Military Review

Marauders. For the anniversary of the tragic events of 3 October 1993 of the year: eyewitness notes

58

The day that passed under the sign of the victory of the defenders of the Supreme Council ended in a crushing defeat ...


There was little talk about it at the campfire, they didn’t talk about almost anything at all - they threw boughs into the fire, poured ice-cold vodka for themselves, drank without claping their eyes like at a funeral ... the balls were shaking small glow. Sometimes the flame snatched someone's face from the darkness - and it immediately disappeared, as if picked up by the wind, and again became part of the night, filled with rustling voices, the ringing of bottles, the strumming of guitar strings. “What sad faces, / And how hopelessly pale ...” Which of these people lived till morning?

Nobody argued about anything, did not call anyone for anything. There was nothing to change - it only remained to wait for the morning. The smell of smoke and baked potatoes was mixed with the smell of fallen leaves, damp earth, tree bark and mushrooms, although their time had passed. Somewhere alongside they sang: "And in the taiga in the morning fog ...", and a little further, twisting the motif, Beatles: "Hey, Jude." These voices and smells came as if from previous times, when there were no street battles or riot policemen with shields and batons, and in the fashion were tourist gatherings and author song contests. But there were other voices. “Lord, save Thy people,” they sang softly and beautifully at the other end of the park, but soon the song was blocked by a long, rollicking sigh of an accordion that began to dance. “Eh, eh, eh!” - the shod boots booted into the ground, the invisible dancers whistled with youthful whistles.

- Russian man! .. - someone shouted from the dark. - No, you listen to what I tell you. Russian man! .. What is it? "Fun and drink"! It was created in order to drink and be merry! And he invented a debt and ideas. Who the hell is this? Our Motherland - fun! “Watching until midnight is ready / At the dance with a tramp and whistle / Speaking of drunken peasants.” Here it is - a race, here it is - a Russian man!

Yesterday, for these words, they would give the stranger firmly in the forehead and call him a provocateur (which, perhaps, he was), and now everyone was tired and silent.

So this night of our defeat stretched. We dozed off only in the morning. We woke up because somewhere over our very heads it was booming and often hit KPVT - a heavy machine gun. The air trembled, broke off the branches and spun down the invisible spiral of maple leaves. The trees stood sunlit emptiness. The air smelled of fumes. Chattering our teeth from chills, we rose to our feet. The park has become unrecognizable. Wavy strands of frost, sparkling in the sun, intricate patterns woven into the grass.

Again the machine gun crashed, a female voice screamed heart-rending. From the side of the square, it grunted, clanged: the tracked combat vehicles of the landing force overcame flimsy barricades.

Another minute, and they would cut us off from the House of Soviets. We ducked and ran to his left wing. Bullets crumbled, broke the plaster over our heads, I even sprinkled it.

So this day began. I remember him as delirious, sketchy, dotted. Was after tank shooting at the House of Soviets a moment of desperate hope, when on Novy Arbat, half a kilometer from us, a hot shootout ensued, and someone shouted: “These are ours! Ours fit! ”, And I believed him, so much so that tears came to my eyes. Alas, these were not ours - the Yeltsin special forces thrashed through the windows in which there were supposedly snipers ...

Then, drawn by people running somewhere, the poet and me, Victor Mamonov, now deceased, found themselves under a large front staircase, where there was a pass office. We thought that the people around us were their own, and wanted to enter the building with them, but soon we realized that we were wrong ... Without further ado, they busily and efficiently broke down the door and rushed inside, as usual as in a tram, pushing elbows and shoulders . Sensing something was wrong, we did not follow their example. Soon the burglars began to return - with bags filled with coffee, cookies, juice, compote, canned food, cigarettes ... Some lucky people took possession of portable televisions and radio receivers. Someone carried behind the ear, a large pillow. The other is a telephone set with wires being dragged along the ground. The third - a heap of police caps. Others put them on their heads. Why, their power came ... Someone with a simple face gave out unfilled deputy certificates with red crusts. They came out just as businesslike as they came in - young, well-dressed, in sturdy shoes, walking with booty towards New Arbat, casually bypassing the volunteers who were carrying from the opposite entrance, under the bridge, disfigured and bloody corpses.

“Let's get out of here,” Victor said in a dull voice. I pushed off the wall and walked, as if through the air, not feeling my legs. I did not feel anything at all, only the simplest sensations: we were under the stairs in the shade, and now we were in the sun. It was as if I lost flesh and bones: it seemed to me that if someone in a hurry with the prey wanted to pass through me, I would have done it without difficulty. Somewhere in the depths of consciousness, as in a shallow well, the question splashed: how could all this have happened?

It took only two years of Yeltsinism, so that people in the center of Moscow openly robbed their own parliament ...

And no matter what the corrupt hacks say about the “ambiguity” of the events, their moral side is completely unequivocal: the defenders of the Supreme Council, having freed the city hall from the 3 of October, did not rob it - they took it under protection.

Getting out from under the stairs, we were surprised silence. Apparently, they declared a truce or something like that. Someone spoke on a megaphone from the window of the fifth floor. Judging by the voice, it was Rutskoi. We climbed the main staircase upstairs, where there was already a small crowd. Rutskoy, apparently remembering that he was a pilot, asked other pilots to raise their combat vehicles into the air and protect parliament - why did he decide that there were pilots among the handful of people standing under the windows? We sighed and went down. Towards us, brilliantly lit by the rays of the sun, the colonel climbed out of the tank with a machine gun in his hand. He walked straight at us, tall, strong, blue-eyed, tanned, with a frank selfish reluctance to look into anything at all, peculiar only to senior army and police ranks (even civilian bureaucrats have a different look - more artistic, perhaps). He walked as if from American films, from a meat grinder, where he “just carried out the order,” with camouflage-shaped sleeves rolled up and an open collar, from which a snow-white turn-out looked out. Beautiful, greyish - went to present an ultimatum of legitimate authority. Even after death he will go on forever, under the slanting rays of the setting sun, with a heavy machine gun in his hand, but he will never come anywhere.

At about 4 hours in the afternoon, when the time came for the looters, volunteer rescuers brought a woman out of one entrance of the House of Soviets. She was an employee of the secretariat of the Supreme Council, located in the building from September 21. According to her, for two hours she, along with other women and children, made her way through the underpass from an office building located about 150 meters from the White House, gliding through the blood of the wounded and killed there. At the exit for the cordon, they beat her and marauded off her hair. Victor and I made our way through the crowd to her and managed to lead her out. Emaciated, disheveled, drooping, trembling from days of cold, she stood surrounded by a few sympathizers and spoke with eyes wide with surprise that during the hit of tank shells the huge building was swaying like an earthquake. She also said bitterly: “The Army ... We waited for her all these days ...” And she added with an indescribable feminine contempt in her voice: “Even today, we waited until noon ...”

I realized with horror that in front of me was one of the victims of the Densk newspaper articles. Some analysts of the newspaper, often anonymous or hiding behind the KGB pseudonym, assured readers that Yeltsin was a sick, incapable, drunk man with hooligan manners instead of political will, while others asserted that in military units and at large enterprises he was working against the "invaders" powerful Front national salvation. A little more - both the army and the people will lose patience, and they will move to Moscow in close-in-a-thousand columns. The first issue of the Day after the coup came out with a portrait of Yeltsin upside down - everything, they say, is a skull. And finally, the bribed army approached, shot, set fire to the House of Soviets, by which they carried the corpses of young guys disfigured by cumulative shells beyond recognition ... “Burbulis is not transmitted during a handshake” - a malicious joke of “The Day”.

Then we stood at the iron barriers on the sidewalk. Past still went the marauders, and in the other direction still carried the corpses. The upper floors of the House of Soviets chadno burned. The few preserved windows of the lower floors also burned - in the rays of sunset. In the city hall building there was a roar and a clang, as if there was a tank turning inside. The birds circled over the house again, frightened by cannonade. I looked at them and envied: how easy and simple it is for them to fly up there, look at all this from a height. In the same way, in the morning, silvery fragments of the blinds of the House of Soviets circled in the air, thrown high by the monstrous blast wave of a cumulative tank projectile. I took them at first for pigeons. Light plates flew to the ground for a long time, smoothly, beautifully, like birds. For some reason, I remembered, quite out of place: “Take a look at the birds of the sky: they do not sow, do not reap, do not collect in the barn; and your heavenly Father nourishes them. Are you much better than them? ”

I wanted to smoke, but ran out of cigarettes. Victor asked a cigarette from the man standing next to a Caucasian. He pulled out a bluish tutu, nodded at the parliament: "From there."

By a strange coincidence, cigarettes were also called "Parliament." Noticing my unkind gaze, the Caucasian said: “One guy gave, I did not go there myself. Now Yeltsin is exactly kapets, ”he added. Oh, read already in the "Day" ...

From the New Arbat, a nasty metallic clanging was heard - these were the “burzhuins” —moderes smashing Brilliant's brilliant spiral with terrible hooks with stones, getting souvenirs for themselves. Rattling with shields, a detachment of riot police ran into the square in front of the stairs, lined up in a line and, waving batons and machine guns, began to crowd out the crowd. We trudled, driven by riot police, in the direction of New Arbat ...

Since then, for me, the symbol of the events of October 4 is not even the shot and burning House of Soviets, but looters. In their appearance then, as it seems to me, there are historical the meaning of what happened. In the same way as some looters robbed parliament on October 4, 1993, others, a larger one, robbed the country in the 90s. It seems to me that premonitions do not deceive us when we suspect that our government is somehow too mild towards criminals. She does so. And can not do otherwise. And not because the police, prosecutors, the Investigative Committee are all bad. But because the state is. At the core of his political system is crime. This is not a figure of speech or hyperbole at all, but the verdict of the Constitutional Court of Russia of September 21, 1993 on Yeltsin’s actions, which the court’s chairman V. Zorkin never refused.

The modern political system, enshrined in the Constitution of 1993, was born as a result of a bloody, unconstitutional, marauding coup.

The name “criminal revolution” given by S. Govorukhin has long been behind these events. But we, reflecting on the causes of our troubles, rarely think about this: if a “revolution of marauders” occurred in the country 20 years ago, then what are its legal and legal consequences? But what are: 4 in October 1993, the cynical politicians and gesheftmahery, now called oligarchs, did not just “come to power”: they rebuilt everything “by themselves” - legislation, law, morality, ideology, cultural policy, etc.

And how hard we now have to get rid of this heritage.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.stoletie.ru/
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Denis
    Denis 7 October 2013 09: 16
    -3
    We woke up because somewhere above our heads we heard the KPVT loudly and often hit - a heavy machine gun
    It is doubtful that the defenders would have fled from the shots. It's not a throat at rallies to tear
    Rutskoi, apparently remembering that he was a pilot, asked other pilots to lift combat vehicles into the air and defend parliament
    Carpet bombing or what?
    street battles
    To lie like that, it was necessary to add bloody
    Bad article, all in g ..., and I'm in white!
    Never would these clowns stop the tanks with barricades, so there was no order
    And who was to be protected, deputies who first of all granted themselves privileges and apartments?
    1. olegff68
      olegff68 7 October 2013 09: 41
      +4
      Quote: Denis

      Bad article, all in g ..., and I'm in white!
      Never would these clowns stop the tanks with barricades, so there was no order
      And who was to be protected, deputies who first of all granted themselves privileges and apartments?

      From the words of the tank commander - "They brought me to Moscow (from Tamanskaya), set the task of preventing riots by blocking the roads, the tanks marched in a column (the towers are slightly deployed), at the entrance to the bridge we hear screams" military brothers for us, for Yeltsin, they are already and they brought the guns to the White House, "I think they got stuck, why should they go to explain to everyone that tanks always move like that.
      1. Denis
        Denis 7 October 2013 11: 24
        +3
        Quote: olegff68
        military brothers for us, for Yeltsin
        It feels like the clients of psychiatric hospitals were talking. Golyak in stores, don’t take your money from a savings bank, etc. and they with this Anna Karenina promised to lie on the rails
        It was necessary to study better, it took place at school
        Lenin V.I. Complete Works Tom 11

        THE PROLETARIAT IS FIGHTING. Bourgeoisie Sneaks to Power

        During the war, diplomacy has nothing to do. At the end of hostilities, diplomats come to the fore, summing up, compiling accounts, practicing honest brokerage.
        Something similar is happening in the Russian revolution. During the military clashes of the people with the forces of the autocracy, the liberal bourgeois hide in their burrows. They are against violence from above and below, they are enemies and the arbitrariness of power and the anarchy of the mob. They enter the scene at the end of hostilities, and their political decisions clearly reflect the change in the political situation brought about by these actions
        And to think at least occasionally, it is also not superfluous
        Protecting some parasites from others is unwise
        The author really wants to become a hero, only they are not self-proclaimed, they are chosen by the people
        The people, and not the decree of the Duma as those three idiots are unclear how they fell under the tracks
    2. kostya_a
      kostya_a 7 October 2013 11: 12
      +5
      Do not talk nonsense! Defended the constitution of the USSR, which was rudely violated on four counts! And no one expected that Yeltsin and Co. would shoot down the Parliament and ordinary people. The army was on the side of the Congress of People's Deputies, if Alexander Vladimirovich were tougher, there would be no subsequent events!
      1. v.lyamkin
        v.lyamkin 7 October 2013 11: 41
        +4
        Well, yes, of course, the events took place in 1993, and the constitution of the USSR was defended.
        Yes, most people did not understand what was happening. Moreover, as in 1917, the main events took place in the capitals. And all of Russia gradually subordinated. so in 1993 - in Moscow riotous, and the rest of Russia looked at events from the side.
        1. kostya_a
          kostya_a 7 October 2013 12: 10
          +2
          Firstly, who controls the capital, he controls the country, so that in all coups, actions take place in the capitals (from World History)
          Secondly: the people did not understand what was happening, because they had previously created the ground for this by introducing the posts of the President of the RSFSR and the President of the USSR. The regions did not understand whom to obey. But in 1991 the first coup failed and in 1993, after the resignation of Gorbachev, he becomes the only President. The fact that he signed decree No. 1400 did not tell the common people. So naturally, only some part of Moscow supported the People’s Deputies, which was shot by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, which in turn was provoked by the Beitarov detachments!
      2. Denis
        Denis 7 October 2013 11: 45
        0
        Quote: kostya_a
        Parliament and ordinary people will be shot.
        If parliament, then the world would not lose anything, but about ordinary people do not lie, there wasn’t
        1. kostya_a
          kostya_a 7 October 2013 11: 54
          0
          For reference, here is a list of the dead "difficult" people: http://1993.sovnarkom.ru/TEXT/SPISKI/spisok-m.htm
      3. old man54
        old man54 8 October 2013 00: 35
        0
        You "+"! hi
        Video in the topic, "so to speak", but a very sad video and even tough!
      4. vpimen2010
        vpimen2010 8 October 2013 23: 45
        -2
        And the Congress was on the side of Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin, which the army confirmed by following the order of the Commander-in-Chief Yeltsin. Who is Shurik Av Rutskiy, maybe a politician? I don’t know this. Maybe a commander? Also no one had heard of him.
        In my opinion, it is, according to the Hamburg account, a traitor:
        - left the communists, splitting their single faction, created his own: "Communists for Democracy", that is, betrayed his party comrades;
        - betrayed Yeltsin, who made of a simple deputy, vice president;
        - betrayed his Supreme Commander-in-Chief, who awarded him the rank of general, i.e. the commander who handed him a star on general's epaulettes;
        - betrayed the voters who voted for Yeltsin and who was chosen by him as an assistant, a previously unknown colonel colonel Avutsky;
        - betrayed his comrades-in-arms, urging them to betray: to bomb the Kremlin and their Supreme Commander, who was there; not a single officer in the world descended to such baseness. Judas was not an officer.
        - betrayed Rodin, ordering the people who believed him to storm the city hall and the television center, i.e. to kill his compatriots, other citizens and voters of Russia, and thereby started a civil war in the country, something that the enemies of Russia have always sought, on his hands is the blood of deceived and killed military, civil and police officers, citizens of our country. Even a corporal would not have realized commit so many betrayals and meanness made av rutskim.
        I can’t forget the words of Alexander Vasilyevich Korzhakov about this type: "Generals do not surrender three times." Lano and as a brand. Forever. Traitor! Forever.
      5. vpimen2010
        vpimen2010 12 October 2013 14: 15
        0
        In the words of Blank-Ulyanov-Lenin, the authorities suppressed .. "the anarchy of the rabble ..."
        The Parliament is the Congress of People’s Deputies, the highest legislative and administrative body of the country's government, in which 1089 elected representatives of the people work. The place of work of the Parliament of the RSFSR is the Kremlin. Another senior official of the country worked in the Kremlin together with the Parliament. The Supreme Glanomandor, endowed by Parliament with the right to issue decrees that contradict the law, is the President of Russia Boris Yeltsin.
        The Supreme Council, not the Parliament, but the working body of the Parliament of 250 deputies who prepared the fundamental laws of the country for consideration by the Parliament.
        By its self-righteous actions, the Supreme Council constantly quarreled between the two highest branches of government of the country: the Parliament Congress and the President, trying to draw the plenipotentiary of Parliament to the Supreme Council and equalize their status with the President. This is one of the reasons for the conflict.
        On the territory of the Kremlin, no one shook the Parliament building with steel blanks from tank guns, which means that the Parliament was not shot.
        Maybe in the process of shesyasenya walls and upper floors of the White House, at least one deputy was shot with these steel blankets? Nothing is wrong, everyone is safe and receives an increased deputy pension. Once none of the deputies was injured by this shaking of the walls, then there really was no execution of the working body, the Supreme Council, or the Parliament. What is the conversation about then?
        As Ilyich said, "Power is only worth something when it can defend its power!" Yeltsin proved both the correctness of Blank-Ulyanov and the correctness of the choice of the people who entrusted him with power. Protecting power from .. ".. the ararchy of the rabble ..", as Blank-Ulyanov-Lenin said.
        Politics is hard, sometimes bloody ....
    3. vpimen2010
      vpimen2010 7 October 2013 18: 47
      -7
      Glory to you Warriors who extinguished the hotbed of the civil war and did not allow millions of people to die, like Russia itself! And the eternal memory of the deceived and the lost.
      Your feat, damned by the enemies of Russia, the people of the country will always remember. You were not the first to shed blood on the streets of Moscow, anathema to those who shot the sniper from the White House, 03.10. 93 years old, killed the senior police lieutenant Alexander Boyko, then sent people to death, assault the city hall and Ostankino. Here is the first and terrible blood shed at 15:03.1013 on XNUMX, police officer A. Boyko and Alexander Rutsky, who was beaten to death in his office, was Alexander Braginsky, and on whom is the anathema about which the partiarch Alexy II spoke?
      Officers, following the order of the President of Russia, in 1993 didn’t allow what was happening in Syria, what has already happened in Libya in the homeland. Thanks to your moral and moral choice, the world is in Russia. And this is the main reason why the soldier of the Fatherland lives. Glory to you warriors!
      Victor Mironov


      Marat Musin says that they went to the assault on Ostankino with 18 machine guns - a lie! Probably, there were 18 machine gunners in the car in which Musin was driving to capture Ostnkino, the rest of the weapons were in the remaining 10 cars and buses with the revolutionary pogromists of Avrutsky and Makashov. Senior Investigator of the General Prosecutor's Office Leonid Proshkin, named the exact number of weapons in the White House building, 962 machine guns and an assault rifle, plus 147 barrels were seized at the militia department of the mayor's office, plus about 500-700 barrels of weapons that were thrown into panic by militiamen in the mayor's office and the hotel " Mir "I personally, from the office of the mayor's office No. 2010, saw people getting into cars and buses after Avrutsky's order, all of them with weapons. (Where did the weapons come from? In 1991, the security unit of the Supreme Soviet and the Presidential Security Service issued about 700 machine guns defenders, so why in 1993 the security service of the Supreme Council and Security of Khazbulatov should have fewer weapons than in 1991? In addition, in the process of the seizure of the city hall, 147 barrels of weapons were stolen from the police department of the OVD.) Further, all who were in the city hall and At the Mir hotel, the militiamen threw their weapons on the floor and ran away. And in front of me they shouted: "Whoever they catch with a weapon, they will kill" and threw off their unloading and weapons. The whole floor was littered I personally picked up a machine gun and an unloading device with three horns and barricaded myself in my office. The "defenders of the Constitution" who seized the mayor's office plundered alcohol stocks of all three restaurants of the mayor's office and the Mir hotel and all 7 buffets Having killed Aleksandr Braginsoy, the minister of the Moscow government, they, drunk, then went with a grenade launcher to Ostankino. As Avrutsky said "Explain the truth to people," under Khasbulatov's shout: "We need to take the Kremlin and these criminals by storm .." !, with hands up to the elbows in blood.
      Here the "defenders of the Constitution" who remained in the mayor's office, had a full break. The looters plundered all the offices, except for No. 2010, the 25-storey building of the former CMEA. They went down to a bestial state.

      About the "snipers of Korzhakov" .04.1993, they were personally destroyed by A.V.Korzhakov, M.I.Barsukov and their guards on Novy Arbat (near the Globe). To which I am a witness and participant.
      Alexander Vasilyevich Korzhakov said well about the Avrutsk: "The General does not surrender three times!"
  2. olegff68
    olegff68 7 October 2013 09: 22
    +3
    As the Japanese say, there is nothing worse than change.
    The mess, on the territory of the entire former Union, was incredible in those years and this was only the beginning.
    And those who IDEAN wish the next color revolution - should think and look back - do you really want IT?!?!
  3. scientist
    scientist 7 October 2013 09: 27
    17
    Somehow, the memoirs of the head of the CIA about the events of 90-93, where he wrote: "The United States spent hundreds of billions of dollars annually on the arms race and attempts to destroy the Soviet economy. Why couldn't we figure out earlier that it was enough to spend 4 billions of dollars to bribe Soviet politicians so that they themselves would destroy their country. "
    I think that the time has not yet come for a historical assessment of the scale of betrayal and treason, which was made at that time by the leadership of the USSR and Russia.
    In the military school, we did not part with weapons, we even slept with him. One thing was clear that the army would defend its people in any case. But it is not clear to us on whose side the Ministry of Internal Affairs will be. At that time, there were constantly clashes with the cops, sometimes even with shooting. And if mass demonstrations and rallies had begun, the Ministry of Internal Affairs would have been ready for the toughest measures.
    Now, many who took part in the coup d'etat with the shooting of the White House are still in power. Many have made their capital in the chaos and chaos of the 90s so far in big business and influence the policies of Russia and the CIS countries.
    Therefore, it takes time to leave a generation of mentally ill politicians and influential criminals, then society will have a chance to recover and appreciate this historical tragedy.
    1. olegff68
      olegff68 7 October 2013 09: 57
      +5
      Quote: scientist
      In the military school, we did not part with weapons, we even slept with him. One thing was clear that the army would defend its people in any case. But it is not clear to us on whose side the Ministry of Internal Affairs will be.

      Are you so sure of the correct political orientation of the leadership of your school ???
      At that time, the military and cops often stood side by side in cordons, and both of them were extremely confused in "misunderstandings" - how can this happen in OUR country?!?!
      And those, and those, did not accept (on a national scale) anyone's side and simply continued to serve, the result - we avoided another "civil" one.
      1. scientist
        scientist 7 October 2013 11: 18
        -1
        Quote: olegff68
        At that time, the military and cops often stood side by side in cordons, and both of them were extremely confused in "misunderstandings" - how can this happen in OUR country?!?!

        The military was usually cordoned off. All the same, it was necessary to overcome the psychological barrier in order to raise a hand or weapon against unarmed people. But the special units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs specifically trained as such a riot.
        1. olegff68
          olegff68 7 October 2013 13: 58
          +2
          Quote: scientist
          The military was usually cordoned off. All the same, it was necessary to overcome the psychological barrier in order to raise a hand or weapon against unarmed people. But the special units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs specifically trained as such a riot.

          Yah ?!?! The tanks, too, were militiamen fired at the white house, and indeed the rest of the tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, and militia armored personnel carriers were ??
          And you wrote correctly:
          Quote: scientist
          units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs specifically trained as such a riot.

          It is on the riots !!! - and not to defend the interests of some politicians and overthrow others - other structures were engaged in this.
          1. scientist
            scientist 7 October 2013 19: 57
            -1
            The tanks belonged to the Taman Division, which had already undergone baptism of fire in the fight against civilians in Poland and Czechoslovakia. I think this sad experience is an exception to the rule and this should not be.
  4. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 7 October 2013 09: 42
    18
    In one, the author is 100% right - the looters came to power!
    1. Denis
      Denis 7 October 2013 10: 01
      +3
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      looters came to power!
      The author pushes another topic, in the white house there were all angels, and even defenders in general are saints
      If this happens now, except for patients with psychiatric hospitals, who will go to protect them?
      Rather, the opposite will tear
      1. v.lyamkin
        v.lyamkin 7 October 2013 11: 44
        0
        There were two groups fighting who were trying to find out who was the most important. That's all.
        1. Denis
          Denis 7 October 2013 18: 21
          +2
          Quote: v.lyamkin
          There were two groups fighting who were trying to find out who was the most important. That's all.
          Reasonable comment. Here, mostly parliament defenders threw themselves up, or rather praise themselves.
          Have you forgotten the mockery of these parliamentarians about lifelong deputy, about the quick privatization of service space, etc., etc.?
          We know who the fuck is with his gang, and now they are rubbing at us that some crystal-clear people have gathered in parliament. The same thieves, only some in power, while others climbed into it
          And where are the promised 50 suitcases of compromising material?
          Was it worth protecting?
    2. Misantrop
      Misantrop 7 October 2013 10: 14
      +3
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      looters came to power!
      Marauders were, alas, in both warring camps. They were eager for power, repainting on the go. Now it is already known for sure that the drunk Yeltsin on the throne is VERY bad. But for some reason, no one thinks, and then an addict Khazbulatov would be the BEST choice then?
  5. pahom54
    pahom54 7 October 2013 10: 35
    +3
    Marauders always appear in such situations, regardless of state or nationality. But it seems that the same looters are sitting at the top, and first of all - in the State Duma ..., yes, the Duma, but I didn’t make a reservation.
  6. SolomonSS
    SolomonSS 7 October 2013 11: 27
    +2
    Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Putin and Medvedev, and their entire pack, as enemies of the people to recognize, one is posthumous. And there, as expected, in the stands of the Coliseum negative
  7. smiths xnumx
    smiths xnumx 7 October 2013 11: 51
    +4
    Andrei Dunaev, until the summer of 1993, the former Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, a supporter of the Supreme Council: “Before my eyes, an employee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs died, he was squinted by a sniper from the Mir Hotel. They rushed there, but the shooter managed to leave, only by special signs and style of performance they realized that this was not the writing of our emwedes, not the KGB officers, but someone else's. Apparently, foreign intelligence services. And they sent instigators from the American embassy. The US wanted to fan the civil war and ruin Russia. ”
    1. zub46
      zub46 7 October 2013 16: 39
      -1
      Does Dunaev have a diamond eye? From two hundred meters watching how the shooter from the knee attached and what, by its assembly, is it already visible to a foreigner? A mercenary mermaid in the service of the shark of imperialism? Give ...
      1. smiths xnumx
        smiths xnumx 7 October 2013 16: 48
        +1
        And will you deny the presence of unknown snipers in those tragic days, who shot at all and at the White House defenders and the military and at the police?
        The commander of Alpha Gennady Zaitsev did not go on the assault, did not comply with Yeltsin’s direct order, but sent parliamentarians to the White House. And more massive victims, thank God, were avoided. Why did he do so, Gennady Zaitsev said in an interview: “Our Alfovets, junior lieutenant Gennady Sergeyev, died ... They drove up on a battalion to the White House. On the pavement lay a wounded paratrooper. And they decided to take him out. They dismounted from the Bateer, and at that time a sniper hit Sergeyev in the back. But this was not from the “White House” there was a shot, I definitely declare. This meanness, it was for one purpose - to embitter the “Alpha”, so she rushed there and began to shred everything. ”

        http://nstarikov.ru/blog/20939

        According to one version cited by the Russian Special Forces newspaper, on October 3, at about 15:00, a riot police officer was killed by a sniper from the Dragunov sniper rifle at a level not lower than 15 floors. After that, police officers fired on demonstrators - defenders of the Council House According to the State Duma Commission, in this case we are obviously talking about a senior lieutenant, deputy company commander of the 2nd regiment of the police patrol service, Alexander Boyko, who was really killed by a sniper in the city hall building.
        On October 3, while shooting at a crowd near the Ostankino television center, several people were killed with sniper shots, including journalist Rory Peck.
        On October 4, during the storming of the White House and the occupation of adjacent territories by units of the internal troops and the Ministry of Defense, several people from among the defenders of the House of Soviets, military personnel, and also casualties were killed by snipers. It was snipers, according to the State Duma Commission, that in the area of ​​the House of Soviets that day, Interior Ministry officers and soldiers who were on the side of forces loyal to Boris Yeltsin were killed: Moscow police department officer Mikhail Drozdov, senior lieutenant of the airborne landing regiment Konstantin Krasnikov (in Devyatinsky Lane), the driver of the police department "Zyuzino" senior sergeant Alexander Pankov, officer of the special forces group "Alpha" Gennady Sergeyev.
        According to one version proposed in his book by Ivan Ivanov (Marat Musin), a participant in the events, calling himself a "scout" and speaking on the side of the defenders of the House of Soviets, a sniper from the building "completely controlled by Boris Yeltsin’s troops," the second lieutenant of the special forces group was shot dead " Alpha "Gennady Sergeev.
        According to the version referenced by journalist Mark Deutsch, who was heard by him from an anonymous interlocutor - a professional of special services, “the shot was fired from the technical room of the Kapranov factory, which is located next to the White House. This room was used for a long time by the KGB of the USSR to monitor the American embassy. ”
        According to the investigation of the State Duma Commission of Russia, snipers acted even on October 5. In particular, on the Krasnopresnenskaya embankment, an officer of the Moscow police Nikolai Baldin, who was intoxicated, was killed by a top-down shot in the neck.
        The head of the investigation team of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation to investigate the events of September-October 1993, Leonid Proshkin called the snipers who participated in the events, a question to which the investigation team "could not find an answer."
        http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%E0%E7%E3%EE%ED_%C2%E5%F0%F5%EE%E2%ED%EE%E3%EE_%
        D1%EE%E2%E5%F2%E0_%D0%EE%F1%F1%E8%E8#.D0.A1.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B9.D0.BF.D0.B5.D1.80.
        D1.8B
        1. zub46
          zub46 7 October 2013 18: 22
          0
          Of course I won’t.
        2. vpimen2010
          vpimen2010 8 October 2013 01: 45
          -2
          And you undertake to assert that every sniper, for all to see, hangs out his name, rank, part number, and the name of the commander?
          What is all this nonsense about "unknown snipers" invented by the interpreter of history N. Starikov?
          Okay! I agree. Then name not the "unknown" snipers, but those who were, are, or will be known to everyone in advance, even before the shooting of people began. In any city, in any country. Are there any known snipers before starting the mission?
          I think it's time for everyone to stop discussing the topic of "unknown snipers", they are always known. These are the snipers of those forces that are interested in chaos, the beginning of bloodshed. In October 1993, these were the raging Ampilov, Makash, Rutskoy, and the rest of the instigators of the mutiny. On whose conscience is the death of the attack aircraft killed at Ostankino, the grenade launchers who shot at the Vityzia servicemen. And this is a mixed hodgepodge of militiamen who were in the city hall, these are warriors. And they seriously defended the object and defended themselves, and therefore 146 corpses. Victor Mironov
    2. vpimen2010
      vpimen2010 8 October 2013 01: 24
      -3
      To get from the Mir hotel, to the senior militia lieutenant Alexander Boyko who was killed on the ramp of the city hall, it was necessary to shoot "mortar bullets" through the 25-storey wing of the mayor's office, built in the shape of a letter, separating the murder site from the place of the shot. X ". Where the upper left wall, if viewed from above, tightly cut off the place of the murder of A. Boyko, who was in the" dead zone ", in the area of ​​the crosshairs of the city hall.
      Therefore, I declare that Andrei Dunaev, a LIAR, disgracing his epaulettes, a man without honor and conscience, betraying his comrades, and first of all a former colleague killed by a sniper from the White House, A. Boyko. He was killed in front of my eyes with a shot in the left ear. The sniper was hiding and firing from a small window under the roof of the DB. Not the high-rise of the DB, but its low 5-6 floors of the encirclement building. Pay attention to how famously Dunaev lies, that he identified the handwriting of a foreign special service one shot at a time! An expert-forensic ballista-foreign expert, and not a deputy ministry of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. So, on the go, you can only determine in one case if he, this Dunaev, planted himself to ambush a shooting "foreign sniper". Expert.
      Victor Mironov.
  8. Boricello
    Boricello 7 October 2013 12: 14
    +8
    I don’t know what would happen with the country if the parliament and its leaders came to power, but I see what the drunk Yeltsin did with Russia. But what Yeltsin figures are all as white and fluffy as they want to show them? ... As many people died under Yeltsin did not die under 1 regime. From hunger, humiliation, etc. The economy collapsed and sold ... If I had my will, would have dug from the grave and hung in public.
    1. vpimen2010
      vpimen2010 10 October 2013 01: 44
      0
      The leadership of the coup gang with deputy badges, on 03.10.93 in the evening at Ostankino and in the afternoon at the city hall showed that they did to the country. Also, that now in Libya. Well, who in their right mind would go on a whiskered general? Khas? Frenzied Makashov, ampilov Alksnisu ????
      Millions of people killed, devastation, famine and the complete and final collapse of the country. Were Russia not for Yeltsin, Korzhakov and their entourage.
  9. My address
    My address 7 October 2013 13: 05
    +6
    My relatives, Sverdlovsk builders, on the EBN of the following opinion:
    He loved only power. He liked to be the center of attention. He easily substituted people, if only he was not responsible for mistakes or on suspicion of competition (often his mistakes and his suspicions were made up by him).

    The October shooting was quite in the spirit of EBN. EBN, the young crooks around the EBN, the intellectual shame (like the forty-one signatories to the blood) twenty years ago merged into ecstasy. Here we have what we have. And who prevents to filter the applicant above a certain position according to certain criteria? Including with the help of testing and polygraph? Power interferes. She likes herself and will not give up. For example, can DAM be tested for intelligence, experience, patriotism, and commitment to justice?
  10. anushin10ru
    anushin10ru 7 October 2013 14: 33
    +3
    Dispersal of the Supreme Soviet and execution of its defenders is a crime under all articles of the then acting constitution. The consequence was the "calling of the Boriska to the kingdom," the current squalid, anti-democratic constitution. But to this day, the protege of Yeltsin and his clique, V.V. Putin is developing the creative legacy of his patron.
    1. SolomonSS
      SolomonSS 7 October 2013 20: 59
      +3
      Russia has become an oil and gas additive in Europe and America.
      Raw materials are sold for a penny, it turns out where we sell oil, the cost of gasoline is cheaper than ours.
    2. vpimen2010
      vpimen2010 8 October 2013 02: 27
      -3
      Nobody shot the first defenders of the White House. All the deputies were piece by piece. Nobody pushed the parliament either, because in Russia in 1993 there was no parliamentarian. There were a bunch of inadequate deputies trying to start a civil war, and under the slogan of defense raped by them Constitution, ruin Russia.
      Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin, acting as a commander during the battle, neutralized the instigators of rebellion and put things in order on the ship. What a successor, educated and trained by him, Vladimir Putin continues to do with success. I congratulate him on his birthday! And the Constitution will be trumped up, and everything will be fine.
      1. old man54
        old man54 8 October 2013 03: 09
        +1
        Quote: vpimen2010
        nobody shot the first defenders of the White House. All deputies are piece by piece intact. Nobody pushed apart the parliament either, because in Russia in the 1993 year there was no parliament. There were a bunch of inadequate deputies trying to start a civil war, and under the slogan of defense raped by them Constitution, ruin Russia. Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin, acting as a commander during the battle, neutralized the instigators of rebellion and put things in order on the ship.

        Well, Mr. N.I.d. but you, it’s a pity that you yourself weren’t shot there, there’s some kind of omission! angry
        1. vpimen2010
          vpimen2010 8 October 2013 04: 55
          -5
          Well, why, they tried. 28 times snipers shot me from the White House, but didn’t hit, they were drunk. Employees then picked bullets from the walls. I keep it. And those who, on October 3, tried to break into the office of City Hall No. 2010, about .. when they saw my Kalash. There were officers among them, they understood, they left, and the rest ... Marauders, what can you take from them.
          Yes, two dozen shots were fired at the database building, even Shurik Av Rutsky, the Kremlin decided to bomb with a fright. But there was no parliament, 100 inadequate deputies, out of 1089 elected deputies, is that parliament? A gang of marauder leaders.
          P.S. One thing I don’t understand is why you are turned away from the truth, like unclean from holy water. It can be seen that souls, ruined through the fault of the putschists, do not give rest.
          1. d.gksueyjd
            d.gksueyjd 8 October 2013 22: 56
            0
            "28 times snipers shot at me from the White House!" Believe me, even I would not be a sniper 3 times. Why the number 28, lie like Yeltsin!
            1. vpimen2010
              vpimen2010 9 October 2013 00: 25
              0
              Well, pour something like you, great masters like ampilovy and rutskie. All for the most part on the corpses. Alien.
              you simply do not imagine the place of attempted murder committed 28 times. Five millimeter thick double glazed city hall buildings, curtains, the angle of the walls, the configuration of the building and a height of 20 floors.
              you generally write about nothing and everything, but nothing specifically, a virtual dreamer who knows nothing, but is sure that no one will guess about it. Go on.
      2. d.gksueyjd
        d.gksueyjd 8 October 2013 22: 20
        -1
        On account of this "commander" drunk hundreds of thousands of innocent people. I affirm: "Yeltsin is a liar and a traitor. The fact that he was brought to power illegally is confirmed even by Chubais. At the time of the execution of the BD, the Supreme Soviet was the only legal authority of the Russian Federation.
        All ugl * s violating the Oath are subject to the Military Tribunal. Some such as rooks and novels got theirs. List of other traitors: http: //supermnenie.mirtesen.ru/blog/43256476528/Eti- "l
        itsa "-strelyali-v-narod.-Zapomnite-ih -! /? padw = 1 & pad_page = 0 & utm_campaign = tra
        nsit & utm_source = footer & utm_medium = page_0
        1. vpimen2010
          vpimen2010 9 October 2013 00: 30
          0
          you do not accidentally ampil? White and fluffy ampils.
          President Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin is worthy of the people who elected him their president.
          1. d.gksueyjd
            d.gksueyjd 9 October 2013 00: 41
            0
            The election of Yeltsin by the people is falsification, which even Chubais confirmed! I ask you not to drag the Russian people to this alcoholic!
            What Yeltsin did for the Russian Federation, the people of the Russian Federation will disentangle more than a dozen years. I personally saw the cause of this alcoholic’s ambitions from Moscow to Petropavlovsk, not to mention the former Soviet republics. He may have thrown this extraordinary rank and 30 silver coins from the lord's shoulder, and honest officers for 6-7 months did not receive any allowance. Only with the advent of GDP did changes for the better begin.
            1. vpimen2010
              vpimen2010 10 October 2013 01: 46
              0
              Maybe, but in 1996, three years after the 1993 coup.
      3. d.gksueyjd
        d.gksueyjd 8 October 2013 23: 08
        0
        On account of this "commander" hundreds of thousands of innocent victims. I AFFIRM - Yeltsin, a liar and a traitor! Even Chubais admitted that Yeltsin was "elected" illegally. The Supreme Soviet was the only legal authority of the Russian Federation. All "officers" who took part in the coup of 1993 are criminals who have violated the Oath and are subject to the Military Tribunal!
        1. vpimen2010
          vpimen2010 9 October 2013 00: 35
          0
          exactly ampilov. he also APPROVES, and ALKSNIS also APPROVES, and the Rutsk affirm, and the people live quietly, work, increase fertility and enjoy life, and deep into the drum such APPROVERS are, I firmly affirm to you!
          Amnesty applies to all participants in the events of the 1993 rebellion.
          1. d.gksueyjd
            d.gksueyjd 9 October 2013 00: 49
            0
            By this decree, Yeltsin primarily contributed to ending the investigation into the reasons for the execution of the Supreme Council and in fact granted amnesty to war criminals! The people of the Russian Federation live and rejoice contrary to the wishes of Yeltsin and his ilk!
            1. vpimen2010
              vpimen2010 9 October 2013 14: 02
              0
              you are an uneducated person, dense and ignorant. Have the audacity to talk about things, the mind and understanding of your inaccessible.
              An amnesty to end the criminal prosecution of the instigators of the civil war: Av Rutskoi and the rest of the gang of rebels, contrary to the will of Boris Borisovich Yeltsin, February 23, 1994, was adopted by the State Duma, in which the majority had a commune-zoid.
              Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin was categorically against the adoption of an amnesty, it was Yeltsin who insisted on the investigation of all the crimes committed by the pogromists.
              But the adoption of the decree on amnesty is attributed to the exclusive competence of the State Duma, the communist majority of which did everything possible to prevent the investigation of the crimes they committed in order to avoid responsibility for the death they sent to storm the law and the state of people.
              It was on such as "v s", in most of the deceived, uneducated and incapable of independent reasoning, that the rebels were betting. Which led to the death of 146 people.
  11. Snoop
    Snoop 7 October 2013 15: 11
    +3
    Everything that I watched on TV about these events is complete bullshit. It turns out that we must thank Yeltsin for stopping the civilian in this way. I remember again Svanidze with his face distorted with anger - ... red-brown. And then there was a new stamp: in October 93 Yeltsin stopped the civil war, in October 17 Lenin unleashed it. Although the civilian started later. Before that, there was a so-called "triumphal march of Soviet power", almost all the provinces accepted it. And then the Czechs and all that.
    They cover Yeltsin’s deed with beautiful words. In fact, he then sought sole power, that's all, the parliament then prevented this.
    1. d.gksueyjd
      d.gksueyjd 9 October 2013 00: 14
      0
      You are right, absolutely right! I want to add that in the Supreme Council the majority of deputies were, to put it mildly, not very respected by their people, but they represented the legitimate authority of the Russian Federation. And vpimen2010 is one of those who put on a maroon beret on Yeltsin, disgracing the special forces!
      1. vpimen2010
        vpimen2010 9 October 2013 14: 28
        0
        The supreme power in Russia at that time was represented by: the highest executive-administrative and supreme commander-in-chief by all armed forces — the President, Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin and the highest legislative parliament — the Congress of People’s Deputies, consisting of 1089 people’s deputies.
        For the period between meetings of the Congress, part of its legislative powers related to the preparation of fundamental laws for consideration by the Congress was vested in the Supreme Council, consisting of 250 deputies, i.e. less than a quarter of the Russian Parliament (Congress of People's Deputies).
        Being the president of Russia is more difficult than conquering the maroon spetsnaz, which no one can defame. And first of all, to people who are ignorant and uneducated, such as the writing nonsense stated above.
  12. samoletil18
    samoletil18 7 October 2013 15: 22
    +1
    20 years ago, we simply breathed a sigh of relief that a civil war had not happened. And about looting then on TV, and on the radio, and in the press. Only around already the brothers ruled the ball. And about the looters: well, who else did Yeltsin rely on! I thought so then, because I didn’t like either one or the other. Although now, having forgotten about the Barkashevists and the like, he would have morally supported the vanquished. And then only the power squabble is visible. And they did not care about the victims.
    1. Denis
      Denis 7 October 2013 18: 24
      0
      Quote: samoletil18
      only squabble for power. And they did not care about the victims
      That's the whole interpretation of events. Briefly and clearly, + you
  13. Yarosvet
    Yarosvet 7 October 2013 15: 44
    0
    ---------------------------------------------
    1. vpimen2010
      vpimen2010 8 October 2013 14: 10
      -1
      Time puts everything in its place. And all the secrets become apparent. At first A. Nevzorov said that he had watched V. Zorkin and R. Khasbulatov whispering behind a curtain-screen while negotiating the wording you quoted and the resolution of Const. Courts: The fact that V. Zorkin was cheating with the six between the Kremlin and the White House. And recently, in an interview, Khasbulatov himself said that after Yeltsin’s deprivation, he saw only Zorkin in his place, provided that the president will be pocketed and the country will be ruled he, at the head of the Supreme Council. So this couple is already September 21, and they had previously conspired and acted in their own interests.
      The removal from power of the president is a whole and complex mechanism, the decree shown by you is an important, but not the main and decisive part of this mechanism. The president can deprive the authorities ONLY of the Congress of People's Deputies, and these are 1089 people's deputies, and not a bunch of conspirators from 131 deputies who appointed the president of Av Rutsky, illegally removing Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin from power.
      P.S. You showed the Court of Justice ruling, that is, figuratively the wheel and called it a car. No car
      it’s not only one wheel, but also an engine, chassis, transmission, ignition, cooling, brake system, etc., etc. ... So this is not a smart statement, in the style of a possessed ampilov or rutskoi about the illegitimacy of all power in Russia, this is to the naval or straight to a mental hospital. Doctors and provocateurs love these, in every way possible.
  14. zub46
    zub46 7 October 2013 17: 09
    -1
    Then I saw the marauders in their literal sense for the first time in my life. No sooner had they brought the defenders from the White House to the buses of Rutskoi and Khas, when they were still shooting inside, a crowd rushed through the doors at the right end into the building. Three to five minutes later, the first earners appeared from there. They dragged themselves away from huge framed pictures and ending with teapots. But, to give credit, the police quickly intervened in the situation. About "snipers": On October 3, I saw with my own eyes people periodically appearing in window openings from the 10th and approximately 15th floors of the White House, armed with long weapons, from a distance similar to SVD or PK. They fired singles into the crowd, hit the onlookers, to which the heroic ambulance doctors immediately made their way. A couple of times in a short line in the direction of tanks on the bridge and people around. The ricochets from the steel structures of the bridge and the granite curbs of the road on the bridge itself were impossible to miss. I went downstairs and watched further from the lattice of the Moskva River embankment, finding myself completely unclaimed for the first time in more than two decades. The period of life began on very free breads.
    1. Denis
      Denis 7 October 2013 18: 34
      +2
      Quote: zub46
      armed with long weapons from a distance resembling SVD or PC. Shot solo into the crowd
      How are you with the materiel?
      They only have a lot in common and what they shoot. A sniper with a PC is not funny, and SVD shoots only single shots, it does not shoot in bursts
      Quote: zub46
      The period of life began on very free loaves.
      And before that, what and where were you allowed to ask?
      1. zub46
        zub46 8 October 2013 13: 37
        0
        From 200-300 meters in a short time it is difficult to distinguish Dragunovka from the PKK, will you agree? I ask for a brief biography in the profile.
        1. Denis
          Denis 9 October 2013 13: 37
          +1
          Quote: zub46
          It’s difficult to distinguish Dragunovka from the PKK in 200-300 meters in a short time, will you agree?
          I agree. Only if a sniper is seen from 200-300 meters even for a short time, is it already bad i.e. dead sniper
          A lot of tales of the type of Tbilisi sapper blades are distributed by the gossips quietly knowing from which side the AK cartridge is thrown away. Especially in articles affecting politics. Remember how many things ... surfaced before the elections. And ... it’s not from political views, but from that that the site is messing with them

          We woke up because somewhere above our heads loudly and often hit KPVT
          Question to an eyewitness, is this possible there? Someone who, but you understand that it’s not a slingshot for glass and lights
  15. Black
    Black 7 October 2013 17: 56
    +2
    Quote: v.lyamkin
    Yes, most people did not understand what was happening.

    yes, yes .... Has everything become clear now? Who pushed Boriska, who paid for his "pusher", and what goals did he set? who was behind the suddenly daring - Khazbulat, and what happened to the head of the Pilot "calling" aviation, and asking not to cut down birches in the Kremlin? ...
    1. vpimen2010
      vpimen2010 8 October 2013 05: 46
      0
      The pilot, whom Boris Nikolaevich invited to his team and actually appointed vice president, was never friends with his head.
      But to bomb it in its part, and the politician, he didn’t know what it was without a politician. He was put to agriculture, that’s why he would increase milk production and productivity. He wanted to,
  16. d.gksueyjd
    d.gksueyjd 8 October 2013 22: 44
    -1
    Directly assaulting the House of Soviets was led by Minister of Defense P. Grachev (dead), he was assisted by a deputy. Minister of Defense General K. Kobets (dead). Assistant General Kobets was General D. Volkogonov (dead). (According to Yu. Voronin, in the midst of the execution of the White House, he told him by telephone: “The situation has changed. The President, as the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, signed an order to the Minister of Defense to storm the House of Soviets and took full responsibility. We will repress the putsch at all costs. Moscow will be guided by the forces of the army. ")
    The military units participating in the assault and their commanders:
    2nd Guards Motorized Rifle (Taman) Division, commander - Major General Valery Gennevich Evnevich.
    4th Guards Tank (Kantemirovskaya) Division, commander - Major General Polyakov Boris Nikolaevich.
    27th separate motorized rifle brigade (Teply Stan), commander - Colonel Denisov Alexander Nikolaevich.
    106th airborne division, commander - Colonel Savilov Evgeny Yuryevich.
    16th Special Forces Brigade, commander - Colonel Tishin Evgeny Vasilievich.
    216th Special Forces Battalion, Commander - Lieutenant Colonel Kolygin Viktor Dmitrievich.

    The following officers of the 106th Airborne Forces showed the greatest zeal in preparing for the assault:
    regiment commander Lt. Col. Ignatov A.S.,
    chief of staff of the regiment, lieutenant colonel Istrenko AS,
    battalion commander S. Khomenko,
    commander of the battalion, captain Susukin A.V.,

    as well as officers of the Taman Division:
    deputy Division commander Lt. Col. Mezhov A.R.,
    regiment commander Lt. Col. Kadatsky V.L.,
    regiment commander lieutenant colonel Arkhipov Yu.V.
    Performers of criminal orders from the 12th tank regiment of the 4th (Kantemirovsky) tank division, who made up the volunteer crews, shot at the House of Soviets:
    deputy tank battalion commander Major I. Petrakov,
    deputy Major Brulevich V.V., commander of a tank battalion,
    Major Rudoi PK, battalion commander,
    reconnaissance battalion commander lieutenant colonel A.V. Yermolin,
    commander of the tank battalion major Serebryakov VB,
    deputy Captain Maslennikov A.I., commander of a motorized rifle battalion,
    reconnaissance company commander captain S.A. Bashmakov
    How the killers were paid:
    Officers, participants in the storming of the House of Soviets, were paid 5 million rubles (about $ 4200) each as remuneration, riot policemen were given twice 200 thousand rubles (about $ 330), ordinary soldiers received 100 thousand rubles, and so on.

    In all, apparently, at least 11 billion rubles ($ 9 million) was spent on the promotion of those who excelled especially - such an amount was removed from the factory of Goznak and ... disappeared (!
    1. vpimen2010
      vpimen2010 9 October 2013 00: 04
      0
      Glory to you, the officers who executed the president’s order and protected Russia from collapse, the civil war and the millions of people killed. You don’t let what happened in Libya and what is happening in Syria now! Bow to you and thanks, comrade officers.

      P.S. someone is interested in money from Gosnak, you are honored, integrity and the civil world of the motherland!
      1. d.gksueyjd
        d.gksueyjd 9 October 2013 00: 27
        0
        I remind you that according to the oath, they were OBLIGED to follow the instructions of the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation. Breaking the oath is a war crime and has no statute of limitations. We are not talking about simple executors of the order, but about the PERSONS GIVING THE ILLEGAL ORDER. Further, thanks to Yeltsin, the Chechen war began. I am not delighted with Khasbulaty and Rutskoi, but it is the Supreme Soviet that would not allow a civil war. And if you want glory for honest officers, remember L. Rokhlin - a real officer. And the "officers" from the incomplete list (above comments) given by me are traitors and war criminals !!!
        1. vpimen2010
          vpimen2010 11 October 2013 19: 27
          0
          According to the oath, they are obliged to carry out the orders of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, and the President of the country Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin! And they both "Alpha" and "Vityaz", Yeltsin's order, carried out.
  17. d.gksueyjd
    d.gksueyjd 8 October 2013 23: 26
    0
    In 2003, Evgeny Kirichenko and I made the film "Black October of the White House", on the tenth anniversary of the execution of Parliament. Someday I will write about it in detail. There is a lot to say. And about what the investigation established: no shots were fired from the weapons in the White House, and how a schoolboy who wanted to “see the story with his own eyes” bled for four hours under the balcony of the apartment building with a bullet in his stomach, and about how two riot policemen threw off the roof, shooting at their feet, and how a sniper shot a 12-year-old girl who came to the window to see the rallies and much more.
    The film was made for NTV. This was, of course, not the NTV, but there still remained some kind of backlash for freedom of speech (although after Kirichenko’s broadcast, access to television was closed tightly).
    1. vpimen2010
      vpimen2010 9 October 2013 14: 41
      0
      Well, yes, NTV owned by the seven-banker-oligarch Gusinsky? And what is interesting that people who do not have basic knowledge, such masters of disinformation as "you" can film and show to the gullible people? To provoke a new fratricide?
      And the Congress was on the side of Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin, which the army confirmed by following the order of the Commander-in-Chief Yeltsin. Who is Shurik Av Rutskiy, maybe a politician? I don’t know this. Maybe a commander? Also no one had heard of him.
      In my opinion, it is, according to the Hamburg account, a traitor:
      - left the communists, splitting their single faction, created his own: "Communists for Democracy", that is, betrayed his party comrades;
      - betrayed Yeltsin, who made of a simple deputy, vice president;
      - betrayed his Supreme Commander-in-Chief, who awarded him the rank of general, i.e. the commander who handed him a star on general's epaulettes;
      - betrayed the voters who voted for Yeltsin and who was chosen by him as an assistant, a previously unknown colonel colonel Avutsky;
      - betrayed his comrades-in-arms, urging them to betray: bomb the Kremlin and their Supreme Commander, who was there; not a single officer in the world descended to such baseness. Judah, he was not an officer.
      - betrayed Rodin, ordering the people who believed him to storm the city hall and the television center, i.e. to kill his compatriots, other citizens and voters of Russia, and thereby started a civil war in the country, something that the enemies of Russia have always sought, on his hands is the blood of deceived and killed military, civil and police officers, citizens of our country. Even a corporal would not have realized commit so many betrayals and meanness made av rutskim.
      I can’t forget the words of Alexander Vasilyevich Korzhakov about this type: "Generals do not surrender three times."
      It is said about him and made by him like a stigma. Forever. Traitor! Forever. Traitor!