"The Unites"
LDPR leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky’s speech at the Duel Vladimir Solovyov talk show, which caused a big scandal and a lot of feedback from leading politicians, does not look spontaneous. It must be said that, although Zhirinovsky plays the role of a jester with the king, it is because of this role that the important information is allowed to be made public, saying that the “king is naked”. He is a smart man, and he plays his role well. Zhirinovsky would not have lasted on top of the Russian political Olympus for so long if he did not know how to dose emotion and the "truth-womb". His speech is an informational stuffing that allows you to track both the reaction of the Russian “elite” and the mass of the inhabitants.The Russian political “elite”, which had long forgotten about independence, responded to Zhirinovsky’s speech as it should be - with harsh criticism. The head of Yabloko, Sergey Mitrokhin, sent an appeal to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation with a request to open a criminal case against the head of the Liberal Democratic Party under the article “Incitement of hatred or enmity”. According to Mitrokhin, the statements of Zhirinovsky "are frankly Nazi in nature", undermine the statehood of Russia as a multinational country and ultimately are aimed at the collapse of the state. The head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, responded predictably, calling the measures proposed by Zhirinovsky "fascist" and, turning to the individual, called the LDPR leader "pitiful and insignificant." In addition, he expressed surprise that the State Duma of the Russian Federation has not yet raised the question of the responsibility of Vladimir Zhirinovsky for his words about the inhabitants of the North Caucasus.
Chairman of the Russian State Duma Committee on National Affairs, Gadzhimet Safaraliev, who is a member of United Russia, said on Sunday that he should be at least deprived of the right to speak in the lower house of the Russian parliament for up to six months for Zhirinovsky’s appeals to restrict birth rates in the North Caucasus. At most, the words of Zhirinovsky speak about the need to suspend the activity of the Liberal Democratic Party. At the same time, the chairman of the State Duma Committee on National Affairs is ready to send a deputy request to the General Prosecutor’s Office on the question of whether Zhirinovsky’s statements that were made on October 12 on Solovyev’s “Duel” program are appeals to incitement of ethnic hatred and war. Safaraliev said that deputies representing the State Duma of the Republic of the North Caucasus addressed him with an official statement about Zhirinovsky’s words, and the State Duma Committee on Nationalities Affairs sent a letter to the Duma Chairman Sergei Naryshkin about the need to take some measures. Safaraliev also promised to appeal to the Duma commission on deputy ethics with a request to assess the statements of the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party. Andrei Andreev, deputy chairman of the Duma ethics commission, did not rule out a possible trial of Zhirinovsky’s statements.
Russian statesmen to the provocation of Zhirinovsky, who voiced what many people think (the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party himself believes that 90% of Russian citizens share his position), also answered as expected. A false Soviet “about the friendship of peoples” and internationalism continues to operate at the top. However, the truth is a tough thing ...
First, no internationalism and “friendship of nations” exists in nature. The Russian kingdom, the Russian Empire and the USSR were created and held on to labor and bayonets of the super ethnic group of the Rus. Those nations that supported the building of the empire received all the benefits from the general security, imperial achievements in the field of culture, education, science and economics. Those who defied the empire were punished as “the father of nations” by Stalin punished the Chechens and the Crimean Tatars for aiding the Nazis during the Great Patriotic War. The false theory of the "brotherhood of nations" was introduced and introduced by Lenin, Trotsky and other Marxists; under Stalin, the role of the Russian people was restored, but then the artificial installation won up, becoming one of the prerequisites for the fall of the USSR. This false principle also prevails in the Russian Federation, leading it to a new geopolitical catastrophe.
Secondly, the modern stratum of Russian politicians is absolutely dependent people. If Mr. Putin writes a couple of articles and delivers a speech about the "benefits of Great Russian chauvinism" (patriotism) for Russia, its salvation in the face of external and internal threats, then the rhetoric of the overwhelming majority of public and political figures will change dramatically. When a new program arrives, the very same politicians who speak beautifully about “multi-ethnic”, “multi-religious”, “multiculturalism” and “tolerance” will shed tears about the dominance of migrants and “foreigners” and demand the fight against ethnic criminal groups. The most honest are ultra-liberals, ethno-separatists and jihadists. They both hated the Great Russia, and they will hate it, hoping to dismember it into cozy “hollandas”, bantustans and emirates. They are frank and clear enemies of Russia.
Russian citizens have a point of view that is the opposite of the “elite”. This is a common thing for Russia. So, on the issue of the death penalty, the majority of Russians support the death penalty (it can be public) against terrorists, slave traders, child tyrants and other evil spirits, but the authorities continue to adhere to the course of “tolerant” Europe, which has already led it to a conceptual dead end. Zhirinovsky was supported by the majority of those who voted in the “Duel” program. Radical moods (“Water!”) Are growing stronger in society. The general understanding that “it’s impossible to live like this” gradually leads to political crystallization. The global systemic crisis, whose waves are gradually overwhelming Russia, raises very specific and tough questions. A people who cannot answer them will "drown." Given the thousands of years of experience of the Rus superethnos, which survived after a series of geopolitical disasters and destroyed the most serious military opponents, it is safe to say that the Russians will find the answer to the threats of the 21st century.
Throwing Zhirinovsky allowed to analyze attitudes in society. It is especially interesting from the point of view of the survival of modern Russian authorities in the future world (current problems are “flowers”). Representatives of the authorities openly admit that in the 2014 year, and, apparently, in the future, Russia will face a host of serious social and economic problems. The budget is waiting for a drop in revenues, the country is a surge in unemployment, the government talks about the need to cut social spending, etc. The recipes for “problem solving” offer the old ones, the liberals in power simply cannot give up all of their old policies and recognize its complete fallacy. “Medvedev and K” do everything according to Western recipes: privatization, “optimization” (reduction), movement towards the complete rejection of state intervention in the “affairs” of the population. Like, get out as you can.
Naturally, all this will lead to a serious politicization of Russian society, will lead the country to the threshold of a revolutionary situation. The discontent of the population, its energy must be "channeled." As a result, instead of recognizing the crime of 1990 reforms and the collapse of the USSR with harsh and public punishment of the main actors and the creation of the USSR-2 (a new empire built on the basis of socialism), the authorities assess the degree of discontent and look for channels that the energy of the dissatisfied masses can be thrown out ... But in the construction of the new Russian Empire, it would be possible to use both Russian, and Caucasian, and Tatar youth. Give people an idea and hope, an opportunity to express themselves, realize their creative potential, spend energy in a creative way.
The Russian Federation repeats the sad experience of the Russian empire with its riots, which representatives of the Police Department were aware of. And the pogroms were beneficial to all. The Jew received the sympathy of the then world community and the Western press (much of which was controlled by the Zionists and Jewish bankers), which contributed to emigration to the United States and the poor to Palestine. Revolutionaries could use in their campaigns examples of the "horror of the tsarist regime." Local authorities removed the heat of discontent that spilled over the Jews. In Russia, the role of Jews can be played by internal and external migrants. Moreover, taking into account the number and cohesion of the latter, the pogroms can result in very serious and bloody conflicts. They completely distract citizens from social and economic problems, clogging up the information field of the country, closing the guilt of the authorities and allowing them to block activists from both sides.
In this regard, the last shaft News on the topic of “come in large numbers” and migrants it is quite reminiscent of the methodology already worked out by the government on “reform of the Ministry of Internal Affairs” (in the preparation of the law on renaming the police to the police). Then the press was savoring the details of the cases of “werewolf policemen”, the atrocities of the policemen, and there were indicative investigations. And this despite the fact that the police at that time were no different from previous years, because the Ministry of Internal Affairs is simply a reflection of the state of the whole society. The society is degrading, the police are also decomposing. The picture was sad, but not catastrophic. In the wake of the current negative attitude towards the USA, we know that the American police are much more severe than the Russian police. American cops can shoot a person only for the suspicion that he is going to attack the police officer or even without any special motives. So, on October 28, 2013, there was news that a policeman shot Bobby Bennett, a mentally ill person with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, in Dallas. The victim's mother, Joyce Jackson, and Bobby had a falling out. Mother called the police. She was promised to send employees with experience in dealing with the mentally ill. When the police arrived, Bobby was calm and sat in a wheelchair and only got up when the police officers approached. He stood calmly, executing a command to “freeze”, and police officer Carden Spencer opened fire and severely wounded Bobby in the stomach.
And October 22 police patrol killed a teenager for disobeying. Dramatic events took place in the small American town of Santa Rosa in California. The police paid attention to the young man in whose hands was a Kalashnikov assault rifle. They demanded to fold weapon. The teenager did not obey and continued moving; police officers opened fire to kill. The guy was fatally injured. The Kalashnikov machine gun and a pistol under the belt turned out to be toys. Killed was 13-year-old local resident Andy Lopez. Such tragedies are routine for the United States. Such incidents occur there every year in the hundreds.
By pumping hysterics over the "disgraces" of the police, the government was able to prepare the ground for pushing the police law. But the renaming of the police to the police as a whole did not lead to positive results. A separate reform of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, without a fundamental change in the concept of Russia's development and the emergence of a holistic state ideology, cannot solve the problem. The authorities were only able to divert the public’s attention from the depravity of the system as a whole, turning the arrows on the “bad policemen” and the next sweep of the unwanted, and turning the police into a “police” in the Western style - that is, ready to go against the people (“policemen”).
Apparently, at the present time the same technology is practiced again. The population is distracted from the policy of the authorities in dumping the social responsibility of the state, the image of the main “internal enemy” is being worked out. Whom will be “killed” in the first place - “foreigners” or uncontrolled nationalists - while the question is. The main thing is that the channel of dissatisfaction is found. Moreover, the fact that the problem of external and internal migrants is also the result of the policy of the authorities (who started with the murder of the USSR) will be silenced in every way. Emotions will come to the fore. The main thing is to organize pogroms, clean up the ranks of Russian nationalists, throw off social tension. Everything will be reduced to emotions, to the formula “for / against foreigners”.
The “Swamp Revolution” was developed using the same technology. Instead of analyzing the systemic problems that Russia and the Russian civilization as a whole (including Ukraine and Belarus) are building, everything came down to the question “for / against Putin”. All sensible arguments drowned in the "swamp". Currently, a scenario is being launched in Russia: “nationalists” against “Islamists”, “aliens”. All the principle of "divide and conquer."
Duel with V. Solovyov 24.10.13. Participants in the issue: Vladimir Zhirinovsky and Maxim Shevchenko.
Information