Military Review

The black berets of Kamchatka in a training fight neutralized a group of conditional terrorists

14
Battalion-tactical exercises were held at the Kamchatka training ground “Wet Sands”, in which up to 200 marines and more than 30 units of marine battalion command under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Pavel Nogin took part.
After receiving the order, the divisions of the battalion advanced to the area of ​​dispersal and carried out measures to set up fortifications. As part of the exercises, the Marines were given units of radiation, chemical and biological protection, a self-propelled artillery battalion and a flamethrower platoon.






The forces of the reconnaissance company established the location in the area of ​​the group of “conditional terrorists” who occupied a section of an unequipped sea coast. After a report on the situation and the receipt of the combat order, the battalion units carried out a series of measures to eliminate illegal formations.





During the short training battle, the infantry units, under the cover of self-propelled guns, reinforced all-terrain vehicles and grenade launchers, suppressed with fire the forces of the conditional enemy and provided full control over the terrain. A feature of these exercises was their conduct in the marshy conditions of Kamchatka tundra. When forcing a complicated terrain, the marines made a detour by attacking "terrorists" from several directions.













According to the commander of the regiment of the marine corps, Colonel Vadim Klimenko, the maneuvers went smoothly, without violating safety requirements, and all units coped with the tasks. In the future, Kamchatka "black berets" will have to perform a number of large-scale tasks in regimental tactical exercises. They will be for the Marines final stage of the summer period of training.
Originator:
http://pressa-tof.livejournal.com/153434.html
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Zhenya
    Zhenya 9 October 2013 08: 57 New
    +7
    It’s time to work off the landing somewhere, for some reason ... the bandits are no longer relevant.
  2. The Indian Joe
    The Indian Joe 9 October 2013 09: 14 New
    +4
    The black berets of Kamchatka in a training fight neutralized a group of conditional terrorists
    - it would be strange if it were the other way around. Has anyone at least heard about the "terrorists" inflicting heavy losses on attackers and fighting back?
  3. Prapor Afonya
    Prapor Afonya 9 October 2013 09: 46 New
    0
    Where they are, there is victory !!!
  4. Marconi41
    Marconi41 9 October 2013 09: 51 New
    +1
    Kamchatka Marine Corps has no means for landing. Here comes the Mistral, maybe it will ride them. In the meantime, alas, unfortunately.
    1. Hleb
      Hleb 10 October 2013 05: 22 New
      +1
      I'm certainly not naval and maybe this data is not accurate, but what then is it?
      July 24, 2011 in Vladivostok, a ceremony was held in honor of the assignment of the name "Admiral Nevelskaya" to the large landing ship of the Pacific Fleet of the Russian Navy BDK-98. The ship BDK-98 of project 775-II of Polish construction (building number 775/16) was put into operation in 1982. It is tacitly claimed that the name was given on the initiative of the “patronizing” ship of the Maritime State University named after G.I. Nevelsky.

      To date, the BDK-98 has remained the only ship in the Project 775 series of the Pacific Fleet that did not receive a name. In January 2006, the names "Relight" and "Oslyabya" were assigned, respectively, BDK-11 and BDK-101.
      1. Hleb
        Hleb 10 October 2013 05: 57 New
        +1
        and this is the landing of the 3rd regiment


        and the Mistral will be based in Vladivostok.
        so why the dash?
  5. Doctor Evil
    Doctor Evil 9 October 2013 10: 16 New
    +2
    The exercises are good, but the script is already boilerplate. In my memory, for the last ten years only groups of "conditional terrorists" have been confronting ten troops, moreover, in exercises at all levels. And they are also opposed in a stereotyped way, dooming their troops to a decisive victory with their idiotic tactics. Maybe it's time to remember V.I. Lenin with his "learn military affairs in the present way"?
    1. nerd.su
      nerd.su 9 October 2013 20: 56 New
      0
      Quote: Dr. Evil
      In recent years, only ten groups of “conditional terrorists” have been confronting ten troops, moreover in exercises at all levels. And they are also opposed in a stereotyped way, dooming their troops to a decisive victory with their idiotic tactics.

      Yes, judging by the forces, it’s not very stereotyped and dangerous "terrorists", because
      After receiving the order, the battalion units moved to the area of ​​dispersal and carried out activities to establish fortifications. As part of the exercises, Marines were assigned units of radiation, chemical and biological defense, a self-propelled artillery battalion and a flamethrower platoon.

      The RKhBZ, however, narrows the circle of possible "terrorists" what
      1. Doctor Evil
        Doctor Evil 9 October 2013 23: 13 New
        0
        Yes, Sergey, I also scratch my turnips, trying to understand what kind of group of "conditional terrorists" they occupied a section of unequipped coast in the swampy conditions of the Kamchatka tundra. Radioactive Japanese from Fukushima ashore in a swamp bogged down? And there they burned them with flamethrowers? crying
  6. makst83
    makst83 9 October 2013 10: 41 New
    +1
    Military exercises are wonderful! But are we learning to fight with those !? I do not want to attribute the tragedy of the 1941 of the year here, then we learned to fight with little blood and on foreign territory!
    1. Walking
      Walking 9 October 2013 22: 10 New
      0
      Yes, what kind of terrorists are there, write directly a reflection of the Japanese landing on the Kuril Islands.
  7. Son
    Son 9 October 2013 11: 35 New
    +3
    Yes, okay ... Don’t criticize ...
    "Terrorists" - so "Terrorists" ...
    He served there, and judging by the photo, how the "anti-airborne defense" was under the Union - it remained ...
    The task is the same, the reflection of the sea landing, pr-ka in the city of Wet Sands ...
  8. understudy
    understudy 9 October 2013 12: 49 New
    +2
    Put a "plus", but ... Some kind of crap is happening, that neither doctrine, we are fighting with evil terrorists. And why the internal troops? To counter alien invasion?

    Did the fantasy run out or did the ephemeral “tolerance” attack the Armed Forces and completely wipe out the brains of the script developers? Well, you can’t do that. Do exercises involving strategic nuclear forces also target terrorists?
    1. Son
      Son 9 October 2013 13: 09 New
      +4
      Glamorous, fashionable, tolerant, liberal ...
      In short x..i.
  9. egsp
    egsp 9 October 2013 16: 22 New
    +1
    I agree, there is a division, at least it should be. Probably, the author does not know that the gunners and anti-aircraft gunners do not have battalions. Well, okay, infuriates another - we seem to be re-equipping, but in practice the same self-propelled guns and MTLB, as before. Samples are certainly worthy, but everything has its time ...
  10. klim44
    klim44 9 October 2013 16: 31 New
    +1
    Maneuver scenarios are something. Terrorists are supermen. Judge for yourself both the marines and the artel and the anti-aircraft gunners (probably the bandits have their own Air Force), from the gun on the sparrows - the right word. Next time terror nuclear weapons. Why pull a cat for all the details.
  11. moreman78
    moreman78 9 October 2013 22: 09 New
    0
    "self-propelled artillery battalion" and "staging fortifications and armored all-terrain vehicles" - THIS IS NEW IN OUR ARMY! AUTHOR - DOESN'T!
  12. Marek Rozny
    Marek Rozny 10 October 2013 18: 54 New
    0
    Why did you stick to the term "terrorists"? All conduct exercises, calling the conditional enemy "terrorists", although in reality the enemy side is an army unit. Well, it’s not customary now to emphasize what a conditional enemy is fighting with our army. Nobody teases the neighbors.
  13. helg717
    helg717 11 October 2013 16: 32 New
    0
    And another question afftoru ... BTU? with amplification means? and 200 marines ... something is wrong with the OShs, however angry