And our tanks are fast

57
Jumping on tanks have always been considered a primordially Russian counter, but no:

And our tanks are fast

BT-7 in the jump into the river


Americans are not far behind


And here the British joined the race on Cromwell


Americans step on heels, even old man Lee is lifted into the air


Russians on T-80U again break out in front




Germans join the race


Jews are pulling up


Belarusians

And where are the Americans ?? And here is where

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    7 October 2013 07: 43
    from the Don.
    Where are the Americans? With burgers inside the stomach, do you really jump? It's a bit heavy, though!
    1. +7
      7 October 2013 07: 49
      Is this how the teams are preparing for the tank biathlon?))) I will laugh very much when I see this with an abramsa such a box!)
      laughing laughing laughing
      1. +13
        7 October 2013 08: 03
        The last photo is generally class!
        1. maxvet
          +5
          7 October 2013 08: 47
          And what kind of Belarusian miracle, the gun seems to be not MBT, then why is it in the line?
          1. +4
            7 October 2013 09: 32
            Combat reconnaissance vehicle 2T "Stalker".
            1. 0
              16 October 2013 00: 22
              And you don’t know, the elephant is the only animal that cannot jump.
          2. 0
            7 October 2013 13: 07
            Quote: maxvet
            And what a Belarusian miracle, the gun seems to be not MBT

            This is a brm combat reconnaissance. car; subclass bmp-2 ...........?
    2. +3
      7 October 2013 10: 14
      Bred here ... LYALA !!! there he is Abrams right under the t-80u photo, not high but jumping)))
      1. 0
        7 October 2013 10: 24
        Quote: Patton5
        there he is Abrams right under the t-80u photo, not high but jumping

        - In my opinion, judging by the tail and rounded ears, this is a low jumping creature - of the cat's kind, a typical leopard.
        And even if Abrams jumped, it was from pain when his "Metis" stung.
        1. +1
          7 October 2013 10: 34
          I do not want to spoil patriotic moods, but the author would have to pick out the photo more carefully. This is an abrams and nothing else hi
      2. 0
        7 October 2013 11: 46
        Type of flea, savvy Russian Lefty? wink
      3. +2
        7 October 2013 12: 06
        Quote: Patton5
        not high but jumping

        In Abu Dhabi, one such one, all jewelry in the form of side screens, etc. immediately flew off and went over the chassis with replacements at all.
        Heavy however.
      4. 0
        7 October 2013 13: 10
        Quote: Patton5
        not high but jumping

        ..... and this, what a crocodile, he jumps but inferior, inferior
  2. +5
    7 October 2013 07: 43
    Here it is, cruelty to Ambrams !!! belay
  3. Alikovo
    +4
    7 October 2013 07: 45
    it’s easier for amers to blow up abrams than to make them jump like a T-90.
    1. +1
      7 October 2013 12: 10
      Quote: Alikovo
      jump like a T-90.

      At least half as much as the T-80U will learn to jump, then talk about its laudable jumping ability as a reference for comparison.
  4. +7
    7 October 2013 07: 47
    Yes, the abrams could not, well, could not ...
    And the most elegant BT jumps, then they were called flying tanks
    1. Hon
      +3
      7 October 2013 09: 40
      Quote: Denis
      And the most elegant BT jumps, then they were called flying tanks

      Actually, BT is a development of American engineers.
      1. 0
        7 October 2013 12: 20
        The American inventor sold the councils only the concept of the structure of the body. and a power plant with a transmission is entirely the merit of Soviet engineers. And as you probably think, the hull itself will not fly.
        1. netMolotov
          +2
          7 October 2013 15: 44
          Muadipus - sold to the councils only the concept of the structure of the hull.

          It is a pity that there is no smile - hand face! Before you write this - well, at least read something.
          1. -1
            8 October 2013 00: 17

            Well, yes, I made a little inaccuracy, although I'm not far from the truth

            by sabzh from 11 minutes.

            sad
        2. Hon
          0
          10 October 2013 20: 39
          Have you heard anything about "Christie's suspension"?
          1. 0
            11 October 2013 12: 41
            Quote: Hon
            Have you heard anything about "Christie's suspension"?

            In the sense of ?
      2. 0
        7 October 2013 12: 23
        Quote: Hon
        Actually, BT is a development of American engineers.

        Well, and what?
        If you are about Christie, then say that the fifth beta was almost one with the one sold to him in the 30th prototype.
        And the seven is already the Kharkov KB _ Bondarenko, Morozov, Doroshenko, Kurasov, Veselovsky, Tarshinov.
        In theory, as a 34-ku

        and 55-ku (
        undercarriage: ... rubberized rollers of large diameter, .... on each side
        ) can be ranked among the Americans.
        1. netMolotov
          0
          7 October 2013 16: 01
          Cynic (1) -Well, so what?

          Well, really, well, and what? Well, and which of the tanks you cited as an example is BT. Well, so offhand point a finger!
          1. 0
            7 October 2013 17: 16
            Quote: netMolotov
            Well, which of the tanks you cited as an example is BT

            The first . True BT-7M or A-8, as you like best.
            Strange You in a bite by birth beta, but personally not familiar with it?
  5. +12
    7 October 2013 07: 57
    Sorry for the stupid question, why do tanks jump? What is the practical significance of this trick? It is clear that this shows that the tank is powerful, fast, strong (very), and so on, but in real combat, is there really such a place for such feints? I am not an expert, I want to figure it out! Connoisseurs, respond.
    1. +6
      7 October 2013 08: 07
      Quote: diver1977
      Sorry for the stupid question, why do tanks jump? What is the practical significance of this trick?

      Overcoming the counter-escarp. Quickly. So, if possible without losses, without substituting the top of the tank.
      1. +4
        7 October 2013 10: 02
        Enlighten, in the war of Doomsday the Jews crumbled our tanks in a jump, or they no longer crawled from old age. Our boasts are over the edge, a tank biathlon looked last Saturday, something got up without jumping, but in battle? Lada you, and praise the tanks, I drive - it does not break, strange patriotism.
    2. +3
      7 October 2013 08: 12
      Overcoming anti-tank obstacles. The more maneuverable and faster the tank is on the battlefield, the more difficult it is to hook the PTO.
    3. +4
      7 October 2013 08: 16
      Quote: diver1977
      but in real combat, is there really such a feint?
      In the documentary I saw how BT jumps the rivulet, everything is faster than building a bridge under fire
      And also anti-tank ditches
    4. +6
      7 October 2013 08: 20
      No need to jump. The optimal speed is about 30. Another question - jumping shows the possibilities, incl. on mobility, safety factor. Well, beautiful. And if someone foolishly jumped, the deputy engineer of the battalion ..... will turn out.
      And on article the beauty of the last photo.
    5. Ivan Pavlov
      -2
      7 October 2013 08: 27
      yes it doesn’t matter .. the hunt is simply vomiting ... Anyway, a lot of loafers divorced
      1. stroporez
        +2
        7 October 2013 12: 31
        I beg your pardon, but you yourself ----- "in business" ???
  6. 0
    7 October 2013 08: 00
    It is correctly sung: - "The armor is light, and our tanks are fast ..."! Thanks for the photo! I have never seen tanks flying like that, well, if only in the movies, but there you don't focus on it.
    1. Ivan Pavlov
      -2
      7 October 2013 08: 29
      the armor is strong! and the fact that it was light is also true of course. Burnt in packs
      1. +5
        7 October 2013 09: 13
        Viktor Suvorov has already written a bunch of books about "burning in batches". Although there is a lot of "foolishness", it's true about tanks. Sometimes it took one KV to set fire to 137 shells)))
        1. +1
          7 October 2013 10: 42
          We will say this: there were tanks with strong armor and there were fast tanks, so the song converges.
        2. +1
          7 October 2013 12: 34
          So KV did not jump. smile
      2. zmey_gadukin
        0
        7 October 2013 11: 40
        Yes, actually any tank can be burned
      3. 0
        7 October 2013 17: 19
        Well, a reservation, in a hurry! somehow in the afternoon somehow at work!
  7. ed65b
    +3
    7 October 2013 08: 51
    Photos are cool. Thanks to the author. especially for the photo of "old man Lee" I can imagine the state of the crew in this heap of metal with turrets. Respect.
  8. +2
    7 October 2013 08: 57
    Is this another portion of patriotism in the brain? Can Abrams Jump? Fuck knows, maybe it can’t, although Abrams’s specific power is not lower than that of Leopard 2. The question is, should he be able to jump on horseradish?
    1. +2
      7 October 2013 10: 45
      Imagine:
      Around the battle, you fly on the tank in the attack, everyone is aiming at you, but here you have a small hill, not big, 1,5-2 meters and suddenly you realize that there is a stop or braking and you will get a shell or a rocket on board or under the tower, it remains only to jump or die.
      1. +2
        7 October 2013 13: 58
        Quote: cth; fyn
        but here in front of you is a small hill, not big, 1,5-2 meters and suddenly you realize that there is a stop or braking and you will get a shell or a rocket on board or under the tower, you just have to jump or die.

        Well, of course. Wouldn't it be better to use this "gorchka" as a cover from the same shell or missile, and not to go on a rampage like Chapay on horseback?
        1. +1
          7 October 2013 17: 26
          If the "pea" has arisen suddenly, then I think it’s better not to slow down, otherwise, by the nose. It’s like a car, if you drive fast, and suddenly - a hole, it’s better not to slow down.
        2. 0
          7 October 2013 17: 44
          how is the cover? But what can the enemy’s uninhabited infantry remain behind? and while that forehead behind the hill hiding you the whole poop RPGami stuffed.
    2. fklj
      +3
      7 October 2013 11: 10
      Can Abrams Jump?

      Can! If you push him from Mount Ararat smile I just remembered the old joke.
  9. +1
    7 October 2013 09: 08
    And in Belarus, the second rink behind the torsion bar is broken or set at the wrong angle, as if the rest would not break when landing .....
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. vietnam7
    +4
    7 October 2013 09: 31
    But what, doesn’t the Abrams fly between the T80 and the leopard? Only low low.
    1. +3
      7 October 2013 10: 15
      at least one attentive)
    2. roial
      -1
      7 October 2013 10: 21
      That no, the same Leo.
  12. shitovmg
    +2
    7 October 2013 10: 05
    I liked the Americans! ...
    1. +7
      7 October 2013 10: 34
      To your health!
      1. +2
        7 October 2013 11: 53
        For comments on photos "*", although it's not entirely fair it turns out - different weight categories.
  13. vietnam7
    +1
    7 October 2013 10: 22
    Quote: Patton5
    at least one attentive)
    At one time, for knowledge of the technology, now probable friends were strictly asked
  14. +3
    7 October 2013 10: 22
    Art collage to the famous photo.
  15. vietnam7
    +2
    7 October 2013 10: 34
    Quote: roial
    That no, the same Leo.
    For a long time now they began to put on Leo Browning and the profile of the Abrashi gave him a plan?
  16. avg
    +3
    7 October 2013 11: 52
    When asked why the tank should jump, I will simply answer: "When the cosine reaches 9 in battle, sometimes you even want to jump with a pole." wink
  17. +2
    7 October 2013 13: 19
    Jumping the tank speaks about the reliability of the equipment, the load on some nodes when landing, God forbid what.
  18. +2
    7 October 2013 14: 04
    It’s interesting to jump with such weight as Merkava’s, it’s interesting to look at its suspension
  19. soldier's grandson
    0
    8 October 2013 09: 44
    why tanks should jump at all, it’s not included in the combat mission, in Iraq the Abrams showed superiority over the jumping ones

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"