Military Review

On the military alliance of Israel and Saudi Arabia against Iran

38
On the military alliance of Israel and Saudi Arabia against Iran

The Saudi Arabian Ministry of Defense has placed an order with the United States for the supply of high-tech cruise missiles and aviation bombs totaling $ 6,8 billion. The contract is expected to be signed within a month after the application is approved by Congress. According to the Pentagon's Office of Military Cooperation (DSCA), the supply of arms will not change the military balance in the region and does not pose a threat to neighboring states. Is it so? Now, when Israel and Saudi Arabia are discussing the possibility of a military alliance against Iran, this deal looks like a military strengthening of the Arab-Israeli alliance, the likelihood of which is taking on real shape ...


Tel Aviv and Riyadh perceived the US refusal to launch a military strike on Syria and President Obama’s first steps to normalize relations with Tehran as the beginning of the White House’s new stage of transformation of the geopolitical structure of the Middle East. The Saudi royal family, unhappy with Obama’s policy, responded asymmetrically to Washington, challenging the United Nations. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) was the first state to refuse membership in the UN Security Council, making claims to the activities of the Security Council. Riyadh is not satisfied with the fact that Bashar Asad still remains in power, there is no success in resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, and besides, according to Saudi diplomats, the UN has not made sufficient efforts to ensure that the Middle East becomes free. from weapons mass destruction (meaning the Iranian nuclear program).

The Russian Foreign Ministry called the Saudis demarche "strange." It is obvious that the accusations against the Security Council in the context of the Syrian crisis are anti-Russian. Earlier, Russia and China three times blocked the resolution of the Council, tougher sanctions against Syria. Arab UN member countries also do not hide their bewilderment by Saudi Arabia’s refusal of honorary status and urge Riyadh to reconsider, at least in order to ensure the representation of the Arab world in the Security Council. The Saudi leadership, however, argues that "the working methods of the Security Council do not allow it to carry out functions to maintain international peace and security." So the monarchy responds to the United Nations rejection of the Saudi calls for armed intervention in the Syrian conflict and the resolution of the Iranian nuclear issue through military force.

Riyadh is not the first time declares its claims to dominance in the region of the Middle East. It came to the point that the Saudi leadership was offering Barack Obama to pay for a military operation against Syria in the days of the Syrian confrontation, as if it was a question of the services of an assassin. The White House’s refusal to take military punitive measures against the Syrian government caused deep disappointment of the Arab sheiks. Washington has been criticized for failing to carry out its own threats.

Dissatisfaction with Obama’s policies was even more pronounced in Saudi estimates of the first signs of a thaw in Iranian-American relations. Riyadh concluded that the United States and Iran are secretly planning a strategic alliance aimed at weakening Saudi influence. There is nothing unexpected in the fact that rapprochement with Iran may meet the regional interests of America. According to the Americans themselves, the option of control over the Middle East, which would not allow any of the countries to become an unconditional military leader with claims to the role of a regional superpower, is beneficial for the United States. The classic way to achieve this goal is to maintain the balance of power and at the same time maintain constant tension in relations between rival states, in this case Saudi Arabia and Iran.

The longstanding one-sided orientation in the Islamic world to Saudi Arabia led the United States to lose influence among Shiites, and Sunni Islam under Saudi influence adopted an anti-American course. Riyadh not only finances foreign military intervention in Syria, Saudi special services support terrorist Sunni militant groups in all countries from Algeria to Pakistan, including the Taliban fighting with the Americans in Afghanistan. Further unconditional friendship with Riyadh has become dangerous for the United States, and the assumption that soon Washington’s foreign policy will stop serving the interests of Saudi Arabia seems to be quite reasonable.

Of course, Washington’s rapprochement with Tehran does not guarantee a significant strengthening of the US position in the world of Shiite Islam, but a chance for a decline in anti-American sentiment arises in a number of countries of the Greater Middle East. These are Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Bahrain and Afghanistan. In addition, a “reset” of relations with Iran would allow the United States to avoid the threat of being dragged by allied commitments into a war to protect Saudi Arabia. Nevertheless, Washington still permits the forceful “closure” of the Iranian nuclear dossier by attacking Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. Israel strongly insists on this scenario. Saudi Arabia does not hide its interest in the military crushing of nuclear facilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Tel Aviv announced its readiness for an independent operation against Iran. The direction of strikes on Iran through the territory of KSA is considered by the Israeli military to be among the main ones. In addition to hostility towards Iran, Israel and Saudi Arabia have a common goal of overthrowing the regime in Syria, Tel Aviv and Riyadh agree in support of the military government in Egypt, they also found a common language regarding the inadmissibility of enhancing the geopolitical role of their common rival Turkey. Information about the secret negotiations of Israel and Saudi Arabia for several years is not among the sensational. Even contrary to US plans, the world can witness the emergence of a seemingly unlikely Arab-Israeli alliance, claiming the role of a “collective superpower” region.

This autumn brought chaos to the ranks of the American allies. The plans of the US military action in Syria were not supported by the most loyal ally of Great Britain, the overwhelming majority of NATO countries refused to participate in this adventure, the leaders of many other allied states declined solidarity with President Obama, and now the long-term Middle Eastern partners claim independence in resolving the issue of war with Iran.

There are already a lot of examples of Israeli amateur performance. More than a quarter of a century ago, in 1981, Israel destroyed the Iraqi Ozirak nuclear reactor shortly before its commissioning. The Reagan administration then officially condemned the attack, but the Israelis consider it one of their most successful military operations. In 2007, Israel launched air strikes on the allegedly unfinished Syrians in a desert area in the east of the country to the Al-Kibar reactor, which the IAEA did not know about to demonstrate its determination to destroy the nuclear projects of neighboring countries in their infancy. Then the Bush administration was divided in its assessment of this attack, and many high-ranking politicians in the United States still believe that the raid was premature. In May of this year, Israel struck at Damascus airport, as well as at several missile bases in Syria. The real goal of Israeli air strikes against Syrian military facilities was to test the possibility of overflying this Arab country in order to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities. Such rehearsals of the beginning of the war are held by Tel Aviv without regard to the reaction of the world community. The UN has not responded to any of the latest Israeli armed action in Syria.

Saudi Arabia, unlike Israel, makes its debut publicly these days in the role of a UN authority repudiator for the first time, but the royal family prepared for many years to enter this dangerous trail, closely linking their foreign policy activities with the support of international terrorist organizations. Talking about the moral principles of Saudi diplomacy has not been adopted for a long time, and therefore the consent of Saudi Arabia to provide the Israelis with a military corridor can be viewed as participating in strikes against Iran.

It is also about the temporary basing of aircraft at Saudi air bases. Israeli Air Force transport aircraft have already been spotted in Saudi Arabia for unloading ammunition, which in the event of war with Iran is more convenient to have here, at hand. And it is even better for Israel if the Saudi military pay for the cruise missiles and aerial bombs for these purposes and deliver them from the United States themselves. This is the main point of the new order of the KSA Defense Ministry, which costs almost 7 billion dollars. In the nomenclature of the supply of more than 90%, it is ammunition for American-made fighter-bombers that are in service with the Air Force and Israel and Saudi Arabia. By endorsing this contract, the US Congress will give the green light to the dangerous designs of Tel Aviv and Riyadh, and the American military contingent in the Persian Gulf will be embroiled in a dangerous adventure by the two allies who have come out of obedience.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.fondsk.ru/
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. andrei332809
    andrei332809 23 October 2013 18: 26
    +7
    they want Iran to fill up. and then what? How will Arabs and Jews share laurels? the Saudis need to yell for Israel to get rid of the comp. otherwise, after hunting for Iran, Jews will start hunting for the Sauds themselves. And on whose side the Yankees will be, everyone probably knows. Well, Jews don’t get used to cooking porridge even with the devil, if it’s profitable
    1. Civil
      Civil 23 October 2013 18: 47
      +1
      Well dk, you need democracy in Iran, otherwise the oil just disappears.
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 24 October 2013 07: 37
        0
        Well, Debka writes that Russia and Iran are beginning to lay an unprecedented basis for military ties, and this is challenging America.
        It is good that they have not yet written that this undermines the foundations of democracy and stability in the region.
        Like the union of Saudi Arabia and Israel does not counterbalance the peaceful conversation between the United States and Iran.
    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 23 October 2013 18: 54
      +1
      Yes, just a little different

      Saudi Arabia abandoned strategic partnership with the US


      The head of Saudi intelligence, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, announced a “sharp turn” in his country's foreign policy. According to him, from now on, the kingdom will no longer focus on Washington, which ignores the interests of Riyadh. If this information is confirmed, the Middle East and the world as a whole are waiting for big changes.

      http://lenta.ru/articles/2013/10/23/unfriended/
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. hrych
        hrych 23 October 2013 20: 34
        +4
        What a disgusting face this beautiful prince has!
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. zvereok
        zvereok 23 October 2013 21: 34
        +1
        Hitler Muslim?
      5. Botanologist
        Botanologist 23 October 2013 22: 29
        +2
        Quote: Sith Lord
        If this information is confirmed, the Middle East and the world as a whole are waiting for big changes.


        If this information is confirmed, major changes await Saudi Arabia in the first place. crying
      6. Russ69
        Russ69 23 October 2013 22: 56
        +2
        Quote: Sith Lord
        Saudi Arabia abandoned strategic partnership with the US

        It seems to me that this is only a temporary political demarche, without a serious continuation.
      7. mirag2
        mirag2 24 October 2013 07: 27
        +1
        Here's what is coming: an explosive mixture is formed from the terrorist state of Saudi Arabia (the Wahhabis have the status of an official party) + Israel, which does not follow any principles in politics, except for its own shirt closer to the body (apartheid of pure water, the Jews themselves say so, even if the Pimpled strains typing the question: "reference").
        These two countries are unprincipled and accustomed to getting what they need, from the golden subway and snow in the desert to the war they only need, where the Americans will die (the life of a Jew is expensive, this is not a penny's life).
        That’s what it will turn out to be — an interesting question.
        But it seems that the indestructible union of Israel and the States cracked, and this is important, because if the interaction between the States and Israel begins to fall apart, the Jews will have to act differently, exposing their interests (usually masked) for the world.
        I believe that the US does not need to build its policy around the interests of Israel.
        Of course, in the USA there is such a powerful Jewish lobby (only the Saudi lobby is almost equal to it) that it is almost an impossible thing, but possible, because it started to happen.
        I wonder what groups of congressmen-senators are promoting whose interests there - you need to see their newspapers: "The New York Tames", "Usa Today", "Newsweek", "Vashington Times & Post".
        Yes, and Debk must also be poked ...
    3. mirag2
      mirag2 24 October 2013 07: 00
      0
      Then they will figure it out.
      In the meantime, they have a common enemy.
      Moreover, long ago at DEBKE I read that the delegation of Saudi Arabia in Washington was not even accepted.
      And the Jews are so accustomed to pressuring the United States, and using the United States to their advantage, that they were speechless with surprise.
      They generally perceive the States as if they owe them something. As if this country exists only to destroy the enemies of Israel, Iraq, Syria, now Iran.
  2. Zhenya
    Zhenya 23 October 2013 18: 33
    +1
    This porridge is brewed .... belay
  3. Ezhaak
    Ezhaak 23 October 2013 18: 37
    +2
    And even better for Israel, if the Saudi military will pay for cruise missiles and aerial bombs for these purposes and bring them from the United States

    This is what happens. The USA did not want to follow the Saudis’s lead, did not agree with the role of mercenaries in the war against Syria, so Israel is ready for such a feat. Well, as the Israeli soldiers begin to die, who will be guilty of all this? Is there really overpopulation in Israel and it's time to destroy the country's inhabitants?
    1. a52333
      a52333 23 October 2013 21: 10
      0
      I think so. States can not wage a full-fledged war neither in terms of money, nor in strength. They decided to delegate authority to create a fire belt. After this, the moral right to withdraw from the allowance of Israel will appear (I do not say that they will withdraw, but a trump card will appear), and finish off Arabia, because aggressor, with democracy is not so hot, and in the ass in any way.
      1. Botanologist
        Botanologist 23 October 2013 22: 40
        +4
        Quote: a52333
        After that, the moral right to withdraw from the allowance of Israel will appear (I do not say that they will withdraw, but a trump card will appear), and finish off Arabia,


        It is more likely that the Saudis will have to pay Israel the entire war against Iran. After that, they will no longer be needed by anyone, and they will be crushed. The pressure will most likely be Iran, m. Syria, maybe Egypt will connect. In any case, the Saudis sit in a pan. And if America ceases to buy oil, as promised - pi-pets to them.
        As for Israel, it will scoop up money, help from the Saudis, bomb it in Iran, and will calmly watch how the proud Saudi people deal with the Iranian army (which, naturally, will not go anywhere). I think there will be enough days for the KSA army on 10, and the path from the borders to Riyadh through the desert is not close.
  4. morpogr
    morpogr 23 October 2013 18: 37
    +3
    This is a union of two spiders that then eat each other and I think that the Saudis already understand this and are barking in the USA because they did not justify their notions of democratization of the Middle East. Israel amerikosy will not give up too strong a lobby.
  5. Neighbor
    Neighbor 23 October 2013 18: 43
    0
    So for now, not Syria ..... Will Assad Ahmadinejad now support?
    1. Zhenya
      Zhenya 23 October 2013 18: 44
      0
      Syria is supposed to return to a peaceful life by 2015.
      1. Xroft
        Xroft 23 October 2013 18: 58
        +2
        This is optimistic .... what are the prerequisites for this? I certainly FOR something would be so ....
      2. atalef
        atalef 24 October 2013 07: 06
        -1
        Quote: Marrying
        Syria is supposed to return to a peaceful life by 2015.

        By whose assumptions and will Assad be in power?
    2. Ezhaak
      Ezhaak 23 October 2013 19: 01
      +5
      Quote: Neighbor
      Will Assad Ahmadinejad now support?

      If it does, then only psychologically. Even a war like the one going on in Syria today takes up a lot of human reserves and, especially, money. But still need to restore the country. Again, it comes down to money. And no money, no weapons. Something like that.
    3. alone
      alone 23 October 2013 19: 38
      +8
      Quote: Neighbor
      So for now, not Syria ..... Will Assad Ahmadinejad now support?


      my friend, you are not observant in mine. Ahmednidzhat is no longer the president. The president there is Rouhani
      1. smersh70
        smersh70 23 October 2013 23: 53
        -2
        Quote: lonely
        my friend, you are not observant

        and also notice on the map - Armenia and Azerbaijan are shown as one state ..... why would it .... wassat
        1. Gooch v. 2
          Gooch v. 2 24 October 2013 04: 13
          +3
          Quote: smersh70
          and also notice on the map - Armenia and Azerbaijan are shown as one state ..... why would it ....

          Brotherhood lol
          1. smersh70
            smersh70 24 October 2013 13: 26
            0
            Quote: Gooch v.2
            Brotherhood

            hi bro !!!!!!!! you are always in shock today drinks
        2. Orthodox warrior
          Orthodox warrior 24 October 2013 07: 56
          +1
          Quote: smersh70
          and also notice on the map - Armenia and Azerbaijan are shown


          For the bruised! The name of the country is capitalized! Not Armenia, but Armenia!
          1. smersh70
            smersh70 24 October 2013 13: 27
            -2
            Quote: Orthodox warrior
            The name of the country is capitalized!

            but we didn’t know .... today you are in line with the free lawyers of Armenians .... wassat every day something new)))))))))))
            1. Orthodox warrior
              Orthodox warrior 24 October 2013 19: 51
              +1
              Quote: smersh70
              Quote: Orthodox warrior
              The name of the country is capitalized!

              but we did not know ....


              Well, now know!
              Write the name of your country with a small letter, one of the Armenians, you probably would anger at the snot!
  6. Neighbor
    Neighbor 23 October 2013 18: 51
    +1
    So for now, not Syria ..... Will Assad Ahmadinejad now support?
  7. starhina01
    starhina01 23 October 2013 18: 55
    +1
    along the way, they have a plan to destabilize the entire region once this is decided fool current sideways they will come up with a conceived scam. I hope the mind will return to them hi
  8. Doctor Evil
    Doctor Evil 23 October 2013 19: 25
    +2
    Did the Saudis really believe so much in their own invulnerability in the event of a strike on Iran? Or Israel promised them "iron domes", plus a guarantee of the destruction of all military potential of Iran at once? If not really scumbags, you should understand that they will be shooed away from Iran in response, do not play around. fool
  9. Hairy Siberian
    Hairy Siberian 23 October 2013 19: 36
    +5
    For some reason, on the map, Armenia and Azerbaijan are a state! fool
    1. Sirius-2
      Sirius-2 23 October 2013 20: 19
      +4
      "+" for attentiveness!
    2. Revolver
      Revolver 23 October 2013 20: 25
      +6
      Quote: Hairy Siberian
      For some reason, on the map, Armenia and Azerbaijan are a state!

      Gorbachev's dream come true?
      Anecdote of perestroika times.wassat
      Gorbachev (G) sleeps and sees that he came with a report to Stalin (C).
      S: Well, tell me what problems?
      G: Here, comrade Stalin, there are riots in Karabakh, the Armenians and the Azeris * are in conflict over the administrative affiliation of Karabakh.
      S: But do you think that if Armenia and Azerbaijan are united in the Republic of Armenia, the issue of the administrative affiliation of Karabakh will disappear on its own?
      G: Thinking about it, Comrade Stalin. But we do not know where to make the capital of the republic. The Armenians will not agree with Baku, and the Azerbaijanis with Yerevan.
      S: If they do not agree to resolve the issue in a good way, make them the capital in Magadan.

      * Marked so until the end of his reign, and maybe even now, he did not learn to pronounce "Azerbaijan" correctly.
      1. smersh70
        smersh70 23 October 2013 23: 57
        +2
        Quote: Nagan
        Marked like this until the end of his reign, and maybe even now, he did not learn to pronounce "Azerbaijan" correctly.

        I don’t agree with the joke))) but with this you correctly noticed .... because of it all the troubles went ....
        1. Revolver
          Revolver 24 October 2013 00: 29
          +2
          Quote: smersh70
          disagree with the joke)))

          I did not compose. Just remembered. Then from a distance it seemed ridiculous. I can understand that this is much closer to you, and therefore no laughing matter, so excuse me - I did not mean to run into anyone other than Mishani.
          Quote: smersh70
          because of him all the troubles went ....
  10. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 23 October 2013 19: 42
    +3
    Israel and the Saudis sniffed, waiting for provocations .. and a big war (these as always will be on the sidelines) .. They defended Syria but only for a while .. I wrote here that Azerbaijan was not armed for parades .. Hard times are coming .. (in the Middle in the east, at first everyone clings .. and not just shootouts ..) Iran will finish off Syria urgently .. by any means and provocations .. Then we ... (collapse in oil prices, etc ...)
    1. Gooch v. 2
      Gooch v. 2 24 October 2013 04: 17
      +2
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Israel and the Saudis sniffed, waiting for provocations .. and a big war (these as always will be on the sidelines) .. They defended Syria but only for a while .. I wrote here that Azerbaijan was not armed for parades .. Hard times are coming .. (in the Middle in the east, at first everyone clings .. and not just shootouts ..) Iran will finish off Syria urgently .. by any means and provocations .. Then we ... (collapse in oil prices, etc ...)

      By the way, in the new version of Battlefield 4, the action takes place oddly enough in Azerbaijan, in Baku. :) By the way, the US Armed Forces beat off the attack of the Russian troops there, I wonder what it would be. )
      1. smersh70
        smersh70 24 October 2013 16: 18
        0
        Quote: Gooch v.2
        I wonder what it would be. )

        after Eurovision interest in us has increased laughing soon the European Championship will be held here, and I’m not talking about the European Olympic Games 2015 wassat
  11. alone
    alone 23 October 2013 19: 45
    +5
    looking at the map, I was a little surprised. why hit Iran from the bases of Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan? why use the AUG from the Mediterranean Sea if there are dozens of air bases in the Arabian peninsula, and the Afghan group is impressive.

    let's say that the United States wants to hit Canada. For this you do not have to fly to Brazil, from there make a detour back to the United States and bomb Canada. Oh God, it’s funny how it turns out. An arrow through Turkey is not at all clear, you think the Turks will give the opportunity to hit Iran. I remember that even a strike on Iraq was not allowed to the Americans in 2003. if the hook through SA is honestly incomprehensible, why such a hook if you can fly directly?
    1. Doctor Evil
      Doctor Evil 23 October 2013 20: 13
      0
      "Normal heroes always go around." I read "The Period of Decay" by Alexander Afanasyev. According to the book, the Israeli air force attacked Iran through the Turkmen airspace, behind the main positions of the air defense system.
      1. alone
        alone 23 October 2013 21: 34
        +1
        and how will they get into Turkmenistan? You can write anything.
      2. atalef
        atalef 24 October 2013 07: 10
        0
        Quote: Doctor Evil
        According to the book, the Israeli Air Force attacked Iran through the Turkmen airspace, in the rear of the main positions of the air defense system.

        Chukchi is not a reader, Chukchi is a writer. Rear Air Defense --- an interesting thought laughing
        1. Doctor Evil
          Doctor Evil 25 October 2013 11: 40
          0
          Oh, blabbed ... winked The Hel Haavir planners read my comment. That's it, a cap for Iran ...
    2. atalef
      atalef 24 October 2013 07: 09
      0
      Quote: lonely
      looking at the map a little surprised. why hit Iran from the bases of Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan? why use the AUG from the Mediterranean if there are dozens of air bases in the Arabian peninsula, and the Afghan group is impressive

      Totally agree with you . both the card and the article are not worth the paper on which it is written.
  12. Revolver
    Revolver 23 October 2013 19: 48
    +3
    To be friends against someone is much easier than just being friends. What else can there be in common between Israel and the Saudis (who seem to be officially still at war since 1948), except for a common enemy?
    And if it really comes to fighting, the two of them will drown Iran. By the way, the Saudi Air Force is not weak, at least on paper. But it seems that by training and motivation they are far from the Israeli Air Force. They themselves understand this, otherwise why would they need the help of Israel, which they are also ready to pay?
    1. Gooch v. 2
      Gooch v. 2 24 October 2013 04: 19
      +3
      Quote: Nagan
      To be friends against someone is much easier than just being friends. What else can there be in common between Israel and the Saudis (who seem to be officially still at war since 1948), except for a common enemy?
      And if it really comes to fighting, the two of them will drown Iran. By the way, the Saudi Air Force is not weak, at least on paper. But it seems that by training and motivation they are far from the Israeli Air Force. They themselves understand this, otherwise why would they need the help of Israel, which they are also ready to pay?

      For the Saudis, the general staff will not be able to develop a special operation of this scale, due to the lack of experience, the Saudis in the region are more like a "strike force" of the Arab military bloc.
  13. Warrawar
    Warrawar 23 October 2013 20: 02
    0
    Saudi Arabia will be friends with Israel against Iran, and Iran will be friends with the United States against Russia.
    1. Revolver
      Revolver 24 October 2013 00: 46
      +2
      Under the Shah, Iran was friends with America, but also did not oppose the USSR. I even remember the shah came to the Union, and he was met with a pomp (note, not a fire). And even there was a thing, they quietly shared with the USSR a model of the latest American missile, which came complete with the F-14 Tomcat. But with the advent of Khomeini, relations deteriorated for a very long time.
      Why do you think that after changing the mullococracy regime to something else (yes, at least some relative of the deceased Shah will be elevated to the throne) Iran will turn against Russia?
  14. zheleznyack
    zheleznyack 23 October 2013 21: 11
    -1
    I’m terrified of these guys how these idiots \ go crazy in a joke class \ could destroy the USSR. no one can see their parodies
  15. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 23 October 2013 21: 12
    +2
    The tight knot of contradictions in the Middle East is dragging on ever tighter. Israel was seriously scared of the Iranian nuclear program and is ready to get in touch with the devil, if it were, try to neutralize the rebellious Iran. By the way, Israel itself has nuclear and chemical and bacteriological weapons. These are the grimaces of Middle Eastern democracy.
  16. Andrey Peter
    Andrey Peter 23 October 2013 21: 26
    0
    The situation is not straightforward. There have already been articles on these topics, and I already wrote, our diplomats and special services should think very well here. East is a delicate matter. And to discuss at VO without knowing the whole background, it is useless. I hope our politicians will prove this time that Russia is more forward-thinking and will be able to protect its interests with common benefit.
  17. Migari
    Migari 23 October 2013 21: 48
    0
    The United States offended its jackals, and so they are creating their peacekeeping alliance.
    1. atalef
      atalef 23 October 2013 22: 20
      +4
      Quote: Migari
      The United States offended its jackals, and so they create their peacekeeping alliance

      Explain to the inexperienced in BV politics that along with the Saudi prince and the Israeli flag, the photographs are Mursi (Egypt - Muslim Brotherhood) and Chania (Gaza-Hamas)
      1. andreitk20
        andreitk20 23 October 2013 22: 41
        +2
        one nursing hand, that those who have these differences in these minute interests do not have the whole four
        1. atalef
          atalef 24 October 2013 06: 41
          0
          Quote: andreitk20
          one nursing hand, that those who have these differences in these minute interests do not have the whole four

          Could somehow explain more accessible.
  18. Asan Ata
    Asan Ata 24 October 2013 00: 44
    +2
    I don't think Iran will be "friendly" against Russia. There was simply an anaphylactic shock of the "friends" of Syria, who believed in the omnipotence of the United States. The Iranians wisely seized the moment and made a jerk at the finish line to the Saudis and Jews. The Qataris were the first to come to their senses, apparently they will trample in Iran, wait for them with a bow in Russia. I think soon the Saudis and Jews will also start sending ambassadors to Syria and Iran. There will be no war: there is only the fear of retribution.
  19. ReifA
    ReifA 24 October 2013 09: 06
    +1
    Mursi is the representative of the Muslim brothers who hate Israel. You know, Hamas, the other day admitted that the next tunnel destroyed by the IDF was intended for terrorist attacks and kidnappings. The new power of Egypt removed the Mursi and Hamas aches. What are they (Mursi, yes Hamas) against the background of the flag of Israel I xs.