Military Review

Expert Yury Krupnov: “Why does Greenpeace keep silence?

69
Expert Yury Krupnov: “Why does Greenpeace keep silence? During the day, the radiation level in groundwater samples at the Japanese nuclear power plant Fukushima-1, which the accident suffered two years ago, increased 6, 5 thousands of times. Earlier, radiation was found in seawater. The situation is commented on by the Chairman of the Development Movement Yury KRUPNOV.


- We will call things by their names. The threat to the safe existence of the Far East, the Asia-Pacific basin has become a reality. During 24 hours, the level of radioactive beta radiation in groundwater samples at the Fukushima-1 NPP was 400 thousand becquerels per liter. How could radiation get into the water? Experts believe: along with the showers brought by the typhoon. However, after the accident at this power plant in 2011 in March, the Japanese authorities seemed to have done everything possible to eliminate its consequences and restore the normal life of their citizens. Around 70, the Japanese nuclear power plants were stopped or completely mothballed. But this, apparently, was not enough.

In August of this year, at the Fukushima-1 NPP, the largest after the 2011 accident was 300 leaked tons of radioactive water (with a strontium concentration of about 80 million becquerels per liter) from a tank where water is stored after cooling of the reactors. The Nuclear Energy Control Committee has assigned a third hazard level to the leak. There is a risk of it falling together with groundwater in the ocean. These fears, apparently, were justified. Already in October, radioactive cesium-1 from this nuclear power plant was detected for the first time in seawater outside the technical port of Fukushima-137.
It is significant that at the time when the deadly liquid penetrated into the depths of the ocean, activists of the “international public organization” Greenpeace did not want to know about it. These, if I may say so, the “greens” were busy with much more “important” matters. They directed their efforts to penetrate the Russian oil-resistant Prirazlomnaya ice-resistant platform located on the continental shelf - the drilling platform, which has not yet begun to work. A year before, Greenpeace, including even Greenpeace International CEO Kumi Naidu, turned out to put tents right on the sheer wall of the platform. Violently resent possible oil spill. And now they are completely silent, when the radiation begins to penetrate into the ocean spaces.

The inaction of Greenpeace in such an unprecedented situation reflects, in my opinion, the opportunistic and bespoke nature of the activities of this organization. In addition, it is impossible not to note the obvious: the long-term geopolitical American-Japanese cooperation covers the unacceptable, extremely dangerous situation that has developed with Fukushima-1. The two countries are afraid of losing face and, trying to distract the attention of the world community, they are using Greenpeace for their own purposes.

After the accident at Fukushima-1 and its consequences, there was a big humanitarian problem that should be monitored by the world community and become open to specialists. However, the opposite happened. For the sake of US geopolitical interests, Japan did not dare to use Russia's vast experience in dealing with the consequences of such an accident, the inadmissibility of leaks of nuclear materials, disposal of nuclear waste, etc. We were contacted directly from the nuclear power plant only six months ago, and then only on a particular issue. Until now, no serious analysis, an audit of what happened at Fukushima-1, what measures were taken, has been done. Scientists of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences have enormous knowledge of this problem, and they could use them in Japan. However, practically they were not claimed.

Of course, the threat hanging over many countries and waters of the Pacific can be prevented. I would suggest creating an internationally competent team of highly qualified specialists to deal with the consequences of the accident. In my opinion, Russian specialists with the necessary knowledge and experience could play a priority role in this group. Overseas customers of Greenpeace, instead of making cheap provocations at a Russian drilling site, it would be better to contribute to the creation of such an international group.
Originator:
http://file-rf.ru/context/2948
69 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Ivan79
    Ivan79 19 October 2013 07: 14 New
    29
    Greenpeace: "Fukushima? No, you haven't heard!"
    1. Rus2012
      Rus2012 19 October 2013 11: 10 New
      15
      Quote: Ivan79
      Greenpeace: "Fukushima? No, you haven't heard!"

      Not that scary.
      It is surprising that EVERYTHING is silent about the meldown that happened there.
      The worst thing happened that could happen. And so far nothing has been done to at least stop the further spread of decay products. Everyone is scared by Chernobyl, but there, I'm sorry, 80% of the products remained in place. And here - no one knows what is happening there. Corporate conspiracy however ...

      PS: meltdown - fusion, destruction of a nuclear reactor
      1. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg 19 October 2013 12: 37 New
        10
        Quote: Rus2012
        The worst thing happened that could happen. And so far nothing has been done to at least stop the further spread of decay products. Everyone is scared by Chernobyl, but there, I'm sorry, 80% of the products remained in place. And here - no one knows what is happening there. Corporate conspiracy however ...


        Moreover. When Chernobyl gasped with us, even though the state was combing it about eliminating the accident, I understand, of course, such a country was, but still. Ukraine, in spite of its low character, is still dealing with the consequences.

        What about the Japanese? Japan in this sense has shown itself to be the quintessence of idiocy. All available sources of electricity were shut down in the country, frightening the population with an accident at a nuclear power plant, but at the same time the accident itself was abandoned. True, at the same time, stations operating on imported fuel work, well, I agree, I need to take electricity somewhere. And most importantly, the accident is progressing, and the state is not even scratching it. Purely my opinion that adding a nuclear bomb to Fukushima will be much more environmentally friendly than just doing nothing. After the explosion, at least the situation will be predictable.

        And greenpeace there saves their whales ...
        1. Basarev
          Basarev 19 October 2013 16: 30 New
          +1
          A similar story was at the Mayak plant, but then almost 90% remained on the territory of the plant, the remaining 10 covered a relatively small area. Then all the little people were quickly taken out and closed.
      2. Xroft
        Xroft 19 October 2013 19: 51 New
        +4
        I don’t advise eating fish from the Pacific Ocean ...... and buy Japanese cars only after checking with a dosimeter.
        1. Cynic
          Cynic 19 October 2013 20: 36 New
          +3
          Quote: Xroft
          I definitely don’t advise fish from the Pacific Ocean

          Yeah, we won’t.
          That's just the ocean he is world!
          1. Aryan
            Aryan 20 October 2013 13: 29 New
            +1
            Why is Greenpeace silent?
            Yes, because he wrote
            stuck in his back green
            That's why Greenpeace is silent good
  2. Peaceful military
    Peaceful military 19 October 2013 07: 23 New
    16
    It is silent, because there is no order.
    1. alexng
      alexng 19 October 2013 08: 00 New
      21
      Yes, they can only paint under green trees for free. Hence the name "green sykun".
    2. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 19 October 2013 14: 19 New
      +3
      Quote: Peaceful military
      It is silent, because there is no order.

      Naturally, no one paid, or rather paid, so as not to climb.
      1. Peaceful military
        Peaceful military 19 October 2013 14: 40 New
        +3
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: Peaceful military
        It is silent, because there is no order.

        Naturally, no one paid, or rather paid, so as not to climb.

        Perfect circuit laughing They pay everything, some to get in, and others not to climb wassat
    3. knn54
      knn54 19 October 2013 15: 13 New
      +2
      - Peaceful military: silent, because there is no order.
      For the "buzu" in Russia, the Yankees pay orders of magnitude more.
      And the Japanese are ruining the entire Pacific Ocean, but stubbornly do not want to let anyone directly into the source of radiation ... true kamikaze.
      PS This high-tech country cannot do what was done in the USSR. There is no alternative to the sarcophagus ...
      1. Peaceful military
        Peaceful military 19 October 2013 15: 35 New
        +1
        Quote: knn54
        - Peaceful military: silent, because there is no order.
        For the "buzu" in Russia, the Yankees pay orders of magnitude more.
        And the Japanese are ruining the entire Pacific Ocean, but stubbornly do not want to let anyone directly into the source of radiation ... true kamikaze.
        PS This high-tech country cannot do what was done in the USSR. There is no alternative to the sarcophagus ...

        Dear Nikolai!
        There's no getting around here, the reactors at Fukushima (e) are American, "antediluvian", while the Soviet ones, the same 4th at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, are much safer and shied away from outright sabotage, which only those who do not want to know do not know this is. Therefore, "buzzing" against "Fukushima (s)" is not allowed.
        I can’t speak about the sarcophagus as categorically as you, because I don’t own this topic. soldier
      2. Cynic
        Cynic 19 October 2013 20: 47 New
        +2
        Quote: knn54
        There is no alternative to the sarcophagus ...

        Let's not forget this is simply beautifully called SARCOPHAGUS, in fact, this is an object "SHELTER"!
        Ours have covered the roof of destruction! Well, I didn’t hear about isolation from below!
        And from the neighbors, apparently, the BOTTOM flowed and how (and who?!) Will isolate it, this great secret is!
  3. Humpty
    Humpty 19 October 2013 07: 28 New
    18
    The fact that Greenpeace is engaged in ordering is obviously a long time ago. Yuri Krupnov wrote quite a lot about such organizations - enemies without borders, committees of soldiers and other mothers, etc.
    There are no more fools who believe in the noble goals of these organizations than those who trust the speeches of Mlechin and Svanidze.
  4. domokl
    domokl 19 October 2013 07: 29 New
    +7
    Greenpeace has long turned from an environmental organization into an economic one. Nobody wants to finance the Japanese theme, all the money bags understand, it's silly to invest in such a long-term project.
    So pis, although if he is green, all the same, there are pis ... pah..pis
    1. a52333
      a52333 19 October 2013 08: 43 New
      19
      Good morning. hi I would put the question more broadly. We dismantled the USSR due to its "nonviability". Well, not us, but now is not about that. The further, the more I am convinced:
      CAPITALISM - AN UNVILABLE BRANCH
      Initially, it is "sharpened" for profit. And, as a consequence: progress, quality, human relationships, and what is there - life. - everything in this "order" is secondary - profit is primary !!!
      In the framework of this article, two confirmations of my words can be seen.
      1. Fokushima in the pursuit of profit is built without taking into account all safety factors.
      2. Greenpeace - it would seem environmentalists, but the moral of the restaurant girl: feeding and swotting lol .
      These are my sad conclusions, dear ones. recourse
      So where did the phallus carry us ??? !!!!! Is it time to go back?
      1. Ustas
        Ustas 19 October 2013 09: 04 New
        14
        Quote: a52333
        CAPITALISM - AN UNVILABLE BRANCH

        So about it still the founders of Marxism-Leninism spoke.
        But in the 90s we did not believe in this, so we have to comprehend it in our own skin.
      2. SHILO
        SHILO 19 October 2013 13: 40 New
        10
        a52333
        CAPITALISM - AN UNVILABLE BRANCH


        At one time, our Chernobyl liquidators in the West were contemptuously called "bio-robots" - apparently for the ability of Soviet people to carry out orders without looking back either at their health or at their lives. Make the samurai carry the plutonium with buckets or shovel the strontium - you will get overwhelmed (as well as us, including your humble servant - beaten with the beaten capitalism). If Chernobyl happened - part two of the hr ... we could handle it.
        Sincerely.
        1. yur
          yur 19 October 2013 19: 58 New
          +6
          But it seems to me that happen, God forbid, Chernobyl 2, then we’ll go and manage. Evidence of this is the fight against flooding in the Far East. More than 130000 victims and not one dead. Whatever our ill-wishers say, this is an indicator!
          1. a52333
            a52333 20 October 2013 21: 14 New
            0
            Quote: yur
            But it seems to me to happen, God forbid, Chernobyl 2, then let's go and manage.
            Ah well done !!! Here is the difference between the Slavs !!! ARIES ARE TRUE !!!
            Come on, I'll go. And in May of the 45 year they called fire on themselves in Koenigsberg and on the Zeelovsky heights.
          2. koosss
            koosss 21 October 2013 15: 42 New
            0
            compared natural flooding with an atomic technological disaster ..
    2. avdkrd
      avdkrd 19 October 2013 13: 48 New
      +4
      Quote: domokl
      Greenpeace has long evolved from an environmental organization to an economic one.

      They have never been an environmental organization. The tasks they are assigned from Langley and the main ones are: distracting public opinion from really serious problems, lobbying the interests of trans-corporations, by presenting problems at the "right" angle, espionage, accelerating hysteria in projects that are competitive with the main customer. It is no coincidence that the greens are "silent in a rag" about shale gas and Fukushima, and as soon as it comes to Russian global projects, the whole world starts to smell, conferences are organized, "public" environmentalists and other political garbage greedy for money are involved. The very ecological theme is a fertile ground for playing on the feelings of people and the scribes are promoting it to the fullest.
  5. AX
    AX 19 October 2013 08: 06 New
    +6
    This office was created known by whom, and it is known for what purposes ...
    1. Sashkessss
      Sashkessss 20 October 2013 23: 39 New
      0
      Indeed, they did not say anything new. Everyone already knows everything. But they are silent
  6. kripto
    kripto 19 October 2013 08: 22 New
    +3
    But why should the United States and zelenopisers bother with such problems, especially since this to some extent meets their interests. For those who studied geography in a Soviet school, I remind you that all the muck from Fukushima in various currents ends up in the fishing areas that Russia uses. And taking into account the venality of our bureaucrats, it may be further on our tables. That's it ....
    1. yur
      yur 19 October 2013 20: 13 New
      0
      In no way am I going to defend corrupt bureaucrats — I hate them myself. But as a person who studied geography in the Soviet school, I must note that the main currents from Fukushima are directed to the south and southeast, i.e. to the shores of southeast Asia and to America.
  7. awg75
    awg75 19 October 2013 08: 24 New
    +6
    long ago it was necessary to rip the mask off these "nature lovers". in no case should they follow their lead - and those who were caught at Prirazlomnaya should be given real deadlines and in full
    1. Basarev
      Basarev 19 October 2013 16: 41 New
      +2
      Yes, they should have scammed their scum. In the DPRK, there’s no such ceremony
      1. andrei332809
        andrei332809 19 October 2013 21: 03 New
        0
        Quote: Basarev
        Yes, let their scum sank

        to the bottom is not necessary. repaint, change the name, and in operation. I think the vessel will not interfere with the Far Eastern Academy of Sciences, they will find application
  8. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 19 October 2013 08: 24 New
    +6
    Everything is clear with the Green Labels. They are ordered mongrels .. But Japan actually declared a nuclear war for us! Our Far East will soon become the second Chernobyl only on a more global scale (currents spread this infection throughout the oceans)! Why are our specialists not allowed there? we have the same experience and not small .. Japs with their money and high technology along the way ... specifically ... and they are silent and the whole world is silent as if everything is fine (the main thing is that they poison Russia and it suits everyone ..)
    1. Zhaman-Urus
      Zhaman-Urus 19 October 2013 08: 38 New
      +6
      Do not worry, with the course everything carries to the authors of Fukushima, in the USA))
      1. a52333
        a52333 19 October 2013 09: 26 New
        +2
        Does a fish with crabs take it there too? Unfortunately not. Though in hyper for a weekly purchase, take a Geiger counter.
  9. Omskgasmyas
    Omskgasmyas 19 October 2013 08: 50 New
    +7
    Any successful public project becomes a commercial and political shop as soon as the founders leave it (or they leave). And they begin to serve the interests of the dollar-shekel mafia.
    Quote: MIKHAN
    But Japan actually declared a nuclear war to us!

    - some original way to fight by blowing up a reactor on its territory. More like national suicide. And if you look at the map of currents, then Kuro-Shio brings the healing water of Fukushima right to the doorstep of the authors of this "safe" nuclear power plant on the other side of the Great Ocean.
  10. Belogor
    Belogor 19 October 2013 09: 04 New
    +2
    As always, double standards apply. Imagine if this happened on Russian territory (God forbid, of course), then there would be so much noise and tantrum and generally complaints. And here, the world’s oceans are poisoned and nothing, and Greenpeace is attacking the Russian platform, which has not yet begun production. We got a rebuff, now they are organizing an anti-Russian hysteria
  11. major071
    major071 19 October 2013 09: 04 New
    +5
    These, so to speak, “green” were occupied with much more “important” matters.

    Of course, others - grandmothers were counting for custom provocations, and then we went hunting.
    1. Edward72
      Edward72 19 October 2013 09: 25 New
      0
      Well, if ours doesn’t behave for dollars and shekel, then they will go for the smell of Taiga.
  12. andruha70
    andruha70 19 October 2013 09: 29 New
    +1
    here on the news the news flashed-off the coast of the United States caught a herring-5 meter long belay they called a fish-belt ... I don’t know if Fukushima is to blame or if there are any in nature (not a fisherman repeat ) but if herring of such sizes happens, then what, in diameter, should there be a flounder? fellow laughing
  13. vvvvv
    vvvvv 19 October 2013 09: 33 New
    +1
    The Netherlands is not silent, but: baltinfo.ru/2013/10/18/Niderlandy-grozyat-Rossii-tribunalom-po-delu-Grinpis-3861

    22
  14. stroporez
    stroporez 19 October 2013 09: 59 New
    +1
    I am convinced that greenpeace environmental protection is like the Western world "struggle for democracy" .... they deeply FSUs. on all these "endangered species" "environmental protection", "greenhouse effect" ......... this is how ------ an office for "wiring" Slavic los ......... ...... and not Toko Slavic.
  15. lewerlin53rus
    lewerlin53rus 19 October 2013 10: 45 New
    +2
    To call our specialists means to sign our own helplessness and lack of professionalism. Plus, it is possible to disclose design flaws that led to such consequences that it would inflict a crushing blow on the entire US nuclear industry
  16. Yuri Y.
    Yuri Y. 19 October 2013 10: 54 New
    0
    Of course, the threat looming over many countries and the waters of the Pacific Ocean can be prevented. I would suggest creating an internationally competent group of highly qualified specialists to deal with the consequences of the accident.

    For a start, it would be nice, the group would decide on further joint actions. The question concerns everyone in this region, in theory the question is greenpeace. Although the real environmental problems are not apparently included in the scope of their activities.
  17. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 19 October 2013 11: 31 New
    +2
    The nuclear reactors that are installed in Japan (in particular on Fokushima) are American. And the United States is doing everything to muffle public outrage over the outrages that occur in Fokushima. From this we can conclude that Greenpeace is a pro-American organization that carries out orders from overseas bosses. And they attacked the Russian platform with the "blessing" of the Americans.
  18. APASUS
    APASUS 19 October 2013 11: 34 New
    0
    I won’t be surprised that greenpeace receives contributions from the Rockefeller House or the CIA, it’s painful for them to be interested in oil and gas. And they were interested in nuclear power in France only when they were paid from America and it hit the press!
    The scandal turned out and they quickly had to take all their manat from France
    1. Basarev
      Basarev 19 October 2013 16: 47 New
      +1
      But a bad story happened with Germany - they thought up a long time ago to dismantle all nuclear power plants and are now close to this goal. And it is somehow unbeknownst to the Germans that there is no less harm from coal and peat smoke and ash there than from a bombed nuclear power plant
  19. 222222
    222222 19 October 2013 11: 38 New
    +1
    “Why is Greenpeace silent?”
    Greenpeace: "Where is it, Fukushima? On the Kuril Islands?"
    "Yes, and there was no team and they did not give prepayment .. And we do not work for free"

    The Netherlands is ready to appeal to the Maritime Tribunal in the case of Greenpeace .. And why not the Russian Federation apply to the tribunal on the fact of piracy at sea ..
  20. Silkway0026
    Silkway0026 19 October 2013 11: 40 New
    +2
    Why is silent ...
    1. Not paid
    2. Lyuley can be obtained from serious uncles (they say - do not get into your own business)

    it's like a prostitute, without money there will be no tenderness)))
  21. Tatanka Yotanka
    Tatanka Yotanka 19 October 2013 11: 59 New
    +3
    from this article about the leakage of radiation and all kinds of cesium and strontium into the ocean, I realized that the movie "Godzilla" is based on real events
    1. sarmat-4791
      sarmat-4791 20 October 2013 10: 56 New
      0
      Exactly, they like to shoot all kinds of armageddons to themselves there, now - it comes true!
  22. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 19 October 2013 12: 12 New
    0
    Well, we understand where the wind comes from now we need an adequate answer: to condemn all this "riffraff", working out thirty "amerovskoy" pieces of silver, to the maximum, as terrorists and drug dealers, so that others would not disdain to get into the affairs of a sovereign state! To bring the impostors to the surface and demonstrate the process to the worldwide information network!
    1. Basarev
      Basarev 19 October 2013 16: 49 New
      0
      Pure water is a great honor for them. Mayak's liquid waste storage facility will be enough
  23. Arkan
    Arkan 19 October 2013 12: 37 New
    +1
    Green .... they didn’t pay the sky, so she is silent.
  24. Horn
    Horn 19 October 2013 12: 47 New
    +1
    So the green pisya didn’t really occur in the event of a BP accident in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 ...
  25. Chicot 1
    Chicot 1 19 October 2013 13: 27 New
    +5
    Why, and why? .. Because Greenpeace has long been used as a cover for all kinds of special services and their employees. They (special services) provide the main funding for this camarilla ...
    No there, of course there are "real" fighters "for nature." But as a rule (except for small shares) they only play the role of loudmouth "crowd" and a kind of ram. For example, when entering an object ...
    And in good faith it is necessary in every possible way to restrict the access of Greenpeace "activists" to the territory of the Russian Federation ...

    The best remedy for Greenpeace at sea ...
  26. mmmakm
    mmmakm 19 October 2013 13: 33 New
    +1
    And also, it seems that the size of the ship in the "green" does not coincide with those on the drawings. Now they wool it with special care and meticulousness. So they have a panic.
  27. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 19 October 2013 13: 38 New
    +2
    “Why is Greenpeace silent?”

    Well, why is he SILENT, he shouts about "painful", about "lawlessness" on the part of Russia! Look what THREATS are sent to her address, filed an appeal (complaint) on the basis of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, they hope to "put pressure on Russia about the" prisoners ".
  28. Vittt
    Vittt 19 October 2013 14: 11 New
    -2
    Quote: Geisenberg
    Purely my opinion that adding a nuclear bomb to Fukushima will be much more environmentally friendly than just doing nothing. After the explosion, at least the situation will be predictable.
    And greenpeace there saves their whales ...

    Poor, poor Japs, the third bomb is ready for them. To hell with the third bomb - just spray plutonium, uranium, deuterium and tritium (over all of Japan, but what would touch the Hawaiian and Aleutian islands a little).
    Indeed, everything is simple: the Japs fell into a stupor after the accident and they have endless brain diarrhea - our specialists could really help them, but, as I said earlier, they probably hate not only other nations, but also their homeland.
    1. Basarev
      Basarev 19 October 2013 16: 54 New
      0
      And they hate it for a reason - their grandfathers specifically caved in under America, and there was a time when, with just a bunch of noses, they carried out entire naval bases ...
  29. Pesnyadv
    Pesnyadv 19 October 2013 15: 12 New
    +3
    In the distant, early 90s, when the Internet was gaining strength, I came across an article about Greenpeace.
    Her foreign journalist wrote.

    According to him, this organization was organized by a very smart and advanced fraudster.
    The camouflage was perfect. Everything is decorous and noble. Everything was tied to blackmail.
    But the international mafia took him for the gills.
    And Greenpeace went to her.
    Then they learned about this special service. they made an offer that the mafia could not refuse and Greenpeace once again changed owners.

    This I talk schematically.
    And the article was all with a name, dates, facts, argumentation.

    And now we expect noble deeds from Greenpeace?
  30. Altona
    Altona 19 October 2013 15: 58 New
    +1
    The Japanese at a press conference after this factual leakage indistinctly spread their thoughts on the tree ... Experts said that the Japanese government was financing the construction of an underwater dam wall around the epicenter of the leakage, perhaps not just in one belt, but that this measure was practically nothing help with all its obvious cost ...
  31. put
    put 19 October 2013 20: 13 New
    0
    Greenpeace has no place in Japan. What will they fight with? There is no oil or gas. Radiation? So the Japanese
    with her already since 1945. live.
  32. Boris63
    Boris63 19 October 2013 20: 43 New
    0
    Greenpeace is a mongrel who is "ordered by the FAS" and they "yap", and when there is no team they are silent (there is no analogy with the best friends of people). So our ecologists need to "blow all the fanfare", and the state. the same for husbands.
    1. sarmat-4791
      sarmat-4791 20 October 2013 10: 53 New
      0
      who pays money, the girl rubs the back of the bathhouse ...
  33. Valery Neonov
    20 October 2013 04: 12 New
    +1
    Quote: domokl
    Greenpeace has long evolved from an environmental organization to an economic

    It’s more like a political one. And he engages in frankly dubbing.hi
  34. vlad.svargin
    vlad.svargin 20 October 2013 09: 09 New
    +1
    The enormous energy and strategic capabilities of the Arctic have already whetted the appetites of five Arctic states - Canada, the United States, Russia, Norway and Denmark, the author of the article continues. Russia, having included the issue of the Arctic among its priorities, has already submitted an application to expand its economic zone on the grounds that the Lomonosov Ridge is an extension of its continental shelf. However, the determination of the Russians has provoked protests from other nations, claiming to expand their own economic zones in the Arctic. "In the face of this cold war in the Arctic, will the UN be able to make a transparent decision? A priori, no, since the conflicting parties do not seem to be ready to make concessions," Joubert writes.(Source: Le journal du dimanche au quotidien)

    The inaction of Greenpeace in such an unprecedented situation reflects, in my opinion, the opportunistic and bespoke nature of the activities of this organization. In addition, it is impossible not to note the obvious: the long-term geopolitical American-Japanese cooperation covers the unacceptable, extremely dangerous situation that has developed with Fukushima-1. The two countries are afraid of losing face and, trying to distract the attention of the world community, they are using Greenpeace for their own purposes.

    I think that Greenpeace's main customer emerges from these quotes:
    1) Create difficulties for a competitor (Russia) in the development of the Arctic by attracting "public attention" through Greenpeace.
    2) Save your face in a disaster at Focusim without getting attention through Greenpeace.
    American and Japanese firms, for example, Generak Electric and Hitachi, still earn huge sums of money for operating nuclear power plants, as if nothing had happened.
    Greenpeace, most likely, will appear near the Kuril Islands for the purpose of their far-fetched "ecological safety" by order of "their masters" ...
    1. sarmat-4791
      sarmat-4791 20 October 2013 11: 06 New
      0
      This is not entirely the case, although there is a certain share (about the Arctic). Here is another! Did you blow up the station? Blew up! Do they eliminate the consequences? No! Will radiation pollution spread? Will be! Will the people go away? Will be! But there is not enough space for everyone and they will climb abroad. And they will be explained to them why they are right and why they are fighting. Who are their neighbors? ... Mina (when will she explode?)
  35. Takashi
    Takashi 20 October 2013 10: 12 New
    +1
    The fact that Greenpeace - selling murzilka is understandable.
    In light of Greenpeace’s detention in the North, questions are different:
    1. On what basis does the FSB special forces land on a ship (detain) outside the territorial waters of Russia? The Federal Security Service alone guards our border + 25 mile zone (200 km). The detention of the court is the prerogative of the Russian Navy. Do we have a navy?
    2. On what basis do these murzilkas "sew" "piracy"? they didn't seem to capture the platform with weapons

    the fact that they were detained for 2 months is understandable: foreign citizens will merge into their embassies and you won’t get it, but why shut down the same journalists and photographers who are present on the ship for 2 months?
    1. Sour
      Sour 20 October 2013 18: 33 New
      0
      Quote: Takashi
      On what basis do these murzilkas "sew" "piracy"? they didn't seem to capture the platform with weapons

      In article 227 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Piracy), the use of weapons only in part 2, and in part 1, "the use of violence or the threat of use of violence" appears.
      Quote: Takashi
      but why for 2 months to close the same journalists and photographers who are present on the ship?

      For the same as the rest. They were present on the attacking ship. And they were detained precisely for this, and not for membership in "Greenpeace" and not for foreign citizenship.
      Quote: Takashi
      The detention of the court is the prerogative of the Russian Navy

      Is it written in the Constitution? Or where?
      The Navy has no prerogatives, but only duties. Like any power structure. Whoever is ordered will fulfill the task.
      The Federal Security Service only guards our border + 25 mile zone (200 km)The FSB and outside of Russia is valid, if that.
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 20 October 2013 18: 46 New
        0
        Quote: Sour
        Quote: Takashi

        but why for 2 months to close the same journalists and photographers who are present on the ship?

        For the same as the rest. They were present on the attacking ship. And they were detained precisely for this, and not for membership in "Greenpeace" and not for foreign citizenship.

        Here you do not have all the information. I don’t know how on others, but the Russian freelancer was hired Greenpeace for the consecration of this action. http://www.nr2.ru/authors/462361.html
      2. Takashi
        Takashi 20 October 2013 20: 50 New
        0
        Do not write nonsense.

        1. Read the comments to the CC. Violence or threat is when a group of persons disembarks a ship and, using violence or the threat of a weapon (anyone), hijacks the ship. But not when, a group of unarmed people interferes with the work of others by their actions. At most, their actions can be interpreted as "hooligan" or "creating danger at an industrial facility."

        2. They did not intentionally commit a serious crime. It was enough to take a subscription about not leaving. Especially if you hit the first time.

        3. According to the international treaty, in particular on territorial waters (which are ratified by Russia) - outside the territory of the waters - inspection, detention and bringing him to the nearest port of the vessel are entitled only to the Navy, but not to the border guard (represented by the FSB).
        In this case, it is the actions of the FSB special - classified as "banditry" and "piracy".
        1. Was mammoth
          Was mammoth 20 October 2013 21: 13 New
          0
          Quote: Takashi
          Do not write nonsense.

          "The law is that tongue ...". Well, there is still time. You can search for other articles, pulling in the top ten. That the "defenders" of nature were discouraged to arrange provocations. Who don't even know that there are polar nights in the Arctic. And who thought there would be a pleasure walk. Some also thought to do with a "hooligan", desecrating the temple.
          "From the bag, but do not renounce the prison." Good folk wisdom.
        2. Lopatov
          Lopatov 20 October 2013 21: 25 New
          0
          Quote: Takashi
          They did not intentionally commit a serious crime. It was enough to take a subscription about not leaving. Especially if you hit the first time.

          This is not a sufficient condition for issuing a subscription. If you know the Criminal Code, then you must know this.

          Quote: Takashi
          According to the international treaty, in particular on territorial waters (which Russia ratifies) - outside the territory of the waters - inspection, detention and bringing it to the nearest port of the vessel are entitled only to the Navy, but not to the border guard (represented by the FSB).

          Just international treaties nothing they don’t talk about who has the right to detain those who have committed a criminal offense in Russian territory.
        3. Sour
          Sour 20 October 2013 22: 33 New
          0
          You yourself do not write nonsense.
          1. Even from your quote it follows that the use of violence does not necessarily imply the presence of weapons.
          2. What is the "recognizance not to leave", if there are a lot of foreigners? Complete nonsense. Detention, of course. And what does it mean "did not do it intentionally"? Did you happen to be there? Not even funny.
          Piracy is a serious crime, read Article 15, Part 4 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
          3. What kind of contract is this? Link, if not difficult.
          Section 30 of the 19th Law on the State Border speaks quite differently.
  36. Mr. Tyler
    Mr. Tyler 20 October 2013 17: 07 New
    0
    Quote: Basarev
    A similar story was at the Mayak plant, but then almost 90% remained on the territory of the plant, the remaining 10 covered a relatively small area. Then all the little people were quickly taken out and closed.

    1957, Kasad River Flow and nearly 30 km. from the millionth Chelyabinsk, the nearest infection zone. People still live there, expert.
  37. luka095
    luka095 20 October 2013 21: 24 New
    0
    "Of course, the threat that looms over many countries and waters of the Pacific Ocean can be prevented. I would suggest creating an internationally competent team of highly qualified specialists to deal with the consequences of the accident."
    In order to create such a group, it is first necessary to promote for a long time in the media around the world what is happening with nuclear power plants. And for this, for starters, you need to break through the information blockade on this topic, which was erected by both the Japanese and the Americans. By definition, Greenpeace will not participate in this. So, Russia needs to do this - our territory is nearby with all the ensuing consequences ...
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 21 October 2013 06: 12 New
      +6
      Shtatovskie reactors, the Japanese smashed with the accident at Fokushima and now we have what we have. Therefore, they are silent. But why are other APR countries silent? Unclear. There is a so-called food chain and soon all fish will be radioactive. In short, fishing in the Far East is covered with a copper basin, and then the population. Greenpeace is not interested.
  38. a.hamster55
    a.hamster55 21 October 2013 07: 48 New
    0
    Subscribe to travel home for years on 10 and determine the place- Bay of the Cross- let the whales be considered.
  39. Guilty
    Guilty 23 October 2013 14: 04 New
    0
    These environmentalists should be sent to Japan and sent on their ark. And let them protect this nature there. Around the clock. Because in a couple of days they will begin to glow in the dark. I should have listened to the screeches of these defenders that oil could spill in the Barents Sea. By the way, I live not far from this sea)))