Military Review

Barack Obama met for a third term

52
According to the 22 th amendment to the US Constitution, one person can hold the post of American president for no more than two terms. The amendment was accepted because Franklin D. Roosevelt ruled the United States for four terms: in 1940, he was elected for a third term, in 1944, for the fourth term. After the end of World War II, American democracy in the face of Congress imposed a two-term limit, fearing a possible dictatorship: some future tyrant could take advantage of Roosevelt's precedent. The 22 amendment was approved in 1947 and ratified in 1951.




As shown historical perspective, the amendment made sense. In 2008, Barack Obama was elected President in the United States - a man in whom George Orwell's gloomy predictions began to come true in the country (see the novel 1984, which depicts a totalitarian American future with Big Brother, watching screens in cramped apartments and the Ministry of Truth ) In 2013, Barack Hussein really thought about a third presidential term and, according to rumors, already talked about this subject with a competent lawyer - the US Attorney General.

In January, 2013 of the year - that is, after Obama’s second victory in the presidential election and shortly before the inauguration - on Fox News Latino A note appeared in which the idea of ​​José Serrano, a Democratic congressman from New York, was reported. This person believes that the 22 amendment to the Constitution should be repealed by law, which will enable Barack Obama to remain the master of the White House for the third time. Mr. Serrano didn’t limit himself to words and on January 4 presented the corresponding bill.

The note noted that Serrano is far from the first opponent of the 22 amendment, which, according to some experts, actually turns the American president into a “lame duck” in his second term. A similar resolution was even introduced by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in 1989.

Ronald Reagan, after becoming president, expressed his support for the 22 Amendment, but changed his mind during his second term. In an interview with Barbara Walters in 1986, Reagan said that "thinking about this more and more, I came to the conclusion that the 22-I amendment was a mistake."

Bill Clinton is also among the opponents of the 22 amendment.

October 23 Stephen Wallace in "National Report" wrote that Barack Obama is likely to consider what was once unthinkable: go for a third presidential term. At the same time, the journalist reports that recent polls have shown: an increasing number of Americans support this idea. Others either did not make a choice, or do not mind.

Referring to the documents allegedly at the disposal of the National Report, including private electronic correspondence between Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder, the journalist points to some “specific”, even if “speculative,” questions from Obama seeking advice on circumvention. The 22 th amendment or such editing of the US Constitution, which could pave the way for the next legal re-election.

Where did the web portal on which the so-called “citizen journalists” work, the correspondence of Obama and Holder?

It turns out that there is a certain anonymous source, prescribed in the office of the American Attorney General. He kindly agreed to talk to a journalist.

The mysterious stranger noted that today the Constitution prohibits being elected for a third term, however, as every American knows, the Constitution is a living document. If necessary, it can be changed as the people see fit. The very fact of that, the anonymous said further, that there were already 27 amendments, shows that the idea of ​​Obama’s third term - even if it would require overcoming what seems insurmountable - is quite realizable.

What need can lead to constitutional changes?

According to the source, preventing the attempts of the extreme-right Republicans to seize control over the executive branch is in the interests of all Americans. These are exactly what the administration of Barack Obama can declare a threat to democracy. And the threat will require "emergency measures."

The Attorney General in his responses informs the president that the states should ratify the amendment to 3 / 4, and indeed, 26 of them are controlled by Republicans.

Obama, on the other hand, is oppressing his line, relying on extraordinary powers and unforeseen circumstances.

The very next day, responding to the Prosecutor General, he asks for a list of "unforeseen" circumstances that would give the president extraordinary powers - say, in wartime. He also asks a question about the restrictions of rights when declaring martial law by the president.

Conspiracy therapists, add on my own, will find here plentiful food for thought. Stories with hundreds of thousands of plastic coffins, FEMA camps, a huge amount of ammunition, which are officially purchased by the US Department of Homeland Security along with bulletproof and fireproof checkpoints and special equipment, total surveillance and interception of the NSA, pressure from the Obama administration on opposition journalists, extension of the “Patriotic Act” "And the introduction in 2011 of the Year of the" Authorizing Act on National Defense ", which transferred the so-called anti-state affairs into the able hands of army representatives or the special services and to remove the legal procedure from the cases, - all this “seems to hint” that the ironic comment of Comrade Wallace did not appear from scratch.

By the way, in addition to the acts mentioned, the United States adopted in 2007 the “Defense Warrant Act of John Warner”, which allows the American president to declare a state of emergency, send troops to any point of the country and take control of the state with the help of the National Guard. Consent of governors or cities are not required. The purpose of the state of emergency is to “suppress the disturbance of public order”.

It is necessary to mention the “Food Order”. This decree periodically updates the powers of the president. When the decree enters into force, the president gets the right to take control of all state energy sources, including oil and natural gas, to gain control over all civilian traffic, and even provides the possibility of introducing conscription in order to achieve both military and non-military objectives.

As for the threats to which we will have to respond with emergency measures, there is no need to go far for an example: quite recently the federal government turned off for sixteen days. And Republicans from Congress were to blame for this, including, among other things, the Obama health insurance program (nicknamed “Obamacare”).

And one more thing to add.

Barack Obama does not want to concede in anything to one of his main political competitors on the planet, Vladimir Putin. The first loves to make pompous speeches in public, hiding in a bulletproof booth, and the second takes articles in the New York Times. Obama declares American exclusivity, and Putin makes this exclusivity a matter of timely criticism. Obama brews beer, and Putin catches pike. The American president advocates for homosexual rights, and his Russian rival does not approve of same-sex love. The Syrian crisis hurt the reputation of the aggressive owner of the White House, and the Kremlin strategist became famous as a 21st century peacemaker. Barak Hussein rules his second term for his state, and Vladimir Vladimirovich is already the third.

Agree, a list of comparisons - not in favor of Obama. True, Obama has a “Nobel Prize”, but the authority of this award is rather dubious. Here Obama should rather be compared with Gorbachev.

And further. Obama is the president of crisis America. It was during his time that the national national debt reached an astounding amount, and the number of poor and needy was 15% of the country's population. To brag, in short, nothing.

Obviously, Obama would like to go down in history, and not “plunge” into it. Leading economists are sure that the crisis in the world will last at least another few years. The most pessimistic forecasts reach 10 and even 20 years. If we reject extreme points of view, overcoming the years of the 5-6 crisis, in order to get towards the end of the third term the laurels of triumph that revived America, could become the historical goal of Mr. B.H. Obama.

Of course, in order to achieve this goal, you will need cartridges, camps, coffins and faithful dogs from DHS (Department of Homeland Security). But how! Without dictatorship and state of emergency anywhere. Obama could improve the economy with an eye on the experience of another ruler from Russia - Stalin. Forced industrialization in its high-tech-sharachechnogo version would allow Obama (for which just are powerful IT corporations) to return production from China, thereby inflicting a strategic defeat on a major geopolitical opponent.

But for the implementation of such economic and political protracted B.H., a third term is needed ...
Author:
52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Canep
    Canep 1 November 2013 09: 06
    10
    And if they cancel the 22nd amendment and re-elect Barak Huseynovich, then not only the predictions of Orwell but Wanga will come true. And the monopoly on democracy will collapse, less than 40% of voters support it.
    1. Igor39
      Igor39 1 November 2013 09: 11
      28
      I am for! Obama will finish the USA! smile It will be the revenge of the blacks.
      1. twister
        twister 1 November 2013 09: 56
        +5
        By the way, all the prophets from Nasterdamus to Vanga prophesy that the last president of America will be 44 and he will be black, so maybe the Yankees will come to an end soon! winked
        1. Versed
          Versed 4 November 2013 09: 12
          -2
          It will be, and the sun will go out.
          Only now the Russian empire fell apart, the USSR shamefully fell into 15 parts, the end of Russia is near, and we all dream of America lol
          1. carbofo
            carbofo 5 November 2013 18: 04
            0
            Quote: Versed
            the end of Russia is near, and you are all dreaming of America

            We are always dreamers, but with warm hearts and steel characters.
    2. SHILO
      SHILO 1 November 2013 09: 19
      12
      In light of the low rating and extreme exclusivity of the United States, you can announce the second coming and please - the eternal label on the board.
      1. Krasnoarmeec
        Krasnoarmeec 1 November 2013 09: 36
        +9
        Who cares who their president is! Republicans or deMocrats, or someone else there, the course from this will not change, nor has it changed over the course of 50 years!

        Someone from the Amerekos said "We had one worthy president, but we killed him" hi
    3. Beibit
      Beibit 1 November 2013 09: 36
      +3
      to ... ate absenteeism does not have time to do, for which he was elected ...
    4. APES
      APES 1 November 2013 11: 23
      0
      Quote: Canep
      will cancel the 22 amendment and re-elect Barak Huseynovich

      as I heard from unnamed official sources of the White House, they are now intensely seeking their Medvedev
      1. Letun
        Letun 1 November 2013 16: 50
        +3
        Quote: APES
        as I heard from unnamed official sources of the White House, they are now intensely seeking their Medvedev

        Yes, mine, let ours be taken away. laughing
      2. Versed
        Versed 4 November 2013 09: 14
        -1
        in Russia, you don’t need to look, he already is.
        and Obama will not be able to become president for the third time - the constitution, which simply does not exist in Russia, will not allow. lol
    5. Polovec
      Polovec 1 November 2013 19: 08
      +1
      His gut is thin! Again leans on fagots, but don’t turn your back on those! laughing
  2. rrrd
    rrrd 1 November 2013 09: 07
    +2
    Vegetable (eggplant)
  3. AK-47
    AK-47 1 November 2013 09: 09
    +2
    It will not work, he does not have Medvedev.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 1 November 2013 09: 14
      +5
      Quote: AK-47
      It will not work, he does not have Medvedev.

      There is democracy, everything will be there.
      1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
        GELEZNII_KAPUT 1 November 2013 09: 31
        +4
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        There is democracy, everything will be there.

        Democracy has already passed there, they have been ill, the oligarchs of the military-industrial complex rule! laughing
    2. Denis
      Denis 1 November 2013 11: 06
      +3
      Quote: AK-47
      It will not work, he does not have Medvedev.

      And we will give them Dimka for rent, for four years wink
      1. Migari
        Migari 1 November 2013 11: 49
        +5
        That Dima, it is better to give them their favorite, Nobel Prize winner Gorbachev, he damn them such a restructuring.
        1. Denis
          Denis 1 November 2013 11: 52
          +1
          Quote: Migari
          That Dima, it is better to give them their favorite, Nobel Prize winner Gorbachev, he damn them such a restructuring.

          this one will not last four years ..
        2. ben gun
          ben gun 1 November 2013 12: 43
          +3
          Pus rented both! And in the team of this star pair, the entire Kodlu, starting from Chubais, ending with the Germans with bulk. The rental period will end when TAM builds a better world and not earlier! laughing
    3. abrakadabre
      abrakadabre 1 November 2013 13: 20
      0
      Medvedev is our national brand.
      Let them seek Skunsov.
      Well, or in party terms: Elephant or Oslo. Or am I confused with the British Tory-Wiggy?
      Elephant or Donkeyev - it sounds! The synonymous Donkeyev Ass_ov sounds even more prophetically.
      wassat
    4. vadson
      vadson 1 November 2013 15: 24
      0
      Quote: AK-47
      It will not work, he does not have Medvedev.

      they have a schwarzenegger, we ask him to plant the same doll for a short while
  4. Boris55
    Boris55 1 November 2013 09: 21
    +8
    If you want to ruin the matter - change leaders more often.
    The idiotic system for limiting the length of time a leader is in his post is beneficial to anyone but not to the people.
    1. If the leader copes with his duties and the life of the people improves from year to year - why change to no one knows?
    2. If the leader does NOT cope with his duties and the life of the people worsens from year to year - why wait for the end of the term?
    1. bolonenkov
      bolonenkov 1 November 2013 09: 40
      +4
      The first point is correct, and the second requires refinement, as it will be the incentive for revolutions and other things
    2. Muadipus
      Muadipus 1 November 2013 09: 40
      +5
      I completely agree!!! So it should be, but with a debugged system of impeachment.
      1. vadson
        vadson 1 November 2013 15: 26
        +2
        every two years it is necessary to hold a national referendum on the impeachment of the entire leadership, then they will work
  5. makarov
    makarov 1 November 2013 09: 35
    +1
    the taste comes with food !!! Feeding trough - it is also in America Feeding trough ....
  6. Muadipus
    Muadipus 1 November 2013 09: 38
    +8
    The photo in the article is carbon monoxide :) thanks to the author for the article.

    Barack Obama needs to be supported, no re-election until he finishes America and the indigenous people take power.
  7. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 1 November 2013 09: 41
    +2
    from the Don.
    Negro Jews I do not know! And if so, give OBAMU for 3 term !!!!
    1. abrakadabre
      abrakadabre 1 November 2013 13: 27
      +5
      Negro Jews I do not know!
      There are those in nature. Israel even recognizes them. These are from Ethiopia.
    2. Starfish
      Starfish 1 November 2013 13: 30
      0
      "I don’t know Negro Jews! And if so, I GIVE OBAMU for 3 terms !!!!"

      First, what have the Jews to do with it?
      secondly, Obama's mom Stanley Ann Dunham is Jewish laughing
      and thirdly Obama for life president
      1. abrakadabre
        abrakadabre 8 January 2014 13: 45
        0
        and thirdly Obama for life president
        And posthumously too. Then do not elect kings, but only governors. Until the parish, after two thousand years, Aragorn ... Oh, what am I talking about? During this time, the elves (i.e. the Hasidim) yearn for and reach the blessed lands of the Middle East Valinor. Mexican and Florida orcs breed and partially mutate in Texas, California, and Detroit Urukhas.
        wassat
  8. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 1 November 2013 09: 48
    +2
    The third term ... boldly, against the background of mistrust of more than half of the citizens of the United States .. For Russia, only a plus, -will bring amers to the "pen" if he has time ... Vanga said that the "little black" will be the last president for that state. .. repeat
    1. Muadipus
      Muadipus 1 November 2013 16: 12
      +3
      Vanga said that "little black" would be the last president for that state ... feel
      yeah next will be - His Majesty King Pendosni Barack First


  9. KEKS44
    KEKS44 1 November 2013 09: 54
    +1
    You can’t imagine a better president for the states good After his reign from the USA, stone on stone will not remain laughing
    1. Versed
      Versed 4 November 2013 09: 19
      -1
      why is it bad?
      The US economy is growing, living standards too. NATO expanded missile defense at Russian borders lol
  10. maxcor1974
    maxcor1974 1 November 2013 09: 55
    0
    22 amendment cancel. Obama does not re-elect. Choose for life George W. Bush. And he will bury America.
    1. vadson
      vadson 1 November 2013 15: 28
      +2
      he will bury the whole world and not America
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. twister
    twister 1 November 2013 10: 02
    +2
    Dima will help!
  13. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 1 November 2013 10: 16
    +6
    I don’t understand what the problem is to elect a new puppet? In my opinion, Obama has already bothered everyone, give a woman to the president! And there is a benefit: people have changed, tolerance is just rushing, women’s rights are respected, everyone is happy, choose only a girl more beautiful, and not some lonely aging bureaucrat, she is still required to:
    • Ability to put a signature;
    • Read pre-written speeches;
    (the ability to put a cross + the ability to read), like nothing more is needed.
    1. illarion
      illarion 1 November 2013 13: 46
      +3
      It’s a pity the aunt from Alaska: he would have been a good president. She wouldn’t need to speak, just go back and forth across the stage. And the heterosexual majority would already be for US policy. It’s a pity they ate.
    2. Nick888
      Nick888 1 November 2013 15: 04
      +2
      Her, better homosexual there) It is possible that by nationality was a Latinos to make chic better)
  14. Sirocco
    Sirocco 1 November 2013 10: 27
    +4
    I don’t know how it goes about the presidential term, and the real term for crimes against humanity (Libya Syria) would not hurt him to solder.
    1. Krasnoarmeec
      Krasnoarmeec 1 November 2013 10: 35
      +1
      And one term here is definitely not enough !!!
  15. morpogr
    morpogr 1 November 2013 10: 34
    +4
    It seems to me that they are shoving Obama for a third term not just like that, but to make him a scapegoat. It’s better not to find a black candidate, and even Huseynovich is just a gift.
  16. aszzz888
    aszzz888 1 November 2013 10: 35
    +3
    On October 23, Stephen Wallace wrote in National Report that Barack Obama is probably considering what once seemed unthinkable: to go for a third presidential term.

    As the famous artist said, in the equally well-known film "Prisoner of the Caucasus" - "Shyutka!", That is, translated into Russian - a joke.
  17. Russ69
    Russ69 1 November 2013 10: 37
    +6
    Wang, it seems, said that America kirdyk with a black president. If before the end of the second term he doesn’t manage to break up, then he simply must go to the third term ... smile
  18. major071
    major071 1 November 2013 12: 27
    10
    To the tune of an old French song from the beginning of the 18th century "Malbrook is going on a campaign ..."
    Gathered for the third term,
    Eaten sour cabbage soup
    And then obs (r) alsya
    And he died that day ...
    Michel's wife
    Sat on a pot
    And plaintively ne (p) deeds
    Like a gun in a war.
    Four generals
    His pants carried.
    And twenty three corporal
    Go (c) but of them were shaking.
    He was buried
    Where was the toilet before?
    They put in the grave
    Obos (p) anny uniform.
    1. kaktus
      kaktus 1 November 2013 16: 53
      +2
      repeat ah-ah-ah ... and also a cultured person, maybe even wearing a hat? or at least with glasses? A song in the subject! wassat
      1. major071
        major071 1 November 2013 18: 52
        +6
        Do not guess, sir. No glasses, no hats, but funny! wassat laughing And in the song, I just put the name Michelle and changed the first line. The rest is original. tongue
  19. slovak007
    slovak007 1 November 2013 12: 58
    +2
    Appetite comes with eating.
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. ZU-23
    ZU-23 1 November 2013 18: 33
    +1
    Come on Barack finish them)))
  22. alone
    alone 1 November 2013 22: 24
    0
    democracy is not democracy, I personally do not believe that Obama will go to the polls for the third time. They still have laws working. They do not change the constitution every 10 years to please politicians.
    1. cdrt
      cdrt 2 November 2013 00: 05
      0
      Quote: lonely
      democracy is not democracy, I personally do not believe that Obama will go to the polls for the third time. They still have laws working. They do not change the constitution every 10 years to please politicians.


      100500
      He was barely pushing the budget.
      And for re-election he needs no less than the "magician" Churov. Without this our know-how will never work
  23. Goldkonstantin
    Goldkonstantin 2 November 2013 11: 28
    0
    And let it go, what is this to us? Is Obama more concerned with LGBT rights and other perversions than with real deeds, and is he constantly losing to us in the geopolitical field than the not ideal president of an enemy state?
  24. Ahmed Osmanov
    Ahmed Osmanov 2 November 2013 20: 37
    0
    Communicated with the Americans on the Internet, they say that Barack Obama is for them, as for us, Gorbachev.
  25. Do not care
    Do not care 3 November 2013 02: 31
    +1
    ".... that recent opinion polls have shown that an increasing number of Americans support this idea. Others are either undecided or don't mind."

    Brad!
  26. Klibanophoros
    Klibanophoros 4 November 2013 02: 58
    0
    All right, wait for the hysteria a la "Change" in 2008, also known as "Obamamania". Remember all those posters and the ecstasy of the masses of American consumers? (I almost wrote to the workers). Even rumors, but the rumor, be it truth or fiction, gives out headlong.
  27. pilot-mk
    pilot-mk 8 January 2014 13: 30
    0
    None of the US presidents has done so much to destroy American hegemony, so I have both hands for Obama’s third term, since I hope to see the collapse of the American empire during our lifetime.