What do human rights defenders protect and from whom?
Earlier, when I heard the word human rights activist, there was a man standing in front of my inner eye, who was supposed to be (according to my notions) crystal honest, fair, decisive, educated, disinterested (since he stands in defense of others), possessing great courage, in general, positive from all sides. I have no doubt that there are such people, but very few people know about them, because in all media we are shown very different, “right” human rights defenders. To my deep regret, we have to admit: how naive I was to think so, since many so-called “human rights activists” do not really possess these qualities, while others have only some of them. Before proceeding, let's clarify. Who are human rights defenders? What are they guided in their work? Who finances them? Who do they protect?
1. "Human rights defenders are people engaged in social activities that involve the protection of human rights by peaceful means, as a rule, against the arbitrariness of government agencies or officials." Wikipedia
2. In their activities, human rights defenders are guided mainly by the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, which is part of the International Bill of Human Rights, along with the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, two Optional Protocols.
It should be noted that the declaration is not a law that everyone should strictly follow, but essentially the same thing as a wish, recommendation or suggestion. In order not to download the text, I will cite just one article from this Declaration (there are thirty of them there), and the question of who these people are protecting and who are financing them will be discussed below.
Article 2
“Every person must have all the rights and all freedoms proclaimed by this Declaration, without any distinction, such as: race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other beliefs, national or social origin, property, estate or other position ... "
Wonderful! It seems that all the words are correct, besides “all rights and all freedoms”, each person is endowed from birth (as stated in the declaration), but Valery Novodvorskaya, a veteran of the “human rights movement” known to the whole “civilized” world, writes about these “rights” man ”, which she zealously defends, in her article:“ We will not give up our right to the left! ”, unequivocally designating our position.
“... I personally never teased myself with such a rattle. I am an adult. I always knew that decent people should have rights, and indecent (like Kryuchkov, Khomeini or Kim Il Sung) - should not. The right is an elitist concept. So either you are a trembling creature, or you have the right. One of two things ... I, personally, human rights to fill my fill. Once we, the CIA and the United States, used this idea as a ram to destroy the communist regime and the collapse of the USSR. This idea has served its purpose and stop lying about human rights and human rights defenders. And how not to cut down the branch on which we all sit. " The newspaper "New look" N46 from 28 August 1993g.
An unequivocal conclusion follows from the text, Mrs. Novodvorskaya believes: only “decent” people can have rights and freedoms, in other words, “elite”. Point! Then the question arises: who determines whether a person belongs to the elite or not? What, the very attitude to the "elite" automatically gives the right to consider itself "decent"? But this is absurd! It seems to me that Madame Novodvorskaya most likely identifies herself as a favorite to the “elite” and considers herself “decent”, in which I allow myself to doubt what I have every right to do. By the way, among the "elite" is full of scum, including "quivering creatures." But the most interesting thing is that all the other “human rights activists” (colleagues in the workshop), who seem to think the same way, but who are afraid to speak about it out loud, because of their natural “modesty”, did not condemn and did not distance themselves from it, although “Hedgehog” it is clear that this statement is complete nonsense and in fact discredits the entire human rights movement. In addition, she declares: “Once we, the CIA and the USA, used this idea as a ram to destroy the communist regime and the collapse of the USSR”. By the word we, naturally, she means herself and other “human rights defenders”, thereby recognizing that the human rights community of our country, together with the CIA and the United States, is responsible for the collapse of the Soviet Union, which she is proud of and does not hide. Since “human rights activists” continue their activities in the same spirit, Russia, by definition, should become their next victim (this follows from the logic of their actions) and this is what we all need to remember and never forget. Go ahead.
Who finances human rights organizations in our country?
In order not to download the text, I advise you to read the article Nikolai Starikov "List of foreign agents in Russia"in which data are given, including those of human rights organizations financed from abroad. Whom do these “comrades” work for, I suggest everyone find out on their own.
Who are protected by "our" "human rights activists"?
Rather what! And if you think well, it turns out that most often they protect abstract rights and freedoms, which are based on "universal human" values. A small clarification: firstly, there are no rights without obligations and freedom of action without responsibility, and the term “universal human values” is the same as the average temperature in the ward. Values are only specific: material, cultural, moral, and so on. At that, for different people these values can be completely different, and this diversity only enriches all peoples on Earth. Defending and imposing “universal human values” on the whole world, “human rights activists”, in essence, aim to eliminate this diversity, which ultimately leads to the destruction of not only original cultures and traditions, but also the enslavement of peoples who embrace these “values”. That is why “our human rights defenders” love to protect all perverts, illegal (illegal) migrants and all who hate our homeland. For example:
“Practically in any conflict in which the Russian state is“ mixed up ”, Russian human rights activists are taking the side of the enemy - be it the leadership of gangster Ichkeria or scientists and journalists accused of espionage. Even in the seizure by the Chechen terrorists of the theater building on Dubrovka, Russian human rights activists saw the blame of the Russian authorities, and no less (some of them were EG Bonner, AP Podrabinek, LA Ponomarev, A.Yu. Blinushov, E. N. Sannikova, N. Khramov - even more) than the guilt of the terrorists ”.
“The head of the Moscow Helsinki Group Lyudmila Alekseeva (has US citizenship) and the leader of the For Human Rights movement, Lev Ponomarev, called the sentence of the Pussy Riot band members harsh, noting that it could cause a storm of indignation. The sentence of Pussy Riot is harsh and can raise a storm of indignation against the authorities and the Russian Orthodox Church, Alekseeva said. ". Moscow, 17 August RIA News.
“Tatyana Lokshina, deputy head of the Moscow bureau of Human Rights Watch, in an interview with the Russian News Service, stated that by refusing to hold a gay parade, Russia was violating the Convention of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). “The European Court of Human Rights has made an unequivocal decision regarding bans on gay pride. No references to social acceptability or unacceptability, traditional values and the like can justify the refusal of LGBT activists to hold peaceful events. ”. GayRussia.Ru.
“Human rights activists” having seen the “new GULAG” in the camps for illegal migrants, declare: “This is a kind of genocide of foreign citizens,” sums up Moskovsky Komsomolets, forgetting that it is customary to call extermination of certain groups of the population as genocide, and here we are talking only about their expulsion. The Echo of Moscow observer Anton Orekh, in turn, said that this is no more and no less like a new GULAG ... It should be noted that such pity from the liberal media and human rights activists have never been honored, for example, Sagra, Pugacheva, or Kondopoga. Can anyone remember that Gannushkina and other “Moscow Komsomol members” have a word about the present, and not the fictional genocide of the Russian population of Chechnya, ever spoken? So I do not remember either. ”
In this article I would like to touch on a very sore subject that concerns everyone without exception: the genocide of Russians and other peoples, which took place in Chechnya in the 1991-1992 years. These events have already become history, stubbornly keep silent about it, only because otherwise it will be necessary to tell the truth and call the “authors” of this genocide by name, and oh, how much you don’t want “our well-wishers.” Therefore, so much outright lies are poured on our heads all the media. In this case, it remains for me, using only facts, to try to show the causes and consequences of these events for today. Let us analyze historical events from the beginning of the Second World War, although it is possible to start from an earlier history, the essence will not change.
“Since the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, Chechens took an active part in the hostilities in the rear of the Red Army. Germany in the North Caucasus, as in the Balkans, relied on Muslims. Not wanting to fight against the Nazis, the Chechen population massively declined to be drafted into the Red Army (63% to be called up) or deserted, leaving weapons in the mountain teams. Almost all the peoples of the Caucasus fought against fascism - (for example, the Ossetians were mobilized almost without exception). But Chechen groups of up to 40 thousands of people (!) Were beaten in the rear of the Red Army. In addition to small arms, they were armed with artillery and mortars obtained from the German "friends". They were trained by abandoned Nazi instructors. German agents helped create a fascist organization "Caucasian Eagles" (approximate number - 6540 people), operating near the front ".
At the same time, the number of deserters increased as the Red Army retreated. If in the 1941, the deserters were “only” 10%, in 1942, they were already recruited over 90% of the total number of draftees and “volunteers”. However, in the 1943 year, after the victory at Stalingrad, their “total” 50% became, which very vividly characterizes the mentality of this nation. Total during the war, on November 1 1943 of the year, according to the report Kobulov, and this is an official document that Beria then presented to Stalin, deserters were considered - 16511 of 30309 recruits and volunteers drafted from Chechnya to the army since the summer of 1941goda, who received weapons, went to the mountains (doesn’t it remind you anything?).
Therefore, 31 January 1944, taking into account the danger of the current situation, which threatened the security of our country, was adopted by the resolution of the State Defense Committee of the USSR No. 5073 on the abolition of the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic deportation its population "for aiding the fascist invaders" away from sin, to Central Asia and Kazakhstan.
In fairness, it should be noted that there were Chechens and Ingush who heroically fought against the Nazis, for example: the famous “Wild Division”, as it was called in Chechnya or the 255th special Chechen-Ingush cavalry regiment, which fought near Stalingrad, where it suffered heavy losses, confronting 14 tank Wehrmacht divisions in August 42nd and many others.
Time passed and in the autumn of 1991, the Chechen National Guard, catching the “historical moment”, seized power in Grozny, the Supreme Council of Chechen-Ingushetia was dispersed, and General Dzhokhar Dudayev became the President of the self-proclaimed Chechen Republic of Ichkeria. From this moment begins the real genocide of Russians. Be sure to read about this article on Sergei Maslennikov's RuAN "The lessons of Chechnya need to learn forever!", very sobering and cleans the brain, of course who has them. However, not a single dog said a word about it in the media, and “our” valiant “human rights activists” were silent “like a fish against ice”.
And in 2012, Valeria Novodvorskaya, speaking of Russians in Chechnya, “broadcast”: “... in fact, nobody killed them at all (there was not a single corpse), and they themselves left Chechnya because they were afraid to stay with the Chechens, did not understand them, because they were scoops, and did not want any independence for Chechnya and we could not agree with them - there are no problems here. ”.
Anna Politkovskaya is a famous Russian journalist and human rights activist, focusing on the conflict in Chechnya, blamed Russian soldiers for all mortal sins, but she also didn’t hear and didn’t see how, when, and how many Russian civilians Chechens were slaughtered like sheep in broad daylight. After her murder, it turned out that at the beginning of 90's, she received US citizenship, and given the content of the oath that the US citizen receiving the passport says, everything falls into place and it becomes clear who she actually worked for and whose interests she defended.
However, the fact of the genocide of the Russian population of Chechnya in their speeches was repeatedly confirmed even by the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin: in an interview with the French weekly Paris-match, published on the official website of the Kremlin, Putin, recalling the "years of shame," said: “In recent years, we have witnessed large-scale genocide against the Russian people, against the Russian-speaking population, on the territory of Chechnya. Unfortunately, no one reacted to this. ”.
And December 19 2002, Putin, answering the questions of the Russians, said: "... according to various estimates, as a result of ethnic cleansing in Chechnya, up to 30 thousand people died," and possibly more. "This will not happen again," the head of state said. "
So what do we have? But the following: The Chechen Republic, which was included in the North Caucasus Federal District, became a virtually mono-national republic (from 85% to 94% are Chechens), while the Chechens created such conditions under which people of other nationalities did not can live in principle. But the Chechens themselves live freely among other nations, but only as long as there are few of them, but over time, when their number increases, they begin to become impudent, after which the same thing always happens: the expulsion of the indigenous people and their replacement by their relatives. Study the real story and you will understand everything!
In conclusion, I would like to cite “curious” data that clearly show the trend of ongoing changes in the national composition of this republic. “According to population censuses in the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1989 Russians lived in 269130 (24,8% of the population), in 2010 Russians 24382 lived in the Chechen Republic (1,9%)”. Wikipedia
And yet, in Chechnya there were several cities with the native Russian population, which was gradually replaced by Chechens, for example: in Gudermes, in 1926, 69% of Russians lived, 20% of Ukrainians and only 2,4% of Chechens, and already in 1970 was 56 % of Russians, 2% of Ukrainians and 34% of Chechens, 1979% of Chechens already live in 47, 47% of Russians and 1,5% of Ukrainians, and finally 2002% of Russians in Gudermes live not left. The same picture was observed in Grozny and throughout Chechnya. The next in line is the Stavropol Territory and "further everywhere."
“When not so long ago, the Stavropol Territory, together with all the Caucasian republics, was merged into the North Caucasus Federal District with the center in Pyatigorsk, all of us (Stavropol residents) were shocked. We perfectly understood what it means - now the Chechens will come to the Stavropol Territory and settle here ... Some time has passed, this is what is happening in the Stavropol region now ... The Chechens behave as if they are the masters here, and it is impossible to oppose them completely now nothing, because they behave so with the sanction of our beloved government. Of course, we all understand - soon the Olympics in Sochi, in the Caucasus should not shoot, blow up, etc., otherwise no one will go to us. therefore Chechens were given at the disposal of what they had long dreamed of - the Stavropol Territory».
For those who do not agree with this state of affairs in our country, in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation there is the notorious article 282 "Incitement of hatred or enmity, as well as the humiliation of human dignity." This article is popularly called “Russian”, because according to it 99.9% of convicts are ethnic Russians and they are convicted mainly for inciting ethnic hatred, “for anti-Semitism”, etc. Although there are tens of thousands of facts about the oppression of Russians in the republics North Caucasus, their expulsion from their homes, but not a single case of bringing the perpetrators for this article is known. All this is called: “to throw from the sick head to the healthy”.
Remember: Chechens respect force and reckon only with it, it is a reality and they talk about it themselves, and they perceive all people who preach liberal democratic and “universal human values”, at best, as weaklings, and at worst, they are considered potential slaves and nothing else. And if over time there are no Russians left in the Stavropol region, do not be surprised, because they only do what we allow them to do, so we need to be strong, otherwise ... Start thinking and draw your own conclusions.
In conclusion, I want to shout loudly: "Human rights activists." AU! Where are you? Give your vote in defense of Russians and other nations! ”And in response, as one“ hero ”said in a famous film: “... along the road are dead with braids standing. And silence...".
1. "Human rights defenders are people engaged in social activities that involve the protection of human rights by peaceful means, as a rule, against the arbitrariness of government agencies or officials." Wikipedia
2. In their activities, human rights defenders are guided mainly by the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, which is part of the International Bill of Human Rights, along with the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, two Optional Protocols.
It should be noted that the declaration is not a law that everyone should strictly follow, but essentially the same thing as a wish, recommendation or suggestion. In order not to download the text, I will cite just one article from this Declaration (there are thirty of them there), and the question of who these people are protecting and who are financing them will be discussed below.
Article 2
“Every person must have all the rights and all freedoms proclaimed by this Declaration, without any distinction, such as: race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other beliefs, national or social origin, property, estate or other position ... "
Wonderful! It seems that all the words are correct, besides “all rights and all freedoms”, each person is endowed from birth (as stated in the declaration), but Valery Novodvorskaya, a veteran of the “human rights movement” known to the whole “civilized” world, writes about these “rights” man ”, which she zealously defends, in her article:“ We will not give up our right to the left! ”, unequivocally designating our position.
“... I personally never teased myself with such a rattle. I am an adult. I always knew that decent people should have rights, and indecent (like Kryuchkov, Khomeini or Kim Il Sung) - should not. The right is an elitist concept. So either you are a trembling creature, or you have the right. One of two things ... I, personally, human rights to fill my fill. Once we, the CIA and the United States, used this idea as a ram to destroy the communist regime and the collapse of the USSR. This idea has served its purpose and stop lying about human rights and human rights defenders. And how not to cut down the branch on which we all sit. " The newspaper "New look" N46 from 28 August 1993g.
An unequivocal conclusion follows from the text, Mrs. Novodvorskaya believes: only “decent” people can have rights and freedoms, in other words, “elite”. Point! Then the question arises: who determines whether a person belongs to the elite or not? What, the very attitude to the "elite" automatically gives the right to consider itself "decent"? But this is absurd! It seems to me that Madame Novodvorskaya most likely identifies herself as a favorite to the “elite” and considers herself “decent”, in which I allow myself to doubt what I have every right to do. By the way, among the "elite" is full of scum, including "quivering creatures." But the most interesting thing is that all the other “human rights activists” (colleagues in the workshop), who seem to think the same way, but who are afraid to speak about it out loud, because of their natural “modesty”, did not condemn and did not distance themselves from it, although “Hedgehog” it is clear that this statement is complete nonsense and in fact discredits the entire human rights movement. In addition, she declares: “Once we, the CIA and the USA, used this idea as a ram to destroy the communist regime and the collapse of the USSR”. By the word we, naturally, she means herself and other “human rights defenders”, thereby recognizing that the human rights community of our country, together with the CIA and the United States, is responsible for the collapse of the Soviet Union, which she is proud of and does not hide. Since “human rights activists” continue their activities in the same spirit, Russia, by definition, should become their next victim (this follows from the logic of their actions) and this is what we all need to remember and never forget. Go ahead.
Who finances human rights organizations in our country?
In order not to download the text, I advise you to read the article Nikolai Starikov "List of foreign agents in Russia"in which data are given, including those of human rights organizations financed from abroad. Whom do these “comrades” work for, I suggest everyone find out on their own.
Who are protected by "our" "human rights activists"?
Rather what! And if you think well, it turns out that most often they protect abstract rights and freedoms, which are based on "universal human" values. A small clarification: firstly, there are no rights without obligations and freedom of action without responsibility, and the term “universal human values” is the same as the average temperature in the ward. Values are only specific: material, cultural, moral, and so on. At that, for different people these values can be completely different, and this diversity only enriches all peoples on Earth. Defending and imposing “universal human values” on the whole world, “human rights activists”, in essence, aim to eliminate this diversity, which ultimately leads to the destruction of not only original cultures and traditions, but also the enslavement of peoples who embrace these “values”. That is why “our human rights defenders” love to protect all perverts, illegal (illegal) migrants and all who hate our homeland. For example:
“Practically in any conflict in which the Russian state is“ mixed up ”, Russian human rights activists are taking the side of the enemy - be it the leadership of gangster Ichkeria or scientists and journalists accused of espionage. Even in the seizure by the Chechen terrorists of the theater building on Dubrovka, Russian human rights activists saw the blame of the Russian authorities, and no less (some of them were EG Bonner, AP Podrabinek, LA Ponomarev, A.Yu. Blinushov, E. N. Sannikova, N. Khramov - even more) than the guilt of the terrorists ”.
“The head of the Moscow Helsinki Group Lyudmila Alekseeva (has US citizenship) and the leader of the For Human Rights movement, Lev Ponomarev, called the sentence of the Pussy Riot band members harsh, noting that it could cause a storm of indignation. The sentence of Pussy Riot is harsh and can raise a storm of indignation against the authorities and the Russian Orthodox Church, Alekseeva said. ". Moscow, 17 August RIA News.
“Tatyana Lokshina, deputy head of the Moscow bureau of Human Rights Watch, in an interview with the Russian News Service, stated that by refusing to hold a gay parade, Russia was violating the Convention of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). “The European Court of Human Rights has made an unequivocal decision regarding bans on gay pride. No references to social acceptability or unacceptability, traditional values and the like can justify the refusal of LGBT activists to hold peaceful events. ”. GayRussia.Ru.
“Human rights activists” having seen the “new GULAG” in the camps for illegal migrants, declare: “This is a kind of genocide of foreign citizens,” sums up Moskovsky Komsomolets, forgetting that it is customary to call extermination of certain groups of the population as genocide, and here we are talking only about their expulsion. The Echo of Moscow observer Anton Orekh, in turn, said that this is no more and no less like a new GULAG ... It should be noted that such pity from the liberal media and human rights activists have never been honored, for example, Sagra, Pugacheva, or Kondopoga. Can anyone remember that Gannushkina and other “Moscow Komsomol members” have a word about the present, and not the fictional genocide of the Russian population of Chechnya, ever spoken? So I do not remember either. ”
In this article I would like to touch on a very sore subject that concerns everyone without exception: the genocide of Russians and other peoples, which took place in Chechnya in the 1991-1992 years. These events have already become history, stubbornly keep silent about it, only because otherwise it will be necessary to tell the truth and call the “authors” of this genocide by name, and oh, how much you don’t want “our well-wishers.” Therefore, so much outright lies are poured on our heads all the media. In this case, it remains for me, using only facts, to try to show the causes and consequences of these events for today. Let us analyze historical events from the beginning of the Second World War, although it is possible to start from an earlier history, the essence will not change.
“Since the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, Chechens took an active part in the hostilities in the rear of the Red Army. Germany in the North Caucasus, as in the Balkans, relied on Muslims. Not wanting to fight against the Nazis, the Chechen population massively declined to be drafted into the Red Army (63% to be called up) or deserted, leaving weapons in the mountain teams. Almost all the peoples of the Caucasus fought against fascism - (for example, the Ossetians were mobilized almost without exception). But Chechen groups of up to 40 thousands of people (!) Were beaten in the rear of the Red Army. In addition to small arms, they were armed with artillery and mortars obtained from the German "friends". They were trained by abandoned Nazi instructors. German agents helped create a fascist organization "Caucasian Eagles" (approximate number - 6540 people), operating near the front ".
At the same time, the number of deserters increased as the Red Army retreated. If in the 1941, the deserters were “only” 10%, in 1942, they were already recruited over 90% of the total number of draftees and “volunteers”. However, in the 1943 year, after the victory at Stalingrad, their “total” 50% became, which very vividly characterizes the mentality of this nation. Total during the war, on November 1 1943 of the year, according to the report Kobulov, and this is an official document that Beria then presented to Stalin, deserters were considered - 16511 of 30309 recruits and volunteers drafted from Chechnya to the army since the summer of 1941goda, who received weapons, went to the mountains (doesn’t it remind you anything?).
Therefore, 31 January 1944, taking into account the danger of the current situation, which threatened the security of our country, was adopted by the resolution of the State Defense Committee of the USSR No. 5073 on the abolition of the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic deportation its population "for aiding the fascist invaders" away from sin, to Central Asia and Kazakhstan.
In fairness, it should be noted that there were Chechens and Ingush who heroically fought against the Nazis, for example: the famous “Wild Division”, as it was called in Chechnya or the 255th special Chechen-Ingush cavalry regiment, which fought near Stalingrad, where it suffered heavy losses, confronting 14 tank Wehrmacht divisions in August 42nd and many others.
Time passed and in the autumn of 1991, the Chechen National Guard, catching the “historical moment”, seized power in Grozny, the Supreme Council of Chechen-Ingushetia was dispersed, and General Dzhokhar Dudayev became the President of the self-proclaimed Chechen Republic of Ichkeria. From this moment begins the real genocide of Russians. Be sure to read about this article on Sergei Maslennikov's RuAN "The lessons of Chechnya need to learn forever!", very sobering and cleans the brain, of course who has them. However, not a single dog said a word about it in the media, and “our” valiant “human rights activists” were silent “like a fish against ice”.
And in 2012, Valeria Novodvorskaya, speaking of Russians in Chechnya, “broadcast”: “... in fact, nobody killed them at all (there was not a single corpse), and they themselves left Chechnya because they were afraid to stay with the Chechens, did not understand them, because they were scoops, and did not want any independence for Chechnya and we could not agree with them - there are no problems here. ”.
Anna Politkovskaya is a famous Russian journalist and human rights activist, focusing on the conflict in Chechnya, blamed Russian soldiers for all mortal sins, but she also didn’t hear and didn’t see how, when, and how many Russian civilians Chechens were slaughtered like sheep in broad daylight. After her murder, it turned out that at the beginning of 90's, she received US citizenship, and given the content of the oath that the US citizen receiving the passport says, everything falls into place and it becomes clear who she actually worked for and whose interests she defended.
However, the fact of the genocide of the Russian population of Chechnya in their speeches was repeatedly confirmed even by the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin: in an interview with the French weekly Paris-match, published on the official website of the Kremlin, Putin, recalling the "years of shame," said: “In recent years, we have witnessed large-scale genocide against the Russian people, against the Russian-speaking population, on the territory of Chechnya. Unfortunately, no one reacted to this. ”.
And December 19 2002, Putin, answering the questions of the Russians, said: "... according to various estimates, as a result of ethnic cleansing in Chechnya, up to 30 thousand people died," and possibly more. "This will not happen again," the head of state said. "
So what do we have? But the following: The Chechen Republic, which was included in the North Caucasus Federal District, became a virtually mono-national republic (from 85% to 94% are Chechens), while the Chechens created such conditions under which people of other nationalities did not can live in principle. But the Chechens themselves live freely among other nations, but only as long as there are few of them, but over time, when their number increases, they begin to become impudent, after which the same thing always happens: the expulsion of the indigenous people and their replacement by their relatives. Study the real story and you will understand everything!
In conclusion, I would like to cite “curious” data that clearly show the trend of ongoing changes in the national composition of this republic. “According to population censuses in the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1989 Russians lived in 269130 (24,8% of the population), in 2010 Russians 24382 lived in the Chechen Republic (1,9%)”. Wikipedia
And yet, in Chechnya there were several cities with the native Russian population, which was gradually replaced by Chechens, for example: in Gudermes, in 1926, 69% of Russians lived, 20% of Ukrainians and only 2,4% of Chechens, and already in 1970 was 56 % of Russians, 2% of Ukrainians and 34% of Chechens, 1979% of Chechens already live in 47, 47% of Russians and 1,5% of Ukrainians, and finally 2002% of Russians in Gudermes live not left. The same picture was observed in Grozny and throughout Chechnya. The next in line is the Stavropol Territory and "further everywhere."
“When not so long ago, the Stavropol Territory, together with all the Caucasian republics, was merged into the North Caucasus Federal District with the center in Pyatigorsk, all of us (Stavropol residents) were shocked. We perfectly understood what it means - now the Chechens will come to the Stavropol Territory and settle here ... Some time has passed, this is what is happening in the Stavropol region now ... The Chechens behave as if they are the masters here, and it is impossible to oppose them completely now nothing, because they behave so with the sanction of our beloved government. Of course, we all understand - soon the Olympics in Sochi, in the Caucasus should not shoot, blow up, etc., otherwise no one will go to us. therefore Chechens were given at the disposal of what they had long dreamed of - the Stavropol Territory».
For those who do not agree with this state of affairs in our country, in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation there is the notorious article 282 "Incitement of hatred or enmity, as well as the humiliation of human dignity." This article is popularly called “Russian”, because according to it 99.9% of convicts are ethnic Russians and they are convicted mainly for inciting ethnic hatred, “for anti-Semitism”, etc. Although there are tens of thousands of facts about the oppression of Russians in the republics North Caucasus, their expulsion from their homes, but not a single case of bringing the perpetrators for this article is known. All this is called: “to throw from the sick head to the healthy”.
Remember: Chechens respect force and reckon only with it, it is a reality and they talk about it themselves, and they perceive all people who preach liberal democratic and “universal human values”, at best, as weaklings, and at worst, they are considered potential slaves and nothing else. And if over time there are no Russians left in the Stavropol region, do not be surprised, because they only do what we allow them to do, so we need to be strong, otherwise ... Start thinking and draw your own conclusions.
In conclusion, I want to shout loudly: "Human rights activists." AU! Where are you? Give your vote in defense of Russians and other nations! ”And in response, as one“ hero ”said in a famous film: “... along the road are dead with braids standing. And silence...".
Information