Military Review

Maxim Reva: Third World - US Strategy

61
Maxim Reva: Third World - US StrategyIn the 1938 year, England and France themselves pushed Hitler into war, allowing him to occupy Czechoslovakia and sanctioning the Anschluss of Austria. But then the brown plague could be stopped. If London and Paris were more determined, Europe would not have lay in 7 years in ruins and there were no 70 millions lost. On the European ashes a new global empire has grown - the USA. North America received a huge financial income from both the Second World War and the post-war reconstruction of Europe and was able to fully recover from the consequences of the Great Depression.


Now we are in the initial phase of the global crisis, which can last for ten years, and is similar, and perhaps even more severe than the depression that has befallen the world in the 20-30 years of the last century. But now the United States is preparing to overcome the crisis. The United States simultaneously creates conditions for both the re-industrialization process, the restoration of the full technological cycle of North American industry, and the emergence of an enemy with whom, after the crisis, could unleash a new world war that could give the United States even more 100 years of sustained economic development.

Over the past 10 years, Americans have made a significant step in the development of their fuel and energy complex, which influenced the change in US policy in the Middle East. If 10 years ago, the White House, while conducting military interventions, pursued the goal of controlling the level of oil prices that was comfortable for itself, now the US is interested only in one thing - to increase the difference in quotations between Brent oil traded in Europe and WTI listed on North American market. The US favors the growth of Brent quotes, as it allows for Europe and Asia to reduce production costs in America without reducing the cost of labor.

With the change of goals, the policy has changed. America does not seek to create in the Arab world controlled regimes whose task would be to ensure uninterrupted supply of oil and gas. Now the US is leaving behind the chaos of civil war, death and destruction.

The United States set fire to the entire Middle East and North Africa - Brent crude quotes remain at a level above $ 110 per barrel, production in Europe and China is declining. However, if we look at the countries where the so-called Arab Spring has recently swept through, we will see that secular nationalist regimes have formed in all these countries.

Despite European-specific conditions, the development of nation states in the Middle East and North Africa is similar to the development of nation states in Europe from the end of the 19 century to the beginning of World War II. After the collapse of the continental empires, caused by the consequences of the First World War, nationalist states were formed in Europe. Many of them respected the rights of national minorities and religious denominations. Approximately the same situation was in Libya and in Egypt and is still preserved in Syria. By the way, Iran, one might say, goes the way of Spain during the reign of General Franco.

The strengthening of national states inevitably leads to the formation of an elite that is vitally and financially interested in preserving and enriching its national state. And even if members of the elite were nourished by foreign states, these elites themselves begin to defend national interests, often at odds with the interests of former sponsors.

For Iran, Syria, Egypt and Libya, the European market is the only one where oil and gas can be supplied with low transportation costs. What Europe means lower energy price. But this goes against the US plans for new industrialization. It is no coincidence that unrest in Syria began right after agreements were reached between Syria, Iran and Iraq to lay a gas pipeline along which Iranian gas destined for Europe was to be supplied to Syrian LNG terminals.

In the 30s of the last century in Europe, not without the influence of Nazi Germany and fascist Italy, with the tacit connivance of France and Great Britain, the elites of the new national states leveled democratic institutions in a short time by establishing pro-Nazi or pro-fascist regimes. Gradually began the persecution of national and religious minorities. Such organizations as the Muslim Brotherhood, professing radical forms of Islam, can be attributed, according to the European tradition, to religious pro-fascist organizations. The Muslim Brotherhood, which is trying to establish radical religious regimes in the Arab world, is sponsored by the closest US allies Qatar, Jordan and Saudi Arabia - countries, to put it mildly, no different than democracy or religious tolerance. Against this background, Iran can be called a state making tremendous progress in democratization and in the development of secular society.

After the chaos sown by the USA in the Middle East, radical religious regimes can be formed in the Arab world, which will be united into one huge caliphate. Like the Third Reich, this caliphate will have close ties with the US financial world. As in the case of Nazi Germany, many North American bankers and industrialists are interested in creating such a caliphate.

While the American economy is emerging from the crisis and a new robotic industry is developing in the United States, a religious extremist caliphate will be able to accumulate enough weapons to wage a full-scale war. At the same time, in Europe, being in a deep crisis, a socio-political situation will arise, in which the emergence of a new authoritarian empire is possible. In this case, the role of outsiders, on which it will be possible to write off all the evils, and, above all, expensive oil, will be performed by Muslims or Arabs. World war will become inevitable. The reason, perhaps, will be a terrorist act in Europe, which will be a retaliatory step for the deportation of Muslims or the organization of concentration camps for Arab terrorists.

The Third World War will bring destruction on such a colossal scale that the United States will be able to develop more systematically over 100 years without social upheavals on its territory. Not to mention the profits that Americans are planning to get from the war itself.

In this regard, it is clear the reluctance of Europe and the main ally of the United States of Great Britain to get involved in a war with Syria. NATO also decided to step back from the Syrian adventure. But, in principle, the US rejection of the alliance is only on hand. In the NATO scenario described above, the Americans do not need it, for they will try to wage a third world war with someone else’s hands, joining it at the last stage, as it was during the first and second World Wars. The North Atlantic bloc may prematurely, and, quite possibly, not on the right side, draw the Americans into the slaughter. Most likely, NATO is waiting for the fate of the United Nations, with which the United States has long been reckoned with and uses it as a tool to promote only its own interests.

Never before have the interests of the USA and Europe been so opposite than they are now. However, as in the 30 of the 20 of the twentieth century, France and Great Britain were more frightened by the communist threat of the Chimera than by the obvious facts of Hitler’s preparation for war, now Europe prefers to see the threat in Russia rather than admit the obvious fact that the United States has ceased to be a guarantor of European security and become a force pushing Europe and the world towards a third world war.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.regnum.ru/
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Gorinich
    Gorinich 9 September 2013 16: 12 New
    40
    The fact that the United States is creating a new map of the world is visible to the naked eye. And we must clearly understand that we are designated on this map as a zone of devastation, where there is no economy, but only resources and a reservoir of cheap labor.
    1. Igor39
      Igor39 9 September 2013 16: 33 New
      10
      I completely agree with the author of the article, which is why we need a well-equipped, modern, trained army.
      1. 2vladim2
        2vladim2 9 September 2013 18: 13 New
        35
        I write a lot on social networks. I keep a diary (blog), where I write a lot about our army, about the military. And I just can’t understand those people who make a remark to me. Like, you, my friend, got carried away with this military theme. Why do you need it? We have no army in the literal sense of the word. And they will not give their sons to our army. I answer them something like this, but what did you personally do for the army? Yes, you yourself served the military service. It was difficult. I believe. And for three years I served in the Navy and even underwent training on the Russian island. And then we were sent to Bangladesh. There mines were trawled. Do you think it was easy for me? No, it’s also difficult. But I love the army and I will write about it. It’s funny when men write about flowers and are afraid for their sons. My son and I never had a conversation about this. Called, served. And with a position like that of some men, where do we get a good army? And why should not everyone serve there, but only those who do not have a "roof"? The army is a reflection of our society. So let's get together and make a good army. And today, no matter what, it is not very bad with us. And I will write about the military. No one will forbid me to do this! Thank you!
        1. Apologet.Ru
          Apologet.Ru 9 September 2013 21: 13 New
          +5
          hi
          It is necessary, clearly, looking into the eyes of reality, to realize that if Russia hadn’t had enough nuclear weapons and chemical ammunition since the 1991 of the terrible year of the collapse of the Great Russian Empire, Russia would have been more than once on the verge of a foreign invasion under the auspices of P .indostana.
          And no matter what “reloads” the rulers of this country — the stronghold of world Satanism — declare, their goal was, is and will be — the defeat and death of the Russian World!
          And our ancestors were absolutely right -


          I am absolutely sure - The country singing SUCH songs is UNBEATABLE ...
          1. Apologet.Ru
            Apologet.Ru 10 September 2013 00: 04 New
            +4
            Colleagues, who are seriously interested in what the events in Syria are connected with, I highly recommend watching the first part of the program "Military Secret", I’m sure you won’t regret it ...

        2. Jogan-xnumx
          Jogan-xnumx 10 September 2013 01: 58 New
          +1
          From a retired pensioner of the USSR Armed Forces - soldier hi
        3. VasDA
          VasDA 10 September 2013 04: 51 New
          +3
          And it would not hurt modern politicians and the highest ranks of the Moscow Region to remember our not-so-distant past, when the sons of the country's rulers fought along with everyone, suffered and died on the fronts and in captivity.
          Yes, then it was taken for granted. Maybe I’m not right, but sometimes I would like modern politicians and candidates to indicate their sons served or not in their files. Yes ... And it may look cheap, but maybe even such a popularization of our army is needed now?
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 9 September 2013 17: 25 New
      +4
      Just read the name and again the Third World sad sad sad Chot has not been successful for our time. Here you understand the plans, and they are again about the warrior. Even Klim will crying
      1. Tersky
        Tersky 9 September 2013 18: 15 New
        +2
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Just read the name and again the Third World

        Sasha, judging by this news, it seems that the amers are trying to turn on the back:The head of the US State Department, John Kerry, said that if Syrian President Bashar al-Assad voluntarily surrenders all his chemical weapons, he can avoid a military invasion by the US government. In addition, Kerry said that all chemical weapons are in the hands of three people.

        “Of course, he can transfer all his chemical weapons to the international community within the next week - transfer them all without delay and provide full accountability, but he is not going to do this, and this cannot be done,” RIA Novosti quoted John Kerry as saying on Reuters. The head of the State Department also emphasized that the chemical weapons are in the hands of three people: Bashar al-Assad, his brother Maher al-Assad and another Syrian general.

        Bashar al-Assad said today at a press conference that military strikes can take various forms, according to Reuters. “We must prepare for the worst,” he said, commenting on a possible US attack.
        True source is far from unbiased, but refers to the RIA which in turn refers to Reuters, (laughing Skalburil, read to myself it became funny), http://rbcdaily.ru/world/562949988830678
        1. PValery53
          PValery53 9 September 2013 18: 55 New
          +4
          Let America surrender all its weapons with which it attacked Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and other countries, and then it will save itself from an attack on its own territory, otherwise let it pray ...
        2. Egen
          Egen 10 September 2013 07: 06 New
          +1
          Quote: Tersky
          Of course, he can transfer all his chemical weapons to the international community over the next week - transfer them all without delay and provide full accountability, but he is not going to do this, and this cannot be done. ”

          Yes, on the one hand it includes the back, and on the other - the front :)
          Those. it’s hard to shout against such a killer argument as “agree to give up chemical weapons” if Obama is stubborn, even psychiatrists don’t understand him :). But to retreat means to lose face, + try to report for a bunch of taxpayer money spent on moving troops. And inside, everything is not at all okay. Obama desperately needs a victorious mess, and he will look for new pretexts. And not even so much to Obama himself - but to those who pull his strings ...
          1. Egen
            Egen 10 September 2013 14: 47 New
            0
            News:
            The first comments from Washington were restrained: representatives of the White House and the Department of State said they would study the proposal, but were skeptical about its prospects.
            “There is a statement by the Russian Foreign Minister and a response from the Syrian Foreign Minister. We are going to study them and communicate with Russians and other parties on this topic, but we must continue to put pressure on the Assad regime and threaten military action from the US, since it was this threat that led to such a proposal, ”said White House spokesman Jay Carney.
            State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf made it clear that the United States does not rely too much on the cooperation of the Syrian authorities. “We have serious skepticism in this regard. Assad ignores the calls of the international community. We need to consider everything that he has been doing in recent years with regard to chemical weapons, ”Harf said.
            “We will follow this diplomatic path. I sincerely hope that this can be resolved non-military way, ”Obama said in an interview with Fox News.
            At the same time, he made it clear that he would continue to promote the discussion of a military strike on Syria in Congress. “I think it’s important for us not to let the gas pedal go when it comes to letting them know that we are really serious,” said the American leader. He said he welcomed the offer to withdraw chemical weapons from the Syrian authorities, but the US needed a “very quick response” regarding how serious the Russian proposal is.

            Fully http://news.mail.ru/politics/14696196/?frommail=1
            So much for the rear speed, as I knew :(
    3. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 9 September 2013 17: 37 New
      +3
      Quote: Gorinich
      The fact that the United States is creating a new map of the world is visible to the naked eye.

      What is surprising, now is the year of the black snake-nigga Hussein (Obama).
      Hitler at one time could not soak, maybe even cut it
      1. Egen
        Egen 10 September 2013 07: 11 New
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Hitler at one time could not soak, maybe even cut it

        "Other times, other people."
        At one time Hitler was "raised" by the Anglo-Saxons, and he himself, along with Krupp and K, brewed what was expected of him and where he was sent. That is, he was an instrument, a missile with GOS :)
        Now Obama is just a puppet in the same hands, lacking such capabilities as Hitler - a missile guided by wire. That is, the extra link in the chain was simply excluded ...
    4. FATEMOGAN
      FATEMOGAN 9 September 2013 18: 42 New
      +5
      Quote: Gorinich
      The fact that the United States is creating a new map of the world is visible to the naked eye. And we must clearly understand that we are designated on this map as a zone of devastation, where there is no economy, but only resources and a reservoir of cheap labor.


      According to the plans of the mattresses, not only we, the whole world, with the exception of the USA itself and their singing, should be in ruins. An interesting video on the current events in the world and the future global war.

      1. PValery53
        PValery53 9 September 2013 19: 25 New
        +8
        Henryk! You are an old ... action club! And you will not be able to hide your old bones behind the wall of a puffed "superpower"! First of all, they will get to you, old s__ka! - “Guys” will not save you !!
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Committee
        Committee 10 September 2013 00: 42 New
        +1
        Gorgeous analysis - I recommend everyone to listen.
    5. PValery53
      PValery53 9 September 2013 18: 47 New
      0
      But h__r them (amerikosam) on the nose !!!
    6. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 9 September 2013 21: 05 New
      +2
      Quote: Gorinich
      The fact that the United States is creating a new map of the world is visible to the naked eye. And we must clearly understand that we are designated on this map as a zone of devastation, where there is no economy, but only resources and a reservoir of cheap labor.


      Here we must clearly understand that some did not guess with the zone of devastation and free resources. Whoever touches this expected zone will receive in response the whole set of consequences from a shock wave to radioactive contamination of the area, followed by a nuclear winter. So do not be afraid.
    7. Apologet.Ru
      Apologet.Ru 9 September 2013 21: 41 New
      +2
      hi
      Quote Gorinich
      USA creates a new world map

      Take a look!
      On this new world map there is NO place of INDEPENDENT Russia ...
  2. a52333
    a52333 9 September 2013 16: 12 New
    +3
    Who is the USA?
    But now the United States is preparing to overcome the crisis. The United States is simultaneously creating conditions for both the process of reindustrialization -,
    If this is Wall Street, then they do not give a damn about the industrialization of the USA, as well as the USA. they care only about their wallet. In order to return production to the United States, it is necessary. so that ordinary Americans learn to work for free.
    1. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 9 September 2013 16: 45 New
      +5
      Wrong. At the moment, you can run away with money. Question - where? The answer is nowhere. A ball is small for a person with money but without the protection of a powerful state. There is no one to protect the wallet, panimayish ... It is not necessary for Americans to work for free. It is enough to organize the matter so that for their work one could tear as much money as one wants. Then enough for a good salary.
      For example, in Europe, a former forge of scientific and technical personnel, juveniles are massively introducing innovation - are they forcing you to do your homework? Call us, we will deal with this mess! Europeans are rapidly degrading technically, flying down a stake. What is it for?
      Our monetization of education has reached almost 100%. Any diplomas and any exams are bought. That is, we also fly down a stake, whistling forward, into the Stone Age, without any bombs. Given that we have almost the entire top of the minobra on foreign grants ... in general, everything is clear to the pain.
      And now imagine a big war. What will she lead to? People who, by hook or by crook, fought with their own states, and in spite of them who received a good education, will be where? They will control modern weapons. Because there is nobody else ... That is, they will perish. So what?
      1. a52333
        a52333 9 September 2013 17: 02 New
        +1
        A ball is small for a person with money but without the protection of a powerful state.
        thought about it. Everything is not simple, it is a war between clans, which implies, first of all, maximizing profits. so I’m not going to comment on the high salaries of Americans. As a result, they drove themselves into a corner by the race for profit. Europe may become unsafe (especially France and Germany) They seem to sit out somewhere. and the picture unfolds so that only the United States is suitable for this. Profit (while sitting out) must be received. Conclusion. War between the clans. Print dollars? How much more? I don’t know, they had to think about a backup aerodrome before.
      2. DimychDV
        DimychDV 10 September 2013 05: 14 New
        0
        I agree! In our USSR, the intelligentsia went astray: some on Blavatsky, some on UFOs, some Roerichs, some crazy, some Kashpirnyas ... But those crazy people had brains taught to help the country. Instead, snot about subtle energies. “Why would it be? ..” In 1991, they found out - why ... And so far, some of the eggheads still have a good tone to fronting, not helping the country. I, too, am not enthusiastic about some of the Nashi. But where are your brains to teach them to think?
        Against technologically advanced Japan, Aum Shinrikyo tried to imprison. "Why would it? .." Someone really needs it ???
    2. Apologet.Ru
      Apologet.Ru 9 September 2013 23: 24 New
      +1
      hi
      Quote a52333
      Who is the USA?

      I repeat. but we are witnessing a satanic transformation from USA - United States of America to USA - United States of AL-QAEDand NATO is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in NATO is North Atlantic TERRORIST Organization ...
  3. serge-68-68
    serge-68-68 9 September 2013 16: 14 New
    0
    The author should be specified - with whom, in his opinion, the US plans to wage a "Third World War." And it may turn out so that after its completion, only Papuans, or even rats with cockroaches, will "develop without social upheaval".
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 9 September 2013 16: 24 New
      11
      Quote: serge-68-68
      The author should be specified - with whom, in his opinion, the US plans to wage a "Third World War."

      apparently they do not plan to conduct it with anyone.
      they will bleed everyone and will philosophically observe from overseas, the main thing is to bring the "caliphate" close to the borders of Russia
      1. DimychDV
        DimychDV 10 September 2013 05: 40 New
        +1
        They have been doing this since the 90s - they’ve bred such a long node in our underbelly ... Yugoslavia, the Caucasus, now Turkey is worried, Iran and Iraq are not a present either, Afghanistan is completely fragrant like May poppy ... Pakistan again. .. Well, the Mongols have enough land. And the Chinese - they will wait until we die out of all drunkenness and starvation, and the Sami and Chukchi will conquer us from the north ... They will already agree with those.

        So we need to stock up more MLRS along the southern borders. Where are we all of them, b ... dei, will we bury them? ..
  4. magadanets
    magadanets 9 September 2013 16: 15 New
    +4
    They hope to sit out on their mainland, as before
    1. TekhnarMAF
      TekhnarMAF 9 September 2013 16: 27 New
      14
      They hope to sit out on their mainland, as before
      Well, you need to carry the vector of tension to THEIR mainland!
      1. Docent1984
        Docent1984 9 September 2013 16: 40 New
        +4
        For example, under the auspices of the struggle for the restoration of historical justice. Colombia, after all, not America)
      2. Egen
        Egen 10 September 2013 07: 15 New
        +1
        Quote: TehnarMAF
        Well, you need to carry the vector of tension to THEIR mainland!

        Duc, who argues! Methods and technologies for this have long been known and worked out, the only thing is that there are no people like that before :(, and most importantly - money is needed, which is also missing :(
        But this is a global issue not only for Russia, but also for China and so on. Nobody is in a hurry to unite in it ...
    2. Arminian power
      Arminian power 9 September 2013 22: 03 New
      +2
      Syria is not Iraq and not Libya will answer as it should ........ if the bambits of Syria, then their house will be hot.
      1. Committee
        Committee 10 September 2013 00: 14 New
        0
        Syria’s air defense is not echeloned enough to protect the country from a massive raid, it is even less suited to repel a technological raid (cruise missiles, the latest strike air systems) and is completely powerless before the usual betrayal, which can include a thorough study by a potential adversary of all the technical characteristics of air defense systems (consisting and promising) in service in Syria. According to the estimates of the Syrian specialists themselves, by 20-25%.
  5. seller trucks
    seller trucks 9 September 2013 16: 26 New
    +8
    The interests of the United States and Europe have never been so opposed than they are now.


    what is the author trying to do, about this, to unleash a number of controlled local warriors on two continents, sit by himself on the sidelines, and then come as a winner, I understand correctly?
  6. erased
    erased 9 September 2013 16: 27 New
    +3
    Well, directly drawn to ask - and sho? Mustache mustache understand. Fools are dumb, extinct. So it's clear how much and where. And again - shaw? Will Europe stand up against an attack on Syria? Or collapse into the arms of Russia? Ali Japan shouting "Banzai!" will quit NATO?
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  7. michajlo
    michajlo 9 September 2013 16: 34 New
    +1
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir Today, 16: 24
    Quote: serge-68-68
    The author should be specified - with whom, in his opinion, the US plans to wage a "Third World War."

    apparently they do not plan to conduct it with anyone.
    they will bleed everyone and will philosophically observe from overseas, the main thing is to bring the "caliphate" close to the borders of Russia

    Good afternoon, dear Vladimir!

    You are completely right. good

    I’ll add from myself that it’s quite possible that we ourselves
    The USA / political elite, expect that everything will be easy and profitable!

    But there were already interesting reflections that in the event of the loss of the USA (as Hitler Germany), the financial elite_world (and not just Amer.) Has other worked out options, how to achieve a decrease in the population of the globe, wreak havoc, Well, by themselves, they are invisible to ordinary people (because of the "theater curtain") and continue to continue pulling their DOLLS - our WORLD POLITICS from most countries.
  8. KG_patriot_last
    KG_patriot_last 9 September 2013 16: 35 New
    0
    And the war will be fought on the territory of such countries as the Kyrgyz - at the crossroads of civilizations ...
  9. ars_pro
    ars_pro 9 September 2013 16: 35 New
    +8
    The United States has exhausted itself at the moment in foreign policy for sure, it’s safest for them now not to twitch, it will not be so painful. There is an understatement ...
    1. a52333
      a52333 9 September 2013 17: 24 New
      0
      Exactly. Here's a good article to confirm you: http://warfiles.ru/38280-putin-perevorachivaet-dosku-figury-obamy-padayut.html
  10. eplewke
    eplewke 9 September 2013 16: 39 New
    +2
    As if this third world earth had left mother alive ... And then, as Einstein said: “I don’t know what they will fight in the third world war, but the fourth is just like sticks and stones” ...
    Who are going to sponsor mattress covers? Cockroaches and rats? Or running mutants on the incinerated earth ??? what
  11. Nikolay_1995
    Nikolay_1995 9 September 2013 16: 43 New
    +5
    It is not surprising that the United States is unleashing the Third World War. They have a fascist policy development. But the day will come when the world will hate them (and he already hated them) and then America will be simply destroyed.
  12. Storm
    Storm 9 September 2013 16: 55 New
    +3
    Well, well, one more confirmation that good must be strong in order to survive among the not very good .. wassat
  13. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 9 September 2013 17: 03 New
    +6
    States during the Second World War were welded well .. Now they are again on the verge of depression as in the 30s. They want to repeat that freebie again due to the bloody massacre in the Old World ..
    1. Committee
      Committee 10 September 2013 00: 05 New
      +1
      Maybe it's time to say out loud, WHO EXACTLY in the USA profited from wars and continues to do so now.
  14. Andrew 447
    Andrew 447 9 September 2013 17: 19 New
    +1
    The Third World War will bring destruction on such a colossal scale that the United States will be able to systematically develop for over 100 years without social upheaval on its territory. According to the author, the third world will not affect the territory of the states ??? And then forgive me, who will fight with whom? This is an unrealistic scenario for the course of the war. World War III will be the war of ALL AGAINST EVERYONE and it will go exponentially in the number of participating countries and types of weapons. The last strike of each of the dying countries may not be predictable in terms of the place, method and type of delivering this retaliation strike. No one will sit aside, well, maybe Nepal and part of Africa, although ......
    1. explorer
      explorer 10 September 2013 06: 34 New
      +1
      And why, then, the US is developing its missile defense - including for this hi option.
  15. Russkiy_Prapor
    Russkiy_Prapor 9 September 2013 17: 22 New
    +5
    "The United States has ceased to be a guarantor of European security and is becoming a force pushing Europe and the world towards a third world war." Well, firstly, the United States has never been any guarantee of security. And secondly, what does it mean pushing? Are there no brains in Europe? Well, just like little ones: big guys made me smoke.
  16. july
    july 9 September 2013 17: 38 New
    +2
    I agree with the author in many ways, although not even more voiced, too many destabilizing factors and symbols of lies, artistry, bloodthirstiness, cowardice, perversions and betrayal flicker like in a kaleidoscope. The world is waiting for the Syrian knot to untie now, that will be the course of events. Everything is still not lost, Putin took a tough stance and maybe this will cool some hotheads, but if not, in this situation he loses the first move, but he no longer right. Now it’s hard to assume something, too much uncertainty, the knot will loose and everything will become clear, but I don’t believe in one thing that amers will flourish for another hundred years in any situation, they are at the peak and nothing will stop it and no technology will help them .
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. individual
    individual 9 September 2013 17: 39 New
    +1
    The fact that the United States solves its financial problems through war is told by the very history of a civilian state. In less than a year, the Americans did not intervene in the affairs of a foreign state.
    The reasons are different,the target is one $$$.
  19. falcon
    falcon 9 September 2013 17: 45 New
    +3
    I read the article. The author contradicts himself in almost every paragraph. And the passage is about the third MV,
    which will bring such enormous destruction that the United States will be able to develop steadily over a hundred years
    without social upheaval, this is generally something. Or the creation of a new Arab caliphate (which,
    according to the author, is already on the way)? How to correlate this with the author’s statement about the formation of the elite,
    vitally interested in the preservation and enrichment of their nation-states?
    In fact, the elite in any state is not something homogeneous - they are different groups (financial,
    industrial, intellectual, etc.), respectively, the interests and ways to achieve them, these
    groups may be different. Where did the author get it, that it is in the interests of the United States to unleash a third MB?
    This thesis is at least false. Accordingly, the conclusion, too.
    1. a52333
      a52333 9 September 2013 18: 55 New
      0
      The author contradicts himself in almost every paragraph.
      Yeah. If the third world using nuclear weapons, no one will stay anywhere. The war against the Wahhabis of Europe, may there not be a war. There will be terrorist attacks in Europe. We will have an outbreak in the Caucasus + terrorist attacks.
  20. sub307
    sub307 9 September 2013 17: 53 New
    +2
    Yes, all this garbage (the article means). The people - do not worry.
  21. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 9 September 2013 18: 24 New
    +5
    Most likely we won’t be allowed to live in peace again .. They just started to recover and right away Russia is like a bone in the throat .. We need a strong army .. Special services .. Without this, we won’t have a peaceful life .. an economic and technological breakthrough .. I such a feeling .. (now I’ll have to break the ridges again .. and crush (it’s better to pick out with a poison with a poison .. it will be painful but reliable ..) the fat bugs stuck to the body of Russia .. That's so little emotional .. and what to do ..
    1. vlad.svargin
      vlad.svargin 9 September 2013 19: 18 New
      0
      And to restore, first of all, our industry by changing the financial and credit system, remove the tax policy press and pay, first of all, the positive attention of the military-industrial complex.
  22. michajlo
    michajlo 9 September 2013 18: 56 New
    0
    Quote: 2vladim2 Today is 16:13
    I write a lot on social networks. I keep a diary (blog), where I write a lot about our army, about the military. And I just can’t understand those people who make a remark to me. Like, you, my friend, got carried away with this military theme. Why do you need it? We have no army in the literal sense of the word. And they will not give their sons to our army. I answer them something like this, but what did you personally do for the army? Yes, you yourself served the military service. It was difficult. I believe. And for three years I served in the Navy and even underwent training on the Russian island. And then we were sent to Bangladesh. There mines were trawled. Do you think it was easy for me? No, it’s also difficult. But I love the army and I will write about it. It’s funny when men write about flowers and are afraid for their sons. My son and I never had a conversation about this. Called, served. And with a position like that of some men, where do we get a good army? And why should not everyone serve there, but only those who do not have a "roof"? The army is a reflection of our society.
    So let's get together and make a good army.
    And today, no matter what, it is not very bad with us. And I will write about the military. No one will forbid me to do this! Thank you!

    Good afternoon, dear Vladimir!
    Your position and activity in its place, do not let yourself be dissuaded by all sorts of lazy people or "florists". good

    Anti-propaganda in the form of distracting conversations and various "stupid fun" for people and youth - in the post-USSR and post-ATS, oh so much, sober balanced voices are now very necessary !!!

    I personally did not serve in the army, but in 1989, after the 40th Army was withdrawn from Afghanistan, I had the opportunity for several months to communicate with the Afghan officers at the border post in Panj (Tajikistan). They taught me a lot of things about life and war, a major from Russia and a captain from Ukraine. Then I was there as part of a medical group in a district hospital from Transcarpathia.
  23. vlad.svargin
    vlad.svargin 9 September 2013 19: 11 New
    +3
    MIKHAN<<States during the Second World War were welded well .. Now they are again on the verge of depression as in the 30s. They want to repeat that freebie again due to the bloody massacre in the Old World ..>>


    And the external debt is very transcendent. They will try to write it off.
    at the expense of the “alien war”, as they have already succeeded more than once. Apparently the “shadow cabinet” of the United States came to such a plan, but the fire of war will also embrace this country. Modern military equipment will not let them sit overseas, this is not the 20th century.
    1. Committee
      Committee 10 September 2013 00: 00 New
      +1
      But if they start firing in all directions with nuclear missiles - nothing good either. But such a hysterical reaction can be expected in general. A nuclear power with modern weapons, bloated, fueled by "extra-national" banks, exorbitant ambitions, cosmopolitan, devoid of any national idea (there is no such nationality - "American", however, like "Russian") by the government - it is dangerous.
  24. Motors1991
    Motors1991 9 September 2013 19: 49 New
    +5
    It seems to me that the Americans have already lost the war, and therefore are jerking unpredictably. Why do I think so? Over the past 20-30 years, America has been de-industrialized, they are still very powerful in the financial sector, but in the industrial real economy they are hopelessly losing to China and Russia, India and others . China I owe trillions of dollars to myself and I ask myself what will happen if China nationalizes tomorrow all these Toyota, Philips, Sony, Mercedes and other enterprises owned by international corporations, and settles with them, full-weighted, treasury bonds of the US state debt . For the West, this is a disaster, and they won’t be able to quickly increase production. Therefore, for Russia it is necessary to first deal with the real economy so that the Russian superjet consists of 100% Russian parts, and not a set of parts from around the world.
    1. Committee
      Committee 9 September 2013 23: 55 New
      +1
      It’s beautiful, but China will never do that, firstly they will abide by the agreements (they also need to contain the overproduction crisis somehow), and secondly this may surprise, but China has a very strong “banking lobby” (of the famous “non-national” banking families, you understand, about whom I), there are thirdly, but it follows from the first two.
      1. Motors1991
        Motors1991 10 September 2013 14: 01 New
        0
        Why not? As soon as China is confident in its abilities, it will definitely do it. In 10-15 years we can expect that this will not happen earlier. As for the banks, China has a planned economy, it will slam those banks like flies. What is the use of them there was no economy. In the USSR there were four state banks and they completely coped with lending to the economy. And do not forget that China has its own huge domestic market, which is still mothballed, but as soon as they begin to pump up the economy not in dollars, but in RMB, it will wake up and swallow all the surpluses and will say little more, come on again. Remember the USSR, how much they didn’t produce, it was always lacking. Apparently, China has already embarked on this path. So it’s a matter of time before the PRC presents the United States.
  25. PValery53
    PValery53 9 September 2013 19: 58 New
    +2
    If something serious begins, then, first of all, the States should suffer from all, and what remains is for everyone else ... Such a world evil should sharply decrease in size, and all countries and peoples will immediately become easier.
  26. Andrey Peter
    Andrey Peter 9 September 2013 20: 00 New
    +3
    Somehow. I do not immediately agree that the United States needs uncontrollable chaos in the east. Then why should they invest in this. Quite the opposite, chaos first and then divide and conquer.
    1. Committee
      Committee 9 September 2013 23: 49 New
      +1
      Quote: Andrey Peter
      divide and rule

      The main principle of the "wise men"
  27. avega
    avega 9 September 2013 20: 35 New
    +2
    It is absolutely clear that the upper echelons of power in Sha, Sa, and Israel are strongly interested in military operations ... (self-interest and megalomania) ... it turns out that the elemental human essence of these bodies turned colossal. Such people, in my opinion, in the worst case, I can’t even imagine sitting in a uranium mining well ... but those who poisoned civilians with sarin should experience the pangs of compassion during life ... and then burn in hell in the next world. ... A man should always remain a man .....
  28. Deadmen
    Deadmen 9 September 2013 20: 43 New
    +3
    it’s time to bring democracy to the American continent.
    1. Committee
      Committee 9 September 2013 23: 48 New
      +1
      A very heterogeneous people are American Americans. White is a minority.
  29. Savva30
    Savva30 9 September 2013 20: 54 New
    +2
    Geniuses are planning a revolution, making romantics, and the villains are using its fruits.
    (Otto von Bismarck)
    1. Committee
      Committee 9 September 2013 23: 46 New
      0
      Only now he forgot to say that many "geniuses" who planned many famous world revolutions are rascals.
  30. Committee
    Committee 9 September 2013 23: 45 New
    +1
    Yes, they did not fight with communism in 1941, but with the Russian people, with the goal of its complete destruction as a maximum or a sharp reduction, at a minimum.
  31. Revolver
    Revolver 10 September 2013 02: 59 New
    -1
    Article plus - if you expand, you get cool fantasy. good hi
    1. Egen
      Egen 10 September 2013 07: 21 New
      +1
      Quote: Nagan
      Article plus - if you expand, you get cool fantasy.

      Why? Dear Nagan, your opinion is always interesting, but please speak out essentially from your geographical point of view.
      IMHO the author is at the root, of course I didn’t take into account all the consequences, but then I’ll find it difficult to predict too many variables for my old head :) The only big “-” in the article is not a word about China ...
      1. Revolver
        Revolver 10 September 2013 19: 27 New
        0
        Quote: Egen
        Why?

        That's just because:
        Quote: Egen
        Of course, I didn’t take into account all the consequences,
        In particular, nuclear weapons. And even the fact that the Islamists have neither the means of delivery thereof across the ocean, nor the resources, in particular the brains, for their creation, mean nothing. A nuclear explosive device, even the size of a railway carriage, is mounted in the hold of a thread of an old rusty galosh, after which it hangs a Panamanian-Liberian-it doesn't matter whose flag it takes on board somewhere in a third country, for example, in China, it is quite legitimate the cargo doesn’t matter what, and with the suicide squad goes to the destination port - well, say, New York or San Francisco. Further explain? So no one, being in his mind, will rely on the Islamists, especially in connection with the 3rd World War.
  32. goody
    goody 10 September 2013 08: 41 New
    +2
    To war, to whom mother is dear ...
  33. Goldkonstantin
    Goldkonstantin 10 September 2013 14: 04 New
    -1
    The USA is a fascist state, covered by a torn canvas of democracy, which is nowhere to be found! I do not recognize this country as a superpower, because it is a colony of Great Britain, which rules all the dirty tricks. And the fact that history is repeating now is nothing surprising, the main thing is not to lose ground and not flinch. The US will soon fall apart. Like the Roman Empire.