Moscow’s proposal to take under control chemical weapon Syria has dramatically changed the situation around the conflict in this country. More recently, a foreign invasion of Syria seemed inevitable, but now the military operation is at least postponed. Analysts say the success of Russian diplomacy, which in difficult conditions has found a delicate move, which deprives the United States of reason for attacking Syria. However, the danger of the war of the Western coalition with official Damascus has not been eliminated.
Andrey Parshev, the author of the book Why America Comes, commented on KM.RU for the geopolitical layout in this region.
Damascus receives only a postponement from the United States, but not “forgiveness”
The Russian proposal for chemical weapons and the immediate positive reaction to it by the Syrian government clearly confused the maps of the United States. The whole ideology of the invasion of the west side was based on the theme of chemical weapons, but the Americans themselves point out that the ban on such weapons exists in military international law and does not concern internal conflicts. Indeed, the situation in the West was not quite comfortable: after all, it was a war of the Libyan type, but it can be assumed that the cause of future aggression was not chemical weapons. This is just a reason!
Despite the delay and maneuvers, the Syrian government can still be accused of concealing stocks of these weapons, of insincerity, etc. They may well demand responsibility for “previously committed crimes”. Recall the case of Gaddafi, when he agreed to pay a ransom for Libyan prisoners accused of bombing a Lockerbie plane. In the West, they said then that Gaddafi’s consent is a recognition of his responsibility for this terrorist act. The same thing can now be said about official Damascus: the same proven technology.
There is a good expression - “by hook or by crook,” so I think that Damascus receives only a reprieve, but not “forgiveness”. At the same time, Russian diplomacy showed a good level. Obama was substituted, and we have opportunities for such moves.
Nobel Peace Prize man receives for the conduct of two wars and also begins the third
As for the Syrian operation, Obama’s support within the United States is by no means absolute. Oddly enough, but in this case, the opponents of the operation are the American right-wing conservatives, in particular, the Republicans. The governor of Alaska and in the last election, the Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin said that the situation looks idiotic and it turns out that the United States is going to bomb Syria because Syria is bombing Syria.
In order to try to give a forecast of the development of the situation, I use the adage “a jug has gotten into the water to walk, there he has to fold his head” It seems to me that the Americans will not stop, and they have a program to this effect. The situation was in the spirit of the dystopia of Orwell: the Nobel Peace Prize man receives for waging two wars and begins a third war. This phantasmagoria is worthy of Kafka’s pen, but we live in such a world ... Tragedy stories in that even the strangest, delusional events have a rationale, although not an excuse.