Military Review

And our tanks are fast

57
Jumping on tanks have always been considered a primordially Russian counter, but no:


And our tanks are fast

BT-7 in the jump into the river


Americans are not far behind


And here the British joined the race on Cromwell


Americans step on heels, even old man Lee is lifted into the air


Russians on T-80U again break out in front




Germans join the race


Jews are pulling up


Belarusians

And where are the Americans ?? And here is where

Author:
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 7 October 2013 07: 43 New
    13
    from the Don.
    Where are the Americans? With burgers inside the stomach, do you really jump? It's a bit heavy, though!
    1. ben gun
      ben gun 7 October 2013 07: 49 New
      +7
      Is this how the teams are preparing for the tank biathlon?))) I will laugh very much when I see this with an abramsa such a box!)
      laughing laughing laughing
      1. tronin.maxim
        tronin.maxim 7 October 2013 08: 03 New
        13
        The last photo is generally class!
        1. maxvet
          maxvet 7 October 2013 08: 47 New
          +5
          And what kind of Belarusian miracle, the gun seems to be not MBT, then why is it in the line?
          1. Evgeniy-111
            Evgeniy-111 7 October 2013 09: 32 New
            +4
            2T Stalker reconnaissance fighting vehicle.
            1. crazyrom
              crazyrom 16 October 2013 00: 22 New
              0
              And you don’t know, the elephant is the only animal that cannot jump.
          2. edge
            edge 7 October 2013 13: 07 New
            0
            Quote: maxvet
            And what a Belarusian miracle, the gun seems to be not MBT

            This is a brm combat reconnaissance. car; subclass bmp-2 ...........?
    2. Patton5
      Patton5 7 October 2013 10: 14 New
      +3
      Bred here ... LYALA !!! there he is Abrams right under the t-80u photo, not high but jumping)))
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 7 October 2013 10: 24 New
        0
        Quote: Patton5
        there he is Abrams right under the t-80u photo, not high but jumping

        - In my opinion, judging by the tail and rounded ears, this is a low jumping creature - of the cat's kind, a typical leopard.
        And if Abrams jumped, it was in pain when his Metis stung.
        1. Patton5
          Patton5 7 October 2013 10: 34 New
          +1
          I do not want to spoil patriotic moods, but the author would have to pick out the photo more carefully. This is an abrams and nothing else hi
      2. Starover_Z
        Starover_Z 7 October 2013 11: 46 New
        0
        Type of flea, savvy Russian Lefty? wink
      3. Cynic
        Cynic 7 October 2013 12: 06 New
        +2
        Quote: Patton5
        not high but jumping

        In Abu Dhabi, one such one, all jewelry in the form of side screens, etc. immediately flew off and went over the chassis with replacements at all.
        Heavy however.
      4. edge
        edge 7 October 2013 13: 10 New
        0
        Quote: Patton5
        not high but jumping

        ..... and this, what a crocodile, he jumps but inferior, inferior
  2. Letnab
    Letnab 7 October 2013 07: 43 New
    +5
    Here it is, cruelty to Ambrams !!! belay
  3. Alikovo
    Alikovo 7 October 2013 07: 45 New
    +4
    it’s easier for amers to blow up abrams than to make them jump like a T-90.
    1. Cynic
      Cynic 7 October 2013 12: 10 New
      +1
      Quote: Alikovo
      jump like a T-90.

      At least half as much as the T-80U will learn to jump, then talk about its laudable jumping ability as a reference for comparison.
  4. Denis
    Denis 7 October 2013 07: 47 New
    +7
    Yes, the abrams could not, well, could not ...
    And the most elegant BT jumps, then they were called flying tanks
    1. Hon
      Hon 7 October 2013 09: 40 New
      +3
      Quote: Denis
      And the most elegant BT jumps, then they were called flying tanks

      Actually, BT is a development of American engineers.
      1. Muadipus
        Muadipus 7 October 2013 12: 20 New
        0
        The American inventor sold the councils only the concept of the structure of the body. and a power plant with a transmission is entirely the merit of Soviet engineers. And as you probably think, the hull itself will not fly.
        1. netMolotov
          netMolotov 7 October 2013 15: 44 New
          +2
          Muadipus - sold to the councils only the concept of the structure of the hull.

          It is a pity that there is no smile - hand face! Before you write this - well, at least read something.
          1. Muadipus
            Muadipus 8 October 2013 00: 17 New
            -1

            Well, yes, I made a little inaccuracy, although I'm not far from the truth

            by sabzh from 11 minutes.

            sad
        2. Hon
          Hon 10 October 2013 20: 39 New
          0
          Have you heard anything about Christie’s suspension?
          1. Cynic
            Cynic 11 October 2013 12: 41 New
            0
            Quote: Hon
            Have you heard anything about Christie’s suspension?

            In the sense of ?
      2. Cynic
        Cynic 7 October 2013 12: 23 New
        0
        Quote: Hon
        Actually, BT is a development of American engineers.

        Well, and what?
        If you are about Christie, then say that the fifth beta was almost one with the one sold to him in the 30th prototype.
        And the seven is already the Kharkov KB _ Bondarenko, Morozov, Doroshenko, Kurasov, Veselovsky, Tarshinov.
        In theory, as a 34-ku

        and 55-ku (
        undercarriage: ... rubberized rollers of large diameter, .... on each side
        ) can be ranked among the Americans.
        1. netMolotov
          netMolotov 7 October 2013 16: 01 New
          0
          Cynic (1) -Well, so what?

          Well, really, well, and what? Well, and which of the tanks you cited as an example is BT. Well, so offhand point a finger!
          1. Cynic
            Cynic 7 October 2013 17: 16 New
            0
            Quote: netMolotov
            Well, which of the tanks you cited as an example is BT

            The first . True BT-7M or A-8, as you like best.
            Strange You in a bite by birth beta, but personally not familiar with it?
  5. diver1977
    diver1977 7 October 2013 07: 57 New
    12
    Sorry for the stupid question, why do tanks jump? What is the practical significance of this trick? It is clear that this shows that the tank is powerful, fast, strong (very), and so on, but in real combat, is there really such a place for such feints? I am not an expert, I want to figure it out! Connoisseurs, respond.
    1. igordok
      igordok 7 October 2013 08: 07 New
      +6
      Quote: diver1977
      Sorry for the stupid question, why do tanks jump? What is the practical significance of this trick?

      Overcoming the counter-escarp. Quickly. So, if possible without losses, without substituting the top of the tank.
      1. varov14
        varov14 7 October 2013 10: 02 New
        +4
        Enlighten, in the war of Doomsday the Jews crumbled our tanks in a jump, or they no longer crawled from old age. Our boasts are over the edge, a tank biathlon looked last Saturday, something got up without jumping, but in battle? Lada you, and praise the tanks, I drive - it does not break, strange patriotism.
    2. Snoop
      Snoop 7 October 2013 08: 12 New
      +3
      Overcoming anti-tank obstacles. The more maneuverable and faster the tank is on the battlefield, the more difficult it is to hook the PTO.
    3. Denis
      Denis 7 October 2013 08: 16 New
      +4
      Quote: diver1977
      but in real combat, is there really such a feint?
      In the documentary I saw how BT jumps the rivulet, everything is faster than building a bridge under fire
      And also anti-tank ditches
    4. My address
      My address 7 October 2013 08: 20 New
      +6
      No need to jump. The optimal speed is about 30. Another question - jumping shows the possibilities, incl. on mobility, safety factor. Well, beautiful. And if someone foolishly jumped, the deputy engineer of the battalion ..... will turn out.
      And on article the beauty of the last photo.
    5. Ivan Pavlov
      Ivan Pavlov 7 October 2013 08: 27 New
      -2
      yes it doesn’t matter .. the hunt is simply vomiting ... Anyway, a lot of loafers divorced
      1. stroporez
        stroporez 7 October 2013 12: 31 New
        +2
        I apologize, but you yourself ----- "at work" ???
  6. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 7 October 2013 08: 00 New
    0
    It is correctly sung: - "The armor is light, and our tanks are fast ..."! Thanks for the photo! I’ve never seen tanks so “flying”, well, if only in the movies, but you don’t focus on it.
    1. Ivan Pavlov
      Ivan Pavlov 7 October 2013 08: 29 New
      -2
      the armor is strong! and the fact that it was light is also true of course. Burnt in packs
      1. roma-belij
        roma-belij 7 October 2013 09: 13 New
        +5
        Viktor Suvorov has already written a bunch of books about the "burnt bundles." Although there’s a lot of “dope” there, the truth is about tanks. To one KV set fire to 137 shells sometimes took)))
        1. cth; fyn
          cth; fyn 7 October 2013 10: 42 New
          +1
          We will say this: there were tanks with strong armor and there were fast tanks, so the song converges.
        2. Zymran
          Zymran 7 October 2013 12: 34 New
          +1
          So KV did not jump. smile
      2. zmey_gadukin
        zmey_gadukin 7 October 2013 11: 40 New
        0
        Yes, actually any tank can be burned
      3. ia-ai00
        ia-ai00 7 October 2013 17: 19 New
        0
        Well, a reservation, in a hurry! somehow in the afternoon somehow at work!
  7. ed65b
    ed65b 7 October 2013 08: 51 New
    +3
    Photos are cool. thanks to the author. especially for the picture "old man Lee" I represent the state of the crew in this heap of metal with turrets. Respect
  8. Nayhas
    Nayhas 7 October 2013 08: 57 New
    +2
    Is this another portion of patriotism in the brain? Can Abrams Jump? Fuck knows, maybe it can’t, although Abrams’s specific power is not lower than that of Leopard 2. The question is, should he be able to jump on horseradish?
    1. cth; fyn
      cth; fyn 7 October 2013 10: 45 New
      +2
      Imagine:
      Around the battle, you fly on the tank in the attack, everyone is aiming at you, but here you have a small hill, not big, 1,5-2 meters and suddenly you realize that there is a stop or braking and you will get a shell or a rocket on board or under the tower, it remains only to jump or die.
      1. Nayhas
        Nayhas 7 October 2013 13: 58 New
        +2
        Quote: cth; fyn
        but here in front of you is a small hill, not big, 1,5-2 meters and suddenly you realize that there is a stop or braking and you will get a shell or a rocket on board or under the tower, you just have to jump or die.

        Well, of course. But isn’t it better to use this “gorochka” as a cover from the same projectile or rocket, and not climb on the rampage like Chapai on a horse?
        1. ia-ai00
          ia-ai00 7 October 2013 17: 26 New
          +1
          If the "gorochka" arose suddenly, then I think it’s better not to slow down, otherwise, by the nose. It’s like a car, if you drive fast, and suddenly - a hole, it’s better not to slow down.
        2. cth; fyn
          cth; fyn 7 October 2013 17: 44 New
          0
          how is the cover? But what can the enemy’s uninhabited infantry remain behind? and while that forehead behind the hill hiding you the whole poop RPGami stuffed.
    2. fklj
      fklj 7 October 2013 11: 10 New
      +3
      Can Abrams Jump?

      Can! If you push him from Mount Ararat smile I just remembered the old joke.
  9. kostik1301
    kostik1301 7 October 2013 09: 08 New
    +1
    And in Belarus, the second rink behind the torsion bar is broken or set at the wrong angle, as if the rest would not break when landing .....
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. vietnam7
    vietnam7 7 October 2013 09: 31 New
    +4
    But what, doesn’t the Abrams fly between the T80 and the leopard? Only low low.
    1. Patton5
      Patton5 7 October 2013 10: 15 New
      +3
      at least one attentive)
    2. roial
      7 October 2013 10: 21 New
      -1
      That no, the same Leo.
  12. shitovmg
    shitovmg 7 October 2013 10: 05 New
    +2
    I liked the Americans! ...
    1. cth; fyn
      cth; fyn 7 October 2013 10: 34 New
      +7
      To your health!
      1. Starover_Z
        Starover_Z 7 October 2013 11: 53 New
        +2
        For comments on photos "*", although it’s not entirely honest, it’s different weight categories.
  13. vietnam7
    vietnam7 7 October 2013 10: 22 New
    +1
    Quote: Patton5
    at least one attentive)
    At one time, for knowledge of the technology, now probable friends were strictly asked
  14. cth; fyn
    cth; fyn 7 October 2013 10: 22 New
    +3
    Art collage to the famous photo.
  15. vietnam7
    vietnam7 7 October 2013 10: 34 New
    +2
    Quote: roial
    That no, the same Leo.
    For a long time now they began to put on Leo Browning and the profile of the Abrashi gave him a plan?
  16. avg
    avg 7 October 2013 11: 52 New
    +3
    To the question why the tank should jump, I’ll answer simply: “When the cosine reaches 9 in battle, sometimes you even want to jump with the pole”. wink
  17. Russ69
    Russ69 7 October 2013 13: 19 New
    +2
    Jumping the tank speaks about the reliability of the equipment, the load on some nodes when landing, God forbid what.
  18. user
    user 7 October 2013 14: 04 New
    +2
    It’s interesting to jump with such weight as Merkava’s, it’s interesting to look at its suspension
  19. soldier's grandson
    soldier's grandson 8 October 2013 09: 44 New
    0
    why tanks should jump at all, it’s not included in the combat mission, in Iraq the Abrams showed superiority over the jumping ones