Military Review

Ali al-Musavi: "To bomb the country to help its people is absurd"

41
Ali al-Musavi: "To bomb the country to help its people is absurd"

In Cairo, during the meeting of the Arab League, the heads of the foreign ministries adopted a resolution calling on the UN to take action against the Syrian authorities. Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Tunisia and Algeria spoke out against armed intervention. Advisor to the Prime Minister of Iraq, Ali al-Mousavi, told the Voice of Russia about what threatens Iraq this bold stance against the interests of the West.


- Iraq was, is and will be against military invasion. The same opinion is shared by Algeria, Lebanon, Mauritania, Tunisia and Egypt. At the Al-Azhar University of Egypt (the main Islamic university of the world), they declared that the invasion of Syria would be a challenge for the entire Arab nation. And we agree with that. It’s hard to imagine how the bombing of a country can help its people. This is absurd.

As for a possible revenge or some kind of sanctions, then Iraq is already in disgrace. They are boycotting us in every way in the Middle East arena; we are not allowed to fully participate in regional negotiations. We literally say: "Either you are with us, or against us!".

- How do you comment on the irreconcilable position of some Arab countries regarding Syria?

- This suggests that these Arab countries have already invested their "investments" in the Syrian crisis with big plans for the future. Money is invested, but there is no result, the Syrian army defeats the terrorists. Therefore, it is natural that they beg the United States to strike Syria, because then their money, time and effort will not be wasted.

- Is any unification of Iraq with other countries planned to uphold the position of non-intervention in Syria?

- Yes, we are working to create an Arab moderate front that will act solely in the interests of the Arab society and peace in the region, including against invading any country.
Originator:
http://rus.ruvr.ru/
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. makst83
    makst83 9 September 2013 08: 47
    53
    Barack of Deception: "The Syrians are destroying the Syrians and we must destroy the Syrians who are destroying the Syrians so that they stop destroying the Syrians!" Something like this hi
    1. Canep
      Canep 9 September 2013 15: 11
      16
      In nature, the White House needs to be renamed the Yellow House. You can also repaint, surround with a high fence and to attract healthy orderlies for protection.
      1. 7Hz
        7Hz 9 September 2013 15: 17
        19
        so it’s more correct to paint in rainbow colors
        1. Sakhalininsk
          Sakhalininsk 9 September 2013 15: 45
          +4
          Quote: 7Hz
          so it’s more correct to paint in rainbow colors


          And for the sake of completeness, to seat there the sitters on personal Persian strap-ons called cola in the common people!
          1. Apologet.Ru
            Apologet.Ru 10 September 2013 00: 09
            0
            hi
            Colleagues who are seriously interested in what the events in Syria are connected with, I strongly recommend watching the first part of the "Military Secret" program, I am sure you will not regret it ...

      2. Bob
        Bob 9 September 2013 16: 39
        +8
        Quote: Canep
        In nature, the White House needs to be renamed the Yellow House.

        It has long been Blue .... and this is not a symbol of peace and harmony, but rather - modern Sodom and Gomor.
      3. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 9 September 2013 17: 40
        +4
        Quote: Canep
        In nature, the White House needs to be renamed the Yellow House. M

        Why not in blue?
        1. Corsair
          Corsair 9 September 2013 23: 15
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Why not in blue?

          And therefore, Dear Alexander, that the ATTENDANCE of your toilet in the Oval Office can catastrophically fall fellow
          1. Very old
            Very old 9 September 2013 23: 20
            0
            Is it possible pokeretney?
      4. VasDA
        VasDA 10 September 2013 04: 18
        0
        And on the door of the Oval Office, hang a sign "Ward No. 6".
    2. Jin
      Jin 9 September 2013 15: 50
      +7
      Quote: makst83
      Barack of Deception: "The Syrians are destroying the Syrians and we must destroy the Syrians who are destroying the Syrians so that they stop destroying the Syrians!"


      + In general, yes, I smiled. But the Syrians there have long been destroyed not by the Syrians, but by a rabble of assorted bandits from all over the world. Today there was a report about how the "German" Salafis-Alafis are leaving for Syria to fight against Assad.
      1. adm656
        adm656 9 September 2013 21: 42
        0
        See how they will return (those who survive, of course) and what they will do .. They will put the blue German army as cancer ..
      2. alone
        alone 9 September 2013 21: 58
        +1
        laughing Salafis-Alavites))) Ahahhaha killed on the spot!
        Salafis are Wahhabis who fight just against the Alawites)))
        1. Jin
          Jin 10 September 2013 10: 39
          0
          Quote: lonely
          Salafis-Alavites)))


          I wrote Salafi alaфIt, dear! smile
    3. Ruslan_F38
      Ruslan_F38 9 September 2013 17: 01
      +2
      "Arab countries have already invested their" investments "in the Syrian crisis with big plans for the future. The money is invested, but there is still no result, the Syrian army is defeating the terrorists. Therefore, it is natural that they beg the United States to strike Syria, because then their money, time and efforts will not be wasted. " - oh well, the question is, as always, about money?
      1. Ruslan_F38
        Ruslan_F38 9 September 2013 17: 08
        +1
        "We are working to create an Arab Moderate Front that will act exclusively in the interests of Arab society and peace in the region, including against invasion of any country." - this is ideally, has it really come, but there will be no such union, firstly, the mentality is not the same, not allied in most Arab countries, and secondly, because of the dough, they will crunch each other and kill or merge. That's because they are - Israel and always wins.
      2. Sirocco
        Sirocco 9 September 2013 17: 36
        0
        Allow me to correct you.
        - How do you comment on the irreconcilable position of some Arab countries regarding Syria?
        NOTHING PERSONAL, IT'S JUST BUSINESS! In this situation, about those who want to bomb Syria, one can say, To whom is war, and to whom is my mother! What is the result? What is their difference from the Nazis? Ordinary pirates as in the Middle Ages English filibusters, under the protection of the crown.
    4. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 9 September 2013 17: 40
      0
      If the frogt is created (which is discussed in the article) and Iran also enters into it, then there will be no warriors. Resist force, only force can.
      1. Ruslan_F38
        Ruslan_F38 9 September 2013 21: 00
        -1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        If the frogt is created (which is discussed in the article) and Iran also enters into it, then there will be no warriors. Resist force, only force can.


        Do not tell me which front, who will enter it, but they will all be split over there. And the war will be sooner or later - the Middle East is on the verge and the massacre can not be stopped there - it's just a matter of time, given the greed and venality of the Saudis, Qatar and others, as well as the all-consuming hatred between religious movements, well, religious fanaticism is over.
    5. sashka
      sashka 9 September 2013 18: 02
      +2
      Quote: makst83
      "The Syrians are destroying the Syrians and we must destroy the Syrians who are destroying the Syrians so that they stop destroying the Syrians!"

      Cool .. Beautifully .. Let politicians read it so that they would not carry any nonsense ..
      1. hommer
        hommer 9 September 2013 20: 55
        +3
        There is already a picture on the network. By the way, the GDP offers an option for the Nobel laureate to get out of the stupid position, saving face -
        Russia calls on Syria to transfer chemical weapons under international control -http: //metateka.com/cluster: 56237068-Rossiia-prizyvaet-Siriiu-peredat-khimiches

        koe-oruzhie-pod-mezhdunarodnyi-control /
        Syrian Foreign Minister has already agreed to the leadership of Syria.
        Obama needs to agree.
        1. alexng
          alexng 10 September 2013 00: 54
          +1
          Quote: hommer
          Russia calls on Syria to transfer chemical weapons under international control

          Yes! Oh, the stalemate for the scavenger bloodsucker. Something does not luck the Nazis today. USkaliki screwed up in full.
        2. sashka
          sashka 10 September 2013 22: 08
          0
          The picture "Das ist Fantastic." I already voiced the "text" yesterday .. or today? Slogan for the UN which or which is a deaf-mute old fool
    6. Arminian power
      Arminian power 9 September 2013 21: 51
      0
      amerikosi xotyat Siriyu bez Siricev (alavitov)
  2. eplewke
    eplewke 9 September 2013 14: 13
    +5
    yes ... That sounds like that. The result is one - the Syrians are dying. I am glad that at least some, but a coalition in support of Assad exists. Someday, at least someone must stop the American lawlessness! Although it sounds somehow fantastic, but a loan on the state of affairs - I hope the sunset of the empire of lies and homophilia is close ...
    1. tilovaykrisa
      tilovaykrisa 9 September 2013 15: 08
      12
      It is a pity that at one time they did not harness for Yugoslavia, perhaps the world would be different. If the bandit does not immediately discourage the robbery and kill, then he becomes intoxicated by permissiveness and impunity.
      1. Docent1984
        Docent1984 9 September 2013 15: 23
        15
        It is a pity that the Yugoslavs at one time did not harness themselves for Yugoslavia ... Some people think that helping and doing for him is the same thing. Of course, this does not justify our weak-willed position, but first of all they surrendered themselves. One must always defend one's country to the last breath. As the prince of Kiev Svyatoslav said: "We will not shame the Russian land, but with our bones we will lie down here, the dead have no more shame."
    2. Jin
      Jin 9 September 2013 15: 52
      +1
      I also didn’t cut it, but where is in the list of countries that are "against" Iran ???
      1. hommer
        hommer 9 September 2013 20: 30
        0
        Iran is not a member of the Arab League.
        This is a meeting of the Foreign Ministers of the League of Arab States.
        And so, of course, he is against.
      2. alone
        alone 9 September 2013 21: 56
        0
        Iran is not an Arab state
      3. eplewke
        eplewke 10 September 2013 08: 47
        0
        Iran is not part of the G20 group.
  3. a52333
    a52333 9 September 2013 15: 09
    +4
    I think that Iran will not officially enter the war on the side of the ATS. Another point is that after the start of the bombing, they will expand military assistance (militias and money). Iran, oh, how unprofitable for Assad to be thrown.
  4. andrei332809
    andrei332809 9 September 2013 15: 16
    +6
    It is hard to imagine how bombing a country can help its people. This is absurd.

    finally voiced the obvious thing. half the world had to be smashed to understand this
  5. soldier's grandson
    soldier's grandson 9 September 2013 15: 17
    10
    if Obama so badly wants to help the Syrian people, then let him not bomb, but take to his states this people who feel bad there, who feel good in Syria let them
  6. Koronik
    Koronik 9 September 2013 15: 18
    +3
    The fear of losing a lot of money pushes them to pay any expenses of military operations. "And they beg the US to strike at Syria." Yes, who would count our losses in Syria, if the bandits win?
  7. erased
    erased 9 September 2013 15: 23
    -2
    Of course, they need to do something. But it looks like it's late. If the States have bitten their bit, they cannot be stopped. And they don't care about the "deep concern" of the Kremlin's inmates. People, of course. it's a pity. We can only watch how missiles and bombs fall on Syria. That is exactly what we did in 1998, in 2003 and in 2010. The masters of the world twist their affairs, and the world gendarme is shaking his muscles. Their hangers-on squeal with joy and estimate the percentage of benefits. It is getting hotter and more fun on Earth.
    1. Andrew-001
      Andrew-001 9 September 2013 16: 12
      +5
      I will explain for the one who minus you. With all due respect, but with such an approach
      Quote: erased
      But it seems too late. If the States have bitten a bit, they cannot be stopped. ... We can only watch ...

      it will always be late. This is a policy of defeatism. Yes, we don’t have so much strength, but this is not a reason to give up.
      1. erased
        erased 9 September 2013 16: 30
        0
        If we survive, we’ll get it.
  8. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 9 September 2013 15: 24
    +4
    - This suggests that these Arab countries have already invested their "investments" in the Syrian crisis with big plans for the future. Money is invested, but there is no result, the Syrian army defeats the terrorists. Therefore, it is natural that they beg the United States to strike Syria, because then their money, time and effort will not be wasted.
    That's the whole democracy in action ... And then all for the Syrian people shed tears. Shaking your pocket!
  9. Strashila
    Strashila 9 September 2013 15: 25
    +1
    Some Arab countries ate radical Islam ... concluded.
  10. seller trucks
    seller trucks 9 September 2013 15: 26
    +4
    This suggests that these Arab countries have already made their "investments" in the Syrian crisis with big plans for the future. The money has been invested, but there is still no result, the Syrian army is defeating the terrorists.


    the golden words (+) of the article and Ali al-Musavi, at the head of everything is the worship of the Golden Calf, Syria has no mythical chemical weapons, namely money, given the situation in the United States with external debt, everything is quite logical, Syria in exchange for the money of Arab sheikhs.
    1. a52333
      a52333 9 September 2013 15: 33
      +3
      It would be nice (and fair) if in Arabia, after the first missile towards Syria, a refinery or oil terminal exploded. am I’ll dream: our military divers are already there. winked
      1. novobranets
        novobranets 9 September 2013 15: 41
        +1
        after the first missile to Syria, an oil refinery or oil terminal exploded.
        Maybe it will be so, Assad understands who pays for the mess. bully
  11. tarks
    tarks 9 September 2013 15: 35
    +1
    It seems that this is understood even in America. Some.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. anton 42
    anton 42 9 September 2013 15: 42
    0
    they beg the United States to strike Syria, because then their money, time and effort will not be wasted. us army of mercenaries.
  14. Manager
    Manager 9 September 2013 15: 46
    +2
    Is there silence about Iran? These things can say anything ..... Here is the only strong player in the Tor region is Iran. And I'm more interested in what he "thinks" and "will" if that ...
  15. repytw
    repytw 9 September 2013 15: 56
    +1
    If Egypt, Iraq are opposed, and Jordan closes its airspace, then how the AUG "Nimets" (aircraft carrier, URO cruiser, 4 destroyers) will be able to participate in the bombing of Syria, the US forces may be reduced by half, and the most weakly covered southern regions of the country will not be attacked, unless of course Israel starts, but he is silent.
  16. Tambov we ...
    Tambov we ... 9 September 2013 16: 26
    0
    Quote: soldier's grandson
    if Obama so badly wants to help the Syrian people, then let him not bomb, but take to his states this people who feel bad there, who feel good in Syria let them


    And he will give money to those who stayed so that they do not worry much that others have left. And no axes, bombs, etc. do not. Yes, and cheaper for Americans.
  17. michajlo
    michajlo 9 September 2013 16: 46
    +4
    Quote: a52333 Today, 15:33
    It would be nice (and fair) if in Arabia, after the first missile towards Syria, a refinery or oil terminal exploded. am I’ll dream: our military divers are already there. winked

    Good afternoon, dear Alexey!

    Pleasant and GOOD your dreams! good
    But it is possible after the start or without the US attack on Syria, and in the UAE and "great" Qatar, explosions and fires will begin. followed by the RAGE of their peoples / nomads to the rulers! good

    With all the fantasy, this may well be, since the REASON for the "Wahhabist intervention" is precisely THERE.

    By the way, this country of the Arabian Peninsula is Russia-VERY MUCH owe money for the preparation of fanatics and the Chechen wars. It is probably time for the Kremlin to pay off "written off debts", or I will continue my "undercover commercial schemes."
    1. a52333
      a52333 9 September 2013 17: 09
      +3
      I agree, Michael (is that possible?). If you remember. Khattab so he staff member Saudi intelligence.
  18. VadimSt
    VadimSt 9 September 2013 18: 43
    +1
    The East is a delicate matter, and apparently the thinner, the more transparent - just as you look, the USA’s erysipelas appears everywhere.
    The notorious "World Caliphate", one of their propaganda ploys, which is aimed at intimidating "moderate" Europe, disuniting the Arab world, maintaining its presence and dominance in the region. A united East will mean one thing - the fall of the Arab monarchies, the control of the countries of the Middle East over national resources, the end of the US world domination.
  19. batia72
    batia72 9 September 2013 19: 36
    0
    why no one attacks the Saudis themselves, for example in retaliation. all come together - Iran, Syria, Iraq, etc., and to hell with the instigators
    1. sashka
      sashka 9 September 2013 19: 40
      0
      Quote: batia72
      why no one attacks the Saudis themselves, for example in retaliation. all come together - Iran, Syria, Iraq, etc., and to hell with the instigators

      It is logical .. And why really?. Maybe they are satisfied with such a situation or religious beliefs? it is not clear .. Maybe then the amers will start yelling again. Maybe they didn’t want to stir up the anthill. Now it's too late ..
  20. Semyon Albertovich
    Semyon Albertovich 9 September 2013 19: 37
    0
    U.S. propaganda just so claims that they will strike (bombing) to free people from the bloody regime. But in reality they want to bring religious scumbags-fanatics to power - the main thing is to remove the undesirable Assad regime. The odious Senator McCain-Vietnamese claims that the United States will lose respect in the world if they do not strike at Syria. This is the policy of bombing the unwanted today dominates the United States.
  21. obrjak
    obrjak 9 September 2013 21: 11
    +1
    USA-hired killers. Well, and who is against the fact that killers need to be punished ... Maybe they already came up with a price tag for Russia ...
  22. Alikovo
    Alikovo 9 September 2013 21: 35
    0
    the whole elite of Western countries day and night thinks how to help the Syrian people.
    The way out is simple: the whole elite of Western countries should be treated in a psychiatric hospital.
  23. 31231
    31231 9 September 2013 21: 45
    0
    The response of the countries is clear. 2 pipelines go from Iraq through Syria to Tartus. Iraq would not want to change anything.
    Egypt has its own with the tankers and gas carriers of Saudi and Qatar passing through Suez and would not want to lose this "kopeck" if they extended a pipe around it. And the madman Mursik was leaked.
    War is purely economic, not political. Saudis and Qatar v. Iran and Iraq.
    Even Brzezik does not understand how Obama got there. If only against Iran. For in Iraq and in Saudi transnational corporations they also pay part of the taxes in the USA. Yes, and weapons that Iraq, that Saudi buys a lot from the United States.
  24. voliador
    voliador 10 September 2013 00: 37
    0
    Definitely scramble climb over oil and gas!
  25. sds555
    sds555 10 September 2013 16: 29
    0
    Quote: voliador
    Definitely scramble climb over oil and gas!

    And not only that, they are pleased to feel like a world gendarme