Military Review

Ali al-Mousavi: "Bombing the country to help its people is absurd"

41
Ali al-Mousavi: "Bombing the country to help its people is absurd"

In Cairo, during the meeting of the Arab League, the heads of the foreign ministries adopted a resolution calling on the UN to take action against the Syrian authorities. Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Tunisia and Algeria spoke out against armed intervention. Advisor to the Prime Minister of Iraq, Ali al-Mousavi, told the Voice of Russia about what threatens Iraq this bold stance against the interests of the West.


- Iraq was, is and will be against military invasion. The same opinion is shared by Algeria, Lebanon, Mauritania, Tunisia and Egypt. At the Al-Azhar University of Egypt (the main Islamic university of the world), they declared that the invasion of Syria would be a challenge for the entire Arab nation. And we agree with that. It’s hard to imagine how the bombing of a country can help its people. This is absurd.

As for a possible revenge or some kind of sanctions, then Iraq is already in disgrace. They are boycotting us in every way in the Middle East arena; we are not allowed to fully participate in regional negotiations. We literally say: "Either you are with us, or against us!".

- How do you comment on the irreconcilable position of some Arab countries regarding Syria?

- This suggests that these Arab countries have already invested their "investments" in the Syrian crisis with big plans for the future. Money is invested, but there is no result, the Syrian army defeats the terrorists. Therefore, it is natural that they beg the United States to strike Syria, because then their money, time and effort will not be wasted.

- Is any unification of Iraq with other countries planned to uphold the position of non-intervention in Syria?

- Yes, we are working to create an Arab moderate front that will act solely in the interests of the Arab society and peace in the region, including against invading any country.
Originator:
http://rus.ruvr.ru/
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. makst83
    makst83 9 September 2013 08: 47 New
    53
    Barack of Deception: "The Syrians are destroying the Syrians and we must destroy the Syrians who are destroying the Syrians so that they stop destroying the Syrians!" Something like this hi
    1. Canep
      Canep 9 September 2013 15: 11 New
      16
      In nature, the White House needs to be renamed the Yellow House. You can also repaint, surround with a high fence and to attract healthy orderlies for protection.
      1. 7Hz
        7Hz 9 September 2013 15: 17 New
        19
        so it’s more correct to paint in rainbow colors
        1. Sakhalininsk
          Sakhalininsk 9 September 2013 15: 45 New
          +4
          Quote: 7Hz
          so it’s more correct to paint in rainbow colors


          And for the sake of completeness, to seat there the sitters on personal Persian strap-ons called cola in the common people!
          1. Apologet.Ru
            Apologet.Ru 10 September 2013 00: 09 New
            0
            hi
            Colleagues, who are seriously interested in what the events in Syria are connected with, I highly recommend watching the first part of the program "Military Secret", I’m sure you won’t regret it ...

      2. Bob
        Bob 9 September 2013 16: 39 New
        +8
        Quote: Canep
        In nature, the White House needs to be renamed the Yellow House.

        It has long been Blue .... and this is not a symbol of peace and harmony, but rather - modern Sodom and Gomor.
      3. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 9 September 2013 17: 40 New
        +4
        Quote: Canep
        In nature, the White House needs to be renamed the Yellow House. M

        Why not in blue?
        1. Corsair
          Corsair 9 September 2013 23: 15 New
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Why not in blue?

          And therefore, Dear Alexander, that the ATTENDANCE of your toilet in the Oval Office can catastrophically fall fellow
          1. Very old
            Very old 9 September 2013 23: 20 New
            0
            Is it possible pokeretney?
      4. VasDA
        VasDA 10 September 2013 04: 18 New
        0
        And on the door of the Oval Office hang a sign "Ward No. 6".
    2. Jin
      Jin 9 September 2013 15: 50 New
      +7
      Quote: makst83
      Barack of Deception: "The Syrians are destroying the Syrians and we must destroy the Syrians who are destroying the Syrians so that they stop destroying the Syrians!"


      + In general, yes, smiled. But the Syrians there have long been destroyed not by the Syrians, but by a bunch of assorted bandits from all over the world. Today there was a report about how the "German" Alafite Salafists are leaving for Syria to fight against Assad.
      1. adm656
        adm656 9 September 2013 21: 42 New
        0
        See how they will return (those who survive, of course) and what they will do .. They will put the blue German army as cancer ..
      2. alone
        alone 9 September 2013 21: 58 New
        +1
        laughing Salafis-Alavites))) Ahahhaha killed on the spot!
        Salafis are Wahhabis who fight just against the Alawites)))
        1. Jin
          Jin 10 September 2013 10: 39 New
          0
          Quote: lonely
          Salafis-Alavites)))


          I wrote Salafi alaфIt, dear! smile
    3. Ruslan_F38
      Ruslan_F38 9 September 2013 17: 01 New
      +2
      "Arab countries have already made their" investments "in the Syrian crisis with big plans for the future. Money is invested, but there is no result, the Syrian army defeats the terrorists. Therefore, it is natural that they beg the United States to strike at Syria, because then their money, time and effort will not be wasted. " - C'mon, the question is, as always, about money?
      1. Ruslan_F38
        Ruslan_F38 9 September 2013 17: 08 New
        +1
        "we are working to create an Arab moderate front that will act exclusively in the interests of Arab society and peace in the region, including against invasion of any country." - this is ideal, has it really come to pass, but there will not be such an alliance, firstly, the mentality is not the one that is not allied in most Arab countries, and secondly, because of the dough, they themselves will be split and killed or merged. That's because they are like that - Israel always wins.
      2. Sirocco
        Sirocco 9 September 2013 17: 36 New
        0
        Allow me to correct you.
        - How do you comment on the irreconcilable position of some Arab countries regarding Syria?
        NOTHING PERSONAL, IT'S JUST BUSINESS! In this situation, about those who want to bomb Syria, one can say, To whom is war, and to whom is my mother! What is the result? What is their difference from the Nazis? Ordinary pirates as in the Middle Ages English filibusters, under the protection of the crown.
    4. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 9 September 2013 17: 40 New
      0
      If the frogt is created (which is discussed in the article) and Iran also enters into it, then there will be no warriors. Resist force, only force can.
      1. Ruslan_F38
        Ruslan_F38 9 September 2013 21: 00 New
        -1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        If the frogt is created (which is discussed in the article) and Iran also enters into it, then there will be no warriors. Resist force, only force can.


        Do not tell me which front, who will enter it, but they will all be split over there. And the war will be sooner or later - the Middle East is on the verge and the massacre can not be stopped there - it's just a matter of time, given the greed and venality of the Saudis, Qatar and others, as well as the all-consuming hatred between religious movements, well, religious fanaticism is over.
    5. sashka
      sashka 9 September 2013 18: 02 New
      +2
      Quote: makst83
      "The Syrians are destroying the Syrians and we must destroy the Syrians who are destroying the Syrians so that they stop destroying the Syrians!"

      Cool .. Beautifully .. Let politicians read it so that they would not carry any nonsense ..
      1. hommer
        hommer 9 September 2013 20: 55 New
        +3
        There is already a picture on the network. By the way, the GDP offers an option for the Nobel laureate to get out of the stupid position, saving face -
        Russia calls on Syria to transfer chemical weapons under international control -http: //metateka.com/cluster: 56237068-Rossiia-prizyvaet-Siriiu-peredat-khimiches

        koe-oruzhie-pod-mezhdunarodnyi-control /
        Syrian Foreign Minister has already agreed to the leadership of Syria.
        Obama needs to agree.
        1. alexng
          alexng 10 September 2013 00: 54 New
          +1
          Quote: hommer
          Russia calls on Syria to transfer chemical weapons under international control

          Yes! Oh, the stalemate for the scavenger bloodsucker. Something does not luck the Nazis today. USkaliki screwed up in full.
        2. sashka
          sashka 10 September 2013 22: 08 New
          0
          The picture "Das Ist Fantastish." Text "I voiced yesterday .. or today? A slogan for the UN which or which is a deaf and dumb old
    6. Arminian power
      Arminian power 9 September 2013 21: 51 New
      0
      amerikosi xotyat Siriyu bez Siricev (alavitov)
  2. eplewke
    eplewke 9 September 2013 14: 13 New
    +5
    yes ... That sounds like that. The result is one - the Syrians are dying. I am glad that at least some, but a coalition in support of Assad exists. Someday, at least someone must stop the American lawlessness! Although it sounds somehow fantastic, but a loan on the state of affairs - I hope the sunset of the empire of lies and homophilia is close ...
    1. tilovaykrisa
      tilovaykrisa 9 September 2013 15: 08 New
      12
      It is a pity that at one time they did not harness for Yugoslavia, perhaps the world would be different. If the bandit does not immediately discourage the robbery and kill, then he becomes intoxicated by permissiveness and impunity.
      1. Docent1984
        Docent1984 9 September 2013 15: 23 New
        15
        It is a pity that the Yugoslavs did not harness for Yugoslavia at one time ... Some people think that helping and doing for him is one and the same thing. Of course, this does not justify our weak-willed position, but they first of all surrendered themselves. You must always protect your country to the last breath. As the prince of Kiev Svyatoslav said: "We will not shame the Russian land, but we will lay our bones here, the dead will not have shame."
    2. Jin
      Jin 9 September 2013 15: 52 New
      +1
      I also didn’t get it, but where is Iran on the list of countries “against” ???
      1. hommer
        hommer 9 September 2013 20: 30 New
        0
        Iran is not a member of the Arab League.
        This is a meeting of the Foreign Ministers of the League of Arab States.
        And so, of course, he is against.
      2. alone
        alone 9 September 2013 21: 56 New
        0
        Iran is not an Arab state
      3. eplewke
        eplewke 10 September 2013 08: 47 New
        0
        Iran is not part of the G20 group.
  3. a52333
    a52333 9 September 2013 15: 09 New
    +4
    I think that Iran will not officially enter the war on the side of the ATS. Another point is that after the start of the bombing, they will expand military assistance (militias and money). Iran, oh, how unprofitable for Assad to be thrown.
  4. andrei332809
    andrei332809 9 September 2013 15: 16 New
    +6
    It is hard to imagine how bombing a country can help its people. This is absurd.

    finally voiced the obvious thing. half the world had to be smashed to understand this
  5. soldier's grandson
    soldier's grandson 9 September 2013 15: 17 New
    10
    if Obama so badly wants to help the Syrian people, then let him not bomb, but take to his states this people who feel bad there, who feel good in Syria let them
  6. Koronik
    Koronik 9 September 2013 15: 18 New
    +3
    Fear of losing big money is pushing them to pay any costs of military operations. "And they are begging the US to strike at Syria." Yes, who would consider our losses in Syria if bandits won?
  7. erased
    erased 9 September 2013 15: 23 New
    -2
    Of course, they need to do something. But it seems too late. If the States have bitten a bit, they cannot be stopped. And the Kremlin’s "deep concern" about drumming them. People, of course. sorry. We can only watch as rockets and bombs fall on Syria. What we did in 1998, in 2003 and in 2010. The masters of the world are twirling their affairs, and the world gendarme is trembling with muscles. Their henchmen squeal with joy and estimate the percentage of benefits. On Earth, it’s getting hotter and more fun.
    1. Andrew-001
      Andrew-001 9 September 2013 16: 12 New
      +5
      I will explain for the one who minus you. With all due respect, but with such an approach
      Quote: erased
      But it seems too late. If the States have bitten a bit, they cannot be stopped. ... We can only watch ...

      it will always be late. This is a policy of defeatism. Yes, we don’t have so much strength, but this is not a reason to give up.
      1. erased
        erased 9 September 2013 16: 30 New
        0
        If we survive, we’ll get it.
  8. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 9 September 2013 15: 24 New
    +4
    - This suggests that these Arab countries have already made their "investments" in the Syrian crisis with big plans for the future. Money is invested, but there is no result, the Syrian army defeats the terrorists. Therefore, it is natural that they beg the United States to strike at Syria, because then their money, time and efforts will not be wasted.
    That's the whole democracy in action ... And then all for the Syrian people shed tears. Shaking your pocket!
  9. Strashila
    Strashila 9 September 2013 15: 25 New
    +1
    Some Arab countries ate radical Islam ... concluded.
  10. seller trucks
    seller trucks 9 September 2013 15: 26 New
    +4
    This suggests that these Arab countries have already made their "investments" in the Syrian crisis with big plans for the future. Money is invested, but there is no result, the Syrian army defeats the terrorists.


    the golden words (+) of the article and Ali al-Musavi, at the head of everything is the worship of the Golden Calf, Syria has no mythical chemical weapons, namely money, given the situation in the United States with external debt, everything is quite logical, Syria in exchange for the money of Arab sheikhs.
    1. a52333
      a52333 9 September 2013 15: 33 New
      +3
      It would be nice (and fair) if in Arabia, after the first missile towards Syria, a refinery or oil terminal exploded. am I’ll dream: our military divers are already there. winked
      1. novobranets
        novobranets 9 September 2013 15: 41 New
        +1
        after the first missile to Syria, an oil refinery or oil terminal exploded.
        Maybe it will be so, Assad understands who pays for the mess. bully
  11. tarks
    tarks 9 September 2013 15: 35 New
    +1
    It seems that this is understood even in America. Some.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. anton 42
    anton 42 9 September 2013 15: 42 New
    0
    they beg the United States to strike Syria, because then their money, time and effort will not be wasted. us army of mercenaries.
  14. Manager
    Manager 9 September 2013 15: 46 New
    +2
    Is silence about Iran? These can say anything ..... Here is the only strong player in the tor region is Iran. And I’m more interested in what he “thinks” and “undertakes” if that ...
  15. repytw
    repytw 9 September 2013 15: 56 New
    +1
    If Egypt, Iraq are against, and Jordan is closing its airspace, then the Nimets AUG (aircraft carrier, URO cruiser, 4 destroyers) will be able to take part in the bombing of Syria, the US forces can be cut in half and the southern regions of the country that are most poorly covered by air defense will not attacked, unless of course Israel starts, but he is silent.
  16. Tambov we ...
    Tambov we ... 9 September 2013 16: 26 New
    0
    Quote: soldier's grandson
    if Obama so badly wants to help the Syrian people, then let him not bomb, but take to his states this people who feel bad there, who feel good in Syria let them


    And he will give money to those who stayed so that they do not worry much that others have left. And no axes, bombs, etc. do not. Yes, and cheaper for Americans.
  17. michajlo
    michajlo 9 September 2013 16: 46 New
    +4
    Quote: a52333 Today, 15:33
    It would be nice (and fair) if in Arabia, after the first missile towards Syria, a refinery or oil terminal exploded. am I’ll dream: our military divers are already there. winked

    Good afternoon, dear Alexey!

    Pleasant and GOOD your dreams! good
    But it is possible after the start or without the US attack on Syria, and in the UAE and the “great” Qatar themselves, explosions and fires will begin. followed by the anger of their peoples / nomads to the lords! good

    With all the fantasies, this may well be, as the REASON for the “Wahhabi intervention” is precisely HERE.

    By the way, Russia, this country of the Arabian Peninsula - VERY MUCH in debt for training fanatics and the Chechen wars. Perhaps the time has come for the Kremlin to pay for the “written-down debts”, or I will continue my “covert commercial schemes”.
    1. a52333
      a52333 9 September 2013 17: 09 New
      +3
      I agree, Michael (is that possible?). If you remember. Khattab so he staff member Saudi intelligence.
  18. VadimSt
    VadimSt 9 September 2013 18: 43 New
    +1
    The East is a delicate matter, and apparently the thinner, the more transparent - just as you look, the USA’s erysipelas appears everywhere.
    The notorious "World Caliphate", one of their propaganda tricks, which is aimed at intimidating a "temperate" Europe, disuniting the Arab world, maintaining its presence and dominance in the region. The united East will mean one thing - the fall of the Arab monarchies, the control of the Middle East countries over national resources, the end of US world domination.
  19. batia72
    batia72 9 September 2013 19: 36 New
    0
    why no one attacks the Saudis themselves, for example in retaliation. all come together - Iran, Syria, Iraq, etc., and to hell with the instigators
    1. sashka
      sashka 9 September 2013 19: 40 New
      0
      Quote: batia72
      why no one attacks the Saudis themselves, for example in retaliation. all come together - Iran, Syria, Iraq, etc., and to hell with the instigators

      It is logical .. And why really?. Maybe they are satisfied with such a situation or religious beliefs? it is not clear .. Maybe then the amers will start yelling again. Maybe they didn’t want to stir up the anthill. Now it's too late ..
  20. Semyon Albertovich
    Semyon Albertovich 9 September 2013 19: 37 New
    0
    U.S. propaganda just so claims that they will strike (bombing) to free people from the bloody regime. But in reality they want to bring religious scumbags-fanatics to power - the main thing is to remove the undesirable Assad regime. The odious Senator McCain-Vietnamese claims that the United States will lose respect in the world if they do not strike at Syria. This is the policy of bombing the unwanted today dominates the United States.
  21. obrjak
    obrjak 9 September 2013 21: 11 New
    +1
    USA-hired killers. Well, and who is against the fact that killers need to be punished ... Maybe they already came up with a price tag for Russia ...
  22. Alikovo
    Alikovo 9 September 2013 21: 35 New
    0
    the whole elite of Western countries day and night thinks how to help the Syrian people.
    The way out is simple: the whole elite of Western countries should be treated in a psychiatric hospital.
  23. 31231
    31231 9 September 2013 21: 45 New
    0
    The response of the countries is clear. 2 pipelines go from Iraq through Syria to Tartus. Iraq would not want to change anything.
    Egypt has its own tankers and gas carriers Saudi and Qatar passing through Suez and would not want to lose this "penny" if they extended a pipe to bypass it. Yes, and the madman Mursik leaked.
    War is purely economic, not political. Saudis and Qatar v. Iran and Iraq.
    Even Brzezik does not understand how Obama got there. If only against Iran. For in Iraq and in Saudi transnational corporations they also pay part of the taxes in the USA. Yes, and weapons that Iraq, that Saudi buys a lot from the United States.
  24. voliador
    voliador 10 September 2013 00: 37 New
    0
    Definitely scramble climb over oil and gas!
  25. sds555
    sds555 10 September 2013 16: 29 New
    0
    Quote: voliador
    Definitely scramble climb over oil and gas!

    And not only that, they are pleased to feel like a world gendarme