Military Review

Russia, Syria, and the decline of American dominance

166
Russia, Syria, and the decline of American dominanceFirst, good news. American hegemony is over. The bully was tamed. With the Syrian crisis, the world has crossed a key fork in the modern stories. It was as risky as the Cuban 1962 missile crisis. The chances of a full-scale war were high when the steel will of America and Eurasia clashed in the Eastern Mediterranean. Some time will have to pass before we realize what we have been through: this is normal for events of this magnitude. The turmoil in the United States — from the insane chase in Washington to the close of the federal government and a possible default by the US — all are direct consequences of this event.


Remember the Berlin Wall? When it was broken, I was in Moscow, I wrote for Haaretz (Izr. Newspaper; comment mixednews). I attended a press conference with members of the Politburo at the President Hotel, and asked them whether they recognize that the likelihood of an end for the USSR and the socialist world is high. I was ridiculed. Of course not, they said. As a result of the fall of the wall, socialism will flourish. Two years later, the USSR ceased to exist.

The most dramatic events of September 2013 were the confrontation near the Levantine coast, when five US destroyers aimed their Tomahawks in the direction of Damascus, and they were opposed by the Russian flotilla Of the eleven ships led by the Moscow missile cruiser, the carrier of the killer missiles of aircraft carriers, supported by Chinese warships. It seems that two missiles were launched towards the Syrian coast, and both could not reach their destination.

One Lebanese newspaper, citing diplomatic sources wrote that the missiles were launched from the NATO airbase in Spain, and that they were shot down by anti-missile systems, shipboard sea-air. Another explanation was presented to Asia Times, which states that the Russian used their cheap and powerful jammers for GPS, making expensive Tomahawks helpless, and led to their disorientation and fall. Another version attributes launch Israelis, whether an attempt to provoke the crossfire or just study the clouds, as they say themselves.

Whatever the reason, after this strange incident, the shootout did not start, President Obama passed back and removed his weapon. This was preceded by an unexpected vote in the British Parliament. This venerable community declined the honor to join the attack proposed by the United States. For the first time in two hundred years, the British Parliament rejected a tempting offer to start a war — usually the British cannot resist such a temptation.

After that, Obama threw a hot potato Congress. He did not want to start end of the world alone. Congress did not want to get involved in a war with unpredictable consequences. Obama tried to intimidate Putin 20G meeting in St. Petersburg, but he did so and failed. Proposal to remove the Russian chemical weapons allowed Obama to save face. This adventure ended the American hegemony, superiority and exclusivity.

After this event began to unfold quite deftly. U.S. President to the chagrin of Tel Aviv had a conversation with the new president of Iran. Free Syrian Army after two years of war with Assad suddenly wanted to talk to him, and their delegation arrived in Damascus, leaving extremists empty-handed. Their supporter Qatar crumbles surge. Closure of the government and a possible debt default gave Americans another, more important reason, which would be worth to worry. With the end of the hegemony of the U.S. dollar as the days of the world's reserve currency are numbered.

Third World almost happened, as wanted and banksters. They have accumulated too much debt, including unsustainable U.S. debt. If these Tomahawks reached their goal, banksters would declare force majeure and have disavowed debts. Millions of people have died, but billions of dollars in the vaults of JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs could have been saved. In September this world safely crossed the point of bifurcation, as President Obama has refused to take the blame banksters themselves. In the end, maybe he deserved his Nobel Peace Prize.

The near future is full of trouble, but none of them is fatal. The US dollar will cease to serve as the world's reserve currency, although it will remain the North American currency. Other parts of the world will resort to their euros, yuan, rubles, bolivars and dinars. US military spending will have to be reduced to acceptable, and this reduction in foreign military bases will allow American people to survive the transition more or less painlessly. No one wants to follow America - the world is just tired of their saber-rattling here and there.

During the crisis, I remained in Moscow, and watched through the eyes of Russian developments. Some time Putin and Russian ruthlessly crushed.

* The U.S. supported and financed liberal and nationalist opposition in Russia; national elections in Russia were represented as one big fraud. To some extent the government was delegitimize.

* Magnitsky Act in the U.S. Congress authorized the arrest and seize the assets of any Russians at will, without court intervention.

* Some of the Russian state assets were seized in Cyprus, which experienced some problems.

* U.S. incite Moscow Pussy Riot, gay pride parades, etc., thus contributing to the creation of the image of Putin dictator, an enemy of freedom and hater of homosexuals in the West and in the possession of Russian oligarchs media.

* Support for Russian Syria criticized, ridiculed and portrayed as devoid of humanity act of cruelty. At the same time, experts in the Western media have expressed confidence that Russia will hand over Syria.

Russia had no intention of surrendering Syria for a number of reasons - it is an ally, Syrian Orthodox Christians trust Russia, geopolitically the war is near the borders of Russia. But the main reason was irritation of Russia by American willfulness. The Russians believed that such important decisions should be made by the international community, namely, the UN Security Council. They were not satisfied with the role of the United States as a world arbiter.

In 1990, Russia was very weak and could not effectively resist, but the Russians felt bitter when they bombed Yugoslavia, and NATO, in spite of Gorbachev's promises, expanded to the East. The Libyan tragedy was another important point. This unfortunate country was bombed, and eventually disintegrated. From the richest African state it turned into the most miserable. The presence of Russians in Libya was very limited, but still, Russia lost some investments there. Russia abstained in the vote on Libya, as it was the position of the then Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who believed he was playing with the West with one ball. Putin, on no pretext, did not want Syria the same fate.

Russian revolt against Western hegemony began in June, when the Aeroflot flight from Beijing delivered Edward Snowden. Americans began to put pressure on every conceivable button to get it back. They use the whole range of agents in Russia. But despite U.S. pressure, Snowden has been granted asylum.

The next step was the Syrian escalation. According to Russia, there was not and could not be any reason for the United States to act unilaterally - neither in Syria, nor in any other place. In a sense, the Russians have returned international law to its original, respected status. The world has become better and safer.

None of this would have been possible without the help of China. The Asian giant considers Russia to be its “elder sister,” and relies on its ability to act with wide-open eyes (i.e., “as is customary in whites”, the round-eye expression was invented in Hollywood, and in fact has never been used by Asians in relations of Europeans; note mixednews). The Chinese, in their quiet and modest manner, played on Putin’s side. They vetoed the anti-Syrian resolution in the UN Security Council, and sent their ships to the Mediterranean. That is why Putin stood not only for Russia, but also for the entire Eurasian continent.

The church supported Putin — not only the Russian Church, but also the Catholics and all the Orthodox in general were united in their opposition to the American campaign of support for the rebels, who exterminated Christians. Pope called Putin the defender of the church - the same did the churches of Jerusalem and Antioch. Dad almost threatened to wean Hollande, and this latent threat worked. Therefore, Putin enjoyed the support and blessing of the Orthodox patriarchs and the Pope: such a double blessing is an extremely rare event.

In Syrian saga was a lot of interesting and exciting moments, each of which by itself is worthy adaptation. Putin met with almost united front at the summit of the West G8 in Ireland, but he managed to drag someone on their side, and sow the seeds of doubt, when he recalled the leader of the Syrian rebels, eating human flesh.

It was deftly implemented a proposal to destroy the Syrian chemical weapons. The UN resolution blocked the possibility of an attack on Syria under the cover of the seventh chapter. Miraculously, the Russians won this peculiar tug of war. The alternative was grim: Syria would have been destroyed like Libya; a subsequent attack by the United States and Israel would be inevitable; the Christians of the East would have lost their cradle; Europe would be inundated with millions of refugees; Russia would have shown its inconsistency, and would have been equated to Bolivia, whose president’s plane could be forced to sit down and search. Russia would return to the 1999 position of the year when Clinton bombed Belgrade.

The top of this confrontation was reached in exchange exclusivity Putin and Obama. Let's start with the fact that these two are not friends. Putin was irritated by what he perceived as the hypocrisy and deceit of Obama. The man who rose from the very bottom to the very top, Putin appreciates his ability to speak frankly with people from all walks of life. His candid conversations can be shockingly rude. When he criticized the French journalist for the way he represented the Chechen separatists, he said:

“Islamic extremists are enemies of Christians, atheists, and even Muslims themselves, because they believe that traditional Islam is hostile to the goals that they set themselves. And if you want to become an Islamic radical and are ready for circumcision, I invite you to Moscow. We are a multi-faith country, and we have specialists who can do it. And I would advise them to conduct this operation so that nothing more grows in this place. ”

Putin tried to speak frankly with Obama. We know about their exchange of remarks by leakage of confidential conversation between Putin and Netanyahu. Putin called the Americans, and asked, what is your position on Syria? Obama replied: I am worried that the Assad regime does not comply with human rights. Putin was nearly sick of hypocritical response. He understood it as a refusal to talk honestly, eye to eye.

In the aftermath of the Syrian standoff, Obama turned to the peoples of the world on behalf of American exceptionalism. US policy is “what makes America special. What makes us exceptional, ”he said. Putin responded: “It is extremely dangerous to encourage people to consider themselves exceptional. We are all different, but when we ask the Lord for a blessing, we should not forget that he made us equal. ” It was not only ideological, but also theological difference of positions.

The United States is based on the theology of exclusivity, on the fact that they are elected. This is a country from the Old Testament. This is a more profound reason for the special relationship between the United States and Israel. Europe is experiencing a stage of apostasy and rejection of Christ, and Russia is still deeply Christian. Her churches are full, they congratulate each other on Christmas and Easter, and not with the banal change of seasons. Russia is the land of the New Testament. And the rejection of exclusivity, of being chosen, is the fundamental principle of Christianity.

For this reason, although organized American Jewry supported the war, condemned Assad, and urged America to intervene, the Jews of Russia, very numerous, rich and powerful, did not support the Syrian rebels, but rather stood on Putin’s side in his attempts to preserve peace in Syria. The same is true in Iran, where rich Iranian Jewry supported the legitimacy of the Syrian government. It seems that countries led by strong clergy are immune to destructive influence and the lobby; while countries without such clergy - for example, the United States or France - surrender to such influence and accept illegal intervention as the norm.

With the reduction of U.S. hegemony, we face an uncertain future. Monstrous power of the U.S. Army still make mischief; wounded animal is the most dangerous. Americans would be worth listening to Senator Ron Paul, call for reducing foreign bases and cut military spending. International law and the sovereignty of all nations must be respected. People the world over love America when she stops to engage surveillance and intimidation. It's not easy, but we have already agreed on a course at the Cape of Good Hope and achieved.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/08/russia-syria-and-the-decline-of-american-hegemony/
166 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. My address
    My address 12 October 2013 07: 43 New
    -41 qualifying.
    GDP in domestic policy is an unfortunate clone of GDP - foreign policy. Well, except for the choking liberastov.
    1. tronin.maxim
      tronin.maxim 12 October 2013 07: 46 New
      26
      Quote: My address
      GDP is a foreign policy.

      Now it remains to find the right premiere!
      1. RUSSIA 2013
        RUSSIA 2013 14 October 2013 07: 54 New
        +2
        I personally liked the article, Russia really played a very important role, I am proud that we did not abandon Syria, and amers are soon waiting for a deplorable kaput, and their Jews will rush to us, as they got it, RUSSIA WITHOUT JEANS.
    2. Beibit
      Beibit 12 October 2013 08: 01 New
      -24 qualifying.
      but the GDP law on the reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences still signed. It is possible that the GDP is raising its image in the external arena, thereby it is a national hero in the eyes of its people, but in reality, many of its actions at the hands of the prime minister destroy the country with his hands. So to say that he is for Russia, I would not hurry ...
      1. true love
        true love 12 October 2013 10: 23 New
        20
        Only academicians themselves can speak with authority about the reform of the RAS. The common people do not understand ANYTHING in this reform. But academics are people too, and it is very difficult for them, like ordinary people, to step back from their privileges. This reform is more like a diminution of privileges than an attempt to destroy science. But "the devil is in the details."
        1. Starfish
          Starfish 12 October 2013 11: 22 New
          -16 qualifying.
          all the achievements in Mr. P.’s foreign policy are not necessarily his personal merits, but not staged dances with tambourines. elimination of chemical weapons in Syria
          "achievements" in domestic politics and economics are obvious. benefit for a penny - a loss for a ruble.
          1. t-95-70
            t-95-70 12 October 2013 18: 49 New
            18
            come on specifically, 1999 when he arrived, and today, say there is a difference or not.
            1. dimon-media
              dimon-media 12 October 2013 19: 34 New
              +3
              It’s useless to prove, Ilya. Many stubbornly pass black as white and white as black. Either from a principle, or from self-deception, you and I cannot understand. wink
            2. 755962
              755962 13 October 2013 19: 44 New
              +7
              "Do not hope that once you take advantage of Russia's weakness, you will receive dividends forever. Russians always come for their money. And when they come, do not rely on the Jesuit agreements that you signed, supposedly to justify you. They are not worth the paper on which they are written. Therefore, it is worth playing with the Russians either honestly, or not playing at all. "


              Otto von Bismarck.

              We will be back soon and will require payment of old bills
        2. a52333
          a52333 12 October 2013 12: 10 New
          14
          the devil is in the details
          Well done = +! I will expand a little. After the Serdyukov-Medvedev-Chubais "reforms", Russians developed a stable feeling towards normal and NECESSARY evolutionary development, which ranges from alertness to hysteria. Explainable and justified. But let's not take the word "reform" as destruction. For a start, look at the reformer. And closer to the "body". The reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences will shake the dust off the academics, who have "relaxed" for 20 years. Someone will be pushed away from the trough to which he has sucked. That's hysteria.
          1. Geisenberg
            Geisenberg 12 October 2013 13: 14 New
            16
            The people of the world will love America again when it ceases to engage in surveillance and intimidation. This is not easy, but we have already agreed on a course to the Cape, and have achieved Good Hope.


            This is unlikely. It must be replaced by several generations, pure, without an American exclusive stink. During this time, America itself may change, and until then has been and will remain a huge need.

            So, that past Izya, past ...
          2. dimon-media
            dimon-media 12 October 2013 19: 39 New
            +3
            Quote: a52333
            But let's not take the word "reform" as destruction. For a start, look at the reformer.

            I am afraid that the word "reform" among Russians will for a long time cause allergies in many generations after us. We are accustomed to everything that since the "Gorbachev" times, this word carries with it only devastation. Well, what can you do? It is already in the blood, which is why such associations arise. We are getting rid of reforms like the devil with incense.
        3. vvvvv
          vvvvv 12 October 2013 21: 12 New
          +5
          I don’t know the situation in the Russian Academy of Sciences well, but I know perfectly well the situation in the university (higher) education as a whole - total corruption and lawlessness ... Initially, fraudulent schemes, absolute fiction, instead of education. This, too, needs to be reformed globally, but I am sure that all corrupt officials will raise a wild howl if they are going to reform and give it on their tentacles ...
          Just yesterday I learned the "scheme". Corrupt teachers of the city N, having entered into an initial conspiracy, offer the university to open representative offices in different cities, while they themselves "teach", traveling to all these cities. There, obviously, all of its teachers and methodologists, as well as a collaborating firm, executing "works for students". As a result, no one allows students to pass the exam on their own, and all - the methodologists and teachers strongly recommend resolving issues through the firm. It turns out to be 100% fiction and a goof - this university, which was divorced. Although, there may be a collusion with the leadership. This is not an abstract example, but I know it directly from the schema organizer ...
          And this is not done by some geniuses of the RAS, etc. highly professional charms, and ordinary businessmen without any tricks. And what the more skilled ones can stir up - one can only guess. And they don’t have enough mind to mess up about their affairs ...
          I believe that in Russia it’s just a ** but in the field of education ... This is how not one fake university works, but there are several of them in one "bundle" only in cases known to me.
      2. Patriot.ru.
        Patriot.ru. 12 October 2013 19: 53 New
        +5
        I accidentally set a minus. I like the foreign policy of GDP. I don’t have a domestic one. VVP signed excise taxes on alcohol and tobacco next year they will rise by 40%. At the same time, Valentina Matvienko said that raising excise taxes on alcohol last year did not bring a ruble to the treasury. (Import from Kazakhstan and Belarus, moonshine and left-hand vodka 5 liters 250 rubles are sold here). The same thing will happen with cigarettes, maybe worse. Vodka doesn’t interest me (I have mead grape wine) Tobacco planted but it didn’t grow properly. next year I’ll plant a lot. Why mock ordinary people? PS I remember that the collapse of the Union began with tobacco riots in Moscow.
        1. rolik
          rolik 13 October 2013 15: 27 New
          +2
          Quote: Patriot.ru.
          GDP signed excise taxes on alcohol and tobacco

          Travel to neighboring Finland, Sweden, Norway. Look at their excise taxes on alcohol and tobacco. In Bulgaria, cigarettes are more expensive than ours. Unfortunately, people can be weaned from drinking and smoking only by high prices for these products. But then a collision arises, "pits" immediately appear selling alcohol and cheap booze. Plus there is cheap swill, which (for some reason suddenly) has become very difficult to track)))) In this case, normal police work is needed to close these "holes" and plant suppliers of cheap, dangerous swill. But what kind of work can we talk about when the police themselves feed from these points. It turns out this endless Moebius strip. In general, beer is in the first place in consumption today. Not real brewed beer, but a substitute in bottles and cans. This swill can hardly be called beer. So we get guys who are 30 years old, I apologize, the ass is wider than the shoulders and pussies are not brought into combat))))))
    3. t-95-70
      t-95-70 12 October 2013 18: 47 New
      +1
      wondering whose clone you are?
  2. andrei332809
    andrei332809 12 October 2013 07: 44 New
    17
    not too much oil? I think the war for Syria and for influence in the world is far from over. The West has temporarily retreated from Syria, but the Israeli woman is already throwing another "enemy" for them, which must be urgently put into the stall of Western democracy. So, probably, major battles ahead
    1. INTER
      INTER 12 October 2013 08: 24 New
      12
      Quote: andrei332809
      not too much oil? I think the war for Syria and for influence in the world is far from over. The West has temporarily retreated from Syria, but the Israeli woman is already throwing another "enemy" for them, which must be urgently put into the stall of Western democracy. So, probably, major battles ahead

      That's right, no need to relax and think that everything is in the hat, this is just the beginning!
      1. a52333
        a52333 12 October 2013 09: 26 New
        14
        major battles ahead
        Exactly, exactly. There will be two more calls. Syria, in principle, is no longer interesting for the states - the goal has been achieved. A country in war and ruins. Iran and the countries of "Mediocre such Asia" remained. From when everything is on fire, they will wipe the sweat from their face. Yes. Author +. For an unbiased opinion.
        1. 528Obrp
          528Obrp 12 October 2013 09: 34 New
          +4
          Quote: a52333
          Syria, in principle, is no longer interested in the states - the goal has been achieved

          But is Syria already an agent of state influence? But the agent of influence of Russia is yes.
          1. a52333
            a52333 12 October 2013 12: 21 New
            11
            But is Syria already an agent of state influence?
            And in what corner of my comment did you read this?
            But the agent of influence of Russia is yes.
            This is what a fright?
            Syria is resolving its issues, and we are ours. At this stage, they (interests) coincide. I will write a cynical thought: (no one wrote, many just keep in mind, or choose more streamlined expressions) While the war in Syria, we have a respite. Sharpen or understand? And the fact that Syria is a partner, I would say this: not an enemy. But until the partnership, what would be the Treaty on Mutual Defense, not yet. And God forbid we get in there! Help with weapons - yes.
            1. 528Obrp
              528Obrp 12 October 2013 12: 30 New
              +6
              Quote: a52333
              While the war in Syria, we have a respite.

              This is the first. There are a lot of branches in this first one.

              In the near future it is conductor interests of Russia.
              Assad's Victory Case - Expansion of Economic Expansion
              And the moral aspect - Russia did not throw - This is one of the most important factors of influence.

              And in what corner of my comment did you read this?
              sorry, this is my interpretation: the states lose interest in the victim only when the resistance is suppressed, the leader is removed or killed, and you can begin expansion - economic or political, without allowing competitors
              that is, have a direct impact on the region as a whole. The vector is as follows: Syria-Iran - Russia. While Syria is holding the vector is directed towards the application of force.
              1. a52333
                a52333 12 October 2013 15: 06 New
                +5
                And the moral aspect - Russia did not throw
                I agree - an argument. But they didn’t throw it. They announced a veto, put a weapon, and even flew the fleet. But this is only comradely, not friendly. Without the introduction of troops. While the Saudis and Qatar got stuck in money and attention in Syria, we at least in the Caucasus brought order, not to the end, but still.
                The vector is as follows: Syria-Iran
                and the rest of the countries of the Arab East love money too much. And friends to the one who pays them more. After Egypt and Iraq, I would not even talk about the continuity of relations. Syria is also not far from Egypt and Iraq. There was a period of obscurity. Iran: Do you think straight friend? They now have the enemy No. 1 - the west. and in this context something is sticking. And so you think they forgave us for helping Iraq? Hardly unlikely. They have been squinting at us since World War II.
                the leader is removed or killed and expansion can begin

                Not really. THOSE. for all their tools. Gaddafi knew a lot, he had personal money and most importantly KOMPROMAT.According to Hussein and Bin Laden. Therefore, the main goal has already been achieved.
                Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agreed with Russian President Vladimir Putny that preserving Assad’s power in Syria is beneficial for both countries, as even more dangerous and bloody chaos can become an alternative to Assad.
                The enemy is weakened and dismembered. Kurds will take SUCH autonomy SUCH, and now Assad will not be able (will not allow) to do anything.
                Therefore, I would consider some short alliances. Long with the Arabs is not worth planning anything. Ungrateful occupation.
                1. 528Obrp
                  528Obrp 12 October 2013 17: 04 New
                  +2
                  states lose interest in sacrifice only when
                  Here I did not quite express myself exactly. When an opponent is defeated, the states change tactics because, from a military point of view, the opponent is not dangerous, but they never lose interest in managing the remaining chaos. Only methods change. And the chaos development vector is known.
                  Quote: a52333
                  I would consider some short unions. Long with the Arabs is not worth planning anything. Ungrateful occupation.

                  I agree completely, my words: "In the near future, it is a conductor of Russia's interests.". How long this period drags on depends on the greed of future rulers. and here I agree with you
                  Quote: a52333
                  Arab countries love money too much.

                  And while there is a vector of opposition to the states, Syria will voluntarily or not freely be a vehicle of our interests. Those. agent of influence.
                  Example? So here it is - discussed.
                  1. a52333
                    a52333 12 October 2013 18: 19 New
                    +5
                    I do not quite agree with you, I don’t know how to contact you about the final result. Do you think that from the point of view of the states they need to change Assad? Yes, the states do not care who steers. The more disorder in the underbelly of the Russian Federation and Europe, the better. From a business point of view, Syria is not of any interest to the United States. Bombed 40 years ago, and that’s it. That is, from the point of view of the states and Israel, the task has already been completed.
                    When an opponent is defeated, the states change tactics,
                    He is defeated. Already. And partially divided (Kurds). And the Americans have already forgotten about Syria. Another point is that there is still Israel. Those have their own interest: flying over Syrian territory. But they have one more interest: they are better off one whole state at hand, than a bunch of tribes. like now in Libya. Who to negotiate with? Saudis and Qatar remain. It’s more difficult with them. February is there in full swing. but clouds are also gathering over them. I think. that they will now be thrown into the furnace against Iran.
                    1. 528Obrp
                      528Obrp 12 October 2013 18: 24 New
                      0
                      Okay, let’s stay with everyone. Although on most issues we have a common point of view. And the fact that the next Iran is without a doubt.
                      1. a52333
                        a52333 12 October 2013 18: 37 New
                        +1
                        AHA, our vision of the issue varies in fractions,
                        next Iran is no doubt
                        Yeah, just whose hands. I tried to get an opinion from Aron Zaavi. He is silent, Jewish partisan. Okay, the ferret went for a walk. Let's chat again. hi
                    2. aksakal
                      aksakal 12 October 2013 19: 32 New
                      +4
                      Quote: a52333
                      I do not quite agree with you

                      Quote: 528Obrp
                      I agree completely, my words: "In the near future, this is a conductor of Russia's interests." How long this period will last depends on the greed of the future rulers. and here I agree with you
                      - Listen, gentlemen, is the fact that Syria was an ally of Russia back in Soviet times and remained so even at a time when Russia writhed from the collapse of the USSR, while Russia, under the pretext of condemning "ideological betrayal" "China, North Korea and even Cuba - Syria did not condemn anything, but simply remained a loyal ally country - is this circumstance not taken into account by you? Although the local Israelis row all Arabs with the same brush, I still single out the Syrians, they, my IMHO, compare favorably with the same rotten Egyptians who danced with joy while Soviet pilots were dying from Israeli bullets, from the same Libyans and other Arab gentlemen.
                      1. a52333
                        a52333 12 October 2013 22: 06 New
                        +3
                        Quote: aksakal
                        all the same, I distinguish the Syrians, they, my IMHO, compare favorably with the same rotten Egyptians
                        I do not argue. Assad will survive, it’s at least, but as a maximum he’ll leave the country under control. (Well, almost completely), unlike Gaddafi, he was a bug.
                      2. igor67
                        igor67 13 October 2013 16: 41 New
                        +2
                        Quote: aksakal
                        Quote: a52333
                        I do not quite agree with you

                        Quote: 528Obrp
                        I agree completely, my words: "In the near future, this is a conductor of Russia's interests." How long this period will last depends on the greed of the future rulers. and here I agree with you
                        - Listen, gentlemen, is the fact that Syria was an ally of Russia back in Soviet times and remained so even at a time when Russia writhed from the collapse of the USSR, while Russia, under the pretext of condemning "ideological betrayal" "China, North Korea and even Cuba - Syria did not condemn anything, but simply remained a loyal ally country - is this circumstance not taken into account by you? Although the local Israelis row all Arabs with the same brush, I still single out the Syrians, they, my IMHO, compare favorably with the same rotten Egyptians who danced with joy while Soviet pilots were dying from Israeli bullets, from the same Libyans and other Arab gentlemen.

                        In fact, Syria supported the states in Iraq and did not support Russia during the war in Chechnya, unlike Israel,
      2. fktrcfylh.h09
        fktrcfylh.h09 12 October 2013 09: 43 New
        +3
        But this is a different beginning, not 93 and not Medvedev’s abstinence under the tacit consent ...
    2. Rusich51
      Rusich51 12 October 2013 10: 02 New
      +9
      Quote: andrei332809
      not too much oil? I think the war for Syria and for influence in the world is far from over. The West has temporarily retreated from Syria, but the Israeli woman is already throwing another "enemy" for them, which must be urgently put into the stall of Western democracy. So, probably, major battles ahead


      For the first time in two hundred years, the British Parliament rejected a tempting offer to start a war - usually the British cannot resist such a temptation. am

      After that, Obama threw hot potatoes to Congress. He did not want to start the End of the World alone. laughing

      The hegemony of America is being replaced by multipolarity; I think a return to international relations taking into account the interests of the majority is better than the Amer’s dictate.

      Europe is undergoing a phase of apostasy and rejection of Christ, and Russia is still deeply Christian. Her churches are full, they congratulate each other on Christmas and Easter, and not with the banal change of seasons. Russia is a country of the New Testament. And the rejection of exclusivity, from selectivity, is a fundamental principle of Christianity.

      After all, Jews can be adequate. wassat
      1. a52333
        a52333 12 October 2013 12: 26 New
        10
        Israel Shamir (p. 1947, Novosibirsk) is an anti-Zionist Russian-Israeli writer, translator and publicist. Orthodox christian. It was also printed under the names of Israel Adam Shamir and Robert David.
        Critics of Shamir accuse him of anti-Semitism and call him a “self-hating Jew."
        1. Aaron Zawi
          Aaron Zawi 12 October 2013 15: 49 New
          -18 qualifying.
          Is that a stuffed animal? They look at us like in Russia at Novodvorskaya.
          1. a52333
            a52333 12 October 2013 15: 54 New
            19
            Still would laughing ... I guess that his article, although not anti-Israel, is not in line with your point of view.
          2. Rusich51
            Rusich51 12 October 2013 15: 55 New
            13
            Quote: Aaron Zawi
            Is that a stuffed animal? They look at us like in Russia at Novodvorskaya.


            In vain Aaron is so about his fellow countrymen. It is necessary to respect a person, verbs the truth, without a second thought.
            1. a52333
              a52333 12 October 2013 16: 08 New
              +6
              verbs the truth
              Vladimir, there are always at least two truths... Aron has his own truth, and by the way, if we discard the fact that the "truth" of Israel is not entirely in our hands, I can admit that the Israelis are more pleasant to me than the Arabs. They shouldn't have minus Aron, although that's your opinion.
              1. Rusich51
                Rusich51 12 October 2013 16: 19 New
                10
                Quote: a52333
                verbs the truth
                Vladimir, there are always at least two truths... Aron has his own truth, and by the way, if we discard the fact that the "truth" of Israel is not entirely in our hands, I can admit that the Israelis are more pleasant to me than the Arabs. They shouldn't have minus Aron, although that's your opinion.


                Arabs are also different, as are Jews, however. The Wahhabis - go, but Abdus Salam the great physicist is completely different, or the radical Zionist is also go.no, and Einstein is generally the messiah in physics.
                1. a52333
                  a52333 12 October 2013 16: 29 New
                  +4
                  I agree +. But I am more weighted average about the nation as a whole. Take even an external manifestation. Eilat blooms and smells clean, the tankers are unloading (by the way, a cool alternative to Suez). And Jordan through 1 km. Oppa - the beaches are filthy, the cellophane swims, everything is shabby. See the dead sea. From the side of Israel, hospitals, oases, from the side of the Jordan desert. And so in everything.
                  1. 528Obrp
                    528Obrp 12 October 2013 17: 52 New
                    0
                    Quote: a52333
                    But I am more weighted average about the nation as a whole.

                    Link to the topic
                    http://avtonom.org/old/lib/theory/marx-engels/juden.html
                  2. Rusich51
                    Rusich51 12 October 2013 18: 32 New
                    +4
                    Quote: a52333
                    I agree +. But I am more weighted average about the nation as a whole. Take even an external manifestation. Eilat blooms and smells clean, the tankers are unloading (by the way, a cool alternative to Suez). And Jordan through 1 km. Oppa - the beaches are filthy, the cellophane swims, everything is shabby. See the dead sea. From the side of Israel, hospitals, oases, from the side of the Jordan desert. And so in everything.


                    Here you are right, I agree, the general culture is lower. By the way, in Moscow, too, a lot of filth appeared. In Minsk, as it was clean before the coup, it is just as clean.
                2. Silkway0026
                  Silkway0026 13 October 2013 22: 34 New
                  +2
                  of which time (the great judge) Einstein’s messianic role in physics slowly lowers ...
              2. Aaron Zawi
                Aaron Zawi 12 October 2013 19: 42 New
                +6
                Well, something like that. If an article by Novodvorskaya appeared on the site, where she would lick the USA's butt and if I wrote a "scarecrow" about her, they would add me. hi But in principle, well, plus, well, minus, what is the difference in FIG?
              3. aksakal
                aksakal 12 October 2013 20: 17 New
                +3
                Quote: a52333
                Although, this is your opinion.

                - according to your drawing, my spouse claims that in our family the opposite is true. If I drop the plate, then this is fortunately. Well, I declare this, everyone should smile and wave their hands at the same time ... If the spouse drops ... Maybe I'm wrong what
                1. a52333
                  a52333 12 October 2013 21: 09 New
                  +2
                  Are right. It is worth appreciating women with oriental education. laughing
          3. a52333
            a52333 12 October 2013 17: 10 New
            +1
            Aaron. I'm curious about your vision of the situation: Israel + Saud? What do you think about it? After all, a deal with the devil. And the States will look at this "friendship" is not clear. No, in the sense of "-" will be credited. So, just your opinion. Is Iran really worse than the Saudis?
            1. Aaron Zawi
              Aaron Zawi 12 October 2013 19: 44 New
              +2
              Quote: a52333
              Aaron. I'm curious about your vision of the situation: Israel + Saud? What do you think about it? After all, a deal with the devil. And the States will look at this "friendship" is not clear. No, in the sense of "-" will be credited. So, just your opinion. Is Iran really worse than the Saudis?

              Mine (IMHO), in that it’s not possible to talk about any alliance, but I completely admit some collaboration on common pain points, at the level of intelligence and security forces.
              1. Patriot.ru.
                Patriot.ru. 12 October 2013 20: 36 New
                0
                Divide and conquer. Here and the whole deal.
          4. ruslan207
            ruslan207 12 October 2013 19: 38 New
            +2
            Yes, who knows him in Israel
          5. Botanologist
            Botanologist 12 October 2013 22: 52 New
            13
            Quote: Aron Zaavi
            Is that a stuffed animal?


            But what is it really?
            Jews amaze me -
            They are so Russified
            What their Jews annoy.
            1. aksakal
              aksakal 12 October 2013 23: 23 New
              +3
              Quote: Botanologist
              But what is it really?
              Jews amaze me -
              They are so Russified
              What their Jews annoy.

              But comments laughing laughing good drinks
          6. olviko
            olviko 13 October 2013 08: 31 New
            +1
            OUR MAN! I wonder how in Israel they treat Novodvorskaya?
          7. Silkway0026
            Silkway0026 13 October 2013 22: 31 New
            +3
            if you looked at him differently - we would not look at him at all)))

            it’s clear that you are rattling him, he’s voicing all your cunning asshole.
        2. RUSSIA 2013
          RUSSIA 2013 14 October 2013 07: 58 New
          0
          it’s written in the face, Jew, groom, as they got it, they don’t work in difficult conditions at work, they need to be evicted, in a place with all the blackening.
    3. aksakal
      aksakal 12 October 2013 10: 10 New
      13
      Quote: andrei332809
      not too much oil? I think the war for Syria and for influence in the world is far from over. The West has temporarily retreated from Syria, but the Israeli woman is already throwing another "enemy" for them, which must be urgently put into the stall of Western democracy. So, probably, major battles ahead

      - Didn't see oil. Do not forget - it is not a Russian, but an Israeli observer who writes, and writes exactly as he sees it. When I am accused of anti-Semitism, I emphasize that I have a lot of respect for Jews. Just like Wasserman, like this author of SABZH. Objective, intelligent and accurate in their assessments. Pirmanov has oil in yesterday's SABZH, other Russian publicists, like, "Putin does not belong only to himself."
      But not this author. He does not receive money from the Kremlin, he is an Israeli publicist and wrote in this case how he himself sees the picture for real. That’s for him respect, here I see the Jew whom I respect.
      As for Putin, I also do not like a number of positions on his domestic policy. In terms of foreign policy, Putin is IMPOSSIBLE so far, he is a master in these matters, and here I respect him. But in the inside - a bunch of questions for him. Including and the policy in relation to the RAS, the soft-body policy in relation to very high-ranking corrupt officials (without names) in the field of economics. But here, after all, only Mother History can judge. It now seems to us that Putin is destroying the Russian Academy of Sciences and destroying the economy, it now seems to us that we are unequivocally condemning Putin's RIGHTS ... In fact, this is a question that history alone can judge. It remains a little - to wait for her sentence. While we wait - let's live along the way. No need to make revolutions and other sharp movements. Curve yes take out. We will solve problems as it arrives.
      To Israel Shamir - Respect. I liked the subject.
      1. 31231
        31231 12 October 2013 14: 11 New
        +3
        Most Jews in Russia are proud. For they have a country, not a nation.
      2. michajlo
        michajlo 13 October 2013 21: 58 New
        0
        [quote = aksakal _131012 / sub] [quote = andrei332809] not too much oil? .... Do not forget - it’s not Russian, and an Israeli columnist writes exactly as he sees. When accused of anti-Semitism, I emphasize that I respect Jews very much. Just like Wasserman, like this author of the subject. Objective, intelligent and accurate in their assessments. Pirmanov has oil in yesterday's SABZH, other Russian publicists, like, "Putin does not belong only to himself."
        But not this author. He does not receive money from the Kremlin, he is an Israeli publicist and wrote in this case how he himself sees the picture for real. That’s for him respect, here I see the Jew whom I respect.
        As for Putin, I also do not like a number of positions on his domestic policy. In terms of foreign policy, Putin is IMPOSSIBLE so far, he is a master in these matters, and here I respect him. But in the inside - a bunch of questions for him. Including and the policy in relation to the RAS, the soft-body policy in relation to very high-ranking corrupt officials (without names) in the field of economics. But here, after all, only Mother History can judge. It now seems to us that Putin is destroying the RAS and destroying the economy, it now seems to us that we are unequivocally condemned by Putin RIGHT ... In fact, it’s a question that history alone can judge. It remains a little - to wait for her sentence. While we wait - let's live along the way. No need to make revolutions and other sharp movements. Curve yes take out. We will solve problems as it arrives.
        To Israel Shamir - Respect. I liked the subject. [/ Quote]


        Hello dear! Please forgive me, your name has forgotten.

        I liked your assessment of the article and the author himself.
        good
        And I was especially interested in your balanced opinion regarding the ROLE and PURPOSE of Putin in domestic politics?
        In this you are right that only time (10-20-40 years) will most accurately assess his personality within Russia.

        And in foreign policy, here I unconditionally support and see Putin as the leader of a great COUNTRY, which has so far begun to rise from its knees, and which, when it gets up IN FULL GROWTH, many of its enemies will run screaming into the bushes to look for "burdock leaves." smile
        But Putin himself, especially with cheap PR and praising his media as an alpha male, looks a little childish (be the best on the tatami, under water or under the clouds ...)

        Personally, for the time being, this is a clear dualism of Putin; I could not swallow it in any way. fool
      3. Neighbor
        Neighbor 14 October 2013 19: 49 New
        0
        But it seems to me or maybe it is imagining .... Obama himself asked, in my purely opinion, that the gdp with his "fleet" gave a reason to leave with a beautiful face from the uncomplicated situation. European allies are not under
        held ....
    4. APASUS
      APASUS 12 October 2013 10: 44 New
      +7
      Quote: andrei332809
      not too much oil? I think the war for Syria and for influence in the world is far from over. The West temporarily retreated from Syria, but the Israelite is already throwing another "enemy" for them,

      At the moment, we are on the verge of comparable only perhaps to the World War. The endless US influence is coming to an end and most likely there will be a new leader in the world or there will be several, perhaps we are returning to multipolarity.
      Each Empire has its own sunset!
    5. timer
      timer 12 October 2013 20: 23 New
      +1
      In principle, I agree. There are many rosy statements and illusions in the article. This is the first step of Russia on the difficult and thorny path of turning it into the "heart of the world" (morally, economically and politically). The Anglo-Saxons were unable at this stage to "stir up" the global conflict. I am even pleasantly surprised that Putin did not bend under pressure, that they did not sell Syria for 30 pieces of silver (as they sold Libya, Yugoslavia). But Putin is not suitable as the head of Russia. He supports the rotten politician built by Yeltsin's friends and liberals. and economical. a system of corruption and consumerism. I want Russia to become powerful in every sense and crush this infection of the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers (it’s their submission that the hotbeds of local wars do not fade away and new ones are formed. They burn in hell for this). In Russia!!
  3. Lech from our city
    Lech from our city 12 October 2013 07: 45 New
    10
    Islamic extremists are enemies of Christians, atheists, and even Muslims themselves, because they believe that traditional Islam is hostile to the goals that they themselves establish. And if you want to become an Islamic radical and are ready for circumcision, I invite you to Moscow. We are a multiconfessional country, and we have specialists who can do this. And I would advise them to carry out this operation so that nothing grows in this place. ”

    It’s not bad said - I will repeat once again in Putin’s foreign policy that there are no equal among modern politicians, and as for domestic politics, I have a complete misunderstanding of his actions.
    1. Zhenya
      Zhenya 12 October 2013 08: 11 New
      +2
      I sincerely hope that after consolidating himself as a leading figure on the world stage, he will transfer to what is happening in the country. Migrants \ incomes \ corruption \ Caucasus, etc. a lot of problems.
      1. My address
        My address 12 October 2013 08: 59 New
        +3
        Eugene, I also hoped until this spring. sad

        I repeat - that GDP is not influenced by some groups. Wrong character. Even soft Brezhnev, after a year, won over the Politburo. So Peter's friends are more dear to him than others. And friends of friends, such as Chubais, whose fan Kudrin. hi
        1. vlad.svargin
          vlad.svargin 12 October 2013 14: 10 New
          +6
          My address
          I repeat - that GDP, under the influence of certain groups, does not believe. Not that character warehouse. There, even a soft Brezhnev, after a year the Politburo crushed under him.

          As for Brezhnev, there was no need for the Politburo to "crush" at that time. It consisted of strong personalities, after all, Khrushchev was removed because of his "voluntarism" and stupid orders. But later the composition of the Politburo changed for the worse and practically secretly "led" Brezhnev with various undeserved awards and praises, thanks to the senile insanity of the elderly General Secretary they secretly began to destroy the country.
          And what about GDP, if you paid attention. by his actions, he became a different person, and not only in foreign policy. Previously, he did everything in favor of the elite who nominated him for this post. He is very careful and I think "chickens are counted in the fall." The time will come, we'll see ...
          I’m pleasantly surprised by the article, you don’t always read this from a publicist from Izrail. It's nice to see another one among them.
          serious and objective writer. A big plus article.
          1. My address
            My address 12 October 2013 20: 27 New
            +2
            My claims to GDP:
            Unprofessional recruiting based on personal loyalty only. After all, the LADY has already "distinguished himself" in the presidency. And the ministers, except for a small part? Not a single entrepreneur will hire these ministers as directors or managers, unless for deliberate bankruptcy.
            Gross violation of management principles in terms of the lack of responsibility in high positions. And responsibility must grow with responsibilities and rights. Examples - Serdyukov, Skrynnik, etc.
            The gold currency works for our far from friends (in the form of a dollar, pound, euro) approximately at 1% per annum for us, and the state and private traders occupy there under 4-5%. And no one clearly explains why it is not invested in our production.
            Selective justice. Why are the patriots Kvachkov and Khabarov immediately in jail and then a decent time, and the above-mentioned people close to "C" are not even suspects? Only "pusam" more or less, but not enough.
            What kind of love is for the billionaire slayer (this is now just a scammer) for Chubais?
            And what is the reason for the decree about raising the fees for top officials (with wrap up to almost a million per month)?

            Or is he not responsible for all this?
            1. Botanologist
              Botanologist 12 October 2013 23: 14 New
              +5
              Quote: My address
              The gold currency works for our far from friends (in the form of a dollar, pound, euro) approximately at 1% per annum for us, and the state and private traders occupy there under 4-5%. And no one clearly explains why it is not invested in our production.



              I’ll try to explain vaguely (as I understand it). Some things come from sources that I just take for granted. You can criticize.

              So here. The USA has huge debts. And in order to live, they need to borrow a lot of money. The question is how? Best of all, according to the scheme, when the United States does not give land or gold, but they take money. So there are worthless stocks (government bonds, derivatives, etc. dregs). Japan, China, Russia buy these shares (they are forced) for many reasons. At least according to what the United States could tell Russia and China about 20 years ago: either a complete embargo and support for separatism (Tibet, Chechnya), or enter the loan system. Calculate - loans are more profitable than embargo. Moreover, neither Russia nor China in the 1995 year could jib before America. It is only now that both here and in China, something is beginning to appear in the armies and trade has, at the very least, organized. So they are forced to silently unfasten.
              And today, when the United States began to weaken, and we got a little stronger, we begin to slowly clamp. We increase the share of gold in reserves, diversify the dollar-euro, and much more. But we understand that nobody will ever return our reserves to us. 20 percent will give everything. This is a fee for a quiet 20 years.
              On the other hand, the USA understands that we have already grown so strong that they will not force us to pay a very high price. Both us and China. Therefore, they are for any pi-pez. There is no money and never will be. Hence the American crisis - Obama has no choice. Rather, there is, but it’s bad to default on October 19 on October 2013 or in May 2014. The difference is small, and in principle it does not mean anything. It’s just that in these few months something completely bad for the United States may happen, or it may not happen, that’s all. Obama for any political star. Wang did not say in vain that he was the first black and the last president of the United States.
              This explains Putin's policies. To tell all this to the population is too sad. Bulling - why? Hacking liberals - it makes no sense, because he will not be forgiven for those circles that forced Russia to pay tribute in due time, but one can run into great problems. Therefore, he just quietly waits where else he can endure.
              Maybe I'm wrong, but this version explains a lot.
              1. aksakal
                aksakal 12 October 2013 23: 30 New
                +3
                Quote: Botanologist
                Maybe I'm wrong, but this version explains a lot.

                - Not everything is right, but the post is sober, I like it.
                1. Botanologist
                  Botanologist 12 October 2013 23: 35 New
                  +3
                  Quote: aksakal
                  not all right, but fasting sober


                  Thank you drinks
                  I tried to figure it out for three years until I found a more or less logical version.
                  1. a52333
                    a52333 13 October 2013 18: 55 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Botanologist
                    I tried to figure it out for three years until I found a more or less logical version.
                    I agree on 100%. Moreover, China and we do not let the dollar collapse. So they would have already dumped him. But one moment you opened a new one for me:
                    Default 19 on October 2013 or in May 2014.
                    October is understandable, explain May.
                    1. Botanologist
                      Botanologist 13 October 2013 22: 23 New
                      +2
                      Quote: a52333
                      October is understandable, explain May.


                      2014 year, according to some forecasts, the last for the accumulation of debts. And some figures came from the presidential administration bully ... Before that, a lot needs to be done - to withdraw the states from the United States, to declare a new country, to negotiate with a successor on nuclear weapons, to formalize the remaining debt in some unfortunate state - the "legal successor" of the United States, and so on. etc. So it doesn't work after May.
                      1. a52333
                        a52333 13 October 2013 22: 42 New
                        -1
                        Very, very, direct interesting. But there is a detailed (article link) that is, hypothetically, I was wondering what would happen approximately like with the USSR. Share !!!! You can copyright. Drop right here. Waiting, waiting. I thought so.
                      2. Beck
                        Beck 14 October 2013 09: 10 New
                        0
                        Quote: Botanologist
                        Before that, a lot needs to be done - to withdraw the states from the United States, to declare a new country, to negotiate with a successor on nuclear weapons, to formalize the remaining debt in some unfortunate state - the "legal successor" of the United States, and so on. etc. So it doesn't work after May.


                        YES!?!?!?

                        What you will not make public for the sake of substantiating super violent fantasies. You should send this to the most prestigious competition of literary fantasies - the first place is guaranteed, you will be a laureate.

                        You be careful, I will be careful too. This is so as not to accidentally drown, so that the tram does not cross, so that it does not strike with electric current. To live to May 2014 and VIEW. You are at the embarrassment of your mindsets, I am at your embarrassment.
              2. Beck
                Beck 13 October 2013 11: 16 New
                +4
                Quote: Botanologist
                American crisis - Obama has no choice. Rather, there is, but it’s bad to default on October 19, 2013 or in May 2014. The difference is small, and in principle it does not mean anything. It’s just that in these few months something completely bad for the United States may happen, or it may not happen, that’s all.


                Somehow it was said with great joy.

                But public debt (this is mainly when the state additionally prints money for any of its internal programs) in the USA as a percentage of GDP is not the largest, but the MOST influential in the entire world economy.

                About ten years ago in America two mortgage banks went bankrupt. And what we were concerned about them and the housing problems of the Americans. So no, the whole world was shaking, still sneezing.

                And Urashniki, with a kamikaze grin, rejoice at the upcoming, possible default of the United States. Clearly, the amers will get the job not only to them, but to the whole world. In the era of globalization, when national economies have become integral parts of the global economy, the collapse of the largest link will cause stress, the destruction of the entire world economy. No one will stand aside. Who needs this? Only suicide bombers.

                To get ahead of America it is necessary to work and introduce everything new in itself, as China does, and not desire self-hanging.
                1. Botanologist
                  Botanologist 13 October 2013 12: 28 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Beck
                  Somehow it was said with great joy.


                  rather, with a feeling of deep satisfaction. I have a complicated attitude towards the USA - I was there, I had to work a little, and the people there did not cause me a negative. But if the people there were not held hostage by the system of world domination, everything would be different. And so - how it happened, so it happened.

                  Quote: Beck
                  the USA as a percentage of GDP is not the largest, but the MOST influential in the entire world economy.


                  The problem is not in percentages, but in absolute numbers. 17 trillions - this, you see, is a bit much. Even for the whole world - too much.


                  Quote: Beck
                  No one will stand aside. Who needs this? Only suicide bombers.


                  I did not understand you - do you propose to continue to increase debt? And you are aware that debt also needs to be serviced. For money.
                  And the second question - where does it come from? Out of the air? Not. This is our money. So why should we continue to give them to America? Out of fear of a big schucher? We have already passed the collapse of the country. Let America pass this now, we will see how it will cope.
                  1. Beck
                    Beck 13 October 2013 17: 29 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Botanologist
                    I did not understand you - do you propose to continue to increase debt?


                    I didn’t understand you. What do we care and we can not influence the US public debt. But if Republicans continue politics not uplifting the ceiling of public debt, as required by the Obama administration, all world financial institutions predict the collapse or fall of not only the US economy, but the entire world economy.

                    Quote: Botanologist
                    And the second question - where does it come from? Out of the air? No. This is our money. So why should we continue to give them to America?


                    Something you got a mess, you seem to confuse the public debt with external and internal debt. Of course, the Russian money put by the Kremlin in American banks is working for America. So for this it is necessary to ask not from the Obama administration, but from those who put them there, from the Kremlin and ask.

                    You initially confuse where the public debt comes from, you seem to be confusing public debt with external and internal debt. In the days of Nixon, perhaps, he did not have enough budget money to fulfill his election promises. He and the administration asked, "on loan", money from their own main bank, that is, from the Fed. The Fed said please and printed an additional several billion dollars. And this became known as the state debt. Other presidents also began to ask for a loan from the Fed, and the debt reached 17 trillion. And in fact, for the state, this is the transfer of money from one pocket to another.

                    Other states have followed this example. Now all developed countries have billions and trillions of government debt. And in fact, these public debts are one of the causes of inflation.

                    In Russia, there is also a public debt, if I am not mistaken, about 50 billion dollars. Otherwise, where would the Kremlin regularly fund populist programs — raising pensions, benefits, payments to the military, building pompous structures. Payments increased, accelerated inflation and a year later, two of these increases disappeared into rising prices.

                    Those days when the currencies of the world were provided with gold are long gone. Now paper money lives its own kind of life, according to the new financial rules.
                2. a52333
                  a52333 13 October 2013 19: 22 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Beck
                  US national debt () as a percentage of GDP is not the largest

                  Oh?
                  GDP 12 g United States 15 684 800

                  And the level of public debt 16,7 trillion. Moreover, Democrats deficiency will now increase
                  You just Moody's and Fitch listen less. In 2008 they put AAA mortgage papers a month before the collapse. And if you read more closely, then American analysts (throwing away "little accounting tricks, like the debts of individual states and municipalities) counted 70 trillion, a total of 550%. recourse
                  Now one more curious point: the structure of GDP (found 2007, but it has not changed much)
                  Pay attention to the real sector, not to the sector that inflates the bubbles. 15% works for you there. Other brokers and traders. and yes, yes, and doctors.
                  So that's it. When the United States is covered with a "basin" - shake the whole world. But then, when everyone remembers that the main thing is real goods - oil, gas, meat, grain, and not DERIVATIVES and credit swaps, and it will be fast (TWO YEARS MAXIMUM) you will have to remember how to work with pens and for little money.
              3. Pivowar
                Pivowar 13 October 2013 16: 08 New
                0
                An interesting link about this is http://youtu.be/_UK7fbuxDeI
              4. michajlo
                michajlo 13 October 2013 22: 11 New
                +1
                [quote = Botanist _131012 / sub] [quote = My address] Gold and currency ...

                I'll try slurred explain (as I understand it). Some things come from sources that I just take for granted.
                You can criticize.
                So here. The USA has huge debts. And in order to live, they need to borrow a lot of money. The question is how? Best of all, according to the scheme, when the United States does not give land or gold, but they take money. So there are worthless stocks (government bonds, derivatives, etc. dregs). Japan, China, Russia buy these shares (they are forced) for many reasons. ...
                Therefore, they are for any pi-pez. There is no money and never will be. Hence the American crisis - Obama has no choice. Rather there is, but it’s bad to default on October 19, 2013 or in May 2014. The difference is small, and in principle it does not mean anything. It’s just that in these few months something completely bad for the United States may happen, or it may not happen, that’s all. Obama for any political star. Wang did not say in vain that he was the first black and the last president of the United States.
                This explains Putin's policies. To tell all this to the population is too sad. Bulling - why? Hacking liberals - it makes no sense, because he will not be forgiven for those circles that forced Russia to pay tribute in due time, but you can run into great problems. Therefore, he just quietly waits where else he can endure.
                Maybe I'm wrong, but this version explains a lot. [/ Quote]


                Hello dear!
                Sorry, I don’t know your name, because "Botanologist", it is not entirely clear for me to address the interlocutor.

                Thank you for your vision of the causes and expected consequences of the US financial crisis themselves!
                Contrary to your fears, it looks CONSTANT and quite logical. good drinks

                Continue to educate us (including me) in this very important financialareas, so there are superficial judgments in it (and mine are just like that), as a rule, are far from reality and are expensive.
                1. Botanologist
                  Botanologist 13 October 2013 22: 27 New
                  +1
                  Quote: michajlo
                  it looks INTELLIGENT and very logical

                  drinks
                  Than I can.
            2. Revolver
              Revolver 13 October 2013 06: 34 New
              +5
              Quote: My address
              My claims to GDP:

              Nevertheless, if it depended on me (dreams, dreams ...) I would change Obama for GDP, which is called without looking. Remember my word, Obama will receive in America 20 years after his resignation, about the same reputation that M.S. Gorbachev, also known as Mishanya Mechny, has in Russia now.
              1. My address
                My address 13 October 2013 07: 52 New
                +1
                And easily.
                There is an economic system in the States in which not everything depends on the president in the economy. GDP matters in international politics (or Lavrov understands?).
                But aren't you afraid that the GDP will start working for your St. Petersburg friends?
              2. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 13 October 2013 07: 56 New
                0
                Quote: Nagan
                Obama will get in America 20 years after

                In 20 years, America will be gone and Obama too! Never before has evil been in the world, for so long.
                1. Botanologist
                  Botanologist 13 October 2013 12: 30 New
                  0
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Years through 20 America will be gone


                  Much earlier, believe me.
                  1. atalef
                    atalef 13 October 2013 12: 34 New
                    0
                    Quote: Alexander Romanov
                    Years through 20 America will be gone

                    Much earlier, believe me.

                    and who will stay. Well, I would like to know
                    1. Silkway0026
                      Silkway0026 13 October 2013 22: 53 New
                      +2
                      p.Indostana will not become - Israel will automatically be covered with a copper basin. It is unlikely that the Holocaust gesheft will continue without US pressure. Yes, and people already figured out millions and millions of victims
                      1. Mitrich
                        Mitrich 13 October 2013 23: 03 New
                        0
                        Strongly agree. The United States even developed a missile defense system in the first place to protect Israel. Here is an article on sabzh http://pakgauz.com/blog/usa_navy/21.html
                  2. 528Obrp
                    528Obrp 13 October 2013 16: 09 New
                    +2
                    Quote: Botanologist
                    Much earlier, believe me.

                    I would like to believe.
                    But one of the sane said (I don’t remember who) before the election of Barack
                    (I convey only the meaning): America has a choice, either a terrible end, or horror without an end. America chose the second.
                  3. mikkado31
                    mikkado31 15 October 2013 01: 21 New
                    0
                    Dreamers you all the same.
      2. Starfish
        Starfish 12 October 2013 11: 24 New
        +3
        I sincerely hope that after consolidating himself as a leading figure on the world stage, he will transfer to what is happening in the country. Migrants \ incomes \ corruption \ Caucasus, etc. a lot of problems.

        hope dies last...
    2. Lyokha79
      Lyokha79 12 October 2013 09: 12 New
      +6
      An assessment of his actions can be given after a while.
      1. Starfish
        Starfish 12 October 2013 11: 27 New
        +1
        An assessment of his actions can be given after a while.

        some estimates can be given now. the activity vector is already clearly visible. You just take a closer look at what is happening around.
    3. aksakal
      aksakal 12 October 2013 10: 23 New
      +5
      Quote: Lech from our city
      It’s not bad said - I will repeat once again in Putin’s foreign policy that there are no equal among modern politicians, and as for domestic politics, here I have a complete misunderstanding of his actions
      - It was said a long time ago, since then Putin has not expressed himself so harshly that sometimes it infuriates me. Especially when a Dutch pedophile (he registered a party of lovers of little girls in Holland) began to run into Putin for "violating the rights of sexual minorities and pedophiles in Russia," Putin - and I expected from him at that moment EXACTLY SUCH HARD response for this hitting, in style, "Listen to a pedophile, come to Russia, for example, to Dagestan, with this proposal to respect gay men and lovers of little girls, and I will advise the Dagestanis what to do with you!" Russia, the mentality of the population in Russia will not accept this, there are even fears that Russia may take up arms! " and other rubbish. Why act like that in front of a pervert and therefore a subhuman?
      In my opinion, Akela missed here, while he missed very little, but enough to start looking closely. Still, a man over 60 began to lose his teeth. That is how I view this toothlessness in relation to that pervert.
      1. alone
        alone 12 October 2013 17: 15 New
        +2
        Syria’s problem has not yet been resolved. And it’s still unknown what will be there. Asad, in power, they will not be left behind from Syria.
  4. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 12 October 2013 07: 55 New
    +5
    Beautifully written +++.
    But here is what worries: there is an opinion that the technical default of amers threatens a new crisis in the world economy; and what prevents the Republicans from reaching an agreement with Obama, raising (once again) the ceiling of the national debt, and acting as such "saviors" of the world economy, this is probably what will happen-it's me, as the average man reasoning ...
    Yes, and with Iran closer ties should be "tied", while the Amer is not up to foreign policy - the East, as we know, is an extremely delicate matter. hi
    1. 31231
      31231 12 October 2013 14: 18 New
      +3
      So raise the ceiling. Republicans are not small children. Behind them are companies and holdings that do not want a default. But extort Obama from them now is the best moment. And rightly so, because the Americans are overgrown with debt and fat, but they are not trying to deal with it.
    2. Botanologist
      Botanologist 12 October 2013 23: 23 New
      +2
      Quote: Valery Neonov
      what prevents the Republicans from reaching an agreement with Obama, raising (once again) the ceiling of the national debt, and acting as such "saviors" of the world economy, this is probably what will happen


      I wrote a little higher that interferes. Raising the ceiling of a public debt is possible, but how to raise the ceiling of the one you are going to borrow? Any debt needs to be serviced (the so-called traverse), it also costs money. Therefore, it is impossible to raise the ceiling to 1000 trillions - the amount of services will exceed GDP, and all banks in the world will refuse to work with debt. Here is such a sadness. Just watch how the United States will cease to be an empire and go bankrupt. When? I think very soon. During the year. I just don’t see any reason to prolong the agony.
  5. edge
    edge 12 October 2013 07: 57 New
    -4
    I will not even comment on this subjective duplicity.
  6. 528Obrp
    528Obrp 12 October 2013 08: 45 New
    +5
    Firstly, the good news. American hegemony is over.
    To balm for the soul, to whom and sickle for I .. am.
    I'm not one of those who are sickle. But who is ready to steer the world in the event of an American corkscrew?
    Russia? China? Germany or England? Russia is still very weak, everyone has already seen Germany,
    England is not a candidate either. China has absolutely no experience. Multipolarity is good, but who is the chairman?
    The danger is now in the rapid fall of amers. Need a gradual transition.
    Let them rule while we will be a gray cardinal, without Board which nothing is being done, and I, I think, is enough for a start. Moreover, it is necessary to tighten their fall while we gain strength. IMHO

    PS
    Yes, and where to put everything that flows from overseas? Blue, pink, rainbow, etc., etc. ????? No, really. Let it go slowly. And we will observe and help with advice.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 October 2013 08: 57 New
      +9
      Quote: 528Obrp
      But who is ready to steer the world in the event of an American corkscrew?

      Why should they steer? Each country itself must choose how to live.
      1. 528Obrp
        528Obrp 12 October 2013 09: 03 New
        +2
        This is ideal. But the world is not perfect. Everywhere there are disputes Religious, territorial. There must be an arbiter. If there is an arbitrator respected by everyone, the probability of war will be less.
        1. alex-cn
          alex-cn 12 October 2013 09: 39 New
          +3
          It is unlikely that what will rot there will reach us, only if Europe will let mold come in ... perhaps it is even better for us ... while they rot - gain strength. and then beat them not by force but by ideology. Maybe Russia will really become the "third Rome"
        2. a52333
          a52333 12 October 2013 12: 36 New
          +8
          There must be an arbiter.
          From let me steer !!!! No, let me steer !!! fellow Do we have any other smut? We would like to restore order inside the country. And when the "big brother" blows away, clean up all this liberal, which is piled up in all corners of our communal flat (especially in the red corner - in the government, Skolkovo, ohNanonistov), ​​with neighbors in a communal apartment to understand. And then peek into the staircase.
    2. fktrcfylh.h09
      fktrcfylh.h09 12 October 2013 09: 47 New
      +2
      "we will help with everything we can" - GDP)))))))))

      you correctly noticed that the pillar is too large and therefore it is necessary to dismantle it not in a hurry
    3. Rusich51
      Rusich51 12 October 2013 10: 09 New
      +5
      528Obrp

      I adhere to the position of Romanov, multipolarity is the best way out at this stage in the development of society.
      1. 528Obrp
        528Obrp 12 October 2013 10: 28 New
        +2
        Quote: Rusich51
        I adhere to the position of Romanov, multipolarity is the best way out at this stage in the development of society.

        Theoretically 100%!
        But in practice, questions begin:
        - And how to divide the voices of each pole?
        - And how to resolve the conflict between the unions of the poles
        - What is considered a pole? Is Luxembourg a pole?
        etc. etc.
        We need a serious chairman (superpower) or a coalition (superpowers), so that in case of something I could poke.
        Otherwise, there will be complete anarchy.
        1. Rusich51
          Rusich51 12 October 2013 10: 54 New
          +7
          Quote: 528Obrp
          Quote: Rusich51
          I adhere to the position of Romanov, multipolarity is the best way out at this stage in the development of society.

          Theoretically 100%!
          But in practice, questions begin:
          - And how to divide the voices of each pole?
          - And how to resolve the conflict between the unions of the poles
          - What is considered a pole? Is Luxembourg a pole?
          etc. etc.
          We need a serious chairman (superpower) or a coalition (superpowers), so that in case of something I could poke.
          Otherwise, there will be complete anarchy.


          Regional powers will solve these problems two times. soldier
          1. 528Obrp
            528Obrp 12 October 2013 11: 04 New
            +1
            Quote: Rusich51
            Regional powers will solve these problems in two times

            100%!
            But who should be considered a regional power and the same trifle? They will eat her and will not listen.
            It seems to me not so simple.
            1. Botanologist
              Botanologist 12 October 2013 23: 26 New
              +5
              Quote: 528Obrp
              But who should be considered a regional power and the same trifle? They will eat her and will not listen.
              It seems to me not so simple.


              A regional power is a dominant in a certain space. Little things are better to be silent at this moment, until they paid attention to it and cleaned it from head to tail.
              1. aksakal
                aksakal 12 October 2013 23: 42 New
                +1
                Quote: Botanologist
                Little things are better to be silent at this moment, until they paid attention to it and cleaned it from head to tail.

                - Be quiet? Disagree - not the best strategy in this situation. The best is to take part in the so-called. a game that the poet Mandelstamm called the game of "thin-necked scoundrels". That is, to express loyalty to the regional dominant and as a sign of proof of their loyalty to take part in the "mochilov" of just that little thing that, unfortunately, decided to be indignant with actions
                Quote: Botanologist
                dominant in a certain space
                in the absence of a "Supreme Arbiter". Moreover, to clearly prove that by the cruelty of "mochilov" you clearly surpass the regional dominant, despite the fact that "a pot-bellied trifle".
                Here's the best strategy. And the silence? And silence is a lottery. Maybe he will pass by and will not notice. Or maybe - "why are you standing here and hiding? Come on here!" and further in the text.
                True, do not attribute this best strategy to me personally, I absolutely do not know how to adapt to life, well, I am not an opportunist. But I know the strategies; seek advice. laughing
    4. 31231
      31231 12 October 2013 14: 20 New
      +3
      And what, world history was constantly steering?
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 12 October 2013 23: 58 New
        +1
        Quote: 31231
        srulevoy
        - can I find out who "srul" is and why is he called that? This is something new in the Russian language.
        1. 31231
          31231 13 October 2013 09: 46 New
          0
          I just want to ask what would be the specifics: Where does the hegemon begin for you and where does it already cease to be a hegemon ?!
          And my question above meant that has world history always been with such a hegemon?
  7. andruha70
    andruha70 12 October 2013 08: 51 New
    +6
    American hegemony is over. The bully was tamed. With the Syrian crisis, the world has crossed a key crossroads in modern history.
    but are not you happy early? It seems to me that so far we have just come to the fork and are waiting for the next step to consolidate the result. but then you can cross. so what, we are waiting!
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 October 2013 08: 59 New
      12
      Quote: andruha70
      but are not you happy early?

      Maybe it's early, just wait already tired when the scumbag dies
      1. 528Obrp
        528Obrp 12 October 2013 09: 43 New
        +5
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Maybe it's early, just wait already tired when the scumbag dies

        +100 in the shower. But rationality says: "make your mongrel out of him, so that no one knows about it and command, and whatever is so - a kick in the tail."
  8. Gregazov
    Gregazov 12 October 2013 09: 04 New
    +7
    It seems that countries led by a strong clergy are immune to the destructive influence and lobby; while countries without such clergy — for example, the United States or France — surrender to such influence and accept illegal intervention as the norm.
    This is the answer to the opponents of Orthodoxy on our website.
    1. Rusich51
      Rusich51 12 October 2013 10: 13 New
      +8
      Quote: GregAzov
      It seems that countries led by a strong clergy are immune to the destructive influence and lobby; while countries without such clergy — for example, the United States or France — surrender to such influence and accept illegal intervention as the norm.
      This is the answer to the opponents of Orthodoxy on our website.


      The Orthodox in union with the Muslims of Russia will not allow demons to take over the country.
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 12 October 2013 11: 36 New
        12
        Quote: Rusich51
        Quote: GregAzov
        It seems that countries led by a strong clergy are immune to the destructive influence and lobby; while countries without such clergy — for example, the United States or France — surrender to such influence and accept illegal intervention as the norm.
        This is the answer to the opponents of Orthodoxy on our website.


        The Orthodox in union with the Muslims of Russia will not allow demons to take over the country.
        - Amendment - with normal Muslims. Muslims like my neighbor. He has a beautiful young wife running around in mini, and he condescendingly grins into his beard. You ask - "why can't you restrain?", He replies that it is her choice. If you continue, like it is useless for her, Allah does not order - she will answer, so when she comes to Allah, then she will understand. And she must COME to Allah herself when she feels her need for this coming, artificially and even more forcefully to push to the Almighty, he, a faithful neighbor, DOES NOT INTEND, because the Koran categorically forbids this! Here is a normal Muslim.
        And those Muslims who are called Wahhabis-Salafis are just extremists who cover up their unseemly deeds with faith. One of our members of the forum - he forgot his nickname, from Azerbaijan, he was gone for a long time, by the way - he gave them an exact definition. He called them "Shaitanists". I agree.
        1. Rusich51
          Rusich51 12 October 2013 16: 02 New
          +5
          Quote: aksakal
          And those Muslims who are called Wahhabis-Salafis are just extremists who cover up their unseemly deeds with faith. One of our members of the forum - he forgot his nickname, from Azerbaijan, he was gone for a long time, by the way - he gave them an exact definition. He called them "Shaitanists". I agree.


          Alibek is a quite adequate Muslim, I hope this will remain so, if he does not hide behind the sign of course. Tyrnet is still largely impersonal.
          1. aksakal
            aksakal 12 October 2013 20: 12 New
            +1
            Quote: Rusich51
            Alibek is a quite adequate Muslim, I hope this will remain so, if he does not hide behind the sign of course. Tyrnet is still largely impersonal.
            - He is. And how was his nickname? And why hasn't he been there for a long time?
            1. Rusich51
              Rusich51 12 October 2013 23: 19 New
              +3
              Quote: aksakal
              - He is. And how was his nickname? And why hasn't he been there for a long time?

              The professional himself chooses the time when to appear and what to talk about.
              Yarbey is a nickname.
  9. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 12 October 2013 09: 38 New
    +6
    we are facing an uncertain future. The monstrous power of the US Army can still do misfortune; a wounded beast is the most dangerous.
    I don’t forgive Syria in the morning ... Tel Aviv and the Saudas sniffed, but these intriguers are still .. But the most important thing was that they entered the fray (war of nerves.)
    1. 528Obrp
      528Obrp 12 October 2013 09: 49 New
      +4
      And who said it would be easy. The beginning of a new game, playing white, the move is ours.
    2. a52333
      a52333 12 October 2013 12: 41 New
      +2
      Iran hangs over them, by the way, such a frail enemy. They are now looking more in that direction. Refueling exercises remember? The preparation has gone.
    3. Patriot.ru.
      Patriot.ru. 12 October 2013 20: 47 New
      0
      Two rockets took off in the Mediterranean Sea. And ... they didn’t hit anywhere. This is my main point. Mass production by Ameri Tomahawks should have ended just like that. We’ll destroy all the ICBM mines with conventional weapons. they think.
  10. major071
    major071 12 October 2013 09: 42 New
    +9
    I’m reading an article and I think that it’s so good, that everything is so damn good. Everything is too rosy. And America is dead, and we are on a horse. Not everything is as simple as the author draws. Of course, I want to believe that the beginning of the end of American hegemony has been laid, but when it comes, it is not yet known. We must continue to adhere to the course chosen by GDP in international politics. We will remove the garbage away from the threshold of our house, and we will clean the house.
  11. Lyokha79
    Lyokha79 12 October 2013 09: 55 New
    10
    We all demand too much from Vladimir Vladimirovich. We want him to take away corruption, defeat the Americans, give heat to the liberals, and, of course, improve life in the country. But at the same time we forget that he is an ordinary person, and not a super-hero. Some are outraged that he did so, and not otherwise. Not seeing the whole picture as a whole, they begin to build their assumptions, sometimes outrageous, allowing themselves to come up with nicknames to the first person in the state. I supported V.V. Putin in his politics, foreign and domestic. I see how the country is changing for the better, how it is growing stronger, including in the international arena. And this is the merit of Vladimir Putin. Naturally, he makes mistakes, which those who hate him cling to, but the one who does nothing is not mistaken.
    It’s very easy to sit at a computer keyboard and advise on how to manage the state, while doing nothing to make the country better.
    1. Rusich51
      Rusich51 12 October 2013 10: 17 New
      +8
      Lyokha79
      There are positive changes, I would like more of course. I hope our children will get the best share. The world has changed dramatically and continues to change. Maybe for the better.
    2. Arti
      Arti 12 October 2013 10: 31 New
      +6
      +1 - for koment, Putin may not be perfect, but he is really the best leader of the country since Stalin. And it can only be criticized by an indiscriminate person who thinks that the president is like a computer user called Russia and in order for everything to be perfect in the country, he only needs to press a button.

      I just recently had such a wild thought - what if some of the money that the country has lost as a result of some corruption cases just falls into the shadows in order to be used to finance the interests of Russia abroad.

      Of course, the idea does not pretend to be true, it just says that from our bell tower you cannot see the enormous work that is being done and evaluating its individual stages without taking into account other points, there is a mistake.
    3. a52333
      a52333 12 October 2013 12: 46 New
      10
      Lyokha79 +++ !!!
      We want him to take away corruption, defeat the Americans, give heat to the liberals, and, of course, improve life in the country.

      And at the same time, he lowered ALL prices (communal, electric energy, fuel) rearmament of the army, and put cola with the heads of Chubais, Dame, Serdyukov at the entrance to the Kremlin. And everything is right today before dinner. I agree with you and with everyone. I would like to right now. But let's be realistic:
      he is an ordinary person, not a super hero.
      Well, almost ordinary. Therefore: At least cola with heads today, the rest agrees to wait. good
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 12 October 2013 14: 26 New
        10
        Quote: a52333
        At least cola with heads today, I agree to wait for the rest

        - And the first I want to see is not Chubais’s head, but Gorbachev’s !!! And Chubais - only the next, but also on a Coke !!!! And further to the bolt activists
    4. timer
      timer 12 October 2013 20: 36 New
      +2
      Firstly, no one demands a miracle from the president — all requirements are quite prosaic — it is a nation, order and justice. Nobody pulled him to be president, he himself wanted to participate in the elections and knew what he was up to.
      Secondly, the people are against the current rotten political and economic system of power in the country, when a small group of parasites (oligarchs, part of bureaucrats, speculators bankers) who are generally not interested in strengthening the state and improving the sanitation drive it.
      Thirdly, there is no effective mechanism for monitoring and adjusting decisions made. Therefore, sabotage, fraud, and ignoring presidential decrees are everywhere. Who should create this mechanism? A horse in a coat? The answer is the president!
  12. 528Obrp
    528Obrp 12 October 2013 10: 13 New
    +3
    Quote: Lyokha79
    But at the same time we forget that he is an ordinary person,

    He is the president of one of the greatest countries in the world! And this is NOT an ordinary person.
    With my great respect for Putin as a person, I really don’t like the style of his leadership!
    A huge part of the rough work that he does is to be done by his specialists.
    Well, it’s not worth the leader to do this !!! Indeed he is a man, he is not a god. But he is the president !!!
    He ordered - done.
    With such a guide, God forbid what happens to the president !!! All!!! Hana!
    We need cool specialists such as Lavrov, Onishchenko everywhere !!!!
    IMHO.

    PS
    In Russia, so far there are no figures equal to Putin, and probably in the world.
    1. 31231
      31231 12 October 2013 14: 28 New
      +2
      He is the president of one of the greatest countries in the world! And this is NOT an ordinary person.
      With my great respect for Putin as a person, I really don’t like the style of his leadership!

      There is Obama. Compare ?! There was EBN. Remember ?! Or do you have a desire to "heh to heh to change" ?!
  13. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 12 October 2013 10: 30 New
    +3
    Quote: Lyokha79
    We all demand too much from Vladimir Vladimirovich. We want him to take away corruption, defeat the Americans, give heat to the liberals, and, of course, improve life in the country. But at the same time we forget that he is an ordinary person, and not a super-hero. Some are outraged that he did so, and not otherwise. Not seeing the whole picture as a whole, they begin to build their assumptions, sometimes outrageous, allowing themselves to come up with nicknames to the first person in the state. I supported V.V. Putin in his politics, foreign and domestic. I see how the country is changing for the better, how it is growing stronger, including in the international arena. And this is the merit of Vladimir Putin. Naturally, he makes mistakes, which those who hate him cling to, but the one who does nothing is not mistaken.
    It’s very easy to sit at a computer keyboard and advise on how to manage the state, while doing nothing to make the country better.

    I agree to all 100% of the GDP, in fact alone, it is opposed to this entire gang of the world .. (and inside the fifth column is strong, the oligarchs marches, etc.)
    But at the expense of "knocking on the keyboard" in the modern world, it can be more effective than pressing the trigger of a machine gun .. (here many, if something happens, take up arms even without a call ..)
    Information war! (who owns the information that owns the WORLD) .. We are read and analyzed by our worldview .. Now there are many members of the forum in their Russian provinces and they write not badly and it pleases! As they say, we will not die alive ... We will break through as always!
  14. homosum20
    homosum20 12 October 2013 11: 35 New
    +5
    The article is correct. Only instead of "Obama" it would be more correct to write "FRS". Everything will become clearer. The Fed is fighting for the dollar as a world currency. Otherwise, everything, the kapets of the power of the Yusovsky Morgan, Rockefellers and others.
    For the first time in human history, kapets is very likely.
  15. Metlik
    Metlik 12 October 2013 12: 00 New
    -2
    Three countries aspire to world leadership. USA, China and Russia.
    America relies heavily on science.
    China to the economy.
    Russia for military force.
    But the one who manages to convince others that his path is better will win.
    And for this there is only one way - to improve the quality of life of people. The USSR lost because it did not care about its citizens. And they began to answer him the same.
    1. Corsair5912
      Corsair5912 12 October 2013 18: 41 New
      +6
      Quote: Metlik
      Three countries aspire to world leadership. USA, China and Russia. America relies heavily on science. China on the economy. Russia on military power.

      This is not true, and even quite the opposite - a lie.
      Neither Russia nor China have ever claimed or are claiming world domination, and if they wanted to, they would have dominated for a long time.
      These are only Jews and Yankes, "the chosen" and "exceptional", and we, Russians, are ordinary people, and even more so than the Chinese.
      There is no science in USA and never has been, their whole science is stolen.
      To adapt other people's stolen discoveries and inventions for their own selfish purposes, they are masters, this cannot be taken from them. A funny episode of the USAA story:
      About thirty years ago, flipping through a popular scientific and technical magazine, American intelligence officers stumbled upon an article by the Russian physicist Peter Ufimtsev, which stated that wing-type aircraft made of certain materials, especially faceted and painted, were practically invisible to radars .
      The article was very interested in American military experts, and in the United States decided to build and test such an aircraft.
      There were opportunities for this. Then, at the Pentagon - the US Department of Defense - a program was being developed to create a new generation of aircraft - a high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft and a high-altitude interceptor, which were intended to be unattainable for enemy detection and destruction means.
      ... Attempts to create a "plane-complete invisibility" for a long time were unsuccessful. Only twenty years ago, the United States showed the world a miracle of military technology, similar to a bat or an alien ship. Two modifications of the "stealth" were made: the F-117 fighter-bomber and the B-2 heavy strategic bomber, which were used in the war against Iraq.
      It turned out that the technological breakthrough of the Americans in the production of "stealth" was associated with the emigration of Ufimtsev to the United States, who was involved in the creation of invisibility.
      For many years Ufimtsev did the same in the USSR. And not only him.
      In at least two Soviet design bureaus, various types of invisible aircraft were built and tested. The conclusion of the authoritative commissions was as follows:
      1) an invisible aircraft made according to the ideas of Ufimtsev, due to its shape, has low speed and maneuverability - in fact it is a hang glider, poorly adapted to combat maneuver and incapable of aerobatics;
      2) the aircraft can be detected visually and with special high-frequency radars; in addition, when bombs are opened and in some flight modes, it is visible with ordinary radars and can be easily shot down after a "notch";
      3) the cost of the aircraft is prohibitive.
      Conclusion: the construction of such aircraft is impractical; Moreover, this type of aircraft is a “dead end branch of the development of military aviation”.
      Therefore, at the beginning of the 1980-s, work on the Ufa’s "stealth" in the USSR was stopped. The offended designer left for the USA, where he realized at the expense of the Americans his “senseless" ideas, as time has proved,.
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 12 October 2013 20: 07 New
        +4
        Quote: Corsair5912
        There is no science in USA and never has been, their whole science is stolen.
        To adapt other people's stolen discoveries and inventions for their own selfish purposes, they are masters, this cannot be taken away from them

        - nevertheless, the elements of "stealth" now, the tiny EPR of the aircraft is an indispensable requirement of the fifth generation fighter. The dead end is a dead end, but for now we have to admit that the legislators in science and technology are still Americans. And not because more ideas "give birth", but because they know how and like to take risks, they are not afraid to implement a bold idea in life. This is me WITHOUT sympathy for the Americans, just a fact. Russians know how to think out of the ordinary, and therefore they often have unexpected and very bold ideas, among which they come across very effective ones. But due to the fact that without a "fried rooster" showing suspicious activity near the fifth point, Russians do not like to move, then they miss a lot because of this. Examples? Active armor. There was an attempt, some general yelled that he would not let "put on the tank in explosives from head to toe" - and that was the end of it, everyone relaxed and went to drink champagne. Until that very cock in the face of Israeli tankers pecked at the ass in Syria. Another example? UAV. Yes, yes, I mean the same "Tupolevs" disposable and about "Buran". This roast-cock habit must be DESTROYED!
        And at the same time to raise science. Russians have everything that Russians need to get ahead of America, besides weaknesses for a roasted rooster.
        1. Corsair5912
          Corsair5912 12 October 2013 21: 52 New
          +2
          Quote: aksakal
          But due to the fact that without a "fried rooster" showing suspicious activity near the fifth point, Russians do not like to move, then they miss a lot because of this.

          Dear, aksakal, Russians in this, fortunately, are not unique. The Yankees also have this property, but for well-known reasons they have a better situation with finances. They themselves print the world currency.
          Capitalist Russia did not compete with the USSR, for a well-known reason, they did not spare money on science, there was money and science was moving where the Yankees were.
          And now we are like the Yankees, there is not enough budget for everything, and our oligarchs are amusing themselves with villas and yachts, and they spit on the Russian economy.
          The Yankees suffered from this at the beginning of the 20 century.
          1. aksakal
            aksakal 12 October 2013 23: 55 New
            +2
            Quote: Corsair5912
            Capitalist Russia did not compete with the USSR, for a well-known reason, they did not spare money on science, there was money and science was moving where the Yankees were.
            And now we are like the Yankees, there is not enough budget for everything, and our oligarchs are amusing themselves with villas and yachts, and they spit on the Russian economy.
            - it is also possible. But there are examples of bad investments by Americans, which suggests that they are not generally timid guys in terms of trying to innovate. The same example of the unsuccessful construction of a satellite network for satellite communications - a competitor to cellular communications. A bunch of launched satellites had to be burned ... How many military developments, where a lot of dough was pumped in, and the result - the closure of research due to the futility of development. If this is attributed to corruption, then Russia with its corruption is simply resting against the backdrop of American corruption. But it seems to me that all this is an unsuccessful investment, which the Americans are making boldly enough. Perhaps their courage is due precisely to the fact that money is too easy for them due to their position as a "world emission center" ... I will not argue. Be that as it may - with regret I have to admit - the Americans even now, just before their collapse, are still leaders in fundamental and applied science.
            You need to try to break out into the leaders.
      2. Metlik
        Metlik 12 October 2013 20: 08 New
        0
        Quote: Corsair5912
        There is no science in USA and never has been, their whole science is stolen.

        Nobel Laureates USA-309, Russia -7.

        Quote: Corsair5912
        These are only Jews and Yankes, "the chosen" and "exceptional", and we, Russians, are ordinary people, and even more so than the Chinese.


        Yes, we do not claim to be exceptional, but there are no ordinary peoples, each one is unique.
        Quote: Corsair5912
        Neither Russia nor China have ever claimed or are claiming world domination, and if they wanted to, they would have dominated for a long time.

        Whether we like it or not, sooner or later we have to find out who is stronger.
        1. Corsair5912
          Corsair5912 12 October 2013 22: 03 New
          +2
          Quote: Metlik
          Nobel Laureates USA-309, Russia -7.

          How objective the Nobel Committee can be seen in Obama's Peace Prize.
          Do you really believe that the committee is more objective in chemistry, physics, and literature?
          Quote: Metlik
          Yes, we do not claim to be exceptional, but there are no ordinary peoples, each one is unique.
          Whether we like it or not, sooner or later we have to find out who is stronger.

          There are only 3 Great Ancient Civilizations on planet Earth, which Russia, India and China are much more 1000 years old. The planet has seen many one-day flyers like the British, German, Spanish empires, they appeared piped up, poured blood and inevitably fell into insignificance.
          Neither China, nor India, nor Russia have ever sought to find out who is stronger, this is already known.
          We don’t need to measure our strengths, this is the lot of upstarts and early ripening idiots, like arrogant Saxons and Yankees. We just live on this planet, for thousands of years on our territory and on foreign land we have not climbed if we are not threatened.
          1. Metlik
            Metlik 12 October 2013 22: 27 New
            +1
            Quote: Corsair5912
            Do you really believe that the committee is more objective in chemistry, physics, and literature?

            I would really like Russia’s science to be higher than American, but if scientists leave for the USA, this indicates where the best conditions are created for science.


            Quote: Corsair5912
            We don’t need to measure our strengths, this is the lot of upstarts and early ripening idiots, like arrogant Saxons and Yankees.

            Add here the Mongols, French, Germans, Poles, etc. the list of all who came to us to measure their strength will be short. At least a hundred years Russia lived without war? And I wrote world leadership and not domination. Being a leader does not mean pushing everyone - it means leading.
            1. Corsair5912
              Corsair5912 13 October 2013 14: 58 New
              0
              Quote: Metlik
              I would really like Russia’s science to be higher than American, but if scientists leave for the USA, this indicates where the best conditions are created for science.

              Fundamental science in Russia and in Europe and Asia, too, has always been, is and will be higher than the American one. It is not scientists who leave for YSA, but despicable dirty self-seekers who want to sell at a higher price what they have stolen in their country. As scientists, these creatures, in themselves, are a little worth. Of course, “the best conditions have been created in YSA,” Russia cannot print dirty green papers and parasitize the entire planet.
              Quote: Metlik
              Add here the Mongols, French, Germans, Poles, etc. the list of all who came to us to measure their strength will be short. At least a hundred years Russia lived without war? And I wrote world leadership and not domination. Being a leader does not mean pushing everyone - it means leading.

              Russia has always been a leader in the world, and it was peaceful, and not at the expense of aggression and robbery of other countries, like naglosaksy and Germans.
              1. Metlik
                Metlik 14 October 2013 00: 22 New
                0
                Quote: Corsair5912
                It turned out that the technological breakthrough of the Americans in the production of "stealth" was associated with the emigration of Ufimtsev to the United States, who was involved in the creation of invisibility.


                Quote: Corsair5912
                Not scientists, but despicable dirty skins who want to sell the stolen in their country at a higher price, are leaving for USA. As scientists, these creatures themselves stand a little.

                You yourself contradict. Or do you think the Ufimtsev is a skinner and costs a bit as a scientist?
  16. Silkway0026
    Silkway0026 12 October 2013 12: 08 New
    +3

    The era of Aquarius is the era of Russia.
    Era of Aquarius is an astrological time period from approximately 2000 of the year BC. e. until 4000 of the year n. e., corresponding to the zodiac sign of Aquarius.
    In astrology, it is believed that in this era, humanity will achieve harmony and understanding, a high spiritual level. The era of Aquarius will unite all nations and abolish borders. Material values ​​will play a lesser role than spiritual ones.

    In this era, a serious role will be assigned to people (and countries!), Under the sign of Aquarius, characterized by a high level of development of intelligence and internal harmony.
    It is believed (one of the astrological schools) that Aquarius will fully enter its rights in the 2013 year. The influence of Pisces will end and a new era will begin.


    this is not my research. they are thousands of years old. the era of Pisces (lies and money-grubbing) ends.
  17. Zbigniew McCain
    Zbigniew McCain 12 October 2013 12: 58 New
    -1
    Dreaming is sometimes good.
    1. vlad.svargin
      vlad.svargin 12 October 2013 14: 56 New
      +2
      Zbigniew McCain

      Dreaming is sometimes good.

      It is useful if you strive for them and do something, do not wait "according to Oblomov."
      1. Zbigniew McCain
        Zbigniew McCain 12 October 2013 14: 57 New
        -1
        Quote: vlad.svargin
        Zbigniew McCain

        Dreaming is sometimes good.

        It is useful if you strive for them and do something, do not wait "according to Oblomov."

        Good luck
        1. Rusich51
          Rusich51 12 October 2013 16: 06 New
          +5
          Zbigniew McCain

          This is nick wassat

          These eagles, even at the funeral wake, do not deserve praise.
          1. Corsair5912
            Corsair5912 12 October 2013 22: 08 New
            +2
            Quote: Rusich51
            Zbigniew McCain
            This is nick
            These eagles do not even deserve praise

            The American corpse-eagle at the wake does not need praise, it has a different interest. fellow
  18. Ruslan_F38
    Ruslan_F38 12 October 2013 13: 32 New
    -3
    Firstly, the good news. American hegemony is over. The bully was tamed.
    Well, what nonsense, who put him in line with this bully? Then do not forget that there are still other hooligans from the gang led by England so far no one has brought them under control. The author should not wishful thinking and hover in the clouds! Yes, and there is China, India, others claiming the role of leaders, while they are white and fluffy, and then they can reveal themselves in all their "glory" so that the United States looks like a lamb. And Russia is not yet a fact that an independent country with an independent GDP, while the curls, Chubais, Shayimievs and others are not under lock and key, but heroes like Kvachkov are imprisoned, and like Budanov they are killed!
    1. aksakal
      aksakal 12 October 2013 14: 46 New
      +5
      Quote: Ruslan_F38
      Yes, and there is China, India, others claiming the role of leaders, while they are white and fluffy, and then they can reveal themselves in all their "glory" so that the United States looks like a lamb.

      - you are deeply MISTAKED !!!! These countries are NOT AGGRESSIVE, and therefore they will not have this policy!
      You know, if the US falls apart and leaves the world stage, who will be the next bully, who will have to be kept by seven, because six will not? Because nature does not like emptiness and the place of a bully should be filled FOREVER?
      Here is my IMHO: Here is Korovin's article - "America is above all!" - http://www.vz.ru/opinions/2013/10/10/654328.html
      Read on. After reading, just everywhere, instead of the words "Protestantism, true Calvinists, right-wing Puritans" - just insert "Judaism, true Jews, Orthodox Zionists" - and you will get an article ".... - above all!" Do you already guess which country I'm trying to explain to you instead of the ellipsis? The most interesting thing is that this SBZH, its message and fidelity (truth) will not change from this replacement!
      And I am more afraid of a new bully than the USA! My ancestors at the word "Goloshchekin", a very significant representative of the "forming ethnic group of a new hooligan" for the Kazakhs, shudder and say that this is not a person at all, but a very ruthless and cold-blooded killer. The same can be said about Zalkind and Bela Kun.
      But they may object to me - how can this state of only 8 million people replace a bully the size of 300 million people? Well, first of all, THEM 300 million in fact around the world will be typed, you just need to whistle! And secondly, even in the amount of 8 million, they manage to put the whole world on their ears, what will happen if they whistle and unite in 300 million? There is no such force that he can stop such a bully!
      Therefore, let's weaken America, but not completely kill it. Leaving as such a "strongly weakened dominator" is the best way out, IMHO.
      1. Rusich51
        Rusich51 12 October 2013 16: 09 New
        +4
        Quote: aksakal
        Therefore, let's weaken America, but not completely kill it. Leaving as such a "strongly weakened dominator" is the best way out in general


        A good sentence, there is a homespun truth in your words.
        1. Corsair5912
          Corsair5912 12 October 2013 18: 20 New
          +2
          Rusich51
          Nice suggestion, there is a homespun truth in your words.


          Yeah, "true", but not homespun, but fecal.
          The unfinished reptile is even more dangerous and insidious, the pathological killer-corpse-eaters are not recoverable.
          The hyena will recover when it dies.
          1. Rusich51
            Rusich51 12 October 2013 18: 40 New
            0
            Quote: Corsair5912
            Rusich51
            Nice suggestion, there is a homespun truth in your words.


            Yeah, "true", but not homespun, but fecal.
            The unfinished reptile is even more dangerous and insidious, the pathological killer-corpse-eaters are not recoverable.
            The hyena will recover when it dies.


            Your ardor smiled. laughing
            1. Corsair5912
              Corsair5912 12 October 2013 18: 58 New
              +1
              wassat
              Quote: Rusich51
              Your ardor smiled.

              But essentially? Or are you only able to smile? wassat
              1. aksakal
                aksakal 12 October 2013 20: 53 New
                +2
                Quote: Corsair5912
                But essentially? Or are you only able to smile?
                - I understand your ardor and desire to quickly end Amera, but experienced specialists in the fight against organized crime (the mafia) have this trick - they still manage to take the most influential mafia boss for testicles with the most difficult special operations, but they don’t put him in jail, but it’s just being controlled and skillful guiding movements seriously weaken the criminal situation. And this is often more effective than hiding this boss immediately in a jail, thereby provoking a big mafia war for redistributing influence and exacerbating the criminal situation to the extreme, and then eventually getting an even smarter, more cruel and even more dodgy mafia boss, rather than the one that was so fleetingly imprisoned. What for?
                My post about America and its possible successor is from about that opera. Moreover, a very large similarity was found in the behavior of "Protestants" and "Jews" - both of them consider themselves exceptional, and therefore horseradish is not sweeter, it is better to take America by the butt and control it than to get a new international "hooligan". The bully who can replace the United States is much tougher and more terrible, but this is my IMHO.
                1. Corsair5912
                  Corsair5912 12 October 2013 22: 18 New
                  +1
                  Quote: aksakal
                  My post about America and its possible successor is from about that opera. Moreover, a very large similarity was found in the behavior of "Protestants" and "Jews" - both of them consider themselves exceptional, and therefore horseradish is not sweeter, it is better to take America by the butt and control it than to get a new international "hooligan". The bully who can replace the United States is much tougher and more terrible, but this is my IMHO.

                  Dear, aksakal, since the time of Queen Victoria (19 century), Jews have ruled the Naglosaks on both sides of the ocean, no one has doubts about the origin of Benjamin D, Israel's Earl of Beaconsfield. Any doubts about the origin of President Abram Lincoln, a Puritan or a Jew?
                  But after Lincoln, a lot of water flowed and there is no doubt about the current owners of USAA.
                  So the labels do not reflect the essence and it is unlikely that the Jews will be more influential than today, rather the opposite.
                  1. aksakal
                    aksakal 13 October 2013 00: 11 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Corsair5912
                    So the labels do not reflect the essence and it is unlikely that the Jews will be more influential than today, rather the opposite.

                    - maybe you are right, as much as possible contributing to the collapse of the USA, we can kill two birds with one stone at once - weaken the influence of both the Anglo-Saxons and the Jews at the same time. This suspicion is reinforced by the fact that the United States is essentially a hybrid of the Anglo-Saxon and Jewish value systems, and the collapse of the United States can weaken both of them at the same time.
                    But this does NOT IN THE WAY to change the fact that Israel can potentially take the vacant seat? Who else? According to the law of Nature, there must be a villain, and he will be. But then who? Who will come instead of the USA? Russia? It can easily be, by the way. In Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings", of course, fantasy, but there is still some homespun truth in what will become of the one who wears this ring.
              2. Rusich51
                Rusich51 12 October 2013 23: 27 New
                +2
                Quote: Corsair5912
                wassat
                Quote: Rusich51
                Your ardor smiled.

                But essentially? Or are you only able to smile? wassat

                There is a term for everything. The Roman Empire collapsed when the time came. To be able to wait and help is our task.
                1. Corsair5912
                  Corsair5912 13 October 2013 12: 02 New
                  +2
                  Quote: Rusich51
                  There is a term for everything. The Roman Empire collapsed when the time came. To be able to wait and help is our task.

                  The Roman Empire was rotten, but without a blow from the outside it would certainly not have collapsed.
                  After the Gallic wars of Caesar, half a million slaves flooded the markets. Hundreds of thousands of prisoners were captured during the wars of the early Empire. It is not surprising that many of its inhabitants met barbarians as saviors. Hundreds of thousands of "brutus" were needed to take revenge on the wild, greedy and cruel people. Long live the "barbarians"!

                  Now the ocean helps the arrogant, "wild, greedy and cruel people" to hide from just retribution.
      2. Ruslan_F38
        Ruslan_F38 13 October 2013 10: 50 New
        0
        Quote: aksakal
        - you are deeply MISTAKED !!!! These countries are NOT AGGRESSIVE, and therefore they will not have this policy!


        Well, yes, I will not argue with you, because you are apparently not aware of the mentality of these peoples, and secondly, you are still under the influence of Soviet propaganda and the stereotypes of "friends" imposed on us. And yet I will add - THIS CHINA IS NOT AGGRESSIVE !? From the history of the Soviet period - Damansky Peninsula!

        Therefore, let's weaken America, but not completely kill it. Leaving as such a "strongly weakened dominator" is the best way out in general
        but I agree with that. hi
  19. Just
    Just 12 October 2013 16: 30 New
    +2
    "... The people of the world will love America again when America stops surveillance and intimidation. It's not easy, but we have already agreed on a course to the Cape and have achieved Good Hope."

    Once the world ditches the Fed's printing press, this bubble of "love" built on a mixture of bribery and Hollywood advertising will burst. The USA is a dummy, she has nothing for her soul. If there is no world dollar, there will be no "love".
  20. olviko
    olviko 12 October 2013 17: 39 New
    +3
    Quote: aksakal
    "It was said a long time ago, since then Putin has not expressed himself so harshly that sometimes it infuriates me."

    It seems to me that Putin has become more effective in practical actions. Yes, for example, before he could say: "We will kill the terrorists in the outhouse," so what? , after that there was Dubrovka and Beslan. After the "formidable" speech in Munich in 2007, who was scared? by no means, in 2008 there was a war with Georgia. Agree, it is difficult to call it a successful policy. It's a completely different matter now. Take Syria. In the article, the author mentions how Putin promised the Frenchman to be circumcised up to the eggs. In the case of Syria, Putin promised nothing to anyone, moreover, it would seem that he did not say anything special at all, well, except that Kerry called him a liar, and nevertheless America turned its intentions 180 degrees. Russia, did not fire a single shot, and Washington backed down. I don't know what Putin whispered in Obama's ear, they say that Russia and China secretly played the Treasury bond card in order to protect their client states - Syria and Iran from the impending American invasion. It is likely that financial intermediaries or lower-level central bank contacts could have hinted to their American counterparts that China and Russia could start cashing out treasury bills, which China alone already has for trillions of dollars, if Washington continues its planned military adventure against Syria. The chemical deal at the last minute was just a gift from the Obama administration to keep them face-to-face, so they could provide a rationale for a sudden change of position and an order to stop the attack on Syria. Apparently this deal was thought out long before it was proposed to Obama. Agree, a beautifully performed, professional game, put in place not only Obama but also Cameron and Oland.
    1. olviko
      olviko 12 October 2013 17: 41 New
      +6
      Another example is Snowden. Putin again said nothing but the truth and only the truth! First, Putin said that Snowden would leave Russia at the earliest opportunity. Many decided that Putin simply did not want to quarrel with the United States. Others are already openly saying that Putin has betrayed the interests of Russia and is now bowing to the United States just to make amends. But you need to know Putin, he is well aware of what intelligence officers call a game. The whole thing is that he speaks the truth, speaks openly, but no one can understand what he is saying. It’s not that Putin cannot speak, but it’s definitely that no one wants to ponder over what the Russian president is saying. Realizing that everything said can be used against him at some point, the Russian president tries to tell the truth. He not only speaks this truth, but also acts accordingly, but the way of presentation is such that the journalists themselves come up with the most incredible scenarios. The Americans tear and dash, and he: "Snowden will choose a country for himself to live in and freely go to it," then "We hope that Snowden will soon leave Russia" Then "Russia is not going to extradite anyone anywhere. Nobody betrayed anyone to Russia and Russia will not do that either. " What is not clear? Putin made a trial move here. How will the world community perceive this now? In order to dilute the porridge, a statement was immediately made that Mr. Snowden must stop harming his American partners. The world might not have listened to this last part of the statement, they mean nothing at all. This was said for the burdocks from Echo of Moscow. And how beautifully the Western special services flew into th..no with the plane of the President of Bolivia, Evo Morales. Now the EU is no longer happy with the fact that the plane has landed and Europe will be loaded into a furious machine for a long time to come. Then the next invention turned out, a meeting with human rights activists. Putin, of course, will not give up Snowden, and this is another circumstance that Putin will definitely pay attention to. Everything that happens should look so that those CIA employees who are potential defectors and are now hesitating, see that nothing threatens them in Russia and that it is possible to deal with Putin. It was to them that the statement was addressed that Russia would never extradite anyone. This means that they will not be returned to the United States. Well, you yourself saw it all. I would like to wish Putin to act in the same vein and just as successfully!
      1. t-95-70
        t-95-70 12 October 2013 19: 04 New
        +4
        At last . at least one real attempt to analyze the actions of the president. CRITICIANS or how to scream them that everything is sold fully. But when you start asking questions on the merits, what you blame him for, what claims, a set of general phrases and no more. Guys are unhappy, stop it, turn on your brains, and try to just take and analyze the actions of the president since 1999, when the country was at war, and what claims are you trying to make now.
        1. aksakal
          aksakal 12 October 2013 20: 35 New
          +3
          Quote: olviko
          I think Putin has become more effective in practical actions
          - I agree. I note that over the years Putin also gained experience and now at the peak of his form, you convinced me.
          But nevertheless, the pedophile had to be brutally shaved off - there was no need to explain anything to them, to scatter before them in politically correct explanations, all the more to throw beads in front of them ... These are bad people, the same terrorists, only with regard to children, you need to be sure just like with terrorists. The blue ones have not far gone from these, that from those - they are just as dangerous to society, unless they kill.
          In general, respect. Nice post. The "Syrian" diplomatic operation, whatever happens to Syria in the future, will already go down in history and the annals of diplomatic science as a brilliant operation, and will be studied by students - future diplomats.
          I have not figured out the operation with Snowden to the end, to be honest, so I can’t assess it. But your post in this part must be taken into account in order to draw your conclusions.

          Thank you.
  21. Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 12 October 2013 18: 11 New
    +3
    Americans should pay attention to Senator Ron Paul, who calls to reduce foreign bases and cut military spending. The norms of international law and the sovereignty of all states must be respected. People of the world again love Americawhen she stops doing surveillance and intimidation.

    People of the world and now "love" YUSA like a dog stick (America is a broader concept, Cuba and Mexico are also America).
    Surveillance and intimidation, so the Yankees may stop doing? What humanity !!!
    Will peaceful cities and villages continue to bomb and burn with napalm?
    And yusovskie downs from the state towns will continue, in occupied countries, to make beads from human fingers and ears cut off from the women and children they killed?
    And the torture in numerous guantanamas, and the killing of adopted children, and aggression will continue?
    How everyone will love the Yankees! No matter how they were carried by that love !!!
  22. ATATA
    ATATA 12 October 2013 20: 31 New
    +2
    Excellent article +100 500
    Auto RU hi
  23. Andrii
    Andrii 12 October 2013 21: 56 New
    0
    Thanks to the author. Useful article for everyone.
  24. VIPER
    VIPER 12 October 2013 23: 09 New
    0
    America will die scary. WILL REACH ALL
    1. aksakal
      aksakal 13 October 2013 00: 19 New
      +2
      Quote: VIPER
      America will die scary. WILL REACH ALL
      - we will endure, not the first time. Grandfathers survived years of devastation, fathers - the years of the Great Patriotic War with blockades and hardships, we are the dashing 90s ... Are our children so "heroes - not you"?
  25. D_L
    D_L 13 October 2013 10: 25 New
    0
    Good GDP beat Obama and his minions.
  26. VladimS
    VladimS 13 October 2013 11: 03 New
    +1
    Quote: Beibit
    but the GDP law on the reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences still signed. It is possible that the GDP is raising its image in the external arena, thereby it is a national hero in the eyes of its people, but in reality, many of its actions at the hands of the prime minister destroy the country with his hands. So to say that he is for Russia, I would not hurry ...

    I will assume sedition, but the real confrontation of Medvedev’s group, led by him, to the forces behind Putin’s, seems increasingly strong to me. There are many indirect evidence of this.
    There is a strong belief that the iPhone does a lot in spite of ...
    And this is only from what we see. It is easy to imagine the amount of undercover struggle up to open sabotage. Sorry.
    It is no coincidence that attempts to express a vote of no confidence in this gentleman are increasingly visible in the Duma.
  27. olviko
    olviko 13 October 2013 13: 24 New
    +1
    aksakal (1)
    "To be honest, I haven’t figured it out about the Snowden operation yet."

    About Snowden, if you want. The information disclosed by Edward Snowden, caused British intelligence "the most catastrophic damage in its history," said a former senior British government adviser.
    In an interview with The Times, Sir David Omand expressed confidence that the data provided by a former U.S. intelligence officer was now analyzed in detail by Russia and China, and even the Cambridge Five did not do such harm to Britain in the 1950s. Sir David led the British in the past electronic intelligence - the Center for Government Communications (GCHQ), which, as appears from the data transmitted by Edward Snowden, not only works closely with similar American structures, but also collects huge amounts of personal data.
    “We need to distinguish between the initial revelatory impulse and the intention to stimulate debate - this is a responsible act - and the theft of 58 thousand top-secret British intelligence documents and who knows how many Americans have done serious harm,” said David Omand.
    “Experts now proceed from the fact that all or almost all of this information fell into the hands of Moscow and Beijing. This is the most catastrophic loss in British intelligence history, much worse than what Burgess and Macklin did in the 1950s, ”he added.
    Donald Dewart Macklin and Guy Burgess, as well as Kim Philby, Anthony Blunt and, as relatively recently became known, John Cairncross were part of a group of British civil servants who graduated from Cambridge University and then became Soviet agents.
    Earlier this week, Andrew Parker, head of MI5 British counterintelligence, said the disclosure of the "scope and limits" of British intelligence was a gift to terrorists.
    Guardian editor Alan Rasbridge responded by saying that people from the security services always say that.
    It is possible that the data provided by Snowden helped Putin to firmly grab not only Obama but also Cameron, which helped to cancel the attack on Syria!

    Read more: http://www.inosmi.ru/world/20131013/213816487.html#ixzz2hamCalMt
    Follow us: @inosmi on Twitter | InoSMI on Facebook
  28. IslamMoyReligion
    IslamMoyReligion 13 October 2013 13: 44 New
    +1
    Kissinger recently said about the geopolitical role of the United States that "nothing can be changed, there is a long-term program about the role of the United States in the modern world" (perhaps not so literally)! So Russia is now growing geopolitically, BUT tomorrow (God forbid, of course, after all, its time is not eternal) GDP will go away, what's next ??? Another president will come! Does Russia have such a policy?
  29. VladimS
    VladimS 13 October 2013 14: 37 New
    +1
    I believe that in Russia it’s just a ** but in the field of education ... This is how not one fake university works, but there are several of them in one "bundle" only in cases known to me.


    Totally agree with you.
    We have one. T.N. evening university. (Screw yourself !!!)
    Classes from 18-20 to 21-00 and then not always, but often finish much earlier.
    One teacher reads coming to the work week, all disciplines. Three haha laughing
    In fact, I consider the statements about the profanation of Higher to be true. Arr.
    So it turns out. There is a fan of diplomas, but there is really no one to work. With this it is necessary to do something, of course, but as if in the bustle not "throw out the baby." Finally, destroying the little more competitive that is still in the higher. school. To reform who will be in the field? Most likely, as usual, the ones that were planned to be cut.
  30. HF
    HF 13 October 2013 18: 13 New
    0
    [quote = Beibit] but the GDP law on the reform of the RAS was signed. It is possible that GDP is raising its image in the external arena, thereby it is a national hero in the eyes of its people, but in reality, many of its actions by the prime minister’s hands destroy the country. So to say that he is for Russia, I would not be in a hurry ... [/ quote]

    About RAS, I won’t say anything, it’s not competent (excuse me). But why did you get the idea that the destruction of Russia, especially the hands, of the Prime Minister’s absolutely unpleasant President of Russia, is taking place? recourse
    [quote = Beibit]
  31. Mitrich
    Mitrich 13 October 2013 22: 48 New
    0
    Quote: t-95-70
    At last . at least one real attempt to analyze the actions of the president. CRITICIANS or how to scream them that everything is sold fully. But when you start asking questions on the merits, what you blame him for, what claims, a set of general phrases and no more. Guys are unhappy, stop it, turn on your brains, and try to just take and analyze the actions of the president since 1999, when the country was at war, and what claims are you trying to make now.

    Is this this real attempt to analyze?
    Quote: t-95-70
    Putin called the Americans and asked what is your position on Syria? Obama replied: I am worried that Assad’s regime does not respect human rights. Putin was almost sick of this hypocritical response. He understood this as a refusal to speak honestly, face to face.
    How does the author know telephone conversation, and why does Putin feel sick?
    1. olviko
      olviko 14 October 2013 07: 52 New
      0
      Mitrich
      "Why is Putin sick?"

      Well, looking at the expression on Putin's face when, in response to the lies of the Americans, he uttered the phrase: “And they know about it. He lies and knows that he’s lying, it’s sad” I can well assume that he was not only sick.
      1. Mitrich
        Mitrich 14 October 2013 10: 06 New
        0
        Obama only voices what he writes on a piece of paper. This is not a president, this is a puppet.
  32. Mitrich
    Mitrich 13 October 2013 22: 55 New
    +1
    The most dramatic events of September 2013 were the confrontation near the Levantine coast, when five US destroyers aimed their Tomahawks in the direction of Damascus, and they were opposed by a Russian fleet of eleven sudo led by the missile cruiser Moscow - killer rocket carrier aircraft carriers supported by Chinese warships. It seems that two missiles were launched towards the Syrian coast, and both could not reach their destination. This is five points. The author does not understand well the subject that he undertook to cover.
  33. Anton Nakhimov
    Anton Nakhimov 14 October 2013 00: 17 New
    0
    Quote: Mitrich
    The most dramatic events of September 2013 were the confrontation near the Levantine coast, when five US destroyers aimed their Tomahawks in the direction of Damascus, and they were opposed by a Russian fleet of eleven sudo led by the missile cruiser Moscow - killer rocket carrier aircraft carriers supported by Chinese warships. It seems that two missiles were launched towards the Syrian coast, and both could not reach their destination. This is five points. The author does not understand well the subject that he undertook to cover.

    Yes, indeed, the situation was tense .. thank God, everything ended successfully so far)
  34. Alexander Pe
    Alexander Pe 14 October 2013 00: 35 New
    0
    Quote: tronin.maxim Yesterday, 07:43
    Now it remains to find the right premiere!

    Alexander Pe:
    How do you like Sergei Stepashin?
    1. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 14 October 2013 01: 03 New
      0
      In his last interview, Mr. Stepashin said that he had personally warned 2 years before the "Oboronservis case": Anatoly, figure it out, not everything is going smoothly there. This is the head of the Accounts Chamber, he warned !!! they didn’t bring it because he submitted the documents in the wrong form. smile
      1. Alexander Pe
        Alexander Pe 14 October 2013 02: 23 New
        +2
        The powers of the Accounts Chamber include checking government agencies, state-owned companies and other government "lice" and transferring the results above and EVERYTHING! He acted within the framework of his authority. It seems that last year Stepashin proposed expanding the powers of the joint venture - not only to record "events", but also to make specific decisions on specific affairs of specific people, but this did not work. He knows about all the "figurants" and about the underlying balance of forces - he was the first deputy director of the Federal Counterintelligence Service, headed the FSB of Russia, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, was the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation - he is a statesman and a PROFESSIONAL!
  35. Asan Ata
    Asan Ata 14 October 2013 01: 28 New
    +1
    I had to meet ordinary Russian Jews, who are cunning from Jewish) (she feels sick. I think the author is a Russian person. From his material I can see the joy of positive changes, a presentiment of peace. God grant these people the strength to build a post-war world, and our children have a clear sky above their heads !
  36. Nikolaev1950
    Nikolaev1950 14 October 2013 06: 45 New
    -1
    Licked everything?
    1. Mitrich
      Mitrich 14 October 2013 10: 07 New
      0
      / Even grunt /
  37. mikkado31
    mikkado31 15 October 2013 01: 25 New
    0
    Gyyyyy ... America about 20 years old predicts a collapse (especially violent it does even longer) but still somehow ... Dear Russians, relax. In your century, the collapse and collapse of the United States you will not find)))