Military Review

In Tula deployed assault brigade

22

The Ministry of Defense and the General Headquarters of the Armed Forces of Russia decided to form a separate assault brigade (SSBR), which will be deployed in Tula, said Commander of the Airborne Forces Colonel-General Vladimir Shamanov.


“In accordance with the new concept of airborne development, approved by Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, before 2017, the formation of the 345-th separate airborne assault brigade of constant combat readiness will be completed in Tula,” said Vladimir Shamanov. He stressed that the team will be a three-battalion composition. “Two battalions will be formed by airborne assault, and one - by parachute, that is, it will be parachuted from BTA aircraft along with military equipment,” the general specified. The commander noted that the formation of the brigade should be completed by 2017 year. "Now the headquarters of the Airborne Forces jointly with the General Staff and other departments of the military department are working on the staff of the Special Security Forces Command, whose headquarters are to be located in Tula, in the homeland of the first Russian defense minister, Army General Pavel Grachev," said Vladimir Shamanov.
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. erased
    erased 2 October 2013 11: 39
    +4
    Well, with the part number, everything is clear - in memory of the legendary 345 Airborne Regiment. The rest is fog.
    The brigade will be part of the Airborne Forces, separate, as well as Ulyanovsk. Why 3 battalions? And how will it differ from the regiment? The second artillery division? Intelligence instead of intelligence? To hell with PDB? What tasks will the team carry out?
    And the connection to Grachev is all the more unpleasant. While he was in the USSR army, he served with dignity. And how he became the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation and after his "heroic" leadership of the Chechen war, nothing can be said about him except swearing.
    In a word, the darkness is complete. Maybe in time everything will become clear. In the meantime, some questions.
    I am glad that the Airborne Forces is growing quantitatively. Although it would be better quality.
    1. svp67
      svp67 2 October 2013 11: 44
      +1
      Quote: erased
      The rest is fog.
      I agree a lot in this decision is not clear. Separate, meaning the direct subordination of the headquarters of the Airborne Forces or MO. And isn’t it not enough, in that case, maybe it needs a number of more than three baht ...
      1. sakmagon
        sakmagon 6 October 2013 22: 04
        0
        separate, which means that it is not part of a division or other merger of which the Airborne Forces do not have, before there were periods when the DRB were part of the districts. Now, yes, of course, in the subordination of the Airborne Forces
    2. Russ69
      Russ69 2 October 2013 11: 54
      +5
      Chet, it is not clear whether this team will be re-created or simply renamed part of the 106th Tula Division?
      1. Vadivak
        Vadivak 2 October 2013 12: 04
        +1
        Quote: Russ69
        Chet, it’s not clear that this team will be re-created


        The Mebelführer generally wanted to defocus her in mid-2009. I wanted to reorganize the airborne assault regiments and support units into brigades and send them to strengthen other airborne divisions.
        In general, a rumor about brigades instead of regiments in airborne divisions has been going on for a long time
        1. Russ69
          Russ69 2 October 2013 12: 53
          +1
          Quote: Vadivak
          In general, a rumor about brigades instead of regiments in airborne divisions has been going on for a long time

          So the Shamans seemed to be against the brigades. Well, at least in due time the Airborne Forces defended from the reforms of the stool.
    3. Rattenfanger
      Rattenfanger 2 October 2013 11: 58
      0
      Quote: erased
      To hell with PDB?

      The PDB is capable of parachuting along with the equipment, followed by the landing of the landing DShB and other units. DShB with "kopecks" (or whatever they are planning) will not jump.
    4. Serg 122
      Serg 122 2 October 2013 12: 26
      +1
      Question: Is not a brigade planned from the Tula division ?!
      1. zanoza
        zanoza 2 October 2013 13: 43
        0
        Why in Tula? Why not in the Far East? Not in the south?
        1. sakmagon
          sakmagon 6 October 2013 22: 07
          0
          in the Far East there are TWO DShB and in the south there
  2. serjant4
    serjant4 2 October 2013 12: 15
    0
    and with the 51st regiment what will happen?
  3. Kolovrat77
    Kolovrat77 2 October 2013 12: 54
    0
    I believe in Shamanov. If only the quality did not fall. In general, I think they have allocated the Airborne Forces as a separate branch of the armed forces, which would have turned out to be like the Indo Marine Corps. As far as I know, this is Margelov’s dream. Under the Union, this could not be done by any agreement there. You see, yes, p.Indostan is an island there marines, we are a continental power in our Airborne Forces, like quick reaction troops. My opinion. Once again, if only the quality did not fall, God help. Glory to the Airborne Forces.
    1. Rattenfanger
      Rattenfanger 2 October 2013 18: 52
      +1
      The Airborne Forces is a separate type of troops.
      1. Kolovrat77
        Kolovrat77 2 October 2013 19: 12
        0
        When the Union was part of the ground forces.
  4. ilf
    ilf 2 October 2013 12: 59
    0
    And in the photo, the NATO paratroopers
    1. SAG
      SAG 3 October 2013 03: 11
      0
      phew ... and I thought I noticed one! a complete scribe, how the author could confuse our white domes with their carpet jumps angry
      Well, in the background, it’s definitely not 76, Hercules most likely
  5. Semurg
    Semurg 2 October 2013 15: 47
    0
    unclear. in Tula, it seemed that the division was the brigade instead or near and why the division and the brigade were nearby. or they want to conduct an experiment on a direct comparison of brigade and division.
    1. sakmagon
      sakmagon 6 October 2013 22: 10
      0
      different parts, on the existing base it is easier to form, well, for example, let's take the "cheapest" - an airfield
  6. Yuri Y.
    Yuri Y. 2 October 2013 16: 17
    0
    Quote: ilf
    And in the photo, the NATO paratroopers

    On the resource where taken it is designated as ours (caption under the photo).
    1. Airman
      Airman 2 October 2013 21: 57
      0
      Quote: Yuri I.
      Quote: ilf
      And in the photo, the NATO paratroopers

      On the resource where taken it is designated as ours (caption under the photo).

      In the photo, both the NATO plane and, most importantly, NATO parachutes.
      1. Alex 241
        Alex 241 2 October 2013 22: 08
        0
        Fort Bragg soldiers jump out of a C-130 during Operation Toy Drop at Sisily’s landing site. During Operation Toy Drop, thousands of toys are delivered to children in the Fayetteville neighborhood by air every year since 1998. This operation is organized by a group for interaction with the civil administration and the population, together with other teams from Fort Bragg base.
  7. Blondin nikonov
    Blondin nikonov 2 October 2013 20: 09
    +1
    It would be nice to see Comrade Shamanov as the Minister of Defense, and not the acting "managers" of the Communist Party .... who didn’t even serve urgently ....
  8. Yuri Y.
    Yuri Y. 2 October 2013 23: 00
    0
    The guys are like there in the movie "Well, I'm silent, I'm silent ...". I didn’t see a duffel bag hanging in the photo, ours didn’t jump like that.
    1. Kolovrat77
      Kolovrat77 3 October 2013 16: 17
      0
      And about GK 30 you have not heard. With all due respect.