Military Review

The black berets of Kamchatka in a training fight neutralized a group of conditional terrorists

14
Battalion-tactical exercises were held at the Kamchatka training ground “Wet Sands”, in which up to 200 marines and more than 30 units of marine battalion command under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Pavel Nogin took part.
After receiving the order, the divisions of the battalion advanced to the area of ​​dispersal and carried out measures to set up fortifications. As part of the exercises, the Marines were given units of radiation, chemical and biological protection, a self-propelled artillery battalion and a flamethrower platoon.






The forces of the reconnaissance company established the location in the area of ​​the group of “conditional terrorists” who occupied a section of an unequipped sea coast. After a report on the situation and the receipt of the combat order, the battalion units carried out a series of measures to eliminate illegal formations.





During the short training battle, the infantry units, under the cover of self-propelled guns, reinforced all-terrain vehicles and grenade launchers, suppressed with fire the forces of the conditional enemy and provided full control over the terrain. A feature of these exercises was their conduct in the marshy conditions of Kamchatka tundra. When forcing a complicated terrain, the marines made a detour by attacking "terrorists" from several directions.













According to the commander of the regiment of the marine corps, Colonel Vadim Klimenko, the maneuvers went smoothly, without violating safety requirements, and all units coped with the tasks. In the future, Kamchatka "black berets" will have to perform a number of large-scale tasks in regimental tactical exercises. They will be for the Marines final stage of the summer period of training.
Originator:
http://pressa-tof.livejournal.com/153434.html
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Zhenya
    Zhenya 9 October 2013 08: 57
    +7
    It’s time to work off the landing somewhere, for some reason ... the bandits are no longer relevant.
  2. The Indian Joe
    The Indian Joe 9 October 2013 09: 14
    +4
    The black berets of Kamchatka in a training fight neutralized a group of conditional terrorists
    - it would be strange if it were the other way around. Has anyone at least once heard about the "terrorists" inflicting heavy casualties on the attackers and fighting back?
  3. Prapor Afonya
    Prapor Afonya 9 October 2013 09: 46
    0
    Where they are, there is victory !!!
  4. Marconi41
    Marconi41 9 October 2013 09: 51
    +1
    Kamchatka Marine Corps has no means for landing. Here comes the Mistral, maybe it will ride them. In the meantime, alas, unfortunately.
    1. Hleb
      Hleb 10 October 2013 05: 22
      +1
      I'm certainly not naval and maybe this data is not accurate, but what then is it?
      On July 24, 2011, a ceremony was held in Vladivostok in honor of the assignment of the name Admiral Nevelskoy to the large landing ship of the Pacific Fleet of the Russian Navy BDK-98. The Polish-built BDK-98 project 775-II ship (building number 775/16) was commissioned in 1982. It is secretly asserted that the name was given on the initiative of the "patronizing" over the ship of the GI Maritime State University. Nevelsky.

      Until now, BDK-98 remained the only ship of the Pacific Fleet 775 project series, which did not receive a nominal name. In January 2006, the names Peresvet and Oslyabya were assigned, respectively, to BDK-11 and BDK-101.
      1. Hleb
        Hleb 10 October 2013 05: 57
        +1
        and this is the landing of the 3rd regiment


        and the Mistral will be based in Vladivostok.
        so why the dash?
  5. Doctor Evil
    Doctor Evil 9 October 2013 10: 16
    +2
    Exercises are good, but the scenario is already formulaic. In my memory, for the last ten years, the troops have been opposed only by groups of "conditional terrorists", and in exercises of all levels. And they also confront stereotypically, dooming the troops to a decisive victory with their idiotic tactics. Maybe it's time to remember V.I. Lenin with his "study of military affairs in a real way"?
    1. nerd.su
      nerd.su 9 October 2013 20: 56
      0
      Quote: Doctor Evil
      For the last ten years, the troops have been confronted only by groups of "conditional terrorists", and in exercises of all levels. And they also confront stereotypically, dooming the troops to a decisive victory with their idiotic tactics.

      Yes, here, judging by the forces, are very unconventional and dangerous "terrorists", because
      After receiving the order, the battalion units moved to the area of ​​dispersal and carried out activities to establish fortifications. As part of the exercises, Marines were assigned units of radiation, chemical and biological defense, a self-propelled artillery battalion and a flamethrower platoon.

      RHBZ, however, narrows the circle of possible "terrorists" what
      1. Doctor Evil
        Doctor Evil 9 October 2013 23: 13
        0
        Yes, Sergei, I also scratch my turnips, trying to understand what kind of group of "conditional terrorists" occupied a section of the unequipped coast in the swampy conditions of the Kamchatka tundra. Radioactive Japanese from Fukushima on the shore in a swamp? And there they were burned with flamethrowers? crying
  6. makst83
    makst83 9 October 2013 10: 41
    +1
    Military exercises are wonderful! But are we learning to fight with those !? I do not want to attribute the tragedy of the 1941 of the year here, then we learned to fight with little blood and on foreign territory!
    1. Walking
      Walking 9 October 2013 22: 10
      0
      Yes, what kind of terrorists are there, write directly a reflection of the Japanese landing on the Kuril Islands.
  7. Son
    Son 9 October 2013 11: 35
    +3
    Yes, okay ... Don’t criticize ...
    "Terrorists" - so "Terrorists" ...
    I served there, and judging by the photo, as was the "antiamphibious defense" under the Union - it remained ...
    The task is the same, the reflection of the sea landing, pr-ka in the city of Wet Sands ...
  8. understudy
    understudy 9 October 2013 12: 49
    +2
    I put a "plus", but ... Some kind of crap is going on, that no ucheniya, we are at war with evil terrorists. And why internal troops? To counter an alien invasion?

    Fantasy has dried up or ephemeral "tolerance" has attacked the Armed Forces and the scriptwriters have completely eaten their brains? Well, you can't do that. Are exercises involving strategic nuclear forces also directed against terrorists?
    1. Son
      Son 9 October 2013 13: 09
      +4
      Glamorous, fashionable, tolerant, liberal ...
      In short x..i.
  9. egsp
    egsp 9 October 2013 16: 22
    +1
    I agree, there is a division, at least it should be. Probably, the author does not know that the gunners and anti-aircraft gunners do not have battalions. Well, okay, infuriates another - we seem to be re-equipping, but in practice the same self-propelled guns and MTLB, as before. Samples are certainly worthy, but everything has its time ...
  10. klim44
    klim44 9 October 2013 16: 31
    +1
    Maneuver scenarios are something. Terrorists are supermen. Judge for yourself both the marines and the artel and the anti-aircraft gunners (probably the bandits have their own Air Force), from the gun on the sparrows - the right word. Next time terror nuclear weapons. Why pull a cat for all the details.
  11. moreman78
    moreman78 9 October 2013 22: 09
    0
    "self-propelled artillery battalion" and "setting up fortifications and reinforced all-terrain vehicles" - THIS IS NEW IN OUR ARMY! The author DOES NOT ACCEPT!
  12. Marek Rozny
    Marek Rozny 10 October 2013 18: 54
    0
    Why did you dig into the term "terrorists"? Everybody conducts exercises, calling the imaginary enemy "terrorists", although in reality the enemy side is army units. Well, it is not customary today to emphasize what kind of a conventional enemy is fighting with our army. Nobody teases the neighbors.
  13. helg717
    helg717 11 October 2013 16: 32
    0
    And another question afftoru ... BTU? with amplification means? and 200 marines ... something is wrong with the OShs, however angry