Military Review

“The exchange rate policy of the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance is killing Russian production”

65
From the point of view of Russia and the traditional Russian economy, there is no worsening of the world conjuncture.


The media transmit the statement of the head of the Ministry of Economic Development Alexei Ulyukayev about the deterioration of the dynamics of economic development in Russia. In his opinion, this is explained by the unfavorable conjuncture of foreign markets, which affected domestic exports. As a result, in 2013, the level of development of the Russian economy was below the world average.

The information published by Ulyukaev is commented for KM.RU by Mikhail Leontyev.

We have not very good prospects for global market conditions.

This is beyond my comprehension! All that Ulyukaev is talking about is the product of the activity, first of all, of Ulyukayev himself. As an ideologist of the Central Bank, responsible for course policy, he certainly should understand this and could not fail to understand this. In terms of Ulyukaev, I exclude the possibility of thoughtlessness, misunderstandings and errors in calculations. Of course, there is not one Ulyukaev here, this is Kudrinism in general, but Ulyukaev is a key figure.

The first. From the point of view of Russia and the traditional Russian economy, there is no worsening of the world conjuncture. Commodity prices are high. If we were Chinese and threw industrial goods at the European market, if we were Americans or Germans and threw goods at the market with very high added value, we could talk about a worsening of the conjuncture.

Yes, we do not have very good prospects for the world conjuncture, I would say, just bad. But current balance and current conjuncture are not created by prospects. Energy prices and, in general, the traditional goods of our exports are very high. They did not fall.

It was the first, and now the second. The competitiveness of the Russian economy is primarily reduced due to the exchange rate policy pursued by the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance. This exchange rate policy has led to a four-fold appreciation of the ruble over the past ten years. This is if you look at the effective exchange rate of the ruble, and we live in an open economy and compete with foreign industrial goods. This kills Russian production, stimulates the consumption of exclusively imported goods.

Prospects I see in a return to common sense in macroeconomic policy

The financial and economic bloc of our government has destroyed all opportunities for its own economic growth in Russia. Credit is unavailable, it is super high, money is expensive. They cannot win inflation, because they persistently struggle by monetary methods against non-monetary inflation, that is, inflation of the costs created by the growth of tariffs of natural monopolies. The exchange rate policy systematically destroys the competitiveness of Russian manufacturers. That's the whole история.

Hence the fall in investment. And who will invest in an economy that is not just uncompetitive, but which systematically reduces its competitiveness through the macroeconomic policies of its own government? We have now begun the process of refusal of foreign automakers to localize. Unprofitable! This is a very typical, very indicative industry. It is more profitable to produce the same in France and Germany. This is prohibitive. And I see prospects in returning to common sense in macroeconomic policy.

Read more: http://www.km.ru/spetsproekty/2013/09/19/ekonomika-i-finansy/720981-kursovaya-politika-tsentrobanka-i-minfina-ubivaet
Author:
Originator:
http://www.km.ru/spetsproekty/2013/09/19/ekonomika-i-finansy/720981-kursovaya-politika-tsentrobanka-i-minfina-ubivaet
65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Asgard
    Asgard 21 September 2013 07: 35 New
    33
    That's what is interesting !!!!
    The entire Russian economy entered the WTO ....
    And the financial sector - NO ????
    That is, lending rates (borrowed funds)) did not fall to the levels of Europe and America ....
    How shoud I understand this???? The Russian government - suckers ???? Once signed this ???
    IN O P O R S?
    1. a52333
      a52333 21 September 2013 08: 35 New
      +3
      Well right now !!! Let's open the arms of Goldman Sachs and Morganam with Bank of America. Where will we put their offices? What are you? !! They already finished off the states with their policies, and now these foxes are in our chicken coop? Maybe it’s better for us to immediately control in the head? We need to deal with the Central Bank, AHA, I agree. But let these be in Manhattan. They’ve gotten too much in the undercover "games."
      1. nbw
        nbw 21 September 2013 09: 28 New
        19
        Let's open the arms of Goldman Sachs and Morganam with Bank of America.
        Well, comrade, it seems to me, had in mind that we need to reduce the interest rates of our banks to acceptable (and accepted in the world) levels, but this is not done by our government inagets. And where are the hugs? what
        1. astra
          astra 21 September 2013 09: 51 New
          23
          Credit is unavailable, it is super high, money is expensive.
          Quote: a52333
          We need to deal with the Central Bank

          Quote: nbw
          we need to reduce the interest rates of our banks to acceptable (and accepted in the world) levels,

          Even before the appointment of Elvira Nabiulina to the post of Central Bank, everyone assured that with the advent of Nabiulina, interest rates in the Central Bank would reduce, that Nabiulina reflects the interests of Putin. But it turned out on the contrary promised that they would only elect her, and having chosen, she continues to keep high rates, without reducing. It turns out that I threw everyone, now you can’t re-elect it in the next 5 years. Worldwide, refinancing rates are low from about 0.1 to 2-3 percent, hence low interest rates on household loans, and economic development. And it’s cheaper for us to take a loan abroad than at home. The Central Bank makes excuses that it is impossible to lower the refinancing rate, supposedly high inflation, and what prevents it from freezing the tariffs of monopolies, for gasoline, electricity, etc. thereby not giving rise to inflation, lowering interest rates on loans for the population, hence the revival of the economy. It seems that in the Central Bank, the Ministry of Finance, and liberal politicians in the government, Western proteges are doing everything possible to prevent the Russian economy from rising. It smells of treason.
          1. a52333
            a52333 21 September 2013 10: 36 New
            -2
            Well, hopefully not. I would like to focus on the fact that the decision on the rate is not made by the chairman of the Central Bank, but by the board of directors.
            It seems that in the Central Bank, the Ministry of Finance, and liberal politicians in the government, Western proteges are doing everything possible to prevent the Russian economy from rising.
            Not only with you.
          2. nbw
            nbw 21 September 2013 11: 03 New
            12
            But it turned out on the contrary promised that they would only elect her, and having chosen, she continues to keep high rates, without reducing.
            Do you really think that the fundamental principles of the economy of the largest country in the world depend on the personal desire of some woman? (the hint is clear, or continue? wink)
            It seems that in the Central Bank, the Ministry of Finance, and liberal politicians in the government, Western proteges are doing everything possible to prevent the Russian economy from rising.
            You will not believe... laughing Does the surname Fedorov tell you anything? He’s been talking about this for two years now.
            1. astra
              astra 21 September 2013 14: 00 New
              10
              Quote: nbw
              Do you really think that the fundamental principles of the economy of the largest country in the world depend on the personal desire of some woman? (the hint is clear, or continue?)

              I see in fact, before the election, I said that the rate should be reduced, after I see that the rate has not been reduced for 2 months already. Maybe I don’t understand everything (I’m not strong in economics), but I think that S. Yu. Glazyev should be elected to the Central Bank he is at least not a liberal, but that says a lot.
              Quote: nbw
              You won’t believe ... Surname Fedorov is telling you something? He’s been talking about this for two years now.

              I heard, watched his videos, at first believed, then hesitated, now I don’t believe it, because the point of his remarks is that most of the GDPs of the West surround him and they don’t give him much to do. This cannot be, he forms the government and depends on him who will work and who will not, so you can’t relieve yourself of responsibility and shift your failures to the machinations of Westerners and whitewash yourself. I believe that in 3 terms with a skillful approach, the country could be raised even higher. Many GDPs have done both good and bad. I think that people are prima format ova or be Lukashenko raised the country faster.
              1. nbw
                nbw 21 September 2013 14: 48 New
                0
                This cannot be
                You know better wassat
                I think that people of the Primakov format
                Primakov is not even funny. Where were all these cf *** e (old wink) Communists, when Gorbachev ruined the country? Did you drink cognac at the dachas? And then once - and would raise? Gygs. Remember how Zyuganov’s comrades fled in 93 from the House of Soviets? Like rats. There is no faith in the indifferent "communists." The real Communists under Stalin ended.
                or Lukashenko
                He’s been raising for 20 years, he won’t raise it in any way. As Belarus was part of Russia, it remained (economically). He is well done, of course, that he holds such a course, but I do not see much prosperity there. Under the weight of Russia, Lukashenko would have extended his legs.
                1. Mature naturalist
                  Mature naturalist 21 September 2013 21: 25 New
                  +6
                  Quote: nbw
                  He’s been raising for 20 years, he won’t raise it in any way.

                  Old Man would have our resources ... And so, only potatoes, Bulbash, brains and Salihorsk
                  Yes, and that (Salihorsk), tried to lower and take away ...
                  Certainly, they wouldn’t have built fur coats under him.
                  Although, of course, when talking with Belarusian enterprises, I recall the Soviet Union: the question of money is secondary for them, the main thing is “not to lean out of the window” (remember the symbolic inscriptions on the trams?)
              2. Dilshat
                Dilshat 21 September 2013 17: 27 New
                +2
                There is a dark situation with Fedorov. What he is opposed to now was doing in the same team and under the leadership of Chubais. Why did he switch over and switch over to figure it out.
          3. Dilshat
            Dilshat 21 September 2013 17: 20 New
            +6
            We recently recently discussed Ukraine, how it fell into slavery to the European Union. And our situation is no better, the same host of traitors in the government.
          4. Oleg14774
            Oleg14774 21 September 2013 18: 38 New
            +6
            Quote: astra
            It seems that in the Central Bank, the Ministry of Finance, and liberal politicians in the government, Western proteges are doing everything possible to prevent the Russian economy from rising. It smells of treason.

            According to Petrov, inflation arises due to higher interest rates in banks, but we are told on the contrary that bankers are poor and should raise rates in connection with inflation. But let's see the chain. The collective farm takes a loan at 1% per annum and lays the price of agricultural products at 1% + profit and development money, takes a price of 20%, respectively. Therefore, the head is to blame, not the legs. Bankers are bloodsuckers, and "our" bank, this is not ours, this is their bank. He was ours in the USSR, when it was printed on banknotes that it was a state treasury ticket. And what do we write on modern rubles ?!
            1. Mature naturalist
              Mature naturalist 21 September 2013 21: 35 New
              +1
              Quote: Oleg147741
              Bankers - Bloodsuckers

              Yes, this is a sin of usury. One of the seven deadly sins.

              And there is a curious thing - Islamic banks.
              The principle of the Islamic banking system is that any Muslim, regardless of whether it is a loan or a debt, cannot, according to religious standards, conduct a financial transaction at a stable interest. Usury forbidden by the Qur'an
              1. aksakal
                aksakal 21 September 2013 23: 44 New
                +2
                Quote: Mature Naturalist
                The principle of the Islamic banking system is that any Muslim, regardless of whether it is a loan or a debt, cannot, according to religious standards, conduct a financial transaction at a stable interest. Usury forbidden by the Qur'an

                - forget it. Why? Remind me? Ok, a bit of recent history. So, in 2007, in the USA, a crisis in the low-quality mortgage market suddenly happened. In 2008, the crisis escalated, a bunch of banks staggered, "Vashoviya" collapsed, the US Government began to save Goldman Sachs and with it took off ...
                In Kazakhstan, Alliance Bank and BTA Bank have stumbled. The head of BTA M. Ablyazov, without wasting time, cashed out a bunch of cabbage, having inherited in Russia along the way, hit the road to London.
                And at that time, not a single Islamic bank even stumbled, and these Islamic banks began to blow the whole world about it. Idiots! No, that would be silent, to grow up a protective buffer from the special services, to put their faithful people in the governments of their countries, to buy weapons from Russia - they say that the greed of the fryer was ruined. Money became a pity for Russian weapons, good money for good intelligence and security services in their Islamic countries, but it’s a pity to blow the whole world, being essentially naked and defenseless, look, this is a crisis due to the wrong principle of lending, here he is the result - the crisis, but not a single Islamic bank ... Well, hereinafter. Kazakhstan, for example, immediately noticed, Nazarbayev rushed on a tour of the Middle East with gingerbread cookies for Islamic banks.
                And then suddenly flashed unexpectedly (unexpectedly and unexpectedly?) The so-called the "Arab spring", which is still burning and will be burning in the future, until the source of the fire is extinguished. And the source of fire sits in the most powerful militarily state, and even beyond the ocean, you don’t really get it, you will get this source.
                There are many versions of the "Arab spring" - from the fact that chaos is needed by the Amers, simply because the Amers love chaos, to the point that they get to Russia from the south, etc. My version is that the Middle East, as a potentially dangerous competitor in the field of finance, should be destroyed precisely as a financial cluster, and a functioning mode should be created in it in which no banks can appear. Money loves silence, but if the Tahrir Square is very noisy, then the money will simply go to another place. Where is the calm place? Of course in the States. If they count the money, China is also calm, then Tiananmen, Tibet and Xinjiang Uyghur. You already know about Russia. In Europe, too, there are enough smoldering coals. Thus, only the States.
                Quote: Mature Naturalist
                Usury forbidden by the Qur'an

                yes, Mr. Evidence, it is, but that's only the homeland of the Koran is forbidden by usurers. Forever. Forever. How to be What to do? Who's guilty? The question was asked by the classic, and for almost three centuries we can’t find answers.
              2. Ingvar 72
                Ingvar 72 22 September 2013 21: 54 New
                +1
                Quote: Mature Naturalist
                Yes, this is a sin of usury. One of the seven deadly sins.

                The Torah also says that you can’t give people money in growth. But it also says who should be considered people and who is not. The doggy of usury is buried there.
          5. Alez
            Alez 22 September 2013 22: 20 New
            0
            Fat cat cats rule the world. Take a look around, do you see production around, engineering, IT production? No - around, loans without red tape at 24-44% per annum, just take it. Why the heck are our production workers with 10%? It’s easier to print money, to drive it into bondage. Legislatively it is necessary to prohibit the issuance of mortgages more than 7%, consumers more than 10%. In the West and China, loans are 3%, so bankers rule our government. Everything obvious lies on the surface, and Mr. Putin has an interest with bankers, otherwise he would have put things in order long ago.
          6. v.lyamkin
            v.lyamkin 23 September 2013 05: 37 New
            0
            This situation is not only with Nabiullina, but with all the candidates. when nominated, they promise anything, and then just forget about their promises. In the best case, they may refer to the fact that the situation has changed.
      2. user
        user 21 September 2013 10: 48 New
        13
        Do you really think that Goldman Sachs and Morganam with the Bank of America do not participate in the management of Russian banks through affiliated board members. You are just like a child.
        There are only a few banks with 100% state participation, and not a single financial and controlling organization knows the rest of the final beneficiaries, these are the pies.
        1. NOBODY EXCEPT US
          NOBODY EXCEPT US 21 September 2013 23: 35 New
          0
          Which of our banks, if not secret, have 100% state participation ...?
      3. Pilat2009
        Pilat2009 21 September 2013 13: 06 New
        +3
        Quote: a52333
        Where will we put their offices?

        I don’t see the place where cheap FOREIGN loans can harm us.
        Unless, of course, in the conditions there is no clause on early repayment
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 21 September 2013 08: 39 New
      10
      Quote: Asgard
      How shoud I understand this???? The Russian government - suckers ????

      Is not it?
      Former Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation Alexei Kudrin became the head of the Sberbank of Russia Strategic Planning Committee, which was headed by the Minister of Economic Development Alexei Ulyukaev before his appointment.argumentiru.com/economics/2013/09/285315
      SchA will plan.
      1. My address
        My address 21 September 2013 09: 41 New
        +1
        I have a friend on this occasion all the northern beast recalled: "Well, everything, fox."
      2. luka095
        luka095 21 September 2013 21: 37 New
        +2
        And yet they are not suckers. They have been pursuing their policies consistently for a long time. No matter who our president is.
        When it came to choosing the head of the Central Bank, the probability of appointing Glazyev to this post was discussed. And then it was clear that he would not be appointed to this post. Because Glazyev’s vision of a development strategy for the economy in Russia is practically the exact opposite of the liberal approach.
    3. Ruslan_F38
      Ruslan_F38 21 September 2013 10: 55 New
      10
      And still continue to believe that Putin is completely in control of the country and completely independent? Well, continue to believe further. Kudrin with Chubais and some other real Russian rulers greetings and place of honor in the hottest corner of hell.
      1. optimist
        optimist 21 September 2013 12: 30 New
        13
        Quote: Ruslan_F38
        And still continue to believe that Putin is completely in control of the country and completely independent? Well, continue to believe further. Kudrin with Chubais and some other real Russian rulers greetings and place of honor in the hottest corner of hell.

        While the majority of the population will consider Putin “D * Artagnan” among the crowd of 3.14 doraces, nothing will change. But when it comes to the pri.urkov that he is the main 3.14doras in this "cockerel" - then, perhaps, something will begin to change ...
        1. Ruslan_F38
          Ruslan_F38 21 September 2013 12: 35 New
          +3
          Quote: optimist
          While the majority of the population will consider Putin “D * Artagnan” among the crowd of 3.14 doraces, nothing will change. But when it comes to the pri.urkov that he is the main 3.14doras in this "cockerel" - then, perhaps, something will begin to change ...


          Well, as for the main thing, I bet if you see something that others do not or do not want to see, then you must understand this)). Who brought Putin into politics? Kudrin and ... red)). There are some more, but I would not call their names)).
        2. Dilshat
          Dilshat 21 September 2013 17: 32 New
          +3
          Yeah. Something that Kolobok did not think so when he lived on Lisa. It seems that after Stalin our country ceases to belong to its citizens gradually.
    4. Konsmo
      Konsmo 21 September 2013 10: 58 New
      +2
      The bank cannot give money lower or at the inflation level. It is now 6-7 percent.
      Plus margin is profit.
      The conclusion is that the monopole eggs need to be twisted counterclockwise. They accelerate. There will be inflation of 1-2 percent, a loan of 7-8 percent and commerce will work, and a mortgage too.
    5. zvereok
      zvereok 21 September 2013 11: 31 New
      +5
      By God, Fuckers. They blame the ruble, and at the same time artificially restrain its growth. And the competitiveness of the manufacturing sector by raising tariffs killed 20 years. As they killed, they decided to join the WTO and freeze tariffs, so that the capital accumulated in the chests would come to the Russian Federation, buy everything up and feel comfortable.
    6. smart ass
      smart ass 21 September 2013 16: 02 New
      +3
      Aha, when they entered the WTO they promised cheaper computers, everyday life. vehicles, foreign cars ... As a result, current prices are rising
    7. Wolf
      Wolf 22 September 2013 12: 29 New
      +2
      Macroeconomics is simple if you know what the hype is and what the truth is! The foundation of the cutting itself is strong in the world, it is oil, gas, metal, grain. Russia net exporter tј. she is in + with a good balance! Is there really no real reason for inflation and a drop in the exchange rate of the ruble !? The weight of financial systems in Russia is sazdan for manipulation by the economist of Russia to the country of world speculators (Rothschild, Rockferel, Morgan, Schiff, etc.). The WTO and the agreement on $ or € are the same as opening the doors of an apartment for robbing! They steal through $ and € !, which is their most terrible robbery weapon. Secular Bank, MMF and Commercial Bank is just a place where this happens! If you take away your imprint, you can buy your own America several times over from Yudima. Then you don’t understand what the real economy is, or what it is that you are deceiving and speculating, or doing it with intent. Today it does not have a currency in the world of cator, by its real power it can measure it with Rubљ !!! Remember that in times of greater crisis, even gold loses value, but energy and grain and their wearer are not !!!
      1. Theophanes
        Theophanes 22 September 2013 16: 09 New
        +2
        The liberal government is the end of Russia. This is understandable even to the very last fool. Putin is also a liberal. Hence the conclusion, Russia does not see a rise while the liberties are in power. Everything is very, very bad!
    8. No_more
      No_more 23 September 2013 13: 54 New
      0
      And this is not included in the conditions of entry into the WTO for any country. The US, too, is not tolerant of extraneous financial institutions in its own country, it is much tougher there than ours.
      And you can’t worry about loans. Now banks are starting to feel that consumers have become more picky and no longer take loans out of their heads, have tasted the bitterness of interest. I have all relatives who have at least one kata (even salary) call and offer loans to these banks, interest rates are reduced, but thank God we do not need. Now they’ll try to credit cards and have to go to finance entrepreneurship, because the gold rush in our country with consumer loans has dried up.
  2. FC SKIF
    FC SKIF 21 September 2013 07: 40 New
    +7
    As Leontiev is not about slate and Belorussia, so the smartest person, you can directly listen.
  3. bairat
    bairat 21 September 2013 07: 49 New
    14
    In the USA inflation is 4%, in the Russian Federation 12%, which means that the ruble against the dollar should become cheaper by 8% every year. But he is not getting cheaper, for the past 10 years he has been walking in the corridor of 28-32 rubles per dollar. This is the artificial appreciation of the ruble. It is very beneficial for exporters, and for local producers this is a sentence. The fact that somewhere else some production is warming is not our merit but an oversight of the Chinese "comrades".
    1. sergey32
      sergey32 21 September 2013 08: 16 New
      +2
      And we have the whole economy, the whole country ensures the well-being of natural monopolies. The main thing that they were sweet, we are so on the side of the hot spot. Everyone is already used to being constantly sanded.
    2. a52333
      a52333 21 September 2013 08: 40 New
      0
      artificial appreciation of the ruble. It is very beneficial for exporters
      lol Nothing messed up? Oh oh The Japanese and the Chinese come out wink .It's artificially lowered its currency. "Currency wars" - ask Yandex.
      1. nbw
        nbw 21 September 2013 09: 26 New
        +4
        And what did he confuse?) The appreciation of the domestic currency has a negative effect on the domestic producer, and the cost reduction is positive. Our manufacturer should be bad, in China - good. Well, it is. Where is the contradiction? Not awake, chtol? hi
        1. a52333
          a52333 21 September 2013 10: 07 New
          0
          Well, someone definitely didn’t wake up hi . Let's understand:
          Currency wars or competitive devaluation are successive deliberate actions by governments and central banks of several countries to achieve a relatively low exchange rate for their national currency, in order to increase their own export volumes. Increase in export volumes occurs due to decrease in local currency the cost of production of domestic enterprises-exporters and the ability to reduce prices for products of exporters.
          1. nbw
            nbw 21 September 2013 11: 19 New
            +3
            relatively low exchange rate for its national currency
            And I'm about the same. And the ruble is artificially rise in price. Will we figure it out further? fellow

            PS In the original post, “exporters” (as I understand it) meant foreign manufacturers, as opposed to domestic, and you decided that you mean domestic producers exporting products to other countries. So?
            1. a52333
              a52333 21 September 2013 12: 30 New
              +1
              It seems so
              but it is very beneficial for exporters, and for local producers this is a sentence.
              It wasn’t very clear, it was about rubles, and in this light it would be more correct to call exporters “Importers”. And there is one more nuance, which can not be said:
              US inflation 4%
              - This is an understated figure. I read this (don’t ask, some economist, I don’t remember.) Since 1990, the dollar has fallen by 300%. Again, it’s worth clarifying: the colonial dollar! the inside is different there.
    3. Konsmo
      Konsmo 21 September 2013 11: 11 New
      0
      For a normal enterprise with normal leadership, the course does not play a role.
      And if you sharpen the same matryoshka for 50 years, then yes the Chinese are crying for you.
      And if you (the management) turn on the brains and start releasing nesting dolls (offhand: with a smell, with music, with a fridge for vodka, with a clock and so on), then you are the market leader yourself and dictate the price of sales and your profit, respectively, since competitors are far in the pope.
      You need to think, not whine.
      1. bairat
        bairat 21 September 2013 12: 24 New
        +2
        Matryoshka is a primitive. we produce telecommunication equipment, in 1998, when the dollar jumped in, equipment imported from abroad “suddenly” became 4 times more expensive, naturally, local telecom operators switched to us. these were the fattest years.
        And it is profitable for our exporters to trade in raw materials to keep a solid ruble, they win by paying taxes.
  4. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 21 September 2013 07: 55 New
    +1
    Video in the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7iZWzrP3xA
  5. Peaceful military
    Peaceful military 21 September 2013 09: 07 New
    +5
    All this causes outrage both in fact and in perpetuity. angry
    Well, why, for more than 20 years, the same faces of Gaidar, Chubais, Kokhov, Germans, Kasyanovs, Kudrins, Dvorkovichs and other Ulyukaevs have led the country? WHY?!angry
    I understand that this is a rhetorical question ...sad
    1. Ruslan_F38
      Ruslan_F38 21 September 2013 11: 03 New
      +5
      Quote: Peaceful military
      All this causes outrage both in fact and in perpetuity. angry
      Well, why, for more than 20 years, the same faces of Gaidar, Chubais, Kokhov, Germans, Kasyanovs, Kudrins, Dvorkovichs and other Ulyukaevs have led the country? WHY?!angry
      I understand that this is a rhetorical question ...sad

      MOSCOW, September 20. / ITAR-TASS /. Vladimir Putin signed a decree appointing Vladislav Surkov an assistant to the president of the Russian Federation, the Kremlin’s press service said today.

      The decree comes into force from the day it is signed. According to the document, Surkov will fulfill the duties of Tatyana Golikova, whom Putin has dismissed today and which the State Duma has appointed head of the Accounts Chamber. "Surkov will be in charge of exactly the same issues that Tatyana Golikova was in charge of as the assistant to the president of the Russian Federation," the correspondent said. ITAR-TASS press secretary of the head of state Dmitry Peskov.
      Returned)). Nothing really changes. The performance continues.
    2. nbw
      nbw 21 September 2013 11: 09 New
      +4
      I understand that this is a rhetorical question ...
      The occupation administration wassat When (if) the people rise and throw off the occupiers - and the faces disappear, scatter / sit down. But the people so far prefer to be fooled by Navalny, etc.
    3. vlad.svargin
      vlad.svargin 21 September 2013 16: 17 New
      +2
      In the power is a strong influence of the "puppeteers" who benefit from these "faces" that fulfill the order for destruction. These "faces" were introduced under the EBN and Putin will have to "clean out these Augean stables" for a long time to come. We need a completely new economic course, independent of the dollar and the international mafia. It seems that the whole industry and agriculture is being destroyed for the sake of foreign capital (due to competition into the gates of others) and only the raw material component is “strengthening”.
      << if you look at the effective exchange rate of the ruble, and we live in an open economy and compete with foreign manufactured goods. This kills Russian production, stimulates the consumption of exclusively imported goods >> And for sure, who will invest in a non-competitive economy! On the example of China, the economy is booming and investing there is profitable, you can get big profits from investors from this.
      1. Mature naturalist
        Mature naturalist 21 September 2013 21: 39 New
        +6
        Quote: vlad.svargin
        and Putin will have to "clean out these Augean stables" for a long time

        Do you seriously believe that he "cleans" them?
        1. Peaceful military
          Peaceful military 21 September 2013 21: 53 New
          0
          Do you seriously believe that he "cleans" them?

          This question arises more often.
          BUT!
          The rhetoric is different. what
  6. Garrin
    Garrin 21 September 2013 09: 09 New
    +7
    Recently I had to trudge in a traffic jam on Ryazan Avenue. There was a time to glance around and I was stunned, almost all the first floors of the buildings are occupied by various banks. IMHO, 60 percent need to be deprived of licenses and closed. At its core, these are no longer banks, but ordinary usurious offices. Indeed, they really slow down production and rob citizens.
  7. Igarr
    Igarr 21 September 2013 10: 48 New
    +4
    All is well, of course, brothers ... currency wars, loan sharks ...
    And I liked how Misha pushed back - ".. And I see prospects in a return to common sense in macroeconomic policy ..."
    ..
    Such words must be cast in bronze!
    Damn, what’s in PLATINUM !!!!
    And placed in the State Duma on every corner.
    .
    What is macroeconomic policy?
    I am sure everyone knows.
    Talkhouse, damn it .... that's all.
    ....
    Macroeconomic .... politics ....
    Nano-breakthroughs ... in nanotechnology.
    .
    Unified power, it seems that only Stalin knew a remedy for unbridled chatter - 9 grams per skull.
    Chatterboxes lack so much.
    Me, including, too.
    1. nbw
      nbw 21 September 2013 11: 12 New
      +1
      Chatterboxes lack so much.
      Me, including, too.
      Self-critical. Why aren’t you on the NOD shares, since you are so worried about your homeland? wink Today is just http://rusnod.ru/ it's time, the rally on September 21.
      1. Igarr
        Igarr 21 September 2013 11: 41 New
        +5
        Yes, I’m not tuned somehow .. to distribute the missing 9 grams of brains.
        And frankly, there isn’t such a thing in Orel. More precisely, what is - does not inspire me.
        .
        In addition, I do not worry about Russia.
        She stood without me for millennia. And after me - will remain intact. More beautiful than before, as they say.
        I would like the children to have less frustration.
        Although....
        1. nbw
          nbw 21 September 2013 11: 56 New
          0
          Yes, I’m not configured somehow
          Well, a compromise with conscience is an amateur matter smile
          there is no such thing in Orel
          st. Lenina d 1 Printing house labor 14.00
          what it is does not inspire me.
          In our country it also hasn’t really moved yet, but, as it seems to me, “sofa analysis” is sometimes useful to be diluted with exits “to the people”. So i will go soldier
          1. Igarr
            Igarr 21 September 2013 12: 12 New
            0
            Successes !!!!
            I envy ....
            And to compromises ... I’m already used to it somehow ... for more than 50 years.
            .
            In addition, on this bridge .... weddings today. And without me enough people.
  8. Nitarius
    Nitarius 21 September 2013 12: 43 New
    +3
    NATIONALIZE NECESSARY! CENTRO BANK!
    IT'S PRIVATE WITH! 1990. AND BELONGS TO THE ROTHSCHILDS through the SWISS BANK!
    PUTIN 2 ALREADY POSTED THIS QUESTION FOR VOTING! But only not-IN THE DRAFT ONE TRADITORS SIT! Scum!
    1. Yarosvet
      Yarosvet 22 September 2013 15: 25 New
      0
      Quote: Nitarius
      PUTIN 2 TIME ALREADY POSTED FOR VOTING this QUESTION!
      Bill number?
      1. mak210
        mak210 22 September 2013 19: 12 New
        +3
        http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/%28SpravkaNew%29?OpenAgent&RN=130800-6&02

        Just do not think that this law was introduced by Putin.
    2. Spike
      Spike 22 September 2013 23: 27 New
      0
      If my memory serves me, the majority in the Duma is United Russia, and GDP BECAME A COMMUNIST AGAIN laughing
  9. Spectrum
    Spectrum 21 September 2013 13: 13 New
    +3
    something our Ministry of Finance more and more Serdyukov recalls.
  10. sashka
    sashka 21 September 2013 13: 26 New
    +3
    Ministry of Finance .. Kudrin "removed." What has changed.? It’s just that a person said something that didn’t fit into the election program. The site is certainly interesting. Winter begins in the Far East. Can all of them be relocated to Moscow and Sobyanin, together with Putin and DaM, will provide apartments? Moreover, the housing market has "sunk" thoroughly. "But again, there is something to share .. The worse the better. Strange logic.
    1. Igarr
      Igarr 21 September 2013 13: 53 New
      0
      Sasha ..... damn it, got it ..
      What does it mean - the housing market dipped?
      Where did you go?
      Can I urgently refuse a hut in Vidnoye?
  11. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 21 September 2013 18: 19 New
    +3
    It is difficult for an ordinary person (not an economist) to answer the question, why are we even transporting paper clips and push pins from China? Why closed the domestic enterprises that made these buttons? Is the Central Bank again to blame? All small and artisanal industry in Russia perished in favor of lousy Chinese consumer goods. Who is to blame? The question is rhetorical ...
  12. Ross
    Ross 21 September 2013 21: 22 New
    0
    Quote: a52333
    Well right now !!! Let's open the arms of Goldman Sachs and Morganam with Bank of America. Where will we put their offices? What are you? !! They already finished off the states with their policies, and now these foxes are in our chicken coop? Maybe it’s better for us to immediately control in the head? We need to deal with the Central Bank, AHA, I agree. But let these be in Manhattan. They’ve gotten too much in the undercover "games."


    But what about City Bank? Bank of Rothschilds and the main shareholder of the US Federal Reserve, with might and main in our market ....
  13. denkastro
    denkastro 21 September 2013 21: 59 New
    0
    Blah blah blah. The enemies are killing the economy, the industry too. If they wanted to kill, they would have killed it in 500 days. Some older people remember how it is done. And every gopher in the field is an agronomist. It’s just that moaners screaming at me about the superpolymers have already killed me. I do not think that at the present stage of history, the Russian authorities are defending the interests of the West, and until they are informed of all gophers as freshwater arthropods to China. Another thing is that the interests of the elites may not coincide with the interests of the people, but this is a completely different movie. The eternal question of the exploiters and the exploited was at one time laid out on the shelves by K. Marx. Surprise is unnecessary here. IMHO of course. Respectfully.
  14. aud13
    aud13 21 September 2013 21: 59 New
    0
    I read the article and comments - smiled.
    Of course, I will not say for everyone, but in my opinion, the problem of interest rates is not in the first place in business. Business is more concerned (this is of course my point of view and I do not pretend to play any huge role here):
    - high taxes;
    - administrative and other obstacles;
    - lack of state support;
    - defenselessness against all kinds of raiders who want to profit if they see a tidbit business.
    And the problem with interest rates is just a derivative of the risks that we have today.
  15. slaventi
    slaventi 22 September 2013 04: 01 New
    0
    The financial and economic block of our government has destroyed all the possibilities of our own economic growth in Russia. The loan is unavailable, it is superhigh, money is expensive

    The Central Bank performs the function of withdrawing real money from the Russian economy and pumping it to the states. Therefore, he does not give cheap loans for the development of the Russian economy. In essence, he performs fiscal functions.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. Enot-poloskun
    Enot-poloskun 22 September 2013 09: 17 New
    +1
    As I understand it, you asked what to do?

    I will answer this with a quote from V.I. Lenin:

    The rich and the crooks, these are two sides of the same coin, these are the two main categories of parasites fed by capitalism, these are the main enemies of socialism, these enemies must be taken under the special supervision of the entire population, they must be dealt with, at the slightest violation of the rules and laws of the socialist society mercilessly.
  18. michajlo
    michajlo 22 September 2013 15: 47 New
    +3
    Good day to all!
    I allow myself to cite an excerpt from an interview held in 1986-87 in Prague with the late Miroslav Doleici, where he leads another "assessment of FORCE" of the modern financial system (applied the last two centuries).
    .
    - Depending on what you say, I think your view of modern society is very pessimistic. The rich become richer, to the extent that a narrow group of people will receive unlimited power over the whole society. These most in danger are human freedom itself anywhere in our world.
    In your opinion, is there a way out of this situation?
    What hope does an honest person have in this world?
    Doleishi:
    - I will answer in a slightly wider aspect. All economic theories that support Marx's thesis that capital has a real price are nonsense.
    Today’s policy is based on three principles:
    - credit
    -% of loan
    - and retention of capital.


    I will explain you the model: with the help of money, I will cause a revolution or international war.
    The inhabitants who will be involved in them are impoverished. They will be in trouble.
    I will offer the state, which befell a war or revolution, a loan with% according to these conditions.
    The government of such a state is forced to accept such a loan if it really wants to renew life in their country. And I know that they can never repay this loan to me. Then there will be penalties.
    As a banker, I will begin to demand payment of a loan in the agreed term. Since my commercial partner is not able to pay me, I will give him a new loan to pay interest.
    And so everything repeats ad infinitum.
    This mechanism is consistent with the financial policies of the MMF, the World Bank, etc.

    These are operations typical for owners of financial capital that today (1996 / note translator) have over 86% of world capital.
    That's because of these reasons these financiers are interested in the emergence of plutocracy under the pretext of democracy, which today exist in the USA, Great Britain and other Western European countries. (as well as in the post-ATS and post-USSR, with the exception of the Republic of Belarus / translator's note)

    Those who have money rule in societies where they were able to convince that money has a real price.
    At present, however, we can buy less and less for them.
    In this phenomenon lies our hope.

    We presume that, for example, in 1915 I could “buy for myself” Trotsky and Lenin, they reproduced the socialist revolution.
    I could buy Hitler and others for myself. They reproduced the World War.
    Just like then, today I was able to buy myself Havel, Dienstbier, Klaus or Kotsaba (Havla, Dienstbiera, Klausa či Kocába) and others, but they did not reproduce anything.
    The fact of devaluation of the only means becomes visible. who rules the world for 200 years.

    There can be only one explanation for this - that the calculation with the influence of money is clearly erroneous.

    To take this fact into account means to get rid of this means, that is, to get rid of the world financial system,
    which is currently smothering modern civilization.
  19. satellite
    satellite 22 September 2013 17: 32 New
    +3
    About Comrade Fedorov, here I look many believe him (such as nbw). Here take a look for fun
    http://kireev.livejournal.com/921051.html это уже о многом говорит,лживые они там все на верху.
  20. michajlo
    michajlo 22 September 2013 22: 42 New
    +2
    Quote: satelite Today, 17:32
    http://kireev.livejournal.com/921051.html

    Good evening, dear Alex!
    Yes, the link you posted is interesting, thanks. good Here on the site constantly 2 or 3 members of the forum URGE for him and campaign, though either with a "youthful fervor" or with a "professional-working" ... fool
    Sincerely, Mikhailo.