Shoigu: military registration and enlistment offices are no longer chasing draft diversions

125
Shoigu: military registration and enlistment offices are no longer chasing draft diversionsThe head of the Russian Ministry of Defense Sergei Shoigu said that the number of conscripts in the Russian army from next year will begin to decline by tens of thousands of people due to the replenishment of the army with contract servicemen, Interfax reports.

"We have recruits only where we need to prepare a mobilization reserve, and this is an important component of our approach. We finish the calculations, as far as we reduce the number of recruits. I can say by a lot. I think we can name the final figure in November but trust me - these are tens of thousands, "said Shoigu.

The Minister of Defense also stressed that the agency "ceases to chase" the number of conscripts and "catch" them at the military registration and enlistment offices.

“Whether we want it or not, but the army must become a contract, or we must recruit conscripts for at least five years. The complexity of the weapon systems is such that we will not prepare the draftee for at least a year, even for two so that he can fight on this weapons"- emphasized Shoigu.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    125 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +49
      18 September 2013 08: 12
      quote-The complexity of the weapons systems is such that we will not prepare a conscript for at least a year or two to be able to fight with this weapon, "Shoigu stressed.

      it’s absolutely true, but at the same time, in my opinion, I think I’ll significantly increase the monetary allowance of contractors by reducing the bloated bureaucracy.
      1. 225chay
        +45
        18 September 2013 08: 24
        Quote: Apollon
        I think in my opinion at times to increase the monetary allowance of contractors by reducing the bloated bureaucracy.

        The bureaucracy should be reduced dozens of times, and not only in the Ministry of Defense, but throughout Russia. Nakhlebnikov will soon be more than producers of hard workers with peasants
        1. +24
          18 September 2013 08: 36
          interestingly, more and more documents are being made using computers, and paper circulation is still growing wildly ... And every bureaucrat considers it important to come up with something new for himself, as a result of an increase in the volume of work and an increase in the number of officials.
          1. +7
            18 September 2013 09: 07
            Quote: Letnab
            interestingly, more and more documents are being made using computers, and paper flow is still growing frantically ...

            You just do not know the popular wisdom - "What is a computer for - in order to print a bunch of unnecessary papers ..."
            1. +1
              18 September 2013 21: 22
              hi
              In my opinion, somehow "not comfortable" sounds - contractors, under a contract.
              The Russian soldier differs from the mercenary within the meaning of the service.
              The Russian Army is not a Foreign Legion!
              There is a phrase - a career officer.
              Therefore, here it is more correct, as it seems to me personally, and it will sound professionally - personnel, personnel.
              Private / sergeant of the frame sounds quite worthy! Not?

          2. +21
            18 September 2013 09: 20
            and "catch" them at the military registration and enlistment offices

            You won’t have to catch it, even if you extend the service life to 3 years if you issue a civil passport after being demobilized from the army, the mowers don’t have to give out passports at all, thereby depriving them of citizenship and rights. draftees under the control of the FSB. Here then, from those who want to serve, there will be no end.
            1. No_more
              +3
              18 September 2013 12: 56
              Can shoot right away? Why do you need such a huge army of beggars? Now it’s normal to ensure that one soldier costs very good money. It must be admitted that the cost-effectiveness ratio of professional military is several times better. Not for nothing that they left the slave system, turned out to be a professional involved in the business of their personal choice much more efficiently hundreds of those who were forced to do anything by force.
              1. +7
                18 September 2013 13: 30
                Quote: No_more
                Can shoot right away? Why do you need such a huge army of Holodroots?

                Crap then do not fence. Give an example of which army has "much better cost / efficiency ratio for professional military personnel."
                For your information, the main expenses in the army are not for maintaining personnel, but for maintaining the military-technical and scientific-educational infrastructure, for arming and conducting exercises, and for capital construction.
                For your information, a "contract army" is an army of mercenaries that fights "under a contract" for money, not for the Motherland, and its maintenance is several times more expensive than a "draft" army.
                So do not meddle with "democracy" in the army
                1. No_more
                  +1
                  18 September 2013 16: 41
                  I am for mutual respect and can not stand when they use such words in relation to me. For this, put a minus. I hope that this can be taken with understand.
                  As for the remark, I want to say that I doubt that the costs of "maintaining the military-technical and scientific-educational infrastructure" are somehow increasing for a professional army, especially since it is possible to save money on the training of professional military personnel. to teach 100 people who do not want to study for 10 years from scratch every year is much more expensive than keeping the same hundred professionals in shape for 10 years. And the costs of "arming and conducting exercises, capital construction" are almost directly dependent on the size of the armed forces.
                  With the approach that "a" contract army "is an army of mercenaries that fights" under a contract "for money, not for the Motherland," I can remind you that now officers are also paid salaries, there are military pensions, and this does not prevent them from loving their Motherland. I believe that any work should be paid and everyone should do their job.
                  1. +2
                    18 September 2013 17: 36
                    Quote: No_more

                    And according to the remark, I want to say that I doubt

                    If you are in doubt, it means you don’t know anything on the topic, otherwise you would first ask yourself what types of weapons you can entrust to a contractor, and what position, say, in the Air Force, Strategic Missile Forces, Radio-Technical Troops, Navy, he can hold, and what kind of education he can take for this will need. And then they would have continued to talk about "contract conscripts"

                    In general, the Minister of Defense, who declares that army equipment is so complicated today that it cannot be mastered by conscripts in a year, it’s necessary to kick such a minister away from the army, directly to Khakassia, by grazing sheep.
                    1. grafrozow
                      +4
                      18 September 2013 19: 24
                      Quote: Polar

                      In general, the Minister of Defense, who declares that army equipment is so complicated today that it cannot be mastered by conscripts in a year, it’s necessary to kick such a minister away from the army, directly to Khakassia, by grazing sheep.
                      Are you aware that no one has yet shot down the F-16 from a slingshot? And how much time does it take to prepare a cool tablet player, not to mention the radar operator ... And you would have to throw all the hats, I'm sorry. hi
                      1. +1
                        18 September 2013 20: 59
                        Quote: grafrozow
                        And how much time is needed to prepare a cool tablet player, not to mention the radar operator ...

                        Two, with a little, months)). But ... If a fighter is physically developed and has a concept of conscious discipline and teamwork.
                        It is enough that the sergeant was, as a rule, a contract soldier, and the conscripts, in a game or in serious form, would prepare for service in the armed forces for a couple of years. In civilian life)).
                        And, which is characteristic, a serious struggle is waged against this simple maxim. Since Soviet times. A miner is the Ministry of Defense)).
                        1. grafrozow
                          +1
                          18 September 2013 23: 35
                          Quote: ctepx
                          Two, with a little, months)). But ... If a fighter is physically developed and has a concept of conscious discipline and teamwork.
                          Oleg, anti-aircraft defense is not a construction battalion, you do not need muscles, but brains, and not everyone is able to carry out 30 goals at the same time, namely the master will sound arrogant, but it is.
                        2. 0
                          19 September 2013 09: 02
                          Quote: grafrozow
                          Oleg, air defense is not a construction battalion

                          Alexander, the key word is here
                          Quote: grafrozow
                          pursue 30 goals simultaneously not everyone is capable

                          Absolutely agree)). He served urgently just in the air defense)).
                          But if a person is capable, then 2-2,5 months of training is enough for posts that trust conscripts)). In more important places, as already noted, contract soldiers (in my time - warrant officers) and officers)).
                        3. grafrozow
                          +1
                          20 September 2013 18: 13
                          Quote: ctepx
                          )). He served urgently just in the air defense)).
                          51 orb 1ta 140 digits per minute. 15 "horseman". And there was also "armor" -600 km radius.
                        4. 0
                          26 September 2013 20: 15
                          Quote: grafrozow
                          140 digits per minute

                          AND? It is impossible for 2,5 months. to prepare a ABLE young conscript up to 140 characters?)).
                      2. Debryansk
                        +2
                        18 September 2013 21: 07
                        Sorry, only tablet players in the army
                        and radar operators are needed, there are also security companies, RMO companies, etc. There is no need for long-term training in such units. But if you create an effective training system, you will not need to be trained for 5 years.
                        1. grafrozow
                          0
                          20 September 2013 19: 56
                          Quote: Debryansk
                          Sorry, only tablet players in the army
                          and radar operators are needed,
                          In the air defense did not take conscripts from the Caucasus, diction interfered.
                    2. +4
                      18 September 2013 19: 51
                      You know, to be honest, the level of knowledge of conscripts is getting worse and worse every year.
                      people do not distinguish where the north is, where the south. Do you think you can immediately teach these modern military technologies?
                      1. 0
                        18 September 2013 21: 02
                        Quote: lonely
                        , the level of knowledge of draftees is getting worse and worse every year.

                        Your untruth)).
                        Deadline (three years) level Knowledge draftees rises)).
                      2. grafrozow
                        0
                        20 September 2013 19: 58
                        Quote: lonely
                        You know, to be honest, the level of knowledge of conscripts is getting worse and worse every year.
                        people do not distinguish where the north is, where the south. Do you think you can immediately teach these modern military technologies?
                        So they still believe that we have penguins in the city.
                    3. +5
                      18 September 2013 20: 43
                      Are you delusional with the tunnels? Normal turner, locksmith. a welder, a carpenter, a plumbing technician, you can't teach in a year in five years, maybe not everyone personally do you know a lot of experts in your field? And for you it turns out that the military science is complete garbage and modern technology about the complexity of which the military has spent all ears no more complicated than a broom and a shovel? HOW can an 18-year-old green boy trust a technician worth several million dollars? Moreover, he will not perform work on the manufacture of any products, but will be engaged in the most responsible business, namely the protection of our life! Suppose you are the director of an enterprise and an 18-year-old boy comes to work after school, what will you put him at the bench after two months of study? Yeah, he’s going to walk with you for a year, bring it, move away, don’t bother him, and only after looking closely at him and making sure that he doesn’t completely entrust the most simple and not responsible, why? And because this is your own and your well-being depends on it! Duck, our general well-being depends on the availability of specialists, professionals in the army. And what about the expensive, let's estimate how many expensive equipment resources and other things to be crushed by the hands of "inexpensive" conscripts? I'm afraid if you count everything for two contract armies.
                      1. +1
                        18 September 2013 21: 11
                        Quote: max702
                        Normal turner, locksmith. a welder, a carpenter. plumbing, in a year you can’t train

                        Respected)). We are not talking about repair or manufacturing equipment)). And about its users)). At the TV remote control level)).
                        Taking into account military specifics, an advanced user should have military honor, the concept of military duty. and have standard soldier skills and abilities)).
                        1. +2
                          20 September 2013 00: 02
                          Do you seriously think that military equipment is at the level of the TV remote control? Bravo! But an advanced user is already a pro like it, and he spent quite a lot of time on advancement quite probably not a year or two (actually 3-5), so we came to the answer that there should be a professional in the army who spent on training 3 -5 years and not gone kudato (demobilization), but remaining in its place.
                        2. grafrozow
                          +1
                          20 September 2013 20: 06
                          Quote: max702
                          Do you seriously think that military equipment is at the level of the TV remote control? Bravo! A
                          +++ Maxim, don't break your heart, these "patriots" will throw their caps on the enemy.
                        3. 0
                          26 September 2013 19: 20
                          Quote: max702
                          Do you seriously think that military equipment is at the level of the TV remote control? Bravo!

                          Do not distort, dear)).
                          I believe that if military equipment is at the TV level, then its management is at the level of controlling the remote control from the TV)).
                      2. Debryansk
                        0
                        19 September 2013 01: 01
                        Max 702 is it you rave - you can study for 5 years, you can study for 10 years, and then don’t know how to turn on the machine, write about your experience? My experience as an employer shows that it’s not age, but as a training, we’ll start the majority of employers save. I think that min. It will also do this, and then they will scream about long periods of training and other reasons to purchase equipment more simply. Create an effective training system without saving on this. The teaching staff should be highly qualified. Here is the solution to the problem.
                        1. -1
                          20 September 2013 00: 16
                          So you are an employer, great !! And then they stood behind the machine? It seems to me no, because then they would not have carried the blizzard, but there are especially talented people who have mastered the profession in two years, and even if you are lucky with teachers, but far from all aspects, did you serve in the army? Have you been trained by a highly talented teaching staff? Where will you get so many unique people? It would be necessary to create, it would be necessary to organize .. one would .. look into reality there will not be this and will not happen, if in the Soviet times they couldn’t just now not really.
                        2. Debryansk
                          +2
                          21 September 2013 19: 01
                          I am writing a max 702 for you not very gifted. I am a master of stone processing, I worked on various polishing and sawing machines, as well as on very expensive equipment for cutting various profiles and so on. Work experience in hazardous production is 8 years. I studied at production, the training period is 3 years, to become a master of manual stone processing is the most difficult. It’s much easier to learn on machines. I’m gaining only in my own production without work experience, I train according to my own program, the training period has been reduced to one year. Therefore, when it’s impossible for me to speak, I answer nonsense. I served in the army, training in Tajikistan, then Ussuriysk separate battalion special purpose, OSSN airborne forces. It is not necessary to create a problem that the army should be treated not according to the residual principle, but as a priority business, and the people who will be created should not be random, but specialized specialists, and most importantly, effective managers should not interfere with them.
                  2. +2
                    18 September 2013 19: 58
                    Quote: No_more
                    I am for mutual respect and cannot stand when they use such words in relation to me

                    That is, I guessed - you did not serve in the army, since you did not like my words not to issue full-fledged passports to the mowers.
                    Quote: No_more
                    For this, put a minus. I hope that this can be taken with understand.

                    Catch my minus, I also hope for understanding)))
                    I repeat to have and maintain an army of professionals in return for draftees, not really! money is not enough and then in case of war they will sooner or later die, by whom will you replace them? recruits who did not serve in the army? And the population drafted in the event of a war has a little bit of experience in the army, hence the losses will be less, and the experience of fighting will be gained as you serve.
                  3. 0
                    22 September 2013 13: 15
                    No_more
                    A professional army is certainly good. But what if, God forbid, war be? The losses of the army will be big, but who will replace the contract soldiers then?
                    Those who don’t know how to disassemble the machine? In my opinion, there should be an army of professionals and those who can at least partially replace them. In Russia, there has always been a training system for soldiers, so we need to revive it.
                2. grafrozow
                  +3
                  18 September 2013 16: 52
                  Quote: Polar
                  For your information, a "contract army" is an army of mercenaries that fights "under a contract" for money, not for the Motherland, and its maintenance is several times more expensive than a "draft" army.
                  So do not meddle with "democracy" in the army

                  You - don't confuse contract soldiers with "foreign legion"
                  Quote: Polar
                  For your information, the main expenses in the army are not for maintaining personnel, but for maintaining the military-technical and scientific-educational infrastructure, for arming and conducting exercises, and for capital construction.
                  You forgot to add the "content" of the women's battalion - this is where the effective investment of funds is! In general, do not write nonsense, we all served and we know where the ears grow. I would like to see your personal meeting with our contractors, especially its completion wassat
                3. +7
                  18 September 2013 17: 01
                  Professionals i.e. `` contractors '' should not be called the word `` mercenaries '', these are incompatible concepts. During the Second World War, our fighters were paid for the destroyed equipment, the manpower of the enemy. If you think about it, it was mercenaries. I think you are wrong. Each work must be paid, and hard, military, all the more. The contract must stipulate everything, including payments to the family, and payments to the soldier himself in case of injury. The contract, i.e., a professional army must be in Russia. send 18 year olds to slaughter.
                  1. 0
                    18 September 2013 21: 22
                    Quote: Sh.O.K.
                    During the Second World War, our fighters were paid for destroyed equipment, manpower of the drunkard

                    It seems not a lie. There were facts)). How much, interestingly, did each Fritz have? And muck and rushing.
                    A completely contract army in Russia is the dream of our geopolitical "friends".
                    But, Shoigu, thank God, did not say that.
                    And 18-year-old boys should not be sent for slaughter. It is necessary to prepare and arm them in this way)).
              2. +4
                18 September 2013 17: 14
                Quote: No_more
                a professional business man of his own choice is much more effective than hundreds of those who were forced to do something by force.


                I apologize in advance, but I can't even imagine a more stupid conclusion. Yes, a mercenary can know and be able to do much more than a recruit. But a mercenary is not a patriot. He is a money-grubber, a consumer of the people's welfare. The war in Chechnya was carried by the conscripts. A mercenary, i.e. a contract soldier - came to the army to earn money. Ask any of them. Call them patriots - most will think that you have offended them. You obviously did not serve in the army. Otherwise, you would not say so. Many contract soldiers boast of their "skills". They look high at the recruits, and at the young officers. Although there are decent people among them. Mercenaries can serve under any flag.
                Unlike Russian citizens, a foreigner does not swear allegiance to Russia and does not undertake to "courageously defend the freedom, independence and constitutional system of Russia." He undertakes only to comply with the Constitution, "to fulfill military duty with dignity" and "to fulfill the orders of commanders." And who will protect the homeland?
                1. Gur
                  +2
                  18 September 2013 17: 32
                  In general, this is a very controversial issue, but at least the army should be combined and contract soldiers and draftees, and still all officers receive a salary, all officers are contract soldiers and what do you want to say that among officers there are no heroes if a person defends his homeland it doesn’t mean that he should be a beggar? earn decent money and I’m sure that most of them will give their lives for their homeland. Glory to the soldiers of Russia
                  1. 0
                    19 September 2013 16: 22
                    Quote: Gur
                    and yet all officers receive a salary, all contract service officers and what do you want to say that among the officers there are no heroes if a person defends his homeland this does not mean that he should be a beggar


                    PLEASE DO NOT CONFUSE GOD'S GIFT WITH OVARIES. I do not take officers into account. Yes, they are all contract soldiers. Mostly, they chose their own destiny themselves. But even among them there are different ones. In service they cannot be distinguished from a soldier - money-grubber. After all, the MARKET is all around. And this often draws, unfortunately, enough sober people. And we are able to throw all the slogans.
                    Yes, by the way, I asked you - did you serve in the Army! I didn’t receive a response. CONCLUSION: DON’T SERVE. And IF YOU DON’T SERVICE, THEN, AND MAKE SURE TO CONCLUSIONS BEWARE!
                2. Gur
                  +2
                  18 September 2013 17: 35
                  And turn 18 year old guys are big CHILDREN and they can be trained to train but not sent to battle.
                  1. +1
                    18 September 2013 21: 34
                    Quote: Gur
                    18 year old guys are big CHILDREN and they can be trained to train but not sent to battle.

                    Demagogy)). At the level: every mother should know where and in what conditions her son serves)). If you still do not receive a grant salary, please hurry. As far as I know, there is a significant competition)).
              3. +2
                18 September 2013 19: 54
                Quote: No_more
                Can shoot right away? Why do you need such a huge army of beggars? Now it’s normal to ensure that one soldier costs very good money. It must be admitted that the cost-effectiveness ratio of professional military is several times better. Not for nothing that they left the slave system, turned out to be a professional involved in the business of their personal choice much more efficiently hundreds of those who were forced to do anything by force.

                And what are you so excited about? Are you a deviator, since you so zealously defend the rights of mowers. In my quote, I urged not to give citizenship to mowers because I consider them cowards and traitors since they did not pay back their debt to their homeland, thereby signing for the future that in case of war they would do everything possible just not to go to the war.
                Where did you see in my comments that I advocated only for the army on the draft, instead of a professional. That you stick a gag.
                Since I touched on the subject of conscripts and professionals, so I will ask you a question - in the event of war, the most militant, sturdy, and brave units who don’t run and stand to death are usually knocked out during the first period of war. a professional army, without conscription, it follows that conscripts who didn’t hold arms at all click once, they will have to study during the war. Remember the story-there were almost no old soldiers left by the middle of the Great Patriotic War, the population, adolescents were calling, the losses were big. So you need to keep a compulsory appeal, and attract professionals.
              4. +1
                18 September 2013 20: 29
                Quote: No_more
                Can shoot right away? Why do you need such a huge army of beggars? Now it’s normal to ensure that one soldier costs very good money. It must be admitted that the cost-effectiveness ratio of professional military is several times better. Not for nothing that they left the slave system, turned out to be a professional involved in the business of their personal choice much more efficiently hundreds of those who were forced to do anything by force.
                The Swiss army is one of the strongest in Europe. 90% of recruits. no natural resources.
                1. +2
                  18 September 2013 20: 32
                  The Swiss army is one of the strongest in Europe.

                  Who told you that? They have not fought for hundreds of years, preferring to maintain neutrality with everyone, cheese, darling, bank frauds here and they are the strongest in geyrop.
            2. +1
              18 September 2013 17: 49
              Brilliant!
          3. jasper
            0
            18 September 2013 10: 55
            but I agree with that
          4. +1
            18 September 2013 11: 19
            Quote: Letnab
            and all the same paper flow grows furiously

            But how will the Russian post survive without this? By the way, I read somewhere that the postman profession is dying.
          5. Cat
            +1
            18 September 2013 11: 35
            Quote: Letnab
            And each bureaucrat considers it important to come up with something new for himself, as a result of an increase in the volume of work, and an increase in the number of officials.

            So Murphy’s laws have not yet been denied.
          6. +1
            18 September 2013 12: 24
            Quote: Letnab
            interestingly, more and more documents are being made using computers, and paper circulation is still growing wildly ... And every bureaucrat considers it important to come up with something new for himself, as a result of an increase in the volume of work and an increase in the number of officials.


            Another lie, designed for illiterate hamsters.
            In fact, the federal workflow is being accelerated into electronic form.
            1. roial
              +3
              18 September 2013 13: 23
              Another lie, designed for illiterate hamsters.
              In fact, the federal workflow is being accelerated into electronic form.


              Here are just the original document MUST BE printed, signed and sewn into the case. Or do you want to say that you have a digital signature implemented ??? So no need to breed hamsters laughing
            2. 0
              19 September 2013 16: 26
              Quote: Simpleton
              designed for illiterate hamsters.


              Tell me - who do you think is a hamster? Too often they have begun to use the name of this beautiful animal. OFFEND IT! Au-defenders of nature! THERE IS A REASON TO TAKE ACTION!
          7. +3
            18 September 2013 19: 48
            Quote: Letnab
            interestingly, more and more documents are being made using computers, and paper circulation is still growing wildly ... And every bureaucrat considers it important to come up with something new for himself, as a result of an increase in the volume of work and an increase in the number of officials.


            Alexei, you know that the more papers, the more those who have to put a signature. And you have to pay for a signature. Thus, officials create a feeder for themselves))
            1. +1
              19 September 2013 16: 30
              Quote: lonely
              the more those who must sign.

              SERDYUKOV SAID THAT HE PUT 7000 signatures per day. CAN HE SO TAKE BILLIONS FOR HIS BLACK WORK? RELEASE IT FROM RESPONSIBILITY AND EVEN PAY UP !!!!!!
          8. +1
            19 September 2013 08: 04
            - there is "Parkinson's Law", written by Norkot Parkinson, where he very wittily and evilly describes bureaucratic "evolution" ("An official breeds an official"). In the first version, published by Foreign Literature sometime in the 70s, there was a paragraph: in the Second World War, the author served in the intelligence of the British Air Force and - alone - was engaged in decoding the results of aerial photography. Once after a drinking bout on the occasion of a holiday, he (with a hangover!) Filed a report on the allocation of an assistant to him ..., by the end of the war under his command there were about 10 people doing the same work that he did alone (! ) ...
        2. +3
          18 September 2013 10: 30
          Who is so easy to cut back from the bread place?
        3. jasper
          +3
          18 September 2013 10: 54
          what a pity. h then everyone who knows how to manage the state already works as taxi drivers and hairdressers hi no offense but such assertions look, to put it mildly funny
          1. +1
            18 September 2013 20: 02
            Yeah, they let a smart and honest person go there, if they let them go with blood, money and other shit, they tie them up and if they don’t bother, they’ll throw them in the trash right away without waiting for the big man to become. there as in Mowgli WE are of the same blood! You and I. There are no others there. and this is the most stringent rule. Won Evdokimov tried and how did he end? And how many we don’t know? Personally, I know such a story, the trade union organizer at our factory decided to fight for the rights of workers .. well, we arrived home, they twisted me, they took me to the hospital for two days under a dropper, and I signed everything as nice, and I was very glad that I wasn’t disabled I stayed drinking only right now, people with power have a lot of levers to break anyone, but they won't break it, they’ll bury and all is not in debt ..
            1. Cat
              0
              18 September 2013 23: 02
              Quote: max702
              Yeah, they let a smart and honest person go there, if they let them go with blood, money and other shit, they tie them up and if they don’t bother, they’ll throw them in the trash right away without waiting for the big man to become.

              So we are not children, everyone knows that only an organization can fight an ORGANIZATION. Let's leave the bad stories about the loner beating the system to Hollywood. The point is that in the process of the struggle, the initially "smart and honest" cannot but turn into the likeness of those with whom they are fighting. Well, "... those who fought with dragons for too long become dragons themselves" (C) I don't remember who said
        4. +1
          18 September 2013 11: 17
          Quote: 225chay
          The bureaucracy must be reduced dozens of times, and not only in the Ministry of Defense,

          moreover, it is desirable to reduce by shooting with confiscation.
        5. +2
          18 September 2013 14: 12
          completely incompetent statement, first find out the powers of state bodies, their functions and tasks, then divide by the number of "officials", delve into the salary, and think: are you ready to go to work as an official ??? for 25-30 tyr rubles. with such a volume of work. but the leaders of this large company who receive from 100 sput. rub. only from the budget, not counting kickbacks really 5 percent, and how you can reduce them, edrosia rules. And if you think that ordinary advisers and consultants are parasites, then you are a person far from life, according to the criterion of efficiency, one advisor surpasses a 6th grade locksmith by 35 times, learn mat. part and do not translate the negative from the small number of grabbers and thieves to all civil servants. I only left the government agency because of the low salary for the volume that I performed, but don't tell me about kickbacks.
          1. grafrozow
            +3
            18 September 2013 17: 01
            Quote: woker
            , then you are a person far from life, according to the efficiency criterion, one adviser exceeds the locksmith of the 6th category by 35 times,
            You are far from life, you can build a dam on the Amur from advisers, but you are tormented to look for a real locksmith of the 6th category, and it is not a fact that he still wants to talk to you. hi
          2. grafrozow
            +1
            18 September 2013 17: 11
            Quote: Sh.O.K.
            .Contracted i.e.professional army should be in Russia
            Why argue? Woker from "left the state agency", for such problems of the army, as well as the problems of the development of Mars, are solved easily and simply, the usual office plankton.
        6. +3
          18 September 2013 16: 29
          Quote: 225chay
          The bureaucracy should be reduced dozens of times, and not only in the Ministry of Defense, but throughout Russia. Nakhlebnikov will soon be more than producers of hard workers with peasants

          And besides the bureaucratic apparatus, there are inexhaustible reserves. Have you ever paid attention to how many private security companies have got divorced? Where the grandmothers used to sit - "God's dandelions", now sit their foreheads, who need to go to the army, the police, the mine, but they sit as watchmen. By the way, the grandmothers carried out the service better, more responsibly. And these who have a pig on their forehead can sit half asleep, half drunk in all schools, kindergartens, clinics and hospitals. Previously it was called a watchman, now a guard. But what the hell is a security guard, if you bark louder, then he will crawl under the table.
          1. +2
            18 September 2013 19: 29
            Igor, you are right. Although we do not have private security companies, but LLCs, military enlistment offices are paying more and more attention. With checks often. The reserve is hoo. If there is a war, we will go to the front in our UAZs with service weapons.
        7. The comment was deleted.
        8. 0
          26 September 2013 19: 28
          Quote: 225chay
          There will soon be more freeloaders than manufacturers

          Take a look, today, one with a bipod, seven with a spoon.
      2. +1
        18 September 2013 08: 24
        Quote: Apollon
        it’s absolutely true, but at the same time, in my opinion, I think I’ll significantly increase the monetary allowance of contractors by reducing the bloated bureaucracy.


        you (+), only probably not officials, but still gentlemen from the General Staff, the generals are not much cheaper than the budget, and they steal not less than amicable.
      3. Lockbase170
        +2
        18 September 2013 08: 36
        Absolutely to the point .. You can’t cancel the general military duty, but you need to take pros for the profession with the appropriate motivation and creation of an environment for a successful social sphere ..
      4. +2
        18 September 2013 09: 19
        Quote: Apollon
        it’s absolutely true, but at the same time, in my opinion, I think I’ll significantly increase the monetary allowance of contractors by reducing the bloated bureaucracy.

        it is necessary to adjust not only the payment of double basses, but also the entire army monetary support system ... with all its thuy heap of numerous allowances and bonuses ...
      5. jasper
        +1
        18 September 2013 10: 53
        or we must recruit recruits for at least five years.

        and give those who served the exclusive rights to free education, work in the police, the prosecutor’s office, don’t do shtafs there
      6. +1
        18 September 2013 11: 33
        Quote: Apollon
        quote-The complexity of the weapons systems is such that we will not prepare a conscript for at least a year or two to be able to fight with this weapon, "Shoigu stressed.

        it’s absolutely true, but at the same time, in my opinion, I think I’ll significantly increase the monetary allowance of contractors by reducing the bloated bureaucracy.


        But it is necessary to fight against the dominance of the "bureaucratic apparatus" of the EU, but I strongly disagree with the statement "it is impossible to prepare".
        Even if Shoigu’s statement is true, it turns out that they don’t know how to prepare specialists, or they call for complete (excuse me!) Idiots.

        Moreover, in the first and second cases, the fault of MO ...
        1. No_more
          +1
          18 September 2013 13: 01
          No, all right, says Shoigu. After all, if a person does not want to serve, you can’t teach him with a rocket to hit a target in 10 years. And if you remember that half of the contractor’s cost will be spent on it, it will become clear how white the day the legs grow from this initiative. Banal price / performance ratio.
      7. 0
        18 September 2013 12: 27
        Quote: Apollon
        by reducing the bloated bureaucracy.

        so big and believe in fairy tales. and where will they attach the younger grandchildren and other relatives?
        during Putin’s reign, the number of officials has increased almost 2 times.
      8. +4
        18 September 2013 13: 35
        Absolutely not true. The problem of today's Russia is that it is not run by professionals, but officials who have come up from nowhere, with a dark labor biography.
        So the army was ruled first by a furniture dealer, then by a plasterer-rescuer, hence the outlandish "reforms" with unpredictable consequences.
      9. alx104
        +1
        18 September 2013 20: 56
        Maybe in the General Staff and the apparatus is inflated, but there is a shortage of staff in the troops. And to be equipped with contract soldiers is also an issue. We have a poor country. Not really things, not new technology. cars for 10-15 years. Do not forget about the circumcised states, the contractor has 7-9 outfits per month, if the conscripts were easier
      10. +1
        18 September 2013 21: 58
        I hear this nonsense about the transition to a contractual basis .... for many years. Everyone who tries to PR, Shoigu is no exception, considers it his duty to dwell on this issue. I agree that with such a service life, it is not possible to prepare a specialist.
        Just let someone answer two questions, in the current state of the economy, where to get the money, maybe due to rearmament. and the second question in the event of war (not a local conflict or counter-terrorist operation) where to get the mobilization resource, the army is contract.
      11. 0
        22 September 2013 11: 49
        all this talk about the fact that a professional army is better, and a conscript cannot be taught - from the evil one, because firstly the main task of the army is to prepare CITIZEN and secondly, who tried to teach them in a year, you can teach a bear, not just a person, but to avoid this leapfrog with refuseniks. NEED TO ACCEPT TOTAL one law (not serve in the army can occupy elected and appointed public office and senior executive positions in commercial enterprises with state stakes in) and one amendment of the law on CALL IMPROVING draft age from 18 to 21 years
        Quote: Apollon
        quote-The complexity of the weapons systems is such that we will not prepare a conscript for at least a year or two to be able to fight with this weapon, "Shoigu stressed.

        it’s absolutely true, but at the same time, in my opinion, I think I’ll significantly increase the monetary allowance of contractors by reducing the bloated bureaucracy.
    2. waisson
      +1
      18 September 2013 08: 14
      where he finds so many crickets and what lures
      1. +1
        18 September 2013 11: 02
        Quote: waisson
        where he finds so many crickets and what lures

        In Russia, and a reasonable monetary and social policy, when a "serviceman" person will calmly carry out his official duties, knowing that he has the opportunity to create a reserve for the future, in the form of receiving, free of charge or at a significantly lower price than those who do not served, the education he needed in the future, that he and his family have acceptable living conditions, and this is not only housing, but also kindergartens and schools for children and the opportunity to work for his wife ... In short, there is work here, for real "statesmen "very, very much ...
      2. grafrozow
        0
        18 September 2013 17: 19
        Quote: waisson
        where he finds so many crickets and what lures
        Dear, unemployment in the country is growing, and in the army you can get a good profession for free. Yes, and always in a civilian attitude to former military men was an order of magnitude higher than civilians, and so the number of people wishing to increase. hi
    3. Soldier
      +6
      18 September 2013 08: 22
      He himself served, “term”, 2 years. But I believe that the optimal service life on conscription should be 3 years. So that after training it is REALLY possible to master a specialty in the troops.
      1. +14
        18 September 2013 09: 06
        Without a draft army, without a mobilization reserve that is being prepared for military service, Russia, due to its large territory, thousands of kilometers of border, numerous neighboring states, of which most are potentially hostile, cannot create an effective army that can defend Russia's territorial integrity .
        Is the experience of the history of our state does not teach anything. Remember the 1941 year when the cadre Red Army was actually destroyed, some died, and 3 million soldiers and officers were captured. A prepared mobilization reserve saved the country.
        Yes, at first the storerooms had little experience and knowledge, and the reserve officers (as they are now called "jackets" for cadres) had insufficient command skills, BUT they quickly learned and broke the back of the Nazis. And what would happen if the USSR at that time did not have a mobilization reserve of soldiers and officers, but only had a regular army? Defeat was guaranteed.
        Therefore, appeals and the policy of transition to a contract army from the evil one is to the detriment of Russia.
        1. not good
          +5
          18 September 2013 09: 56
          Contractors are contract soldiers, but conscripts are still needed. A mobile reserve cannot be created from contract soldiers. Especially in the infantry in a more or less large-scale conflict, combat units will lose hp. Israeli experience
          role model. Through military service, albeit with a minimum period, all eligible citizens of the country must pass. And the mobile reserve must constantly maintain combat readiness by means of training. Shooting should be taught not in battle, but at the training ground. It is better to play it safe in the defense of the country.
          1. jasper
            -1
            18 September 2013 11: 02
            and sense? from ignoramus? pass shooting and tactical training without conscription
            1. not good
              0
              18 September 2013 22: 59
              And get a Voroshilov shooter badge on his chest. And tactical interaction on military films, and honey wassat You can do the preparation in the morgue.
        2. jasper
          +2
          18 September 2013 11: 00
          can create a militia (like the national guard in the usa?), training for 3 months, at the place of registration, and every year two-week fees? and make the army a professional conscription, but with a service life of 5-7 years, with serious motivation, namely, free higher education for those who will pull in the best universities in the country, only these people should have the right to civil service in the police, prosecutors, become judges etc?
          and by the way it doesn’t hurt that the right to be elected to the legislative bodies of power would be granted only to them, and to persons who are members of the militia for at least the same 5-7 years
        3. +5
          18 September 2013 11: 27
          Quote: vladimirZ
          Without draft army

          I agree. The appeal must be left.
        4. No_more
          0
          18 September 2013 13: 08
          With this logic, you can not twitch, even if we have everything from infants to the elderly will be mobilized, then China will defeat its regular army.
          The times of huge unprofessional armies have passed. I think it’s possible to manage sensible NVP, it is necessary for survival, just like the same physical education, but it’s not worthwhile to forcefully drive the army, if anyone doesn’t want it, what good will it be? Only in vain will the state maintain and teach it for 3 years.
          1. +5
            18 September 2013 17: 23
            Quote: No_more
            It’s not worthwhile to forcefully drive into the army. If anyone does not want to, then what good will it be? Only in vain will the state maintain and teach it for 3 years.

            IMAGINE: War. Patriots fight, the best die. And all scum sits in the rear, bastards with delight, enjoys the delights of life. The war is over. And who will raise the country? A cohort of loafers, mowers? I doubt it deeply! It must always be remembered - THE DEFENSE COSTS NEVER BEEN WANTED !!!!!
            1. No_more
              +3
              18 September 2013 19: 27
              Patriots fight, the best die. And all scum sits in the rear, bastards with delight, enjoys the delights of life.

              You tell this to the blockade workers and workers in factories that worked 18 hours undernourished. Why do many people think that what they do is the most important thing, while the rest only interfere with harm?
              After all, it’s not true that during a war only the military is needed. People do not stop being born, dying, eating, getting sick and so on. Are the people who treat others, feed, work in factories, do basic science, and even do art (after all, during the war, the artists raised the spirit of soldiers and brightened everyday life) not patriots, but "idlers and mowers."
              If so, then I do not want to live in a country where a patriot is only a man with weapons during the war.
              Well, a full-scale war is now scary to think about, and not because all sorts of "unpolluted" people are afraid to serve, but because even an army of billions will be wiped out by the use of nuclear weapons, which will inevitably be used if it comes to such a war.
              1. 0
                19 September 2013 16: 39
                Quote: No_more
                You tell this to the blockade workers and workers in factories that worked 18 hours undernourished


                DO NOT CONFUSE SOMETHING WITH THE FINGER. YOU HAVE A DAMAGED CONCEPT OF PATRIOTISM. I talked about idlers, not workers. They also kept weapons in their hands. Their weapons - machine, tractor, etc. But nuclear weapons - after all, it is WMD for everyone.
                Most clearly, such phenomena are described in the Slavic-Aryan Vedas.

                Santi Vedas of Perun. Circle One:

                “6. (134). FASH-DESTROYER has evaporated the rivers,
                the sea and the sky were filled with black clouds
                through the impenetrable stench
                the beam does not pass light ...
                ... and Life will never return to that World ever ... "
          2. 0
            18 September 2013 18: 31
            Will win Having a numerical advantage over the enemy for more than one century, the celestial warriors suffered defeat after defeat. Recall Khabarov and his guys, the siege of Albazin ... the Manjuirs who invaded China, the Opium Wars, the Japanese occupation ...
            1. not good
              +2
              18 September 2013 23: 12
              If we take into account that Khabarov crushed the Manzhurs (in fact, the payment) by Cossacks (professional wars), then no parallels are drawn with our time. The Chinese army is already semi-professional and serve there longer than ours, and they pour enough money, and the equipment is updated regularly. it is better to have a mobrezerv trained and more numerous. preparation?
    4. 0
      18 September 2013 08: 38
      EBN has already canceled the call! Maybe the same rake?
      1. +5
        18 September 2013 09: 41
        The reduction is not yet canceled, on average, the draft company is about 300 thousand people, i.e. if Shoigu speaks of tens of thousands, then the maximum appeal will be reduced to 200 thousand, agree 400 thousand for the autumn and spring calls is not bad.
    5. Boot under the carpet
      0
      18 September 2013 08: 46
      For that matter, it would be worth calling the young people for three months in order to somehow study the charter and learn how to use personal firearms!
      1. +5
        18 September 2013 09: 10
        Quote: Boot under the carpet
        For that matter, it would be worth calling young people for three monthsto at least somehow study the charter and learn how to use personal firearms!

        ... so that, if something happens, they could shoot themselves correctly? ...
        1. +1
          18 September 2013 09: 48
          I think it’s better for 3 years with vacations and a good salary, then the service will no longer be seen as a burden, but rather as training in a technical school, and even issue a certificate of education which will be quoted as a diploma of secondary education in a regular educational institution. e. the state will be free to teach technical education.
      2. 0
        18 September 2013 11: 47
        Quote: Boot under the carpet
        For that matter, it would be worth calling young people for three months in order to somehow study the charter and learn how to use personal firearms

        It is not enough to study the Charter, it is necessary to train a fighter GUIDED by him ...
    6. 0
      18 September 2013 09: 04
      "Whether we like it or not, the army must become a contract army ..." Shoigu stressed.

      so still ... do we want or do not want? ...
      "The complexity of the weapons systems is such that we will not prepare a conscript in a year or two to be able to fight with this weapon," Shoigu stressed.

      beginning of the end of the call? ...
    7. +6
      18 September 2013 09: 07
      Armeec, I absolutely agree with you. He also served two years. We still had such an opinion with our colleagues, not all of course. In my subjective opinion, it will not work to equip the Russian army with pure contract soldiers in sufficient numbers - there will be a strong shortage. A year-olds generally will not really understand anything and be able to, respectively, too. In the case of a big kipish, you will have to call up useless dropouts. But everyone will be happy ... In my unit, everyone who was involved in special equipment learned their specialty at the proper level to fulfill the task.
      Cowards, like fire-fearing army, and so a dime a dozen, and when the number of conscripts will be reduced at times, then the majority of the male population will have an idea of ​​the army and war from games and reports, which will adversely affect the real situation.
      They make rags of us that are not able to protect themselves or their loved ones. Our country has always been proud of its wars, and now everything is going to the point that we will cease to be such, and we will rely only on contract soldiers: "When will they come, when will they save us?"
    8. -2
      18 September 2013 09: 12
      even for a year, even for two, we will not prepare for him to be able to fight on these weapons

      Those who are unable to learn should be sent to our probable friends, for permanent residence, with recommendations from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.
    9. vladsolo56
      +4
      18 September 2013 09: 30
      The increase in contractors, although I do not like this word. I would call them professionals, it won’t lead to positive changes if the training in the military specialty is only theoretically, without constant practice, it doesn’t make sense anyway, as the saying goes. And the point is not to pay huge salaries at once, a military professional in peacetime should receive the same as an average skilled worker. Otherwise, there will be a caste of armed, trained people for whom money will be a measure of their own well-being. And such in the event of war will not protect anyone.
      1. 0
        26 September 2013 19: 42
        Quote: vladsolo56
        And the point is not to pay huge salaries right away,

        I think it would be wise to reintroduce class and merit. Reached a certain level of professionalism, confirmed in the standings, get an extra charge.
    10. Alikovo
      +3
      18 September 2013 09: 42
      really bloated we have the right:
      Chairman of the Law-va-1 First Deputy and 7 Zamov.
      Ministry of Internal Affairs-2 deputy.
      MES-5 first deputies, approx. 20 deputies.
      Ministry of Health-4zama, 9 assistants, 1 adviser.
      mid-7 deputies.
      Ministry of Culture-6 deputies.
      Defense Ministry-1 First Deputy.
      Ministry of Education and Science-1 first deputy. 5 deputies.
      min.development of long tail-5sam.
      Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources-6zam.
      minprom-6zamov.
      communications ministry-4 deputy.
      Ministry of Agriculture-7 deputies.
      Mysport-5 deputy.
      Ministry of Labor and Social Security-5zama.
      Ministry of Finance-8zam.
      Ministry of Justice-7 deputies.
      Ministry of Economic Development-10zam.
      minenergo-2 deputy.
      1. +1
        18 September 2013 11: 30
        For a long, long time it was time to reduce the number of deputies to the necessary minimum - leave three, for example. And so that everyone bears personal responsibility (including the leader and deputies) for tasks and decisions under his control.
        And of course, he screwed up - he found the last of the deputies and he seemed to be out of business. Democracy, h_li ...
    11. +3
      18 September 2013 09: 49
      Quote: vladimirZ
      Without a draft army, without a mobilization reserve that is being prepared for military service, Russia, due to its large territory, thousands of kilometers of border, numerous neighboring states, of which most are potentially hostile, cannot create an effective army that can defend Russia's territorial integrity .
      Is the experience of the history of our state does not teach anything. Remember the 1941 year when the cadre Red Army was actually destroyed, some died, and 3 million soldiers and officers were captured. A prepared mobilization reserve saved the country.
      Yes, at first the storerooms had little experience and knowledge, and the reserve officers (as they are now called "jackets" for cadres) had insufficient command skills, BUT they quickly learned and broke the back of the Nazis. And what would happen if the USSR at that time did not have a mobilization reserve of soldiers and officers, but only had a regular army? Defeat was guaranteed.
      Therefore, appeals and the policy of transition to a contract army from the evil one is to the detriment of Russia.

      In something I agree, In something not.
      1. In the event of the start of serious hostilities (with serious powers), the entire modern army (on both sides) will be destroyed almost completely during the first day.
      2. After which mobilization reserve will go into action. Unprepared and not knowing anything, but AK is so simple that a monkey can handle it.
      3. Why then do we need a modern army of contract soldiers? To participate in local conflicts. To participate in conflicts on their territory. Perhaps even against his people.
      4. And so as not to run away from the military registration and enlistment offices - I agree with the proposal voiced here in the comments - to issue a passport after serving in the army. (will greatly contribute to the desire to serve !!!)
      1. vladsolo56
        +1
        18 September 2013 14: 31
        How is everything simple for you? I served a passport, so what? again, everything will be as it was, for those who have money and don’t have to serve, and who don’t have, the whole army service will fall on them, this is the first. The second mobilization reserve does not have to be prepared calling on everyone, spending a lot of money on recruiting, maintaining, and training. Where it is easier to conduct training at the place of residence, starting from school. and then retraining at local training centers, which can be organized in each regional center. It will be both cheaper and more efficient. I don’t understand why some simply can’t sleep how they want to drive everyone into the barracks.
    12. The comment was deleted.
    13. -4
      18 September 2013 09: 53
      Chasing is not necessary. just judge and give a specific term.
    14. +6
      18 September 2013 09: 54
      It seems to me that you just need to finally train a conscript in military affairs given his abilities as a civilian. Tell me, where will they distribute, say, a successful programmer? - right, dig trenches, because it is stooped, the eyesight is a bit low, it cannot carry heaviness. And this despite the fact that the army is sorely lacking specialists. Yes, he (the programmer) would love to work day and night, on programs for the military, if he were fed, provided access to the Internet and not distracted (of course I exaggerate, but the essence does not change).
    15. onegin61
      +2
      18 September 2013 09: 56
      Comment. from the pros (28 years in the Rocket Forces, not a day in the office). Optimize the "top" to a minimum, make military districts according to directions and leave only parts of a complete battlefield in them, transfer the rest to a rapid deployment reserve. To establish the concept that equipment should fight in a war, and people only control it, and there should be a minimum of people ... Do not distract specialists for secondary tasks, such as combat security, technical support, guard duty, and households. service (that's there and send a call). Make a den. sod. such that they do not leave. Regularly raise the full BG with the implementation of all tasks with practical application. The random ones will leave, who will go to the utility block, who will go to the security and maintenance, only the pros will remain, with a very high den. sod., service housing (to move around the service in the districts), with this formulation of the question there will be no desire to change something.
    16. Peaceful military
      +3
      18 September 2013 10: 03
      I am not a big fan of the contract army, especially with the Russian size and Russian poverty.
      I think that the respected minister is led by the nose, saying that the conscript needs as much as 5 years to master the technology. With the revival of the DOSAAF system, the strengthening of the system of junior specialists, a radical solution to the problem of sergeants and the release of military personnel from economic activity, the previous 2-3 years will suffice.
      BUT!
      The political component of the issue is such that no other can do it. The degree of hatred for the army is inflated by the liberals and fueled by failures and betrayals in the Caucasus. Demoralization and beating of the officer corps. Endless "reforms" and Serdyukovism. Rampant liberals in power. Etc. All this forces us to make such a decision.
      Good luck!
      1. Lockbase170
        +2
        18 September 2013 10: 32
        Yes, she .. I didn’t understand a bit .. The contract is a contract, the compulsory appeal is not canceled, they just have to create a comfortable environment for people who conclude the contract, and urgent urgency .. But already as a DRS ..
      2. NOBODY EXCEPT US
        +1
        18 September 2013 12: 10
        Where did you read fairy tales about the poverty of Russia? The author is not Rotenberg by chance?
        1. Peaceful military
          +1
          18 September 2013 13: 30
          Where did you read fairy tales about Russia's poverty?

          Nearby screamers recommend comparing the basic GDP figures of leading economies. Still, comparing, it would be nice to pay attention to which particular sectors of the economy, how much are necessary. Adequate cries will cease, but inadequate ones do not interest me.
          It’s boring to answer such stupid cries, but I just now have complete idleness, so I’m stupidly killing time.
          By the way, and who is this
          Rothenberg
          ?
          hi
      3. grafrozow
        0
        18 September 2013 19: 35
        Quote: Peaceful military
        The political component of the issue is such that there is no other way.
        Yes, the Russian language is 5 + ... The political components of the question-the eggs aren’t worth it, the economic components-Read the report to the Government of the Head of the Ministry of Economic Development Alexei Ulyukaev, without rushing, these are not the works of Marx, more interesting ... laughing
        1. Peaceful military
          0
          18 September 2013 19: 45
          The political components of the question, the eggs aren’t worth it, the economic components. Read the report to the Government of the Head of the Ministry of Economic Development Alexei Ulyukaev, without rushing, these are not the works of Marx, more interesting ...

          Dear Alexander!
          I am aware, but I do not agree with your opinion, because here, in my opinion, it is precisely the political nuances that I have listed above. Well, along with this, attempts to bring also an economic mine, by the liberals, never stopped. I see no contradiction? I see only a cart and a horse. Do not put the cart in front of the horse. laughing
          1. grafrozow
            0
            18 September 2013 21: 56
            Quote: Peaceful military
            but I don’t agree with your opinion, because here, in my opinion, it is precisely the political nuances that I have listed above. Well, along with this, attempts to bring also an economic mine, by the liberals, never stopped

            In my opinion, only professionals can do their job with high quality, when I see mechanics with a "diploma" from the Khrenogorsk college, this is a headache and God forbid them, in five years, without a manual, they can distinguish the gearbox of a highway KAMAZ from an all-terrain vehicle. Experience, no substitute for patriotism , and I do not like it when some faceless liberalism is abruptly criticized, name specific names. Here you are a military man, to whom will you refer Serdyukov after his reforms? Enemies of the people, liberals or friends in power? guarantor "... Sleep residents, everything is calm in Baghdad ... hi
    17. slacker
      +3
      18 September 2013 10: 27
      Shoigu is right. Nefig drag into the army those who are stubborn and unwilling to serve, and even spend considerable budgetary funds on them.
      Slave labor is the most inefficient. That is why all systems built on the use of slave labor will inevitably fall apart and crash.
      It is enough to recall the Roman legions. When they were equipped with motivated Roman citizens, the empire grew stronger and expanded. When the legions began to be equipped with all in a row, including foreign barbarians, and citizens began to burn their lives in gladiatorial battles and in the arms of the courtesans, the empire died out and died.
      Will be able to attract truly motivated Russian citizens to the army is a big question. If it can be solved positively, then Russia will live and its influence will grow. They cannot, it means Russia will repeat the fate of Rome.
      Modern weapons and the highest and most profitable motives for those who will be qualified to use these weapons - this is the only recipe.
      The army must be fully contracted.
      The reserve is universal and professional.
      To compensate for possible losses, there should be a system in which all men enter the reserve according to the Swiss model, have personal weapons, uniforms and equipment at home. But these reservists should be trained not in combat units, but in special training centers where they can be trained by personnel officers who have gone to the reserve and have a sufficient level of professional training.
      But these teachers from among retired officers should not stay in these centers for more than 3-5 years.
      They should be replaced by fresh retired officers with the latest experience in using troops and using even newer weapons.
      To pay for being in the reserve, to encourage advancement in the reserve and to reward for successes in training the reservists.
      For an attempt by the reservist to evade serving in the reserve (for example, not to come to the training camp) or to abuse (for example, to sell weapons given to him and stored at home), he must be judged and judged strictly.
      A mass army of 18-year-old brainless youths is the road to nowhere. Obviously backward armies like the North Korean, which try to compensate for the lack of quality of weapons with the amount of manpower, follow this path.
      So Shoigu is right.
      1. gunnerminer
        -4
        18 September 2013 11: 25
        So Shoigu is right.







        Of course, Shoigu is right! And Marshal D.T. Yazov was right. All the Defense Ministers who started the campaign to equip the Armed Forces with the contract soldiers were right. Oh, how right. Here the Defense Ministry A.E. Serdyukov took, and he reduced a lot of tens of thousands of contractors, together with officers and midshipmen, warrant officers! Upon transition to a 1-year term of service, deciding that this will solve the problems with the recruitment of the RF Armed Forces. Colonel General Makarov, Chief of the General Staff, gave a fiery speech on this subject. And they were both right. Now he defends his innocence Russian Defense Ministry S. Shoigu. And he is right!
      2. +1
        18 September 2013 17: 34
        Quote: Loafer
        A mass army of 18-year-old brainless youths is the road to nowhere. Obviously backward armies like the North Korean, which try to compensate for the lack of quality of weapons with the amount of manpower, follow this path.

        And who fought with us in Afghanistan, Chechnya and other hot spots? According to your classification, brainless youths. But the country is proud of them. And I would not advise insulting our fighting youth ... It might cost more.
        1. 0
          26 September 2013 19: 57
          Quote: AleksUkr
          According to your classification, brainless youths. But the country is proud of them. And I would not advise insulting our fighting youth ... It might cost more.

          Do not distort, no one offends the memory of our soldiers. Better think about how less losses would be if the guys were better prepared and not thrown into the hell after the accelerated course of the young soldier.
    18. onegin61
      +10
      18 September 2013 10: 29
      An example of mediocre hostilities was during the South Ossetian conflict. There, starting with Medvedev (following), the Minister of Defense, they conducted military operations like the Great Patriotic War (led by the unit of war). The personnel completed the tasks, but at what cost? Just the Georgians fought poorly there despite their good equipment, and our units they threw it there like meat. It was necessary to fight with the technique: suppress all control points with point missile strikes (including in Tbilisi, it was not in vain that Saakashvili chewed a tie with fear), block all approaches to our group with missile volleys, AND ALREADY TAKE OVER THE TERRITORY.
      1. +1
        19 September 2013 16: 45
        Quote: Onegin61
        It was necessary to fight with the technique: suppress all control points with precision missile strikes (including in Tbilisi, it was not in vain that Saakashvili chewed a tie from fear), block all approaches to our group with missile volleys, AND ALREADY TAKE OFF TERRITORY.


        WHERE WERE YOU WERE IN 2008, WHY DIDN'T YOU CORRECT OUR MILITARY-POLITICAL MANAGEMENT? SPRAY THE HEAD WITH ASH!
    19. Lockbase170
      +3
      18 September 2013 10: 41
      The motto of the Airborne Forces: Nobody except us! Airborne Intelligence Motto: Are We Spoofing? ;)
    20. Fl000d
      -2
      18 September 2013 10: 54
      But what about mob training. No, everyone should serve, and the contract army as utopia is unattainable.
    21. rsv75
      +2
      18 September 2013 10: 56
      What is the appeal of the contractors? We already have no contractors. Fresh food and .... with difficulty.
      1. gunnerminer
        +1
        18 September 2013 11: 18
        What is the appeal of the contractors? We already have no contractors. Fresh food and .... with difficulty.



        The first mass recruitment of contract soldiers was in the spring of 1992. Before 1992, there were many of them, they were called conscripts. Most often they served in the Navy and the Air Force.
        1. rsv75
          +1
          18 September 2013 12: 20
          All the previous sets of contractors since 92 ended in failure (the last with Serdyukov, with the wording removed as unnecessary, illiterate), now we will recruit from scientific companies.
          1. gunnerminer
            +1
            18 September 2013 15: 25
            All the previous sets of contractors since 92 ended in failure (the last with Serdyukov, with the wording removed as unnecessary, illiterate), now we will recruit from scientific companies.



            I agree, the sets of contractors failed. During the reform, they were reduced, regardless of the attitude to the service, class, service life. Scientific companies are officially organized opportunities for evading children of authoritative people.
          2. 0
            18 September 2013 19: 36
            I remember the contractors of the 1992-93 model. None of the officers knew what to do with them.
            1. AX
              +3
              19 September 2013 08: 47
              I, a 1992 contract soldier, have been serving for more than 20 years ... And I don’t remember that the officers didn’t know what to do with us. In that first unit of mine, the training process, as well as the service, were very well established. was minimal. At least, all reductions and optimizations (all sorts of "survival", courses for raising it is not clear what, etc.) have so far passed without "losses", it was contract servicemen of the 1992 model who also had to fight ...
              1. +1
                19 September 2013 09: 13
                Quote: AX
                I, a contractor of the 1992 model, have been serving for more than 20 years ...

                Respect, Igor.
                This is not common ...

                And in the Belogorsky garrison, service will be more generous than in the middle zone of Russia.
                Good luck.
                wink
              2. +1
                24 September 2013 22: 22
                Dear Igor You remember what chaos was happening then. The Soviet Army ended, served under temporary charters. They signed a contract after six months of service. Drivers and wireless at least. Together with them, open drunkenness came to the barracks. This is from what I saw myself. I appreciate your choice of profession, I was only enough for 10 years.
    22. onegin61
      +2
      18 September 2013 10: 58
      Quote: Fl000d
      But what about mob training. No, everyone should serve, and the contract army as utopia is unattainable.
      ON MODERN TECHNOLOGY ONLY SHOULD BE PROF, AND MONKEYS WITH A Pomegranate WE DO NOT NEED. the whole call for military guard, guard duty, technical support, the hozblok in general, as far as abilities are concerned.
      1. rsv75
        +1
        18 September 2013 11: 05
        And in Chechnya, too, the monkeys fought on technology?
      2. gunnerminer
        0
        18 September 2013 11: 19
        ON MODERN TECHNOLOGY ONLY SHOULD BE PROF, AND MONKEYS WITH A Pomegranate WE DO NOT NEED. the whole call for military guard, guard duty, technical support, the hozblok in general, as far as abilities are concerned.



        This spell has been repeated since about 1984.
      3. Fl000d
        +1
        18 September 2013 12: 55
        Modern technology is designed for its simple and affordable management, including without proper education. Not all, but most of the modern technology is available for use without many years of study. In addition, considering that everywhere the technology is modern, all the time, you are clearly experiencing illusions in this regard. And everyone must learn to learn how to fight, to be able to protect themselves, loved ones, and, of course, their country.
        1. 0
          26 September 2013 20: 07
          Quote: Fl000d
          Modern technology is designed for its simple and affordable control.

          Modern technology needs not only management, but also competent service. Make the ignoramus service and prepare the tank for exit, how far will it go?
          Quote: Fl000d
          without proper education

          Well, well.
    23. gunnerminer
      +5
      18 September 2013 11: 15
      It will not work to equip the RF Armed Forces. Contractors are voluntarily signing a contract. The Minister of Defense apparently forgot about this. The government is not able to create acceptable living conditions for officers, as it can promise something to candidates for contract soldiers. Over 100 thousand officers who served, midshipmen, Ensigns, contractors can not get any housing, no certificates, no funds to purchase housing. Those who served the terms according to the contract. Since the beginning of the 90s, tens of thousands of contractors were reduced and dismissed, especially during the 2007-2012 reform, without pity and sense. all these organizational events are remembered by contractors, they must remember that, if necessary, the leaders of the Moscow Region will be thrown out to the citizen, not perceiving the contract as a document, but as a scrap of paper. In addition, no one is trying to explain to the candidates for contractors after the end of the contract or reaching a citizen by age.
      1. +5
        18 September 2013 11: 42
        Quote: gunnerminer
        It will not work to equip the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Contractors are voluntarily signing a contract. The Minister of Defense apparently forgot about it.

        MO understands this, to put it mildly, poorly. Now there will again be reports on the percentage of contractors, "races" for completeness of admission and other "delights" of obligation and companionship. This has happened more than once. It's a shame that the "talking shop" starts again and the promises never end. Whom to call under the contract? Now half of the contracts are those who simply "did not find" themselves in ordinary life. So after all, the soldiers of them - none!
        Remove your glasses from Shoigu, I think he has something with glasses ...
        1. gunnerminer
          +3
          18 September 2013 11: 54
          The MO understands this, to put it mildly, poorly. Now there will again be reports on the percentage of contractors, "races" for completeness of admission and other "delights" of obligation and companionship. This has happened more than once. Offended that the "talking shop" begins again and promises have no end. Whom to call on the contract? Now half of the contracts are those who simply "did not find" themselves in ordinary life. So after all, the soldiers of them - none!
          Remove your glasses from Shoigu, I think he has something with glasses ...



          I agree with you. For all points.
          1. +2
            18 September 2013 17: 04
            Shoigu put these glasses on himself and he is comfortable in them ...
        2. +4
          18 September 2013 14: 53
          Quote: IRBIS
          Now half of the contracts are those who simply "did not find" themselves in ordinary life. So after all, the soldiers of them - none!

          Yes
          Alexander, my word "contrabass" is still a nervous tick.
          belay
          ......................

          Comrade Shoigu, it’s good to follow the lead of tolerant public opinion.
          Make a life of at least 1,5 years and moderate stool suction to an acceptable level.
          And then the fighters and equipment do not have time to learn over the year and do not know how to do anything on it.
          Already told one story (real):

          Morning. Park equipment PPD.
          A kid (clearly not a "fighter") in a clean suit runs up to a representative of the plant:
          - Uncle, but my tank will not start again.
          - Ahem ... And you are on the Levinian pos.sl, son?
          - Yes, uncle, popped on the wheel, as you advised the last time ... All the same, do not start.
          - So shitty pos.sl ...

          We extinguish the light, drain the oil. A curtain.
          1. gunnerminer
            +2
            18 September 2013 15: 32
            We extinguish the light, drain the oil. A curtain




            It can be seen that an experienced soldier writes. IRBIS imho serves in the GUK, judging by the presentation of the topic. Experienced.
            1. VAF
              VAF
              +4
              18 September 2013 15: 40
              Quote: gunnerminer
              IRBIS IMHO serves in GUK


              Greetings to you. Dear +! drinks One guessed right- EXPERIENCES soldier

              But the rest lol

              This is Irbis soldier


              And this is Alex TV soldier


              "Headquarters" is not even close there .... drinks
              1. +1
                18 September 2013 16: 40
                Quote: vaf
                This is Irbis

                Thank you, Sergey!
              2. +1
                18 September 2013 17: 52
                Quote: vaf
                And this is Alex TV

                Thank you Sergey!
                T-80 test photo
                good

                Only nana litola is bigger and dirt, dirt, dirt ...
                Not at the show, tea.
                laughing
            2. +3
              18 September 2013 16: 39
              Quote: gunnerminer
              It can be seen that an experienced soldier writes. IRBIS imho serves in the GUK, judging by the presentation of the topic. Experienced.

              No, not in the GUK, I’m on the other side, but I had to deal with this, like any commander. On duty, he was responsible for recruiting part of the permanent readiness with contract soldiers. They gave a plan and away we go ... Reports, reports and standing in the offices of the chiefs in the pose of a laundress. Then the brigade commander said: "That's it, I can't take it anymore!" and scored everyone "for the plan." Part of the combat readiness completely lost, but the "vigorous" report went to the "top". And the fig ????
              1. +2
                18 September 2013 17: 56
                Quote: IRBIS
                and scored everyone "for the plan." Part of the combat readiness completely lost, but the "vigorous" report went to the "top". And the fig ????

                Everything is as usual ... Eheh.

                The double basses discredited themselves almost completely.
                The very principle of the approach to solving this issue is rotten.
                Here it is necessary to change it.

                In Soviet times, this "tribe" was smaller in number, but of higher quality.
                I will always remember "Crickets" with a kind word.
                1. +1
                  18 September 2013 18: 03
                  Quote: Aleks tv
                  Here it is necessary to change it.

                  And all that is necessary to remember the words of "grandfather" VIL - "Better less, but better ..."
                  1. 0
                    18 September 2013 18: 07
                    Quote: svp67
                    "Less is better ..."

                    good

                    Greetings, Sergey.
                    hi
                    1. +1
                      18 September 2013 18: 08
                      soldier ZdravZhelavTov
                      Quote: Aleks tv
                      Aleks tv
                      laughing
                      What's new here?
                      By the way, about the article. After all, the country is again approaching a demographic pit, so what you want - you don’t want, but the number of draftees will decrease. So, really, it’s better now to take care of their replacement by contract soldiers, but of course you need to prepare them, you need and we need to ... and what to like, that there are progress in the right direction, if only they would not stop ...
                      1. +2
                        18 September 2013 18: 22
                        Quote: svp67
                        What's new here?

                        Yes, we’re goggling slowly.
                        wink

                        I read, now, storytellers - dreaming of smart, strong, professionally trained double bass ... pah, damn it ... contract soldiers.
                        Which are versed in technology at times, and literate to the point, even conscious by the most I can’t ...

                        Who doesn’t want such fighters ... I would tear them to my unit with arms and legs.
                        laughing
                        Just hde to take them ... Yes, the whole Army ...
                        On Mars, well, put the military commissariats ...
                        what winked

                        And the preparation of a mobile resource for "dreamers" is not at all interested.
                        And rightly so, fuck us mob.resource? He doesn’t need us at all, we’ll throw his hats of heroic adversary without even getting up from computers.
                        Urya ...

                        Something like that.
                        1. +2
                          18 September 2013 18: 31
                          Quote: Aleks tv
                          Something like that.

                          The most offensive thing is that our beloved, to tears, the Fatherland, systematically exterminated the desire of NORMAL men to serve on a contract basis, and as a result, a very bad picture is now emerging that people who are trained, needed by the Armed Forces, the same Armed Forces cannot take on contract service, since those were already there and "having cooked in that mess", or rather "d.erm.e from promises and demands" broke the contract, and you know what articles, or rather an article, it was done earlier ... In short, "time trouble." But it's good that we can overcome it, because there are young people, only that have served, but it costs much more to attract them to a "contract" now ... both morally and financially.
                        2. +1
                          18 September 2013 18: 45
                          Quote: svp67
                          Fatherland, systematically exterminated the desire of NORMAL men to go to serve under the contract,

                          Quote: svp67
                          But it's good that we can overcome it, because there are young people, only that have served, but it costs much more to attract them to a "contract" now ... both morally and financially.

                          Yes, NORMAL will not be easy to attract now ...
                          Mixed type of picking, with strict and clearly defined selection, with clear goals and objectives such an action as engaging contractors.
                          Better on sergeants.
                          This: more or less real.
                          And then there will be plenty of bunting.
              2. +1
                18 September 2013 18: 00
                Quote: IRBIS
                And the fig ????

                Yes, so that at the very first meeting "the nails from the chair should not be pulled" ... The command was given - it was executed, it was clearly reported to the Supreme Commander - this is what we are ... But NORTHERNOUS ever thought about combat readiness ... They are temporary workers. ...
          2. VAF
            VAF
            +3
            18 September 2013 15: 32
            Quote: Aleks tv
            - Yes, uncle, popped on the wheel, as you advised the last time ... All the same, do not start.
            - So shitty pos.sl ...

            We extinguish the light, drain the oil. A curtain.


            laughing laughing laughing+++++ ..15 minutes I laugh ... lying under the table .... pause drinks
            1. +2
              18 September 2013 15: 47
              Quote: vaf
              pause

              Greetings, Sergey.
              drinks

              And the story is real.
              A co-worker told, still pulling the strap.
        3. VAF
          VAF
          +1
          18 September 2013 15: 29
          Quote: IRBIS
          This has happened more than once.


          Sasha, +! soldier
          1. +2
            18 September 2013 16: 45
            Quote: vaf
            Sasha, +!

            Sergei, as far as I know, our aviation is also developing and reforming "in a spiral", the turns of which are connected by the rake put on it.
            Sometimes I wonder why it is necessary to step in one odorous pile even not twice to understand what it is r ... oh?
            1. VAF
              VAF
              +1
              18 September 2013 16: 57
              Quote: IRBIS
              Why do you need to step into one odorous bunch not even twice to understand that this is g ... oh?


              Sasha is here only according to the classics, either according to Tyutchev or according to Krylov ... unfortunately recourse +! crying
        4. +1
          18 September 2013 17: 15
          Quote: IRBIS
          Now half of the contracts are those who simply "did not find" themselves in ordinary life. So after all, the soldiers of them - none!

          Sasha, welcome!
          A little higher I wrote about ChOPovtsev. Pretty much the same.
    24. +2
      18 September 2013 11: 21
      Contractors are worth a deal (given the current complexity of military equipment) But I think that I should be at the level of military training (initial military training), I should increase hours and schools should be (former officers at least) .. Otherwise, if something happens (general mobilization) they will crumble like cabbage ..
      1. +1
        18 September 2013 13: 31
        The mobilization of human stocks for NVP in the school is not being prepared.
        Only military service for ordinary and sergeant personnel, compulsory military departments in state universities for the training of reserve officers, periodic military training are able to prepare the mobilization reserve necessary for the state.
        In view of the collapse of the preparation of the mobilization reserve in Russia, someone seems to consciously liquidate it.
        A childish question arises why they do it and who are they? And isn't it time to take proper measures to them, even though "we are not 37 years old."
    25. +1
      18 September 2013 11: 27
      again the contract army as a panacea .... The budget, I wonder, due to which category of professional citizens will be expanded for the normal salary of contract soldiers?
      IMHO, with our length of borders, the transition to a fully contracted army in the form in which they are trying to make it, will lead to a budget deficit and ..only in the economy.
      The army, of course, must be professional, but on a voluntary basis. That is, a person must consciously choose a military profession and already, so to speak, grow in this direction. A kind of separate estate, if you will. as an officer in pre-revolutionary Russia.
      And so that people are ready to consciously choose this path, powerful incentives are needed - from the banal provision of housing and decent salaries, to preferences in the tax, public and other fields, depending on merit, rank and professional experience.
      For example, if a person is a participant in hostilities, then he has a tax discount of, say, 20%. if it is injured - then in 30%. And if he has government awards, for example, orders, then he is completely exempt from taxes. Now, if I’m not mistaken, only the Heroes of Russia have the right to tax relief and free travel on various modes of transport. Although how this actually works in practice, I find it difficult to say.

      Well, as a formation of the mobile reserve, it is necessary to leave the year of conscription, increasing the draft age to 21 years, or replacing the draft with mandatory military fees for those liable for military service, say, once every two years.

      And the model of the contract army in its modern representation (as it is now) can be used as an initial transitional stage to the system I described above.
      something like this :)
    26. 0
      18 September 2013 11: 41
      The title of the article:
      Shoigu: military registration and enlistment offices are no longer chasing draft diversions
    27. +3
      18 September 2013 11: 53
      I just remembered at the end of the 80s we gathered all the graduates of the guys in the military registration and enlistment office, they handed out tests (some were tricky ..). ... you will serve abroad .. a lot of money .. women are darkness .. everything!)))) then troubled times began .. But what I mean ... The selection from schools was already choosing the best in terms of development and psychological stability An officer in the USSR was a prestigious and respected profession Elite (to defend the MOTHERLAND!) Now seems to be reviving, but I think the selection of officers should be determined for almost 5 years. to cook (military-patriotic circles, etc.) We need to create a cult ... that's something I wanted to say so
      1. +2
        18 September 2013 12: 19
        Quote: MIKHAN
        but I think the selection of officers almost 10 years should be identified. to cook (military-patriotic circles, etc.) It is necessary to create a cult

        My good friend, a lieutenant colonel, was unable to attach his grandson to the Suvorov School in St. Petersburg. General’s grandchildren crossed the road. Something like that.
    28. smiths xnumx
      +8
      18 September 2013 11: 58
      Somehow like this...

      Yours! hi
      1. +1
        18 September 2013 19: 38
        PERFECTLY AT THE POINT, PUTIN AND SHOYU NEED TO THINK ABOUT THIS PROBLEM.
    29. +4
      18 September 2013 12: 12
      He served as an officer in the 70 of the last century. The staff of the unit would be soldiers. But we did not allow them to enter technology (they served 2 of the year). The soldiers were engaged in cleaning the premises, repairing equipment, etc. Servicing sophisticated electronic equipment involved officers and warrant officers. So, back in the last century, we have already abandoned conscripts. Another thing is tank troops, motorized infantry, railway troops, etc. there you can’t do without urgent service. Yes, and the mobile reserve must be cooked. Nobody has canceled the war.
      1. +1
        18 September 2013 17: 43
        Quote: Ivanovich47
        it is necessary to prepare a mobile reserve. Nobody has canceled the war.


        A sober thought is always at a price. THANKS FOR UNDERSTANDING, IMMEDIATELY IMMEDIATELY - THERE ARE NO EXIT OFFICERS !!!!
    30. 0
      18 September 2013 12: 20
      Quote: 225chay
      Quote: Apollon
      I think in my opinion at times to increase the monetary allowance of contractors by reducing the bloated bureaucracy.

      The bureaucracy should be reduced dozens of times, and not only in the Ministry of Defense, but throughout Russia. Nakhlebnikov will soon be more than producers of hard workers with peasants


      The bureaucracy must be reduced hundreds of times. And not only in the Ministry of Defense and Russia, but in the whole world. To drive a filthy broom to the street of all these managerial managers.
      Here's how to write.
    31. 0
      18 September 2013 12: 45
      I absolutely disagree with the fact that conscripts are considered only for cannon fodder. What do you think that only an officer can skillfully defend his homeland?
      just like in the 19th century, when the officer could be the one who was born an aristocrat, and everyone else was a soldier.
      Fortunately, Napoleon came and began to introduce reforms into the French army, any soldier could become an officer, for this it was necessary to show all his best qualities, first by courage in battles, then managing the squad, platoon and so on.
      And now? nothing seemed to have changed from Tsarist Russia. A general or colonel is sitting for himself, and commands though no one has combat experience, that is, I am 100% sure that this general did not run in the pants of a soldier.

      I propose to equip the army entirely from conscripts, and for two years not to engage in combat training and painting curbs, but most of the time to learn how to master technique and physical exercises. Let those who studied at the academy, as officers, teach them. And I suggest that the soldier be given the opportunity to choose where to serve, rather than shove to where he lacks according to plan. Here I am, a jacket, motorized rifle, but who asked me whether I want this specialty or not, maybe I'm a sniper from God, or a tankman. There would be courses I went to study.
      1. iSpoiler
        0
        18 September 2013 14: 57
        Then go to the contract and all things.)
        The main thing is to express desire and perseverance. Go to the pick point.
    32. 0
      18 September 2013 14: 33
      But what about this same mobilization reserve ???
    33. 0
      18 September 2013 15: 34
      Quote: 225chay
      Quote: Apollon
      I think in my opinion at times to increase the monetary allowance of contractors by reducing the bloated bureaucracy.

      The bureaucracy should be reduced dozens of times, and not only in the Ministry of Defense, but throughout Russia. Nakhlebnikov will soon be more than producers of hard workers with peasants

      As always. One with a bipod, and semerol with a spoon.
    34. 0
      18 September 2013 16: 22
      Quote: 225chay
      Nakhlebnikov will soon be more than producers of hard workers with peasants

      Well said, but "they don't give up their own."
    35. Druid
      +3
      18 September 2013 16: 28
      Quote: vladimirZ
      Without a draft army, without a mobilization reserve that is being prepared for military service, Russia, due to its large territory, thousands of kilometers of border, numerous neighboring states, of which most are potentially hostile, cannot create an effective army that can defend Russia's territorial integrity .
      Is the experience of the history of our state does not teach anything.
      I agree, this is an axiom and not only for Russia. Throughout the ex-Sovka, history is rewritten a hundred times for itself without respecting or honoring its lessons, without making conclusions.

      Quote: vladimirZ
      and the reserve officers (as the personnel call them "jackets" now) had insufficient command skills, BUT they learned quickly and broke the back of the fascists.
      An officer, or rather a commander, I like it more, it is impossible to learn, for example, specialists in many professions, according to my personal observations, almost half, if not more, of career officers in war are, frankly speaking, "random people". And your humble servant was a jacket and his direct boss, and many colleagues were also jackets, all graduated only from military departments at their universities, but we had an education behind us, i.e. real knowledge and life experience. Our battery was commanded in the world by a labor teacher, from where the Lord knows the talent, but his mines flew more accurately than the state tomahawks.

      Quote: gunnerminer
      The government is not able to create acceptable living conditions for officers, as it can promise something to candidates for contract.
      Bytovuha is a scourge ... In Russia, it was lucky that there was a crisis when there was nowhere to put in place the housing built and under construction, they remembered veterans and officers and supported cowards to businessmen at the expense of the budget, and so many apartments would not have seen.
      The main reason why he did not want to stay in the army. I do not need handouts, provide office housing at the place of service, and then it is not your business - pay decently, and I myself will figure out where and which housing to buy, instead a bunch of bureaucrats in uniform warms their butts in their offices and "solving my housing problems" ... The state should deal with housing for the officer's family only in the event of his death.
    36. +2
      18 September 2013 18: 26
      Lecture at the institute. The lecturer says: "Who is willing to miss my lectures throughout the year?" Forest of hands.
      -"Are you sure?"
      - "Yes-ah!"
      The teacher opens the door: "Come in, Comrade Major. It seems I can help you save the draft plan."
    37. 0
      18 September 2013 18: 57
      It is a pity that not everyone can serve 5 or 25 years, because even one year in the Army gives a man a lot. Maybe they will still find in MO the opportunity to make a 1 or 2 year emergency for not very important specialties. Young people must be at least a little bit, but serve the homeland!
    38. +1
      18 September 2013 19: 25
      It seems that few people also need a mobilization squad. They can’t normally call for training. They don’t know at the military enlistment office when the planned West 2013 exercises will begin)))) fellow
    39. +2
      18 September 2013 19: 29
      I’m a military radio telegrapher and I think that now there may be no such profession. I served for 3 years, studied for 6 months and worked for 2.5 years and upgraded qualifications to grade 1. And what profession you can learn in one year with the current complex technique is not clear. after at least 2 years of a contract with a very good salary. Most of our youth are good guys and girls, and some people who hold power are, to put it mildly, not very, but it will be rude to have one MAT.
    40. +1
      18 September 2013 19: 32
      completely to the point !!!!
    41. +1
      18 September 2013 20: 24
      ... The complexity of the weapons systems is such that we will not prepare a conscript for at least a year or two to be able to fight with this weapon "... - These are golden words !!
    42. AlexP47
      +1
      18 September 2013 22: 45
      It is quite possible to train a motorized rifleman / machine gunner / grenade launcher for a year of service normally (of course, if you teach correctly, and not "dress up" according to household work and outfits in the dining room and not toil about idleness in the barracks). For other simple VUSam, too, conscripts - year-olds will do. It is not necessary to recruit professional contractors to go on guard.
      On complex equipment (communications, fleet, aviation, Strategic Missile Forces, Air Defense, Airborne Forces, etc.), semi-trained boys have nothing to do!
      Another question that needs to be raised is the prestige of military service: a ban on civil service for those who did not serve for disrespectful reasons (as was done in Belarus), benefits for higher education, seniority (1 year for 1,5-2), etc. .
      In general, you need a balanced mixed principle of manning.
    43. 0
      19 September 2013 08: 00
      Quote: Apologet.Ru
      There is a phrase - a career officer. Therefore, here it is more correct, as it seems to me personally, and it will sound professionally - personnel, personnel. Private / sergeant of the frame sounds quite worthy! No?

      I completely agree. Moreover, the professionalism of the Army must be raised to the proper level, at the level of training of officers, only more emphasis must be placed on the practical possession of weapons and equipment, and tactics must not be overlooked. As one of the major military leaders said, "every soldier must know his own maneuver." Well, of course, a full social package. So that the soldier does not think of himself outside the Army, and knows that he has nothing to do in civilian life.
    44. Druid
      0
      19 September 2013 12: 06
      Quote: NORILCHAN
      I’m a military radio telegrapher and I think that now there may be no such profession. I served for 3 years, studied for 6 months and worked for 2.5 years and upgraded qualifications to grade 1. It is not clear what profession you can learn in one year with the current complex technique.
      You forget about colleges (technical schools), normal specialists still come out from there, even despite the current mess. Another thing universities in the whole CIS divorced as dogs uncut, stamping dash that, while technical schools zilch. There can be no real need for such a number of highly qualified specialists in any country, it is necessary to revise the education system, which incidentally flies to every country a pretty penny, the army cannot live separately from society and in no army in the world can they ever pay a highly qualified specialist more than citizen, the army can only give stability and social guarantees, like any civil service in general.
      And about the complex equipment in the army, alas, I will disappoint, a modern tractor, combine, excavator, bulldozer or even an asphalt roller for components and systems such as an engine, transmission, hydraulics, electrical system, are more advanced than modern BMPs, BMDs, the main tank made in Russia or Ukraine. Modern automated lines are far superior and also more advanced are automatic tank loaders or self-propelled guns.
      So I think there is no need to discuss supposedly stupid conscripts, you just need to build a normal state, a normal education system and be selective when called up, there is a state education standard, on the basis of this, draftees with secondary special education should be distributed. Now, youth from the military registration and enlistment office only gets to driving schools, and here is the result.
      It is useless to cook from conscripts with triples and deuces and 8 classes of education of a wireless telegraph operator; conscripts with special education are another matter, the benefit is to the army and the state as a whole. Emergency service is not only defense and reserve, read the arguments and calculations of Italian scientists from various fields who opposed the abolition of the draft in Italy.
    45. KOH
      0
      23 September 2013 06: 10
      Quote: Wyalik
      No_more
      A professional army is certainly good. But what if, God forbid, war be? The losses of the army will be big, but who will replace the contract soldiers then?
      Those who don’t know how to disassemble the machine? In my opinion, there should be an army of professionals and those who can at least partially replace them. In Russia, there has always been a training system for soldiers, so we need to revive it.


      Who to replace? I’m 50 years old, they were deregistered at the military registration and enlistment office, but I don’t feel like a pensioner, I think the honey commission should have passed, they recognized the person as unsuitable and then goodbye, I know so many of my peers that will give young odds, it seems to me from the register must selectively shoot, especially if there are several military specialties ...
    46. 0
      13 October 2013 22: 33
      we need a draft army! Nonsense to defend the homeland for money. All wars were won by the people who knew which side to hold the gun

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"