Military Review

North Korea refused to sign a non-aggression agreement with the United States

77
North Korea refused to sign a non-aggression agreement with the United StatesDPRK authorities refused to sign a non-aggression agreement proposed by US Secretary of State John Kerry.


The US Secretary of State spoke in favor of the possibility of resuming talks with North Korea on October 3, while on a visit to Tokyo. Kerry said that Washington is ready to negotiate with North Korea if Pyongyang returns to the issue of denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula.

"Knowing what the United States means by denuclearization, we will reject all proposals that are designed to isolate and suppress our country," reports the Korean Telegraph Agency of Korea (TsTAK).

A representative of the North Korean Committee for the Peaceful Unification of the Motherland said that the proposal of Secretary of State Kerry is a "profanation." The official stressed that the United States should end the “unjust” sanctions imposed on the DPRK after the third nuclear test in February of this year.

Earlier, the DPRK authorities threatened to launch a preemptive strike in the event of "military provocations" by the United States and South Korea. "The military conspiracy (US and South Korea) is aimed at stopping the current peace process and dialogue on the Korean Peninsula, and also heightens tensions that could escalate into a nuclear conflict," said the Central Democratic Party of Korea.
Originator:
http://www.rosbalt.ru/
77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. andrei332809
    andrei332809 12 October 2013 18: 09
    34
    the amers have all the political methods licked off the Britons - to do a lot of things to a nasty country ... but then offer "peace" on favorable conditions exclusively for themselves. and it would be fine after the victory and surrender of the enemy, no, out of the blue they want to warm their paws
    1. bask
      bask 12 October 2013 18: 17
      20
      North Korea refused to sign a non-aggression agreement with the United States

      Well done, Eun, he laid his Korean ***** on both SUSH and the whole western shit democracy
      1. Sosed74
        Sosed74 12 October 2013 21: 14
        20
        Eun well done. wassat
        Yes, the same murderer and bloodsucker as the Americans. No better. Terrible poverty, hunger and total control over their people are proof of this. RICE people eat 2 times a year !!! On the birthday of this and on state. Holiday. They eat grass. But the drug is legal to inject like a zombie 12 hours a day. You cannot have a radio at home - every 3 months all houses and apartments are shumbled. People are slaves and live in hell.
        Well done is South Korea, with an average salary of $ 4.000. And such a standard of living that God forbid us such. Only here, like in the DPRK, ~ ghouls are also in power. Who devour their own people and do not choke, but on the contrary - all is small. For whom the common population - this is the last - is worse than animals.
        1. catapractic
          catapractic 12 October 2013 21: 21
          +2
          about 4000 tons of bucks, it’s you turned down the average salary there is less, but the DPRK is ready to sign the rest in relation to its citizens-a terrible country
          1. Sosed74
            Sosed74 12 October 2013 21: 28
            11
            The main thing is that those who need it at the trough. Generals led by E-Mr. Fatten. Eun himself studied in England. His watches are for 100.000u.e. The top is not poor in general.
            So it’s not for them to change something, to let someone left to the loaf.
            And the people are simply zombie - they firmly believe that Eun has descended from heaven - that they will have everything in a bunch - the main thing is juche. wassat Asylum in general.
            In Russia, the attitude towards the people is practically the same - only everything is much bolder and simpler. They steal Into the Open and Impudent - without embarrassment to anyone. And dissatisfied very much - either in prison, or in the next world. Everything is simple. Without any juche there. wassat
            1. alone
              alone 12 October 2013 21: 55
              +2
              Eun generally studied in Switzerland. For the rest, he agrees 100%. Something is not noticeable in the Euna figure, he also suffers as his own people. Yes, and if you think carefully about how many more people will trust him there, it is not known.
        2. poquello
          poquello 13 October 2013 00: 51
          +2
          Quote: Sosed74

          Well done is South Korea, with an average salary of $ 4.000. And such a standard of living that God forbid us such. Only here, like in the DPRK, ~ ghouls are also in power. Who devour their own people and do not choke, but on the contrary - all is small. For whom the common population - this is the last - is worse than animals.

          Our stump is worse than anyone else - and illegal drugs and an average salary of less than 4 ty of cabbage.
        3. vladstro
          vladstro 13 October 2013 19: 49
          +7
          and you were in North Korea, or just crazy about Taldychete, watch a movie about the Country and then say they eat grass or not, the Union didn’t eat eggs either, but they were afraid and respected, and now they’re full of caviar, and they’re zeroing their feet, they wipe their legs as they want I choose respect
      2. Strezhevchanin
        Strezhevchanin 13 October 2013 07: 19
        13
        Quote: bask
        Here you go, Eun, he laid down his Korean

        I suspect not only he fellow laughing
      3. Army strong
        Army strong 14 October 2013 07: 22
        -1
        Obama is an American Gorbachev - he fucked up everything that you can
      4. The comment was deleted.
    2. mirag2
      mirag2 13 October 2013 06: 56
      +4
      Korea, on the one hand, acts as the Baltic, Georgia-Saakashvili but against the states.
    3. Baemaley99
      Baemaley99 13 October 2013 12: 43
      +3
      Of course they are. After all, you are a continuation of British policy. And they, in turn, continued the policy of the Roman Republic-Empire. " DIVIDE AND RULE " . And do the dirty work with someone else's hands.
  2. Very old
    Very old 12 October 2013 18: 14
    +5
    Like, and comments to anything. Andrew, than am. from br. are different?
    1. andrei332809
      andrei332809 12 October 2013 18: 22
      15
      Quote: Very old
      .Andrey than am. from br. are different?

      Britons are more restrained, the centuries-old "hardening" in meanness affects. and the Yankes, in comparison with them like from a tree three days ago, climbed down, first blurted out, and then, in order not to look completely fools, they come up with some kind of "truth"
      1. Very old
        Very old 12 October 2013 18: 25
        +5
        For the "centuries-old" - YOU are special ++++++
        1. andrei332809
          andrei332809 12 October 2013 18: 27
          +3
          Quote: Very old
          For the "centuries-old" - YOU are special ++++++

          and I don’t feel sorry for the "+". It’s nice when a person agrees with you without using a club, that is, in Yankees way (I mean that the Yankes in "disputes" got used to grabbing the club)
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. aksakal
            aksakal 13 October 2013 16: 41
            +2
            Quote: andrei332809
            (I mean that the Yankes in the "disputes" got used to grabbing a club)
            - in my opinion, they like to clutch more for colt. And they like to say a good word with this metal product in their hand. What about the club? And they can take away the club, and with it you yourself ...
            1. andrei332809
              andrei332809 13 October 2013 16: 50
              +1
              Quote: aksakal
              they like to clutch more for colt.

              Well, you understand that the "club" is figurative? tongue "but if ..." angry
              (by the way) must remember-armenfilm- "Wow, talking fish" lol
      2. bask
        bask 12 October 2013 18: 26
        10
        Quote: andrei332809
        Britons are more restrained, the centuries-old "hardening" in meanness affects. and the Yankes are like a tree compared to them

        Naturally, Andryukh, shaving from his kinetic garbage, got rid of them for 200 years.
        Sending all the convicts and other mischief to the United States and Australia, etc.
        1. catapractic
          catapractic 12 October 2013 21: 23
          +6
          Americans will surely find the right solution, having tried all the rest before - Churchill
  3. AleksUkr
    AleksUkr 12 October 2013 18: 33
    +2
    Denuclearization - i.e. creation of a nuclear-weapon-free zone. In this case, the Korean Peninsula.
    Beijing, October 10 / Xinhua / - China calls on interested parties to strive to mitigate the situation and implement the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, and in no case the other way around. This was announced today at a regular press conference by the official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, Hua Chunying, commenting at the request of journalists about the fact that the South Korean side confirmed on the eve of the fact that the DPRK resumed operation of the nuclear reactor in Yongbyon.
    BUT:
    The DPRK authorities refused to sign the non-aggression agreement proposed by US Secretary of State John Kerry, reports Reuters.

    Earlier, Kerry said that the United States is ready for negotiations with North Korea under the conditions of denuclearization. In turn, Pyongyang called for the lifting of the sanctions imposed after the test of nuclear weapons in February this year.

    The DPRK authorities also criticized the joint naval exercises of the United States and South Korea and invited the Americans to "think about it."

    DPRK WARNING (threatening?):
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 12 October 2013 18: 44
      10
      Already seven microphones from comrade Kim Jong-un on the podium! Just the same in Feng Shui, in seven microphones he sent amers to all Feng Shui. laughing
      1. Serg 122
        Serg 122 12 October 2013 21: 47
        +5
        These are levers for controlling missiles ... laughing
      2. Algor73
        Algor73 13 October 2013 00: 08
        +1
        He sent something, he will not become better for ordinary people from a poor country. It is clear that propaganda, faith in a brighter future, is good. But when will it be, is it a bright future, when do you want to eat already? You can’t tell this from the face of Eun, and the rest?
        1. Hudo
          Hudo 13 October 2013 16: 38
          +3
          Quote: Algor73
          He sent, he will not become better for ordinary people from a poor country

          Those. Do you think that if these people are beaten with axes and other bearers of democracy (if signed), we will be able to observe an improvement in the life of the people of North Korea? A very dubious statement.
    2. grafrozow
      grafrozow 12 October 2013 18: 50
      +2
      Quote: AleksUkr
      Denuclearization - i.e. creation of a nuclear-weapon-free zone. In this case, the Korean Peninsula.
      That is precisely why we need another Chernobyl at hand, not such a DPRK rich country to engage in expensive projects. Simple Koreans are sorry.
    3. Gunsmith
      Gunsmith 13 October 2013 16: 54
      0
      Someone who threatens amers? S. Korea - and, clearly, ... again, winter is just around the corner, it's time to intimidate everyone. I would like to know what these Jucheists can count on without humanitarian supplies from the states of fuel oil and rice - tens of thousands of tons. Again to Russia - we are kind ...
  4. buzer
    buzer 12 October 2013 18: 39
    10
    I doubt that the Americans hoped that the DPRK would agree to sign this "piece of paper" !!! Here is something else ... Most likely the Yankees again want to present North Korea as an inadequate aggressor and play some kind of tricky combination !!!
    1. cyberspace
      cyberspace 12 October 2013 20: 53
      +5
      Quote: buzer
      There is something else

      Of course, the other thing is to declare war on the DPRK and surrender the next day so that the debts are written off to the Koreans, let the creditors demand loot from them.
      1. mcvdvlad
        mcvdvlad 12 October 2013 22: 52
        +2
        brilliant !!! But it is unlikely that mattresses will be able to come up with this ...
        1. Sergh
          Sergh 13 October 2013 08: 21
          +1
          Quote: siber
          the next day to surrender so that debts are written off to Koreans, let lenders demand loot from them

          + 100500!
    2. RUSS
      RUSS 13 October 2013 09: 35
      +2
      Amer is not interested in stability on the Korean peninsula, for example, as another justification for military bases in Japan.
  5. buzer
    buzer 12 October 2013 18: 53
    +7
    no one in the world except the Koreans themselves needs a united Korea! United Germany has become the "locomotive of Europe", the main "breadwinner" of the EU and a regional leader !!! United Korea is capable of becoming the regional leader of the whole of Southeast Asia, and such a Korea (which has nuclear weapons and labor resources of the northerners, as well as modern technologies and financial resources of the southerners) is of no use to anyone and even more !!! DANGEROUS! For all ! Chinese, Japanese, Americans, Russians ... Everyone.
    1. clidon
      clidon 12 October 2013 19: 49
      +3
      By and large, the Koreans themselves do not really need it either. It is much more pleasant to talk about it and to meet one’s side than to pull the poor North to its hump.
      There are no resources there, rabsila in its mass is low-skilled and in general has little to say about real capry. That is, investments there will pay off not just not soon (the German Democratic Republic entered the FRG as a sufficiently well-off CMEA country), but in general it is not known when.
      Therefore, it is not surprising that the conversations with South Korean officials mentioned on the sidelines boil down to the following: "It would be nice if the North first followed the Chinese path, wriggled around a little, and we will invest money, help there slowly, but not unite."
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 13 October 2013 16: 49
        +1
        Quote: clidon
        It is much more pleasant to talk about it and to meet one’s side than to pull the poor North to its hump.

        laughing laughing laughing Beggar North. Already how much to say - the North is not so poor as they paint for us ... And they even paint for us shots from grenade launchers of their mistresses. If only a credible writer from South Korea would rave.
        And then - I see, the West Germans did not really bother, "dragging the East Germans on their backs." After two dozen, they even managed to drop, albeit not much, the standard of living of East Germans laughing laughing Two decades after the merger laughing But their economic potential at the expense of the GDR and the level of their sloppy special services at the expense of a very professional "Stasi" raised very significantly.
        1. clidon
          clidon 13 October 2013 18: 17
          0
          Well, by yourself then do not judge the jolly you are ours. You can draw anything, even mortar executions of generals, if you like Southern fairy tales. You need to be able to filter information at least at the initial level. In the bottom line, we get a poor country that 10 years ago was starving and still an important part of its penumbra economy is the export of frogs, mushrooms and fish.
          About the GDR: You apparently slept (or you were very young then) somewhere in the 90s, so you don't know what blow the German economy suffered by taking on the "ballast" of the GDR. The fact that they got out of this only speaks of how much safety margin Bonn had. And, I repeat, the GDR is not S Korea, the Germans were the most prosperous CMEA country.
          Well, the fact that the informers and spies from the Stasi (most of them were exposed of course) somehow began to work to the west, then of course a powerful argument.
    2. Peaceful military
      Peaceful military 12 October 2013 20: 05
      +3
      nobody in the world but Koreans themselves needs a united Korea

      It is not strange, but, like the Germans (at one time), the Koreans do not need unity.
      sad
  6. kress42rus
    kress42rus 12 October 2013 18: 54
    +2
    one criminality lives in Amer and the same in the world collects from them neither debt nor homeland remember who colonized her
  7. Peaceful military
    Peaceful military 12 October 2013 18: 58
    +6
    "Knowing what the United States means by denuclearization, we will reject all proposals that are designed to isolate and suppress our country," reports the Korean Telegraph Agency of Korea (TsTAK).

    So that the "common people" and their gaskets do not mutter, but the DPRK, like, for example, Iran, Belarus, Venezuela, etc., pursuing a consistently firm foreign policy, relying on it on a certain power component (nuclear weapons, allies), provide its sovereignty.
    The groans about starving children, we know well, as well as the price to them ...
  8. atalef
    atalef 12 October 2013 19: 03
    -3
    Well, of course, S. Korea does not agree to sign the agreement. After all, the next day, Donut will have to explain that all the problems in Korea are not due to the Amer. but because of Juche’s ideas.
    I would be very surprised if Kim Jong Il agreed --- this is just one berry - Abbas, Kim Jong Il - war is the only condition for them to exist --- peace is death for them
    1. knn54
      knn54 12 October 2013 21: 25
      +7
      - atalef: war is their only condition for existence --- peace is death for them.
      1. And when did the DPRK fight?
      2. But the Yankees of the USA from ALL crises came out of wars!
      http://ruclubnews.ru/16-trillionov-dollarov-gosdolga-ssha-vysota-vzyata.html
      http://www.profi-forex.org/novosti-mira/novosti_ameriki/usa/entry1008136077.html

      http://repeatingginny.blogspot.ru/2012/11/blog-post_2272.html
      And when did the Yankees respect international treaties?
      In this case (upon signing the agreement) the USA will organize provocations against the DPRK, and in case of retaliatory actions they will accuse the North Koreans of violating the agreement. And so the Yankees will know that at any time they will receive an answer, incl. and nuclear.
      1. Nayhas
        Nayhas 13 October 2013 09: 18
        -6
        Quote: knn54
        1. And when did the DPRK fight?

        Well, we have arrived ... And why the war in 1950? started then? Memory "knocked out" or it was not?
        1. knn54
          knn54 13 October 2013 13: 45
          +3
          Eugene, turn on the brain (if any): half a century has passed. Moreover, there was an American invasion of North Korea under the UN flag. That is, it was as if international forces were “putting things in order” in Korea, although in practice the invasion was purely American. The results of restoring order: in Pyongyang, after the carpet bombing, not a single surviving house remained ...
          And how many times after that the Yankees and their vassals imposed "democracy". Unlike the southerners (who also fought in Vietnam), the DPRK fighters were not abroad, even in peacekeeping missions.
      2. Archibald
        Archibald 13 October 2013 10: 04
        +1
        And who attacked South Korea during the Korean War?
  9. dimon-media
    dimon-media 12 October 2013 19: 03
    +4
    And what, S.Koreya is doing the right thing. To be friends with mattresses is more expensive. Yet it is beneficial to even a small country to have nuclear weapons. They spit saliva, bark like dogs (mattresses), and troops can no longer be entered. Nuclear weapons are a powerful argument for non-aggression.
    1. Serg 122
      Serg 122 12 October 2013 21: 50
      +2
      So the Americans first conclude a contract, and then commit a provocation - like you broke the contract, here you get it!
    2. Nayhas
      Nayhas 13 October 2013 09: 20
      -1
      Quote: dimon-media
      And what, S.Koreya is doing the right thing.

      Of course, it’s right how the food runs out, you have to roll back to blackmail, and with a peace treaty it will not look beautiful, starve to death or what?
  10. Igor62
    Igor62 12 October 2013 19: 08
    +1
    Quote: bask
    North Korea refused to sign a non-aggression agreement with the United States

    Well done, Eun, he laid his Korean ***** on both SUSH and the whole western shit democracy
    1. mikkado31
      mikkado31 12 October 2013 22: 00
      -1
      Firstly, I did not lay down but put it. There is no such word "lodged". Learn your native language.

      Secondly, this Donut continues to scare everyone with its nuclear program, but if something goes wrong, then the Russian Far East will be covered with radioactive dust. And the fact that there this Korean jumps up and refuses to sign an agreement, well, he’s worse. In the eyes of his older Chinese brothers, he now looks like a complete nerd.
      1. Hudo
        Hudo 12 October 2013 23: 01
        +6
        Quote: mikkado31
        Firstly, I did not lay down but put it. There is no such word "lodged". Learn your native language.


        Dickfalse on the opinion of others, provides a long and happy life! "F. Ranevskaya.
        1. alexng
          alexng 14 October 2013 08: 52
          0
          Quote: Hudo
          North Korea refused to sign a non-aggression agreement with the United States


          Believing in the United States is the same as deceiving yourself. And in general, what the Empire of LIES can offer.
        2. alexng
          alexng 14 October 2013 08: 52
          0
          Quote: Hudo
          North Korea refused to sign a non-aggression agreement with the United States


          Believing in the United States is the same as deceiving yourself. And in general, what the Empire of LIES can offer.
  11. atalef
    atalef 12 October 2013 19: 09
    +5
    Quote: dimon-media
    what, S.Koreya is doing the right thing. To be friends with mattresses is more expensive.

    But don’t be friends, just sign a non-attack treaty. What is the problem


    Quote: dimon-media
    Yet it is beneficial to even a small country to have nuclear weapons.

    And keep the people in poverty. Or isn’t it? Maybe Kim Jong-un should take care of prosperity and peace for his people. Does he fear America? He is offered to sign an agreement, the sanctions will be lifted, live, develop. only without an enemy such a regime cannot survive, therefore - for them it’s like death
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 12 October 2013 19: 28
      +7
      Quote: atalef
      Quote: dimon-media
      what, S.Koreya is doing the right thing. To be friends with mattresses is more expensive.

      But don’t be friends, just sign a non-attack treaty. What is the problem


      In December 2003, Gaddafi officially announced that his country was abandoning its plans to create nuclear weapons. This step was met with the approval of foreign powers, including SyShyA. In January 2004, Libya ratified the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT)

      I can recall what happened a little later.
    2. alone
      alone 12 October 2013 22: 04
      +3
      if you sign a non-aggression pact, all the internal policies of the north’s leadership will go to the smart, which is based on the fact that the country is surrounded by enemies who even think in a dream how to attack the north. They will have to cut off all the privileges of the military power of the north. and this is already to set up part of the military against itself and, ultimately, the coup and see the Kim era. And Eun knows this best.
    3. IGS
      IGS 13 October 2013 13: 53
      0
      He will not sign. And he will not give up nuclear weapons either. For the same reason as Israel, which also does not want to sign documents on nuclear weapons. The only guaranteed factor is, if anything, "slam the door loudly", and you can hold everyone in tension.
    4. Saburov
      Saburov 13 October 2013 19: 16
      +2
      Again, the Jews went to excuses, so without the enemy and the US die, that their military convulsions of the last 20 years prove, they are already in principle at death, the last 10 years.
      1. Saburov
        Saburov 13 October 2013 19: 22
        +1
        Although if you look, the Jewish lobby in the United States is very strong, there are as many of you as in Israel it’s enough to see the creeds of most state senators and statesmen, you don’t have to go far, take the Bernanke Fed at least, so forum users don’t pay attention, Israel is well aware that if the United States comes tryndets, then he will come to Israel.
  12. waisson
    waisson 12 October 2013 19: 10
    +2
    well done good does not go on amerians with amers. SO HOLD !!! soldier soldier soldier
  13. tennis
    tennis 12 October 2013 19: 11
    +4
    Non-aggression agreement was also signed with fascist Germany. What this led to we know. The United States in such matters will wipe its nose anyone you want - give them a finger and they will bite off their head.
  14. pogis
    pogis 12 October 2013 19: 14
    +3
    Fell under the table (neighing)! I looked at the globe, and did not find any reason for excitement for the United States! The United States reminds me of a porn actor who removed his bottom pair of ribs for a car!
    1. POCC
      POCC 13 October 2013 02: 51
      0
      good drinks and my mouth pus smeared with superglue lol and they will be busy all the time and others will not be reached .. EACH DREAMS drinks We’ll try to fulfill your dream
  15. almost demobil
    almost demobil 12 October 2013 19: 19
    +1
    And I argue from my tower like this, if there is at least some chance to avoid a nuclear war, be it at least some kind, real, paper, virtual, or speech, you have to grab onto this opportunity. Of course, without reducing the BB of the Strategic Rocket Forces. But when the fat fa-atik is on its own without real steps leading to a decrease in tension in the region, I can’t understand this. So I didn’t deal with such a der of the USSR (and these morons consider themselves followers), by the way having not rusty rockets, like these fans, but quite flying.
  16. Migari
    Migari 12 October 2013 19: 28
    +4
    And the amers' point is not iron, they just threatened everyone with an atomic club and its use, they are "exceptional", but a small but growing bomb among Koreans is already like a pain in the ass, so they propose to make a nuclear-free zone in Korea , peacekeepers are shitty, well, they would offer Izrail this zone,
  17. individual
    individual 12 October 2013 19: 29
    0
    DPRK’s firm confidence in its rightness is surprising.
    1. clidon
      clidon 12 October 2013 19: 53
      +3
      And they cannot do otherwise. A living god is in charge there, and this is a unique case in earthly practice. His great-great-grandfather destroyed American traders in the 19th century. His grandfather, along with the partisan units, defeated and expelled the Japanese in 1945 and defeated the Americans in 1953 with a powerful attack. His father managed to defeat the United States in the political arena, saved the country, its integrity, and despite the massive famine (the so-called "difficult campaign") launched a rocket into space and created a nuclear bomb.
      However, the grandson likes the grandfather more.
  18. APASUS
    APASUS 12 October 2013 19: 35
    +7
    Americans in their style, politics has not changed for decades.
    You part with nuclear weapons, and we will beads for you !!
    Moreover, all the fame and initiative is solely appropriated - the propaganda step is pure water! The US is sanctioning - not a word about them, the American bases will remain in South Korea - again not a word, a peace treaty is a kind of temptation which is currently not relevant.
    1. andrei332809
      andrei332809 12 October 2013 20: 50
      +3
      Quote: APASUS
      You part with nuclear weapons, and we will beads for you !!

      Well, the Yankees of Israel do not offer to abandon the vigorous loaf? Or are the peoples divided into very valuable and completely unnecessary (superfluous)? Well, yes, of course they are. Something I stepped on what
    2. POCC
      POCC 13 October 2013 02: 53
      +3
      America on the soap tongue But seriously, those who mud this porridge drinks
  19. RussianEmpire
    RussianEmpire 12 October 2013 21: 37
    +5
    Nonaggression pact? Somewhere it was already ...
  20. LAO
    LAO 12 October 2013 21: 42
    +1
    North Koreans can only sympathize and express condolences.
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 12 October 2013 22: 39
      +4
      Quote: LAO
      North Koreans can only sympathize and express condolences.


      Im your condolences like a mountain hare microscope. Let them live as God puts them to their hearts.
  21. mikkado31
    mikkado31 12 October 2013 22: 03
    -4
    I look at the comments and am amazed. I have not seen such a degradation of consciousness for a long time. In Scoop, people were even more adequate. From the category "to spite my grandmother, I will frostbite my ears" ...

    Kim did not sign the contract, and to hell with him. Then let him not say that they did not offer MIR.
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 12 October 2013 22: 36
      +4
      Quote: mikkado31
      Kim did not sign the contract, and to hell with him. Then let him not say that they did not offer MIR.


      I do not understand who suggested the WORLD? Isn't that the bloody maniac pin-dos the mattress world offers everyone that turns out to be profit for them and avoiding another financial crisis, but for everyone else, with democratic bombing and casualties?

      Quote: mikkado31
      I look at the comments and wonder. I have not seen such a degradation of consciousness for a long time.


      Yeah! it’s even surprising somehow that you, Amer’s flawed lysozade, have forgotten to ask for advice. laughing
      1. qwertynsan
        qwertynsan 14 October 2013 07: 15
        0
        I will subscribe to each camera; there’s nothing to add, like pin dos to do on such forums
    2. mcvdvlad
      mcvdvlad 12 October 2013 22: 58
      +2
      Is there a troll?
    3. tennis
      tennis 12 October 2013 23: 13
      +3
      Quote: mikkado31
      I look at the comments and am amazed. I have not seen such a degradation of consciousness for a long time. In Scoop, people were even more adequate. From the category "to spite my grandmother, I will frostbite my ears" ...

      Kim did not sign the contract, and to hell with him. Then let him not say that they did not offer MIR.

      You have not confused the site? Sing your songs on "echo", there are no idiots here.
  22. Cherdak
    Cherdak 12 October 2013 22: 10
    +1
    Americans are too cynical to play this card before Congress, knowing full well that they themselves are not in danger. But the budget of the warriors entrenched in Okinawa will not be cut
    1. Azaat
      Azaat 13 October 2013 00: 11
      +2
      Well, yes, Syria could not be divorced, so North Korea will succeed.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. Cherdak
    Cherdak 12 October 2013 22: 19
    +3
    Best illustration
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. w2000
    w2000 12 October 2013 23: 36
    +8
    The fact that people eat grass in the UK are stories invented by liberals. Yes, the country is poor, but proud and independent. The standard of living there is about the same as in Ukraine.
    1. yanus
      yanus 13 October 2013 12: 08
      -1
      Quote: w2000
      The standard of living there is about the same as in Ukraine.

      I have not been to Ukraine for a long time. Hardly so bad there.
  27. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 12 October 2013 23: 45
    +5
    Quote: mikkado31
    Then let him not say that they did not offer MIR.

    To sign an agreement for Eun means to agree to curtail the nuclear program and destroy what they have ... and for how long after that the DPRK will exist as a state .. for a short while this is a fact. Una has the opportunity to put pressure on the IAEA and the United States, and he will not give up. hi
  28. MREDBEST
    MREDBEST 13 October 2013 00: 59
    +4
    I respect North Korea good
    Signing an act of non-attack with the USA is the same as signing an agreement with Nazi Germany
    1. atalef
      atalef 13 October 2013 12: 31
      -3
      Quote: MREDBEST
      I respect North Korea good

      and you don’t want to live there?
      1. MREDBEST
        MREDBEST 13 October 2013 14: 10
        +2
        I don’t understand how do you know how it lives there ?! It seems to me in any case better than in Libya or in Iraq! If America offers something, it means that it pursues its own selfish goals! You still tell me that they are the American government wants world peace))))
        In the previous comment, I have a typo * non-attack pact *)))
  29. svp67
    svp67 13 October 2013 01: 00
    +2
    DPRK authorities refused to sign a non-aggression agreement proposed by US Secretary of State John Kerry.
    All right, shiver America .... tongue
  30. poquello
    poquello 13 October 2013 01: 25
    +2
    Kiri’s zebra gotten messy, and the DPRK sent and did not agree with Karzai on security.
  31. POCC
    POCC 13 October 2013 02: 21
    +5
    Quote: andrei332809
    Quote: Very old
    .Andrey than am. from br. are different?

    Britons are more restrained, the centuries-old "hardening" in meanness affects. and the Yankes, in comparison with them like from a tree three days ago, climbed down, first blurted out, and then, in order not to look completely fools, they come up with some kind of "truth"

    Agree drinks but those and those scoundrels and bandits
  32. 528Obrp
    528Obrp 13 October 2013 02: 48
    +3
    One small but very proud bird .........

    ......... I'm sorry for the bird crying
  33. Siberian
    Siberian 13 October 2013 08: 49
    +3
    First, they want to impose a non-aggression agreement. And then the Americans will look for any reason that the DPRK is violating the agreement, and in addition to arrange rotten provocations in order to quickly find a clue for a collision in the North. Korea. And they will shout informationally to the whole world that S. Korea is threatening the entire earthly community and especially the US security.
  34. ZU-23
    ZU-23 13 October 2013 08: 55
    +4
    Juche handsome! In general, as Russia began not to put amers in anything, so Asians began to fade from them more often.
  35. Essenger
    Essenger 13 October 2013 10: 23
    -5
    It really hurts the commies very much in the Stone Age)))))
  36. Silkway0026
    Silkway0026 13 October 2013 11: 05
    +5
    Do Americans Really Reveal the Rest of the World for Idiots? most likely - yes, because they are so indignant when someone is not being fooled by their stupid divorces. we were led in due time - and how now we pay ....
  37. svp67
    svp67 13 October 2013 11: 25
    +1
    Quote: grafrozow
    DPRK is not such a rich country to engage in expensive projects. Simple Koreans are sorry.

    DPRK, something painfully familiar and dear ...


    1. samoletil18
      samoletil18 13 October 2013 17: 34
      0
      Sympathetic Chinese women significantly
      1. Alexkorzun
        Alexkorzun 13 October 2013 22: 07
        +1
        Yes, there are so cool, yabvd ....)))
  38. svp67
    svp67 13 October 2013 11: 41
    +1
    DPRK, something painfully familiar ...

    1. Know-nothing
      Know-nothing 13 October 2013 17: 42
      0
      Riddle: which road is in North Korea? smile
  39. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 13 October 2013 12: 08
    +3
    I also remember the USSR signed such a pact, the result was bloody and destructive for our country ..
  40. Budilnik
    Budilnik 13 October 2013 12: 28
    +4
    here the Koreans are right for everything100. Gaddafi abandoned nuclear programs we know what this led to. Israel has long possessed nuclear weapons America not a word. The cynicism and arrogance of America knows no limits.
  41. Sour
    Sour 13 October 2013 12: 49
    0
    Quote: dimon-media
    Why, S.Korea is doing the right thing. To be friends with mattresses is more expensive.

    Actually, nobody offers Kim a friendship, but offers only a non-aggression pact. Negotiations on the nuclear-free status of the peninsula is the next step. For starters, just a non-aggression pact.
    Kim should not sign such an agreement, because without an external enemy his regime will completely lose its meaning in the eyes of its fellow citizens. And you will never find another external enemy.
    But in any case, the situation is in Russia's hands. The more problems the US has, the better.
    1. Gregazov
      Gregazov 13 October 2013 21: 09
      +1
      The Russian American company has signed several contracts with the United States and lost everything. Koreans just don't step on a rake.
  42. 10kAzAk01
    10kAzAk01 13 October 2013 12: 50
    +4
    ......... damn ........ I would have given way to the elderly wassat
    1. samoletil18
      samoletil18 13 October 2013 17: 29
      0
      They would gladly take his place. fellow
  43. Bradley
    Bradley 13 October 2013 13: 29
    -4
    It is a logical decision for the North. Koreans ... Brains then - zero!
    Why not start developing industry, economics, science, etc.? Why was the southern neighbor able and the northern not? Why not be friends with the USA? The example of Southerners shows that friendship with the United States is beneficial!
  44. rereture
    rereture 13 October 2013 13: 50
    -3
    http://www.ridus.ru/news/112991/
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 13 October 2013 17: 00
      +2
      Quote: rereture
      http://www.ridus.ru/news/112991/

      So not the North Koreans in Biryulyovo are buzzing, why the hell did you stick here?
  45. Ckyf
    Ckyf 13 October 2013 15: 38
    -1
    Eun needs a goal where to orient the efforts of the people. At present, the Juche ideology has reached full prosperity - the third kingdom of the nation, internal problems can always be attributed to the machinations of external enemies, continue to conduct international blackmail to minimize the satisfaction of their own needs, such as the supply of food and energy. Eun understands that the DPRK army will at best be able to conduct combat operations for two to three weeks, so nuclear blackmail plays a major role in ensuring the retention of the remnants of the DPRK's international authority in the region.
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 13 October 2013 17: 11
      +1
      Quote: Ckyf
      Eun needs a goal where to orient the efforts of the people


      So, as if everyone needs some goal. laughing Is the meaning of the word "aimless" clear to you?

      Quote: Ckyf
      At present, the Juche ideology has reached full prosperity - the third kingdom of the nation, internal problems can always be attributed to the machinations of external enemies, continue to conduct international blackmail to minimize the satisfaction of their own needs, such as the supply of food and energy.


      In your match, replacing the words of Juche ideology with the democratic values ​​and interests of the United States, and the third king of the nation - by 44 in the account of the king of the nation, Obama, nicknamed coal, we get a full description of the vile activity of Sysh for the past hundred years.
  46. samoletil18
    samoletil18 13 October 2013 17: 21
    +1
    Non-aggression pact, is it or not, what's the difference? Almost all the participants of the Second World War had them with everyone, so what? Is that to reproach the former ally (Although present-day Russia has never squeaked about the German-British pact, for example). Now, if the DPRK refuses nuclear programs, then they will quickly slam it. In Syria, a whole gang of chemical inspectors Assad. deprives weapons. It is like without WMD, the intervention in Syria is much more comfortable to carry out. A similar approach to North Korea, and to Iran, and to Russia, and to anyone.
  47. Technologist
    Technologist 13 October 2013 17: 57
    -3
    Quote: Sosed74
    Only here, like in the DPRK, ~ ghouls are also in power. Who devour their own people and do not choke, but on the contrary - all is small. For whom the common population - this is the last - is worse than animals.

    This is really true.
  48. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 13 October 2013 18: 21
    +3
    This is what a country with a nuclear weapon means. The world gendarme "offers" ... And Yugoslavia was smashed to pieces ... I understand the leaders of Iran. Without nuclear weapons. living with America on the same planet is dangerous!
  49. vladstro
    vladstro 13 October 2013 20: 01
    +3
    Well, let's bring Western democracy there, we’ll solve the fagos first thing, and then what?
  50. morprepud
    morprepud 13 October 2013 22: 03
    +1
    Quote: Sosed74
    Well done is South Korea, with an average salary of $ 4.000. And such a standard of living that God forbid us such. Only here, like in the DPRK, ~ ghouls are also in power. Who devour their own people and do not choke, but on the contrary - all is small. For whom the common population - this is the last - is worse than animals.

    Dear, at least you don’t say about your country a lot of dirt "AND THEN, you will choke!" And if you don’t like it, “take it off” to South Korea or straight to the Pentagon, there the “scammers” will always be repaid ...
    1. Technologist
      Technologist 14 October 2013 18: 26
      0
      I ask you not to confuse the country and government, like heaven and earth. It looks like you came up with ads:
      GAZPROM - a national treasure. Party card, go and wear it at your heart, DEAR.
      You can minus if you think that I'm wrong.