Military Review

How is the ban on Russia's strategic development being implemented?

49
Some citizens of Russia are surprised when they hear that Russia is forbidden to have institutions responsible for the country's development strategy. It should be understood that the strategy is the development perspective for 20-30 years. If we carefully read the Constitution of the Russian Federation, we will see that the development cycles of our state are limited to terms in 5 - 6 years (Section 1 Art. 81, Art. 96). At the same time, the same person cannot be the head of state for more than 2 terms in a row (Section 3 Art. 81). This means that the development cycle of the Russian state can last a maximum of 10-12 years. That is, 10 is for years a country, theoretically, can move in one direction, because after coming to power of other forces (whose election campaign, as a rule, is built on criticism of its predecessor), the country begins to go in the opposite direction, which ultimately leads to “trampling” in place. At the same time, this will not happen in practice, because we have considered an idealistic option, in which the president and the parliament have the right to implement a sovereign course. And today, as we know, the President is only a political notary and a guarantor of the Constitution (Art. 80), which means a guarantor of paying tribute through the ruble issue mechanism independent of the state of the Central Bank (Art. 75), a guarantor of the ban to have an ideology (Art. 13), in a word guarantor of the colonial status of Russia.


Strategy goes hand in hand with ideology. However, no ideology can be established as a state one. Here we must understand that there can be no “non-state” ideology, because this question, in practice, can only be realized by the state. So, we have a ban on the national ideology, and therefore on the national strategy.

To ensure the objectives of the strategic development of sovereign Russia, the state ideology should permeate the totality of all non-state forms of self-organization of citizens. Let's see if these institutions are nationally oriented in modern Russia. The authors of the book "Fundamentals of electoral technologies and party building" E.Malkin and E.Suchkov highlight the following institutions of civil society:

1. Free enterprise is the economic basis of civil society. We have already written that it is generally forbidden for Russia to have a national business. How this prohibition is implemented in practice is more detailed here http://rusnod.ru/theme726.html

2. Local government. Political parties are a natural link between society and government. All large (parliamentary) political parties need serious funding, which can be provided only by big business. And since he is all in foreign jurisdiction, through the mechanism of control of property, the United States can influence the party. And this means that they are not sovereign in their policy and are agents of the occupier’s ideology, and cannot implement a national strategy.

3. Trade unions, pensioners, women, youth and other public organizations defending the corporate interests of their members. By analogy with the parties, they need funding and, through the mechanism of control over the business, are under the control of the occupier and, therefore, are not entitled to be agents of the nationally-oriented development strategy of Russia.

4. Non-profit organizations: confessional, scientific, sports and other associations of citizens by conviction or by interests; charities, etc. Most of them work for the occupier and receive support in the form of foreign grants, or the Americans provide such support through the mechanism of distribution of Russian state grants http://rusnod.ru/theme740.html. Those organizations that could potentially become agents of the national strategy are in every way discredited. A vivid example is the Russian Orthodox Church, which is systematically attacked through informational stuffing (in relation to the patriarch, priests), through punitive political actions (PussyRiot, exhibitions of Marat Gelman), as well as in other ways.

5. "Free" media. Are under the full control of the United States. Managed through a rating system, because, regardless of ownership, they are set in terms of market relations. Ratings publishes the American company TNS. And the higher the rating, the greater the advertising revenue. A large customer of advertising is, as a rule, a business that is in foreign jurisdiction and if the TV channel starts to conduct incorrect propaganda from the point of view of the United States, it will easily block financial oxygen. The propaganda itself is carried out through American agents who run all the major media outlets. Almost all the heads of the TV channels came from the team of the oligarch Gusinsky, who was responsible for ideology in the Seven Bankers. And the head of NTV, in general, the CIA agent himself does not hesitate to talk to the camera https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cc5OOiGNSNA

6. Finally, the primary, but perhaps the most important institution is citizens - not just “residents”, but people who are aware and ready to actively defend their rights and interests, and at the same time feel their personal responsibility for the state of affairs in the country. And in the aggregate of the ideological impact on our compatriots, to those traditional 10-15 percentages of traitors, on whom the invaders historically rely, are added people who take the path of treachery under the influence of American propaganda.

Thus, all the institutions that should be guides of the nationally-oriented development strategy of Russia are under American control. Through this mechanism, a ban on development strategy for Russia is implemented. If the nationally-oriented forces try to change the existing state of affairs, the American agents will conduct a punitive operation and accuse those who advocate such changes in violation of the Constitution. After Art. 13 forbids us to have an ideology, and any initiatives to create a national strategy can be brought under the formal violation of the 13 article. For example, a single textbook storieswhich manually pushes the national leader - this is also an element of the state ideology. That is, when deciding on the strategic development of Russia, we are again talking about the need to change the Constitution, and it is impossible to do this without mass popular support http://rusnod.ru/theme741.html.

That is why it is necessary to be actively involved in the struggle to restore the sovereignty of Russia and come with like-minded people to rallies, which will take place on September 21 on September 2013 throughout the country.

Member of the supreme political council of the National Course party, coordinator of the Bryansk branch of the GCD, Alexander Turykin
Originator:
http://rusnod.ru/theme767.html
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. serge-68-68
    serge-68-68 17 September 2013 06: 45 New
    +3
    If we take into account the list of "agents of influence" and that the author of this opus is a member of the highest political council of the National Course party, the coordinator of the Bryansk branch of the NLD, he is therefore an American hirelings, like the vast majority of Russian citizens who are somehow involved in public organizations .
    Conclusion: the author is raving.
    1. Civil
      Civil 17 September 2013 06: 48 New
      +5
      The author is generally right, but explains this with completely crazy theories :-)
      1. smel
        smel 17 September 2013 06: 57 New
        +5
        I agree ,,, The main idea is that with the change of president, the course is changing - completely crazy. Amer nothing happens when they change their president. Our society needs to educate its responsible and patriotic politicians, and not on the last day to choose between greater and lesser evil. Yes, and make sure that the political field is not trampled by the existing elite, which is imposed on the country, people and society as a whole
        1. sergo0000
          sergo0000 17 September 2013 10: 18 New
          +7
          Quote: smel
          I agree ,,, The main idea is that with the change of president, the course is changing - completely crazy. Amer nothing happens when they change their president. Our society needs to educate its responsible and patriotic politicians, and not on the last day to choose between greater and lesser evil. Yes, and make sure that the political field is not trampled by the existing elite, which is imposed on the country, people and society as a whole

          Do we have a well-educated and patriotic elite ?!
          1. washi
            washi 17 September 2013 13: 08 New
            +9
            Quote: sergo0000
            Quote: smel
            I agree ,,, The main idea is that with the change of president, the course is changing - completely crazy. Amer nothing happens when they change their president. Our society needs to educate its responsible and patriotic politicians, and not on the last day to choose between greater and lesser evil. Yes, and make sure that the political field is not trampled by the existing elite, which is imposed on the country, people and society as a whole

            Do we have a well-educated and patriotic elite ?!

            The elite are the best. But we do not correctly call the elite those who have loot.
            In fact, the elite are those who, despite the lack of finance, are engaged in real production, agriculture, raise science, and serve in law enforcement agencies.
            How can thieves be considered an elite. Or their attendants (cultural figures)
            1. skeptic
              skeptic 17 September 2013 14: 27 New
              10
              Quote: Vasya
              How can thieves be considered an elite. Or their attendants (cultural figures)


              However, the figures of "culture" are more and more riveting films where the lessons of "win the war" and the military personnel, like small children ...

              They are imposing “thieves' values” on us, trying to turn the youth’s self-awareness upside down, distorting social guidelines, therefore the author is not too “contrary” to the truth.
              request NOT COMPLETE AWARENESS OF THREATS - DOES NOT RELAX FROM THE FOLLOWING DISASTERS.
            2. Skiff-2
              Skiff-2 17 September 2013 19: 49 New
              +3
              THE AUTHOR OF RIGHTS IN THE MAIN THING - THE CONSTITUTION SHOULD BE CHANGED, THERE IS AN INITIATIVE GROUP OF DEPUTIES, BUT WITHOUT PUSHING AND WITHOUT WITHOUT PUSHROOM IS WITHOUT A WITCH HELPED GORBACHEV WITH YELTSIN'S COUNTRY TO DECLINE (WHO WANTED THE SNICKERS, WHO HAVE OILS, WHO FOOLS, WHO INTENTED EVIL)? IT IS TIME IT WOULD BE ABLE TO TAKE PLACE TO HELP THE HONEST PEOPLE TO RETURN RUSSIA'S FREEDOM, DIGNITY AND SIMPLY THE RIGHT TO THE FUTURE, BUT THIS EVERYONE ADVISOR HAS BEEN CONSIDERED ... (SORRY CHARTER).
              1. Yarosvet
                Yarosvet 17 September 2013 21: 11 New
                +1
                Quote: Skif-2
                AUTHOR OF RIGHTS IN THE MAIN THING - THE CONSTITUTION SHOULD BE CHANGED
                To begin with, it would be worth trying to comply with the provisions of the current.

                PUTIN, FORMALLY, WILL BECOME A CRIMINAL BY SHOWING SUCH AN INITIATIVE
                Stupidity, or deliberate lie?
              2. Theophanes
                Theophanes 18 September 2013 02: 10 New
                -1
                I completely agree with SKIF - 2 !!! Only with our help it is possible to defeat the amers and their clerks of the Libers. As long as they rule the ball in Russia, while the media in their hands only the Internet will help us with this. Wail the country is huge ....
          2. military
            military 17 September 2013 13: 26 New
            +6
            Quote: sergo0000
            Do we have a well-educated and patriotic elite ?!

            mostly - well-fed liberal ...
            1. Yarosvet
              Yarosvet 17 September 2013 21: 14 New
              0
              Quote: military
              Quote: sergo0000
              Do we have a well-educated and patriotic elite ?!

              mostly - well-fed liberal ...

              To which the "national course" belongs, along with the Chubais acne Fedorov.
        2. POBEDA
          POBEDA 17 September 2013 23: 56 New
          +1
          In the United States, presidents have long been more likely to be “talking heads,” voicing decisions by the powers that be. And republicans and democrats are the essence of two wings of one party in power. No other party has been in power for 200 years, but even in the elections! What the hell is "democracy"? Democracy ends with the election of a sheriff in a small town .. And rightly so, in large states democracy is a farce.
    2. GreatRussia
      GreatRussia 17 September 2013 06: 48 New
      +9
      5. "Free" media. Are under full control of the United States.

      The Foreign Agent Act is working.
      Why not apply this kind of law to the media?
      1. tronin.maxim
        tronin.maxim 17 September 2013 06: 54 New
        12
        Quote: GreatRussia
        Why not apply this kind of law to the media?

        Yes, immediately 80% of the media in the trash.
        1. washi
          washi 17 September 2013 13: 09 New
          +2
          Freedom of speech. Yes, and we ourselves need to have information from various sources for its analysis and conclusions.
          Quote: tronin.maxim
          Quote: GreatRussia
          Why not apply this kind of law to the media?

          Yes, immediately 80% of the media in the trash.
          1. matross
            matross 17 September 2013 15: 40 New
            +4
            Quote: Vasya
            we ourselves need to have information from various sources for its analysis and conclusions.

            Information - yes, it is necessary. But garbage for the s.r.s.r.p.a.s. of fragile minds - no. And rightly so - 80% of TV channels are clean and uncluttered trash with dubious funding.
      2. SPACE
        SPACE 17 September 2013 18: 29 New
        +2
        Quote: GreatRussia
        The Foreign Agent Act is working. Why not apply this kind of law to the media?

        It’s not so simple, indirect financing and gray schemes, except to prohibit or limit advertising, but again, the state’s invasion of the business sector, a hysterical scream will begin.
        It’s just that everyone needs to learn to draw conclusions and counter-propaganda, warned, therefore armed. The more people who understand this, the less the impact of such media will be.
    3. Sunjar
      Sunjar 17 September 2013 07: 23 New
      +7
      If the comrades from the NCD are moving from bread to kvass, then no - they are not mercenaries. Moreover, in Russia there are businessmen who are generally patriotic, and the scope of their business goes beyond the interests of Western democratizers. There probably meant large parties of the Communist Party, EdRo and so on. As for the media, he certainly does not drive. I saw schemes of interaction between our media and abroad (that is, control from the side of abroad). As a result, a closure goes to special services, and not so much through real documentation, but through personal acquaintances. So you don’t show anything to anyone.
      1. afire
        afire 17 September 2013 08: 16 New
        -2
        God, what does the author have in mind ??? belay
        1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
          GELEZNII_KAPUT 17 September 2013 08: 32 New
          0
          Cockroaches, very large, these are mine request !
          1. alexng
            alexng 17 September 2013 09: 04 New
            0
            There, not only cockroaches, but termite ants started.
    4. SPACE
      SPACE 17 September 2013 09: 20 New
      +2
      Quote: serge-68-68
      Conclusion: the author is raving.

      Definitely. The author in obsessive, unrealistic delirium goes out of his way to prove that he is occupied, with the aim of encouraging him to climb the barricades, he could write more simply: Democracy is an occupation. For liberalism and monetary relations, absolutely within the framework of the law, allow creating, including anti-state forces for their own purposes, but then the reverse is also true and here, everyone must realize their own belonging, in the end, ideology is not only a state task and obliged to come from the state, but also must, that it’s even more important to be in every person and go from each person, determining the state itself, you cannot buy everyone. And the ideology is really simple and is in a prominent place, it is not necessary to look for it in books, clever sayings and debates of political figures, ideology in the affairs of ancestors, in that it is worthy to live, do good, be strong, fight evil, to defend the Fatherland in its capabilities and forces.
      Then everything will gradually fall into place, although screamers based on their overly conscious stupidity or practical prudence will always be there.
    5. Tartary
      Tartary 17 September 2013 10: 42 New
      10
      Quote: serge-68-68
      Conclusion: the author is raving.

      The author, like his associates, is at least trying to do something to change the realities described in his article. Contrary to the conditions in which the Russian state has existed for two decades now ...
      And what did WE do ??????????????????

      What did you want to change in the 90s ?? What could you do?

      What are we doing now? Trying to hit the hands of patriots?

      And about raving, too categorically too said, colleague.
      1. serge-68-68
        serge-68-68 17 September 2013 13: 11 New
        +2
        Do you think the author is trying to do something? And I believe that the author simply promotes another incomprehensible pseudo-political organization, and even does it unprofessionally (at least read his party’s program more closely). If he wants to do something - in Bryansk awesome front of practical work, as in most cities of Russia. However, the closest (and the only one on the site) rally of this very party in this very city is "a rally of popular anger against US policy towards the Russian Federation." And I believe that the author was “soaped” with the next leaders, because he doesn’t want to work with his hands in the mud, and he can’t. But for this, at least he needs to learn to express thoughts firstly correctly, and secondly with meaning.
        But today I am soft, and therefore my conclusion is soft: the author is raving. But I can say tougher: the author deliberately misleads us in order to use our support for his personal purposes. Those. he is not raving. He lies.
        1. Yarosvet
          Yarosvet 17 September 2013 21: 22 New
          0
          Quote: serge-68-68
          Those. he is not raving. He lies.
          Absolutely true - their goal is to change the principles of the financial and monetary system to bring the printing press under government control, which if successful will definitely lead to hyperinflation.

          Another of their tasks is to blame all the problems on the amers, thereby masking the internal comprador policy of the Government.
  2. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 17 September 2013 06: 55 New
    +1
    Conspiracy theory is booming. It is strange that God's chosen people are not mentioned.
    a single history textbook that is manually pushed by a national leader

    We do not need order in education. If there are 200 textbooks, it’s much easier to push the national strategy. A national strategy suited to the author.
  3. Xmypp
    Xmypp 17 September 2013 06: 57 New
    14
    "And come with
    like-minded people at rallies that
    will be held September 21, 2013 throughout
    country. ”
    You rallied everyone with your rallies. Maybe it's better to start working in production?
    1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 17 September 2013 08: 39 New
      +2
      Yes, everything is fine, we’ll swing ... capital accumulation in a predatory way has ended (I'm not talking about corruption), now capital is accumulating with its hump, and this is a much longer process! hi
      1. jasper
        jasper 17 September 2013 09: 17 New
        +6
        moreover, the loot in favor doesn’t go, how many “heroes” of the 90s stay afloat? units
        1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
          GELEZNII_KAPUT 17 September 2013 13: 24 New
          +3
          Quote: yasenpen
          moreover, the loot in favor doesn’t go, how many “heroes” of the 90s stay afloat? units

          I’m talking about this, do not steal money!
      2. True
        True 17 September 2013 10: 51 New
        +1
        Yes, everything is fine, we’ll swing ...
        I am impressed by your "strategy". Everything is thought out to the smallest detail, everything is provided! I didn’t understand about capital. Do you care about their capital?
        1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
          GELEZNII_KAPUT 17 September 2013 13: 23 New
          +3
          Quote: True
          I didn’t understand about capital. Do you care about their capital?

          The fact is that almost all of these capitals were blown away, as they say "how it came and went," but you don’t want to lose your casino with your own hump, is that more clear ?!
          1. True
            True 19 September 2013 21: 01 New
            +1
            Control: do you care about their capital?
  4. Vadim-Skeptic
    Vadim-Skeptic 17 September 2013 07: 01 New
    +9
    To find a national strategy and ideology, you need to change the constitution. To change the constitution, the political will of the leadership of the state is needed. To gain political will, military force and money are needed. To gain military power and money, a national strategy and ideology are needed. Here is such a yen, yin and yang.
    1. jasper
      jasper 17 September 2013 09: 15 New
      +3
      But didn’t you try to work? we’re all twisting, and who will screw the bulb in the bathroom? Putin? belay
      1. True
        True 17 September 2013 10: 16 New
        +5
        Do you seem unemployed? Everyone works, most of them on the resale of those bought for petrodollars.
        1. jasper
          jasper 17 September 2013 10: 54 New
          +4
          storyteller? most really work, but some work with languages
      2. Vadim-Skeptic
        Vadim-Skeptic 17 September 2013 16: 20 New
        +1
        Since 2006, he worked in the Federal State Unitary Enterprise for the defense industry, the office has now been privatized by the public company, but is executing the state defense order, and is still working in this office (who has a controlling stake without a clue). And someone works as a farmer, he is speculating in his homeland. Here is such a national strategy - to trade in the Homeland.
        PS: Unlike others, I have every right to act.
    2. washi
      washi 17 September 2013 13: 20 New
      +4
      Quote: Vadim the Skeptic
      To find a national strategy and ideology, you need to change the constitution. To change the constitution, the political will of the leadership of the state is needed. To gain political will, military force and money are needed. To gain military power and money, a national strategy and ideology are needed. Here is such a yen, yin and yang.

      Read the Constitution.
      It says that no ideology should be state-owned (Art. 13 p. 2) And without an idea, the state cannot exist.
      For the further existence of the state, a revision of the constitution of the Russian Federation is necessary, starting with Article 1, Clause 2. This item must be supplemented with the word Rus
      1. Yarosvet
        Yarosvet 17 September 2013 21: 27 New
        +2
        Quote: Vasya
        And without an idea, a state cannot exist.

        What is that?
  5. Anatole Klim
    Anatole Klim 17 September 2013 07: 07 New
    +1
    "... the highest political council of the party" National Course ""
    To my shame, I have not heard of such a party, this is that poorly-covered agitation and self-promotion.
  6. Shtv
    Shtv 17 September 2013 08: 20 New
    -3
    people call an ambulance to the author badly! (preferably psychiatric)
  7. vot-te-raz
    vot-te-raz 17 September 2013 08: 47 New
    0
    As we already got these theories that we are in an occupation, we pay tribute, we can’t do anything, Putin wants, but can’t, enemies around (Fedorov, Starikov) with a promise for 2 years now of some jerk (which is about to happen) .
    For some reason, in foreign policy, we can do everything, but there is no order at home, like the theory of occupation.
  8. baltika-18
    baltika-18 17 September 2013 08: 48 New
    +9
    Minus. In the style of Fedorov. Designers, brains, pancake ...
    Is it really incomprehensible that only by changing the economic system can something be done? Everyone has come up against a superstructure, everyone is not lazy to criticize her darling. Don’t you change it radically without changing the basis itself. Economics is primary, ideology and politics are secondary. Nationalization (just not according to Fedorov) and socialism in a new form, that is the key to Russia's success, everything else is from the evil one.
    1. jasper
      jasper 17 September 2013 09: 14 New
      -3
      there was little "change in the economic system" in 1917 ???? when the soviet regime robbed Russia did not go to good? and 6/7 industry was destroyed? like a few million peasants? so much so that later with the blood of the Russian People they restored what was lost? Or is it not enough for you to "change the economic system" of 1991? when the decline in production has become more than in the Second World War, but many times less than in the politics of war communism ??? want to rob again?
      1. jasper
        jasper 17 September 2013 10: 48 New
        -2
        judging by the minuses, you gentlemen, the good ones like the regular robbery of Russia, do you hope to participate in it yourself?
      2. washi
        washi 17 September 2013 13: 29 New
        +3
        Who was involved in the destruction of enterprises in 1917?
        Who did they belong to?
        Who restored them?
        Who owns enterprises (including those built during the Soviet era)?
        Who destroyed them?
        Who needs to be restored?
        I think the answers are the same?
    2. washi
      washi 17 September 2013 13: 25 New
      +3
      Quote: baltika-18
      Minus. In the style of Fedorov. Designers, brains, pancake ...
      Is it really incomprehensible that only by changing the economic system can something be done? Everyone has come up against a superstructure, everyone is not lazy to criticize her darling. Don’t you change it radically without changing the basis itself. Economics is primary, ideology and politics are secondary. Nationalization (just not according to Fedorov) and socialism in a new form, that is the key to Russia's success, everything else is from the evil one.

      Introduce the Stalin constitution with amendments and additions, remove the modern (based on Western constitutions). Revise laws based on the new constitution.
      Only who will do it?
    3. Yarosvet
      Yarosvet 17 September 2013 21: 30 New
      0
      Quote: vot-te-raz
      (Fedorov, Starikov)

      Quote: baltika-18
      In the style of Fedorov

      So this is Fedorov laughing
    4. fisherman
      fisherman 17 September 2013 22: 07 New
      0
      Is it really incomprehensible that only by changing the economic system can something be done? Everyone has rested on a superstructure, everyone is not lazy to criticize her darling. Yes, you will not change it radically without changing the basis itself.


      devastation in the minds - that’s where the basis is; what kind of economic system does South Korea have? and China? What is the difference between the economic system of Qatar and Iraq?

      You will wander for centuries in these pines.

      not there basis (the root of all problems) are looking for, and therefore the conclusions are demagogic :)
  9. jasper
    jasper 17 September 2013 09: 23 New
    +2
    "Free" media. Are under full control of the United States.

    huh? and I always thought that the United States was under the control of the owners of free media
  10. elmonje
    elmonje 17 September 2013 09: 24 New
    +3
    The specific minus. Too many far-fetched explanations of a particular situation ("... which means a guarantee of payment of tribute ...", "... means that the development cycle of the Russian state can last a maximum ...", "... that means we have a ban on national ideology ...", etc.), far-fetched facts and hyperbolization ("... Russia is generally forbidden to have a national business.", "... political parties need serious funding, which only big business can provide. And since it is all in foreign jurisdiction ...", "Trade unions ... By analogy with parties, they need financing and, through the mechanism of control over business, are controlled by the occupier and, therefore, do not have the right to be agents of a nationally oriented strategy ...").

    Well, and what is it? And this, as is usual for second-rate natsagitka, is an advertisement for a new party, which, obviously, consists of the most honest and correct “wrestlers”. From the very beginning, you @ go (and, specifically, in an amateurish way) to the brain of people, simplifying and filtering _factual_ information for your interests. What to expect from you in the future? On the forums for housewives, I still understand this, but here what are you hoping for?
  11. jasper
    jasper 17 September 2013 09: 35 New
    0
    Strategy goes hand in hand with ideology. However, no ideology can be established as a state

    the only sound grain, enough to build on the bones of the Russian People, then communism, then liberalism
    1. Bigriver
      Bigriver 17 September 2013 10: 21 New
      +4
      Quote: yasenpen
      Strategy goes hand in hand with ideology. However no ideology can be established as a state

      the only sound grain, enough to build on the bones of the Russian People, then communism, then liberalism

      The author said stupidity, but you support him.
      There are no states without ideologies. There are still not occupied by anyone territory.
      Even Switzerland and the Principality of Monaco have an ideology.
      1. jasper
        jasper 17 September 2013 10: 49 New
        -1
        they did without ideology and Russia grew lands, started an ideology, a third have already lost
        1. Bigriver
          Bigriver 17 September 2013 13: 46 New
          +2
          Quote: yasenpen
          they did without ideology and Russia grew lands, started an ideology, a third have already lost

          On the contrary.
          The crisis of the state ideology of the Republic of Ingushetia in the late XIX - early XX centuries led to a revolution and, at first, to the collapse of the country.
          The crisis of socialist ideology at the end of the XNUMXth century also brought collapse.
          In the 90s, we completely abandoned any ideology, saying that we did not need it and that we would follow some universal path, learning everything from the West.
          Well, that’s followed up.
          In the late 90s and early 2000s, rethinking and probing of their path began. Ma-a-a-scarlet sprouts of a new ideology based on Eurasianism appeared. Will anything grow out of it - winked
          1. fisherman
            fisherman 17 September 2013 22: 12 New
            +1
            there will be no new ideologies, then there will be no new crises. You yourself proved it perfectly, thanks for the logic :)

            and the idea in Russia has long existed, there’s only one problem, constantly new armored cars appear on which new clowns with their new ideas jump up :)
  12. v.lyamkin
    v.lyamkin 17 September 2013 12: 34 New
    -2
    Advice to the author of the article: it will turn out well to interpret the prophecies of Nostradamus.
  13. tarks
    tarks 17 September 2013 12: 38 New
    +1
    With ideology, everything is not so simple, in fact.
    In the USSR - there was a State ideology.
    But she did not save him. Perhaps, on the contrary, it contributed. More precisely, it is not ideology itself, but state institutions that provide it.
    Only one Leonid Makarovich Kravchuk what is it worth.
    In 1988-1990 - head of the ideological department, secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine. In the late 1980s, on the pages of the newspaper “Evening Kiev” Kravchuk began an open discussion with supporters of Ukrainian independence. Against the background of a very conservative leadership of the CPU his position looks more than moderate. And this is an ideologist of the Union level, for a minute.
    GDP offers as an ideology patriotism, or rather the cultivation of patriotism. And he doesn’t say anything and doesn’t just do so, impromptu.
  14. falcon
    falcon 17 September 2013 13: 19 New
    0
    If a member of the highest political council carries such nonsense, we can only guess that
    is going on in the minds of the remaining 499 members of this party. However, the author’s message is clear-rally,
    rally, and rally again! I would like to recommend to the author again carefully
    read the Constitution and engage in, instead of calls for rallies, socially useful work.
    Useful, you know.
  15. washi
    washi 17 September 2013 13: 33 New
    +2
    Quote: tarks
    With ideology, everything is not so simple, in fact.
    In the USSR - there was a State ideology.
    But she did not save him. Perhaps, on the contrary, it contributed. More precisely, it is not ideology itself, but state institutions that provide it.
    Only one Leonid Makarovich Kravchuk what is it worth.
    In 1988-1990 - head of the ideological department, secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine. In the late 1980s, on the pages of the newspaper “Evening Kiev” Kravchuk began an open discussion with supporters of Ukrainian independence. Against the background of a very conservative leadership of the CPU his position looks more than moderate. And this is an ideologist of the Union level, for a minute.
    GDP offers as an ideology patriotism, or rather the cultivation of patriotism. And he doesn’t say anything and doesn’t just do so, impromptu.

    The IVS also just did nothing. That is why, back in 38, he proposed alternative elections to councils with the broad participation of trade unions and other public organizations
  16. Sergeant
    Sergeant 17 September 2013 13: 54 New
    -1
    There are three troubles in Russia: fools, roads and ... loans. That's what you have to fight with, but not at rallies, but, for starters, in your head! fool

    All the time, some kind of "fight, fight, front" ... Ml .. be! Will we ever work?
  17. Bigriver
    Bigriver 17 September 2013 14: 00 New
    +5
    Here, by the way.
    It was exactly a year ago.

  18. slaventi
    slaventi 17 September 2013 14: 30 New
    0

    Who rules Russia
  19. GUSAR
    GUSAR 17 September 2013 19: 52 New
    0
    De facto Russia is the main anti-Russian country on the planet today, no Georgia, the Baltic states and other America-Europe can do as much harm to the Russians as the Russians themselves ...
  20. Grey68
    Grey68 17 September 2013 20: 34 New
    +1
    Quote: Skif-2
    AUTHOR OF RIGHTS IN THE MAIN THING - THE CONSTITUTION SHOULD BE CHANGED

    I agree the current constitution is high time to change, but not just. The next should be the constitution of the Union.