushed them to become a member of the Security Council where they could be at the center of decision making against Iran.

          This time. WHERE ABOUT APPROXIMATION?

          "Saudi Arabia knows that in the Security Council it will have to behave in accordance with the dictates of the United States, although it does not approve of President Barack Obama's policies on a wide range of issues. It does not want to be at the same time with US support for Israel, with Obama's appeasement of Iran and the shameful behavior of the West in regarding Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, the pagan murderer of Muslims. "

          Have you read it? Here it is said clearer than clear - Saudi Arabia does not want to support Israel. Or do you have problems understanding the text?

          “But the main reason for their refusal to join the Security Council is the fact that Saudi Arabia is constantly undermining the security of many countries: it finances the Sunni terror in Iraq, its billions lubricate the operations of hundreds of jihadist militias operating in Syria, and Saudi Arabia is using its petrodollars to spread radical Wahhabi Islam throughout Europe, Africa, Asia and America. A seat on the Security Council contradicts such activities and can embarrass Saudi Arabia. Awkwardness is the last thing the average Easterner will tolerate, save shame.
          The Saudi Arabian regime prefers to work behind the scenes, to exert influence in secret, far from the public eye. That's where his strength lies. A seat on the Security Council will put Saudi Arabia in the spotlight, which, too, runs counter to its preference to influence without exposing itself. She has everything and she has something to lose. Membership in the Security Council will not contribute to her reputation and will only create friction with the countries of the world, friction that is unpleasant for her, given her traditional and religious worldview. "

          If you don’t know, Sunni terrorism is one of Israel’s main opponents
          1. mirag2
            mirag2 7 November 2013 15: 09
            +1
            Here's about "rapprochement":
            http://www.slate.fr/story/36201/rapprochement-saoudien-israelien-syrie
            In French, will a source suit you?
            1. Pimply
              Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 38
              0
              Quote: mirag2
              Here's about "rapprochement":
              http://www.slate.fr/story/36201/rapprochement-saoudien-israelien-syrie
              In French, will a source suit you?

              You purposefully decided to spam the same messages on 10 times?
    2. atalef
      atalef 7 November 2013 14: 32
      -5
      major071 (3) Today, 14: 20 New
      Now I read on Wikipedia that the Israeli army is the most powerful in the world and has not yet lost a single war. It is necessary to fix this, and not by making corrections to Wikipedia.

      Well then, dear Gru, I’ll probably have to collect all the minions, grab like a reducing agent there, and for a start probably reduce Syria and all the Arab countries to the size of Israel, apparently when they are very large they somehow don’t fit, but they will become small - suddenly turn out laughing
      1. major071
        major071 7 November 2013 18: 48
        +4
        Dear atalef, the minions have long been collected, only they are engaged in another matter, well, by no means related to the state of Israel. And this is our domestic business. You still can’t see from there. stop
    3. APES
      APES 7 November 2013 14: 36
      +5
      Quote: major071
      still not lost a single war


      the only loss for them will mean the absolute end
  • Norady
    Norady 7 November 2013 14: 27
    +2
    Quote: Guun
    Then the IDF troops invade Syria - does Assad need it? So the Syrian army is exhausted by the civil war, and also the war against Israel. Do not pull this war Syria.

    Bashar al-Assad (s)
    “We have a full guarantee for the Russians that their troops will enter any war unleashed against Syria,” the newspaper quoted him as saying. (“We have a full Russian pledges that Russian troops will enter in any war waged against Syria,” he was quoted as saying).
    1. JIaIIoTb
      JIaIIoTb 7 November 2013 14: 31
      +2
      Link to the studio. I want to read it with my own eyes.
      If this is true, then some have flown.
      1. atalef
        atalef 7 November 2013 15: 41
        -2
        Bashar al-Assad (s)
        “We have a full guarantee for the Russians that their troops will enter any war unleashed against Syria,” the newspaper quoted him as saying. (“We have a full Russian pledges that Russian troops will enter in any war waged against Syria,” he was quoted as saying).
        Reply Quote Report Abuse
        1

        JIaIIoTb Today, 14: 31 ↑

        or got out
  • Garik
    Garik 7 November 2013 14: 37
    +2
    The Turkish plane was shot down when the Turks took on a weakly furrowed ter. the waters of Syria. It's just that Jews have long explored the weaknesses and pockets of the Syrian pro and use this information in their rat sorties. Re-grouping about will mix all the cards, then there will only be a chance to turn the tide. I don’t understand one thing is c-300 in Syria or not?
    1. atalef
      atalef 7 November 2013 14: 55
      -2
      Quote: Garik
      The Turkish plane was shot down when the Turks took on a weakly furrowed ter. the waters of Syria. It's just that Jews have long explored the weaknesses and pockets of the Syrian pro and use this information in their rat sorties. Re-grouping about will mix all the cards, then there will only be a chance to turn the tide. I don’t understand one thing is c-300 in Syria or not?

      They say that there are, like Buki, Wasps, and much more
  • ramin_serg
    ramin_serg 7 November 2013 14: 39
    +4
    <Syria may respond to Israeli air strikes>

    I think that if I could, I would answer
    1. atalef
      atalef 7 November 2013 19: 17
      -1
      <Syria may respond to Israeli air strikes>


      Theoretically, of course, you know anecdote about the difference between theoretically and practically?
  • Strashila
    Strashila 7 November 2013 14: 47
    0
    The method of the Israelis is not new ... everything has been tested in Yugoslavia and Iraq when neutral airspace is used ... it’s impossible to touch, it’s not realistic to prove the first one. And again, amazing accuracy ... which indicates the presence of an agent network to illuminate targets. .. and it can only be terrorists. International terrorism = radical Islam = Israel = USA = NATO ... the same thing.
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 00
      -1
      Quote: Strashila
      The method of the Israelis is not new ... everything has been tested in Yugoslavia and Iraq when neutral airspace is used ... it’s impossible to touch, it’s not realistic to prove the first one. And again, amazing accuracy ... which indicates the presence of an agent network to illuminate targets. .. and it can only be terrorists. International terrorism = radical Islam = Israel = USA = NATO ... the same thing.

      Apparently, UAVs and Maglan were also canceled.
      1. their
        their 7 November 2013 21: 14
        -1
        Do not tell which muggle in Syria .., just save missiles for a massive attack in the future of your Air Force.
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 21: 16
          0
          Quote: sus
          Do not tell which muggle in Syria .., just save missiles for a massive attack in the future of your Air Force.

          The farther, the funnier 8)
          1. atalef
            atalef 7 November 2013 21: 24
            -2
            Quote: Pimply
            The farther, the funnier 8)

            let the horse have fun, nor does the presence of a large head always mean a large brain.
            1. their
              their 7 November 2013 21: 39
              0
              What kind of horse?
              1. atalef
                atalef 7 November 2013 23: 18
                0
                Quote: sus
                What kind of horse?

                Hebrew sauce, I hope so far without a coat laughing
  • i_vam_ne_hvoratj
    i_vam_ne_hvoratj 7 November 2013 14: 47
    +4
    Dear colleagues. Maybe I’m not right, but, in my opinion, Israel has ceased to feel the limits of what is permitted. It is impossible to kill citizens of another country with impunity just because someone has decided that he has the right to deliver a preventive strike. (Just like that. Just because he decided so.) And as for the adequate response from Syria, a dozen jackals can easily stomp a weakening lion. With every kick, the lion will feel worse both physically and mentally. And they stammer and wipe their paws ... But there is one caveat ... This will happen only when the lion forgets that he is a lion. I would not want that ...
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 03
      -3
      Quote: i_vam_ne_hvoratj
      Dear colleagues. Maybe I’m not right, but, in my opinion, Israel has ceased to feel the limits of what is permitted. It is impossible to kill citizens of another country with impunity just because someone has decided that he has the right to deliver a preventive strike. (Just like that. Just because he decided so.) And as for the adequate response from Syria, a dozen jackals can easily stomp a weakening lion. With every kick, the lion will feel worse both physically and mentally. And they stammer and wipe their paws ... But there is one caveat ... This will happen only when the lion forgets that he is a lion. I would not want that ...

      Israel has a war with Syria. Lasting from the 1948 year. Official, on a piece of paper. For some reason, you are not outraged by the many years of Syria sponsoring the guys from Hamas, for example, and the killing of Israeli citizens by Syria.

      Russia, for example, inflicted a preemptive strike on Pankisi in 2002. The territory of another state. Do you blame her?
    2. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 11 November 2013 12: 11
      0
      Israel has firmly got used to the role of Tabaka under the mighty Sher Khan. He never "felt the boundaries", it was not necessary. How and with whose support the same Golan were selected is not a secret even once. It's funny that extremely subjective emotions are so strongly superimposed on seemingly absolutely objective processes, but otherwise it is impossible!
      Well, what prevents Syria from cutting down all the planes that dared to rise from any Israeli airfield? Never mind. Our missiles can provide all this, no matter who yells. But the attack on the Tobacco is an attack on the tiger. Because Tobaccos, vile, mean and nasty, the tiger likes it. The Syrians are desperate because fighting with a jackal is not a problem, but a tiger ... So they are trying to stick to us. They even began to accept our citizenship.
      And, apparently, it’s not for us to fight for them, no matter what they say ... They just dream that we should restrain the tiger, and they’ll figure it out with the jackal. The Israelis do not understand, and apparently no longer understand how much they have accumulated hatred. Not anti-Semitism, no, no matter how much they want it. Hatred of someone who gets into a fight while being completely covered by an immeasurably greater force.
      I am afraid that Israel will end instantly. This will happen a day after America abandons them. And they will be thrown, for sure ...
  • Drosselmeyer
    Drosselmeyer 7 November 2013 14: 47
    0
    Words, words ... There is nothing for Syria to answer Israel, the Syrian army is not coping.
  • Drosselmeyer
    Drosselmeyer 7 November 2013 14: 48
    0
    Words, words ... There is nothing for Syria to answer Israel, the Syrian army is not coping.
    1. In the reeds
      In the reeds 7 November 2013 19: 54
      -1
      We now have Bella Gvardiya following Bulgakov at "9" at 17.50 Israeli time. Wake up Russichi.
  • i_vam_ne_hvoratj
    i_vam_ne_hvoratj 7 November 2013 14: 48
    +1
    Dear colleagues. Maybe I’m not right, but, in my opinion, Israel has ceased to feel the limits of what is permitted. It is impossible to kill citizens of another country with impunity just because someone has decided that he has the right to deliver a preventive strike. (Just like that. Just because he decided so.) And as for the adequate response from Syria, a dozen jackals can easily stomp a weakening lion. With every kick, the lion will feel worse both physically and mentally. And they stammer and wipe their paws ... But there is one caveat ... This will happen only when the lion forgets that he is a lion. I would not want that ...
    1. atalef
      atalef 7 November 2013 15: 04
      -1
      Quote: i_vam_ne_hvoratj
      Dear colleagues. Maybe I’m not right, but, in my opinion, Israel has ceased to feel the limits of what is permitted. It is impossible to kill citizens of another country with impunity just because someone has decided that he has the right to deliver a preventive strike. (Just like that. Just because he decided so.) And as for the adequate response from Syria, a dozen jackals can easily stomp a weakening lion. With every kick, the lion will feel worse both physically and mentally. And they stammer and wipe their paws ... But there is one caveat ... This will happen only when the lion forgets that he is a lion. I would not want that ...

      In general, Assad will not forget, his last name is so translated, but will it help him? To be called a lion and to be them are different things, like this lion, he ended all 5 wars in a pose and with a tail under his tongue, if one were to face the facts. Now nothing has changed, Assad beat 60 years ago, 40 until today, when something in this formula changes, then you will sing the victorious praises of Leo, we really look at life, and everything can change, maybe someday there will be a holiday on Asadovskaya Street, but I wish him good luck in the battles with the SSA, but it’s better not to bother with us (and does not help Hezbollah), in general, Pope Assad understood this well, and therefore lived calmly (after the last cradle), yes Bashar is not dad and he will never be
  • mirag2
    mirag2 7 November 2013 14: 48
    +5
    Quickly pulled a pimpled ... tongue
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 04
      -2
      Quote: mirag2
      Quickly pulled a pimpled ...

      Can you be more specific? Or will you again multiply posts and write answers on F-22 instead of answers on F-35?
  • Federal
    Federal 7 November 2013 14: 50
    +4
    yes, they can't do a fig .... Another disgrace and complete impotence of the most "strong air defense" in the east. Give a gun to the barbarian and shoot himself, Arabs are good only as servants in hotels, fucking our women and cannon fodder. Dot. The Jews know this and wipe out about these untermentized feet and do the right thing by the way ...
  • mirag2
    mirag2 7 November 2013 14: 54
    0
    Here's about "rapprochement":
    http://www.slate.fr/story/36201/rapprochement-saoudien-israelien-syrie
    Will a French source suit you?
    ps
    Can I throw a lot, be glad?
    But can you provide me with a source that suits ME, where it says that Israel and Saudi Arabia DO NOT COOPERATE (and do not "get closer")?
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 22
      -1
      Quote: mirag2
      Here's about "rapprochement":
      http://www.slate.fr/story/36201/rapprochement-saoudien-israelien-syrie
      Will a French source suit you?

      Do you understand the difference between source and opinion, for starters?
      You give an analytical article from the 2011 year in the form of what ???

      Have you read it? It does not speak of direct rapprochement. It says that Israel and Saudi Arabia are worried about the same problems, and they react similarly to certain situations.

      And also about the fact that Israel is worried that in the wake of the Arab revolutions everyone will again appoint him extreme.

      It suggests that Netanyahu wants to establish, under Russian auspices, an alliance with moderate Arab countries against the Iranian nuclear threat. In what form this union will be, how it will work - no conclusions are drawn. This is the assumption of Jacques Benillouche from 2011 of the year. Two years ago.

      And no one argues that, to a certain extent, countries interact on a common interest. What does not prevent them from opposing their own.
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 7 November 2013 16: 39
        0
        So where is the source on your part that says that Saudi Arabia and Israel are not getting closer (in contact)?
        Or the facts that you cite are your opinion?
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 51
          0
          Quote: mirag2
          So where is the source on your part that says that Saudi Arabia and Israel are not getting closer (in contact)?
          Or the facts that you cite are your opinion?

          What do you mean by getting closer. Do you drive teas together?
  • ramin_serg
    ramin_serg 7 November 2013 14: 54
    -1
    // Syria can respond to attacks by Israeli aircraft //

    If I could, I would answer
    1. Guun
      Guun 7 November 2013 15: 17
      +1
      If she could, she wouldn’t answer, but simply hit the rockets - but this has not happened again. Give a reason to the west and Syria will not, and the answer against the bombing of Israel is the same light for gunpowder.
      1. alone
        alone 7 November 2013 20: 58
        0
        Quote: Guun
        If she could, she wouldn’t answer, but simply hit the rockets - but this has not happened again. Give a reason to the west and Syria will not, and the answer against the bombing of Israel is the same light for gunpowder.


        the air defense system with the help of powerful electronic warfare systems turns into iron bars, and besides, almost all air defense is junk. death sentence.
  • Ivan Tarasov
    Ivan Tarasov 7 November 2013 15: 01
    +1
    The best response from Syria will be the destruction of militants - pseudo-Islamists, whom Israel is arming and sending to kill women and children.
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 23
      -1
      Quote: Ivan Tarasov
      The best response from Syria will be the destruction of militants - pseudo-Islamists, whom Israel is arming and sending to kill women and children.


      Tell me, why the hell with Israel, which has been fighting the Islamists for decades, to arm them if they are successfully armed with Qatar, Europe, Saudi Arabia, the USA, Turkey?
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 7 November 2013 15: 26
        +2
        Do not make yourself a naive child, so that they would shoot each other.
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 46
          -1
          Quote: mirag2
          Do not make yourself a naive child, so that they would shoot each other.


          Ingenious. Islamists to shoot each other. That is, for this, only Jewish weapons are kosher? But is Saudi, American, European, etc. not suitable? And then to turn against Israel?
          1. Ivan Tarasov
            Ivan Tarasov 7 November 2013 15: 53
            -1
            And Saudi and American and European are suitable, including Israeli.
            The fact that Israel is supplying is a fact.
            Of course, not with his own money, Qatar and Saudi Arabia pay him for this.
            It is unlikely that it will turn against Israel - the raven will not bite its eye.
          2. mirag2
            mirag2 7 November 2013 16: 07
            0
            Islamist radicals and secular Islamists.
            1. Pimply
              Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 10
              -2
              Quote: mirag2
              Islamists secular.

              This is not even brilliant. This is something completely unbelievable 8)
              1. mirag2
                mirag2 7 November 2013 16: 22
                0
                Islamists-people professing Islam.
                How are Orthodox Jews = radical Jews, or Orthodox Jews = non-Jews?
                1. Pimply
                  Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 29
                  0
                  Quote: mirag2
                  Islamists-people professing Islam.

                  In fact, people who profess Islam are Muslims, you are mine illiterate. Tell me, do you specifically emphasize illiteracy?

                  Islamism is a religious and political ideology and practical activity aimed at creating conditions under which any contradictions within society and the state where there is a Muslim population, as well as interstate relations with their participation, will be resolved on the basis of Sharia norms.

                  Al-Azm lists the following essential attributes of Islamism:
                  fundamentalism - as a return to the foundations of Islam (Salafism)
                  rebirth - active faith and rites
                  Integralism - the unification of all spheres of life of society and the state under the laws of Sharia
                  theocracy - the restoration of Allah as the supreme authority
                  theonomism - literally "the supremacy of the laws of the Lord", the direct, literal and comprehensive application of Sharia
                  terrorism - as a way to inflict maximum damage to the enemy without taking into account any long-term consequences.

                  What are you talking about secular Islamism?
                  1. mirag2
                    mirag2 7 November 2013 16: 37
                    0
                    Of course, I’m a seeker of a ray of light and truth in a dark world in which I am forced to vegetate.
                    So what about Arafat?
                    1. Pimply
                      Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 41
                      -1
                      Quote: mirag2
                      Of course, I’m a seeker of a ray of light and truth in a dark world in which I am forced to vegetate.
                      So what about Arafat?

                      No, you are just an illiterate writer. Which does not read.

                      As for Arafat - did you read the findings of the Russian institute, which conducted an examination before the Swiss? And french?

                      International experts have questioned the findings of the Lausanne Institute of Radiophysics (Switzerland) about the poisoning of former Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat with radioactive polonium-210. In particular, a radiation specialist from the University of Surrey, Professor Paddy Regan, said that the conclusions of Swiss experts can be admitted only with a large number of reservations, writes BBC News.

                      The British scientist drew attention to the fact that the half-life of polonium-210 is 138 days. In this regard, the samples, which the Swiss received for study, remained an insignificantly small amount of the substance, therefore, it is incorrect to judge on this basis its quantity at the time of Arafat’s death in 2004. As stated by Regan, the actions of Swiss experts are tantamount to trying to determine the size of an elephant in the dark, holding onto its tail.

                      The study of the causes of Arafat's death was carried out not only by Swiss, but also by Russian and French scientists. Back in mid-October, it became known that the Russian Federal Biomedical Agency (FMBA), which conducted an examination in the Arafat case, did not find traces of polonium at all and ruled out the version of poisoning. This was reported to Interfax by the head of the agency, Vladimir Uyba. Russian scientists submitted their report to the Palestinian authorities on 2 on November, ITAR-TASS noted.

                      Read, read, or write faster than you read.
            2. Ivan Tarasov
              Ivan Tarasov 7 November 2013 16: 23
              +1
              Islamists - radicals - a myth imposed by those who conceived all this.
              It is necessary to call a spade a spade, then it will be difficult to divert consciousness to the "right" side.
              Pseudo-Islamists are a term that should be introduced.
              Otherwise, an association with Islam will arise, and this is what they want from us!
              Let’s not become cows, it’s difficult, but turn on the brain.
              For a start - terms.
              1. Pimply
                Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 29
                -1
                Quote: Ivan Tarasov
                Islamists - radicals - a myth imposed by those who conceived all this.
                It is necessary to call a spade a spade, then it will be difficult to divert consciousness to the "right" side.
                Pseudo-Islamists are a term that should be introduced.
                Otherwise, an association with Islam will arise, and this is what they want from us!
                Let’s not become cows, it’s difficult, but turn on the brain.
                For a start - terms.


                Do you even understand the initial terms first, before you come up with new ones.
                1. Ivan Tarasov
                  Ivan Tarasov 7 November 2013 16: 52
                  0
                  Do you even understand the initial terms first, before you come up with new ones.

                  For example?
                  1. Pimply
                    Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 54
                    -1
                    For example, learn to separate Muslims and Islamists, and read the definition of Islamism and Islamist, and learn to distinguish them from Islam and Muslim.
                    1. Ivan Tarasov
                      Ivan Tarasov 7 November 2013 17: 02
                      0
                      Islam is a religion, Islamism is a religious and political ideology, in a practical plane.
                      There is no radical in Islam, everything that is preached by the so-called "radical Islamists" - perversions of Islam, in essence is not Islam.
                      So, do not put a shadow on the wattle fence.
                      1. Pimply
                        Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 05
                        +1
                        Quote: Ivan Tarasov
                        There is no radical in Islam, everything that is preached by the so-called "radical Islamists" - perversions of Islam, in essence is not Islam.

                        Right. Nevertheless, they do not cease to be radical Islamists from this. Well, Islamists really have little in common with Muslims.
                      2. Ivan Tarasov
                        Ivan Tarasov 7 November 2013 17: 17
                        0
                        Nevertheless, they do not stop being radical Islamists

                        Wait, how does this stop?
                        If what they preach is not Islam, therefore they themselves are not Islamists, neither radical nor whatsoever, they fall out of the circle of the concept of Islam.
                      3. Pimply
                        Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 21
                        0
                        Quote: Ivan Tarasov
                        Wait, how does this stop?
                        If what they preach is not Islam, therefore they themselves are not Islamists, neither radical nor whatsoever, they fall out of the circle of the concept of Islam.


                        From their point of view and from the point of view of many Muslims - is. Radical Christians do not stop being Christians. Radical Jews or Buddhists, too.

                        There is a clear definition of Islamism.
                      4. Ivan Tarasov
                        Ivan Tarasov 7 November 2013 17: 34
                        0
                        Islamism includes Islam.
                        Islam cannot be Islamism, since Islam and Islamism are different categories of concepts.
                        Islamism is built on Islam, not the other way around.
                        Therefore, if Islamism is not built on Islam, can it be called Islamism?
                      5. Pimply
                        Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 43
                        -2
                        Quote: Ivan Tarasov
                        Islam cannot be Islamism, since Islam and Islamism are different categories of concepts.

                        Right.
                        Quote: Ivan Tarasov
                        Islamism is built on Islam, not the other way around.

                        Right.


                        Quote: Ivan Tarasov
                        Therefore, if Islamism is not built on Islam, can it be called Islamism?

                        Then you begin to contradict yourself and get confused.
                    2. Ivan Tarasov
                      Ivan Tarasov 7 November 2013 17: 47
                      0
                      There is a clear definition of Islamism.

                      Of course there is.
                      Islamism is a religious and political ideology and practical activity aimed at creating conditions under which any contradictions within society and the state where there is a Muslim population, as well as interstate relations with their participation, will be resolved on the basis of Sharia norms.
                      Sharia (Arabic Sharia, literally - the right way, mode of action), a set of religious, ethical and legal prescriptions of Islam, based on the Koran.
                    3. Pimply
                      Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 49
                      -2
                      Quote: Ivan Tarasov
                      Islamism is a religious and political ideology and practical activity aimed at creating conditions under which any contradictions within society and the state where there is a Muslim population, as well as interstate relations with their participation, will be resolved on the basis of Sharia norms.
                      Sharia (Arabic Sharia, literally - the right way, mode of action), a set of religious, ethical and legal prescriptions of Islam, based on the Koran.


                      That is, the basis of Islamism is Islam, right, and its basic norms, radicalized. I am wrong? So why can't Islamists be Islamists?
                    4. Ivan Tarasov
                      Ivan Tarasov 7 November 2013 20: 04
                      -1
                      If the norms of Islam are radicalized, then this is a distortion of Islam, right?
                      And if so, is Islam a distortion of it?
                    5. Pimply
                      Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 20
                      -1
                      Quote: Ivan Tarasov
                      If the norms of Islam are radicalized, then this is a distortion of Islam, right?
                      And if so, is Islam a distortion of it?

                      Is an. The radical form in one way or another relies on the basic Islamic tenets. Now, if there was a rejection of some basic principles, for example, the principle of halal, or a number of suras, then it would be possible to discuss. For example, subbotniks can hardly be fully attributed to Christians, and Karaite to Jews.
                    6. Ivan Tarasov
                      Ivan Tarasov 7 November 2013 21: 40
                      -1
                      So after all, the radicalization of Islam is a departure from the basic norms.
                      This is no longer Islam.
                    7. Pimply
                      Pimply 7 November 2013 21: 53
                      -1
                      Islam. But radical. If they denied Muhammad as a prophet, then they could be considered something else. And so - a simple enforcement of norms, and a different interpretation of Islam does not mean that it is not Islam.
                    8. Ivan Tarasov
                      Ivan Tarasov 8 November 2013 00: 37
                      0
                      Not the enforcement of norms, but a perversion that denies the very foundations of Islam.
                      And the fact that Muhhamed appears just points to the concept - pseudo.
                      False Islam.
                    9. Pimply
                      Pimply 8 November 2013 01: 45
                      0
                      Quote: Ivan Tarasov
                      Not the enforcement of norms, but a perversion that denies the very foundations of Islam.
                      And the fact that Muhhamed appears just points to the concept - pseudo.
                      False Islam.

                      However, radical Islam is Islam. In one of its manifestations. Like radical Christianity - Christianity.
                    10. Ivan Tarasov
                      Ivan Tarasov 8 November 2013 06: 34
                      0
                      This is for those to whom the concept is intended - radical (Islam after all ...) - for the layman who does not understand the details.
                      And the devil is just in the details.
                      But why, to a mediocre layman powder brains? But just in order for the masses to perceive the pledged program - the virus, and began to play according to the rules imposed on them. They began to play someone else's game. They became puppets, bargaining chips, cannon fodder, in the hands of those who want to reformat this world for themselves.
                      Pseudo-Islam is a fuse in a global war.
                      The percentage of pseudo-Islamists is small, and the strength is correspondingly insignificant, but the goal is to ignite Islam, to push it against other faiths. If the masses cease to associate pseudo-Islamists with Islam, then the fuse will not work, it will turn into a banal firecracker, zilch.
                      That is why SMRAD is trying to impose the word "radical" so that the concept of Islam remains.
                      So that; pseudo-islam, pseudo-islamists, pseudo-Muslims.
  • mirag2
    mirag2 7 November 2013 16: 30
    -3
    "... let obala disappear in Syria like all enemies of Israel !!! Let them destroy each other to the last martyr!"
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 42
      0
      Quote: mirag2
      "... let obala disappear in Syria like all enemies of Israel !!! Let them destroy each other to the last martyr!"


      And what is this phrase and what should it prove?
  • Ivan Tarasov
    Ivan Tarasov 7 November 2013 15: 48
    +1
    The Israeli leadership should ask about this.
    Moreover, they not only arm, but treat the wounded on their territory, supply them with medicines and supplies.
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 50
      -1
      The IDF command allowed the 3-year-old girl from Syria to be wounded in Israeli battles between the rebel units and the army of Bashar al-Assad.

      Together with her mother, the girl was taken to the Ziv hospital in Safed.

      The girl suffers from shrapnel wounds to the eyes. Her condition is evaluated by doctors as moderate.
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 7 November 2013 16: 10
        0
        What about the execution of the IDF soldier who came to the Al-Aqsa mosque on Friday prayers?
        http://www.slate.fr/story/36201/rapprochement-saoudien-israelien-syrie
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 32
          -1
          Quote: mirag2
          What about the execution of the IDF soldier who came to the Al-Aqsa mosque on Friday prayers?
          http://www.slate.fr/story/36201/rapprochement-saoudien-israelien-syrie

          I'm curious - do you read anything from this site from the French media at least anything?

          And did you read the article itself? It tells about how Assad’s troops destroyed a man at the 54 demonstrations, and that the units of Maher Assad were sent to suppress the uprising.

          And about the possible turn of the Sunnis towards Israel against the background of the situation, since Israel is preferable to Shiites.

          And this is analytics again - if you certainly know what it is - from the 2011 year.

          Where is there about "the shooting of the IDF soldiers of the Palestinians who came to Friday prayers at the Al-Aqsa mosque"? The shooting, which I don't remember at all.
      2. Ivan Tarasov
        Ivan Tarasov 7 November 2013 16: 14
        +3
        All this information is to the public.
        Israel is involved in a network-centric war against Syria.
        All this compassionate information is precisely designed for the consciousness of the masses.
        Intercepting control in the information field is one of the tools for waging this war.
        1. their
          their 7 November 2013 21: 26
          +1
          The Israelis are participating in the war in Syria on the side of the militants, and Israel’s attacks on Syria should in principle help the militants. They write about civilians that Israel is treating, I wonder where he then puts them ?? Does it return back to Syria?

          Israelis are meanly fighting and lying about their alleged non-participation in this war, despite the cooperation with the Saudis who sponsor terror.
          1. Pimply
            Pimply 7 November 2013 21: 35
            0
            Quote: sus
            Israelis participate in the war in Syria on the side of militants

            Israel has been fighting for decades with Sunni militants. Israel is worse than the bitter radish that Assad, that his opponents.
            Quote: sus
            and attacks on Syria by Israel should, in theory, help the militants.

            What do you think, if Israel really wanted to help the militants, how serious would the consequences for Assad be?


            Quote: sus
            They write about civilians that Israel is treating, I wonder where he then puts them ?? Does it return back to Syria?

            Yes, does it surprise you? Assad’s troops now have almost no control over the border with Israel.

            Quote: sus
            Israelis are meanly fighting and lying about their alleged non-participation in this war, despite the cooperation with the Saudis who sponsor terror.


            Well, how not involved? There, they hit the warehouse. No one talks about total non-participation.
            1. their
              their 7 November 2013 21: 53
              0
              "What do you think, if Israel really wanted to help militants, how much more serious would be the consequences for Assad?"

              I answer: Israel has been participating on the side of the militants for almost 3 years, and it is precisely because of this that the militants are unable to turn the tide of the war. You overestimated yourself too much, your abilities are really low.

              You are such naive Israelis, I'm just starting to doubt the mental abilities of some Jews. You are fighting on the same side with al-Qaeda foreign terrorists, the front of Al-Nusra against Assad. Is this a fact or will you refute?

              1. atalef
                atalef 7 November 2013 21: 59
                -1
                [quote = sus] I answer:
                Sometimes it's better to chew than talk

                [quote = sus] You are such naive Israelis, I just start to doubt the mental abilities of some Jews. [/ quote]
                laughing

                [quote = sus]. You are fighting on the same side with al-Qaeda foreign terrorists, the front of Al-Nusra against Assad. Is this a fact or will you refute? [/ Quote]
                If they fought on their side. Assad would have been remembered for 2 years

                [quote = sus] I’m interested in writing here on a Russian site, make so much propaganda and lies, You probably keep all fools because they are goyim ?? [/ quote]
                No, apparently only you belay
                1. their
                  their 7 November 2013 22: 38
                  0
                  C'mon, you lost. In 2006, Hizbullah was pissed off with a whistle, in 2008 the Georgians were advised, 2011 - they began to play against Assad and here is the result.
                  1. Pimply
                    Pimply 7 November 2013 23: 33
                    -1
                    Quote: sus
                    C'mon, you lost. In 2006, Hizbullah was pissed off with a whistle, in 2008 the Georgians were advised, 2011 - they began to play against Assad and here is the result.

                    That is, Nasrallah still sitting in the bunker, the destruction of 500 militants, and the shelling of the North of Israel that has ceased since then, is a loss?
              2. Pimply
                Pimply 7 November 2013 22: 07
                0
                Quote: sus

                I answer: Israel has been participating on the side of the militants for almost 3 years, and it is precisely because of this that the militants are unable to turn the tide of the war. You overestimated yourself too much, your abilities are really low.

                Right And without Israel, the militants would immediately defeat 8). The logic is with you - I am delighted with 8)
                1. their
                  their 7 November 2013 22: 33
                  0
                  And with you and without you would lose. You were mistaken, seriously miscalculated.
                  1. Aaron Zawi
                    Aaron Zawi 8 November 2013 01: 08
                    0
                    Quote: sus
                    And with you and without you would lose. You were mistaken, seriously miscalculated.

                    Well, glory to Assad. Only when will he win? Can you tell me. In 2014 or in 2015?
      3. mirag2
        mirag2 7 November 2013 16: 26
        -1
        Cured the girl, well done, the humanities, their mother ...
        Have you poisoned Arafat’s fig?
        Yes, and Litvinenko, along the way, also got a little regiment from the same test tube. Some people.
        Who benefited from Arafat poison?
        Poor Palestinians have long said that the Jews poisoned Arafat, but only Israel said, “Why do we need this?
        We want to negotiate with him, we are treating the Palestinians ... And you poison ... "
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 50
          0
          Quote: mirag2
          Cured the girl, well done, the humanities, their mother ...
          Have you poisoned Arafat’s fig?
          Yes, and Litvinenko, along the way, also got a little regiment from the same test tube. Some people.
          Who benefited from Arafat poison?
          Poor Palestinians have long said that the Jews poisoned Arafat, but only Israel said, “Why do we need this?
          We want to negotiate with him, we are treating the Palestinians ... And you poison ... "


          That is, Arafat, who could easily be killed dozens of times - for example, when he was kept on a fly in Mukat, was killed by Israel.

          International experts have questioned the findings of the Lausanne Institute of Radiophysics (Switzerland) about the poisoning of former Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat with radioactive polonium-210. In particular, a radiation specialist from the University of Surrey, Professor Paddy Regan, said that the conclusions of Swiss experts can be admitted only with a large number of reservations, writes BBC News.

          The British scientist drew attention to the fact that the half-life of polonium-210 is 138 days. In this regard, the samples, which the Swiss received for study, remained an insignificantly small amount of the substance, therefore, it is incorrect to judge on this basis its quantity at the time of Arafat’s death in 2004. As stated by Regan, the actions of Swiss experts are tantamount to trying to determine the size of an elephant in the dark, holding onto its tail.

          However, Russian scientists have not found anything at all. Amazing right?

          And I would advise you to read the 108 page report myself. From it it becomes clear that Al-Jazeera, to put it mildly, is lying.

          In fact, the report states that the radiation background of land samples taken from Arafat’s grave does not differ from the radiation background of land samples taken near a mosque located near the mausoleum. The authors of the report also emphasize that it is extremely difficult to draw unambiguous conclusions about the presence of particles of a radioactive substance on the remains 8 years after the burial.

          The authors of the report write that toxicological and radiological studies were hampered by an insufficient amount of "biological material". In particular, it is noted that blood, urine, feces and cerebrospinal fluid samples taken from Arafat in 2004 at Percy Hospital were destroyed. A toxicological examination did not reveal any drugs in Arafat's body other than those given to the patient at Percy Hospital.

          According to the report, the original "biological material" (before the exhumation of the remains) was as follows: a single hair, traces of sweat, blood and urine on clothes. After exhumation, the researchers obtained samples of hair, bones, and scalp, as well as primitive soil. "All of these specimens proved to be problematic in terms of their analysis and interpretation of the results," the report says. The authors of the report emphasize that in scientific practice there was almost no experience of such an analysis, and this kind of research has not been described in the scientific literature. They again and again declare that 8 years after the funeral, given the "non-optimal" storage conditions for the samples, it is impossible to speak with confidence about the discovery of traces of polonium-210. Scientists point out that such studies would require samples of liver, kidney and soft tissue.

          However, page 67 notes that traces of polonium-210 (210Po, half-life just over 138 days) and lead-210 (210Pb, half-life 22,2 years) were found on the remains of Arafat and his personal belongings, and on " biological material "the concentration was slightly higher than on personal belongings. At the same time, it is emphasized that the probability of falsification of samples is "very unlikely" (it is not clear on what basis such a conclusion is made).
    2. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 15: 58
      -3
      Ophthalmologist Arie Abidan said that only yesterday a 15-year-old boy was brought to the department with his eyes gouged out and his leg cut off. The Safed doctors can no longer restore his sight - the boy will remain blind. Orthopedic surgeon Alexander Lerner also had never seen a wounded with such severe injuries before: some are brought in with real "holes" in their bodies caused by huge blows.
      The correspondent saw an 15-year-old teenager with an amputated leg in Syria. A crushed and crushed hand was saved in Safed. A boy and his brother drove water on an ATV to the base of the Syrian army, and the ATV hit a mine. Soldiers of the government army took the wounded brothers to their parents, and their father drove them to the Israeli border.
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 7 November 2013 16: 17
        +1
        And Assad soldiers gouged out the boy’s eyes ...
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 36
          0
          Quote: mirag2
          And Assad soldiers gouged out the boy’s eyes ...

          And I gave comments, who pricked my eyes? I can give more specific how children are treated, with respect to which it is precisely indicated that they suffered precisely from the Asad children. Or do you think these are guys with nimbuses?
  • JonnyT
    JonnyT 7 November 2013 16: 15
    0
    Tell me, why the hell with Israel, which has been fighting the Islamists for decades, to arm them if they are successfully armed with Qatar, Europe, Saudi Arabia, the USA, Turkey?

    Again it began .......
    Terrorists fighting in Syria in your interests, they weaken your long-standing enemy, they open the way to a long-standing enemy-Iran ....... in the face of obvious benefit ..... and money can be earned, experience and knowledge can be gained. ...
    For decades, you have been fighting the Islamists that Syria and Iran cultivate .... well, you have decided to grow your own in order to fight your enemies ......
    And when they do their job, then you pass them on like cockroaches, since brainless monkeys screaming "alayavbar" without technology and without organization and interaction do not pose a serious threat to you ...
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 37
      -1
      Quote: JonnyT
      Again it began .......
      Terrorists fighting in Syria in your interests, they weaken your long-standing enemy, they open the way to a long-standing enemy-Iran ....... in the face of obvious benefit ..... and money can be earned, experience and knowledge can be gained. ..

      Exactly, again. Do you really think that Israel will benefit from a new Afghanistan close by, where Sunni terrorists from all over the world are flocking. And this despite the fact that among the Sunni jihadists, Israel is one of the main enemies?
      1. JonnyT
        JonnyT 7 November 2013 17: 06
        0
        The presence of strong opponents, with a well-trained and equipped army, with good officers with combat experience, poses a much greater danger to Israel than a crowd of unorganized terrorists without significant financial and technical support ......... You are this "new Afghanistan at hand roll out "no problem ...... And there will be neither terrorists, nor hostile states in the vicinity ... You will equip the liberated territories according to your standards, establish your own control and coptrol system. Israel is the leader in the region ... Khazaria revived .......
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 18
          +1
          Quote: JonnyT
          The presence of strong opponents, with a well-trained and equipped army, with good officers with combat experience, is a much greater danger for Israel than a crowd of unorganized terrorists without significant financial and technical support .......

          Say it to the Americans in Afghanistan or Iraq? Have to participate in a counter-guerrilla decentralized war?
          1. JonnyT
            JonnyT 7 November 2013 17: 32
            0
            Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq need chaos and mess !!! They are at war with the Taliban and they themselves give money for arms .... they guard their heroin fields ...... If they really wanted to restore order they would have spread the whole Taliban ... the CIA and the terrorists are old Kent!

            Thank God I did not have to participate ........ partisan units, that is, terrorist groups will not enjoy any support from the local population ....... to finance them if you agree with your partners USA, Europe, no one will ..... no money, no support from the population, no weapons, no ammunition
            1. Pimply
              Pimply 7 November 2013 17: 44
              0
              Quote: JonnyT
              Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq need chaos and mess !!! They are at war with the Taliban and they themselves give money for arms .... they guard their heroin fields ...... If they really wanted to restore order they would have spread the whole Taliban ... the CIA and the terrorists are old Kent!

              Right They only dreamed about this - about strengthening Shiite allies of Iran, and about al-Qaeda with the Taliban. Do you even understand what nonsense you are?
              1. JonnyT
                JonnyT 8 November 2013 08: 58
                0
                Well, then why did they support them ????
                The fact that the CIA gave rise to the Taliban has long been known to everyone!
                reinforced Shiites and al-Qaeda are very necessary for the military-industrial complex to work properly ... for the population to shiver under the covers at night in fear for their own lives while not noticing acute socio-economic problems ...... every senator, politician could successfully gain a rating, manipulating public opinion using the image of the enemy ......... along with the collapse of the union, ideology also disappeared ...... there was no one to resist the people of the United States ..... and now they created terrorism !!! And how can they now be without the image of the enemy ???? That’s why this gain is beneficial for them .... Al Qaeda can always be quickly dismantled ...... An intensive missile strike ...... and Shiites are again below the baseboard .... well, Iran is the key to Russia .. . Therefore, our country does not allow him to drive into the Stone Age
  • Mareman Vasilich
    Mareman Vasilich 7 November 2013 15: 28
    +3
    There is nothing to be surprised at. Israel is an ordinary carrion jackal, working as a servant at the American Sher Khan. But as if he had not jumped a lion, he would never become. I will say more, in a fight with the current Syria, exhausted by the war, one on one, they have no one chance to win. Because the jackal is always in the soul will be a jackal.
    1. mirag2
      mirag2 7 November 2013 15: 33
      +1
      You are mistaken, here is the question-who (!) The jackal-Israel did for the states what?
      Rather, Israel will use the USA with might and main in its interests.
      About these methods a long, and believe me, a very interesting conversation.
      Natural conspiracies have nothing to do with it. Pure benefit for the Jews and all.
      1. Mareman Vasilich
        Mareman Vasilich 7 November 2013 15: 42
        +3
        Quite. I think that after all, the United States (Fed) holds Israel in that region as a chain dog, waiting for commands from above. On the other hand, the Fed is the property of leading bankers, most likely Jews. Then the circle closes. This is generalized. A detailed understanding makes sense only if for yourself personally, a hobby so to speak.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. Federal
      Federal 7 November 2013 15: 35
      -2
      and a short-sighted person will always remain that way, it’s about you, look at your leisure chronicle of the Israel-Syria and Company conflicts and think with your head and not just go there before dumping another tautalogy comrade
    3. In the reeds
      In the reeds 7 November 2013 20: 39
      0
      It has never been, and it is a pity that there is no real opportunity to challenge you to a duel in the framework of the best Russian traditions. Israel is not a lion, not a tiger, not a leopard, Israel Israel will forgive me, a simple cat which, with its back against the wall, turns into a beast which does not exist stronger in the world. And you are responsible for your words ... Life (this) is not infinite, you will suddenly have to answer, but rudeness cannot be explained ...
  • Cherdak
    Cherdak 7 November 2013 15: 30
    +1
    It remains for the Syrians to stick up only such posters in order to scare the adversary ... something is not really believed that they can really go to the answer, too unequal forces
    1. Mareman Vasilich
      Mareman Vasilich 7 November 2013 15: 46
      +2
      Of course, Syria will not be able to fight against all of NATO.
      1. atalef
        atalef 7 November 2013 16: 28
        -1
        Quote: Mareman Vasilich
        Of course, Syria will not be able to fight against all of NATO.

        Is Israel already in NATO?
        1. alone
          alone 7 November 2013 21: 05
          0
          wassat mdya .. reading some comments I thought that, all the same, Ulyanov-Lenin was right. as he correctly guessed with the slogan:

          Study, study and study again!!
      2. catapractic
        catapractic 7 November 2013 21: 29
        0
        it will not last long against Turkey alone, if the Kurds do not help, and you swung at NATO
  • shitovmg
    shitovmg 7 November 2013 15: 47
    0
    I think provocation. But Assad with P ... had the intelligence and wisdom to get out of a hopeless situation ... I think, and the victims (exchange for stability) ...
  • MRomanovich
    MRomanovich 7 November 2013 16: 09
    +3
    Quote: i_vam_ne_hvoratj
    Maybe I’m not right, but, in my opinion, Israel has ceased to feel the limits of what is permitted.

    Israel did not respect the boundaries of what was permitted before. I don’t know what it’s connected with: the belief in our God-like nature, the presence of a brother with a big club behind us, represented by the United States or something else, but we definitely need to "cheer up" Israel with a couple of retaliatory strikes. At least in order to knock out a sense of impunity in him.
  • andrei332809
    andrei332809 7 November 2013 16: 15
    0
    Syria can respond to Israeli air strikes

    to eat, then he’s to eat, but who can give him
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 16: 38
      0
      Quote: Jamal
      If a big mess begins in the region, then the shit will be at the epicenter of events and it is unlikely that it will remain unscathed if it is not completely destroyed.

      Have you read the site rules? I advise you to re-read.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • Samsebenaum
    Samsebenaum 7 November 2013 16: 26
    +3
    ... The Syrian army still has not responded to Israeli airstrikes on its territory, but reserves the right to retaliate ...
    If you continue this way, then soon nothing will remain of this "right" ...
    Relapses occur only where there is impunity.
    1. In the reeds
      In the reeds 7 November 2013 21: 54
      0
      She left herself the right ... They left it to her ... Or went to war to lose the Golan ... I would like to make peace with us, we really wanted this. Wants lyuley please have with us and this
  • tomich
    tomich 7 November 2013 16: 30
    +2
    could have long answered
  • iulai
    iulai 7 November 2013 17: 06
    0
    It’s lived, we know, a gangster, a bully is stopped only by a good kick in the nickle, and the main thing is not to be afraid, to beat first.
    1. atalef
      atalef 7 November 2013 19: 19
      0
      Quote: iulai
      It’s lived, we know, a gangster, a bully is stopped only by a good kick in the nickle, and the main thing is not to be afraid, to beat first.

      This is exactly what we are doing. hi
  • Ihrek
    Ihrek 7 November 2013 17: 28
    0
    Quote: mirag2
    You are mistaken, here is the question-who (!) The jackal-Israel did for the states what?
    Rather, Israel will use the USA with might and main in its interests.
    About these methods a long, and believe me, a very interesting conversation.
    Natural conspiracies have nothing to do with it. Pure benefit for the Jews and all.

    It is true, Jews are more likely to use states than vice versa.
  • Stinger
    Stinger 7 November 2013 17: 37
    0
    Sadat apparently knows the old practice of Odessa bandits, when a cocky kid comes out first, and then the swara begins. If he answers, then a big uncle will come with a question: why are you insulting the little ones?
    1. atalef
      atalef 7 November 2013 18: 24
      0
      Quote: Stinger
      Sadat apparently knows the old practice of Odessa bandits, when a cocky kid comes out first, and then the swara begins. If he answers, then a big uncle will come with a question: why are you insulting the little ones?

      Sadat from the grave or something?
  • USNik
    USNik 7 November 2013 18: 08
    +1
    Quote: tomich
    could have long answered

    How? Jews strike from neutral zones or from the territory of NATO litter. Plus, their pilots are trained and experienced, the route is calculated so that they would be discovered at the last moment. Plus, the inevitable scandal with the tantrums of Ban-gy-gy-moon and the beating of dishes at the UN. A typical Gopstop approach, a small six provokes a person from around the corner, and beside him in the shade stands a gang of guopars with clubs and wait for the muzzle to come muzzle. Does Assad need it?
    1. atalef
      atalef 7 November 2013 19: 22
      -1
      Quote: USNik
      Quote: tomich
      could have long answered

      How? Jews strike from neutral zones or from the territory of NATO litter. Plus, their pilots are trained and experienced, the route is calculated so that they would be discovered at the last moment. Plus, the inevitable scandal with the tantrums of Ban-gy-gy-moon and the beating of dishes at the UN. A typical Gopstop approach, a small six provokes a person from around the corner, and beside him in the shade stands a gang of guopars with clubs and wait for the muzzle to come muzzle. Does Assad need it?

      From which exactly such litter, name the country, and preferably with a reference and about how they found it and about the codl that is nearby. By the way, Assad claims that in the event of a NATO strike, Russia will enter the war on the side of Syria, is that how?
      1. poquello
        poquello 8 November 2013 00: 59
        +1
        Quote: atalef
        By the way, Assad claims that in the event of a NATO strike, Russia will enter the war on the side of Syria, is that how?

        as a guarantor of a chemical disarmament, that’s more careful there, unlike us, will cover your poopers at once
  • yacht
    yacht 7 November 2013 18: 38
    +1
    Syria at present and in this situation cannot answer Israel, that’s the whole situation.
  • NKVD
    NKVD 7 November 2013 18: 54
    +2
    Well, gentlemen, Jews, we already support terrorists? So soon Allah Akbar will start screaming
  • Sobol
    Sobol 7 November 2013 19: 39
    +1
    Quote: Pimply

    However, the guys who are fighting against Assad are no better.


    However, weapons labeled "Made in Israel" regularly fall on them.
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 20: 23
      +2
      Quote: SoboL
      However, weapons labeled "Made in Israel" regularly fall on them.

      Do you know the history of the region? The region is oversaturated with weapons. Israel from 1982 to 2000 was in Lebanon. For example, the Army of South Lebanon was armed with Israeli weapons. Israel lost weapons in wars, when retreating from Lebanon in 2000, entire depots were abandoned, weapons were regularly stolen.

      Do you want to accuse Israel of stupidity, in the presence of a huge amount of captured weapons unmarked?
    2. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 7 November 2013 20: 36
      +1
      [quote = SoboL] [quote = Speckled]

      However, weapons labeled "Made in Israel" regularly fall on them. [/ Quote]
      To be honest, I’m even surprised that so few hits, given how much it remains in Lebanon, especially after the collapse of the South Lebanese army.
      1. atalef
        atalef 7 November 2013 21: 26
        0
        Quote: sus
        Israel is reaching Syria now, it is enough to lower the entire arsenal of missiles to the center of Israel, and place C-300, Shell, Buk. Syria used to be weak enough, but today it is no longer, so they caught up with the terrorists.

        Assad can strike at any time against Israel, and Hezbollah will help him in this. Israel will tryndets.

        Yes, you’re directly a strategist, will you be from Genghis?
      2. poquello
        poquello 8 November 2013 01: 12
        +1
        [quote = Aron Zawi] [quote = SoboL] [quote = Pimpled]

        However, weapons labeled "Made in Israel" regularly fall on them. [/ Quote]
        To be honest, I’m even surprised that it gets so little, given how much it remains in Lebanon, especially after the collapse of the South Lebanese army. [/ Quote]
        Here I read the benefit of your compatriots, however, the first sound argument.
  • atalef
    atalef 7 November 2013 21: 18
    +1
    Quote: sus
    Israel is reaching Syria now, it is enough to lower the entire arsenal of missiles to the center of Israel, and place C-300, Shell, Buk. Syria used to be weak enough, but today it is no longer, so they caught up with the terrorists.

    Assad can strike at any time against Israel, and Hezbollah will help him in this. Israel will tryndets.

    Yes, you’re directly a strategist, will you be from Genghis?
  • Gerurra
    Gerurra 7 November 2013 21: 21
    +2
    Poor pimpled. Many minus him. Although he has the right statements. But Israel is a stillborn state. Forever in outcasts. Arabs finish off. America will merge - many Jews themselves do not need Israel, turning into a kind of fascism, but with its own bells and whistles. Maybe the homeland of the Jews is not in this territory. And where was Khazaria before. And from there they fled when they tapped on their necks. Here they came up with an exodus from Egypt. And the fact that many of them died in the camps of the Second World War. Every third Belarus died !!!!. There is no scream from them. What are they poor and unhappy. And Russians, Ukrainians and other nationalities !!!. They also do not tear their hair so intensely to myself. And the Jews have developed self-PR. It’s probably convenient to be stingy. But there’s one good thing: they have a lot of gifted people, that is, a pancake would treat their teeth, sing, dance, act in films. What else is needed !! AND !
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 7 November 2013 21: 25
      0
      Quote: Gerurra
      . Damn they would treat their teeth, sing, dance, act in films. What else is needed !! BUT !


      Well, probably not to be tried to exterminate, like Bogdan Khmelnitsky or Adolf Hitler
  • Dimon-chik-79
    Dimon-chik-79 7 November 2013 21: 26
    0
    Bluff! Do not answer! Could have answered right away. No, now they can’t afford it, definitely So they will endure as long as possible! After all, the country is in the flame of war (and on its territory) with terrorism and the Syrians obviously will not pull a second front
    But as soon as the opportunity presents itself, retribution will not keep itself waiting
  • sergo1979
    sergo1979 7 November 2013 23: 06
    0
    plya not burned in vain Russian cruisers go there
    1. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 8 November 2013 01: 10
      0
      Quote: sergo1979
      plya not burned in vain Russian cruisers go there

      Where to?
  • ochakow703
    ochakow703 8 November 2013 01: 04
    0
    Quote: mirag2
    Rather, Israel will use the USA with might and main in its interests.
    It seems to me that the Jews generally use everyone, and not just the Americans. That and live.