"Justice" at all costs

46
Recently, high-ranking American politicians are increasingly and more insistently calling for the start of a military operation against Syria. However, a large part of the world community recognizes that a forceful invasion is a dead-end method of resolving the current situation and can lead to both a humanitarian and a nuclear catastrophe.

Syrian authorities do not have nuclear weaponsHowever, the so-called “peaceful atom” is actively used in the country. These technologies are in demand in agriculture, industry and medicine. If American missiles hit such facilities, tens of square kilometers of the country's territory will become uninhabitable, thousands of people will receive a lethal dose of radiation. In addition, dozens of victims will be counted directly from the missile attacks themselves.

This and many other factors indicate that only United Nations peacekeeping is the only way to resolve the difficult situation in the Syrian Republic and restore peaceful life in the country. Most of the world leaders have already realized this, and therefore, at present, the Americans are left alone in their desire to strike at the army of Bashar al-Assad. Such permanent allies as Great Britain and France refused to support the United States. Washington cannot even count on the support of its own NATO bloc.

People still remember the tragedies that led to the US actions in Iraq, Libya, and the support of the opposition in Egypt. The once prosperous countries are on the verge of a humanitarian catastrophe. Continuous stream of messages about human victims.

Despite the fact that the US authorities insist on the guilt of Bashar al-Assad in the use of chemical weapons, which is the main pretext for overthrowing the legitimate president of the Syrian Republic disagreeable with the Americans, they have not presented any weighty evidence. However, the UN commission working at the site of the chemical attack has already found evidence that indicates the use of prohibited weapons by the opposition. A video was also made public showing how several armed militants charge a large-caliber mortar with special ammunition. The ammunition has the form of a hermetic blue tank with a detonator. The video shows how one of the militants, under the supervision of a specialist, twists a detonator into ammunition, after which the entire mortar crew hides in a shelter and carries out a shot.

Apparently, this is why the American authorities are trying to unleash an operation against the Syrian authorities as soon as possible. It is in their interest not to let UN specialists finish their work.

Meanwhile, according to UN Deputy Secretary General Valerie Amos, organization volunteers in Syria receive threats from the armed opposition. Recently, 11 UN staff members have already died in Syria.

The need for a peaceful solution of the problem is recognized worldwide. The UN Secretary-General and the leaders of most of the countries in the organization insist that the parties sit down at the rehearsal table. “A political decision is the only way to stop the bloodshed in Syria,” said Ban Ki-moon.

In addition, even citizens of the United States understand the need for a diplomatic solution. A survey conducted by Reuters showed that 56 percent of Americans are against intervention in the civil war in Syria. Rallies against military operations were held on the streets of many American cities. However, Barack Obama and his administration continue to insist on the need to strike at Syrian territory, which directly contradicts the UN Charter, which states that any military operation other than self-defense is aggression.

In this situation, the main task of the world community is the preservation of peace and the prevention of arbitrariness on the part of the state, which places itself above others.
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    26 September 2013 06: 03
    When the war does start, I suggest that Assad actually use chemical weapons somewhere in the suburbs of Washington or New York. Maybe then the American herd will think about how they annoyed the whole world with their "democracy".
    1. Crocodile
      +1
      26 September 2013 08: 03
      Let's hope that the topic with the chemical attack has already exhausted itself!
      The article was a little late, but it’s too early to relax - the states will look for a reason for the democratization of Syria.
      A respite must be taken to re-equip the country and consolidate success in the repelled territories.
      And these words concern not only Syria, but also Russia!
      1. +2
        26 September 2013 09: 12
        Quote: Crocodile
        Let's hope that the topic with the chemical attack has already exhausted itself!


        Yeah, and now the US authorities will focus on the search for biological weapons.
        And if it doesn’t roll, then plasma, psychotronic, and so on. The United States has a vile goal, and in order to achieve it, they will use the same vile means.
        1. -3
          26 September 2013 13: 13
          Bravo, Alexey. Here I completely agree with you. As the famous movie hero said: you need to think
    2. slacker
      +1
      26 September 2013 09: 17
      It is necessary to initiate the issue of initiating criminal proceedings against specific American leaders for committing crimes against peace and humanity.
      And the tone of the Yankees policy will immediately change.
      1. -1
        26 September 2013 13: 14
        And it remains to clarify: how?
      2. -4
        26 September 2013 13: 37
        Quote: Loafer
        It is necessary to initiate the issue of initiating criminal proceedings against specific American leaders for committing crimes against peace and humanity.
        And the tone of the Yankees policy will immediately change.


        File a lawsuit in an international court in The Hague. Just from the principle that the imperfections are thoughtful.
        1. -2
          26 September 2013 16: 07
          Quote: Sandov
          Quote: Loafer
          It is necessary to initiate the issue of initiating criminal proceedings against specific American leaders for committing crimes against peace and humanity.
          And the tone of the Yankees policy will immediately change.


          File a lawsuit in an international court in The Hague. Just from the principle that the imperfections are thoughtful.


          Suing the court itself? What's the point?
    3. -3
      26 September 2013 13: 10
      And about HIM.O. Have you thought well?
    4. 0
      26 September 2013 15: 49
      Quote: Passer
      When the war does start, I suggest that Assad actually use chemical weapons somewhere in the suburbs of Washington or New York. Maybe then the American herd will think about how they annoyed the whole world with their "democracy".


      Explicit application gap. First, not Assad, but the Syrian patriots, so Bashar has enough problems. Secondly, not in the suburbs, but in the center, otherwise it makes no sense - mostly those who are not involved and innocent will suffer. Thirdly, they should not be allowed to land on the ground with an explosion, but with an aerosol from a plane about 50 meters away ...

      something like this.

      PS: fourthly, inappropriately nothing to do so. Enough to destroy power substations, bridges and railways, as they were going to.
  2. stranik72
    -3
    26 September 2013 06: 09
    Only money, the USA, of all the warriors always came out financially secure, even moreover, the 1st and 2nd world war, became a kind of Eldorado for them, made the mattress great, and the fact that it’s a question in blood is not for "them", but for the devil who created this state. God if you are, punish the USA.
    1. Crocodile
      -1
      26 September 2013 08: 06
      Hope for God, but don’t be bad!
      It's time to pull out Russian assets from Western banks, and let them into the development of the country!
  3. vitek1233
    -2
    26 September 2013 06: 11
    56% against the war, but there are 44% more d-bs who are for
    1. 123123123
      -1
      26 September 2013 06: 53
      Who said that 44% are in favor, there are always abstentions ....
      1. Crocodile
        0
        26 September 2013 08: 13
        I wonder if there is evidence of how many Americans know where Syria is.
        Data on the mass protests of the people is too exaggerated!
        Most likely, the number of American defenders of Syria is much less than the number of defenders of blue whales!
        1. vahatak
          -2
          26 September 2013 23: 07
          I think these 56% of those who know.
  4. -3
    26 September 2013 06: 13
    Americans are currently left alone in their quest to strike at Bashar al-Assad’s army.

    how could they forget such giants supporting amers in their quest to bring peace and prosperity to a planet like Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and, of course, Georgia
    1. Crocodile
      -2
      26 September 2013 08: 17
      For the time being, there are those who want to relish the American anus!
      Young democrats in a single impulse provide diplomatic assistance to the states!
  5. +2
    26 September 2013 06: 14
    The attitude of not their henchmen to their different dem.values
    if not everything says a lot:
  6. -2
    26 September 2013 06: 34
    Hello all.
    In addition, the need for a diplomatic solution is understood even United States citizens.

    They reach the latter.
    However, Barack Obama and his administration continue to insist on the need to strike at Syrian territory, which directly contradicts the UN Charter, which states that any military operation other than self-defense is aggression.

    They are already three to four Nuremberg heaped.
  7. -2
    26 September 2013 07: 07
    The US has already missed the moment to strike. At the UN, it's time to push for a collective strike against the aggressor, which is clearly the Nobel laureate.
  8. -4
    26 September 2013 07: 17
    from the Don.
    Bambamke and USAike do not give a damn about everyone! They can’t calm down their exclusivity in any way. Refusing all countries to pay with Amer’s papers is the way to stall this whole ... brotherhood !!!
  9. +2
    26 September 2013 07: 37
    The author is wrong that a "political solution" is needed. It just doesn't exist. It is precisely a "forceful solution" that is needed. Destruction of militants in the bud. More likely they will not pop up elsewhere.
    1. -2
      26 September 2013 15: 33
      I agree. The political round behind sheer superiority was won by Putin.
      To prevent the terrorist infection from regrouping to another region of the world, a forceful solution with a clear superiority of Russian forces, which is currently available in Syria and the Mediterranean Sea, would be the best "exercise" with the use of "pinpoint strikes" on the militants.
  10. -3
    26 September 2013 07: 50
    Recently, high-ranking American politicians are increasingly calling for a military operation against Syria

    You at least manage to leave Afghanistan "not cropped", apparently you have not been patted enough there.
  11. -2
    26 September 2013 07: 59
    It doesn't seem so long for the United States to be as developed. They have a public debt ceiling and so 17 mln. The other day they will defend the position that it would be necessary to raise the ceiling, otherwise we will have a default. They just don’t seem to want to raise the state debt ceiling. But on the other hand, it will hit the entire world economy, and again, as under Nixon, when he defaulted - the whole world ran to save America at its own expense at no cost. Now about the same will most likely happen. My question arose: why did the USSR not declare itself the only bastion of the right model for the economy against the backdrop of the US default? Very direct interesting.
    1. -2
      26 September 2013 22: 39
      Quote: Sunjar
      . They have a public debt ceiling and so 17 billion.


      they have a public debt ceiling of 17 trillion, not billions.
  12. +5
    26 September 2013 09: 46
    The US has long been living in debt. US foreign debt has exceeded all reasonable limits. The only way they see the outbreak of war is to spur their dead economy. On TV, they say that everything is fine, but in fact, everything has long been in BIG Zh. PE!
    1. -4
      26 September 2013 22: 41
      for how many years we’ve just heard: big, big, but this doesn’t want to appear))
    2. vahatak
      -4
      26 September 2013 23: 11
      Long????? NO!!! FROM THE VERY BEGINNING! During their war of independence, they received a loan from France, and after the war they refused to pay. It is believed that, among other things, because of this, a crisis began in France, which led to a revolution.
  13. albanech
    +4
    26 September 2013 12: 11
    Quote: major071
    The US has long been living in debt. US foreign debt has exceeded all reasonable limits. The only way they see the outbreak of war is to spur their dead economy. On TV, they say that everything is fine, but in fact, everything has long been in BIG Zh. PE!


    Yes, the United States has always lived in debt, and this whole situation does not prevent the United States from being a hyena "devouring" the foundations of democracy - this is far from a secret! Their economy is far from dead! I worked in the USA for about 7 years! The issue with food in the USA has been resolved - the people are well fed ($ 1 per kg of beef) and are pleased with the fact that there is work and housing (rent an apartment from 250 - 500 per month). Salary about $ 300 per week (from $ 1800 per month and above). The United States has lived in debt and will live and spit on its debts. The United States has a very powerful gold reserve and a strong world banking system. Most of the world's corporations are concentrated in the United States - their offices. And about the complete W * PY - empty DISINFORMATION! THE USA IS FREQUENTLY CALLED THE Vulture of the WORLD - "RESIDENT OF EVIL" USA - A COUNTRY OF DOUBLE MORALITY!
    PS I can say that the US can be broken by the principle of "strangling" 200 world corporations that rule the worlds with the tacit consent of the US administration!
    1. -5
      26 September 2013 12: 35
      Quote from albanech
      The United States has a very powerful gold reserve and a strong global banking system.

      But ... then I ask you to answer, WHY DOES THE USA REFUSE (or are not able?) To return part of the gold reserves of Germany?
      Trillions of unsecured US dollars "walking" around the planet, issued "into the light" without security - a sign of the strength of the financial system ????
      1. albanech
        +1
        26 September 2013 12: 45
        I answer as it is! "THE US DOESN'T CARE ABOUT THE DEBTS OF SIMPLE MORTALS - THEY ARE ABOVE ALL COUNTRIES"! I repeat - a completely different level of state policy!

        "Walkers" on planet threeЛLyons unsecuredНny US dollarsЛares released "into the light" without security - a sign of the strength of the financial system ????
        GOLD STOCK OF THE USA - THE GUARANTEE OF THE CURRENCY OF THE USA - THIS IS UNDISPUTABLE! I am sorry that you do not know much!
    2. -3
      26 September 2013 14: 17
      Quote from albanech
      The issue with food in the USA is resolved - people are full

      Are you malnourished in Belarus now? So "hungry" that you squint at the states ...
    3. -5
      26 September 2013 18: 31
      Quote from albanech
      PS I can say that the US can be broken by the principle of "strangling" 200 world corporations that rule the worlds with the tacit consent of the US administration!

      What is the number of "200 corporations" that you have been repeating like a mantra (if I am not mistaken) since September 18th? request

      Explain!
      1. Glover
        +3
        27 September 2013 17: 46
        Quote: Corsair
        Quote from albanech
        PS I can say that the US can be broken by the principle of "strangling" 200 world corporations that rule the worlds with the tacit consent of the US administration!

        What is the number of "200 corporations" that you have been repeating like a mantra (if I am not mistaken) since September 18th? request

        Explain!

        I'd better explain for Mikhail that any sane person knows about 200 "Jewish families" - "world corporations" that rule the world and dictate their terms to the world! It's funny! Like a campaigner! Don't make me angry! am They could not answer a simple question and forced the person to leave the "Military Review" Shame! Shame!
  14. albanech
    +3
    26 September 2013 12: 36
    The economy is dead, but in full F * PE! It’s just that the USA has found a way to use a global wallet and not repay debts! A completely different level! Answer a simple question: In what currency do you have savings? Of course in US dollars! BUYING DOLLAR YOU SUPPORT US ECONOMY! That says it all!
    1. -3
      26 September 2013 12: 50
      Quote from albanech
      What currency do you have savings in? Of course in US dollars!

      Leave the withered "green" for yourself, My "current" savings - in rubles, "long-playing" - in banking metals ...
  15. albanech
    -4
    26 September 2013 12: 59
    JUST AS BILL CLINTON SAID: I COULD! The USA has the whole world, and against them I do not hear more than one voice! DOLLAR is stronger than RF RUB - it was, is and will be! THIS IS A SIMPLE TRUT, understandable even to a schoolboy in Sev. Karee!
    1. -2
      26 September 2013 13: 06
      Quote from albanech
      The USA has the whole world, and against them I do not hear more than one voice!

      My one voice, of course, is weak, but Russia is us!
      And if you don't "hear" our voice, then you'd better get numb soldier
      1. albanech
        +2
        26 September 2013 13: 17
        Are we talking about economics or about patriotism? I need to reread N.A. Ostrovsky "How the Steel Was Tempered".
        1. -5
          26 September 2013 13: 22
          Quote from albanech
          Are we talking about economics or patriotism?


          Quote from albanech
          The USA has the whole world, and against them I do not hear more than one voice!


          So THIS is about economics ... fool
    2. -2
      26 September 2013 13: 25
      Quote from albanech
      JUST AS BILL CLINTON SAID: I COULD!

      And this expression apparently refers to Monica Lewinsky?
  16. albanech
    +2
    26 September 2013 13: 24
    So I am about the same!
  17. albanech
    0
    26 September 2013 13: 32
    Corsair (1) It’s just that Bill Clinton, with or without Monica Lewinsky, was able to be one of the best president not only in IQ!
    1. -4
      26 September 2013 14: 01
      Quote from albanech
      It’s just that Bill Clinton, with or without Monica Lewinsky, was able to be one of the best president not only in IQ!

      Somewhat "positive" IQ, relatively clearly "negative" for Bush. ml ...
      And this "best" created a hotbed of tension in southern Europe for many decades.

      And in general, we have different idols and ideas about the world order ...
      1. smershspy
        +2
        27 September 2013 09: 20
        And you are not quite right, but there is some truth in your words! Every politician, president has something negative or positive!
  18. albanech
    +2
    26 September 2013 14: 12
    I agree! How many people - so many opinions! I was interested in talking with you! Hopefully we will discuss different articles and topics! I am wondering: Who is the authoritative president of the former USSR or modern Russia for you?
    1. -3
      26 September 2013 14: 27
      Once interesting, then:
      Firstly ;
      Gromyko, Kosygin, Stalin (the figure is ambiguous and contradictory, and history will continue to dot the "I" in assessing his activities);

      In modern Russia:
      Putin, Zhirinovsky (whose external clown is hiding common sense), Zyuganov, Lavrov ...
  19. albanech
    +2
    26 September 2013 14: 47
    Another question: If you had no choice, where would you like to live in North Korea or in South Korea.
    1. -3
      26 September 2013 15: 09
      Quote from albanech
      Another question: If you had no choice, where would you like to live in North Korea or in South Korea.

      Are you a sociologist, or just curious to disgrace?

      In general, they don’t choose their homeland ...
    2. -3
      26 September 2013 15: 41
      Quote from albanech
      Another question: If you had no choice, where would you like to live in North Korea or in South Korea.

      Not a correct comparison ... China is under the rule of the Communist Party, but soon the US will overtake the economy.
      And life on credit will end sooner or later. The more the Fed prints money, the more the dollar will weaken, it is also an economy. Now many strange refuse to make calculations in bucks, there is talk of a common international unit in the calculations.
      The process is not fast, and no one will do it abruptly, it is fraught with everything else ...
  20. albanech
    +2
    26 September 2013 15: 15
    I thought that you won’t answer my question!
    1. -3
      26 September 2013 15: 48
      Quote from albanech
      I thought that you won’t answer my question!

      The question is not worthy of a DEEP answer, they told you that they DO NOT elect a HOMELAND.
      1. smershspy
        +2
        27 September 2013 09: 23
        Why not worthy? A common question requiring a specific answer!
  21. albanech
    -1
    26 September 2013 16: 15
    And what does the homeland have to do with it? If you had no choice, where would you like to live in North Korea or in South Korea.
    1. -4
      26 September 2013 17: 00
      Quote from albanech
      And what does the homeland have to do with it? If you had no choice, where would you like to live in North Korea or in South Korea.

      Change plate am
  22. albanech
    +1
    26 September 2013 17: 04
    And what does the homeland have to do with it? If you had no choice, where would you like to live in North Korea or in South Korea.
  23. albanech
    +3
    27 September 2013 09: 05
    It is immediately evident that the generals here are purely virtual and in life and on the Internet they cannot give intelligible answers - "there is not enough chamfer", and blindly shouting Motherland, Mother Russia, USSR - this we can, but in fact we cannot do anything for her - only empty talk and bad roads, and even if you go where - you can immediately see where the order is!
    I am leaving the "Voennoye Obozreniye" in quotation marks with a lot of reluctance and hope that I will never come back here! There is nothing to do here! Happy empty talk!

    PS It’s immediately obvious that there are too many trolls and few real officers! Think about whether you should spend your time and energy, or maybe you should do something useful for the sake of your homeland!
    1. -5
      27 September 2013 13: 00
      Quote from albanech
      I am leaving the "Voennoye Obozreniye" in quotation marks with a lot of reluctance and hope that I will never come back here! There is nothing to do here! Happy empty talk!
      PS It’s immediately obvious that there are too many trolls and few real officers!

      There is nothing to blame on the mirror ...
      (troll logo)
      1. Glover
        +2
        27 September 2013 17: 41
        You yourself do not understand and behave like an ordinary troll! If you know the logo, it means a troll!
        1. agrindler
          +1
          27 September 2013 18: 01
          Right! The real troll is this Corsair (1)! A man asked to answer a simple question, but he is like a kid! Where are the heroes? Where are the generals? Laughter and more!
  24. agrindler
    +1
    9 October 2013 12: 39
    Corsair (1) It is a pity that you were so scared that everyone was included in the "black list" - okay, all this is nonsense! The main thing I want to ask you as an officer of an officer is: DID YOU SERVE IN THE ARMY? I hope that you will answer me, and not start quoting! Thanks! smile
  25. agrindler
    +2
    9 October 2013 12: 39
    Corsair (1) It is a pity that you were so scared that everyone was included in the "black list" - okay, all this is nonsense! The main thing I want to ask you as an officer of an officer is: DID YOU SERVE IN THE ARMY? I hope that you will answer me, and not start quoting! Thanks! smile