HQ-9 and C-300. China denies copying charges

145

As is known, the Chinese HQ-9 long-range air defense system “Red Flag” became the winner of the Turkish T-Loramids tender, winning the competition from the American Patriot system, the Russian C-400 and the European Aster, mil.news.sina.com.cn.

The FD-2000 is an export version of the HQ-9 ADMS. It is wrong to assume that this complex is a copy of the Russian C-300. Russia showed C-300 for the first time at the Moscow Airshow in 1992, in 1993, deliveries of complexes to China began (according to other data, in 1996), after which Beijing began building its own HQ-9 complex, development continued for almost 15 years. Probably in the middle of the development stage, later Russian technologies were used.

But the differences are striking. The HQ-9 rocket has a total length of 6,51 m as compared to 7,5 m for the 48Н6 С-300 SAM (Western designation SA-10). The Chinese complex has a maximum firing range of about 125 km, a target height of 18000 m, an average damage range from 7 to 50 km at altitudes from 1000 to 18000 m, a minimum impact height of 25 m, a range of damage to ballistic targets from 7 to 25 km at altitudes from 2000 to 15000 m, maximum rocket overload during 22g maneuvering.


The HQ-9 complex incorporates a CJ-202 phased-array radar fire control system (PAR), an improved version of the radar used in the KS-1 complex (this air defense system has the military designation HQ-12 - approx. "VP") . The antenna has an azimuth of 120 hail, peak power of 1 MW, average power of 60 kW, detection range of 300 km, can simultaneously monitor 100 targets, perform automatic threat assessment and ensure simultaneous shelling of six targets.

The number of missiles on the PU is the same as that of the C-300 (four transport-launch containers), the missiles are fired from the container in a “cold way” using a steam and gas generator. PU is located on the four-axle all-terrain chassis of domestic development and production. Missile launches can occur at intervals of about 5 seconds.


The brigade consists of six battalions, each of which is equipped with its own command vehicle and radar fire control. The battalion is equipped with 8 PU, the number of missiles ready to launch is 32.


The export version of the complex uses a more modern HT-233 fire control radar, each antenna consists of 1000 or more phase shifters, average radiation power 60 kW, peak power 1 MW, maximum target tracking distance (aircraft) 120 km or more, control of the electron beam It is produced in the 120 range in the horizontal gradient and 65 grad in the vertical direction, and is capable of simultaneously tracking up to the 100 targets and targeting 50.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

145 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. honest jew
    +47
    14 October 2013 13: 48
    Another Chinese copy !!! Made in Chine !!!
    1. +92
      14 October 2013 14: 13
      Well, Honest Jew is really honest)))))
      He set the article as a minus. There is a miserable semblance of excuses ..... (And to the Jew +))
      The Chinese do nothing of their own ....
      In China there is a village (they took me there)) - There absolutely everyone draws paintings by Rembrandt, Dali, Shishkin, Warhal ...... etc. etc.
      Moreover, everyone draws (from small to large))) and Rembrandt to some pictures-draw and draw))))))

      I ask, they say, something of my own, from myself ,,,, for the soul surrounding nature, Residents, animals ?????
      No, we don’t know how, You’ll draw and then We will draw .......

      I bought a magnet)))))
      1. +12
        14 October 2013 14: 34
        Quote: Asgard
        Well, Honest Jew is really honest))))) I put the article minus. There is a miserable semblance of otmazy ..... (And to the Jew +)) The Chinese do nothing of their own .... There is a village in China (they took me there)) -There, absolutely everyone draws pictures of Rembrandt, Dali, Shishkin, Warhal ...... etc. etc. Moreover, everyone draws (from small to large))) and Rembrant to some pictures-draw and draw)))))) I ask , they say, something of their own, from myself ,,,, surrounding nature for the soul, Residents, animals ????? No, we don’t know how, You draw and then We draw ....... I bought a magnet))) )))

        He shit in 3 topics and then said that it’s impossible to say anything else! It’s necessary to ban him!
        1. +36
          14 October 2013 15: 06
          Oh guys, how much to explain to you ....
          N E at p about d about B L Y Y T E S b))))
          You can’t do by analogy, this is how monkeys do, you need to notice GOOD and cultivate it .....
          And to ask People not to go to synagogues, because there they commit murders of both People (goys) and Souls of those who call themselves Jews .....

          Recall Sasha Koptsova, the grandson of the rabbi led to the Moscow Hasidic synagogue on Bolshaya Bronnaya (there is a metal detector at the entrance)) they drank and tried to bleed the body (this is indicated by characteristic cuts on the face and neck .... He (woke up)) jumped up and grabbed a lancet and cut eight people — who participated in the murder .....
          The judicial system is arranged in such a way that the guy was imprisoned for 13 years, although People endure the "little things" from prison and it expounds a Logically true version, not a COURT JUDGMENT ...


          What am I doing? He’s not following a nickname, he reads, learns, his brain adjusts to Ludskoye and at some point, he will leave the herd type of life, begin to think of himself (this is priceless)), and here you must contribute to this, and not spread rot rudiments of the mind ....
          True, the Jews have a "good opinion" about themselves and their merkava is the most depraved))) the Shnobel laureates they received most of all the Nobels))))

          But then we know what's what ....
          I suggest, if you have not very good feelings for a Jew or any NIK, do not quarrel with him ...

          From the side, it somehow doesn’t color the Man)))
          Sincerely, Vladimir))))
          1. rolik
            +5
            14 October 2013 19: 30
            Quote: Asgard
            You can’t do by analogy, this is what monkeys do,

            So do the Chinese))))))
          2. POCC
            0
            15 October 2013 18: 20
            good if true then drive the Hasidim with a filthy broom
      2. +21
        14 October 2013 15: 55
        Do you know any great Chinese mathematician, physicist, chemist, biologist, aircraft designer? According to the school curriculum, they claim that the Chinese invented gunpowder, paper and a compass. Oh well. I know for sure that according to the number of options for torturing people, they are definitely unsurpassed. This quiet, not evil (in comparison with representatives of the southern regions of Russia) nation knows how to slowly hurt.
        1. Dovmont
          +10
          14 October 2013 16: 42
          China invented gunpowder, compass, paper !!! ??? Old and deep-rooted misconceptions, oh, how hard it is to knock out brains. The only thing they invented is the Chinese characters, which no one else can parse except them)))
          1. grapefruit
            +12
            14 October 2013 19: 44
            I had to communicate with Chinese professors from Nanjing Aerospace. The same is with the owner of the plant near Shenzhen (naturally he comes from peasants, and he created a plant for 1500 personnel - he makes electric motors and winches, and sends 10% of the volume to Russia). Both (!!!!) answered the question about copyright protection - "if I read Pushkin's poems on the square, and they throw me a change, should I pay tax to Pushkin's relatives? And about copyright - the laws of physics that you have in Russia, that we have in China - the same .. "The only thing that we, Russia, can resist the Chinese tyring is with production technologies - here they are like with Rembrandt's paintings - figurines that they themselves can come up with, only to simplify to reduce the cost
            1. +2
              15 October 2013 05: 56
              Both (!!!!) issued a question about copyright protection - "if I read Pushkin's poems on the square, and they throw me a change, should I pay tax to Pushkin's relatives lol What the hell ... Confucius nervously smokes on the sidelines ... lol
          2. +2
            14 October 2013 20: 26
            There are good reasons that hieroglyphs were invented before them! Well, copy and modify is not a problem, the same with the S-300
          3. 0
            15 October 2013 07: 29
            Gunpowder, paper and compass are not Chinese inventions. Proven already. Well, let's begin to forget this pearl from the school course.
            The only thing is porcelain.
        2. +5
          14 October 2013 16: 42
          Quote: Vittt
          According to the school curriculum, they claim that the Chinese invented gunpowder, paper and a compass.


          Their only exact invention is their hieroglyphs, only a complete moron could come up with this.

          By the way, Schwartz invented gunpowder. That's for sure. But the Chinese and Japanese already then copied and stole everything.
          1. gladiatorakz
            +6
            14 October 2013 19: 07
            Quote: Vadivak
            Their only invention is their hieroglyphs.

            I would not rush to such a conclusion. Even in their legends it is described that tall, fair-haired people arrived and taught to read and write.
            1. +1
              14 October 2013 23: 41
              and the great wall of China stands with loopholes in and not out, as in normal fortified areas. Many all the same, stories were stolen from us ..
              1. +2
                15 October 2013 05: 58
                and most of the Wall was completed during the time of Mao.
        3. 0
          14 October 2013 20: 26
          Quote: Vittt
          Do you know any

          Especially without going into details, in China hieroglyphs, meaning numbers appeared in the II millennium BC. Does this mean anything? This nation is not so simple, although there is no reason to boast about its Nobel laureates, unlike other nations. Gunpowder was invented by a chemist, a compass by a physicist.
      3. Ruslan_F38
        +4
        14 October 2013 16: 49
        Quote: Asgard
        Well, Honest Jew is really honest)))))
        hi

        Today, honesty is rushing out of it))).

        No, we don’t know how, You’ll draw and then We will draw .......
        wonderful and the future speaks for this nation - a disaster!
      4. +5
        14 October 2013 17: 39
        Quote from the article: "It is incorrect to believe that this complex is a copy of the Russian S-300."
        Dear author, open your eyes! In the photo of your article, the Chinese clone S-300!
        Well, we read his performance characteristics. What's next? This "good" is not really fired anywhere (a pig in a poke), there are anecdotes about the reliability of Chinese electronics, the latter about the use of this barokhl in Russian missiles, which led to the loss of GLNASS satellites, as well as the purchase of defective Chinese radars by Ecuador.
        Turkey in this adventurous purchase plays Russian roulette. Mad people save on air defense. hi
        1. +4
          14 October 2013 19: 20
          Quote: GSH-18
          Quote from the article: "It is incorrect to believe that this complex is a copy of the Russian S-300."
          Dear author, open your eyes!

          What confused me most of all was that they allegedly participated in the tender and lost to the S-400 Chinese laughing are delirious to the masses .. zombie chole? )))
          As you know, the Chinese long-range air defense system HQ-9 "Red Flag" won the Turkish tender T-Loramids, winning the competition American Patriot system, Russian S-400 and European Aster, writes today mil.news.sina.com.cn.

          S-400 is not yet sold on the side until ....
          Russia will start exporting S-400 air defense systems only after it equips its Armed Forces
          1. AlexanderSS
            0
            22 February 2015 03: 52
            about C 400 I think a typo, maybe even a truncated 400 would not lose, well, at the price of current.
        2. POCC
          0
          15 October 2013 18: 52
          That's for sure. Don't chase pop for cheapness.hi hi hi
      5. Jogan-xnumx
        +1
        14 October 2013 18: 03
        Well, Honest Jew is really honest)))))
        He set the article as a minus. There is a miserable semblance of excuses ..... (And to the Jew +))

        hi Torn from the tongue ...
      6. +2
        15 October 2013 05: 51
        In China there is a village (they took me there)) - There absolutely everyone draws paintings by Rembrandt, Dali, Shishkin, Warhal ...... etc. etc.
        Moreover, everyone draws (from small to large))) and Rembrandt to some pictures-draw and draw)))))) laughing laughing There is such a thing .... Yes
      7. 0
        13 August 2016 12: 46
        Well, he himself said that they only know how to copy, and the reasoning does not work for themselves.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. sens99.ru
      +16
      14 October 2013 16: 26
      Which S-300? Nisevo do not know the hermit laughing
      1. +12
        14 October 2013 17: 19
        Quote: sens99.ru
        no matter copy or not


        Maybe Ivan doesn’t matter to you, but it infuriates me when this is called not Su-27, but domestic Chinese J-11
        1. 0
          15 October 2013 00: 44
          Or An-12 Yu-12
        2. +1
          15 October 2013 03: 54
          And why doesn't it infuriate you that Li-2 is Douglas DC-3, and Tu-4 is B-29?
          1. +3
            15 October 2013 08: 36
            Because we went further and developed our own, and the Chinese are still copying.
    4. Ivan Pavlov
      +10
      14 October 2013 16: 39
      it doesn’t matter if it’s a copy or not. The main thing is that rockets fly and hit the target.
      and most importantly, the Chinese have political will, a reasonable state policy in the field of education. Every year, Chinese youths win prizes at the Physics and Mathematics Olympiads. And that means there is a future, and they will have their own developments purely, which will be too tough for us and Amers
      1. +7
        14 October 2013 16: 52
        Quote: Ivan Pavlov
        Every year, Chinese youths win prizes at the Physics and Mathematics Olympiads.


        Olympics are good. Solve puzzles, solve puzzles. Only inventions and technologies among the Russians and Americans both stole and steal. And in the future they will steal.
        1. +2
          14 October 2013 17: 30
          Quote: Ivan Pavlov
          it doesn’t matter if it’s a copy or not. The main thing is that rockets fly and hit the target.
          and most importantly, the Chinese have political will, a reasonable state policy in the field of education. Every year, Chinese youths win prizes at the Physics and Mathematics Olympiads. And that means there is a future, and they will have their own developments purely, which will be too tough for us and Amers

          Quote: Vadivak
          Quote: Ivan Pavlov
          Every year, Chinese youths win prizes at the Physics and Mathematics Olympiads.


          Olympics are good. Solve puzzles, solve puzzles. Only inventions and technologies among the Russians and Americans both stole and steal. And in the future they will steal.

          It’s one thing to win an Olympiad in physics and mathematics, another is to create an airplane or an air defense system. Here are purely Chinese developments, clearly copied from something:
          J-8-I, similar to the experimental interceptor E-152 OKB Mikoyan. Do not confuse it with J-7
          1. +2
            14 October 2013 17: 38
            and here is the J-8-II, which shows the Su-15. During its development, the Chinese used the MiG-23, donated by the pro-American Egyptian government. The Chinese made J-8 aircraft without Soviet help, but copying could not have done lol
            1. +2
              14 October 2013 17: 42
              and here is the J-31, a copy of the F-35. I don’t think that Lockheed-Martin will sell to his probable adversary the technology of his latest fighter, albeit still not brought to mind
              1. +2
                14 October 2013 20: 39
                Quote: 0255
                and here is the J-31, a copy of the F-35

                Let me ask, where did the Chinese get the F-35 to copy it? As I understand it, the Americans have not sold a single sample to the side so that we can make such statements.
                And how long ago in the USSR they stopped copying other people's products. Either airplanes, then home appliances, then microchips. German engineers worked in the USSR helping us to repeat the FAA. With rare exceptions, the USSR copied everything.
                VCR VM-12 - a copy of Panasonic on our element base. He cited it as an example.
                1. Mature naturalist
                  +1
                  14 October 2013 22: 10
                  Quote: Hedgehog
                  Let me ask, where did the Chinese get the F-35 to copy it?

                  A few years ago, Chevrolet developed a small class A car, but it did not go into production, because the Chinese had released it earlier under the brand name Chery QQ
                  Here is a "cuckoo" ...
                2. +1
                  14 October 2013 22: 54
                  Let me ask, where did the Chinese get the F-35 to copy it? As I understand it, the Americans have not sold a single sample to the side so that we can make such statements.

                  the appearance of the F-35 can be copied according to the drawings. Look at the J-8 that I cited - the Chinese seem to have developed them themselves, but they copied the appearance of the E-152 and Su-15. The same, perhaps, was with the J-31 - such as an independent Chinese development, but with a slant under the F-35.
                  And how long ago in the USSR they stopped copying other people's products. Either airplanes, then home appliances, then microchips. German engineers worked in the USSR helping us to repeat the FAA. With rare exceptions, the USSR copied everything.

                  The Americans also launched their first astronaut on a replica of the Fau. The Germans also helped them with jet planes. Copied the English "Harrier", the "Canberra" bomber under the name B-57. In the F-14 and F-15, the MiG-25 is visible. There is a version that the appearance of the F-22 Lockheed was borrowed from the Soviet project. F-117 was created on the basis of the works of the Russian mathematician Ufimtsev. And here is the E-8 fighter, from which the F-16 was stripped

                  they wanted to call it "MiG-23", its developments were implemented in the MiG-23, which went into production.
                3. v.lyamkin
                  +1
                  15 October 2013 05: 41
                  Answers:
                  1. F-35 Chinese copied from a photograph, maybe even this one.
                  2. The USSR stopped copying someone else’s long ago, no later than 1991.
              2. +1
                14 October 2013 20: 45
                On F-35 it seems like one dvigun. And on this Ketai like 2, or is my vision cheating on me? Although for some forum experts what is 2, what is 1, what's the difference?
                1. +1
                  14 October 2013 22: 49
                  The Chinese do not have the right engine power. Therefore, it costs two. Presumably our AL-31.
              3. AVV
                +2
                14 October 2013 20: 52
                Hackers stole f-35 technology !!! It’s good that they have the same drawbacks as the original !!! Everything is stolen everywhere, China decided to follow the Japanese path, they also stole know-how, new developments, inventions! Well, not China also needs to sell the Su-35, otherwise their face will crack !!!
        2. +2
          14 October 2013 17: 33
          So was it worth it to sell it all?
        3. 0
          14 October 2013 18: 34
          Quote: Vadivak
          Only inventions and technologies among the Russians and Americans both stole and steal.

          What Europe does, Asia fakes. O. Bender.
      2. +1
        14 October 2013 20: 15
        To know and be able to make two big differences.
      3. avg
        +1
        14 October 2013 23: 28
        Every year, Chinese youths win prizes at the Physics and Mathematics Olympiads.

        While at the Olympics, the first places are occupied by ours and Indians. I think it will remain so in the foreseeable future. The Chinese here act according to their mentality. While ours are looking for an original and beautiful solution, the Chinese are using the command method, by sorting through memorized template tasks, how computers run options and choose the right one.
        Such thinking is the best suited for in-line production, incl. and copying. But scientific breakthroughs do not have to wait.
        As you know, the Chinese long-range air defense system HQ-9 "Red Flag" won the Turkish tender T-Loramids

        And the HQ-9 SAM, the Chinese, to the Turks, whatever they like, you want for a billion, but you want for a million. It can be cheaper, but then they will not be dyed. bully
        1. POCC
          0
          15 October 2013 19: 03
          Ile for a penny But then from a tree lol Every whim for your money drinks
      4. POCC
        0
        15 October 2013 18: 57
        And our .... s in power for a place of reasonable politics do not understand that And the Chinese are well done hi hi
      5. AlexanderSS
        0
        22 February 2015 03: 56
        here I agree, the amount goes into quality xs can in 40-50 years and will not be worse rivet. One must be very careful in technology transfer and collaboration.
    5. +7
      14 October 2013 17: 38
      As is known, the Chinese HQ-9 long-range air defense system “Red Flag” became the winner of the Turkish T-Loramids tender, winning the competition from the American Patriot system, the Russian C-400 and the European Aster, mil.news.sina.com.cn.


      misinformation.s-400 did not participate in the tender.
    6. +7
      14 October 2013 17: 58
      Quote: Honest Jew
      Another Chinese copy !!! Made in Chine !!!

      HQ-9 and C-300. China denies copying charges


      A copy, not a copy, but the fact that the HQ-9 was made using the S-300 solutions, in fact being its modernized version, including the option for the Chinese technological capabilities - ON FACE. And whatever they say, "the sons of the dragon ..."
      1. me
        me
        0
        14 October 2013 18: 53
        Right on the face? Are you an expert in this field, have you seen the technical stuffing, etc.?
    7. +3
      14 October 2013 18: 36
      Quote: Honest Jew
      Another Chinese copy !!! Made in Chine !!!

      In this news, although what you noticed probably has a place to be, so in this news the main thing is not written about, but these are questions: why and why, or from whom Turkey was going to defend itself so that its defense would not be simply turned off. If you acquire all the weapons from manufacturers of NATO countries, the conclusion suggests itself, and this conclusion again raises a bunch of questions. Hence the question then why China, probably just Russia they will not sell such weapons to them at the moment. Based on this message, try to determine for yourself the circle of potential opponents of Turkey.
    8. +2
      14 October 2013 20: 00
      And do not be shy! If only blushed!
      1. +1
        15 October 2013 00: 49
        Why blush. Their main task is to equip their army with modern weapons; morality does not interest them. End justifies the means.
    9. Drosselmeyer
      +4
      15 October 2013 00: 29
      You know, in Sevastopol there was a plant to them. Kalmykova. He made radio communications for ships, about 5 thousand worked there. person. And they made good, even consumer electronics. My acquaintance engineer traveled to China in the early 90s and laughed from their new buildings that were not connected to the sewers. Now we have no factory in this city. They now sell Chinese goods in several supermarkets in the former workshops of the plant. In our city of Sevastopol, new buildings are being built on old communications (thank God they connect to the sewers). So what am I talking about all this ...
  2. +11
    14 October 2013 13: 56
    cheap chinese fake.

    China denies copying allegations
    and someone expected them to confess?
    1. +5
      14 October 2013 15: 37
      Yes, let them buy, whoever would be against it ... Then, let them not complain.
      -That recently one Latin country bought a bunch of radars from them, and then it turned out that they did not work!
  3. fklj
    +12
    14 October 2013 14: 00
    Copywriting nation
    And do not sell them figs!
    1. +10
      14 October 2013 14: 43
      Quote: fklj
      And do not sell them figs!

      Missiles must be made not collapsible. When trying to open, self-blowing. The only way.
      1. +5
        14 October 2013 14: 58
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        Quote: fklj
        And do not sell them figs!

        Missiles must be made not collapsible. When trying to open, self-blowing. The only way.


        they are such - non-separable. a billion Chinese. they want to be labeled for molecules apart from losses.
        1. Airman
          +2
          14 October 2013 17: 16
          Quote: Geisenberg
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          Quote: fklj
          And do not sell them figs!

          Missiles must be made not collapsible. When trying to open, self-blowing. The only way.


          they are such - non-separable. a billion Chinese. they want to be labeled for molecules apart from losses.

          Let at least a million gather around her, anyway the rocket MUST EXPLODE! Or, during an unauthorized opening, important control units burn out. Against copyists this is the only method.
      2. POCC
        0
        15 October 2013 19: 05
        drinks Precisely vigorous charge Yes
    2. Airman
      +5
      14 October 2013 17: 09
      Quote: fklj
      Copywriting nation
      And do not sell them figs!

      Quote: fklj
      The Chinese complex has a maximum firing range of about 125 km, the height of the target being hit is 18000 m, the average range of destruction is from 7 to 50 km at altitudes from 1000 to 18000 m

      Pay attention to the average range from 7 to 50 km, that is, the complex does not even reach the far. I, as Pvoshnika, was very surprised. Therefore, even up to the S-300PMU, he falls short.
    3. +2
      14 October 2013 17: 53
      Quote: fklj
      Copywriting nation
      And do not sell them figs!

      Our Su-35s want to push them! Note the time, in a couple of months China will have (like two drops of water similar to a Su-35) some sort of J-16, etc. PURE CHINESE PRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT! request
      1. +6
        14 October 2013 18: 30
        Quote: GSH-18
        Quote: fklj
        Copywriting nation
        And do not sell them figs!

        Our Su-35s want to push them! Note the time, in a couple of months China will have (like two drops of water similar to a Su-35) some sort of J-16, etc. PURE CHINESE PRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT! request

        With all due respect, you are exaggerating the Chinese possibilities. He will not appear in a couple of months, and even a couple of years looks too optimistic. Here, it’s more likely that about 5 years only the glider and avionics will go away, and dviglo will most likely be bought in Russia. The saddest thing is that in Russia there will certainly be idols that they will sell, and they will also be proud that they export high-tech products. But having turned on the brains, they themselves could have sold whole planes to some thread conditional Pakistan, instead of the Chinese.
        But the loss of a potential export market is not so bad. The trouble will be when the Chinese decide that they are strong enough to, as they say, "restore historical justice" and "liberate the original Chinese lands" almost to the Urals. Soviet and Russian developments will play a significant role in this, because they have only green tea of ​​their own development and also quotation books of "Great Helmsman" Mao - almost the most important piece of equipment for every Chinese serviceman.
        1. +3
          14 October 2013 20: 15
          Quote: Nagan
          With all due respect, you are exaggerating the Chinese possibilities. He will not appear in a couple of months, and even a couple of years looks too optimistic. Here, it’s more likely that about 5 years only the glider and avionics will go away, and dviglo will most likely be bought in Russia. The saddest thing is that in Russia there will certainly be idiots who will sell, and they will also be proud that they export products. But having turned on the brains, they themselves could have sold whole planes to some thread conditional Pakistan, instead of the Chinese.
          But the loss of a potential export market is not so bad. The trouble will be when the Chinese decide that they are strong enough to, as they say, "restore historical justice" and "liberate the original Chinese lands" almost to the Urals. Soviet and Russian developments will play a significant role in this, because they have only green tea of ​​their own development and also quotation books of "Great Helmsman" Mao - almost the most important piece of equipment for every Chinese serviceman.

          A couple of months is a hypothetical period.
          I absolutely agree with all your post to the last word!
        2. +1
          14 October 2013 22: 57
          The trouble will be when the Chinese decide that they are strong enough to, as they say, "restore historical justice" and "liberate the original Chinese lands" almost to the Urals.

          There are some doubts that they will decide on this. For in the event of the intervention of China, everything from the Urals to the Sea of ​​Japan will be a radioactive desert. I can exaggerate a little, but this probability is high. The Chinese are not really fools to rush into a country with nuclear weapons (and mostly tactical), even a billion-dollar army.
        3. POCC
          0
          15 October 2013 19: 08
          But there are no brains for our fertilizer ideas anyway lol Catch plus
  4. +9
    14 October 2013 14: 07
    The donkey is understandable, it was created on the basis of the S-300, something was modified and now they give it away as their own. The usual Chinese song!
  5. +26
    14 October 2013 14: 12
    But the differences are striking.

    We take a bicycle. We put the wheels of a smaller diameter, another steering wheel, and the call from the right side is transferred to the left, the trunk is moved forward, and we install the front brake. Hooray! We invented our own bike! laughing
    1. +2
      14 October 2013 23: 59
      We put the wheels of a larger diameter. The steering wheel is different. we transfer the call from the left side to the right. Instead of the trunk from the front we put the basket well and know how the disc brake from the moped. Hurray, we also invented our own bicycle laughing You +++ great idea drinks
  6. +8
    14 October 2013 14: 15
    When China says that it does not copy, it sounds as absurd as if the Japanese would prove that he is not Asian. laughing
  7. +9
    14 October 2013 14: 18
    rank, she is the rank! and go control processors also a rank? then I don’t envy the Turks!
    And they also stink like all Chinese toys? !!! 1 smile
  8. +9
    14 October 2013 14: 21
    (used in SAM KS-1A, power 300 MHz)

    Range 300 Parrots
    frequency 500
    fellow
    1. +6
      14 October 2013 14: 40
      each antenna consists of 1000 or more phase shifters, average radiation power 60 kW, peak power 1 MW

      I won’t get 300 MHz!
      I won’t get 300 MW!
      What is 300?

      average radiation power 60 kW - one of phase shifters?
      And how many antennas then? can 300?
      1. +3
        14 October 2013 14: 47
        This is the Chinese. They have different concepts. So they took and received.
        Quote: AlexAl
        the average radiation power of 60 kW - one of the phase shifters?
        Yes, there, with such an average power of one phase shifter, sparks will fly between the PAR elements.
    2. POCC
      +1
      15 October 2013 19: 10
      bully and the parrots are small drinks
  9. +3
    14 October 2013 14: 22
    Quote: Baron Wrangel
    мощность 300 MHz)

    Yeah ..
    1. +3
      14 October 2013 15: 08
      Quote: 528Obrp
      power 300 MHz)
      Yeah ..

      The Chinese have their own units, do you remember Chinese 600 W radio tape recorders? :)
    2. +3
      14 October 2013 17: 58
      Power 300 megahertz - this cool nasaynika !! laughing laughing laughing
  10. +3
    14 October 2013 14: 34
    frequency 500, at that frequency
    Quote: 528Obrp
    power 300 MHz)
    and such power
    very easy to achieve a detection range of 800 barrels / day
  11. +2
    14 October 2013 14: 43
    And what power source should provide at a peak of 1 mW? And what is it done on?
    1. +4
      14 October 2013 14: 45
      The system will permanently guard the Turkish speakers. Along the way, leaving the citizens of Turkey without light. There will be more than one system!
    2. +2
      14 October 2013 18: 04
      This crap gives out such power before death, at the moment of hit of an anti-radar missile! laughing Last squeak lol
  12. +2
    14 October 2013 14: 44
    mdaa! In copying technology, there are no better Chinese!
  13. +1
    14 October 2013 14: 51
    Presumably we are talking about 300 MT in TNT equivalent.
    The system has small rockets to distract attention, and at this time the pilots are balding, and round eggs become square on the floor of the sixth. Then it’s clear why 300 - so that unfinished (not finished) would not fly away!
    1. POCC
      0
      15 October 2013 19: 23
      smile baked square on the sixth floor laughing
  14. +1
    14 October 2013 14: 55
    As you know, the Chinese long-range air defense missile system HQ-9 “Red Flag” won the Turkish T-Loramids tender, having won the tender against the American Patriot system, the Russian S-400 and the European Aster, mil.news.sina.com.cn writes today.

    so they have riots like in Syria, which is probably why they took a cheaper air defense system. Let the Chinese "Kalash" buy for their army - and the rebels will win the civil war wassat
  15. Snipe 74
    +6
    14 October 2013 14: 56
    China is such a friend who is worse than 10 enemies. Very, I really do not believe in their friendship. And unscrupulous competition is just beginning, taught on their own head.
    1. Airman
      +3
      14 October 2013 17: 22
      Quote: Snipe 74
      China is such a friend who is worse than 10 enemies. Very, I really do not believe in their friendship. And unscrupulous competition is just beginning, taught on their own head.

      They also launched it in the Far East and Siberia; soon there will be more of them there than the local residents.
      1. POCC
        0
        15 October 2013 19: 33
        Fifth colona however soldier soldier An optimist teaches English, a pessemist Chinese and a realist Kalashnikov assault rifle. We learn materiel, but we need to start with our own power.... With your own thought exclusively about your pocket
  16. +4
    14 October 2013 15: 02
    Beijing began the creation of its own HQ-9 complex, copying lasted almost 15 years.
    It’s worse if you learn in a year ... Well, you jerk! laughing
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. ilya63
    +3
    14 October 2013 15: 04
    That's what you raised the stench to heaven, they can copy, it means they can (the economy allows), but ours cannot (because there is practically no industry) they could not even copy the UAV for a very long time, what can we say about the auto industry (I won’t give it to others either ), and about all the cries on the air about fakes, so China put everything on it and did it right, otherwise they came up with some copyrights, and economic espionage has always existed, you can not only copy but improve, supplement and launch in mass production and even to send all to to hell and sell an improved copy on the foreign market in this they (Chinese) are great, more than half the world go in Chinese clothes, drive Chinese cars and other vehicles and use computers and gadgets based on them, production in China, so let's not Yes, and the quality of factory products in China is at a decent level (steel is shit and the rest of lotions and technologies are quite at the level), we need to learn from them, and not sell our resources for nothing and scream that everything is fine with us, Putin and the party with us and we are ahead of the rest (p about thieves probably per capita)
    1. +3
      14 October 2013 15: 20
      more than half of the world go in Chinese clothes

      mostly sewn in basements in unsanitary conditions. Fold the Chinese shirt in half and see how crooked it is sewn
      use computers and gadgets based on them production-china

      It is one thing - electronics of eminent companies, for example Samsung, LG, Sony, etc., which are assembled in China, and another thing - purely Chinese companies, unknown to anyone, which "mow" the floor of decent brands. Chinese fakes are both buggy and inferior in quality to absolutely everything. There is good China, but it is in the minority
      1. Airman
        +1
        14 October 2013 17: 30
        Quote: 0255
        Chinese fakes are both buggy and inferior in quality to absolutely everything. There is good China, but it is in the minority

        On the contrary, bad China is in the majority, there are already more than 1 billion 300 million copyists, and the worst thing is that they copy only themselves.
      2. +1
        14 October 2013 18: 51
        Quote: 0255
        There is good China, but it is in the minority

        Good China is stoned China. It was not in vain that the local people "convinced" the Chinese government not to interfere with the import of opium into China. By the way, they convinced quite easily, since muzzle-loading flint muskets and wooden (don't laugh, these are exactly what were in service with the Chinese imperial army) cannons are rather weak counterarguments against breech-loading rifles and artillery.
        1. BBM
          BBM
          0
          15 October 2013 05: 22
          Well, so to speak, the representative of the most humane democratic nation volunteered. Of course, I understand that the Chinese are not people for you. As well as Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians and other natives. But you confused a little is not an American site.
        2. BBM
          BBM
          +1
          15 October 2013 06: 32
          By the way, it is this Britashka (mother of two children) who is behind the seizure of the shopping center in Nairobi, absolutely monstrous in cruelty (comparable only to Beslan). And somehow it happened that just on the eve of the next visit of the local president (not creeping to the west, besides) to China. Samantha Lewithwaite is a "white widow" in person. Although she would be more suitable for the nickname of another arachnid - Black Widow. This is really a fake passport. I wanted to find a sample of her photo on a British passport - and figurines, Google, even without understanding, I don’t know of such images. So the Naglo-Saxons are all the same Naglo-Saxons, for almost two hundred years their morals have not changed much.
    2. +5
      14 October 2013 15: 46
      Quote: ilya63
      that's what you stench raised to heaven

      Apply your statement about yourself. Do not stink, amiable, not stink, but a natural, sincere and fair indignation. The ranks of the ssa are in the eye, and they all have tea of ​​the highest grades. In the USSR, S-75 was changed to 300s in the second half of 80 -h.On a fundamentally different scheme (vertical launch of an anti-aircraft missile), the world has never heard of either. And the China of the 90s, this is not China of the 2000s. It's about the Chinese recognized copywriters (copywriters, copy-paste) of the finished products, for the most part, but not technologies. Which, to the Chinese wall, their own technologies!
      1. +4
        14 October 2013 16: 58
        Quote: Be proud.
        The ranks of the pisses in the eye, and they all have top-grade tea


        These two products should have good vision support, but no.
        Quote: Be proud.
        .In the USSR S-75, changed to 300 matches in the second half of the 80s

        According to the recollection of friends who worked on them, the equipment was out of order even out of = a draft. How much was spent on debugging forces is horrible.

        Quote: Be proud.
        What, to the Chinese wall, their technology!


        Ram the land in half with the builders and lay it over with bricks. They are still building this way. And Tajiks are taught this.
        1. +2
          14 October 2013 17: 19
          Quote: Vadivak
          According to the recollection of friends who worked on them, the equipment was out of order even out of = a draft. How much was spent on debugging forces is horrible.

          I do not argue. It just infuriates when the Chinese stupidly deny their improved technologies and theft, passing them off as "dormant thousand-year wisdom."
        2. +1
          15 October 2013 08: 37
          Quote: Vadivak
          Ram the land in half with the builders and lay it over with bricks. They are still building this way. And Tajiks are taught this.

          Smiley, thanks! laughing
          But you are right to disgrace! 100%
      2. +1
        14 October 2013 18: 58
        Quote: Be proud.
        .What to the Chinese wall, its technology!

        1000 Chinese with files replace the milling machine.
    3. 0
      14 October 2013 18: 18
      Quote: ilya63
      not only copy but improve, complement and launch into mass production

      Another adherent of Chinese fakes.
      Dear, fake, by definition, can not be better than the original is an axiom. Since its production requires significantly less money, and it is done not so that people use it, but in order to be able to sell it in large quantities, due to the difference in price. There are a lot of mean people in the world. And the Americans have taught PR to this guano (fake) of the Chinese.
      1. ilya63
        0
        15 October 2013 00: 04
        gsh-18 I am not an adherent of Chinese consumer goods as you put it and you don’t have to pull certain pieces from the offers, they make fakes for the rest of the suckers and at the same time they put a hell on all sorts of copyrights and international agreements, many of which appeared with the development of economic espionage , read the whole article conceptualized and then something mug
        1. +1
          15 October 2013 08: 16
          Quote: ilya63
          read the whole article comprehend and then something mug


          More respect. I don’t poke you.
          And I do not burst, as you put it, but I speak normally, and for each word I can answer reasonably.
          I myself rushed to buy Chinese industrial goods, that's why: I bought myself a new computer about 7 years ago, and a year later all Chinese-made spare parts in it safely went to another world (1 year passed a new Chinese record) including a hard drive! Replaced everything with normal manufacturers (Korea, Japan, states) -6 years normal flight! And I would immediately buy a normal system unit, and there were no problems! And why? Yes, I wanted to save money. Miserliness (as you know, avaricious pays twice). So it turns out that buying Chinese equipment in the end comes out more expensive than high-quality! So that Yes
  19. Sergeant
    +1
    14 October 2013 15: 04
    ... HQ-9 "Red Flag" became the winner of the Turkish T-Loramids tender, having won the competition against the American Patriot system, the Russian S-400 and the European Aster ...


    There is probably a mistake in the article: Not S-400, but S-300 (export version).
    I doubt that Russia could offer the S-400.
    1. 0
      14 October 2013 15: 28
      It was the case that the Chinese did 40 pieces of rockets for the S-300-Deribas and trash, but they did not receive the essence of all the information.
    2. +1
      14 October 2013 17: 02
      Quote: Sergeant
      I doubt that Russia could offer the S-400.


      Already. Only not Russia. The Russian government has proposed that China buy the S-400 after 2017. By then they will be finished, debugged and sold. And 4 years will not fly by.
      1. 0
        14 October 2013 17: 20
        Quote: Vadivak
        Quote: Sergeant
        I doubt that Russia could offer the S-400.


        Already. Only not Russia. The Russian government has proposed that China buy the S-400 after 2017. By then they will be finished, debugged and sold. And 4 years will not fly by.

        no words, only expressions belay for which they will ban me ...
    3. Airman
      0
      14 October 2013 17: 36
      Quote: Sergeant


      There is probably a mistake in the article: Not S-400, but S-300 (export version).
      I doubt that Russia could offer the S-400.

      That's right, ours offered the S-400, apparently the thirst for profit was overshadowed by the mind. I don’t know for what reason they replaced it with the S-300.
      1. +1
        14 October 2013 22: 59
        Weren't those C-400 trimmed versions?
  20. Mr. Gambu4aS
    +3
    14 October 2013 15: 32
    We don’t copy China's from the bottom, you have a Russian penis that’s balsa, but we have a Chinese one that’s very small, how can we cap it?))) (South Park)
    1. Rezun
      +4
      14 October 2013 20: 32
      Quote: Mr. Gambu4aS
      We don’t copy China's from the bottom, you have a Russian penis that’s balsa, but we have a Chinese one that’s very small, how can we cap it?))) (South Park)

      ... we cessno subscribe ...
  21. +5
    14 October 2013 15: 34
    Quote: Asgard
    China denies copying allegations


    I immediately remembered the old American comedy "Coming to America" ​​- when Cleo McDowell, the owner of the McDowell bistro chain, resentfully rejected McDonald's claims to copy the trademark: "They have golden arches, but I have golden arches!"

    Cleo McDowell: Look ... me and the McDonald's people got this little misunderstanding. See, they're McDonald's ... I'm McDowell's. They got the Golden Arches, mine is the Golden Arcs. They got the Big Mac, I got the Big Mick. We both got two all-beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles and onions, but their buns have sesame seeds. My buns have no seeds.
  22. Bergman
    0
    14 October 2013 15: 36
    The Americans are against Turkey building its air defense system from these Chinese systems.
  23. +1
    14 October 2013 15: 49
    But the differences are striking.

    Of course they rush !! They have a file of the Chinese system! In the garage, you can also assemble a Mercedes from Mercedes spare parts. And even in some places to improve them. But from this he will not cease to be a copy. So they copied as best they could ... for 15 years ...
  24. +1
    14 October 2013 16: 03
    There is a plus here, in this Chinese copy. Just copy, it means they can’t create anything.
  25. +7
    14 October 2013 16: 04
    Well, let's see how it flies in China. Please note, this is exactly the Chinese clone S-300
    1. +3
      14 October 2013 16: 22
      Quote: Den 11
      see how it flies in

      and is it kuda with such tricks? Yeah, no target will run away from such maneuvering belay
    2. +2
      14 October 2013 16: 33
      Oh .... super maneuverability! wink Well, not all of us mace scare people. Although what comparisons are there ...
    3. +1
      14 October 2013 16: 40
      Failure of one of the guidance loops. It also happens here, but very rarely. The rackets are raw at all, apparently the electronics are not designed for serious overloads, and the engine is rather weak and smoky.
    4. IGS
      +3
      14 October 2013 18: 47
      Beautiful .. All the same, the Chinese know their job, they know how to make firecrackers .. wassat and if desired, they will give them any form, even rockets, even an airplane, even a sewing machine.
    5. +2
      14 October 2013 20: 34
      Yeah, flies, get hurt! Well, at least the Chinese themselves did not hit! laughing
      However, these guano did not get into anything in this video. New Chinese very expensive fireworks wassat
      1. +2
        14 October 2013 22: 44
        By the way, the thought arose - what if it just hit it? At some sort of birdie .. accidentally ?! The goal is eliminated! laughing
        1. +1
          15 October 2013 07: 51
          Quote: Wedmak
          By the way, the thought arose - what if it just hit it? At some sort of birdie .. accidentally ?! The goal is eliminated! laughing

          Well, will they lie in a bird? And a couple of germs hit for sure! laughing The world's first antimicrobial RZS! Made in Shina!
  26. 0
    14 October 2013 16: 06
    HQ-9 “Red Flag” became the winner of the Turkish T-Loramids tender, having won the competition against the American Patriot system, the Russian S-400 and the European Aster, mil.news.sina.com.cn writes today.


    But what about the statement that the S-400 will not be exported until they re-equip the domestic air defense forces?
    1. 0
      14 October 2013 16: 38
      Unfortunately, C-400 covers only Moscow. Already covers. As for the rest .... well, as usual, Antey C-350 is likely to get it. So the promises ... these are the promises.
  27. +1
    14 October 2013 16: 11
    300 MHz is cool) by RUN TO SCHOOL !!!
  28. +6
    14 October 2013 16: 14
    Quote: Sergei Medvedev
    Just copy, it means they can’t create anything.


    There is only one big nuisance - they copy and sell much CHEAPER than create unhealthy competition.

    Too lazy to look for the source, but here is someone else's description of the fight against such arrogant piracy:

    "In the late 40s, the Japanese raised shipbuilding (and, in fact, created anew) and took" for trial "ship designs from the British. They copied all the documentation, returned with gratitude but free of charge, built according to the documentation, the ship according to the Admiral Nelson project was called" Fukuoka-maru "and launched.

    On one of the copied ships there was an engine, in the side of which a cavity was drilled (casting defect) and a metal patch was screwed onto four bolts. The English designer of this ship somehow got on the Japanese take of his ship and found an engine with a patch.
    And the next time, the Japanese received a ship project, and again refused to purchase the project as unnecessary.
    And when the Japanese ship was lowered into the water, it turned upside down with its keel, for the ship's center of gravity was above the waterline. The Japanese project manager made himself a hara-kiri. "(C) Advanced
    1. +2
      14 October 2013 16: 36
      There is only one big nuisance - they copy and sell much CHEAPER than create unhealthy competition.

      No one is against copying if this is done under license or in joint development. And Russia copied in due time, but she bought licenses for production! Often paying in gold. And these produced copies were only the basis for their own development. And not cuts of the existing design.
    2. Dovmont
      0
      14 October 2013 16: 53
      This story dates back to the end of the XNUMXth century, when England intensively prepared Japan for a war with Russia.
  29. +2
    14 October 2013 16: 36
    China won the tender only because it was the only one of the bidders who agreed to fully transfer the technology and cooperate in further improving the air defense systems. Obviously the copy is not its own, it’s not a pity. Then they will copy and sell it, it’s cheaper than trying and developing it yourself.
    For Turkey, the minimum price + full transfer of technology is a key condition. And they themselves will achieve the required quality slowly
  30. +1
    14 October 2013 16: 36
    The Chinese are well done !!! During the night, files can grind any copy, including missiles !!! Them there is darkness !!!! lol
  31. 0
    14 October 2013 16: 36
    HQ-9 “Red Flag” became the winner of the Turkish T-Loramids tender, having won the competition with the American Patriot system, the Russian C-400 and the European Aster
    They also won against everyone. And why did you win, because cheap like all Chinese products?
  32. 0
    14 October 2013 16: 52
    Yes, everything is clear to everyone, and quarreling, well, no matter how we can’t!
  33. +2
    14 October 2013 17: 34
    What nonsense ?? How long did the S-400 take part in the tender? Where does this information from the author come from ???? Does he even understand what the S-400 system is ??? There is little that the Turks are considering !! And who will sell them ?? WITH THE SAME SUCCESS, YOU CAN WRITE THAT WE POST ON THE TENDER AND "Poplar" -Turks are also interested in buying them, and even a lot of Arab countries)) !!! Here is a quote
    “We are actually conducting market research on the possibility of S-400 deliveries in the future, but we can’t talk about any deliveries at present,” RIA Novosti quotes a Rosoboronexport representative.

    Yes, and five years at least they will conduct their marketing research))))
    1. +3
      14 October 2013 17: 46
      laughing did you want the Chinese to write that they won the tender with s-300v?
      you need to somehow advertise your product.
  34. 0
    14 October 2013 17: 43
    Oh, these Xeroxes! That is, the Chinese laughing miserable likeness on the S-300. Compared to all technical specifications. It did not work out to create an analogue to our air defense systems, even resorting to copying. On the other hand, let it be inferior, but it your air defense system! Down and Out trouble started! I have no doubt that they will not stop there. Then they will create better than this, their firstborn.

    Z.Y. I ask the Chinese not to be offended that they dubbed them xeroxes))) I did not pick up other words laughing
  35. +2
    14 October 2013 17: 45
    Create a copy and write one TTX on a piece of paper, but can this copy compete with the original? S-27 was copied, but there is no sense in making the engine, it is too weak, so I heard. They made an AK copy, but there’s not enough material to make the trunk of the mind, so it spits after the first horn.
  36. +1
    14 October 2013 17: 52
    It is reliably known that at least one of the S-300PS complexes from the first delivery was completely disassembled by the Chinese and examined "under a microscope." It is also no secret that at one time KB "Almaz" made at least part of the software for the Chinese counterpart. So, of course, the Chinese HQ-9 is not a complete copy of the C-300PS, but made on the basis and using those. three hundred solutions on its (Chinese) hardware base.
    1. kopleev
      0
      14 October 2013 19: 12
      The important thing is not that they copied the C300, but how the Chinese did it. The USSR also plagiarized in this area, an example of the P-25 copied from AIM 7E Sparrow. Only ICD Pennant, a copy was technically more perfect than the original. I doubt the Chinese.
  37. +1
    14 October 2013 18: 14
    Yes, copy and how. For example, there is such a device in trucks, buses - a digital tachograph (for those who don’t know, this is a device for controlling the driver’s work and rest), and so it’s designed so that if it is disassembled, it breaks down, but it’s narrow-eyed something not in the house))). An experimental batch was installed on the Chinese auto industry, after some claim:
    - You delivered us non-working devices!
    And why do you think so? ....that's it)))))
  38. TTX
    TTX
    +2
    14 October 2013 18: 17
    Obviously something else ... They study ... In conditions when the growing potential no one erases in the sand due to the fact that it is growing (excuse me: "who needs a growing") they have a real chance to acquire the skill of a manufacturer of a full-fledged weapon ...
  39. +1
    14 October 2013 18: 29
    We need to rejoice that a country from the NATO bloc, a country potentially hostile to Russia - Turkey - bought Chinese junk.
  40. +1
    14 October 2013 18: 39
    The Americans themselves do not sell some samples of military equipment even to their allies. And we, that ... a Cossack will rush at the tank with a saber. Surely there is already a copy of the S-500, which will be released earlier than the original of ours ... and it will be not surprisingly in a country that is corrupt ... it's a shame, someone develops a gnome, doesn’t eat up his brains, and “effective managers” cut the loot.
  41. sxn278619
    +1
    14 October 2013 18: 42
    We must take an example from China, copy the four core processor and VLSI.
  42. kopleev
    +1
    14 October 2013 18: 56
    The fact that the Chinese gunsmiths copied the C300 is clear as "god's day". Well, let them copy the complex of the last generation. The fact that Rossvooruzhenie sells technologies abroad, which are then studied and used in their own developments by countries such as China, is certainly not encouraging. But it should be noted that a significant part of the funds received from the sale of weapons goes to the maintenance of the military-industrial complex of Russia. In our difficult times, only with good funding can advanced weapons be developed.
  43. 0
    14 October 2013 19: 06
    And the author did not mess up with the dimension of the antenna power?
  44. +1
    14 October 2013 19: 10
    Chinese Kalashnikov and domestic are two different things. Even if they copied, it’s not a fact that qualitatively.
    1. waisson
      +3
      14 October 2013 19: 38
      in Serbia, we preferred Chinese than Romanian or Bulgarian Kalashnik; the Chinese turned out to be more hardy in metal than in the listed states
  45. 0
    14 October 2013 19: 38
    Quote: Povshnik
    Quote: Sergeant


    There is probably a mistake in the article: Not S-400, but S-300 (export version).
    I doubt that Russia could offer the S-400.

    That's right, ours offered the S-400, apparently the thirst for profit was overshadowed by the mind. I don’t know for what reason they replaced it with the S-300.

    Well, ours could not offer the S-400, because there is still no export option. The Turks were offered S-300VM - a complex not intended for covering stationary objects. Therefore, it is completely logical that the Turks did not even consider such a proposal.
  46. gaikin13
    +1
    14 October 2013 19: 42
    Local gentlemen, according to your comments, you can see that you did not hold the original Chinese things in your hands! smile There the quality is EXTREMELY decent!
    1. +1
      14 October 2013 23: 06
      Held. Decent quality. Huawei smartphones are very decent devices ... but also not without copying, industrial espionage, and more.
  47. waisson
    +1
    14 October 2013 19: 42
    but if about the S-300 we’re not guilty, the Chinese will tell you you yourself have instigated us, we turned yours and created ours
  48. SAG
    0
    14 October 2013 19: 43
    As you know, the Chinese long-range air defense system HQ-9 “Red Flag” became the winner of the Turkish T-Loramids tender, having won the competition with the American Patriot system, Russian S-400 and European Aster, writes today mil.news.sina.com.cn.

    belay what??? maybe we C-500 immediately put up for tender and even C-600that really trifle then!?! fellow
  49. 0
    14 October 2013 19: 46
    Those who strongly criticize China for copying - probably they don’t know their own history - the very USSR did not hesitate to copy the most modern types of weapons ... Tu-4 is a copy of B-29, our R1 missile is a copy of German Fau-2, ours the Kalashnikov assault rifle absorbed a lot from the German Sturmgever ...
    And China also copies - and if someone copies something, it means that this weapon is very modern and the design idea in it is very progressive ...
    And just don’t think that if you use Chinese consumer goods, they can do just that - they do what our businessmen buy from them ... And the law of our business is known to the whole world - a minimum of investments and a maximum of profit ... That’s it to us on the market such dubious goods - such as crookedly sewed T-shirts and disposable bicycles :)))
    1. gaikin13
      0
      14 October 2013 20: 09
      Yes, it’s being taken to our country from China! Chinese original products are VERY high quality! good
      1. +1
        14 October 2013 20: 25
        In China, there are very high-quality things and goods, and there are many of them ... Only in our market it is less profitable to trade expensive goods at cost - expensive goods are designed for a narrower population - therefore, their payback is much longer ...

        Therefore, for example, it is much more profitable to bring 1000 tin and cheapest Chinese bicycles and quickly selling them to make a profit than bringing 100 expensive and high-quality ones and trying to sell them ...
        And modern flexible production is designed for any customer - you need bicycles at a cost price of $ 500 - please - they will do it as needed for the entire technology - you need $ 50 each. - please - twist quickly from Mr. "candy" !!! :)))
    2. 0
      14 October 2013 23: 13
      The Tu-4 is a copy of the B-29, our R1 missile is a copy of the German Fau-2, our Kalashnikov assault rifle absorbed a lot from the German Sturmgever ...

      The first flying copies were indeed copies. In those days, no one hesitated to tyrit other people's developments. Only OUR developments and OWN devices went further. Head and shoulders above the "originals".
      Threat.
      Tu-4 merged 1: 1 on the orders of Stalin, in addition to engines, weapons and a radio station, the P1 was also structurally different from the Fau-2, Kalashnikov only looked like a Sturm ...
  50. The comment was deleted.
  51. +1
    14 October 2013 20: 23
    Well done Chinese, they invented everything, the SU-27, S-300 and everything else, they will soon invent a hovercraft, it’s called ZUBR after Ukraine transfers the technology, it won’t be long to wait.
  52. gaikin13
    -1
    14 October 2013 20: 48
    Here the bulk of the Soviet propaganda is rushing! “Everyone around is rotting, but we are thriving with Putin...” Chinese quality is several orders of magnitude higher than Russian! good
    1. +5
      14 October 2013 21: 25
      I see the defenders of China appeared closer to night? This is not where we should start, gentlemen and comrades. Not from this... stop
  53. +1
    14 October 2013 21: 05
    I am sure that after the first launch, these missiles will be taken to the service center for repairs, like everything else Chinese...am!
  54. +1
    14 October 2013 21: 13
    Quote: Selevc
    our Kalashnikov assault rifle has absorbed a lot from the German Sturmgever...

    There are a lot of articles on the Internet where it is explained that Kalashnikov did not absorb anything, but there is always an expert. They are similar in appearance - just like any machine gun or assault rifle is similar in appearance.
    And I propose to rename China Copyrai. laughing
  55. netishunUA
    0
    14 October 2013 21: 34
    It looks something like this: we attach a couple of reflectors to the S-300, and the AshQ-9 is ready.
    In general, it is necessary to prohibit the Chinese from selling anything more complex than a sapper’s shovel. So, you can finish the game when the Russian Far East is taken away with Russian weapons.
    1. +1
      14 October 2013 23: 30
      Understand! When we copied B29, we had to create entire industries for it.
      Why don't we copy the Merc, the Japanese, or at worst the Korean - WE CAN'T. The crankshaft doesn't work well on belt-driven machines.
      1. +1
        15 October 2013 08: 41
        Why don't we copy the Merc, the Japanese, or at worst the Korean - WE CAN'T. The crankshaft doesn't work well on belt-driven machines.

        Who needs another car with the same price as a Mercedes, but Russian? Can you imagine what its promotion to the market will entail???
        Tell the Chinese about belt-driven machines. How we make aircraft engines on these machines. And titanium blades for turbines.
  56. +1
    14 October 2013 22: 27
    Quote: Hedgehog
    Quote: Vittt
    Do you know any

    Especially without going into details, in China hieroglyphs, meaning numbers appeared in the II millennium BC. Does this mean anything? This nation is not so simple, although there is no reason to boast about its Nobel laureates, unlike other nations. Gunpowder was invented by a chemist, a compass by a physicist.

    Everything is fine, but the Chinese cannot present to the world a single written source written before the 16th century. I wonder how to explain this?
  57. Druid
    +1
    14 October 2013 22: 28
    Quote: Den 11
    Please note that this is a Chinese clone of the S-300
    This is a Russian-made rocket and complex.
    The Chinese did not invent anything new; they once studied at Soviet institutes and learned a lot from there:
    - atomic bomb - copying;
    - rocket technology - copying;
    - aviation jet engine - copying;
    - transport aircraft - copying;
    - bomber - copying;
    - submarine - copying;
    - air-to-air missile with thermal seeker - copying;
    - etc. etc.
    What is the name of the plagiarist's country?

    This air defense system is like a Kalashnikov assault rifle, elements of different systems have been introduced and everything has been simplified for the vocational training officer.
    1. e3tozy
      +1
      14 October 2013 22: 48
      And we helped them with space at one time. Was it worth it though?
  58. rocketman
    +1
    14 October 2013 22: 38
    And I upvoted the article. I found out by chance that the Chinese cloned this. Well done! The Americans bought three hundred from the Syabrs a long time ago, but they can’t copy them... But they succeeded. The performance characteristics are not bad, but everyone knows about reliability - they are disposable. although, show me a war game where you have to re-use such air defense systems?
  59. e3tozy
    +1
    14 October 2013 22: 38
    Quote: Scoun
    What confused me the most was that they write that they supposedly participated in the tender and lost to the Chinese. ))

    This information is truly alarming.
  60. +1
    14 October 2013 22: 59
    In art it would be appropriate: “The student surpassed the teacher” feel And here, alas, the stupid corruption of all weapons dating back to the Soviet era in the 90s is reflected. Well, many people in the allegedly market division in the CIS really wanted to drive foreign cars!
  61. +1
    14 October 2013 22: 59
    We’ve been sitting on this for 30 years, but where is the C1300? It’s bad that the sales market was taken away. So let's do something that is simply impossible to copy.
    1. avg
      0
      14 October 2013 23: 25
      What one person has done, another can always break. And even more so to copy. lol
    2. 0
      14 October 2013 23: 40
      Quote: nazgul-ishe
      It’s bad that the sales market was taken away

      It’s too early to talk about this; everything will be decided by the outcome of the operation of these Chinese complexes in Turkey....
  62. 0
    14 October 2013 23: 36
    And who will say that everything is licked????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hi
  63. +2
    15 October 2013 00: 04

    The quality will be like this.
    PS An acquaintance bought a Chinese car, and his butt caught fire from the heated seats.
    He quickly sold it. lol
    What to expect from more complex Chinese products? wink
    1. +1
      15 October 2013 00: 06
      Quote: maestro123
      it will be something like this.

      Are they already releasing personalized shoes? Are these specially for Dimas?
  64. flak155
    +2
    15 October 2013 01: 12
    I heard that they even build cities with copies from Europe
  65. DimychDV
    +1
    15 October 2013 02: 01
    Quote: Asgard
    I suggest that if you don’t have very good feelings towards a Jew or any other nickname, do not argue with him... From the outside, this somehow doesn’t look good on a Person)))


    Including because I have seen disputes between our Orthodox Christians and the Semitic Khvarise on the Internet. They have adopted the fashion of not letting anyone down on the topic of anti-Semitism, and they strive to pour salt on the tail of everyone who is eloquent, and they snap at EVERY one of you and EVERY sympathetic remark, and so on for as long as they like - certainly leaving the last word and remark for themselves. Even knowing that you are right, in two months you will spit and leave, tired of messing with them, and they will celebrate their “victory”. That is, the topic of the forum, commentary, discussion is completely forgotten, and goes on and on under the slogan “they are beating our people.” I suggest simply reminding all those who deviate from the topic of the article to return to the mainstream.
  66. 0
    15 October 2013 03: 11
    It’s great, now they’ve licked off the S-300 and the Patriot, and tomorrow they’ll have their own, and while in Russia they’ll dress up to whom and how much they need to give in order to introduce a new one, the Chinese will have their own air defense system, with characteristics better than ours.
    1. +1
      15 October 2013 04: 32
      When you have your own, then it’s worth talking about... so far there’s nothing of your own.
      Moreover, with characteristics better than ours.
      This is what school is for!
      Here they have a school of copying, this school does not know how to create something new.
  67. +2
    15 October 2013 06: 45
    The Chinese have once again shown that they have reached a level equivalent to advanced technologies and no matter what they say about them, no matter how much they criticize them, it is from the evil one and from their own powerlessness. Our idiot shipmen still won’t understand that selling weapons from new developments is very bad, it is a direct betrayal of the interests of their country. It is obvious that we are handing over our weapons to the enemy. The dollar has become not only the basis of our existence, but also a substitute for gray brain matter for many Russians.
  68. 0
    13 August 2016 12: 53
    Ours still want to sell them the Su-35! They’ll copy them piece by piece, at least not give a license for the production of parts, let them buy from us.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"