Military Review

In Syria, there is a C-300

139
Syrian government forces have several C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems (ZRS), while Iskander’s supplies of tactical missiles (OTR) have been detained by Russia. This was stated by sources in the Hezbollah leadership to a correspondent of the Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Rai, reports PostSkriptum. The Lebanese Hezbollah movement supports the efforts of Bashar Assad in the fight against militants seeking to overthrow his government by armed means.


The reason for the absence in Syria of the OTR "Iskander" is considered by President Putin to underestimate the speed with which the United States began preparing for the solution of the Syrian issue by force.

According to Hezbollah, a well thought-out American-Israeli plan is being carried out around Syria. Proof of this is Netanyahu’s last visit to Moscow and his request not to supply Syria with C-300. Israeli Prime Minister assured Putin of Israel’s desire not to change the military-political balance in the Middle East. In addition, he expressed concern that advanced weapons systems could fall into the hands of extremist groups in Syria.

According to the Hezbollah leadership, President Putin did not believe Netanyahu’s assertions. However, the execution of contracts for the supply of Syria weapons slowed down so as not to provoke the West. But despite this, a certain amount of C-300 SAMs are on the way.

REFERENCE

In Syria, there is a C-300The S-300 (SA-10, Grumble) ZRS has several modifications. All-weather C-300PMU2 “Favorite” long-range (export version) is intended for the zone defense of important military-state objects and groups of troops from strikes of all types of modern EAS with intensive enemy electronic countermeasures. The Favorit missile defense system is capable of hitting airplanes, helicopters and cruise missiles at 3-200 km ranges in the altitude range from 10 m to 27 km, operating at speeds over 10000 km / h with a probability 0,8-0,97.

The Iskander-E mobile high-precision operational-tactical missile system (OTRK) (SS-26) is designed to defeat small-sized and area targets in the depth of the operational deployment of enemy troops at a distance from 50 to 280 km. These can be weapons of fire, missile defense and air defense, airfields, command posts and communications centers, infrastructure facilities and other important small-sized and area targets. The missile can be equipped with cassette, high-explosive fragmentation and penetrating warhead in the usual equipment. Missile mass - 3800 kg, weight of the warhead - 480 kg.
Originator:
http://rosinform.ru/
139 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. klimpopov
    klimpopov 11 September 2013 11: 41 New
    44
    But, despite this, a certain number of S-300 air defense systems are on the way.

    Is it on the way or is it in place? We lured speculation on the topic. Why publish arguments. There is C- 300 excellent! no - it is necessary to deliver. And grind the ground ...

    Syrian government forces have several S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems

    blurry again. Surely there is. The question is whether they know how to work for them and how many there are and whether there is a BC to them and so on ...
    1. Guun
      Guun 11 September 2013 11: 45 New
      25
      The Iskanders will not deliver - there is a big risk of losing, and even worse they can get their Western partners.
      1. klimpopov
        klimpopov 11 September 2013 11: 46 New
        21
        And not only that. Can you imagine how in one place the hair of the same Nitanyahu stir?
        1. tilovaykrisa
          tilovaykrisa 11 September 2013 11: 56 New
          26
          His hair will move when he sees a nuclear mushroom above Nahal Sorek wassat
          1. Vovka levka
            Vovka levka 11 September 2013 14: 12 New
            +1
            Quote: tilovaykrisa
            His hair will move when he sees a nuclear mushroom above Nahal Sorek wassat

            I have no words.
            1. Hariva
              Hariva 11 September 2013 18: 25 New
              +4
              Even a resident of the sovereign moon will move his hair when he sees a “mushroom” within the solar system.
          2. Geisenberg
            Geisenberg 12 September 2013 00: 36 New
            +2
            Quote: tilovaykrisa
            His hair will move when he sees a nuclear mushroom above Nahal Sorek wassat


            Maybe they will see, but only they will not be able to tell what they saw laughing
        2. King
          King 11 September 2013 12: 01 New
          21
          I am current for the hair of the Jews climbed from all places. a lot of water has poured time to do something about it. and about the Iskanders, then you don’t have to worry, I think that you can install a self-destruction program in them just in case. after all, a modern weapon and not a catapult with axes.
          1. Patriot.ru.
            Patriot.ru. 11 September 2013 23: 03 New
            +1
            Self-liquidation should be. But only when our weapons are used against us.
            1. Geisenberg
              Geisenberg 12 September 2013 00: 37 New
              +1
              Quote: Patriot.ru.
              Self-liquidation should be. But only when our weapons are used against us.


              She is. Even more globally. Satellite signal and weapons deactivated, forever laughing
      2. tilovaykrisa
        tilovaykrisa 11 September 2013 11: 54 New
        +7
        Yes, they have already been delivered; why did you think the BDK was sent there? In addition, they do not know what a secret for a long time and at the moment they are being upgraded to increase the range. Yes, and in fact, it would not hurt to check.
        1. Geisenberg
          Geisenberg 12 September 2013 00: 48 New
          +1
          Quote: tilovaykrisa
          Yes, they have already been delivered; why did you think the BDK was sent there? In addition, they do not know what a secret for a long time and at the moment they are being upgraded to increase the range. Yes, and in fact, it would not hurt to check.


          As I understand it, six months ago, ours were going to help Assad get rid of XO. The move was clearly calculated and Assad quickly agreed to it, apparently everything had been agreed for a long time. Now 5 BDKs will simply take on board all the ammunition equipped with chemistry and take it for disposal, most likely to us, along the Volga in Saratov, and there they will dispose of it as it should. And let the western components take the binary components laughing ... it was about a few thousand tons, so let them choke laughing
          1. Andrei shit
            Andrei shit 12 September 2013 01: 20 New
            +1
            better let them get some
      3. zanoza
        zanoza 11 September 2013 12: 03 New
        24
        Quote: Guun
        Iskanders will not deliver -


        It is not clear where the topic of the supply of Iskander OTR to Syria came from. Here in the Russian Armed Forces, they can be counted on the fingers, and then there’s a "conversation" about the delivery "over the hill", and to this troubled and unstable region.
        If the conversation was about the supply of TP "Point" or "Point-U" complexes, then this can still be taken for granted, but "Iskander" ....
        1. klimpopov
          klimpopov 11 September 2013 12: 12 New
          +8
          By the way, about the Iskander or the news or the duck was not so long ago, in general, we wanted to put the Iskander (in the future) in Kaliningrad - that’s how the Pshek raised such a howl, but notice the Kaliningrad region is the territory of Russia. They wanted to deliver to Belarus (either a duck or news). In general, continuous rumors and no more on this about Syria can not be said.
          1. smile
            smile 11 September 2013 16: 17 New
            +8
            klimpopov
            That's right. When the Poles intended to host an American missile defense system, in our Kaliningrad Region a decision was made to deploy the Iskanders, whose radius of action blocked the starting positions of the missile defense system ... the Poles shouted, of course ... but a lot of Poles shouted it’s such a fortune to constantly be under the gun of missiles with which warheads are still .... they had quite serious fights there, the majority of the population was against missile defense (oh, pun):))) not deployed, Iskanders, it seems, did not set, so that perhaps Well, there’s nothing more serious than the Point-We have here ... but the indignation, yes, there were no borders ... :)))
            1. klimpopov
              klimpopov 11 September 2013 16: 54 New
              +4
              It’s good when there is something to bargain ... This is the power of powerful and modern weapons ...
        2. baltika-18
          baltika-18 11 September 2013 13: 40 New
          +2
          Quote: zanoza
          It is not clear where the topic of the supply of Iskander OTR to Syria came from.

          Probably in the dreams of Hezbollah.
          "Source in Hezbollah leadership of Kuwaiti newspaper ...."
          Such news does not respect yourself to comment.
          1. alone
            alone 11 September 2013 17: 53 New
            0
            laughing Well, hezbollah can say anything, but really, all this can be found out only when it is activated with the S-300. I hope at least it hasn’t come to that
        3. don.kryyuger
          don.kryyuger 11 September 2013 14: 23 New
          +3
          There is “Tochka-U”, for a long time, the army uses them, but since it’s expensive, they’ll only beat at “partisan” clusters.
          1. alone
            alone 11 September 2013 17: 56 New
            +1
            there is a point, not a point-y.
        4. Geisenberg
          Geisenberg 12 September 2013 00: 42 New
          +1
          Quote: zanoza
          Quote: Guun
          Iskanders will not deliver -


          It is not clear where the topic of the supply of Iskander OTR to Syria came from. Here in the Russian Armed Forces, they can be counted on the fingers, and then there’s a "conversation" about the delivery "over the hill", and to this troubled and unstable region.
          If the conversation was about the supply of TP "Point" or "Point-U" complexes, then this can still be taken for granted, but "Iskander" ....


          There is a point in Syria, still Soviet. As I understand it, they have weapons for the last word. Is Iskander or not - no one will report to us, they did not come out with a rank. But they can deliver it - pay the money, get the option with the letter "E" and lehaym. If Syria paid for it, they would. That's about the point - in the case of Syria, this will be just strategic offensive weapons. Before delivering this, one must take the consequences for a long time. Even the most balanced leader sometimes scratches his hands like "fucking together in Tbilisi" ...
      4. Vadivak
        Vadivak 11 September 2013 12: 13 New
        11
        Quote: ..
        There are S-300s in Syria, sources in Hezbollah’s leadership told a Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Rai.


        Hezbollah again. What other sources do not have?

        There are normal agencies,

        Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, on the eve of the G20 summit, announced that certain components of the S-300 air defense systems had been delivered to Syria. Reports about it RIA News.At the same time, he noted that deliveries are still underway.

        Hedgehog it is clear that the components are assembled into the product on site.
        1. klimpopov
          klimpopov 11 September 2013 12: 27 New
          +2
          Here I am talking about too. Is it really impossible to quote the president?
        2. Azaat
          Azaat 11 September 2013 12: 53 New
          0
          That's right !!! And how to collect will be fast or slow, good or bad, it's the Syrians. Like the fact that fighting at these complexes, well or poorly trained, will also be Syrians. Our guys wouldn’t be needed there.
      5. 31231
        31231 11 September 2013 12: 52 New
        +3
        That's right, the latest Iskanders cannot be delivered to an unstable country. Will fall into the hands of enemies and the entire short-lived. There are enough Points.
      6. Russ69
        Russ69 11 September 2013 13: 30 New
        +2
        Quote: Guun
        The Iskanders will not deliver - there is a big risk of losing, and even worse they can get their Western partners.

        “Iskanders,” of course, too. Enough "Tochka-U" for now. Moreover, there are Iranian launchers, somewhere there were photos of launches from them in Syria.
      7. Good Ukraine
        Good Ukraine 11 September 2013 14: 30 New
        +4
        hi
        Quote: Guun
        The Iskanders will not deliver - there is a big risk of losing, and even worse they can get their Western partners.


        Well, why immediately Iskander? - There is a "Point" in the end, also not bad. I think these complexes are in Syria.
        And the presence in any country of good air defense (C 300) turns this country into a country without problems with democracy. good
        And in order not to scare Tamahawks from the sea, you need to put a couple of CLUBs.
        And all the "democratizers" will forget about Syria.
      8. ziqzaq
        ziqzaq 11 September 2013 17: 55 New
        0
        Quote: Guun
        The Iskanders will not deliver - there is a big risk of losing, and even worse they can get their Western partners.

        If they will deliver, then the export option ... In my opinion - it is necessary to deliver .....
      9. S-200
        S-200 11 September 2013 20: 52 New
        +8
        I read the whole branch and was upset ... crying
        at least they would be interested, colleagues ... Iskander-E Syria has long been delivered!
        as "Point-U", coastal mine - "Bastion-S"(Putin's knight's move) wink
        Shalom, Iron Cumpole!
        This is us - missiles from Syria, with love!
        hi
      10. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg 12 September 2013 00: 34 New
        +1
        Quote: Guun
        The Iskanders will not deliver - there is a big risk of losing, and even worse they can get their Western partners.


        Western partners can simply buy them, like sausage in a store. Someone like Jordan will start negotiations and buy a division for trial, and the division will simply leave for America. So this is not an argument. Well there will be an export option. In it, the identification system is different and one missile on the PU. The software of combat algorithms is encrypted so that it is enticed to decrypt, all around protection against unauthorized access. The partners will shoot the ammunition for export missiles, smack their lips and go to invent new intrigues against Syria. It’s another matter that Iskander will keep the calf at gunpoint and the iron dome is not a hindrance to him, this is an argument. Benny could have bent over with his pants off.
    2. arutun
      arutun 11 September 2013 11: 45 New
      +9
      I agree, there is already so much desa on these three hundred that I no longer want to read such materials.
      Even if they are there, they will not play a significant role.
      You need layered defense, and it is very difficult to build it when not the whole country is under control, especially since you have been waging a difficult war for more than two years, and the most armed army at the moment will attack you. Moreover, you do not have a space grouping and early warning stations, Russia will certainly help, but still this is not the case.
      1. Natalia
        Natalia 11 September 2013 11: 57 New
        +7
        Syrian government forces have several S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems

        If this is not some kind of information duck, well then.
        Of course, if they want it, tens of thousands of tons of madness in the form of “Nimitz” and “Harry Truman” will be swept away anyway, but the S-300 is the S-300, it won’t work out in the dry ....
    3. eplewke
      eplewke 11 September 2013 11: 51 New
      15
      S-300, in any case, if they exist, then they are with our specialists ... Because the Arabs definitely do not trust such equipment ... But our specialists are there, it is a fact. And about the news speculation, I agree with you, some rumors and arguments, no facts! And the article is another rumor.
    4. Tersky
      Tersky 11 September 2013 11: 54 New
      +5
      Quote: klimpopov
      Is it on the way or is it in place?

      Klim, hi! So the source is what -This was stated by sources in the leadership of Hezbollah, Namyto is still a soft comparison. God grant that all this would be in Syria. Assad is far from a sucker who would share such info with Hezbollah’s ally
      1. klimpopov
        klimpopov 11 September 2013 11: 56 New
        +1
        Hello! yes, the source also pleased wassat
        1. Ruslan_F38
          Ruslan_F38 11 September 2013 12: 01 New
          +1
          If the S-300 is good. And if you put the Iskander - Israel will be in a chicken faint.
    5. aviator_IAS
      aviator_IAS 11 September 2013 13: 10 New
      +9
      Hezbollah nightmares shit democrats wassat Probably the next news will be "Russia delivered Assad Topol-M." Then insolent peacekeepers will piss at night. smile
      1. drewlanin
        drewlanin 11 September 2013 21: 14 New
        +2
        and then it will be like in the movie, well, the fighter pisses so exactly, comrade military piss, well, Nitsche fighter you will not only piss, but I’ll fight it, I think the shit is the best option !!!
      2. eplewke
        eplewke 12 September 2013 11: 59 New
        0
        Well poplar you certainly went too far. I think for nervous tics and sleepless nights they have enough Tornadoes, Pinocchio for complete epilepsy ... laughing
    6. waisson
      waisson 11 September 2013 14: 09 New
      +1
      according to the information, unfortunately, there is supposedly no completely Syrian specialist who should have mastered the complex in 2014 but I hope that our instructors will help myself to finish the training with which the instructors left for Syria-Libya-Egypt-Vietnam and so on in 80.
    7. Skiff
      Skiff 11 September 2013 14: 18 New
      +1
      Strange you, who will tell you where and how many and when there will be missiles, this is Santa Barbara, and military secret.
      1. klimpopov
        klimpopov 11 September 2013 14: 42 New
        0
        And I asked about where, when and how much? The question is something else ...
    8. faraon
      faraon 11 September 2013 15: 36 New
      +1
      That's exactly what is blurry about it being reported. Yes and there will still be S-300s or not in Syria so far no one can say anything else, but can these systems, while in the presence of the Syrian army, work effectively, After all, the Syrian officer is very different from Russian with his education, mentality, responsibility to fulfill the task.
      And the second 300 complex, after all, is a deeply echeloned air defense system that will be effective in conjunction with the entire air defense ring. And is there such a connection, there is a civil war in the country and sometimes the reports do not accurately reflect the real facts
      1. j iz sibiri
        j iz sibiri 11 September 2013 21: 36 New
        +1
        That's exactly what is blurry about it being reported. Yes and there will still be S-300s or not in Syria so far no one can say anything else, but can these systems, while in the presence of the Syrian army, work effectively, After all, the Syrian officer is very different from Russian one with his education, mentality, responsibility to accomplish the task. That's exactly what is vague about this. Yes and there will still be S-300 in Syria, no one can say anything else, but can these systems be in the presence of the Syrian army work effectively, a Syrian officer fact very different from the Russia of his education, mentality, the responsibility to carry out the task.
        And the second 300 complex, after all, is a deeply echeloned air defense system that will be effective in conjunction with the entire air defense ring. And is there such a connection, there is a civil war in the country and sometimes the reports do not accurately reflect the real facts
        And the second 300 complex, after all, is a deeply echeloned air defense system that will be effective in conjunction with the entire air defense ring. And is there such a connection, there is a civil war in the country and sometimes the reports do not accurately reflect the real facts




        but you compare how the Assad army fought at the beginning of the war and how it is fighting now

        and guess who would teach them to fight

        Well, if our taught them how to fight, and with 300 to apply, they will also teach them

        (it will be hard for you to fly)
        1. faraon
          faraon 12 September 2013 11: 35 New
          0
          Yes, it’s not a matter of flights and airplanes, explain to me the dark what Assad has been fighting for two and a half years — if he has such an army, trained and trained, why he allowed the armament of the opposition from his depots, why his officers and generals flee to the side of the opposition. And many more why.
          And now, with regard to training. Not their motivation and mentality, it’s like those Afghans who received higher military education in the USSR. And after the USSR left Afghanistan, they pushed their revolution
          1. Ezhaak
            Ezhaak 12 September 2013 12: 04 New
            0
            Quote: faraon
            Not that they have motivation and mentality

            Michael, help me, the dark deal with the pictures. What are the inscriptions in them and in what language?
          2. Ezhaak
            Ezhaak 12 September 2013 12: 06 New
            0
            and here is the second with the same question
      2. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg 12 September 2013 02: 12 New
        0
        Quote: faraon
        That's exactly what is blurry about it being reported. Yes and there will still be S-300 or not in Syria


        I will not quote everything.

        1. And what is actually a Syrian officer worse than an Israeli ???

        2. S-300 can work on its own - TsU, PU, ​​radar and all. They will fire at their zone and leheim.
      3. Cynic
        Cynic 12 September 2013 07: 49 New
        0
        Quote: faraon
        But can these complexes, while in the presence of the Syrian army, work efficiently? After all, the Syrian officer is very different from the Russian in his education, mentality, and responsibility to carry out the task.

        The hopes of young men feed
        Joy is served to the elders

        laughing
      4. flint1309
        flint1309 12 September 2013 10: 03 New
        0
        see my post ...
    9. Cynic
      Cynic 11 September 2013 18: 47 New
      0
      Quote: klimpopov
      Is it on the way or is it in place? We lured speculation on the topic.

      Nothing scares like the unknown!
      The game has entered the next phase, phase _ Iskander, whether it is, or not!
      Life is bad without sucker


      In the subject
      Missile cruiser "Moscow" entered the Mediterranean Sea
      http://www.itar-tass.com/c1/873103.html
    10. Modus
      Modus 17 September 2013 20: 17 New
      +1
      As a former air defense worker, I’m risking writing a few words on this topic.
      S-300 air defense system being a very good air defense system, is not any "miracle weapon", as many people think.
      To assume that the mere appearance of 4 such air defense systems will dramatically change the strategic situation in Syria is somewhat naive.
      As correctly written in one of the comments, this requires a layered air defense system. It should be added that powerful and modern EW stations are still required, as well as jamming radars and other means of target detection at small and extremely low altitudes, ACS, trained calculations, of course, modern air forces and IA are needed. And much more is needed.
      And even all this, together, DOES NOT GUARANTEE a reliable reflection of the massive impact of TFRs flying on the PMW, under the cover of powerful active noise interference along the line of sight of the target and missile.
      It should be borne in mind that along with its strengths, the SRC has many weaknesses, which our "partners" are well aware of.
      You can recall, at least, that this complex is quite "bulky" and not armored. Consequently, it is extremely vulnerable to attacks from the ground. Even a small mortar attack on the position of the air defense system will almost certainly lead to its failure. And shelling from small arms - too. But in Syria - a civil war and fights are even in Damascus ...
      It should be understood that the declared performance characteristics do not mean their indispensable implementation in all conditions. Depending on the combat position, TTD goals, their altitude, electronic countermeasures, etc. they are VERY different.
      For example, the detection range of targets at extremely low altitudes (where TFR usually fly) is determined by the curvature of the earth. For SKR it will be 30-40 km maximum. So the time for their capture and shelling will be VERY short.
      1. Cynic
        Cynic 18 September 2013 17: 20 New
        0
        Quote: Modus
        It should be added that powerful and modern electronic warfare stations are still required, anti-jamming radars and other means of target detection at low and extremely low altitudes,

        Well, I think somehow, this question is resolved _ at the expense of our ships naturally.
        Quote: Modus
        DOES NOT GUARANTEE reliable reflection of a massive impact of TFR

        In general, it’s humorous for me to read the comments of our URY-patriots (yes, yes, URA, not URA, these are two completely different categories, in my opinion of course)!
        We are talking only about inflicting unacceptable losses on the attackers.
        This task of the S-300 is quite capable.
        1. Modus
          Modus 18 September 2013 20: 42 New
          0
          As for the "urya" of partiotism, I completely agree with you.
          There is nothing worse than capricious moods.
          Essentially your comment:
          I am not very familiar with the noise immunity of naval radars. But even if you imagine that it is a cut above that of the country's air defense equipment (which is unlikely), it is necessary that information from these naval radars be transmitted in real time to the firing positions of the Syrian air defense systems. It is simply impossible to do.
          The real combat capabilities of the S-300 can only be shown by the experience of its use in the course of a real war. This experience has not yet been. So time will tell.
          Yours faithfully,
          1. Cynic
            Cynic 18 September 2013 21: 00 New
            0
            Quote: Modus
            It is simply impossible to do.
            The real combat capabilities of the S-300 can only be shown by the experience of its use in the course of a real war. This experience has not yet been.

            I think Hussein Obama would not want the USAF to act as a guinea pig.
            You look at how the C 300 chain lined up
            The supply contract was either there or not
            There is a contract
            Either made or not.
            Made
            Either shipped, or not.
            Shipped
            Either received, or not.
            Received, but not in full !!!
            Constantly on S-300 Yusovtsy keep on treason .
            Type want to know for sure _ Ahead, for the consequences are not responsible!
            By the way, the question arose _ Who is next. Type _ Algeria. So he got his first S-300 for a long time! It seems back in 10 years.
            bully
            1. Modus
              Modus 18 September 2013 21: 10 New
              0
              Wait and see.
              Once again I will say: “prodigy” from “XNUMX” is too early to do.
              1. Cynic
                Cynic 19 September 2013 17: 40 New
                0
                Quote: Modus
                "Wunderwaffe" of the "three hundred" early to do.

                Yes, and it won’t work out.
                It was said
                Quote: Cynic
                We are talking only about inflicting unacceptable losses on the attackers.
                1. Modus
                  Modus 19 September 2013 19: 57 New
                  0
                  I agree.
                  It remains to understand what percentage will be considered "unacceptable"?
                  During WWII, for strategic US aviation, it was considered above 5% of the raid.
                  O for a raid of 300 TFR, what% would be unacceptable ?!
                  1. Cynic
                    Cynic 20 September 2013 10: 25 New
                    0
                    Quote: Modus
                    During WWII, for strategic US aviation, it was considered above 5% of the raid.

                    I will ask to notice during the war , i.e. in the conduct of hostilities, and not in the first strike, and the Congress with the Senate did not threaten impeachment with the sword of Damocles.
                    So, it is quite possible that the percentage can be much larger.
                    But why exactly TFR then? And if, roughly speaking, EVERYTHING is in the air in the area of ​​the Yusovskiy Navy grouping?
                    Yes, still _ we will not forget about the Bastions.
                    hi
  2. Predator-74
    Predator-74 11 September 2013 11: 41 New
    +5
    Well, here’s the "big hello" to NATO aviation!
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 11 September 2013 12: 14 New
      +7
      Quote: Predator-74
      Well, here’s the "big hello" to NATO aviation!

      There will be no aviation until the amers understand how Syrian air defense opposes cruise missiles. If it works out efficiently, it won’t be at all. If there is no sense in rebuff, they can also connect aviation.
  3. Bae likhte
    Bae likhte 11 September 2013 11: 42 New
    +1
    It was generally fun from the Iskander! the ardor was many times less, it’s a pity ...
    1. klimpopov
      klimpopov 11 September 2013 11: 44 New
      13
      If you put Iskander-Israel will howl howl not yet when. In general, the existence of such a state as Israel, in the presence of such complexes, is being called into question.
      1. eplewke
        eplewke 11 September 2013 11: 54 New
        12
        Not only Israel will howl, Erdogan will be cast off. Iskander can still carry a tactical nuclear warhead. It certainly puts the aggressors in their place, but I really don't want to give such weapons to the wrong hands ...
      2. Samminosh
        Samminosh 11 September 2013 12: 04 New
        0
        Israel's military strength and technological advantage is head and shoulders above all neighbors; do not drive the blizzard. The IDF is one of the most efficient and most experienced armies in the world, which, incidentally, would not hurt us to learn from, and a dozen export weather iskandera will not do.
        Yes, they will make you nervous, but there will be no fundamental change in the balance of power.
        But we can get a lot of trouble from the refusal to supply unmanned technologies to new equipment of all kinds of Georgia.
        And in lobbying world affairs, Jews have no equal. They can click in other directions.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 11 September 2013 12: 15 New
          12
          Quote: Samminosh
          But we can get a lot of trouble from the refusal to supply unmanned technologies to new equipment of all kinds of Georgia.

          Well, yes, otherwise they will not arm Georgia to please us.
        2. klimpopov
          klimpopov 11 September 2013 12: 37 New
          +4
          About the blizzard, what are you talking about?
          I wrote in my post only about perspective and alternative reality. And for some reason you perceive it at your own expense.
          Will Israel make the deep defense in depth and the nth number of Iskanders nervous? And at its borders? The rhetorical question. And the fact that Tsakhal is the best army in the world is what we constantly hear.
          1. 31231
            31231 11 September 2013 13: 00 New
            +8
            Now their cavalry will jump into the chat and will tell the whole "truth" about the "life-being" of the Middle East.
          2. faraon
            faraon 11 September 2013 15: 48 New
            0
            I wrote to you above, but I repeat. In Syria there is no deeply layered air defense system, there is a lack of personnel for these systems, It’s a weapon Like Iskander, the S-300 is in the hands of a savage, so is it worth transferring this weapon to anyone as a trophy.
            1. klimpopov
              klimpopov 11 September 2013 15: 55 New
              +4
              In general, I agree, without trained personnel, a pile of scrap metal. But personnel are a matter of time.
              1. faraon
                faraon 11 September 2013 16: 28 New
                -2
                Yes, the time has already been lost, but where is the guarantee that tomorrow these complexes will not be in the hands of the opposition (I admit that with the Russian specialists)
                1. klimpopov
                  klimpopov 11 September 2013 17: 00 New
                  +3
                  Oh yeah, what’s there, in Kaliningrad they tried to place it, the pshek went under themselves twice and then Syria. But from time to time it’s worth to wave your fist, it cools the riotous heads.
                  About what they get. The way out is to train mother Syrians in Russia. Well, even if iron gets there, Israel will not see anything new there because it is not C-400 ... But to send specialists there only on voluntary terms and for big money, a man went as a military specialist and secured his life, but it is better with us.
                2. Geisenberg
                  Geisenberg 12 September 2013 02: 16 New
                  0
                  Quote: faraon
                  Yes, the time has already been lost, but where is the guarantee that tomorrow these complexes will not be in the hands of the opposition (I admit that with the Russian specialists)


                  And where is the guarantee that Israel will not start a nuclear war tomorrow?
            2. Geisenberg
              Geisenberg 12 September 2013 02: 15 New
              0
              Quote: faraon
              This is a weapon. Something like Iskander, the S-300 is a stick in the hands of a savage, so whether it is worth handing over this weapon to anyone as a trophy.


              In the same place above they answered already to you - to show off inappropriately. In my opinion, savages with a stick are those who supply weapons to bandits from the budget of their state.
  4. a52333
    a52333 11 September 2013 11: 48 New
    0
    If only they were not demolished, the recharge from the C-300 is not fast.
  5. Dazdranagon
    Dazdranagon 11 September 2013 11: 51 New
    0
    This was stated by sources in the leadership of Hezbollah to the correspondent of the Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Rai, reports PostSkriptum. - The source is a bit confusing. I would like to believe that this is not another duck ...
  6. erased
    erased 11 September 2013 11: 51 New
    +3
    Chi e, Chi no - States will not abandon plans. Even if all experts prove that the "opposition" used chemical weapons, that is, bandits supplied and fed by the States. And even if Syria surrenders its chemical weapons to UN control. It is necessary to bang Assad - znazy will bang. All according to the concepts of the States and their owners.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. Alikovo
    Alikovo 11 September 2013 11: 53 New
    +6
    there’s still some kind of anxiety for Syria. Anglo-Saxons just do not lag behind her.
  9. Volkhov
    Volkhov 11 September 2013 11: 53 New
    +2
    If there is a S-300 then the Venezuelan ones - they did bring Pechora to Tartus, maybe the S-300, they have 2 BM divisions. Only the Russian Federation is not in the business. Fight systems.
  10. amp
    amp 11 September 2013 11: 59 New
    +1
    Without the aviation component of Syria’s air defense it will still be incomplete. You need at least two hundred flashes 29 or su 27, then the Americans would have been given the heat .... The problem is that then we would have to deliver the aircraft together with the pilots.
    1. Anatoli_kz
      Anatoli_kz 11 September 2013 13: 39 New
      +2
      Two hundred Mig 29 or Su27 will solve the problem without C300
      But where to get them with the pilots?
      In Russia itself, it is interesting to have so much in service?
  11. GRDS
    GRDS 11 September 2013 11: 59 New
    11
    Rumors and disinformation with a picture that the Serbs have a S-300 have postponed a blow to Yugoslavia. So here - maybe, or maybe not - daisy and only ... let the monsters guess. And the uncertainty in some issues, oh, how to sleep, some people get in the way. From lack of sleep, the probability of making wrong decisions increases))
    Putin said they are there, but they were not delivered in full ... silence is true that they did not deliver only 1 charging machine) The contract was not fulfilled ... and was delayed))
  12. Ivan79
    Ivan79 11 September 2013 12: 11 New
    +3
    Anyway, the Americans slowly began to deflate. You look at the information about the presence of S-300 in Syria will generally cool their hot heads. What can not but rejoice!
  13. mogus
    mogus 11 September 2013 12: 16 New
    +2
    Postscript with reference to Hezbollah - iron arguments! : D
  14. poccinin
    poccinin 11 September 2013 12: 16 New
    12
    you can’t believe the West and ISRAEL. always cheated. cheat and will cheat. why no one makes noise about it. that Israel has nuclear weapons. and he did not sign any treaties.
    1. faraon
      faraon 11 September 2013 15: 53 New
      0
      So Israel does not shout about it on every corner, And at the same time it does not threaten anyone.
      Israel’s nuclear potential is not a weapon of attack, but only a deterrent to ardent Middle Eastern goals.
      Israel has nothing to lose if it has no choice, and this must also be taken into account
      1. ruslan207
        ruslan207 11 September 2013 19: 13 New
        +2
        Oh well, they only say on the wreck that you need to bomb Syria like Assad used the ump
  15. Druid
    Druid 11 September 2013 12: 18 New
    +7
    Content - golem linden.
    About ISKANDER, in general laughter, how will Assad help the Americans? This is an OTRK with a range of 280 km in export performance.
    The magic words "S-300 Iskander" are circled in tongues and they write heresy.
  16. pensioner
    pensioner 11 September 2013 12: 21 New
    +2
    Mobile high-precision operational-tactical missile system (OTRK) Iskander-E (SS-26)

    Those. that’s what can fly to Israel ... If that ...
    1. Borz
      Borz 11 September 2013 12: 58 New
      +1
      The complex solves operational-tactical tasks, not strategic ones. The scanner can destroy the radar, command post, but you never know what else, but it does not solve strategic tasks.

      PS: I wasn’t minus one.
    2. Do not care
      Do not care 12 September 2013 02: 51 New
      +1
      Syria has an Iranian counterpart to Iskander - Fateh-110

      For reference - parameters:

      Weight: 3450 kg
      Length: 8,86 m
      Diameter: 0,61 m
      Warhead: 500 kg
      Engine: single-stage, solid fuel
      Effective range: 300 km (latest)
      Speed: Mach 3,5
      CVO: 10 m
      Control System: Gyroscopic + GPS

      Israel covered a warehouse with these missiles belonging to Hezbollah in May:

  17. Letterksi
    Letterksi 11 September 2013 12: 40 New
    +8
    S-300 is a strange thing - like it is ... but it is not there right away
    1. Do not care
      Do not care 12 September 2013 16: 29 New
      0
      - Do you see the gopher?
      - Not
      - And he is

      << DMB >>
  18. Big
    Big lexey 11 September 2013 12: 42 New
    +2
    Quote: Vladimirets
    Quote: Samminosh
    But we can get a lot of trouble from the refusal to supply unmanned technologies to new equipment of all kinds of Georgia.

    Well, yes, otherwise they will not arm Georgia to please us.

    Absolutely ... After 2008, Israel did not cooperate in the military sphere with Georgia, at least officially and openly. As far as I understand, this was one of the points of the agreement on the refusal to supply S-300 to Iran.
  19. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 11 September 2013 12: 51 New
    +4
    Time won is the most important thing! I think Iran is urgently needed to arm (as Syria’s main ally), especially air defense systems, so that Syria is also covered. Here then you can play the Indians .. wassat
    1. nikcris
      nikcris 11 September 2013 13: 33 New
      +2
      so that Syria is also covered

      What kind of systems are these? Where is Iran and where is Syria? Such only in a strongly inflamed head of the ensign exist today ...
    2. faraon
      faraon 11 September 2013 16: 01 New
      -11
      Let me argue dear. This is just what you do not need to arm Iran, it will not be able to help Syria with anything, but in secret it claims to the whole east of Russia, including the Central Asian republics.
      Does Russia need such a headache?
      1. ultra
        ultra 11 September 2013 16: 24 New
        +6
        Quote: faraon
        but in secret, he claims to be in the entire east of Russia including the Central Asian republics.

        There are many who claim to be secret! China, for example, Turkey .... etc.
        1. faraon
          faraon 11 September 2013 16: 56 New
          -5
          But you must admit that China wants the whole Far East and Siberia (quiet expansion is already underway) and that something needs to be done and somehow solved.
          But Iran wants to have its own nuclear weapons and this is no longer a joke, but not a mediocre threat to Russia and the entire Central Asian region.
          So is it necessary to arm Iran so that later this weapon would be used against Russia itself.
          The ultra-east is a delicate matter and this option should not be discounted.
          1. j iz sibiri
            j iz sibiri 11 September 2013 17: 29 New
            +7
            But you must admit that China wants the whole Far East and Siberia (quiet expansion is already underway) and that something needs to be done and somehow solved.
            But Iran wants to have its own nuclear weapons and this is no longer a joke, but not a mediocre threat to Russia and the entire Central Asian region.
            So is it necessary to arm Iran so that later this weapon would be used against Russia itself.
            The ultra-east is a delicate matter and this option should not be discounted.


            here you are arming militants together with the us so that they ushat syria and Iran
            so you don’t fight with them yourself
            and then it’s easy for you to finish off all these fighters and everything will be good

            so we’re better armed Iran so that they wet you and if they fail, it will still be easier for us
          2. aviator_IAS
            aviator_IAS 11 September 2013 21: 31 New
            +3
            Quote: faraon
            But Iran wants to have its own nuclear weapons and this is no longer a joke, but not a mediocre threat to Russia and the entire Central Asian region.


            If your overseas partners were not engaged in terrorism at the global level, ignoring the norms of international law, Iran would not have thought of a bomb. It turns out now only the possession of nuclear weapons can protect the country from tomahawks.

            Quote: faraon
            So is it necessary to arm Iran so that later this weapon would be used against Russia itself.

            It's funny to hear such a "translation of arrows" from Israel. What compassionate! belay So sincerely worried about Russia. Why's that?
            1. Arabist
              Arabist 11 September 2013 21: 33 New
              +1
              Clearly not well-intentioned. And atomic weapons are indeed an indulgence for all sins.
            2. Marine One
              Marine One 17 September 2013 00: 58 New
              0
              Quote: aviator_IAS
              It's funny to hear such a "translation of arrows" from Israel. What compassionate! belay So sincerely worried about Russia. Why's that?

              From the point of view of the ruling Ayatollah in Iran, you, I and the others are no different from the faithful Israeli Oleg Sokolov - Professor. You, I are exactly the same giaurs, enemies, nonhumans, infidels. Only more stupid, because helping with the nuclear program and going to sell modern weapons to the demoniac regime.
          3. cherkas.oe
            cherkas.oe 11 September 2013 22: 03 New
            +1
            Quote: faraon
            (quiet expansion is already underway) and something needs to be done and something to be solved.

            Schyass, right by the pike desire of the Jews we will begin to "decide"
          4. ultra
            ultra 11 September 2013 22: 17 New
            +2
            About China I agree completely! But you do not think that Iran is creating nuclear weapons as opposed to Israel, which already has it!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. j iz sibiri
        j iz sibiri 11 September 2013 17: 01 New
        +1
        Quote: faraon
        Let me argue dear. This is just what you do not need to arm Iran, it will not be able to help Syria with anything, but in secret it claims to the whole east of Russia, including the Central Asian republics.
        Does Russia need such a headache?

        we do not need nobody Syria is not Iran and even Israel and even more so

        the more you kill each other, the easier it will be for us to breathe

        oh yes even amerokosy are not needed

        all of them Khan is only a matter of time
      4. Voskepar
        Voskepar 11 September 2013 17: 02 New
        +1
        Dear, you confuse the Persians with your Turkish brothers.
        Quote: faraon
        Let me argue dear. This is just what you do not need to arm Iran, it will not be able to help Syria with anything, but in secret it claims to the whole east of Russia, including the Central Asian republics.
        Does Russia need such a headache?
    3. alone
      alone 11 September 2013 18: 01 New
      +2
      belay Vitaly, open the map and see where Syria and Iran. Such air defense systems have not yet been invented.
  20. Alexander borey
    Alexander borey 11 September 2013 12: 54 New
    0
    I will say Putin's words: utter nonsense (article). They come up with big names to attract readers and increase the rating. There is no S-300 in Syria. What kind of postscript is this? Is this an authoritative source? Or were they personally shown the “XNUMXs” in Syria? Such false untested speculations should not appear in the press and the media at all. negative
  21. Prishtina
    Prishtina 11 September 2013 12: 56 New
    0
    Something article how negative as if not fresh ...
    this is when Nathan with Cameron and Pirdogan .. then they flew to Russia .. 2-3 months ago ?!
  22. King
    King 11 September 2013 12: 59 New
    +2
    If Syria has the S-300 or not, we can only find out when the American plane is shot down.
    1. Free Island
      Free Island 11 September 2013 16: 46 New
      -1
      According to the Los Angeles Times, one flyer (Fu-22 Raptor) was already shot down and fell into pieces of bainki in Jordan. Just in the same con, when the alleged "educational goals of the United States were hit by Israeli warriors))))) so that the same LA Times, in addition to the deceased raptor, also lists four" missing "Tomagotchi merites after the launch in the Mediterranean Sea (S-300 ( and speaking of the volumes of drugs LS Times just talks about the S-400) in the hands of Assad.
  23. Sunjar
    Sunjar 11 September 2013 13: 00 New
    +7
    I agree with GRDS: it’s better to dissolve more rumors from different sources so that they sit there in their headquarters and get nervous. By the way, there is information that in Syria at the end of August they shot down the F-22 Raptor and four Tomahawk's, which is why they delayed the crawl to Syria.
  24. Alexander borey
    Alexander borey 11 September 2013 13: 11 New
    0
    Quote: Sunjar
    By the way, there is information that in Syria at the end of August they shot down the F-22 Raptor and four Tomahawk's, which is why they delayed the crawl to Syria.

    I immediately remembered the song of V. Vysotsky about rumors laughing
  25. maxcor1974
    maxcor1974 11 September 2013 13: 18 New
    +1
    Quote: klimpopov
    But, despite this, a certain number of S-300 air defense systems are on the way.

    Is it on the way or is it in place? We lured speculation on the topic. Why publish arguments. There is C- 300 excellent! no - it is necessary to deliver. And grind the ground ...

    Syrian government forces have several S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems

    blurry again. Surely there is. The question is whether they know how to work for them and how many there are and whether there is a BC to them and so on ...

    It is necessary to publish, as this is one of the links in the information war. This will make the states nervous, draw up additional action plans, erode their efforts. Attacking a country with and without a modern air defense system is not the same thing. The acceptability of losses will be different, Obama is not far from impeachment, and in case of failure or too high losses, he is guaranteed.
    On the other hand, the rejection of strikes is a loss of face, so in any case, no matter what he does, everything will play against him. Putin well done beat him like a kid ...
  26. JonnyT
    JonnyT 11 September 2013 13: 20 New
    +3
    ohh ... hezbolah said .... laughing
    it is strange that they did not mention the bloody Jews
  27. cryloff.il
    cryloff.il 11 September 2013 13: 31 New
    0
    It’s unfortunate that for now this is all
  28. shoroh
    shoroh 11 September 2013 13: 41 New
    +2
    if the s-300 were in Syria, then no one would give the chemical weapons to the world community.
    1. alone
      alone 11 September 2013 19: 53 New
      0
      I think you're right. To give the only thing that amounted to parity in the fight against Israel. If this happens, then Israel already has complete superiority over all countries in the region.
      1. Arabist
        Arabist 11 September 2013 19: 59 New
        0
        Lonely, I don’t think Assad would have applied it at all. It hardly had a decisive influence on parity. Rather, they took away the reason to strike today, but it takes time to come up with a new one.
        1. alone
          alone 11 September 2013 22: 22 New
          +2
          Quote: Arabist
          Rather, they took away the reason to strike today, but it takes time to come up with a new one.


          This is undeniable. The blows have been postponed, but they are still on the agenda. I still do not share the great joy of this. It is still unknown what the Americans thought up.

          As for the use of chemical weapons, I’ll say this as long as he’s in the hands of Assad, his actions are unpredictable. He can also use it when striking, but maybe not. and without a chemical weapon, the amers will already know 100 pounds that Assad does not already have it. Here's the catch.
  29. Tatanka Yotanka
    Tatanka Yotanka 11 September 2013 13: 53 New
    +3
    operating at speeds over 10000 km / h
    something that I was slightly overwhelmed, hypersonic things in service for a long time?
    1. dzvero
      dzvero 11 September 2013 17: 44 New
      +3
      so it’s ~ 2.7 km / s or roughly 8M - the speed of a tactical ballistic missile warhead. those. The S-300 also functions as a theater theater missile defense.
  30. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 11 September 2013 14: 01 New
    +6
    But why should we think whether there is an S-300 in Syria or not? Let the Americans think. And their pilot will "scour".
    1. sashka
      sashka 11 September 2013 14: 25 New
      +1
      Quote: VohaAhov
      But why should we think whether there is an S-300 in Syria or not? Let the Americans think. And their pilot will "scour".

      But it’s nice, after all, when enemies are “afraid” or just afraid .. I like it ..
      1. sashka
        sashka 11 September 2013 14: 49 New
        +1
        Quote: Sasha
        But it’s nice, after all, when enemies are “afraid” or just afraid .. I like it ..

        I do not understand what kind of crap .. Admins. You violate my right to speak and speak out in a language that I understand .. And use words that the Constitutional Court has not forbidden. If the site is located in Germany, it’s not ... But I’m clear I’m talking to ushlopki ..
      2. Free Island
        Free Island 11 September 2013 16: 50 New
        0
        pity the pseudo-Americans, my friend! given the mental imbalance of the American soldier, who is dying in large numbers from suicide, they’re not so much to start kicking, they’ll begin to die on the way to Syria !!!
  31. left-wing
    left-wing 11 September 2013 14: 23 New
    0
    Good news! We also need to put ballistic missiles so that they reach the American fleet ...
  32. DmitryMSK
    DmitryMSK 11 September 2013 14: 25 New
    19
    By the way, there was a rumor that there were Syrian officers in recent exercises in Ashuluk wink
    ps without amers, it’s very difficult for the hobits
    1. vaddag1
      vaddag1 11 September 2013 16: 52 New
      0
      Thanks for the video - neighing from the heart. Syrian comments? I didn’t know that they had normul with humor
    2. Vorkot cat
      Vorkot cat 12 September 2013 13: 09 New
      0
      One hundred were?

      S-300 stood with the Syrian flag
  33. Sergey Medvedev
    Sergey Medvedev 11 September 2013 14: 36 New
    +1
    This information only confirms the words of the GDP that the S-300 contract has been partially implemented.
  34. denson06
    denson06 11 September 2013 14: 42 New
    +2
    Quote: Tatanka Yotanka
    operating at speeds over 10000 km / h
    something that I was slightly overwhelmed, hypersonic things in service for a long time?

    I somehow somehow also did not understand this figure ..
    They would have written clearly in the TTX language of these systems ..
    The radial speed of the targets hit is up to 2800 m / s. You can immediately see how many swings m. at the goal ..
    With respect.. hi
    1. scientist
      scientist 17 September 2013 19: 03 New
      0
      The author, of course, turned down. Apparently, he made a mistake with “0” or is not friends with mathematics, I’m eating more than the TTX S-300PMU2, even if it’s easy to find the letter E even on official sites. Therefore, I think that the article is somewhat provocative, and maybe customized. See how many Jews are on the forum! "To be or not to be? That is the question," Yes, of course BE!laughing
  35. Maks-80
    Maks-80 11 September 2013 15: 22 New
    +1
    Good news. "Iskanders" would also not hurt Syria. You could also put a dozen "Twister" and "Grad".
    1. Vityaz68
      Vityaz68 17 September 2013 10: 17 New
      0
      HOORAY!! GOOD WEST.
  36. DmitryMSK
    DmitryMSK 11 September 2013 15: 25 New
    +8
    By the way. we completely forgot to congratulate our heroic lion!

    1. Ram chandra
      Ram chandra 11 September 2013 18: 21 New
      +7
      Glory to the lion! Long life to Assad!
      1. lecturer
        lecturer 11 September 2013 20: 20 New
        +1
        YES, there are still PRESIDENTS worthy of the love of their people! And God grant him, to remain for a long, long time on the difficult path of his people! They, such Heroes of the people, remain forever!
        P / S. And mine, PVV, is also smart!
  37. gawroche
    gawroche 11 September 2013 16: 00 New
    +6
    Very good news, and I believe that this is true, because it is confirmed at various events. And that Bashar al-Assad stated that Syria is an S300, President Putin denies, but I think both were telling the truth. In Syria, the S300 is only with Russian specialists, and only they decide on their use. This confirms the information about the hacking of F22 and 4 Tomahawk. The second information is a statement by Bashar al-Assad that the attackers will meet with an “unpleasant surprise,” which could mean the Iskander’s response to the strike and the US’s tactical rejection of the threat of attack (while Russia gives the US the opportunity to abandon the threat). All this makes the World breathe a sigh of relief. Congratulations to Russia, Putin and World Peace
  38. Sirs
    Sirs 11 September 2013 16: 17 New
    0
    This is chess! will there be a gambit?
    1. Straus_zloy
      Straus_zloy 12 September 2013 08: 13 New
      0
      This is chess! will there be a gambit?

      Barbecue of them will be

  39. Sadikoff
    Sadikoff 11 September 2013 16: 25 New
    0
    Yes, in any case, Americans can launch up to a thousand hatchets - you can’t get enough rockets for them! Here you can break them with some kind of traps and amy weapons.
  40. chushoj
    chushoj 11 September 2013 16: 48 New
    0
    The very name S-300 in Syria is, and no one is hiding it. But only the missile machine itself is a pile of metal. That is why the United States wants to broadcast live to humiliate Russian weapons. The main initiator of the war is not Abama (this is a doll that was taught to ask Congress). The main character is Israel, which wants to maintain a balance of power, that is, nuclear weapons against the S-200. It is acceptable and enjoyable.
  41. mitya24
    mitya24 11 September 2013 17: 14 New
    +2
    Well, it’s clear with the Jews. God himself ordered the knives to them, or what is their ultrasound? are you mercenaries? sharpen the Arabs. But where the Saudis then climb. That’s why you definitely need to be foolish because it is Arabia with this stupid thing. And then a prince of some kind comes to the GDP to show off bashing, teaches politics. Ofigeli completely.
  42. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 11 September 2013 17: 35 New
    0
    Nobody remembered the initiative to transfer chemical weapons in Syria under international control, but in vain. The presence of foreign specialists in Syria will cool the American fervor no worse, if not better, than the deployed and combat-ready S-300s. Naughty foreign controllers will be very fraught with serious complications. Our diplomats - multiple URA !!!
  43. Ezhaak
    Ezhaak 11 September 2013 17: 35 New
    -2
    According to Hezbollah, a well-thought-out US-Israeli plan is being implemented around Syria.

    I do not believe in the meanness of Israel. It cannot be. Even according to the conversations of the Israelis on this and other sites, they will not allow and do everything possible to ensure that the party of war leaves power. Many of these comrades even refuse to work for Lieberman, despite threats from the Mossad. lol
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 11 September 2013 20: 14 New
      +3
      Quote: Hedgehog
      I do not believe in the meanness of Israel. It cannot be. Even according to the conversations of the Israelis on this and other sites, they will not allow and do everything possible to ensure that the party of war leaves power. Many of these comrades even refuse to work for Lieberman, despite threats from the Mossad

      Have you noticed one feature?
      Around Israel, everything is on fire, around a revolution, but in Israel, everything is calm.
      So say that Israel does not have a plan .............
      1. Sour
        Sour 11 September 2013 20: 43 New
        +4
        All the "revolutions" in the Arab world are inspired by the international Jewish lobby. It also achieved the destruction of Iraq as a capable and united state. Now run over to Syria.
        Neither Gaddafi, nor Hussein, nor Ahmadinejad threatened the United States in any way. But they could threaten Israel. The Zionist lobby is striving to weaken the Arab world as much as possible. It’s easier for them to deal with current Iraq (or Libya) than with what it was before. Scattered and weakened Arab states torn by internal wars is Israel's dream. It is easier for him to deal with them than with strong Arab states.
        When you realize that US politics in the Middle East has a global Jewish lobby, then everything becomes clear. Absolutely everything, from start to finish. Including the fact that Al Qaeda (a branch of the Saudi secret services) often barks at Israel, but never does anything against it. And it is in tense relations with the main enemies of Israel - the Palestinians, Syrians, Iranians.
        1. Very old
          Very old 11 September 2013 20: 58 New
          0
          You can’t insert your brains on them. They have been zombified for a long time
        2. Professor
          Professor 11 September 2013 22: 02 New
          -2
          Quote: Sour
          Including the fact that Al Qaeda (a branch of the Saudi secret services) often barks at Israel, but never does anything against it. And it is in tense relations with the main enemies of Israel - the Palestinians, Syrians, Iranians.

          Another homegrown strategist drew. Who do you think of Sinai shelling Isaril? Green pussy?

          Quote: Sour
          It’s easier for them to deal with current Iraq (or Libya) than with what it was before.

          Rave. One dictator is always easier to negotiate than with all this pack.
      2. Ezhaak
        Ezhaak 11 September 2013 20: 46 New
        0
        Quote: APASUS
        Have you noticed one feature?

        Of course I noticed. Israel is much worse off than all Arab countries combined. Plus Afghanistan in the same pile.
  44. Ivan Ural
    Ivan Ural 11 September 2013 17: 59 New
    0
    Typical information war. Now the Syrians say a lot of things in order to confuse, scare, buy time. Feels like an Iranian school.
    1. chushoj
      chushoj 11 September 2013 18: 16 New
      -1
      So this is the most important thing. The strike is scheduled for 13-14, and “Moscow” will be able to arrive only 17. Without the “Moscow” “Panteleev” will feel awkward.
      You understand, confuse, this is adulthood.
      When two people watch an erotic film, both of them do not like it.
      http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2013/043/nbub378.jpg
      1. Ezhaak
        Ezhaak 11 September 2013 19: 06 New
        +1
        Quote: chushoj
        Moscow will be able to arrive only 17

        Information for consideration, if such an ability is present!
        http://tvrain.ru/articles/krejser_moskva_voshel_v_sredizemnoe_more_-352038/
        http://www.newsru.com/world/10sep2013/obama.html
        1. Cynic
          Cynic 11 September 2013 19: 08 New
          0
          In the Arctic, the unique wiring of a detachment of ships of the Northern Fleet by four atomic icebreakers
          http://topwar.ru/33180-v-arktike-sovershena-unikalnaya-provodka-otryada-korabley
          -severnogo-flota-chetyrmya-atomnymi-ledokolami.html
      2. Very old
        Very old 11 September 2013 21: 00 New
        +1
        It would be nice even in pure Russian
  45. Double major
    Double major 11 September 2013 18: 52 New
    +1
    Sorry. Iskanderchiki would be there right now ...
  46. yacht
    yacht 11 September 2013 19: 48 New
    0
    I don’t understand why such disputes on Iskander-E? E - export option, that is, for sale to other countries, there are international bans on the export of missile weapons, which allows the delivery of complexes with a range of destruction of no more than 300 km. Russia has signed this agreement. So that, purely legally, there are no bans on the supply of such complexes in Syria, it’s another thing for the politician, Russia does not want to quarrel with Israel.
    On the S-300, too, everything is clear; they are delivered to Syria, but not in full and are not yet combat ready. But the question of completeness is very interesting, for example, complexes can be without missiles and this is not a set, but can be just without some kind of wire fuse, also not a set. laughing
  47. Vtel
    Vtel 11 September 2013 20: 38 New
    0
    Even if there is no S-300 in Syria, then the crafty one from Israel and the USA, not counting their mongrel and roosters, is to say that maybe they are already there, as well as the S-400, Iskander, Tor-M2 and the jumping bomb - bluffs are also weapons who knows these mysterious savages from Russia.

    "WASHINGTON, September 11. Eight more countries joined Tuesday in a statement in support of US actions on Syria, bypassing the UN Security Council, the White House said.
    Georgia, Guatemala, Kuwait, Malta, Montenegro, Panama, Poland and Portugal joined in the statement.
    Recall, the day before, the number of countries that signed the statement was 25. On Monday, Albania, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Honduras, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Morocco, Qatar, Romania and the UAE joined the statement. The document was also signed by the authorities of Kosovo, which the United States recognizes as an independent state. "- And here are the mongrels and roosters, with a blue tint.
  48. Shellback
    Shellback 11 September 2013 20: 59 New
    +1
    There are no S-300s in Syria
    1. j iz sibiri
      j iz sibiri 11 September 2013 21: 03 New
      -1
      papadamus yes?
  49. Shellback
    Shellback 11 September 2013 21: 24 New
    0
    Quote: j iz sibiri
    papadamus yes?

    Karaganda
  50. nod739
    nod739 11 September 2013 22: 02 New
    +1
    there was a time in the first half of the 80s ... when there were no s-200s in Syria, ..

    but 3 mattress planes (and even earlier a pair of drones with a six-pointed star) were taken off the air, and the aircraft carrier’s codpiece, just like all the personnel, was very messed up. spirit has fallen. One aircraft carrier, having pulled the codpiece crawled to Sicily, and the other at all to the port of registry, the Mediterranean was not very safe for the 6th fleet of mattresses. the spring was 86