South Korea built the first landing ship

According to ARMS-TASS, in the Republic of Korea, in the region of the port of Busan, the first landing craft of domestic production with a displacement of 3,5 thousand tons, which will be part of fleet in 2014 year.

Starting from the 2015 year, it is planned to attract him to perform military transport and peacekeeping tasks. This was reported by official representatives of the headquarters of the South Korean Navy.

The ship, built at the shipyards of Hanjin Heavy Industries & Construction, was named Cheonwangbong after the highest peak in the Chirisan mountain range.

“This ship, which possesses high mobility and carrying capacity, will play an important role in enhancing our capabilities for conducting amphibious operations,” said Admiral Choi Yoon He, chief of staff of the Navy of Kazakhstan.

Chonwanbon is 126 meters long, 19 meters wide and is capable of a top speed of about 23 knots. He can take on board up to 300 fully equipped and armed soldiers, as well as several tanks- amphibians and two helicopters.

Comments

[il grand casino]

"Starting from 2015, it is planned to be involved in carrying out military transport and peacekeeping tasks." And what are their peacekeeping tasks? Bring democracy to North Korea? ..

[rugor]

Korean shipbuilding companies are among the strongest in the world. Samsung has made a tremendous leap in this direction over the past three decades. Modular construction is carried out with extraordinary speed. But they were mainly engaged in civil engineering. The landing ship is a natural step.

[Vadivak]

Unimportant photo but what it is.

[Apollo]

Quote: Vadivak

Unimportant photo but what it is.

There is a video, albeit a short one.
good afternoon Vadim.

[Vadivak]

Quote: Apollon

There is a video, albeit a short one.
good afternoon Vadim

Good afternoon. Thank you for the video.

[Simple]

Yeah. The information is somehow stingy:

[vladsolo56]

and all this splendor can be covered with a copper basin from one decent rocket, beauty

[clidon]

An alternative can only be the abandonment of the fleet as such. But few are willing.

[Kavtorang]

Wait a minute! Am I missing something in this world? Where is the Dokdo udk / light aircraft carrier built? Like in Busan. Two more will be built there (or have already begun).
And three amphibious divisions with heavy armored vehicles and a separate DR battalion of marine corps on type junks dissect.
According to the above characteristics and photos - this is a classic DVDKD. Experience in the construction of such a class of SK is not to occupy - the entire Indonesian series.

[Simple]

...............

[Kavtorang]

Quote: vladsolo56

and all this splendor can be covered with a copper basin from one decent rocket, beauty

But what do you write in a similar vein?
If not our tank / bmp / ​​btr / MRAP - be sure to weave RPG-7.
If the combat aircraft is not ours, be sure to perform the mantra about the Su-27/30 / PAK-FA / T-50.
If the combat helicopter is not ours - a flailing with a tambourine about Mi-28 or Ka-52.
If a battleship - then perform a match for "our unbreakable missiles" - yeah, right now!
And pictures, pictures more !!!
Themselves are not yet ... smiling?
Let calmly penetrate into the information.
And as practice shows, any ship from anti-ship missiles sinks without comment. What ours will fly to, what ours from that - the effect will be approximately the same. There is an exception - the "tanker war" in the Persian Gulf, when a supertanker received two "Exocets" on board and, having sworn at all the belligerents, pushed itself further.

[novobranets]

There is a rebuff to homegrown extremists.

[ka5280]

The modern tanker is the one more hippo =)

[Simple]

Ship Model LST II:


http://panzercho.egloos.com/10694164

[Alexey M]

Well done Koreans. They themselves invented ourselves. We are still far from them.

[Vadivak]

Quote: Alexey M

Well done Koreans. They themselves invented ourselves. We are still far from them.

You probably didn't live in the USSR, you wouldn't write that. If we were developing technically now as in "stagnation", they would have been before us as before the moon

[alone]

when we built ships during the Soviet Union, the Koreans made pleasure boats. the collapse of the union and the antics of the liberals brought it all into decline. but I still think that Russia is capable of making ships for the fleet on its own. It only interferes with the cuts of funds and big kickbacks

[Kavtorang]

Quote: Simple

Ship Model LST II:

Interesting. And our sold pr.12061 where will they be? I'm not a marine, but IMHO in the dock-cameras they have the place (like LCAC).

[Simple]

Just arrived recently.

For what reasons did you agree on such a concept? (They gathered to do a whole series)
Maybe someone else for sale?

The first option is for the sake of economy in the construction process ("Dokdo") and operation (compact).
On this, all the advantages end (IMHO):
the deck is cluttered (instead of them, it would be better if behind the superstructures a couple of hangars for another pair of helicopters were placed or some additional weapons.)
On the go and with the excitement of the boat you will not let go.
Boats can be lowered by crane only to the port side.
What if the tap sticks?
The problem with loading on boats: completely dependent on the weather.
My purely amateurish IMHO.
Look at this site:
http://panzercho.egloos.com/10694164
- I'm not strong in Korean.

Long --126m
Width -19m
max. -23 node speed
economical move -19 node
Landing - about 300 people
tonnage -4.950 tons
max tonnage - 7140 tons
The loading and unloading crane can work with 65 tons.

[Ragnarek]

did and did what news then? before that, did the barges not do something?

[Kavtorang]

Quote: Ragnarek

did and did what news then? before that, did the barges not do something?

Well, you may not be news and don't care when Honduras is on fire.
The transport "shoulder" of the civil merchant fleet from the port of loading Busan to the port of unloading Vladivostok is just over 1,5 days. "Container carriers" go faster - a day.
Your opinion - what is the "shoulder" of the ships of the Navy of one very difficult state? Do I need to know this or is it in fig? If anything, I live on the very edge of Russia and this is much more interesting to me than MAKS.

[Alexkorzun]

well done, cho. keep it up, chop carrots there, kimchi and all that

[Kavtorang]

Quote: Alexkorzun

shred carrots there, kimchi and all that

LG, SAMSUNG, DAEWOO, KIA - walk through household and computer equipment in your apartment - you will be pleasantly surprised.

[starhina01]

Well done. And here's why

[novobranets]

Quote: starhina01

but why

You will need to drive on a fishing trip, they will find, "somewhere we had such garbage," the dust will be blown away and flooded.

[Kavtorang]

Quote: starhina01

Well done. And here's why

And to be. In order not to make shame in the whole world, the second month trying to form a more or less sane local grouping of the Navy. And one hell - a complete imbalance of ship structure.

[Siberian]

“This ship with high mobility and carrying capacity will play an important role in enhancing our capabilities for landing operations”

Are they already going somewhere to parachute ?? Everyone understands the very name "AMBANDING".

[Kavtorang]

Quote: Simple

For what reasons did you agree on such a concept? (

Well, three Marine divisions, with heavy weapons, up to MBT. They must somehow be delivered to the drop point. We decided that the concept of UDC is suitable and amphibious ships are being built, forming a de facto standard with their world's best shipbuilding industry - how to build ships, for a specific task.