Proton-M with Luxembourg satellite launched from Baikonur: for the first time after the July accident

39
From the Baikonur Cosmodrome (Kazakhstan) launched in 1: 38 MSK Proton-M launch vehicle with a Briz-M upper stage and Astra-2E spacecraft.

The orbital unit with the Briz-M upper stage and the Astra-2E spacecraft has already separated from the third stage of the Proton-M launch vehicle. “The rocket has completed its flight phase without comment,” the representative of the Space Center named after him. Khrunicheva, as reported by Interfax. According to him, further removal of the Astra-2E spacecraft into the target orbit is carried out with the help of five inclusions of the Briza-M marching system.

The first launch is performed 94 seconds after the separation of the orbital block from the rocket, as a result of which the reference orbit is formed. The second inclusion forms an intermediate orbit. As a result of the third and fourth inclusions, a transition orbit is formed. The fifth launch brings the satellite to the target orbit.

The total duration of the launch, from the launch of the launch vehicle to the separation of the spacecraft, will be 9 hours 12 minutes.

The contract for launching the device using the Proton-M launch vehicle was concluded by the satellite operator SES (Luxembourg) and International Launch Services Inc. (ILS). The owner of the controlling stake in ILS is the FSUE "Khrunichev State Space Research and Production Center", which is also the developer and manufacturer of the Proton rocket and the Briz-M upper stage.

The launch of the Astra-2E spacecraft was the sixth launch of the Proton rocket in 2013 and the 389 launch in its flight stories. For ILS, the launch was the fifth launch of the Proton rocket in 2013 and the 82 of the launch of its commercial operation in April, 1996.

The Proton rocket was used 23 for removing the payload of the SES group of companies. In addition, it is the 16-th launch of the Proton with a spacecraft made on the basis of the Eurostar platform. This is also the 22-th launch in the 2013 year from Russian space centers.

Astra-2E is a telecommunications spacecraft created by the leading European developer of space technology - Astrium - for the satellite communications operator SES. The new satellite will provide new generation of broadcast, VSAT and broadband services in Europe, Africa and the Middle East.

Astra-2E will be installed in geostationary orbit at 28,2 degrees east longitude in order to restore and increase power fleet SES, including over 50 geostationary devices. The device, based on the Eurostar E3000 platform, is equipped with 60 Ku-band transponders and three Ka-band broadband transponders.

A satellite weighing about six tons is designed for an 15-year orbital life. The span of the deployed solar panels of the device is 40 meters.

The launch and launching of the spacecraft in orbit will be under the control of the Astrium control center in Toulouse, France. The Astra-2E satellite will be the seventh Eurostar apparatus in the SES constellation.

Recall, on July 2, the Proton-M rocket with three Glonass-M vehicles launched from the 81 site of the Baikonur cosmodrome. Almost immediately after separation from the launch pad, it sharply deviated from the flight path, began to disintegrate in the air, fell near the launch site and exploded.

On board the launch vehicle was about 600 tons of heptyl, amyl and kerosene.

The emergency commission came to the conclusion that the cause of the incident was the incorrect installation of the angular velocity sensors.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    30 September 2013 17: 17
    Well, rehabilitated.
    1. +4
      30 September 2013 17: 26
      Quote: klimpopov
      Well, rehabilitated.

      It is very sad that it is necessary to rehabilitate, in order to launch satellites normally, first you need to fill up a couple of three launches. Proton is one of the most reliable missiles.
      1. +1
        30 September 2013 19: 55
        Quote: APASUS
        It is very sad that it is necessary to rehabilitate, in order to launch satellites normally, first you need to fill up a couple of three launches. Proton is one of the most reliable missiles.

        Why be surprised? As collected, and flew. In the USSR, this (incorrect installation of sensors!) Would not have been allowed. And if it was found! That measures would have been taken immediately, and in the future THIS would definitely not happen again. And we are pouring in with "enviable" regularity, winding thoughts of sabotage .. And, interestingly, they just can't get to the bottom of why, and eliminate the cause .. And every time there are new bloopers.
      2. +6
        30 September 2013 20: 16
        Like a Luxembourg satellite - everything is fine, like a Russian one - so the same rocket crashes. The pattern is obvious! Need to shoot for sabotage. Then the saboteurs will consider: on one side of the scale is a fee from Uncle Sam, on the other - their own life. The United States, of course, will scream about human rights, because the sabotage business will collapse.
        1. +3
          30 September 2013 20: 42
          Quote: Kohl
          Then the saboteurs will consider: on one side of the scale is a fee from Uncle Sam, on the other - their own life. The United States, of course, will scream about human rights, because the sabotage business will collapse.

          The screech of the US State Department is a direct indicator of the good work of the Russian Foreign Ministry and the FSB soldier
    2. +13
      30 September 2013 17: 58
      Quote: klimpopov
      Well, rehabilitated.

      Do not flatter yourself. If the satellite were GLONAS, then this Proton would also have fallen.
      1. +6
        30 September 2013 19: 04
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        Do not flatter yourself. If the satellite was GLONAS, then this Proton would also fall


        For you, definitely. Why protons with glonasses fall, but they fly with different foreign satellites.
    3. nnnnnn
      +3
      30 September 2013 19: 14
      Quote: klimpopov
      Well, rehabilitated.

      rehabilitated it pleases, but it makes you wonder when the foreign satellites are no problems, and when the Russian explodes at the start, then it does not go into orbit ???
      1. 0
        30 September 2013 19: 22
        I think, because then there will be problems with foreign ones, and a possible loss of customers, which is not profitable. Well, what’s Russian, well, a couple of other missiles will explode, the state budget will be cut normally + they will be shared with the prosecutor’s office, they’ll protect, they will threaten with a finger, but calm down on this.
    4. +1
      30 September 2013 22: 16
      Quote: klimpopov
      Well, rehabilitated.

      Klim, hi! Don't ... No. ! With alien companions flies with our falls request ..
    5. 0
      1 October 2013 07: 04
      And foreign satellites never ruined.
  2. +14
    30 September 2013 17: 21
    It leads to strange thoughts. Our devices are crushed, and foreign ones are displayed without problems.
    1. +8
      30 September 2013 18: 08
      Quote: Wedmak
      It leads to strange thoughts. Our devices are crushed, and foreign ones are displayed without problems.
      I wrote, when Proton fell with our companions, that this is sabotage. Many disagreed with me. I wonder what they think now.
      1. 0
        30 September 2013 20: 56
        Quote: bomg.77
        I wrote, when Proton fell with our companions, that this is sabotage. Many disagreed with me. I wonder what they think now.

        I don’t know what they think now, but I have always held something like yours. Still sewn with white thread. Where is the FSB looking ??
    2. rereture
      0
      30 September 2013 18: 09
      It has long been noticed
    3. +3
      30 September 2013 18: 37
      Ugh three times. It was not enough for him to fall off with a foreign one. To justify it, so to speak.

      By the way, I would have booted with a foreign one, they would have immediately said that the satellite was specially stuffed with "enemies" with explosives in order to discredit our space program.
      And even if it was a pre-planned sabotage, then there is nothing worse than "knocking down" a missile right after launch. It is better either immediately on the table to damage the launcher, or high above the ground, when the commission will investigate only using telemetry data.
    4. +2
      30 September 2013 20: 02
      Quote: Wedmak
      It leads to strange thoughts. Our devices are crushed, and foreign ones are displayed without problems.

      Rather, the thought of sabotage. Or negligence, which in this case is the same ..
  3. +2
    30 September 2013 17: 22
    Such never fall .... It is not strange hehe heh!
  4. +2
    30 September 2013 17: 23
    I also can’t dismiss this thought. it really looks like a pattern.
  5. +7
    30 September 2013 17: 23
    Quote: klimpopov
    Well, rehabilitated.

    If you think so, then the question arises: - "Who, in front of whom and in what?" Korolev's missiles also fell, but not because of general laxity and irresponsibility.
  6. +1
    30 September 2013 17: 30
    Quote: 123321
    I also can’t dismiss this thought. it really looks like a pattern.

    Yes, it doesn’t seem so.
  7. +10
    30 September 2013 17: 32
    Their satellites display normally, ours do not. It's time to recreate "Smersh" and register the tower with confiscation for sabotage. Only now there is no one to make a decision - in the Kremlin they themselves are afraid of "Smersh" like fire.
    1. avt
      +4
      30 September 2013 18: 00
      Quote: erased
      Their satellites display normally, ours do not. It's time to recreate "Smersh" and register the tower with confiscation for sabotage. Only now there is no one to make a decision - in the Kremlin they themselves are afraid of "Smersh" like fire.

      request Well, that's actually the question and answer. What do you add here, Smersh "then you can enter, but where for him to take the GKO and the Supreme, if ,, not 37 years" ??
      1. 0
        30 September 2013 18: 22
        Alas, yes ... It will be so ... fall that it is necessary and fly that it is not necessary.
    2. +3
      30 September 2013 19: 07
      for their ditched companion they will have to pay a large sum for an unfulfilled contract. and for their ditched no answer. Maximum punishment transfer to another job and they will put some kind of worker! and all
  8. 0
    30 September 2013 17: 39
    The contract for launching the device using the Proton-M launch vehicle was concluded by the satellite operator SES (Luxembourg) and International Launch Services Inc. (ILS). The owner of the controlling stake in ILS is the FSUE "Khrunichev State Space Research and Production Center", which is also the developer and manufacturer of the Proton rocket and the Briz-M upper stage.


    Interestingly, who was the contractor with the Glonass satellites?
  9. Gur
    0
    30 September 2013 17: 41
    I, too, thought this thought must someone to the wall still put
    1. SvetoRus
      +1
      30 September 2013 17: 58
      What are you bloodthirsty smile , maybe in a "sharazhku" for a start?
  10. 0
    30 September 2013 17: 41
    All the same, I want to get a return on. Who wants a tasty thing?
  11. -3
    30 September 2013 17: 54
    Quote: Wedmak
    It leads to strange thoughts. Our devices are crushed, and foreign ones are displayed without problems.

    There are state. launches (for rubles), but there are commercial ones (for cabbage). For a commercial launch, specials are appointed. a commission on the type of military acceptance, which, for the sake of cabbage, conducts tight control over the entire missile manufacturing cycle. Well, who’s for wood? - nihto!
    1. +3
      30 September 2013 19: 03
      Did you participate in those commissions or did you blurt out for the red word?
  12. andru_007
    +4
    30 September 2013 18: 23
    Quote: klimpopov
    Well, rehabilitated.

    The fact that Protons are falling only with Russian satellites (as I understand it mostly GLONASS) makes us wary ... And the fact that these “failures” lead to the reform of the entire industry makes us wonder ... what
    Z.Y. words involuntarily come to mind like wrecking or cutting ... some dark thoughts ... and it's sad ...
    1. Volkhov
      -2
      30 September 2013 19: 18
      The idea that the fallen Proton started on a summer morning with an active ionosphere, but doesn’t come up with a calm night on an autumn night?
      1. 0
        1 October 2013 09: 31
        And where is the ionosphere? The fallen Proton did not even go up to a kilometer.
  13. DPN
    +2
    30 September 2013 19: 28
    WHAT TO **** I get. Russian satellites explode and burn, and foreign ones fly on these missiles and carry out their tasks. So some kind of filth curled. FSB in vain bread eats or roofs the enemy.
  14. DPN
    +1
    30 September 2013 19: 35
    In general, there’s nothing to be happy about, the time of taxi drivers before the ISS is coming to an end and Russia will soon be left without a lot.
    Unless of course there is no Trojan horse in the bosom!
    1. 0
      30 September 2013 21: 22
      Quote: DPN
      In general, there’s nothing to be happy about, the time of taxi drivers before the ISS is coming to an end and Russia will soon be left without a lot.
      Unless of course there is no Trojan horse in the bosom!

      In the meantime, the TROYAN HORSE is charged along with the Glonasses ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  15. +2
    30 September 2013 20: 03
    The conclusion suggests itself: GLONAS should be output only complete with foreign ones.
    1. +1
      30 September 2013 20: 21
      Quote: Bort Radist
      The conclusion suggests itself: GLONAS should be output only complete with foreign ones.

      During the last Proton crash, one satellite was foreign, it seems from New Zealand. I could be wrong, but only in the country, but the fact that one of the two was foreign is for sure.
    2. +1
      30 September 2013 20: 24
      Quote: Bort Radist
      The conclusion suggests itself: GLONAS should be output only complete with foreign ones.

      Instead of laughing
  16. aleksandr.k
    0
    30 September 2013 20: 29
    Shot installers of angular velocity sensors. The next time they will work normally.
    1. 0
      30 September 2013 21: 35
      Next time you will not find installers of angular velocity sensors.
      1. 0
        1 October 2013 09: 33
        Come on! Is it really so difficult to screw this sensor correctly? You have to be careful, we’re not planting potato tea.
        1. Dusk
          0
          1 October 2013 13: 25
          I wonder where the control department looked when this sensor was installed ...
          1. 0
            1 October 2013 18: 00
            Remember the case when the Americans, instead of training warheads, picked up a B-52, nuclear. Where and who looked, it was completely written there. These are not there, these are signed without looking ... Here the same thing.
        2. 0
          1 October 2013 17: 58
          Yes, in general, everything is simple there and screw and solder. Only these children's "shoot" are already tired. Found the key to solving all the problems.
          This is a systemic problem, the industry is not in the position to sort out grub-cadres. We need normal control and education of workers and engineers. Their timely stimulation, not swoops, as it is now. Then just dismissal will be a terrible punishment.
  17. +1
    30 September 2013 21: 34
    Quote: klimpopov
    Well, rehabilitated.

    Maybe when they want !!!
  18. -1
    30 September 2013 21: 39
    flew on green papers
  19. +3
    30 September 2013 21: 46
    The Russian soul is arranged very strangely - when everything is bad, we hope for the best, when it starts to turn out we are looking for the guilty. In general, good news - let the Protonchiki fly to increase defense capability and replenish the budget!
  20. 0
    30 September 2013 23: 19
    That space production, that aviation, do not forgive self-confidence and reassurance. You can never relax, production discipline is the basis of success. And the Federal Security Service should look for enemies.
  21. 0
    1 October 2013 00: 39
    it’s not at all profitable for our sworn partners (friends to say that language doesn’t turn around) to be in orbit, and they’re falling. Our special services are not working properly. The locksmith was fired. Another one will rise for statistics, and will plop with an important product (God forbid).
  22. 0
    1 October 2013 00: 52
    They removed the military acceptance, that’s all. Such high-tech products must be manufactured with double, triple control.
    1. 0
      1 October 2013 01: 01
      Quote: voliador
      They removed the military acceptance, that’s all. Such high-tech products must be manufactured with double, triple control.


      We love to set up costly experiments on ourselves. What if it works out? Yes, it will not work, the production technology, quality control system, including military acceptance, have been developed for decades. And suddenly take everything and cancel?