Lukashenko told Russia about how he treats her

100
October 11 Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko held a large-scale press conference for the Russian regional media. The event lasted five and a half hours, during which time the head of Belarus answered more than 30 questions.

The fact of holding such press conferences suggests that Lukashenko considers it necessary to build communication directly with the Russian regions - that is, with real Russia. It should be noted that the actual communication with the head of the republic was completed by the press tour of Russian journalists in Belarus, most of which was held this year in the Grodno region. The president emphasized that no one retouched reality for the journalists to come and they were not taken to exemplary agro-towns or enterprises, and thus the guests saw "the real picture - how Belarus lives every day."

"Nabro" about the withdrawal of Belarus from the Union

The press conference had not finished yet, as some media have already presented a “sensation” to the public: Belarus may withdraw from the Customs Union, if Russia does not abolish duties on oil products. Particularly distinguished in this regard, the Ukrainian media - which is not surprising. Although they came across (or deliberately worked in this context), and the Russians. For the sake of justice, we note that some media have found the strength to admit a mistake and annul news.

In fact, the sensation apparently grew out of the following statement by the Belarusian leader:

- The development of the Customs Union involves the creation of attractive conditions for the participants of the association. Putin promised: starting with 1 in January of 2014, we will remove any exemptions ... If we want to develop the Customs Union and create the Eurasian Economic Union, then this must be done. We will still get the effect from this and lose nothing. Otherwise, we will not drag anyone into this Customs Union if we do not see the results from it.

As for the actual duties on petroleum products, Lukashenko stressed the following:

- Do not blame us for the fact that we took this from Russia. We didn't take anything from anyone. And the fact that customs duties were removed in domestic trade - this is how the Customs Union assumes ... At the same time, Minsk transfers to the Russian budget only for oil products exported to the West, 4 billion dollars. And if they stayed in the country - I would have already built the Emirates here.

The Case of Uralkali

As the President of Belarus stated, the “potash business” should not harm the relations between Belarus and Russia, and in this thesis there is a full understanding with the Russian leader:

“When Putin and I met, I said that not a single Baumgertner and Karimov were worth it that we not only once and for all have relations at the state level, but even personal relations were spoiled.” He says: I agree with 100%, they are not worth it. We agreed that we should deal honestly with this matter. Our approaches are absolutely the same: a thief should be in prison.

Lukashenko noted that the Belarusian side is basically ready to restore relations with Uralkali:

- It will only benefit. I told Putin: do not delay the decision. As a last resort, let the state redeem it, now it costs little money. I promise you in a year to double the capitalization of Uralkali. We know how to do it ... We will build relations with anyone, but we would no longer like to see rogues here ... We have already started selling potash fertilizers, we received 150 million dollars last month, we received in October-December from 200 million we are even better contracts. We climb out. We are now very hard, but we get out.

At the end of the topic, Lukashenka said that he was ready to forgive the oligarch Suleiman Kerimov for “non-partner” actions in the Belarusian Potash Company, but the investigation of the criminal case in any case will continue:

- We are ready for any scenario: either we understand and bring the case to the court, or, please, you can refer the case to the court in Russia, we will work together in the attachment, as we have under an interstate agreement.

On the personal relationship of Lukashenko and Putin

According to the Belarusian leader, what is important is not what he discusses with the Russian president, it’s important how the parties discuss the issues:

- This is an absolutely friendly discussion. We can always sit at the table and very frankly, that sometimes it is even unacceptable in relations, for example, between Russia and America, with other states, very openly and as friends to discuss problems. This is also a great achievement. Because when negotiating with a particular state, you always adhere to canons, protocol, diplomatic things. Here we are absolutely deprived of this, we, as in one state, live ...

We have a very good relationship, although I will not say that they are always cloudless. We always had enough problems, there were also collisions, you remember them, we didn’t hide the reasons for this, but how we got out of this situation is important. They also always went out in a friendly way, without causing great damage to each other. Our relations and dialogue is a cast of problems existing between our states. And not only problems, there are good things. We are happy to celebrate them. Meeting, it is always nice to discuss such issues.

About integration processes

As Lukashenko said, Belarus and Russia are now more important than ever to be together in order to successfully overcome emerging problems:

- The global financial crisis has affected all countries, including us. This adversely affected the pace of economic development, complicated the export of products and services, especially since the second half of this year. In this regard, it is important for Russia and Belarus to be together more than ever ...

Today we are progressively making joint efforts, we are moving towards the creation of the Eurasian Economic Union. I want to emphasize that these integration processes are not an empty sound. Thanks to close economic, political and other ties between our states, we already have an excellent opportunity not only to sell goods in a huge market, but also jointly protect the interests of our countries from external threats. Feeling fraternal shoulder, it is easier to pass through new political and economic challenges, and there will be a lot of them ahead ...

At the same time, according to the Belarusian leader, he is disturbed by the behavior of “individual members of the Russian government, politicians who do not really delve into the processes taking place today”:

- If only there is something on the screen to blur, not understanding what is happening. We agreed that one great politician, whose name you all know, stated during the potash conflict that we, it turns out (to me it was amazing), bring the assembly shop from Uralkali and collect it in Belarus ... As usual, they gave the team “atu”, he ran, not knowing what to say.

In the integration context, Lukashenko said that the project of the Union State serves as a template for the creation of new integration entities, including the Eurasian Economic Union. The President of Belarus is sure that the union project has not outlived itself - “we must bear in mind that we are not standing in place: little by little, but we are moving.”

Why Lukashenko is against the union of MAZ and KAMAZ

As the President stressed, in order to privatize any Belarusian enterprise or its part, an investor must be ready to invest in its development, introduce new technologies, open new markets for the products manufactured by this enterprise. On the part of KamAZ, Lukashenko does not see the appropriate opportunities:

- If you take these three parameters, then there is no money (from the Russian side), the technology is worse than at MAZ, because MAZ produces competitive products that are sold no worse than KamAZ if you put them on equal terms. Minsk Automobile Plant is a modernized enterprise, now in-depth modernization is underway. Therefore, questions to the Russian partners regarding their participation in this process are fully justified. If you go, how will you participate in upgrading? None? Then I have a question: would it not be possible that you will take this enterprise for nothing (there is no money) and, over time, at MAZ, they will only produce disks for cars? Can't be like that? Can.

Lukashenka’s proposal is the following: “We can agree on this: divide our common market and sell it”.

On the recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia

At a press conference, Lukashenko was asked why Belarus still did not recognize the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The answer is:

- Do you need this? Is it necessary today, from the point of view of even Russia, to haunt us this question? We recognize the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia - Georgia will immediately be excited, countries with territorial claims will be excited, and the West will immediately swell up. Does Russia need this? Thank God, we survived this moment, and so no one puts the question, and we will simply be a catalyst for this unnecessary trend. What for?

The president noted that, despite the lack of formal recognition, Belarus is closely cooperating with Abkhazia and South Ossetia:

- We helped them with equipment, tractors, and we cooperate in trade. Everywhere we demonstrate that we cooperate with the state. But there was no political chatter. It would give Russia a little, and it would lower us to such a bottom, where we would never see prospects at all. If Russia had shared these risks with us and assumed it, I would personally sign this decree. But I did not get that answer.

About the biggest problem of Belarus

According to Lukashenka, Belarus is ready to accept for permanent residence and “feed” 10 million people. According to statistics provided by the president, for the permanent place of residence profits from Russia to Belarus for 5 have been more than 35 for thousands of people, about 9 for thousands of Belarusians have received a residence permit in Russia for this time. The head of Belarus noted the following:

- The biggest problem we have is not even money, but people. At least as many people as we live live in our territory: we need not 10 million people, but 20 million. We can easily feed them. But they will work and create even more production. If a Russian person, a Russian, wants to come to us from any region, you are welcome, we will only welcome.

Separately, Lukashenko stressed that there is no problem with foreign labor migrants in the republic:

- People come from Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, other countries, mainly families, with children. Accept. If they settle in the countryside, they ask for land - yes, for God's sake, it is profitable for us. Work on construction sites, etc ... The best propagandists in Belarus are those who came to our country from where it is difficult, where it is difficult. They are happy to become private traders, farmers, are engaged in production.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

100 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +21
    16 October 2013 08: 40
    Belarus may withdraw from the Customs Union if Russia does not abolish duties on oil products.
    Old Man knows how to bargain and loves. By God, sometimes I envy Belarusians. sad
    1. Natalia
      +12
      16 October 2013 09: 34
      Quote: a52333
      Old Man knows how to bargain and loves. By God, sometimes I envy Belarusians.

      Hi all, hi
      Come on ... this is nonsense, we have the most fraternal (sisterly) relations with Belarusians, if we have any questions, we discuss, disagree, argue, but still we are united. Belarus is the younger sister of Russia, so with whom we have friendship for centuries, it is with Belarus. wink

      PS An example of how it could be with Ukraine, if not for strange ambitions and a false insult of Ukrainian politicians to Russia ....
      1. +12
        16 October 2013 09: 57
        Quote: Natalia
        an example of how it could be with Ukraine, if not for strange ambitions and a false resentment of Ukrainian politicians against Russia ....

        What does "strange ambition" mean? It's not about ambition! The fact is that NOBODY can show Lukashenka the facts that he keeps money in foreign banks. They tried it somehow, so he replied: "Whoever finds these" my "accounts can take this money for himself. I have never had foreign accounts." And Ukrainian politicians of all stripes keep their money only there! From here we dance!
        1. Natalia
          +9
          16 October 2013 10: 13
          Quote: Egoza
          And Ukrainian politicians of all stripes have money only there! Hence and dance!

          Well, vividly, we’re talking about Belarus right now, we have mmmm with Belarusians ... nevertheless, there’s something more, and money has nothing to do with it, that's for sure ...
          We with Belarus, with different disagreements, are one. And if they are one, then they are invincible fellow
          1. 0
            16 October 2013 15: 31
            Quote: Natalia
            We with Belarus, with different disagreements, are one.

            The people to a greater extent agree with this, but on our TV - either silence about Belarus with the Old Man, or frank de.rmo.
            And as for the preferences of Belarus, they should be so, if they are brothers to us.
            Belarusians hi
            1. Natalia
              0
              16 October 2013 16: 35
              Quote: Z.A.M.
              The people to a greater extent agree with this, but on our TV - either silence about Belarus with the Old Man, or frank de.rmo.

              Oh come on ... over and over again, on the channel - = RUSSIA 1 = -, - = RUSSIA 24 = -, Channel One, NTV, military joint exercises, then some exercises then other exercises ... not what. ...and.
    2. +12
      16 October 2013 09: 39
      Oh, we would have in Russia such a President as Lukashenko, the country would flourish and the people would live well!
      1. t-95-70
        +1
        16 October 2013 11: 46
        To go nuts, people, Lukashenko, really well done, but those who say that everything is rolling in oil there, have you been there? They live far from better than ours. Together we need to be this 100%. And the last, in Belarus in the 90s there was no Yeltsin. And yet, what would Belarus be like without Russia?
        1. +1
          16 October 2013 12: 48
          Listen, it’s good to make such stupid and stupid statements:
          Quote: t-95-70
          And yet, what would Belarus be like without Russia?

          I would not represent myself with Russia, I would represent with Poland. You don't have to make yourself a great savior and patron of the arts. Belarus is not Angola or Vietnam, she lives as she can within her means. And rejoice that with Russia. As the saying goes, "most of the way has been covered, why go back? Now only forward."
          1. xan
            -6
            16 October 2013 14: 59
            Quote: Max Otto
            I would not represent myself with Russia, I would represent with Poland. Do not make yourself a great savior and philanthropist. Belarus is not Angola and Vietnam, it lives as it can within its means. And rejoice that with Russia

            That’s for sure, Belarusians made us happy by connecting with Russia, and not with Poland. Now Russia again owes to Belarus.
            Zadolbalo is all.
            Separate countries need to live without any alliances. Then everything will be over the garlic. Old Man begins to blackmail Putin - we’ll leave the vehicle if you don’t leave 4 billion. And this cenar rubs that Belarus is in chocolate and that Russia is very lucky.
            1. +1
              16 October 2013 17: 56
              There is this type of people - to whom everyone owes everything, you are probably one of those. We live in separate countries, no one has died and will not die, for a long time everything is "on the garlic." Nobody demanded any 4 billion from anyone, this is your negative fantasy, and TS, it is, what is not, there is no sense from it yet, it is still developing. In terms of economic indicators, Russia is deep in chocolate, 5th economy in the world, but for some reason you can't believe it.
              1. xan
                -1
                16 October 2013 22: 48
                Quote: Max Otto
                There is such a type of people - to whom everyone owes everything, you are probably one of them.

                And there is another type of people who have a bunch of serious nishtyaks from other people, giving some garbage in return (everyone understands that this is a form of support), but they pretend that the exchange is equivalent, and they are equal partners in such an alliance.
                You are probably one of those cunning ones.
            2. The comment was deleted.
          2. t-95-70
            -1
            16 October 2013 17: 53
            WELL HOW MUCH MUCH WHERE BELARUSIAN WOULD BE With Poland? GOOD LUCK
          3. t-95-70
            -1
            16 October 2013 17: 54
            and by what means does she live
            1. 0
              16 October 2013 19: 26
              Yes, damn it, your lives, once every six months I go to collect tribute. I personally give it to the head of the state bank. wassat Otkudov, can we even have money? We are lying on the stove, waiting for it to be planted.
              Handouts facts will be? Just do not write about gas at a low price, as agreed, they sell it. Gazprom isn’t completely Russian, and these people will give nothing to zeal, even you Russians wink .
      2. +1
        17 October 2013 14: 04
        Quote: vladimirZ
        Oh, we would have in Russia such a President as Lukashenko, the country would flourish and the people would live well!

        our GDP is no worse and better
        just different conditions
    3. +5
      16 October 2013 10: 05
      More than anything. in the speech of A.G. Lukashenko, I liked his remark about the imminent revision and assessment of all the events that took place in 91g. It will soon be internstno.
    4. +4
      16 October 2013 11: 36
      .
      When Putin and I met, I said that not a single Baumgertner and Karimov were worth it so that we would not only ruin relations at the state level, but even personal relations would be ruined. He says: 100% agree, they are not worth it.


      they are not worth it. but still these people act, and in addition, they also connected Onyshenko to this matter.
  2. +12
    16 October 2013 08: 43
    Old Man well done. Keep it up.
    1. +14
      16 October 2013 08: 47
      Lukashenko is a smart guy.
  3. +3
    16 October 2013 08: 46
    If only all the risks were thrown to Russia, and he himself rowed the petrodollar with a shovel - life would have gone. Constant some kind of blackmail, not just flew information about the exit from the vehicle, it is necessary Lukashenko means something from Russia, but just did not give.
  4. +1
    16 October 2013 08: 52
    As for the recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, the blizzard drove Lukashenko.
    1. +12
      16 October 2013 08: 56
      Sasha, why the blizzard? Do you think that if you don’t recognize the question with an edge? Recognizes! Is it necessary? Russia recognized. What else do you need? They sell Belarusian sausage (probably) there, so far (probably) tractors, equipment - please ...
      1. +4
        16 October 2013 08: 58
        Quote: klimpopov
        Do you think that if you don’t recognize the question with an edge?

        Hi Klim! Why put an edge, he’s just an ally and that’s it.
        1. +8
          16 October 2013 09: 09
          Well ally and ally. He named the reasons why he did not. Yes, and it feels that it’s afraid that our people can throw it (agree the option is possible with our crooks) and then to him then face to face with Europe. I think so.
          But I agree, for "well-wishers" - this is another reason to "be-be-be" to say. Especially which are slightly south of Belarus.
          1. -2
            16 October 2013 17: 04
            Quote: klimpopov
            Yes, and it feels that it’s afraid that ours can be thrown (agree the option is possible with our crooks) and then to him alone with Europe. I think so.

            Yes you are laughing. he is on horseback now. therefore, I started a conversation about duties and the Kaliningrad type of exit from the vehicle. He has nothing to fear, he unfolded the shafts. pretended to be a common man and he will be accepted with applause in Europe. But a vehicle without Belarus will come (a wet cat, or rather a wet pussy), or rather, a miscarriage will occur with the embryo, long before birth.
            Lukashenko will only turn around now with requirements, and no Onishchenko will help.
        2. 0
          16 October 2013 16: 59
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Hi Klim! Why put an edge, he’s just an ally and that’s it.
          Hey . Sasha. Are you right whether it is worth complicating relations because of Abkhazia and Ossetia. Although the Old Man is not d ... ac. he holds trumps in his sleeve. Do you think he’s been driving about duties for 2 weeks now? He understands that Ukraine will not enter the CU. Belarus, the only way to Europe is free (If Belarus is in the CU), and if Belarus suddenly decides to leave the CU, he (the CU) will definitely die. Therefore, forget about fraternal relations - only money. Now the Old Man understands that there is no alternative to him and therefore --- and the duties will be canceled and, in general, the Old Man will begin to suck .... juices of Russia. you will see and all this will be equipped with such beautiful demagogy that it will pay (GDP), and even feel guilty
      2. t-95-70
        +1
        16 October 2013 11: 48
        Guys, why do you forgive everything for one, and for nothing else for the other. Lukashenko framed us in this matter.
        1. +1
          16 October 2013 15: 12
          why did you stick to Lukashenka !? why don't you demand recognition from China, to whom you give taiga, electricity, oil almost for nothing., from the countries of Central Asia, to whom you support the army and let migrants go according to a simplified scheme., stick to Armenia, to Kazakhstan in the end. partners "EU and USA.)
          1. xan
            0
            16 October 2013 15: 24
            Quote: stasimar
            then you pester Lukashenko !? why don’t you demand recognition from China, to which you give away taiga, electricity, oil for nothing.,

            almost for nothing - how much, where did the information come from?
            What a cry?
            1. 0
              16 October 2013 15: 33
              http://rusplt.ru/articles/business/energetiki-gonjat-elektrichestvo-v-kitay.html
              on electricity. apparently about territorial concessions and concessions in the taiga.
    2. +1
      16 October 2013 09: 24
      I agree. Gave slabin. Found someone to be afraid of!
    3. 0
      16 October 2013 09: 36
      If an ally then must recognize the dwarf gangster states?
      Lukashenko is not a serf of Russia and Belarus is not a colony. Continue to live in a world where everyone owes you everything.
      1. +3
        16 October 2013 09: 40
        I agree that "Lukashenka is not a serf of Russia and Belarus is not a colony" - this is a union!
      2. t-95-70
        -2
        16 October 2013 11: 49
        Well done, feeding from the hands of Russia is super, but to confirm that you are an ally and brother, this is politics.
        1. +2
          16 October 2013 11: 53
          What is the feeding? We are also interested in them. And all that you are transferring for money.
          1. xan
            0
            16 October 2013 15: 03
            Quote: klimpopov
            We are also interested in them.

            So, how is that?
            As we are interested in Belarus, we have nowhere to go 4 billion? And for the recognition of Ossetia and Abkhazia still money to roll off?
            1. 0
              17 October 2013 13: 43
              Is there an alternative to Belarus in the CU?
  5. +9
    16 October 2013 08: 54
    - The biggest problem we have is not even money, but people. At least as many people as we live live in our territory: we need not 10 million people, but 20 million. We can easily feed them. But they will work and create even more production. If a Russian person, a Russian, wants to come to us from any region, you are welcome, we will only welcome.

    Damn going to Belarus!
    Why am I sitting here ...?
    1. +9
      16 October 2013 09: 00
      Quote: klimpopov
      Why am I sitting here ...?

      So I think, what are you talking about when the train has 20 minutes left wassat
      1. +2
        16 October 2013 09: 11
        It turned out interestingly. But we have a train Kislovodsk - Minsk in 22 30 runs (well, it used to be). But a plane is better. This reserved seat romance somehow does not catch me. And so it was a rhetorical question.
        1. +5
          16 October 2013 09: 15
          Quote: klimpopov
          And so it was a rhetorical question.

          Yeah, like, envy yes, I'm going to a normal country, where laws work and there are no thieves wink
          1. +5
            16 October 2013 09: 19
            Well, Sasha, you know, the uncle lives there, well, not only idolizing the dad, but what I see there can not but rejoice.
            1. +16
              16 October 2013 09: 22
              Quote: klimpopov
              but what I see there cannot but rejoice

              Are you in Minsk? If yes, at least you will see how the capital might look without Caucasians recourse
              1. +10
                16 October 2013 09: 32
                Yes, to Minsk. A beautiful city. I advise. Yes, there are Caucasians and everyone else, but in much smaller numbers there is no question of the titular nation either, by the way I have heard that people are afraid of such a development of events as in the MSC, but the policy of the authorities is determined ... So shi ...
                1. +5
                  16 October 2013 09: 39
                  Quote: klimpopov
                  Yes, to Minsk
                  drinks


                  Quote: klimpopov
                  Yes, there are Caucasians and everyone else, but in much smaller numbers

                  Almost not noticeable them.
                  Quote: klimpopov
                  and the question of the titular nation is not worth it,

                  Yes, let them try to deliver, Lukashenka will bend them with cancer right away. This is in Russia, this is in Moscow crowds can shout Allah akbar with the full support of "our" leadership am
                  1. Captain Vrungel
                    +8
                    16 October 2013 09: 49
                    They are at home, and we are only at a party.
  6. +16
    16 October 2013 08: 55
    Lukashenka with all his "quirks" still remains a real business executive who cares for the entire economy of Belarus. If you were in the Kremlin, everything went differently in the Russian economy.
    1. Bumbik
      +5
      16 October 2013 09: 53
      Quote: Lindon
      Lukashenka with all his "quirks" still remains a real business executive who cares for the entire economy of Belarus
      Write it on the Belarusian forums. Pounded to hell and twisted a finger at the temple
      1. +3
        16 October 2013 09: 55
        They love - just afraid to jinx it.
        I understand they are already fed up with the "scoop" - they are just naive children - they don’t know what oligarchs and Chubais’s privatization are.
        This is how all engineers and teachers go to sell Chinese rags to the bazaar and recognize the bestial grin of capitalism.
        1. +2
          16 October 2013 10: 46
          Quote: Lindon
          They love - just afraid to jinx it.

          Sorry - mine. The buttons are confused. Beer was already tasty yesterday. drinks I will be corrected.
          1. +1
            16 October 2013 10: 57
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Beer was already tasty yesterday.

            Shaking hands require continuation of the banquet, but the liver opposes laughing
            1. +4
              16 October 2013 11: 47
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              but the liver opposes laughing

              Wife too. laughing
              1. +1
                16 October 2013 13: 15
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                Wife too.

                She has wine and flowers, and a beer to herself wink
                1. 0
                  16 October 2013 14: 46
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  She has wine and flowers, and herself a beer under the guise of wink

                  Experienced, not a ride. She will be with wine and flowers, but I will still be without beer. crying
        2. sq
          0
          16 October 2013 11: 16
          Quote: Lindon
          all engineers and teachers trade at the bazaar

          For a long time in the bazaars there are many teachers and engineers.
          1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Field
        +3
        16 October 2013 11: 21
        still, of course, they will twist, the strangler of freedoms and a terrible dictator. And the fact that the streets are clean, the food is normal, the lump of naaaamnogo less than even here in Siberia (soon as it will be in Moscow), there is no order. Thieves and oligarchs (forgive, of course, honest businessmen - practically conductors of the "market") are jailed without looking back at anyone else.
        Yes, without such external chic and gloss, but for the bulk of the population it is hardly achievable.
        But when this is not the case, "free" people will howl differently
  7. -1
    16 October 2013 08: 56
    People come from Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, other countries, mainly families, with children. Accept - Is there really a demography in Belarus too? This is news, but what am I talking about? In Kazkhastan, you will go to your third child - in the end you will hear enough from the relatively harmless "wow, how brave you are!" before "have you heard about the presence of contraceptives in pharmacies?", what can we say about Belarus.
    Only a foolish way, then in return we get a surge of Belarusian nationalism, as we now have in Russia. But it’s a pity, such people used to be sincere. Now I don’t want to look into Runet once again. So, my friend, it’s better to try to keep the people in the village for the most part, people, they breed in the village, crowded in the city, people do not breed there. And in the village to keep the peasants as serfs - you, Old Man, you can, no one will be surprised at serfdom and will not even be outraged. This is impossible in Russia - there will soon be a juvenile. And you, Old Man, is still possible. Moreover, in the village, eliminate the clubs, switch off the light after 20-00, and fundamentally eliminate contraceptives in pharmacies! Then there will be a result. Janitors, peasants and builders will be their own, relatives.
    1. Jack122
      +1
      16 October 2013 09: 35
      Russia is impossible - there will soon be a juvenile.
      ---
      Tomorrow at three o'clock Moscow time will introduce, yeah. Where do you get it at all?
      1. +2
        16 October 2013 10: 11
        Quote: Jack122
        Tomorrow at three o'clock Moscow time will introduce, yeah. Where do you get it at all?

        - in any case, all sorts of Matvienko and other weighty women, with the support of weighty journalists like Dorenko ("come home after troubles at work, hit your child and you will feel better!") press so hard that Putin, you do not love, will survive or not? is a big question. Read more often your own Russian news, track trends. Well, if Putin holds out, what then is the dislike for Putin? He will be admirable.
        Anyway - there are just wishes for Father - let him not step on the same rake that Russia has already stepped on - like “we need working hands, come, we’ll take it!” Who needs these conflicts out of the blue? Only the West and Israel are in the hands of the "divide and rule!" easier to implement. Therefore, please comment on the merits. On the juvenile, perhaps exaggerated, I agree. Do not exaggerate - you will not touch the quick.
    2. +2
      16 October 2013 10: 16
      Quote: aksakal
      People come from Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, other countries, mainly families, with children. Accept

      - what are they doing? Do not you howl like a wolf here, and so much so that it’s disgusting to listen to what migrant workers are tired of? After all, I’m not howling - you are howling! am And when, in your defense, I will ask Old Man - say, do not repeat the mistakes of others, do not step on the same rake that the Russians have stepped on, you dare to minus it! am
      And then, because of your mistakes, I have to read what you think about my skin color and eye shape! am Well, then keep your opinion to yourself, then I will not post such advice to the Old Man!
      1. MIX58
        +2
        16 October 2013 11: 22
        Quote: aksakal
        you also dare to minus!


        Nisebe why do you have ideological expressions .... (how dare you spoil my pure drink here with your unclean snout .... !!!!!)


        Quote: aksakal
        And then, because of your mistakes, I have to read what you think about my skin color and eye shape!

        .... Yes, you also have xenophobe ... in addition to everything ...... (((((
      2. sq
        0
        16 October 2013 11: 30
        Quote: aksakal
        Quote: aksakal People come from Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, other countries, mainly families, with children. Accept

        Those who come to work are best accepted. And there are few such, more often there are rednecks (masters of life) because of which all this fuss is.
      3. +1
        16 October 2013 11: 42
        Quote: aksakal
        - what are they doing?


        Do you need pros or cons? It’s enough that you expressed your opinion. Like or dislike, but this is your opinion.

        P.S.minus is not mine.
        1. +1
          16 October 2013 16: 09
          Quote: lonely
          Do you need pros or cons? It’s enough that you expressed your opinion. Like or dislike, but this is your opinion.

          - Yes, it’s not the matter - the matter is whether the forum users agree or disagree to solve this urgent problem, which is already becoming a real threat to the Eurasian Union.
          Of course, I went over with the restriction of freedom for the Belarusians-villagers, I earned it a minus, although for the sake of justice I should say that the USSR was still dealing with such a restriction from excessively fast urbanization - the institute of residence registration pursued precisely this goal, will you argue?
          BUT!!!! Both Belarusians, Kazakhs, and Russians are developing their economies EXTENSIVELY. That is, economies grow by 5% (plus or minus) per year, and the population DOES NOT GROW at such a pace. And growth is not due to the growth of labor productivity, but due to the involvement of new labor resources. And where to get it in the amount of 5% per year, if your population does not give birth? Here is your question and answer to it. And the answer is on the surface. Switch to intensive economic growth, due to the growth of labor productivity, which may at first give a serious increase in unemployment, and limit the rate of urbanization. That is, in the village, on the contrary, DO NOT INCREASE the growth of labor productivity, but simply require an increase in the volume of agricultural products and maximize the living conditions in the village. The city never gave, does not give and will not give population growth, but to reduce - this city can easily. THIS is not just an axiom and a postulate, it is the first rule of a DEMOGRAPH. Do you want population growth? Keep the people in the village.
      4. 0
        16 October 2013 16: 11
        Quote: aksakal
        because of your mistakes, I have to read what you think about my skin color and eye shape!

        Cool tantrum! good
        And what about the problem with your skin incision?
  8. +11
    16 October 2013 09: 01
    Here we are absolutely deprived of this, we live in one state ...

    I always believed and still think that Russia and Belarus are one state, one people. Still Ukrainians would have understood this. IMHO. recourse
  9. Valery Neonov
    +2
    16 October 2013 09: 08
    I'm sorry, I'm waiting -----, but I do not agree; trade again, profit again ... or maybe blackmail; otherwise -“You don't have to reproach us that we took it from Russia. We didn’t take anything from anyone. And the fact that customs duties were removed in domestic trade - so the Customs Union assumes this ... At the same time, Minsk transfers to the Russian budget only for oil products exported to the West, $ 4 billion. And if they remained in the country, I would have already built the Emirates here. "...
    Truly ENEMIES ARE ENEMIES, you know what to expect; friends, wait for anything ... - I say that I consider it necessary ... AGA. POINT. hi
    1. Belogor
      +3
      16 October 2013 09: 36
      I agree with you, this "friendly" blackmail has already gotten out. Under beautiful words about friendship, he behaves like ... in short, I would not go into intelligence with him. Enemies are easier to deal with.
  10. Sergeant
    +1
    16 October 2013 09: 18
    ..At the same time, according to the Belarusian leader, he is alarmed by the behavior of “individual members of the Russian government, politicians who do not really go into the current processes ..”


    I think that "individual members of the Russian government" are alarming many in Russia too (said softly? sad .. I must say: got it already! ..M .. fuck! angry ).
    And they delve into the "processes", but they have their own "process": stick as many sticks in the "wheels of Russia" as possible!
    1. +5
      16 October 2013 09: 28
      I would single out the word "members" here. That says it all. The Russian language is great and mighty. laughing
  11. +2
    16 October 2013 09: 39
    Today we are progressively making joint efforts, we are moving towards the creation of the Eurasian Economic Union. I want to emphasize that these integration processes are not an empty sound. Thanks to close economic, political and other ties between our states, we already have an excellent opportunity not only to sell goods in a huge market, but also jointly protect the interests of our countries from external threats. Feeling fraternal shoulder, it is easier to pass through new political and economic challenges, and there will be a lot of them ahead ...

    You can’t say better. If our officials from the Kremlin had the same reason, Ukraine would have joined long ago.
  12. soldier's grandson
    +1
    16 October 2013 09: 53
    the real president is a business executive, he will be able to raise the country because he is not tolerant
    1. xan
      +1
      16 October 2013 15: 20
      Quote: Soldier's grandson
      the real president is a business executive, he will be able to raise the country because he is not tolerant

      in St. Petersburg was in the chamber of commerce at a meeting with representatives of Belarusian enterprises. Asked specific questions to representatives of manufacturers of building materials, despite the fact that these materials are already supplied to St. Petersburg. I did not receive specific answers, which was incredibly surprised. An acquaintance who has business with them said that Belarusian managers are all like that, afraid to take responsibility.
      What is there to adopt?
  13. +2
    16 October 2013 09: 59
    Every tenth economically active Belarusian is now a labor migrant. Mostly in the Russian Federation, where he receives a salary and pays taxes.
    Instead, Belarus needs 500 thousand migrants - Uzbeks, etc., whose salaries are paid by suppliers from the Russian Federation, because she is twice as high as the local one.
    Then every fifth Belarusian will be forced to become a migrant, and Belarus will need another 500 thousand Uzbeks.
    Such is the price of applications for the admission of migrants to the Russian Federation and the need for population growth by the leaders of the Republic of Belarus.
  14. +1
    16 October 2013 10: 08
    Sensible and thoughtful President. He is a fan of his republic, of his people. Russia would solve many problems if the country's leadership fought corruption like a dad. Any thieves are not comfortable living in Belarus. Unfortunately, such citizens feel at ease in Russia.
  15. 3935333
    +3
    16 October 2013 10: 16
    Why did Lukashenka even organize this press conference? Goal? Will we like the Russians? to show and tell the regions "who lives well in Russia"?
  16. MIX58
    0
    16 October 2013 11: 05
    “When Putin and I met, I said that not a single Baumgertner and Karimov were worth it that we not only once and for all have relations at the state level, but even personal relations were spoiled.” He says: I agree with 100%, they are not worth it. We agreed that we should deal honestly with this matter. Our approaches are absolutely the same: a thief should be in prison.

    .... "Batka" diplomat, of course .... he is still ........ (but personally to me --- very much this statement liked it ..... !!!)
  17. Field
    -1
    16 October 2013 11: 10
    Old Man, a more efficient and effective politician and manager, because he does not look back at anyone (at the economic and political elite).
    A lot of things are pleasing in Belarus (of course, there are also enough minuses, but there are a lot of positive ones), I want our situation to be at least no worse.
  18. Federal
    +4
    16 October 2013 11: 52
    Usual old-fashioned rhetoric in the style of the father .... Unpersuasive and nothing new, designed for a semi-literate layman, give us crutches in the form of another preference from Moscow within the framework of the Customs Union and we will modernize MAZ AND BELAZ, at your expense, yeah, as always .. .. Take away now the benefits for gas, crude oil, a super business executive well, a bulb will transplant his 10 million.
    The level of life in the Russian Federation is at least half higher, and this despite the fact that the Russian Federation was and will be a cash cow in Belarus. Gentlemen must pay for friendship and military bases, but it’s bitter but true. It’s necessary to change the Old Man in a good way, and to put an adequate and loyal RF preza, this one got everyone, DAM doesn’t even want to meet this dependents, Putin just needs to work sometimes, although it’s obvious how disgusting, everything looks in your pocket that you’re stealing ...
    1. -1
      16 October 2013 13: 18
      Quote: Federal
      Usual old-fashioned rhetoric in the style of the father .... Unpersuasive and nothing new, designed for a semi-literate layman, give us crutches in the form of another preference from Moscow within the framework of the Customs Union and we will modernize MAZ AND BELAZ, at your expense, yeah, as always .. .. Take away now the benefits for gas, crude oil, a super business executive well, a bulb will transplant his 10 million.
      The level of life in the Russian Federation is at least half higher, and this despite the fact that the Russian Federation was and will be a cash cow in Belarus. Gentlemen must pay for friendship and military bases, but it’s bitter but true. It’s necessary to change the Old Man in a good way, and to put an adequate and loyal RF preza, this one got everyone, DAM doesn’t even want to meet this dependents, Putin just needs to work sometimes, although it’s obvious how disgusting, everything looks in your pocket that you’re stealing ...

      Do you have facts that MAZ and BelAZ are modernizing at the expense of Russia? Gas, oil at a discount? So it’s paid for by actually transferring all the infrastructure to the ownership of Russian companies, and not received for nothing. At the expense of living standards: my dear aunt lives in Pskov, I shut up her forever on this subject. I live in a private sector in a city. In my house, sewage and water supply since 82 years old, and from 10 years old and gas. She lives in a brick 2-story building, still has amenities on the street, carries water from a column and drowns with firewood, she can’t see a new apartment! And my mother moved to a new apartment from Khrushchev, but I built it, and not on a mortgage. What is the standard of living? Show me the facts, how Belarus lives at the expense of Russia?
      1. Federal
        +1
        16 October 2013 14: 29
        And my aunt lives in Brazil where there are a lot of wild monkeys ..... Before writing this nonsense, dear, take the trouble to read, the gas transport system of Belarus, also known as Beltrans GAS, was bought by Gazprom for real money for several tranches of LIVE money, and not for half-tractors and televisions. Can I tell you how much my native gaulayateritstvo Yandiya pays for Russian gas now? About 400 bucks per cube and Bydlorussia? Do not know? 160 is not it really felt comrade? What about duty free oil, and if it does not change the memory under 400 bucks per ton now? Continue the list of dairy agricultural products in huge Russian. market? Will we continue to quack about the brilliant ransomware Lukashenka or be silent?
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          16 October 2013 16: 32
          hamlo bender
          1. t-95-70
            0
            16 October 2013 18: 00
            I just don’t understand how you gentlemen supposedly differ from the same liberals. Those who are not with them that enemy, a vivid example of the United States, And you who do not think how you are, that all the scum is over. Guys then who are you?
        3. 0
          16 October 2013 18: 02
          Quote: Federal
          And my aunt lives in Brazil where there are a lot of wild monkeys ..... Before writing this nonsense, dear, take the trouble to read, the gas transport system of Belarus, also known as Beltrans GAS, was bought by Gazprom for real money for several tranches of LIVE money, and not for half-tractors and televisions. Can I tell you how much my native gaulayateritstvo Yandiya pays for Russian gas now? About 400 bucks per cube and Bydlorussia? Do not know? 160 is not it really felt comrade? What about duty free oil, and if it does not change the memory under 400 bucks per ton now? Continue the list of dairy agricultural products in huge Russian. market? Will we continue to quack about the brilliant ransomware Lukashenka or be silent?

          What is this diarrhea of ​​consciousness? Yes, even in Honduras, your aunt lives empty, h.mo. (this is for "cattle") Why are you poking me gas prices? They sent their downs to negotiate - they agreed, what are you complaining about. Or do you think if you constantly pour slop on your head, then you should be given gas for nothing? When your neighbor bought a thing cheaper than you, do you also throw tantrums and don't talk to your neighbor?
          In addition to rudeness, there is no answer how modernization is being carried out at the expense of Russia.
  19. t-95-70
    +5
    16 October 2013 11: 57
    Everyone who praises Lukashenko here has forgotten that he has neither Chechnya, nor Dagestan, etc. That Tajiks don’t tear toward him, because there you can’t earn. Forget it, comrades, that in the 90s Lukashenko was in Belarus, not Yeltsin. You forget that there was no 10 years of the Chechen war, you forget that it has not 86 subjects, and no more than 150 peoples inhabit Bulbandia. And lastly, what is Belarus without present-day Russia?
  20. AlexCPP
    +1
    16 October 2013 12: 32
    I do not understand your optimism and joy about Lukashenko. Someone even offers to invite him to the throne in the Russian Federation. But if you have relatives in Belarus, he will understand me. According to their description, life has become much worse. Prices are rising and salaries have remained virtually unchanged since 2010. Even I complained that there was a shortage of essentials in 2011. Honestly, I do not support optimism regarding the father. And even more so, to compare a practically mono-ethnic country with a population of 10 miles. a person with a multinational country with a population of 143miles. man is not something that is not correct it is even stupid. And about the economy, I can say one inflation in the Republic of Belarus since the beginning of the year is already 10%, while the GDP grew by only 1.1%. So draw conclusions. And let the residents of Belarus talk about 2011? About half-empty counters in some stores and much more. And just let it be true.
    1. pahom54
      0
      16 October 2013 13: 19
      When I read you, it seems to be right ... But I have two classmates and three just acquaintances who remained after the collapse of the USSR in Belarus, they themselves are Russians, my relatives are all in Russia, and sometimes we call back, sometimes we meet, talk, and for some reason then they are not going to return and become citizens of Russia. Normal men, don’t get drunk and torn, you can believe them ... So your information is mine and I’ve got it from different sources, and it’s hard to decide which one to trust ... I have known people I’ve been talking about for 35-40 years, so that I can’t believe them, it makes no sense to lie to me ...
      1. AlexCPP
        +1
        16 October 2013 14: 37
        I can say that they are also not going to go where it is their land. As well as I from RK in the territory of which my ancestors moved from Belarus in 1902. And in 2010, I was at my best to tell the historical homeland with a stretch. So, I have not seen much progress in comparison with the Russian Federation. For example, in Minsk the roads are worse than in Tyumen. But what really surprised me was this population. I have never met such a good-natured people.
      2. t-95-70
        0
        16 October 2013 18: 02
        utter stupidity, for those with billions in their feeds they also have 35-45-50. and you can’t not trust them either, right?
  21. chushoj
    +1
    16 October 2013 12: 40
    After the collapse of the USSR, as a prepared decaying non-Russian creation of the 80s, Lukashenko was chosen to build a new union formation of the Slavs and all who want to join. They chose him in the midst of rampant banditry, economic reforms (Gaidar, Chubais, Shokhin, Shakhrai under the leadership of a member of the CPSU and the KGB Berezovsky). As Lukashenko treats Russia with love, it is better to look on business and not on explanation.
  22. pahom54
    0
    16 October 2013 12: 46
    The idea of ​​a united state has come up more than once, but the two chieftains cannot share power ... But it would be nice: Old Man Lukashenko to be the president, Putin to the prime minister, and Medvedev can really be sent to some Belarusian collective farm work ... Only Belarusians, I'm afraid they won’t accept him ...
  23. AlexCPP
    0
    16 October 2013 12: 52
    Quote: pahom54
    The idea of ​​a united state has come up more than once, but the two chieftains cannot share power ... But it would be nice: Old Man Lukashenko to be the president, Putin to the prime minister, and Medvedev can really be sent to some Belarusian collective farm work ... Only Belarusians, I'm afraid they won’t accept him ...

    And by what criteria do you want an old man as president? Just want to find out? What merit?
    1. chushoj
      0
      16 October 2013 13: 00
      And if he wrote that Australia needs to be moved to India, would you also ask him why he decided so?
    2. +1
      16 October 2013 13: 00
      Because he is against s and geyropi. /sarcasm/
    3. pahom54
      -1
      16 October 2013 13: 13
      at least because there is no such corruption in the state ... He has enough negative traits - even though he is still a dictator, this is give and not sin ... But still, ordinary people have more sense of security there than with us ... We have corruption - although we are shouting at the president and the government - in the very root system, in the localities the specific princes do what they want, and there, at least the dad removes their Bosko ...
      1. t-95-70
        0
        16 October 2013 14: 21
        Guys, well, Lukashenko has a different territory, and the state is mono-ethnic. AND NOT THE TERMS OF IT AFTER THE 90s. And last, the guys today, Belarus, without today's Russia, well, if it hadn’t been what it was, it would have lain under somebody
        1. +1
          16 October 2013 14: 30
          I would say that without Russian money injections, But father would have gone around the world for a long time.
  24. +1
    16 October 2013 13: 14
    Our approaches are exactly the same: a thief should be in prison.

    Chet Old Man has beguiled a little .. In Russia, a thief should sit in EdRe, and a megavore should have a ministerial portfolio, or oligarch status sad
    1. t-95-70
      0
      16 October 2013 14: 15
      Listen, here you read such opuses and the question arises, why do you need this?
  25. +1
    16 October 2013 14: 11
    To dad chtoli go? I like Minsk ... When I served in Belarus, I thought that it’s better and there’s no people ...
  26. -1
    16 October 2013 14: 37
    Lukashenko in Belarus thinks about the country, not his pocket. And this is the most important thing
    1. AlexCPP
      +1
      16 October 2013 14: 44
      Yes, especially when at the beginning of 2011 you get a sn in the amount of $ 1200 and at the end there are 470 of the same dollars. And at the same time ask for help from the Russian Federation in the form of leverage with loans. And the reason is simply not to turn on the printing press, even the Russian Federation cannot afford it.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. t-95-70
      +3
      16 October 2013 14: 48
      Precisely, and the son grows up to replace him. And mind you not for your own pocket, worries about the family, i.e. about all of Belarus.
      1. 0
        16 October 2013 15: 23
        Quote: t-95-70
        Precisely, and the son grows up to replace him. And mind you not for your own pocket, worries about the family, i.e. about all of Belarus.

        and ours do not lag behind ... little by little ... on the scale of all Russia ... and clannishness does not differ much from nepotism ...wink
        and for irony, plus ... good
  27. 0
    16 October 2013 15: 03
    I don’t like Obama, and the young men chose him for a second term, which means he is good for them. Old Man how many already rules? Good or not Belarusians decide.
    1. AlexCPP
      +1
      16 October 2013 15: 11
      If everything rested on the terms of rule. Here Elizabeth II rules since Great Britain since 1952. We do not say good or bad. We are talking about how he is like everyone else. There is nothing special or far-sighted in him. He cares like all the leaders of the former USSR from the beginning about his problems and then only about ordinary people. As in principle, and in all countries.
      1. +2
        16 October 2013 15: 29
        Quote: AlexCPP
        There is nothing special or far-sighted in him.

        I absolutely agree with you. When reporting on Old Man, you will never hear critical judgments, although there are a lot of problems in Belarus. In this article, for example, nothing is said about the $ 100 tax that Lukashenko wants to introduce for his citizens traveling to other countries for shopping, but at that press conference they asked such a question. I can’t imagine if in Russia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan ... the presidents said: “It will be like this: we serve you at the border - pay $ 100 from the nose and go abroad,” the RBC agency quotes the Belarusian president. He believes that then Belarusians will buy all the necessary goods of local production. ”
        “Belarusians are massively leaving abroad. According to the representative of the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in Belarus Natalya Jacques, at present, from 800 thousand to 1,2 million Belarusian citizens of working age are abroad. “This does not mean that they left forever and do not return,” the expert noted. “They leave, return, they leave for seasonal work, then return again, that is, it is such a seasonal migration.”
        Labor migration is, first of all, the reaction of the population to economic difficulties, a way to overcome them. In a study conducted by the IPM Research Center, it is noted that, in general, the dependence of socially vulnerable groups on material assistance to relatives and friends has increased, including in the form of migrant transfers.
        Belarusian authorities are thinking about how to compensate for the shortage in the labor market by attracting workers from abroad. To attract migrants to our country, the National Program for Demographic Security for 2011-2015 provides for financing in the amount of 2,8 billion rubles annually. ”
        http://belanews.ru/2013/01/05/33834/
        Well, think for yourself, if everything in Belarus was wonderful and cloudless, almost 5 million of 1 million able-bodied Belarusians would go to work. I won’t recall hyperinflation in Belarus in 2011, overstocking warehouses there after Russia entered the WTO, I won’t even remember information. WikiLeaks: the whole truth about Lukashenko Belarus. I served there for many years, Belarus is not a stranger to me, I always warmly remember Belarusian friends, come to them and always rejoice at how prettier the country has been in recent years. But if you hush up the problems, do you really think they will be solved by themselves. Well, it’s impossible to cross capitalism with socialism, a hippo with a crocodile, a dandelion with a Christmas tree. We need competent, effective reforms. It would be better if the Belarusians themselves honestly talked about the problems, although it is unlikely - the country is small, I do not want problems.
      2. t-95-70
        +2
        16 October 2013 18: 04
        I agree completely, but we don’t need to impose it on him, he can’t cope with today's Russia
        1. 0
          16 October 2013 19: 42
          Yes, no one is imposing ... it is simply clear that the neighbors, Slavic brothers, have a patriotic president. By the way, he is the only one from the Belarusian leadership in 1991 who was against the collapse of the USSR.
          "... he cannot cope with today's Russia ..."
          )))))))) And are these coping? )))))))
          1. 0
            16 October 2013 22: 32
            Quote: Goodmen
            By the way, he is the only one from the Belarusian leadership in 1991 who was against the collapse of the USSR.


            Permit Dmitry, you were a little mistaken! Lukashenko in 1991 was just a deputy of the Armed Forces, he was not among the leadership of Belarus
  28. IGS
    +2
    16 October 2013 16: 04
    Actually, the slogans: "Lukashenka is the president of Russia", I am somewhat alarmed, we have our own president, he personally suits me perfectly. Although the fact that on the world stage looks dignified, without looking back at anyone, fearing to anger someone and not wagging, the example of Syria. As for the economy ... you can let the dogs go, but it is far from better than us, Russia saved from a complete collapse of the economy, otherwise everyone quickly forgot something, forgot about the disagreements that were. I don’t like his behavior: let’s give us the management of the Kaliningrad Region, we’ll make a piece of candy there, and let’s leave 4 billion, they will still be robbed of you, this is just in memory, still fresh. Let's go without "let's". And then friendship ends as soon as it comes to money. Why this press conference? Will someone answer me clearly? And tell me also that during the time of disputes with Russia, he did not try to turn to the west, but only he had no way there. Belarus is mono-national, there are no such problems as in Russia. The territory is smaller, it is easier to hold everything in your hands there, eat me up, but dad himself is not enough to share with the oligarchs. Do not take this for the fact that I am forcing something between Russia and Belarus, I am talking specifically about Lukashenka. I don't like all these praises in his direction. Why should I constantly peck a Russian as it is good in Belarus and everything thanks to Lukashenka. I myself know how it is there, and if something is good it is thanks to people. I don't really like Ukrainians for their character, I honestly speak and speak about it, and I consider Belarusians the best people, for their spiritual qualities, for their hard work. This is my opinion. I don’t want to offend the Belarusians if you like your president, this is good, but you don’t need to impose him on me. And then, what is this: "Lukashenka is president and Putin is prime minister"? Let Putin be the president, and Lukashenka the minister of agriculture, it suits me more, like many here.
    1. 0
      17 October 2013 01: 02
      Quote: IGS
      . I do not really like Ukrainians for their character, I honestly talk about it and spoke, and I consider Belarusians to be the best people, for their spiritual qualities, for hard work.
      You are fundamentally wrong! Character and hard work is not a feature of the nation !!!
      1. IGS
        0
        20 October 2013 06: 52
        There is such a concept "national character trait".
  29. 0
    16 October 2013 16: 26
    no economic affairs with Belarus can now be had --- I am sure that big business understood this very well. when a mustachioed genius steers the economy, this is how disgusting the HRC is ... I have a very, very negative opinion about our oligarch --- but what the All-Belarusian Old Man is doing is simply no words .... I really hope that he will come across this
    1. 0
      16 October 2013 17: 04
      They wanted to throw daddy with potassium ... and the "partners" from our side sawed off the budgets ... So he was offended ...
      And he severely steers the economy, I agree ... But the capital is not withdrawn from the country ... industry belongs to the state, not to crooks, who in time fussed with privatization ... well, etc. etc. He is a patriot of his people. And this is an important feature for the president !!!
  30. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  31. 0
    16 October 2013 18: 56
    Quote: Z.A.M.
    The people to a greater extent agree with this, but on our TV - either silence about Belarus with the Old Man, or frank de.rmo.


    Do not forget whose tune our media are dancing.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"