Military Review

The Pentagon is pleased that the US missile defense system has shot down one of the two warheads

64
For the first time, the US armed forces tested the missile defense system, which immediately launches two anti-missiles on a target with a divided warhead. Tests were conducted as part of exercises in the Pacific in the Hawaiian Islands.


The Pentagon is pleased that the US missile defense system has shot down one of the two warheads


A ballistic target missile of close range has been released from the island of Kauai. Then, the Lake Erie missile cruiser tracked the target trajectory and fired two SM-3 Block IB missiles at it. At the same time, the Pentagon stressed that only one of the missiles successfully hit a warhead separated from the missile.

Lockheed Martin, a company specializing in aerospace engineering, is a key enterprise in the US military-industrial complex. Her main pride is a component of the SPY-1 radar missile defense system. It is used on warships and has one of the farthest range in the world. It is this characteristic that gives the United States and its allies the advantage of observing airspace. At the moment, 27 naval ships fleet The United States has the ability to observe over long distances. In addition, the Navy plans to equip four more ships with a missile defense system and anti-ballistic missiles.

FIGURE: 50 percent of Americans have a negative attitude towards Russia. For the first time in 15 years, there were more of them than those who trust Moscow (44 percent)
“The last test showed that the Lake Airy cruiser, seafarers and missile defense equipment can track, analyze and control missiles with split warheads in flight using radio interception,” said Lockheed Martin’s missile defense program development program, Nick Bucci. The 4.0.2 PRO defense configurations provide the fleet with the ability to respond to threats emanating from evolving and evolving ballistic missiles around the world using robust and reliable technical capabilities. "

Americans, of course, do not say directly that their newest missile defense system is directed against Russia. But at the same time, it is obvious that this is the case. After all, the lion's share of missiles with separable warheads is in service with the Russian army.

Help
Tests of a missile defense system in the USA have been conducted since 2001. During this time, as part of the exercise, the Americans managed to hit 63 79 target missiles.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.rg.ru
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. j iz sibiri
    j iz sibiri 20 September 2013 11: 27 New
    +4
    and then your warhead
    1. Kibalchish
      Kibalchish 20 September 2013 11: 30 New
      +9
      fishless and cancer wassat
      1. tronin.maxim
        tronin.maxim 20 September 2013 11: 36 New
        +1
        Well, yes, for them it is relevant! laughing
      2. kostyan77708
        kostyan77708 20 September 2013 11: 54 New
        10
        on birdless and ass nightingale)))
        1. crasever
          crasever 20 September 2013 19: 29 New
          0
          And on the light-heartedness and its own rocket with a lighthouse - blonde !!!
      3. Dim Dimych
        Dim Dimych 20 September 2013 22: 01 New
        0
        "fish without fish and cancer" ... and blonde without fish and a bag ...! wink
    2. Tersky
      Tersky 20 September 2013 11: 45 New
      +8
      Quote: j iz sibiri
      and then your warhead

      In their "warhead" let them hit with a hammer, laughing it is useful, and most importantly, the result is always pleasant. (especially when you miss wassat ) laughing
      1. VAF
        VAF 20 September 2013 15: 46 New
        +9
        Quote: Tersky
        and most importantly, the result is always pleasant. (especially when you miss


        Victor, hi! Well, if this news was "filed" by our military experts in this format, and so .... lol They and everything with the Mace fellow but recourse

        But what kind of report do the “amers” themselves give, which is very different from ours fellow Articles wink :

        The U.S. Navy launched two Raytheon SM-3 Block IB missiles from the Lake Erie missile cruiser on one tactical missile with a multiple warhead, ASDNews reported on September 19. The first missile with a direct hit kinetic interceptor successfully destroyed the target.

        The SM-3 is a defensive weapon used in the US and Japan to defend against short- and medium-range ballistic missiles. “Confidence in the effectiveness of a missile defense is growing with every flight test. When these weapons are deployed in 2015, the United States and our allies will have an extremely reliable defense system, ”said Taylor Lawrence, president of Raytheon Missile Systems.

        During the test, both missiles were launched sequentially. The first hit the target, the second missile was specially designed to test the ability of the ship system to control the flight of several missiles at the same time to hit different targets. The second missile had no task to intercept the target.

        “We are gathering a tremendous amount of information about missile defense capabilities, and in many cases the interceptor missile far exceeds our expectations. It turns out that the SM-3 Block IB can take on the implementation of increasingly complex combat scenarios, such confidence creates the basis for a decision on mass production, ”says Dr. Mitch Stevison, program director at SM-3 Raytheon Missile Systems.

        This test was the 25th successful SM-3 test flight and the fourth in the SM-3 Block IB modification program. Previous missiles of the highly successful SM-3 Block IA are currently deployed worldwide. Modification SM-3 Block IB is equipped with a two-color infrared seeker with increased capabilities and an advanced propulsion system that accelerates the anti-ballistic missile towards the targets entering the affected area.

        1. PN
          PN 20 September 2013 16: 18 New
          0
          This is against short- and medium-range missiles. What about long-range missiles? But in our country only such people are in service. Or do they care what to shoot down, what is distant and what is near?
          1. Know-nothing
            Know-nothing 20 September 2013 18: 03 New
            -5
            Minutemen and Tridents are intended against Russian missiles.
        2. Phase
          Phase 20 September 2013 17: 24 New
          +8
          Quote: vaf
          Modification SM-3 Block IB is equipped with a two-color infrared seeker with increased capabilities and an advanced propulsion system that accelerates the anti-ballistic missile towards the targets entering the affected area.

          About the two-color GOS - everything is so. As for the engines - I’ll clarify. This is not about the marching engine, but about the interceptor maneuvering unit - DACS. It does not disperse the interceptor, but changes the direction of its movement. In essence, it is a gas-jet control system. On this modification, they made it 10-nozzle, it is cheaper than the previous one and works more reliably. Bypass valves are unclear, but it seems that according to some sources, they are also modernized.
        3. mirag2
          mirag2 21 September 2013 05: 48 New
          0
          I saw one activist here, so he rubbed it, that our missile defense system near Moscow works like that — it fires a nuclear missile missile and knocks down the Amer’s. Is it really so? And the Amer sm3 block will fly at a speed of 2015 km sec.
          1. SPACE
            SPACE 21 September 2013 06: 27 New
            +1
            Quote: mirag2
            I saw here one activist, so he rubbed that our missile defense system near Moscow works like that — it fires a nuclear missile defense — and knocks down the Amer’s. Is this really so? And amer’s cm3block to 2015 will fly at a speed of 8 km.sec.

            A-135 consists of Don-2н radar and two types of missiles, the 51Т6 Gordon long-range missile and the 53Т6 Gazelle melee rocket. Gordon has a powerful thermonuclear warhead and is designed to hit in space a group target of several warheads, neutron radiation. The gazelle against single warheads that have passed the first echelon hits a fragmentation warhead at altitudes up to 50 km. At the moment, Gordon has been removed from combat duty, only missiles of the Gazelle type remained in service with the Moscow missile defense system, there is no talk of defense against a massive strike, only limited.
    3. Stiletto
      Stiletto 20 September 2013 11: 46 New
      24
      And with their left hand they intercepted their "Warhead", and with their right, and now - finally, they reached orgasm - the Pentagon is happy! Rejoice, you banana countries too! The Pentagon is clearly not happy with just one thing: Russia will have thicker warheads, and no Vaseline.
      1. Ruslan_F38
        Ruslan_F38 20 September 2013 13: 06 New
        +1
        Well, at least one hit from the fifth time.
    4. Hon
      Hon 20 September 2013 13: 48 New
      +1
      Actually, the system is still in development, but the maces put into service do not want to fly.
    5. artemiy
      artemiy 20 September 2013 15: 28 New
      0
      In short, if Che, then half of our warheads will reach the goal)))
    6. Phase
      Phase 20 September 2013 17: 12 New
      12
      Strange, this news was like yesterday ...
      Quote: j iz sibiri
      and then your warhead

      The information provided is not entirely correct. Most likely the shooting was carried out simply by a burst of two missiles. In any case, in our country’s air defense forces (not to be confused with military air defense) this is always the case. In some cases, the RBD provides for firing at one target even with a burst of three missiles (the target is a carrier of nuclear weapons or, in some cases, jammers). Any missile has a finite probability of damage, usually in the range of 0,7 - 0,85. Shooting a burst of two missiles gives a total probability close to unity. In the event of a hit by the first missile, the second goes to self-destruction. For them, this is most likely the same and almost certainly this was the case in this case.
      I wrote yesterday that SM3 BlockIB against ICBMs are powerless - the maximum target speed is 3600 m / s. Block II, which they plan to create in 2016-18. will intercept targets at a speed of up to 5000 m / s.
      So these missiles can not threaten our ICBMs yet. They are created as a reaction to the Chinese program for creating anti-ship ballistic missiles with optical correction in the last section of the trajectory. Now the ships do not have weapons that can cope with them, and if they are not created, then when the Chinese put their PKBR into service, the aircraft carriers will be worthless.
      The second purpose of these missiles is to combat the old RSDs of developing countries made using Soviet technologies of the 60s. They also cannot fight with maneuvering warheads of the RSMD type such as Iskander. Despite the fact that they managed to create a supernova device for maneuvering the interceptor - a solid-fuel multiply charged gas generator, plus 10 nozzles with different orientations, plus a system of microwave valves for transferring to nozzles (they write that as many as 20 operations per second). But do not blow like nozzles, and the interceptor has mass and it’s still impossible to change its flight direction instantly.
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 21 September 2013 05: 00 New
        0
        To the heap, this is a new system, if I’m not mistaken, it does not undermine the charge next to the target, but hits it precisely, destroying the target with its kinetic energy. They say, probably thanks to Israel for their help (after all, the Dome also works for them).
    7. Army1
      Army1 20 September 2013 19: 23 New
      +1
      In fact, the American Navy, these are mostly ships, carriers of precision weapons. Somehow I looked: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qS_CTIecRw maybe not this. Well, in general, the idea of ​​using an EMP charge against the enemy’s fleet (a large group of ships), while the most interesting thing is without using nuclear weapons, Amy’s weapons. Ships turn into a floating storage of missiles.
      1. patsantre
        patsantre 20 September 2013 19: 54 New
        +1
        And what will remain after EMP?
        1. Uncle Serozha
          Uncle Serozha 20 September 2013 23: 42 New
          0
          Quote: patsantre
          And what will remain after EMP?

          If we are talking about the fight against American ships, then we will have nothing there. In the case of the use of EMR ammunition, no one will send ships there, and the radius of the effective action of EMR is not so large. And radar-blind blinding is a really effective measure. Moreover - for the defending side. We are in our native land, and they are in foreign waters and they have nowhere to be repaired. Yes, and once.
    8. starshina78
      starshina78 20 September 2013 19: 35 New
      +3
      Sarcasm is not appropriate! With each test, they are getting better and better. And this is an occasion for our scientists to think to make sure that they cannot shoot down our warheads. After all, a time may come when they can shoot down one warhead with one rocket. Why not ? And what will we answer?
      1. Uncle Serozha
        Uncle Serozha 20 September 2013 23: 35 New
        +3
        Quote: starshina78
        With each test, they are getting better and better. And this is an occasion for our scientists to think to make sure that they cannot shoot down our warheads. After all, a time may come when they can shoot down one warhead with one rocket.

        As mentioned above, fire is usually fired by two anti-missile systems. This is the same with airplanes.
        Our S-400 is capable of destroying ballistic targets moving at speeds of up to 4800 m / s - more than SM3 BlockIB. But at the same time he loses a lot to the American system in range - 60 km for ballistic targets (400 km for aerodynamic). That is, it is still more likely an air defense system with limited missile defense capabilities.
        For an American missile, the range is incomprehensible. They write "range of 500 km" (it is not clear at what speed the target) and "ceiling - 160 km" (similar). Ours are inclined to think that the real range of RSD interception is about 100 km, since the trajectory is steep.
        Of course, the S-500 will immediately change the picture. It will have separate fire channels - anti-aircraft and anti-missile (missile 77N6-N). He is able to work on a target moving at a speed of up to 7000 m / s at ranges of more than 150 km (on an aerodynamic target - up to 600), plus for all kinds of hypersonic child prodigies. They promise to put one on duty next year. It will be great if they can.
    9. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 21 September 2013 05: 06 New
      +1
      not funny! the SM-3 rocket is a serious thing, and you shouldn’t be foolish about it. I would like to believe that a similar one is being developed here.
  2. experienced
    experienced 20 September 2013 11: 28 New
    11
    The Americans, of course, do not say in plain text that their latest missile defense system is directed against Russia

    They are protected from terrorists and pirates in the spirit of the latest trends. Well, maybe against aliens wassat
    1. Tersky
      Tersky 20 September 2013 12: 59 New
      +4
      Quote: seasoned
      They are protected from terrorists and pirates in the spirit of the latest trends.

      Lesha, rather traditions wink
  3. rugor
    rugor 20 September 2013 11: 28 New
    +9
    No brainer that this program is directed against Russia! The main thing for us is not to stand still, the hurt from the time of the USSR is not eternal.
  4. Airman
    Airman 20 September 2013 11: 32 New
    11
    How much plagiarism can you do? If there is nothing to say your own, it is better to remain silent, maybe you will marry a smart one.
  5. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 20 September 2013 11: 32 New
    +1
    Missile defense system so far .. So train amers. And surprises in which case we have ...
    1. alexng
      alexng 20 September 2013 14: 00 New
      +2
      The United States fueled illusions intensely. They, these illusions, became very thick and completely replaced reality.
  6. Dmitry 2246
    Dmitry 2246 20 September 2013 11: 34 New
    +2
    I hope our army has 54 missiles for 27 US ships.
    1. PROXOR
      PROXOR 20 September 2013 12: 22 New
      +8
      Quote: Dmitry 2246
      I hope our army has 54 missiles for 27 US ships.

      Satan has not yet been removed from service, but a different rocket in the approach. I don’t know how she will fuck. But even with poplars they are eaten. To repulse such a massive attack, it is necessary to keep all the ships in one place. So we are not bast. We have a nuclear triad. A lot will break through and will be like in a joke: "On you Card, on you eraser - erase your America."
  7. zart_arn
    zart_arn 20 September 2013 11: 34 New
    +2
    FIGURE: 50 percent of Americans have a negative attitude towards Russia. For the first time in 15 years, there were more of them than those who trust Moscow (44 percent)

    And this is already a jamb of politicians and ideologists. In fact, the important figures are that if there are more trustees in our country, then the missiles will be worse - why should we focus our friends on a superweapon. Psychology.
  8. slavik_gross
    slavik_gross 20 September 2013 11: 36 New
    12
    God forbid, we will compete with amers on the battlefield who will intercept more ...
  9. Akim
    Akim 20 September 2013 11: 37 New
    +9
    In the final section of the ballistic trajectory, shooting down a warhead is already a success. But such things have been actively maneuvering since the 80s, and they must have shot down a free-falling one.
  10. Igarr
    Igarr 20 September 2013 11: 37 New
    +8
    Here you go...
    One of two.
    And how many have we shot down? And when?
    Do we have confidence that out of 5 BGs and 5 simulators, exactly false ones will be shot down?
    No.
    Therefore ... or we do not print such materials. Or launch 20 ... warheads.
    Or let real BGs learn to dodge .. from missiles. Let them learn to scream Hurray and give honor.
    1. OPATOP
      OPATOP 20 September 2013 12: 19 New
      +3
      Quote: Igarr
      And how many have we shot down? And when?

      You probably forgot how many targets can be fired at 300 at the same time, at what altitudes, what maneuvers, and what dimensions. but there are 400 more, and 500 is already on the way. Remember and answer your own question.
      1. Igarr
        Igarr 20 September 2013 18: 37 New
        0
        Pancake.....
        duck and it infuriates !!!!
        We found in Syria, near Damascus ... half-rusted skeletons of missile shells, with Cyrillic inscriptions.
        Now we otmazyvatsya - it was not we who delivered chemical shells Assad ...
        .
        What do we have? Brain softening?
        And if beautiful booklets were published that one S-400 battery makes the start-ups of 500 DumbIndian Topors ineffective ... ????
        Then what?
        ....
        Ours proposed, allegedly, to conduct a tank duel in Abu Dhabi. Frags refused. Fly.
        So we will ...... sailor tales ... do?
        And where is the simplest advertisement ???
  11. MolGro
    MolGro 20 September 2013 11: 40 New
    +5
    the second warhead destroyed the protected target)
    Honestly, I am always struck by this love of self-praise in the USA.
    That is why our military is not willing to talk about what they have or will have, but because the less the enemy knows, the later he can take action.
  12. svp67
    svp67 20 September 2013 12: 01 New
    +6
    The Pentagon is pleased that the US missile defense system has shot down one of the two warheads
    this is one of the few news that pleases both sides. I think HALF of our warheads will be enough to FINALLY resolve the issue with the USA ...
  13. alone
    alone 20 September 2013 12: 04 New
    +8
    Russia is drawing weapons into the race. Well, it’s understandable, once it worked. The main thing now is to pursue such a policy so that you don’t step on that rake a second time !!
  14. Alikovo
    Alikovo 20 September 2013 12: 11 New
    +2
    Tests of a missile defense system in the USA have been conducted since 2001. During this time, as part of the exercise, the Americans managed to hit 63 79 target missiles.
    16 cores / warheads half the country themselves would be rafigachit.
    1. Big
      Big lexey 20 September 2013 13: 44 New
      +8
      In vain you are so ... 63 out of 79 - this is a very good result.
      And if you take into account that the launches were made from a moving object on a fast moving object, and 63 of 79 were hit by a hit in the “bullseye” - the result is excellent.
      Do not underestimate the enemy, oh you can’t ...
  15. teleset
    teleset 20 September 2013 12: 15 New
    +2
    No one really knows if they can shoot down our warheads or not. This will show current when it comes to real war.
  16. The comment was deleted.
    1. zao74
      zao74 20 September 2013 13: 46 New
      +2
      About shmazery and doggie to the very point. laughing
  17. KononAV
    KononAV 20 September 2013 12: 45 New
    +3
    God forbid that all this had to participate in battles
  18. GELEZNII_KAPUT
    GELEZNII_KAPUT 20 September 2013 12: 54 New
    +2
    This promise to Obama, give me money !!!
  19. sigdoc
    sigdoc 20 September 2013 13: 01 New
    +1
    FIGURE: 50 percent of Americans are negative about Russia - anti-Russian propaganda is gaining momentum
  20. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 20 September 2013 13: 23 New
    +8
    Quote: sigdoc
    FIGURE: 50 percent of Americans are negative about Russia - anti-Russian propaganda is gaining momentum

    On the contrary, Russia is gaining momentum in foreign policy and military power.! And "good" treated us at the time of the hunchback and Yeltsin (they handed over everything and signed that they would sign) the "world community" applauded and neighing frankly above us .. I remember well their malicious and smug smiles and our Judas sold for 30 pieces of silver. .and dousing everything and everyone with dirty lies ..
  21. knn54
    knn54 20 September 2013 13: 23 New
    +2
    Let them try to shoot down the X-101 (X-102), and not the North Korean counterpart.
  22. Know-nothing
    Know-nothing 20 September 2013 13: 30 New
    +3
    Where did TWO warheads come from in the title of the article? Even the text says that two missiles fired at one target
    Lake Erie missile cruiser tracked the trajectory of the target and fired two SM-3 Block IB missiles on it
    , and if you open a press release http://investor.raytheon.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=84193&p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=1856
    133 then find out The second SM-3 was designed to test the ship weapons system's ability to launch multiple missiles at one time against a threat. An intercept for the second SM-3 was not part of the test scenario.
  23. Gur
    Gur 20 September 2013 13: 32 New
    +1
    shot down 1 out of two it’s a speech not about an airplane but about nuclear weapons with such a result the end of the whole grouping work further
  24. Nitarius
    Nitarius 20 September 2013 13: 56 New
    -6
    Guys The US has a lot faster things! And it is so SHOW! designed for the mass audience!
    They are missiles with HYPERSONIC SPEEDS - hit the TOWER on September 11
    and we were hooked on SU-27!
  25. Nitarius
    Nitarius 20 September 2013 13: 57 New
    +1
    here and on the towers they plopped
    1. Stiletto
      Stiletto 20 September 2013 14: 43 New
      +2
      belay Let’s once again for an encore shmalnut, otherwise it’s shallow and we did not make out yes
  26. eduardtt
    eduardtt 20 September 2013 14: 27 New
    -1
    Bravo amers what you can write exercise more. When do not you finish your missile defense and then it will be no longer funny to us
  27. Andrey Peter
    Andrey Peter 20 September 2013 14: 29 New
    0
    And why are they so happy? Of 2, one. Currently, missiles are equipped with a large number of charges, for example, the same Mace has 6, and even if it reaches the 3rd world, there will fly such a quantity that no missile defense can help. So let them think better not to start a war, otherwise their "democratization" will make you sick. Better is a bad world than a good war. hi
  28. NC1982
    NC1982 20 September 2013 14: 33 New
    +3
    "The Pentagon is glad that the US missile defense shot down one of two warheads" - the Russian Defense Ministry shares the Pentagon’s joy.
    1. alone
      alone 20 September 2013 15: 17 New
      0
      The U.S. Armed Forces first tested the missile defense system, which launches two missiles at once with a multiple warhead. The tests took place as part of the Pacific Ocean exercises in the Hawaiian Islands. A short-range ballistic target missile was launched from Kauai. Then, the Lake Erie missile cruiser tracked the trajectory of the target and fired two SM-3 Block IB missiles on it. At the same time, the Pentagon emphasized that only one of the missiles successfully hit the warhead detached from the missile.


      and where is it written that there were two target missiles?
  29. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 20 September 2013 15: 15 New
    +6
    The process of intercepting the target missile took place under ideal conditions. Were absent intentional interference (radio, heat, camouflage). Under interference, there will be completely different results. Further, Russian warheads learned to maneuver. And over the years, this skill is only being improved. A big role is played by surprise. After all, at these exercises everyone knew where the rocket would fly from. In real life, this will not happen. Together with new developments of a new generation of intercontinental ballistic missiles, new principles of missile defense of these missiles are also being developed. Life does not stand still. So, let the Americans not upset us, they will be better off.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  30. Spectrum
    Spectrum 20 September 2013 15: 34 New
    +1
    On a separable warhead, a bisected missile =))
  31. andruha70
    andruha70 20 September 2013 17: 15 New
    +2
    FIGURE: 50 percent of Americans have a negative attitude towards Russia. For the first time in 15 years, there were more of them than those who trust Moscow (44 percent)
    what does this insert to the article have to do with it? what or is it, like, frame 25, only in the text? lol
  32. Agent 008
    Agent 008 20 September 2013 17: 24 New
    -1
    Theirs missile defense from the word Prostitute ... The same full of holes!
  33. The comment was deleted.
  34. The comment was deleted.
  35. Enot-poloskun
    Enot-poloskun 20 September 2013 19: 23 New
    -1
    And why do not ours conduct missile defense tests? Do we have it, near Moscow?
    1. Know-nothing
      Know-nothing 20 September 2013 20: 00 New
      0
      Is this supposed to destroy a rocket with a nuclear explosion? Indeed, why not? And the picture allegedly from the archives of Kataev Vitaly Leonidovich confuses:
  36. flint1309
    flint1309 20 September 2013 19: 32 New
    +1
    Quote: Hon
    Actually, the system is still in development, but the maces put into service do not want to fly.

    I would say so until responsibility as under Stalin is introduced at industry enterprises such as (rocket, space, aviation ... and so on), all this will fall, explode and sink ...
  37. Gennady1973
    Gennady1973 20 September 2013 20: 59 New
    +2
    Personally, my opinion ... Is there a nuclear weapon in Iran and Korea or not ?! I think yes. Notice that both the "axis of evil" were threatened and will not go any further. The question is why? An adequate answer, even with one warhead that will fly ... I'm sorry this is my personal opinion. only in these countries (which do not interfere with anyone) there is still no "democracy" of kotaray, who doesn’t need anyone.
  38. 1goose3
    1goose3 20 September 2013 21: 12 New
    0
    Quote: slavik_gross
    God forbid, we will compete with amers on the battlefield who will intercept more ...


    God forbid in this to compete with anyone at all, but our armored train is worth ....
  39. Klibanophoros
    Klibanophoros 20 September 2013 21: 53 New
    0
    Sidetracking. If someone thinks that missile defense in Europe poses a real threat to Russia's nuclear missiles, then he does not know how to think. A massive nuclear strike is by definition impossible to repel. Yes, let 10 out of 100 warheads be able to break through, for the enemy it is - unacceptable damage. It’s just that the defenders and officials in the West are able to cut money from taxpayers much more elegantly than their not-so-distant bastard Russian colleagues. And there are such projects there - the sea. You can still remember about the worthless F-35 Lightning.
  40. paul1969
    paul1969 20 September 2013 21: 58 New
    0
    Quote: PROXOR
    Quote: Dmitry 2246
    I hope our army has 54 missiles for 27 US ships.

    Satan has not yet been removed from service, but a different rocket in the approach. I don’t know how she will fuck. But even with poplars they are eaten. To repulse such a massive attack, it is necessary to keep all the ships in one place. So we are not bast. We have a nuclear triad. A lot will break through and will be like in a joke: "On you Card, on you eraser - erase your America."
    1. amp
      amp 20 September 2013 22: 49 New
      0
      Especially when you consider that most missiles will fly across the Arctic .....

      Here is another: as if under the guise of a missile defense they would not have created something else.
  41. amp
    amp 20 September 2013 22: 27 New
    +1
    It’s like body armor, which is saved from a bullet in the chest, while the second hit the head.
  42. Army strong
    Army strong 20 September 2013 22: 58 New
    +1
    I read the comments and realized that the American missile defense system is very weak and underdeveloped and Russia has nothing to worry about. And it pleases
  43. avg
    avg 20 September 2013 23: 12 New
    +1
    Her main pride is a component of the SPY-1 radar missile defense system. It is used on warships and has one of the farthest range in the world.

    Aw! SVR, GRU enough to sit in pants, it's time to work out the increase in "monetary pleasure".
  44. soldier's grandson
    soldier's grandson 20 September 2013 23: 29 New
    +1
    God forbid that no one had to bring down
  45. castle
    castle 21 September 2013 00: 07 New
    +1
    Why the US missile defense, if Russia has a "Mace" - http://warfiles.ru/39092-bulava-okazalas-bulavkoy.html
  46. Apologet insane
    Apologet insane 21 September 2013 05: 27 New
    0
    Everyone forgets that the Americans are developing a nuclear-free missile defense, while in our missile defense near Moscow the main part was missiles with a nuclear warhead. Which, incidentally, was removed from duty due to old age. Remained only non-nuclear, which replaced the engines. Oh yes, we also have a missile defense radar running on Elbrus-2 computers with a processor frequency of 16 megahertz ...
    1. mirag2
      mirag2 21 September 2013 05: 50 New
      0
      In kind so? Wow!
  47. kmike
    kmike 21 September 2013 09: 56 New
    -1
    I am very pleased with the American success: with two missiles one warhead and then mine. And what about the “poplar-M” do not want to try?
  48. viktor_ui
    viktor_ui 21 September 2013 11: 15 New
    +2
    Most of those who commented, it’s just they didn’t pull the army strap, but obviously pulled and pull, according to tradition, apparently a cat for candelabra ... even minus you in the scrap of “TRUE PATRIOTS” (although very rarely, minus). Well, it really doesn’t reach you that _amerikosy__ are calibrating their ABM with might and main, and not only REAL !!! and nichrome do not hesitate to inform the diverse public about it ... comments like: ha hit, ha ha in your own way, but want to get into "Poplar ..." and the pilot thought rushed about another stupidity of YANKI - YES PATRIOTS ??? But what about, after all, this is a country-AMERICOSIA and they live there, a priori, exclusively DEBLES ??? And we have everything gloriously and we are true angels, and there are some devils without exception. Why do I, as the sworn oath of the USSR, DO NOT COME INTO THE HEAD AND NOW THOUGHTS "about stupidity and wretchedness" DO YOU KNOW WHOSE PATRIOTS ??? I was born and raised in a powerful country, and not in a raw materials appendage, and apparently therefore I can not afford a reasoning in the style: “Do not want a Topol on the head” and the like ... you want to burn in a nuclear firebox - BURN AND WRITE and the flag in your hands in this direction. Me and me like are clearly the other way. With what badun they began to smell so powerful? Without a year, a week as a stool from the army was thrown out and there affairs could not turn around the remnants of the OFFICIAL CASE. Can you all be around 14 years old - PATRIOTS ??? Well then, it’s excusable because there are no brains, and there is only one urea tokma. While mincing, do not cough at your leisure wassat