AK-15 - another modification of the Kalashnikov

92
Definitive Arms and Krebs Custom jointly created, probably, one of the most beautiful AK modifications. The company Krebs this model was given the designation AK-15.





As a base for AK-15, the Russian “Saiga” was used under the 5,56-mm cartridge. At Definitive Arms, using the Kalashnikov machine gun platform, improved weapon. The weapon was equipped with a magazine receiver, allowing the use of standard magazines for the AR15 rifle. In addition, the AK-15 has a slide delay, which increases the speed of production for firing after the magazine has been replaced.

After the specialists of Definitive Arms conducted work on AK-15, they transferred it to Krebs Custom. Attention given to each element of the weapon. First of all, the old barrel was replaced with a new barrel with a length of 413 mm, equipped with a 4-x slot flame arrester developed by Krebs Custom.

4's slotted flame arrester


Handguard allows you to easily mount additional straps


Handguard fits very tightly with the receiver


The next highlight of the new modification was the installation of the forearm. In the new rifle, the forearm covers the weapon almost the entire length of the barrel. Gunsmiths from Krebs Custom believe that such a length will provide an opportunity to install more popular accessories and various equipment. The new handguard provides installation of attachments in a short time on three sides of the handguard (bottom, right and left). Above there is an integrated Picatinny rail for sighting equipment, although it does not sit low enough to use the popular red dot Aimpoint T-1 Micro sight.

It is also necessary to note the new convenient pistol grip.

The butt was also improved. Thanks to the mounting of the VLTOR butts guide on the rifle, most of the M4 style butts like the Malpul CTR mounted on this rifle can be mounted.

A serious improvement was subjected to the safety lever. The standard lever was replaced with a Krebs lever with a notch to hold the bolt in the rearmost position. This improvement gives you the opportunity to start firing with an open shutter and prevents an arbitrary shot.

The standard trigger mechanism was replaced with the Red Star trigger system.

In addition to all this, the rifle has a Cerakote coating. There are three color options: Magpul Flat Dark Earth, Magpul OD Green and Graphite Black.

The mass of such a tuned rifle equals kilogram 3,62. Length with folded butt is 838 mm, with fully extended - 921 mm.

While the rifle is just a prototype and its cost is unknown, however, apparently, consumers in the US will soon be able to buy it.




According to the materials of the sites http://www.thebangswitch.com/krebs-ak-15-the-sexy and http://www.guns.yfa1.ru
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    92 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +10
      4 October 2013 08: 06
      A copyright, not? Did not hear?
      1. +7
        4 October 2013 09: 09
        Quote: Marrying
        A copyright, not? Did not hear?


        copyrasty is a severe mental illness ...
      2. Aubert
        +11
        4 October 2013 11: 34
        What are you talking about?
        The technical patents for AK have long expired. In fact, AK can be produced by anyone.
        1. +9
          4 October 2013 13: 15
          Ak - maybe Saigu - no. Although this is just tuning and everything, on the other hand judging by the stigma they take a saiga under an American .223
          1. +6
            4 October 2013 13: 35
            Namely, they sell the tuned Saigu - without breaking anything, and the name - if someone did not notice - the K-bookoff is reversed - you won’t dig.
            Another thing is more interesting - where are our Lefties and other gunsmiths?
            1. vanaheym
              +14
              4 October 2013 14: 52
              Quote: lelikas
              where are our lefties and other gunsmiths?

              Mainly under Art. 223 are sitting.
            2. HOUSES
              +2
              4 October 2013 21: 31
              Another thing is more interesting - where are our Lefties and other gunsmiths?
              What did you mean?! I get the impression that our weapons are made in the same way as confectioners make candies - they are so full that they can’t look at them. Well, our gunsmiths do not like their products, they do not like! Medium toggle picatinny slats - deep modernization! They were supposed to stand on arms about 25 years ago and without kicks from the MO and gun owners.
              1. +1
                23 December 2013 20: 43
                I don’t like the Picatinny rail. The Swallow Tail is much more convenient.
                1. vanaheym
                  +4
                  23 December 2013 22: 05
                  Dovetail is convenient only on AKMoids, on which any other mount becomes crutches. Yes, and there was a side bar because of the desire to combine a hedgehog and a hedgehog - to put some kind of optics where the traditional normal mount was not provided for in design. Personally, I do not think the side mount for a traditionally brick-weight sight is a good solution.
      3. 0
        4 October 2013 20: 25
        what rights? Ak is not patented and now everyone who wants to release it!
      4. +1
        7 October 2013 09: 32
        As you can understand, they buy Saigu and remake it into a rifle. So there is nothing illegal here.
    2. +4
      4 October 2013 08: 07
      If the barrel is byak, and the cartridges are bullshit ... then appearance does not play any role. And now with it in the autumn slush in the field ... yes, up to the ears in Russian reality ... question ??? what lexicon the soldier will have when cleaning this machine.
      1. +8
        4 October 2013 09: 30
        Quote: Strashila
        what lexicon the soldier will have when cleaning this machine.

        What soldier are you talking about? Tuning Saigi for practical shooting, in general a toy for the masses. Only it is not clear what is left of Saigi except the box.
    3. rereture
      +10
      4 October 2013 08: 07
      It's just saiga tuning)
      1. +6
        4 October 2013 09: 11
        Quote: rereture
        It's just saiga tuning)


        This is a manic need to make M16 clones from everything on the market ...
        1. vanaheym
          +7
          4 October 2013 12: 39
          And where does the clone AR-15 from all that is available on the market?
          Do you think that such a "Saiga" as it gets to the USA looks better?
          1. +3
            4 October 2013 12: 52
            Why not such a photo ?:

            or such:
            1. vanaheym
              +2
              4 October 2013 12: 57
              Because in the United States, rifled Saigas come in this form - some tricks in their weapons legislation about the number of American-made parts that should be on imported weapons, and in California and New York they are generally sold with an integral store to get around assault weapon ban.
          2. -4
            4 October 2013 13: 17
            for a hunting rifle, it looks great, but what the Americans did is not just for hunting, but for post-shoots on banks.
            1. vanaheym
              +5
              4 October 2013 13: 46
              For some reason, it seems to me that the main buyers of this carbine are the IPSC arrows.
              There, just everything is imprisoned for this - a shutter lag, a fast adjustable trigger, the use of AR-like stores, the characteristic latch of the store.
              All this gives a rather serious gain in speed, while realizing the standard reliable gas system AK.
              1. 0
                7 October 2013 12: 56
                And the fact that it is imprisoned for IPSC, well Duc, I do not argue. But I don’t think that IPSCs were rushing to buy it, so it’s more for post-fireworks. Although I may be wrong.
                1. vanaheym
                  +1
                  7 October 2013 13: 40
                  They didn’t break at all, since even the majority of Ukrainian IPSCshniki prefer to shoot from the AR-15, rather than from the AK.
    4. +11
      4 October 2013 08: 22
      There is a beauty for everyone, for me, so all these body kits and trims only disfigure Russian weapons.
      1. +2
        4 October 2013 10: 34
        Totally agree with you. There is no need to climb into the identity of Russian weapons.
    5. +3
      4 October 2013 08: 26
      The original article is called: KREBS AK-15 - “THE SEXY” -sex Kalash not bad right? And in operation, try to dip it in the mud, in the forend a kilogram will pick up for sure. I do not see any super improvements. The usual design change.
      1. +4
        4 October 2013 08: 55
        That's really seks.x will be with him when you climb through the swamp laughing
      2. +4
        4 October 2013 09: 17
        Quote: igor36
        I do not see any super improvements.

        It does not say that this is an improved Saiga, but an option for 5,56 rounds.
        Quote: igor36
        The usual design change.

        Replacing the trigger, changing the caliber is a "design change"?
        1. +3
          4 October 2013 11: 48
          Quote: Nayhas
          It does not say that this is an improved Saiga, but an option for 5,56 rounds.

          Actually, the Saigi version for 5,56 (223rem) is also available here.
        2. vanaheym
          +4
          4 October 2013 12: 43
          Quote: Nayhas
          Replacing the trigger, changing the caliber is a "design change"?

          And what has to do with the replacement of the caliber - it initially comes in .223, and many IPSC fans change the standard "Saiga" trigger for the adjustable Red Star - it is better.
      3. -1
        4 October 2013 09: 19
        Especially picking out dirt from the neck (store receiver) ... this is a real se-ks.
        Although - something worth paying attention to and think about implementation.
        ... such trifles as a pistol grip, bolt delay, and, of course, workmanship.
    6. +11
      4 October 2013 08: 45
      Cool, I have a Saezhka-12, a reliable device, but heavy 4,5 kg equipped, I had to take a 20 caliber double-barreled gun for normal hunting. MR-301 (in Russian Izh-27). I haven't got a saiga out of the safe for two years now. These are the jokes with the Saiga, i.e. it really doesn’t need a fuck, it’s very heavy, only for self-defense from "horsemen", it surpasses the RPK in terms of the density of fire with grapeshot). And over the years of service I have worn out with AKM, I think it is a very heavy weapon, we need to lighten it as much as possible. My opinion the AK century has passed, we have better options. And the old weapons should be sold to hunters and those wishing with a normal psyche, but not to "horsemen" they have this junk and so full cellars.
    7. +3
      4 October 2013 09: 03
      Quote: air wolf
      My opinion is that the AK age has passed, we have better options.
      There is always something better. Think about AEK? Soon to write off AK. All 20-3 and the beginning of the 21st centuries are proof of this.
    8. +3
      4 October 2013 09: 06
      Definitive Arms and Krebs Custom have jointly created, incorrectly, one of the most beautiful modifications of AK.


      Beautiful AK-15 ????
      M-16, no more ...
    9. -1
      4 October 2013 09: 44
      As for me - AK is NOT a beautiful weapon at all. Yes, probably the most reliable, but the most common. But I don't dare to call this "humpback" beautiful. The trouble is that the percentage of "beauty" of a weapon is almost always inversely proportional to its reliability.
    10. DuraLexSedLex.
      +6
      4 October 2013 09: 51
      On the 4th photo there is an inscription in large letters "SAIGA" what kind of Kalashnikov assault rifle is this ?! And nothing new is observed in it ... store shaft + new forend, well, of course the slide delay.
      Bullshit for the domestic market of America. I think the name AK-15 is just an advertising move in order to bring together the not close AR-15 and AK)
    11. +6
      4 October 2013 10: 15
      Workmanship and coatings cause tears, we would do that!
    12. +1
      4 October 2013 10: 47
      Who will explain

      Why do you need a Picatinny rail on a combined-arms machine?

      Indeed, the combined-arms machine has a narrow set of additional equipment: a grenade launcher, a scope - everything seems to be ... But for 2 - 3 devices you can create (and have already created) special mounts. Therefore, to produce a combined-arms machine with Picatinny slats is at least stupid.

      It seems to me that the introduction of Picatinny bars is an informational diversion of our ... geopolitical competitors.
      1. +1
        4 October 2013 11: 56
        Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
        Why do you need a Picatinny rail on a combined-arms machine?

        Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
        Indeed, the combined-arms machine has a narrow set of additional equipment: a grenade launcher, a scope - everything seems to be ... But for 2 - 3 devices you can create (and have already created) special mounts.

        The Picatatinni rail is just the standard of fixtures for various additional equipment, nothing more, the Western standard. All the bells and whistles now go under it, dovetail, in the west people would not understand. It's like different charger connectors for mobile phones, who like what.
        Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
        It seems to me that the introduction of Picatinny bars is an informational diversion of our ... geopolitical competitors.

        Geopolitical competitors simply remade our famous weapons to fit their needs and those of our customers.
        1. 0
          4 October 2013 12: 23
          in the west, people would not understand

          But are we doing combined arms weapons for ourselves, or for the West?
          I understand the Picatini straps on weapons for special forces, for the police. But for the army ...
          1. 0
            4 October 2013 12: 34
            Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
            But are we doing combined arms weapons for ourselves, or for the West?

            What does the combined arms weapon have to do with it? An article about tuning a civil carbine. request
            1. 0
              4 October 2013 12: 39
              And I'm talking about general AK
              1. vanaheym
                +1
                4 October 2013 12: 59
                Show the combined arms AK in the article? Can you see him? For example, I see "Saiga" ..
                1. +2
                  4 October 2013 13: 05
                  Show where it is forbidden to write comments and ask questions on related and related questions?
                  1. vanaheym
                    +2
                    4 October 2013 13: 15
                    Given that both the Ukrainian and Russian army are gradually switching to a professional basis, the requirements for weapons of a professional soldier will be somewhat different from the requirements for weapons of conscripts, as well as their tactics, moving away from Soviet instructions with massive infantry attacks.
                    No wonder, for example, the Ukrainian army is switching from SVD weapons to Ukrainian sniper rifles from the Mayak plant in the caliber .338 Lapua Magnum, although the SVD is a legend.
                    1. 0
                      4 October 2013 13: 18
                      Not without reason, for example, the Ukrainian army is moving from the armament of the SVD ...

                      For nothing that goes ...
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. -2
                      4 October 2013 15: 32
                      Is this "Lighthouse"?!?! This is the T-5000 !!!
                      1. vanaheym
                        +4
                        4 October 2013 19: 32
                        If for you everything that is not SVD and bolted is T5000, then yes, then this is T5000.
                        And so, actually - this is the Zbroyar Z-008, an enterprise rifle that lasts longer than Orsis.
                    3. 0
                      5 October 2013 06: 52
                      And how many new weapons are there now in the troops of the Square? Yeah, they enter the army ..., dreams come true, everywhere it’s Zbroyar and Oploti ..
                  2. The comment was deleted.
      2. vanaheym
        +2
        4 October 2013 12: 35
        Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
        Why do you need a Picatinny rail on a combined-arms machine?

        Probably so that the owners of this tuned "Saiga" could put on it not only Soviet sights of the PSO-1 type, but also something else, much more advanced.
        Quote: Ivan_Ivanov
        It seems to me that the introduction of Picatinny bars is an informational diversion of our

        I think this should be told to the designers of the AK-12, who refused side mounting in favor of the Picatinny rail.
        As an option, the main saboteurs are Russian special forces, who for their money buy sights such as Eotech or Aimpoint (due to lack of analogues) and install them on the same AK inventing skis with their installation.
        1. 0
          4 October 2013 12: 43
          Do you understand that there are different requirements for combined arms and special forces weapons?

          So the inconvenience of the special forces has nothing to do with the issue raised. What is the disadvantage of the lack of sights on the Picatinny rail?
          1. vanaheym
            +1
            4 October 2013 13: 03
            Well, that is, special forces can have picatinny rails and normal sights, but for example, a contract soldier does not need a sight at all, even if it shoots from the open?
            (Given the fact that the counterparty troops are almost 100% equipped and in combat conditions have shown their effectiveness)
            1. +1
              4 October 2013 13: 07
              So you want to say that the requirements for special weapons and combined arms are about the same?
        2. 0
          5 October 2013 07: 55
          Quote: vanaheym
          I think this should be told to the designers of the AK-12, who refused side mounting in favor of the Picatinny rail.
          As an option, the main saboteurs are Russian special forces, who for their money buy sights such as Eotech or Aimpoint (due to lack of analogues) and install them on the same AK inventing skis with their installation.


          Another nonsense, adapter-brackets from the side to the Picatinny are produced immeasurably, including even by Russian manufacturers. Or do you think that if a new machine gun is adopted in Russia, the whole army will be re-equipped with it? You are clearly out of touch with reality. And yet, during the joint exercises of the US Marines and the Marines of the Russian Navy in Vladivostok, they clearly showed that the presence of a collimator and assault optics did not in any way affect the results of the exercises, the entire American landing was destroyed 100%. With a similar landing from the Russian side, 25% of the landing was "killed". Laser imitators were used as markers, which brought with them mattress covers. The battle went company to company.
    13. Admiral 013
      0
      4 October 2013 10: 47
      Kalashnikov has long been a full-fledged independent culture. What weapons did you see on the arms of several sovereign states besides Kalashik? So it is not surprising that today until fig all sorts of modifications of this is still the most popular weapon in the world.
    14. +1
      4 October 2013 10: 52
      Well, everything looks completely nothing. BUT (!) All this junk does not give decisive advantages over the original. Yes, replaced the trunk. but if the barrel is much more accurately made, then it will have to be cleaned more often, and this is not always possible in combat conditions.
      1. vanaheym
        +3
        4 October 2013 12: 25
        The accuracy of manufacturing the barrel and its exact landing in the mounting pin - does not lead to an increase in the frequency of its cleaning. But increasing the manufacturing accuracy of the chamber leads to potential problems from the use of cheap ammunition like Wolf / Tulammo with a polymer coating.
        Quote: Zerstorer
        and this is not always possible in combat conditions.

        This is "Saiga", what are the combat conditions?
    15. +1
      4 October 2013 11: 09
      Bullshit. But thanks to the author for the information.
    16. sillsas
      +1
      4 October 2013 12: 01
      Forend a little reminds PPSh.
    17. georg737577
      +1
      4 October 2013 12: 02
      You can immediately buy a SIG 550 and not fool around ...
      1. vanaheym
        +1
        4 October 2013 12: 48
        They can’t just buy a SIG-550; it’s in the USA under a ban.
        1. 0
          5 October 2013 07: 14
          Another disinformation? SIGs are selling well in the US in their price range from 3500 to 13000 bucks! It's just a little expensive for an American. Do not mislead people!
        2. Ytfluunu
          0
          6 October 2013 14: 47
          there is a SIG 556
    18. georg737577
      +4
      4 October 2013 12: 08
      And really, why reinvent the wheel ...
    19. +2
      4 October 2013 13: 02
      If grandmother had eggs, he would be grandfather. AK-15 with such alterations is no longer a grandmother.
      1. vanaheym
        +1
        4 October 2013 13: 06
        This is a commercial project, people make money - if they buy it, then everything is fine. In the base is the "Saiga" that comes to the United States - no AK, no gun, or something else.
      2. faint27
        +1
        4 October 2013 15: 52
        Quote: chunga-changa
        If grandmother had eggs, he would be grandfather

        My favorite army saying)))
    20. -1
      4 October 2013 13: 32
      Definitive Arms and Krebs Custom have jointly created, incorrectly, one of the most beautiful modifications of AK

      Create something, maybe created, only who will use it? Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation? After Serdyukov, abstain (own ass more expensive).
      1. bezumnyiPIT
        0
        4 October 2013 20: 41
        do you care? why if you created something then you need to immediately equip someone with this weapon? gunshot for a gun shop
    21. +1
      4 October 2013 14: 07
      I somehow do not know what kind of mania amers triple the receiving shaft for the store? In M-16, in the PP of various stripes, this mine is available. And the absence of this in AK there for some reason is considered a flaw.
      Specialists, enlighten my dark consciousness! I will be grateful.
      1. vanaheym
        +3
        4 October 2013 14: 26
        The mine was put to use stores AR-15. Without it, these stores cannot be used. We decided to use such stores because of their faster reset (and for IPSC shooters, this is important), and the quality of Magpul exceeds the quality of regular stores.
        1. +1
          5 October 2013 07: 27
          With proper skills, the store is removed and inserted from the AK in 2 movements. The magazine mount is considered the best for AK combat weapons. It seems that you know about shooting from AK only from the Internet.
    22. +3
      4 October 2013 14: 31
      Americans love to practice finalizing the Kalashnikov assault rifle and its tuning and design derivatives, according to Discovery it is often shown, they really like the design ... So in this regard, the master-master, as you want and pervert ... They already have a whole such a subculture dedicated to AK and SVD ... I see nothing wrong with that ... Moreover, people are exploring the capabilities of our weapons thoroughly and making improvements that they consider necessary ...
      1. +2
        4 October 2013 20: 23
        You have a little misplaced accents in the US weapons subculture on tuning and upgrading our small arms. In the first place SCS (by a wide margin) and only in the second AK of Bulgarian and local industries. Everything else Soviet small arms is tuned much less and within the limits of statistical error.
        1. vanaheym
          +1
          4 October 2013 21: 45
          Quote: romanru4
          Everything else Soviet small arms is tuned much less and within the limits of statistical error.

          Soviet AK they have exorbitant money to tune it
          1. 0
            5 October 2013 06: 45
            Again, bullshit? After Iraq and Libya, the US arms market is quite saturated with Soviet-made AKs, and the price tag is quite affordable, especially compared to AR10 / 15. The price ranges from 750 to 1200, depending on the year of manufacture. And besides CIA, the full production of AK is conducted by Vector Arms.
    23. -1
      4 October 2013 18: 19
      Quote: Altona
      ..Although people study the capabilities of our weapons thoroughly and make improvements that they consider necessary ...


      Well, the flag in their hands and a fair wind in the back.

      You look, something new will work out, but it will come in handy good
    24. Garrym
      -4
      4 October 2013 18: 47
      Quote: Serg888
      Another thing is more interesting - where are our Lefties and other gunsmiths?


      Where is the Russian civilian weapons market when a citizen can go to the store and buy a semi-automatic rifle without too much trouble? In the United States there is such a market, where the power of armed citizens is not afraid, and left-handed people with small firms are full, but in Russia the majority of left-handed people go under the article or shabbat. In the United States, citizens can easily make weapons themselves in garages (within the framework of the law), and in the Russian Federation a completely different reality is where you have to wait 5 years to buy small things with a shotgun


      Just do not understand, do you really think that the free circulation of weapons, as in the United States, is this normal? As for me, this is bullshit ... Wild West is long over, but the laws remain. So they live shooting along in the neighbors. Makhnovism is clean.
      But about "Lefty", so the tsar himself invited him to work. That's right, talents should work for the state, that is, for the good of ALL citizens, and not a separate contingent ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. vanaheym
        +4
        4 October 2013 20: 21
        Quote: GarryM
        So they live shooting along in the neighbors. Makhnovism is clean.

        And here, people live tapping each other with hammers, bottles, axes and cutting kitchen knives. And the percentage of people who attack each other with their personal weapons tend to zero, compared with household.
    25. The comment was deleted.
    26. +3
      4 October 2013 20: 11
      Quote: GarryM
      Just do not understand, do you really think that the free circulation of weapons, as in the United States, is this normal? TO


      What’s abnormal here? In Georgia, in Moldova, the short-barrel is sold freely (though with some restrictions). I didn’t hear that the Georgians and Moldavians started a war in the yard. But then every day I watch and listen to on Moscow TV, they KILLED from a traumatic event.
      LORD !!! YES HOW MUCH CAN YOU DO FROM US ???
      Yes, I am ready to become a Georgian or Moldavian to buy a cop and so that it lies at my fingertips.
    27. +1
      4 October 2013 21: 33
      I wonder how much time now takes to disassemble and assemble this product to clean it? Twist all the screws a couple of times to get to the gas chamber, everything will loose. The more bells and whistles, the faster they go loose. Then, bolts, screws, welding, gluing, electrical tape, etc. are used. etc. So the toy is disposable - bought, hung on the wall and admire.
      1. vanaheym
        +2
        4 October 2013 21: 54
        Quote: sedoj
        The more bells and whistles, the faster they go loose.

        Well, just the mechanics of AK are such that either to make a fixed gas tube, or to cling optics to a standard one so that it hangs like a fuck in the hole. Or make a monolithic receiver cover like TWS Dog Leg with a hinge mounted instead of an open sight.
        Or put crutches on the side bar, so that later you can put optics on these crutches.
        The gas pipe itself can be perfectly cleaned without daily removal from the machine. If we talk about loosening, then I see no reason why the fastening screws should loosen in a quality product.
        1. -1
          5 October 2013 02: 04
          Quote: vanaheym
          Well, just the mechanics of AK are

          The mechanics of the Ak are self-sufficient and do not require a body kit, the crap invented in the West is no better than the YEARS that can be operated on AK-like units, absolutely without problems. The side suspension of the sight does not impair accuracy, does not impair ergonomics, it is just different, no worse than the same weaver and picatini, it is just different, created for WAR and not a prom.
          1. vanaheym
            +4
            5 October 2013 02: 58
            Quote: Locksmith
            it’s just different, created for WAR and not promenade.

            The side bar was invented to mount optics on the weapon, which was not adapted for this. And has always been regarded as an ersatz. It was then that some urban legends arose that it was an ideal for war, and so on.
            AK - not adapted for the operation of normal sights. All these body kits are also a left ersatz, which makes it possible to put something that is not set according to normal and cross the snake with a hedgehog. But it is necessary to set, because a soldier who cannot even see the enemy who shoots at him usually dies. Again, the Soviet doctrines of mass infantry attacks went to the bottom together with the country. PSO-1 / Racurs / Thread - sights of the level of the 60s, which is shown by really warring units of the Russian army, which put the kit up to the point that they buy imported optics for their money, which they put on picatinny rails - they probably don’t know about that, as the side bar and the optics under it for war, unlike combs.
            Quote: Locksmith
            Mechanics Ak is self-sufficient

            Well, that is - a self-sufficient fighter with an open sight at a time makes a guy equipped with AKOG and / or modern night optics installed on the machine?
        2. -3
          5 October 2013 07: 59
          Quote: vanaheym
          Quote: sedoj
          The more bells and whistles, the faster they go loose.

          Well, just the mechanics of AK are such that either to make a fixed gas tube, or to cling optics to a standard one so that it hangs like a fuck in the hole. Or make a monolithic receiver cover like TWS Dog Leg with a hinge mounted instead of an open sight.
          Or put crutches on the side bar, so that later you can put optics on these crutches.
          The gas pipe itself can be perfectly cleaned without daily removal from the machine. If we talk about loosening, then I see no reason why the fastening screws should loosen in a quality product.


          What the fuck are crutches and mount screws in AK? And adapters for what? You probably don’t even suspect them ....
          1. 0
            5 October 2013 08: 16
            Quote: vanaheym
            Well, that is - a self-sufficient fighter with an open sight at a time makes a guy equipped with AKOG and / or modern night optics installed on the machine?

            See the post above!
    28. 0
      5 October 2013 13: 49
      Quote: sven27
      Quote: chunga-changa
      If grandmother had eggs, he would be grandfather

      My favorite army saying)))


      She would be a transvestite.
    29. Crrusader40
      0
      5 November 2013 23: 59
      there is nothing completely new in it. just hung any garbage.
      not sure what it should be called AK-15
    30. 0
      4 May 2016 21: 42
      Quote: Timeout
      And yet, with the joint exercises of the US marines and marines of the Russian Navy in Vladivostok



      And can it be more detailed with proofs? Google doesn’t give out anything.
    31. 0
      9 October 2016 16: 13


      Plagiarism from the new Kalashnikov!
    32. 0
      2 November 2016 19: 30
      It certainly looks beautiful, it’s brutally possible to say, but .... how would it ... in general, it’s like a good dog, you know, in the very juice Alabai put it in little ruffles, pink bows, pull on a thong and so on including a plug in fall. he will remain a dog, but he is no longer destined to be a fighter. so with this modification of AK. you can’t fight with him anymore. if the dirt gets in the casing or in the store’s receiver all the weapons fail, and the sand immediately becomes contraindicated, and about the muzzle brake in general, no, of course it is beautiful. only after a queue of three five rounds you will not see the target in the collimator and you will have to look over the scope and with a high degree of probability to catch someone else’s bullet while you crush the eggs. I don’t understand other people's sores on horseradish for good weapons
      The company Definitive Arms using the platform of the Kalashnikov assault rifle, improved weapons. Weapons equipped with a store receiver, allowing you to use standard stores for the AR15 rifle. In addition, the AK-15 has a shutter lag, which increases the manufacturing speed for firing after the magazine has been replaced.
      How can you improve perfection tell me. No, what is the IMPROVED Kalashnikov assault rifle (not to be confused with modernization)
    33. 0
      20 November 2016 12: 02
      It looks like an M-16, not Kalashnikov. soldier
    34. 0
      24 November 2016 19: 05
      Here's my question. By way of reasoning only. I do not mind, I am for the modernization of the AK, but I would like it not to forget in a fit of enthusiasm that the best is the enemy of the good. In any long-term conflict, one of the main points is the possibility of producing military documents and weapons with minimal labor costs. As an example - German tanks! They were good tanks! Technological, with good armor, cannons, and now imagine that the Germans could do them as quickly as we T34 !!! ??? And now the awesome Teutonic genius was never able to develop a technology that would make it possible to make any weapon quickly and with a commensurate quality and, in my opinion, not quite corresponding to the geography and climate. As "Merkava" or "Abrams", but in our copses and ravines, will they go far? Maybe in the steppes of the outskirts, then yes, it will probably go.
      Well, so, I fall into liquid spring mud and all this shize merrily penetrates through all these cute and brutal holes? No, I do not deny their usefulness in terms of, well, maybe cooling, because I don’t know if it helps or not. Also (due to retrogradeness on the topic - before the sky was pigeons) I do not always understand the body kit of the weapon with additional pribludes. Sometimes they are needed, sometimes not, but you need to be able to effectively use sights before those that walked to us from the 19th century. And what, practice aiming without closing your left (right) eye. Just how each element of the weapon is good when you need it. And if you have the ability to quickly replace something - our side mount. Ah - some say this is the last century, so what? Why does the Automaton need prohibitive accuracy when working from 50 to 150 meters? In my opinion, our side, quick-release mount with a weaver rail is more convenient. Yes, after the rearrangement, it seems, it is necessary to shoot, etc., but if after the rearrangement to the mentioned 150 m I get, say, not to the center, but 2 to the right? (I’m not talking about specialists. This is a separate conversation.). , but a simple fighter? Itself fell, dropped from a fright or something else tryndets. I saw one like that, okay, the border, with it throws the trunk less, but he didn’t need a powerful sniper scope in the forest for some reason, for some reason combined with a calimator, I still didn’t understand it. Beyond my comprehension. The red dot can give out your position, the assault handle can catch, the flashlight can crash, the scope will fly off ... In general, in any situation for combined arms affairs, I would prefer to have the most light, unencumbered weapons, but I would carry something packaged for the specifics in the knapsack immediately on interchangeable levels. Well this is my deeply pure opinion.
    35. 0
      25 June 2017 13: 44
      Some garbage ...

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"