Military Review

Assad will use Belarusian technology in the war with the United States

29
Assad will use Belarusian technology in the war with the United StatesThe latest Belarusian technologies, supplied by Syria, are a means of countering high-precision arms.


Thus, a military observer Alexander Alesin commented on the website charter97.org about possible supplies of weapons to Syria by Belarus.

“It is possible that, along with the Belarusian-made MiG-23BM bombers at Syria, the Syrian fighter-bombers of the Su-7B and Su-22 types were repaired at the Baranovichi Aviation Plant. They were widely supplied by the Soviet government to the countries of the Arab East and in general throughout the world. This is a fairly effective aircraft, and after a corresponding modernization, its combat properties for inflicting pinpoint strikes with a large set of ammunition are quite large. It can be used for strikes against ground targets. It is also possible suspension weapon-controlled weapons, which can be used against naval targets, ”- said the expert.

According to him, Belarus, undoubtedly, could participate in the modernization of the air defense of Bashar al-Assad.

“These are the Pechora-125М C-2 complexes, because the Belarusian and Russian companies are also co-contractors in the consortium that performs these works. Moreover, the chassis is supplied by the Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant. Information about this is available in numerous sources, although official Belarusian and Russian sources do not confirm this, ”the military observer emphasized.

He added that Belarus also produces radar equipment and sells them all over the world.

“In principle, these dual-use technologies are not banned for delivery to Syria. In addition, in Syria can be used electronic suppression, because the transfer of such systems is very difficult to fix. They are effective in countering precision weapons, manned aircraft and unmanned aviation devices. In other areas, this is the modernization of the armored potential of Syria. There are Tanks “T-55 and T-72, in the improvement of sights and fire control systems which experts from Belarus could very well participate,” continued Alexander Alesin.

He stressed that these programs take a long time.

“Therefore, this is unlikely to be done now, but there has been a long time. It is the air defense systems and the modernization of the Assad aviation potential that are the most important element of the defense of Syria. As stated in the reports of Lukashenka and representatives of the Ministry of Defense, the latest Belarusian technologies are the means to counter the precision weapons that the Americans want to use, ”the expert concluded.
Originator:
http://www.charter97.org/be/news/2013/9/2/74945/
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Nayhas
    Nayhas 4 September 2013 07: 04 New
    +9
    Syrian fighter-bombers of the Su-7B and Su-22 type were under repair. ... This is a fairly efficient aircraft, and after appropriate modernization, its combat properties for delivering precision strikes with a large set of ammunition are quite large.

    What kind of nonsense? Su-7 is one of the most unsuccessful examples of remaking a fighter into a strike aircraft. How can the Su-7B and Su-22 help Syria against the United States? For the sake of raising a wave of patriotism, is any nonsense suitable?
    1. GreatRussia
      GreatRussia 4 September 2013 07: 07 New
      +4
      Two and a half years ago, the British parliament supported UN military intervention in Libya to protect Libyan citizens from the forces of Muammar Gaddafi. Perhaps this is why many were shocked to learn that last week, British lawmakers completely ruled out any country's intervention in the Syrian crisis, writes The Wall Street Journal.
      Like Libya, Syria is engulfed in a civil war waged by an evil dictator with its people. How could members of the British Parliament in two years give the same answer to the same question? This rhetorical question is asked in an article for WSJ by a member of the British Parliament from the Conservative Party, David Davis.

      In fact, the Syrian crisis is similar to the war in Libya only at first glance. In the case of Libya, MPs felt morally obligated to vote for the intervention, as a humanitarian catastrophe was inevitable. While the strike on Syria will significantly worsen the situation as a whole, the politician believes.

      Moreover, reports of a chemical attack in Syria raise more questions than answers. Both the British and American authorities claim that only Assad could use gas, but they do not provide convincing evidence. Even the Joint Intelligence Committee of the British Parliament, according to David Davis, admits that it cannot understand Assad's logic - why should the president use chemical weapons if he knows that this will lead to the intervention of Western forces?

      A member of the British Parliament believes that any military intervention in the Syrian conflict will have consequences far beyond the region. The parliamentarian notes that Russian President Vladimir Putin provided anti-aircraft missiles to the Assad regime. “If we attack the Syrian military facilities, Russia will respond accordingly. Whatever British missiles are destroyed in Syria, Mr. Putin will replenish this in double volume. Punitive strikes will only push the approach of the world, ”says David Davis.

      No matter how desperate the circumstances may seem, it’s wrong to enter the war, armed with missiles, in the absence of convincing facts, David Davis believes and draws the following conclusion: the British parliament did the right thing, keeping the country's authorities from interfering in the Syrian conflict.
      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324432404579048461976397956.html
      1. lewerlin53rus
        lewerlin53rus 4 September 2013 08: 16 New
        +2
        “If we attack the Syrian military facilities, Russia will respond accordingly. Whatever British missiles are destroyed in Syria, Mr. Putin will replenish this in double volume. Punitive strikes will only push the approach of the world, ”says David Davis.

        That is curious, does he know something or suggest only?
      2. Sandov
        Sandov 4 September 2013 13: 33 New
        +2
        It's funny if it wasn't so tragic to watch the body movements of amers with a shobla. They themselves organize to invade and destroy countries, and then "keep" their regimes from striking. Everything is sewn with white thread shit-makers are quietly pursuing their neo-colonialist policy. You look at the Arabs, who, enchanted by the amer's mantras, are walking in the wake of their politics. Destroy these amers, the next will come.
    2. Odysseus
      Odysseus 4 September 2013 07: 31 New
      +7
      Quote: Nayhas
      What kind of nonsense? Su-7 is one of the most unsuccessful examples of remaking a fighter into a strike aircraft

      Well, at one time he was not so much unsuccessful as emergency.
      But the joke is that they have long been written off.
      "Bomber" MiG-23BM also amused.
      I have nothing against the fact that Belarusian technologies have helped Syria, but this expert seems to have been smoked.
      1. VAF
        VAF 4 September 2013 16: 14 New
        +2
        Quote: Odyssey
        But the joke is that they have long been written off.


        Hello odyssey! Well, not everyone has been decommissioned, at least a couple of Su-7Us are still flying and have recently undergone repairs in Baranavichy! bully

        And so ... they repair the Su-17th (Su-20/22) and Mig-29 and upgrade their BM and it turns out .. not bad at all.

        Well, the Mig-23 BM, consider it practically like the Mig-27K (though with a stretch, but you can still fight in the afternoon)! soldier
        1. Odysseus
          Odysseus 4 September 2013 23: 04 New
          +1
          Quote: vaf
          Hello odyssey!

          drinks
          Quote: vaf
          Well, not everyone has been decommissioned, at least a couple of Su-7Us are still flying and have recently undergone repairs in Baranavichy!

          Syrian? belay Well, how old are they? They were also written off for a long time even in the DPRK. Alive means a smoking room))
          Quote: vaf
          Well, the Mig-23 BM, consider it practically like the Mig-27K

          As far as I remember, BM is the ancient name Mig-27 (without an index) .And the very first modification-BN was delivered to Syria. I can, of course, be confused.
          Quote: vaf
          but you can still fight during the day)

          IMHO, if they are bombed, you need to send the Su-20/22, MiG-27, Su-24 "on the last trip" to the amerskoy base in Turkey, or to Turkey itself (if it participates).
          There’s nothing to lose anyway.
    3. artemiy
      artemiy 4 September 2013 09: 18 New
      +3
      Watch completely! Russia and China will experience the latest air defense systems on American aircraft!
      1. Aryan
        Aryan 4 September 2013 10: 42 New
        +1
        at 11:50 it was surprised that the journalist was reporting without a gas mask
        brave people however
        and for some reason, in that warehouse, everything is laid out like in a museum
        1. APASUS
          APASUS 4 September 2013 21: 45 New
          +1
          Quote: Aryan
          at 11:50 it was surprising that the journalist was reporting without gas masks, however, for some reason, everything was sorted out in that museum's warehouse like in some museum

          Surprised that he touches everything there, moves canisters. And if a camouflaged mine?
          1. FATEMOGAN
            FATEMOGAN 4 September 2013 22: 52 New
            +1
            Quote: APASUS
            I was amazed that he touches everything there, moves canisters. And if the camouflaged mine?


            All the same, they were probably not the first to be allowed to go there, for sure the sappers examined everything, judging by the fact that they constantly go with guards, they are clearly cherished, otherwise there will be no one to tell the truth about the war.
            1. APASUS
              APASUS 5 September 2013 19: 12 New
              +1
              Quote: FATEMOGAN
              All the same, they were probably not the first to be allowed to go there, for sure the sappers examined everything, judging by the fact that they constantly go with guards, they are clearly cherished, otherwise there will be no one to tell the truth about the war.

              What are sappers against chemical weapons? If we need binary components?
              When serving, we were strictly forbidden to touch unfamiliar objects, whatever it was !!!
    4. Black Colonel
      Black Colonel 4 September 2013 10: 07 New
      +3
      Most likely in the role of kamikaze. And then, if they can reach the goal, which is unlikely.
    5. tilovaykrisa
      tilovaykrisa 4 September 2013 10: 55 New
      +1
      as kamikaze for destroyers.
    6. VAF
      VAF 4 September 2013 16: 28 New
      +3
      Quote: Nayhas
      Su-22 may help Syria against


      Of course it’s hard, but .... and if there’s nothing more? Yes, and on the ground M4 in the afternoon. yes, in good hands .. still hoo! soldier

      The main thing is that almost all types are being repaired and modernized! Well done Bellarus, a very good factory in Baranovichi. 588ARZ, very! drinks
      1. Alex 241
        Alex 241 4 September 2013 16: 59 New
        +2
        ...................
  2. andrei332809
    andrei332809 4 September 2013 07: 07 New
    +7
    little help. to drive the bearded offspring, yes, and the amers are afraid to let their deltas go. for 2 months they’ll throw rockets, scum. although ... if you recall Yugoslavia, these high-precision gunners were stuck in the Chinese embassy and immediately crap one's pants. maybe, and now a few pieces past the target flew to Israel.
    1. Black Colonel
      Black Colonel 4 September 2013 10: 12 New
      +2
      Under such shelling, it is possible to launch a four-thread from Syria to the ground of Israel. Let them then prove that it was not the amers who "did not get into the country," as the late Lebed once put it, when several CDs flew to Bulgaria and Macedonia instead of Yugoslavia.
      1. andrei332809
        andrei332809 4 September 2013 10: 24 New
        +2
        Quote: Black Colonel
        Let them prove later

        There is no need for evidence. for all failures, the culprit was found at all times — Russia. Now, if we did not exist, what nonsense would be on the planet
  3. Ddhal
    Ddhal 4 September 2013 07: 40 New
    -2
    - 1 F-22
    -3 Tomahawk
    4 Raptor left in Jordan
    Count the Tomahawks later

    Date Course Change
    04.09 33,3693 0,1171
    03.09 33,2522 0,0048
    31.08 33,2474 0,0691
    30.08 33,1783 -0,0015
    29.08 33,1798 0,0574
    28.08 33,1224 0,1660
    27.08 32,9564 -0,0988
    24.08 33,0552 -0,1356
    23.08 33,1908 0,2171
    22.08 32,9737 -0,0269
    Now, attention - a question ......... see the publication "Why does the West need chaos in the Middle East. The concept of three world wars"
    1. shapkin14
      shapkin14 4 September 2013 09: 08 New
      0
      what does it mean?
      1. Nayhas
        Nayhas 4 September 2013 09: 22 New
        +2
        Quote: shapkin14
        what does it mean?

        Do not read! You are being encoded!
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 4 September 2013 07: 51 New
    +4
    Therefore, this is hardly done now, but there has been a long time. Part It is air defense systems and the modernization of Assad’s aviation potential that are the most important element of Syria’s defense. As stated in the reports of Lukashenko and representatives of the Ministry of Defense, the latest Belarusian technologies are means of counteracting high-precision weapons that Americans want to use, ”the expert summed up.


    God would have given that all these and other air defense systems were in service with Syria. How would you like to dump all the tomahawks and other missiles on the ground and in the sea!
    1. andrei332809
      andrei332809 4 September 2013 08: 43 New
      +4
      Quote: aszzz888
      to dump all the tomahawks and other missiles on the ground and in the sea!

      it's not real (of course, it's a pity, but ..). too volley will be "wide". but if Iran helps to gurgle several (and at least one) "sources" of hatchets, then yes, then the precision will drop significantly. Well, and accordingly will howl (psheki again say-Russia). it seems that the Iranians had something such sabotage. but again "but". let the tactics vypisyvayutsya - after all, there are those on the site who learned this specialist
      1. FATEMOGAN
        FATEMOGAN 4 September 2013 22: 57 New
        0
        Quote: andrei332809
        but if Iran helps to gurgle several (yes at least one) "sources" of hatchets, then yes, then the precision will drop significantly


        Perhaps all this combination is being played out, so that an excuse would appear to enter Iran as well.
  5. Ddhal
    Ddhal 4 September 2013 07: 54 New
    +2
    GreatRussia SU Today, 07: 07 ↑
    Two and a half years ago, the British parliament supported UN military intervention in Libya to protect Libyan citizens from the forces of Muammar Gaddafi. Perhaps this is why many were shocked to learn that last week, British lawmakers completely ruled out any country's intervention in the Syrian crisis, writes The Wall Street Journal.
    Like Libya, Syria is engulfed in a civil war waged by an evil dictator with its people. How could members of the British Parliament in two years give the same answer to the same question? This rhetorical question is asked in an article for WSJ by a member of the British Parliament from the Conservative Party, David Davis.

    It’s just that someone in Europe had the mind to read grandmother Vanga ....... And the states, they are like children, at first we do, then we realize .... sorry Zhibnev retired, it was a worthy opponent ...
  6. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 4 September 2013 07: 57 New
    0
    Well, the author was laughing, of course Belarus can do something, but with aviation it's just nonsense! And the "peacekeepers" fear the Syrian air defense the most!
  7. King
    King 4 September 2013 08: 13 New
    +5
    Good luck to Assad!
  8. shinobi
    shinobi 4 September 2013 08: 30 New
    +6
    Entirely and completely for Assad. No matter how shitty from the point of view of the West he was, Assad represents the Syrian majority elected by the people. This is by the way. The main idea is that it would not work like with Iraq. Then the same was predicted that "Schaz Hussein will show his Air defense kuz'kinu mother ", and came out pshik. Own generals sold. Where is the guarantee that this does not work out? what
  9. apostrophe
    apostrophe 4 September 2013 08: 32 New
    +3
    Too many words are possible in the article, and charter97.org is still a colored trash.
  10. waisson
    waisson 4 September 2013 09: 23 New
    +3
    the war will show everything, but I would not want it to be
  11. Vtel
    Vtel 4 September 2013 09: 24 New
    +3
    S-125 Neva The export name of the complex is Pechora, a Soviet short-range anti-aircraft missile system. It was adopted by the USSR in 1961.
    According to TSAMTO, in recent years, Russia has carried out several large arms deliveries to Syria. Among the largest programs in the air defense segment:
    - supply of 6 ZRPK 2С6 “Tunguska” (the contract was concluded in 2004 year, delivery was realized approximately in 2008 year);
    - 18 delivery of Buk-M2E ADMS (the contract was concluded in 2007 year, delivery - in 2008 year);
    - supply of 36 ZRPK Pantsir-С1 (the contract was concluded in 2006 year, deliveries began in 2008 year, this year, presumably, the last batch of 6 units must be delivered);
    - delivery of a large batch of Igla MANPADS as part of the Sagittarius launch modules (order from 2005 of the year, delivery to 2005-2006, the number is not known);
    - delivery of two divisional sets of the Pechora-125М C-2 ZRS (order from 2008 of the year, delivery to 2011 and 2012 from the Air Force, 2 of the divisional sets for 4 PU, total 8 PU).
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. Alex-z84
    Alex-z84 4 September 2013 09: 36 New
    +2
    Quote: DDHAL
    - 1 F-22
    -3 Tomahawk
    4 Raptor left in Jordan
    Count the Tomahawks later

    Date Course Change
    04.09 33,3693 0,1171
    03.09 33,2522 0,0048
    31.08 33,2474 0,0691
    30.08 33,1783 -0,0015
    29.08 33,1798 0,0574
    28.08 33,1224 0,1660
    27.08 32,9564 -0,0988
    24.08 33,0552 -0,1356
    23.08 33,1908 0,2171
    22.08 32,9737 -0,0269
    Now, attention - a question ......... see the publication "Why does the West need chaos in the Middle East. The concept of three world wars"

    The F-22 infa was not confirmed, it was not shot down and was taken to escort the air defense radar of the SAR, although it seems that it is positioned as invisible laughing
    1. Black Colonel
      Black Colonel 4 September 2013 10: 32 New
      +3
      About that, F-22 is invisible, only Americans know. yes
    2. 787nkx
      787nkx 4 September 2013 11: 56 New
      +1
      No invisibility yet.
  14. Slotxnumx
    Slotxnumx 4 September 2013 09: 54 New
    +3
    The article is blurred to the point of horror that the author wants to say that the Republic of Belarus has put up defensive means, upgraded tanks, or it could POTENTIALLY upgrade ... if
  15. Alex-z84
    Alex-z84 4 September 2013 10: 28 New
    +1
    Quote: Putin reported that Russia has supplied Syria with individual S-300 components, but that delivery has not been completed. According to him, Moscow will decide how to proceed "depending on the situation." Finally!!!
  16. Slotxnumx
    Slotxnumx 4 September 2013 10: 34 New
    +7
    If, God forbid, these shit-guns decide to hit Syria, then their pilots should think so ...
    1. andrei332809
      andrei332809 4 September 2013 10: 46 New
      +1
      did he squeeze the deck like that? strong!
    2. Sandov
      Sandov 4 September 2013 13: 40 New
      +2
      To inflict substantial damage to the Amer Air Force is a super task for Syria. There will be big losses, amers will choke with bile.
      In this difficult hour, I wish the people of Syria steadfastness and military success in the fight against occupants.
  17. 787nkx
    787nkx 4 September 2013 11: 57 New
    -1
    Belarus cannot offer anything more or less modern to Syria.
    Only re-export from Russia is possible.
    1. PSih2097
      PSih2097 4 September 2013 14: 10 New
      +1
      Quote: 787nkx
      Belarus cannot offer anything more or less modern to Syria.
      Only re-export from Russia is possible.

      Well, Belarus can upgrade the S-125 and S-200 systems to an acceptable level.
  18. adminds
    adminds 22 September 2013 23: 15 New
    +1
    I was ashamed and hurt when they bombed Yugoslavia! Now I am scared, but this is a wise and correct decision and direction! Read more material on Syria here: u-reklama.ru
  19. baku1999
    baku1999 29 October 2013 15: 58 New
    0
    BUTTERFLY, SIRUITSIV NE TO THROW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!