The large reconnaissance ship "Yuri Ivanov" (project 18280) is launched

39
By 2020, the Russian fleet should receive more than 50 modern warships. In addition, by the same time, the Ministry of Defense of Russia expects to order and receive a little less than 100 various auxiliary vessels for various purposes. We are talking about tugs, support vessels, rescue vessels, transport vessels and other ships. In addition, the Russian fleet ordered the construction of 2-x special communication vessels (large reconnaissance ships), built under the project 18280.

The first large reconnaissance ship of the 18280 project was named “Yuri Ivanov” (it is planned to build 2 of such a ship) and was laid out in 2004 year, but the financial situation of those years did not allow to pay for the works in full and on time. For this reason, during the first few years of construction, the process of work left much to be desired. In addition, several years ago, another problem manifested itself, which affected the timing of construction. OJSC “Kolomensky Zavod” was not able in time to deliver the power plant units necessary for the ship. For this reason, the construction plans have been amended. At present, the installation of all the necessary equipment, including the power plant, is continuing on the ship.

The launching of the ship took place in St. Petersburg on Monday, September 30, 2013 at the Severnaya Verf Shipyard OJSC. The ship was launched from a floating dock. Yuri Ivanov (serial number 787) is the lead communications vessel (large reconnaissance ship of the 1st rank) of project 18280, which is being built for the Russian Navy. The ceremony of launching the ship on water was attended by senior representatives fleet and industry: Admiral Alexander Tatarinov, chief of the General Staff of the Russian Navy, and Igor Zakharov, vice president of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC). For another 6 months, the ship will be completed afloat, at the end of 2014, "Yuri Ivanov" after completion of all necessary tests will be handed over to the customer, the ship will begin its service as part of the Northern Fleet.

The large reconnaissance ship "Yuri Ivanov" (project 18280) is launched

On the ship in the slipway and on the stocks of the enterprise, the main complex of assembly work was completed, most of the mechanical equipment systems were installed, which ensure safe launching and the ship completion process afloat. The ship was laid in December 2004 of the year, withdrawn from the 13 workshop June 2013 of the year. Initially, it was planned to be launched in the 2012 year, but later the launch was postponed for one year due to disruptions in the delivery of equipment and interruptions in funding.

The developer of the 18280 project ship is St. Petersburg-based JSC Iceberg Central Design Bureau. The main feature of the ships of this project is a very high level of automation, integration of complexes and systems. The purpose of the 18280 project ships is to provide communications and control of the fleet, conduct electronic warfare, radio and radio intelligence. It is reported that the ships built on this project will have significant potential for further modernization.

The name of the lead ship of the series was in honor of Vice Admiral Yuri Vasilyevich Ivanov (1920-1990), who all his life was associated with the fleet and intelligence. From July 1965 to July 1975, he served as chief of intelligence of the Navy, from July 1975 to January 1979, held the position of head of the Intelligence Directorate - Deputy Chief of the Main Staff of the Navy for Intelligence. Yuri Ivanov made a very big contribution to the development and development of a permanently operating intelligence system of the Russian fleet.


Due to the fact that Severnaya Verf Shipbuilding Plant OJSC was included in the register of the sole supplier of communications ships of the 18280 project for the Russian Navy, on November X of this year it is planned to lay out the second serial communications vessel (serial number 14). By order of the commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy, the second ship of this project has already been given the name “Ivan Khurs” (also in honor of the vice-admiral of the Soviet fleet).

The communication ship Yury Ivanov of the 18280 project is a fundamentally new ship for the Russian fleet, which will significantly exceed in its tactical and technical characteristics and capabilities similar ships of previous generations. Its main feature will be the versatility and high level of automation and system integration. It is already clear that this will be the largest ship in the Russian fleet among all the ships of this class.

The specific composition of the reconnaissance equipment installed on the ship, for understandable and understandable reasons, is today kept secret and is unlikely to become the property of the general public in the near future. All publicly available information relates only to the electronic equipment of the vessel and concerns that part of it which does not have a direct relationship to all the tasks facing the ships of this class. For example, it is already known that the ship will have the navigation radar MP-231-3 installed and the integrated bridge system “Bridge-18280” is used. Details about the other equipment of the ship are kept secret. Secrecy in relation to the composition of the target equipment of the ship is primarily due to its tasks. It is reported that one of the tasks of a large 1 rank reconnaissance ship can be tracking the US missile defense system.

Technical characteristics of the ships of the project 18280:
Full displacement - about 4000 t.
Maximum length - 95 m.
Width - 16 m.
Draft - 4 m.
The power plant - 2 diesel engine 5DRA 2720 HP each.
Maximum cruising range - at least 8000 miles (at a speed of 16 nodes)
Maximum speed - 20 nodes
Crew - 120 people.
Armament:
Artillery - 4 installations MTPU with large-caliber machine guns KPV 14,5-mm (4х1);
Anti-aircraft missile - Igla type MANPADS;
Equipment - a set of equipment for communications, navigation and radio intelligence: the integrated bridge system "Bridge-18280", navigation radar MP-231-3.

Information sources:
-http: //www.nordsy.spb.ru/pressroom/2262
-http: //bmpd.livejournal.com/626326.html
-http: //www.arms-expo.ru/049051124051051051052056.html
-http: //militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-731.html
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    4 October 2013 07: 58
    a very necessary ship in our fleet! keep it up! I think he will be a good splinter in the back of NATO
    1. +3
      4 October 2013 08: 53
      Everything is fine and the ship is good and necessary, but I would like more of such launches ... I would like to hear about the launches of cruisers, at least the laying of aircraft carriers and much more ... recourse
      1. Nitup
        +1
        4 October 2013 19: 42
        Quote: Romn
        Everything is fine and the ship is good and necessary, but I would like more of such launches ... I would like to hear about the launches of cruisers, at least the laying of aircraft carriers and much more ... recourse

        You don’t hear about the descent of the cruisers, most likely. Since they as a class will cease to be produced for our fleet, as well as for the US fleet, by the way. We are now developing a destroyer that will have strike and defensive power at the cruiser level. This is possible due to the fact that modern electronics and radio electronics are much more compact, like weapons systems, so that on a vessel of the same size now you can install more weapons than before.
        1. gunnerminer
          -2
          4 October 2013 23: 53
          This is possible due to the fact that modern electronics and radio electronics are much more compact, like weapons systems, so that on a vessel of the same size now you can install more weapons than before.



          But what, were the previous electronics and radio electronics so large that they affected the compactness of weapons systems? Are there any exaggerations in your words? What are the sizes of torpedo tubes, ATGMs (launch transport missile containers) and other things that can decrease in size? Exaggerate? Instead of 20 missiles can squeeze 80 or 100?
    2. +2
      4 October 2013 10: 55
      2 ships of this class are few, at least 3 are needed, if the ship is delivered to the dock for 4 fleets of the Russian Federation, only 1 ship remains
    3. +1
      4 October 2013 14: 24
      To the big ship - a big antenna !!!
  2. +13
    4 October 2013 08: 03
    To make the sutra for readers a little warmer!
    1. +14
      4 October 2013 09: 04
      and a microscope yet
    2. 0
      5 October 2013 04: 09
      Quote: Karavan
      To make the sutra for readers a little warmer!

      Thank you, it immediately became easier on the soul.
  3. +39
    4 October 2013 08: 33
    Is this a big reconnaissance ship ??? THIS IS BIG
    Atomic reconnaissance aircraft "Ural" USSR 1988
    1. +5
      4 October 2013 10: 05
      Electronics has stepped far forward. So now the ranks of the fleet ships and the ranks even of the times of the USSR are no longer worth comparing.
      1. gunnerminer
        0
        5 October 2013 00: 07
        Electronics has stepped far forward. So now the ranks of the fleet ships and the ranks even of the times of the USSR are no longer worth comparing.




        Watching whose, and on what element base I stepped.
    2. 0
      4 October 2013 10: 19
      But it’s in a different direction (tracking and collecting information on launched missiles), for interception it is like an ordinary missile defense system.

      And yes, he was killed in the USSR. Conscripts burned both cars, the ship froze in the harsh Pacific winter and it became unusable, there is only one reactor in good condition and that’s all.
    3. avg
      -1
      4 October 2013 10: 49
      Well yes, long live Soviet computers - the largest computers in the world. Take a look at your phone and see how electronics has changed since then.
    4. +1
      4 October 2013 12: 32
      Well, how big, compared to what remains - big.
    5. coast
      0
      4 October 2013 13: 02
      sorry project from the beginning did not go, project 1941
    6. Storm
      +1
      4 October 2013 15: 21
      No it's tremendous laughing
    7. Nitup
      +2
      4 October 2013 20: 03
      Quote: Kibalchish
      Is this a big reconnaissance ship ??? THIS IS BIG
      Atomic reconnaissance aircraft "Ural" USSR 1988

      Yes, this is a large reconnaissance ship, and in your photo - a huge reconnaissance ship.
    8. Yankuz
      +3
      4 October 2013 20: 35
      So it was the Big Union in the Soviet Union, and in Russia - such a big one! wassat
  4. 77bob1973
    +7
    4 October 2013 09: 00
    For the last five years I have been looking at this unfinished building almost every day. Without it, even something is missing ...
    1. gunnerminer
      0
      5 October 2013 00: 08
      For the last five years I have been looking at this unfinished building almost every day. Without it, even something is missing ...



      We’ll have to watch at least one more year.
  5. +1
    4 October 2013 10: 18
    Any such event is frankly happy! good
  6. +3
    4 October 2013 10: 43
    In addition to it, long-range reconnaissance aircraft of the Navy would have modernized. Then it would be absolutely gorgeous.
    1. gunnerminer
      +1
      5 October 2013 00: 09
      In addition to it, long-range reconnaissance aircraft of the Navy would have modernized. Then it would be absolutely gorgeous.




      How can one modernize what is not in nature?
  7. smiths xnumx
    +3
    4 October 2013 10: 48
    Well done, communication and electronic warfare - our everything!
    "Ass in soap, muzzle in mud - we are soldiers from the communications company"
    Although, aircraft carriers are building faster ... From December 2004 to October 2013. Launching is an obvious progress. Let's wait how the delivery of RTR systems by the industry will progress.
    Well, in order to really assess the capabilities of the current military-industrial complex, you need to wait about 5 years. Just recently laid ships, well, other weapons systems, pensioners will retire. For the five-year period, keeping afloat at the cost of the titanic efforts of the crews, ships and submarines of extreme ages, thirty and forty years, will finally stand at the walls of bankrupt shipyards. After 5 years, the call will sound again - wait another 5 years. And then the time will come X. I'm afraid that it will be negative, but we'll see.
    1. Misantrop
      0
      4 October 2013 20: 27
      Quote: Kuznetsov 1977
      Well, in order to really assess the capabilities of the current military-industrial complex, you need to wait about 5 years. Just recently laid ships, well, other weapons systems, pensioners will retire. For the five-year period, keeping afloat at the cost of the titanic efforts of the crews, ships and submarines of extreme ages, thirty and forty years, will finally stand at the walls of bankrupt shipyards. After 5 years, the call will sound again - wait another 5 years. And then the time will come X.

      Although this is bad, but ... wait. I don’t want, to be honest, that you are right, but ... sad
    2. gunnerminer
      0
      5 October 2013 00: 12
      Well, in order to really assess the capabilities of the current military-industrial complex, you need to wait about 5 years. Just recently laid ships, well, other weapons systems, pensioners will retire.



      Pensioners - living people can be persuaded or persuaded to stay to serve beyond the contract. Ships if they get up, then forever.
  8. 0
    4 October 2013 10: 54
    I really agree with the very necessary ship, but why again to the Northern Fleet?
    1. Nitup
      0
      4 October 2013 20: 12
      Quote: Xroft
      I really agree with the very necessary ship, but why again to the Northern Fleet?

      And this is the first such ship
    2. +1
      4 October 2013 20: 23
      Quote: Xroft
      I really agree with the very necessary ship, but why again to the Northern Fleet?

      because the northern fleet can go through the north pole to the shores of the usa, but the usa does not have such icebreakers.
      1. +1
        4 October 2013 20: 40
        Quote: Fofan
        because the north fleet can go to the us shores through the north pole

        strong pearl, I was even taken aback by reading it! laughing Amused! good Teach geography, huh?
  9. 0
    4 October 2013 10: 59
    they write about him that there are problems above the roof ... they let them down, but how much they will finish building is unclear ... because everything is foggy with the filling.
    1. smiths xnumx
      +2
      4 October 2013 11: 09
      There are a number of problems with the reliability of the RTR and other types of reconnaissance. In addition, it does not work to combine a data exchange system with reconnaissance aircraft, air flying command posts, ships, and displaying the operational situation in real time. It is not intended to work with unmanned aerial vehicles of even the most primitive modifications. .
  10. avg
    +1
    4 October 2013 11: 23
    I am always happy when something new appears in the field of intelligence and especially communications, in which we are constantly lagging behind, which led to sad results. It is enough to recall how in 41 the General Staff could not contact the headquarters of the districts, and the tankers had two main signals - “backwaters” and “do as I do”. For comparison, the German, even light Pz.II tanks were equipped with a Fu 5 shortwave radio station. The range is 6,4 km by telephone and 9,4 km by telegraph.
    That's why, before building aircraft carriers, it is simply necessary to solve pressing problems with ammunition, equipment, maintenance of equipment and away. And above all, with management, intelligence and communications.
  11. 0
    4 October 2013 12: 43
    And I am always glad to be compared with the Germans. And about "just solve pressing issues." Who will decide, and why is it just that you personally decide? Let's go, unlearned and now you decide for a small salary, or all the same you settled down normally and think more about a new car. But those who really decide, cope as best they can, and not as it should, and what, where is the help? Think of a device that is useful, and then listen to how your device did not contact the rate in 41, but the Germans had a tank on each matacycle, and we had one rifle for three.
  12. 0
    4 October 2013 13: 01
    Previously stated that the Pacific Fleet will go
    1. 1712
      0
      4 October 2013 13: 57
      He will act in the Pacific. Will serve near Alaska with its missile defense systems. Track their algorithms and encodings. The desired ship will replace the army of agents and residents.
  13. +1
    4 October 2013 13: 40
    reconnaissance ships are needed, you need 2 minimum per fleet
  14. +1
    4 October 2013 16: 35
    Finally, otherwise the reconnaissance fleet has diminished considerably in recent years, allegedly as unnecessary ... and the "Maryata" never leaves our borders ... there was a whole brigade on the Northern Fleet, but only crumbs remained ... Keep it up !!! !
  15. 0
    4 October 2013 16: 36
    It’s interesting how in the conditions of the coming economic recession, which the authorities are already talking about openly, the state is going to carry out the shipbuilding program? Or to reduce this program, then the dreams of the Navy will remain a dream, or by reducing other budget items, which will hurt a significant number of citizens. Or maybe an economic miracle will happen, it’s hard to believe ...
    1. Nitup
      0
      4 October 2013 20: 16
      Quote: gerafak
      It’s interesting how in the conditions of the coming economic recession, which the authorities are already talking about openly, the state is going to carry out the shipbuilding program? Or to reduce this program, then the dreams of the Navy will remain a dream, or by reducing other budget items, which will hurt a significant number of citizens. Or maybe an economic miracle will happen, it’s hard to believe ...

      It has already been stated that all the volumes of financing planned for GPV-2020 have been preserved.
      1. Misantrop
        +1
        4 October 2013 20: 29
        Quote: Nitup
        all volumes of financing planned for GPV-2020 are preserved
        Those. officials in high chairs will not remain hungry. Already at least it pleases ...
        1. Nitup
          0
          4 October 2013 20: 49
          Quote: Misantrop
          Those. officials in high chairs will not remain hungry. Already at least it pleases ...

          I meant rearmament costs
  16. 0
    4 October 2013 19: 47
    He has an interesting mast. Obviously there will be a lot of antenna systems for various purposes. I think the most difficult work on the electromagnet compatibility of electronic warfare systems, radio-electronic systems, radio-electronic devices, and radio-electronic signals is still ahead.
  17. +1
    4 October 2013 20: 22
    I remember "Marshal Nedelin". After the plant, in 85, we were docked in Kronstadt. There was so much secret service there, we were even afraid to look in his direction! It was a very cool boat full of equipment. That was also a scout. .Like all the other "white" ships. They cut him. Like in the late 90s. Maybe this will be lucky.
  18. 0
    4 October 2013 20: 27
    "Severnaya Verf" is more familiar to me while its old name "Zhdanovsky wink - Well done! Rivet for the Navy corps of various projects. I looked at the site of the Baltic Shipyard. Quite gone from warships. At one time, the giants of the atomic cruiser 1144 project worked. And now the Navy has lost this factory as a customer. It's a pity.
    1. Nitup
      0
      4 October 2013 20: 53
      Quote: xomaNN
      "Severnaya Verf" is more familiar to me while its old name "Zhdanovsky wink - Well done! Rivet for the Navy corps of various projects. I looked at the site of the Baltic Shipyard. Quite gone from warships. At one time, the giants of the atomic cruiser 1144 project worked. And now the Navy has lost this factory as a customer. It's a pity.

      It is not yet known where the new destroyers will be built
  19. gunnerminer
    0
    5 October 2013 00: 04
    There, the subcontractors have problems with RTR and other types of reconnaissance systems. In addition, it doesn’t work to combine a data exchange system with reconnaissance aircraft, airborne flying command posts, ships, and displaying the operational situation in real time. The combat qualities of this unconditionally long-awaited ship will be but the command and developers will be able to hide the main shortcomings of the RTR complexes and other types of reconnaissance. But the frequent unsuccessful results of combat exercises with naval weapons, such as the Bulava missile or the UGST torpedoes, are difficult to hide from taxpayers. Therefore, the delivery of the Navy's reconnaissance ships will be much easier.
    1. 0
      5 October 2013 10: 38
      These problems cannot be solved without the intervention of the customer of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. A lot of enterprises work for the defense industry and each claims its own exclusive role. Therefore, it is very difficult to force developers to unify data exchange protocols. Everyone believes that his protocol is the most reliable and secure. There were very serious problems with the integration of ship’s airborne automated control systems and ground-based air defense control systems of the country, the situation with the integration of reconnaissance assets of the border troops is even worse, there is no talk about the interaction of communication systems and control systems of the CSTO countries (now the main way is by voice, through an open fixed channel communications, in modern conditions it’s the same as through the media).
      Actually, this should be done by the naked research institutes of communications of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, and they were turned into scribblers, they only deal with documents, unsubscribe and contracts.
  20. +1
    5 October 2013 00: 10
    More armament than on the French Mistral. fellow But that's me, by the way.
  21. Admiral 013
    0
    5 October 2013 06: 04
    After the collapse of the Union, our fleet suffered and lost the most. Therefore, it is vitally necessary to restore it, not necessarily to the Soviet level (we will not be able to reach it), but at least have a fleet that can deliver a lot of trouble for the enemy. Well, in electronic warfare, we were always in the leading positions, we could put a simple jammer in all of northeastern China (in our Khasan region there was a battalion of reb, then it was removed and now corefana is quietly jamming us).
  22. The comment was deleted.