Military Review

Analytical program "However" with Mikhail Leontiev 03 September 2013

41



The only military purpose in the case of chemical weapons in Syria, the Assad regime could only be the Assad regime itself. Actually, this is an absolutely comprehensive alibi for any mentally normal observer. On this, in fact, it was possible to put an end.

The notorious chemical attack in Syria is a stupid two-way provocation against Assad. And it is all the more ridiculous to demand convincing evidence from Americans: well, as they could, they did it concoct. What else do you want? You can arbitrarily poke Americans into the fact that in Syria they directly support exactly those people who killed Americans, including in America. In any case, according to their version. So what?

Is it really so difficult to understand: to approach from the positions of morality to the policies of our Western partners is stupid ?! There is no morality there and never was. And there is only a cynical calculation. Adjusted for paranoid ambitions. And it is good, when the cynical calculation wins.

The Americans announced the decision to strike at Syria right after the chemical attack near Damascus, without waiting for any evidence or inspections. All week on the eve of the Security Council meeting, the American administration was rattling the weapon. And after 28 of August, Russia and China blocked the anti-Syrian resolution, it was a question of striking by the evening of 29. However, then the European allies began to evade one after another from participation in the operation. And after the refusal of the British Parliament to support the operation, the United States had to rely only on the partnership of France, headed by the courageous Hollande. Pentagon chief Chuck Hagel sadly remarked that "Americans will participate in the operation only as part of a coalition." And President Obama unexpectedly referred the case to Congress. That is, at least until the end of the Senate vacation.

"I know that we are tired of war. We had a war in Iraq, the war in Afghanistan is not over. And the Americans understand that we cannot solve the conflict in Syria only by military means ... We don’t want our troops to be drawn in into a foreign war. But we, the United States, should not turn a blind eye to what happened in Damascus, "said Obama.

So what happened? What happened was that Assad began to obviously overwhelm this collected from around the world Islamist shoblu, which made huge bets. By all. From American "hawks" to Saudi-Qatari sheikhs and French fighters for the rights of sodomites. And they all wildly piled on poor Obama, who is well, very peaceful. For nothing, whether the Nobel Peace Prize winner. However, here the Nobel Prize will not hide. Here it is necessary to throw the bone.

From the cartoon "Cheburashka and the Crocodile Gena":
- No, Cheburashka, no. Never. You can not work with us.
- Why not?
- Why, why ... Eat.

No need for a herbivore Obama to work in a zoo. Now he promises that it will not be at all like in Iraq, that it will be a small, pinpoint, time-limited, indicative punitive action. Dummy. Well, just gag the crocodiles.

US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, speaking in the Senate back in April, warned about the dangers of intervening in Syria. “Because if you enter it, there will be no way back,” said the Pentagon chief. “Once you start, you won’t go back. You can't just say,“ Well, everything did not go as well as I thought, so we leave "".

Well, Obama does not want to fight. Here it is, the struggle of cynicism with paranoia. But can win and paranoia.

“You can always expect that the Americans will find the right solution - after everyone else tries,” said Winston Churchill.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. ReifA
    ReifA 4 September 2013 09: 20 New
    37
    Minor fix
    "" You can always expect that the Americans will find the right solution - after fail everyone else, "said Winston Churchill."
    Although after correction, they are not found and do not apologize.
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 4 September 2013 09: 31 New
      16
      Quote: ...
      It wouldn’t be necessary for the herbivore Obama to work in the zoo.


      Dear Michael. There is a good saying, "called a cargo climb into the back." Fight for the world - fight. But Obama is the same jackal as his masters and do not feel sorry for him and who else but you should know who and why is going into politics?
      1. Prorox
        Prorox 4 September 2013 10: 09 New
        +6
        Quote: Vadivak
        There is a good saying, "called a cargo climb into the back."


        Obama was counting on "Let them call them at least a cast iron, they just don’t put it in the stove," but they shove it together and I think they’ll shove it (in your example, in a box). Mikhail is right, Obama does not want to fight, just does not know how, or rather does not even understand (hence the promise to end the war in Iraq and Afghanistan) and is afraid of the incomprehensible. His masters know this and push, Obama guesses and resists, does not want to be a scapegoat, only who will allow him.
        1. Vadivak
          Vadivak 4 September 2013 10: 14 New
          +8
          Quote: Prorox
          Obama does not want to fight, just does not know how, or rather does not even understand


          But nobody knows whether he asks if he wants or does not want, knows how or does not, but he doesn’t need to understand anything. His task is to work out the money invested in it by one of the clans, and not to dictate his adamant will, such as Joseph Vissarionovich
          1. Gunsmith
            Gunsmith 4 September 2013 10: 22 New
            +4
            Namely, weapons disposal is a very expensive process. And here are three in one - Assad was overthrown, they got rid of the old weapons, ordered a new one and paid for it. One minus - the public debt will grow. And who in the states thinks about it?
            1. Prorox
              Prorox 4 September 2013 11: 14 New
              +1
              Quote: Gunsmith
              Namely, weapons disposal is a very expensive process. And here are three in one - Assad was overthrown, they got rid of the old weapons, ordered a new one and paid for it. One minus - the public debt will grow. And who in the states thinks about it?


              Such disposal can be very expensive, you can tear yourself, and Assad has not yet been overthrown.
          2. Prorox
            Prorox 4 September 2013 11: 05 New
            +7
            Quote: Vadivak
            And you know, if no one asks


            Their Wishlist and only, and Obama can vzrybknut everything happens in life, Kenadi as an example. With world Wishlist it’s even more complicated, like brewing the First World War and the revolution achieved the collapse of the Russian Empire, but something went wrong and the mighty Soviet Union appeared, Hitler was raised, armed and muddied the Second World War, again, these Russians are the 9th of May Victory. They found that they wrecked the sword. The Union seems to have gone a little more and they will ruin Russia, but no, it doesn’t work. There is another authority in this life, Thank God, but anyone can assume.
            1. Vadivak
              Vadivak 4 September 2013 11: 42 New
              +1
              Quote: Prorox
              Yes, and Obama can buck in life anything happens


              One bucked heaped up as an example for future generations.
      2. evgenm55
        evgenm55 4 September 2013 10: 13 New
        +8
        Yes, no. You didn’t understand him. Leontiev, as always, very subtly and accurately lowered the americos into the company’s field needs ... Michael, as always, well done.
  2. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 4 September 2013 09: 31 New
    +5
    It wouldn’t be necessary for the herbivore Obama to work in the zoo. Now he promises that it will not be at all like in Iraq, that it will be a small, punctual, time-limited, demonstrative punitive action.
    Obama is a naive Albanian boy .. He still does not know what they are pushing him into (who is behind him ..) "saving the world" was about to watch a bit of Hollywood stupid fighters. ??. Well
    1. OTTO
      OTTO 4 September 2013 11: 33 New
      +4
      Quote: MIKHAN
      "save the world" was going to see enough of Hollywood stupid militants. ??

      The "Saved World" will be a sad sight ...
  3. NAV-STAR
    NAV-STAR 4 September 2013 09: 32 New
    15
    Leontyev is a great officer in the information war, sheds light on the events in Syria, as well as M. Musin. Now there is a fierce battle in the information environment, and the chain dog of puppeteers of Western civilization has not gone so far just because our forces in the information confrontation have grown stronger in comparison with the same Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya.
    1. Suhov
      Suhov 4 September 2013 10: 18 New
      +2
      Quote: NAV-STAR
      Leontyev is a great officer in the information war, sheds light on the events in Syria, as well as M. Musin. Now there is a fierce battle in the information environment, and the chain dog of puppeteers of Western civilization has not broken so far just because including becausethat our forces in the info-standoff are stronger compared to the same Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya.

      So more precisely.
      yes
      I personally sogethousand ...
      (Arkady Raikin's Style)
  4. a52333
    a52333 4 September 2013 09: 33 New
    +6
    But McCain played poker at a congressional decision-making meeting.
    In turn, McCain wrote on his Twitter page: “Scandal! Caught playing an iPhone game during a three-hour Senate hearing. But the worst part is that I lost.”
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 4 September 2013 09: 40 New
      0
      Putin allowed the possibility of Russia's consent to a military operation in Syria

      Russian President Vladimir Putin recalled that there is no exact data on who exactly is responsible for the use of chemical weapons near Damascus, and urged to wait for the findings of UN inspectors
      The head of state also did not rule out that he would give consent to a military operation in Syria if the guilt of the authorities of the Arab Republic in the use of chemical weapons is proved. However, this agreement, Putin emphasized, will be given only after the relevant decision of the UN, RIA Novosti reports.
      http://www.vz.ru/news/2013/9/4/648566.html
      1. nov_tech.vrn
        nov_tech.vrn 4 September 2013 09: 53 New
        +4
        Among the restrictions on conducting a military operation, there is a corresponding decision of the UN Security Council where Russia and China have a veto, because only the UN Security Council has the appropriate powers.
      2. Dmitry 2246
        Dmitry 2246 4 September 2013 09: 55 New
        +5
        The wise use of politics is flexible.
        It is necessary to “break through” any alignment and make the only right decision.
        Good teachers say one thing - do another.
      3. evgenm55
        evgenm55 4 September 2013 10: 19 New
        -6
        Well, here, the face of our rulers seems to clear up ...
      4. Apollo
        Apollo 4 September 2013 10: 26 New
        +4
        Quote: Apollon
        http://www.vz.ru/news/2013/9/4/648566.html



        I can’t understand one thing laughing

        1.Me, for having posted the info.
        2.V.V. Putin for the statement.
        3. Or an online publication for publishing.
        1. Papakiko
          Papakiko 4 September 2013 10: 55 New
          +6
          Quote: Apollon
          I can’t understand one thing

          For publishing the GDP attributed to you with your easy hand on the possibility of Russia's consent to a military operation in Syria.
          1. Apollo
            Apollo 4 September 2013 11: 06 New
            +3
            Quote: Papakiko
            For publishing the GDP attributed to you with your easy hand on the possibility of Russia's consent to a military operation in Syria.


            Clearly, only my hand is not light but heavy. wassat
            1. Papakiko
              Papakiko 4 September 2013 11: 10 New
              +4
              Quote: Apollon
              Clearly, only my hand is not light but heavy

              So are you really going to the "naughty" person for tea or is it "chifirnete"? wink
        2. Refund_SSSR
          Refund_SSSR 5 September 2013 04: 24 New
          +1
          For tearing phrases out of context.
          It was possible to give a speech, and not to highlight false headings ... no matter how small, you need to understand. fool
      5. Bort radist
        Bort radist 4 September 2013 10: 58 New
        +6
        In a little more detail - Russia does not exclude consent to a military operation in Syria, if it is proved that chemical weapons were used by the country's authoritiesPresident Vladimir Putin said in an interview /
        “We will be convinced deep case study question and the presence of evidence that would be obvious and that would clearly prove who used and what means were used ”- added the president.
        If you are 100% sure that the states will not be able to prove anything, then you need to take time, and now every day is worth a lot.
        1. Botanologist
          Botanologist 4 September 2013 12: 25 New
          +3
          Speaking in Russian - first try to convince me guys request
          1. stalkerwalker
            stalkerwalker 4 September 2013 13: 34 New
            +3
            Quote: Botanologist
            Speaking in Russian - first try to convince me guys

            And then ...
            If the GDP were not sure whose hands it was, I would not say.
            The statement fits into the mainstream of Lavrov’s statement that Russia will not fight for Syria.
  5. gal
    gal 4 September 2013 09: 41 New
    +1
    This is what happens when sick people come to power!
  6. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 4 September 2013 09: 46 New
    +2
    All the supreme power of America (Congress, Senate) rebelled against Syria. They do not respond to UN calls, in the person of the Secretary General, to wait for the results of verification of the use of air agents near Damascus. The huge ruthless rink of the US military-political machine of the United States drives up to the borders of Syria. The world froze in anticipation of a gangster attack.
  7. andrei332809
    andrei332809 4 September 2013 10: 19 New
    +1
    rents Leontiev. said nothing new, but about irony ... to the usual authors of O.Ch. and A.V. he needs to learn
  8. chehywed
    chehywed 4 September 2013 10: 21 New
    +8
    "You can start a war whenever you want, but you will not stop it at will."

    N. Machiavelli
  9. Koronik
    Koronik 4 September 2013 10: 23 New
    +1
    I completely agree with M. Leontyev that this is only the beginning. Remember Wanga’s predictions?
    1. Peaceful military
      Peaceful military 4 September 2013 12: 45 New
      +2
      Well, the beginning is not at all here. I recommend the political-historical cycle of the same M. Leontiev "The Big Game" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWBo9mEOiaU
      Here and the beginning and continuation. Although the very beginning in the fall of man in the person of Adam and Eve, which in the course of time gave rise to the murder of his brother by brother ... and it started ... (see. Bible).
      hi
  10. KazaK Bo
    KazaK Bo 4 September 2013 10: 27 New
    +4
    The notorious chemical attack in Syria is a stupid two-way provocation against Assad

    The main thing is a provocation ... it will allow you to start your plan ... and then it will be "late to drink Borjomi" ... Yesterday too ... the case of the launch of ballistic missiles ... After all, it was a PROVOCATION! If it weren’t for our SPR system, it’s still VERY UNKNOWN to WHOM THE Western MEDIA WRITTEN STARTING THESE ROCKETS !!! But they flew towards Israel! THINK THIS IN! So who could be attributed this launch? There are no three options here. No wonder AMERIA and the sons of Moses did not recognize this launch for 4 hours .... apparently they had to rebuild their entire system of statements about the next treachery of SYRIA or IRAN! The purpose of this provocation is an occasion to "put on the ears" all doubters in England ... Germany ... Italy and other states, to create a new polynomial front of the struggle against Damascus - after all, the world media would have insisted that there was an attack on MALYUSENKY .. ISRAEL!
    But the statement of the official KREMLIN nullified all the plans of the next provocation !!!
    Now we are waiting for new ... other ... more sophisticated provocations ... and they will be. It is possible that against RUSSIA!
    1. olviko
      olviko 4 September 2013 11: 34 New
      +2
      Well, Israel and the Saudis are well-known masters of provocations. I won’t be surprised if their involvement in the whole story with the chem. attack. Nitanyahu did not succeed in inciting America against Iran, but now they have muddied Syria. Therefore, the European NATO allies did not want to drag chestnuts out of the fire for Israel and Saudi Arabia. One president of the country of cocks continues to cock, apparently a lot of money from the sheikhs, now we need to work out.
    2. kartalovkolya
      kartalovkolya 4 September 2013 11: 50 New
      0
      We need to wait for provocations, but for the sophisticated they don’t have the time or the brains! And in my opinion it was a test of the ability of (our air defense) to track missile launches, and we’ve made sure ... No, we’re the “democrats” on the alert, so finish messing up, but not that ... This is what you can hope for in the age of space technology (you can distinguish a newspaper sheet from a satellite) have you really not noticed those who used chemical weapons? They themselves applied (by the hands of a hired rabble) now they themselves have condemned and they themselves want to carry out the verdict! And the garden plant will fit into your anus! (Or rather a hedgehog) Leontyev is generally clever, always at the forefront of the information war!
  11. Sergey Medvedev
    Sergey Medvedev 4 September 2013 10: 29 New
    +1
    The only military target in the case of the use of chemical weapons in Syria by the Assad regime could be only the Assad regime itself. Actually, this is an absolutely exhaustive alibi for any mentally normal observer.

    Neither reduce nor add. Other versions can only get stupid amers.
  12. DEfindER
    DEfindER 4 September 2013 10: 36 New
    +5
    The question arises: what the hell did they send the UN commission to investigate the use of chemical weapons, if its conclusions are not even going to wait? From Kerry’s speech before the Senate, “Chem weapons were used in territory not controlled by the Syrian Army, so Assad’s troops did it in any way,” the logic is iron. those. it turns out Assad is advancing on all fronts and is already killing the enemy, and suddenly he has insanity, “Why do I need a victory? Maybe it’s better to lose and let my country no longer exist, I’ll use chemical weapons to bomb me, cool idea” should someone else believe? Rather, most senators have already believed in this today .. what else can I talk about? What are their elected representatives?
    1. kartalovkolya
      kartalovkolya 4 September 2013 11: 56 New
      +1
      How the hell? Yes, everything is very simple: the commission probably has adequate people, an example of this is the recent statement by Carla del Ponte! Then, after all, you will have to answer for misinformation and international robbery; America itself is on its way to ruin!
  13. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 4 September 2013 10: 55 New
    +3
    "You can always expect that the Americans will find the right solution - after everyone else has tried," said Winston Churchill.- they (amers) found NOT THE RIGHT DECISION, NOT START TO SEARCH.This means:
  14. FC SKIF
    FC SKIF 4 September 2013 10: 59 New
    +1
    Everything that does not relate to the “shale topic” by Leontyev is logical and accurate, including this article.
  15. Kite
    Kite 4 September 2013 11: 05 New
    +1
    "..... it remains only to rely on the partnership of France, led by courageous Hollande " laughing
    This is called differently, and even depends on the active or passive role. Did not deserve entot Hollande male rating!
    I liked the last quote from ChurchIl! laughing
  16. tttttt
    tttttt 4 September 2013 11: 10 New
    +3
    Monkey on the strings:
  17. sashka
    sashka 4 September 2013 11: 13 New
    +1
    Any bastard, so easy and simple, goes and kicks everyone with his feet .. The rest look stupidly .. Nikita is not enough, knock on the podium with his shoe. Gouge so to speak. Putin disappointed .. A little gray and inconspicuous mouse. She hides behind DAM and stupid excuses .. But I always didn’t like it. So-so .. It's not a ruler ..
  18. olviko
    olviko 4 September 2013 11: 22 New
    +2
    "Putin allowed the possibility of Russia's consent to a military operation in Syria."

    A few days ago, Lavrov said that Russia would not fight. Today, Putin no longer excludes Russia's participation in the military operation, I think it is clear that he is not on the side of the United States and Israel. Given the proposal of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, such a change in Russia's position is quite natural. Now there has come a period of mutual probing for “lice”, those who have stronger nerves, who are the first to make a mistake, make the wrong move. Putin has already announced ahead of the G20 summit that certain components of the S-300 air defense systems have been delivered to Syria, and deliveries continue. This was reported by RIA Novosti. I think that they have been there for a long time, it’s just that it’s not common in the game to spread all the trump cards at once - how many and what trump cards were brought to the BDK and by transport aviation is known to one god and even Putin. The fact that Obama does not want to fight is evident not with an armed gaze; he attacked Libya without discussing anything, with any Congress. Let's see who will pull the rope, hawks or common sense.
    1. svp67
      svp67 4 September 2013 17: 51 New
      0
      Quote: olviko
      A few days ago, Lavrov said that Russia would not fight. Today, Putin no longer excludes Russia's participation in the military operation, I think it’s clear that he is not on the side of the USA and Israel

      Everything was fine, until we were completely ready - they were reassuring, more or less the fleet was assembled, Assad was thrown up his weapons, plans worked out - now you can scare them ...
  19. old rocket man
    old rocket man 4 September 2013 11: 41 New
    +3
    “You can always expect that the Americans will find the right solution - after everyone else has tried,” said Winston Churchill

    However, it is an exhaustively accurate description of the Americans. This is the method of all the undershots: first try the most attractive solution that lies on the surface, and then, after breaking off, start to “think”.
    The whole world makes fun of the "education" of Americans, but they are dangerous by this unpredictability
  20. Tartary
    Tartary 4 September 2013 12: 34 New
    0
    I am sure that the last sentence of Leontyev ended with an exclamation of the listener: - Ahahahahaha ...
  21. Peaceful military
    Peaceful military 4 September 2013 12: 58 New
    +2
    I respect M. Leontiev and agree with his opinion.
    He dug and deeper. I recommend his monumental work "The Big Game": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWBo9mEOiaU
  22. andruha70
    andruha70 4 September 2013 15: 17 New
    0
    all the same, d.u.s., this obama ... it would be better to arrange an attempt on himself, and before that he would angrily condemn the invasion of Syria ... he would at least be remembered as Kennedy. lol
  23. Jogan-xnumx
    Jogan-xnumx 4 September 2013 17: 48 New
    +1
    "It wouldn’t be necessary for the herbivore Obama to work at the zoo." request

    Work as an exhibit is also work. Where does this "peacekeeper" go? Mattress mats are the biggest bankrupt in the world, that's why they are so impudent. Especially their defense industry. From there the whole wind blows ... And all this fuss around the Arabs and not only, one hundred rubles, because of Russia. In addition to, of course, the capture of fossil resources, countries are knocked out, naturally weaker, maintaining relations with Russia and its military-industrial complex. Allies, so to speak. They never considered us any partners and will not consider us. First of all, we are potentially dangerous for them. Plus, our territories and mineral wealth - what a tidbit for them. Therefore, until they specifically receive their teeth, they won’t calm down ... angry
  24. left-wing
    left-wing 4 September 2013 18: 25 New
    +1
    God, they don’t even hide their cynicism, to hand the Nobel Prize to the person who unleashes wars
  25. Old bear
    Old bear 5 September 2013 08: 00 New
    +1
    Greetings to all members of the forum! Russia submitted a 100-page report on the artisanal production of sarin used in Syria. Here's the complete info --- From the report of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs published on Wednesday evening it follows that the chemical munitions detonated near Aleppo back in March were made in a makeshift way, characteristic of products manufactured by the Bashair An-Nasr brigade: hexogen was used as a detonator, which is not used in regular ammunition, but in the composition of the poisonous substance itself there is a fraction of diisopropyl fluorophosphate, characteristic of western samples of chemical weapons. Recall that, according to the press, the Bashair An-Nasr brigade is part of the so-called Free Syrian Army.
    And here's another - “It's no secret that the Assad regime has accumulated chemical weapons, significant stockpiles of chemical weapons,” said Hagel. To the Congressman’s clarifying question, from which particular countries the weapons came from, the head of the Pentagon answered: “The Russians supply them, others (also) supply them with these chemical weapons. They do something themselves, ”RIA Novosti reports.
  26. Old bear
    Old bear 5 September 2013 08: 34 New
    0
    As in a bad action movie, well, who apart from Russian villains am How childishly predictable amers