Military Review

"Justice" at any cost

46
Recently, high-ranking American politicians are increasingly and more insistently calling for the start of a military operation against Syria. However, a large part of the world community recognizes that a forceful invasion is a dead-end method of resolving the current situation and can lead to both a humanitarian and a nuclear catastrophe.


Syrian authorities do not have nuclear weaponsHowever, the so-called “peaceful atom” is actively used in the country. These technologies are in demand in agriculture, industry and medicine. If American missiles hit such facilities, tens of square kilometers of the country's territory will become uninhabitable, thousands of people will receive a lethal dose of radiation. In addition, dozens of victims will be counted directly from the missile attacks themselves.

This and many other factors indicate that only United Nations peacekeeping is the only way to resolve the difficult situation in the Syrian Republic and restore peaceful life in the country. Most of the world leaders have already realized this, and therefore, at present, the Americans are left alone in their desire to strike at the army of Bashar al-Assad. Such permanent allies as Great Britain and France refused to support the United States. Washington cannot even count on the support of its own NATO bloc.

People still remember the tragedies that led to the US actions in Iraq, Libya, and the support of the opposition in Egypt. The once prosperous countries are on the verge of a humanitarian catastrophe. Continuous stream of messages about human victims.

Despite the fact that the US authorities insist on the guilt of Bashar al-Assad in the use of chemical weapons, which is the main pretext for overthrowing the legitimate president of the Syrian Republic disagreeable with the Americans, they have not presented any weighty evidence. However, the UN commission working at the site of the chemical attack has already found evidence that indicates the use of prohibited weapons by the opposition. A video was also made public showing how several armed militants charge a large-caliber mortar with special ammunition. The ammunition has the form of a hermetic blue tank with a detonator. The video shows how one of the militants, under the supervision of a specialist, twists a detonator into ammunition, after which the entire mortar crew hides in a shelter and carries out a shot.

Apparently, this is why the American authorities are trying to unleash an operation against the Syrian authorities as soon as possible. It is in their interest not to let UN specialists finish their work.

Meanwhile, according to UN Deputy Secretary General Valerie Amos, organization volunteers in Syria receive threats from the armed opposition. Recently, 11 UN staff members have already died in Syria.

The need for a peaceful solution of the problem is recognized worldwide. The UN Secretary-General and the leaders of most of the countries in the organization insist that the parties sit down at the rehearsal table. “A political decision is the only way to stop the bloodshed in Syria,” said Ban Ki-moon.

In addition, even citizens of the United States understand the need for a diplomatic solution. A survey conducted by Reuters showed that 56 percent of Americans are against intervention in the civil war in Syria. Rallies against military operations were held on the streets of many American cities. However, Barack Obama and his administration continue to insist on the need to strike at Syrian territory, which directly contradicts the UN Charter, which states that any military operation other than self-defense is aggression.

In this situation, the main task of the world community is the preservation of peace and the prevention of arbitrariness on the part of the state, which places itself above others.
Author:
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Passer
    Passer 26 September 2013 06: 03 New
    +7
    When the war does begin, I suggest Assad really use chemical weapons, somewhere in the suburbs of Washington, or New York. Maybe then the American herd will think about how they got sick of the whole world with their "democracy."
    1. Crocodile
      Crocodile 26 September 2013 08: 03 New
      +1
      Let's hope that the topic with the chemical attack has already exhausted itself!
      The article was a little late, but it’s too early to relax - the states will look for a reason for the democratization of Syria.
      A respite must be taken to re-equip the country and consolidate success in the repelled territories.
      And these words concern not only Syria, but also Russia!
      1. Stiletto
        Stiletto 26 September 2013 09: 12 New
        +2
        Quote: Crocodile
        Let's hope that the topic with the chemical attack has already exhausted itself!


        Yeah, and now the US authorities will focus on the search for biological weapons.
        And if it doesn’t roll, then plasma, psychotronic, and so on. The United States has a vile goal, and in order to achieve it, they will use the same vile means.
        1. Very old
          Very old 26 September 2013 13: 13 New
          -3
          Bravo, Alexey. Here I completely agree with you. As the famous movie hero said: you need to think
    2. slacker
      slacker 26 September 2013 09: 17 New
      +1
      It is necessary to initiate the issue of initiating criminal proceedings against specific American leaders for committing crimes against peace and humanity.
      And the tone of the Yankees policy will immediately change.
      1. Very old
        Very old 26 September 2013 13: 14 New
        -1
        And it remains to clarify: how?
      2. Sandov
        Sandov 26 September 2013 13: 37 New
        -4
        Quote: Loafer
        It is necessary to initiate the issue of initiating criminal proceedings against specific American leaders for committing crimes against peace and humanity.
        And the tone of the Yankees policy will immediately change.


        File a lawsuit in an international court in The Hague. Just from the principle that the imperfections are thoughtful.
        1. Geisenberg
          Geisenberg 26 September 2013 16: 07 New
          -2
          Quote: Sandov
          Quote: Loafer
          It is necessary to initiate the issue of initiating criminal proceedings against specific American leaders for committing crimes against peace and humanity.
          And the tone of the Yankees policy will immediately change.


          File a lawsuit in an international court in The Hague. Just from the principle that the imperfections are thoughtful.


          Suing the court itself? What's the point?
    3. Very old
      Very old 26 September 2013 13: 10 New
      -3
      And about HIM.O. Have you thought well?
    4. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 26 September 2013 15: 49 New
      0
      Quote: Passer
      When the war does begin, I suggest Assad really use chemical weapons, somewhere in the suburbs of Washington, or New York. Maybe then the American herd will think about how they got sick of the whole world with their "democracy."


      Explicit application gap. First, not Assad, but the Syrian patriots, so Bashar has enough problems. Secondly, not in the suburbs, but in the center, otherwise it makes no sense - mostly those who are not involved and innocent will suffer. Thirdly, they should not be allowed to land on the ground with an explosion, but with an aerosol from a plane about 50 meters away ...

      something like this.

      PS: fourthly, inappropriately nothing to do so. Enough to destroy power substations, bridges and railways, as they were going to.
  2. stranik72
    stranik72 26 September 2013 06: 09 New
    -3
    Only money, the USA from all warriors always came out financially secure, even more than that, the 1st and 2nd world war became for them a kind of eldorado made mattresses great, and the fact that this is not a question of blood for them, but for the devil who created this state. God, if you have, punish the USA.
    1. Crocodile
      Crocodile 26 September 2013 08: 06 New
      -1
      Hope for God, but don’t be bad!
      It's time to pull out Russian assets from Western banks, and let them into the development of the country!
  3. vitek1233
    vitek1233 26 September 2013 06: 11 New
    -2
    56% against the war, but there are 44% more d-bs who are for
    1. 123123123
      123123123 26 September 2013 06: 53 New
      -1
      Who said that 44% are in favor, there are always abstentions ....
      1. Crocodile
        Crocodile 26 September 2013 08: 13 New
        0
        I wonder if there is evidence of how many Americans know where Syria is.
        Data on the mass protests of the people is too exaggerated!
        Most likely, the number of American defenders of Syria is much less than the number of defenders of blue whales!
        1. vahatak
          vahatak 26 September 2013 23: 07 New
          -2
          I think these 56% of those who know.
  4. andrei332809
    andrei332809 26 September 2013 06: 13 New
    -3
    Americans are currently left alone in their quest to strike at Bashar al-Assad’s army.

    how could they forget such giants supporting amers in their quest to bring peace and prosperity to a planet like Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and, of course, Georgia
    1. Crocodile
      Crocodile 26 September 2013 08: 17 New
      -2
      For the time being, there are those who want to relish the American anus!
      Young democrats in a single impulse provide diplomatic assistance to the states!
  5. Denis
    Denis 26 September 2013 06: 14 New
    +2
    The attitude of not their henchmen to their different dem.values
    if not everything says a lot:
  6. George
    George 26 September 2013 06: 34 New
    -2
    Hello all.
    In addition, the need for a diplomatic solution is understood even United States citizens.

    They reach the latter.
    However, Barack Obama and his administration continue to insist on the need to strike at Syrian territory, which directly contradicts the UN Charter, which states that any military operation other than self-defense is aggression.

    They are already three to four Nuremberg heaped.
  7. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 26 September 2013 07: 07 New
    -2
    The US has already missed the moment to strike. At the UN, it's time to push for a collective strike against the aggressor, which is clearly the Nobel laureate.
  8. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 26 September 2013 07: 17 New
    -4
    from the Don.
    Bambamke and USAike do not give a damn about everyone! They can’t calm down their exclusivity in any way. Refusing all countries to pay with Amer’s papers is the way to stall this whole ... brotherhood !!!
  9. Bakht
    Bakht 26 September 2013 07: 37 New
    +2
    The author is wrong in that a “political decision” is needed. It simply does not exist. What is needed is a "forceful solution." Destruction of militants in the bud. More likely that they will not emerge elsewhere.
    1. Duelist
      Duelist 26 September 2013 15: 33 New
      -2
      I agree. The political round behind sheer superiority was won by Putin.
      So that the terrorist infection does not regroup in another part of the world, a forceful solution with the clear superiority of the Russian forces, which is currently available in Syria and the Mediterranean Sea, would be the best "exercise" with the use of "point strikes" on militants.
  10. vlad.svargin
    vlad.svargin 26 September 2013 07: 50 New
    -3
    Recently, high-ranking American politicians are increasingly calling for a military operation against Syria

    At least you know how to leave Afghanistan "not trimmed", apparently you have not been patted enough there.
  11. Sunjar
    Sunjar 26 September 2013 07: 59 New
    -2
    It doesn't seem so long for the United States to be as developed. They have a public debt ceiling and so 17 mln. The other day they will defend the position that it would be necessary to raise the ceiling, otherwise we will have a default. They just don’t seem to want to raise the state debt ceiling. But on the other hand, it will hit the entire world economy, and again, as under Nixon, when he defaulted - the whole world ran to save America at its own expense at no cost. Now about the same will most likely happen. My question arose: why did the USSR not declare itself the only bastion of the right model for the economy against the backdrop of the US default? Very direct interesting.
    1. alone
      alone 26 September 2013 22: 39 New
      -2
      Quote: Sunjar
      . They have a public debt ceiling and so 17 billion.


      they have a public debt ceiling of 17 trillion, not billions.
  12. major071
    major071 26 September 2013 09: 46 New
    +5
    The US has long been living in debt. US foreign debt has exceeded all reasonable limits. The only way they see the outbreak of war is to spur their dead economy. On TV, they say that everything is fine, but in fact, everything has long been in BIG Zh. PE!
    1. alone
      alone 26 September 2013 22: 41 New
      -4
      for how many years we’ve just heard: big, big, but this doesn’t want to appear))
    2. vahatak
      vahatak 26 September 2013 23: 11 New
      -4
      Long????? NO!!! FROM THE VERY BEGINNING! During their war of independence, they received a loan from France, and after the war they refused to pay. It is believed that, among other things, because of this, a crisis began in France, which led to a revolution.
  13. albanech
    albanech 26 September 2013 12: 11 New
    +4
    Quote: major071
    The US has long been living in debt. US foreign debt has exceeded all reasonable limits. The only way they see the outbreak of war is to spur their dead economy. On TV, they say that everything is fine, but in fact, everything has long been in BIG Zh. PE!


    Yes, the USA has always lived in debt and this whole situation does not prevent the USA from being a hyena of the “devouring” basis of democracy - this is far from a secret! Their economy is far from dead! I worked in the USA for about 7 years! The issue with food in the USA has been resolved - people are fed up ($ 1 per kg. Of beef) and are pleased that there is work and housing (rent an apartment from 250 - 500 per month). Salary about 300 $ per week (from $ 1800 per month and above). The United States lived on credit and will live and spit on its debts. The United States has a very powerful gold reserve and a strong global banking system. Most global corporations are concentrated in the United States - their representative offices. And as for the complete F * PY - an empty DISINFORMATION! US OFTEN CALLED THE Vulture OF THE WORLD - "RESIDENT OF EVIL" USA - THE COUNTRY OF DOUBLE MORAL!
    PS I can say that the USA can be broken by the principle of "strangulation" of 200 world corporations that rule the worlds with the tacit consent of the US administration!
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 26 September 2013 12: 35 New
      -5
      Quote: albanech
      The United States has a very powerful gold reserve and a strong global banking system.

      But ... then I ask you to answer, WHY DOES THE USA REFUSE (or are not able?) To return part of the gold reserves of Germany?
      Trillions of unsecured US dollars “walking” around the planet, issued “into the light” without collateral — a sign of a financial system strength ????
      1. albanech
        albanech 26 September 2013 12: 45 New
        +1
        I answer as it is! "USA DOESN'T SPIT ON DEBTS OF SIMPLE DEATH - THEY ARE ABOVE ALL COUNTRIES!" I repeat - a completely different level of state policy!

        "Walking" on the planet threeЛLyons unsecuredНny US dollarsЛAres issued without security - a sign of the strength of the financial system ????
        GOLD STOCK OF THE USA - THE GUARANTEE OF THE CURRENCY OF THE USA - THIS IS UNDISPUTABLE! I am sorry that you do not know much!
    2. Corsair
      Corsair 26 September 2013 14: 17 New
      -3
      Quote: albanech
      The issue with food in the USA is resolved - people are full

      Are you malnourished in Belarus now? So "hungry" that glance at the states ...
    3. Corsair
      Corsair 26 September 2013 18: 31 New
      -5
      Quote: albanech
      PS I can say that the USA can be broken by the principle of "strangulation" of 200 world corporations that rule the worlds with the tacit consent of the US administration!

      What is the figure from the "200 corporations" that you repeat as a mantra (if I am not mistaken) from the 18 of September? request

      Explain!
      1. Glover
        Glover 27 September 2013 17: 46 New
        +3
        Quote: Corsair
        Quote: albanech
        PS I can say that the USA can be broken by the principle of "strangulation" of 200 world corporations that rule the worlds with the tacit consent of the US administration!

        What is the figure from the "200 corporations" that you repeat as a mantra (if I am not mistaken) from the 18 of September? request

        Explain!

        I’d better explain to Michael that any sane person knows about 200 "Jewish families" - "world corporations" that rule the world and dictate their conditions to the world! It's ridiculous! Like a servant! Do not be angry! am They could not answer a simple question and forced a person to leave the "Military Review" Shame! Shame!
  14. albanech
    albanech 26 September 2013 12: 36 New
    +3
    The economy is dead, but in full F * PE! It’s just that the USA has found a way to use a global wallet and not repay debts! A completely different level! Answer a simple question: In what currency do you have savings? Of course in US dollars! BUYING DOLLAR YOU SUPPORT US ECONOMY! That says it all!
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 26 September 2013 12: 50 New
      -3
      Quote: albanech
      What currency do you have savings in? Of course in US dollars!

      Leave the decayed "greens" for yourself. My "current" savings are in rubles, "long-playing" in bank metals ...
  15. albanech
    albanech 26 September 2013 12: 59 New
    -4
    JUST AS BILL CLINTON SAID: I COULD! The USA has the whole world, and against them I do not hear more than one voice! DOLLAR is stronger than RF RUB - it was, is and will be! THIS IS A SIMPLE TRUT, understandable even to a schoolboy in Sev. Karee!
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 26 September 2013 13: 06 New
      -2
      Quote: albanech
      The USA has the whole world, and against them I do not hear more than one voice!

      My one voice, of course, is weak, but Russia is us!
      And if you don’t “hear” our voice, then you’d better get numb soldier
      1. albanech
        albanech 26 September 2013 13: 17 New
        +2
        Are we talking about economics or patriotism? I need to re-read N.A. Ostrovsky "How steel was tempered."
        1. Corsair
          Corsair 26 September 2013 13: 22 New
          -5
          Quote: albanech
          Are we talking about economics or patriotism?


          Quote: albanech
          The USA has the whole world, and against them I do not hear more than one voice!


          So THIS is about economics ... fool
    2. Corsair
      Corsair 26 September 2013 13: 25 New
      -2
      Quote: albanech
      JUST AS BILL CLINTON SAID: I COULD!

      And this expression apparently refers to Monica Lewinsky?
  16. albanech
    albanech 26 September 2013 13: 24 New
    +2
    So I am about the same!
  17. albanech
    albanech 26 September 2013 13: 32 New
    0
    Corsair (1) It’s just that Bill Clinton, with or without Monica Lewinsky, was able to be one of the best president not only in IQ!
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 26 September 2013 14: 01 New
      -4
      Quote: albanech
      It’s just that Bill Clinton, with or without Monica Lewinsky, was able to be one of the best president not only in IQ!

      Somewhat "positive" IQ, relatively clearly "negative" in Bush. ml ...
      And this "best" created a hotbed of tension in the south of Europe for many decades.

      And in general, we have different idols and ideas about the world order ...
      1. smershspy
        smershspy 27 September 2013 09: 20 New
        +2
        And you are not quite right, but there is some truth in your words! Every politician, president has something negative or positive!
  18. albanech
    albanech 26 September 2013 14: 12 New
    +2
    I agree! How many people - so many opinions! I was interested in talking with you! Hopefully we will discuss different articles and topics! I am wondering: Who is the authoritative president of the former USSR or modern Russia for you?
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 26 September 2013 14: 27 New
      -3
      Once interesting, then:
      Firstly ;
      Gromyko, Kosygin, Stalin (the figure is ambiguous and controversial, and history will still continue to dot the “I” in the assessment of its activities);

      In modern Russia:
      Putin, Zhirinovsky (whose external clown is hiding common sense), Zyuganov, Lavrov ...
  19. albanech
    albanech 26 September 2013 14: 47 New
    +2
    Another question: If you had no choice, where would you like to live in North Korea or in South Korea.
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 26 September 2013 15: 09 New
      -3
      Quote: albanech
      Another question: If you had no choice, where would you like to live in North Korea or in South Korea.

      Are you a sociologist, or just curious to disgrace?

      In general, they don’t choose their homeland ...
    2. Russ69
      Russ69 26 September 2013 15: 41 New
      -3
      Quote: albanech
      Another question: If you had no choice, where would you like to live in North Korea or in South Korea.

      Not a correct comparison ... China is under the rule of the Communist Party, but soon the US will overtake the economy.
      And life on credit will end sooner or later. The more the Fed prints money, the more the dollar will weaken, it is also an economy. Now many strange refuse to make calculations in bucks, there is talk of a common international unit in the calculations.
      The process is not fast, and no one will do it abruptly, it is fraught with everything else ...
  20. albanech
    albanech 26 September 2013 15: 15 New
    +2
    I thought that you won’t answer my question!
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 26 September 2013 15: 48 New
      -3
      Quote: albanech
      I thought that you won’t answer my question!

      The question is not worthy of a DEEP answer, they told you that they DO NOT elect a HOMELAND.
      1. smershspy
        smershspy 27 September 2013 09: 23 New
        +2
        Why not worthy? A common question requiring a specific answer!
  21. albanech
    albanech 26 September 2013 16: 15 New
    -1
    And what does the homeland have to do with it? If you had no choice, where would you like to live in North Korea or in South Korea.
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 26 September 2013 17: 00 New
      -4
      Quote: albanech
      And what does the homeland have to do with it? If you had no choice, where would you like to live in North Korea or in South Korea.

      Change plate am
  22. albanech
    albanech 26 September 2013 17: 04 New
    +1
    And what does the homeland have to do with it? If you had no choice, where would you like to live in North Korea or in South Korea.
  23. albanech
    albanech 27 September 2013 09: 05 New
    +3
    It’s immediately obvious that the generals here are purely virtual and in life and on the Internet they can’t give intelligible answers - “there’sn’t enough guys”, but we can blindly shout Motherland, mother Russia, USSR, but we can’t do anything for her - only empty talk and bad roads, and even if you go somewhere, you can immediately see where the order is!
    I am leaving the quotation "Military Review" with great sediment and the hope that I will never return here! There is nothing to do here! Happy empty talk!

    PS It’s immediately obvious that there are too many trolls and few real officers! Think about whether you should spend your time and energy, or maybe you should do something useful for the sake of your homeland!
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 27 September 2013 13: 00 New
      -5
      Quote: albanech
      I am leaving the quotation "Military Review" with great sediment and the hope that I will never return here! There is nothing to do here! Happy empty talk!
      PS It’s immediately obvious that there are too many trolls and few real officers!

      There is nothing to blame on the mirror ...
      (troll logo)
      1. Glover
        Glover 27 September 2013 17: 41 New
        +2
        You yourself do not understand and behave like an ordinary troll! If you know the logo, it means a troll!
        1. agrindler
          agrindler 27 September 2013 18: 01 New
          +1
          Right! The real troll is this Corsair (1)! A man asked to answer a simple question, but he is like a kid! Where are the heroes? Where are the generals? Laughter and more!
  24. agrindler
    agrindler 9 October 2013 12: 39 New
    +1
    Corsair (1) It’s a pity that you were so scared that you put everyone on the “black list” - well, all this is nonsense! The main thing I want to ask you as an officer is an officer: YOU SERVED IN THE ARMY? I hope you answer me, and do not start quoting! Thank! smile
  25. agrindler
    agrindler 9 October 2013 12: 39 New
    +2
    Corsair (1) It’s a pity that you were so scared that you put everyone on the “black list” - well, all this is nonsense! The main thing I want to ask you as an officer is an officer: YOU SERVED IN THE ARMY? I hope you answer me, and do not start quoting! Thank! smile