Military Review

Greenpeace. Fighters for the "greens"

196
In the world today, there are two main types of environmental organizations. The former earn financial resources in order to allocate them for the protection of the environment, the restoration of populations of endangered animals, the creation of nature conservation zones and reserves. Others use environmental problems (and often pseudo-problems) to earn money. As they say, organizations act with accuracy “to the contrary”. Let's try to guess what type of organization Greenpeace belongs to? You won’t have to guess for a long time, if only because the organization’s budget has grown more than 11 times over the past two decades (from 30 to 350 million dollars) and continues to grow today, but this organization is in no hurry to realize effective environmental projects except for PR-projects that attract attention.


Greenpeace. Fighters for the "greens"


Let's approach consideration of a question and on the other hand. What do you think, what kind of state segment should, by definition, an environmental organization expand if its budget increases significantly? Well, it is understandable, the reader will say: the staff of environmentalists ... in fact, environmentalists, experts in the study of flora and fauna. But it turns out that this seemingly obvious trend in Greenpeace does not work. Of course, the staff of people who call themselves “ecologists” is also growing there, but for some reason, the staff of professional lawyers is growing more ... Nobody argues that the rights of environmental organization employees should be protected, but when the staff of lawyers becomes comparable in number with a staff of "environmentalists", and the legal questions of the employees themselves are put up above environmental issues, this leads to certain thoughts ...

Greenpeace has 20 regional and 27 so-called national offices (including in Russia), and each of these offices is served by a professional legal group. In Russia, advocate work in the direction of Greenpeace is carried out by lawyer Irina Isakova, who today condemns the very fact of the detention of activists on the Prirazlomnaya platform and accusing them of piracy.

Irina Isakova (Greenpeace International lawyer):
Of course, allegations of piracy are not substantiated and not proven. Evidence must be sufficient to charge. The evidence of the investigation is irrelevant - the protocol of interrogation of witnesses does not contain specific facts that indicate a particular person. Evidence from the investigation is also unacceptable, as it was collected in violation of the law. For example, the detention took place for the most part without the presence of lawyers. We will appeal against illegal actions of both investigative and judicial authorities.


It is noteworthy that the reception room of Mrs Isakova is not a hut at all, covered with moss in a green oak forest, as one would expect with a lawyer of an environmental organization, but an office in the center of the capital. Barely distracting from her “green” concerns in Greenpeace, Irina Ivanovna does not leave her other clients in legal trouble. Isakova’s clients include the singer Anastasia Stotskaya, for whom a lawyer knocks out money from her producers ... Apparently, after social events and talks with producers of Russian “pop stars”, the lawyer again suffers an irresistible craving for the protection of “defenders” of the Arctic ...

We return, however, directly to Greenpeace. This movement itself began to take shape in the 60s of the last century, when tests were conducted in Alaska weapons mass destruction. Initially, the organization may have looked like a kind of association of romantic enthusiasts who, by their activity, wanted to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Over time, a certain circle of people who, frankly speaking, have a tenth relation to environmental romance, decided that this project can be a good idea. However, in order to make the earnings not look obvious, an excellent screen was conceived in the form that the organization does not take money from business structures and from state authorities, but will exist only with money from benefactors ...

For the number of such benefactors to grow steadily, it was necessary and to act accordingly. They tried to attract people not to environmental protection projects, but to sentimental photographic and video materials on how activists fight for this environment ... Arrive in northern latitudes in a fur hat, down jacket and leather shoes, take a picture and put photos on the background of a dead cub seals in print, arrive on an SUV that “eats” 20 liters per hundred kilometers, at a gas station, chained yourself to a gas station, protesting against oil production, videotaped (without taking your SUV into the frame) and spread around the world ... Organize rock concerts, in which young people and girls are often “under sympathy” with the narcotic high for the fighters for the “greens”, buying tickets and “foolishness” replenishing the growing budget and appeasing appetites.

Sympathizers, of course, were before, and continue to multiply now. After seeing a photo of a bloody hemmy, many of course would like to help. And you will want to help yourself ... But the whole thing is that Greenpeace is not going to do anything that stops barbaric fishing. The heads of the current Greenpeace are absolutely not interested in the future of Arctic animals, the process of oil production, or the threat of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. They are interested in something else - how you can earn here. At the same time, some activists are really sure that they are helping nature, as are the holders of the “controlling stake” Greenpeace. The psychological principle of self-conviction works when a person tries to justify his activity by inventing new and new variants of this justification. In order to convince themselves, first of all, of themselves, and then of those around them, activists and their chiefs use posters and shots with heart-breaking plots and texts, necessarily against a bright background, always with arshin letters, necessarily bloodied bodies of animals, frustrated children and other components PR campaigns.

To understand how this works, it is enough to visit any Greenpeace site. We enter the electronic office of the organization in Russia. The first thing that catches your eye is the phrase “Make a donation” under the photo of an almost crying baby, holding a soft toy of a white and dirty bear in his hands. On the other site - English-speaking - a photo of a dead dolphin and bloody jets in sea water, on the next photo - Lalita Ramdas (chairman of the board) in Hindu vestments and a characteristic bindi point on the forehead. And again the call to make a donation. Agree, the psychological effect is amazing. He frankly gives methods, if not totalitarian sects, then something very similar ... It wouldn’t be enough to write: “If you like nature, send us a hundred bucks, brother! Hallelujah! ”

On the pages of the site, however, we will not find information about which nature reserves or nature conservation areas were discovered by activists, what successes in the fight against poachers were demonstrated, but we will find this - and in large numbers:

Greenpeace's response to unsubstantiated statements by the Russian authorities and some media

Greenpeace lawyers appealed to the Investigative Committee

Greenpeace ship detained illegally: legal analysis

Greenpeace International attorneys' statements regarding the first results of the trial (author’s comment on Arctic Sunrise activists)

Yes, everything is fine, guys. But where is the ecological work? If you yourself believe that you are an environmental organization, then at least let those who donate their donations believe it. But it’s definitely not enough to do with some biting green letters. Where are the results directly?

So after all these questions from Greenpeace will still remain unanswered. Why? Because this organization does not consider it necessary to respond to what is outside its field of interest. Here is one of the typical examples. Repeatedly, the question of the destructive development of a nickel deposit on the lands of the Khopersky Reserve has been raised on our resource. Representatives of Russian environmental organizations have repeatedly appealed to Greenpeace for help, but ...

Here is the answer of one of the leaders of the Greenpeace division in Russia, Mikhail Kreindlin:

It is not yet possible to determine what kind of damage will be caused by the nickel mining enterprise of the Khopyorsky Reserve, since environmentalists have practically no information about the new nickel mining project.

I don’t know what kind of wind rose there is, calculations haven’t been seen, if emissions will fly, what emissions will fly towards the reserve, it’s impossible to say, at least according to the information we have. The same applies to water resources, near the river Khoper, which flows through the reserve. If there are injections into the river, then, of course, the region, including the reserve, may be damaged.


That is, with respect to the Khopersky Reserve, Greenpeace answers in the style “I don't know”, “maybe”, “impossible to say”, “river” - this is normal, but on the “Prirazlomnaya” these guys immediately, you know, determined everything ... What is characteristic , no wind rose was needed ... Only some calculations a decade ago, which were even criticized in the UN (well, you understand why the word “even” was used).

Awesome job, isn't it? And all because there is not a lot of money to help the “protection” of the Khopersky Reserve ... It’s probably impossible to take a photo against the dead muskrat of the activists - you need to catch up with her live first ... Another thing is stationary Prirazlomnaya and other similar projects - noise a lot, budget revenues, too, lawyers rub their hands - in general, the fighters for the "greens" are all in the works, like a bee ...
Author:
196 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. givargi
    givargi 5 October 2013 07: 43 New
    54
    Greenpeace is given by such personalities as Lady Gaga and other Hollywood scum. You don’t even think for a second that they are working against the interests of Russia and its people.
    1. experienced
      experienced 5 October 2013 10: 11 New
      45
      Alexey Volodin raised a good topic hi Greenpeace has long been another pawn in the clan rivalry of competitors. They are paid money and they, like mongrels attack who they say ...
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 5 October 2013 10: 35 New
        29
        Quote: seasoned
        Greenpeace has long been another pawn in the clan rivalry of competitors. They are paid money and they, like mongrel attack someone they say ..

        This is not a clan struggle, this is a struggle for the energy market, but this is state policy.
        If Russia can also produce platforms, its equipment as at Prirazlomnaya, then the profit of Western companies will decrease, they will no longer be called into joint projects.
        The West needs to bind us with its joint projects, impose obligations. They are very afraid of our independence.
        1. Setrac
          Setrac 5 October 2013 15: 50 New
          12
          Quote: APASUS
          If Russia can also produce platforms, its equipment as at Prirazlomnaya, then the profit of Western companies will decrease, they will no longer be called into joint projects.

          Therefore, the greensos were bored on the barge, because it is all Made in Russia.
          1. bif
            bif 5 October 2013 21: 43 New
            11
            Among sponsors can be found Shell foundation (oil), Ford, Honda, Pacific gas and Electric Corporation (power plants, oil), BP (British Petrol - oil company), Goldman Sachs (bank) ... WHO TREASURES A GIRL, THERE IS DANCING HER.
            In general, "dirty organization" - "Sponsorship gifts for this organization can be deducted from the amount subject to tax. Greenpeace, however, then transfers this money to the account of its other division, which is not exempt from taxes. And sponsorship gifts to this division cannot be deducted from the tax base.

            I don’t know how anyone, but for me it looks like laundering dirty money. Thus, Greenpeace uses the money donated to charity to carry out various semi-criminal actions, such as an invasion of a nuclear power plant, an attack on a whaling ship and others.

            Therefore, Canada canceled the Greenpeace tax exemption back in 1989. And because they recognized this organization as not charitable ... "http://green-pravda.com/%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE-%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%B5%D1% 82-% D0% B4% D0% B5


            %D0%BD%D1%8C%D0%B3%D0%B8-greenpeace/
            It is necessary to declare this organization a terrorist one with an appropriate "kick in the ass" .. with confiscation, of course, in the best democratic traditions ..
            1. APASUS
              APASUS 6 October 2013 14: 46 New
              +5
              Quote: bif
              Among the sponsors you can find the Shell Foundation (oil), Ford, Honda, Pacific Gas and Electric Corporation (power plants, oil), BP (British Petrol - an oil company), Goldman Sachs (bank) ... WHO GIVES A GIRL, THIS AND DANCES .

              Somehow in France, journalists dug up documents that Greenpeace received money from US energy companies for protests against the AU in France. Such a scandal erupted that they had to close their office in Paris ......... Now the French at the word Greenpeace usually say venality!
              1. Denis
                Denis 6 October 2013 15: 14 New
                +4
                Quote: APASUS
                .Now the French at the word Greenpeace usually say venality!
                The first one + to them, after all the rampage of homosexuals, not counting ++ the mayor who did not become homosexuals to register housewives, will break the Femenists
                It’s a pity they only say, but they did
                PRESIDENTIAL FRANCE BROTHER BROKEN THE FLAGMAN GREENPRISE SHIP
                03.10.2006 11:35

                A "family" scandal erupted around one of the leaders of the French Socialist Party and the most popular candidate for the presidency of France, Segolene Royal. It turned out that her brother Jellal in July 1985 blew up the ship of the international environmental organization Greenpeace "Warrior of the rainbow" (Rainbow Warrior).
                According to The Independent, another brother of Segolen, Antoine Royal 29 in September in an interview with reporters said that Gerard worked for the most powerful intelligence service in France - the Directorate General for External Security (DGSE). According to Antoine, it was Gerard Royal who was given the task of planting a bomb on a Greenpeace ship
                Around midnight on July 10 1985, two explosions, one after the other, cut the hull of the ship. As a result of the blast, photographer Fernando Pereira was killed.
                The name of the dish, the coloring of the dish and doves do not hint at anything?
              2. peter_shchurov
                peter_shchurov 10 October 2013 20: 07 New
                0
                Quote: APASUS
                Now the French at the word Greenpeace usually say venality!

                I agree with you, these prostitutes, with Gazprom's money, also bred cf. "h recently in our Donetsk region, when Shell was doing exploration for shale gas.
                So they, too, fought hysterically - they say, ecology cranes, ah-ah-ah.
                So where are you, who are corrupt, were half of Donbass dug up, the metallurgical plant of Energokapital in Makeyevka, the mining and processing plant in Mariupol, these are only recent environmental scandals, but then the language in the anus was tightened, for this nobody is talking.
            2. bif
              bif 8 October 2013 20: 58 New
              +1
              http://vz.ru/politics/2013/10/8/653975.html
              Greenpeace is informational terrorists; they deliberately exaggerate and play on people's fears. Their campaigns are based on fabrications, they are fooling people! ”- these are the words of Patrick Moore, one of the founders of the organization, who for 15 years was a member of its board of directors. As Moore now recalls: “In the middle of the 80's, I suddenly discovered that I was the only one of Greenpeace’s directors with a specialized education and science. None of my colleagues had a degree in at least any close field. These were political figures, some public figures, environmental careerists. ”
              Another founder and former board member Paul Watson says .. “We created Greenpeace because we wanted to have a small group of people focused on specific actions who would come to the place and, attracting the attention of the media, would do that or another controversial problem, widely debated to get to its root, ”Watson quotes in his book“ Ecowines. A radical movement in defense of nature "Rick Scarks. “So it was the first seven years or so.” We have successfully done our job. And then one day we woke up ".." "For lobbying, there are other organizations and institutions. And the fact that Greenpeace became one of them destroyed its main function - protecting nature from barbarians. The organization has become just a beautiful screen for collecting money, while from 70 to 80% of all donations are spent on supporting the work of the largest bureaucratic machine. ”
        2. michajlo
          michajlo 5 October 2013 22: 40 New
          +9
          Good evening, dear author of the article, Alexey, you have a big "+"! You pleasantly surprise me with a stream of good, informative and short articles, keep it up, writer! good
          Dear Vladislav and Alexey! Totally agree with you.

          From the noble thought and desire to protect nature and reduce the harmful effects of man on our mother Earth, there remains only a “financially profitable business stream with a pronounced political subtona”. And lawyers here only help to drive out new millions and cover up enemy intentions and actions.

          And you Alexei are right in the sense that everything that Russia and the TS will be able to construct, test, improve and produce for themselves, and then also sell around the world,
          - so this is simply unacceptable free thought,
          - denial of the countries of the post-USSR imposed on us the role of "obedient servant of the West and the financial and criminal elite",
          - and a threat to the financial interests of "business sharks" and Western multinationals.

          Therefore, if when the age of 20-25, Greenpeace stocks aroused my interest and sympathy, in recent years I have been spitting more on their next “financial trick”.

          But many young people today don’t know
          - what after the answer to the simple question “Who pays them” ?,
          - and "who after their shares", re-register the old projects and continues "the same subsoil development",

          so their essence and real activity will come out, and it turns out that it is no longer the benefit of the globe, but simply a good and profitable “business for fooling the naive” and distracting the attention of ordinary people from other, more important and dangerous problems around the world.
        3. a52333
          a52333 5 October 2013 22: 48 New
          +6
          For a change (well, let's take care of nature there), you can advise the Green Pies to swim to Fokushima, and drag buckets of water from the reactor somewhere to the TEPCO office (Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated (TEPCO)). Prohibit the extraction of shale gas. Another good option: the article was recently in Mali or Niger, oil is being extracted by hand. From there there is a field for protests - only, it seems to me, in Africa they will join (forcibly) the ranks of the "oil industry". wink
        4. Serg 122
          Serg 122 5 October 2013 22: 59 New
          +6
          As Hillary Clinton said at the time: "More than 70 percent of natural resources are located in Russia. We cannot agree with this state of affairs. Russia will have to share with us - voluntarily .... or in another way."
          1. 31231
            31231 5 October 2013 23: 47 New
            +4
            No, well, we can share uranium or plutonium with them wink
            The main thing is if only they managed to catch our "handouts" about theirs.
          2. aviator_IAS
            aviator_IAS 6 October 2013 03: 06 New
            +6
            Better let H. Clinton perfectly master the craft of Monica, and not stick his nose to other people's resources.
        5. mikkado31
          mikkado31 9 October 2013 23: 13 New
          -1
          Have mercy. The shale gas and oil market marked the beginning of the end of the Russian energy monopoly. Oil production in the Arctic will soon become unprofitable. Only now, Gazprom and Rosneft do not understand this.
          1. nerd.su
            nerd.su 10 October 2013 00: 15 New
            +1
            Quote: mikkado31
            The shale gas and oil market marked the beginning of the end of the Russian energy monopoly. Oil production in the Arctic will soon become unprofitable. Only now, Gazprom and Rosneft do not understand this.

            Wipe yourself, troll! Shale gas is a myth! In Gazprom and Rosneft not, they all understand perfectly.
      2. Fin
        Fin 5 October 2013 11: 45 New
        +8
        Quote: seasoned
        They are paid money and they, like mongrels attack who they say ...

        The title of the article to the point, it is immediately clear what they are doing. Not long ago I saw a crowd of journalists, defenders and other "fighters for nature" near the court.
      3. Simon
        Simon 6 October 2013 11: 10 New
        +5
        In Russia, it has long been necessary for us to ban this organization and consider it as a totalitarian sect that feeds from behind a hillock. stop
        1. peter_shchurov
          peter_shchurov 10 October 2013 20: 09 New
          -1
          Quote: Simon
          In Russia, it has long been necessary for us to ban this organization and consider it as a totalitarian sect that feeds from behind a hillock.

          I would have equated the ROC with a totalitarian sect, but in the state. level and for your money.
          1. both s69
            both s69 11 October 2013 17: 34 New
            0
            Quote: peter_shchurov
            I would have equated the ROC with a totalitarian sect, but in the state. level and for your money.

            "There is an elder in the garden, and an uncle in Kiev" ... fool
            And here is the Russian Orthodox Church? Discussed here, it seems to me, is a completely different topic. No one personally forces you to go to an Orthodox church - this is a purely voluntary matter. Please respect not only your right to a worldview choice. hi
            1. peter_shchurov
              peter_shchurov 12 October 2013 11: 19 New
              0
              But do not you think that recently the ROC has already begun to impose its point of view with all these "laws on the protection of believers", etc., and so on. Has the long-mane become too much lately?
      4. PValery53
        PValery53 8 October 2013 19: 13 New
        0
        Well, filthy boogers! - Now it is clear why they do not disclose to the “owners” the hawalnik. It turns out that these Greenpeace employees need to be "beaten down" for at least 15 days! - And, "humiliated and insulted", drive out the borders of the state with an average broom. - Do not talk to them about "hu-hu - poo-hu", - to high matters, with corrupt elements?! ..
      5. fomich1977
        fomich1977 10 October 2013 22: 34 New
        0
        Yes, I am of the same opinion!
    2. Constantine
      Constantine 5 October 2013 10: 52 New
      12
      Quote: givargi
      Greenpeace is given by such personalities as Lady Gaga and other Hollywood scum. You don’t even think for a second that they are working against the interests of Russia and its people.


      Why would Lady Gage try to force the Russian Federation and the shelf? She doesn't have enough brains for such combinations. Is she the secret shareholder of some Chevron lol

      By the way, Chirikov, Kakashin and Yashin will no longer be allowed to enter the European parliament) These animals came to blame Russia for Greenpeace and other far-fetched things, encountered dissent there and, in the best traditions, wrapped the European parliament in the media wassat This is probably their best move in recent times. wassat
      1. givargi
        givargi 6 October 2013 16: 16 New
        +1
        Lady Gaga prosta bogataya i otvratitelnaya dura kotoraya verit v greenpeace, i vo vsiom chto v amerike nazyvaetsya "liberal," naprimer "LGBT rights". A te kotorye eti dengi na konkretnye operacii poslali, oni to uzhe liudi kotorye imeiut tesnie svyazi s razvedkoi USA. Vot sxema operacii greenpeace, i voobshe vsex NGOs kotorye tknuli svoi gryaznye nosy v Rosii i voobshe vo vsiom post-sovetskom prostranstve.
    3. experienced
      experienced 5 October 2013 11: 00 New
      +3
      givargi US

      Who can explain the avatar of this user ...
      What the hell is on the star? belay
      I suspect Georgian letters hi
      Just wondering
      1. bomg.77
        bomg.77 5 October 2013 11: 06 New
        +3
        Quote: seasoned
        givargi US

        Who can explain the avatar of this user ...
        What the hell is on the star? belay
        I suspect Georgian letters hi
        Just wondering

        Yes, Georgian just do not know what is written there
        1. experienced
          experienced 5 October 2013 11: 12 New
          +5
          Quote: bomg.77
          Yes, Georgian just do not know what is written there

          There is a clause in the site’s Rules on writing comments only in Russian ... It seems that this rule should be applied to avatars and nicknames as well, and some negligent users will send us ava on foot on an erotic journey lol
          1. Armata
            Armata 5 October 2013 12: 32 New
            +5
            Quote: seasoned
            There is a clause in the site’s Rules on writing comments only in Russian ... It seems that this rule should be applied to avatars and nicknames as well, and some negligent users will send us ava on foot on an erotic journey
            Hi, hello. What do you want? I rule his comments. He asked me to write in English, I will translate and correct it as necessary.
            1. experienced
              experienced 5 October 2013 12: 35 New
              +3
              Quote: Mechanic
              What do you want?

              It became interesting what kind of Georgian letters are on the red star. winked It’s clear that this is with the USSR, but that’s what it means request
              It would be better if he wrote comments in English, but he didn’t display avu with Georgian characters. IMHO
              1. givargi
                givargi 6 October 2013 16: 22 New
                +6
                Eto akronim dlya "Qartuli Tsiteli Armia." QCA. Gruzinskaya Krasnaya Armia. Eto ot nachala 20x godov, kogda Gruzya prisoedinilas' s CCCP. ne zabudte chto u nas bylo mnozhestvo slavnyx geroev kotorye za edinuiu sovetskuiu rodinu srazhalis.
                A s russkimi bukvami ya ne mogu pechatat 'na moi computer! :) ivninyaus! Ya zhivu v pindosii :))
                1. The comment was deleted.
        2. givargi
          givargi 6 October 2013 16: 33 New
          +5
          Ya zhivu v shtatax uzhe bolee 20let, mne seichas 35 ... (vprochem ya vernulsya v Gruzii v 98m, dumal navsegda, no tam ne smog prozhyt 'bolee goda). Ya ochen 'xorosho znayu chto proisxodit v amerike, i chevo oni xotyat zateyat' v rosii, i voobshe v regione (ix glavnyi cel 'eto Evrazya). Na gruziu zapad rabotaet ischio s 70ix i navernoe 60x godov. Potomu i narod tam sovsem otupel i veryat vo vsio "evroatlanticheskoe". Ya chuvstvuyu sebya kak poslednii iz mogikano soldier v
          1. michajlo
            michajlo 6 October 2013 18: 31 New
            +2
            givargi Today, 16:22 _131006 / week
            Eto akronim dlya "Qartuli Tsiteli Armia." QCA. Gruzinskaya Krasnaya Armia. … A s russkimi bukvami ya ne mogu pechatat 'a moi computer! :) ivninyaus! Ya zhivu v pindosii :))


            Good afternoon, dear George!

            Do you know Russian well or medium? Despite the fact that you live in the USA / America (п * и_н * д_о * с_и * я - this is also correct, but vulgar), the Russian language and spelling You will very soon need ... Do you know how to add a new keyboard layout in Windows, Mac and Linux? If so, add it and it will have Russian. Keys ”to“ change keyboard layout / language ”select“ Shift + Atl ”or whatever you like.

            Well, yourself write the Russian letters of the Cyrilitsa in “contrasting indelible felt-tip pen” on the front or top of the buttons.

            And write "opening the page" in a text editor. By repeatedly pressing each key, you will determine which Russian letter corresponds to it and only after checking, write it on the button.

            For 20-25 minutes of diligent work You will have a complete "US-RUS_keyboard".
            In this way, in Slovakia I have US-SK-RUS-UKR-CZ layouts.

            What do not know, ask. Go to any Russian-language site, ask for help and they will advise you. I have been helped and advised many times on various sites and on IT. Just remember to thank them at the end.

            Good luck, Mikhailo, Slovakia.
          2. peter_shchurov
            peter_shchurov 10 October 2013 20: 18 New
            0
            Quote: givargi
            Ya zhivu v pindosii:))

            Quote: givargi
            Ya chuvstvuyu sebya kak poslednii iz mogikano


            But, probably, the 1st of the world championship "Rey, why do you call the country that sheltered you?"

            Of those like you, I’m sure the Georgian army consisted of the infamously draped from South Ossetia in 2008.

            Yes, the days of "Knights in the Panther's Skin" are gone for Georgia forever ..
      2. givargi
        givargi 6 October 2013 16: 24 New
        +3
        Gruzinskaya Krasnaya Armia. Ot furazhki 20x godov.
    4. Akuzenka
      Akuzenka 5 October 2013 14: 30 New
      +5
      You are mistaken, dear. The money of the pop and other sexual minorities is a drop in the ocean. The customer pays them money. PR money is a promotion. I hope that this "protection" of nature will end in real terms for real shares. Romance! (I received money - share - prison).
    5. Avenger711
      Avenger711 5 October 2013 15: 04 New
      +3
      Lady Gaga may have no idea what money gives, like the vast majority of stars who, like other people, have little knowledge of what lies beyond their professional activities.
      1. experienced
        experienced 5 October 2013 15: 07 New
        +1
        Quote: Avenger711
        Lady Gaga may have no idea what money gives, like the vast majority of stars,

        Bugaga, take off your "rose-colored glasses", they know how to count money ...
        1. Walking
          Walking 5 October 2013 16: 13 New
          +1
          Yes, everything is clear here, they work for a specific order.
        2. Avenger711
          Avenger711 5 October 2013 19: 08 New
          +1
          Give you 100cc green, will you count them? Will you seriously bother because of the penniless handouts for you that raise your image? And it’s easy to feel sorry for the animals in general, it goes well with hate. The competence of artists in matters of politics, ecology, and other things on which they like to ask their opinions, as a rule, is zero.
    6. 755962
      755962 5 October 2013 20: 52 New
      +6
      Quote: givargi
      Greenpeace give money
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 6 October 2013 14: 24 New
        0
        According to the old saying "" "" "from a camel!" "" "
      2. In the reeds
        In the reeds 6 October 2013 21: 40 New
        0
        b. Lady Gaga photo did not go squeaky pussy
    7. I do not care
      I do not care 6 October 2013 15: 28 New
      0
      100 you won’t think about how the virus itself will help!
    8. Siberian German
      Siberian German 7 October 2013 03: 46 New
      0
      although subject to the principles that they declare a good office
  2. Ruslan67
    Ruslan67 5 October 2013 07: 47 New
    22
    God grant! if the current case goes to trial and conviction am Then there will be a precedent after which this painting will suck on itself until complete exhaustion wassat
    1. andrei332809
      andrei332809 5 October 2013 07: 50 New
      +4
      Quote: Ruslan67
      if the current case comes to trial and the conviction

      and what is there that the Dutch have smoked, that because of these green (blue) ones they are suing Russia?
      1. Denis
        Denis 5 October 2013 21: 38 New
        +4
        Quote: andrei332809
        and what the Dutch have smoked,
        What is always and what the rules prohibit calling
        But interestingly, only Russian Arctic oil is harmful?
        Something about their tricks among the Arabs was not heard
      2. Botanologist
        Botanologist 5 October 2013 23: 29 New
        +1
        Quote: andrei332809
        and what is there that the Dutch have smoked, that because of these green (blue) ones they are suing Russia?


        Prince Dutch Philip - President of WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature). And WWF (which, by the way, really does a lot to protect nature, including in Russia) is obliged to support all environmental organizations. Corporate ethics. Therefore, the prince has nowhere to go, the boys will not understand if he does not give.
      3. Prapor-527
        Prapor-527 6 October 2013 19: 33 New
        +3
        Not as an advertisement ...
        1. Denis
          Denis 6 October 2013 19: 38 New
          +1
          Quote: Prapor-527
          Not as an advertisement ...
          They are international pedrils, how can they use the Dutch national symbol?
          Although ... those are the same, only as if the state
    2. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 5 October 2013 07: 56 New
      13
      The title of the article answers all questions. And you need to put in the same camera with Pusi Wright. Those will teach them chilled chickens from stores to save. wassat
      1. bomg.77
        bomg.77 5 October 2013 11: 01 New
        +3
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        Those will teach them chilled chickens from stores to save.
        Recently, another group, by the type of pusek, saved one chicken, so to speak, a chicken-in-chicken system laughing
    3. smile
      smile 5 October 2013 10: 57 New
      +6
      Ruslan67
      Hey. Clawed!
      Well, how can you condemn them, because there were no lawyers in the assault group that detained these nice people ... yeah, one for all crew members ... :)))
      Imagine - a group of Special Forces neutralizes a gang of freedom fighters in the forest. Delivers the surrender ... but my goodness, there were fewer people running after the group of lawyers than the detainees .. ah-ah-ah ... illegal detention ... those who did not have enough lawyers would have to be released .... :)))
      1. Akuzenka
        Akuzenka 5 October 2013 14: 41 New
        +4
        Yes, this is another liberal pearl.
        1. El13
          El13 5 October 2013 19: 00 New
          +2
          You just need to fill out a half-time lock-up by a lawyer ... business then.
          1. abrakadabre
            abrakadabre 7 October 2013 14: 08 New
            +1
            For the second half-time by his own prosecutor
            The rest of the jury volunteers
            laughing
  3. bomg.77
    bomg.77 5 October 2013 07: 47 New
    23
    It would be better if they sailed to Japan on a ficusima than on a "prirozlomnaya."
    1. Sashkessss
      Sashkessss 5 October 2013 09: 44 New
      +9
      Japan is an inconspicuous ally of the United States, it is now easier in this regard.
      America is simply trying to undermine our authority, which Putin has done. And they have already ceased to succeed. Rather, not even America, but some rich uncles who rule America.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. Grenz
    Grenz 5 October 2013 08: 12 New
    10
    In addition to making money for all sorts of projects and public relations campaigns, these guys make good money collecting information for well-known intelligence services. And they go along the routes - where shipyon does not creep in, greenpeace is easy under the ecological slogan. Suffice it to recall the betrayal of Nikitin on environmental grounds.
    Greenpeace is another weapon of global manipulation of world consciousness.
  7. Lech from ZATULINKI
    Lech from ZATULINKI 5 October 2013 08: 24 New
    28
    Sometimes I think that Greenpeace is a bunch of ... derasts and lesbians.
    Here is their next action - they all need a visit to the PSYCHIATRUS.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 5 October 2013 12: 38 New
      +3
      Quote: Lech s ZATULINKI
      Here is their next action-

      This action can be called in one word-ANIMALS.
      1. AVV
        AVV 5 October 2013 13: 35 New
        +3
        Yes, greenpeace, this is one of the divisions of the blue ones, their tasks and methods are similar, this blue-green scum spawns like blue-green algae, that one, that the others are parasites, and the methods of earning grandmothers are the same !!!
        1. Forward
          Forward 5 October 2013 16: 45 New
          +6
          Greenpeace is a nasty office sponsoring a batch of pedophiles in Holland. Yes yes !!!! There is such a party
    2. Current 72
      Current 72 6 October 2013 00: 58 New
      +1
      Lyokha, and they accidentally didn’t freeze their letters there? That would be great.
  8. 1398727
    1398727 5 October 2013 08: 24 New
    +3
    Greenpeace is a purely commercial PR company that hasn’t spent a dime on the environment. In the Russian Federation, environmental funds are engaged in this business, on whose laurels constantly someone sits from the local princes.
  9. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 5 October 2013 08: 26 New
    +8
    But the Finns did not send a present, and they are silent, like a fish in the depths.
    Or maybe "outbid" this "green" movement ... and send it to the "address" with the stamp "America ... Let them walk there."
    All HAZARDS at once and MANIFEST!! ...
    But please: hi
    1. Denis
      Denis 5 October 2013 21: 47 New
      +2
      Quote: Valery Neonov
      Or maybe "outbid" this "green" movement
      To buy all of these multi-colored can become more defense budget
      It is stated about the Greenpeace, other various pedrils and other informals are also not poor ...
      Children must be properly educated so that all this muck is not considered for people, as well as all their nonsense
  10. Admiral 013
    Admiral 013 5 October 2013 08: 31 New
    +2
    These are just the pawns that people paid behind the curtain.
  11. morpogr
    morpogr 5 October 2013 08: 39 New
    +7
    This organization has become commercial for a long time and is fulfilling the orders of the owners for money under the guise of a struggle for the environment. An example of an ozone hole over the Arctic is how much noise. And the reason for the noise was to move companies that produce refrigerators in frion, which are supposedly to blame for the destruction of the ozone layer. Although scientists say that volcanoes during the eruption throw out frion more than humanity did. And there was always a hole over the Arctic and now the greenpeace has worked out the money, the company is satisfied with the topic closed. Also with nuclear waste it is a very profitable business to process it. How much noise there was when the waste was taken out of Germany, but how only in a row for processing did anyone get silence right away. Russia in the Arctic on the shelf is still the first and only one to produce 60% of the oil and gas reserves in our Arctic sector as well. Someone really wants to get the professor’s statements from here that the Arctic should be given for international control, and greenpeace attacks on the rig.
    1. michajlo
      michajlo 5 October 2013 22: 50 New
      0
      Good evening, dear Yuri!

      You are right in this observation! good And how many other profitable projects have already been completed and what else is being prepared?

      And for them, the devil is not nature. the main thing is to work out the "order" and the Customer to stay calm.

      Sorry, I was drawn to the appropriate "obscene" words, it's a pity that the rules of education and the forum do not allow. hi
    2. edmed
      edmed 6 October 2013 13: 38 New
      +2
      Done right, when the hysteria over the ozone hole reached "A-ah, we will all die!" A "savior" firm "Dupont" appears on the scene with its freon, but it is strange that they have quieted down with "global warming", the "saviors" have something then probably not passionate? smile
      1. nerd.su
        nerd.su 6 October 2013 14: 14 New
        +1
        Quote: edmed
        strange but that they have quieted down with "global warming"

        And froze to the last letters of the Latin alphabet! laughing
      2. Denis
        Denis 6 October 2013 15: 21 New
        +2
        Quote: edmed
        Strange, but what has calmed down with the "global warming", the "saviors" are probably not passionate about something?
        You don’t like simply outstanding pseudo-scientists. They, stsuki, cunning. Now Golsftrim will stop and we will die everything from exposure
  12. stroporez
    stroporez 5 October 2013 08: 41 New
    +2
    I read somewhere that at Prirazlomnaya, literally, a revolutionary technology in the field of hydrocarbon production is being worked out ....... if it's true, the "greens" didn't just climb this platform for a reason ... ..
    1. saber
      saber 5 October 2013 09: 01 New
      +4
      Of course not just like that, but for the money! a bunch of platforms and swim closer to them, but it was ours that was needed!
  13. sigizmund472
    sigizmund472 5 October 2013 08: 46 New
    +9
    For example, detention was mostly carried out without the presence of lawyers. We will appeal against unlawful actions of both investigative and judicial authorities.

    Well, of course, of course ... Mrs. Isakova was not invited to the detention. But if unknown guys enter the house (or office) of Mrs. Isakova through the windows, what will Mrs. Isakova herself do? Something one of two things, in my opinion - either shout "good people," or sit down at clever books and look for what exactly the above guys are violating at the moment.
  14. saber
    saber 5 October 2013 08: 59 New
    +8
    they still need to confiscate the ship, create a precedent. Otherwise, they’ll still climb - to all of us, our shelf is like an eyesore! And to attract the children to work - send to Tolokonnikova, let the seam on the codpiece teach them how to do it, you see they will have a normal profession
  15. ed65b
    ed65b 5 October 2013 09: 03 New
    +4
    It is necessary to plant. let 2 years old but necessary, and confiscate the ship. Let them have shaitanyat. And then pooh ... whether at all.
    1. Valery Neonov
      Valery Neonov 5 October 2013 09: 10 New
      +3
      Ehh, it is not provided, although if you attach St262 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, then confiscate will go, yeah. hi 227 Article. Piracy

      [Criminal Code of the Russian Federation] [Chapter 24] [Article 227]
      1. An attack on a sea or river vessel with the aim of taking possession of another's property, committed with the use of violence or with the threat of its use, -

      shall be punishable by deprivation of liberty for a term of five to ten years.

      2. The same act committed with the use of weapons or objects used as weapons -

      the applicable sentence is deprivation of liberty for a term of eight to twelve years, with a fine in the amount of up to five hundred thousand rubles or in the amount of the wage or other income of the convicted person for a period of up to three years or without it.

      3. The acts envisaged in the first or second part of this article, if they are committed by an organized group or negligently resulted in the death of a person or other serious consequences, -

      Shall be punishable by deprivation of liberty for a term of ten to fifteen years with a fine in the amount of up to five hundred thousand rubles or in the amount of the wage or other income of the convicted person for a period of up to three years or without it.
      1. Gunsmith
        Gunsmith 5 October 2013 09: 52 New
        +5
        I think - they will cover this Peace) to the good - the stakes are high, and no backstage * will help - the times of the EBN are over, the GDP itself can lead the country without the help of the West. Pisovtsam still have to go to Chelyabinsk, to Kyshtym ...
      2. bomg.77
        bomg.77 5 October 2013 09: 56 New
        +2
        Quote: Valery Neonov
        Ehhh, it’s not provided, although if you attach St262 to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, then confiscate will go, yeah. 227 Article. Piracy
        You can! As an instrument of crime.
        1. Valery Neonov
          Valery Neonov 5 October 2013 11: 02 New
          +2
          hi 227 Article. Piracy

          1. An attack on a sea or river vessel with the aim of taking possession of another's property, committed with the use of violence or with the threat of its use, -
          shall be punishable by deprivation of liberty for a term of five to ten years.
          2. The same act committed with the use of weapons or objects used as weapons -
          the applicable sentence is deprivation of liberty for a term of eight to twelve years, with a fine in the amount of up to five hundred thousand rubles or in the amount of the wage or other income of the convicted person for a period of up to three years or without it.
          3. The acts envisaged in the first or second part of this article, if they are committed by an organized group or negligently resulted in the death of a person or other serious consequences, -
          Shall be punishable by deprivation of liberty for a term of ten to fifteen years with a fine in the amount of up to five hundred thousand rubles or in the amount of the wage or other income of the convicted person for a period of up to three years or without it. request what
        2. Valery Neonov
          Valery Neonov 5 October 2013 11: 05 New
          +1
          Now, if illegal fishing .... Article 256 .... here are YES ...
          Article 256. Illegal extraction of aquatic animals and plants

          1. Illegal fishing of fish, sea animals and other aquatic animals or commercial marine plants, if this act is committed:
          a) causing major damage;
          b) using a self-propelled floating vehicle or explosive and chemical substances, electric current, or other methods of mass extermination of these aquatic animals and plants;
          c) in places of spawning or on migration routes to them;
          d) on the territory of the reserve or wildlife sanctuary, or in the zone of ecological disaster or in the zone of ecological emergency,
          shall be punishable by a fine in the amount of one hundred thousand to three hundred thousand rubles, or in the amount of the convict's salary or other income for a period of one year to two years, or by compulsory labor for a term of one hundred eighty to two hundred and forty hours, or by correctional labor for a term of up to two years or arrest for up to six months.
          2. Illegal prey of fur seals, sea beavers or other marine mammals in the open sea or in restricted areas -
          shall be punishable by a fine in the amount of one hundred thousand to three hundred thousand rubles, or in the amount of the convict's salary or other income for a period of one year to two years, or by compulsory labor for a term of one hundred eighty to two hundred and forty hours, or by correctional labor for a term of up to two years or arrest for up to six months.
          3. The acts provided for by the first or second parts of this article, committed by a person using his official position or by a group of persons in a preliminary conspiracy or by an organized group, -
          shall be punishable by a fine in the amount of one hundred thousand to five hundred thousand rubles, or in the amount of the convict's salary or other income for a period of one year to three years, or by imprisonment for a term of up to two years with the deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities for a term of up to three years or without it.
  16. bubla5
    bubla5 5 October 2013 09: 03 New
    +2
    But it was impossible to immediately drown the ship with a torpedo, less problems went to the bottom
    1. bomg.77
      bomg.77 5 October 2013 11: 23 New
      +4
      Quote: bubla5
      But it was impossible to immediately drown the ship with a torpedo, less problems went to the bottom
      laughing it’s better to go straight to the home port, what to spend on salary. laughing
      1. Denis
        Denis 6 October 2013 12: 11 New
        +2
        Quote: bomg.77
        it’s better to go straight to the home port, what to spend on salary.
        The French were blowing them up somewhere in zealand-australia, though it was then an occasion to poke something for the entire geyrop. Yes, and these environmentalists were neither ecologists nor managers of different then (that's how hard they lived laughing ), they came if the USSR didn’t stumble about any controls. And from the thought of getting into an object one would have been all over this Organization
    2. jjj
      jjj 6 October 2013 02: 38 New
      +9
      Fifteen years ago, a Greenpeace steamer went to protest towards Novaya Zemlya. Ours launched a simulator of a torpedo from the boat. And they have acoustics on the ship like adults, they could even classify an object. So the Greenpeace guys did it. They screamed on the air: "We were torpedoed!" Prevention was enough for three five-year plans. This time ours really shot. Maybe another ten years will be enough.
      And something suspiciously "Belluna" keeps quiet
      1. bomg.77
        bomg.77 6 October 2013 02: 46 New
        +3
        laughing
        Quote: jjj
        ... So the Greenpeace guys did it. They screamed on the air: "We were torpedoed!"
        Tough, but not in another way. yes
        1. abrakadabre
          abrakadabre 7 October 2013 14: 19 New
          0
          but not in another way
          You can - torpedo combat, not a simulator. With the simultaneous inclusion of electronic warfare, so as not to clog the air with matyuk.
  17. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 5 October 2013 09: 13 New
    +7
    From the Don.
    Recent sponsor: Greenpeace: -: British Petroleum:. And that says it all. Cover these: wrestlers: so that others are not in the habit!
    1. Sirocco
      Sirocco 5 October 2013 12: 16 New
      +5
      Initially, the organization may have looked like a kind of association of romantic enthusiasts who, with their activity, wanted to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
      Everything is old as the world, and nothing new. As they say about the revolution, let’s say so about Greenpeace. "Revolutions are invented by romantics, performed by fanatics, and scoundrels use its results"
  18. Mr.M
    Mr.M 5 October 2013 09: 13 New
    +3
    Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye, the author is well done. This information would be yes on the central TV, the people enlighten)
    In general, it is necessary to drive their representative offices from our territory, just under the law on NGOs.
  19. pva1964
    pva1964 5 October 2013 09: 22 New
    +3
    a ship for scrap metal and these citizens are gaining in the mind zone
    1. 31231
      31231 5 October 2013 12: 44 New
      +4
      Why like scrap metal ?! It seems to me to sell it as a vessel much more revenue. In general, financially better to punish these fools. And a small income to us and financial waste to them. And the West will not whine about these victims of the bloody Russian gebni.
    2. jjj
      jjj 6 October 2013 02: 40 New
      +4
      Here, in a nearby branch, a man said that the SF does not have target ships for missile launches. The adversary ship is the best target
  20. 1c-inform-city
    1c-inform-city 5 October 2013 09: 27 New
    +8
    About 20 years ago I considered this gang to be extremists and subject to a ban. Some older people remember how they had a hand in the destruction of our Medbioprom at the end of 80, how many factories were closed and we were left without pharmaceuticals.
  21. DPN
    DPN 5 October 2013 09: 37 New
    +3
    For the violation of the state border, for the longest term in the north, let the white bears help for the good of Russia. The main thing to say to their people is that they wouldn’t justify themselves to the whole world, as happened with the Koreans, let the green letters make excuses for violating the BORDER, the rest Pole and stop.
    The article is ++.
  22. Grbear
    Grbear 5 October 2013 09: 45 New
    +5
    Closed for 2 months - already ahead. The "ideological" ones will be split, the rest will be cleared of their brains. They will not "pull" on piracy, but they will create a precedent.

    And it is worth taking a closer look at "friends".
    1. Valery Neonov
      Valery Neonov 5 October 2013 11: 36 New
      +1
      And it seems to me they will give me MAX to say ... about the fight, well, with this (corruption ...). hi
  23. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 5 October 2013 09: 48 New
    +3
    The article claims that this organization has become something. A thoughtful look at her convinces me that she did not become anything. It was originally created to cover a certain type of work - in this case, nuclear testing. Here are the trials, here are the ideological fighters with them, everything is in order, sleep on ...
    Second. People should clearly understand what they are for and for whom. This is me about the hopper hysteria. Do you want a strong country, an empire? Do you understand that if the Empire needs minerals, if it does not want (and it not only does not want, it simply cannot) depend on a single deposit and all sorts of accidents and problems on it, it must stop stupid leaps. That is, it is humane to send merry coke-workers of "environmental protests" to uranium. Beforehand, a good deal of whipping up the children who call themselves Cossacks there ... If you want a clean ecology, get down to real work on treatment facilities. And the dragonfly leaping fencers - into the zone! This is, you know, imperial thinking.
    1. Volodin
      5 October 2013 10: 06 New
      +5
      Michael if
      Empire needs minerals
      , as you put it, and if "Empire" does not have enough of them, then you can, for example, start mining them under the building of the State Duma or the Federation Council - there is so much peat ... And to extract them in a region where it works much more efficiently agriculture, and even "at the reserve" - ​​somehow not at all "imperial" - shortsighted.
      1. Mikhail3
        Mikhail3 5 October 2013 10: 17 New
        +4
        The Empire cannot afford to be trolled. Speeches like "let them dig under the State Duma," but we don't need to ... "We didn't send you there," remember? Afghans remember very well, very well ... so the Empire is gone. So either Russia will stop its course and the world will perish with it ... or a tough correction awaits you. Hopefully a soaked vine and not a prison sentence.
        1. Volodin
          5 October 2013 10: 44 New
          +2
          Speeches like "let them dig under the State Duma" but we don't need
          - to whom should we? Are you a State Duma deputy? Then I'm sorry. In general, I hope that you are joking about the death of Russia and the world without Khopersky nickel, well, or effectively trolling our "something holding". Then I will also play along: the Empire, of course, is under attack (smiley in black glasses and with a serious look). If you are serious, then you and I definitely have different views.
        2. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 5 October 2013 12: 42 New
          +2
          Quote: Mikhail3
          So either Russia will cease its course and the world will perish with it

          Don’t wait! Everyone is burying Russia and constantly, BUT ..............
      2. nerd.su
        nerd.su 5 October 2013 17: 40 New
        0
        Quote: Volodin
        you can, for example, start to mine them under the building of the State Duma or the Federation Council - there is so much peat ...

        I understand that this is a figurative expression, but the peat under these buildings is either very small or not at all.
        Quote: Volodin
        And to extract them in a region where agriculture works much more efficiently, and even "in a nature reserve" - ​​somehow not "imperial" at all - is shortsighted.

        If it works there so efficiently, then why do the surrounding villages live so poorly?
        And who, based on what materials, claims that the reserve is in danger? Besides the money rain that will flood his administration ...
        1. Volodin
          6 October 2013 08: 29 New
          +1
          Do you think that if mining begins, the surrounding villages will live better? Officials, of course, but whether it will reach the residents ... You write
          his administration will be flooded
          .
          1. nerd.su
            nerd.su 6 October 2013 13: 40 New
            +1
            Important note - if mining begins! There are no nickel reserves, no deposits, what is the point of discussing mining when it is necessary to do exploration though.
            Not everyone will be better off, of course. And who is more active, who have not yet drunk and are not lazy at the end. There is work, especially for those who will seek it. The rest will not live worse. They will use at least new infrastructure, roads will improve in every way.
            Well, the guys with stripes and hats in the proletariat are bad luck, of course, these are not seeds on the bench to pound. But in the protection, order and prohibition on the field to support just right.
            So everyone will have a lesson.
          2. 31231
            31231 6 October 2013 14: 39 New
            +1
            You know, I often work with mining enterprises. On average, earnings are much higher than in the village of peasants.
    2. edmed
      edmed 6 October 2013 14: 24 New
      +1
      "Your excellency! Eck, you're my friend, cool!" Sorry, joke. On business, maybe you need to look elsewhere, Kr. North, Siberia, Far East? But why dig a "hole" in the very center of the densely populated part of the European part of Russia? It is clear that the costs are minimal, transport, labor, energy, export of finished products, but who can guarantee that after they "gut" this tidbit, they will bring order, reclamation, cleaning, etc. Under the USSR this was not very much observed, and in the era of "Maximum profit at minimum costs" even more so. As it is not very, wild capital and the Empire, everything can be covered up with the interests of the Empire. Somewhere it happened before...
      1. nerd.su
        nerd.su 6 October 2013 15: 34 New
        +2
        Quote: edmed
        On business, may need to look elsewhere, Cr. North, Siberia, Far East? But why dig a "hole" in the very center of the densely populated part of the European part of Russia?

        That is, Siberia and the Far East let them plow, and here we will sit on our collective farm on subsidies and social benefits! So what question do you pose?

        Quote: edmed
        but who can guarantee that after they "gut" this tidbit, they will put things in order, reclamation, cleaning, etc.

        That's when they do not put things in order, break the law, then spread rot on them. At that, moreover, it’s not the USSR now, any actions can be carried out, except for an armed uprising. Under the USSR, no such speeches were organized.
      2. Denis
        Denis 6 October 2013 15: 35 New
        +1
        Quote: edmed
        but who can guarantee that after they "gut" this tidbit, they will put things in order there
        Minister of Ecology and those responsible for this
        Ridiculous?
        Me too, and after the adoption of a law obliging them to spend their weekends and holidays there with their families?
        That would be something to do instead of masturbation about stray animals
        Oh, dreams ... crying
  24. Darth Revan
    Darth Revan 5 October 2013 09: 49 New
    +5
    In fact, to shoot at the violators of the State Border ... to kill am
  25. DPN
    DPN 5 October 2013 10: 00 New
    +1
    It seems that these Greenpeace workers are working out the money of Western intelligence, if they climb to violate the state border, then they know the laws, which means they are promised very large dollars if they are ready to wind up the deadlines.
  26. lewerlin53rus
    lewerlin53rus 5 October 2013 10: 01 New
    +4
    The other day, in a conversation about the development of the Russian Arctic, Putin mentioned the development of the icebreaker fleet. Greenpeace vessel, of course, not so hot any icebreaker, but the farm can even come in handy lol
  27. mivmim
    mivmim 5 October 2013 10: 14 New
    +4
    The title pleased, you can’t say more precisely.
  28. Ascetic
    Ascetic 5 October 2013 10: 15 New
    12
    Greenpeace are scammers, extortionists and outright provocateurs. I really hope that Russia will not breed politically correct snot and plant these clowns "in full". So that next time it was discouraging.
    By the way, in Canada, New Zealand and a number of other countries, Greenpeace’s activities are generally prohibited, while in Russia it functions as a foreign agent, financed mainly from America.
    This office should not have been called "green world", but green bucks world, and in the light of the expected court- GREENBUCKSPEECE (-dets).
    The action itself is another attempt by the American authorities to blacken Russia. All demarches of pederests, hysterics about Puski, a tie-eater in the UN and "green" provocateurs are suitable for this - all this is a clip of clowns of one master.
  29. Jogan-xnumx
    Jogan-xnumx 5 October 2013 10: 19 New
    +3
    Well, what for these problems? request Let's remember the catch phrase: "There is a person - there is a problem. If there is no person, there is no problem." Or, as the settlers in the Wild West used to say: "A good Indian is a dead Indian." Plus popular wisdom: "Ends in the water." In Arctic waters, they freeze in 15 minutes. And the trough of theirs "suddenly" covered with a storm wave ... lol The result is missing. The Arctic is a harsh and unpredictable climate. And under the guise of "sweep" the greenpeace out of the country. They say, we do not want to be held responsible for their thoughtless, risky actions, violations of any TB that have involved victims, etc. In addition, you can send rescuers 3-4 days after the naughty about the disappearance of these idiots, catch the squids, solemnly equip them with wooden jackets and send them to fertilize the land of the Fatherland with a bunch of snot ... crying Perhaps this will be the only environmental benefit from them. hi
    1. 31231
      31231 5 October 2013 12: 25 New
      +2
      After 3-4 days, there would be nothing to catch. Crabs would eat. That's who the real Greenpeace officer of Russia is. He utilizes everything gamno marine.
      1. Jogan-xnumx
        Jogan-xnumx 5 October 2013 13: 28 New
        +1
        So what am I talking about? And what remains is to "solemnly" fish. Identify by teeth and remnants of clothing. And further on the script ... laughing
    2. Volkhov
      Volkhov 5 October 2013 20: 44 New
      -1
      Quote: Jogan-64
      And the trough of theirs "suddenly" covered with a storm wave ...

      Maybe what other trough covered September 9th? Greenpeace could notice and upset patriots ...
      1. Jogan-xnumx
        Jogan-xnumx 5 October 2013 21: 08 New
        0
        Maybe what other trough covered September 9th? Greenpeace could notice and upset patriots ...

        Do you like the "activity" of these greenpeaces?
        1. Volkhov
          Volkhov 5 October 2013 22: 31 New
          -1
          I like the law.
          1. Jogan-xnumx
            Jogan-xnumx 5 October 2013 22: 57 New
            0
            I like the law.

            Whose law is it?
            1. Volkhov
              Volkhov 6 October 2013 00: 12 New
              0
              The winner of the auction for buying judges, whose else ... there should be complete openness in corruption and correction of violations of the Yemeni type, without double standards.
              1. Jogan-xnumx
                Jogan-xnumx 6 October 2013 00: 23 New
                +1
                But is it possible to make calculations clearer? Somehow it turns out costly ... what Do not find?
                1. Volkhov
                  Volkhov 6 October 2013 00: 53 New
                  -3
                  First you need to have a box from the Xerox ... and then
                  "Money doesn't matter" (C) (Fifth element)
                  In wild Japan, in the middle of the airport, there is a private house of a man who did not want to move during construction for any money; in medieval Venice, an "old woman's house" is built into the prince's palace, which also did not sell the plot - this is the law, they just lost the habit of it for a long time ...
                  In the case of Greenpeace - the Law of the Sea, and not the desire of a floating security officer.
                  1. Setrac
                    Setrac 6 October 2013 02: 31 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Volkhov
                    In wild Japan, in the middle of the airport there is a private house of a person who did not want to move during construction for any money

                    Quote: Volkhov
                    in medieval Venice, the "house of an old woman" is built into the prince's palace, who also did not sell the plot - this is the law, they just got out of the habit of it for a long time.

                    This is not a law, this is insanity.
                  2. Jogan-xnumx
                    Jogan-xnumx 6 October 2013 12: 16 New
                    +1
                    ... this is the law, it’s just weaned from it here a long time ago.

                    And how long have you got used to it here, can you tell me by chance? At the same time, if not difficult, and make a small clarification. Here - where is it?
                    In the case of Greenpeace - the Law of the Sea, and not the desire of a floating security officer.

                    And the Law of the Sea is written only for a security officer? Green letters it is not a decree? Did you happen to notice that any stick has two ends?
                  3. nerd.su
                    nerd.su 6 October 2013 13: 10 New
                    +2
                    Quote: Volkhov
                    In the case of Greenpeace - the Law of the Sea, and not the desire of a floating security officer.

                    And what about the law of the sea? Who violated him first? And why is no one running to the international maritime tribunal?
                    1. Volkhov
                      Volkhov 6 October 2013 15: 03 New
                      0
                      They came running to the Maritime Tribunal.
                      http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2313332
                      1. nerd.su
                        nerd.su 6 October 2013 20: 00 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Volkhov
                        They came running to the Maritime Tribunal.

                        So read what is written there:
                        According to Frans Timmermans, the litigation with Russia may take "years."

                        “A diplomatic solution to the problem remains our preferred option,” assured Mr. Weinen. The interlocutor of Kommersant said that on October 1, the Dutch authorities received a response from Russia, which explained the reasons for the detention of the ship and its crew. “But these explanations did not satisfy us,” the diplomat said.
                        Read more: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2313332


                        Even the Dutch side admits that it is better to agree outside the court. And the prospects for Holland’s victory described below may lead to the FSB getting a thread from the detainees for recognition of the desire to seize the platform or blow it up. And then the decisions of the international tribunals cried. Or someone doubts that if there is a desire of the country's leadership it is impossible to achieve such evidence? sad
                      2. Volkhov
                        Volkhov 7 October 2013 01: 38 New
                        0
                        Quote: bot.su
                        As a result, the FSB will get from anyone of the detainees a confession of the desire to seize the platform or blow it up

                        Only this is not enough for a complete set - even if you eat them under the video, the reputation will not deteriorate more.
  • Ulysses
    Ulysses 5 October 2013 10: 47 New
    +4
    Heading, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye.
    Fighters for the "green". good
  • major071
    major071 5 October 2013 10: 48 New
    11
    As there in KVN: Greenpeace would have seen you - but once they, they are on barbecue.
  • Navy7981
    Navy7981 5 October 2013 10: 53 New
    +6
    "... The activists, apparently, cannot take a picture against the background of a dead desman - they still need to catch up with her ..." and kill her! But she is so fast ...
  • Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 5 October 2013 11: 07 New
    0
    <<< Greenpeace has 20 regional and 27 so-called national offices (including in Russia), and each of these offices is served by a professional legal team.
    On the pages of the site, however, we will not find information about which reserves or nature protection zones the activists have opened, what successes they have shown in the fight against poachers, >>>
    Because neither nature reserves, nor protected areas, nor the fight against poachers do not fucking need Greenpeace, this is a ROOF, which, first of all, is convenient for employees of the "appropriate" services to hide behind, who poke their noses everywhere and interfere in other people's affairs in the interests of their owners, and first of all, of course, in Russia, and secondly, it allows you to make good money on noisy protest companies in the media, promoted again in the interests of these owners, especially if this again concerns Russia! This complements well the general gamokratichesky pressure of Russia from the West.
  • 128mgb
    128mgb 5 October 2013 11: 40 New
    +3
    It seems to me that these greenpeople are somehow connected with the statements of a certain Medvedev from the HSE. Chelrons with chevrons do not like Russia's actions in the Arctic, and so they have intensified. Do not answer, sit on the neck.
  • 17085
    17085 5 October 2013 11: 59 New
    +2
    Honestly, I didn’t read the article, I got to
    as if the allegations of piracy were not substantiated or proved. Evidence should be sufficient to bring charges. The evidence of the investigation is irrelevant - in the protocol interrogation of witnesses does not contain specific facts that indicate a specific person. The evidence of the investigation is also unacceptable, since it was collected in violation of the law. For example, detention was mostly carried out without the presence of lawyers. We will appeal against unlawful actions of both investigative and

    The horse understands that our security forces do not need these martyrs by nature, they will close the terrorist organization, well, they will declare terrorist in Russia. Burn you in hell, it would be better to draw the attention of the public to the 3acpat Arthur Kill near New York.
  • cooper
    cooper 5 October 2013 12: 01 New
    +2
    Greenpeace achieved what he wanted, and even with interest. And the Russian law enforcement agencies helped him in this.
    Do you really think that they were going to hijack or spoil the tower? They needed PR. They even got it with interest. Understand, they purposefully created a provocation, and were led into it.
    1. Gecko
      Gecko 5 October 2013 16: 58 New
      +2
      To remain silent, they will constantly provoke. And so they will plant it as a piece of cake, so that later everything would be disgraceful to others, the topic is closed.

      The words of one of the founders of Paul Watson: “The secret to the success of this organization lies in the secret to the success of its creator: it doesn’t matter what is true, it is only important that people respect the truth. You are the one who put you in the press. ”Much immediately becomes clear, the rest is proved by the facts.
      Here are just a few examples:
      • Intentional torture of seals in front of a cell in 1979;
      • fee to West African fishermen for catching infected fish;
      • hiring teenagers to rip the uterus from a pregnant kangaroo for the film Goodbye Joy, shot by Greenpeace in 1986;
      • image of clean sand as contaminated in 1996;
      • A fee for Seattle teens for $ 5 each to protest the camera against selling Icelandic fish in 1999.
      • In the early 80s: Danish journalist Leif Blodel proved that during the shooting of the next video, the Greenpeace intentionally paid Australian kangaroo hunters for torturing and killing animals in front of the cameras.
      • Everyone knows that the "greens" fall into ecstasy at the sight of cut down forests. Against this, they are long - to a wild scandal! - fought in the original way: they stuck small peaks into the trees so that they stuck into the bodies of the workers.
  • pensioner
    pensioner 5 October 2013 12: 09 New
    +2
    Thank you Alexey! Great article. Greenpeace in Russia is banned as an extremist organization. The steamer is theirs to requisition. It will be useful to master the Arctic. All detainees have a maximum term under the "terrorism" article. It seems to me that after that everything in the Arctic will immediately become environmentally friendly ...
  • NORILCHANIN
    NORILCHANIN 5 October 2013 12: 10 New
    +1
    Quote: ed65b
    It is necessary to plant. let 2 years old but necessary, and confiscate the ship. Let them have shaitanyat. And then pooh ... whether at all.

    What are 2 years? The maximum term under the article with the confiscation of the vehicle, and to bring environmental cleanliness on the coast of the northern seas.
    1. nerd.su
      nerd.su 5 October 2013 18: 04 New
      0
      Quote: NORILCHAN
      What are 2 years? The maximum term under the article with the confiscation of the vehicle, and to bring environmental cleanliness on the coast of the northern seas.

      Why are you so angry! There, for example, do you think I’ve taken much care of the environment? Yes, I went there for a salary, because you won’t earn much at home. So what should he solder to the maximum? 2 months is enough for the eyes to be witty. It turns out, you look quickly recruited on what thread our trawler, even if they don’t pay so much, but you can only get to a Norwegian prison, that is, according to our concepts, to a sanatorium ...
  • Cpa
    Cpa 5 October 2013 12: 19 New
    +2
    Citizens, don't pollute the air, "people" make money from it. laughing
    Violation of the rules of navigation - seizure of the vessel, a fine to the owner. Pull it to the maximum, then they will abandon their icebreaker, in 2 of the month it will be ours according to the law. good
  • 31231
    31231 5 October 2013 12: 19 New
    +2
    Koba would not even know about them. The NKVD would have put them in place to feed the crabs.
  • turan_up
    turan_up 5 October 2013 12: 33 New
    +1
    For example, the detention took place mostly without the presence of lawyers

    I propose a lady who blurted out to go to the waters of the Arctic Ocean. Be present at the next detention. To eternal place of residence.
  • Garmash
    Garmash 5 October 2013 13: 04 New
    -14 qualifying.
    An article is custom-made as well as your screams, about greenpeace we can say that everyone has skeletons in the closet, but take an interest in the internet of skeletons at the oil platform.
    1. Pushkar
      Pushkar 5 October 2013 13: 33 New
      0
      And how long? Facts in the studio. No?
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 5 October 2013 13: 45 New
        +1
        Quote: Pushkar
        And how long? Facts in the studio. No?

        This is the lawyer of the company’s green pirate, you need to slam him a minus laughing
    2. 31231
      31231 5 October 2013 17: 22 New
      +5
      When in the Gulf of Mexico the BiPisnaya well flowed where were these warriors of the Galaxy ?!
      Fukushima phonite, where are these quixotes ?!
    3. Setrac
      Setrac 5 October 2013 20: 07 New
      +6
      Quote: Garmash
      An article is custom-made as well as your screams, about greenpeace we can say that everyone has skeletons in the closet, but take an interest in the internet of skeletons at the oil platform.

      The BP has a skeleton the size of the Gulf of Mexico, for some reason no one orders them. Around the American nuclear power plants, not a single Greenpeace officer.
  • Volkhov
    Volkhov 5 October 2013 13: 13 New
    -6
    It is clear to everyone that the pirates - the Federal Security Service of the FSB - detained the ship outside the territorial waters with firing, then broke and forced the captured ship to drag itself to Murmansk.
    The platform was declared "ice-resistant" - that is, it must withstand the bulk of ice fields with a load of tens of thousands of tons (supposedly) - how could the banner damage it?
    The actions of the authorities are fraught with the fact that in a counterclaim, state property will be arrested abroad, including vessels in ports and tervodas — the flag of the Russian Federation and so rare in civilian courts ...
    So something happens in the region that requires hiding so much that they spat on all the risks and tied possible witnesses ... from notable events - the Great Armada’s campaign along the NSR to the Boiler House with 3 floating cranes in its composition - or to lift something from the bottom, whether for laying there ... whether it’s not the Kuzkin’s Mom ... then the ecologists really will not understand.
    1. Pushkar
      Pushkar 5 October 2013 13: 38 New
      +2
      Wow! Now everything is clear. Mordor (Russia) again has the audacity to defend itself. You give international control over Russia. Control entrust ward number 6 Alekseevskaya hospital.
      1. Volkhov
        Volkhov 5 October 2013 14: 11 New
        -8
        "Protection" looks like an unsuccessful attack - the Russian Federation is rampant with the current leadership, and because of them Russians are considered maniacs, fortunately weak-minded technically and not very dangerous only for this reason.
        1. IGS
          IGS 5 October 2013 14: 38 New
          +3
          Well, of course .... but under EBN we were smart, quiet, we had to be and remain that way. Shchazzz .. The fact that Greenpeace has long been an organization for earning "green" is recognized by many here and there. There will be no counterclaim, believe me. Legally, Russia did the right thing. And it will not work out at the wrong time with Russia, and I advise you to look at the calendar. And regardless of the leadership, it is high time to stop "chewing snot" and shaking "like trembling creatures."
          1. Volkhov
            Volkhov 5 October 2013 20: 23 New
            0
            Quote: IGS
            I advise you to look at the calendar.

            Horseradish calendar - little is left, so the fleet was burned this summer in unsuccessful attacks. The Greenpeace is generally away from the main events, they were tied up so that they wouldn’t prevent the Russians from being deceived - there are few who want to go to the penal battalion, you need to show the sanatorium without footcloths with a buffet so that the rams come in, and when the situation changes dramatically ... you won’t go back, just go ahead yourself or a carrot in the virtual future.
            1. IGS
              IGS 6 October 2013 00: 22 New
              +1
              How are you ... For a long time?
        2. 31231
          31231 5 October 2013 17: 27 New
          +3
          This dooo. I will rush to you in an apartment, you are a hammer on my turnip. And you happen to attack me wink Now it’s clear why the Geyropey court is the most humane in the world.
        3. michajlo
          michajlo 6 October 2013 00: 39 New
          0
          Good evening, dear Vasily!

          So in your opinion, if the next time, these "Greenpeople"
          - they will tie it in the same way, and push it “on the brains” past the video camera,
          - but with the presence of “our Russian lawyer” from the law office with the founders from the FSB leadership,
          - moreover, our lawyer, before “removal” / mopping up, will read to them their rights and paragraphs that they violated during their action, of course there is ONLY “in Russian” without interpreter,
          - then the legal protocol will be respected,
          - and in your opinion, enemies will begin to “speak” less or simply choke in “poisonous saliva” !?

          Can you advise the Russian security officials then how to arrange / organize and shoot the next “sober scuffle" of the guards and border guards so that it looks more elegant than shooting New York cops against black teenagers?
          1. Volkhov
            Volkhov 6 October 2013 01: 11 New
            -2
            Quote: michajlo
            Can you advise then the Russian security forces

            Do not fail in other places for the sake of someone else's interests, then it is not necessary to isolate in an exotic way witnesses who have not violated anything, especially maritime borders.
            In principle, they were lucky (Greenpeace) - when during the V-2 tests a rocket fell near a Swedish yacht, the link of the Messerschmitts destroyed it for the sake of a surprise for England ...
            How long have you seen "Russian" security officials besides athletes and loaders?
            1. michajlo
              michajlo 6 October 2013 01: 37 New
              0
              Volkhov SU Today, 01:11 _131006 / week
              How long have you seen "Russian" security officials besides athletes and loaders?


              Good evening, dear!

              Then you did me, I take off my hat. hi

              The siloviki and patriots of the USSR, the Chekists in spirit and deeds, alas became extinct in 1984! sad
              Only the “carriers of the suitcases with banknotes” remained until the “group of mopping up dangerous witnesses” and then from among the patriots of the USSR ...

              I see so that after a couple of sharp exchanges of opinions, we may find that in some issues, we look at the world around us “from the same angle” ?! what winked

              Sincerely, Mikhailo.
    2. Corsair
      Corsair 6 October 2013 12: 30 New
      +2
      Quote: Volkhov
      The platform was declared "ice-resistant" - that is, it must withstand the bulk of ice fields with a load of tens of thousands of tons (supposedly) - how could the banner damage it?

      It is interesting HOW would react uv.Volkhov when would "SOMEONE" try to "stick" SOMETHING to his car or apartment door?
      1. Volkhov
        Volkhov 6 October 2013 15: 10 New
        -3
        Well, of course, I would shoot and kidnap advertisers - as well, because there is an example of the state ...
        Is a corsair a life principle?
        1. Corsair
          Corsair 6 October 2013 15: 51 New
          +2
          Quote: Volkhov
          Well, of course, I would shoot and kidnap advertisers - as well, because there is an example of the state ...
          Is a corsair a life principle?

          You could be 100% sure that under the guise of "posting ads" you will not be "spanked" ... let's say a TNT charge (leading I wrote: "SOMEONE will stick SOMETHING")?
          1. Volkhov
            Volkhov 7 October 2013 01: 30 New
            0
            Where I live in systemic banditry (covering black realtors), the police are involved in conjunction with the administration, private security companies and crime, they have been using poisons for a long time in the first place (aerosol with a mortality of 3 minutes and others), partly legal, as it were, to destroy dogs.
            TNT is a promotion of terrorists and anti-terrorists. SOME and SOMETHING live under the guise of government agencies.
  • chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 5 October 2013 13: 38 New
    +5
    Greenpeace protects sea pirates whether the organization’s activities will be banned in Russia, and the leadership of the Russian branch has been convicted of organizing piracy.
  • labendik
    labendik 5 October 2013 14: 09 New
    -7
    I’m somehow far from a fan of Greenpeace and other leftist riffraff, but you didn’t notice that you accused Greenpeace of drug trafficking. It seems to me that this is already too much.
    1. IGS
      IGS 5 October 2013 15: 08 New
      0
      Where and who was charged with "drug dealing"? Please provide a quote.
      1. labendik
        labendik 5 October 2013 17: 18 New
        +2
        About youth at rock concerts, which were sponsored by Greenpeace with the purchase of "fool". Written clearly.
        1. 31231
          31231 5 October 2013 17: 36 New
          0
          Give a link to an official source?
          1. labendik
            labendik 5 October 2013 17: 57 New
            -1
            Listen, do you know how to read? An article like in Russian?
            1. 31231
              31231 5 October 2013 20: 56 New
              +3
              Sorry, wrong. And really inattentively read.

              Organize rock concerts where young men and women often sympathize with fighters for greens, buying tickets and dope replenishing a growing budget and quenching Greenpeace's appetites under a drug high.


              Then, in fact, the question is to Alexei, why did he get that Greenpeace employees were bawling at concerts ?!
              1. Volodin
                6 October 2013 08: 24 New
                +1
                Sergei, the article does not at all say that it is Greenpeace that distributes drugs. It is written that Greenpeace arranges rock concerts and receives income from this. And what usually happens at rock concerts, especially in large western cities, you should know. As the saying goes, s_ex, drugs, rock and roll. You don’t think that only people in white shirts and bow ties come to rock concerts, drinking a milkshake - this is naive. So, the Greenpeace employees are jabbering - you, as a reader, are twitching yourself, there are enough other hucksters.
                1. labendik
                  labendik 6 October 2013 08: 39 New
                  0
                  It is not necessary again, in the style of "United Russia", to be sidetracked. YOU HAVE CLEARLY WRITTEN THAT GREENPEAS GETS MONEY FROM THE SALE OF "DUI". Read your article carefully. You have to answer for your words !!! After that, and your entire article is worthless.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. 31231
                      31231 6 October 2013 14: 48 New
                      0
                      All the same, mistakes should be recognized, and not puffed up and move down to the last. Well, they went a little over with a catchword, well, this is an article, not a people's court.
                      Personally, I apologized to the man for my haste and carelessness.
                      1. Volodin
                        6 October 2013 15: 59 New
                        +1
                        And I thought that you really asked me a question:
                        question to Alexey
                        . I did not know that the answer in the question was not foreseen in advance, otherwise why would you:
                        not puff and move down to the last
                        .
                      2. 31231
                        31231 6 October 2013 19: 42 New
                        0
                        Alexey, I asked about the availability of reliable information about what you said in the article
                        buying tickets and dope replenishing the growing budget and quenching Greenpeace's appetites.

                        the article does not say at all that Greenpeace is distributing drugs.


                        That is, you want to say that it is not Greenpeace who sells the "nonsense", but the money from this sale goes to the Greenpeace budget? Are dealers paying bribes to Greenpeace?
          2. IGS
            IGS 6 October 2013 00: 21 New
            +1
            For some of the young people, the incentive to attend concerts, from which Greenpeace receives income, is the opportunity to buy drugs at these concerts. Thus, in this case, we can consider a bunch of illegal activities for the sale of drug-containing drugs and drugs and the public activities of Greenpeace, albeit indirectly. Try, dear, (note on "you") to object, the person simply incorrectly formulated his phrase, not showing disrespect to you personally, unlike you.
            And then they raised a cry, they insulted me, something I didn’t hear about these colored ones, so that they would appear near Fukushima laughing
            1. labendik
              labendik 6 October 2013 08: 47 New
              +1
              It is necessary to formulate correctly, but in general it does not attract randomness here. And personally, I want to tell you when a person rests against the last, despite the UNCONDABLE FACTS - it is written in black and white, somehow it does not cause me special respect. I'm sorry.
  • Setrac
    Setrac 5 October 2013 20: 11 New
    +1
    Quote: labendik
    I’m somehow far from a fan of Greenpeace and other leftist riffraff, but you didn’t notice that you accused Greenpeace of drug trafficking. It seems to me that this is already too much.

    It seems to you, but it does not seem to the competent authorities.
    1. labendik
      labendik 5 October 2013 20: 50 New
      -4
      What are these bodies? NKVD?
      1. IGS
        IGS 6 October 2013 03: 46 New
        +2
        Wake up, the NKVD, the MGB, the KGB ... made a mistake at least a century, I sympathize, and stop flooding, "orangey". Here about the "green" speech wassat . Wrong page, and resource too.
        1. labendik
          labendik 6 October 2013 09: 07 New
          +1
          Yes, I adhere to liberal views, but the State Department, unfortunately, does not pay me, I have to live on their own. I, of course, could call you some kind of "red-brown", etc., but even in this I do not see any sense. You at least read what it is about, and think before you write something. What kind of nonsense about "competent authorities"? That, there are official statements of any "competent authorities" - NKVD, KGB, Defensiv, Sigurantsa, NSA. etc., that GREENPEES TRADES IN DRUGS AT THE CONCERTS? !!!
  • Alikovo
    Alikovo 5 October 2013 14: 19 New
    +1
    American mongrel like the United Nations, the IMF, NATO, the Baltic states, Poland.
  • kosopooz77
    kosopooz77 5 October 2013 14: 48 New
    +8
    ExxonMobil is the most active in the Arctic, but Greenpeace is not attacking their platforms. Why would it be?
  • pensioner
    pensioner 5 October 2013 14: 51 New
    +2
    Now on REN TV they showed an announcement of a program about greenpeace with something like this comment: "Why did it take to turn the detention of a greenpeace vessel into an act of intimidation?" Well, Y. Shevchuk got in, put in his 5 kopecks: "This is not an extremist action. Normal. Slightly hooligan. Rock and roll!" Like this...
    1. 31231
      31231 5 October 2013 17: 31 New
      +2
      Yura Shevchuk already tired of seeing Russian songs to sing. Understands that liberal songs are paid more.
      1. pensioner
        pensioner 5 October 2013 17: 51 New
        +2
        Money has nothing to do with it. I have no doubt that he is PERFECT !! It’s just a pity that these "IDEAS" were embedded in this very head ... I loved his work. But, by the way, for 15-20 years now, shevchuk hasn't written anything like a travel guide. Maybe it was then that his rebirth from a patriot and lyric poet to a liberal took place?
        1. 31231
          31231 5 October 2013 21: 03 New
          +1
          I don’t remember something, but did he participate in the defense of EBN from the Emergency Committee together with Kinchev and Makarevich?
  • IGS
    IGS 5 October 2013 15: 02 New
    +4
    We lacked the "blue", now the "green" have trampled ... How much wickedness (namely "wickedness", not "evil spirits") has been raised against us ... recourse Straight rebellion banderlog wassat
  • savage1976
    savage1976 5 October 2013 15: 17 New
    0
    Quote: sigizmund472
    For example, detention was mostly carried out without the presence of lawyers. We will appeal against unlawful actions of both investigative and judicial authorities.

    Well, of course, of course ... Mrs. Isakova was not invited to the detention. But if unknown guys enter the house (or office) of Mrs. Isakova through the windows, what will Mrs. Isakova herself do? Something one of two things, in my opinion - either shout "good people," or sit down at clever books and look for what exactly the above guys are violating at the moment.

    No, I think this lady will invite the police, and she will begin to offer her lawyer services to those who climbed up.