Military Review

Knight's story. As prince Pozharsky saved Russia and did not become king

18
Prince Dmitry Mikhailovich Pozharsky was distinguished by courage, courage, intelligence, loyalty to the word and unselfishness. These qualities glorified him for centuries, but prevented him from taking the throne.


Hero raised mother

The era of the Time of Troubles was the hardest test for Russia. The question was not only about power, but about the very existence of the country as an independent state.

Internal civil strife has shaken all state institutions, all perceptions of duty and honor. Many statesmen during this period managed to change camps repeatedly, supporting one or the other contenders for the throne. In a word, there are almost no those who did not mess with their name with shameful acts.

“Almost” - because among the heroes of the Time of Troubles, the figure of Prince Dmitry Mikhailovich Pozharsky stands apart, with courage, whose valor and loyalty to the oath were admired not only by comrades, but also by enemies.

The future hero was born on November 1 of 1578 in the family of Prince Mikhail Fedorovich Pozharsky and Euphrosyne Feodorovna Beklemisheva.

Rod princes Pozharsky leads his history from the legendary Prince Vsevolod the Big Nest, whose descendants ruled Russia right up to the suppression of the Rurik dynasty.

Despite this, in the era of Ivan the Terrible, Dmitriy’s father was not in the public service. Generally, in the Pozharsky family there were no prominent commanders and politicians. Is that Dmitry's grandfather, Fedor Ivanovich Pozharsky, was a regimental commander of Ivan the Terrible during the capture of Kazan.

Dmitry Pozharsky's father died when the boy was not even ten years old. Mother moved Dmitry with her brother and sister to Moscow, where she took up their upbringing.

Knight's story. As prince Pozharsky saved Russia and did not become king

Euphrosyne Beklemisheva came from a noble noble family, but even with this in mind for her time she was a unique woman. The mother of Prince Dmitry herself received an excellent education and was able to give the same to her children. Throughout her life, she helped Dmitry with wise advice, to which her son always listened.

It was the mother who formed such qualities as the absence of arrogance, arrogance and conceit in Dmitry Pozharsky; lack of greed and arrogance, justice and generosity; modesty and honesty in dealing with people and actions; dedication to the sovereigns of Russia and their Fatherland; courage and self-sacrifice.

Atypical career

In 1593, 15-year-old Dmitry Pozharsky enters the royal service. To the accession of Boris Godunov, the prince wore court title "Solicitor with a dress." The prince's mother also occupied a fairly high position at court, although the position of Pozharsky until the 1602 year remained unstable. The new monarch, apparently, groped those people on whom he could rely. In 1602, 24-year-old Dmitry Pozharsky, who proved to be a good enough service, received the rank of steward from the king.

However, with the instability of supreme power, the elevation could be short-lived. And indeed, in the 1605 year, Boris Godunov died, and False Dmitry I. solemnly entered Moscow.

However, the young Prince Pozharsky remained at the court. Loyalty to duty by that time became the distinguishing feature of Dmitry. But the False Dmitry in Moscow was recognized as the legitimate king, and Prince Pozharsky did not allow himself to doubt his “legitimacy”.

But in 1606, the struggle for the throne continued - the False Dmitry was overthrown and killed, and the boyar Vasily Shuisky ascended to the throne. The new tsar was sworn in by his subjects, and Dmitry Pozharsky among them.

The power of Vasily Shuisky was weak - the army of the new impostor False Dmitry II, nicknamed “Tushinsky Thief”, was advancing to the very walls of Moscow; Lithuanians and Poles were in charge of looting and ruining cities in western Russia, armed gangs everywhere.

Vasily Shuisky needed skilled and loyal generals, and in 1608, he appointed 30-year-old Dmitry Pozharsky as a regimental voivode.

The new commander immediately showed himself brilliantly, breaking the squad "Tushinsky thief" near Kolomna. A year later, he noted that he had completely defeated the gangs of the rebellious ataman Salkov, after which in February 1610 he was appointed governor to the city of Zaraysk.

Shuisky noted the talented commander, having presented the village of Nizhny Landekh and the landlord Kholui in Suzdal district with villages, repairs and wastelands to him as patrimony.

In 1610, another talented Russian military commander, Mikhail Skopin-Shuisky, with the Russian-Swedish army, liberated the outskirts of Moscow from the troops of the Tushino Thief and the Polish-Lithuanian gangs. However, after this success Skopin-Shuisky was poisoned. The death of the commander was associated with the name of his uncle - Tsar Vasily Shuisky, who began to fear the popularity of his nephew.

The death of Skopin-Shuisky caused a great outrage among the people. Part of the Russian cities refused to further recognize the authority of Vasily Shuisky. Zaraysk also hesitated, but the authority of the governor of Pozharsky, who remained loyal to the oath, allowed the city to remain under the control of the royal authority.

Fearless warrior

But Vasily Shuisky, Prince of Pozharsky, did not save loyalty - he was overthrown by the boyars, forcibly tonsured as a monk, and then sent to Polish captivity, where he soon died.

In Russia, the final chaos. In Moscow, the functions of the government were performed by the so-called “Seven Boyarschina”, advocating the invitation to the throne of the Polish king Vladislav. At the same time, the current Polish king, Sigismund III, claimed the throne. Part of the cities of Russia was controlled by the troops of the next False Dmitry. In addition, various small, militarized groups that did not submit to anyone flourished everywhere.

The whole question raised the question whether Russia will continue to exist as a state.

Polish troops entered Moscow with whom the representatives of the Seven Boyars collaborated. Patriarch Hermogenes called for resistance to the invaders, who sent letters to all cities of Russia with a call to protect the Russian land and the Orthodox faith.

One of the most active activists of the First Militia, which was formed for the liberation of Moscow in 1611, was Ryazan voivode Procopius Lyapunov. It was to the Lyapunov detachment with his warriors that the Zaraisk voivode Dmitry Pozharsky joined.


The first militia turned out quite mixed and poorly organized. He was led by a triumvirate of Procopius Lyapunov, Prince Dmitry Trubetskoy and Ataman Ivan Zarutsky. The Cossacks of the latter for a long time were part of the troops of the Tushino Thief. Distrust and conflicts among the leadership of the militia led to his failure. The troops managed to approach Moscow and even capture the White City, but more could not be achieved. The conflict between Zarutsky and Prokopiy Lyapunov ended in the murder of the latter, after which the militia disintegrated.

As for Prince Dmitry Pozharsky, he did not participate in these feuds and proved himself from the best side. In May, 1611, he heroically fought with the Poles on the streets of Moscow, reflecting their attacks in the area of ​​modern Lubyanka. Stop it could only serious injury. Companions were taken by the prince from Moscow to the Trinity-Sergius monastery, and then transported for treatment to the family estate of Yurino Nizhny Novgorod district.

The best tandem

In September, 1611, an energetic and active Nizhny Novgorod district warden Kozma Minin called for the formation of a new militia for the liberation of Moscow and Russia and in general.

Minin was supported and entrusted to him to lead the collection of funds and their distribution among the warriors of the future militia.

Given the bitter experience of the first militia, Kozma Minin seriously approached the issue of the candidacy of a military commander. However, in the eyes of many, Dmitry Pozharsky seemed to have no alternative candidate. He was almost the only one who managed not to get dirty in all sorts of betrayals and bloody internecine clashes. His victories and wounds received in battle spoke of military prowess.

As a result, the citizens of Nizhny Novgorod called for the leadership of Dmitry Pozharsky's militia. He accepted the invitation, but on condition that Kozma Minin was in charge of all the economic matters in the militia, the organizing ability of which the prince was able to appreciate.

This is how the Pozharsky-Minin tandem was formed, which became one of the most successful in the history of Russia.

The new militia did not immediately move to Moscow. Having solved organizational issues, it formed the “Council of All Lands”, which became, in fact, the new Russian government, an alternative to the “Seven Boyars”.

Gradually, the new structure began to restore order in the field, eliminating powerlessness and restoring stability. At the same time, the militia received new funding and fighters.

The actions of the government headed by Pozharsky and Minin inspired hope to Russians tired of the Troubles.

The Liberator is too good for a king

At the end of July, 1612, the Second Militia fought on Moscow. The militiamen went to intercept the troops of the Polish hetman Chodkiewicz, who was moving to help the Poles in Moscow with a large wagon train. The fact is that since the time of the First Militia part of the Russian troops continued to block the Polish garrison in the Kremlin.

The battle at the walls of Moscow between the 15-thousandth army of Hetman Khodkevich and 8000 of Prince Dmitry Pozharsky's militia stretched for several days. The courage of the Russian soldiers and the leadership talent of Prince Pozharsky solved the matter - the hetman's troops suffered a decisive defeat and retreated.


The occupiers remaining in the Kremlin were deprived of any hope for help. 1 November 1612, after a long siege, the militia stormed China Town. Four days later, the Kremlin garrisoned surrendered. Moscow was liberated from invaders.

The government of Pozharsky and Minin fulfilled his task, and the new tsar was to be elected by a specially convened Zemsky Sobor, which began to meet in January of 1613.

Among the candidates for the vacant throne was the name of Prince Dmitry Pozharsky.

From the point of view of the common people, he was the perfect option. The prince, who has not stained himself by meanness, betrayal and theft, has glorified his name with military prowess, has saved the country from invaders - what kind of a king is needed?

But the logic of the people and the elite in all ages differed significantly. From the point of view of the nobility, Prince Pozharsky was too distantly related to the Rurikovichs, he was not listed as a Trouble in the front ranks of the boyars. But the main thing that frightened the powers that be was the impeccable reputation of Dmitry Pozharsky. The representatives of the Russian elite, who were completely upset by the crimes during the Time of Troubles, were afraid of retaliation. It is easier to write off and forget all crimes if the one who has the stigma of a cannon is on the throne.

It is clear that the 17-year-old Mikhail Romanov himself elected to the kingdom did not have time to be noted for crimes during the Time of Troubles, but the Romanovs as a whole got pretty dirty. However, this is a topic for another conversation.

Prince of Emergencies

Prince Dmitry Pozharsky with the new king did not fall into disgrace, but, on the contrary, became one of the most prominent figures of the new era.

A new dynasty needed an experienced, and most importantly, loyal oath man, on whom it was possible to rely. It was impossible to find a person more reliable than Prince Pozharsky.

He repulsed new attacks by Polish detachments, led diplomatic negotiations, led Yamskoy and Rogue orders in different years, was the Novgorod commander and viceroy in Suzdal, then headed the Moscow Judgment. Looking at the career of Prince Pozharsky under Mikhail Romanov, we can say that for the tsar he became the same as Sergei Shoigu for Vladimir Putin. Dmitry Pozharsky was constantly charged with the most problematic and difficult state issues.

Dmitry Mikhailovich Pozharsky died April 30 of the year 1642. For a long time, the hero’s burial place remained a secret. It was only in the second half of the 19th century that it was established for certain that Prince Dmitry Pozharsky was buried in the ancestral tomb in the Suzdal Savior Euthymius monastery. Over the years, the tomb was destroyed and was finally dismantled in 1933 year. However, the prince’s grave itself was intact. In 2009, the tomb was restored and opened on November 4 in the presence of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.aif.ru/
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dazdranagon
    Dazdranagon 7 November 2013 09: 29
    +6
    Looking at the career of Prince Pozharsky under Mikhail Romanov, we can say that for the tsar he became what Sergey Shoigu became for Vladimir Putin - that's just not necessary, it's too early to make such comparisons. And then, as time shows, sometimes dignitaries, sons-in-law-lovers sometimes emerge from dignitaries ... hi
    And the article is good, these are the films you need to shoot, not "They fought for Katya" ...
  2. Belogor
    Belogor 7 November 2013 09: 31
    +8
    As a rule, decent people rarely reach administrative heights. Usually it is better for all rogues and unprincipled people, they have an almost pathological craving for power.
  3. DAGESTAN333
    DAGESTAN333 7 November 2013 09: 59
    10
    Knight's story. As prince Pozharsky saved Russia and did not become king

    maybe I don’t know something .. but is it possible to say - "History knight..."
    1. Tyumen
      Tyumen 8 November 2013 06: 59
      +1
      Well done!! I thought about that too. Even Alexander Nevsky drove this infection from our land,
      and put his whole life in the fight against chivalry. Armored assassins in worship
      unknown ideal lady, not suitable for designating a Russian patriot.
  4. Mhpv
    Mhpv 7 November 2013 11: 07
    0
    The Zaraisk Kremlin is considered an architectural monument of the mid-16th century, although during its existence it has been repeatedly repaired and reconstructed. In this regard, the Kremlin has lost to some extent its original form. At the same time, numerous small changes over the centuries have created a unique look for this pearl of the architecture of Old Zaraysk.


    The Kremlin was built by decree of the Sovereign and Grand Duke of Moscow Vasily III at the same time as the first stone St. Nicholas Cathedral in 1528-1531. This was preceded by a series of events set forth in the final parts of the “Cycle of Tales of Nikola Zarazsky”. The name of the architect who directed the construction is unknown, but back in the 19th century it was believed that he was Aleviz Fryazin Novy. The Kremlin bears clear features of Italian influence in Russian serfdom and is one of three fully regular medieval fortresses in our country. For one and a half centuries, it has stood on the defenses of the borders of the Russian state. The fortress was part of a single line of fortifications linking such large centers as Kolomna, Pereyaslavl Ryazansky, Tula and others. Repeatedly stone walls, surrounded with time by a wooden prison, withstood attacks of the Crimean Tatars, including large detachments under the leadership of the Tatar princes.
  5. Mhpv
    Mhpv 7 November 2013 11: 14
    0
    At the beginning of the XVII century, the Zarayskaya fortress fell under the blows of Polish interventionists under the leadership of Colonel Alexander Joseph Lisowski. In memory of his victory, he ordered all the defenders of Zaraysk to be buried in one grave and a mound was poured over them, which still remains.
    After the Poles left the city, a new governor was appointed to it. They became Prince Dmitry Mikhailovich Pozharsky. Under the influence of the prince, as well as the protopope of the St. Nicholas Kremlin cathedral Dmitry Leontyev, Zaraysk, one of the few nearby cities, opposed the supporters of False Dmitry II.
    The territory of the Kremlin today is decorated with two stone cathedrals - Nikolsky and John the Baptist. The first one was built in 1681 by order of Tsar Fedor Alekseevich. To this day, a traveler can admire the magnificent view of his five chapters towering above the walls, crowned with ancient gilded crosses.
    The second cathedral was built at the beginning of the XX century. on the initiative of an outstanding public figure, the head of the Kremlin cathedrals, the mayor, the deputy of the State Duma N.I. Yartseva and at the expense of the famous patron A.A. Bahrushin.
    On the territory of the Kremlin there is also a monument to the legendary Ryazan princes Fedor, Eupraxia and their son John Postnik, whose names have been associated with Zaraisk from ancient times.
    The majestic walls and towers of the Kremlin rise above the old part of the city, creating a unique and rare view for the central regions of Russia, opening from the left bank of the river. Sturgeon.
  6. Mhpv
    Mhpv 7 November 2013 11: 15
    0
    At the beginning of the XVII century, the Zarayskaya fortress fell under the blows of Polish interventionists under the leadership of Colonel Alexander Joseph Lisowski. In memory of his victory, he ordered all the defenders of Zaraysk to be buried in one grave and a mound was poured over them, which still remains.
    After the Poles left the city, a new governor was appointed to it. They became Prince Dmitry Mikhailovich Pozharsky. Under the influence of the prince, as well as the protopope of the St. Nicholas Kremlin cathedral Dmitry Leontyev, Zaraysk, one of the few nearby cities, opposed the supporters of False Dmitry II.
    The territory of the Kremlin today is decorated with two stone cathedrals - Nikolsky and John the Baptist. The first one was built in 1681 by order of Tsar Fedor Alekseevich. To this day, a traveler can admire the magnificent view of his five chapters towering above the walls, crowned with ancient gilded crosses.
    The second cathedral was built at the beginning of the XX century. on the initiative of an outstanding public figure, the head of the Kremlin cathedrals, the mayor, the deputy of the State Duma N.I. Yartseva and at the expense of the famous patron A.A. Bahrushin.
    On the territory of the Kremlin there is also a monument to the legendary Ryazan princes Fedor, Eupraxia and their son John Postnik, whose names have been associated with Zaraisk from ancient times.
    The majestic walls and towers of the Kremlin rise above the old part of the city, creating a unique and rare view for the central regions of Russia, opening from the left bank of the river. Sturgeon.
  7. RUSS
    RUSS 7 November 2013 11: 44
    +5
    "Yes, in our time, they were not like the present tribe!"
    1. Valery Neonov
      Valery Neonov 7 November 2013 12: 26
      +1
      +++. That’s not to take away, not to add! good
    2. Yarbay
      Yarbay 7 November 2013 14: 15
      0
      Quote: RUSS
      "Yes, in our time, they were not like the present tribe!"
  8. Opera
    Opera 7 November 2013 11: 53
    +4
    So much for the role of personality in history! Here is the answer to a very controversial saying - we have no interchangeable ones!
  9. unclevad
    unclevad 7 November 2013 12: 13
    +4
    Russia has held onto such people, will and will continue to hold it. They are not in sight. They calmly do their job and do not climb forward while walking along the bones.
  10. knn54
    knn54 7 November 2013 13: 03
    +2
    Filaret Romanov was made "patriarch" by Tushinsky thief. Romanov swore allegiance to the Pole Vladislav. In the "captivity" of the Poles he graduated from the Catholic College of the Jesuits in Vilnius.
    But who are the “voters”: a crowd of traitors who wanted to surrender Zaraysk in 1610 to False Dmitry and who were pacified by voivode Pozharsky. And the boyars who wanted to rule the country on their own gave Tsar Vasily Shuisky to the Poles and invited them to Moscow.
    They chose, of course, their ...
    -You can say that for the tsar he became what Sergey Shoigu became for Vladimir Putin.
    Is this serious ??? ... or a joke.
  11. knn54
    knn54 7 November 2013 13: 03
    +1
    Filaret Romanov was made "patriarch" by Tushinsky thief. Romanov swore allegiance to the Pole Vladislav. In the "captivity" of the Poles he graduated from the Catholic College of the Jesuits in Vilnius.
    But who are the “voters”: a crowd of traitors who wanted to surrender Zaraysk in 1610 to False Dmitry and who were pacified by voivode Pozharsky. And the boyars who wanted to rule the country on their own gave Tsar Vasily Shuisky to the Poles and invited them to Moscow.
    They chose, of course, their ...
    -You can say that for the tsar he became what Sergey Shoigu became for Vladimir Putin.
    Is this serious ??? ... or a joke.
    1. Tver
      Tver 7 November 2013 17: 18
      0
      Absolutely - they "chose their own" Brothers of the 17th century chose a Judaic family. This clan organized a senselessly bloody reform of the CHURCH, abolished the patriarchate, etc.
  12. ele1285
    ele1285 7 November 2013 13: 12
    +4
    This is who should be canonized and canonized, and not the Romanov family, who had a power
    1. Yarbay
      Yarbay 7 November 2013 14: 14
      0
      Quote: ele1285
      Here's who to canonize

      Efrosinya Beklemisheva came from a noble noble family, but even taking this into account, she was a unique woman for her time.


      Beklemisheva-familiya tatarskaya))))))) (beklemish-ojidaemaya (tatar)
      1. Pancho
        Pancho 7 November 2013 22: 44
        +1
        Quote: Yarbay
        Beklemisheva-familiya tatarskaya))))))) (beklemish-ojidaemaya (tatar)

        So what? Tatar in it by that time it is unlikely that there was anything left, and if it was left, then what? Rakhmaninov is also a Tatar surname, but he hardly considered himself a Tatar. This is all from the same opera that Pushkin was supposedly an Ethiopian, and the fact that the Ethiopian was just a great-grandfather on the maternal side doesn’t mean anything. so what?
  13. fisherman
    fisherman 7 November 2013 13: 51
    +2
    the article is good, but this is- Looking at the career of Prince Pozharsky under Mikhail Romanov, we can say that for the tsar he became what Sergey Shoigu became for Vladimir Putin, an obvious bust
    1. Tver
      Tver 7 November 2013 17: 21
      0
      for the tsar, he became what Sergey Shoigu became for Vladimir Putin, a phrase from another opera
  14. soldier's grandson
    soldier's grandson 7 November 2013 22: 49
    0
    But is Moscow’s salvation the salvation of all of Russia? Kutuzov didn’t think so, and in the 2nd World Kuibyshev became the capital of the USSR