Expert Yury Krupnov: “Why does Greenpeace keep silence?

69
Expert Yury Krupnov: “Why does Greenpeace keep silence? During the day, the level of radiation in the ground water samples at the Japanese nuclear power plant "Fukushima-1", which suffered an accident two years ago, increased 6, 5 thousand times. Even earlier, radiation was found in seawater. Yuri KRUPNOV, Chairman of the Development Movement, comments on the situation.

- Let's call a spade a spade. The threat to the safe existence of the Far East and the Asia-Pacific basin has become a reality. Within 24 hours, the level of radioactive beta radiation in groundwater samples at the Fukushima-1 NPP amounted to 400 thousand becquerels per liter. How could radiation get into the water? Experts believe: together with the downpours brought by the typhoon. However, after the accident at this power plant in March 2011, the Japanese authorities seemed to have done everything possible to eliminate its consequences, to restore the normal life of its citizens. About 70 Japanese nuclear power plants have been shut down or completely mothballed. But this, apparently, was not enough.

In August this year, the Fukushima-1 nuclear power plant discovered the largest leak after the 2011 accident of 300 tons of radioactive water (with a strontium concentration of about 80 million becquerels per liter) from a tank where the water is stored after cooling the reactors. The Committee for the Control of Atomic Energy has assigned the third level of danger to the leak. There was a risk of it entering the ocean along with groundwater. These fears, apparently, were justified. Already in October, radioactive cesium-1 from this nuclear power plant was first detected in seawater outside the technical port of Fukushima-137.
It is significant that at a time when the deadly liquid penetrated into the ocean depths, the activists of the "international public organization" "Greenpeace" did not want to know about it. These, if I may say so, "green" were busy with much more "important" matters. They focused their efforts on penetrating the Russian oil ice-resistant platform Prirazlomnaya, located on the continental shelf - a drilling platform that has not yet started to work. And a year before that, Greenpeace employees, including even the CEO of Greenpeace International, Kumi Naidu, had set up their tents right on the sheer wall of the platform. Violently outraged by a possible oil spill. And now they remain completely silent when radiation begins to penetrate the ocean expanses.

The inaction of Greenpeace in such an unprecedented situation reflects, in my opinion, the opportunistic and ordered nature of the activities of this organization. In addition, one cannot fail to note the obvious: long-term geopolitical US-Japanese cooperation covers up an unacceptable, extremely dangerous situation with Fukushima-1. These two countries are afraid of losing face and, trying to divert the attention of the world community, use Greenpeace for their own purposes.

After the accident at Fukushima-1 and its consequences, a major humanitarian problem has developed, which should be under the supervision of the world community and become open to specialists. However, the opposite happened. For the sake of the geopolitical interests of the United States, Japan did not dare to take advantage of Russia's colossal experience in eliminating the consequences of such an accident, inadmissibility of leaks of nuclear materials, disposal of nuclear waste, etc. We were contacted directly from the nuclear power plant itself only six months ago, and only on a private matter. Until now, no serious analysis, audit of what happened at Fukushima-1, what measures were taken, has not been done. Scientists of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences have colossal knowledge on this issue, and they could be used in Japan. However, in practice they were not in demand.

Of course, the threat hanging over many countries and waters of the Pacific Ocean can be prevented. I would suggest creating an internationally competent team of highly qualified specialists to deal with the consequences of the accident. In my opinion, Russian specialists with the necessary knowledge and experience could play a priority role in this group. Overseas customers of Greenpeace, instead of arranging cheap provocations at the Russian drilling rig, it would be better to contribute to the creation of such an international group.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

69 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +29
    19 October 2013 07: 14
    Greenpeace: "Fukushima? No, you haven't heard!"
    1. +15
      19 October 2013 11: 10
      Quote: Ivan79
      Greenpeace: "Fukushima? No, you haven't heard!"

      This is not scary.
      It is surprising that EVERYONE is silent about the meldown that happened there.
      The worst thing happened that could happen. And so far nothing has been done to at least stop the further spread of decay products. Everyone is frightened by Chernobyl, but forgive me there, 80% of the products remained in place. And here - no one knows what is happening there. Corporate collusion however ...

      PS: meltdown - meltdown, destruction of a nuclear reactor
      1. +10
        19 October 2013 12: 37
        Quote: Rus2012
        The worst thing happened that could happen. And so far nothing has been done to at least stop the further spread of decay products. Everyone is frightened by Chernobyl, but forgive me there, 80% of the products remained in place. And here - no one knows what is happening there. Corporate collusion however ...


        Moreover. When Chernobyl zhahnul at us even the state itched itself about the liquidation of the accident, I understand, of course the country was like that, but still. Ukraine, in spite of being lowly, is still dealing with the elimination of the consequences.

        And what about the Japanese? Japan in this sense has shown itself as the quintessence of idiocy. The country closed all available sources of electricity, intimidating the population with an accident at a nuclear power plant, but at the same time abandoned the accident itself. True, at the same time, stations operate on imported fuel, well, I agree, it is better to take electricity somewhere. And most importantly, the accident is progressing, and the state does not even itch. In my pure opinion, planting a nuclear bomb on Fukushima would be much more environmentally friendly than just doing nothing. After the explosion, at least the situation will be predictable.

        Greenpeace saves their whales there ...
        1. +1
          19 October 2013 16: 30
          There was also a similar story at the Maya plant, but then almost 90% remained on the territory of the plant, the remaining 10 covered a relatively small area. Then quickly all the people were taken out and the territory was closed.
      2. +4
        19 October 2013 19: 51
        I do not recommend eating fish from the Pacific Ocean ... and buying Japanese cars only after checking with a dosimeter.
        1. +3
          19 October 2013 20: 36
          Quote: Xroft
          I definitely don't recommend eating fish from the Pacific Ocean

          Yeah, well we won't.
          But the ocean is Worldwide!
          1. +1
            20 October 2013 13: 29
            Why is Greenpeace silent?
            Yes, because he is his pis
            stuck in my back green
            That's why greenpeace is silent good
  2. Peaceful military
    +16
    19 October 2013 07: 23
    He is silent because there is no order.
    1. +21
      19 October 2013 08: 00
      Yes, they can only paint under green trees for free. Hence the name "green sykun".
    2. +3
      19 October 2013 14: 19
      Quote: Peaceful military
      He is silent because there is no order.

      Naturally, no one paid, or rather paid, so as not to climb.
      1. Peaceful military
        +3
        19 October 2013 14: 40
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: Peaceful military
        He is silent because there is no order.

        Naturally, no one paid, or rather paid, so as not to climb.

        Ideal circuit laughing Everyone pays, some to get in and others to stay out wassat
    3. +2
      19 October 2013 15: 13
      - Peaceful military man: is silent, because there is no order.
      For "buza" in Russia, the Yankes pay orders of magnitude more.
      And the Japanese are ruining the entire Pacific Ocean, but stubbornly do not want to let anyone directly to the source of radiation ... true kamikaze.
      PS This high-tech country cannot do what was done in the USSR. There is no alternative to the sarcophagus ...
      1. Peaceful military
        +1
        19 October 2013 15: 35
        Quote: knn54
        - Peaceful military man: is silent, because there is no order.
        For "buza" in Russia, the Yankes pay orders of magnitude more.
        And the Japanese are ruining the entire Pacific Ocean, but stubbornly do not want to let anyone directly to the source of radiation ... true kamikaze.
        PS This high-tech country cannot do what was done in the USSR. There is no alternative to the sarcophagus ...

        Dear Nikolai!
        There's no getting around here, the reactors at Fukushima (e) are American, "antediluvian", while the Soviet ones, the same 4th at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, are much safer and shied away from outright sabotage, which only those who do not want to know do not know this is. Therefore, "buzzing" against "Fukushima (s)" is not allowed.
        I cannot speak about the sarcophagus as categorically as you do, because I do not know this topic. soldier
      2. +2
        19 October 2013 20: 47
        Quote: knn54
        There is no alternative to the sarcophagus ...

        Let's not forget this is simply beautifully called SARCOPHAGUS, in fact, it is an object "SHELTER"!
        Ours have covered the roof of destruction! Well, I haven't heard of insulation from below!
        And judging by the whole BOTTOM, the neighbors have flowed and how (and who ?!) will isolate it, this is a great secret!
  3. +18
    19 October 2013 07: 28
    The fact that greenpeace is engaged in ordering is obvious for a long time. Yuri Krupnov wrote a lot about such organizations - enemies without borders, committees of soldiers and other mothers, etc.
    There are no more fools who believe in the noble goals of these organizations than who trust the speeches of Mlechin and Svanidze.
  4. +7
    19 October 2013 07: 29
    Greenpeace has long turned from an environmental organization into an economic one. Nobody wants to finance the Japanese theme, all the moneybags understand that it is foolish to invest in such a long-term project.
    So pis, even if he is green, there are still pisses ... ugh ... pisom
    1. +19
      19 October 2013 08: 43
      Good morning. hi I would put the question more broadly. We dismantled the USSR due to its "non-viability". Well, not us, but now is not about that. The further, the more I am convinced:
      CAPITALISM IS AN UNVILABLE BRANCH
      Initially, he is "sharpened" for making a profit. And, as a consequence: progress, quality, human relationships, and what is there - life. - everything in this "order" is secondary - profit is primary !!!
      Within the framework of this article, you can see two confirmation of my words.
      1. Fokushima in the pursuit of profit was built without considering all the safety factors.
      2. Greenpeace - it would seem environmentalists, but the morality of a restaurant girl: feeding and swotting lol .
      These are my unhappy conclusions, dear ones. recourse
      So where did the phallus carry us ??? !!!!! Isn't it time to go back?
      1. +14
        19 October 2013 09: 04
        Quote: a52333
        CAPITALISM IS AN UNVILABLE BRANCH

        This is how the founders of Marxism-Lenenism spoke about it.
        And we in the 90s did not believe in this, so we have to comprehend on our own skin.
      2. +10
        19 October 2013 13: 40
        a52333
        CAPITALISM IS AN UNVILABLE BRANCH


        At one time, our Chernobyl liquidators in the West were contemptuously called "bio-robots" - apparently for the ability of Soviet people to carry out orders without looking back either at their health or at their lives. Make the samurai carry the plutonium with buckets or shovel the strontium - you will get overwhelmed (as well as us, including your humble servant - beaten with the beaten capitalism). If Chernobyl happened - part two of the hr ... well, we would cope with it.
        Sincerely.
        1. yur
          yur
          +6
          19 October 2013 19: 58
          And it seems to me if it happens, God forbid, Chernobyl 2, then let's go and manage. The evidence of this is the fight against floods in the Far East. More than 130000 victims and not a single one died. Whatever our ill-wishers say, and this is an indicator!
          1. 0
            20 October 2013 21: 14
            Quote: yur
            And it seems to me if it happens, God forbid, Chernobyl 2, then let's go and manage.
            Well done! Here is the difference between the Slavs !!! ARIA TRUE !!!
            Come on, I'll go. And in May 45 they called fire on themselves in Konigsberg and on the Seelow Heights.
          2. 0
            21 October 2013 15: 42
            compared a natural flood with an atomic man-made disaster ..
    2. +4
      19 October 2013 13: 48
      Quote: domokl
      Greenpeace has long been transformed from an environmental organization to an economic one.

      They have never been an environmental organization. The tasks they are assigned from Langley and the main ones are: distracting public opinion from really serious problems, lobbying the interests of trans-corporations, by presenting problems at the "right" angle, espionage, accelerating hysteria on projects that are competitive with the main customer. It is no coincidence that the greens are "silent in a rag" about shale gas and Fukushima, and as soon as it comes to Russian global projects, the whole world starts to smell, conferences are organized, "public" environmentalists and other political garbage greedy for money are attracted. The environmental theme itself is a fertile ground for playing on the feelings of people, and the scribes are promoting it to the fullest.
  5. AX
    +6
    19 October 2013 08: 06
    This office was created by whom it is known, and it is known for what purposes ...
    1. 0
      20 October 2013 23: 39
      Indeed, they did not say anything new. Everyone already knows everything. But they are silent
  6. kripto
    +3
    19 October 2013 08: 22
    Why should the United States and green writers bother with such problems, especially since this, to some extent, meets their interests. For those who taught geography in the Soviet school, I remind you that all the muck from Fukushima along various streams eventually ends up in the fishing areas that Russia uses. And taking into account the venality of our bureaucrats, it may continue to appear on our tables. That's it ....
    1. yur
      yur
      0
      19 October 2013 20: 13
      I am in no way going to defend corrupt bureaucrats, I myself hate them. But as a person who taught geography in the Soviet school, I must note that the main currents from Fukushima are directed to the south and southeast, i.e. to the shores of Southeast Asia and to America.
  7. +6
    19 October 2013 08: 24
    long ago it was necessary to rip the mask off these "nature lovers". in no case should they follow suit - and those who were caught at Prirazlomnaya should be given real deadlines and in full
    1. +2
      19 October 2013 16: 41
      Yes, their scow should have gone to the bottom. In the DPRK they do not stand on ceremony with such
      1. 0
        19 October 2013 21: 03
        Quote: Basarev
        Yes, they should have sunk their scow

        do not need to go to the bottom. repaint, change the name, and go into operation. I think that the ship will not interfere with the Far Eastern Academy of Sciences, they will find application
  8. +6
    19 October 2013 08: 24
    With Greenpeaks, everything is clear, these are custom-made mongrels .. But Japan has actually declared nuclear war on us! Our Far East will soon turn into a second Chernobyl only on a more global scale (currents carry this infection across the entire world ocean)! Why are our specialists not allowed there? we have experience and not a small one ... the Japs with their money and high technologies in the course of the matter about ... are specific ... and they are silent and the whole world is silent, like everything is fine (the main thing is that Russia is being poisoned and it suits everyone ..)
    1. +6
      19 October 2013 08: 38
      Do not worry, with the course everything carries to the authors of Fukushima, in the USA))
      1. +2
        19 October 2013 09: 26
        Does it take the fish and crabs there too? Unfortunately no. Take a Geiger counter for a weekly purchase.
  9. +7
    19 October 2013 08: 50
    Any successful public project becomes a commercial-political shop as soon as the founders leave it (or they leave). And they begin to serve the interests of the dollar-shekel mafia.
    Quote: MIKHAN
    But Japan has actually declared a nuclear war on us!

    - some original way to fight by blowing up a reactor on its territory. More like national suicide. And if you look at the map of currents, then Kuro-Shio brings the healing water of Fukushima right to the doorstep of the authors of this "safe" nuclear power plant on the other side of the Great Ocean.
  10. Belogor
    +2
    19 October 2013 09: 04
    As always, double standards apply. I can imagine if this happened on Russian territory (God forbid, of course), how much noise and hysteria and claims in general would have been. And here, they poison the world's oceans and nothing, and greenpeace is attacking the Russian platform, which has not yet begun production. We got a fight back, now they have an anti-Russian hysteria
  11. +5
    19 October 2013 09: 04
    These, if I may say so, "green" were busy with much more "important" matters.

    Of course, others - the grandmothers were counting for custom-made provocations, and then they went hunting.
    1. 0
      19 October 2013 09: 25
      Well, if ours for dollars and shekels do not lead, they will go for the smell of Taiga.
  12. andruha70
    +1
    19 October 2013 09: 29
    then on the news the news flashed - off the coast of the United States they caught a herring-5 meters long belay they called it a belt fish ... I don't know if Fukushima is to blame or there are such in nature (not a fisherman feel ) but if there is a herring of this size, then what, in diameter, should there be a flounder? fellow laughing
  13. +1
    19 October 2013 09: 33
    The Netherlands is not silent but: baltinfo.ru/2013/10/18/Niderlandy-grozyat-Rossii-tribunalom-po-delu-Grinpis-3861

    22
  14. stroporez
    +1
    19 October 2013 09: 59
    I am convinced that greenpeace conservation of nature is like the Western world "struggle for democracy" .... they deeply FSUs. for all these "endangered species" "environmental protection", "greenhouse effect" ......... this is how ------ an office for the "wiring" of Slavic dogs ......... ...... and not Toko Slavic.
  15. +2
    19 October 2013 10: 45
    Calling our specialists means signing your own helplessness and unprofessionalism. Plus, the publicity of design flaws is possible, which led to such consequences that they will deal a crushing blow to the entire US nuclear industry.
  16. 0
    19 October 2013 10: 54
    Of course, the threat hanging over many countries and waters of the Pacific Ocean can be prevented. I would suggest creating an internationally competent team of highly qualified specialists to deal with the consequences of the accident.

    For a start, it would be nice, the group would decide the issues of further joint actions. The question concerns everyone in this region, in theory it is just a greenpeace issue. Although real environmental objectives are not, apparently, in the scope of their activities.
  17. +2
    19 October 2013 11: 31
    The nuclear reactors that are installed in Japan (in particular at Fokushima) are American. And the United States is doing everything to muffle public outrage about the outrages that are taking place in Fokushima. From this we can conclude that Greenpeace is a pro-American organization that carries out orders from overseas bosses. And they attacked the Russian platform with the "blessing" of the Americans.
  18. 0
    19 October 2013 11: 34
    I would not be surprised that greenpeace receives contributions from the Rockefeller house or the CIA because they have an interest in oil and gas. And in nuclear power they were only interested in the French nuclear power plants, when they were paid from America and it got into the press!
    It turned out to be a scandal and they had to quickly take away all their belongings from France
    1. +1
      19 October 2013 16: 47
      But with Germany, a bad story happened - a long time ago they decided to dismantle all the nuclear power plants and now they are already close to this goal.
  19. +1
    19 October 2013 11: 38
    Why is Greenpeace keeping silent?
    Greenpeace: "Where is it, Fukushima? On the Kuril Islands?"
    "Yes, and there was no team and they did not give an advance payment .. And we do not work for free"

    The Netherlands is ready to go to the Maritime Tribunal in the Greenpeace case .. Why doesn't the Russian Federation go to the Tribunal on the fact of piracy at sea ..
  20. +2
    19 October 2013 11: 40
    Why is silent ...
    1. Not paid
    2. Lulei can be obtained from serious uncles (they say - do not meddle in your own business)

    it's like a prostitute, without money there will be no tenderness)))
  21. +3
    19 October 2013 11: 59
    from this article about the leakage of radiation and all sorts of cesium and strontium into the ocean, I realized that the movie "Godzilla" is based on real events
    1. 0
      20 October 2013 10: 56
      Precisely, they like to take pictures of all sorts of Armageddons there, now - it is coming true!
  22. 0
    19 October 2013 12: 12
    Well, we understand where the wind comes from now we need an adequate answer: to condemn all this "riffraff", working out thirty "amerovskoy" pieces of silver, to the maximum, as terrorists and drug dealers, so that others would not disdain to get into the affairs of a sovereign state! To bring the impostors to clean water and demonstrate the process to the worldwide information network!
    1. 0
      19 October 2013 16: 49
      Pure water is a great honor for them. The liquid waste storage facility of the Mayak plant will be enough.
  23. +1
    19 October 2013 12: 37
    Green .... they didn’t pay, so she’s silent.
  24. +1
    19 October 2013 12: 47
    So the green pisya did not really appear in the case of the BP accident in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 ...
  25. +5
    19 October 2013 13: 27
    Why, and why? .. Because Greenpeace has long been used as a cover for all kinds of special services and their employees. They (special services) provide the main funding for this camarilla ...
    Not there, of course there are "real" fighters "for nature." But as a rule (except for small shares) they only play the role of loudmouth "crowd" and a kind of battering ram. For example, when entering an object ...
    And in good faith it is necessary in every possible way to restrict the access of Greenpeace "activists" to the territory of the Russian Federation ...

    The best remedy for Greenpeace at sea ...
  26. mmmakm
    +1
    19 October 2013 13: 33
    And also, it seems that the dimensions of the ship in the "green" do not coincide with those on the drawings. Now they wool it with special care and meticulousness. So they have a panic.
  27. +2
    19 October 2013 13: 38
    Why is Greenpeace keeping silent?

    Why is he SILENT, he shouts about "painful", about "lawlessness" on the part of Russia! Look what THREATS are sent to her address, filed an appeal (complaint) on the basis of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, they hope to "put pressure on Russia about the" prisoners ".
  28. -2
    19 October 2013 14: 11
    Quote: Geisenberg
    In my pure opinion, planting a nuclear bomb on Fukushima would be much more environmentally friendly than just doing nothing. After the explosion, at least the situation will be predictable.
    Greenpeace saves their whales there ...

    Poor, poor Japs, the third bomb is already ready for them. To hell with the third bomb - just spray plutonium, uranium, deuterium and tritium (over all of Japan, but that would touch the Hawaiian and Aleutian Islands a little).
    Indeed, everything is simple: the Japs fell into a stupor after the accident and they continue to have endless brain diarrhea - our specialists could really help them, but, as I said earlier, they probably hate not only other peoples, but also their homeland.
    1. 0
      19 October 2013 16: 54
      And they hate it for a reason - their grandfathers specifically caved in to America, and there was a time when only a handful of carriers carried out entire naval bases ...
  29. Pesnyadv
    +3
    19 October 2013 15: 12
    Back in the early 90s, when the Internet was gaining momentum, I came across an article about Greenpeace.
    It was written by a foreign journalist.

    According to him, this organization was organized by a very smart and advanced fraudster.
    The camouflage was perfect. Everything is decorous and noble. Everything was tied to blackmail.
    But the international mafia took him by the gills.
    And Greenpiss went to her.
    Then the special services found out about it. they made an offer that the mafia could not refuse and Greenpiss once again changed owners.

    I am describing this schematically.
    And the article contained everything with name, dates, facts, argumentation.

    And now we expect noble deeds from Greenpeace?
  30. +1
    19 October 2013 15: 58
    The Japanese at the press conference, which was given after this, the facts of large-scale leaks were indistinctly spreading thought along the tree ... Experts said that the Japanese government is financing the construction of an underwater dam wall around the epicenter of the leaks, perhaps not even in one belt, but that this measure is practically nothing will help with all its obvious cost ...
  31. put
    put
    0
    19 October 2013 20: 13
    Greenpeace has no place in Japan. What will they fight with? There is no oil or gas. Radiation? So the Japanese
    with her since 1945. live.
  32. 0
    19 October 2013 20: 43
    Greenpeace is a mongrel who is "ordered by the FAS" and they "yap", and when there is no team they are silent (there is no analogy with the best friends of people). So our ecologists need to "blow all the fanfare", and the state. the same for husbands.
    1. 0
      20 October 2013 10: 53
      who pays money, he rubs the back of the girl in the bathhouse ...
  33. Valery Neonov
    +1
    20 October 2013 04: 12
    Quote: domokl
    Greenpeace has long been transformed from an environmental organization into an economic

    Rather, it is political, and is engaged in frank gentage.hi
  34. +1
    20 October 2013 09: 09
    The enormous energy and strategic capabilities of the Arctic have already whetted the appetites of five Arctic states - Canada, the United States, Russia, Norway and Denmark, the author of the article continues. Russia, having included the issue of the Arctic among its priorities, has already submitted an application for the expansion of its economic zone on the grounds that the Lomonosov Ridge is an extension of its continental shelf. However, the determination of the Russians has provoked protests from other nations, claiming to expand their own economic zones in the Arctic. "In the face of this cold war in the Arctic, will the UN be able to make a transparent decision? A priori, no, since the conflicting parties do not seem to be ready to make concessions," Joubert writes.(Source: Le journal du dimanche au quotidien)

    The inaction of Greenpeace in such an unprecedented situation reflects, in my opinion, the opportunistic and ordered nature of the activities of this organization. In addition, one cannot fail to note the obvious: long-term geopolitical US-Japanese cooperation covers up an unacceptable, extremely dangerous situation with Fukushima-1. These two countries are afraid of losing face and, trying to divert the attention of the world community, use Greenpeace for their own purposes.

    I think that Greenpeace's main customer emerges from these quotes:
    1) Create difficulties for a competitor (Russia) in the development of the Arctic by attracting "public attention" through Greenpeace.
    2) Save your face in a disaster at Focusim without drawing attention through Greenpeace.
    American and Japanese firms, for example, Generak Electric and Hitachi, to this day earn huge sums of money to operate nuclear power plants, as if nothing had happened.
    Greenpeace, most likely, will appear near the Kuril Islands for the purpose of their far-fetched "ecological safety" by the order of "their masters" ...
    1. 0
      20 October 2013 11: 06
      This is not entirely the case, although there is a share (about the Arctic). It's different! Was the station blown up? Blown up! Will the consequences be eliminated? No! Will radiation pollution spread? Will! Will the people go away? Will! But there is not enough space for everyone and they will climb abroad. And they will be explained why they are right and what they are fighting for. Who are their neighbors? ... Mina (when will it explode?)
  35. +1
    20 October 2013 10: 12
    The fact that Greenpeace is a venal murderer is understandable.
    In light of the detention of Greenpeace in the North, the questions are different:
    1. On what basis does the FSB special forces disembark (detain) a ship outside the territorial waters of Russia? FSB only here guards the border + 25 mile zone (200 km). Detention of the court is the prerogative of the Russian Navy. We don't have a navy?
    2. On what basis do these murzilkas "sew" "piracy"? they didn't seem to capture the platform with weapons

    the fact that they were detained for 2 months is understandable: foreign citizens will merge into the embassies later and you will not get them, but why close the same journalists and photographers who are present on the ship for 2 months?
    1. 0
      20 October 2013 18: 33
      Quote: Takashi
      On what basis do these murzilkas "sew" "piracy"? they didn't seem to capture the platform with weapons

      In article 227 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Piracy), the use of weapons only in part 2, and in part 1, "the use of violence or the threat of use of violence" appears.
      Quote: Takashi
      but why close the same journalists and photographers who are present on the ship for 2 months?

      For the same as the rest. They were present on the attacking ship. And they were detained precisely for this, and not for membership in "Greenpeace" and not for foreign citizenship.
      Quote: Takashi
      Detention of the court is the prerogative of the Russian Navy

      Is it written in the Constitution? Or where?
      The Navy has no prerogatives, only responsibilities. As with any power structure. Whoever is ordered to do the task.
      FSB only protects the border with us + 25 mile zone (200 km)FSB and outside of Russia acts, if that.
      1. 0
        20 October 2013 18: 46
        Quote: Sour
        Quote: Takashi

        but why close the same journalists and photographers who are present on the ship for 2 months?

        For the same as the rest. They were present on the attacking ship. And they were detained precisely for this, and not for membership in "Greenpeace" and not for foreign citizenship.

        Here you do not have all the information. I do not know about others, but the Russian freelancer was hired Greenpeace for the consecration of this action. http://www.nr2.ru/authors/462361.html
      2. 0
        20 October 2013 20: 50
        Do not write nonsense.

        1. Read the comments to the CC. Violence or threat is when a group of persons disembarks on a ship and, using violence or the threat of a weapon (anyone), hijacks the ship. But not when, a group of unarmed people interferes with the work of others by their actions. At most, their actions can be interpreted as "hooligan" or "creating a danger at an industrial facility."

        2. They did not intentionally commit a serious crime. It was enough to take an agreement not to leave. Especially if you hit it for the first time.

        3. According to an international treaty, in particular on territorial waters (which Russia has ratified) - outside the territorial waters - only the Navy, but not the border guard (represented by the FSB) have the right to inspect, detain and bring it to the nearest port of the vessel.
        In this case, it is the actions of the special FSB that are classified as "banditry" and "piracy".
        1. 0
          20 October 2013 21: 13
          Quote: Takashi
          Do not write nonsense.

          "Law that drawbar ...". Well, there is still time. You can search for other articles, pulling in the top ten. That the "defenders" of nature were discouraged to arrange provocations. Who don't even know that there are polar nights in the Arctic. And who thought there would be a pleasure walk. Some also thought to do with a "hooligan", desecrating the temple.
          "From the bag, but do not renounce the prison." Good folk wisdom.
        2. 0
          20 October 2013 21: 25
          Quote: Takashi
          They did not intentionally commit a serious crime. It was enough to take an agreement not to leave. Especially if you hit it for the first time.

          This is not a sufficient condition to issue a subscription. If you know the Criminal Code, you should know this too.

          Quote: Takashi
          According to an international treaty, in particular on territorial waters (which Russia has ratified) - outside the territorial waters - only the Navy, but not the border guard (represented by the FSB) have the right to inspect, detain and bring it to the nearest port of the vessel.

          Just international treaties nothing do not talk about who has the right to detain those who have committed a criminal offense on Russian territory.
        3. 0
          20 October 2013 22: 33
          Do not write nonsense yourself.
          1. Even from your quote it follows that the use of violence does not necessarily imply the presence of weapons.
          2. What is the "recognizance not to leave", if there are a lot of foreigners? Complete nonsense. Detention, of course. And what does it mean "did not do it intentionally"? Did you happen to be there? Not even funny.
          Piracy is a serious crime, read article 15, part 4 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
          3. What kind of contract is this? Link, if not difficult.
          Article 30, paragraph 19 of the Law on the State Border says something completely different.
  36. Mr. Tyler
    0
    20 October 2013 17: 07
    Quote: Basarev
    There was also a similar story at the Maya plant, but then almost 90% remained on the territory of the plant, the remaining 10 covered a relatively small area. Then quickly all the people were taken out and the territory was closed.

    1957, Kasad of the Techa River and almost 30 km. from the millionth Chelyabinsk, the nearest contamination zone. People still live there, expert.
  37. luka095
    0
    20 October 2013 21: 24
    "Of course, the threat that looms over many countries and waters of the Pacific Ocean can be prevented. I would suggest creating an internationally competent team of highly qualified specialists to deal with the consequences of the accident."
    In order to create such a group, it is first necessary to promote for a long time in the media all over the world about what is happening with the nuclear power plant. And for this, for a start, it is necessary to break through the information blockade on this topic, which was erected by both the Japanese and the Americans. Greenpeace, by definition, will not participate in this. This means that Russia needs to do this - our territory is nearby with all the ensuing consequences ...
    1. +6
      21 October 2013 06: 12
      The reactors are state-of-the-art, the Japanese have let loose with the accident at Fokushima, and now we have what we have. Therefore, they are silent. But why are other countries of the Asia-Pacific region silent? Unclear. There is a so-called food chain and soon all fish will be radioactive. In short, fishing in the Far East is covered with a copper basin, and then the population. Greenpeace is not interested.
  38. 0
    21 October 2013 07: 48
    Signed recognizance not to leave for 10 years and determine the place - Bay of the Cross - let the whales count.
  39. 0
    23 October 2013 14: 04
    These conservationists should be sent to Japan and sent on their ark. And let them protect this nature there. Round the clock. Because in a couple of days they will start glowing in the dark. I would have listened to the screeching of these defenders that oil could spill in the Barents Sea. By the way, I live not far from this sea)))

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"