Concern "Kalashnikov" is ready to 30% increase the production of pistols Yarygin

44

The Izhmeh plant, which is part of the Kalashnikov concern, is ready to increase the production of Yarygin pistols by at least 30%, said the deputy general director of the concern, manager of Izhevsk Mechanical Plant, Vladimir Mayer, today.

"The company has created capacities up to 25 thousand products per year. I think that today Yarygin pistols as a whole for power departments are loaded somewhere on 70, that is, you can reload," said Meyer.

He noted that if there is a need to create additional capacity, the plant will be able to quickly solve this problem. “I really hope that some movements may occur from the point of view of orders not only from law enforcement agencies, but also the Ministry of Defense, perhaps, will respond,” the group’s deputy director said, adding that the state order of Izhmekha’s total production is only four percent.

According to Mayer, “Izhmeh” is the only enterprise in Russia that has kept mass production of short-barreled weapons and using modern technology. “The equipment, of course, is not ours, Taiwanese, but it is optimal in terms of performance and in terms of price. This allows you to get a quality product,” said Mayer.

On Izhmekh, we launched elements of the Whirlwind missile within the framework of a contract of the Russian Ministry of Defense with the Kalashnikov concern. "We have to let in by February a product that will provide assembly of products for Izhmash in the future. Final assembly will take place at the head company, at Izhmeha, and we will supply components," said Meyer.

The gun of Yarygin is a self-loading pistol made in Russia. Developed by a team of designers under the direction of V. A. Yarygin, mass-produced at the Izhevsk Mechanical Plant. In 2003, under the name "9-mm pistol Yarygin" was adopted by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    23 September 2013 11: 15
    quotation-The Izhmekh plant, which is part of the Kalashnikov concern, is ready to increase the production of Yarygin pistols by at least 30%, said Vladimir Mayer, deputy general director of the concern, manager of Izhevsk Mechanics Plant.

    1. 0
      23 September 2013 13: 41
      Quote: Apollon
      ready to increase production of Yarygin pistols by at least 30%

      This seems like a pretty good, powerful "melee argument". that's just, as far as I know, the specialists had comments on the QUALITY OF MANUFACTURE of this pistol. How will this issue be resolved?

      1. 0
        23 September 2013 14: 08
        Quote: svp67
        This seems like a pretty good, powerful "melee argument". that's just, as far as I know, the specialists had comments on the QUALITY OF MANUFACTURE of this pistol. How will this issue be resolved?


        Good day, Sergey hi If I don’t know a question for me, it’s more a question for the creators.
        1. +2
          23 September 2013 14: 15
          Quote: Apollon
          Good afternoon, Sergey. If I don’t know a question for me, rather a question for the creators.
          Kind. There is more to the production workers. I had the pleasure of shooting this pistol in the 90s ... So it seems like the machine is powerful, I "stitched" a sleeve from 5UTS for 50 meters, unlike the PM, which only left dents on it, but the APS is somehow "nicer", not so "loud", and surprisingly, it is easier to get the same PM cartridge from it, but the cartridge case released from the APS "perforated", not so "nice", but "perforated" ... Maybe it was worth the APS for a new cartridge to modify ..
      2. +5
        23 September 2013 15: 37
        I'm not special, but I shot from him. Quality - as an ax healed ...
    2. 0
      23 September 2013 19: 23
      He is very heavy, almost 1 kg. Gsh will be better.
  2. 0
    23 September 2013 11: 18
    PMM was successfully buried for someone’s ambitions.
    1. +1
      23 September 2013 11: 26
      The state intends to sell 49% of the Kalashnikov concern to the joint venture of Alexei Krivoruchko and Andrey Bokarev, Kommersant reports today. 49% of Kalashnikov shares are valued at 1,3 billion rubles.
      Shares for sale will be issued as part of an additional issue. In the next two years, entrepreneurs will also invest about 2,4 billion rubles in the concern. The deal has already been approved by the Ministry of Industry and Trade and personally supported by Vladimir Putin.
      1. 0
        23 September 2013 11: 31
        Quote: kris
        The deal has already been approved by the Ministry of Industry and Trade and personally supported by Vladimir Putin.

        If Vladimir Putin personally approved the deal, then everything has been calculated.
        Russia will produce the most modern small arms in the world.
        1. Hon
          0
          24 September 2013 08: 47
          Quote: cosmos111
          If Vladimir Putin personally approved the deal, then everything has been calculated.
          Russia will produce the most modern small arms in the world.

          Chubais accidentally made the calculations?
      2. +5
        23 September 2013 11: 47
        Quote: kris
        The state intends to sell 49% of the Kalashnikov concern

        Nothing wrong with that. The main thing is that the state retains a controlling stake.
        1. +1
          23 September 2013 13: 36
          The very idea of ​​stocks, debt obligations, etc. came from the Western model of the economy (and, accordingly, they are not doing well because of this model of the economy) in order to even out the real state of affairs, because the same debt obligations by themselves are worthless, and those who acquire them makes money on all sorts of speculation or "economic bubbles", which causes inflation itself. The calculation also assumes that in fact people or corporations will give real money (obtained through the production of goods or the sale of resources: oil, gas, timber), which benefits those who sell these obligations, but not the producers themselves. An example is the high cost of branded clothing, perfume, paintings, etc. With all due respect to those who do all this - all this is not worth such a high price. And the owners give their hard-earned money, if, of course, they are honestly earned, and not stolen. Returning to stocks. They are also produced and bought as an instrument of influence. If the shares fall into the hands of opponents of the OJSC itself, then they, in turn, will be able to influence the company. It is also possible, through certain levers (intimidation, bribery, murder), to influence non-people and make sure that the controlling stake goes over to the side of the right people. And voila, the plant is already owned by foreigners.
          In view of this, such a move is not good.
      3. -1
        23 September 2013 12: 11
        I would sell it all. Oh would tie them up with contracts.
        + Would give money to small arms firms throughout Russia. Tired of a monopoly for crazy money of frankly poor quality. Our people already prefer Turkish guns to ours.
    2. avt
      +6
      23 September 2013 11: 29
      Quote: Strashila
      PMM was successfully buried for someone’s ambitions.

      More likely GSh-18. PMM is like that, but this is my subjective opinion, worse than PM. That is the case when it is better - the enemy of the good.
      Quote: Povshnik
      And let PM go on free sale

      Quite a good "civilian" weapon good , still would have served for a long time.
      1. -6
        23 September 2013 11: 47
        More likely GSh-18

        and what is so ololo about it? Perversion with locking the trunk?
        . PMM like that, but this is my subjective opinion, worse than PM

        Just the same, there is no PMM quite suitable pistol.
    3. +3
      23 September 2013 11: 46
      Quote: Strashila
      PMM was successfully buried for someone’s ambitions.

      MRP, it’s not bad, but weak for the army. The Ministry of Internal Affairs, for the faculty and precinct will go. The army needs something more powerful.
      1. +2
        23 September 2013 12: 16
        It is not entirely clear such a heated discussion of a particular pistol model. The gun as such is not the main small arms on the battlefield for most military personnel. Under the whistle of bullets, I want something more powerful and multi-charged .... In the Armed Forces there are quite a lot of posts of soldiers and officers, where their type of activity, and especially the operation of weapons and equipment, provide weapons only with a pistol. In this case, the serviceman, of course, expects to have the most reliable pistol and preferably multi-shot. hi
        1. avt
          0
          23 September 2013 16: 03
          Quote: zanoza
          In the Armed Forces there are quite a lot of posts of soldiers and officers, where their type of activity, and especially the operation of weapons and equipment, provide weapons only with a pistol. In this case, the serviceman, of course, expects to have the most reliable pistol and preferably multi-shot.

          The category of military personnel providing for weapons ONLY with one gun is how? In the sense that it would only be convenient to shoot yourself? Or are we talking about generals? So they were always made easier and smaller for them. The pistol is the second weapon and here other parameters are more important than multicharging, just because of the specifics of the military specialty.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. 0
            23 September 2013 18: 34
            Quote: avt
            ... with one gun, how is it?


            In the MCP (110 people l / s, including 6 officers and 2 warrant officers)) are in service 23- PM и 9- APM(Stechkin), 66-AK, 3-SVD, 9-RPK and 3-PK. 9 - RPG-7
            1. avt
              0
              23 September 2013 18: 57
              Quote: zanoza
              In the MCP (110 people l / s, including 6 officers and 2 warrant officers)) 23-PM and 9-APM (Stechkin), 66-AK, 3-SVD, 9-RPK and 3 - are in service PC. 9 - RPG-7

              Well, again, I repeat, the pistol is the second weapon, the first machine gun, the rifle, the PP for those who need a shortened compact barrel. By the way, precisely because there was no compact PP like "Kedra" or like "UZI" or like the current "Veresk" and their predecessor appeared - APS. And to run at the head of the MSR indicated by you in combat conditions with a PM, and even with Stechkin, is an exact path to suicide.
    4. +3
      23 September 2013 12: 38
      Already decided which gun will replace the PM? They write either about Yarygin, then about GS-18, then some else. You might think that various groups are fighting ..
    5. The comment was deleted.
  3. Airman
    +4
    23 September 2013 11: 19
    And let the PM go on free sale, at least some kind of profit will be, and then again in re-melting.
  4. 0
    23 September 2013 11: 25
    It's time to change PM ..! The barrel in the photo does not look bad! I hope a reliable and unpretentious gun.
    1. +7
      23 September 2013 11: 30
      In the army, let them change pm to yarygin.
      In the police PM can not be changed !!!! HE is almost perfect.
    2. Airman
      +2
      23 September 2013 13: 43
      Quote: MIKHAN
      It's time to change PM ..! The barrel in the photo does not look bad! I hope a reliable and unpretentious gun.

      Here, a special forces soldier spoke recently at the forum, so Yarygin’s pistol didn’t respond very flattering, there are often delays in shooting, and is very sensitive to pollution.
      1. Algor73
        +2
        23 September 2013 16: 16
        When the "Fort" was launched in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, we also had complaints. But now it's okay, everything is fine. Previously, they did not want to change to PM, now the opposite. "Yarygina" will also grind. I served with a PM, a good pistol, he coped with his task completely. why changed?
  5. ramsi
    +1
    23 September 2013 11: 30
    I never liked the skew of the trunk
    1. +2
      23 September 2013 12: 12
      Quote: ramsi
      I never liked the skew of the trunk


      Unique to you. Everyone likes and you don’t. Apparently it's time to break the negative tendency to refuse to lock the barrel through the ejection window of the sleeve.
      1. ramsi
        -8
        23 September 2013 12: 31
        even if we ignore the mechanics of the movable, and even the warped trunk, I recall some garbage (gulag archipelago, or what? ..) So there, the firing squads first used TT, but then they were forced to switch to Walther, whether on parabellum due to the fact that the TT was falling apart
        1. +2
          23 September 2013 15: 45
          Quote: ramsi
          even if we ignore the mechanics of the movable, and even the warped trunk, I recall some garbage (gulag archipelago, or what? ..) So there, the firing squads first used TT, but then they were forced to switch to Walther, whether on parabellum due to the fact that the TT was falling apart

          Did Solzhenitsyn decide so?
          1. ramsi
            0
            23 September 2013 16: 25
            and yet, the kinematics of SR-1, GSh-18, OTs-33 are somehow more rational
  6. +7
    23 September 2013 13: 03
    It can’t be! Reliability of the TT is proved by the World War!
    1. ramsi
      -8
      23 September 2013 13: 13
      Why can not ?! The barrel is long, the cartridge is powerful, the automation is working - but the shooting teams have slightly different specifics
      1. avt
        +1
        23 September 2013 14: 19
        Quote: ramsi
        Why can not ?! The barrel is long, the cartridge is powerful, the automation is working - but the shooting teams have slightly different specifics

        Oh how! Well, when Browning invented the gun, he knew about it, probably already then he read Solzhenitsyn. Yes, and the Germans certainly scoured in search of TTs for different policemen, sonderkommandas and concentration camp guards
  7. No_more
    +2
    23 September 2013 13: 03
    Sorry. He is inconvenient. PM is easy to get, convenient to hold, nothing touches anything anywhere for clothes. Here it is worth taking a look and it’s immediately clear that the protruding details that ergonomically damage are striking.
    I'm not saying that you don’t need a new gun, but this clumsy one was too much to use. But if you recall the forms of PM, TT, APS, you’ll think about whether they were so neat without extra details.
  8. AX
    +3
    23 September 2013 13: 42
    Eliminate the problems, and a normal pistol ... And dampness, "childhood diseases", must be eliminated before starting the series.
  9. 0
    23 September 2013 13: 51
    In the West, the choice of weapons for special forces of more than 10 types for a specific task, it would be nice to introduce this innovation.
  10. +2
    23 September 2013 14: 07
    angular it’s not the case, the store cuts fingers, at least grind it with a file
  11. +9
    23 September 2013 14: 07
    Oh, my dear friends, well, I don’t have a soul for Izhmash. Nothing. Well, the quality there is practically zero. I saw ak200 alone. Well, there are no words. They ripped off the idea of ​​balanced automation from the Kovrovites. But they CONSCIOUSLY hindered adoption of AEK. Yes, maybe they wanted to receive an order for themselves, corporate interests, etc. etc. But what it says is that they put their OWN interests above state ones. This is where the dough is actually cut. And not some f-35, which does not concern us sideways. But the most basic-sane small arms- in the pope.
    And I will also say, Izhmash crap in my eyes is nowhere worse. The weapon is normal through one. They weighed the Kalash with all kinds of shnyaga and made such a noise that they created almost a weapon on different physical principles. It did not pass. Under the noise they climbed into a money pie- "Concern" ... Ugh! Here, by God, if I had been easier on the rise, I would have gone clean their management. And no time frame would have scared me. The situation with this average Izhmash breaks me down.
  12. +9
    23 September 2013 15: 01
    Ich I know personally. Heavy. 16 rounds in the magazine is too much. It is inconvenient to load the magazine, the sharp edges of the magazine + the last cartridges go very tight. "Illumination" of the sighting device is bullshit. She simply cannot be seen. The holster that goes to the troops with him is inconvenient. It is impossible to get a gun quickly, but sometimes seconds count! The cartridge has to be sent with the whole hand, while the PM allows you to do this with two fingers - thumb and forefinger ...

    Conclusion - rawhide.
  13. Joffrey
    +3
    23 September 2013 15: 45
    And what, the "siloviks" don't like GSH-18?
  14. Stalinets
    0
    23 September 2013 16: 11
    Meyer .... you can cry. He would have to release "Galil" ... Horror. Yes
  15. 0
    23 September 2013 16: 33
    Quote: avt

    The category of military personnel providing for weapons ONLY with one gun is how? In the sense that it would only be convenient to shoot yourself? Or are we talking about generals?


    And here are the generals? Few staff, rear officers and other various specialists whose combat and official activities are not directly related to bullets at the enemy?
  16. -1
    23 September 2013 16: 39
    Was the TTX of this gun difficult to bring? Now look on the Internet. Not everyone, after all, held this PY in their hands.
  17. -1
    23 September 2013 16: 47
    and what, can not be finalized, and then mass-produced?
  18. sashka
    +1
    23 September 2013 18: 25
    Ordinary "Colt 45" .. The scheme was designed by Browning. The rest of the whistle-making deals .. I did not see anything new .. Maybe it's just a cartridge?
  19. albanech
    0
    24 September 2013 13: 57
    Somewhere in places you can find similarities with Glock 18! They copy again, they spend money, and the results are pshyk! Not what you do! Enough! Buy better - cheaper!
    1. -2
      24 September 2013 17: 27
      Exactly! The toad presses our corrupt officials to give the lave.