Military Review

Kalashnikov Concern is ready to increase the production of Yarygin pistols by 30%

44

The Izhmeh plant, which is part of the Kalashnikov concern, is ready to increase the production of Yarygin pistols by at least 30%, said the deputy general director of the concern, manager of Izhevsk Mechanical Plant, Vladimir Mayer, today.


"The company has created capacities up to 25 thousand products per year. I think that today Yarygin pistols as a whole for power departments are loaded somewhere on 70, that is, you can reload," said Meyer.

He noted that if there is a need to create additional capacity, the plant will be able to quickly solve this problem. “I really hope that some movements may occur from the point of view of orders not only from law enforcement agencies, but also the Ministry of Defense, perhaps, will respond,” the group’s deputy director said, adding that the state order of Izhmekha’s total production is only four percent.

According to Mayer, “Izhmeh” is the only enterprise in Russia that has kept mass production of short-barreled weapons and using modern technology. “The equipment, of course, is not ours, Taiwanese, but it is optimal in terms of performance and in terms of price. This allows you to get a quality product,” said Mayer.

On Izhmekh, we launched elements of the Whirlwind missile within the framework of a contract of the Russian Ministry of Defense with the Kalashnikov concern. "We have to let in by February a product that will provide assembly of products for Izhmash in the future. Final assembly will take place at the head company, at Izhmeha, and we will supply components," said Meyer.

The gun of Yarygin is a self-loading pistol made in Russia. Developed by a team of designers under the direction of V. A. Yarygin, mass-produced at the Izhevsk Mechanical Plant. In 2003, under the name "9-mm pistol Yarygin" was adopted by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
Originator:
http://www.itar-tass.com/
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Apollo
    Apollo 23 September 2013 11: 15 New
    +3
    citation-Izhmekh Plant, which is part of the Kalashnikov concern, is ready to increase the production of Yarygin pistols by at least 30%, said Vladimir Mayer, deputy director general of the concern, managing the Izhevsk Mechanical Plant.

    1. svp67
      svp67 23 September 2013 13: 41 New
      0
      Quote: Apollon
      ready to increase production of Yarygin pistols by at least 30%

      It's kinda nice, powerful "melee argument." that's just how much I know the specialists had comments on the QUALITY of MANUFACTURE of this gun. How will this issue be resolved?

      1. Apollo
        Apollo 23 September 2013 14: 08 New
        0
        Quote: svp67
        It's kinda nice, powerful "melee argument." that's just how much I know the specialists had comments on the QUALITY of MANUFACTURE of this gun. How will this issue be resolved?


        Good day, Sergey hi If I don’t know a question for me, it’s more a question for the creators.
        1. svp67
          svp67 23 September 2013 14: 15 New
          +2
          Quote: Apollon
          Good afternoon, Sergey. If I don’t know a question for me, rather a question for the creators.
          Kind. There is more to the manufacturers. I had the pleasure of shooting this pistol in the 90s ... So it’s like a powerful machine, I “flashed” the sleeve from 5UTs for 50 meters, unlike the PM, which left only dents on it, but the APS is somehow “better”, not so “loud”, and what is surprising, it is easier to get the same PM cartridge from it, but the sleeve that was released from the APS was “leaked”, not so “beautiful”, but was “leaked” ... Maybe the APS should be modified under a new cartridge ..
      2. Sergey_K
        Sergey_K 23 September 2013 15: 37 New
        +5
        I'm not special, but I shot from him. Quality - as an ax healed ...
    2. Shabur
      Shabur 23 September 2013 19: 23 New
      0
      He is very heavy, almost 1 kg. Gsh will be better.
  2. Strashila
    Strashila 23 September 2013 11: 18 New
    0
    PMM was successfully buried for someone’s ambitions.
    1. kris
      kris 23 September 2013 11: 26 New
      +1
      The state intends to sell 49% of the Kalashnikov concern to the joint venture of Alexei Krivoruchko and Andrey Bokarev, Kommersant reports today. 49% of Kalashnikov shares are valued at 1,3 billion rubles.
      Shares for sale will be issued as part of an additional issue. In the next two years, entrepreneurs will also invest about 2,4 billion rubles in the concern. The deal has already been approved by the Ministry of Industry and Trade and personally supported by Vladimir Putin.
      1. cosmos111
        cosmos111 23 September 2013 11: 31 New
        0
        Quote: kris
        The deal has already been approved by the Ministry of Industry and Trade and personally supported by Vladimir Putin.

        If Vladimir Putin personally approved the deal, then everything has been calculated.
        Russia will produce the most modern small arms in the world.
        1. Hon
          Hon 24 September 2013 08: 47 New
          0
          Quote: cosmos111
          If Vladimir Putin personally approved the deal, then everything has been calculated.
          Russia will produce the most modern small arms in the world.

          Chubais accidentally made the calculations?
      2. Russ69
        Russ69 23 September 2013 11: 47 New
        +5
        Quote: kris
        The state intends to sell 49% of the Kalashnikov concern

        Nothing wrong with that. The main thing is that the state retains a controlling stake.
        1. Sunjar
          Sunjar 23 September 2013 13: 36 New
          +1
          The very idea of ​​stocks, debt, etc. came from the Western model of the economy (and they, and accordingly with us because of this model of the economy, things are not important) in order to align the real situation, because the same debt obligations themselves are worth nothing, and those who acquire them makes money on various kinds of speculation or on "economic bubbles", which causes inflation itself. Also, the calculation is that in fact people or corporations will give real money (obtained by producing goods or selling resources: oil, gas, wood), which is beneficial to those who sell these obligations, but not to the producers themselves. An example is the high cost of branded clothes, perfumes, paintings, etc. With all due respect to those who do all this - all this is not worth such a high payment. And the owners give their hard-earned money, unless of course they are honestly earned, and not stolen. Returning to stocks. They are also issued and bought up, as an instrument of influence. If the shares fall into the hands of opponents of the company itself, then those in turn will be able to influence the company. It is also possible through certain levers (intimidation, bribery, murder) to influence not people and make sure that the controlling stake goes over to the side of the right people. And voila, the plant is already owned by foreigners.
          In view of this, such a move is not good.
      3. leon-iv
        leon-iv 23 September 2013 12: 11 New
        -1
        I would sell it all. Oh would tie them up with contracts.
        + Would give money to small arms firms throughout Russia. Tired of a monopoly for crazy money of frankly poor quality. Our people already prefer Turkish guns to ours.
    2. avt
      avt 23 September 2013 11: 29 New
      +6
      Quote: Strashila
      PMM was successfully buried for someone’s ambitions.

      More likely GSh-18. PMM is like that, but this is my subjective opinion, worse than PM. That is the case when it is better - the enemy of the good.
      Quote: Povshnik
      And let PM go on free sale

      Quite good civilian weapon good , still would have served for a long time.
      1. leon-iv
        leon-iv 23 September 2013 11: 47 New
        -6
        More likely GSh-18

        and what is so ololo about it? Perversion with locking the trunk?
        . PMM like that, but this is my subjective opinion, worse than PM

        Just the same, there is no PMM quite suitable pistol.
    3. Russ69
      Russ69 23 September 2013 11: 46 New
      +3
      Quote: Strashila
      PMM was successfully buried for someone’s ambitions.

      MRP, it’s not bad, but weak for the army. The Ministry of Internal Affairs, for the faculty and precinct will go. The army needs something more powerful.
      1. zanoza
        zanoza 23 September 2013 12: 16 New
        +2
        It is not entirely clear such a heated discussion of a particular pistol model. The gun as such is not the main small arms on the battlefield for most military personnel. Under the whistle of bullets, I want something more powerful and multi-charged .... In the Armed Forces there are quite a lot of posts of soldiers and officers, where their type of activity, and especially the operation of weapons and equipment, provide weapons only with a pistol. In this case, the serviceman, of course, expects to have the most reliable pistol and preferably multi-shot. hi
        1. avt
          avt 23 September 2013 16: 03 New
          0
          Quote: zanoza
          In the Armed Forces there are quite a lot of posts of soldiers and officers, where their type of activity, and especially the operation of weapons and equipment, provide weapons only with a pistol. In this case, the serviceman, of course, expects to have the most reliable pistol and preferably multi-shot.

          The category of military personnel providing for weapons ONLY with one gun is how? In the sense that it would only be convenient to shoot yourself? Or are we talking about generals? So they were always made easier and smaller for them. The pistol is the second weapon and here other parameters are more important than multicharging, just because of the specifics of the military specialty.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. zanoza
            zanoza 23 September 2013 18: 34 New
            0
            Quote: avt
            ... with one gun, how is it?


            In the MCP (110 people l / s, including 6 officers and 2 warrant officers)) are in service 23- PM и 9- APM(Stechkin), 66-AK, 3-SVD, 9-RPK and 3-PK. 9 - RPG-7
            1. avt
              avt 23 September 2013 18: 57 New
              0
              Quote: zanoza
              In the MCP (110 people l / s, including 6 officers and 2 warrant officers)) 23-PM and 9-APM (Stechkin), 66-AK, 3-SVD, 9-RPK and 3 - are in service PC. 9 - RPG-7

              Well, again I repeat, the gun is the second weapon, the first machine gun, rifle, software for those who need a shortened compact barrel. By the way, precisely because there was no compact software such as ,, Cedar "or like," Ultrasound "or like the current ,, Heather" and their predecessor appeared - APS. And run at the head of the MCP you indicated in combat conditions with the PM, and with Stechkin, well, the exact path to suicide.
    4. xetai9977
      xetai9977 23 September 2013 12: 38 New
      +3
      Already decided which gun will replace the PM? They write either about Yarygin, then about GS-18, then some else. You might think that various groups are fighting ..
    5. The comment was deleted.
  3. Airman
    Airman 23 September 2013 11: 19 New
    +4
    And let the PM go on free sale, at least some kind of profit will be, and then again in re-melting.
  4. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 23 September 2013 11: 25 New
    0
    It's time to change PM ..! The barrel in the photo does not look bad! I hope a reliable and unpretentious gun.
    1. leon-iv
      leon-iv 23 September 2013 11: 30 New
      +7
      In the army, let them change pm to yarygin.
      In the police PM can not be changed !!!! HE is almost perfect.
    2. Airman
      Airman 23 September 2013 13: 43 New
      +2
      Quote: MIKHAN
      It's time to change PM ..! The barrel in the photo does not look bad! I hope a reliable and unpretentious gun.

      Here, a special forces soldier spoke recently at the forum, so Yarygin’s pistol didn’t respond very flattering, there are often delays in shooting, and is very sensitive to pollution.
      1. Algor73
        Algor73 23 September 2013 16: 16 New
        +2
        We, when the “Fort” was launched in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, also had complaints. But now nothing, okay, everyone got used to it. Previously, they did not want to change to PM, now the opposite. Prigrut and "Yarygin". I served with PM, a good gun, he coped with his task quite well. why change?
  5. ramsi
    ramsi 23 September 2013 11: 30 New
    +1
    I never liked the skew of the trunk
    1. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 23 September 2013 12: 12 New
      +2
      Quote: ramsi
      I never liked the skew of the trunk


      Unique to you. Everyone likes and you don’t. Apparently it's time to break the negative tendency to refuse to lock the barrel through the ejection window of the sleeve.
      1. ramsi
        ramsi 23 September 2013 12: 31 New
        -8
        even if we ignore the mechanics of the movable, and even the warped trunk, I recall some garbage (gulag archipelago, or what? ..) So there, the firing squads first used TT, but then they were forced to switch to Walther, whether on parabellum due to the fact that the TT was falling apart
        1. Mareman Vasilich
          Mareman Vasilich 23 September 2013 15: 45 New
          +2
          Quote: ramsi
          even if we ignore the mechanics of the movable, and even the warped trunk, I recall some garbage (gulag archipelago, or what? ..) So there, the firing squads first used TT, but then they were forced to switch to Walther, whether on parabellum due to the fact that the TT was falling apart

          Did Solzhenitsyn decide so?
          1. ramsi
            ramsi 23 September 2013 16: 25 New
            0
            and yet, the kinematics of SR-1, GSh-18, OTs-33 are somehow more rational
  6. Basarev
    Basarev 23 September 2013 13: 03 New
    +7
    It can’t be! Reliability of the TT is proved by the World War!
    1. ramsi
      ramsi 23 September 2013 13: 13 New
      -8
      Why can not ?! The barrel is long, the cartridge is powerful, the automation is working - but the shooting teams have slightly different specifics
      1. avt
        avt 23 September 2013 14: 19 New
        +1
        Quote: ramsi
        Why can not ?! The barrel is long, the cartridge is powerful, the automation is working - but the shooting teams have slightly different specifics

        Oh how! Well, when Browning invented the gun, he knew about it, probably already then he read Solzhenitsyn. Yes, and the Germans certainly scoured in search of TTs for different policemen, sonderkommandas and concentration camp guards
  7. No_more
    No_more 23 September 2013 13: 03 New
    +2
    Sorry. He is inconvenient. PM is easy to get, convenient to hold, nothing touches anything anywhere for clothes. Here it is worth taking a look and it’s immediately clear that the protruding details that ergonomically damage are striking.
    I'm not saying that you don’t need a new gun, but this clumsy one was too much to use. But if you recall the forms of PM, TT, APS, you’ll think about whether they were so neat without extra details.
  8. AX
    AX 23 September 2013 13: 42 New
    +3
    Eliminate the problems, and a normal gun ... But dampness, "childhood illnesses" must be eliminated before the launch of the series.
  9. RUSS
    RUSS 23 September 2013 13: 51 New
    0
    In the West, the choice of weapons for special forces of more than 10 types for a specific task, it would be nice to introduce this innovation.
  10. Massik
    Massik 23 September 2013 14: 07 New
    +2
    angular it’s not the case, the store cuts fingers, at least grind it with a file
  11. mirag2
    mirag2 23 September 2013 14: 07 New
    +9
    Oh, my dear friends, well, I don’t have a soul for Izhmash. Nothing. Well, the quality there is practically zero. I saw ak200 alone. Well, there are no words. They ripped off the idea of ​​balanced automation from the Kovrovites. But they CONSCIOUSLY hindered adoption of AEK. Yes, maybe they wanted to receive an order for themselves, corporate interests, etc. etc. But what it says is that they put their OWN interests above state ones. This is where the dough is actually cut. And not some f-35, which does not concern us sideways. But the most basic-sane small arms- in the pope.
    And I’ll say, Izhmash got dirty in my eyes. There’s nowhere worse. The weapon is normal through one. We licked Kalash with any shnyag and made such a noise that they created almost weapons on different physical principles. It didn’t pierce. Under the noise they got into a money pie- "concern" ... Ugh! Well, by golly, if I had been easier to go up, I would have gone to clean their management. And no deadlines would have scared me. The situation with this average Izhmash really breaks me off.
  12. Severok
    Severok 23 September 2013 15: 01 New
    +9
    I know personally. Heavy. 16 rounds in the store - too much. It is inconvenient to charge the magazine, the sharp edges of the magazine + the latest cartridges go very tight. "Illumination" of the sights - bullshit. She is simply not visible. The holster that goes with the troops is uncomfortable. It’s impossible to get a gun quickly, and sometimes it takes seconds! The cartridge must be sent with the whole hand, while the PM allows you to do this with two fingers - thumb and forefinger ...

    Conclusion - rawhide.
  13. Joffrey
    Joffrey 23 September 2013 15: 45 New
    +3
    And what, GS-18 is not pleasant to "security officers"?
  14. Stalinets
    Stalinets 23 September 2013 16: 11 New
    0
    Mayer .... you can cry. He would release "Galil" ... Horror. yes
  15. Moore
    Moore 23 September 2013 16: 33 New
    0
    Quote: avt

    The category of military personnel providing for weapons ONLY with one gun is how? In the sense that it would only be convenient to shoot yourself? Or are we talking about generals?


    And here are the generals? Few staff, rear officers and other various specialists whose combat and official activities are not directly related to bullets at the enemy?
  16. Sergey Medvedev
    Sergey Medvedev 23 September 2013 16: 39 New
    -1
    Was the TTX of this gun difficult to bring? Now look on the Internet. Not everyone, after all, held this PY in their hands.
  17. mithridate
    mithridate 23 September 2013 16: 47 New
    -1
    and what, can not be finalized, and then mass-produced?
  18. sashka
    sashka 23 September 2013 18: 25 New
    +1
    Ordinary "Colt 45" .. Browning came up with the scheme. The rest of the bells and whistles .. I didn’t see anything new .. Maybe it's just a cartridge?
  19. albanech
    albanech 24 September 2013 13: 57 New
    0
    Somewhere in places you can find similarities with Glock 18! They copy again, they spend money, and the results are pshyk! Not what you do! Enough! Buy better - cheaper!
    1. mirag2
      mirag2 24 September 2013 17: 27 New
      -2
      Exactly! The toad presses our corrupt officials to give the lave.