Military Review

Russophobes are always savages and ignoramuses!

152
The conversation of the publicist-enlightener A.Strele with the famous economist Vazgen Avagyan.


- Vazgen Liparitovich, first give your definition of Russophobia ...

- Russophobia is not a political or nationalistic phenomenon. It is not associated with a particular party or a specific ethnic choice. First of all, Russophobia is a political shell of wildness and ignorance. Therefore, Russophobia can be both Russian and non-Russian, and Russian and non-Russian can also love Russia. This is about the quality of education. Russophobia is the lot of aggressive savagery, militant ignorance, who rebel against culture and awaken the beast in man.

Take, for example, language. Russian language is as close as possible to Paleo-Sanskrit, to the great language of Indo-European civilization. Modern European languages ​​were born from the mixing of this language with the adverbs of the natives of ancient Europe. The natives did not enrich these languages ​​of Europe, but on the contrary, they primitivized them. They are objectively poorer in Russian in terms of meanings and shades of words, vocabulary, phonetics, grammatical system, etc. For word formation, European languages ​​use more primitive methods, in them word formative mechanisms are undeveloped and defective. This gives rise to a kind of inferiority complex among the speakers of European languages, which develops into a thirst for revenge on inaccessible flourishing complexity, and is reborn from people with deceitful mind into Russophobia.

“But the language is not the reason for Russophobia ...”

- Of course, no, this is just a narrow, but very telling example. The Russians are the bearers of that civilizational principle, which the Europeans have already largely lost, and that is why the Russians attract the fury of savages. It's all very simple: the more wildness - the more and rage. The most primitive Europeans are the most russophobes. If monkeys could understand the national question, they would be the most exemplary Russophobes on the planet. Because a parody of a person always internally believes that on the contrary, a person is a parody of her ...

-As an economist, what do you think about the role of Russians in the global economy?

- There is such a thing as "economic collapse." It is difficult, but I will explain to you with simple examples. For example, if every day a horse’s ration is reduced by a few grams, then some time there will be savings in feed, and the horse will not feel anything. But as a result of this line the horse will die, once or sooner or later, i.e. the system collapses, collapses. Another well-known example: if you put a frog in a pan with cold water and slowly bring the water to a boil, the frog will not feel anything: it will not even try to jump out - it will just gradually boil and die.

In economics, there are trends that must inevitably end in a collapse if something does not interrupt them. This is the Western European civilization, and so is the Asian mode of production. If you give them the potential to develop unhindered for a long time, then they will collapse inevitably. The bottom line is that you can not compress the object to infinity, there will come a point where any object will break. You can not expand the object to infinity - any object will break once during expansion.

So, both Western European capitalism and the Asian mode of production can exist only if something holds them back, hinders the realization of inner potencies to the end. And it so happened that these are ideas coming from Russia. I often told the Swedes, for example - do you understand that all your wonderful life became possible only because we are, the Soviet Union? At the same time I was cunning ...

-Did you not believe in the role of the USSR as a threat to predators and a counterbalance to the devastating practices in the West?

-No, I just believed and believe in it. And what is there to believe, when now everything is very clear - there is no USSR, and there is no merry and carefree life in the West. I was cunning in a friend - calling the life of the Swedes wonderful ...

Is she not like that?

-This is the life of geeks and freaks. A hungry person, hitting their mushroom kingdom, will for some time eat up and not think about anything. But we had enough satiety in our USSR too. However, a tightly stuffed stomach does not prevent a person from becoming a complete geek.

Here is a purely school example. Swedish course "Modern Family". The first paragraph that the teachers teach is a story about a family that lived in a “civil” marriage (Swedish “sambo”, even a special word was invented, bastard!). Sambo gave birth to children and separated. Now they have other Sambo partners, also with children, and complete confusion, which is called the “modern Swedish family.” But this is only the beginning. Next - an interview with a homosexual father who, together with his lesbian mother, artificially conceived a child and is now raising him.

The son lives one week with his dad and one week with his mother Anna-Lena and Lisa. For a son, this is natural. But sometimes he says that he wants them to live together together: Ivan, Ula, Anna-Lena and Lisa. But then Ula explains that mom and Lisa are in love with each other and they want to live in their own apartment. Therefore, they continue to live like this: father's house and mother's house.

Then an article about when homosexuals and lesbians got rights in Sweden, when they were officially allowed to adopt children like any marriage, etc. And information is given where you can read more about this, an Internet address is given. Further the scale is drawn, how many homosexual and lesbian marriages were concluded when it became allowed. All this is adjacent to the text of how bad it is when a woman should marry, have children, raise them and take care of her husband and all relatives. But Sweden has now changed for the better, and do not live with a person if you do not love him. And the rights of women and men are the same, and social status does not depend on whether you are married, divorced, etc. Then in this chapter there is a big article on how to inform children about their parents. Further it is told about old men who lived a very hard life together with each other and having many children.

Any normal person understands that such a panopticon cannot be allowed, and that Russia is the most formidable guardian on the path of this kind of practice, characteristic of a Western defective civilization, embedded in it as a kind of "inferiority gene".

-Who would inevitably give rise to a complete collapse of life, if not for the beneficial centuries-old influence of Russia?

-Exactly. This is an extreme degree of sociopaths, which, however, increases with success in Western society. The higher a person rose in the West, the more he is degenerative. Here is just one example - the famous French actor Alain Delon sued his own son Anthony Delon, for the right to use the brand “A. Delon "for perfumery. Can you imagine that the father not only did not give his son his own name, but even disputes the name of his own son? And what is interesting: how is he, a representative of the public profession, not afraid of public opinion? So it is in Europe in the order of things! And why does he, the old fool, need money for cologne, does he die of hunger ?! At one time, I.Solonevich described a similar situation for the court of a father and son, fishermen, for parts of the lake on which they fished in Germany. But then some fishermen of the early twentieth century, and then Alain Delon himself!

It is obvious to me that not only economic, but in general, fresh, life-affirming ideas from Russia serve the preservation of the life of Western civilization. Russian innovations, Russian philosophy and worldview, and finally, the fear of the Russian invasion - makes these crippled cripples to some extent human. But they always retain the ability to curl up in the complete pathology of complete nonviable lunatics.

- Are you not exaggerating ?!

-These bastards, when they start up in independent mental creativity, generate such squalor that it is ridiculous and scary to watch. Here is the American law - the law !!! - adopted by the legislators, seriously, legitimately, by voting: in Idaho it is forbidden to fish while sitting on a camel. Or other similar examples of American mental activity: in Baltimore, it is not allowed to come to the theater with lions. In New Orleans, crocodiles cannot be tied to hydrants.

In the city of Ottumwa in Iowa, a man cannot wink at a woman if he is not acquainted with her. In the city of Zion in Illinois, it is forbidden to give lighted cigars to cats, dogs and other pets. In Hartford, Connecticut, it is officially forbidden by local lawmakers to cross the road in their arms.

In New York, those who jump off the roofs of buildings face the death penalty (this is the surest way to suicide - if you don't break it - they will burn you in an electric chair.)

Can such people with such laws independently pave the way to the future for human civilization? There is no need to laugh, like many, but to cry. Before us is wildness and ignorance, mental inferiority, sociopathy in its purest form. Naturally, Russophobia also grows out of them: it is terrible to look at its locomotive with a scaffold of civilization. Do you think they would ever go out into space themselves if they did not compete with the Russians?

Russian pressure on these disabled minds manifests itself in two forms: in the form of makeup and in the form of pressure. Both are very fruitful for them. The Russian weakness lies in the fact that the Russians, having built something, immediately break it and begin to build a new one, and less active people receive more material benefits from the built, because they do not break it right away.

- It turns out that actions to protect and support Russians, as a people, always coincide with the protection and support of humanity, universal culture, civilization, and actions hostile to Russians inevitably contain enmity to humanistic ideals?

-That's exactly what happens. It is connected with the Russian historical mission that is wider than any ethnism. Let's take the Baltic states or Western Ukraine. What was Russophobia expressed there? That's right, in the marches of the uninhabited SS legionnaires and other Nazi scum. They hate Russians and they are Russophobes, but is their ethnic hatred? Did the Nazis only kill Russians? Fascism fought with world culture and planetary humanity, with the norms of universal morality. Thus, we clearly see that in the Baltic states, and in Ukraine, and by the way, in my Transcaucasia, Russophobia merges irreversibly with misanthropy, with hatred in the most general sense. The stupidity of Russophobia is constitutional, because an intellectually developed person cannot be Russophobe. Take a look - which areas of Ukraine are the most economically developed, the most well-fed? Oriental, where Russophiles live. And what are the most flawed, impoverished, unpromising, subsidized? Western Ukraine, where there are many Russophobes. It turns out, not only Russophobes but also just stupid, because they are not able to establish an economic life and their own life. So I say: these Russophobes and these stupid ones are not different characters, they are the same people.

- What do you think, what is the reason?

-Very simple. People learn, develop the brain, grow spiritually and gradually begin to understand the Russian historical mission. When the Russian doctor, Pirogov, invented anesthesia (anesthesia during operations) - he did not invent it only for Russians. He invented it for everyone. And Gagarin flew into space for all. And Ladygina’s bulb not only burns in Russians in houses, and Blinov’s tractor not only plows Russian lands, and Sikorsky’s helicopters and Zvorykin’s televisions ... It’s not possible to name all Russian revolutions made in world science - it’s a folio, but not an interview. It was the Russian kings who invented detente, disarmament and international arbitration, now embodied in the UN. And if they didn’t come up with this, wars would have started hitherto, as in the days of Bismarck ... However, now that Russia has weakened, this is happening. The values ​​of world peace, peace, anti-war initiatives - this is the Russian mission on the planet and without the Russians, there is no one to fulfill it. I say Russophobes usually - well, that you are puffed up, but without the Russians you will drown in your own bloody vomit, because the braking mechanism is organically deprived. Russophobes in the Balkans, for example, are buckets filled with the eyes of political opponents. So Croatian Ustashi acted with Russophilic Serbs. I think it is obvious here that Croat-Russophobes are at the same time opposed to any human civilization, any humane project in which concern for man is contained. I did not come up with this, I just noticed, and I ask you to testify too: just look, HOW ALL, CRUELY TO RUSSIANS, CRUELS ALSO AND TO ALL OTHER PEOPLE, IN GENERAL TO HUMAN.

This is an obvious relationship between Russophobia and spiritual degeneration, the degradation of the individual, and the perniciousness of man-abiding. Even purely biological, Russophobes are some kind of sinister freak show, a kunstkamera of freaks, as if someone had tipped a cornucopia on them with all the injuries and flaws of human nature.

- Apparently, this is inevitable, since Russophobia and hatred of mankind are closing together indissoluble.

-I think yes. That's not the question. The question is what to do to all of us. I think so: live. Live and affirm life. Life-affirmation always comes to the benefit of Russia and the Russians, and the life-affirmation of hundreds of peoples united by the Russian civilization, like springs, should feed the great Russian river ...
Author:
Originator:
http://www.vened.org/statii/4911-rusofobiya-erapi.html
152 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. NAV-STAR
    NAV-STAR 23 October 2013 08: 18 New
    35
    All these Russophobes do not realize that without the titular nation that they are abusing, they will begin to slaughter their first pigs, because traitors are nowhere needed, betrayed once, betrayed and two. But they play the role of nasty, light rain that should wake the Rus, how much you can sleep !!!
    1. shpuntik
      shpuntik 23 October 2013 17: 00 New
      +3
      NAV-STAR SU Today, 08:18
      But they play the role of nasty, light rain that should wake the Rus, how much you can sleep !!!

      There is a TV channel: "Rain", programs: "Wind through the window", "Echo" from Moscow, etc. "first channels", only this is no longer a light rain. When will the people wake up, and will they wake up? This is the question. He seems to have sober up, he no longer drinks like in the 90s, but young people get drunk in clubs, sit down on drugs. We do not have a single platform for unification, that's the problem. Most of them are Orthodox, others are pagans-Rodnovers, in general there is no unity.

      1. skullcap
        skullcap 23 October 2013 18: 43 New
        +3
        “Modern European languages ​​were born from the mixing of this language with the tongues of the natives of ancient Europe. The natives did not enrich these languages ​​of Europe, but on the contrary, they primitivized them. They are objectively poorer in Russian in terms of meanings and shades of words, vocabulary, phonetics, grammatical system, etc. For word formation, European languages ​​use more primitive methods, in them word formative mechanisms are undeveloped and defective. This generates a kind of inferiority complex among the speakers of European languages, which grows into a thirst for revenge on inaccessible flourishing complexity, and degenerates from people who are crippled by the mind into Russophobia. ”
        -------------------------------------------------- ------------
        And here I absolutely agree, because the settlement of the European Peninsula after the retreat of the glacier went in two directions: from the east (from the territory of the modern Middle Russian Upland) by people of the modern type (Cro-Magnons) with high moral qualities and from the south (through the Iberian Peninsula) cannibalam- Neanderthals.
        As a result, since the Cro-Magnons did not carry out the total genocide of cannibalism-prone arkhantropists, a mixture of species occurred, as a result of which modern Western European peoples were formed.
        But Western Europeans have not forgotten the secret of their origin, although they proclaimed through their “scientists” the established scientific fact that the Neanderthal allegedly did not participate in the genesis of modern man (although for this it is not necessary to do a genetic analysis: you just need to carefully look at the passers-by to make sure that the archangels left a very visible genetic mark in the composition of modern humanity). And this memory, provoking an inferiority complex of its own, burns the soul of a European, causes burning envy and that irrational hatred of the Russian people (Russophobia), which has been observed for centuries.
    2. skullcap
      skullcap 23 October 2013 18: 42 New
      +3
      “Russophobes are always savages and ignoramuses”
      -------------------------------------------------- ------
      If this were the only way !!!
      Unfortunately, among them is full and intelligent and educated.
      The main difference between Russophobes lies in the spiritual and moral plane and lies in the fact that all of them are unscrupulous and ruthless parasites, which (parasitization) fundamentally rejects Russian national world outlook, his view of the just - Divine - world pattern.
      But Russophobia is not a political or nationalistic phenomenon, but an ideological one.
      Therefore, the point here is not at all in the quality of education, but in the formation of a fair (Russian) world outlook, of developing the need for a person to live by the truth, by his own labor, disregarding all parasitism on his neighbors.
      1. Joker
        Joker 23 October 2013 20: 40 New
        0
        Unfortunately, among them is full and intelligent and educated.

        You are confusing the concepts, not all Europeans and Americans are Russophobes, their 10 maximum is there, the rest relate to us neutrally. For example, I did not see the articles of foreign scientists in which they would have responded badly to us.
        1. skullcap
          skullcap 23 October 2013 20: 45 New
          +1
          Have you ever read anything from Brzezinski?
          1. alone
            alone 23 October 2013 21: 24 New
            0
            Russophobia is the lot of aggressive savagery, militant ignorance, which rebel against culture and awaken the beast in a person.


            in general, this definition applies to all those who suffer from various phobias.
    3. rodevaan
      rodevaan 23 October 2013 22: 15 New
      +1
      Quote: NAV-STAR
      The Russians are the bearers of the civilizational principle that Europeans have already lost to a large extent, and therefore it is the Russians who attract the fury of savages. Everything is very simple here: the more savagery - the greater the fury. The most primitive Europeans are most Russophobia. If the monkeys could understand the national question, they would be the most exemplary Russophobes on the planet. Because a parody of a person always internally believes that, on the contrary, a person is a parody of it ...


      - Well, apparently Rusov was not completely brought to the end, since Vanka is still sleeping and is not going to get up. But if he gets up! Damn, it’s better not to do this - because we’ll go to Berlin again, trampling and scattering all the freaks - both western and eastern.
  2. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 23 October 2013 08: 29 New
    30
    from the Don.
    X .. to them all, big and fat! We will live in spite of all the freaks !!!
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 23 October 2013 10: 15 New
      22
      good Support.
      "But now the whole world
      He goes to war
      He smells our blood
      So much the worse for him.
      My soul is light
      My friends are with me
      And so we still
      Let's see who wins. "
      S. Trofimov
      1. afire
        afire 23 October 2013 14: 31 New
        16
        From the phrase - I am Russian - I experience powerful vibrations of power inside. The energy component is inherent in all real Rusak, and there is no fear. Everything else is the little things in life - let's break through yes
    2. shpuntik
      shpuntik 23 October 2013 19: 08 New
      +3
      borisjdin1957 RU Today, 08:29
      from Don ... to them all, big and fat!

      "We have a Rostov branch in every city."

  3. Airman
    Airman 23 October 2013 08: 43 New
    21
    Comrade, believe: she will rise,
    Captivating Star of Happiness,
    RUSSIA will rise from a dream,
    And on the ruins of autocracy
    They will write our names! ..

    Pushkin
    1. 222222
      222222 23 October 2013 11: 58 New
      11
      And you, arrogant descendants
      Known meanness of illustrious fathers,
      Fifth slavish remnants of wreckage
      A game of happiness for offended deliveries!
      You, greedy crowd at the throne,
      Liberty, Genius and Glory hangmen!
      You are ransacked under the law,
      Before you, the court and the truth - keep quiet! ..
      But there is also God's judgment, confidants of debauchery!
      There is a terrible trial: he is waiting;
      It is not accessible to the ringing of gold,
      And he knows thoughts and deeds in advance.
      Then in vain you will resort to evil thoughts:
      It will not help you again ...
      Lermontov Mikhail Yurievich
      1. Goodmen
        Goodmen 23 October 2013 12: 55 New
        17
        Lay down over the precipice the Russian way.
        And breaks into the abyss distance.
        Do not forget Russian Russian.
        Do not betray Russian Russian.

        We would not have stepped over the edge
        Yes, pushing enemies.
        Russian Russian help out.
        Russian Russian help.

        Basking darkness at my fires.
        I do not dare to reproach anyone.
        But rising from the darkness of the ages,
        Russian force kept Russia.

        Has served its own bread and salt.
        The world is not worth our love.
        Russian to Russian, as a password,
        Name the nation name.

        Moved to alarm sound.
        And you can not avoid the fight.
        Can endure the Russian cross
        Only our humps with you.

        Russian spirit, people, be strong
        At its last feature.
        Russian Russian bow.
        Protect Russian Russian.

        Russian soul save.
        Russian land savings.
        In these damned days
        Russian Russian help.

        L. Kornilov
        1. 222222
          222222 23 October 2013 13: 46 New
          15
          The discussion with the enemy is over,
          We will rise again, a feat of grief.
          Russia, Ukraine, Belarus -
          Tribes Slavic three heroes.
          Narrow roads lead us to Christ
          We know death, persecution and captivity.
          We are Russians, we are Russians, we are Russians,
          We will rise from our knees anyway!
          We are Russians, we are Russians, we are Russians,
          We will rise from our knees anyway!
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SufdeCZNqfU
          http://www.ruscadet.ru/library/sing/4.htm
          1. Ulan
            Ulan 23 October 2013 14: 34 New
            10
            "We are Russians, what a delight!" - A.V.Suvorov.
        2. v.lyamkin
          v.lyamkin 24 October 2013 07: 50 New
          0
          Thank you for the above work. I have not heard this author. Worth reading.
    2. Airman
      Airman 23 October 2013 13: 01 New
      +3
      Quote: Povshnik
      Comrade, believe: she will rise,
      Captivating Star of Happiness,
      RUSSIA will rise from a dream,
      And on the ruins of autocracy
      They will write our names! ..

      Pushkin

      And who didn’t like Pushkin?
      1. Goodmen
        Goodmen 23 October 2013 13: 20 New
        +2
        Quote: Povshnik
        And who didn’t like Pushkin?


        ))))) With Pushkin everything is fine!
        I also added good verses.
        1. Airman
          Airman 23 October 2013 14: 35 New
          +3
          Quote: Goodmen
          Quote: Povshnik
          And who didn’t like Pushkin?


          ))))) With Pushkin everything is fine!
          I also added good verses.


          I'm not talking about someone who put Pushkin's poems minus, so I asked.
          1. Gomunkul
            Gomunkul 23 October 2013 17: 18 New
            +2
            I'm not talking about someone who put Pushkin's poems minus, so I asked.
            I dare to assume - Russophobes! Do not pay attention to them. Personally, I put you +. hi
      2. Gordeich
        Gordeich 23 October 2013 16: 40 New
        +2
        Quote: Povshnik
        And who didn’t like Pushkin?


        Most likely you were given a minus for this - "And on the wreckage of autocracy."
  4. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 23 October 2013 08: 45 New
    45
    Cool author kneaded! Well done. I can only try to add: Russia is a special world and it does not belong and will not belong either to Europe or Asia. hi
    1. old man54
      old man54 23 October 2013 09: 55 New
      +7
      Quote: Valery Neonov
      Russia is a special world and it does not belong and will not belong to either Europe or Asia.

      good good hi
    2. Starfish
      Starfish 23 October 2013 11: 10 New
      +9
      but some disagree with Dostoevsky. and it's not me. the guarantor has updated the Council on Interethnic Relations:

      "... the council includes the assistant to the president of the Russian Federation Igor Levitin and the president of the Federal Jewish National-Cultural Autonomy Vladimir Shternfeld" ... The Council of FENKA includes Vladimir Shternfeld, Mikhail Chlenov, Mikhail Skoblionok, Vice-President of FENKA Roman Spektor, also leaders a number of regional autonomies: Mark Goldin (Izhevsk), Igor Dabakarov (Ulyanovsk), Olga Zamyatina (Belgorod), Ekaterina Ivanova (Moscow region), Semyon Livshits (Oryol), Evgenia Lvova (St. Petersburg), Mikhail Oshtrakh (Yekaterinburg), Lev Raikhlin (Tula), Yuri Rubinov (Rostov-on-Don), Irina Chernyak (Bryansk), Dmitry Tsvibel (Petrozavodsk).

      and these people will tell the Russians how to live on their land.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. cdrt
        cdrt 23 October 2013 11: 35 New
        +6
        Quote: Starfish
        but some disagree with Dostoevsky. and it's not me. the guarantor has updated the Council on Interethnic Relations:

        "... the council includes the assistant to the president of the Russian Federation Igor Levitin and the president of the Federal Jewish National-Cultural Autonomy Vladimir Shternfeld" ... The Council of FENKA includes Vladimir Shternfeld, Mikhail Chlenov, Mikhail Skoblionok, Vice-President of FENKA Roman Spektor, also leaders a number of regional autonomies: Mark Goldin (Izhevsk), Igor Dabakarov (Ulyanovsk), Olga Zamyatina (Belgorod), Ekaterina Ivanova (Moscow region), Semyon Livshits (Oryol), Evgenia Lvova (St. Petersburg), Mikhail Oshtrakh (Yekaterinburg), Lev Raikhlin (Tula), Yuri Rubinov (Rostov-on-Don), Irina Chernyak (Bryansk), Dmitry Tsvibel (Petrozavodsk).

        and these people will tell the Russians how to live on their land.


        Quote: Starfish
        but some disagree with Dostoevsky. and it's not me. the guarantor has updated the Council on Interethnic Relations:

        "... the council includes the assistant to the president of the Russian Federation Igor Levitin and the president of the Federal Jewish National-Cultural Autonomy Vladimir Shternfeld" ... The Council of FENKA includes Vladimir Shternfeld, Mikhail Chlenov, Mikhail Skoblionok, Vice-President of FENKA Roman Spektor, also leaders a number of regional autonomies: Mark Goldin (Izhevsk), Igor Dabakarov (Ulyanovsk), Olga Zamyatina (Belgorod), Ekaterina Ivanova (Moscow region), Semyon Livshits (Oryol), Evgenia Lvova (St. Petersburg), Mikhail Oshtrakh (Yekaterinburg), Lev Raikhlin (Tula), Yuri Rubinov (Rostov-on-Don), Irina Chernyak (Bryansk), Dmitry Tsvibel (Petrozavodsk).

        and these people will tell the Russians how to live on their land.



        Well ... ignorance (if grosser - undeveloped or weak intellect and lack of proper education and upbringing) is the basis of any kind of xenophobia.
        It is true for Russophobia, anti-Semitism, sinophobia, etc.

        From the list of phobias:
        Anatidaefobiya - fear that somewhere in the world there is a duck that is watching you laughing
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. cdrt
        cdrt 23 October 2013 11: 38 New
        +5
        Quote: Starfish
        but some disagree with Dostoevsky. and it's not me. the guarantor has updated the Council on Interethnic Relations:

        "... the council includes the assistant to the president of the Russian Federation Igor Levitin and the president of the Federal Jewish National-Cultural Autonomy Vladimir Shternfeld" ... The Council of FENKA includes Vladimir Shternfeld, Mikhail Chlenov, Mikhail Skoblionok, Vice-President of FENKA Roman Spektor, also leaders a number of regional autonomies: Mark Goldin (Izhevsk), Igor Dabakarov (Ulyanovsk), Olga Zamyatina (Belgorod), Ekaterina Ivanova (Moscow region), Semyon Livshits (Oryol), Evgenia Lvova (St. Petersburg), Mikhail Oshtrakh (Yekaterinburg), Lev Raikhlin (Tula), Yuri Rubinov (Rostov-on-Don), Irina Chernyak (Bryansk), Dmitry Tsvibel (Petrozavodsk).

        and these people will tell the Russians how to live on their land.



        Ignorance, or rather a weak mind, poor education and poor education is the basis of any xenophobia: Russophobia, Americanophobia, sinophobia, anti-Semitism and others ...

        Well ... the Russians always determined themselves not by blood roots, but by the adoption of Russian culture (and not always in the form of Orthodoxy, Muslims (the same Tatar nobility - Murz) considered Basurmans, but their own).
        And everyone who created the great Russian Empire usually did not support the "professional Russians", or even fought with them ..
        Actually only because the largest empire in the world is still alive.
      5. Mikhail3
        Mikhail3 23 October 2013 12: 49 New
        +4
        The author of the text is Vazgen Avagyan. Nothing?
        1. kaktus
          kaktus 23 October 2013 19: 03 New
          +6
          quite our Orthodox good
      6. washi
        washi 23 October 2013 15: 03 New
        +3
        Quote: Starfish
        but some disagree with Dostoevsky. and it's not me. the guarantor has updated the Council on Interethnic Relations:
        "... the council includes the assistant to the president of the Russian Federation Igor Levitin and the president of the Federal Jewish National-Cultural Autonomy Vladimir Shternfeld" ... The Council of FENKA includes Vladimir Shternfeld, Mikhail Chlenov, Mikhail Skoblionok, Vice-President of FENKA Roman Spektor, also leaders a number of regional autonomies: Mark Goldin (Izhevsk), Igor Dabakarov (Ulyanovsk), Olga Zamyatina (Belgorod), Ekaterina Ivanova (Moscow region), Semyon Livshits (Oryol), Evgenia Lvova (St. Petersburg), Mikhail Oshtrakh (Yekaterinburg), Lev Raikhlin (Tula), Yuri Rubinov (Rostov-on-Don), Irina Chernyak (Bryansk), Dmitry Tsvibel (Petrozavodsk).
        and these people will tell the Russians how to live on their land.

        RUSSIAN IS NOT NATIONALITY AND STATE OF SOUL. RUSSIAN MAY BE CARRYING ANY SURNAME AND BELONGING TO ANY CROP, BUT HE SHOULD BELONG TO GENERAL MORALITY AND RULES WHICH ARE COMPLIANCE WITH RUSSIAN.
        Caucasians in Moscow do not feel that Moscow residents belong to Russian civilization. Therefore, there are conflicts. (Yes, and under the Soviet regime they were considered not complete)
        In the Trans-Urals (the term "Muscovites") there are no problems yet.
        Until, with the help of TV, the Internet and education, they will not crush young people and turn them into "Consumers"
        1. Normal
          Normal 23 October 2013 18: 30 New
          +2
          Quote: Vasya
          Caucasians in Moscow do not feel that Moscow residents belong to Russian civilization. Therefore, there are conflicts.

          That is, Chechens and Dagi feel their belonging to Russian civilization, but they do not feel that Muscovites belong? And they rush at people with knives only because they do not consider them Russian enough?
          The Russian population of Chechnya probably also did not belong to Russian civilization, and for this it was slaughtered.
          Oh, Vasya ...
        2. Starfish
          Starfish 23 October 2013 18: 54 New
          +1
          RUSSIAN IS NOT NATIONALITY AND STATE OF SOUL

          This is a liberal bullshit. Russian is a nationality - but a liberalist state of mind
    3. Gari
      Gari 23 October 2013 12: 03 New
      26
      Quote: Valery Neonov
      Cool author kneaded! Well done.

      First of all, Russophobia is a political shell of savagery and lack of education. Therefore, a Russophobe can be both Russian and non-Russian, and Russian and non-Russian can also love Russia.
      And he wrote all these words as well as all this wonderful article - by Vazgen Liparitovich Avagyan.
      From his articles: Yes, wake up you!
      Loyalty to Russia is not only a sacred duty of the Eurasian peoples, but also a banal condition for their survival. How Ukrainians do not understand this ?! Russophobia, guys, this is your biological, rude, without quotes, death. Russia will somehow survive without you. But you can’t do without it.
      Anti-Russian republics, listen! Because of its size, you cannot be a self-sufficient world. It means either death by suffocation or trading with the outside world. And who needs your goods - low-quality, small-scale, made on antediluvian equipment?
      The Russian people - the martyr and the righteous - spoiled all of us, riding on our necks, and we thought - some of the Armenians, from the Turks, from the Slavs - that other great nations could roll us around our necks. Nonsense! The Russian people are a world-historical exception in the family of great imperial nations. Any other empire will not pamper you, but will beat you with a stick, sending it to the most dirty and dirty jobs.
      Spoiled all of us, non-Russians, Russian kindness. Russian honestly paid, sometimes with an overpayment, for any of our goods. What do you think, American, English, German are the same? The future trend of Russophobic regimes in the post-Soviet space has already been determined. They are needed to become a cemetery for hazardous waste, a source of slave biomass, they will be left the most worthless scraps in the world division of labor. They can be fed, like a shepherd, against Russia - again, as long as it is. Nobody needs them anymore. Yes, wake up you, finally, gentlemen Russophobia!

      Here, for example, Poles and Czechs changed Russian protection to American occupation. What is the result? The Russians did not drive them to Afghanistan, and the new owners - the Americans - immediately drove all this Eastern European small fry into Afghanistan. But here I have no pity for them - what they earned is what they got. They have no future. As an economist, I testify that all of Eastern Europe is falling into the deepest and most hopeless poverty associated with their complete uselessness in the world market. They have nothing to sell in the context of globalism; they do not have a single competitive production. But these are their problems. Our task is different: to protect Russia and, to the best of our ability, to restore its shaken greatness.
      1. hrych
        hrych 23 October 2013 12: 31 New
        +4
        They must and have already supplanted the Turks, Algerians, etc., in the dirty work.
      2. general
        general 23 October 2013 14: 45 New
        -17 qualifying.
        Gari - the rarest and most brilliant force you wrote nonsense, I feel a remarkable talent, I wish you success!
        1. smile
          smile 23 October 2013 16: 15 New
          12
          general
          As I understand it, do you have any arguments for a detailed answer to Gari's words? Was gunpowder enough for an evil spit? Do not worry because of this, this is the trouble of all Russophobians - their argumentation or lies. or such pathetic powerless shouts ... :)))
          1. general
            general 23 October 2013 19: 12 New
            -6
            Arguments for nonsense? Smile was enough for me only for "spiteful spit";)
      3. washi
        washi 23 October 2013 15: 06 New
        +7
        Beautiful and emotional. Well done.
      4. Black
        Black 23 October 2013 18: 18 New
        +5
        Quote: Gari
        The Russian people - the martyr and the righteous - spoiled us all

        Good words. Thanks you.
        According to the article.
        Russophobia is not a political or nationalistic phenomenon. It is not associated with a particular party or a specific ethnic choice. First of all, Russophobia is a political shell of savagery and lack of education.
        Strongly disagree with the author of the words !!!
        Exactly political !!! It is ideological.
        There is no savagery and lack of education at the heart of inciting hatred for Russia, for Russian. On the contrary, a conscious, verified line. and the goal is clear.
      5. Normal
        Normal 23 October 2013 18: 36 New
        +4
        Quote: Gari
        Yes, wake up you!

        Accept my appreciation and gratitude good drinks
    4. skullcap
      skullcap 23 October 2013 18: 45 New
      +6
      Quote: Valery Neonov
      Russia is a special world and it does not belong and will not belong to either Europe or Asia.

      The author wrote; It is obvious to me that not only economic, but in general, fresh, life-affirming ideas from Russia serve the preservation of the life of Western civilization.
      --------------------------------------
      And here the author is absolutely right. Because Western civilization is a black civilization hole.
      As the black hole in Cosmos draws in everything that it can reach (even the light cannot escape from it if it falls), so the Western civilization voraciously draws in all natural and human (intellectual and just biological) resources, returning in response only a lot of waste and pollution. Everyone knows that the United States is the main consumer of energy and minerals and, at the same time, the main producers of waste, ranging from carbon dioxide to products with GMOs.
      There is no doubt that Western civilization is an agent of the Dark Forces. Its whole history is the history of the misanthropy and the destruction of nations always when it has enough evil power, and wherever it can reach: from the Indians of America to the peoples of Iraq, Libya and Syria, from their own European peoples to the people of America, Africa and Australia. Therefore, in countries that have recently merged into the Western world, all local dark forces, ranging from aspiring SS men to just from scratch grown up homosexuals, carry out their parades.
      Now, after the failed project with fascism, the behind-the-scenes rulers of Western civilization have launched a new, more sophisticated and despicable one. Unable to destroy humanity through mass shootings and gas chambers, they decided to do it with the help of a gomosyatin. Having distorted moral values, they turn people into dirty cattle, paying for it before God (as an option - before Nature) by stopping their being, being a kind. Therefore, no matter how disgusting and disgusting this topic is, in no case can one shy away from fighting it, since retribution will prove to be fatal.
      Russian civilization, which in essence is the antithesis of Western Judeo-pseudo-Christian, can quite logically be reasonably compared with a white hole, which gives rise to new matter and information, including all sorts of bright ideas. About them really required to write folios. The author (quite briefly) identified them. But this is a separate question.
  5. Professor
    Professor 23 October 2013 08: 45 New
    -39 qualifying.
    I thought I read about the causes of Russophobia, and got on another ignorance. negative
    Citizens ridiculed American laws (no matter how strange they may be) are not aware that in America, unlike some other countries, everything that is not forbidden is allowed. Therefore, if there is no law prohibiting giving cigars to cats and dogs, then there is a freak that will do this and no one can forbid him to do so. For example, another law prohibits fart elevators. Well, stupid, because this is understandable. It can be understood, but if there is no prohibiting legislative act, then it will be simply impossible to punish the offender.
    1. loft79
      loft79 23 October 2013 09: 02 New
      11
      Quote: Professor
      For example, another law prohibits fart elevators.

      It is curious how this is written in legal language.
      1. Eternal demobilization
        Eternal demobilization 23 October 2013 09: 28 New
        +4
        Probably so, it is forbidden to let the winds in elevators))
    2. Trapperxnumx
      Trapperxnumx 23 October 2013 09: 29 New
      +6
      Quote: Professor
      I thought I read about the causes of Russophobia, and got on another ignorance. negative
      Citizens ridiculed American laws (no matter how strange they may be) are not aware that in America, unlike some other countries, everything that is not forbidden is allowed.


      Can you tell me what these "some other countries" are? And why, in this case, there are no similar laws in other developed countries?
      1. Professor
        Professor 23 October 2013 10: 01 New
        -20 qualifying.
        Quote: Trapper7
        Can you tell me what these "some other countries" are? And why, in this case, there are no similar laws in other developed countries?

        "Other countries" is where you have to run for a piece of paper permission for everything and everyone. I know a couple of such countries. And in other developed countries, there are a bunch of "strange" laws.

        Quote: Perforator
        In Russia there is no law prohibiting giving cats cigars, and still no one gives.

        Or gives, but neither the authorities nor you can do anything about it.

        Quote: Perforator
        Do you really not know the concepts: morality, rules of conduct, education, etc. Do you need a law?

        Cancel the Criminal Code, because there is morality, rules of conduct, education, etc.
        1. washi
          washi 23 October 2013 15: 17 New
          +2
          Quote: Professor
          Quote: PerforatorDo you really not know the concepts: morality, rules of conduct, education, etc. Do you need a law? Cancel the Criminal Code, because there is morality, rules of conduct, education, etc.

          The Criminal Code must be redone, and it is best to adopt the draft Stalin Constitution of 1937 (which was not adopted) and the Stalin Criminal Code with the famous 58, increasing the punishment for criminality and hooliganism
      2. wax
        wax 23 October 2013 12: 31 New
        +3
        Citizens ridiculed American laws (no matter how strange they may be) are not aware that in America, unlike some other countries, everything that is not forbidden is allowed.

        Is it forbidden to order a pressure cooker over the Internet in America?
    3. Perforator
      Perforator 23 October 2013 09: 52 New
      28
      Quote: Professor
      I thought I read about the causes of Russophobia, and got on another ignorance. negative
      ... if there is no law prohibiting giving cigars to cats and dogs, then there is a freak that will do this and no one can forbid him to do so.


      So much for the damn thing. In Russia there is no law prohibiting giving cats cigars, and still no one gives. Do you think that there is sure to come to mind that you are ready to defend this absurd law? But this in itself is absurd. You can’t fart in the elevator, but without the law you can’t behave humanly? Already have a law banning pants? Do you really not know the concepts: morality, rules of conduct, education, etc. Do you need a law? There is not enough paper forest on earth to enact laws on every delusional situation that may arise in the inflamed brain of lawmakers.
      1. Ascetic
        Ascetic 23 October 2013 13: 51 New
        12
        Quote: Perforator
        Do you really not know the concepts: morality, rules of conduct, education, etc. Do you need a law?


        The ideal Anglo-Saxon is a diplomat and accountant, trained for rivalry with people, for internal bickering, looking for ingenious ways that one could take possession of someone else’s prey. In essence, a trader and a speculator, but in a society where everything is based on the advisability of making profit from everything that is possible the main regulator is the formal LAW, which streamlines this process, otherwise chaos and the Wild West would come. Hence, such detailing is not based on any traditional values ​​and morals that have been replaced by the same expediency of profit-keeping, which preserves the balance of individualistic competitors in society, for whom to conduct how they say a civilized business and not slide into a banal racket and they need a lot of laws and legal restrictions. In a society of general deception and rampant consumption, you just can’t do without it, for example, to regulate marital duties in marriage contracts. What if a spouse wants to infringe on your rights. after all
        Quote: Professor
        In America, everything that is not prohibited is permitted.

        Therefore, you need to take into account any nuance so that your rights of a free individual are not harmed.
        Well, to deceive to take away the enslavement from those who do not live according to their laws is generally considered a blessing, and even better to make everyone live according to them,
        1. Ascetic
          Ascetic 23 October 2013 13: 51 New
          +7
          And for this, ideology is needed. It justifies the moral superiority of such a society over all others, so that they can be deceived and robbed with impunity. Hegel also developed the theory of Atlantism, where he claimed the superiority of civilized and intelligent peoples of the sea over the wild peoples of the continent. From here the roots of Western Russophobia also grow.
          As the studies of Werner Sombart and Max Weber showed, its roots go back to the Old Testament and the Jewish-Protestant religion, which is based on The concept of human relations with God, built on the principles of sale. A sign of God's mercy and, accordingly, a sign of religious zeal is here material, wealth, crushing all cultural, ethical and moral barriers on the path of the hungry economic animal, awakened by such "faith" in man.

          Quote from Dragos Kalajic (Orthodox Serbian philosopher and publicist) book "The Third World War"
          In Russia, even capitalism had its own differences. if you compare our merchants with the Anglo-Saxon and Udean legalists. For any transactions, they relied rather than on lawyers and legalists, but on honest merchant, to violate which was worse than the letter of the law and not because of the fear of responsibility under the law, but because of the complete loss of legitimacy in society and, accordingly, the loss of one’s business. Even the word wealth had a different meaning as given by God, which must be shared with compatriots. From here came the tradition of doing good (charity) not as an obligation under the law but as natural necessity... It was considered bad manners in society if a wealthy person did not engage in any "godly activities". In the West, this sponsorship is usually for the purpose of acquiring any tax or other benefits. Even the word PEACE has a meaning in our country as a human community (we will build a house with the whole world, death is red), in the West, in the society of individualists - consumers, peace is just a state that characterizes the absence of war between human individuals or states.
          It is in this misunderstanding that there is another civilization based on completely different historical and cultural values, which, moreover, cannot be enslaved and remade for itself, as has been done since the time of colonialism and still in the era of the new world order, which also has innumerable material resources cause many Russophobia inferiority complex and hatred of everything Russian
          Quote: Professor
          So draw your own conclusions.
    4. d_trader
      d_trader 23 October 2013 10: 32 New
      +6
      But didn’t they try to behave culturally in public places?
      1. Setrac
        Setrac 23 October 2013 15: 49 New
        +1
        Quote: d_trader
        But didn’t they try to behave culturally in public places?

        They simply do not know how, the imbalances of education.
    5. The gentleman
      The gentleman 23 October 2013 10: 45 New
      13
      Quote: Professor
      I thought I read about the causes of Russophobia, and got on another ignorance. negative
      Citizens ridiculed American laws (no matter how strange they may be) are not aware that in America, unlike some other countries, everything that is not forbidden is allowed. Therefore, if there is no law prohibiting giving cigars to cats and dogs, then there is a freak that will do this and no one can forbid him to do so. For example, another law prohibits fart elevators. Well, stupid, because this is understandable. It can be understood, but if there is no prohibiting legislative act, then it will be simply impossible to punish the offender.

      Mr. Professor, apparently you have to do with jurisprudence or am I wrong? but still, as a lawyer, I will say that any law should regulate real relationships. Speaking of animals, then there is abuse of animals. "it is forbidden to fart elevators" is an administrative offense. why adopt a LAW that shows the real degradation of the population, since they allow themselves to do this in a society that considers itself exceptional. besides, you only paid attention to ignorance, in turn, I am sure that the author showed the civilization of the eastern culture and that the western one cannot develop and originates precisely in the east.
      with respect.
      1. Professor
        Professor 23 October 2013 10: 59 New
        -11 qualifying.
        I am far from jurisprudence although I studied the law of the sea at the university as a compulsory course.

        Quote: Gentleman
        "it is forbidden to fart in elevators" is an administrative offense

        But no. It is not agreed anywhere that this should not be done and no one is interested in the personal opinion of the cop.
        1. The gentleman
          The gentleman 23 October 2013 11: 09 New
          +4
          Quote: Professor
          I am far from jurisprudence although I studied the law of the sea at the university as a compulsory course.

          Quote: Gentleman
          "it is forbidden to fart in elevators" is an administrative offense

          But no. It is not agreed anywhere that this should not be done and no one is interested in the personal opinion of the cop.

          Dear Professor, you say that it is not specified. Well then, a course on jurisprudence, where it is said that the sources of law are customs and traditions (in the law of the sea it is for sure). There is the concept of "unwritten laws". And once this is not said in the law , that is, the law of society, which knows how to condemn. and in the end I would like to say that if the law does not stipulate that it is impossible to "fuck" on the street and in front of everyone, I believe that this gives you personally the right to do it, because it is not prohibited. is the conclusion?
          1. Professor
            Professor 23 October 2013 11: 15 New
            -8
            Quote: Gentleman
            And in the end I would like to say that if the law does not stipulate that you cannot "fuck" on the street and in front of everyone, I believe this gives you personally the right to do it, after all, this is not prohibited. Is this the conclusion?

            In America, everything that is not prohibited is permitted. So draw conclusions.
            1. smile
              smile 23 October 2013 16: 24 New
              +3
              Professor
              Hello. Professor, but your phrase "everything that is not forbidden is allowed" has long been a cornerstone of our legal system. Back in the nineties, this was hammered into the heads of law students. That is why many scammers in the nineties, and some even now came out and come out dry ... so, alas, in this case, you are a little late with advertising this slogan that has long been firmly entered into our life ... for twenty years. :))) And if someone has to run for permits, it is precisely because the Russian legal framework prohibits performing certain actions without permission ... so. that everything is quite American ... :)))
              1. Professor
                Professor 23 October 2013 16: 31 New
                -3
                Quote: smile
                So. that everything is quite American .... :)))

                I already understood this when the rules for using the metro were presented here. "Don't stink" - why not America? wink
                1. smile
                  smile 23 October 2013 17: 59 New
                  +1
                  Professor
                  :))))) For a long time I did not laugh! :)))) Thank!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. cdrt
        cdrt 23 October 2013 12: 03 New
        +3
        Quote: Gentleman
        Quote: Professor
        I thought I read about the causes of Russophobia, and got on another ignorance. negative
        Citizens ridiculed American laws (no matter how strange they may be) are not aware that in America, unlike some other countries, everything that is not forbidden is allowed. Therefore, if there is no law prohibiting giving cigars to cats and dogs, then there is a freak that will do this and no one can forbid him to do so. For example, another law prohibits fart elevators. Well, stupid, because this is understandable. It can be understood, but if there is no prohibiting legislative act, then it will be simply impossible to punish the offender.

        Mr. Professor, apparently you have to do with jurisprudence or am I wrong? but still, as a lawyer, I will say that any law should regulate real relationships. Speaking of animals, then there is abuse of animals. "it is forbidden to fart elevators" is an administrative offense. why adopt a LAW that shows the real degradation of the population, since they allow themselves to do this in a society that considers itself exceptional. besides, you only paid attention to ignorance, in turn, I am sure that the author showed the civilization of the eastern culture and that the western one cannot develop and originates precisely in the east.
        with respect.


        Perhaps the fact is that there is case law in the United States.
        It works like this.
        The court decides a case that is not governed by existing laws. The judge formulates the decision, formulating a certain justification (if there is no applicable law, or the decision of any other court in a similar situation).
        After that, the decision in a formalized form is distributed by the Ministry of Justice (in my opinion, although it may be the Supreme Court) throughout the country and takes the force of law.
        T.O. Once in the Wild West, for example, someone smoked a cat, and a neighbor sued him. The judge decided that you should not torture the animal.
        All other courts in similar circumstances will use this decision as law.
        Yes, the precedent system has its own characteristics, but it reacts much more flexibly than the system of continental law.

        Well ... and the attitude of Americans to the court - the United States was created (and increased in size) by the armed people, acting on their own free will and initiative (we have an analogue - the Cossacks).
        Authorities were formed in order to regulate what people considered necessary to regulate.
        Laws are regulation rules.
      4. shpuntik
        shpuntik 23 October 2013 16: 36 New
        +3
        Maj.
        Gentleman UZ Today, 10:45 ↑ New

        Mr. Professor, apparently you are related to jurisprudence, or am I wrong? But nevertheless, as a lawyer I will say that any law should regulate real relationships. Speaking of animals, there is abuse of animals.

        And what do you think, as a lawyer, about such laws? http://www.perfilovu.narod.ru/nepozn/talmud.html
        http://spinavigator.narod.ru/ihcr_jud_forbidden_eshatology_shulhan_aruh.htm

        ...- “The property of the goy is an uninhabited corner: the first of the JEWS took possession of him, that is the master” (Baba batra, 54, 16.) ...- “Kill the best of the goyim” (Talmud, Melkhit treatise). ...- “The best of the goyim deserves death” (Aboda zara, 26, c, Tosafot.) ...- “The most honest among the goyim should be killed” (Tozefot 1, a) ...- “The shed blood of the goyim pleases God "(Nidderas-bamidebar-slave, s21) ...
    6. Fin
      Fin 23 October 2013 10: 46 New
      +7
      Quote: Professor
      For example, another law prohibits fart elevators. Well, stupid, because this is understandable. It can be understood, but if there is no prohibiting legislative act, then it will be simply impossible to punish the offender.

      That is, the mind to reach that it is indecent-impossible? And in elevators do not do this just because of fear of punishment? So maybe Zadornov is right?
      And I liked the camel. Is it a violation of the rights of a camel? And if you fish with a horse? Theater of the absurd.
      1. Professor
        Professor 23 October 2013 10: 57 New
        -8
        Quote: Fin
        And I liked the camel.

        Where is it written that it is forbidden to transport rams, donkeys or a giraffe in the Moscow metro? Now imagine a guest from the sunny south turning into the subway with his still-alive lunch. On what basis will the cop prevent him from passing (if everything is in order with registration)? After all, everything that is not forbidden is allowed. wink

        The most stupid laws

        The most stupid laws of some countries of the world
        1. The gentleman
          The gentleman 23 October 2013 11: 11 New
          +4
          [quote = professor] [quote = Fin] And I liked the camel. [/ quote]
          Where is it written that it is forbidden to transport rams, donkeys or a giraffe in the Moscow metro? Now imagine a guest from the sunny south turning into the subway with his still-alive lunch. On what basis will the cop prevent him from passing (if everything is in order with registration)? After all, everything that is not forbidden is allowed. wink


          note, references go to exceptional nations that know democracy, human rights, and the like "very well".
          1. Professor
            Professor 23 October 2013 11: 17 New
            -3
            Quote: Gentleman
            note, references go to exceptional nations that know democracy, human rights, and the like "very well".

            Of course. Where socialism and other isms are being built, everything that is not allowed is forbidden. Do you care about this when you were in the USSR?
            1. The gentleman
              The gentleman 23 October 2013 12: 49 New
              +3
              Quote: Professor
              Quote: Gentleman
              note, references go to exceptional nations that know democracy, human rights, and the like "very well".

              Of course. Where socialism and other isms are being built, everything that is not allowed is forbidden. Do you care about this when you were in the USSR?

              I dare not speak, because just a little lived in union, but my father lived, also a lawyer and you know, the jurisprudence system was strong, and you conclude, in some way, being offended.
            2. washi
              washi 23 October 2013 16: 02 New
              0
              Quote: Professor
              Quote: Gentleman
              note, references go to exceptional nations that know democracy, human rights, and the like "very well".

              Of course. Where socialism and other isms are being built, everything that is not allowed is forbidden. Do you care about this when you were in the USSR?

              Everything is allowed. But there are moral limitations. A man without them is not a man. What we can see on the example of some countries where the main animals are: eating, sleeping and sexual satisfaction. Man is self-restraint. And for this it is not necessary to write laws. Laws, as restrictions, are more likely for animals. Lying, sitting, place, etc.
              The ideal of humanity is lawlessness. This is when a person can control himself and do not stoop to instincts, controlling feelings.
              1. Professor
                Professor 23 October 2013 16: 06 New
                -3
                Quote: Vasya
                Everything is allowed. But there are moral limitations.

                Marya Ivanovna, I want to go to the USSR ... crying
                Everything is possible, but not for everyone. Try to explain to the American what a Moscow residence permit is. Good luck.
        2. Normal
          Normal 23 October 2013 11: 23 New
          13
          Quote: Professor
          Where is it written that it is forbidden to transport rams, donkeys or a giraffe in the Moscow metro?


          In the rules of using the subway.

          2.10. It is forbidden to transport in the subway (to be with him in the lobby of the stations):

          2.10.1. Bulky baggage, the sum of the measurements of which (with the exception of specially stipulated cases) in length, width (two diameters or axes at the base of the roll) and height exceeds 150 cm, long items, the length of which is more than 220 cm.

          2.10.2. Firearms, piercing and easily beating objects without covers (packaging), including skis and skates, a small garden tool with open sharp parts.

          2.10.3. Flammable, explosive, poisonous, toxic substances and objects, including household gas cylinders.

          2.10.4. Bicycles (except folding) and other vehicles, except for baby and wheelchairs.

          2.10.5. Animals and birds outside cages or special containers (bags).


          True, there is one omission. If a donkey, a ram or a giraffe is biped and especially stubborn, then of course it needs a special law. But here is a hitch; the law is not written to fools. Therefore, they need to read at least instructions.
          1. Professor
            Professor 23 October 2013 11: 26 New
            -7
            Quote: Normal
            2.10.5. Animals and birds outside cages or special containers (bags).

            Bravo. So a ram in a cage smaller than 150x220 cm can be transported. wink
            Now I know. laughing
            1. Normal
              Normal 23 October 2013 11: 44 New
              +4
              Quote: Professor
              Bravo. So a ram in a cage smaller than 150x220 cm can be transported.

              Bravo !, Professor. Especially for you again:
              Quote: Normal
              ... you need to read at least the instructions.
              completely desirable

              2.11.16/XNUMX/XNUMX. To be in dirty, stinking clotheswith luggage, items , products (including drinks and ice cream in open containers) that can stain passengers, cars, structures and devices of the station.

              2.11.17/XNUMX/XNUMX. Clog and contaminate structures, track devices, equipment, escalators, rolling stock and metro territory.
              1. Professor
                Professor 23 October 2013 11: 56 New
                -8
                I completely read everything that you posted. Let's finish this futile lesson. I hope I could convey my thought to you. Lastly: Dear policeman, a ram in a cage complies with all the rules and instructions. A cage less than 150 by 220 cm in size, ram's feces do not stain anyone, but remain on the pallet of the cage, it does not clog and contaminate buildings, since all sewage remains in it and it is not stain, fetid clothes.
                1. Thirsty for wind
                  Thirsty for wind 23 October 2013 12: 58 New
                  +1
                  How will you carry such a cage through doors or turnstiles?
                  1. washi
                    washi 23 October 2013 16: 11 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Thirsty for the wind
                    How will you carry such a cage through doors or turnstiles?

                    You are not talking about that. If necessary, then an inquiring Russian mind and rhino protects. But why? And is it necessary to strain a large number of compatriots for the sake of showing off? Especially when you consider our collectivist thinking, in contrast to the egoistic Anglo-Semitic.
                    1. Thirsty for wind
                      Thirsty for wind 23 October 2013 16: 18 New
                      +2
                      And how to hint that he is a stupid troll?
                      How to report that the fan of the old model is not fashionable?
                      Yes, and throws too thick ...

                      I'm purely out of altruistic considerations.
                2. Normal
                  Normal 23 October 2013 18: 13 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Professor
                  Let's finish this futile lesson.

                  Let's. yes But first, a few clarifications, otherwise I'm afraid that you really will drag a ram in the subway, in a cage 150 X 220 cm. laughing
                  Quote: Professor
                  I completely read everything that you posted.

                  I had to read the rules completely, and not what I posted. But even what I posted you read exclusively not carefully
                  Quote: Normal
                  2.10.1. Bulky luggage which sum of measurements(except in special cases) in length, width (two diameters or axes at the base of the roll) and height exceeds 150 cm, lengthy objects, the length of which is more than 220 cm.

                  That is, 35 X 45 X 70 cm. In total 150, no more. Boxing for cats and not large dogs. Or a length meter no more than 220 cm, that is, skis
                  Quote: Professor
                  I hope my thought, I was able to convey to you

                  The only thought that you managed to convey is that there are people of a certain mentality who believe that the rules exist in order to break them. Such people are constantly looking for ways to get around the law, find a loophole in it and "go around everyone on the curve." As a rule, such people consider themselves smarter than everyone else and treat others with contempt. Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that such people are especially common among the representatives of the "chosen" people. As a result of unjustified and overstated claims of such people, laws appear prohibiting fishing from a camel or having sex while skiing in a hammock.
                  Quote: Professor
                  Dear cop

                  Dear professor, I'm not a cop, I'm Normal hi
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. Gordeich
              Gordeich 23 October 2013 17: 16 New
              0
              Quote: Professor
              Bravo. So a ram in a cage smaller than 150x220 cm can be transported.
              Now I know.


              Bulky baggage, the SUM of measurements of LENGTH, WIDTH and HEIGHT is 150 cm, and you have a cage from some two-dimensional universe, only two-dimensional rams can be transported in it. Only the overgrown sucker will fit in the subway dimensions :-)
              1. Professor
                Professor 24 October 2013 09: 05 New
                0
                If the third dimension is not specified, then there are no restrictions on it. That's it, I'm driving a ram.
          2. Ascetic
            Ascetic 23 October 2013 15: 27 New
            +3
            Quote: Normal
            If a donkey, a ram or a giraffe is biped and especially stubborn, then of course it needs a special law


            Well conductor, scatter on the turnstile! smile
        3. MilaPhone
          MilaPhone 23 October 2013 11: 29 New
          11
          Quote: Professor
          I thought I read about the causes of Russophobia, and got on another ignorance.

          Dear professor, everything is much more complicated than you think!
          Author Vazgen Avagyan is an ardent opponent of the so-called ErEfii - a society without nationalities, where all Russians are.
          For example, here is his quote:
          "Today Erefia is apartheid with white black Russians. If the South African apartheid could appeal at least to the theory of racial inferiority of blacks, then this dubious argument is not available to the oppressors of Russians: Russians are the elite of the white race, owners of about 50% of the main patents of the world technosphere. Thus, Erefia stubbornly leaves the Russians only labor without remuneration, providing the ruling non-Russians with a huge reward without labor. I sympathize with Erefia's propagandists and would not want to be in their place for any money: it is impossible to defend such a system ideologically ... "

          Yes, for some reason this quote is not Russian, but Armenian!
          By the way, here is his quote addressed to his compatriots:
          This, of course, is about everyone who despised the law of hospitality and sat on the neck of the owner of the house. Under the law of large numbers, of course, it falls under the hot hand and the innocent, such is life. I can advise those of my compatriots who are afraid of falling under the ice rink of generally fair Russian anger: the best cure for xenophobia in Russia is the speedy and most complete return of civil and social equality to the owner of the Russian land - the Russian people. One of the aliens who are fighting for it will stand on a par with the winners and receive a well-deserved reward. But whoever AGAINST this - let him remember that historical retribution is not always proportional to deeds ...

          So, you can fart in the elevator, but only if you are alone in it and the elevator is equipped with ventilation!
        4. Ascetic
          Ascetic 23 October 2013 14: 41 New
          +3
          Quote: Professor
          Where is it written that it is forbidden to transport rams, donkeys or a giraffe in the Moscow metro?


          2.10. It is forbidden to transport in the subway (to be with him in the lobby of the stations):
          2.10.5. Animals and birds outside cages or special containers (bags)
          RULES FOR USE OF THE MOSCOW METRO
          If a ram is being transported in a cage or container, then please. In a bag or tied it is impossible, because this already contradicts the Law "On keeping pets in the city of Moscow"
          Section 11. Pet Transport Procedures

          1. On the territory of the city of Moscow it is allowed to transport pets in urban passenger transport, if during their transportation the safety of people and transported pets is ensured, and there are no obstacles to the use of transport. (in the case of a giraffe and a donkey, item 1 is violated)
          2. When transported by urban passenger transport, small pets are transported in containers or bags (baskets); when transported outside a container or bag (basket) the dog must be muzzled and on a leash.
          3. Vehicles intended for the transport of pets, containers or bags (baskets) must ensure the safety of animals, have ventilation.
          4. When transporting pets, their food and water needs must be met.

          If the conditions of carriage of a sheep correspond to paragraphs 3,4, you are welcome.
          At one time, I had to take my dog ​​of the breed Tobet to the vet by metro because he could not stand traffic jams and was nervous and poked all the aunts and cops in the nose with a printout of these laws

          We continue to learn materiel and laws
    7. Altona
      Altona 23 October 2013 11: 21 New
      11
      Citizens ridiculed American laws (no matter how strange they may be) are not aware that in America, unlike some other countries, everything that is not forbidden is allowed.
      ----------------------------
      The absence of normal human ethics, not instilled either by religious morality or by the unwritten laws of human society, give rise to laws for biorobots, whose program of existence must be restrained by such functional "filters" ...
      1. Professor
        Professor 23 October 2013 11: 23 New
        -1
        Quote: Altona
        The absence of normal human ethics, not instilled either by religious morality or by the unwritten laws of human society, give rise to laws for biorobots, whose program of existence must be restrained by such functional "filters" ...


        For example, from "ethics":
        twenty). In the same city, women are forbidden to wear stilettos.

        Reason: One stiletto woman stepped into the grate of the spillway and injured her leg. She considered that the municipality, which equipped the streets with such dangerous devices, was to blame, appealed to the court and won the case. As a result, in order to prevent similar lawsuits from appearing in the future, the city fathers considered it cheaper to pass a special law than to change the grilles.
        1. SergBrNord
          SergBrNord 23 October 2013 12: 09 New
          +4
          Quote: Professor
          Reason: One stiletto woman stepped into the grate of the spillway and injured her leg. She considered that the municipality, which equipped the streets with such dangerous devices, was to blame, appealed to the court and won the case. As a result, in order to prevent similar lawsuits from appearing in the future, the city fathers considered that cheaper adopt a special law than change the lattice.

          The essence is highlighted.
        2. Altona
          Altona 23 October 2013 14: 25 New
          +5
          Professor, you spoke just recently about tying crocodiles to a water column, which is sadism ... Now you have given an example of a heel in the storm grate - this can be considered a safety precaution ... Do you always confuse the soft with the warm in the discussion? Of course, you can carry out a bunch of prohibitions, both justified and unjustified, but if people agree with an attached crocodile, then it’s not a fact with studs ... Until the next election of the city meeting ...
          1. Professor
            Professor 23 October 2013 14: 30 New
            -5
            Here are the rules for using the subway. After all, you can also laugh with them. Well there about the passage in dirty and stinky clothes. Why aren't you funny?
            1. Altona
              Altona 23 October 2013 14: 47 New
              +4
              It’s quite reasonable rules ... There are people who have fallen and declassed, who climb into the subway to warm up ... Previously, there were hard workers from ZIL who tried to save time on changing clothes ...
              1. Ascetic
                Ascetic 23 October 2013 15: 18 New
                +4
                Quote: Altona
                . Previously, there were hard workers from ZIL trying to save time on changing clothes ...


                In Moscow in Soviet times and not only in the subway officers were forbidden to appear in field uniformsand to soldiers in everyday life if they were in solitary order and not as part of a unit under the command of a senior.
                1. Altona
                  Altona 23 October 2013 15: 29 New
                  +2
                  I didn’t even see the soldier in the field uniform on the streets of Moscow, much less in public transport ... And I lived in Moscow for about 6 years while I was studying ...
              2. Professor
                Professor 23 October 2013 15: 56 New
                -3
                Quote: Altona
                Quite reasonable rules ...

                But in the dead of New York there are no such rules. They should laugh with Muscovites and twist a finger near the temple.
                1. Altona
                  Altona 23 October 2013 19: 06 New
                  +5
                  Is the New York subway a strategic object? And what's the point of writing rules, because many blacks do not even know basic literacy? Why throw beads in front of pigs? Do you agree professor?
        3. cdrt
          cdrt 23 October 2013 19: 38 New
          0
          Quote: Professor
          the city fathers felt that it was cheaper to pass a special law than to change the grilles


          Hmm ... well, it has long been known that the rule of the majority reigns in small towns, which can be mocked at whatever they like on the majority.
          Dogville - just about this (including, IMHO)
    8. revnagan
      revnagan 23 October 2013 11: 28 New
      +4
      Quote: Professor
      if there is no law prohibiting giving cigars to cats and dogs, then there is a freak that will do this and no one can forbid him to do so.

      That's right, there are no internal brakes, the understanding of "what is good and what is bad" is lost. You can't just, humanly, at an everyday level, fill the face of a flayer. Because the people around, instead of support, will run and knock on the police. Well, in general -robots. Or spoiled, spoiled and insolent kids of rich parents.
    9. Eternal demobilization
      Eternal demobilization 23 October 2013 11: 30 New
      +3
      Well, how do you like these laws? Do not make fun of them too?

      In Tombstone, Arizona, men and women over the age of 18 are forbidden to smile if they lack more than one front tooth.

      Arkansas has a law that says: "The Arkansas River may not rise above the bridge in Little Rock. (Capital of Arkansas)

      In Indiana, bathing is prohibited between October and March.

      In the city of Chico in California, a fine of up to $ 500 threatens anyone who detonates a nuclear device within the city. (!) (I wonder who and to whom will pay 500 dollars, after the explosion))) wassat

      Do you think this is normal?
      1. Professor
        Professor 23 October 2013 11: 36 New
        -4
        Quote: Eternal demobilization
        Do you think this is normal?

        If this is normal for them, then let them use it. I do not justify their laws, but only explain the reason for their origin.
        1. The gentleman
          The gentleman 24 October 2013 10: 38 New
          0
          Quote: Professor
          Quote: Eternal demobilization
          Do you think this is normal?

          If this is normal for them, then let them use it. I do not justify their laws, but only explain the reason for their origin.

          to start, plus you! the reason for the origin of dementia, lack of culture!
      2. v.lyamkin
        v.lyamkin 24 October 2013 07: 53 New
        0
        Is there any compliance information for the Arkansas River? Interestingly interesting.
    10. sergo
      sergo 23 October 2013 11: 40 New
      +3
      since people would be normal, then laws would not have to come up with dible
    11. cdrt
      cdrt 23 October 2013 12: 17 New
      +3
      Quote: Professor
      I thought I read about the causes of Russophobia negative


      About phobias:

      Phobia - from the Greek FOBOS - fear. Irrational, obsessive, uncontrollable fear
      Here are some famous phobias:
      Claustrophobia - fear of confined space;
      Xenophobia - an obsessive fear of foreigners;
      Misophobia - fear of pollution;
      Acrophobia - fear of heights;
      Acro-dentophobia - fear of damage to teeth, falling from heights;
      Acro-Dento-Xenophobia - fear of damage to teeth by falling from a height on a foreigner;
      Floro-dentophobia - fear of being bitten by a plant;
      Erythrophobia - fear of blushing;
      Urethrophobia - fear of relieving a small need;
      Erythro-Urethrophobia - fear of reddening, relieving a small need;
      Memento-Urethrophobia - fear of forgetting to relieve a small need;
      Necrophobia - fear of the dead;
      Mobile Necrophobia - fear of the moving dead;
      Quadro Necrophobia - fear of the four dead;
      Quadro-Necro-Xenophobia - fear of four dead aliens;
      Amuro-Necro-Xenophobia - fear of falling in love with a dead alien;
      Necro-Urethrophobia - fear of the dead, celebrating a small need;
      Erythro-Urethro-Necro-Xenophobia - fear of blushing at the sight of a dead, foreigner fulfilling a small need;
      Miso-Claustro-Urethro-Necro-Xenophobia - the fear of contamination of a confined space for any needs of small need by dead foreigners:
      Mobile-Amuro-Quadro-Necro-Urethro-Xenophobi
      1. Ptah
        Ptah 23 October 2013 15: 10 New
        +1
        Quote: cdrt
        About phobias:

        There is an apotheosis of this. And the term is medical too.
        Phobophobia - fear of fear.
        And some people here have a "fear not to stick into the topic for any reason." Let it be about the bumpkin in the elevator. The "disease" is already at a fairly advanced stage.
      2. washi
        washi 23 October 2013 16: 41 New
        +1
        Why all this?
        I'm grossed out.
        And so it is clear that they are afraid of us.
        The main thing is that we do not have phobias, especially Arab and Anglophobia.
    12. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 23 October 2013 13: 06 New
      +6
      Mdya ... But nothing that the author of the article is talking about different ways of perceiving the world? In Western perception, it is necessary for a person to forbid everything that needs to be prohibited by written law. And if something is not forbidden, but he does it - well done. It’s not forbidden for cats to fry in microwave ovens and they are fried. Someone by honest stupidity ... and some by filthy sadism and benefit. Fried a cat - and to court. Millions to tear from the manufacturer, which is not prohibited in the instructions.
      How about in Russian? Does it matter whether the instruction has forbidden the cat to kill in the stove or not? Remember yet? Or did the grant get knocked out of memory? No, the author of the article has enough education and intelligence. This user under the nickname "professor" has an acute lack of conscience ...
    13. rexby63
      rexby63 23 October 2013 14: 03 New
      +1
      about the causes of Russophobia


      Why, the author told about the reasons. True, he does everything emotionally. With them you need their own weapons. Smile, smile, and then again ...! and a footboard, or even a fin in the side. It was not our idea to live with wolves, howl like a wolf. If the "bloody tyrant" after the war had fucked the whole of Europe like a dog, they would have understood this as the right of the seigneur, and would still look right in the eyes. But they were treated like people, and they themselves got it in full. Already the stars fell from the eyes
      1. washi
        washi 23 October 2013 16: 44 New
        +1
        Quote: rexby63
        about the causes of Russophobia


        Why, the author told about the reasons. True, he does everything emotionally. With them you need their own weapons. Smile, smile, and then again ...! and a footboard, or even a fin in the side. It was not our idea to live with wolves, howl like a wolf. If the "bloody tyrant" after the war had fucked the whole of Europe like a dog, they would have understood this as the right of the seigneur, and would still look right in the eyes. But they were treated like people, and they themselves got it in full. Already the stars fell from the eyes

        I do not want, for some reason, to go down. I'm better off honestly.
        You quickly get used to the bad. Then they will rise hard.
    14. washi
      washi 23 October 2013 15: 11 New
      +4
      Quote: Professor
      I thought I read about the causes of Russophobia, and got on another ignorance. negative
      Citizens ridiculed American laws (no matter how strange they may be) are not aware that in America, unlike some other countries, everything that is not forbidden is allowed. Therefore, if there is no law prohibiting giving cigars to cats and dogs, then there is a freak that will do this and no one can forbid him to do so. For example, another law prohibits fart elevators. Well, stupid, because this is understandable. It can be understood, but if there is no prohibiting legislative act, then it will be simply impossible to punish the offender.

      There is only one conclusion from your statement: they value only legal laws, and they don’t give a damn about morality and universal principles.
      Laws can be changed. The moral is harder.
      Jews were killed in the Reich under the LAW.
      You still specify why and to whom anti-Jewish laws were adopted in the 3rd Reich.
      1. Altona
        Altona 23 October 2013 20: 18 New
        +2
        And not without the participation of the Jews themselves, because Heydrich was a racial Jew ...
    15. kaktus
      kaktus 23 October 2013 19: 08 New
      0
      until you find out about some of these laws - you can’t imagine a similar thing on purpose laughing
    16. poquello
      poquello 23 October 2013 20: 24 New
      +1
      Quote: Professor
      I thought I read about the causes of Russophobia, and got on another ignorance. negative
      Citizens ridiculed American laws (no matter how strange they may be) are not aware that in America, unlike some other countries, everything that is not forbidden is allowed. Therefore, if there is no law prohibiting giving cigars to cats and dogs, then there is a freak that will do this and no one can forbid him to do so. For example, another law prohibits fart elevators. Well, stupid, because this is understandable. It can be understood, but if there is no prohibiting legislative act, then it will be simply impossible to punish the offender.

      I knew one villager - his dog smoked Belomor and drank moonshine with him. I don’t see anything damning in this.
      Prohibit farting in elevators can only be stupid, not thinking of the wording "deliberate harm."
      We do not teach you commerce.
    17. alone
      alone 23 October 2013 21: 26 New
      0
      together minus professors wassat

      professorophobia what that))
      1. poquello
        poquello 23 October 2013 21: 49 New
        +1
        Quote: lonely
        together minus professors wassat

        professorophobia what that))

        Well, for example, I just answered him, but there’s clearly nothing to put in plus for him in this case.
        1. alone
          alone 23 October 2013 22: 00 New
          +2
          Quote: poquello
          Well, for example, I just answered him, but there’s clearly nothing to put in plus for him in this case.


          yes it’s not a minus. I just noticed one circumstance. if even a professor writes something right, for example 2x2 = 4, there will certainly be those that put him a minus. hi
          1. Apollo
            Apollo 23 October 2013 22: 11 New
            +1
            Quote: lonely
            yes it’s not a minus. I just noticed one circumstance. if even a professor writes something right, for example 2x2 = 4, there will definitely be those that put him a minus


            Even if it’s right, but much depends on the style and manner of writing.
            1. Ascetic
              Ascetic 23 October 2013 22: 50 New
              +3
              Quote: Apollon
              Even if it’s right, but much depends on the style and manner of writing.

              The style crawled out and proclaimed about nothing, even having no idea in particular in the essence of this issue, gathered minuses to the turtles, the admins raised the rating and enjoyed its own greatness and irreplaceability ... however masochism.
            2. Altona
              Altona 23 October 2013 23: 43 New
              +2
              It seems to me that one should neglect frank nonsense, one should not negate arguments from the opposite, even if they are posed in an unpleasant language ... A professor sometimes asks questions in a manner of childish directness, why should he neglect him for this?
            3. alone
              alone 24 October 2013 00: 05 New
              0
              Well, everyone has their own style and manner. For example, Gromovoy has his own style, sometimes you can fall into a stupor from her articles, but this is her style. There is nothing to be done. but the truth must be appreciated and respected, whatever it may be.
          2. poquello
            poquello 23 October 2013 23: 12 New
            +1
            Quote: lonely
            Quote: poquello
            Well, for example, I just answered him, but there’s clearly nothing to put in plus for him in this case.


            yes it’s not a minus. I just noticed one circumstance. if even a professor writes something right, for example 2x2 = 4, there will certainly be those that put him a minus. hi

            Well, I don’t know, try contacting the Monument Protection Society. Quiet minusers are much more annoying.
  6. APES
    APES 23 October 2013 09: 00 New
    +2
    With this, everything is clear.
    Just what are Westphiles then called? (after all, “Westerner” is not always equal to “Russophobe”).
    What they suffer from is very interesting - I look forward to continuing.
  7. Sergeant
    Sergeant 23 October 2013 09: 01 New
    +4
    Quote: Professor
    but if there is no prohibiting legislative act, then it will be simply impossible to punish the offender.

    ... It is very actual for modern Russia: they "breed" with great force ... (and what to do with it? ..)
    Probably, a law will soon appear prohibiting riding a motorcycle on the subway or walking on the rooftops of churches ... (for example).
    The principle is the same: what is not forbidden is allowed. Any "moral brakes" in our "crappy" society are ALREADY absent ..
    Progress, however. wink
  8. andrey777
    andrey777 23 October 2013 09: 02 New
    11
    Love is the driving force, and without love, everything collapses (which happens in the West). Russia was famous for being spiritually higher. And Orthodoxy took the cross upon itself. The West turned away from its Christian roots. The Idea of ​​Russia ( as it was before) bring Orthodoxy to this world, which means peace and love.
    1. APES
      APES 23 October 2013 11: 21 New
      0
      All is well and completely agree with you, but:
      You need to start with yourself, is there a lot of love in Russia now? Are you capable of the love you taught the Savior?
      And to be honest, I am always alarmed by such pathos speech, I will explain why:
      Summarizing (Russia, the Russian people) a person who says so dissolves himself in the general mass, thereby, in fact, relieving himself of responsibility.
      Regarding Russia, I believe that the majority (the vast majority - 99,99999999999%) are Old Testament people (just in case - I also consider myself to be them), and this is clearly not enough to bring Orthodoxy to this world.
  9. Eternal demobilization
    Eternal demobilization 23 October 2013 09: 03 New
    13
    Tough man put all. +++ per article, as many as a couple of hundred +++. MenYYYYYYYYYY !!!)))
    1. Eternal demobilization
      Eternal demobilization 23 October 2013 09: 27 New
      +3
      Class))) Minus, then right now Russophobia will come running. Don’t feed bread, they will begin to come off.
  10. alekseyal
    alekseyal 23 October 2013 09: 03 New
    13
    What does the Air Defense stand for (The Great Fatherland Party)

    We believe that the Russian People (including Ukrainians and Belarusians, as it was historically) should be officially at the level of the Constitution, proclaimed a state-forming people in Russia, while maintaining the fullness of civil rights for any citizen of Russia, regardless of their ethnic origin.

    We demand by legal means to ban Russophobia and its propaganda, as well as the propaganda of everything that popularizes Nazi or separatist views, aggravates interethnic and inter-religious contradictions.

    http://партиявеликоеотечество.рф/
    1. APES
      APES 23 October 2013 11: 02 New
      -8
      The Russians have two dreams - to rid Russia of those who came in large numbers and topple it out of it themselves.

      Joke - sorry
      1. catapractic
        catapractic 23 October 2013 11: 47 New
        +6
        maybe it’s with you. I want to live on my land, the land of my ancestors according to understandable and intelligible laws.
        1. APES
          APES 23 October 2013 11: 53 New
          0
          I repeat - it was a joke.
          Regarding your post, regarding clear and intelligible laws - it’s very good, but it’s not clear how to achieve this. I am sure you have already thought about this, if it’s not difficult for you to share, your opinion is very interesting.
  11. Alexss
    Alexss 23 October 2013 09: 11 New
    -32 qualifying.
    What a bl-retelling of another Zadornov concert about America and Europe
  12. lex fim
    lex fim 23 October 2013 09: 20 New
    +8
    Yes, and in the Silicon Valley Russian more than anyone else was not.
  13. Trapperxnumx
    Trapperxnumx 23 October 2013 09: 33 New
    16
    And after all, that the most interesting - the author is really right. Take space for example - there was a confrontation with the USSR, there was a development in this direction, the USSR didn’t - nobody needs anything further than satellites, and satellites are needed only to spy and fool around (entertaining and reconnaissance). We started using the atom for peaceful purposes earlier (the first nuclear power plant and the first nuclear icebreaker). And other, other, other
  14. ed65b
    ed65b 23 October 2013 09: 42 New
    +8
    Russia has always been and will be in spite of all the machinations of ill-wishers. Never to bend us into the pose of a Greek warrior. and we can always do this with any adversary, as our history proves. Glory to Russia and its peoples.
    1. old man54
      old man54 23 October 2013 10: 00 New
      +2
      Quote: ed65b
      Russia has always been and will be in spite of all the machinations of ill-wishers.

      Well, it’s you who have so arrogantly and arrogantly declared this, dear! Everything very much depends on us, on people living in Russia and feeling themselves Russian! The fact that our ancestors did not give anyone a descent doesn’t mean anything automatically, especially in terms of dynamics since the 89 of the year, starting all the more so, alas! We will be able to defend it, Mother Russia, will be, we will not be able ... well, then why say something. hi
  15. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 23 October 2013 09: 50 New
    11
    Well, you get puffed up, but without Russians, you will choke in your own bloody vomit, because the braking mechanism is organically devoid.
    It’s precisely noticed ..! Russia always harnesses for someone, pulls away, punishes too arrogant and self-confident .. Without us, the throats would be gnawed on each other for a long time and destroyed the planet ..
    1. 222222
      222222 23 October 2013 13: 41 New
      +1
      Vazgen Avagyan: The Russian people - the martyr and the righteous - spoiled us all ...
      21.10.2013
      “I don’t know how a Ukrainian is, but any normal Armenian with his mother’s milk gets a simple thought: first think about Russia, and only then about yourself. And this is not some subtle matter, but a simple calculation: there will be no Russia - there will be no dust and from Armenia, and from the Armenians. The words "Russia" and "Life" for many centuries of our history were synonyms for us. You can say - "we live", or you can say - "there is Great Russia" without any loss of meaning "
      http://globalconflict.ru/analytics/38132-vazgen-avagyan-russkij-narod-muchenik-i
      -pravednik-izbaloval-vsex-nas
      1. APES
        APES 23 October 2013 15: 15 New
        +3
        It is not sad, but many Armenians care about Russia and even the Russian people more than most Russians. Sometimes it even seems that on 100 such Armenians are one similar Russian.
        PS
        Regarding Ukrainian, Belarusian, Russian - this is one people, and no one will convince me otherwise.
        1. Ivan Sirko
          Ivan Sirko 23 October 2013 20: 48 New
          -3
          Regarding Ukrainian, Belarusian, Russian - this is one people, and no one will convince me otherwise.

          Yeah, and the earth is flat and no one will convince me otherwise. laughing
  16. vlad.svargin
    vlad.svargin 23 October 2013 09: 54 New
    +9
    Specially introduced Russophobia on the so-called liberal ground comes from the propaganda of the media, as a concept of Tsarist and then Communist Russia, as a “prison of peoples”, as a force that suppresses and oppresses all manifestations of freedom, both inside and outside, and about Russians - as agents of this power, which was aphoristically expressed in the well-known definition of Russia as “international gendarme.” (The origins of Russophobia and its purpose. Evgeny Tarasov)

    The article does not quite accurately explain the nature and purpose of directed Russophobia. This is the struggle of the international mafia against the titular nation of Rus. The purpose of the sources of Russophobia:
    1) Undermine the faith of Russian people in their own strength.
    2) Weaken as a titular nation and undermine its authority in front of other peoples.
    3) In the end, to seize the natural wealth of Russia and its land.
    And, pay attention, the "elite" of neighboring states and small nations are mainly seen in Russophobia. This is an ideological weapon, and in our country, first of all, the weapon of the strata that seized power and plundered the national wealth of the country and agitating the building of a society on a Western European model. American society (propaganda of lifestyle from all media) This is the so-called. "agents of influence". In one thing, the author is right that some people, as a result of their low mentality, "pick up" this ideological "tale" by adding their own (looking for the "culprit" of their failures-his "show" authoritative "publications)
    1. 222222
      222222 23 October 2013 14: 12 New
      +1
      In the literal translation, “phobia” means fear. At present, this term denotes a specific type of fear - an irrational, unexplained by objective reasons, constant fear in relation to any object, action or situation.
  17. Revolver
    Revolver 23 October 2013 10: 44 New
    +6
    Russophobia is the lot of aggressive savagery, militant ignorance, which rebel against culture and awaken the beast in a person.
    Well why. The same Zbigniew Brzezinski is quite cultural, polished, with a brilliant education, and in general noble origin, already has a coat of arms. In this russophobe what to look for. Such as he is an order of magnitude more dangerous than any primitives, such as a zapadent who grabbed an excess of torpor and screaming some thread with nonsense about damned scribbles. By the way, Brzezinski is not only a Russophobe, he is also an anti-Semite in addition.
    1. Starfish
      Starfish 23 October 2013 11: 12 New
      +1
      By the way, Brzezinski is not only a Russophobe, he is also an anti-Semite in addition.

      where did you get that?
      1. catapractic
        catapractic 23 October 2013 11: 42 New
        0
        this is by the way the well-known proud nobleman
      2. Revolver
        Revolver 23 October 2013 21: 58 New
        0
        Quote: Starfish
        By the way, Brzezinski is not only a Russophobe, he is also an anti-Semite in addition.

        where did you get that?

        Yes, from his relationship to Israel. It is lazy to look, but he let go of such pearls about Israel that without knowing authorship, one would think that Arafat.
  18. SPLV
    SPLV 23 October 2013 10: 56 New
    0
    Russophobia is a private moment of politics to achieve its goal by any means. And dark savages and ignorant Russophobes are most often renegades of their own people.
  19. mivmim
    mivmim 23 October 2013 11: 13 New
    +3
    Great advantage. Very good rubanul. ++++++++++++
  20. Nomad
    Nomad 23 October 2013 11: 26 New
    -6
    "Russophobes are always savages and ignoramuses!"
    Russian chauvinists and xenophobes too.
    1. Trapperxnumx
      Trapperxnumx 23 October 2013 12: 02 New
      +4
      Quote: Nomad
      "Russophobes are always savages and ignoramuses!"
      Russian chauvinists and xenophobes too.


      The emergence of Russian chauvinism is just a response. I do not advocate chauvinism, I just state a fact. Many go to nationalists because they want to do something for Russia and its people, but they don’t see otherwise how they can help.
      1. Ptah
        Ptah 23 October 2013 15: 18 New
        +4
        Quote: Trapper7
        Many go to nationalists because they want to do something for Russia and its people, but they don’t see otherwise how they can help.


        "Nationalism, for me, is so natural that it will never, under any order, wished by the" internationalists "to fade away. For peoples like the Russian, the savagery of the doctrine of the dangers of patriotism is so obvious that one should not even mention it."

        /DI. Mendeleev /
  21. catapractic
    catapractic 23 October 2013 11: 36 New
    +3
    phobes are always savages and ignoramuses
  22. hrych
    hrych 23 October 2013 12: 04 New
    14
    Comrades, do not minus the Professor's colleague, he is an ethnic Pharisee (no offense), everything is also stipulated in the Talmud, such as: "Can a rabbi urinate from the roof of the synagogue or not? Answer:" Maybe, but the main thing is not to piss on the synagogue. " Just as the Professor will not understand the essence of the Russians, although he lived between them for years, you will not understand the Professor, especially in material matters, he remembered going for inquiries, and he noticed the Cathedral of the Blessed One, but did not see it. It is a normal phenomenon, so the person went there , where the same worldview, so I personally always respect the Jews who left for Israel and am wary of the diaspora parasites. As an experienced Pharisee, the Professor took your discussion to the back staircase, that is, to the anus. Again he has a plus and respect, and you are naive.
    1. hrych
      hrych 23 October 2013 12: 10 New
      +6
      The mentality, however.
      1. MilaPhone
        MilaPhone 23 October 2013 13: 05 New
        +5
        Dear Khrych, I doubt that Professor Russophobe, he just loves to argue in the hope of seeing the birth of truth. I am sure that on Israeli sites he was known as a Russophile!

        "Garik" from Igor Guberman :
        Oh, how would we for our things
        I didn’t have to pay the bill ...
        Jew! So much in this sound
        For the heart of the Russian has merged!
        1. hrych
          hrych 23 October 2013 13: 26 New
          +5
          But, something led him to discuss an article about Russophobia, and this is extremely suspicious. The professor just doesn't show up, I think there is a "conspiracy theory"bully
          1. Ascetic
            Ascetic 23 October 2013 23: 24 New
            +4
            Quote: hrych
            But, something led him to discuss an article about Russophobia, and this is extremely suspicious. The professor just doesn't show up, I think there is a "conspiracy theory"


            Russophobia (there’s not even Russophobia because nationality does not matter to him except Jewish, but obstinacy and unwaveringness in one’s own infallibility) and led, I remember some of his comments about the USSR were imbued directly with bestial hatred, which in general all became clear though he is trying in every possible way to build himself an unbiased and independent expert on almost all issues.
            And his phrase
            -Im free person
            it just touches me.
            Robinson Crusoe pancake on a virtual island. A clinical case of brainwashed sterility
    2. Pinochet000
      Pinochet000 23 October 2013 13: 13 New
      +2
      Quote: hrych
      The professor led your discussion to the back stairs,

      Exactly so, it is no coincidence that a photo of the same Phareseus on the avatar, Newton, a "new tone" who like something discovered there, actually rethought (and I think distorted) ancient knowledge. It is necessary to recheck everything, because science is accepted as well as religions ... on Faith.
  23. sergerz
    sergerz 23 October 2013 12: 16 New
    +3
    At heart, I myself think so. I can not say. Thanks to the author - said.
  24. Eternal demobilization
    Eternal demobilization 23 October 2013 12: 52 New
    +3
    Quote: Professor
    Quote: Eternal demobilization
    Do you think this is normal?

    If this is normal for them, then let them use it. I do not justify their laws, but only explain the reason for their origin.


    How do you know the reason for their origin? Have you personally attended the adoption of these "laws"? IMHO, Adoption of such laws, and says that they began to degrade in the century before last, if not earlier.
    1. Professor
      Professor 23 October 2013 13: 47 New
      -1
      Quote: Eternal demobilization
      How do you know the reason for their origin? Have you personally attended the adoption of these "laws"?

      And you follow the link, it describes the reason for their adoption.

      Quote: Gentleman
      and you conclude, in some way, being offended.

      Not offended, but with the ability to compare. For example, a notification system for starting a business is better for me than a permissive system.

      Quote: Thirsty for the Wind
      How will you carry such a cage through doors or turnstiles?

      The whole village. The main thing is not forbidden after all. wink
      1. Setrac
        Setrac 23 October 2013 16: 09 New
        0
        Quote: Professor
        For example, a notification system for starting a business is better for me than a permissive system.

        And what is the difference? What difference does it call IT?
        1. Professor
          Professor 23 October 2013 16: 14 New
          +1
          Quote: Setrac
          And what is the difference? What difference does it call IT?

          The difference is both heaven and earth. In the first case, nothing depends on the official and he cannot forbid me, and in the second case, everything depends on him. I want permission, but I don’t want to torment myself to run for inquiries.
  25. Xoxoxnumxun
    Xoxoxnumxun 23 October 2013 13: 04 New
    +5
    What is there to discuss? Best of all, and at all times, A.S. Pushkin already said everything:

    What are you talking about, folk orbits?
    Why anathema threaten you Russia?
    What angered you? unrest in Lithuania?
    Leave: this is a dispute between the Slavs,
    Home, old dispute, weighted by fate,
    A question that you will not solve.

    For a long time among themselves
    These tribes are at war;
    More than once bowed under a thunderstorm
    Theirs, then our side.
    Who will stand in an unequal dispute:
    Puffy Lyakh, il true Ross?
    Will Slavic streams merge in the Russian sea?
    Will it run dry? here is the question.

    Leave us: you have not read
    These bloody tablets;
    It’s incomprehensible to you, alien to you
    This is a family feud;
    The Kremlin and Prague are silent for you;
    Pointlessly seduces you
    Fights of desperate courage -
    And you hate us ...

    For what? answer: for whether
    What is on the ruins of flaming Moscow
    We did not recognize the brazen will
    Who were you trembling under?
    For the fact that they plunged into the abyss
    We are idol over kingdoms
    And redeemed with our blood
    Europe, freedom, honor and peace? ..

    You are formidable in words - try it in practice!
    Or the old hero, deceased on his bed,
    Unable to screw up your Izmail bayonet?
    Is the Russian tsar already powerless to speak?
    Or should we argue with Europe new?
    Il Russian weaned from victories?
    Or a little of us? Or from Perm to Tauris,
    From the Finnish cold rocks to the flaming Colchis,
    From the shocked Kremlin
    To the walls of immobile China,
    Shiny bristles,
    Will not the Russian land rise? ..
    So send us to us, Vitia,
    His angry sons:
    There is a place for them in the fields of Russia,
    Among the coffins that are not theirs.
    1. Altona
      Altona 23 October 2013 23: 57 New
      +2
      Pushkin is a genius for all time, a man was already creating almost 200 years ago, but everything to the point, everything to the eye ... And mind you, not a Slav, the son of a migrant, in "modern" language ... And even an African ... But he grew up on Russian culture, worked in the name of the Russian people, directed all the liveliness of the language to gratitude to the cold country that accepted him, gave him an education ... And this despite a bunch of envious and intriguing people ...
  26. Gronsky
    Gronsky 23 October 2013 13: 11 New
    +3
    Respected Professor and just argues from the standpoint of the Westernizing mentality, his opponents from the standpoint of our Eastern worldview. And to argue here is pointless. It is in the world and it is otherwise.
  27. Troy
    Troy 23 October 2013 13: 22 New
    +2
    Super article, respect to the author hi Articles in this vein need more and more often. Look how the amers have been propagated that they are the most correct, no worse than in our USSR. And we need to revive such propaganda on the radio, in the cinema, in literature. Where are our films about how we wet the bad guys from the USA? Where are our dumb yankee comedies? It all has to be, and whatever you look, Americans are super heroes everywhere, and we are stupid people in earflaps and under a chorus. And young people have an inferiority complex.
  28. Sosland
    Sosland 23 October 2013 13: 34 New
    +3
    :) Vasily Stalin as a child secretly whispered to his sister Svetlana "our dad used to be a Georgian"
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. Goodmen
    Goodmen 23 October 2013 13: 44 New
    +5
    It’s fashionable now: “The one who says:“ Russia is for Russians, ”you know, it’s hard to resist not giving characteristics to these people, these are either dishonorable people who don’t understand what they’re saying and then they’re just a fool ..ki, or provocateurs, because Russia is a multinational country. ” V.V. Putin

    And below continuous extremism and incitement !!!! ))))))))))

    Well, and who in the end pr..idu..rok? )))))))))
  31. Silkway0026
    Silkway0026 23 October 2013 13: 52 New
    +7
    Any normal person understands that such a panopticon should not be allowed.
    .

    Vazgen, take off my hat. I think not.
  32. Eternal demobilization
    Eternal demobilization 23 October 2013 13: 56 New
    0
    [quote = professor] [quote = Eternal demobilization] How do you know the reason for their origin? Have you personally attended the adoption of these "laws"? [/ quote]
    And you follow the link, it describes the reason for their adoption.
    If it doesn’t make it difficult, discard the link, otherwise I just can’t find something. This is not a joke, I just want to see it. Thanks in advance.
  33. Eternal demobilization
    Eternal demobilization 23 October 2013 14: 01 New
    +6
    But such laws, I would welcome. good

    Singapore:
    If a person is caught three times for throwing garbage in the street, the offender must wash the streets on Sundays by putting on the sign “I - litter”. Similar punishments are broadcast on local television.
  34. dropout
    dropout 23 October 2013 14: 14 New
    +3
    There are six in the elevator. I would like to see the process of identifying the offender. And listen to the witnesses in court. Then you can not go to the circus for the rest of my life.
  35. The comment was deleted.
  36. Avenger711
    Avenger711 23 October 2013 14: 31 New
    -6
    Take, for example, language. Russian language is as close as possible to Paleo-Sanskrit, to the great language of Indo-European civilization. Modern European languages ​​were born from the mixing of this language with the adverbs of the natives of ancient Europe. The natives did not enrich these languages ​​of Europe, but on the contrary, they primitivized them. They are objectively poorer in Russian in terms of meanings and shades of words, vocabulary, phonetics, grammatical system, etc. For word formation, European languages ​​use more primitive methods, in them word formative mechanisms are undeveloped and defective. This gives rise to a kind of inferiority complex among the speakers of European languages, which develops into a thirst for revenge on inaccessible flourishing complexity, and is reborn from people with deceitful mind into Russophobia.


    What ridiculous chauvinism? And where did you get the idea that isolating (English, Chinese, Bulgarian), or agglutinative (Turkic, Japanese) languages ​​are worse than inflective (Russian, German)? Yes, and in many ways it is the simplicity of the English language that provides it now so widely. And believe me, some German, as a rule, has no idea how complicated Russian is.

    It was the Russian tsars who came up with detente, disarmament and international arbitration


    The first arms limitation treaties date back to the very time when local powers were just beginning to appear and who also needed to think that each hoplite needs to be equipped, and the metal deficit, like the work of the blacksmiths, needs to be trained and fed all the time, this is in conditions of low labor productivity. Well, what is it worth keeping the cavalryman and his horse, and the cavalry horse is a beast larger than the usual peasant horse, this problem remained relevant even in the 19-20 centuries. So they took interpreters and went to the neighbors to negotiate.

    The Russian weakness lies in the fact that the Russians, having built something, immediately break it and start building a new one, and people who are less active get more material benefit from the built because they do not break right away.


    Why would this be? And why is this not Russophobia?
  37. Altona
    Altona 23 October 2013 14: 33 New
    +7
    In general, the article is a little far-fetched ... Not all Russophobes are ignorant, of course, there are simply ideological Russophobes and there are Russophobes "zombified" ... Russophobia, in my opinion, is a good reason that can explain everything ... It's like rabid anti-Americanism. .. No money, damn Moscow occupation ... No industrial growth, Russians are shitting again ... And so on ... This is an easy argument to justify its inferiority and insolvency ... How else to explain the disappearance of fat? Of course, it wound around the tracks of the departing Russian tanks ...
  38. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 23 October 2013 14: 54 New
    +5
    The power of reason with which Russia resists the penetration of Western ugly "values". There are unshakable, bright concepts that are the basis, the foundation of the existence of the country: Fathers and grandfathers, parents, children, homeland. Russia is strong in these concepts. The current advanced Western "philanthropists" are trying to replace these holy concepts with a set of legalized stamps (parent # 1, parent # 2, instead of father, mother, in France, etc.) In Russia, this will not work! We are not such a people.
  39. leon-iv
    leon-iv 23 October 2013 15: 58 New
    +2
    Cho is here again looking for yavreys for pogroms? wassat
    1. Goodmen
      Goodmen 23 October 2013 16: 05 New
      +1
      And you read, you look and the question itself will disappear)))))
      1. leon-iv
        leon-iv 23 October 2013 16: 15 New
        +1
        I don’t like to write to politota.
  40. In the book
    In the book 23 October 2013 17: 46 New
    +1
    Quote: Ascetic
    In any transactions, they relied rather not on lawyers and lawyers, but on an honest merchant's word, which was more terrible to break than the letter of the law and not because of fear of responsibility under the law, but because of the complete loss of legitimacy in society and, accordingly, the loss of their business. Even the word wealth had a different meaning as God-given, which must be shared with compatriots. This is the origin of the tradition to create good (charity) not as a duty under the law, but as a natural necessity. It was considered bad manners in society if a wealthy person did not engage in any "godly activities". In the west, this sponsorship is usually for the purpose of acquiring any tax or other benefits. Even the word PEACE has a meaning with us as a human community (we will build a house with the whole world, and death is red)

    Don't you think that all this has long been forgotten and abandoned? And "business" now, as a rule, is not business, but theft, deception of their own kind. Human values ​​like culture, charity, kindness, empathy are almost completely discounted. It touches me when the nouveau riche, who does not pay their employees wages or pays them the minimum wage, opens art galleries "named after themselves beloved" from the zombie screen, and his wife promotes condoms as a means of fighting AIDS. Despite the fact that these spouses made one of the largest purchases of real estate in the capital of a foggy island state.
  41. Was mammoth
    Was mammoth 23 October 2013 18: 21 New
    -3
    “It’s difficult, but I’ll explain it to you with simple examples. For example, if every day you reduce the horse's feed rate by a few grams, then for some time there will be savings in feed, and the horse will not feel anything. But as a result of this line, the horse once, before or later, it will inevitably die, ie the system will collapse, curl up Another well-known example: if you put a frog in a pot of cold water and slowly bring the water to a boil, then the frog will not feel anything: it will not even try to jump out - it will just gradually cook and die . "
    Strong examples. After them, I somehow can’t understand the author. Thoughts somehow in my head - is he not a sadist?
  42. Black
    Black 23 October 2013 18: 29 New
    +1
    I read the comments ...
    The professor was nominated for the most part. But in essence, he was initially right in the article; there is no analysis of the causes and conditions for the emergence and tenacity of Russophobia. The given examples of amusing amer laws generally do with it? Let them tie crocodiles at least for the eggs, the attitude to the Russian does not change.
  43. VikDok
    VikDok 23 October 2013 19: 37 New
    +4
    Be russian
    (author of the poem - Evgeny Skvoreshnev)

    Being Russian is not a merit, but a burden.
    When the alarm is on the run,
    Hold the belly of kurguzo,
    We grab hold of it and take it down.

    Forget about your own trouble and pain,
    Not getting smarter at all until gray ...
    To be Russian means to be a warrior in the field,
    Even if you are alone in this field.

    Being Russian is not a reward, but a retribution.
    Because the world’s soul is rebellious,
    You stand up for a stranger, like a brother,
    And then he will sell you ...

    Being Russian is shameful and shameful,
    When we are behind the barbed line
    They used to harvest their grain
    For children not a Russian, but a stranger.

    We are Russians. We fool around and pamper
    When grabbing the snow with a hangover mouth
    To any hell we climb with a kiss
    Expecting a bloodstream then ...

    The people live, guided by a gloomy fate,
    For the fatherly way and his image
    Trustingly paying for the skin,
    Although, more often - the head.

    We are Russians. We are with unholy love
    Breaking fraternally poor loaf,
    And in gratitude we hear above ourselves
    Just two words: “it is necessary!” And “come on!”

    Being Russian is not a joy, but a poison,
    With unproductive sadness on the brow
    Paying from ancient times - generously and bloodily -
    Because you live on your own land.

    Being Russian means blocking the way for bandits,
    That trample our land with a boot.
    To be Russian means to be killed
    Fellow more often than the enemy.

    To be Russian means to stand against the wall,
    And let the whole bastard shoot you
    But before her don't fall on her knees,
    Mercy, grabbing the boot, asking.

    Being Russian is a job, duty and share
    Protect the holy honor of the earth
    From the aliens that their Talmud is musol,
    Two thousand years led us to the abyss.

    We are Russians. We are on the chopping block
    Casting an eye over my father’s eye,
    But the beggar’s last shirt,
    Without delay, we habitually give.

    To be Russian is providence and right,
    Not fearing either a bullet or a knife,
    Stubbing stubbornly and rough,
    Not inferior to the mates of the line.

    To be Russian means to grow bread in bad weather.
    And there is no rain - even with blood drizzle.
    But still, what happiness is it -
    Be Russian! Among the Russians! In Russia!

    I grow Russian and tender seed
    Not because someone else’s clan is filthy,
    But let the tribe describe it like this
    Some Jew or gypsy.

    To be Russian means to be in reliable strength.
    And despise the native land bargaining.
    It’s not for nothing that the Suvorov rivers under Izmail:
    - We are Russians! Hooray! What a delight! ..

    I am Russian! Heart, spirit, jerk of the skin.
    I am proud of my ancient nickname.
    Don’t give me at least for a moment, at least in some way, God,
    Not to become Russian, but someone else! ..
  44. shpuntik
    shpuntik 23 October 2013 19: 42 New
    +3
    Russophobes in the Balkans, for example, are buckets filled with the eyes of political opponents.

    Article +. Here is a photo that went around all the newspapers:
    French Muslim Christopher Case holds the head of the Serbian soldier Blagoe Blagojevic. Surroundings of Sarajevo, Yugoslavia. July 1992

    Bosnian Mujahideen captured at least 7 Serbian soldiers. All the prisoners were cut off their heads and later posed with them in front of American journalists.


    http://homshevg.ru/parohiane.htm
    http://vk.com/wall-33685562_110780
    http://myblogjoker777.blogspot.ru/2011/05/blog-post_28.html
  45. Analyst
    Analyst 23 October 2013 20: 17 New
    0
    it is forbidden to fish sitting on a camel

    So gentlemen Russians, do not rent a camel to fish in Idaho.
  46. Analyst
    Analyst 23 October 2013 20: 47 New
    0
    Phobia means fear, so the more Russophobes, the more we are afraid.
  47. Ivan Sirko
    Ivan Sirko 23 October 2013 21: 12 New
    -4
    In the event of another pogrom, ask for a passport so that Vazgen Avagyan doesn’t accidentally get caught. He will be offended, you know.
    In general, Vazgenchik, you go and look at the "rich" eastern regions of Ukraine. You will be unpleasantly surprised and your whole theory, inspired by the swamp climate, will collapse like a house of cards.
    PS Do not poke in the entrances, comrades.
    1. avg
      avg 23 October 2013 23: 07 New
      0
      Ivan Sirko
      PS Do not poke in the entrances, comrades.

      Vanya, well, you shouldn’t substitute your nickname (last name) like that wink
      1. Ivan Sirko
        Ivan Sirko 24 October 2013 19: 50 New
        0
        I don’t understand. Translate.
  48. poquello
    poquello 23 October 2013 21: 28 New
    +1
    "Swedish course" Modern family ""

    “It remains unclear whether public masturbation can be viewed as a violation of other parts of Swedish law.

    “Apparently, according to the judges, masturbating on the beach is normal and even legal, although this act can be regarded as hooliganism,” Olof Vretammar, public prosecutor, said.

    He added that he did not intend to appeal the court decision.

    The court did not take into account the fact that the elderly masturbator could be seen by children. This is all the more surprising given that, according to experts, the Swedish system is very sensitive to the protection of children's rights. "
    http://www.vz.ru/news/2013/9/20/651339.html
  49. rodevaan
    rodevaan 23 October 2013 22: 20 New
    +1
    The Russians are the bearers of the civilizational principle that Europeans have already lost to a large extent, and therefore it is the Russians who attract the fury of savages. Everything is very simple here: the more savagery - the greater the fury. The most primitive Europeans are most Russophobia. If the monkeys could understand the national question, they would be the most exemplary Russophobes on the planet. Because a parody of a person always internally believes that, on the contrary, a person is a parody of it ...


    - That's right! See how always Russian people were more spiritual and morally superior to any Westernoid? In terms of morality and internal development, they still have to crawl and crawl.
    The real development of man is determined not by the presence of computers and drones, but by internal development and internal culture ...
  50. Bosk
    Bosk 23 October 2013 22: 22 New
    0
    But really, among really thinking people ... phobias are rare.