Izhevsk Radio Plant OJSC at the exhibition of weapons RAE 2013 presented a mobile robotic complex

31
Izhevsk Radio Plant OJSC at the exhibition of weapons RAE 2013 presented a mobile robotic complex


Izhevsk Radio Plant participates in the exhibition of arms Russia ArmExpo 2013, presenting an innovative development - a mobile robotic complex (IRC).

The mobile robotic complex of the Izhevsk Radio Plant is a remotely controlled unmanned off-road caterpillar combat unit designed to detect and destroy stationary and mobile targets, fire support and troop reconnaissance, maneuvering tasks.

MRK, equipped with 12,7 mm caliber machine gun Kord, takes part in demonstration shows during all four days of the exhibition. Yesterday, 25 September, the quality of the ISCs were successfully demonstrated to the Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin.



“At the exhibition we are presenting, we present our development - a mobile robotic complex - together with OAO NPK UralVagonZavod. The firing of our mobile robotic complex is limited by demonstration demonstration regulations, ”comments Alexey Slugin, Deputy General Director of Izhevsk Radio Works OJSC. “But the firing capabilities of the complex were confirmed by the results of firing as part of the demonstration of promising robotic complexes at the Defense Ministry’s training ground in July of this year.”

“The experience and potential of our enterprise and UralVagonZavod corporation allow us to create innovative equipment capable of ensuring the fulfillment of the tasks of the Development Concept of robotic complexes in the interests of the Russian Ministry of Defense,” said Alexey Slugin.
Representatives of Izhevsk Radio Plant also ask media representatives to be more correct with submitting information about the developers and manufacturers of the mobile robotic complex. The initiative for the development and production of a prototype belongs to OAO Izhevsk Radio Plant.



Background

The RTO of the Izhevsk Radio Plant is controlled by radio at a distance of up to 5 kilometers; protected from enemy electronic warfare. In addition to the 12,7 mm caliber machine gun Kord, an MRK can also be equipped with tank Kalashnikov machine gun (FCT) 7,62 mm or 30 mm machine-gun automatic grenade launcher AG-17A or AG-30/29. Special equipment: laser rangefinder, gyrostabilizers armory platforms, a thermal imager and a ballistic computer - provide firing accuracy, as well as the ability to operate the complex in difficult topographic and meteorological conditions at any time of the day. The robotic complex has the function of automatic capture and the ability to conduct up to ten targets in motion. The target is held while moving the turntable 360 ​​degrees. Backup power allows the complex to work autonomously up to 10 hours on the move (in "sleep mode" for up to seven days). Cruising range - 250 km. Operating temperature range - from minus 40 to + 40C.
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    28 September 2013 07: 15
    Wow! Handsomely. And what has not been exhibited before? I hope the electronics inside is domestic.
    1. Sergh
      +2
      28 September 2013 07: 37
      Quote: Kibalchish
      Handsomely. And what hasn’t been exhibited before

      M-yes, a good device! He put him to sleep for a couple of days, and then at night to the rear of the Nazis, and not just one, but a couple of them. Beautiful, beautiful !!! You have to buy it at the cottage, otherwise the neighbors got into the currant ... pardon me a meal without asking.
      1. 0
        28 September 2013 08: 00
        The distance must be increased. 5 km - frontline. You don’t particularly send to the rear.
        1. +1
          28 September 2013 12: 01
          Quote: a52333
          The distance must be increased. 5 km - frontline. You don’t particularly send to the rear.


          It must mean that there will be the same robot only with a repeater. 5km is melee.
          1. 0
            28 September 2013 21: 18
            In general, at the front, during anti-terrorist operations - a good thing. A radius to increase, so generally a song.
    2. -1
      28 September 2013 08: 09
      Electronics inside 99% that is not domestic.
      Too high, it had to be lower, so that the silhouette would look like a Mk tank, or like "Goliaths".
      In general, of course it’s good, the trouble began. Even if it’s completely bad, anyway, the main thing started. Hurray!
      And if there were "Elbrus" inside, would they have enough brains?
      1. +2
        28 September 2013 09: 16
        About 99% themselves came up with?))) There 22-32 NM tech. to anything, and we do the rest of the size ourselves.
      2. +1
        28 September 2013 20: 14
        Quote: mirag2
        Too high, it was necessary to lower, so that the silhouette would resemble a tank MK


        Something T-26 reminded me
    3. +2
      28 September 2013 08: 22
      It's time to move on to high-tech products.
      1. Turbo 253
        0
        28 September 2013 10: 51
        -----------------
    4. +1
      28 September 2013 10: 29
      I always believed in our craftsmen, and now we need to file this project as they say!
      1. 0
        29 September 2013 13: 11
        Quote: Civil
        I always believed in our craftsmen, and now we need to file this project as they say!

        There is something to work on, and there is a question on armament:
        Why not post an ATGM platform to fight tanks?
    5. Airman
      -1
      28 September 2013 11: 33
      Quote: Kibalchish
      I hope the electronics inside is domestic.

      The share of imported components in Russian electronics is 50-90%, so we are very dependent on imports.
  2. +2
    28 September 2013 07: 25
    The main thing is that such a robot does not shoot its own.
    1. Airman
      0
      28 September 2013 11: 54
      Quote: Ilya Mikhalych
      The main thing is that such a robot does not shoot its own.

      The designers have come up with the idea to put a self-liquidator on it, if, after the ammunition has been used up, the enemy will capture him.
    2. +2
      28 September 2013 12: 02
      Quote: Ilya Mikhalych
      The main thing is that such a robot does not shoot its own.


      This is more the concern of those who shoot. The robot has nothing to do with it. This is a telecontrol platform, not a robotic one.
      1. Airman
        -1
        28 September 2013 13: 44
        Quote: Geisenberg


        This is more the concern of those who shoot. The robot has nothing to do with it. This is a telecontrol platform, not a robotic one.

        It’s what confuses me to the noise immunity of this telecontrol, it’s possible to drown out the control channel in the current state of electronic warfare equipment.
  3. 0
    28 September 2013 07: 28
    We can if we want! well done!
  4. 6 sunrise 9
    +1
    28 September 2013 07: 32
    So, in robotics, it seems we are already catching up with the west. Such a machine is still far from a combat robot, but apparently in this direction we stand on the spot.
  5. +6
    28 September 2013 07: 43
    The declared characteristics of RTOs pleasantly surprised me. The most important thing now is not to fuck it up, otherwise it will be as always. They showed in the barn - until better times, because there is no money again. stop
    1. +1
      28 September 2013 08: 07
      citation-Izhevsk Radio Plant takes part in the Russia ArmExpo 2013 arms exhibition, presenting an innovative development - a mobile robotic complex (RTO).

      It is a pity that he did not come up with a name. winked


      Quote-Besides the easel machine gun "Cord" 12,7 mm caliber MPK can also be equipped with a Kalashnikov tank machine gun (PKT) 7,62 mm or 30-millimeter machine-gun automatic grenade launcher AG-17A or AG-30 / 29.


  6. 0
    28 September 2013 08: 02
    Here she wants to say the words of the heroine of one of the cartoons: "It's very good that you are so green and flat ..." wink The only thing that I question is the tracked chassis, I think that on such a technique "multi-wheeled" is more appropriate ...
    1. Sergh
      +4
      28 September 2013 08: 34
      Quote: svp67
      I doubt that this is a tracked chassis, I think that on such a technique it is more appropriate to "multi-wheeled

      In such situevina, sometimes I catch myself thinking, and not just me so clever, probably the designers also asked this topic, well, like, change the platform, change the wheels. And the project partners were looking for and testing out different options, and here it is necessary to stand in their place and weigh all the arguments. Suppose he doesn’t ride on asphalt, but crawl along the thick grass, where even with his car the grass wraps around all the rotating parts, so here the caterpillar, like a sled, crushes kalea under the sowing, although I can be mistaken, but they lie in this unit put a caterpillar s-bay-flounder, obviously everything is provided.
      1. 0
        28 September 2013 20: 44
        Quote: Sergh
        In such situevina, sometimes I catch myself thinking, and not just me so clever, probably the designers also asked this topic, well, like, change the platform, change the wheels

        I will not say anything about your "cleverness", since I am not personally acquainted with you, but I expressed my opinion. And as its justification I can give the following arguments:
        - the cross-country ability of modern "multi-wheeled" chassis, especially light ones, not just below the tracked ones, and the winding of grass on the wheels that bothers you so much, sorry - nonsense. With the same success, you can be afraid of winding it on the drive wheel of the caterpillar drive ...
        - in case of damage to the caterpillar from a minefield or enemy fire, this object will be immobilized and the crew, who could have repaired, even under enemy fire, there is no caterpillar in it, so the chance of losing becomes 100%, the "multi-wheeled" scheme gives a chance of the machine not stay in place;
        - and the last modern "multi-wheeled" schemes allow the use of a caterpillar, to address issues of increasing cross-country ability.
        So, in my opinion, a "multi-wheeled" scheme is still preferable here, with the exception of one point - prices, but in this technique saving "on kopecks" can ultimately lead to "ruble losses"
    2. Turbo 253
      -2
      28 September 2013 09: 58
      -----------------
      1. +1
        28 September 2013 12: 05
        Quote: Turbo 253
        ---


        And then ? Where is the production sample where are the real performance characteristics? What is it to us that the guys in the garage remake tanks in karting ??
        1. +2
          28 September 2013 12: 11
          Quote: Geisenberg
          And then ? Where is the production sample where are the real performance characteristics? What is it to us that the guys in the garage remake tanks in karting ??


          visitors to padding have been activated recently angry two flew into the ban this newly arrived third. laughingProbably one of those banned winked
          1. Turbo 253
            -2
            28 September 2013 13: 23


            Russian technology drone is more than 20 years behind
        2. Turbo 253
          -1
          28 September 2013 13: 18
          8 years ago ---
  7. 0
    28 September 2013 09: 39
    looks bad
    1. Turbo 253
      -2
      28 September 2013 10: 03
      ---------------
  8. vaddag1
    0
    28 September 2013 10: 20
    t-37 ....... what quality means
  9. 0
    28 September 2013 11: 24
    Interesting - does "sleep mode" mean automatic "awakening" in the event of an unidentified target appearing in the visibility zone?
    1. +1
      28 September 2013 12: 06
      Quote: marder4
      Interesting - does "sleep mode" mean automatic "awakening" in the event of an unidentified target appearing in the visibility zone?


      Remote control implies that the operator sits on the other half and presses buttons.
      1. 0
        28 September 2013 13: 10
        those. while the robot "sleeps" the operator sits and shoots with his eyes on the sides?
  10. +1
    28 September 2013 13: 30
    Chassis T-26 recalls
    1. windjoker
      0
      29 September 2013 23: 54
      That's right T-26 + "young technician" circle - nothing advanced
  11. 0
    28 September 2013 14: 19
    I hope the project will develop and be implemented "in metal". Let's watch ...
  12. 0
    28 September 2013 15: 12
    in the search engine, type the Viking snow and swamp vehicle, it looks like the device is based on it ..
    1. Vadim K
      +1
      28 September 2013 15: 50
      The chassis also seemed familiar.
      We took the finished chassis, the Belarusian platform Adunok. No armor. The size of this robot is not less than 3 meters.
  13. Vadim K
    0
    28 September 2013 19: 05
    another robot http://ria.ru/arms/20130928/966395904.html
  14. Vadim K
    0
    28 September 2013 21: 45
    video from the exhibition